HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07151986 - X.5 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on July 15 , 1986 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, Torlakson, Powers
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McPeak
ABSTAIN: None
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Establishment of a TSM Committee,
Pleasant Hill BART Redevelopment Area
Supervisor Robert Schroder transmitted to the Board a
letter dated July 9 , 1986 from Merle D. Gilliland, Wallace-Olson
Associates, Inc. , P.O. Box 215 , Moraga 94556 , relative to the
establishment of a Contra Costa County TSM Committee for the
Pleasant Hill BART Redevelopment Area (attached hereto and by
reference incorporated herein) .
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the attached letter is
REFERRED to the County Administrator.
cc: County Administrator
Community Development Director
1 hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of
an acttcn taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supery s on the date shown.
ATTESTED: G
PHIL BA ,'EL ., Cleric of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
Byx G� , Deputy
WALLACE OLSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
DEVELOPERS • REALTORS
P.O. BOX 215, 1100 MORAGA WAY q�rtE
MORAGA, CALIFORNIA 94556 (415) 376-3151 CCllii
July 9, 1986 JUL 121986
�� �V►S�RWINDER
Supervisor Robert Schroder
Contra Costa County - Dist. 3
315 Diablo Road
Danville, CA 94526
Re: TSM Committee
Dear Bob:
As I spoke to you by telephone today, a settlement agreement has
been reached with Ed Dimmick, regarding his lawsuit against the
Boards' action of March 18, 1986 in approving three projects in
the Pleasant Hill BART Station area. This agreement requires
the establishment of the Contra .Costa County TSM Committee.
The purposes of the Contra Costa County TSM Committee
("Committee") are: ( 1) to study traffic problems associated
with residential and office development in Central Contra Costa
County; and (2) to promote adoption of measures to mitigate
those problems. The focus of the Committee's efforts will be to
promote an effective model transportation systems management
("TSM") ordinance, and to promote implementation of TSM in
both the county and the cities.
The Committee shall initially consist of five persons, who shall
be designated, as set forth below:
1. The County shall select one member;
2. The Contra Costa Council shall select one member;
3. Citizens for A Better Contra Costa shall select
one member;
4. The Sierra Club shall select one member;
5. The Contra Costa Centre Association shall select
one member.
If the Contra Costa Council, the Sierra Club or Citizens for A
Better Contra Costa refuses to designate a representative, then
the parties to this Agreement shall select a comparable organization
for this purpose by unanimous agreement. It is anticipated that
additional members will be added to the Committee in the future.
Robert Schroder
Page 2
Enclosed is a copy of the Agreement and Bylaws for your reference.
Thank you for your announcement of this settlement.
I agree with you that something must be done to change the system
so that business could be properly handled! We are confident we
could win the lawsuit, but we could not carry the property for the
two year period necessary to go through the court system. As you
mentioned, the legal system is taking planning away from the planners
and elected officials. What.can we do to make the public aware of this
injustice?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Merle D. Gilliland
MDC :cd.
_Encis.
cc: Supv.Sunne McPeak
Contra Costa Council
AGREEMENT P Y A L�'
THIS AGREEMENT is made by, and among EDWARD A. DIMMICK
("Dimmick") ; THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ("County") , REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ("AGENCY") (collectively,
"County") ; TAYLOR/WARD PROPERTIES, a general partnership
("Taylor/Ward") , SONSPIRIT PROPERTIES, a California corporation
(collectively the "Taylor/Ward Group") ; TREAT CORNERS
PARTNERSHIP, a general partnership ("Treat Corners") , MERLE -
GILLILAND, an individual ("Gilliland") , WALLACE OLSON ASSOCIATES,
INC. ("Wallace Olson") (collectively the "Treat Corners Group") ;
and TAYLOR WOOD ROW OF CALIFORNIA, INC. , . a California corporation
("Taylor Woodrow") , HOOVER ASSOCIATES, a California corporation
(collectively the "Taylor. Woodrow Group") .
RECITALS.
This Agreement is made with reference to the following
facts:
A. In 1985, Taylor/Ward applied for a rezoning
(2658-RZ) and development plan (3002-85) in connection with its
property located in the Pleasant Hill BART station area. In
1985, Treat Corners, Taylor Woodrow, Hoover Associates, Wallace
Olson and Gilliland applied for a rezoning (2656-RZ) and
development plans. (3003-85 and 3063-85) in connection with other
properties in the Pleasant Hill BART station area. On March 18 ,
1986, the County approved these rezoning applications and
development plan applications. A
JUL 121986
-1- �I�pfRVISOR SG�RUDIE.�
B. On April 17, 1986, Dimmick filed a petition and
complaint initiating Contra Costa County Superior Court Action
No. 285120 against the County, its Redevelopment Agency and its
Board of Supervisors, as defendants and respondents, and against
the other parties to this Agreement as real parties in interest
(the "Lawsuit") . In the Lawsuit, Dimmick challenges the
propriety of the County' s approval of the above rezoning
applications and development plan applications and seeks writs of
mandate, an injunction and other relief in connection with those
approvals.
C. It is the desire of the parties to this Agreement
to fully compromise, settle and resolve all of the claims made by
Dimmick in the Lawsuit and to settle the Lawsuit, with the
understanding that nothing contained herein shall constitute any
admission of liability on the part of any of the parties hereto,
which is expressly denied, and that all parties merely intend by
.their actions pursuant hereto to avoid prolonged and further
litigation and to buy their peace.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed among the parties hereto
as follows:
1. FORMATION OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TSM COMMITTEE:
1 . 1 Within twenty (20) days after consummation of
this Agreement (as defined in Paragraph 4 below) , there shall be
created a nonprofit association known as the "Contra Costa County
TSM Committee" (the "Committee") . The Committee will have the
-2- -
purpose and structure, and will function, as set forth in the
Bylaws attached hereto as Exhibit "A" .
1. 2 The Committee shall initially consist of five
persons, who shall be designated, as set forth below, within
twenty (20) days after execution of this Agreement: n a) . the
,. County shall select one member; (b the Contra Costa Council
shall select one member 0c) Citizens for A Better Contra Costa
shall select one member llbd) the Sierra Club shall select one
member; (J�he Contra Costa Centre Association shall select one
member. If the Contra Costa Council, the Sierra Club, the Contra
Costa Centre Association or Citizens for A Better Contra Costa
refuses to designate a representative, then the parties to this
Agreement shall select a comparable organization for this purpose
by unanimous agreement. It is anticipated that additional
members will be added to the Committee in the future, as set
forth in Exhibit "A" .
1 . 3 Within twenty (20) days after execution of
this Agreement, Taylor/Ward, Treat Corners and Taylor Woodrow
shall each pay to the Committee the sum of $26 ,667 for a total of
$80,000 . These funds shall be used for the purposes for which
the Committee is formed, as set forth in Exhibit "A" .
2. DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT:
Dimmick agrees to provide to all other parties to this
Agreement an executed request for dismissal of the Lawsuit with
-3- _
prejudice on or before July 3, 1986, at the time and in the
manner as set forth in Paragraph 4 below. Each party shall bear
its own costs and attorney' s fees in connection with the Lawsuit.
3. BONUS FAR:
County has enacted a transportation systems management
ordinance ("TSM Ordinance") applicable to the subject property.
The Treat Corners Group agrees, with respect to the bonus FAR in
its project, to either:
(a) enter into the exchange with the Taylor Woodrow
Group described in Paragraph 5 , below, in which
event only applicable County requirements shall
govern; or
(b) both (i) provide quarterly reports to the
County TSM Committee, in the form contemplated in
the TSM Ordinance, as to such bonus FAR space and
(ii) enter into an agreement with the County
providing that, with respect to such bonus FAR
space, the Treat Corners Group project shall exceed
the primary or alternative objective options by 5% ,
and providing that within 4 years 60% or less will
commute by single occupant vehicles under the
primary objective option or 55% or less will
commute by single occupant vehicles under the
alternative objective option.
-4- -
4. RELEASE:
Dimmick on behalf of himself and his attorneys
(hereinafter "Releasing Parties") , hereby forever releases and
discharges the County (including its Board of Supervisors and
Redevelopment Agency) , Taylor/Ward, Treat Corners, Sonspirit
Properties, Taylor Woodrow, Hoover Associates, Gilliland and
Wallace Olson, and all of their respective parent corporations,
subsidiary corporations, predecessor or successor corporations,
agencies , committees, political subdivisions, all of its/their-
present and former respective officers, directors, shareholders,
counsel, agents, employees, underwriters, associates,
predecessors, . successors, heirs, assigns, partners , and all
persons acting by, ,through, under or in concert with them, or any
of them, of and from any and all manner 'of action or actions,
cause or causes of action, in law or in equity, and all suits,
liability, claims, demands, damage, loss, cost or expense of any
nature whatsoever, fixed or contingent, whether now known or
unknown, which Dimmick shall or may have, or may in the future
have, against any of the released parties hereto arising out of,,
based upon or relating in any way, directly or indirectly, to: .
(1) the Lawsuit or to any allegation made in any pleading in the
Lawsuit; (2) rezoning applications 2658-RZ and/or 2565-RZ and/or
development plan applications 3002-85, 3003-85 and/or 3063-85,
and/or the approval of the same; (3) .any of the facts, events,
acts, or transactions set forth in Paragraphs A through C of the
above Recitals; . (4) the real properties owned by Taylor/Ward,
-5- -
Treat Corners and Taylor Woodrow, or another released party in
the Pleasant Hill BART station area which is the subject of the
various above applications (the "Subject Properties") . In
addition, the released parties hereunder forever release and
discharge Dimmick from any and all manner of action or actions,
cause or causes of action, in law or in equity, and all suits,
liabilities, claims, demands, damage, loss, cost or expense of
any nature, fixed or contingent, known or unknown, which any of
the released parties shall or may have, or may in the future have
against Dimmick arising out of, based upon or relating, directly
or indirectly, to items (1) , (2) , (3) and (4) above. Dimmick, on
behalf of the Releasing Parties, further agrees not to prosecute
or instigate the prosecution of any further legal actions or
proceedings to challenge or otherwise determine the validity of
any further ,approvals which the County may make in the future
with respect to the Subject Properties so long as such further
approvals are consistent with the amended Specific Plan for the
Pleasant Hill BART Station area. Dimmick acknowledges that he is
familiar with the provisions of California Civil Code section
1542, which provides as follows:
A general release does not extend to claims
which the creditor does not know or suspect
to exist in his favor at the time of
executing the release, which if known by him
must have materially affected his settlement
with the debtor.
Dimmick, being aware of said Code section, hereby expressly
waives any rights he may have thereunder, as well as under any
-6- _ .
statute or common law principle of similar substance. Dimmick,
on behalf of the Releasing Parties, hereby further covenants not
to sue or further sue the released- parties, or any of them, with
respect to any matter covered by the release contained -in this
Paragraph. Neither Dimmick' s dismissal of this action, nor any
provision contained in this Agreement, constitutes a waiver of
any right, claim, or cause of action not specifically and
explicitly included in the Petition for Writ of Mandate and
Complaint for Injunctive Relief in this action, which may have.
accrued, or which may in the future accrue, to Dimmick against
the Board of Supervisors or Redevelopment Agency of Contra Costa
County, or the County itself, with respect to any failure to
comply with the. California Environmental Quality Act or any other
law, or to accomplish in timely fashion all mitigation measures
set forth in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan or
the environmental impact report on the Specific Plan or adopted
by the Board of Supervisors as a part or condition of the
Specific Plan, except that Dimmick forever waives, releases and
discharges all' of the above rights , claims and causes of action:
(1) against the Taylor/Ward Group, the Treat Corners Group and/or
the Taylor Woodrow Group (including any such cause of action in
which any of them would be a real party. in interest) ; (2) which
would otherwise require that any member of the Taylor/Ward Group,
the Treat Corners Group and/or the Taylor Woodrow Group be joined
as a party under Code of Civil Procedure section 389; or
(3) against any person or entity (including the released parties
-7- -
above, the County, its Board of Supervisors and its Redevelopment
Agency) , to the extent that any such right, claim or cause of
action (a) would invalidate or otherwise adversely affect any
approval, permit or other authorization given, or to be given, in
connection with any of the Subject Properties or any projects or
proposed projects thereon or (b) would result in any cost or
expense to the Taylor/Ward Group, the Treat Corners Group and/or
the Taylor Woodrow Group in connection with any of the Subject
Properties or any projects or proposed projects thereon, or any
restriction or limitation on the development, use or occupancy of
any of the Subject Properties or any projects or proposed
projects thereon. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the parties further agree that: (1) no party hereto
shall assert or maintain any right, claim or cause of action in
law or in equity seeking any relief which would result in any of
the invalidations, adverse effects, costs, expenses, restrictions
or limitations set forth in subpart (3) above; and (2) no party
hereto shall obtain any relief in any action or proceeding which
would result in any such invalidations, adverse effects, costs,
expenses, restrictions or limitations. Nothing contained herein
shall be deemed to waive, release or discharge any rights or
obligations created by this Agreement.
5. NEW APPLICATIONS:
The Taylor Woodrow Group and the Treat Corners Group
are considering submitting applications to modify or supersede
-8- -
the existing approvals contained in rezoning (2656-RZ) and
development plans (3003785 and 3063-85) so that a hotel may be
built at the south end of Area 10-B to replace the office
building approved for that portion of the site and an office
building may be built at the north end of Area 10-A to replace
the hotel approved for that portion of the site. In the event of
such a• joint application: (1) the gross square footage to be
approved on Areas 10-A and 10-B shall not exceed 775 ,467 square
feet; (2) the total office square footage of Areas 10-A and 10-B
shall not exceed 558,967 square feet; (3) none of the buildings
shall exceed ten stories in height; (4) subject to these
limitations, the size and design of each building shall be within
the discretion of the developers, subject to the County' s
approval. Nothing contained herein requires the Taylor Woodrow
Group or the Treat Corners Group to seek the approvals described
above, and either the Taylor Woodrow Group or 'the Treat Corners
Group or both may separately apply for modification of its
approvals without the participation or application of the other.
For example, the Taylor Woodrow Group may seek approval for an
office building not to exceed 203,928 square feet in floor area
and a hotel not to exceed 216 ,500 square feet to replace the
approvals previously granted to it. Similarly, the Treat Corners
Group may seek approval for two office buildings (each not to
exceed 10 stories in height) not to exceed 395,379 square feet to
replace the approvals previously granted to it; in this event
Treat Corners shall obtain the right (if at all) to build more
-9- _..
than the 295, 379 office square feet already approved, by
purchasing transferable development rights, obtaining bonus FAR
from the County, or a combination of both. Dimmick agrees that
the release of claims contained in this Agreement shall apply
with equal force and effect to the above-described applications
and approvals and that he, his agents, representatives and
attorneys shall not oppose, challenge, contest or comment upon
said applications or approvals before any administrative or
government agency or any Court. The County is not a party to -
this Paragraph 5.
6. ESCROW:
Miller, Starr & Regalia, whose address is One Kaiser
Plaza, 16th Floor, Oakland, California, shall act as an escrow
for the purpose of consummating this Agreement. On or before
July 3, 1986 , the designated parties shall comply with the
requirements of Paragraph 2 above, and shall also place a
counterpart copy of this Agreement executed by each party in
escrow. The Agreement shall be consummated, and the exchange of
executed copies of this Agreement, the above dismissal, and the
payment for herein shall take place, when all the requirements of
this paragraph have been met, but no later than July 3, 1986.
7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT:
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
parties hereto with respect to the matters covered hereby, and
supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, among the
parties. No other agreement, statement or promise made by any
-10-
party which is not contained herein shall be valid or binding.
This Agreement and its releases shall be binding upon, and inure
to the benefit of, the parties hereto, their successors in
interest and their assigns.
8. COUNTERPARTS:
This Agreement may be executed simultaneously or in
counterparts, 'each of which shall be deemed to be an original,
but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
9. UNDERSTANDING OF AGREEMENT: _
The undersigned hereby declare that they have read this
Agreement, and that its meaning has been fully explained to them
by their attorneys, and that they fully understand and appreciate
its meaning, and have executed this Agreement of their own free
will and accord.
Dated:
EDWARD A. DIMMICK
Dated: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
By:
Board Chair
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and County
VICTOR J. WESTMAN, Administrator
County Counsel
By: By:
-11-
Dated: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY
By:
Its:
Dated: TAYLOR/WARD PROPERTIES,
a general partnership
By:
Its :
Dated: SONSPIRIT PROPERTIES,
a California corporation
By:
Its :
Dated: 7� TREAT CORNERS PARTNERSHIP,
�— a general partnership
By: 01
Its :
-12- -
Dated: TAYLOR WOODROW OF CALIFORNIA,
INC. , a California corporation
By:
Its:
Dated: HOOVER ASSOCIATES ,
a California corporation
By:
Its :
Dated:
MERVE ZILLILAND
Dated: WALLACE OLSON ASSOCIATES , INC. ,
a California corporation
By:
Its:
-13-
BYLAWS OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TSM COMMITTEE
I. Purpose
The purposes of the Contra Costa County TSM Committee
("Committee") are: (1) to study traffic problems associated with
residential and office development in Central Contra Costa
County; and (2) to promote adoption of measures to mitigate those
problems. Emphasis will be on measures not involving significant
expansion of existing roads or construction of major new roads..
The focus of the Committee's efforts will be to promote an
effective model transportation systems management ("TSM")
ordinance, and to' promote implementation of TSM in both the
county and the cities. This will involve educating and informing
the public, community and neighborhood groups, developers,
employers, employees and local governments and their staffs.
Efforts are already underway by Contra Costa County to
enact a model TSM ordinance in the unincorporated areas of the
county and to encourage passage of such an ordinance in key
cities. This Committee will support those efforts by collecting
and disseminating studies on the application and effectiveness of
TSM programs elsewhere; conducting informational and educational
meetings, workshops, and programs with cities and directly
affected groups; . and supporting efforts of the TSM Partnership,
the Mayors Conference and the cities who are seeking passage of
TSM measures . The work of the Committee is not intended to
EXHIBIT A
-1-
conflict with existing efforts but to supplement and complement
them.
II. Committee Membership
To have maximum credibility, the Committee will seek to
include individuals representing the full range of interests
affected by central county traffic problems and TSM -- the
county, the cities ,(Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, Concord,
Clayton, Martinez, and San Ramon) , business and neighborhood
groups, developers, and environmental groups. At the same time
the Committee should not be so large as to be unwieldy. The
"core Committee" will have five (5) members made up as follows:
(1) a) One representative of the Board of Supervisors
shall chair the Committee
(1) b) One representative of employers, designated by the
Contra Costa Council
(1) c) One representative of Citizens for A Better Contra
Costa
(1) d) One representative of developers designated by the
Contra Costa Centre Association
(1).' e) One representative of the Sierra Club
In addition, the Committee should seek to involve and add to its
membership elected or appointed officials from the cities in the
central county and representatives of other interested and
affected groups.
III. Voting
Each member of the Committee shall have one (1) vote.
In order to amend these Bylaws, a unanimous vote of all Committee
EXHIBIT A
-2-
1
members will be required. Selection of the consultant, described
in Paragraph IV below, also will require a unanimous vote of all
Committee members. Otherwise, all decisions of the Committee
shall be made by a majority of the members of 'the Committee.
IV. Consultant
Because the Committee will be made up of lay. people
(i.e. , non-experts in traffic analysis) it will be necessary to
hire a traffic consultant to review the existing studies of TSM
mitigation measures. This consultant should not have the
appearance of being beholden to or associated with any agencies,
developers, or others who might be affected, or whose studies
he/she may be reviewing.
The consultant' s job should primarily be to collect
data and studies on TSM programs now being implemented elsewhere
to help inform cities and the public regarding:
- The types of TSM measures used by others (both
commercial and residential)
- Their effectiveness in terms of changing commute
patterns
- The cost implementation-, and
- Conclusionsregarding the applicability of such
measures to Contra Costa County or portions
thereof.
The consultant shall undertake such additional activities as may
be directed.
EXHIBIT A
-3-
V. Staff
The substantial public education functions of the
Committee will require at least one (1) staff person who is .
familiar with Contra Costa County.
VI. Duration
The target for completion of the Committee's efforts to
promote a model TSM ordinance should be 9 - 12 months. This time
schedule should be held to so as to promote effectiveness.
VII. Funding _
A budget of $80,000 will be established for nine (9)
months. If the core Committee determines that additional funds
are required, it may take steps as may be appropriate to obtain
such funds.
EXHIBIT A _-
-4-