HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06101986 - T.6 T.6
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on June 10 , 1986 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, Torlakson and Powers
NOES : None
ABSENT: Supervisor McPeak
ABSTAIN: None
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Hearing on proposed Transportation Systems Management
Ordinance for the Pleasant Hill BART Station area
The Board on May 20 , 1986 continued to this date the
hearing on the proposed Transporation Systems Management ordinance
for the Pleasant Hill BART Station area.
Supervisor McPeak reviewed the proposed ordinance as
revised and explained the various provisions for reducing single
occupant vehicles, reducing peak hour traffic, getting more
vehicles off the streets, providing for the establishment of an
advisory committee, as well as enforcement procedures and penalties
for non-compliance.
Supervisor Schroder expressed concern that the non-
conformance penalties might be punative and unliveable, and that the
standards set might be unreachable.
This being a continued hearing, the Chair called for any
comments.
Sandford Skaggs advised that the developers had previously
agreed to conditions requiring TSM and that they support the ordi-
nance with a few changes, including providing for the posting of
bonds or letters of credit to guarantee implmentation of the TSM
program. He requested that this hearing be continued for two weeks
to allow input from a June 19 , 1986 meeting being arranged by Duffel
Financial Corporation with the hope that the ordinance can be
extended to the people working in the Duffel buildings.
Merle Gilliland, President of the Contra Costa Centre
Association, requested that the hearing be continued until after
Duffel has his meeting on June 19 , 1986 . He also addressed the com-
position of the committee as outlined in the proposed ordinance,
suggested adding a representataive from Duffel' s Hookston Square
Area, and urged the Board to withold appoiontments from the cities
entitled to a member until those cities have adopted a TSM
ordinance .
Supervisor McPeak noted that the Hookston Square employers
could serve on the committee under the existing provision for
employers.
Supervisor McPeak recommended that the Board introduce the
ordinance as amended to include the bonding provisions suggested by
Mr. Skaggs, provision for one member each for the cities of Walnut
Creek and Pleasant Hill, and fix June 24, 1986 at 10 :30 a.m. for
adoption of the fiinal version of the ordinance.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of
Supervisor McPeak is APPROVED.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered cn the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
cc : Community Development ATTESTED
/9
County Counsel PHIL BATC aR, F
Cine k of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
QBy ___. . �pytY