Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06101986 - IO.5 TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Gm..,,��,,}}/�, tr,a INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE CWLGi DATE: June 9, 1986 COOL / SUBJECT: Mandatory Arbitration of Claims SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1 . Request the County Risk Manager and County Counsel to report to our Committee on August 25, 1986 providing the information requested below. . 2. Leave this matter on referral to our Committee. BACKGROUND On May 20, 1986, the Board referred to our Committee a report from Joseph Tonda, Risk Manager, and County Counsel. Our Committee met with Mr. Tonda and Arthur Walenta, Assistant County Counsel, on June 9. We. reviewed Mr. Tonda' s report in more detail and are requesting a further report to be made to our Committee by Mr. Tonda and County Counsel on the following matters: 1 . The potential for utilizing binding arbitration with the Contra Costa Health Plan beyond the current membership whose contracts include binding arbitration provisions. Such provisions are included only in the contracts for those members of the Health Plan who pay their own premiums. We would like to consider expanding it to other groups within the Health Plan to the maximum extent possible. 2. Establishing a threshhold of perhaps $50,000 as the minimum level for considering claims for arbitration. 3 . Develop a feasibility assessment for human services contract agencies describing how mandatory arbitration provisions might be included in the County' s contracts with selected larger contract programs in the Health Services Department and Social Services Department. This should include a recommendation for a minimum contract payment limit below which mandatory arbitration would not be required, a description of what the contract agency' s experience in liability claims has been to date, and any other efforts that can be made to assist in reducing the liability insurance CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT; YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE _ OTHER SIGNATURE S Nancy C. Fa en Sun ne bl. McPeak «Jl ACTION OF BOARD ON Mune APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _X_ OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TTI ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: . ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN, County Administrator cc: Risk Manager ATTESTED _ June County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Health Services Director SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Social Services Director M382/7-83 B� SIx�LC/a �u o/ DEPUTY e' Page 2 3 . (continued) premium for contract agencies. 4 . A report which describes how mandatory arbitration might be expanded in other areas to reduce the County' s exposure to adverse settlements, to reduce costs to the County, and reduce the number of cases which must go to trial. 5. Include a statement of the professional opinion of the Risk Manager and County Counsel on the benefits and potential drawbacks of a mandatory arbitration system for claims against the County. 6 . A report on the number of claims filed over the last few months and their disposition. This report might be prepared in a format which could be forwarded to the Board on a periodic basis to advise the Board members of the disposition of claims which are filed against the County. County Counsel pointed out that mandatory arbitration is only possible currently in those cases where the County has a contractual relationship with the claimant, such as is the case with the Contra Costa Health Plan. We would like to expand appropriately the number of such contractual relationships the County enters into in order to increase the appropriate use of mandatory arbitration while bearing in mind the potential for increased administrative costs and other related problems which are referred to in Mr. Tonda' s report of May 15, 1986 .