The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 05061986 - 2.3 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM; Contra Phil Batchelor, �.1�J1 ,�I`� County Administrator (JIJ DATE: May 1, 1986 SUBJECT; THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment of $301,000 for the Health Services Department. 2. Direct the County Administrator' s Office to take appropriate action for problem areas identified in this report. 3 . Approve productivity indicators for each department which has submitted data. BACKGROUND: Overview For each of the past six quarters, the County Administrator' s Office has prepared a report which details the activity within each budget unit and provides summary information on the budget as a whole. Actions which are necessary to ensure a healthy budget at the end of the fiscal year are recommended as part of the quarterly reporting process. Other items which have major fiscal impacts are also reviewed as part ' of this periodic report. The Third Quarter Report consists of three major sections. The first section summarizes information for the budget as a whole, discusses the impact of federal and state actions on the status of the budget, recommends specific action to be taken, and highlights items which merit further review. The second section, contained in Attachment 1, includes detailed discussions of budgets which appear to be experiencing unusual revenue or expenditure patterns for the first three quarters of the fiscal year. Projections are made about each budget' s status by the end of the fiscal year. The third section of this report contains a review of the efforts related to developing productivity indicators for each department. Most departments ' indicators are included in the Third Quarter. Report. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE; I RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION Ori,,-'�BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATUREISI: rV ACTION OF BOARD ON Prl�Ip "7 - APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER In addition to the above recommendations the Board also REQUESTED County Administrator to develop an award program to recognize increased- productivity. ncreasedproductivity. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT --_ AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT; ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: County Administrator ATTESTED May 6 , 1986 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPE ISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR M382/7-83 BY ,DEPUTY The Budget Overall Overall, it appears that most budgets will end the year with slight posi- tive fund .balance. . These fund balances are necessary to finance the 1986-1987 budget. For those budgets which a -negative fund balance may be expected, corrective actions will be implemented during the fourth quarter to rd'duce .or eliminate the impact of the deficit. f This positive outlook is attributable to the Board of Supervisors' conser- vative fiscal policies over the last several years, and efforts on each department' s part to manage with the resources that the Board has allocat- ed. Without these two factors, significant fiscal problems would be experienced by the end of this year and into the next fiscal year. Effects of Federal and State Actions on Contra Costa. County A. Federal Impacts There are several major Federal actions which, are having a significant effect on the County' s budget, both this fiscal year and next. Many, of, these items have been discussed with the Board before. First, the Gramm-Rudman Deficit Reduction Act requires that reductions be made in all but a few protected programs in order to balance the federal budget by 1990. The constitutionality of the bill was questioned shortly after it was enacted. The United States Supreme Court reviewed the issue in late April and took it under advisement. Pending the outcome of the Supreme Court' s review, it is difficult to assess exactly what the impacts will be on the County and its various programs if upheld or reenacted with the questionable constitutional sections removed. The second issue directly affecting counties appears to be the Federal Revenue Sharing Program. The latest information that the County has is that the entire reduction for the 1985-1986 fiscal year will be taken out of the fourth quarter' s allotment, resulting in a 17% decrease in what would otherwise be expected. This is in addition to the proposal for 1986-87, which would eliminate Federal Revenue Sharing entirely. Impacts of such action on the County are obvious, since the General Assis- tance Program is currently funded through Revenue Sharing, and would have to be made up by general funds if Revenue sharing funds are not available. Third is new Medicare coverage requirements for persons not currently in the Social Security Program. Recently, Federal legislation was enacted which requires that employers and employees contribute 1.45% of the employ- ees' salary to the Social Security Administration for Medicare coverage for those .employees. Agencies which currently participate in Social Security already have a portion of their payments going towards this coverage. For Contra Costa County, the immediate impact is felt most heavily by safety members, including the Sheriff's Department and Fire District employees. Fortunately, this legislation is prospective rather than retroactive, which means that only employees hired after April 1, 1986 are affected. Although the impacts to the General Fund and Fire Districts is limited this year, over time the extent is expected to be significant. For example, if all current fire districts and Sheriff ' s personnel were covered by this act, -2- the impacts would be over $400,000 per year. Additionally.,. expanded coverage for beneficiaries and former employees appears to be included in the new requirement, which would adversely affect the General Fund. -Finally, impacts of implementing the Fair Labor Standards Act are being felt. In April 1985, the Supreme Court determined that the Fair Labor Standards Act is applicable to local government. This decision has many implicationstfor the County in the areas of compensation time, overtime and minimum wage. For the County, it raised the question about whether elec tion officers are subject to the minimum wage provisions of ...the FLSA. According to County Counsel, the answer is yes. Although the Act does exclude "volunteers" who may receive . a nominal fee, election. officers have in the past, received more than a nominal amount and are, therefore, consid- ered employees. Election precinct boards consist of one Inspector, currently paid $37; one Judge, $34; and two Clerks, $34 each. Minimum wage requirements would raise the pay to $51 for the Inspector, $48 for the Judge, and $48 each for the Clerks. The total increase for . each precinct board would be $56. The June 3rd Primary Election will require the use of approximately 675 pre- cinct boards. Fortunately, the Election Department' s budget has a suffi- cient fund balance to cover the increased costs this year. This is just one example of direct cost increases the County must absorb related to the Fair Labor Standards Act. In fire districts, additional costs amounting to 2.7% of salary are expected. B. State Actions The State' s In-Home-Supportive-Services Program provides for workers to check on people who are confined to their homes. These people can live independently with minimal care, but cannot live independently without some occasional assistance. Last year, for the first time, the State decided that costs in excess of a certain amount would be billed to the counties. . This decision was based on legislation adopted in 1981, which included a "trigger" for County financial participation in this program when costs exceeded certain levels. In 1985-86, the County has been billed for costs of approximately $200,000 for the In-Home-Suportive-Services Program. This is compounded in fiscal year 1986-87 when the current year' s billing is added to the program level expected for next year. Fortunately, the Social Services Department has fund balances in other parts of their budget which can cover- the costs for this year. However, it should be noted that this is an additional expense which was not planned for with this budget year or next. on a more positive note, pending legislation would require the State to continue to provide funding for costs in excess of federal reimbursement levels. The second problem is an increase in the time lag for receiving reimburse- ments for State-funded programs. Last fiscal year, the County had signif- icant problems being reimbursed for services provided on behalf of the State by County workers. Increased efforts were made to improve reimburse- ment times. For a time, it appeared that this problem was under control. However, during 1985-86, the situation has worsened. Noted on Attachment 1 is the observation , that revenues are lagging behind expenditures because -3- reimbursements have not yet been received. This causes several problems, the most significant of which is lost interest earnings because revenue has not been invested, but instead has had to be spent for programs. Staff is considering the advisability of formulating legislation which would require timely reimbursement of claims. Such action, if eventually recommended, would be best pursued through the Statewide . County Supervisors' Associa- tion. Budget Unit Review Overall, it appears that most budgets are in line with appropriations and projections. For those budgets which have problems, corrective action plans are being developed. Detailed discussions of budgets outside of certain expenditure or revenue parameters is included on Attachment 1. The Health Services Department, which has been under review all fiscal year, is continuing to run -a projected deficit. This is explained in more detail below: Health Services Department Funding For the 1985-86 fiscal year, the Health Services Department expenditures are well below budgeted levels. This is the result of action taken by the Health Services Director, to implement stringent expenditure controls within the department. These controls include a multi-level review and Director approval of all personnel requests. For the most part, only those requests deemed necessary for patient care are being approved. A similar process is used for the review and approval of requests to purchase capital items. Many of the items approved for purchase are required in connection with this year' s inspection of Merrithew Memorial Hospital to be conducted by the Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation. The department' s budgeted revenues for the current year were based on actual experience over the last few years. However, current year revenues are falling short of the budgeted amounts. Monitoring of revenue accounts has indicated two primary reasons for this revenue shortfall: 1. A decrease in hospital inpatient volume, and 2. A change in the patient mix. With regard to the decreased inpatient volume, the 1985-86 budget was based on an average daily inpatient census of 120. For the year-to-date, the actual average daily census has been 116. With regard to the change in patient mix, there has been a decrease in Medi-Cal and Medi-Care eligible patients, and an increase in the Basic Adult Care (BAC) program. Health Services Department staff are currently conducting a thorough review of this matter to determine what steps might be taken to maximize Medi-Ca1JMedi-Care revenues. Both of these factors have reduced receipts, but expenses have remained relatively constant. The County Administrator and Health' Services Director are jointly reviewing alternative actions which may be taken .to resolve a projected current year deficit of over $600,000. The objective . is to resolve the deficit while avoiding detrimental impact on the provision of medical care. In January. 1986, a $99;000 appropriation adjustment was made to the Health Services Department budget for use in restoring certain clinical services. -4-. i These functions included staffing additions, to the Pharmacy in both Rich- mond and Pittsburg, restoration of radiological services in Pittsburg, and staffing support for unscheduled absences in dental services. In light of the above comments, it is recommended that $301,000 unallocated funds previously earmarked for the Health Services Department be allocated to the department at this time. This adjustment will allow the Department to maintain .services at levels consistent with patient demands. Based upon demonstrated need, areas requiring additional resources,. either manpower or. services and supplies, will receive a portion of the funds. Such areas would include Medical Records, patient transportation, and nursing augmen- tation. Health Services for Detention Inmates. Current projections indicate that, because of population increases in the jail, the current appropriation for Health Services to jail inmates is not sufficient. The Health Services Department has managed the allocation so as to protect the medical accreditation of the jail, which affects the County' s liability exposure. In order to continue the current service . levels, an- appropriation adjustment will be necessary later in the year. The County Administrator' s Office and Health Services Department are refining the numbers, and will submit an appropriation adjustment later in the quarter. DEPARTMENTAL PERFORMANCE DATA Performance data submitted by departments are included as Attachment 2. A summary of how the departments' performance appeared to other counties and over different time periods is shown on pages 35 through 45. This summary indicates that Contra Costa County Departments rated very highly in relationship to other counties and are producing higher quantities of work in recent time periods than in past time periods. -5- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT GENERAL FUND * Budget Unit 0001 - Board of Supervisors EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $955,471 Percent Expended: 80 Expenses are high because of high costs in building occupancy and also because of an oversight during budget preparation Funding for the. cost of auditing services from Peat, Marwick and Mitchell were erroneously left out of the recommended and adopted budget. An appropriation adjustment may have to be made later this year if the error cannot be offset by savings elsewhere in the budget. REVENUES: Budgeted $4,000 Percent Received: 53 Revenues from the sale of maps and documents were budgeted on the basis of the high level of activity in the latter part of fiscal year 1984-85. Revenues are materializing slowly at this time, and receipt of the budget amount will probably not be realized by the end of this fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0002 - Clerk of the Board REVENUES: Budgeted $2,000 Percent Received: 59 Revenues for the Clerk of the Board are generated by fees for the duplication of documents, board meeting tape transcriptions and weekly Board calendar subscriptions. These revenues are received sporadical- ly and are, therefore, difficult to project. It appears that revenues may not be fully realized by the end of the fiscal year. However, this will not have a significant impact on the Clerk of the Board' s total budget. * Budget Unit 0003 - County Administrator REVENUES: Budgeted $157,748 Percent Received: 59 The low amount received to date is due to charges being made to agencies and special districts for services provided by the office for. half the year. Since the remainder of the charges will be billed in the next quarter, it is anticipated that the budgeted revenues will be realized by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0005 - General County Revenue REVENUES: Budgeted $140,222,486 Percent Received: 83 Revenues appear high because 100% of the expected property tax reve- nues have already been credited to this budget unit. Moreover, .-motor vehicle in-lieu monies are expected to exceed the budgeted amount because of higher than anticipated new vehicle sales, higher than -6- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0005 - General County Revenue (Continued) projected car registration renewals and elimination of the problem of under reporting revenues by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Inter- est earnings is the. other significant revenue source which is also expected to exceed the budgeted level, because of higher than assumed interest rates and average daily balances. All of this funding is needed to fund the 1986-87 budget. * Budget Unit 0006 - General Road Fund Revenues REVENUES: Budgeted $8,818,000 Percent Received: 88 Increased revenues are being realized as a result of increased State assistance for road projects made available through Senate Bill 300. Revenues are expected to be above budgeted amounts by the end of the year. * Budget Unit 0010 - Auditor--Controller i EXPENDITURES: Budgeted: $3,095,846 Percent Expended: 80.9 The Auditor' s office has been experiencing significantly high expenses in Data Processing Services this year. These expenses have been incurred due to retroactive payrolls, development of the supplemental property tax system, mandated changes in the personnel system, and extraordinary training costs. These expenses were unknown at the time of budget preparation and, unless offset by savings elsewhere in the budget., will result in a deficit by the end of the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted: $922,870 Percent Received: 94.1 Revenues appear to be high because they were actually underbudgeted. Conversely, expenditure transfers were budgeted too high because of a misplacement of revenue appropriations. One error tends to offset the other, having nearly a zero net effect on the total budget. * Budget Unit 0015 - Treasurer-Tax- Collector EXPENDITURES: Budgeted: $1,637,206 Percent Expended: 62.7 The Treasurer-Tax Collector has been operating and will continue to operate conservatively in the area of expenditures because of their low realization of revenues.' Several vacancies within the department have also resulted in some salary savings. REVENUES: Budgeted: $455,256 Percent Received: 58.2 Revenues appear to be low because of charges which have not yet been made to other departments. These charges are typically not made-'until -7- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0015 - Treasurer-Tax Collector (Continued) the end of the fiscal year. However, the department is curbing expenditures in anticipation that revenues may not be fully realized. * Budget Unit 0016 Assessor ft REVENUES: Budgeted $54,900 Percent Received: 58. 2 Assessor fees are being realized at a lower rate than anticipated. These revenues will be monitored closely throughout the remainder of the year. It should be noted that the department is underspending so that a net year end balance can be expected. . * Budget Unit 0025 - Management Information System EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $439,414 Percent Expended: 36 Expenditures have lagged in this budget unit because of delays in determining which automation projects will be funded. A total of $2,200,000 in requests have been received and a Steering Committee of department representatives is currently reviewing the projects and will recommend action in the near future. It is anticipated that all funds will be expended by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0030 - County Counsel REVENUES: Budgeted $463,300 Percent Received: 48 Revenues for County Counsel predictably lag behind the budgeted amount until the fourth quarter, when a lump sum is transferred in from the Special District Augmentation Fund. The annual contract with the Contra Costa Community College District for $20,000 was cancelled this year, but the department will make up the loss by concentrating efforts in other areas, such as the Housing Authority. The department anticipates that revenues will actually be higher than the, budgeted amount by the end of the year. * Budget Unit 0035 - Personnel EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $2,382,141 Percent Expended: 60 Expenses are low because the costs for the benefits program are lagging behind a straight line projection. This situation is normal for the benefit programs since contracts for disability and workers' compensation are not paid monthly, but usually paid in May. -8- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT . * Budget Unit 0035- Personnel (Continued) REVENUES: Budgeted $2,517,227 Percent Received: 49 Revenues are unstated because expenditure levels are low. As the expenditures in the benefits program increase in May, revenues will be drawn from the trust accounts to offset expenditures. * Budget Unit 0036 - Personnel Merit Board EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $103,022 Percent Expended: 64 Expenditures are below the anticipated level because the temporary salaries account has not been utilized to date. A temporary employee was to have been hired in March to train for the replacement of the Executive Secretary of the Merit Board. However, due to selection delays, the temporary employee will not be hired until next fiscal year resulting: in. $6,500 under-expenditure in this budget -unit. * Budget Unit 004=3. - Elections EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $2,243 ,920 Percent Expended: 58. 5 Though it appears that this budget is being underspent, Elections will spend most of the appropriation. The major expenses this year are associated with the June 3rd primary election. REVENUES: Budgeted $519,050 Percent Received: 91.1 Revenues are being realized at a higher rate than anticipated because of higher reimbursement from city elections. It is expected that revenues will exceed budgeted amounts by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0079 - Building Maintenance EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $17,967 ,909 Percent Expended: 79 Expenditures are ahead of a straight-line projection because rents are paid one month in advance on non-County owned office space. This budget unit is expected to expend at the projected level by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0111 - Plant Acquisition EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $10,001,442 Percent Expended: 49 Expenditures in this budget are for various capital projects. Funds are accumulated year-to-year for certain projects and expended as project schedules proceed. The allocation includes major sums for the new jail and for the continuation of the purchase of the Southern Pacific right-of-way property. Based upon current activity, it is -9- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0111 - Plant Acquisition (Continued) expected that appropriations will be fully spent by the end of the fiscal year, except for the jail project. Appropriations for that project1tare dependant upon progress in acquisition of the site for the facility. REVENUES: Budgeted $4,040,536 Percent Received: 77 Typically, revenues for capital projects do not follow straight line projections. The high revenue receipts are a result of State funds received for the Southern Pacific right-of-way project. * Budget Unit 0135 - Economic Development EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $77,000 Percent Expended: 100 A contract of $77,000 for services provided by the concord Convention and Visitors Bureau was approved on January 7, 1986. Full payment has been made according to the agreement, reflecting expenditures of 100°x. * Budget Unit 0148 - Central Services EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $367 ,761 Percent Expended: 97 Net expenditures are much higher than projected because expenditure transfers are far below anticipated levels. A major reason for this situation is that charges for service have not been adjusted since April 1984 . It is expected that this budget unit will experience a shortfall of $92,000 by the end of the fiscal year, but this shortfall will be offset by expected underexpenditures in other General Services Divisions. * Budget Unit 0149 - General Services Administration EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $ 0 Percent Expended: 100 Expenditures in this budget unit are offset totally by charges to other divisions in the General Services Department. Currently, the charges to other divisions are one month behind and, therefore, expenditures have not been fully offset. This situation will be corrected before the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0150 - Insurance EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $2,000,000 Percent Expended: 86 The expenditures exceed straight line projections because property insurance policy premiums have been charged to this account and not -10- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT . * Budget Unit 0150 - Insurance (Continued) yet distributed to departments. This budget will be fully expended by year end as charges are allocated and funds transferred to the . Liability Trust Fund. * Budget 'Unit 0161 — Survey Monument Preservation EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $143,818 Percent Expended: 9 The low expenditures reflect the low level of activity devoted to this function. Maintenance of historical land division lines have become a lower priority among the many responsibilities of Public Works and forces have been diverted to higher priority programs so far this fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0200 - Superior Court REVENUES: Budgeted $1,045,336 Percent Received: 66 Revenue is underrealized because payment has not yet been received in State-mandated arbitration and juror fee costs. * Budget Unit 0211 - Bay Municipal Court EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $2,660,169 Percent Expended: 78 Temporary salary and travel accounts will be overspent by the end of the year because the cost of using assigned judges in the first six months of 1985-1986 exceeded budget estimates. These expenses should be reduced during the last half of the year since a permanent judge has been hired by the court. The cost of painting three court rooms and installing the judges ' bench computers are also over the budgeted. amounts. REVENUES: Budgeted $1,057,261 Percent Received: 71 The Court' s total revenue will be underrealized at year end, primarily because vehicle code and general fines are lower than expected. This revenue shortfall will be partly offset if the jury fee reimbursement from the State is received in this fiscal year. Also, the revenue account has been augmented by fines collected for Financial Responsi- bility Law violations (VC-16028) during the first five months of 1985-1986. This source of revenue has been temporarily suspended pending a review of the law' s constitutionality. -11- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0214 - Walnut Creek - Danville Municipal Court REVENUES: Budgeted $1,355,327 Percent Received: 73 The Court's revenue receipts are below expectations after three quarters, primarily because vehicle code and general fines are under- realizdd. Some recovery is expected during the last quarter. due to a greater number of driving-under-the-influence dispositions. This revenue shortfall will be partly offset if the jury fee reimbursement from the State is received in this fiscal year. Also, the revenue account has been augmented by fines collected for Financial Responsi- bility Law violations (VC-16028) during the first five months of 1985-1986. * Budget Unit 0235 - Law and Justice Systems Development EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $410,675 Percent Expended: 43 Expenditures are understated because Data Processing costs to date for programming the Superior Court Criminal Calendaring System have not yet been fully charged to this budget unit. Fixed assets for the Superior Court have not yet been purchased; expenditure on fixed assets for the Municipal courts depends on the receipt of offsetting traffic school revenue not yet realized. * Budget Unit 0238. - Grand Jury EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $65,000 Percent Expended: 102 The increased meeting activity of the Volunteer Grand Jury has led to higher than anticipated expenditures. An appropriation adjustment on the agenda should be sufficient to cover Grand Jury costs through the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0240 - County Clerk REVENUES: Budgeted $1,803,700 Percent Received: 69. 3 Revenues are not materializing as anticipated because of the lower- than-projected volume of court filings. This department' s budget will be closely monitored so that any negative impact of the lower revenues can be minimized. * Budget Unit 0242 - District Attorney REVENUES: Budgeted $1,091,232 Percent Received: 65 Total revenues are understated because of delays in receiving monthly reimbursements from two State grants. The third quarter reimburse- ments from State Subvention Program funds have not yet been credited. -12- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0242 - District Attorney (Continued) These revenues are expected to be fully realized by year-end. Fines and penalties from consumer fraud/environmental law violations appear higher than anticipated. * Budget Vnit 0243 - Public Defender REVENUES: Budgeted $84,279 Percent Received: 58 Revenue is understated because the. third quarter' s reimbursement from State Subvention Program funds has not yet been credited. It is expected that budgeted revenue will be realized by year-end. * Budget Unit 0245 - District Attorney - Family Support REVENUES: .Budgeted $3,744,382 Percent Received: 32 Incentive fund revenues are understated because the collection- disbursement-claim filing process takes three months before State payment can occur. The third quarter' s State reimbursement of the majority of administrative costs has not yet been applied to the reimbursement rate effective October 1, 1985 is expected to be offset by State assistance increases. * Budget Unit 0248 - Conflict Defense Services EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $1,199,500 Percent Expended: 79 Reported expenditures include advance payments to the Contra Costa Bar Association for its conflict defense program. Actual expenditures are somewhat less but still may exceed budget somewhat by year end because of the level of activity in this budget. * Budget Unit 0257 - Delta Regional Communications Center REVENUES: Budgeted $820,010 Percent Received: 44 Revenue realized by this budget represents first and second quarter reimbursement from participating agencies and is, thus, understated. All budgeted revenue is expected to be received by the close of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0266 - Marshal - Municipal Courts EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $2,024,477 Percent Expended: 77 The Marshal' s budget will be overspent in the temporary salaries . account by the end of the year because the Department hired a part- time deputy marshal on March 1, 1986 for the Delta Court and a--clerk for the Walnut Creek office on January 1, 1986. Services and -13 ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0266 - Marshal - Municipal Courts (Continued) supplies will also be overspent,. primarily because the expense of planning the Marshal' s new office in Concord far exceeded the estimated costs. * Budget `Unit 0300 - Sheriff Detention EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $14,373,479 Percent Expended: 76 Expenditures have been increasing in the third quarter because of rise in inmate population. It is -expected that this budget unit will be overexpended by approximately $200,000. These increases will be offset by savings in other parts of the department' s budget. REVENUES: Budgeted $1,065,361 Percent. Received: 88 .Revenue in some accounts has been higher than anticipated due to State payment of prior claims and increased reimbursement rates. While it is not expected that revenue will continue to be received at the same rate all budgeted revenue should be realized. * Budget Unit 0301 - Health Services Detention Inmates EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $1,802, 361 Percent Expended: 91. Expenditures are exceeding the straight line projection. Expenditures for temporary and overtime salaries for the first nine months have already exceeded the annual appropriation amounts. These high expen- ditures are a result of increased staff required to serve increased inmate population. On an annualized basis, it is anticipated that expenditures will exceed the budgeted appropriation amount by approxi- mately $276 ,000. REVENUES: Budgeted $143,000 Percent Received: 52 Budgeted revenues are from State aid for Justice Systems - AB 90 which is an annual allocation which has not yet been received. These funds are expected to be received before the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0308 - Probation EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $17,104,273 Percent Expended: 76 The Department' s salary account is slightly over budget because overtime costs have been higher than expected. Services and supplies will be overspent at year end, primarily because the department' s major data processing project is experiencing cost over-runs and occupancy costs at the juvenile institutions are over budget. -14- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT " * Budget Unit 0308 - Probation (Continued) REVENUES: . Budgeted $1,981,200 Percent Received: .60 Revenue receipts are understated because the SB 90 funds for the Department' s probate/guardianship program will not be received until the last quarter. Also, the third quarter reimbursement from State Subvention Funds has not yet been credited. It is expected that these revenues will be fully realized by the end of this fiscal year. Total yearly revenues are expected to be over budget because parental reimbursement fees for juvenile institutional care and collections for food service to the Pride House Program are exceeding budget esti- mates. * Budget Unit 0325 - Justice System Programs EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $290,755 Percent Expended: . 36 This budget unit consists of three contracts which are paid after demands are received. This causes delays in entering expenditures.. into the finance system. Expenditures are being made in a consistent manner, which should result in the allocation being fully utilized by the end of the year. REVENUES: Budgeted $249,281 Percent Received: 32 Revenues for this budget consist entirely of State Justice System Subvention funds, which are not credited until expenditures are made. State payments are advanced quarterly and help in trust by the Audi- tor. Revenues are thus understated in the budget printout but will be fully realized by June 30, 1986. * Budget Unit 0330 - Flood Control EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $370,231 Percent Expended: 63 Expenditures for this unit are at a lower than expected level because there have not been favorable work conditions to perform scheduled projects. It is anticipated that all work will be completed in the last quarter and expenditures will rise to budgeted levels by the end of the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $28,080 Percent Received: 43 Revenues for this budget unit are generated by a contract for mainten- ance of the North Richmond Pump Station with the City of Richmond. The billing of services rendered normally runs a quarter behind actual work performed. -15- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0335- Agriculture - Weights and Measures REVENUES: Budgeted $698,012 Percent Received: 58 Most. of the department' s revenue comes from State reimbursements. The reimbursement schedule for the State contracts vary. For example, the State reimburses on a monthly basis for. one major contract. However, there is an approximately 60 day reimbursement lag. Iri two other major contracts, lump sum reimbursements are received in May of each year. Therefore, revenues will continue to appear understated for a majority of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0340 - Building Inspection EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $4,121, 487 Percent Expended: 74 Expenditures to date are very close to straight line projections and are expected to be on target at the end of the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $4,351,391 Percent Received: 94 Revenues reflect the present higher than normal building activity in the County and the subsequent increased amount of fees collected for services by the Building Inspection Department. The last quarter of the fiscal year is typically a high period of activity for the build- ing industry. Therefore, revenues are expected to exceed budget by the close of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0347 - Land Information Systems EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $191,658 Percent Expended: 64 Expenditures are slightly under-budget indicating that data processing and equipment maintenance contract costs that are based on a fiscal year have not yet become due for payment. It is fully anticipated that the budgeted allocation will be spent during the current fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $16,000 Percent Received: 64 Revenue is received from cities participating in Land Information System. This revenue is billed quarterly so that revenue for the Third Quarter has not yet been reflected in the monthly accounting figures. Revenues will be equal to or greater than projected for year-end. * Budget Unit 0356 - Local Agency Formation Commission EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $160,104 Percent Expended: 50 Most of the expenses of this budget unit are the result of charges from various County departments for services provided to the Local -16- ATTACHMENT I 1985-.1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0356 - Local Agency Formation Commission (Continued) Agency Formation Commission. To date, not all County departments have made charges to the Local Agency Formation Commission for services provided. It is anticipated that charges from County departments and other expenses will slightly exceed the budgeted amount by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0357 - Community Development EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $1,377,368 Percent Expended: 100+ Approximately $400,000 of expenditures have not yet been cost applied to other budget units. It is anticipated that the net expenditures will be brought into line with the budgeted amount by the end of the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $721,130 Percent Received: 100+ Revenue received from the issuance of permits continues to exceed the budgeted level. With lower interest rates stimulating the building industry, issuance of permits are at a corresponding higher than normal level. If the trends hold, there may be an overage of revenues for this budget unit by the end of the fiscal year. Budget Unit 0358 - Planning Projects EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $547,396 Percent Expended: 57 Expenditures seem to be slightly low. This budget unit includes funds for preparation of environmental impact reports and several special projects. Because of the nature, complexity, and protracted time- frames of these reports and projects, expenditures can not be projected on a straight-line basis. Therefore, it is expected expenditures will increase to budgeted levels by fiscal year end. Except for identified County projects, all other projects are off-set by revenues. REVENUES: Budgeted $180,000 - Percent Received: 100+ Given the increased activity associated with the Community Development Department, it is expected that revenues for this budget unit will increase as the volume of environmental impact reports also increase. The cost of such reports are paid by developers. As more EIRs than originally anticipated have already been scheduled, revenue for this unit should exceed budget expectations by the end of the year. -17- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0359 - Sheriff Coroner REVENUES: Budgeted $14,000 Percent Received: 72 Napa County has decided not to continue its contract with the. Coroner and will use local morticians instead. Revenue will, therefore, be underrealized. * Budget Unit 0360 - Crossing .Guards EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $33 ,000 Percent Expended: 46 Lower level of expenditures reflect the billing procedures of school districts for County provided school crossing guards. It is antici- pated that there will actually be higher than budgeted expenditures for the fiscal year. This is due to increased costs for labor con- tracts negotiated by school districts after County budget process is completed. * Budget Unit 0361 - Energy Conservation EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $119,470 Percent Expended: 63 . 8 The amount of funds expended relates directly to the status of the energy program funded by P.G. & E. The low level of expenditures reflects the level of work being performed in this. area. REVENUES: Budgeted $56,740 Percent Received: 51 . 1 Revenues are transferred in as needed from grant funds and are, therefore, expected to meet budgeted- amounts by, the end, of the year. * Budget Unit 0362 - Emergency Services EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $362,223 Percent Expended: 79 Expenditures for this budget unit appear to be ahead of expectations. The reason for this apparent over-expenditure is that certain expendi- tures related to Budget Unit 0363 (hazardous Materials Management) have erroneously been charged to this budget unit. The errors will be corrected by adjustments between the two budget units. On a combined basis, the two budget units have spent 69 percent of the budgeted amounts. REVENUES: Budgeted $178,339 Percent Received: 31 Budgeted revenues include Federal funds transmitted through the State of California to the County, and contract payments from cities for services provided by Emergency Services. There is a lag of six to twelve months from the time the revenue is claimed until it is re- ceived. Additionally, the Department does not bill the cities for services rendered until late in the fiscal year. It is anticipated -18- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0362 —Emergency Services (Continued) that the budgeted revenues will be received by the end of the fiscal year. tR, * Budget Unit 0363 - Hazardous Materials Management EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $180,631 Percent Expended: 50 Expenditures for this budget unit appear to be less than expected at this point in the fiscal year. This is the result of certain expenditures being erroneously charged against Budget Unit 0362 (Emergency Services) . The errors will be corrected by adjustments between the budget units. REVENUES: Budgeted $55,888 Percent Received: 23 Budgeted revenues consist entirely of. Federal subventions. As dis- cussed in Budget Unit 0362 (Emergency Services) there is a substantial lag time in the receipt of funds. Additionally, Federal funds re- ceived to date have been credited to Budget Unit 0362 and will be transferred to this budget unit as appropriate later in the year. * Budget Unit 0364 - Public Administrator REVENUES: Budgeted $23,000 Percent Received: 132 Revenue is high because several large estates were settled earlier in the year. Revenue is not expected to continue to be realized at the same rate for the remainder of the year. * Budget Unit 0366 - Animal Services REVENUES: Budgeted $1,686, 500 Percent Received: 66 Revenues for this budget unit consist of fees received from animal licenses, spay clinic, sale of animals, city contracts and miscel- laneous humane services. All revenue sources, except city contracts, . are falling short of budget projections. Part of this .shortage is related to staff vacancies experienced by the department during the first half of the year. It is anticipated that revenues will increase during the last quarter of the year but will not reach the budgeted level. Estimated revenue is $1,494,120. This represents a shortfall of $192,380, or 11 percent, below the budgeted amount of $1,686,500. * Budget Unit 0450 - Health Services - Public Health EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $10,136,543 Percent Expended: 76 At this point in the year, expenditures are running only one percent above the budget projection. It is fully anticipated that expendi- tures will be within the budgeted amount for the fiscal year. -19- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0450 - Health Services - Public Health (Continued) REVENUES: Budgeted $4,320,962 Percent Received: 56 Revenues for this budget unit are mainly attributable to State money, most otxwhich is submitted on a quarterly basis. The current revenue figures reflect State reimbursement for only the first two quarters of the fiscal year. However, other sources of revenue for this budget unit are running lower than the budgeted amounts and it is antici- pated that for the total fiscal year, revenues will be somewhat below the budgeted level. * Budget Unit 0452 - Health Services - Environmental Health REVENUES: Budgeted $924,000 Percent Received: 128 Budgeted revenues for this year have already been exceeded by about $258,000. This is the result of implementation of the new underground tank licensing-inspection program during the fiscal year. The large amount of revenue derived from this source this year will not be realized each year in as much as the license fees are good for a five-year period. * Budget Unit 0453 —Toxic Waste Spill Clean-Up EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $ 0 Percent Expended: 100+ Since it is not feasible to predetermine the amount of funds required for toxic waste spill clean-up, no appropriation was budgeted for 1985-86. The funds expended represent the County cost incurred for toxic waste clean-up. Identified parties responsible for the spill are required to reimburse the County for incurred costs. In the event no responsible party is identified, the clean-up remains a County cost. To date, $37,182 has been expended under this budget unit. * Budget Unit 0460 - California Children' s Services REVENUES: Budgeted $1,670,377 Percent Received: 51 Revenues for this budget unit cannot be projected on a straight line basis since over 95% of the revenues are attributable to State reim- bursement received on a quarterly basis. The revenues to date reflect receipt of State reimbursement for the first two quarters of the fiscal year. It is anticipated that the total amount of revenues budgeted for this year will be received. * Budget Unit 0465 - Hospital Subsidy EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $17,308,646 Percent Expended: 64 This budget unit consists of County General Fund money used to subsi- dize operation of -Merrithew Memorial. Hospital and the Contra Costa -20- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0465- Hospital Subsidy (Continued) County Health Plan, which are each separately budgeted enterprise funds. It is anticipated that the total amount of subsidy will be spent by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0467 - Alcohol/Drug Abuse/Mental Health EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $21,483,842 Percent Expended: 76 At this point in the year, expenditures are running only one percent ahead of budget projections. It is anticipated that for the full fiscal year, expenditures will be within the budgeted amount. REVENUES: Budgeted. $19,151,402 Percent Received: 71 ,At this point in the year, revenues are running only slightly behind the budget projection. This is not unusual in that State reimburse- ment for Alcoholism, Drug Abuse and Mental Health programs sometimes lags behind expenditures. * Budget Unit 0470 - State Hospital EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $750,000 Percent Expended: 58 Expenditures for this budget unit are incurred and included in Mental Health Claims within Budget Unit 0467 - Alcohol/Drug Abuse/Mental Health. The Auditor-Controller' s Office then transfers the State Hospital cost to this budget unit. The fact that expenditures are indicated as running below budgeted amounts reflects the delay in the transfer of these costs to this budget unit. It is anticipated that the total appropriation will be expended by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0472 - General Sewer Planning EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $30,000 Percent Expended: 45 The budget unit includes support funds for staff services of the Conservation Program Division of the Community Development Department. This staff provides technical and administrative services related to water, sewer and other environmental issues. It is anticipated that the total amount budgeted will be spent by the end of the fiscal year. r -21- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0473 - Solid Waste Management EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $170,400 Percent Expended: 76 Expendirtures are running slightly ahead of budget indicating that more than anticipated staff time. is being devoted to Solid Waste Management issues. REVENUES: Budgeted $189,700 Percent Received: 100+ Revenues are showing an increase over budgeted levels. The additional revenue is generated from increases in tipping fees based on anticipated volume of solid waste., * Budget Unit 0500 - Social Services REVENUES: Budgeted $24,489,123 Percent Received: 49 Although the county has repeatedly requested the assistance of its legislative representatives, there still exists a problem in timely payments for County claims. The State' s reimbursement delay is primarily due to increased statewide caseloads and claims. Reimburse- ment for the last quarter of 1985 and first quarter 1986 remain outstanding. Additional revenues are anticipated, which will more accurately place revenues within acceptable limits. The Social Services Department will continue to address the problem in reducing reimbursement lag time. * Budget Unit 0516 - Aid to Families with Depending Children (AFDC) EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $63,761,000 Percent Expended: 84 The budget statement ending April 11, 1986 includes AFDC grants for the 10th month. Current expenditures reflect 83% of the fiscal year rather than 75%. Therefore, expenditures are within acceptable limits. * Budget Unit 0518 - AFDC - Foster Care EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $12,029,000 Percent Expended: 80 Expenditures represent 10 months ( 830) rather .than 9 months (75a) . Review of this account indicates that expenditures are within accept- able limits. * Budget Unit 0519 - Adoption Assistance Program EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $267,600 Percent Expended: 91 The programs expenditures reflect an increase in caseload and cost of care for "hard to place" children. The department will submit an -22- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0519 - Adoption Assistance Program (Continued) appropriation adjustment to reflect this. The increased cost will be fully offset by Federal and State revenues. REVENUES: Budgeted $267,600 Percent Received: 7 Reimbursement is received six to seven months after. the fact. The last payment was realized February 1986 to cover the period from July, 1985 to September, 1985. This program is 10.0% Federal and State funded. * Budget Unit 0522 - Aid to Adults EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $122,60.0 Percent Expended: 224 Generally, this budget unit is 100% Federal and State funded. The increase in expenditures is a result of an expenditure transfer of approximately $210,816 from the State to the County for In-Home Supportive Services. Currently., AB 2923 is being considered which would require the State to fully reimburse the counties for these services to the extent Federal and State matching funds are insufficient. This bill will be monitored closely. REVENUES: Budgeted $122,600 Percent Received: -14 Although claims are submitted monthly, there is a one-year lag time in realizing revenue for this program. The last payment received was February 1985, which covered the period from October 1984 to March 1985 . The 'Social Services Department has made efforts to address this problem with the State but more improvements are needed. * Budget Unit 0524 - Aid to Refugees REVENUES: Budgeted $1,635,500 Percent Received: 63 There continues to be a lag time in receiving reimbursement from Federal and State funding. Although additional revenue may not be realized before fiscal year end, projections indicate our net County cost will be approximately $1,50.0 below budget.. * Budget Unit 0579 - Veterans' Resources Center REVENUES: Budgeted $27,849 Percent Received: 98 Revenues are received on a semi-annual basis. Revenues have already been received for. the second half of the fiscal year.. A reduced net County cost is anticipated based on revenues received and salary savings. _ r -23- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0583 - Private Industry Council EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $5,290,435 Percent Expended: 58 The bulk of expenditures are performance. fees related to contracts. The majority of expenditures occur within the last month of the fiscal year (June) . Linear projections are, therefore, distorted. Based upon this, it appears that expenditures will be within acceptable limits. REVENUES: Budgeted $5,269,029 Percent Received: 71 Revenues are based on reimbursement from the State after expenses are incurred and submitted. Currently, there is a- 30-40 day draw-down lag time in processing. * Budget Unit 0588 - Community Services. EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $2,667,428 Percent Expended: 63 Expenditures for the fiscal year reflect a slight decrease due to a two month delay in the start-up of the 1986 direct Weatherization Program and "belt tightening" due to Gramm-Rudman budget reductions. REVENUES: Budgeted $2,541,527 Percent Received: 64 Revenues are consistent with decreased expenditures.. It is.. anticipat- ed that both expenditures and revenues will be on: target and the net County cost will be well within the adopted budget. * Budget Unit 0590 - Community Development, - Block- Grants REVENUES: Budgeted $325,000 Percent Received: 74 This budget unit consists. of federal funds which are "drawn down" against a federal letter of credit. It is anticipated that all revenues will be requested, received and expended by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0591 - Housing Rehabilitation EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $941,372 Percent Expended: 87 This budget unit provides for the housing rehabilitation program administered by the Building Inspection Department. The level of expenditures represents higher than normal activity during the third quarter. In recognition of expenditure percentages, loan approval activity has been curtailed and a personnel reduction has been made. The budget will not exceed allocations by the end of the year. . -24- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0650 - Public Works EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $5,699,543 Percent Expended: 58 Expenditures are lower than anticipated for several reasons. Reduced gas prices have reduced fuel charges for County equipment and costs for data processing have not occurred at. budgeted projections. Additionally, work for cities within the County has been at a lower than anticipated level. REVENUES: Budgeted $5,087,520 Percent Received: 64 Revenues will- increase as road services provided to other agencies increases during the Spring and early Summer months. * Budget Unit 0661 - Road Construction EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $6,995 Percent Expended: 92 Expenditures within this budget unit are earmarked for specific special projects to improve the County road system. Projects initiat- ed at the start of this fiscal year reflect higher expenditure level. It is fully 'anticipated that the target level for expenditures will be met. * Budget Unit 0671 - Road Maintenance EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $3,186,500 Percent Expended: 13 Expenditures within this unit are used to supplement those funds provided by the Road Fund for road maintenance. Expenditure levels fluctuate significantly during the year in relation to the number of projects started and completed during the fiscal year. It is antici- pated that expenditures will be under the budget and unused funds carried forward to the next fiscal year to provide for projects in progress. * Budget Unit 0696 - Pleasant Hill Bart Transit Planning EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $105,000 Percent Expended: 0 Expenditures within this budget unit will be used to mitigate effects of increased traffic levels in and around the Pleasant Hill Bart Station Redevelopment Project Area. The majority of mitigation measures call for construction items. Such items are still in an early development stage. Additionally, funds have been identified for initial studies of the Transportation Systems Management (TSM) program. It is anticipated that the funds for this purpose wou.Idl- be expended in the last quarter of this fiscal year. .-25- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0696 - Pleasant Hill Bart Transit Planning (Continued) REVENUES: Budgeted $1,116,422 Percent Received: 100 Most of4 the revenue generated for this budget unit was received from the formation of Assessment Districts 1983-1 and 1985-3 . These funds were collected for TSM implementation. It is anticipated that this project and associate funds will carry over into the next fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0712 - Small Parks EXPENDITURES: - Budgeted $41,804 Percent Expended: 48 The funds appropriated to this budget unit are earmarked for the development of a park system in the Oakley area. With favorable climatic conditions, the major part of the construction project should be completed prior to the end of the fiscal year.. REVENUES: Budgeted $41,500 Percent Received: 87 The revenue consists of a balance of funds transferred from former County Service Area LIB-II and State grant funds, all of which will be spent. * Budget Unit 0790 - Notes and Warrants Interest EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $4,686,010 Percent Expended: 41 The low amount of expenditure to date is because a large loan payment is to be made in the fourth quarter. Even with this payment, it is anticipated that a portion of the budgeted amount will not be spent in this budget unit by the end of the year. NON-GENERAL FUND * Budget Unit 0007 - Federal Revenue Sharing REVENUES: Budgeted $3,719,100 Percent Received: 63 .8 Revenues appear to be lower than a straight line projection because the County has not yet received its third-quarter payment. Due to the Gramm-Rudman deficit reduction plan, payment for the fourth quarter is expected to be reduced by 17.20. All anticipated revenues have been appropriated to General Assistance, and to offset revenue losses from the veto related to the reimbursement of expenses related to the supplemental roll. r -26- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0008 - County Library Taxes REVENUES: Budgeted $5,934,850 Percent Received: 95 The receipt of revenues for this budget unit appears to be ahead of expectafi ions. However, the amount received to date reflects the fact that the largest single element of property tax revenues has been credited to the Library. The other elements of the property tax revenues will be credited throughout the year as they ate realized. Property tax revenues are not subject to straight line projections. It is anticipated that revenues will be short of the budgeted amount by approximately $76,500 due to adjustments and errors in the estimat- ed amounts of the various categories of property taxes.The Library has developed as plan to balance the Library budget by the end of the fiscal year by reducing expenditures to offset the revenue reduction. * Budget Unit 0113 - Plant Acquisition - Library Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $155,533 Percent Expended: 54 Expenditures in this budget unit are for various capital projects for which funds have been accumulated year-to-year. Expenses are recorded as projects proceed. Projections are that most of the available appropriations will be expended by year end. * Budget Unit 0117 - Los Medanos Capital Project - State EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $ 0 Percent Expended: 0 The current financial report indicates a negative expenditure for this unit. The report will be corrected to a zero amount by year-end. There has been no activity in this budget unit for 1985-1986 . * Budget Unit 0118 - Los Medanos Capital Project - County EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $58,719 Percent Expended:' 403 The indicated overexpenditure is a result of delayed receipt of revenue from the State and charges included here that were attribut- able to the Hospital operational budget. The projection is a net overrun on the project of $50,000 which will be covered by internal adjustments within the Hospital budget. No further charges will be made to this budget unit this fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0119 - Criminal Justice Facilities Construction Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $1,170,457 Percent Expended: 4 T_ The funds allocated to this budget are for criminal justice projects for which planning is currently underway. Expenditures will increase later in the year as the projects proceed to construction bids. -27- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0119 - Criminal Justice Facilities Construction Fund (Continued) REVENUES: Budgeted $610,000 Percent Received: 90 The revenues from the court fines credited to this account are ahead of projections. Increased court activity and interest earnings on unspent funds have contributed to the favorable experience. * Budget Unit 0120 - Plant Acquisition - San Crainte Drainage Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $47,663 Percent Expended: 40 The expenditure level represents final engineering activity on one drainage line and work has not been initiated on additional lines this fiscal year. REVENUES,: Budgeted $3,500 Percent Received: 66 Revenues are derived from drainage fees charged to developers and from interest earnings on the fund. Lower interest earnings have. resulted in the under-realization of revenues to date. * Budget Unit 0122 - Courthouse Construction Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $848,798 Percent Expended: 34 Funds budgeted in this account are being used for design of the Superior Court Annex and represent those architectural fees. The expenditures do not follow a straight line projection in this account. A large progress payment on the design work will be made near year as the project goes to bid. REVENUES: Budgeted $450,000 Percent Received: 98 The higher revenue percentage represents increased court activity and conservative budget estimates as well as interest earnings on unspent funds. * Budget Unit 0124 - East County Airport-Capital Project EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $33,950 Percent Expended: 71 The expenditures are a result of the continuation of the study activi- ty for the East County Airport Project. No new funds were added for 1985-1986. REVENUES: Budgeted $33,950 Percent Received: 57 r Revenues are State reimbursed based upon expenditures and claiming. No new revenues were budgeted for 1985-1986. -28- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0125 - Buchanan Airport Improvement Project EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $1,436,510 Percent Expended: 32 Expenditures for this budget are for a variety of improvements to the airport. Funding is 90% Federal and 10% Airport Enterprise Fund. The expenditure level indicates the progress on the various improvements. REVENUES: Budgeted $1,436,510 Percent Received: 27 Revenues from federal grants for the airport projects are received only after expenditures are incurred. Revenues realized this. fiscal year reflect claims for prior year activity as well as for current projects. Revenues will increase as projects proceed further into construction later in the year. * Budget Unit 0236 - Court Records Automation EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $31,066 Percent Expended: 0 This budget unit was created from an additional $1 filing fee, author- ized by the Board for collection January 1, 1984. Funds have been accumulating since then for the purchase of an automated civil system for the Municipal Courts. Expenditures from this fund will occur when sufficient revenue is available for the purchase of a system. * Budget Unit 0237 - Clerk Records Automation EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $45,731 Percent Expended: 60.4 Funds are being conserved in anticipation of the purchase of a soft- ware program that will automate the Superior Court calendar. If the purchase is made, all available resources from this budget unit would be applied to the purchase. REVENUES: Budgeted $22,000 Percent Received: 72.9 Revenues are being realized slightly under the budgeted amount because of a lower volume of court filings than anticipated during budget formulation. * Budget Unit 0256 - Criminalistics Laboratory REVENUES: Budgeted $4,900 Percent Received: 124 This program is supported entirely by fines from Health and Safety , Code Section 11372. 5 convictions (substance abuse) . Monies may only be used for training of criminalists in the crime Laboratory or c related equipment. -29- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0256 Criminalistics Laboratory (Continued) Revenue for this budget should exceed the allocation. If not used this year, it will be encumbered and carried forward. * : Budget Unit 0353 - Recorder Micrographics/Modernization EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $245,781 Percent Expended: 100 Funds appear to be fully expended, however, an appropriation adjust ment was recently approved for nearly $200,000. It is anticipated that all amounts budgeted will be expended by the end of the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $242,479 Percent Received: 203.8 Revenues were projected at a much higher level than the budgeted amount, but were not budgeted at the higher level since the additional revenues were not anticipated to be spent this year. The actual revenues expectation for this budget unit is $675,000. Revenues received above the amount budgeted will remain in this fund and be appropriated as necessary. * Budget Unit 0531 - General Revenue Sharing EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $4,941,064 Percent Expended: 88 General Revenue Sharing provides assistance to qualified individuals ineligible for any other Federal and/or State funded categorical programs. Expenditures reflect ten months ( 830) of the fiscal year. Although caseload has increased by 6 .8% since February 1985, and the average individual cost per case has increased from $161.75 to $198 .92, the Department estimates the net County cost will be below budget by approximately $70,000. Due to the seasonal nature of the caseloads, a decrease during the next quarter is anticipated. * Budget Unit 0540 - Health Services - Hospital Enterprise REVENUES: Budgeted $53,758,693 -- Percent Received: 70 At this point in the year, revenues for this budget unit are running slightly below the budgeted level. The major cause of this is a lag of transfer of Hospital Subsidy funds from Budget Unit 0465 to this budget unit. In general, however, it is projected that revenues will be below the budgeted level. This reflects a lower than anticipated average daily inpatient census and decreased revenue from Medi-Care and private pay patients. -30- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0585 - Domestic Violence Victim Assistance EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $90,707 Percent Expended: 83 . Expenditures appear high because full year administrative costs were charged this quarter. REVENUES: Budgeted $80,750 Percent Received: 72 Revenue appears somewhat under-realized. Revenue from this funding source increases in the spring months when more marriages occur. * -Budget Unit 0620 - County Library REVENUES: Budgeted $612,897 Percent Received: 99 Revenues appear to be ahead of expectations because most of the large revenue elements have been credited to the Library. Thus the total amount of revenues are expected to be approximately equal to the budgeted amount by the end of the fiscal year. However, it is pro- jected that actual revenues will exceed the budgeted amount by about $33 ,000. This excess will help offset the shortfall in Library property tax revenues. * Budget Unit 0662 - Road Construction - Road Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $5 ,029,972 Percent Expended: 23 Expenditures in this budget unit are seasonal, reflecting the fact that the major road projects are undertaken during the Spring and Summer months. Expenditures will increase significantly during the latter part of the fiscal year. Expenditures will approach the budgeted amounts by the end of the year. * Budget Unit 0672 - Road Maintenance - Road Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $8,928 ,143 Percent Expended: 59 Expenditures in this budget unit are used to provide maintenance for County road system. The last quarter of the fiscal year is typically a period of high activity for road maintenance. Therefore, expendi- tures are expected to reach budgeted amounts by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0673 —Delta Ferry Subsidy - Road Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $100,000 Percent Expended: 58 Expenditures to date reflect some one-time costs for ferry slip repair work. It is fully anticipated that total annual expenditures will remain within the budgeted amount. -31- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0673- Delta Ferry Subsidy - Road Fund (Continued) REVENUES: Budgeted $43,000 Percent Received: 0 Revenuek, for this budget unit consists of County property taxes col- lected within the M-1 Service Area. These tax .revenues will be credited to this budget unit late in the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0674 - Miscellaneous Property - Road Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted. $81,827 Percent Expended: 54 Included in expected expenditures are funds earmarked for construction of a corporation yard site. This construction is slightly behind . schedule, it is anticipated that this condition could cause a carry forward to the next fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $73,500 Percent Received: 94 Revenues are derived from rental income on County-owned structures which lie within County right-of-ways. Revenues have increased during the year as rental income is higher than projected. * Budget Unit 0676 - General Road Planning - Administration - Road Fund EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $1,291,848 Percent Expended: 63 Expenditures are running under target levels, however, the addition of new computer equipment has not yet been added to expenditure amount. However, it is anticipated that there may be a slight under expenditure in this unit. REVENUES: Budgeted $166,600 Percent Received: 19 Revenues include abandonment request fees and reimbursement for staff work associated with the development of fee benefit areas and other project development. Additional revenues will be realized as costs are accumulated and charged against the available revenue sources. * Budget Unit 0841 - Buchanan Field Airport REVENUES: Budgeted $776,690 Percent Received: 100+ Increased usage of airport facilities and development of airport property is resulting in increased revenues. It is anticipated that total revenues for the fiscal year will significantly exceed the budgeted amount. -32- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0842 - Airport - Special Aviation EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $118,960 Percent Expended: 25 This budget unit provides for a special airport and aviation projects, including the repair or replacement of capital improvements. The planned major projects for this year have just started so that there will be. a marked increase of expenditures in the last quarter of the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $99,940 Percent Received: 99 Budgeted revenue consists of a State allocation for capital projects at Buchanan Field Airport. The State allocation was received during the first half of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0843 - Airport Fixed Assets EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $161,700 Percent Expended: 17 This budget unit provides for the purchase of fixed assets and capital improvements required at Buchanan Field Airport. There are several major improvement projects scheduled for this year. Expenditures will increase as the projects are completed. It is anticipated that construction will occur during the Spring and early Summer months. It is anticipated that most, if not all, of these funds will be spent by the end of the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $140,000 Percent Received: 0 This budget unit is funded via the transfer of money from Budget Unit 0841 - Buchanan Field Airport. All of the budgeted expenditures are funded with available money within the Airport Enterprise Fund. * Budget Unit 0853 - Hospital Fixed Assets EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $779, 572 Percent Expended: 58 This budget unit funds major building maintenance and equipment for Merrithew Memorial Hospital and outpatient clinics. The expenditures in this budget unit are not expended on a straight-line basis, but rather, according to need and departmental priorities. Beginning this fiscal year, principal payments on capitalized equipment leases are now being shown in this budget unit also. On an annualized basis, it is anticipated that expenditures will exceed the budgeted level. REVENUES: Budgeted $779,572 Percent Received: 9 The major source of revenue to this Enterprise Fund budget unit comes from Budget Unit 0465 - Hospital Subsidy. The underrealization of revenues to date reflects the fact that transfers from Budget Unit 0465 to this budget unit have not yet been made. -33- ATTACHMENT I 1985-1986 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT * Budget Unit 0860 — Contra Costa Health Plan REVENUES: Budgeted $20,887,957 Percent Received: 73 Year-toTdate revenues are just slightly .behind the budgeted. level.. For the total fiscal year, it is projected that revenues will be close to but maybe slightly below, the budgeted level. * Budget Unit 0863 - Health Plan Fixed Assets EXPENDITURES: Budgeted $100,850 Percent Expended: 82 Expenditures for this budget unit are for the purchase of fixed assets related to administration of the Contra Costa County Health Plan. To date, expenditures are running just slightly ahead of the budgeted level but are anticipated to be within the budgeted amount for the fiscal year. REVENUES: Budgeted $100,850 Percent Received: 0 The revenue to this budget unit is part of the County subsidy to the Health Plan. It is expected to be transferred by journal entry by the end of the fiscal year. * Budget Unit 0997 - Contingency Reserve - Airport EXPENDITURES: Budgeted. $ 0 Percent Expended: 0 Expenditures are made within this unit only in the event of unantici- pated emergency requirements. REVENUES: Budgeted $41,210 Percent Received: 100 The revenue in this budget unit actually consists of Airport Enter- prise Funds not required to meet ongoing operating needs. These funds are being held in reserve and will be expended only as required to meet emergency needs. r -34- a� DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE DATA Departments were requested to submit data which -measures performance of major activities. Also, departments were requested to submit comparison data with comparable departments in other counties and if not available, comparison data from prior time periods. CAO staff discussed this request with the staff of each department and gained a consensus on what data should be compiled. Of the 29 departments, 26 submitted data and 3 departments did not. Those departments not submitting data were the Superior Court, Marshal and Community Services. The data submitted are attached and are summarized in the table on the next several pages. Not all the data were included in the summary, either because the information was judged not to measure performance or because the department submitted more than enough data for a fair ,representation of performance. Note that the summary lists the data by department and performance indicator, and divides the. data into two groups: Comparisons to other counties and comparison to other time periods. A total of 87 perfor- mance indicators are presented. Of the 87, 49 involve comparisons with other counties, national • standards, and other Contra Costa County departments. The remaining 38 consist of comparisons with other time periods. Contra Costa Departments ranked very high relative to other counties. Essentially, comparison counties were selected on the. basis of their scope and similarity of services to Contra Costa County. Below is a frequency distribution of how our departments fared against depart- ments from other counties. Ranking to Number of Percent of Cumulative Other Counties Indicators Total Percent First 11 240 240 Top 10% 4 9% 330 11-250 12 270 60% 26-33% 4 9% 69% 34-50% 11 24% 93% Below 500 3 7% 100% As can be seen, Contra Costa County departments placed first on 41 performance indicators constituting 24% of the total indicators in this group. Moreover, our departments placed in the top 25% of counties compared with 60% of the indicators. -35- • Similarly, a review of data which compares performance over different time periods indicates that our County departments are improving in efficiency. Improvements such as greater work units per staff, less time to complete tasks and increased employee productive time are reflected in the data. Time periods are varied and were selected on the basis of data availability and utility to the performance indica- tor. An outline of the results in presented below. Performance Rating Number of Indicators Percent of Total Better than in 26 680 past periods. Worse than in 8 210 past periods. Unknown* 4 11% As can be seen, department performance is improving in recent time periods over past periods since positive changes occurred with 680 of the indicators while negative changes occurred with 210 of the indica- tors. t *Due to fluctuations in data over a short period of time, changes in performance could not be determined. -36- .o to to 00 00 00 rn rn rn In w w p m aroi p �+ CYJ 0 ry, �, Qi >1 C: w 0 p 0 0 0 o 0 co 04 ro r+ ro •r-4 a,Lt) V0 V0 cd E-4 o. a) •.� tv •.i a) •.� c- p 41 4-) +j r. aro) co aro) ro aro) w o 0 � 0 � 0 � to CL) 4J +J 4 rj O N O 0- O w w UJ O to (n d 4J —4 d N a) a) a) (1) d A 9 y 41 U) 4-J :J 4-1 :1 4-J U) 4J :J 4-) m U A 00 0) a) or. o W9 or. 0) to o 1 ljc: :1 4 :3 :1 10 00 W rA U oa O w O +-) O 4J O 0a 0 +J O 0a zU p •14 u •,-1 U to u cn U -H U w u r-+ w A. N Zd 4 � � � .[ 00 r. 00 Iz00 .O o O4J fir.'. 44 a 4-1 •°r1°4-1 °ri°LH fir..': 44 b�10 4-a b � O LJ O N O N O r`r. 0 O N O `t,' O M O W P4 W P. F-4 d v • U Ca P 00 00 ON O O O 1-4 1-1 N M � Cd d4) T d to Ln to Ln to Ln Ln M a � w A W O >4 b b N 4). +J a) u U: O W cU A. b to >4 a) N a) O H N `n aa o. r 0 p v ;j a w a O td (1) rA to b (1) a) r-4 (1) d >+ En •I, Ul w 4-1 a. cd •r1 (1) b U a) .-, r-1 a) +) Cd +J :J m O > q d 1~ ri U 14 » p GL I~ U O O b a) cd U) 4-1 to :J a) cd cd •rl a) rC •r-I O b rg U) O 4-1 cd W GL >% w i4 rd 0 +) 4 b r1 GL o a`4 ro s~ i4 P, I~ to' U :j G b t`+ E •d U) a o ro H H o PL N O cd s~ tU UJ •rl >4 4-4 N r--1 41 ri 3 W ,C: U, ro a.j:� CO a a (1) o N W -1 m +) N W w w m U) O 1-1 (/1 p a ri 0 4J U r-1 E4 u a) +-) G C: +J &Q b •11 a) r--) a) )a P G 0 a ro r--I A +J GL •r1 0 1-- +-1 a) 4-J U cd U (n d O o 0 U) o W ro 1~ 4-J U) oa•ri +J cd •r1 r •r1 -4 p X. U) :--I O 1~ i-1 Cd $4 U) b N •ri U) rA, 4-) 4-1 rA 4-1 r-1 a-) P r-I U cd >-, >4 —i a) (1) I~ a) a) •r-+ a) •r1 44 A 4-4 ro 9 :j (1) o u p cd a) o a s a cd a 3 > +J U O d o U z cc P4 a d +1 a a, 4-1 �.1 Cl) o P4 .-1 N cr1 to 4J n o0 tT .-4 u, a� U ) t ar ani 4)) r-•t O N p u Cd 41 t i4 r b A Q d d 0 00 cd cn cn 00 00 a) 00 00 00 N ON ON rn ON ON r-I m r-, cd oo w 1 t � r Ch a cd O 0 1~ 00 00 U ,-4 •r+ Ca +J rq (1) •rl a) ri c 1 cn N 00 v cd cd Cl) >, >, ko cn 00 00 rn o >, 0 a) 0 >, >1 >1 00 00 ON cd 'A o -,i aJ >, +J >, > t~ 4J H 4-J $4 JJ u) m ON 1-4 4J 4J P -r4 rl •r1 cd H O -11 O •rc 00 1-4 —4 1~ G 0 -P p 41 p ++ .� .0 •r+ +) -H 4J 1 o a) cd a w0 o 0 oU aJ 1~ P a p 9 � r � >-I 4-JU .0 o cd •11 cd •r., cd a cd a cd 00 00 F=4 a.., U2 0 :J $4 :J p b %0 :j :j :j rn N N •rq v' a d' a o.00 d"d C C7'r-c 0-u') r. 0 a cn P4 P P4 o a) ca G cd A a) w cd 0 cd A cd r. 4-J 1~ +) G cd �4 U .r. d cd N M 3 N ca (1) cd (1) cd 41 cd {J cd (1) rd 4J Ca 4 Ca rill O Ca .O Ca 4 C+ r1~ . N 4 N .9.1 C+ a) ul (1) •r4 t d � •H o H 4J U A O : M o W v 3 M U cd C+ r A O a0 o 4-) p � O U O cyl O W a w P. a d 0 ko E-4 Lnr • 00 00,0 w � Ln n o 0 o ri N M T w (L) LI) U') Ln %o .o .o ko %0 ) 0 P4 Pi w A Ln •d 00 N ON O 4 Ca cd o � En 0 0 0 o a �,4J q o Ti W U U a••, H •r1 T7 .D a) .o L1 a) U 0 al 0) 41 +J Ti O w 00 00 Ca b 4 J E+ V) O O U U qri) q T7 1 1 O Ca U) r. rl C!) N q +J E; a) a) cd m O :j c0 Ln O V ul W -4 W cd •H G. " O a) -r.1 .Q 00 00 •r•i U 4) -J Ca .o C+ m +-1 uJ (A NU) U JJ ON O� 4-J0 q o cd w 4J p 1~ 0 >� aJ O U1:1 —4 -f U 4 O cn 0 +.) > 0 o x •14 •14 o •r1 Ca cd 4-J cd +J Ca rn cd •r1 G1. bA JJ C., r1 cH •r.{ >+ >+ W -H a N 0 U a) 0 .,-j0 >, o, Ca W 3 w W cn 3u o -r+ U rn r-j b U) S *-+ (1) r- of m -r•1 H cd o u cd b (1) 1~ dJ ;j (1) •rl (1) —1 a O +1 U) p O +1 U) Ti Ca b Z p o d 0 �4 0 cd >,� 0 o cd +j o aJ cd +J C: a 4-+ 1~ H r-f :1 w :j > w T1 0 •d p w •,a w o w cn O a) o a) U) 4J O 4-i {J • 1 41 --1 a) O +-J a) N Ti 0) 00 Ca Oa 0 4-J U U E-, o -r+ +1 0 0 a 0 a cd a) r-+ a U) 0 4-J-4 Ej cd o � CO cd U Ti U >1 Ca E; w N U >, r-4 4J V) w r1 4-) •r1 0 M cd W O 1~ 0 O cd a) w cn (1) •rc O cd p w cd cd Ca b Ca O b cd O r. r1 a) T) H p C-, (1) r-I .-4 �+ cd U G1. Ca cd p GL U Ca U cd x C+ +1 G, O GL N )•+ a) aJ a G1, O P. O a) " cd C+ cd U C., cd a) cd D4 C+ E > a) > r� o a > a) P o > 0 O o a) o o d aJ H a x a) a 0 d a d cn z CO O b a, U O Ti as +) a as LH }4 a) ., N C4 7 L 1 llO 9 00 O; O P4 r-, 1-1 1-4 1-4 .-•, .--i .--i O t. �J aJ 4J Cd ® Q 14 C." aJ •r1 a CA p 4J b d) :1 r-A 4J 1~ cd H r•I P, (1) q •ri aPL) ; 0 r O d) O i A d WH c7A Ud a) TA +1 ca > ko .o (1) 00 00 00 >) rn rn m cn A a ko Q 00 •r1 N 00 cd r1 1 O 3•c 0000 N m 00 0 a q y�� + m m z to .O 1 ;J •4 1~ O . + r1 14 N H 00 .t 1~ a) O rn t+ m cd a! U) 1 00 (1) > 3 p a) p cd (1) (1) a) a) a) a) O 00 1-4 (1) $4 N U cd cd cd 1+ - •U cd 4a R) (1) 41 )a O O O (1) I~ 44 .1~ O rC (1) w •r1 ° $4 •r-I i+ •r1 1 t •rl 0 acd O +1 4-) G cd 41 •r1 a) is a) p a) &4 N a) a). o 41 %o o co a a s a s a s *� i~ 00 +1 00 cd 00 ba O O (1) N (1) N a) N rd I p ) s~ •rl C7' a) 1~ I~ r4 Cd H m 4 to Ln •r4 4-1 14" C: H C; r1 C: O a) 41 —4 a) 4 0 . 1 r-I r-1 U) f+" U) 1~ a) I~ v1 �. U .C: +1 3 ba U ri V) cd N cd w td cn cd ° ° x rA ° a � a � �o ca a 4 u a � w O +1 U) +1 :j +°� d o° o ° d A 41 a 0 U ) +1 a1) �U) (11) A O :j ;J •r1 O (1) Ui •r1 a) •r1 U1 O O +1 •r1 a) +1 . 4.1 U >+ U 4-1 O a) � 7 �U , �� N O • U O '� a) A,. OV O rq 4J 04 0 4 C-4 -4U W Pei w a a H v • W (1) ai rn ba >`+ ul %.O 1� 00 m O N -:T Cd a) %.° %° %0 %-O %° %O aw a a w A O W r Cd 10 cd O 0 r 1 a) $4 (1) U O d) ba (1) Tf ba ra s~ : cn O (1) a) •r1 (1) n o n b O +1 u a a P a ba bo cd 'C 10 cn z o U) a) cd r. o r-1 a) a) p z p a) •r.1 0 W (n v) a) vi •r1 U) +1 cd u p u 0,-,1 a m u U) :j ::s :j cd cd > (1) a) (1) 4.1 0 cd z +1 0 o b0 o a) Ia 0 cd r-1 b 1-1 +1 •r.1 W o U) o G C .[ .1~ O ri r-1 O r-1 p v) b0 •r1 O r.1 a) rl +1 4•) a) O a) O O O rl +1 ca 4.) a) a) 10 a) P. cd U) U U 4a U GL 0. H ri 1.1 cd 0 U U I~ U •11 U a) C: U G). r-1 +1 +1 >•c U •r+ •r1 a) —4 .c: rd � -4 aa)) A a`)) cid m cid w. a) a) o a) > > a > cn 1~ rl ca 71 u 0 .0 ri a o o qj >, N a) •d ate) o F-1 a Z •r1 z •r1 44 c1 w „H 4.1 LH O cn cn CO +1 >, a) rA a) a O •ri O rn +1 4./ O O r-1 p a) Cd a) U v > p > v) 10 a) cd cd O a a) cd a) r-i a) :> u cd z a) :1a) o » O p v) c1 +1 •r1 1-+ a ba a) ao•r1 bio p q Ia O p P+ p r[ a) n a) O -r-f U) 1, P a) (1) cd >> cd r_: cd (1) Cd =1 4-4 an 'n (1) r-1 U a) .a p �4 (1) p VI U 11 Ia +1 W 3-1 U GL p a) 41 )4 a) >a a) > (1) A U 4-f O O (1) O a) .,a p. (1) r-1 O a) > a) > O > O o ,1,' ° z 41 z 4-+ z a z -1 0 w > z 04 -te 4-4 p N 1-4 N M O ri W N N N N N N N N N m M $4 a) r O {1 >+ O 4J Cd 41 L) V )-+ 4-J 1~+ 4-1 +1 .4 +1 Cd G •r1 G G Ia O a) O O O rai O A U 6 U U CJ U .0 00 rn ri W � O d o >, > .� o —4 . aJ'P (1) aJ +J P •11 O r-I uJ (1) 4•c r. 1~ Pw d p %0 o 4-J 0 0 P4 00 0 •,•i 0 O'N )4 •r1 d cd E-4 1+ >> > )4 O a) cd r. cd p a 1 Cl). 0 Cd V) 04 O 0 41 t-I •r.1 Ln aJ O N 4-t 0 4-4 � V) � U) � U) 0 O U) d -P 4 o o O a) o a) o a) (1) H 41 U) 4-1 U) a-J UJ (n •r1 H H a-J 4-1 •r1 d 0 a-) (1) U) a). U) N a 1 O a 1 41 a..1 41 ;J a 1 :j V) m 41 -r-I A o U) •, a) • a) •r1 V) •H uJ >~ V) M o a) d) 0 U) O N a-J J~ a-) >~ +J a) 41 d O a) r1 ,J~ :j W -r-I U 3 bA 0 b0 1~ S 0 3 0 ,1: 0 $ 0 41 +•J ba o u p O r+ :1 _4 :j o ;j 0 U O U 0 U U) q •r1 U Cd �+ r-I o r[ o lc~ o 1-4 O r-1 r-I r-•I a) 0 4 L1. a) U U U U M %O %0 J1. O u1 0 4-1 a 1 N )4 N )4 N 1 a 1 N ~., 44 $J 4-1 $4 4-1 r1 0 4-1 O 0 O Jn .-I M 1 M . 4 -ct —4 N O Cl) O M O xi ul N O W a a a) a) o • 04 a) -t - n r- n 00 N N N N N. M �, (d' a)' t\ tr\ t` t\ 00 00 00 00 00 00 1' w y, P4 p4 w W 1~ 'd 4J O. a) a) a) s~ U. p >1 b0 cd ri (1). � � L z 0 Gl, U) 0� a) 0 T 1-1 a-) 411 a) ! p ca o a). O +J a 1 )4 + J)4 cd U1 o r-I v) O •r1 a) 4-1. u), )4 4-4 :j d (L) d a) w 0 44 ai cd V) i4 4a uJ T a3 0 O a a a`4 )4 U •r1 U) a) (1) V) 0 cn W 41 Cl) 4-1 41 41 GJ, 4I •,A •d 14 r-I ,S4 (1) pl d) r--1 p >e Cd p •d U U) U d U) $4 > 0 (1) U w Ei p >4 a :j 0 U a) •r1 (1) •r1 a) a) (1) cd )4 41 x •r1 O r1 (1) a E o ri •r1 .n p p U) $4 s~ > U1 ;:l (1) m p 4 3 +J .x Ei o 4 04 b (1) a-Jcd 41 vd ba 0 cd ' (n o a) p . ra 0 a cn U En rf -,-A U U) U 3 > N a) 0 04 Cl) 4 H a•J •11 M r-I U > 3 4H 0 > •d A p r•1 A m r-1 p p cd 4-4 O 4-1 •r1 •r.1 O 4 •r1 ,--1 d (1) (1) :j cd cd cd (1) (1) •r1 O 41 O > 41 CO (n 4J cd U ba r. 0 G >, I~ a a•d N U U p U +1 C: cd p 41 U H +J m •ri 0 0 4-1 0 a) ;j •r1 a) 41 0 •rJ cd p .y :1 Ed a) 0 a•1 41 41 •r1 4-4 -r-I U1 •d > n 1~ til 04 a) +J a �4 •r, a V) •r•1 U) U) u1 41 cd aJ 0 p r-I o U1 0 d Cl) A a Q ca v �° u u a U) )x a 11 1� u0i z a, w .� 44 s4 00 O� O 1 N P4 M M M M M M ul O U H > En )4 41 U) $4 )4 )4 41 •r1 rL r 0 to 41 G cd p A J0 U A6 C07 x (1) a) rd rd ci N) rn a() rn p rn v (L) O O 0 > 4-J O 1-1 1-1 r-1 —4 bo r4 •r1 -ri •rq (1) v) •rl u) M $4 UJ f4 W $4 -1 fa m P. cn p In 14 If) f4 •d r-1 d) r-10) r-1 d) •14 r-1 () 00 cd oo cd 00 ca O a) a a) a (1) P, 4 44 (1) a rn (1) rn d rn d) aJ N a) N ri (1) 4 0 q Co 4 . . (1) r-1 aJ -4 41 rl aJ O cd ,--I 41 f4 f4 f4 f4 f4 f4 0 a0 0 C: Iz En a ca ca cd cd cd cd 0 to o 00 0 00 0 aJ J.' bo 0 (1) rd d) b N rd U) (1) C 0 V. E; r. 5 (L) 41 1~ 0 7, 0 y, 0 0 •,i . •rl •rl .ra Cl) f4 A •ra d) (1) a) f4 •r+ 4-1 x 4-j x 4-1 9 f4 (1) 0 aJ X 1-4 $4 r-I f4 r--1 Cd H cd •ri ca •ri cd •ra 4 .1. E . cd -4 cd cd ca cd cd cd P, :j U) 0 rA :j rn aJ oo :j U b U rd y v U E; f4 4-1 4J aJ H d) a, t~ P P O a) U 14 U $4 U f4 aJ rC a) U $a a) a) G a) 0 U , O N :j Cl) ;j (1) m f4 O (1) r4 cd -4 ca r-1 ca 41 r-1 > r-1 .> r-I > co m a —i > ca 9 cd A. cd 4 01 fs4 O W O W O ,.7 -4 4J W O U +J V 41 U 41 a1 U) 41 En :j A ai O N o rG 4J U rj U f4 O U •, CO f4 r 1 co s~ U lid a a) O U O N O. 7 � W a • a 1 Oo fa -.11 In %° 00 .--1 ca N 00 00 00 00 00 ON O` ON ON D\ a a) P4 PO w ao A rq W En O a) f4 > :j a) • P 4••1 4JJ • 4 U ,--I E"„ 41 W O cd 71 cd •rI U) 4 b U aJ U) O f4 4J b Cl) > p a, O p •r1 a) O f-1 .xi P � f° Ic.1 U O caPE. U 4-1 . LL U on O f4 fa Ei uJ a U •,1 a) O r-, M O $4 P J a 4 ) $4 a) a) • 4 Q x $4 O bo•,I a) r+ cd o. :J P. a) a) p r-1 •r1 a) a) 4J f4 fa G 4J P. r-c U O a-, T a) .Q r 4 > r-1 P. N Cl) •H •rl •r, •ri U1 .J:� (n :1 O a :J U •rl 0) a, p P, r-i v) M 4-4 b 9, >, U -1 P. 4-1 4-1 m U) rl O P ca 4) Cdcd v) 4-) U r. I~ O b c+-1 P, O a) H b > rtl f4 i4 I~ P a) O U 1~ (1) ra V) •r4 f4 a) (1) O (1) b •ri aJ b —4 4J cd N aJ 4-1 4J O aJ 4-1 •rl O aJ (1) a) cd (1) cd •11 U U U P 4-1 4 q aJ f4 O U bo � on r-I aJ •rl (n 9 N :j N 41 0 UJ cd " f4 d) CO aJ cd 0 f-- U O r q cd H b •ra f4 -1 O p P., ri P. f4 p -r-I p U oo•ra P. R) a, O aJ P cd U O 41 f4 > U1 P (1) (1) f4 •rc b M aJ cd f4 co O a) I~ O :j (1) O 00 > t~ > -4 Q) :jr+ O O w P. P4 w .c o a w -H ,c ca U :3: •r-, A E-c LH p d) r 41 r--1 N m N 41 r+~ U f4 •a N f4 41 -4 cd U 4-1 ni cd f>4 L] P ; a) a) a) •rt P O A wcn .ate Lr) ui un 00 00 00 in rn m m 00 wM rn K44 (n w q C 0 td a Cd N .14 a) •rc a) -r1 (1) a) o ° 4-J P .0 4-J P >i $4 +� �+ H O rj O •r1 0 +J o as a $+ r. ;~ 1~ p 4 � wa) � a : a ; a Cd •r1 v+n v to V cn :J cn Cd H N r. $4 Q 3-1 r r. o1w C r. Cd r. vU a) ) a U 10 (1). cd a) cd N cd rn cd +- x px �+ �r. (1) x O +-J 041 04-J a4-J •d v 10 •d Cd Cd as as U) -P m rn •d m •d m •d . cn •d 44 +J m oQ) :j (1) b0 10 10 •d 1~ o :jW 6 4-) •r4 o •*-1 a) cd (1) ca (1) cd (1) cd o —1 H +) 4-J a) 4J N +) (1) +J . N 4J 4-J u) +J 6 >~ z +) z U U) U v) U cn U U) v) N 4J s~ q o :j an d k m x x a) •rA cn d to O (1) o WT--i W +-1 Wr-I Wr-I X 4.J a) o U i�1U U 1 Uo 7, r. >1r r r. •, O cd i•+ r-1 r-a 41 O +J O 4-J O 4-1 O 1� O -4 N Q4 (1) 4 •,i 0r.4 Z •+-c d •H U � 0 .o til 4J ;l 4-J :J 4J :j +-) 10 0 41 Z 44 O cd O ca O cd O cd $4 N 4-J 4-1 O U O N O U ,7, U Z U 7 U Z m 1-4 cr) O W a a 44 a, E-c U Z � bo �+ �o cl I- tl t- ON ON ON O O N cd (1) ON ON ON (O\ O% ON ON O) O� O O PL4 4-4 a a W � q —1 cn m r. M W O a) a) O cd u) •,A 4J +J r 1 is 4� N +J cd cd •d +J 4-3 M o d 41 41 •r1 4J a ca ; ( V' a°)i a °� aar.) Wr. cd a r-4 q Oo U m a) O bo 0 Q O q cid d G (1) a r-i 0 U O O (1) (1) w a �1 •H O U a•r1 a) -4 -4 •rc 00 a (1) 44 O 4J 4-) o b 5 z p a a r-1 • cd a o Id 41 •14 is r-1 a) •,A U a) 34-J a) Cd :S w a a) � � a� 4-1 r-1 En p to U P 41 44 )•.1 O (1) a1 (1) ::l r. a)r., —4 U cd m o 4.) —1 41 +1 P $4 ba -P T7 O o d (1) +J 1~ U) 4J >~ 0 cd cd 1~ co -r-I )a q W to O •d (1) bo cd N (1) 4-4 4J $4 a) +-1 a) H rn H w bo 1~ U 4-4 •+-1 rl r-A a (L) E 4-4 cd 1~ a 44 d (1) +J cd cd •rq •4 44 � r-I a) a) > (1) o bo d a) O O 0) cd O +3 +) 4-4 cd U U 3 co U •ri N cn U r-I >, U W 1~ (1) •r+ +J cd +J to r. o +J o ri 4-1 a) r-4 u) cn . +J O 41 1-1 a) v) cd a] Id —4 cd .-1 r-1 4a 1-4 U a m r-I 41 -4 r-I r-1 a .o a) p a) 4.J Ua P4 Cd cd p Cdp ;j :j : a :j > a) m a6 � 10 i 10 n � vo 4-4 (1) o a U U a > w z 4a p (1) M O` O . 1 N M a Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 10 .o %0 .o t•.1 4J rn 41 V4 a) N a) O i-1 O cd U cd W ul ra p •4 O a) a) w O $4 P, a P4 a a) a m 41 m A m .9 4- a) 4 p » W L oa s4 (L) 7 00 —I 3 to a � U) N O •r4 m 00 is N N a) -4 N ro ,-I m In N ba .71 O 4 a). (a m w rn p � s•+ oa U � p >, m a cn (1) cn Ln cd Ln Ln p +J •r1 q 00 41 .00 (1) 00 •d 00 m cn -.7 i+ •,i • I U) I >, I I a) O cd H -1 m _ZT d4-J d T U 0 o � � w � w a ° 41wa cn 4a O a) O 4-+ w In 0 A w aa) ) 4-) m `� cin (L) +J a1) A O :3 (1) •H In Cl) 44 a) —4 cn Ej to O A +) a) •r1 O to .0 a) 41 w •*i U o0 3 +) a) 00 I~ 3 p U p -4 O t~ .0 .14 •r1 :j O m a ad) A 0 r-4U o ami 0 1-104 O � 4-J N � U O O I~ 00 !~ O U O crl —4 cn Oti r 7 U N In N 00 W a w P, 04 E-+ U a) a) 00 )-I N M M 7 .7 -4r .7 to (Y) Cd (1) o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � a 44 .-1 .-4 —4 1-1 r-1 .-i . � .-4 1-1 .4 1 P4 a°), w A w O W cn a U 1-+ >4 m O .-A 4-1 m (1) O p +1 4-1 O v a) U m +) a v 41 a) G 4-31.4 s cn ro � � cn En civ a .1-+ ca V) o Cl) a) a O O p •ra (n m rl (1) 4-I O .0 a w (L) r-I a) a a H a) O +J on+1 Cd (1) m U m a p a m cv •rl U > = • 1 a a) :j b m 4-J m G rn 3 •r1 :j O > •r1 b U cn (1) r-I u) —4 P O � v *,•r1 i•+ U m •11 r1 m )-I A, .14 a) •r1 to 4J a) •r-1 +J D (1) ro •r1 O m +J +J (L) - H 4-4 cd In G ca 3-1 v) a p C: ro .-1 cd � Q cn O oU ;j bo a) m .a, m m >, y, » m )-1 m (1) a) •r1 (1) 5 -4 In U � Iv Iv a) a) a) a) a) Fj a) U s� 41 ma.., � �, � 0 oa a 4-4 U r-I +I T I~ a) (n m +1 m +) 4-J m �4 q a) p m cn O p >4 O cd .o a) p � a) -4 r-4 a) O O 10O >4 4-J b m x m r-I a a) :j > ::1 :1 In 4J I-1 In +J a) U) m a) U0 a a H bHdblaw ¢ : 10 z d cd cd O U 14 r. n •U a) 4� N -7 u1 1O M a cc tO .O .O r, En 41 4-1 U b U LH $4 m •r1 A r1 r1 Id a N r-I $4 ra O p 4-4 A a) N $4 Cl) 0 A PI a a A w cn • rd O O •rl 4 a) O ri) (1) cd H a E sa O (1) 41 O 4J 4J ; m 4-1 +-) 4-I 0 m O U) O O O 4.1 :3 O O N M N 4a 4-1 4-1 H 4) 4.) U) 4-1 U) 4-J +J U) Ul 4J +J Ul Ul U) Ul Ul 4) U) 41 O El a) El r. a) (1) 44 U) O 4J (1) 4J N 4-1 (1) A O a) a) U) N M •r1 (1) •rl (1) : r[ •r1 O (1) :j VI •rl El •11 Ul •r-1 Ul O Z •ri (1) -r1 a) +J 4.' }l rc; O b0 4J Ul rC O a) 4) N +J a) 4-j• W 4 V W 4J 34J 3 I~ 00 A b0 u 4 +J a) bo u 3r: 3 0 3 I~ U p -r1 z O >,' O z •r-I : r.4 .L .7 Ul -r-I •rl O :j O :$ O :7 Cd P X! :j r-1 '.j r-I O rC; O ra M O (1) 4J M -A O r-I O r--1 O 04 a) O O U U ri -C3 U r� z ri U U U E 4-. 4 U 10 u rd d rd 41 b0 :j .r~ l~ -z ro O 4J -W 0 I:' Cl) M 4-1 4-4 O M r1 O 4-1 4H J-) M 4.J M z M O U O -1 00 N 00 N r 1 M r 1 110 O 1-1 1-I 'S U r, O -,7 .-1 0� —4 N r 1 W P4 w - P. u a) a) b0 1a 00 ON M --T l(1 M 7 ctl M 7 Ln I' Cd a) O O 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-4 d �y X11 4-4 r-I .-1 r-4 .--1 .--1 —4 .--1 1-4 P1 W W A, O V d U 1 A O :+ 4-4 W d >+ m O W (1) 00a) 6 a) a) f: a) A >+ -rl p $4 4-4 .'4 p 14 is d U) •rl P. O• N +1 O O :+ O O O 4-1 : 4 x U .14 is N x 3•+ O 4-1 4-4 44 vl 97 p (1) uJ 4-1 r•+ cd P N (1) :+ O S :3 a) E a 1.4 U O O a. p a. O a, ul vl Ul 34 r4 (L) •r1 O a) cd 3 a) 3 U 3 >1 a) a) a) O O ++ 1-+ •rl -Y. -14 Ul 14 Ul El +1 1.) 4-J 4-J 4J D s~ U +.l 3-1 a) >, cd >1 Cl) W al >1 a) •r1 cd cd cd Cd ; U O x 4-1 +) +l Ul 0 m 4J Ul r-1 4+ 4+ a•+ u 4-1 r-I T cd 3 cd -rl r� -r1 cd 3 cd •r1 cd -r-I •r1 O O C +-) r-1 •r1 r-4 u U 1-1 u .a p $4 t•+ d •> O a) Z •r.4 •r1 -r1 -1 O O O �'. (1) -4 -S4 4-J -ri .o p,p b0 4-J b0 a b0 on p p a•+ H O p a) cd —4 •r1 E •r1 r� •r•1 0 -rl d -14 4+ P w 4 O 4-4 +l r-I ri b0 cd bo r-1 r-I ri bU -r-I r-i a) a) -4 u a) to LH >~ •r1 cd -H 4J •r1 r7 •r1 :7 -rl :j (1) cd U .7 H r1 ra V -I Ul -4 ♦.' .o 0 r-1 �.. $4 N U 9 Ul -rl 1 (1) a) r-I -ri rl a) r1 a cd cd 1 cd 04 c0 .0 ?-1 4-J U W •ri rd 4J 00 4J +J r-i r-1 •rt r-I Tr Ul ;j is A •rl rd i-c O N r: • 1 0 +-1 C+ R1 r-I r-1 'd 1-1 cd O cd W r I a) a) O a) O r-4 O cd O +) O O (1) O +� O V C Pa 6 a) 04 W a U N V U U 10 Ul 4a a) -ZT 00 O a r" n n n n r- 00 00 00 00 00 r 4-1 N � ,q cd rA a7 Ia H r> (1) U p N 4 O (1) A c/l vl M b O 0 •r.1 4-J � s~ a+ 0 cd H a s4 o av 4J O O N N a)4J —4 tR H 41 4� +J 4� +� +j •14 A o O O � O to O O o W •,j U +J U +J U +J 0 a, awiC) (1) CD SON o4 °1°4-4 -4 4-4 r 44 ro U O x 0 x 0 x 0 Pi w a ,-a • E-4 U W (L) d! Ln W 4-4 a P . w A W O ?+ N N r-1 O ani 4J 4- a. v� a at ai �4 cn E Ei O r+ m a) p 4 (1) -4 W v p m a s cd ai :1 m 1-0 a a , U' Q) H 4-1 4a 0 " U O (1) O r--1 O )•i CU a) o. u p T N �+ a mo0 o � o z a) z a z P 4-t �4 Q) 9141 00 00 00 aa) (L) o � :3 U �4 N W to N r-I a) —4 0) P O A H U January 10 , 19db AGRICULTURE DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 • PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS ALAMEDA SANTA CLA:2A SAN MATEO CONTRA COSTA PEST EXCLUSION Total Plant Ship- 73 ,380 13 ,711 14 ,314 7,335 ments Inspected, Rejected, and/or . Certified Total Manhours 6, 653 10, 446 9, 298 3,155 EGG QUALITY CONTROL 100 Egg Samples 1,099 1, 655 166 1 ,104 Inspected (Whse. ) Total Manhours 321 425 54 360 .5 PESTICIDE ENFORCEMENT Restricted Materials 219 398 170 348 • Permits Issued Restricted Materials 12 7 4 33 Permits Denied Pest Control Operators 113 145 62 119 Registered Pest Control Advisers 37 52 15 41 Registered Total Manhours 4, 978 4,.422 2 , 905 5 ,872 PEST DETECTION Total Detection Traps 4 , 040 8 ,000 5 , 540 3 , 977 in Operation Total Manhours 21, 918 29, 662 1313,10 15 ,651 (actual trapping time) x 48 January 10 , 1986 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS ALAMEDA SANTA CLARA SAN MATEO CONTRA COSTA DEVICE INSPECTION Establishments Visited 5 ,828 5 ,559 2 ,793 2 , 518 Devices Tested 10,807 14,259 6,659 5 , 290 Total Manhours 18 ,385 14 ,180 7,330 9 , 479 QUANTITY CONTROL Establishments Visited 791 271 987 1 ,231 Packages Inspected 11,432 271 185,143 70 ,287 Total Manhours 3 ,842 4,142 2 ,350 5 ,544 SALE OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ENFORCEMENT Establishments Visited 1,720 426 277 858 Routine Inspections 3 ,499 1,444 844 845 Total Manhours 5,213 630 554 450, WEIGHMASTER ENFORCEMENT Establishments Visited 0 271 11 3 :Routine Inspections 0 271 0 2 Total Manhours 1 625 163 11 49 • rn ri rn rLo � Lo n °rte' 00 r- ri M r--1 ri -4 N ri e--1 rl U 4- (0 C:) OO ko ko N <L 00 Q- MC'd N FO � n lc ri M N —4 rl N Z `•-i f--1 a N MFDkl: 8 •r N N O r-i :3 O O U g kq .-4 cr6 01 -1N Z 00 E_ �_�"1 r--i �--�1 r-I t•--I ri �E to >- UNU pppp O Ol N .�-1 l0 lD ri p N r1 N ri U Z d o � n Q co ko Q l 0�0 cE r- 01 N Z rl Z t 2� 4 •r U Ar LO 41Q�^1 00 N .--1 •-I .-1 N N N of � 8 � Lf7 M � r N N N w k o 8 LO a 0 o a 4-) U U C C 'a S m U N �) N N 50 ASSESSOR'S DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS V ASSESSMENT ROLL TOTAL AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL YEAR VALUE (IN MILLIONS) PARCELS (EXCLUDING SEASONALS) 1977-78 14,852 210,086 204 )o32 1978-79 16,316 218,636 165 1979-80 17,498 226,718 148 15312 1980-81 18,892 233,980 138 1981-82 21,648 241,207 128 x'11 1982-83 24,453 247,565 119 To 1983-84. 26,719 254,470 136 If ii 1984-85 ' 29,373 261,914 136 " 02� 1985-86 32,341 264,427 141 1986-87 35,740(Est. ) 270,000 (Est. ) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ROLL UNITS PER EMPLOYEE* NUMBER EMPLOYEES ROLL UNITS COUNTY ROLL UNITS ( INCLUDES SEASONALS) PER EMPLOYEE Riverside 481,812 188.0 2,563 Orange 726,791 327.0 2,223 Contra Costa 300,343 142.3 2,111 San Mateo 236,810 119. 7 2,065 Sacramento 344,517 171.4. 2,010 Alameda 414,794 229.0 1,811 Ventura 225,934 139.0 1,625 Fresno 208,11`; 144.2 1,443 ® * 1984-85 fiscaly ear 51 • FUNCTION/ACTIVITY Number of F.T.E. Positions Accounts Payable/Contracts Authorized as of December 31 , Line items (expenditure codes on checks) 1982 11 .5 F.Y. 1982-83 N/A 1983 .11 .5(1 ) 1983-84 N/A 1984 12.5 1984-85 176,319 1985-86 (Est. ) 180,247 Cancellations and Corrections F.Y. 1982-83 N/A 1983-84 N/A 1984-85 4,325 1985-86 (Est. ) 7,637 Encumbrances and Adjustments F.Y. 1982-83 N/A 1983-84 N/A 1984-85 19,236 1985-86 (Est. ) 22,530 Purchase Orders F.Y. 1982-83 17,400 • 1983-84 15,059 1984-85 16,777 Employee Demands F.Y. 1982-83 17,028 1983-84 18,626 1984-85 18,055 - Warrants Issued F.Y. 1982-83 81 ,700 1983-84 72,500 1984-85 80,100 Contracts(2) F.Y. 1982-83 N/A 1983-84 N/A 1984-85 N/A N/A: Not Available (1 ) Position moved from comp. unit (2) Statistics not available but we intend to start accumulating 7/1/86. 52 FUNCTION/ACTIVITY Number of F.T.E. Positions Payroll Authori.zed as of December 31 , Regular P/R Warrants 1982 6 F.Y. 1982-83 89,600 1983 7 1983-84 88,900 1984 8 1984-85 89,600 Manually prepared Warrants Calendar 1983 756 1984 896 1985 808 Advance P/R Warrants F.Y. 1982-83 58,000 1983-84 57,300 1984-85 56,300 Retirement P/R Warrants F.Y. 1982-83 29,000 1983-84 31 ,700 • 1984-85 33,500 53 i FUNCTION/ACTIVITY Number of F.T.E. Positions Accounts Receivable/Central Collections Authorized as of December 31 , General Accounts Receivable 1982 11 1983 11 Invoices 1984 11 F.Y. 1982-83 26,981 1983-84 31 ,180 1984-85 29,646 Receipts F.Y. 1982-83 26,100 1983-84 30,390 1984-85 36,174 Hospital Accounts Receivable Private Pay Receipts F.Y. 1982-83 40,212 1983-84 39,378 1984-85 27,784 Insurance Receipts F.Y. 1982-83 11 ,808 1983-84 12,130 1984-85 5,768 Program Receipts F.Y. 1982-83 125,808 1983-84 108,630 1984-85 102,339 Domestic Relations Unit Checks Issued F.Y. 1982-83 27,731 1983-84 28,802 1984-85 31 ,278 Receipts Processed F.Y. 1982-83 67,483 1983-84 67,579 1984-85 68,874 D-4 Documents Processed F.Y. 1982-83 52,112 1983-84 50,312 .1984-85 70,007 54 FUNCTION/ACTIVITY Number of F.T.E. Positions Taxes-Special Districts Division Authorized as of December 31 , Parcels, Secured Roll 1982 5 F.Y. 1982-83 271 ,192 1983 5(1 ) 1.983-84 263,804 1984 6 1984-85 268,678 Parcels, Unsecured Roll F.Y. 1982-83 42,203 1983-84 44,547 1984-85 45,301 Supplemental Roll Billings F.Y. 1982-83 None 1983-84 8,595 1984-85 32,490 Secured Roll Corrections F.Y. 1982-83 8,270 1.983-84 (Est. ) 8,000, • 1984-85 7,850 Unsecured Roll Corrections F.Y. 1982-83 5,249 1983-84 4,888 1984-85 4,797 Supplemental Tax Corrections F.Y. 1982-83 None 1983-84 ) 622 1984-85 ) Tax Refund Checks Issued F.Y. 1982-83 1 ,472 1983-84 1 ,683 1984-85 4,115 1915 Act Bond Assessments F.Y. 1982-83 N/A 1983-84 7,590 1984-85 7,940 Fixed Amount Levies on Tax Bills (Sewer service charges, etc. ) F.Y. 1982-83 280,630 ® 1983-84 286,948 1984-85 288,152 (1 ) 4 more positions added in F.Y. 1985-86 for supplemental roll . 55 f • Taxes-Special Districts Division (continued) Tax Rate Areas F.Y. 1982-83 1 ,588 1983-84 1 ,786 1984-85 1 ,868 Taxing Agencies �. F.Y. 1982-83 217 1983-84 217 1984-85 209 County .Special Districts F.Y. 1982-83 68 1983-84 66 1984-85 64 Autonomous Special Districts F.Y. 1982-83 214 1983-84 209 1984-85 199 Tax Allocation Factor Changes (due to annexations, etc. ) (1 ) F.Y. 1982-83 N/A • 1983-84 N/A 1984-85 N/A Redevelopment Agencies Projects and Increment Allocations F.Y. 1982-83 33 $15,308,390 1983-84 33 $15,949,939- 1984-85 15,949,9391984-85 37 $16,213,428' Total Secured Tax Levies F.Y. 1982-83 $294,757,661 1983-84 $319,869,578 1984-85 $356,956,194 Total Unsecured Tax Levies F.Y. 1982-83 $13,142,826 1983-84 $12,924,940 1984-85 $14,308,265 (1 ) These require significant labor effort. Therefore we will start ® keeping. statistics on this function. 56 • FUNCTION/ACTIVITY Division of Audits Number of Professional Auditors per 1 ,000 full time authorized positions 1968 1 .75 1974 1 .35 1979 1 .05 1980 1 .04 1981 1 .06 1982 .93 1983 .94 1984 .95 General County Expenditures per Auditor 1982-83 Contra Costa County $50.3 mil . Average of 30 Counties 31 .6 mil . Average of 10 largest Counties 32.7 mil . • Contra Costa was 27th out of 30 counties from which information was available. That is, 26 counties had more auditors per $1 mil . of county expenditure. Data for other years not readily available, although number of Contra Costa auditors has remained constant while staffing size has increased in six counties and decreased in three. 57 • FUNCTION/ACTIVITY Number of F.T.E. Positions Welfare Accounting Section Authorized as of December 31 , t Food Stamp Authorizations Issued 1982 2.5 1983 2.5 Machine prepared 1984 2.5 F.Y. 1982-83 173,799 1983-84 160,784 1984-85 144,399 Typed F.Y. 1982-83 4,969 1983-84 3,440 1984-85 2,876 Welfare Warrants Issued F.Y. 1982-83 358,800 1983-84 357,700 1984-85 356,300 • 58 0 CONTRA . COSTA COUNTY Contra Costa County n BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT RECEIVED FEB 2 51986 Inter - Office Memo Office of Coling administrator TO: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator DATE: -Febr.24, 1986 ` Attn: Gary Brown FROM: R. W. Giese, Director By: L. T. Gunn, Admin. Svcs. Officer///—.A '` SUBJECT: PRODUCTIVITY DATA Reference our discussion concerning the difficulties in providing meaningful comparison data. The problem stems from the various methods used by jurisdictions to count permits, type of inspections performed and valuation tables, etc. , used in compiling data. However, we can provide historical data for our department (see attached printout) . Our policy is to perform all called inspections the next workday. During Sept. 185 - Dec ' 85, we performed 98. 3% of all inspections on the day called, i.e. , of 17,010 sites inspected only 292 were not conducted on the day requested. if you need any further information, please call me. LTG:ads attachment J 59 ; ' ` ' JILfl). INSP PRODUCTIVITY AS OF 02-12-86 AVG DAILY INSPEC AVG� MAN DAYS AVG # AVG # AVG MTHLY CALLS SITES TOTAL AVAILABLE INSPTRS STAFF PERMIlS ISCAL YR 81/82 , 5 11 . G 363. 3 324. 8 17.5 49. 2 1204 Ell 11 . 5 10. 8 320. 9 271 . 3 14. 5 44. 4 1253 B3/84 11 . 9 11 . 2 342. 8 331 17`4 47. 3 1476 B4/85 10. 9 10. 3 381 353. 7 18. 3 48. 1 1651 5/86 * 13' 7 12. 9 382. 7 311 . 2 18. 7 48. 7 1866 JUL/JAN ' � SO . �� tr w r di . M W d C v r � M co r cA 4 `° m rn o co O co -Cs N sn r M a> C') Lo CD cA O x +t-- %.0 M r-- coa M N a> r co v ' o d Qco N -7:) Cl W cn <fr co �. o- cA rn .n (a � ar- co .. a LL' l 0— co to J d coMr v- O G 41 0? U • N N co N D? A-) V- 0 O O cT t- o) 4- .r � N J1 C-- cb .0 D- O O frl r CS O N Ul I— CD 0 O a d Ln O- E tfs G d 1c N O- L- O V- 0 O i O N 6 � 61 ! tL- S- 61 ' � d B. 1986-1987 BUDGET PROCESS Please compare the 1986-1987 budget process thus far with .last year' s 1985-1986 budget process by circling the appropriate responses to each item below. If you are uncertain of a response, please leave the item uncircled. Statements related to one or more items should be written in the "comments" section. Respondents are particularly encouraged to explain ratings of one or five in the "comments" section. Attach additional comments if necessary. 3 <. RATING BUDGET ITEM r BETTER:Z NO CHANGE If WORSEY AVE. 1. CAO communication of expectations for budget i.t X ® 2 'Z-S7 preparation 'T l 2. Data requirements for budget preparation 4 4 6 Z 13 3 . Amount of time necessary to �t S }(s � 7- Z. 11 prepare, budget 'T 4 . Amount of unnecessary data requirements 3- 3 3,OC 5. Deadlines to prepare budget 2 3 6 X 5 -�� • 6 . Track I and Track II 7 ® X S Z Z alternatives 7 . Policy on charging building 0 $X 4 7- 2,Og occupancy costs 8 . CAO staff advice on budget ® X 7 Z Z z-57 preparation 9. CAO staff cooperation in resolving concerns and 5 n 3 3 2.61 problems 10 . CAO fairness in applying budget policies to all 5 X departments 11. . Overall satisfaction with budget process compared to ® v last year 12 . Comments or suggestions on COumAj TaTAL- IN 70 n7Z 'tS" 2.3 Z-67 Moot 0 Av WE= X IVVt-��t15 1 [uI�»►^5 --.ic h-«,btf of s4tflo45 egGk f [Inw• 62 ) A. BOARD AGENDA PROCESS Please compare the current Board agenda process with the prior process by circling the appropriate responses to each • item below. If you are uncertain of a response, please leave the item uncircled. Statements related to one or more items should be written in the "comments" section. Respondents are .particularly encouraged to explain ratings of one or five in the "comments" section. Attach additional comments if necessary. 3 RATING AGENDA ITEM BETTER2. NO. CHANGE L' WORSE AVE. 1. CAO communication of expectations for submitting and reviewing agenda items 2- 2. 2. Information requirements for agenda item preparation 3 ® X 2 2,61 3 . Amount of time necessary to prepare agenda items 2 3 X © 3 3'22 4. Amount of unnecessary 2 © XO 2 6Z information required If 4 5. Opportunity to provide input2 I / Z Z 3.07 to agenda review meetings �h 6. Deadlines to prepare agenda 1,# items X 3 j.65 • 7 . CAO staff advice on agenda q © ZLI items 8 . CAO staff cooperation in resolving concerns and s X 2 2.50 problems 9 . Length of time for CAO review I ® 2. 3 3,00 10 . CAO fairness in applying agenda item policies to all , X 3 2 i Z.69 departments 11 . Impact of agenda item 2,0 process on Board decisions ( 3 X (D b 12 . Overall satisfaction with current Board agenda process Z (51) 3 X © 3 3.1Z compared to the prior. process 13 . Comments or Suggestions on the F ® (0c.uhN Tol-ALS 39 2-0 2A 7 MODC- 0 AVf9AGC= X Ny%�.�trs ir. co1�»%.,5 art hv«,bu- of 5ejet{yahs fir e" rwhJ. 63 6-o qr.d,. C ,sc,+ Tof,,l # _Ave. Cc-5t,,f► Tot,.! 4t- A-c, Defe.rinih. T6fHt # Aae. Hec r,'.) ye.C\r of Tof, l Co,\sent Per Meefi, 0 ef en,s . P-er Mtef�� 1 e�rrh Per Mee 11 '63 73. 0.% 791 61 .$ 3,2 49 9. a 73.07o 703 13 1 10. 9 40 i yg5 7q. 7Pv �� `+ 67, y � 6 7, Z 78 f�. s Tof 1s 75. 2 % ZzS;3 6Z. 6 375 10. 4 5. 2- 64 . Z64 GENERAL. FUND BALANCE HISTORY 1979100 TO 1984-85 PROP0_QED FINAL FIN. - YEAR END FISCAL YEAR BUDGET D ET BUDGET PROP. ACTUAL ----------- ------------- ------------ -------- -------------- 1984. - 1985 12, 749, 894 12, 739, 754 ( . 080) . 1.'_, 013, 464. 1983 - 1984 .7,807,922 5435, 521 (27. 823) 47415, 3W 19:=2 - 1983 4, 210, 160 143, 310 (96, 596 = = 7774 . 1'=81 - 1982 6i933, 700 67933, 710 ,000 572;27243 1980 - 1981 11 , 601 , 076 11 , 901. , 952 2,594 19, 529, 791 1979, - 1980 13, 531 , 786 l3, 343, 797 ( 1 . 389) 19;435, 726 I i 4f9/ - 3: 41 Ph1 65 Office-of Revenue Collection Cc r1tra 2020 North Broadway Costa S 100 Creek, CA 94596 r J �t Information: (415) 944-3140 Accounting: (415) 944-3141 Administration: (415) 944-3144 TO: DATE: Kerry Harms, Assistant 4/3/86 County Administrator-Finance FROM: SUBJECT: John R. McKinney, Director ,; '`, Performance Data By: Karen Dussell Administrative Analyst Performance indicators presented by the Office of Revenue Collection in a memorandum dated January 30 , 1986 , are based on the assumption of a fully operational department. As you know, O.R.C. is still undergo- ing a period of growth and development. First priority has been assigned to the selection and installation of an automated system, as the department will not become fully functional until this goal is achieved. At this stage in departmental development, a valid comparison of performance indicators is limited. Historically, O.R.C. /Cost Recovery has primarily directed collection efforts toward Public Defender accounts. In the future, a primary focus of recovery efforts will be directed toward County Hospital accounts. These are two distinctly different types of accounts. The recovery rate on each type of account varies accordingly, and they are not comparable. The following data is presented as a basis for comparison against future O.R.C. activity. These statistics .include O.R.C. /C.R. collec- tion efforts on Public Defender accounts and private collection agencies ' activity on hospital accounts during the past two fiscal years. The revenue amounts are shown before deductions for costs. PUBLIC DEFENDER ACCOUNTS OFFICE OF REVENUE COLLECTION YEAR ASSIGNED REVENUE COSTS 1983-84 $483 ,141 $137 ,511 $139,801 1984-85 617 , 287 .163 ,078 147,233 1985-86 204 , 147 66,92.3 63 ,786 (first 6 mos. ) 66 PERFORMANCE DATA HOSPITAL ACCOUNTS PRIVATE COLLECTION AGENCIES YEAR ASSIGNED REVENUE COSTS 1983-84 $3 ,444,276 $297,072 $121,845 1984-85* 1,065,252 181,036 74,483 1985-86 4,196,350 143 ,005 56 ,212 (first 6 mos. ) During this year, the' hospit-al accounting system was undergoing conversion. New accounts were not assigned to collection agencies during the period August, 1984 to June, 1985. Accounts held during that time were assigned in mass during July, 1985. If you have any ,questions regarding this information, please contact me. 67 i l0 r M to w M IT l0 to M k.0 1.0 l0 M -I r- 00 W 1A ON M d' d' 4 C' •V' l.fl d' •1G r I a) k4 u') C tT W O r (dU 00 s, E a O 0 O JT M Lr) -,o O M -,T zr Oo Ln r- 00 00 p E- O) M d M V C1 lf1 d 11 < + >+ +-) 3 (n M In l0 O Cb Ln r O Q) - 00 - 44 4) +- N lf) r 110 r1 M V' In 00 to a) .O 3 - Op .� Ql M M M C' d' V' Q' Q' tI) L) U) H � [ J.) O C •-I �3 4-) O U C �o U C O 00 tY' N N M to Lf) 1.0 CO a •-i O) l0 1-1 O l0 r �'0 M M ra W 41 -i (n J-) U) Lr) Ln O ij O Ln U C CL [o -4 'IT N r N N Ir .0 00 O }� (Y) l0 N (F) IT 1,0 N l0 M . 4 M ra u L4 7 Ln (n U U 'Ir i< sJ O J.) W •i co O %0 N r1 l0 N M d' r 00 (L) U U (n `O >• O) l0 N r 'IT l0 N In M M M U 44 H tx :3 E, .-i -1 -4 --1 •.i C O O h -- z 44 --i . a E� iJ a )n 44 x W �C i+ r0 O M * O C i) U) U N v U 00 O l0 N -I 10 (N M d r W O a) • H Oa �+ O) l0 N r r-' N to M M M Q) --i .-1 -iE• p I r-1 .-i r-1 a) 1) U Z Z r 1 14 U --i =) H (1) ra In Ln •-i (A '-O O C z7 (14 * > O a) U .1 C C 00 O O N O k� N m d' r r-1 f-1 04 J- O (1) O) k0 O r M l0 N 'V' M M IT a) ra a z U) -i -1 .+ .� U) r •O o a �4 0 (a c H w a) U M E� w > U E O 54 W CO r N to l0 Ln r N ra �3 SJ (n O 0'� r 1 N N M -i -1 sJ h 0 04 r-I J-) J-) O, U) S 4 a a z -r1 (1) rJ U) O 1n C 04 r0 -- H 00 co 00 O IT k.0 Ln [r r M CO •11 J-) J-) 44 E-r 0) -1 N N M 1-1 r-i N E r--4 m ?J O H -1 rO (1) a cn rC C (1) O O O C �a U -.-i CL ';V - b O 4.) J-) OD co co O Ln l0 In N r to 00 C to SJ ra .7 0') -4 N N (n -i r-I N ra SJ E O < .--I a) 14 --i )--r �4 a O S4 U a) 44 a) 11 QI p OD OD 00 O Ln k.0 in N r u) co ?4 ?4 (1) a ::D M .--1 N N M .--i r-I N O O Q (n rD -A U Q� a a' 3 a) N + IU) -- A Go r r O I�r w in r-1 k0 In r .k ra Q\ .-i N N M --i r-I N }.j 44 �J (L) o • ra -4 W a. U O O E •.a •r1 O ? J-) J-) U (o c O c iJ a >4 >~ :J O m O N U .0 (o O $J +) CO O �+ O 41 a) O ra N •-i ® U C 2J a) C >, a) (L) C z ?� Z O •ri b a) 14 a) 9:1 (L) 14 C M a E (n b (13 O a) �J ::S C, O (d O >, SJ N 2: C C W a) —i ra 44 U 4J !J (1) E a C •-1 4-) U CA•r1 C c U > M c �J �J C c x E .-t ra O ro --t -1 (a O w m 0 O w o ro -c U cn a (n (n x rn £ U U J, 68 1 • w c7 m .0 In .0 Q 1r1 M ,o .!1 Ln Lr) O N O M M N N N ri O O a) 17 m ..4 of .-i ri .--I ri ri ri .ri J-) f1' r-1 C W a P. O M C) U) CO n N M O) IT O (� 1 M M ON O O'� ()1 O N O ro 2 N M M O O ••-1 N 00 1 - I C a Ol ri r-I r--1 ri .ri .--1 ri ri ri S j i 1 r 1 O �+ w - 4 C4 N F O m Lr) r cr Lr) 'ot- M m r Lr) M� .0 -I m N U • .--I Q' N N N N ri ri O O Ql O 00 _ a) .-i ri .-� .-i r-i -4 r i -Q ro ro/'1 W - o 4- U 14 a m .0 m rn 17 .0 m �-4 O 1 M m O O (3-1 O m a) U M r r r In r Ln -1 �S_- . C 4-) �, (TN rn o r r is m m O O N -ri 4) ?4 Z M •rf 04 H m M ri .o 'I m r C C a 1 U') u, O m ri M In M Ln m H N O .o m m r r♦ '-1 r 1-1 >•, OG% O N .O m C r v r C C ri a ,'y ri N N rf M r-1 M N N w O (10 U) �4 2 U �4 ro N ro • m N r-i ri M M C' l0 lD ON ri ro Q�. ri r-i M r M m m .o o cn O 'ri C O U •� r0 m O N r-i .o o .o .o m r .0 U U , r-1 N .-i N .-i d' ri M N (N 74 . 3 U) (is a) � •� �4 -9- 2 C O LW O. O ' U O C ro 00 C . a) a) m a M in M 'T � .-a r C 0) 0) -C CO ri M ri M N N 'b ''d 4-) U) m a w ra h h v q 11 S4 CL O M v (1) O h m 01 04 (L) 1 a 14 N In r - M .0 r-1 r m cn m O m -i 1-1 ri Cl) 1-1 Cl) N N CP Op li • r-1 •�1 -ri 3 O r-1 ri O z -r1 -r♦ 44 N 4-1 44 CC) 1 .0 3 4-3.-i T O r M M Q' .o -i r r r a) -.-1 OD r-i r-1 r-1 .-i M ri M N (N r-1 _ 3 4-1 x O ),1 O O 3 ro ro � S-1 1'•1 O O (1) E 0 U > a) U) s4 O 4) O + C- 'b 4) C U4-4 a) 4U) o ro b E $4 3 $14 4) o >4 rro E c a) (0 w a) (0 a +) ) >4 + 04O O C �4 > a) C c >4 (a u C ro e a) O a) -1 >+ ro ro ro •--+ (d ro 41 O 3 U aL Z [-4 U) (n (n U) U) U 69 - U) w �D O O O Ln O 00 O O Ln r O O� -4 N 'I -4 'IT t l Ln co 61 00 O 14, -1 d' CY' M N r Ln CO r Ln r Ln r r, m .-1 N cl ri N r W CI) U fZ r-+ 0 — r r N O O r 00 E� ?4 CO l0 CD (T� �D N n r> rp Ol V Cl) ' N N — W U N r-r (n H In Q' .-1 • n x z >4 w �o z I--f N m '-i r M r-1 — E--� W U m vMi � Nr -i � p f z E+ -1 r D z a O H ' U CO O M Ln W 00 ON .--i O M r-r -4 .. r-1 Ln M ri ` O 00 M O OJ r- 00 00 N N 110 O% 00 O O r-r C O -rr m � C (1) rl O N 11 -A U) U7 •rl (U 41 O N O U -H m [ E r; --f +1 N N N O r-1 - 4 E u N -a a }! rd -rr (1) J.) a U z -rl N > Cia U1 v N 1 11 O'L -H,., to 0 a� ro a m b z rrs 0 o > c r- (L) -4•r+ � >4 a •rr --i --I >4 ::) '�, :J U) +1 (n %4 m >4 v U) ' U r+ :3 M U, ra ro ro 54 [Q H £ 2 a 70 r PERFORMANCE DATA COUNTY BUDGET VOTERS COST PER VOTER SANTA CLARA $2 ,091,734 730 , 208 $2. 865 ALAMEDA 2 , 305 ,384 669 ,274 3 . 445 SAN BERNARDINO 1,473 ,000 482 , 811 3. 052 SAN FRANCISCO 2 ,247 ,144 423 ,890 5 .301 SACRAMENTO 2 ,880 ,000 500 ,949 5 . 749 RIVERSIDE 1 ,800 ,000 394 , 020 4 . 568 SAN MATEO 1,549 , 301 332 ,490 4 . 659 VENTURA 1,197 ,550 294 , 943 4.060 FRESNO 1,546 , 000 271 ,016 5. 704 ,,ORANGE 6 ,997 ,000 1 ,104 ,230 6 .336 LOS ANGELES 27 ,072 , 503 3 ,662 , 766 7 .391 •CONTRA COSTA 1 ,724 , 870 427 ,593 4 . 034 TOTALS $ 5.2 , 884 ,486 9, 294 ,190 $5 . 690 71 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE I. EXTERNAL INDICATORS • Number of Documents Recorded Per Employee Calendar Year 198 County Number of Documents Recorded Per Employee San Bernardino 107070 Contra 'Costa 91713 Santa Clara 71941 San Diego 77711 San Francisco 77158 Los Angeles 71110 Riverside 6,770 Alameda 61635 Orange 67482 Sacramento 4,631 The number of documents , affecting title to real property, recorded per employee. (This information is only available for calendar year 1985). II. INTERNAL INDICATORS Number of Vital Statistics (Births Deaths & Marriages) Recorded. • Calendar Year 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Total 15;910 16,289 16,284 16,871 17,201 The number of vital statistics, births, deaths, & marriages recorded per calendar year. Number of Documents Recorded Per Year Calendar Year 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Total 1741129 177,119 1967708 1947267 1993368 The number of documents,affecting the title to real property, recorded per calendar year. 72 R lQ O f N s .9 N N co Co 0 H 2 0 U � N Cl r-+ r-} N N ODON ! e4 la D+ w O UI c 14 OD r^'1 •fi w w 13 COUNTY COUNSEL' S OFFICE Productivity Report #1 April 4 , 1986 FUNCTION/ACTIVITY FY 83-84 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 I. Civil Litigation* a. New Cases Opened per Year 163 177 136 (6 mos. b. Average No. Cases Handled 29.4 .27.6 29.5 (est. per Trial DCC (for Year) r c. Average Srvc Hours per Case 89.8 88.3 84.4 (est. per Year d. Total Litigation Hours/FY 14,637 15,630 11,480 (6 mos. II. Juvenile Services a. Dependency Hearings per Year 1,429 2,074 927 (6 mos. b. Average No. Hearings Handled 571 560 476 (est. per DCC (for Year) c. Average Srvc Hours per Hearing 2.9. 2.9 3.4 d. Total Juv Srvc Hrs/FY 4,109 6,014 3,168 (6 mos. III. Conservatorships (LPS) • a. New Cases Opened per Year 373 304 131 (6 mos. b. Average No. EPS Hearings 590 501 553 (est. per DCC (for Year) c. Average Srvc Hours per Hearing 2.7 3.2 2.2 IV. Small Claims Advisory Service a. Total Phone Calls for Year 4,695 5,335 2,833 (6 mos. b. Average No. Calls Returned 4,695 4,679 5,326 (est. per DCC (for Year) c. Average Srvc Minutes per 19.6 20.7 16.1 Call Returned *Excluding .juvenile and LPS Actions 74 DDA PER COURT - SUPERIOR & MUNICIPAL COUNTY NO. OF DDA NO. OF COURTS DDA PER COURT Ventura County 60 27 2.22 Riverside County 73 36 2.03 Sacramento County 90 45 2.00 San Francisco County 98 50 1.96 Fresno County 62 32 1.94 San Bernardino County 106 55 1.93 Contra Costa County 59 34 1.74 Alameda County 122 72 1.69 Santa Clara County 96 67 1.43 San Mateo County 39 28 1.39 San Diego County 147 109 1.35 Orange County 148 120 1.23 75 CRIMINAL CASES PER DEPUTY 'D.A. - ALL CATEGORIES COUNTY NO. OF DDA NO. OF CASES CASES PER DDA San Mateo County 39 29,882 766 Orange County - 148 81 ,674 552 . San Diego County 147 69,333 472 Contra Costa County 59 27,872 472 Santa Clara County 96 41 ,164 429 San Bernardino County 106 42,570 402 Sacramento County 90 32,198 358 Fresno County 62 21 ,405 345 Ventura County 60 17 ,723 295 Riverside County 73 20,610 282 Alameda County. - 122 28,793 236 San Francisco County 98 19,143 198 . 76 CASES ASSIGNED PER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR COUNTY NO. OF INVESTIGATORS NO. OF CASES CASES PER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR San Mateo County 6 29,882 4,980 San Bernardino County 13 42,570 3,274 Contra Costa County 11 27,872 2,534 Santa Clara County 22 41 ,164 1,870 Orange County 55 81,674 1,485 San Diego County 56 69,333 1 ,458 Fresno County 16 21 ,405 1,338 Sacramento County 33 32,198 976 Ventura County 19 17,723 933 Riverside County 28 20,610 736 Alameda County 42 28,793 686 San Francisco County 36 19,143 532 • 77 PER CAPITA COST OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION CALENDAR YEAR FY 85-86 PER CAPITA COST OF COUNTY 1985 POPULATION BUDGET CRIMINAL PROSECUTION San Francisco County 719,200 10,645,832 $14.80 Sacramento County 889,800 12,000,000 13.49 Ventura,County 589,499 7,265,000 12.32 Riverside County 757,500 9,265,952 12.23 Alameda County 1,170,000 13,738,571 11.74 Fresno County 558,600 6,4749497 11.59 San Mateo County 606,197 6,110,662 10.08 Contra Costa County 703,400 6,316,796 8.98 San Diego County 1,986,900 17,676,932 8.90 San Bernardino County 1,014,481 8,416,294 8.30 Orange County 2,100,000 16 ,466,000 7.84 Santa Clara County 1,365,100 10,008,000 7.33 78 • FY 1985-1986 CRIMINAL PROSECUTION BUDGET San Diego County $17,676-,932 Orange County 16,466,000 Alameda County 13,738,571 Sacramento County 12,000,000 San Francisco County 10,645,832 Santa C1'ara County 10,008,000 Riverside County 9,265,952 . San Bernardino County 8,416,294 Ventura County 7,265,000 Fresno County 6,474,497 Contra Costa County 6,316,796 San Mateo County 6,110,662 • 79 • PER CAPITA COST PER CASE FY 85-86 COUNTY BUDGET NO. OF CASES CASES PER DDA San Francisco County 10,645,832 19,143 556 Alameda County 13,738,571 28,793 477 Riverside County 9,265,952 .20,610 450 Ventura County 7,265,000 17 ,723 410 Sacramento County 12,000,000 32,198 373 Fresno County 6,474,497 21 ,405 302 San Diego County 17,676,932 69,333 255 Santa Clara County 10,008,000 41 ,164 243 Contra Costa County 6,316,796 27,872 226 San Mateo County 6,110,662 29,882 204 Orange County 16,466,000 81 ,674 202 San Bernardino County 8,416,294 42,570 198 80 CALENDAR YEAR 1985 POPULATION BY COUNTIES Orange County 2,100,000 San Diego County 1,986,900 Santa Clara County 1,365,100 Alameda County 1,170,000 San Bernardino County 1,014,481 Sacramento County 889,800 Riverside County 757,500 San Francisco County 719,200 Contra Costa County 703,400 San Mateo County 606,197 Ventura County 589,499 Fresno County 558,600 81 ORAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Alameda San Luis Santa Clara Solano Fresno CCC Custodial 1. Cost per square foot full & part service .12 cents Not avail . Not avail . Not avail . .60 cents .15 cents 2. % mgmt. personnel to workers .13.33% 4.5% 5% 16% .11.9% 9% Fleet 1. # vehicles maintained per 40 (does overall : 71.75 mechanic, auto not include 41.4 incls. includes attendant or 50.6 meh. heavy cars & hvy. cars & service wrkr. 93.76 100 + auto mech. equipment equipment equipment no records 2. Parts are develop. i entory no no form; think t'd for records 100% records same as CCC no records 99.7% as above 3. Tire no records; inventory no no about same acct'd for records 100% records as CCC no records 99.8% 4. Gen'l supplies no no acct'd for 96.98% records records no figures no records 96.9% 5. % pro- 68.7% - 89.01% ductive time 61.05% 77.5% 72.6% no figures 85% 85.81% Central Service 1. # of 692,992 132,500 242,424 254,000 impressions emp./mo. emp./mo. emp./mo. emp./mo. no records 638,461 2. # of mat. do very little; mach. inserted 8,333 mo. 24,667 mo. don't keep rec. -0- no records 50,369 3. # envls. don't keep 130,000 173,747 metered -0- 73,333 mo. records 71,644 mo. (est. mo.) per mo. b# documents 132,104 contract contract contract 62,323 rofilmed (estimate) 20,833 mo. out out out per mo. gssurvy.t4 82 dnOH QOdd dad S),Va 1N311dd m r m n t n n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn 00 ry T LJr4_ Z 7 O � � � > V){ Q (I) Z 0 0 T LO � W fL 00 �- QU Cl) 0 O I ` DQ z� o 0 O u): IL z p ry ! �- e ,^ YM/ W p0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a 4 n m to sNnOH 83 d t A H H 04 Z \ -4tn � OAMO H En U3i U tr. �r 0% 0% 00 00 O1 00 O\ H w �2S d A a E-4 Z N H a 0 N dE- U h000NONM O% a CY. , fn CII N �O M .-4 %0 M � O W Q N N N N N N .fir C4 V] A fA �E: P. r 3 oz a HLn H d b C14 w W M U � G .r{ O M O 00 O 00 Ln M ul N %O 00 to 00 O\ O M p, Cl) Cl) %O .-4 O N O% O x 4 -4 N .A O N 00 G N N N N N N N 00 W O O ' .D M H H m P4 n Q :D G C) A O o � x x C', > O H -H W •• adi W U a r+ H oM 0 P4 Ln a. a: W 00 Ln Ln EW-H a' W W 2 W vl N 00 00 %a d Az " " W 000W � P4C4 00 A v ZU UV O EHW W PWOr � H O ulE-H Ann- H AE- O WW � G u as z C4 0 dul0zA �-i r° 84 I W10H QO8d dad &M 1N31ldd O N It c0 aa O N c0 a0 GO r 10 if! It 't tl Cl( O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 m L_L__ Q ry 1 � , 1 W W �= o a �--- Q ate. / ° z W Ln cn IL 00 U G) < Q ° O Z I-- w Q ' O w UIQ � O 1 � 1 OO o O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O In O O O Il) t7 N N sdnOH 85 dH QOdd d3d Sd3lNnOON3. 0 N It W GO 0 N 00 00 (D In •t d M N r- O 0 W i Z O � Q 00 f Z 00U ry ry W _ z Q o � � i r z CL } = 0 1 Z � w z �-- — w o > zn I Q v) o LL� w O U f- � to T Q1 z J , d. 1 i z 0 I 1 -�. 1 i w O w m O � . � Q 1 D 1 n 1 x O , Z Q I >n00 ! O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o •n (n •r It in n N N soOH 86 o0H aOM dad S11SV1 d/O Go h 0 N d� M N 0 co fya z I O Z � I 00 I ryfy o W � o Q z C C) D Z = i / W fy z z , W LO 0 U U 00 Q o 0 C) z � J . Q cn Q CY Q / O / Q 00 . Ol 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in o in o a t7 N N sNnOH 87 1 • • 1 1 l a • • h i • • s � O 00 m 0% 0. 010.0 C..5 c'O •., P _ iL F- G v •C ';J Q O c. O c. C. v U Q wO CL Cr G7 CL G � s W CL z V (3. Ld On t m Z) v -+ h70) C-iOJ - CL > U w t'`1 C Cd C`i CV N > - LL; F J 1� J J > w it — U �= tT =Jg C'J1m Fu i� NC'-i NC`J N :J v w Z ' w O . Z O � 2 w r w U w L; D F- n w Q O — 0 U Q iA m " i[ 0 Z D. O a OCr Lo r CL CL 0 w m l7 l7 ,0 ID W Z Z in u7 0;a) m c .. f0 F-fZ MO U7 :tm m w iC Z LL m t1i of iC } .0 .0 W CL W Ff- O MxLil W? Crmm 0 } Z Ow 2 iT WwEEQO ` JC•1 -i F GF- C) CL +- OHO W w0iLU — W 1 Mm OT Z 0 la- F- > UZwLI: it : N oo�a �a o, o �, N fa tD �: N � Q 4 o - Lo UDCo o F 0 co o a �D ci o Z C(- I1 Q � 4 �- o 10 . CID 0 a Y o 0 0 0 0 0 a a °o N 0 o g O a p a o a $ o o o a _- NH DOdd 83d SIINn 1N3VUV3& 0 n 0 m o M cV N t0 C� Z i 0 ' r W oo I U Ul ry °' I W o . W I w � W p_ tz �_ I Z I D W p ) O Z W � Z 1 Wtn �. o o . � ao rn f- f 1-i-J \ O W L_L. 0 � W q �L 0 O D Q z Q i O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 a m 0 On 00 � d M N 0 sdnOH 90 i COST PER ITEM CIRCULATED • $ RANK Alameda County 3.03 5 Contra Costa County 1.95 15 Fresno County 2.32 11 Kern County 2.59 9 (tie) Orange County 1.98 13 Riverside County 2.72 8 Sacramento County 3.22 3 San Diego County 1.44 16 San Francisco County 5.48 2 San Mateo County 4.05 . 1 San Bernardino County 1.97 14 Santa Clara County 2.75 7 Solano County 2.91 6 Sonoma County 2.05 12 Stockton-San Joaquin County 3.05 4 Ventura County 2.59 9 (tie) `3 • 3/86 91 • CIRCULATION PER FULL TIME EQUIVALENT CIRC/FTE RANK Alameda County 11335 14 Contra Costa County 20048 4 Fresno County 13486 11 Kern County 16659 6 Orange County 22768 2 Riverside County 12723 12 Sacramento County 18186 5 San Diego County 23120 1 San ,Francisco County 8087 16 San Mateo County 11075 15 San Bernardino County 16209 7 Santa Clara County 14919 10 Solano County 16094 8 Sonoma County 20246 3 Stockton-San Joaquin County 11925 13 Ventura County 15388 9 3/86 92 LOCAL SUPPORT PER CAPITA $ RANK Alameda County 19.05 4 Contra Costa County 9.62 12 Fresno County 7.68 15 Kern County 12.06 8 Orange County 11.89 9 Riverside County 9.52 13 Sacramento County 11.19 11 San Oiego County 8.37 14 San Francisco County 19.50 3 San Mateo County 20.75 2 San Bernardino County 6.34 16 Santa Clara County 22.23 1 Solano County 13.01 5 Sonoma County 12.70 6 Stockton-San Joaquin County 12.29 7 Ventura County 11.25 10 3/86 93 /f I Couch i S D� U/LZ l 3 6 5 Z `� t q. Lt� g z 3 MT .e A (5-J tj4 9 e-s) i N m T A,\1 A i t_..Pz l3 C ��7- i NrT i t I r 5 7q 7 q/ 7 3 8' l go1.z � Z 9 0 , S �� 77 5 � l 1 � ( SS ( off 4.1 min ) 73 G5 l � � 80 77 q 77 i 94 Cc u -L>l A-Y w Cl � 1 uQ0 .0 174 e 4 q4 Y-q ! 3S- b t 7 1� 75-o i 95 t 4--L V1 r r (O CO 4-) C O LO l0 r-A 1— LD C) r-+ CC) n Ll_ ct Q F-- ct Gl 1-4 � 00 r--4 N Cl) M l0 . 03 Cl V) N N M d LO LO LO LO Ln to L,O 4- O (1) O +-) O O O O O o O O O O O O 0 4- o r 4- r r-1 r1 r-1 �-i e--1 •--1 r-� r--1 �--1 r•-1 rN ro 0- 4-)d--) E � V) a c C) V) r3 V) Z U C C w 4- O O :5E: Li_ 4- •r- •r- I— - r6 4-3 +-� U-) +-3 (0 r6 Q N Ln C U r- LD r— Ln Q0 d' 00 C) O C) 00 f1 <r r-i M r-L r-+ wJ +' E4- U V7 r6 •r•- >1 X N " J oZ5 r w V) w rG r0 Z L!) C O r Z Z Cr 4-) U O O V) H w D- L fti 4- V) X O Q) w' Q) : M co C'1 co C) N Ql . L\ co O i +) a Ln r, .--1 G-� m O L.7 N LD l0 LC) O C O lP N O LO L.n N <D Cl Ln 1] 7 r E O O_ ct .--1 r-L r-, M N G-1 C) to to Ln O U E w 4-3A +) c >, +� c Z3 =3 o C O C > O U O =5 4-) U +-� O U +3 O C c b 4--1 C) U C C C U 7 (a =3 +-3 C C O 7 O i O N O Q) O O O +-) O O U r6 U o O an Q) U U C U cmr U U a-- Q) Q) (0 U «3 r0 O Q) E rt3 -0 i rC O C Olr6 E cm Q) r6 7 i C rc C i. O E d-� +3 +-3 to Cm U C C m C C C Q) r0 O S- r0 O ro r rt N O i Ln LO O V) Ln N Q (n U LL- 96 L96 L7 t- M kD dr co d LO Ur ^ ID Ln lD L'7 O N 00 d' m LD 4 N .--f N Gl r..( M 0) ^ _ 00 4 Ol -4 M tet• M In ID lD LP n m r-1 r-� ct N N O I\ CY) .-f Q) 00 1 0 00 cYO N 00 O U') d• N M LD l0 Cl) Lf) N Cl 00 00 r--f 0') 1-4 1-4 N N ID N ID Ol M ko ct r+ NOd• Co NOIR r- 1-4 Cl) ON 00 00 00 d N d• N - M ri t- 00 00 -4 Cr m N M f\ ch Cl r- Lf) CY) N ID 0 00 r-+ m t- co M co 00 Ln l0 N C71 N 00 O O 4 ct d ID Co I\ M M CO 00 N M M ID M .-A m ri 01 r-( r-I e--f r-f 4-) C Q) c E r-f N r+ ID ID O LP Ql Lo m d' t- N 00 -4 O -4 k.0 M lD ct O N LO 00 00 00 4 O Cal '-+ 00 r--f M O co M (-•+ N m r- r--f Co N •-f '--f r--1 . a) > N d (D z F- O O LO dMOI` ID N NOLn Co Co O OM -4 d 00 N Cl d• Co N U•) d• IJ CO cY CO (--( O a) m .4 N N M Ln N ko Ln N F- Cil a) r+ 00 + r f Y V) F- O O E t_ L N LL- 025 i aJ F•- O 01 N C d (6 Z O a) i J W cl:� +J N \ > Z cc F- ro i o d C) a) N 0. 4- Ul) LLLU T7 a) -C L! U •V) a) N V) +-Y LL- (a N '6 +-) a) i C O a) J (C C (6 i O O W 0. O 0. 4- Z U I O O U aJ cn C c LLI +J N V) C L O O C J N a) (n t0 C •C *rt; - U- 4--) O i r- <n rcY 4- aJ C 4-) C i co (U-10 Q) Q) a) to •E E 0. U (n T3 J E i C r aJ (cs >_ (n c ¢ o o c U X C) •� U U +J C C 4 i'J O aJ LLI O U E N r a) U •r- r- (3) a) C) C O •D T7 +J -o IY +) =3 C r r +.J C i Q r N C L C V) (6 4- ' d Cl- aJ Q1 C (3) +J r E O U C E (n Cl C O 1-- (.0 (n N 4- r C a) •r- U C 4- ut C C V) V) () W +-) C r-+ M L• W (O O O (1) 't3 U C al r (D •N +j r- F-- i C (+-- O U Q) 4- V) Ln cn (n (A C V) V) +-J +-) (d (O O > O C) a) (O a) m a) C C «J (6 C O E (D Q) Q) +J (D r E O O C U QJ co i i (L) C] i >) C >1 +J O a) U •v! a) 0 0 4) O O +-) +J •Er +-) r4- -0 V) aJ 1] rr Ur 025r (6 (6 •r ri) i E 4- (Oa) E i a) •V) c x i i a) :3 >, = E E W E (n > o r- LJJ d y 0 0. 2 N U O Z LtJ W 0. LU C a1 CL E (n r o C] (O (n a x E +j a) a) tiJ v L (a a) r c r 0 • � r L.L . ( x E 97 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT Ratio of In-House Pro- Number of fessional Training Staff County *Professional in Personnel to Number AgencyEmployees Training Staff of County Employees Contra Costa County 5,868 2 1 to 2,934 Santa Clara County 10,229 3 1 to 3,410 Orange County 11,518 2 1 to 5 ,759 Sacramento County 7,299 1 1 to 7,299 San Diego County 12,500 1 1 to 12,500 *Several agencies contract with outside consultants to provide employee training and/or they contract with outside consultants to augment their in-house training. 98 Contra Costa County Private Industry Council PERFORM PL C: E STATIT1DARIDS REPORT Title : IIA Program: ?8% Total Pita Through : 12 / 31 / 85 Calculated : 01 / 29 / 86 Print Date : 01 / 29 / 86 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- 'erform=_nce Standards Ori ; inal Adjusted Plan Plan Actual Problem ------------------------------------------------------------------=------------ :ntered Employment Rate (Adult ) 53 . 1% 59 . 4% 79 . 3% ost per Entered Employment ( Adult ) $ 4 , 147 S 4 , 054 $ 4 , 541 < < < ,verage Wage at Placement (Adult ) S 3 . 37 S 5 . 14 $ 6 . 14 elfare Enter Employ Rate ( Adult ) 41 . 9% 46 . 9% 71 . 8% outh Entered Employment Rate 44 . 2% 35 . 7% 74 . 4% of Positive Termination Rate 77 . 7% 79 . 6% 78 . 0% outhMCost Mper MPositive MTerm ------------ 53N859------NSM3 , 488------ SM3 , 76------------M RAW DATA Adult Terminations ; 2G Adult Placements 100 Adult Expenditures :454 , 195 .� . fl Welfare Terminations 32 r l Welfare Placements 23 I k Youth Terminations 141 Youth Placements 105 Youth Positives 110 Youth Expenditures 5414 , 336 f ; 99 I . +p•1 i1 O U +-1 t0 r- LL- � N M M N d d Ln Ln O O RS 4- _ O t0 i O r♦ O O \ LD 00 d ko tl� C1 LO 1- N 3 1 .--1 t0 N N +-1 N r Q) tp r N In In Ln +� Q > O i ^ M_ O N Q Ln O N n N Ln LO 1- LA a) LO N M rl \ n m 00 LO O N r-1 M Z CL ' O O.- 3 b N O r r+ N M d Ln LD • a) N O LD O LD O ct LD N N LD Ln a) V1 Ln C1 N LO m O LO cn N O d N > t0 e--1 .--f Ln Q U a) r-1 N M d Ln LO N N LO O d Ln Ln O LD N m O O O +1 •r N Ln 4m r♦ ^ O N N co co LD O r > M .-1 Ln N r4 co M co 00 O Ln Ln O i Ln k io a) t0 N f1 C; c d ^ Cr c Ln M W d QCL e--1 -4 Ln ra N U c0 ►� QS N t�r♦ Z `-+N W i W U -k O Z O U W4 4-2{� N O 00 O M O d LD ct M C1 LP) Ln 4- Q (D a) � -le Ln . Ln 4m \ d M LD rl <n U- Z > rt) i N M d N Z r-4 r+ r, r-I N N (Y-O C +••) O la) N 3 d H Z co O O r 1•H QL r F-d Q LD Ln r, r t\ d Ln LD O Q 4.; '-4 M Ln LD d d N LD ri* N N O L0 Q LD M Ln r-1 N a% O J aJ \ d' O +a > t\ r-I LO .--1 Z d Ln d N Ln C t� IZ m O C N Ln r+ N r +-1 00 r i d O LO O Q O O O C) d (m N v o LO t0 -4 1 co CLZ a '-+ O M N LA to rn Ln fl, O co Ln Ln O U i l Q1 '••1 n M N d Ql Ql Ln O O O O M 00 Q C1 C) .-1 D1 m M \ w •r O Ln 00 e•-1 Ln Z N N N M N t0 c � N O +-1 N •r i +J c0 N M N b N n Ln c0 O U i N d 1� 00 > .-+ r+ 00 LD N %0 O O O N 1 Ln QCL r� d •-+ .-1 N tV O 0: N O N N Z a) p O C p C r ULA 0 +1 N a) O i r S- (L) (L) +•) (0 U O /0 V- c U a a c c c a r 3 r0 4m r a) i M +1 C.) 10 O m c O c a) LA E a) L co i ,a) U i a) C Q Q1 i b CG LL 10 O N v c 41 to CA di 1 cu In a l 0 0 1P c c c c 1 c , U Q tL J I O • 0 C) C N O O O 4- O O to i••) (o � O O r C 41 � to r (o to U LA to a1 a C to to p O O O O r 0 C d d •F-) O • 00 00 O 0 0 0000 -0 aOc- n.0 0000 as a. a0 M �• to _ in n- in in 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 L L in CL �- O O 0 C] Cl O O 0 +-) -0 r -NC L i L i L L L L i d C.L to to aJ C QJ L O a1 L a) QJ i QJ Q1 (11 a) Q1 L a) O to to C. a1 C. C. (1) C. C. aJ C_ C_ C. C.r` r` C. O > r to C: C. C. Q t\ C. C Q) v � '•-4 00 Ln Ln 0-i v rn n r, a) tTOqr -4r- tDtONO OCT N ^ ^r+ -t:t +� L C%j 00 t1•) -4 Cr d Ln to .-( M M M N .--( tT ct C O U �C 4-4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4-4+- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- E C C L 00000 0000 00 0 0 0 0 0 4-J -0 O eu U i (U r- -0 •r 0 V1 N 0 0 N to to N N V) (A N VI I/) N M C N t -0 �o aa ;:) -0 -aV -u -0 'C •C 'C -0 a �a 0- (7) • 3 (O to to to (C m to b to to (O to b to (o to a) r > O 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 0 0 0 0 0 in (A S- 0- •-( rrrrr rrrr rr rrrrr (A a1 in O a) al aJ aJ a1 a1 a) aJ aJ aJ (1) a) aJ a) a1 (U i (C a- ca 0 N V) V) 0 V) VI N to N N N N N N N a) 3 L Rt. to (O to (0 (O to (O to to co (a to to M (O t V) Ln U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U +1 O • +.J i-) +.J +J J 4 i-) +-) i-) y •J 4-)) + +-) +-) +3 4-) O 0 3 O +3 M to to to to A (a (o to to to (C (a (O (O (a V- r kD O �• C M iJ to a (2) aJ a a) (11 a a) a aJ a aJ (1) a) (J a) >1 C O i H N to to 0 0 to to N V) (A V) to V) (n V) 4) i••) � +•) •r •r •� •r •r •r •r-- •(- •r •r > C C 4- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > L O O LO S. L SL L i. L i L L L i L. L L L L 3 oo to QJ O a) 4) Q) a) O Q) N a) O O O O a) a1 N a1 C. Cl C. d C_ C. C.Q C- C. Q. C- C. C. C. G L &- w a) io 7 3 7 3 0 3 3 > 3 3 7 3 3 0 7 7 r 4) 4) tT 3 N (n V) (A to 0 to N N N V) N N N N 0 to C. C_ C r C (o U V) N to to to 0 to to N to to to N N N N O (A to L C a) aJ aJ aJ (V a) 4) aJ 4) 4) aJ O Q) 4) a) O to C C r v) 0 to to to to to (n U) (n to (n to V) en to L O O N to to b b to to (o (o A to to to to to (o (o Q) -0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U a +J i•) (o to (O A O O q1'tM) D 0)N 0 000 N00 %D 41Pl, n ' 4 m C7) (/) r r n .--t M 00 d Ln t.D kD•cr t\ 00 M C f\Lr) cf •• r r W O a1 %0 Cl) r� t!').-I �D V)ql:r n N LO f\to d Q1 +•J .N r.•- N to w a w w w w U to to O to (o CO r+ Cn r\ -4 sr d N O (71 -4 <t L a) a1 Z U U M 3 > > C) 101 # Z �•- O S- M to +3 O Ln a% tD N a) O N -4 04- u M d N \ N C6 M N a1 n M t-4- to tD M mt N N lc:t M t0 LL- N C O •r � CA •- O t0 >r• M O .Ln O N N N O CO M O S- Z O t0 ^ 00 Ln a1 tD 00 O ct Ln (71 C) O ty tA > d to Q O U N O �a 4-3 • D •-i00 f� O N >.a rr 9 LD •- r-t CO tD c}• al Ln Ln '-+ r- C i•) rt N N N -4 N rt rl r-1 r O O N f > W U 7 r.r� Cl O C O Z cyi O 4-3 ►.�rl •r W # C to cu U N . - -o C Z W O M Ln Cn d cU Ln L r E �-• O 0- cyl t\ O c`• co O O O 00 to CC d d co cy') to en tD co n tD fl_ M to W > N = . y 7 O Z � W F- C �. Q O F- m 4) •�'- � t7 O r• to to O Ln O Ln L[) CO h 00 co tD N -4 td d a r O al O qr co .-'t -A N co O lD N co O d a. C >r to N a1 . a1 I" -4 M N M O r, W tv Z cu w w QJ O W > N y 1-4 M rt CO M N N N M rr to J :3 O. to N ra U U O W N C > O d y.- ca (A 4-3 y O C ' C•r d' O Q) > W +J O O n O +3 C) d to N to IR:r tD fl_ cn N 00 O Sr D- al O r� r-4 O .--t ro 7 ,,•.. w w Q to Q)+) rt M .-•t Ln rl 1-4 M rt Q) •r y �•,� D i > 4-r O O t1 P--• �L > c y i O t� 4•) * d O at Q' M 00 r) r� r-4 O •- O •r •M r� M 00 Lp rt f" a► n O t1) O to O. • y d• 00 Q M M N M N m O O O C > O w w O to 7 cl q*l d• 00 d 00 a\ 00 •••t 1l N co tD y C 7 to M rt i O r a•r Q 0 4-J C O G)1-) t� r to i G) CA y y O •.^ L 7 > +-1 O r- O 4J to U O b O C C U a a C C c cu t- N►"' O rp a1 •r O i 'a4-) t0 O to a O C N to E w i to i it (-3 Z 4) C d CJf Z to m LL- to Z + 7 �t 4J E to C f 1 +1 c td a y to 102 v C C c C r- 0 O r-- i O S- r0 b to A tv O C,) Q U- J I N N to N Ln z tt� Q Q Q 00 Q Q Q Q to S- W w ¢ Q Q v ¢ Q ¢ Q �i E N N M Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ' L LO E XQ M ¢ Q ¢ Q to \ Q I� Q cY N N Z z Z N Z Z M Z Z N i 2 L J C � O ct N M to M � N r" O O t0 d ¢ Q V) aJ N N N LO .-+ M W N U Z Q Z a1 fk! 4 N iQ U'f Ch d Z N N 00 ct t0 M t0 00 Z Z O O s- W 3 O = W Z 0_ O ►-r Z {-- O Q •+ Co N � I—O C +� m d r O O +j g U) m co O_ J O N N LO O O co t0 U) 00 N \ O O a) rr .--r N N N Q to ru a1 U C a) 111 4� RS M Ct 00 S- U Q U \ Cl Q1. t0 U" M co O i � 2 O b O 4J H a ( b tA a) o i S- 4-) +) o r a +) to v o ea C U a1 -0 C C C WU b (1) i co O S- N E O i as S- S- U +j E uCi ¢ c ai L m LL- (a 4-) C t0 cu N ea > U C C C C I C O r L p S. r fd RS fu ea a) U 4. J N N to N N 103 { R ` DEPARTMENT PRODUCTIVITY PAST FIVE YEARS OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 CASES OPENED 13 , 342 14 ,513 15,662 16,534 17 ,739 CASES CONFLICTED 1,247 1,435 1,448 1, 371 1,277 CASES FINANCIALLY .REJECTED 691 526 389 449 351 CASES HANDLED 11 ,404 12 ,552 13 , 826 14 ,698 16 ,111 STAFF ATTORNEYS 37. 5 37. 5 40. 5 40.5 . 40. 5 CASES HANDLED PER ATTORNEY 304 335 341 363 398 PERCENT INCREASE -SINCE 1980-81 10.2 12 .2 19.4 30.9 CASES BY TYPE HOMICIDES 28 25 33 22 52 FELONIES 1,952 2,227 2, 415 2,212 2, 602 MISDEMEANORS 8 ,061 9 ,165 10,036 11,131 11,858 JUVENILES 1,738 1, 662 1, 880 1,926 2,090 CONSERVATORSHIPS 794 802 818 778 669 OTHER 769 632 481 465 468 JURY TRIALS FELONY TRIALS 97 156 206 203 142 AVERAGE DAYS PER TRIAL 4. 3 3 . 9 3 . 0 2 . 5 3 .4, MISDEMEANOR TRIALS ,3 �- /03 12-3 1 2� i S'3 AVERAGE DAYS PER TRIAL 1. 9 1. 9 1. 9 1.7 1.8 CONSERVATORSHIP TRIALS 7 5 9 22 17 AVERAGE DAYS PER TRIAL 1. 6 2. 1 1. 0 1.1 .8 TOTAL DAYS IN ALL TRIALS 682 819 864 783 771 104 • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANSWERING DRAINAGE RELATED COMPLAINTS In fiscal year 1984-85, we answered 1294 complaints and expended $18,814 to do this. The average cost per complaint was $14.54-. As of March 31, 1986 for fiscal year 1985-86, we have answered 2295 complaints and expended $21,073 for an average cost of $9.18 per complaint. MAINTAINING COUNTY ROADS Over the last five years, the miles of County maintained roads have decreased allowing us to .devote a greater maintenance effort per mile of road. Fiscal Year Number of Miles Cost per Mile 80/81 1019.01 $5899 81/82 1025.59 6666 82/83 928.03 8535 83/84 853.05 8800 84/85 858.54 9810 SCH:dg. perfind.t4 (4/29/86) 105 OVERALL USE OF ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION The ranking on use of alternatives in each of these counties was derived from an assessment by the Evaluation Committee established by the Board of Corrections to review Proposition 2 applications' Committee members scored each county on use of the following ten alternative programs. 1 . Alternatives to Incarceration for Public Inebriates. ` ' 2. Weekend Judges or Other Court Processes Leading to Pretrial Release. 3. Special Programs to Clear Holds and Warrants. 4. Misdemeanor Citation Release. 5. Felony Own Recognizance. 6. Ten Percent Bail for Pretrial Misdemeanants. 7. County Parole. S. Early Release per Penal Code Section 4024. 1 , accelerated release; inmate count exceeding bed capacity. 9. Early Release per Penal Code Section 4024. 2, accelerated release; to work on public works or ways in lieu of custody. �jP10. Other Programs that Reduce or Control Jail Populations. Counties could receive up to 37 points, from two primary components of the alternatives to incarceration scoring: a program-by-program review of selected release mechanisms (30 points) and an analysis of prisoner profile (7 points) . ( In other evaluations, the Committee compared counties' overall pretrial average lengths of stay and counties' incarceration rates. ) The scoring method for the program-by-program evaluation called for awarding three points if a county used a program above the average of applicant counties, two points if it used the program below the average, and no points if the county did not use the program. Where possible, a quantitative comparison was made of applicants (e. g. , the percentage of misdemeanants released through sheriff ' s citation) . After reviewing these quantitative comparisons and the application documentation , the committee scored each program in each county. In all but one case, the score awarded was the average of the committee members' individual scores. In the case of county parole, scoring was based solely on quantitative comparisons. The overall scores by county follow: Alameda 33. 6 Contra Costa * 31 . 9 Sabramento 30. 6 Santa Clara 30. 2 Riverside 29. 5 Ventura 23. 7 Splano 23. 3 San Mateo 22. 9 * Contra Costa County second highest in state, Merced County last with 11 . 2. Source: The -State of the Jails in California, Report #2, Prisoner Flow IOS ) and Release, Board of Corrections, 1985, (Draft) '' T A B L E 6 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA SICK; LEAVE ANALYSIS - - DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY 01/01/85 THRU 06/15/85 DEPARTMENTS WITH OVER 100� EMPLOYEES Department Average Use 0255 Sheriff . . . . . . . . . x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24. 91 hrs. 0300 Sheriff-Detention #. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29. 71 hrs. 0359 Sheriff-Coroner **. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29. 44 hrs. Sheriff Combined. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28. 02 hrs. 0242 District Attorney. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27. 87 hrs. 0079 Building Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ . 05 hrs. 0308 Probation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . 35. 50 hrs. 0016 Assessor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37. 50 hrs. 05O0 Social. Service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . 41 . 29 hrs. 0540 Medical Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 . 84 Firs. 0450 Health Svcs. -Public. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45. 46 hrs. Sheriff ' s Detention Division works 10 and 12 hour shifts which tend to increase the sick leave amount used per event. Sheriff ' s Coroner Division works 10, and 24 hour shifts which tend to increase the sick: leave amount used per event. Source: Contra Costa. County Report No. DA 2636. 03, June 24, 1485, Sick: Leave Analysis 107 , T A B L E 7 COMPARISON OF VOLUNTEER SERVICES • Cash Value of Volunteer Hours County Computed at $12 Per Hr. SACRAMENTO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $550, 000 ALAMEDA. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $494,868 SAN MATEO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . $474, 79? CONTRA COSTA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x'65, 71 SANTA CLARA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $360j000 VENTURA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 801440 SOLANO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 72, 000 RIVERSIDE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5', 796 Members of the Sheriff ' s Reserves and Search and Rescue Unit donate their time and talent in providing auxiliary law enforcement services to the county. The volunteer hours above do not include the time donated by the Friends Outside or Counsel of Churches. SHERIFF' S RESERVE The members of the Sheriff ' s Reserve provide supplemental uniformed police assistance in the county area and in the contract cities of Danvi. l. l.e, Lafayette and San Ramon. They operate as back up officers and perform duties similar to those of regular deputies. Reserve deputies in the Sheriff ' s Detention Facilities help process new inmates, assist during visiting hours and supplement regular officers in the inmate housing area. Reserve Marine Patrol deputies patrol the waterways with regular deputies, enforcing boating laws and investigating boating accidents. SEARCH_AND_RESCUE The Search and Rescue (S. A. R. ) Team is a separate unit of reserve deputies. This unit provides assistance in locating and rescuing individuals who have become. 1 ost or stranded in remote areas. The S. A. R. Team is often called to assist counties throughout the state in their rescue efforts. 108j T_A_B_L_E---8 CALIFORNIA CRIME INDEX OFFENSES MOST LIKELY TO BE REPORTED TO THE POLICE BY THE PUBLIC . ' These offenses are willful homicide, forcible rape, robbery aggravated assault , burglary, and motor vehicle theft. Index : Population divided by the total number of reported violent and property crimes. County Population Index Violent Crime Property SANTA CLARA 153725900 711 409 1521 SAN MATEO 607, 200 368 389 1259 ALAMEDA 15176, 800 326 926 2674 SAN BERNARDINO 1 , 032, 000 316 730 2531 VENTURA 585, 000 301 314 1624 CONTRA COSTA 698, 000 256 675 2056 SACRAMENTO 866, 000 254 662 2740 Source: State Department of Justice Criminal Justice Profile. This document was published in September 1985, for the calendar year 1984. ` 109 , T A B L E iG RESPONSE TIME The information below will be used as a base for future comparisons. Number of Details Response Time COUNT',' - UNINCOF:F'C1RAl"EI:7 Priority 1 ## 3, 900 2 minutes All Other Details 65, 308 5 minutes DAAILI._E Priority 1 ## 586 1 minute All Other Details 12, 74-.-. 4 minutes LAr�AYETTE Priority 1 ## 518 1 minute All Other Details 99578 5. minutes SAN RAt'IClr•! Priority 1 550 1 minute All Other Details 2S, 209 5 minutes Time of call receipt to time of officer' s arrival based on the Mode method of averaging, i .e. , the response time that occurs most frequently,. Does not include Delta. Regional Communications Center. ## Incidents of an emergency nature, i . e. , in progress crime. 110 � T_A_B_L_E...2 INMATES GRANTED EARLY RELEASE ( ' PURSUANT TO PENAL CODE SEC. 4024. 1 (ACCELERATED RELEASE; INMATE COUNT EXCEEDING BED CAPACITY) BY COUNTY ' FY 1982-83 � � Percent Sentenced Granted County Early Release CONTRA COSTA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 * � RIVERSIDE. .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SAN MATED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 SANTA CLARA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 ** SOLANO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 ALAMEDA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 VENTURA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 18 SACRAMENTO. . . ' ' ' . . . . ' ' ' . ' . . . . . . . . 0 * Contra Costa has fourth highest percentage of this type of early release state-wide. ** Estimated percent using 10% of 1983 admissions to county jail as number of sentenced inmates. Source: The State of the Jails in California, Report #2, Prisoner Flow and Release, Board of Corrections, 1985 (Draft) � � lll � � T_A_B_L_E...3 WORK IN LIEU OF JAIL POPULATION ' 83 IN CALIFORNIA COUNTIES 1982 - � Average Proportion . of Sentenced Prisoners County on Work in Lieu CONTRA COSTA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52% * SAN MATEO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52% * SACRAMENTO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47% ALAMEDA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25% SnLANO **. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16% RIVERSIDE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14% SANTA CLARA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7% ' VENTURA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% * Contra Costa and San Mateo tied at third highest percentage state-wide. ** Includes out-of-custody work release and "in-custody" work where sentenced inmates get one day credit for each ten hours of work performed. Source: The State of the Jails in California Report #2, Prisoner Flow and Release, Board of Corrections, December 1985, (Draft ) 112 in � m w rn A CAI a)- s4 U b •14 (D £ > 1.) 1 w rd 4 U a 00 �4 ra r+ o .4 S4 dp U W w rn to M m 00 Ln �o o d' a% N .-i* ul 0164 Q M N r 1 N N r 1 N N 4 14 r'n ri 111 in t70 r-1 Ul a -4 >`+ HC :r.12: o - ,A o oo r- d' r- N in C r- � ,o Q •ri U1 W 1 O1 N W �' -4 lD O1 c•1 O O1 in cn -T H rn r-•+ 9 LA rnLi4 rn r 1 A O (CS U (d 110 v r` in N 1n en cT a d' d' rn in z U U W h r1 .A r-1 -4 .4 .--1 •-4 -4 •-4 '-1 .-1 -4 r-1 H w U Ln coO Gw a �+ a 3E _e 0 W 1 r` -4 d' cn r` r-f r-1 rn U I'd --I in O rn r` 00 H �o -1 O tD r` rn O A 4-J iJ �4 C . Q1 rd m k.0 d+ d' -' 'A a0 r- co 1D W h N N rn cn N in ;N r") N N N ^1 N C O O O O O O O O O o O O O O •'4 O O O o o O O O o O O O O !-) 00 VT r- O IT 00 O1 00 Vr N N O1 in b -4 r rn O c-: 00 r in cn cn Q1 %-o .D O1 r- O r- U1 00 a% r- 1n 00 -4 O r- 00 r-1 r- in O1 O r\ 00 O O rte: ,o rn in O ` >1 W r 1 (� N r r !N -t 00 0 U0 00 C O rd -•-1 U r♦ N � ul b u1 r0 UI UI dJ O S 4 -4 w N O O W ij b O U O m o U rd U CT -r4 4) W W 1d 4J► U 1d W �0 b b O C Cl (A E W -r1 34 N L� (� C i! ij ul G 4) ��, W A W £ " 41 ed C 0 w rd > U C C C C C C h U U Q U w ►°a O a Ul 1Udl r11 r/1 CJI VI > Q 113 a O a � }.1 ^� O 14 dP a� � we > (>� N O N 4 ato t] N U 0 a Q ' 0 3 rn --+ C � b C 3 E 00 in o r•4 a► in co 00 ul cn 00 N 00 •rl In w 1 N O do a0 1— un en (n V a1 (0 O N f11 J-) O LY. C VI Y4 C c+1 O O �D �D N 4 O O (d O (a 7 V' l0 00 c•+) a% a% O V' N ON 1— 00 H U u i a h d' N v N m N r, ch 4 U H A Z H - t11 [� 00 U a� r-1 O �4 [z. to (d C4 C3E W' S O WI o t- in in r-/ in .-4 M N O o 00 in W td H O ao cn N 00 rn I-D H O r-1 [- 4j vw C �l C U U ch Li4 4 w 4 H Oct Q+ h in in N %,D in in 1,0 aO kD r i3O U 1 H A w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H •r♦ O O O O O O (A O O O O O O yJ aO 7 c- O V aO 00 v N r4 Ch in id (11 . . . . . . . r-4 .-1 �T c�1 O N a0 Vr �f, l�1 �'1 O1 1D �D '•1 :1 1� in a0 a\ r to a0 .-1 O 1 1 [� in m O 1— w O O r 1-0 (n in a. ri � N ri n� ••-1 In d, co 0 w ao oC o rd �d ..••1 U +� r♦ U) C4 Gl O d �1 3•a Cl O O --1 N (d O U O (d U O U U G! b C C t7+ C N . U rd iT �db b O C Q1 k C 4 0 $4 C C y y > U C G C G C C O H v u° 4 u w a o a vi ui ai cn ren cin > £ Q 114 00 a O. v, r+ A - v_ >a U b > J-► l4 �d C v a00 rn i4 r, .-� O i4aw •� 3-I 00 w 1- 0 00 o rr M -� U W N . c+1 O -- U U �M -4 W W :n r1 o r-I 4 % %.D N ul W w.O —I rl .-1 r-I r1 r-I N U H tn ul 00 H m U) H U) Q I C z f� O b zC 3 0 tD w1— wN o d' l0 m rn �• •rl (n ul C In f'a CO r! [� r 1 a0 4 O; O1 O1 to (4 4 Q; P4 O M Q) M H to cN O '1 O N r1 ) r! 00 to r00 '-1 O U U4 r] (`') (11 rl N N N N N c•1 ri N H Q U H to A 00 z rn H r♦ ' W U a� [ 3 £ -%4 O W 1 rr rn rn rn N tff rf N 01 .4 to r! Cl O rd •••i %.0 m m t+1 N [- m W 41 41 w C x C0 v m ko rn ui m en N W' H Q W '7 ao O\ a0 to to o —4 M r-I o I- rn r- W .--4 rl r1 14 1--1. agg �t C H O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 En •-i a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 00 IT I- O V' 00 ON 00 V' N N O\ to Q r1 d' rn O N a0 d' to m m m %O lD m O O 1` to ao m [- Ln w r-I O r- ao (ry H r� to ON O � 00 O O [- klD M to >>1 (11 rl r N rl N .-4 C `D OD O U 00 C O .14 41 v1 b0 b U U v b G C 0 C N � o rd 01 ,1 N 1.4 v rd 4-J U b W mai [ � 'pQH4ua 0a w x (d � Aj ul r- 41 41 4) v v) > C C C C C rl O $4 O S •'1 b (d rd (d td (d v u q Q U U4 0 o a W cn (n cn cn cn > Q 115 0 a) am r+ O 00 RJ r-f d' l0 00 N l0 00 d' l0 l0 M d' 4-)r 04 ra r-I 00 M l0 (n 00 O M M rA a) W 00 M O M Ul U). \ d' ON w 00 O M 00 d' m O U) V-1 m I` N 01% In O M OO r•i rl r- N . I ri r-1 r-1 I- P OD ¢( U N a �4 U) (d P4 a) M a � � H7 4 U O Ln U R1 -A M N [- r-I I` O O> I` O0 N N W a) 4-) l0 00 (n 0o N I- N N N U1 Ul 14 RS a H H r+ r c4 C4o (r� rn ,-� O Q r4 :J Imo• Lr) M l0 l0 l0 O Ul I- N Ul U Q (d r-I a U7 M d' U7 d' d' Ul M Ul N C U (d O m J� W U] 41 W N Q U -r-I O -EO+ -601). N H Q H W 1 � O C4 Om W W r-- \ Ix 04 1 En w 000 (nn 0 W I a) d' 00 00 00 M l0 O d' M r-1 Ul 00 P4 U] r-i d' d' N N O l0 M m O N I- H In O m W H L l 00 1- Ol rl 00 N M r 1 Ul r-I UI a N IT 00 O d' d' C- O M m M U) E r- ry d' m T m O1 Ol m U) O 1 Q W r•-I r-1 r-i r-I 00 r-I N N O a) Ul m O I- M O N Q) m N d' 00 00 M d' d' l0 .-1 r- N U O M 34 rl N l0 m O N N Q' 10 M CO 9 l0 (d a M O O IT C' 0) M IT w O I- m P4 W W r-I r-I H r-i M r--I M . 4 0l W m 00 I- l0 00 l0 00 Ul l0 C w 1 00 O d' O � •r.1 U) 34 34 O O (d (d a) O 4 U is r-4 rd a) L: +� �4 (d U •ri (d 4J a) a) O 4 F= r. U)4J 4J a) S4 S4 M U I~ I~ A I~ > cd (d 0) s~ U a) z O (d a) (d •rq r1 34 �4 (d (d ;> M U to > cn a l< O w 116 4 ® CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT :_ C3 T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: Health Services Department 41, lot ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. `' 'FIXED MR OBJECT Of EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM N0. QUAN1, �4 DECREAS� INCREASE General Fund 1003 0465 3570 Contribution to Enterprise Fund 301,000 0990 6301 Reserve for Contingency 301,000 0990 6301 Appropriable New Revenue 301,000 Enterprise Fund 1450. 0540 1011 Permanent Salaries 301,000 9995 6301 Reserve for Contingency 301,000 099,E 6301 Appropriable New Revenue 301,000 i - i I f s I i APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER 'Dt To adjust approved Budget for Emergency Services fund. B Date s r2, Qr.,rmoeie#%,tf &W,,-f`s;vt eek*7y eow7,4&w `r.v 'z- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 'A.. AW;TJ By; �( �,1.'•r� / Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Powers,Fanden, YES: Schroder,McPeak,Torlakson N0: --�--' MAY 6198 On' Phi! Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of $upervisors and County r~;ministra►or 4, SIGNATURE TITLE DATE 00 By: �'G1 � -�� \PPROPRIAT,oN ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (NI 129 Rev. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE yam! Y � CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 4 ACCOUNT CODING I.DEPARTNENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: Health Services Department-EF1 ORGANIZATION ACCOUNT 2' REVENUE DESCRIPTION INCREASE <DECREASE> Goheral Fund 1003 0005 9041. Tax Losses Reserve Refund 301,000 Ehterprise Fund- 1450 0540 8381 County Subsidy 301,000 APPaOVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER' ,, jI To adjust for increased County subsidy to By-+� aM446� Date✓ �Z/ 67 COUNTY ADMINIST;ATOR hospital enterprise fund. wN RNltl'r sr:Q ( G 7 �Pc�ir�vr ^ � � �� Rs crJlvi s r www �e �e•vs � r j By. Date 46—" INtc Twr �rttls �/.1'Irrr, BOARD OF SUPERVi3ORS YES: Supervisors Powers,Fanden, - Schroder,McPeak,Torlakson MAY 6 386 NO: "�� Date / Phil Batrhelor, Clerk of the Board Of SUPQ�F 'S�I'��'Ur`% 'd inistrator SIGNATURE TITLE 0ATPE By: REVENUE ADJ. R AOO JOURNAL NO. (M 8134 Rev. II/8I) "d 6