HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04011986 - 2.2 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 1 , 1986 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson, Powers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Landfill Projects Processing Schedule
The Board received a memorandum dated March 27, 1986 from
Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Community Development, (attached
hereto and by reference incorporated herein) relating to the status
of applications for landfill sites and the process to be followed in
consideration of these applications.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid
report is ACKNOWLEDGED.
cc: Community Development Director
County Administrator
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: �A--ZZ /, /9A!6
PHIL BAT ELOR, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
13y Deputy
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: Phil Batchelor, DATE: March 27, 1986
County Administrato
FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus,1 SUBJECT: Landfill Project
Director of Communi ev lopment Processing Schedule
The Board of Supervisors, on March 11, 1986, requested a report from the
Director of Community Development on:
1. The anticipated schedule for hearing and considering the Environmental
Impact Reports and applications (entitlements) for the Kirker Pass
Waste Management Landfill , the Central Landfill , and the East Contra
Costa Sanitary Landfill projects.
2. • The progress of the County Solid Waste Commission's recent educational
program, and its expectation for conducting public workshops on refuse
disposal in advance of the time that decisions can be made on the
projects.
In addition to responses to these two referrals, this memorandum includes a
progress report on the status of the Southeast County Landfill Siting Study.
APPLICATION PROCESSING SCHEDULE
The attached flow chart is a proposed schedule for the County Planning Commis-
sion to hear and make decisions on the three private sector landfill applica-
tions prior to Board of Supervisors' consideration. The schedule begins on
February 4th with the filing of the Notice of Completion (with the State Clear-
inghouse) for the Kirker Pass Waste Management Landfill 's Environmental Impact
Report and it extends to a Planning Commission decision date for all three
projects' local planning entitlements (approvals and permits) on September 30th.
Projects approved by the Planning Commission would then be transmitted to the
Board of Supervisors for hearings and final decisions.
The flow chart also anticipates that the County Solid Waste Commission would
consider amendments to the County Solid Waste Management Plan for all three
projects on a schedule parallel to that of the Planning Commission.
The schedule is based on these principles:
1. The three private sector projects will receive individual attention at
the beginnings of their respective public reviews. Each applicant
will have the opportunity to present his project to the Planning
Commission and to the public at an initial hearing where it is the
sole landfill to be considered.
Phil Batchelor 2. March 27, 1986
2. Planning Commission, and Solid Waste Commission, determinations on the
individual projects will not be made until information on all three
has been developed and their roles in a long-term countywide refuse
collection and disposal system have been evaluated. The schedule
would enable project decisions to be made in a "systems" context.
3. The processing of local planning entitlements by the County Planning
Commission will be coordinated with the consideration of Solid Waste
Management Plan amendments by the County Solid Waste Commission. In
addition to on-going coordination, the schedule proposes a Joint
Commissions' work session after the projects have been heard and
before decisions (recommendations to the Board) have been made.
4. The consideration of Environmental Impact Reports for individual
projects will be separated from the consideration of the project's
other local planning entitlements. EIRs are neutral disclosure
documents. The schedule not only indicates that EIR review hearings
will be separated from approval hearings, but that the EIRs are
expected to be certified substantially ahead of the other local
planning entitlements.
5. To the extent feasible, landfill EIRs and entitlements will be
considered at special Planning Commission hearings. This is intended
to provide adequate time for information to be presented and
considered at the hearings.
The flow chart depicts the minimum number of hearings that would be required to
process the landfill applications. It can accommodate some continuances but
others would extend the indicated time.
SUBSEQUENT PROCESSING ACTIONS
Following a decision by the Board of Supervisors, several actions would have to
occur before a landfill could be developed.
The major of these are:
1. Approval of the applicable Solid Waste Management Plan amendment by a
majority, of the County's cities and the California Waste Management
Board.
2. Approval of the landfill 's design by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board.
3. Issuance of a Authority to Construct (and, later to operate) "permit"
by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
Phil Batchelor 3. March 27, 1986
4. Issuance of a Solid Waste Facilities Permit (operations permit) by the
County Health Services Department, with agreement by the California
Waste Management Board.
5. Compliance with various conditions of approval , including off-site
improvement plans, district annexations, and service and financing
agreements.
Obtaining them would take several months under the most favorable of circum-
stances.
SOLID WASTE COMMISSION EDUCATIONAL SESSIONS
In response to a need for the Commission to provide recommendations to the Board
of Supervisors on future major solid waste decisions, the Solid Waste Commission
requested staff to develop a series of Solid Waste Educational Sessions. The
educational sessions were designed for the Solid Waste Commission members, other
elected officials, and public agency staff. Although open to the public, the
educational sessions were not noticed as such and few of the "general public"
attended.
The following topics were discussed over seven sessions held from August through
December of 1985.
Solid waste quantities.
The "players" involved in solid waste and their roles.
The basics of solid waste sanitary landfills.
Three existing landfills.
Three privately-proposed landfills.
Transfer stations.
Resource recovery (two sessions) .
Wrap-up.
If the Board of Supervisors feels there is a need for education/outreach for the
general public, the Solid Waste Commission would be an appropriate vehicle to
provide this service. A condensed version of the educational sessions could be
developed with an emphasis on the landfill siting issues. The Solid Waste
Commission has expressed the willingness to assist the Board on these types of
matters. The most effective time to conduct these sessions would be after the
Planning Commission has received testimony on the private sector landfill
applications but before recommendations have been made to the Board of Super-
visors (see flow chart) .
Phil Batchelor 4. March 27, 1986
SOUTHEAST COUNTY LANDFILL SITING STUDY
The Board of Supervisors authorized this Study on December 10, 1985 upon recom-
mendation of the Solid Waste Commission. The Solid Waste Commission and the
Commission's Technical Advisory Committee were designated by the Board to act as
an advisory body for the Study.
The purpose of the Southeast County Landfill Siting Study is to identify poten-
tial landfill sites as a backup to the three privately-proposed landfill appli-
cations. Four potential landfill sites have been identified in the southeast
area of Contra Costa County. This area was specifically chosen because of its
remoteness to population centers. The Study is a reconnaissance level study.
Although completely separate from the 1984-85 Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District Study, it uses a similar approach. It is not intended to develop
information comparable to available on the three privately-proposed landfill
sites (each of the three privately-proposed landfill sites has spent several
hundreds of thousands of dollars on various studies leading to the submittal of
the permit application) . The total budget for the Southeast County Landfill
Siting Study is $54,326 for four sites.
The consulting firm of Brown, Vance & Associates, who were the lead consultants
on the Central Costa County Sanitary District/ County Study, have been retained
to perform the Study. The basic data gathering has been completed for all four
sites. A draft final report will be issued in mid-April . A public meeting has
been scheduled at the Antioch Community Center on the evening of Wednesday,
April 23, 1986. The final report is expected to be received in May.
CZ/aa
encl .
u,
gm
Oil
ku
" , a
'I
Iq
C'L
1
I
j t
I
4
: 4 0 NLL. 0
TL
� d 2 3 w 7 �� UI I w
0x_14 d..�..._tj
! 1
a W '
wTw
au
f
—a 2 W w�
CL
a.
oC ,� V Q LL Q i+ 2
IjjVI-- � Z 2 NI N Z J 1T fit 1
.S