HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04151986 - WC.3 I ..
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: WATER COMMITTEE
DATE: APRIL 14, 1986
SUBJECT: WATER COMMITTEE REPORT - LEGISLATION
Specific Requests or Recommendations E Background b Justification
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Take the following positions, as Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Water Agency,
on the legislation listed below:
AB 459- Water Resources Development: Delta Plan (3/18/86) - Watch
AB 3906- Water Conservation Program (2/21/86) - Support
ACR 121- Aquatic Habitat Institute (2/21/86) - Support
SB 2612- Water Facilities (3/17/86) - Oppose
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND
The Water Committee, at its March 14 , 1986 meeti.ng, considered each of the proposed legis-
lative bills and examined the rationale that justified the above-stated positions for
consistency with the County' s established water policy. A summary of the bills and rationale
for County positions has been provided to Board Members and is on file with the Clerk of
the Board and the Community Development Department.
Continued on attachment: yes Signature:
Recommendation of County dmin stratoreco n o Boar Committee
Approve Other:
Signature(s): .�-�7�" G/ �
Supervisor 2unne McPeak Supervisor Ro t Schroder
Action of Board on: /S, l�,9b Approved as Rec ended Other
I
Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
Unanimous (Absent ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes: Noes: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Absent: Abstain:
we.bo.1eg,t4rl Attested244�z /if 9
Orig. Div.: Community Development (EC) p ,' K
cc: County Administrator OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY
County Legislative Delegation-via CDD ADMINISTRATOR
Cressey Nakagawa-Water Agency Attorney-via CDD
By ,
DEPUTY
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: FISH b WILDLIFE STUDY COMMITTEE (VIA WATER C0*1ITTEE)
DATE: APRIL 3, 1986
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO LIST SALMON AS A THREATENED SPECIES
Specific Request(s) or ecommendat ons a Background S Justification
RECOMMENDED ACTION
AUTHORIZE the Chair to sign a letter to the National Marine Fisheries Service supporting
the concept of listing winter run Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River as a threatened
species and encouraging government agencies to take measures to increase the population so
that the listing is not necessary.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND
On March 25,1?86, the Board referred to the Fish b Wildlife Study Committee a letter from
the National Marine Fisheries Services seeking comments on the proposal to list winter run
chinook salmon in the Sacramento River as a federally-identified threatened species. The
American Fisheries Society has accumulated data showing the decline of winter run chinook
in the Sacramento River. This documentation has been presented to the National Marine
Fisheries Services in support of a petition to list the salmon as a threatened species.
The National Marine Fisheries Services has determined that the request presents "substantial
scientific information indicating that the petition action may be warranted". The request
was published in the Federal Register and comments are sought to provide additional infor-
mation and data on the salmon run. The National Marine Fisheries Services will evaluate
all the data presented and will make a determination within 12 months.
Salmon make several runs up the Sacramento River in a given year. The success of spawning
for each run varies depending on climatologicalI conditions, outflow from upstream reservoirs
and hatchery operations. The winter run salmon has suffered a major decline and is in
serious danger. This action would not have a direct impact on other spawning runs of
Continued on attachment: X yes Signature:
Recommendation of County nistratorZK
rd omm ttee
Approve Other:
�?
Si ature s "L, "�
Supervisor Sunne McPeak VSupervisor Robert Schroder
Action of Board on: 1,S 9 t, Approved as Recomnended_X_ Other_
Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 1S A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
Unanimous (Absent ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes: NoeiT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN. .
Absent: Abstain:
wa .ho.salmon.tT— Attested
Orig. Div.: Community Development K
cc: County Administrator OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY
Fish b Wildlife Study Committee via CDD ADMINISTRATOR
Com.for Water Policy Consensus via CDD
By
DEPUT CLERK
PROPOSAL TO LIST SALMON AS A THREATENED SPECIES
April 3, 1986
Page 7
salmon or other species such as striped bass. However, any regulations which would protect
the winter run salmon would have a beneficial effect on other users of the Sacramento
River. One potential problem is that if the winter run salmon are listed as a threatened
species , other salmon which cannot be differentiated from other salmon in the ocean, may
also be "protected" and may affect rights of commercial fishermen, and sports fishermen, to
take salmon. This latter concern is not likely to occur, according to those who have studied
this issue.
At the April 3, 1986 meeting of the Fish & Wildlife Study Committee, the Committee reviewed
their proposal . The Committee felt that the attention that may be caused by the potential
listing of salmon as a threatened species may be beneficial to the salmon and other fish in
the Sacramento River. Governmental agencies, particularly those involved in water projects,
may be more likely to implement projects and management options which would protect the
winter run salmon rather than face the threat of listing the salmon as a threatened species
and being forced to modify their operations substantially. Measures such as modification
of existing dams , operations of existing dams and diversion facilities, and restrictions on
pumping during certain critical time periods could be implemented on a rapid basis by many
governmental agencies.
The Fish b Wildlife Committee recommends that the Board support the concept of listing the
salmon as a threatened species and using this mechanism as a means to bring attention to
the modifications necessary to protect the salmon and other species, as well as general
water quality in the estuary.