HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06251985 - IO.5 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted tills Order on lune 25., 1c8S , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson, Fanden
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Powers
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT proposed Adoption of Fees )
for Permits , Inspections , )
:Plan-Checking and Other ) RESOLUTION NO. 85/ 398
Services ) (Govt . C. §§54986 , 54992
& 65962)
------------------------------------
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California ,
as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection
District , RESOLVES THAT:
1 . A public meeting shall be held before this Board on July__
_3O, 1985 at _2:_3_0 P.M. in the Board of Supervisors Chambers , County
Administration Building, 651 Pine Street , Martinez, California, to
consider the adoption of fees for permits , inspections , plan-
checking and other services performed by the District and to con-
sider any oral or written presentations that may be made at the
meeting .
2 . The Clerk of the Board is DIRECTED, at least 14 days prior
to the meeting , to cause the attached Notice to be published one
time in the "Contra Costa Times , " a newspaper of general cir-
culation.
3 . The Clerk of the Board is DIRECTED, at least 14 days prior
to the meeting , to mail a copy of the attached Notice to any
interested party who has filed a written request for mailed notice
with the Clerk of the Board or with the District , as provided by
Government Code §§54986 (a) and 54992 (a) .
4 . The District Fire Chief is DIRECTED, at least 14 days
prior to the meeting , to file with the Clerk of the Board data
indicating the proposed fees , the cost or estimated cost of pro-
viding the services or enforcing the regulations and anticipated
revenue sources , as required by Government Code S§54986(a) and
54992 (a) .
5 . The Clerk of the Board is DIRECTED, upon request , to make
the data available for public inspection.
6 . Any action by the Board to levy a new fee or charge or to
approve an increase in an existing fee or charge will be taken by
ordinance,.
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED:
PHIL BA CHELOR, Clod. of i Board
of Supervisors and Counl.y Admin'strator
Orig. Dept.: i
cc: County Administrator 2
County Counsel By Deputy .
William F. Maxfield, Fire'Chief
Centra Costa County Consolidated Fire District
Northern California Bldg. Industry Assn
Attn: Dean LaField
Ralph Garrow Inc.
P.O. Box 367, Antioch
RESOLUTION NO. 85/398
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on _June 25 , 1985 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Schroder , McPeak, Torlakson, Fanden
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Powers
ABSTAIN: " None
SUBJECT: Fire District Administrative Permit Fees and
Fees for General Plan Fire Facilities Reviews
The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Tom Torlakson
and Supervisor Nancy Fanden substituting for Supervisor Tom Powers)
submitted a' report dated June 24, 1985 on fire district administrative
permit fees and fees for General Plan fire facilities reviews . Copy
of said report is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein.
The report presented several recommendations which afforded the Board
a choice as, to the course of action it wished to pursue .
Following discussion of Board members , IT IS BY THE BOARD
ORDERED that recommendation number 1 was APPROVED with the adoption
of Resolution No. 85/398 fixing July 30 , 1985 at 2: 30 P .M. for
hearing; on proposed fire district fees .
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that recommendation number 2A was
APPROVED asmodified, fixing September 10, 1985 at ,.10: 30 A.M. for
hearing to consider adoption of an ordinance requiring applications
for rezoning, subdivisions , etc . to provide and demonstrate con-
sistency with .the General Plan, particularly as it relates to the
Fire Protection Plan portion of the Community Facilities element .
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Community
Development is DIRECTED to circulate the proposed ordinance to the
cities in the County and request them to schedule hearings in
September on this matter .
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Community
Development is REQUESTED to give notification of the September 10
hearing to all concerned parties .
FURTHER , IT IS ORDERED that Supervisor Torlakson and the
County Administrator are DIRECTED to share the concept of a plan-
checking fee with The Mayors' Conference at their August meeting
and urge each city to consider adopting such an ordinance in
September to coincide with the Board' s September 10 hearing on this
subject .
1 hgreby certify that this Is .vue and correct copy sof
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTEStED: v2•��� /2z� -
PHIL B TCHELOR, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
by ��� , Deputy
cc: Director , Community Development
County Administrator
Fire Chiefs' Association
County Counsel
I .O. Cte .
TO: BOARD OF SU&VISORS •
Contra
FROM: INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Costa
DATE: June 24 , 1985 County
SUBJECT: Fire District Administrative Permit Fees and Fees for � ��J
General Plan Fire Facilities Reviews
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . Fix either July 23 , 1985 , or July 30, 1985, at 10 : 30 A.M. ,
in the Board Chambers as the date, place, and time to hold a
public hearing to consider the adoption of fees for permits,
inspections , plan checking, and other services performed by
the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and adopt
the attached Resolution relating thereto.
(Supervisor Torlakson prefers the July 23rd date.
Supervisor Fanden, who was substituting for Supervisor
Powers , would prefer to wait until the full Board is
available on July 30. )
2. Adopt one or the other of the following recommendations:
A. 1 ) Fix July 23 , 1985 at 10 : 30 A.M. in the Board
Chambers as the date, place, and time to hold a
public hearing to consider the adoption of an
ordinance requiring that applications for
rezonings, subdivisions, and other planning
entitlements, demonstrate General Plan
consistency, particularly with regard to the fire
protection plan portion of the Community
Facilities element.
2 ) Order the Director, Community Development
Department, to circulate the proposed ordinance to
each city in the County, requesting the cities '
comments and support of the ordinance, and urging
that each city also adopt a similar ordinance.
3 ) Order the Director, Community Development
Department, to request time on the agenda for the
Mayors ' Conference meeting in August to discuss
the proposed ordinance and explain the need for
the cities to each adopt a similar ordinance.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR �X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE /� �Roj&,lV/Y l
SIGNATURES) Tom Torlakson Nancy Fanden
Page 2
(Supervisor Torlakson prefers the above recommendations in
that the Board of Supervisors would be exercising the
leadership of adopting an ordinance and then requesting the
cities to take similar action. )
B. Order the Director, Community Development Department,
to circulate the proposed ordinance to each city,
request the city to adopt the ordinance, and report to
the Board when the majority of the cities in the County
have adopted such an ordinance so the Board of
Supervisors can then consider adoption of a similar
ordinance.
( Supervisor Fanden prefers to see some demonstration on
the part of the cities that they are willing to impose
these fees before the Board does so in order to protect
the interests of the citizens in the unincorporated
area of the County. )
BACKGROUND:'
On March 26 , 1985 , the Board directed the County Administrator ' s
Office, Director of Planning (now Community Development) , Fire
Chiefs ' Association, and County Counsel to prepare a report for
our Committee on current provisions in the Ordinance Code and
State law relating to the right and responsibility of fire
districts to perform certain administrative functions and charge
fees for those functions.
On June 24 , 1985 , our Committee received and considered two
report:; from County Counsel: one on the administrative permit
fees specifically for the Contra Costa County (Consolidated) Fire
Protection District, and the other on the broader issue of the
ability of -the County and Fire Districts to charge a fee to
review planning entitlements for consistency with the County
General. Plan.
In regard to the administrative permit fees, the County Counsel
has prepared a Resolution fixing the public hearing and providing
for the necessary public notice. Once the Board has concluded
the required hearing, the necessary fees can be approved by
ordinance.
Our Committee, with Supervisor Fanden substituting for Supervisor
Powers, agrees that we should move ahead with the . imposition of
the necessary administrative permit fees. Supervisor Torlakson
would like to move on this as quickly as possible and is,
therefore, recommending that the hearing be held July 23rd.
Supervisor Fanden would prefer waiting until the full Board is
present to hear the matter and is, therefore, recommending that
the hearing be set for July 30th.
In regard to setting a fee for a review of the fire protection
plan portion of the Community Facilities element of the County
General Plan, County Counsel points out that the fire districts
have no direct authority to impose such a fee. However, as a
part of the existing fee structure, the Community Development
Department could charge a fee and in turn contract with the
respective fire districts to provide a specialized and technical
review for consistency with the fire protection plan. Since this
fee would be imposed by the County, it would only be applicable
within the unincorporated area of the County. This would mean
that each city would then have to enact a similar ordinance and
contract with the fire district in order for the fire district to
recover the necessary revenue .to cover the cost of these General
Plan reviews.
Page 3
Supervisor Torlakson believes that the cities will enact such an
ordinance once the County does so and is, therefore, recommending
that the Board of Supervisors move ahead with enactment of the
ordinance, with the understanding that the cities would
immediately be urged to enact a similar ordinance.
Supervisor Fanden believes that the interests of the citizens in
the unincorporated areas of the County would best be served by
insuring that the cities have demonstrated their willingness to
impose such a fee by enacting an ordinance, following which the
Board could do so once they saw evidence of the cities '
willingness to do the same.
It is, therefore, necessary for the Board in Recommendation No. 1
to determine which date the public hearing on the administrative
permit fees will be held, and in Recommendation No. 2 to
determine which process is most appropriate in terms of imposing
a fee for General Plan fire facilities ' reviews . If the
ordinance providing for the General Plan fire facilities ' review
is enacted, the Board would then need to conduct a public hearing
and enact an additional ordinance to actually increase the
planning fees.
Jill
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on , June 25Z 1985 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, and Torlakson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Powers
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Recycling Center Contract
Supervisor Torlakson commented on a contract that is
currently being finalized relative to the operation of the Recycling
Center for a five-year period. He expressed his recommended appro-
val of the contract .
Board members CONCURRED and DECLARED their intent to
approve the contract when submitted for the Chair' s signature.
an a 2lonj taE,en and onlc.ed on the :.IMu es of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: !"`L -Ji- , / ?gg
PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board
Of Supervisors and County Administrator
By [ - J , Deputy
cc: Community Development Director
County Administrator