HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05211985 - 1.57 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: May 21, 1985
SUBJECT: APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR NEW COUNTY DETENTION
CENTER (4411-4101; 0928-WH1018)
Specific Requests or Recommendations A Background A Justification
I. RECOMMENDATION
Approve and authorize the Public Works Director to execute on behalf of the County the
First Amendment to a Consulting Services Agreement with The Design Partnership, 44 •Brannan
Street, San Francisco. The original Agreement is for Architectural Predesign Services for
the New County Detention Center. The Amendment will add a food service study to the
original scope of services and will increase the Payment Limit from $46,860.00 to $51,360.00,
which shall not be exceeded without further written authorization by the Public Works
Director. The Amendment will be effective May 21, 1985 .
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT
The costs associated with this Consulting Services Agreement are eligible as local match
contributions for State Grant Funds. Even with this Amendment the Agreement will provide
an architectural predesign report for significantly less than the $138,000 cost of comparable
predesign work which was provided for the Martinez Detention Facility .in 1977. There are
adequate funds to cover this Amendment in capital budget line item No. 4411-4101.
III. BACKGROUND - REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
A. By an Order dated November 27, 1984, the Board approved a Consulting Services Agreement
with the Design Partnership for architectural predesign services for the New County Detention
Center. Under the approved agreement, the Design Partnership is reviewing, refining, and
completing the initial detention center program and requirements which were set forth in
the County's application for State Proposition 2 County Jail Expenditure Funds.
B. The County Administrator's Office, the Planning Task Force and the Design Partnership
have recommended that we increase the scope of the architectural predesign services to
include a detailed analysis and recommendations on options for food service at the New
Detention Center. The analysis will include consideration of the following issues: (1)
Should the kitchen in the New Detention Center serve the entire County Detention• system or
only the New Detention Center? (2) Should the type of service be a chilled delay system or
a hot delivery system? (3) Should the dining facility be a central dining room or disbursed
areas in each housing unit? (4) How much space should be allocated and wh t equipment
should be purchased for each option?
Continued on attachment: yes Signature:
,G
Recommendation of County Administrator Recommendollon o Committee
Approve er:
Si natures)
Action of Board on: May 21, 1985 Approved as Recommended Other_
Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
Unanimous (Absent - ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes: Noes: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Absent: Abstain:
Attested MAY 2 31965
Orig. Div.: Public Works Department PHIL BATCHELOR,
Architectural Div.
cc: Public Works Department CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Architectural Division AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Accounting
Auditor-Controller By DEPUTY
County Administrator
Criminal Justice ,Agency
Design Partnership
RDH:fc
B024.t4