HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04091985 - T.10 T 10
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 9 , 1985 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Schroder , Torlakson and Fanden
NOES: Supervisor McPeak
ABSENT: Supervisor Powers
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Appeal of the Alhambra Valley Improvement Association
from Planning Commission approval of MS 68-84 , Albert R .
Compaglia , applicant , and Micahel D . Bell , owner .
This being the time for hearing on the appeal of the
Alhambra Valley Improvement Association from the Planning Commission
approval of an application for MS 68-84 , filed by Albert R .
Compaglia (applicant ) and Michael D . Bell (owner ) to divide 14 . 3
acres into 3 parcels with variance to have 2 parcels less than
5 acres in an A-2 zoning district , approximately 600 feet north of
Alhambra Valley Road on a private road easterly and opposite Corte
de la Canada , in the Alhambra Valley area; and
Harvey Bragdon , Assistant Director of Planning ,
reviewed the project , including the size of the existing lots in the
area .
The Chairwoman declared the hearing open and the folowing
persons appeared:
A . R . Compaglia , 921 Ulfinian Way, Martinez , appli-
cant , who indicated ageement to 3 lots being built on the property ,
with further development rights being dedicated to the County of
Contra Costa , and advised that it was his opinion that the 3 homes
would not change the character of the area , nor cause concern about
flooding , and that the project is substantially in compliance with
the General Plan and compatible with adjacent developemt , and that
it meets the requirements of the Ordinance Code .
Michael Bell , 5290 Alhambra Valley Road , Martinez ,
owner , commented that he had just recently learned of the
infrastructure fees and suggested that since the land had previously
been approved for one dwelling , the fee should be imposed on only
two dwellings , and advised that he would favor the alternative lot
size configuration which would provide for 3 more equally sized lots
and for access to Parcels B & C from neighboring Subdivision 6443
(Deadhorse) .
Marie Olson , 22 Wanda Way , Martinez , speaking for
Ruth Newman , a member of the Board of Directors of the Alhambra
Valley Improvement Association , discussed testimony presented at
the two Zoning Administrator' s hearings , and the Board of Appeals
hearing with respect to a 2-lot verus a 3-lot subdivision .
Hal Olson , 22 Wanda Way, Martinez , for the Alhambra
Valley Improvement Association , reviewed the history of 2 lots ver-
sus 3 lots and the Zoning Administrator' s reconsideration , and com-
mented that in his opinion , the 3-lot subdivision violates the
policy on ranchettes and zoning as set forth in the General Plan .
Mr . Olson advised that there is an urgent need to move forward with
the specific plan . He advised he is not opposing the development ,
but rather the lot size and urged approval of only 2 lots .
Frank Hackett , 100 Deodara Way , Martrinez , referred to
letters from the City of Martinez and from California Equity Fund
1
representing Stonehurst , urging that the County go forward with a
Specific Plan .
Frank Boyle , Contra Costa County Fire Protection District ,
spoke to the need for adequate road width to accommodate emergency
vehicles .
Doug Flett , Engineer for Deadhorse Ranch , advised that
Deadhorse Ranch does not want the access road for MS 68-84 on the
Deadhorse subdivision .
Mr . Compaglia appeared in rebuttal and suggested that the
matter be continued to give the applicant an opportunity to review
the total cost of complying with the new conditions and infrastruc-
ture costs .
The Chairwoman declared the hearing closed . The Board
discussed with Mr . Bragdon the circumstances under which the recon-
sideration of the first Zoning Administrator' s hearing was granted .
Supervisor Fanden commented that she was satisfied with
the explanation , and then commented on the various conditions she
recommended for approval of the subdivision application , and recom-
mened that the recorded map indicate that in approving this minor
subdivision , it is not the intent of the Board of Supervisors that
the lot size for this subdivision be precedent setting in any way .
Supervisor Fanden also suggested that the applicant agree
to make a $150 contribution to the Alhambra Valley Improvement
Association , which is the amount of the appeal fee paid by that
organization . The applicant agreed to make such a contribution .
Supervisor McPeak indicated that she was concered with the
question of fairness with respect to the imposition of $1 ,000
towards the cost of the Specific Plan and $17,000 per lot for
infrastructure for a 3-lot subdivision .
As recommended by Supervisor Fanden , IT IS BY THE BOARD
ORDERED that the appeal of the Alhambra Valley Impovement
Association is DENIED and the application for MS 68-84 is APPROVED ,
subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A , attached hereto
and by reference incorporated herein , and the Board adopts the fin-
dings of the Planning Commission . adopted February 12, 1985 .
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown
ATTESTED:
PHIL BR, Cierk of the Board
of Superv;scrs and County Admtnfstrator
cc: Director of Planning By C .Deputy
Public Works Director
County Counsel
Alhambra Valley Improvement Assn .
Applicant
Contra Costa Fire Protection Dist .
2
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION 68-84 (Revised)
1. This approval is based upon the tentative map submitted with the application
dated received by the Planning Department September 7, 1984.
2. An exception is granted for Parcels A and B to contain less than five (5) acres
as shown on the tentative map.
3. The existing scenic easement on the property shall be modified to encompass
not less than five (5) acres on Parcel C, subject to review and approval by
the Zoning Administrator prior to recording the parcel map. Development rights
for other than one single family residence on Parcel C shall be granted to the
County.
4. Prior to recording of a parcel map, a geology and soils report shall be sub-
mitted for review by the Planning Department (County Geologist) . Information
available shows the private access road crossing a landslide deposit. The ei -
tent and depth of the deposit and provision for its stabilization shall be
determined prior to recording the map. Bonding for grading and construction
of the access road may be required.
5. If archaeologic materials are uncovered during grading, trenching or other on-
site excavation, earthwork within 30 meters of these materials shall be stopped
until an archaeologist certified by the Society for California Archaeology (SCA)
and/or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA) has had an opportunity to
evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation measures,
if they are deemed necessary.
6. This minor subdivision is conditionally approved, subject to the applicant ob-
taining the necessary approval from the County Health Department for the utiliz-
ation of individual sewage disposal on each parcel and provision for water supply
and service.
7. A building sideyard distance not less than 40-ft., shall be provided along the
south boundary of Parcel C.
8. Comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department:
A. In accordance with Section 9?-?.006 of the County. Or J i,►ance
Code, this subdivision shall conform to the provisions of the
County Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9) . Any exceotions
therefrom must be specifically listed in this conditional
approval statement.
1. Construct a ?Q-foot paved road to orivate road standards form
south property line of Parcel A to the south property line of
Parcel C to the subject property. The existing bridge over
Del Hambre Creek shall he widened or replaced to provide an
unobstructed 10-foot travelled way,, suhject to Fire District
approval . Turnouts shall be provided at 500-foot intervals.
C. Furnish proof to the Public Works Department, Land neveiopment
Division, of the acquisition of all necessary rights of
MS 68-84 Page 2
entry, permits and/or easements for the construction of
offsite, temporary or permanent, road and drainage improve-
ments.
0. Furnish proof to the Public Works Department, Land Development
Division, that legal access to the property is available from
Alhambra Valley Road.
E. Contribute $0.25 per square foot of impervious surface area
to the County Drainage Deficiency Trust Fund designated for
Zone 5 for the construction of area-wide drainage improvements.
F. The creek crossing shall be widened to 20-feet and shall
utilize a culvert.. A drop structure shall he incorporated
into the design. Full credit against the drainaqe fee shall
he allowed for the drop structure.
a
G. Convey to the County, by Offer of Dedication, a drainaqe
easement of sufficient size to encompass the drop structures
and access required for their maintenance.
H. Improvements plans ,for storm drainage and traffic related
items shall be subject to review by the City of Martinez.
I. Contribute $1,000 per lot to the County within 90 days of the
Board of Supervisors' action on the appeal to provide partial
financing of a Specific Plan for Alhambra Valley.
J. Storm water from Parcel A shall be conveyed in a closed
conduit and discharged into the drop structure.
K. Underground all utilities.
L. Contribute $17,000 per lot as the developments fair share of
the area's infrastructure needs. Full credit towards this
contribution will be allowed for the following;. ;
1 . Fire Facilities Contributions
2. Park Dedication Fee (City and County)
3. Road Improvements/Contributions (City and County)
4. Drainage Mitigation Contribution/Improvements
5. Specific Plan Contribution
T Domestic Water Supply (pump .'stations, reservoirs, and mains
to reservoirs).
M. Contribute $150 to the Alhambra Valley Association.
MS 68-84 Page 3
N. The map shall contain a statement that no prece� ent is
intended in the approval of the substandard lots sizes.
The following statements are not conditions of approval. However, you should be aware
of them prior to requesting building permits on the parcels of this minor subdivison.
A. Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District (See attached).
BT:ed
10/3/84
11/21/84
1/7/85
4/16/85
CO�tRA COSH'.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY _ CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT
2010.GEARY ROAD F�'Q£ DIStRPLEASANT HILL, CA 94523-4694
TELEPHONE (415) 939.3400
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
C �°c
September 24, 1984 f.a
ofnrnc
_ x z
Contra Costa County a
Planning Department .�
P. O. Box 951
Martinez, CA 94553
Attn: Byron Turner
SUBJECT: MS 68-84
5290 Alhambra Valley Road
Martinez
Dear Mr. Turner:
We have reviewed the application for a minor subdivision at the subject location.
This project is regulated by codes and ordinances administered by this Fire District
relative to Contra Costa County Ordinance 83/44. If approved by your office, the
following shall be included as conditions of approval:
1. The developer shall provide an adequate and reliable water supply for fire
protection with a minimum fire flow of 1,250 GPM. Required flow shall be
delivered from not more than two 12) hydrants flowing simultaneously while
maintaining 20 pounds residual pressure in the main. (10.301c)UFC
2. The developer shall provide two (2) hydrants of the East Bay type. Location
of hydrants will be determined by this office upon submittal of 3 copies of a
tentative map or site plan. Cost of the installation to be borne by the
developer. (10.301c)UFC
Note: According to available information, existing water supply facilities in
the area are not adequate to provide the required fire flow. You are advised
to contact the appropriate water district to determine whether the required
flows can be made available before proceeding further with the project.
3. All portions of the access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface
of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width, and not less than 13'6" of
vertical clearance, to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls
of every building. Access roads shall not exceed 20% grade, shall have a
minimum inside turning radius of 28 feet, and must be capable of supporting
the imposed loads of fire apparatus (16 tons) . (10.207a)UFC
r l
C.C.C. Planning Dept./Byron Turner
RE: MS 68-84
September 24, 1984
Page 2
4. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 feet long shall be provided
with approved provisions for the turning around of fire department apparatus.
(10.207a)UFC
5. Where open space is to be maintained for public or private use, access into
these areas from public ways shall be provided. These access ways shall be a
minimum 16 foot width to accommodate fire department equipment.
The continued access and maintenance of the District's fire trail system shall
also be insured.
All open spaces, when left in their natural state, shall meet the Fire District's
weed abatement standards. Where practical, we .would encourage the use of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture's Land Management Program utilizing livestock
grazing. This would require fencing the properties and allowing animals to
graze to approximately a 25% residual. If this method is not utilized, mechanical
abatement shall be required. Contact Senior Inspector Emery of this office
for minimum weed abatement requirements. (87.104)C.C.C. Ord. 83/44
6. Due to the extended emergency response time, approximately 6 minutes, to the
subject location, building shall be protected by. an approved automatic fire
sprinkler system and have fire-retardant roof covering. (10.301b)UFC
It is requested that a copy of the conditions of approval for the subject project
be forwarded to this office when compiled by the planning agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
William F. Maxfield
Fire Chief
by: Frank J. Boyle
Fire Inspector
WFM/FJB:vw
CC: Albert R. Compaglia
File MS 68-84
1 . Alhambpn�filey Imprvmt Assn MS 68-84,999 6
2. Compaglia Albert R Alhambra Valley Martinez
area