HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04231985 - 2.1 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on
April 23 , 1985 by the following vote:
,
AYES: Supervisors Powers , Schroder , McPeak, Fanden.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Supervisor Torlakson(for the reason that—he had fiscal
ABSTAIN: concerns for that department)
None .
SUBJECT: In the Matter of Appointment,
Status and Compensation for the RESOLUTION NO. 85/ 206
exempt Class of Chief Deputy Sheriff
THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLVES that:
1. The Sheriff-Coroner is the appointing authority for exempt positions of
Chief Deputy Sheriff, the incumbents of which serve at the Sheriff-Coroner's pleasure.
2. Classified employees appointed to positions in the exempt Chief Deputy
Sheriff class shall retain their status in the classified service in the classification
held at the time of their appointment to Chief Deputy Sheriff.
3. Compensation for the class of Chief Deputy Sheriff is established by the
Board of Supervisors and may be adjusted periodically with other management, exempt and
unrepresented classifications by the Board.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.po
ATTESTEfk /9--0-5
PHIL BATC14ELOR, Clerk o tf he Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
By ' Deputy
Orig. Dept.: Personnel
cc: Sheriff-Coroner
Auditor-Controller
County Counsel
County Administrator's Office—Justice
System Programs
RESOLUTION NO. 85/206
•
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on April 23 , 1985 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers , Schroder , McPeak, Fanden.
NOES: Supervisor Torlakson (for the reason that he had fiscal
concerns for that department)
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None .
SUBJECT: Ordinance(s) Introduced
The following ordinance(s ) which amend(s) the Ordinance
Code of Contra Costa County as indicated having been introduced , the
Board by unanimous vote of the members present waives full reading
thereof and fixes April 30, 1985 as the time for adoption
of same:
Amends Section 33-5. 311 to the .County
Ordinance Code to add Chief Deputy
Sheriff to the list of classes and
positions which are excluded from the
County' s merit system.
(Even though Supervisor Torlakson voted "no"; all five
members were in agreement to waive reading of the proposed
Ordinance) .
�-, POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No.
RECEIVED Date:
PERS011LIKEL DEPHRTr F aT
Dept. No./ Copers
Department Sheriff-Coroner. Budget UrWA « �� (N^�j. No. 2570 Agency No. 25
Action Requested: Create exempt class of Chief Deput�assify one (1) exempt position of
Chief Deputy• Cancel one 1position of Lieutenant
Proposed Effective Date: 7/1/84
Explain why adjustment. is needed: See attached memo 5/21/84 to CA0
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No
Estimated cost of adjustment: $
Cost is within department's budget: Yes No []
If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs area fun
Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment,
Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. i OUNM AD IN. ERVICE9 OFFICER
0FFJcE ad
Personnel Department Recommendation
Date: October 23, 1984
Allocate the class of Chief Deputy Sheriff - Exempt to the Exempt Salary Schedule
at salary_. level C3-2059 (3924-4326) and classify 1 position; and cancel Lieutenant
posistgn salary level C5-1837 (2851-3465).
This class is exempt from overtime.
Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the
Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above.
Effective: s day following Board action.
day following passage of ordinance.
ate for Director f trsonnel
County Administrator Recominendation
Date:
Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel
0 Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel
0 Other:
for County Administr for
Board of Supervisors ActionPhil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of
Adjustment APPROVED M on APR 23 1985 Supervisors and County Administrator
. Date: APR 2 3 1985 By:
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT.
(M321--)-6/82 _
Sheriff-Coroner f T Richard K. Rainey
Contra Costa County SHERIFF-CORONER
~ Warren E. Rupf
P.O. Box 391AP Assistant Sheriff
Martinez, California 94553-0039 R ���
415 372- Gerald T. MltosInka
2404 �Hn BAT Assistant Sheriff -
t:RK BOARD C7IFloR
C NT OFSAOC`..s
To: Board of Supervisors Dat c April 4, 1985
Via Phil Batchelor, County Administrator
From: Richard K. Rainey, Sheriff-Corone Subject: Chief Deputy Position
I am requesting that the Board of Supervisors favorably consider the creation
of a classification of Chief Deputy in my department, and the authorization of
one position to manage the Detention function.
Chief Deputy is a new position which I propose to meet an organizational need
for an additional level of supervision and control . The Detention function is
one of the most complex and important responsibilities in county government.
With a $14 million budget and 235 authorized personnel , the division is larger
than all but four other departments. With a requirement for the total care and
custody of over 900 inmates, the level of responsibility and potential liability
is probably unmatched by any program in the county. This function will continue
to grow, and with the opening of a new jail facility in west county, there will
be only two county departments larger than the Detention Division.
I have had to transfer a Captain to the Main Detention Facility to handle the
responsibility of the day-to-day operations at that institution. Previously,
a Lieutenant supervised four other Lieutenants at that facility, creating an
organizational dilemma. In addition to the Main Facility (over 600 inmates with a
capacity of 386) , the Detention Division Commander is responsible for the Clayton
Rehabilitation Center (270 inmates and a major remodeling effort) , the Richmond
Work Furlough Facility (approximately 100 inmates) , the National Institute of
Corrections program and grant, planning and preparation for the newest jail
facility, negotiating millions of dollars worth of inmate contracts with the
state, and numerous organizational and committee duties which I assign to the
Detention Division Commander. For this tremendous level of responsibility and
scope of assignment, I am asking an individual to take an exempt position. as
Chief Deputy at only a 6% -raise in compensation.
I have studied the organizations of the major Sheriff's Departments in the state,
and am convinced a Detention Chief Deputy is appropriate. You recently received
a similar study from the County Administrator, and the data clearly indicate that
I have a reasonable ratio of management personnel in. my department. In addition,
the overall number of sworn managers will not change with this transaction, as I
am cancelling a Lieutenant position to partially offset the cost of the Chief
Deputy.
I am asking the Board to recognize the need for an appropriate classification and
approve the transaction to be submitted in the near future.
RKR:mg
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER