HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04161985 - 1.46 TO: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FROM: Phil Batchelor Contra
Executive Director Costa
DATE: March 28, 1985 County
SUBJECT: Legislation : Assembly Bill 1725
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a position in support of AB 1725 by Assembly member Hauser
which defines the territorial jurisdiction of the County Redevelopment
Agency when a project area is included in an annexation or ' a new city '
formation .
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Provides assurances that the County Redevelopment Agency will not be
detrimentally impacted if a project area is included in an annexation
or new city formation .
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND
Existing Community Redevelopment Law ( Health 8 Safety Code 3300 et. seq . )
provides that the territorial jurisdiction of the Redevelopment Agency
of the County is the unincorporated territory in the County and that the
territorial jurisdiction of a City Redevelopment Agency is the territory
included within the boundaries of the city .
This bill would , instead , specify that the territorial jurisdiction of
the County Redevelopment Agency includes all of the unincorporated territory
which was included in a project area even if that territory is subsequently
annexed to a city or included within the boundaries of a new city , unless
territorial. jurisdiction is transferred from the County Agency to the
City Agency pursuant to procedures specified in the bill . The bill also
contains certain protections to the County Agency with regard to indebtedness
incurred and the distribution of tax increment revenues from the project
area .
While the County Redevelopment Agency has obtained strong legal counsel
that its financial position , with regard to incurred indebtedness and
tax increment revenues , would not be detrimentally impacted by annexation'
of its project areas, Community Redevelopment Law is silent on the subject .
AB 1725 •wouId clarify the Agency Is territorial jurisdiction and protect its
financial position within a project area . Staff , therefore, recommends strong
support of this bill .
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
XRECOMMENDATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOP RECOMMENDATION OF AGENCY COMAITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF AGENCY CN Qp� 1 P 1QOC APPRCVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOP—
MENT AGENCY ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Adm i n i strator ATTESTED APR j95
Director of Planning PHIL BATCHELOR, AGENCY SECUTARY
Public Works
Redevelopment Agency
M282/7-RS RV