Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04101984 - 2.5 a.� THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 10, 1984 by tM following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ASSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Medi-Cal Reimbursements The Interim County Administrator transmitted to the Board the report dated March 29, 1984 from the Auditor-Controller (copy of which is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein) , commenting on components of the. Medi-Cal Accounts Receivable and the need for an analysis of said accounts as well as suggesting an optimum time to undertake a study. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said report is ACKNOWLEDGED and that the County Administrator is DIRECTED to share said report with the County's Legislative Delegation and appropriate State officials. Further, IT IS ORDERED that the installation of the new data processing system should be completed prior to the initiation of the analysis. I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: Ar /00 J.R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK and ex officio Clerk of tho Board By Deputy Orig. Dept.: Clerk of the Board Cc: County Administrator Legislative Delegation Acting Health Services Director Auditor-Controller nn 11®0i,49 Office of C'.nntra C0_ RECEIVED COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER r,,_�ta,Cr PR �� Contra Costa County 9.R. OLSSOBN Martinez, California MAR 3 0 1984 CLERK.OARA COSUA RVIS0RS Deputy March 29, 1984 By Counf; Hdministrator TO: Charles Dixon, Interim County Administrator Attention: C. L. Van Marter, Assistant County Administrator - Human Services FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller By: Kenneth J. Corcor , Assistant Accounting Manager SUBJECT; Medi-Cal Reimbursement This responds to the questions and issues raised in your March S, 1984 memo on the subject. As you pointed out, the starting point for our recent discussions with the State was in November/December 1983 when the Board expressed concern over the growing cash deficit in the Health Services Department (HSD) and the large Medi-Cal receivable balance which contributed to that deficit. The reason for the Board's focus on this area was primarily due to your December 7, 1983 memo which included a great deal of analysis of the. Medi-Cal receivables and the age of those receivables. All of the numbers used in your memo were provided by this office from the County's official records. I have re-verified that the numbers used in your memo to the Board, which were subsequently used in discussions with the State, were in agreement with the official records. It is significant to note that the Medi-Cal gross receivable and the related contractual allowances were closely scrutinized by my staff, HSD staff, Arthur Young & Co. , and certified to by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. in their annual audit. Therefore, I dispute any inference by the State or anyone else that the records are inaccurate. During the last several weeks there has been much discussion about the reasons for the variance between the amount of claims we show as outstanding versus what the State reported. As you know, the principle reason for the difference is that the State was merely reporting the unpaid claims in its system while our records reflect all unpaid claims. We all recognize now that the claiming mechanism is extremely complicated and there are significant numbers of unpaid claims which are not currently in the State system. These claims can generally be categorized as follows: -- claims recently produced by the CHAS system which are awaiting attention from the billing staff at Patient Accounting. Note that when the claim is produced on the CHAS system (shortly after discharge) it is recorded as a receivable. -- claims which are ready to be sent to the State as soon as the necessary Medi-Cal labels are received and affixed to it. -= claims which are ready with the exceptions of a T.A.R. (Treatment Authorization) from the State Medi-Cal Field Office. 000140 ' -2- Charles Dixon, Interim County Administrator March 29, 1984 Attention: C. 1. Van Marter, Assistant County Administrator Medi-Cal Reimbursements -- claims which have been submitted to the State and fully or partially rejected for some reason; these claims require special follow-up to identify and correct the reason for the rejection. In theory, to completely resolve the questions which have been raised, we would need to select a particular date, identify all unpaid Medi-Cal claims in our system at that date, and ask the State to provide detail on the individual claims in its system on that date. Utilizing the County's Information Center, I believe we could generate a report of all unpaid claims in our system and the State could probably do the same. Using these two reports staff could compile a list of the variances and identify the reasons for the difference. Since the unpaid claims are mainly within the HSD Patient Accounting Office, the research and analysis would require staff from that office to complete the task. This would be an enormous and time consuming process as there are literally thousands of unpaid claims (especially outpatient claims) . A decision on whether this undertaking should be attempted must consider the other priorities Nu Med has established within that office, namely, getting claims out the door to increase our cash flow. It is our opinion that the current priorities are most appropriate at this time. One other factor that might be considered is the fact that the HSD is planning a global write-off of old, uncollectible accounts receivable balances before the fiscal year end. This write-off would include old Medi-Cal receivables where our collection attempts have been exhausted. Once this process is completed, the size of the receivables will be more manageable and easier to analyze. In conclusion, it is the position of this office that the type of in- depth analysis suggested in your memo is needed but, given the current staff priorities, it should not be started until Patient Accounting has eliminated the current billing backlogs. Also, I want to point out that the efforts of the Board and our legislators in attempting to rectify the Medi-Cal billing/processing problems have not been in vain. It is my understanding that we now have a much improved communications line with the State's field office and that certain recently implemented changes have assisted both the HSD and the Social Service Department in effectively dealing with that office. I am available to meet with you or other interested parties on this issue should further discussion be necessary. KJC:ell cc: Gordon Soares, Management and Administration Director, Health Services Betty Garrison, Patient Accounting Pat Godley, HSD Fiscal Officer (Nu Med) 000I JI