Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03271984 - T.3 r-cf THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on March 27, 1984 _, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Schroder , Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisors Fanden, McPeak ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Hearing on appeal of Hillis H. Schlak from granting of Variance Application #1081-83, (Gregory and Gayle Jones, owners) to establish a zero-foot sideyard for a retaining wall in the Walnut Creek area. This being the time fixed for hearing on the appeal of Hillis H. Schlak from granting of Variance Application #1081-83, (Gregory and Gayle Jones, owners) to establish a zero-foot sideyard for a retaining wall in the Walnut Creek area; and Harvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Planning having described the project as being a variance to establish a zero-foot sideyard for a retaining wall, and advised that the recommendation of the County Planning Commission was to approve Variance Application #1081-83; and Gregory Jones, 2499 Warren Road, Walnut Creek, having appeared and briefly described the circumstances which required the filing of Variance Application #1081-83 to establish a zero-foot sideyard for a retaining wall, and having urged the Board to approve the Variance Application by denying the appeal of Hillis H. Schlak; and Hillis H. Schlak, 2497 Warren Road, Walnut Creek, having appeared and urged the Board to change the conditions of Variance Application #1081-83, and having expressed his objections to the construction of the retaining wall which he felt had not been constructed in compliance with the plans which were submitted to the County; and Mr . Schlak having also voiced concerns relating to drainage problems on the subject property, and having requested that the Board require that conditions of Variance Application #1081-83 be complied with, and also having requested that the Board add one additional condition which would require the restoration of the sideyard property line to its original state, and Mr . Schlak also stated that he had some concerns regarding the enforcement of the conditions of approval for the variance application; and Supervisor Powers having recommended that the issues of enforcement be referred to the Director of Building Inspection, and also having commented that in his opinion, he had not yet heard any testimony as to why the variance application should not be granted; and Paul Siedelman, engineer representing Gregory Jones, having appeared in rebuttal and having stated that the major problem with reference to this variance application was in determining where to stop the construction of the retaining wall so as to prevent any further land slides; and The Chairman having closed the public hearing; and Supervisor Schroder having commented that he was not opposed to the action of the Zoning Administrator regarding this variance application, and having requested that the Board defer its decision on this matter for two weeks in order to allow adequate time to work on this situation in the hopes that both parties will benefit from the Boards final decision; Board members having discussed the matter , IT IS ORDERED that the decision on the appeal of Variance Application #1081-83 is DEFERRED to April 10, 1984, at 2: 30 p.m. , and the issues of enfor- cement of the conditions of Variance Application #1081-83 are REFERRED to the Director of Building Inspection. I hereby certity that this is a true end correct copYo# .an action taken and entersd or, the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the data Shown. y ATTESTED: ? ' Y � / J.A. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK .and ex officio Clerk of the Board orig Dept: Clerk of the Board cc: Director of Planning Public Works Director Building Inspection County Counsel Hillis H. Schlak Gregory & Gayle Jones