Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04121983 - R M4 IN 1B down i� � n, OTES APR1� 12 , 19 83 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION TUESDAY April 12 , 1983 IN ROOM 107 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA PRESENT: Supervisor Tom Torlakson, Vice-Chair, Presiding Supervisor Tom Powers Supervisor Nancy Fanden Supervisor Sunne McPeak ABSENT: Supervisor Robert Schroder CLERK: J. R. Olsson, Represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk L 01 I,S�o THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUKff, CALIFORNIA Adoplyd this Order on Apri 1 12, 1983 , by the fol owing vole: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Authorizing Execution of a Lease Commencing February 1, 1983, with Raymond P. Chapot and Earl D. Dunivan, et ux, for the Premises at 814 Escobar Street, Martinez. IT IS BY YK 011110 OFOERED that the Chairman of the Board of Super- visors is AUTHDRIZED to execute, on behalf of the County, a Lease commencing February 1, 1983, with Raymond P. Chapot and Earl D. Dunivan, et ux, for the premises at 814 Escobar Street, Martinez, for occupancy by the Auditor-Controller under the terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said Lease. 1 bm hl @@WV*M ri h•Mv@ wd @ v d df �n sc*m NAwn•ad~W an Ow weIw1fa o1 fM ceded of Supwvboh on Ow dale shmm ATTESTED: - la. (a g3 J.11.OLSSON.COUNTY CLEPA aed tx Clerk of On Noerd a/NIS Public Works Department-LM Public Works Accountin (via L/M) Orig. 0801 Buildings and Grounds via L/M) cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller (via L/M) Lessor (via L/M) 02 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Approval of submission of grant application to Foundations-Corporations (Sumer Youth Project) The Board having considered the recommendations of the Director, Health Services Department, regarding submission of Grant Application 029-433-1 to Foundations-Corporations for East County Mental Health's "Children's Summer Activity Projects", IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said application is APPROVED as follows: Number: 29-433-1 Agency Foundations-Corporations (Sumer Youth Project) Term: July 1, 1983 through August 31, 1983 Funding To be determined by grantor. Grants range from $300 to $750. Service: East County Mental Health's "Children's Sumer Activity Projects" 1 hmby CW ft that this is a trreandeornctCWSI an action taken and ontcme on ow aiingan at w Board of S on the dde 0 n ATTESTED: J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK OW OxxJo111.::o Clark of tM Board •DOW Orig. De t•: Health Services Dept./CCU cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller State of California DG:to To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS rim, Judy Ann Miller, Director Corft Department of Manpower Programs Cab DATE: April 12, 1983 QXM suN.IECT: AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT # 19-9008-0 WITH COMMUNICATIONS PLUS SPEC 1 F 1 C FAXK ST(S) OR REOOMWMMT 1 ON(S' A SAOKGIOtND AND JUST i F 1 CAT ION That the Board AUTHORIZE the Board Chairman to execute, on behalf of the County, standard form contract # 19-9008-0 with Communications Plus, to produce Contra Costa County Private Industry Council (PIC) Program-related newsletters and brochures, in the amount of $7,807 for the term beginning April 1, 1983 and ending September 30, 1983, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. On March 22, 1983 the Board authorized the Director, Department of Manpower Programs, to conduct contract negotiations with the public relations firm, Communications Plus, to produce PIC Program-related newsletters and brochures, with a maximum payment limit not to exceed $10,780 for the term beginning April, 1983 through September 30, 1983. Contract negotiations have been completed and contractor agrees to produce three (3) newsletters and four (4) brochures. The newsletters will provide general and specific information about the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982 (JTPA) , the Private Industry Council, program, special projects, and articles of general interest to the business community. The brochures will describe program components such as classroom training, on-the-job training, PIC business-related services, and the purpose and scope of PIC and DTPA. This contract is totally federally funded through the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982 (DTPA) . CONTINUED ON ATTACNIENT: - VES SIGNATURE RECOWENDATION OF COUNTY AMINISTRATOR MCO111111 D COM ITT= ArrROVE O / SIGNATURKISY. ACTION OF BOARD OF surERvlsORs ON: U APPROVED AS RtCO�=D X WnWR VOTE OF SUPIMISORS I IMNY C01T1FY TMT THIS IS A MK MIAN I N LS (ASSENT I AND COIIIRECT COPY OF An ACTION TAMN AYES: IDES: AND atrz o ON M NINLMW OF TM BOARD ABSENT: ANSTAIN: OF SLO40MINOM ON TIi DATE S1OSN. °C' County Administrator AT1zsTED "IjZ 4? • /k F3 County Auditor-Controller J.R. CUMK Contractor AM oc OWICIO CLWK Os M NRD OA l� 00 te4 (; It .owrY t►.iJ. 0 41 AW THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Approval of the First Amendment to the City of San Pablo's Eighth Year(1982- 83) CDBD Program Project Agreement and reallocation of certain funds. The Board having heard the recommendation of the Director of Planning that it approve the first amendment to the City of San Pablo's Eighth Year (1982-83) Community Development Program Project Agreement incorporating $50,000, reallocated from the County's Activity k 13 - Housing Rehabilitation Program, to Activity 612 - Housing Rehabilitation and Neighborhood Beautification Program, thereby increasing the allocation payment limit from $402,116.37 to $452,116.37. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the above recommendation is approved and its Chairman is authorized to execute said agreement. t A�sb!►�h�t thls is strwaneeae�dee/!af an IMOM 90M wid entered or.Mo nRk"n of go Mood of 8upovia on tta dais shmL ArTEsrD: 412 Hip J.R.OLNOW,COUK"CLERK and ex oMego Clwk of M.Sewd •DOW Orig. Dept.: Planning cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller County Counsel Contractor 3 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on _ April 12- 19$3 - - - . by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Rental Agreement Orinda Library Parking Lot #2 Irwin Way Orinda, California W. 0. 5937 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Rental Agreement with Orinda Community Church, Inc. dated January 1, 1983, for rental of County property at #2 Irwin Way, Orinda, California, is APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTMIZED to sign the Agreement on behalf of the County. The Agreement is on a month-to-month, "as-is" basis, at an annual rate of $120.00, effective January 1, 1983, for Sunday mornings only. I u.easr oar fnat Mir r•f�awf l aanaaf«Ar.t an moo wan and anMrad an do aroma of Me 30"of sup on Ow Me showw ATTESTED: Z 3 j.M.oLSWm.COUNTtt CLERK OW ex QMdo cm*of aw Board By Public Works Department-L/M Orig. Dept.: Public Works Accounting (via L/M) cc: Orinda Community Church, Inc. County Auditor-Controller (via L/M) Real Property (via L/M) L- �J 0ji ME MD OF SWWISORS OF COMM COSTA tOAiY, CALUMIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Consulting Services Agreement with TJKM Transportation Consultants to review alternatives for proposed interchange revisions and modifications at Interstate-680 and Concord Avenue in the Concord area. Project No. 0662-6U4195 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to sign a Consulting Services Agreement with TJKM Transportation Consultants to review alternatives for proposed interchange revisions and modifications at Interstate-680 and Concord Avenue in the Concord area. The full cost of $6,750 will be borne by County. Maximum payment may not be exceeded unless authorized by the Public Works Director. 1 fweby eer ft that VO Is a trueandeomdeMot an action taken and entered on Mw ndsufaa of Nw Board of Supa vism an the dila dwwn. ATTESTED: Aaa:t - 12, Iq$"3 J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK and a Mic,CNrk of dw Rowd B f .Dowb NJ consvcsagrmt.tjkm.t3 ORIG. DEPT.: Public Works Transportation Planning cc: Public Works Accounting Auditor-Controller 07 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ^'Oi1 Supervisor S. W. McPeak C Itra DAW: Gwa April 12, 1983 ^,�, � SUBJECT: Suggestions for Improving Administration of Public and costy Private Programs at State and Local Level SPCC 1 r 1 C REOUEST(S) Q REC0MIt1IDAT 1CN(S) t AAOCORCUSp �yID JIATI rI CAT ICW RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledge receipt of report from Supervisor McPeak; refer report to County Administrator; direct County Administrator, in conjunction with affected department heads, to conduct an analysis of each suggestion, determine the feasibility of implementing each, and report his findings to the Finance Committee on a flow basis as the analyses are completed with recommendations for what action should be taken. BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: On December 20, 1982, the Board authorized me to send letters to community agencies seeking suggestions for improved efficiencies at the State and local level. In response to this authorization, I sent letters to every Chamber of Commerce in the County, the Taxpayers' Association, the Development Association, the area industrial associations, several of our citizen advisory committees, the Board of Realtors, Council of Churches, AAUW, and League of Women Voters, soliciting suggestions for ways in which administrative costs at the State and local level could be reduced, as well as ways in which regulations unnecessarily inhibiting private businesses in the County could be relaxed or eliminated. I convened two meetings with representatives of these organizations; the first on January 17, 1983, and the second on March 9, 1983. A number of written comments were received. In addition, a number of oral suggestions were made. The suggestions cover a wide range of subjects from microfilming centrally for the County to suggestions for changes in the County's legal representation of indigents and the need for an organizational management consultant to study the entire flow of the County's business. Many of these suggestions probably bear further examination by the County Administrator or the affected department. ConrT INUCD ON ATTACM�NT: its S 1 G04ATURC: Sunne Wright McPeak ,L RCCON�NDATICN Or Cpumry ADMINISTRATOR RECOMI;NDATION Or AOARO CO*MITTEC X Ar'+RovE � OTftR SIGNATURc S ACT ION Or wcMng) OI,I• April 12- 19R-'A APPROVED AS RECC044CNOCO OTWX voTc or ftr4c•v121MIS 1 KR[SY CCRT 1 rr TfMT THIS IS A TWLZ UN^N 1 PDMS (AASENT AND CC RCCT CW V Or AN ACT I0V TA/QN AYES: NXS• AND arnewc ON TK MINLPMS or TK NDARD ABSENT: ANSTAI N Or MAWCRVISORS Or M DA-M IOrN. cc= County Administrator ATTtsTso 1 /�, Supervisor McPeak ' R • c"*y CLCW woo PEG Forum Members o` �CWFIC10 CLOW or M =Una .NEnury Y 08 n BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAN: M. G. Wingett, County Administrator LMuM 9WAIM: April 12, 1983 `'!oga sucnCT: Recommendations of Hazardous Materials QyTty Task Force SPCC 1 r i C RCOUEST(S) Cft RCOOPOCMAT ICN(S) • SAMOPIC1,E1 AND 111-T I r l CAT ICN RECOMMENDATION: Refer the status report from the Hazardous Materials Task Force dated April 12, 1983 to the County Administrator and direct County Administrator and Hazardous Materials Task Force to return to the Board on June 7, 1983 with final recommendations for an implementa- tion protocol. BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: On March 8, 1983, the Board requested the Hazardous Materials Task Force to review the proposed Memorandum of Designation in terms of the process which should be followed in its implementation, directed the Task Force to return to the Board April 12 with their recommendations, and indicated the Board's intent to approve the Memorandum of Designation on April 12. The Task Force has now returned to the Board with the following recommenda- tions: 1. The Implementation Draft be submitted to the Board of Supervisors with the understanding that it is an initial guide for further development; 2. The Board of Supervisors authorize the County Health Officer and the Task Force to work with the State Department of Health Services to jointly develop a Final Protocol and present it to the Board by.May 30, 1983. Since the Board has already declared its intent not to meet on May 31, 1983, it is suggested that the Task Force's final report be requested by June 7, 1983. UONTINUCO ON ATTAC"4CNT: VTS SIGNATURE: &k46 -A- R[COPOCNOATION Or COUNTY ADMiNISTRATOR _ RCCOMI.ICNDATION Or •OARO COMMITTEE X A p"OV= _.,_ OMR: S I'CKATURC 132 L-1 w ACTION or IKARo `ON: 83 AIMOVCo AS RCCOIiM MCD �� OAR V OTc Or =UP4 WV a sons I "K 8Y CID T I rY TW"T TNI S IS A TaVe wAw 1 "a is !11�SCNT ) AND C�CCT oo�Y or AN ACT I oN T/IIIZN AYES:' OWES: AND 01lt11C0 ON M Y/NN1lS or VW SDARD A&SENT: .�..�.� ANSTA I Or supcptvl lcl- CN Im &A-M SHOW. cc; County Administrator ATT'ESWO /R /jFf3 Health Services Director 'a" olx�rY CLAM (County Health Officer) of Orr I C 10 CLEW Or M MUND Haz. Mat. Task Force (via DES) 0910%rrY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Apri 1 12, 1983 by Vw fOMOwMip vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT. Port Chicago Highway and Waterfront Road. Supervisor T. Torlakson having advised that he and Supervisor S. W. McPeak had met a few months ago with representatives at the Concord Weapons Station to discuss the Navy's intention and alternative methods of closing Port Chicago Highway and Waterfront Road, and that he has received a request for any updated information on the subject of the road closure from Captain Glenn Mays who will be relieving him as Commanding Officer on June 29, 1983; As requested by Supervisor Torlakson, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator is REQUESTED to communicate with the Concord Naval Weapons Station to update information relating to the proposed closing of Port Chicago Highway and Waterfront Road. 1 fW shy CM MytlMt Mb N atwandmftMoM!►at an SCUM fakan and M*MM an M ONNUS of NO eowd of soperdem an fM dMa shev n. ATTESTED: APR 121983 J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLO K and ex oMkfo CNrk of Ma M@ d Diana'M.fi l,M Orig. Wt.: Clerk of the Board CC: County Administrator Public Works Director L 10 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the foUowAng vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Proposed Fee for Responding to Residential Burglar Alarms Supervisor N. C. Fanden having commented that a constituent in the Orinda area had expressed concern that it had been suggested that the County Sheriff-Coroner might not respond to a burglar alarm sounding off if the Sheriff had previously responded to false alarms at that address; and Supervisor Fanden having suggested that rather than not responding to alarms, that a fee be charged for each response whether or not it was a false alarm; As recommended by Supervisor Fanden, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator and the County Sheriff-Coroner are requested to investigate the feasibility of charging a fee to the homeowner when the Sheriff responds to a burglar alarm. 1 iwxaby 60"IN 60 to Is•Irw�Me«we�oa/y of an milon taken and siMarad an Ms mlivA s Of Mie board of suparobon an Ma Isla dMW& ATTESTED: APR 121981 J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CUMK WW ex o#Wo Clark of the Bend Qidna*M.Herman Orig. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cc: County Administrator County Sheriff-Coroner THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Ail 12, 1983 dY OW followi v AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Funding for Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation Supervisor T. Powers having commented on the need for finding funding for the Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation and having suggested that consideration be given to investigating the possibility of the Legal Services Foundation handling SSI appeals; As recommended by Supervisor Powers, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator is AUTHORIZED to communicate with Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation to investigate pursuing its handling of SSI appeals as a means of securing additional funding for the Foundation. Ihe.*1cavil two"IsaUwo"Go a -amal an C,:*m taken and«dsrad as M■boes of so Aloard of SuparNas on Ilw ON ahasu- ATTESTED: APR 121983 J.R.OLSSOA1,COUNTY CUM OW ex ` awk of Mte eoald Diana M.WrWAS Orig. Dept.: Clerk of the Board CC: County Administrator Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation 1017 McDonald Ave. Richmond, CA 44802 L �' 12 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Group Counselor Staffing at Juvenile Hall This being the time for presentation by Henry L. Clarke, General Manager, CCC Employees Association, Local #1 , with respect to certain policy changes made by the County Probation Officer relating to Group Counselor staffing at Juvenile Hall; and Mr. Clarke having appeared and having advised that he was of the opinion that reduction in Group Counselor staffing will endanger the safety of the Group Counselors at Juvenile Hall and having detailed for the -Board the changes in conditions that have recently taken place at Juvenile Hall;-and Mike Majors and Ken Adams, Group Counselors, having appeared and expressed their concerns; and Board members having discussed the matter; The Board DETERMINED to discuss with the County Probation Officer, in closed session on April 19, 1983, the matter of Group Counselor staffing at Juvenile Hall . I here"co"If f 1 aft Is a wm a eaff tos/ll s0 an*cam taken and aftr on eM WMIAW"A foard of qupwvWm on ww raga sMaa ATTESTED: APR 121983 J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLOW end sx oMlaio CMT of OW 80ed h •DMT Q�na"M.Merman Oris. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cc: County Probation Officer County Administrator Henry Clarke 13 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 . by Ow Fallook Mote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson, NOES: None ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder SUBJECT: Appointment to the Emergency Medical Care Committee The Board having received a March 30, 1983, letter from Joseph Ross, M.D. , President, Alameda—Contra Costa Medical Association, nominating Walter Rohlfing, M.D. , (2089 Vale Road, Suite 21, San Pablo 94806), as said association's representative on the County's Emergency Medical Care Committee to fill the position formerly held by Eugene Kreps, M.D. ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Dr. Rohlfing is APPOINTED to the Emergency Medical Care Committee for a term ending June 30, 1984. 1 fie�sby artnll f ta!fids b�trw aedaoendoo/il al an aefion t@Mn sea entered an Vw mbve•s Of few owd of supertwas an 4':s daM raitsmu ATTESTE:% ��-_•! 1.2.,l 9A.3 J.fl.C?SSC-, M::J*:TY CLERK WW e:ofWo Ciwk of uw Rood Py 1 (kip. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cc: Dr. Rohlfing ACCMA Health Services Director County Administrator 14 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak, Torlsksou. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Sdhroder. ABSTAIN: SUBJECT: Ordinance Establishing Device Registration Fees The Board having been advised by the County Administrator that the Agricultural Commissioner--Director, Weights and Measures, has submitted for approval the draft of an ordinance establishing device registration fees for certain commercial weighing and measuring devices pursuant to Board Order of January 4, 1983; and The Agricultural Commissioner having described the procedures set by AB 2987 (Chapter 1380, Statutes of 1982) which requires the Board of Supervisors to hold at least one public meeting, at which oral or written presentation can be made, before adopting an ordinance charging fees; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an ordinance is hereby introduced establishing device registration fees for certain commercial weighing and measuring devices pursuant to AB 2987 (Chapter 1380, Statutes of 1982); reading is waived, and May 10, 1983, 10:30 a.m. , is fixed as date and time for public hearing to receive testimony on the proposed ordinance and for adoption of ordinance pursuant to Business and Professional Code Section 12243. IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the Agricultural Commissioner is directed to communicate with the State to seek means of fully recouping the costs of providing services. �twsMrswwtr t�ti+is a•t�usswdeaen�.toovpN an asrsn tsesn swd enbo"or.taw sdnoss d en 11e0M of su—r av on Ow deft shown. ATTESTED: aA J.P.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERIC and ex oMdo CMhc of dw eowd Dapie Ong. Dept.: County Administrator cc: Agricultural Commissioner County Counsel County Auditor - - 1� THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12. 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Water Committee Report At the March 22, 1983 Board Meeting, the Board requested County Counsel to determine if the chemical part of the Water Hyacinth Control Program was in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. County Counsel has reported to the Water Committee that the California Attorney General has concluded that the spray of herbicides is in full compliance with CEQA. County Counsel informs the Committee that they would not dispute the Attorney General's conclusion providing that all measures have been done as cited in the Attorney General's opinion. At the March 8, 1983 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the Board approved the chemical control part of the Hyacinth Control Program. . One of the conditions of the approval was that a contingency and notification plan for the remotely possible event of water contamination of the Contra Costa County Water District's supply be thoroughly reviewed and presented to the Water Committee and Board of Supervisors for final review. The Agricultural Commissioner reported to the Water Committee that at the March 23, 1983 meeting of the Water Hyacinth Task Force, the Task Force concurred with the contingency plan of the Contra Costa Water District. The Water Committee was satisfied with the Contra Costa Water District's contingency plan. The Water Committee has received notice that Mr. Lyle Wolff, member of the Fish and Wildlife Study Committee had submitted his resignation. On February 8, 1983, the Board of Supervisors approved a report from Internal Operations Committee recommending that Mr. Leroy Bateman be considered for the next vacancy on the Fish and Wildlife Study Committee. The Water Committee recommends the following action: 1 . Acknowledge receipt of the report from County Counsel and confirm County Counsel's opinion that CEQA has been complied with for the chemical control part of the Water Hyacinth Control Program. 2. Concur with the Water Hyacinth Task Force that the contingency plan of the Contra Costa Water District is acceptable for the Water Hyacinth Control Program. 3. Accept the resignation of Mr. Lyle Wolff from the Fish and Wildlife Study Committee and appoint Mr. Leroy Bateman to fill /l the unexpired term of Mr. Wolff. mm Sunne Wright McPeak, Chair Tom Torlakson Supervisor, District IV Supervisor, District V As recommended by Supervisor Sunne McPeak, the Board HEREBY ACCEPTS the resignation of Mr. Lyle Wolff from the Fish and Wildlife Study Committee and APPOINTS Mr. Leroy Bateman to fill the unexpired tern, ending December 31, 1984. The Board thereafter having heard from the following citizens who oppose the chemical control portion of the water hyacinth program: Diana Patrick, Martinez City Council; Tom Rankin, representative of East Bay Local 2428 AFSCME Rosalind Guilfoyle, who filed a petition containing signatures of citizens opposed to the chemical control program � � 1� Thomas Olin, representative of the City of Pleasant Hill, who filed copies of the same petition, bearing additional signatures; Ron Lane, attorney and resident of Martinez who advised that he would file an Appeal if spraying permits were to be issued; Kathy Radke, City of Martinez councilwoman. The Board having discussed the recommendations of the Mater Committee and the testimony presented by the above interested citizens; As recommended by Supervisor McPeak, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of its Mater Committee report is HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED and April 19, 1953 is fixed for final action on the committee's recommendations. As recommended by Supervisor McPeak, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Board ADOPT the following position: - Advocate integrated program of control of water hyacinth; Urge a review of mechanical harvesting; Offer $10,000 to the State to be used for mechanical harvesting if the State will expeditiously initiate such a program; Request that State respond directly to the County's offer, as soon as possible. As recommended by Supervisor Tom Torlakson, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a letter be sent to the Cities and to the Water Districts, inquiring as to the extent they would be willing to financially participate in a program for mechanical removal of water hyacinth from the Delta. 1herabyCOM1111ha4thbisa�tiMam�toAeel � ap action Wce^and enW.Od OR Gn d so Board c!Suaentl�On dw 1.` ILI V3...— �. ATTESTED. J.R.OLSSON CWk a sewd and o cc: County Administrator Public Works Director Agricultural Commissioner County Counsel Mr. Leroy Bateman, via EC AJ/gt �- 17 THE BOARD OF SUMRV SORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 'Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the woNowirp voM: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder SUBJECT: Neighborhood Watch Month WHEREAS, crime and the fear of crime is one of the most important concerns facing California and the nation; and WHEREAS, the effects of crime transcend all social, eco- nomic and geographic boundaries; and WHEREAS, a united and cooperative effort by all public and private agencies and the citizenry can effectively reduce crime; and WHEREAS, Neighborhood Watch programs actively involve citizens in crime prevention efforts and have been proven to substantially reduce the incidence of crime in communities throughout the state; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that, in recognition of the value of the Neighborhood Watch program, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors joins the California Legislature in proclaming the month of May 1983 as NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH MONTH. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. Attested: April 12, 1983 J. R. Olsson, County Clerk By eeni Nalratw, eputy Clerk Oft• DePt•: Clerk of the Board cc: Attorney General, Department of Justice Sheriff-Coroner District Attorney Probation Public Information Officer County Administrator 18 Flo: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FiW* Judy Ann Miller, Director Caft Department of Manpower Programs coeft DATE: April 12, 1983 QyM swcrr: Proclaiming the Month of July, 1983 as Hire-A-Youth Month +� �1 SPECIFIC IMMMOT(S) Ot RECaMiIMAT1oN(S) • WAAMWOIND AND A WIFICATlal That the Board PROCLAIM the month of July, 1983 as Hire-A-Youth Month, and that the Board Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the appropriate proclamation. The Contra Costa County Private Industry Council is coordinating a cooperative civic effort to implement a county-wide unsubsidized summer jobs program to secure summer employment opportunities for the youth of Contra Costa County. The thrust of the program is to encourage local employers to hire youth during the summer months. The program was precipitated by the current high unemployment rate in the county which has severely affected summertime job opportunities for youth. The youth of Contra Costa County are one of our greatest resources and their contributions to local communities have been invaluable. Therefore, the PIC requests the Board of Supervisors to enhance the benefits frau this readily available labor force to private business by designating the month of July as "Hire-A-Youth Month". CONTINUED ON ATTACI NT: YES SIGNATURK1. RECO/MENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR VWCO086=4&6�100NPF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER; S 1 GNATIAIE 5 ACTION OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON: APPROVED AS REcommmDSD -X-- &naR VOTE of SUPENVISORS 1 HERESY CERTIFY TMT THIS is A Tltli UNANIMMS (ASSENT �- ) AND C0WWCT Corr of AN ACTIM TAKM AYES: NOES: AND ENTEIMD ON M NIMMC8 OF M SOARD ASSENT: ASSTA 1 N: OF SI POM i SOBS CN IM DATE MCM. cc: County Administrator ATTESTED Cwux a,/9.*j Private Industry Council .I.K. ansae. aouirY CLEM AND Ex OFFICIO CLEISC CF Tlt SCUM Elf � .ctivrr ` � 4 19 TD• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS $11101,: M. G. Wi ngett, County Administrator "► MATZ April 7, 1983 V49a 8URJIIC7: Exception to Freeze--Social Service Department VaJV S►CC1r1C RCOLCST(S) C!t IMCOMMOMATICIN(S) • "CK= KM AND JIiTir1CATIC91 1. Authorize the County.Weifare Director to fill a total of 302 positions in the following classifications without additional authorization as a waiver to the freeze on filling vacant positions: Eligibility Work Specialist Eligibility Worker II Eligibility Worker I 2. Authorize the County Welfare Director to fill a total of 48 positions in the classification of Eligibility Work Supervisor I without additional authorization as a waiver to the freeze on filling vacant positions. 3. Direct the County Administrator to establish such controls as he deems necessary to assure that the above hiring levels are not exceeded, the intent being that the Social Service Department be allowed to fill those positions which can be financed from the closed end allocation of State and Federal Income Maintenance funds without the addition of any additional County "overmatch". BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: The above hiring levels can be maintained within the present allocation of State and Federal funds. Reductions below this level save minimal amounts of County money and jeopardize the ability of the Department to assure the.-necessary high level of accuracy in the determination of eligibility for welfare programs. C'ON a INUCD ON ATTACI- I : VMS S I ONATLI tc: .�_ RECCi 4 CNOATION Or COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR __ RCCOMtCNOATION CW MDARD COM4ITTCC X APPROYC - OTIiR: S 1 CWATLotC S : ACT 1 ON Or HOARD ON; APPROVED AS RCCONWHIMD OtHiTt SI�RVISCr1S t 640"" OMN OPT IRMT THIS IS A TIRM WANIIJs {Agt:NT AND C=MRCT Cir CiI AN ACTICRI TAIQN AYES: KRS: AM INNNEWD CIM TW U101t# M CW ns NC M O ARS9WT'�! AMTA 1 N CW SIXMClV I!C" CIN TIM DATtt 4041M. Cc: County Administrator Ud.,Z , loy_3 County Welfare Director J-D- . aotMY CLOW ASD Personnel Di rector CC QVI/CID CLAM Or Tri I10ARD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS M. G. Wingett, County Administrator DATE: April 1 , 1983 fWIECT: Miller Centers, Rates, Authorize Appeal 9MC 1 r 1 C RE01ifT(f) OR R[�i�d►T I ON l f I • " mmoupp AND ."T I Ir 1 CAT ION Authorize the Health Services Director to appeal rates set by the Regional Center of the East Bay and the State Department of Developmental Services for the home-based parent/infant education program and adult programs at the George Miller, Jr. Centers. BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: In May 1982, the Board of Supervisors approved the execution of an application for vendorization by the Regional Center of the East Bay of two "home-based, parent/infant education programs to be operated through the Health Services Department, Miller Centers East and West. These programs were vendorized (numbers 14092 and 14092A) on 9/23/82 by the Regional Center of the East Bay. An hourly rate of payment was then set by the State Department of Developmental Services (DDS) at $6.84. This is the same rate as had been set for the Miller Centers' center- based infant programs. The County cannot provide a home-based service at this low rate. Families who often have the most need because of lack of transportation are still without service because the program is not funded adequately. The average cost to operate similar programs in this area is $17.00-$24.00 an hour. The rate set for two of the Miller Centers' Adult Programs is consistent with that proposed by DDS for "Day Treatment and Activity Center" (DTAC) programs several years ago. All the Miller Center adult services are for persons requiring much more individualized care than do those described for "DTAC". The current rate does not cover the costs of staffing required to serve this population. It is, therefore, necessary for the Board to authorize the Health Services Director to appeal these rates. CONTINUO ON ATTACMENT: _ VIM f1ONATIftE: RECOMm rimAT 1 ON OF coumiy ADMIN 1 iTRATOR _ RECOOENDAT 1 ON Oi GOARO cow 1 T= �. AlTIlONE � ORfiR: S I GNATVIC s : ✓�•'L�Z ACT 1 ON Or 0001110 ON: APl1101010 AS OOOt VOT1E OF w101V/A1i Nmaw COITIFT VMT THIS If A 71111 1.111" ~IN" (ASN* �` Aim OORCT OXY OI AN ACTIO/ TwNIM Am: .•�LLfiiii..��....✓ AND o n=D ON TW r11610M or IM 1101AND STAIN or O/O1VIfOO QI VW am smiIii1. cc: County Administrator A7IMI'm 42 ,/9 2) Health Services Director J.N. frV CLM Ne Dr. Kathleen Malloy EK "WIC10 Qac v %a omD ZI ��C.Z.iwe.A a e.0, .oErvrY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COIN TY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by 9W bftwkV vote: AYES: Supervisor Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder SUBJECT: Affirmative Action Program Annual Report for 1982 The Board having received a report on the County Affirmative Action Program for calendar year ending December 31, 1982, compiled by the Affirmative Action Officer on behalf of the County Administrator, which report shows continuing progress toward the goal of a workforce reflecting the race/ ethnic and sex representation of the County's labor force; The Board HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES receipt of said report. 1 hereby corMy that WalaaHwand0aMsfQW4# an action taken and entered an Yre rebwft of M Board of SupeMe rs on the dsNow shn. ATTESTED: n J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK and a ride Clerk of Ow prig. Dept.: - Clerk of the Board cc: County Administrator Personnel Director /gt � L 22 1-71 r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT RECEIVED December, 198 APR 111983 CLW BOARD OF A MVWS Presented to the Board of Supervisors Robert I. Schroder Chair Snpervisor District 3 Tom Powers Sunne Wright McPeak Supervisor,District I Supervisor, District 4 Nancy C. Fanden Tom Torlakson Supervisor,District 2 Supervisor,District 5 by M.G. Wingett County Administrator Board of Supervisors County Administrator Contra TOMpewrs 1st District County Administration Building Costa "Macy C_Faboe Martinez,California 94553 County I '� 2nd District . (415)372-4000 l.A 11oMr!1.3eMoer► 3rd District W i C Co. Cunn. rM mciwtOunty Administrator 4th District Tore TaWren 40 5th District March 29, 1983 Board of Supervisors Administration Building 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Dear Board Members: Re: Affirmative Action Program Annual Report - December 31, 1982 This is the seventh annual report on the County's Affirmative Action Program. This report consists of a statistical analysis of the race/ethnic and sex composition of the County workforce, departmental analysis, analysis of • 1982 turnover data, special reports, program accomplishments and program objectives for 1983. Throughout the report reference is made to the County labor force. The goal of the County is for the workforce (employees) to reflect the race/ethnic and sex composition of the labor force in Contra Costa County. The 1980 labor force data has not been finalized and published; therefore, we must use the 1970 labor force data. The County labor force has 34.9% Females; 6.5% Blacks; 8.3% Spanish Surname/ Spanish Language (SS/SL) ; and 2. 2% Other Minorities (this group includes Asian/Pacific Islanders, Filipinos, and American Indian/Alaskan Natives) . These are the groups analyzed in this report. Spanish Surname (SS) and Spanish Language (SL) are used to identify Hispanic employees. The County is aware that the Spanish Surname/Spanish Language (SS/SL) data includes some White, Blacks, and members of the other races whose surname and/or language falls into this category. This definition is identical to the one used by the Federal government in the 1970 Census and because of this, the County has adopted it. The data includes some exempt positions but not persons appointed to exempt positions as court reporters, judges, • juvenile court referees, limited term (temporary) positions, County Manpower Programs (i.e. , CETA and WIN-COD) , or elected officials. Board of Supervisors December; 1982 5. Para-Professionals - Occupations in which employees • perform some of the duties of a professional or technician in a supportive role, which usually requires less formal training and/or experience normally required for professional or technical status. Females 84.0%; Blacks 16.0%; and SS/SL 11.7% are representative. Other Minorities 3.3% are under represented. 6. Office and Clerical - Occupations in which employees are response a for internal and external communications, recording and retrieval of data and/or information and other paperwork required in an office. Females dominate this job category with 95.7% representation. There is representation for each race/ethnic group (Blacks 8.5%; SS/SL 14. 7%) except Other Minorities 3. 3%) . 7. Skilled ,Craft Workers - Occupations in which employees perform jobs w ich require special manual skill and a thorough and comprehensive knowledge of the process involved in the work which is acquired through on-the- job training and experience or through apprenticeship or other formal training programs. Males dominate this job category with 100% representation. There is race/ethnic representation for SS/SL 15.7%, but not for Blacks 2.9%, Other Minorities (none) or Females (none) . • 8. Service/Maintenance - Occupations in which employees perform duties which result in or contribute to the comfort, convenience, hygiene, or safety of the general public or which contribute to the upkeep and care of buildings, facilities or grounds of public property. There is race/ethnic representation for Blacks 24.8%, and SS/SL 17.4% in this category. The County must increase its representation for Females 25.5%, and Other Minorities 1.2%. Salaries The salaries are based on the actual salaries (thousands per year) of employees. The salary range of the job classifica- tion or position is not a factor in this analysis. Only the largest number of employees in each category is analyzed. The majority of County employee's (1,314) salary increased $16.0-$18,999 compared to the number of employees (1,076) and salary increases $13.0-$15,999,last year. Salaries $16.0-$18,999, for the largest number of Females (1,092) also increased compared to the number (894) and salaries $13.0-$15,999, last year. Male salaries $25.0-$29,999, remained the same as last year's although Males (largest number) • increased in number from 674 last year to 793 this year. -3- Board of Supervisors December, 1982 Departments with less than one hundred (100) employees are: Race/Ethnic or Total Sex Under County Department Employees Representation County Administrator 29 Representative Agriculture 25 Females, Blacks, SS/SL Animal Services 47 Blacks, Other Minorities Building Inspection 44 Females, Blacks, SS/SL. Community Services Admin. 17 Other Minorities Cooperative Extension 2 Other Minorities County Counsel 25 Blacks, SS/SL Court/Bay 45 Representative • Court/Delta 13 Blacks, Other Minorities Court/Mt. Diablo 36 Blacks,SS/SL, Other Minorities Court/Walnut Creek/Danville 33 Blacks Fire District/Moraga 24 Female,Blacks, SS/SL, Other Minorities Fire District/Orinda 33 Female, Blacks, SS/SL, Other Minorities Fire District/Riverview 85 Female, Blacks Fire District/West 25 Female, Blacks Manpower 19 Other Minorities Marshal 42 Females • Personnel 46 Representative -5- Board of Supervisors December 1982 . Analysis of 1982 Turnover Data Classified New Hires Classified positions are positions that are subject to the Personnel Management Regulations (Merit System) . The County has hired 620 employees in 1982. There were Females, 433 or 70%; Blacks, 85 or 14%; SS/SL 72 or 12%; and Other Minorities 37 or 6.0%, hired above their labor force representation. Promotions The County has promoted 556 employees in 1982. There were Females 364 or 65.5%; Blacks 79 or 14.2%; SS/SL 77 or 14.0%; and Other Minorities 27 or 5. 0%, promoted above their labor force representation. Employees who leave County service leave for various reasons. The reasons analyzed in this report are: resignations, constructive resignations, rejected during the probationary period, dismissed, suspensions, voluntarily demoted, involuntarily demoted, retired and death. There is a separate analysis on employees laid off. Separations • 1. Employees that have resigned from positions in the County service in 1982 were 2T5-. Females 190 or 69%; Blacks 34 or 12. 3% SS/SL 31 or 11.2%; and Other Minorities 20 or 7.3% resigned at percentages higher than their labor force represen- tation. 2. There was one Black female employee that had a constructive resignation last year. 3. There were 41 employees that were rejected during their probationary period. Females 23 or 56.1%; Blacks 12 or 29.2% SS SL 4 or 9.7%; and Other Minorities 2 or 4.8% were rejected at percentages higher than their labor force representation. 4. Twenty-three employees were dismissed from County service in 1982. Twelve or 52% were Females eight or 34.78% were Blacks; and three or 13% were SS/SL. All dismissals were above their labor force representation. There were no dismissals for Other Minorities. 5. Suspensions were 37 in 1982. Females 12 or 32.4%; and Blacks 15 or 40.5% were suspended above their labor force representation. There were no suspensions for Other Minorities and SS/SL were suspended at 5.4% or two employees. • 6. There were only four voluntary demotions last year. Half, 2 or 50% were Females, and one or 25% was SS/SL. There were no voluntary demotions for Blacks or Other Minorities. -7- Board of Supervisors December 1982 • 4. There was only one unclssified death last year. One white male (100%). In summary, the number of separations among unclassified employees were above the labor force percentages for Females, Blacks, and Other Minorities in the resignation category. The remaining categories had only one or two employees separating. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Special Reports Timetables and Goals The County has established goals for job classes with 10 or more positions. They have timetables with interim and final target dates by which specific progress towards correcting an under representation of a particular race/ethnic and sex group should be attained. There are eighty-eight timetables and goals established for job classes throughout the County. The following analysis indicates the progress : • Job Classes Year Number of With Race/Ethnic With Race Ethnic & Timetable Timetables & Sex Representa- Sex Under Represented & Goals & Goals tion In One Area Established Compiled 1976 38 -0- 9 1978 37 5 18 197973 10 23 1980 77 21 22 The fluctuation in the number of timetables and goals compiled is due to the number of new classes being established, eliminated, combined due to flexible staffing, etc. The 1980 labor force data will be available in 1983. The timetables and goals will be updated and should show an increase in job classes that have representation. As the County workforce increases, so does our race/ethnic and sex representation in job classes. • -9- Board of Supervisors December 1982 • In summary, employees (Females, Blacks; and Asian/ Pacific Islanders) were laid off at a percentage higher than their labor force representation; voluntarily demoted (except Asian/Pacific Islanders) at percentages below (Females and Blacks) their labor force representation; and Females and Blacks involuntarily demoted at lower labor force percentages whereas Asian/Pacific Islanders and American Indians/Alaskan Natives at percentages higher than their labor force percentages. Accomplishments in 1982 The accomplishments that have occurred in the County' s Affirmative Action Program are as follows: Countywide 1. Completed the memos necessary to receive a cost estimate on placing the Affirmative Action statistical reports on the computer. 2. Completed the handicapped employees survey . 3. Finalizing administrative bulletins on Affirmative Action program and employment discrimination complaint . procedures. 4. The California Firefighters Joint Apprenticeship Committee's program in Contra Costa County is :a success. The academy training phase of the program is now underway. Departmental 1. Departments are responding to discrimination complaints filed by State and Federal agancies . 2. Departments were advised to send a copy of their Affirmative Action plan (including updated plan) required and adopted by a State or Federal Agency to the Affirmative Action Officer. Personnel Department 1. Affirmative Action. training is provided in basic management workshop. 2. Evaluated recruitment, testing format, composition of oral boards, and other personnel selection procedures. • Affirmative Action Annual Report Objectives 1. Departments were advised of the "Windmills" handicap awareness workshop. -11- • DETAIL ANALYS IS i • ATTACHMENTS • Attachment Number Page I. Summary Analysis A. Workforce 1. Countywide 1 1 2. Job Category 1 1-2 3. Salaries 1 2-4 4. Supervisory/Non-Supervisory 2 1 B. Departmental Analysis 3 1-5 C. Analysis of Turnover Data 1. Classified a. New Hires 4 1 b. Promotions 5 1 c. Separations 6 1-9 2. Unclassified a. New Hires 7 1 b. Separations 8 1-3 • D. Special Reports 1. Timetables and Goals 9 1 2. Discrimination Complaints 10 1-3 3. Training Programs and Employees 11 1 4. Handicapped Employees by Department 12 1-4 5. Layoffs 13 1-8 II. Affirmative Action Accomplishments in 1982 1. California Firefighters Joint Apprenticeship Committee Program in Contra Costa County 14 1-6 • r S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT 6Y PROGRAM PCO49102 C, A OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORY►40e CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS DATE 'CI/20143 PAGE is 111 L DECEMBER air 1992 ALL QEPARTMENTS 4 L TOTAL 1 2 3 4#506 ALIANIPACIFIC 4 AM INDIAN/ �} CLASSIFICATION CLASS E EMPLOYEES IRATE BLACK HISPANIC TOTALS ISLANDERS FILIPINO ALSK. NAT 1 'TITLE Coot V M F T M F T N F t M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T ,i SERVICE/MAINTENANCE litf_446 CATEGORY TOTALS _ 112 101 419 163 72 247 83- 21 104 40 13.. 53.__4... 1 5,_,. 2 2 1 _1 2 ,1 1 _...._... r 74.4 100.0 17.2 19.8 24.6 301 1.0 lot .t .s 1 2405 44.2 6].3 S00 9.4 1206 02 •s .s 02 02 .! SUMMARY REPORT 1 0"o-0,0000,00,40000PERMANENT FULL TIME 2166 4986 2114 206 5$4 201 67 204 ss 14 s6 19 ± '- Gas a 2802 1786 3920 349 107 306 116 97 its 44 16 1s NjI 36.7 6106 35.6 3.4 903 30+4 1.9 304 09 •t 100 •03 i 47.1 30.0 65.6 409 106 402 200 1.0 1.9 ..7 •63 •06._ PERMANENT PART TIME 67 470 437 40 404 444 9 30 19 4 20 24 4 16 20 4 9 11 6 6 - 1 1w 1.1 9.0 6.e .2 __'*1'-_. 03 -_ .1 a •.t' 01 a „ 709 .i 7.6 ss .1 .i .1 .1 .t .1 , MROiEtT-EREM►T+ ]BO 240 420 143 163 126 10 17 _ 27 .i1.. 21 34 14 19. 33 13 16 29 I AlI - -- 1 _2 _..._ t -- - - -----._...� iii; 3.0 7.1 301 •t .s 04 .2„ 06 01 _. 6� :3.... .2 749.._. ri i UNKNOWN STATUS _._. 2 T 6 1 S b . , 1 „I DEPARTMENT TOTALS 2414 $953 2726 225 621 241 los 249 6o is 67 at 1519 1910 4706 396 124 367 154 '74 154 92 " 16 `1t 40.9 100.0 45.6 '-306 10.4 "' ii1 A I ' ` 4.4 " l03 "03 101 .4 5901 33.3 7901 6.7 2.1 6.2 2.6 102 206 09 v1 06 SUMMARY 6Y AUB CATEGORY 1 I. wrrr.r.r.rrrr.�wr..ruu�r..�• ._ . NFICIALS AND AOMIMISTRATO 176 65 243 161 it III 9 10 19 I 2 4 6 2 • 3 t s 1 I ,! 10000...... 2100 , 3i7`_._7i6it_ _`I.;* L+f_.. r " 2607 6603 67.2 401 06 106 06 lot 201 ly; - ...»_.._... ,. _. .. ...__ ._ _._�.»_r_ .. __ - ___.. .__.•...___.,w._._�.w.._w_._w r__r_�._r .-._.___ rr__,.»__,ww,.__.._-r-_. _w__.•_._ tI� ATTACHMENT 1 Page one S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT BY ►ROSAAM ►COe91.2 A OCCUPATIONAL CATECORY*JOS CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS DATE 01120113 PA41 14 - r DECEMBER 31# 1912 l I'rALL DEPARTMENTS � 4 ; L TOTAL 1 2 3 445#6 ASIAN/PACIFIC $ AM INDIAN/ ,;_,CLASSIFICATION CLASS E EMPLOYEES WHITE $LACK HISPANIC TOTALS -ISLANDERS FILIPINO ALSKO HAT, TITLE CODE Y M F T M F T N F T M F T M F T M F T M f T M F ♦ .S_ tROfE3Si0NALS. ,. 824 1773 772 64 160 22 60 119 41 2 16 4 949 672 1444 96 28 30 59 53 94 14 S 9 46.5 100.0 43.5 3.6 4.0 1.2 3.4 6.7 2.3 01 .9 •.2 s ' };_.. 53.5 37.9 61.4 504 1.6 201 3.3 3.0 s03 08 03 09 r ,,l TECHNICIANS 326 651 979 261 470 731 24 100 124 22 46 68 21 39 56 12 12 24 6 is 21 3 e 11 33.5 100.0 41.0 2.5 12.7 407 2.1 507 1.2 .6 2.1 of t' } 6605 26.7 74.7 10.2 2.2 6.9 3061.2 2.5 i.s 0$ 1.1 PROTECTIVE SERVICE WORKERS 620 56 676 $96 41 597 31 13 44 22 1 23 11 1 12 3 1 2 1 3 6 6 "L.. 9107 100.0 6.1 4.6 605 01 108 lie 03 •.4 µ "� 8.3 8202 88.3 109 3.3 304 .1 •4 •4 .1 49 09 PARA-PROFESSIONALS 34 179 213 23 130 1$3 7 27 34 4 15 19 7 T S 5 2 2 16.0 100.0 61.0 3.3 16.0 7.0 303 203 •09 8400 10.8 7104 12.7 1.9 809 3.3 2.3 OFFICE AMC CLERICAL 68 1580 1190 S 134 144 3 52 20 1 20 10 1512 58 1248 129 2 146 49 1 21 19 1 11 4.3 100.0 79.3 03 8.5 9.1 02 303 ' " 103 0I 1.3 06 9507 307 79.0 402 .1 902 3.1 .1 1.3 1.2 •1 •T iE SKIlLEO CRAFT YORKERS - 70 70 64 64 2 2 4 4 I••_ ._ 100.0 100.0 2.9 2.9 • 41.4 41.4 5.7 5.7� 1 r !•�_SERYItf1MAINTENANtE 312 107 414 185 72 257 $3 21 104 40 13 . 53 4 1 5 2 7405 10000 17.2 19.8 24.8 301 1.0 1.2 •.2 •5 2505 4402 6103 500 909 12011 ., _ •02 •05 05 62 02 •02 SUMMARY BY 3AliRT LEVEL i r.:w.rw..wwwrwwrw•rrrww" 0.0-50949 4 4 2 2 2 2 100.0 50.0 SQ•4 � � • 100.0 $000 $000 •a, ATTACHMENT 1 Page two S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT AY P60CRAK PCG69102 A OCCUPATIONAL CATE401Y#JOS CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS DATE 011201$3 PACE $5 L OECER$ER $10 1962 --* r� Atl 4 6� DEPARTMENTS-- L TOTAL 1 2 3 4*5+6 ASIAN/PACIFIC 5 AN INDIAMI - '_ CLASSIFICATIONLASS E EMPLOYEES WHITE $LACK ._ __, CHISPANIC TOTALS ISLANDERS FILIPINO ALSKo NAT -TITLE CODE V M f T K F T M f T K F T M F T M f T N F T M f T �_•9.•.- 6.0-7+9946 25 33 7 22 29 2 2 1 1 2 I 1 2 - .••�'{ - • � 24.2 100.0 66.7 601 300 601 3.4 _.. f..- 75.6 2102 67.9 6.1 300 Soo 6,1 C $.0-9.999 7 69 76 6 62 66 1 1 4 4 3 i 3 3 i., 9.2 100.0 61.6 1+3 1.3 5«3 3+4 2.4 } �•. 90.6 7.9 69.5 5.3 3.9 309 �'• 0 10.0-12.499+ 16 125 143 13 45 106 1 14 15 4 6 it 6 6 4 4 3 3 1 1 12.6 100.0 66.4 .7 10.5 5.6 5o6 ts$ lot •07 $7.4 901 7505 9.6 20$ 604 5.6 toll Rol a7 i -_ ..13.0-15+999,. -.,, _-. 66 640 726 4$ 414 462 30 121 111 6 $4 90 4 21 25 i 9 It 9 9 1 1201 100.0 56.9 4+1 20.T 1105 05 304 lot 102 •04 r I 6709 606 6305 16+6 s6 12.4 209 •.4 106 102 01 05 , f16.0-11.494 222 1114 665 57 156 69 11 46 15 2 16 6 ; 1092 131 996 101 23 112 37 7 22 14 2 10 { 1609 100.0 65.6 403 12.0 6.6 .6 3o7 101 •02 1.2 •06 � $3.1 10.0 75.6 TOT I.6 605 206 .5 107 101 .2 is "; 505 694 134 403 537 29 54 13 17 31 46 9 17 26 7 4 11 2 •7 9 6 6 ! 27.2 100.0 56.1 402 1to0 405 103 307 06 .3 103 •09 7208 1903 77.4 7.6 2.4 6.9 2.4 too 106 1.0 09 jI +� H� _•2200-24.994 _-_.._. 322 345 667 251 293 544 3$ 34 • 72 23 3 26 10 15 25 5 10 15 1 4 S 4 1 5 .. i r » 46.3 100.0 43.9 507 10.6 04 105 1o7 105 •41 07 •01 jI � '� 51.7 3706 $1.6 5.1 304 3+9 202 07 tot .6 06 -07 I 2500-290494 793 1164 315 40 79 11 24 50 14 6 17 1 " r _ 391 692 1007 39 3T 4$ 26 is 27 11 ! 6 �. _ 67s0 140s4 26.6 304 6.7 o4 2.0 402 102 •05 104 •01 .__...._...� _t _ 3300 5604 $501 $01 303 4.1 202 1.1 206 .9 04 •05 1000-340999' 423 209 612 372 16t $14 17 22 39 10 * 1 16 24 17 41 20 11 11 1 4 5 1 2 f 66*9 10000 25.6 207 6.2 Sol 306 605 107 a2 •06 •d 4 � 131 5ir9 6405 303 '106 -206 207 lot 409 06 05 N `� 0000._. 0000_ __._.. ._. . .. _.. . ._ 0000.._.__-. 0000 .. . - . :.. '.. . . ...__.�,:1• �,;_._=�----• .. .__,_,_ .w.___...._. .. .. . .._ _ 000____0.__..__...__._._..__.____..__...__.. ;0000__. ,0.000 .. . _ 0000 _. ,. _..... ...,_. _.._a�' + s ATTACHMENT 1 Page three S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT 9Y PROGRAM PCO111.2 .. A OCCUPATIONAL CATECORYId09 CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS DATE 01/20/01 PACE 66 L DECEMBER 310 1062 ALL'DEPARTMENTS 4 b 1 L TOTAL 1 2 3 40506 ASIANIPACIFIC 5 AM INDIAN/ CLASSIFICATION CLASS E EMPLOYEES WHITE $LACK HISPANIC TOTALS 'ISLANDERS FILIPINO ALSK. MAT _ +. TITLE CODE V M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T K 1500-19.999 110 52 162 97 44 141 6 9 13 2 2 S 1 6 3 1 4 1 1 1 tl 6709 100.0 27.2 4.9 9.0 102 3.1 307 06 06 0b t 32.1 59.9 87.0 301 102 06 109 201 06 s6 Ij " ' L 40.0 PLUS 254 62 316 229 49 270 4 4 9 4 1 5 17 9 29 19 9 23 2 2 }`{ 9004 10000 1503 .103 209 .1 504 709 209 •06 06 _ (..� 19.6 7205 99.0 103 1.3 1.6 205 4.7 •703 '•'1 1 �'�•._.. _. 0.000.. .. .._ .. .. ... .. .... . I r•�._.._._._... ._ __ . _.. . . . .. __0000._. _. _.. . _. .._ . _.. .iti,, - ' i• I ... ..._0+_0_00 ._.___........_._ 13 � 1r __..___.....�._..�._._ .._._..._.__._.._...._.... .. 0000 ._. . ....... . ..'_ ...—000_0.«._...._....- ... .,.._. •--.. 0000. ... «1��� c ( ' •, 0__00_0_..... .__.. _ _ 0000 ... ........ ... 0000.�__. .._......_.0000... ... 0000.. .. t�"� . �YYYYYYy("'��...-_..._0000..__.»...»..._..._«..—_.._.......... ...»0_000 0000. 0000.. __.»__.. 0000_.....__....__....-._..�. ,....._..�._.�..___...__«_�.«. ..».._-.....�.«.._ ...__......_....._-...__........0000..«.�...__... ....._.�,'i 1 � f i .y �M SM• ' i`ii.._.���wsr_.�.w..a�.��a�..�..�r�.......�..�..��w.w..►.a�.+,..�......�.��..�._��.�..�s��.�_....�w.�r.+..wnr_...�s�..a....� ��... _.r.�� ATTACHMENT 1 Page four r3 S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT 6Y PROGRAM PC069102A } A OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORYrAOG CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS GATE 01/20/67 PAGE 63 J L OECEM6ER 31. 1962 (,f'-ALL OEPANIMENTS L TOTAL SPANISH SPANISH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 ! �• CLASS CLASSIFICATION--., _ E_ EMPLOYEES LANG/OR/MANE LANGUAGE HANDICAP VISUAL HEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL OVLP ISA*.._ r•� C00E TITLE V M F T M F T M F T M F T M F fi M i Y M P T M P T. N i T .j SERVICE/MAINTENANCE,_.. _,AOI CATEGORY TOTALS 312 107 419 37 16 73 42 It 94 22 ! 27 7 3 10 •3 1 4 1 1 6 1 t 3 74.9 100.0 3.6 10.0 12.9 1.2 1.7 204 •2 •2 .2 •02 10t 1.2 2903 13.6 17.4 2.9 5.3 604 07 i 1.0 109 2.I rr SUMMARY REPORT PERMANENT FULL ,TIME2196 4966 314 164 406 S! 1! 29 7 2 4 29 6 2602 244 !76 236 70, 125 14 1C 17 2 40 69 7 36.7 63.6 S. 206 6.6 .9 •3 .3 •1 .3 .! i •i .3 47.1 401 9.7 _400_ 1.2 2.1 02 02 03 07 let 01 4��F PERMANENT PART TIRE 67 470 337 ! 49 54 4 36 40 2 7 9 1 3 1 1 3 3 2 i 900 06 .1 .7 .1 •1 •1 7.9 01 09 06 02 01 01 y _ .. . _ _ 000_0 • rt�/RgAECT-EREMPT __--� 160 240 420 21 26 49 17 22 39 9 4 13 2_ _ 2 „s L1 300 701 as 43 07 •1_„ i 4.0 04 •6 •4 •i 02 •i •1 at 01 '_ UMRNOVM STATUS _.._ 1 7 6 3 3 3 ._ 3 DEPARTMENT TOTALS 2434 3119 270 664 299 61!9!3 414 164 466 66 147 17 17• 14 23 3 44 71 6 14 4 2 ! 33 it 19 _ _ ,• ._ h 40.9 10000 7.0 302 6.2 1.1 .3 •6 .i .1 si •t 03 �! 9401 403 21.3 5.0 1.4 2.3 03 •2 04 01 .7 1.3 01 SLIMRARY 6Y A06 CATEGORY �~ OFFICIALS AND AOMIMISTRATO 176 iS 243 It 4 19 6 2 6 I0. 1 i1 3 3 i 2 4 1 9 1 1 --73.3 100.0 _ 1:i ._.-ts3_ 1i3 ;i4_ tity _lii._.� _04�._.. r 2601 409 602 •• 401 403 06 06 1.4 Z0I \•i,-„��,_. .,. ,._. _ __..» ..»___ ... 0_ 000 . . .. �.._�_ ... «. ...Jlrl r w►-.rte�s�...��.r��.r._w..�w�.w.i..��. ��r �.._��_ • � ATTACHMENT 1 Page five +.---------•--- ---- --- ... ._. _. 0000.. .-----. .._ _.._. _. __0000 _.--_ - --------- -. --- ----•------ •. +i S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT 6Y PROGRAM /C0691.2A A OCCUPATIONAL CATECORYPJOB CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS DATE 01/20/03 FACE 04 L DECEMIE/ 31. 1902 All DEPARTMENTS •' - '•__. �., �.; L TOTAL SPANISH SPANISH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5• CLASS CLASSIFICATION - E EMPLOYEES LANG/OR/NINE LANGUAGE HANDICAP VISUAL HEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL OVL►.OISAG �+ Ii CODE TITLE V M F T N f T M F T M F T M F T N f T M F T N F T. M F T .I PROFESSIONALS. 024 1773 61 52 07 10 2 7 2 1 2 11 3 3 it I' 949 77 130 35 16 34 5 1 3 1 10 21 46.5 100.0 3.4 2.9 4.9 1.0 .1 04 .1 .1 .1 06 02 .2 I' 53.5 4.3 7.0 2.0 .9 1.9 .3 .1 .2 •.1 06 10! f•' TECHNICIANS 320 651 979 41 79 120 27 61 06 13 9 22 2 2 4 2 2 6 9 13 1 3 4 33.9 100.0 6.1 !.6 9.0 .9 .2 .4 .5 .1 .4 - 66.5 4.2 1203 6.2 1.3 20! 02 .2 02 .6 103 PROTECTIVE SERVICE YOPKERS 620 56 676 65 4 69 49 2 47 11 1 It 2 2 4 4 7 7 1 1 2 j'}-- 91.7 100.0 .6 6.7 7.0 01 _.3 .3 .1 .3 0.3 9.6 10.2 03 1.6 1.6 •.6 .6 1.0 tic .1 j': PARA-PROFESSIONALS 0000._ . _..,. 34 179 213 4 21 25 4 20 24 2 7 9 ,._ 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 16.0 100.0 9.9 1.9 1103 3.3 .9 09 0S 09 .S 04.0 1.0 11.7 904 .9 402 .9 •.9 1.4 •05 .9 1.4 .9 OFFICE AND CLERICAL 60 1500 229 3 170 25 1 6 4 1 14 3 jI _• -•- 1512 4 233 167 6 31 9 4 1 9 19 3 403 10000 14.5 .2 10.0 1.6 01 .4 03 •01 09 OR "j 95.7 .3 14.7 10.6 04 2.0 03 .3 01 03 l.! at SKILLED CRAFT YORKERS••• 70 70 31 11 30 10 1 1 1 1 100.0 100.0 14.3 14.7 19.7 13.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 I I,J • _SERVICE/MAINTENANCE•- -____-_712.107 419 57 16 73 -4l.,•12- 54.-_22 .Z7•- 7 _••.3 10 3 -•1_ 4 1 i, -,6 1 9_._! ,- 74.5 100.0 306 10.0 1209 1.2 1.7 2.4 •02 02 .2 •02 1.2 102 _. 2505 1306 17.4 209•• 5.3 694 .7 _07 IdD.,_, 1.9 2.1_.. _ i' ;•'LSUMNARY 0Y SALARY LEVEL �r A•._ 900..54999...__ _ ... 0000._.__.--•--••_.._-_0__000 .- - -----•-----...-___ _ i.•` 100.0 "r------ _---- -- -----100.0 . 0000_ _0000..----_ - -_____ --.._ __0000__-_- _.- -• ------ _... ----- _ _�,•' ATTACHMENT 1 Page six tl 0 S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT 6Y PROGRAM ►COe91.2A !( A OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORYPJOI CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS DATE 01/201/3 ►AGE 13 L OECEN9E1 310 3912 All OE►ARTMENIS L TOTAL SPANISH SPANISH TOTAL 1 2 # 4 3 I' !I_ CLASS CLASSIFICATION' _ .- E EMPLOYEES LANG1001MARE LANGUAGE HANDICAP VISUAL NEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL DVLP.OISA9, ,.._ �p COOK TITLE V M F T M f 7 N f 1 M F T M f T M F T M F 1 M F 7 M F 7 _b 6.0-7.999. 4 23 33 3 9 3 7 2 2 t 2 .._� 1f 24.2 100.0 13.2 1S-2 601 601 !!! ,i 7S./ 13.2 I3.2 6.1 6.1 C 9.0-9,999 7 69 76 1 1 6 6 3 3 1 1 2 2 9.2 100.0 10.3 7.9 309 1.3 206 , 90.6 10.3 7.9 1.9 1.3 206 (e (mob 10.0-12.994 to 123 143 4 13 19 3 11 14 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 I.` 12.6 100.0 1003 201 9.1 2.1 a7 07 a7 1704 201 13.# 107 2.1 .7 07 .7 ^� E 13.0-13.999, . . ., .. e4 640 121 1 106 114 1 11 91 2 9 11 4 4 1 t 3 1 1 2 4 6 12.1 10000 14.e lot 12.3 102 03 .3 01 •03 1T,9 1.1 13.7 11.4 .3 1.3 03 01 .4 .i .# .• yy F 16.0-14.999 222 1314 131 23 141 2e 7 14 t 19 2 ! ' 1D92 27 113 111 14 44 7 1 3 1 23 3 ' 16.9 100.0 12.0 1.6 10.7 200 05 1.1 02 1.1 02 •04 "I l 43:1 lot 14.1 9.0 104 303 .3 01 02 6 104 •2 19,0-22:949 149 300 694 23 34 79 16 36 34 6 3 11 1 3 27.2 100.0 1.6 2.3 7.4 07 .4 04 04 01 04.- 7t.4 306 11.4 S.S .9- 106 _..._ .. .3 .7 03 }' . 22.0-24.999 7t2 343 667 31 17 $3 30 1 37 6 6 . It 3 _. # _ _ _ . .l. 1 t 9 2 7 44.3 100.0 1.3 4.5 3.3 .9 .4 -01 03 '01 { �i�_..._. 51.7 9.7 4.2 1.0 .9 1.1 04 01 .7 1.0 --s, „I 1 29.0-29.999 793 1164 32 63 61 9 3 4 1 6 I.,'r 391 14 121 16 21�`i #0 1 6 7 13 14 ! 04- 3390 100.0 2.7 30# b.1 -'01 _.1 _ .3 ' 01 .� .-- 03 03 04- .. 33.0 705 loot 105 1.4 203 .1 01 06 1.1 106 02 3000-344944 - - - 423 209 632 60 is 73 36 11 47 13 3 14 2 t 3 1 4 1 1 9 t 11 t 2 {.! 6609 100.0 2.4 307 704 03 03 03 •02 02 0t •03 03 43 �,• ,"'-'--"'-` 33'01 '9•S1�!_-'_147.'_."2��4" loi '_. .01 06 104 lot •', I„} .3 t- 0 „ ATTACHMENT 1 Page seven S CONTRA COSTA COUNTY YONKFORC£ SURVEY REPORT SY PROGRAM PC0091.2A - ,• A OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORY/J00 CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY LEVEL PROCESS DATE 01/20/03 PAGE 06 L. DECEM6E4 $10 1902 T'AEL DE►ARTMENi3 - a' a L TOTAL SPANISH SPANISH TOTAL 1 2 3 4 9 , jCLASS CLASSIFICATION.,..--..E EMPLOYEES LANGIORINANE LANGUAGE HANDICAP VISUAL HEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL OVLP.OISAO .. CODE TITLE V M F T R f T M F T N F T M P T M F T N F T N F T N f T !.i K 35.0-39.999,, _ 110 92 162 9 3 12 4. _ 1 . .9 ; _ __..3 .._. ._ I } 67.9 100.0 1.9 2.5 3.1 i� 3201 9.6 7.4 .6 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.! •06 06 L 40.0 PLUS 294 62 316 10 1 It 6 1 7 0 2 10 2 1 3 1 1 4 1 9 1 1 .___.__... ._.. 00.4 100.0 .3 ' '1.9-._ ..2.2 .6 .6 .9 ..., . i! j"! 1966 3.2 !.9 .3 2.9 1.2 •03 .3 1.3 1.6 k TA JN iJ ATTACHMENT 1 Page eight CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT SUPERVISORY AND NO4-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES DECEMBER 31, 1982 COUNTYWIDE TSL 1 2 7 4 5 6 4 ♦ 5 ♦ 6 EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PACIFIC FILIPINO AMER. INDIAN OTHER 5S/8L ALASKAN NATIVEM41TIC3 T M E T M F T M P 7'T' SUPERVISORY 1 396 364 76( 350 309 659 28 31 59 7 15 22 8 7 15 3 1 4 1 1 11 9 20 35 26 61 52.1 47.9 100. 6.1 40.7 86.7 3.7 4.1 7.8 .9 2.0 2.9 1.1 .9 2.0 .4 .1 .5 .1 .1 1.4 1.2 2.6 4.6 3.4 8.1) NON SUPERVISORY 1 2030 5191 1630 4047 197 365 562 117 228 345 66 73 119 12 51 63 16 21 37 94 145 239 215 788 623 7155 2417 39.2 60.8 100 31.4 16.5 100. 3.R 7.0 10.8 2.3 4.4 6.6 1.3 1.4 2.7 .'2 1:0 1.2 .3 .4 .7 1.8 2.8 4.6 4.5 7.5 12.0 ATTACHMENT 2 Page one I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MORKYORCE SURVEY REPORT DEPARTMENT PIPPILE DECEMBER 317 1982 TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 ♦ 5 t 6 DEPARTMENTS EMPLOYEE WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PACIlIC lILIPINO AMER. INDIAN OT11P.R SS/SL ALASKAN NATIVE IN RITIES T M ! T jr ! T M M ADMINISTRATOR 1 16 13 29 14 9 23 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 5.,7 44,8 100. 48.,3 79..3 3.4 6,9 10, 3.4 3.4 6.9 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 10.3 13.0 AGRICULTURE M 17 6 25 16 0 24 1 1 1 1 2 2 % 68.0 32.0 10 4,0 32.0 96.c 4,0 4,0 1.0 4.0 .0 -.__ 8.0 r ANIMAL SERVICES ! 28 I-9L 47 25 27 42 2 2 1 1 2 l 1 1 I 2 3 5 59.6 40.4 100.53.7 36.2 89.d 4.3 4. 2.1 2.1 4.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 4.3 6.4 IU.6 ASSESSOR M 1 45 116 67 16 03 2 2 6 22 I- 1 2 1 3 7 30 17 1.2 38.8 100,57.R 31.0 88,1 1.7 1.1 1.7 5.2 6.9_1.7 _1.7 .9 .9 1.7 .9 2.6 6.0 0.6 14.7 AUDITOR-CONTROLLER f 59 112 181 61 93 154 1 2 3 3 9 12 3 u3 6 3 A 3 I- 2 �7 4 8 ?7. 3 16 19 8,,1 61.9 100)3.7 51,4 85.1 ,6 1.1 1.7 1,7 5.0 6.6 1%7 1.7 3.3 1.7 1, .6 1.1 1.7 2.2_4,4 u.6 1.7 8,8_ 10,5 BUILDING INSPECTION i 31 13 44 29 11 40 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 -' ~- 1 2 4 70.5 29,5 10055.9 25.0 90.9 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 4.5 2.3 2.3 3 2,3 4.5 2,3 6.8_ CLERK-RECORDER I T4--qO--*'lb4 13 82 95 1F 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 TC u3.5 06,5 10012.5 78.5 91,3 1.0 1.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.0 3,R 4,8 1.0 5.8 6,7 COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 0 5 12 17 2 5 7 2 3 5 1 4 5 2 5 7 4 29.4 70.6 100 18 17,6 29.4 5.9 23,5 29.4_ 5.9 2315 29.4 M 11.8 29.4 412 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION 2 2 1 1 1 1 - - �1 i 17- % • 100 100 50.0 50.0 50.0 50,0 _ _ _ 50.0 50.0 COUNTY COUNSEL 1 12 13 25 11 lo- 21 1 1 3 ] ♦ 48,0 52,0 100 44.0 40.0 84, 4.0 4.0 12.0 12.4 12,0 12.0 4.0 4.0 ATTACHMENT 3 I age one CONTRA COSTA MORVORCE BURVEY REPORT DEPARTMENT PROFILE DECEMBER 31, 1983 TOTAL I 2 3 4 5 6 4 4 5 + 6 DEPARTMENTS EMPLOYEE NNITE SLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PACIFIC FILIPINO AMER. INDIAN DINER BS/SL ALASKAN NATIVE INA TIES T M F T M-FT M P COURT/BAY 1 45 45 25 25 10 10 9 9 1 1 2 2 10 10 t 100._100 55.6 55.f 22.2 22.2 20.0 20.0_ 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 22.2 22.2_ COURT/DELTA - 13 13 13 11 11 2 2 T 3 3 t 1.00 _100 84.6 04.6 15.4 15.4 23.1 23.1 a 100 100 91.7 91.7 8.3 8.32.8 2.8 -FO UAT/N.C.7bANVILIB-1 2 R-S] -..r-229-^ 29 -•�.__-..-_.1 ..-.__� 2._..__. 1 1 17_ .�.4. ..._...4._. 3,4 04%i Y7,9 3 0 �_ 3.0 ,,,,"ba G,�1 3.0_3. _ _ 3.0 3.0 12.1 12.1 DISTRICT ATTORNEY 0 74 .134 208 64 100 164 5 15 20 4 15 19 1 1 M 2 _ _Y 3 3 1 4 5 7 10 25 35.6 64.4 100 20.6 48.1 78. 2.4 7.2 9.6 1.9 7.2 9_1 .5 .5 1.0 1.4 1.4 .5 1.9 2.4 3.4 8.7 12.0 -- -7 DISTRICT N 279 17���252 220r��12'��232 7 7 8'�19 _ ..Z.._ .__. 2 ..__ ._ 2 - 2 4 4 31 1 32 CONTRA COSTA COC:KfY t 94.8 5.2 100. 87.3 4.8 92.1 2.8 2.8 3.2 .4 3.6 ..8 ,8 _ . .8. .8 1.6 1.6 12.3 .4 12.7 FIRE DISTRICT 1 24 24 24 24 - 1 1 NORACA _ t 300.0 100. 100 100 _ _ _ ._�.__»._..._ __. �_ ._ _.. _..»__. �._.. _ 4.2- 4.2 FIRE DISTRICT M 32 1 33 T27-1-3i 2 2 ORINDA 97.0.3.0 100. 97.0 3.0 100. 6.1 6.1 FIRE CT DISTRIM 80 5 85 64 4 73 i---3 5 5 �-•~ .._�.. 2 1 2 - 1 3 3 2 4 14 2 16 PAVERVIEW t 94.1 4.0.100. 04.0 4.0 08.0 3.5 3.5 S.9- .__5.9 . 1.2 .,_,._..1.2 2.4 1.2..,.3.5 3.5-, 1.2 4.7 16.5 2.4 180 YItd. It2$TRICT 1 24 1 25 21 1 22 2 3 1 1 1 1 5 5 NEST t 96.0 4.0 100. 04.0 4.0 08.0 8,0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0� 4.0 20.0 _ 20.0 TTACHME T 3 age two , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT DEPARTMENT PROFILE DECEMBER 31, 1903 1 2 H33 4 5 6 4 5 6 SS/SL TOTAL DEPARTMENTS EMPLOYEE WHITE FLACK NIC ASIAN/PACIFIC FILIPINO ALASKAN NATIVE MINK ITIES T M T M r T T H F tlHEALTH SERVICES 1 419 1330 174 290 958 1240 66 213 279 11 27 38 65 7 29 36 3 8 11 37 75112 37 145 182 24.0 76.0 100 G,6 54.R 71.4 3.6 12.2 16.016..0 1.,5 2,2 3.7 .4 1.7 2.1 .2 .5 .6 2.1 4.3 6.4 2.1 8.3 104 MEDICAL CARE 1 385 1083 1468 265 7B1 104 62 177 23993 22 24 46 7 27 34 3 710 72 58 90 35 121 526.2 77.8 100 8.1 53.2 71. 4.2 12.1 16.3 6.3 1.5 1.6 3.1 .5 1,6 2.] .2 .5 .7 2.2 4.0 6.1 2.4 0.2 10.6PUBLiC IIEAI.TII 1 57 256 31 41 187 228 6 36 4210 10 14 24 2 2 1 1 10 17 27 2 25 27DIVISI021 � 10.1 81.9 100 17.0 59.4 72. 1.9 11.4 13. 7 5.7 3.2 4.4 7. .6 .6 .3 .3 3.2 5.4 8.6 .6 - 7.9 0.6LIBAAAY 1 26 190 216 22 165 187 7 730 1 0 9 2 2 1 1 1 11 12 217 �1912.0 88.0 100 10.7. 76.4 86. ].2 3. 2 4.6 .5 3.7 4.2 .9 .9 .5 .5 .5 5.1 5.6 ��9 8n6T2-T9 bio IS 10.5 21.1 31036.8 67.2 100 26.7 52.6 78. 5.3 5.3 10. 3 10.5 MAPSIIALL .. .. .. 1 - --�'--T- 1 � 14----1---.5.. MUNI CQUkTS 66.7 33.3 100 61.9 21.4 87. 2.4 4.8 7.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 4.8 711 .5 2.4 11.9 PF.PSOtINEL-- -^N 14 32 46 12 25 37 1 2 7 1 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 8 _ 0.4 69.6 100. 26.1 54.3 80. 2.2 4.3 6.5 2.2 6.5 8.7 4.3 d.3 4.3 4.3 i.l 17.0 17.4 PERSONNEL 1 1 1 1 1 MERIT BOARD _ _% 100 Inc100 10 _ - PLANUINr, N 74 1G 40 22 11 25 2d I _ - - --1_-'-.1 2 .0 - '4" % r,n n 4B_B lrn 1) J2.5 07. '. 5.0 5.0 10.1 2.5 2.5 _ 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 10.0 PRIOATION 1 89 193 307 144 163 307 32 19 51 9 9 18 2 2 2 2 4 _♦ 49.5 50.0 30 37.7 42.7 80. 8.4 5.0 13.4 2.4 2.4 4.7_ 5 S .5 .5 1.0 1.0 5_ 1._6 G.3_5.0 11 3 PUBLIC DEFENDER 1 0 34 64 28 28 56 2 3 5 2 2 1 Z % 6.9 53.1 100 3.0 43.8 97.5 3.1 4.7 7.0 3.1 3. 1.6 1. 1.6 1.6 1.1 6.3 9.4 PUnl.tc%gonxs- -r 195 15 46- 209 s��dT -b�G-G9 --7I- _4TIZ 7-�' GG-- --a9- _ __ • 14.19 15.1 100 ,2.2 11.2 7].]113.3 1.3 14.6 7.1 1.7 8.6 .9 .6 2.6 .4 .2 .6 2.4 .9 3.2 12.9 1.9 14.8 RETIREMENT N 1 8 9 1 8 9 11J1 88 10 11. BB 9 l0D SHERIFF CORONER 1 388156.9 -L-eq 345 124 469 21 17 38 17 13 26 4 4 2 2 4 3 j 9 2 li 71 22 r,l ,. 71_3_28.7_ln_ 6-4.22.6 86. 3.9 3.1 7.0 2.4 2.4 4.B .7 .7 .4 .4 .7 .6 . -1.7 .4 2.0 - 7.2 4.0 11.2 DELTA ur101ONAL 1 S 10 15 5 10 15 CX.MUN!CATIONS CTR\ 3 3.3 66.7 1001 33.3 66.7 100 ATTACHMENTl3 Page 3 :a. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE BURVEY REPORT DEPARTMENT PROPIT.E DECF]NBER 31, 1982 TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 ♦ 5 ♦ 6 DEPARTMENTS OVI,OYEE WHITE SLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PACIFIC FILIPINO AMER.'INDIAN ' OTHER SS/SL ALASKAN NATIVE MINORITIES T T M F T M F T M P M SOCIAL SERVICES 1 130 801 939 100 632 71 14 90 104 6 51 57 16 14 30 1 10 11 1 4 5 10 28 46 13 94 107 140 85,3 100 10.6 67.3 78 1.5 9.6 11.1 6 5,4 6.1 1,7 1,5 3,2 .1 14 1.2 .1 4 5 1.9 3.0 4.9 1.4 10.0 11.4 SUPERIOR COURT I 2 10 12 2 9 11 1 � z�' ADMINT9TRATTON/ 4 16.7 83.3 100 16.7 75.0 91 7 8.3 0.3116.7 16.7 JURY CQdMI§St0tlER TREASURER-TAX 1 4 22 26 3 19 22 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 COLLECTOR 5.4 84.6 100. 1.5 73.1 84. .8 7.7 11.5 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.8 7.7 11.5 19.2 VETERANS 1 1-3 6 J SERVICES 0.0 50.0 100 16.7 50.0 66.1 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 ATTACHMENT 3 Page four CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT OEPARTHENT PROFILE DECEMBER 31, 1982 MAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 ♦ 5 + 6 DEPARTMENTS EMPLOYEE WHITE !LACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PACIFIC FILIPINO AMER. INDIAN CRIER BS/SL ALASKAN NATIVEINORITIES T T M F T M F T M TOTAL COUNTY 1 2434 5953 1980 4706 225 396 621 124 243 367 74 SO 154 15 52 67 16 22 38 105 154 259 270 414 604 3519 2726 ♦ 40.9 59.1 100 3,3 45.9 79.1 3.8 6.7 10.4 2.1 4.1 6.2 1.2 1.3 2.6 .3 .9 1.1 .3 .4 .6 1.8 2.6 4.4 4.5 7.0 11.5 COUNTY LABOR FORCE (1975( % 65.1 34.9 100 63.0 6.5 2.2 0.3 ATTACHMENr 3 Page five RACE/E77MNIC AND SEX DATA FOR NEN HIRES JANUARY-JUNE i JULY-DECEMBER 1982 TOTAL VNITE SLACK SS SL ASEAN FILIPINO AlfERICAN OTHER HISPANIC DMPLOY[[ INDIAN MINORITIES M r T H F T M F T M F T H F T H F T M: C T I Y P 7 M F T January 29 61 90 22 44 66 2 0 10 2 9 11 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 4 2 7 9 February 0 42 50 G 29 35 1 10 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 2 2 March 21 60 Ol 13 43 56 3 9 12 5 7 12 2 2 1 2 3 1 4 51 4 4 S April 26 45 71 19 35 54 2 4 6 2 8 10 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 5I 2 4 6 May 16 44 60 13 25 30 2 10 12 1 8 9 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 6 7 Jun• 2 70 92 10 51 70 1 7 6 2 8 10 1 1 1 5 6 1 6 7' 1 6 7 TOTAL 9 1 4 559 12 41 53 3 5 S 3 12 15 1 1 2 8 2 '10 29 39 37.5 77.0 100 21.0 51.1 72.0 2.5 11.0 13.3 2.7 9.2 12.0 1.0 1.1 2.0 1.0 2.7 3.4 .2 .2 .5 2.0 4.1 6. 2.] 6.5 9.0 July 4 S 12 3 4 7 4 4 1 1 1 1 August 9 13 22 7 7 14 1 4 5 4 4 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 September 19 44 63 17 33 50 2 8 10 1 2 5 7 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 October 19 17 36 15 13 28 4 4 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 November 7 14 21 7 12 19 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 December 7 15 22 S 10 15 2 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 TOTAL 1 65 111 176 54 79 133 7 19 26 3 16 19 1 5 6 4 4 1 1 2 2 10 12 3 5 8 • 37.0 63.1 100 31.0 44.0 76.0 4.0 11.0 15.4 2.0 9.1 11.0 1.0 3.0 3.4 2.3 2.3 1.0 1.0 1. .' 6.• 7.0 .2 3.0 4.6 GRIND TOTAL 1 187 433 620 146 306 452 16 67 65 1S 57 72 4 10 14 3 16 19 2 2 4 9 28 37 13 34 47 • 30.2 70.0 100 24.0 49.4 73.0 3.n 11.0 14.0 2.4 9.2 12.0 1.0 2.0 2.3 .5 3.0 3.1 .] .3 1.0 L.4 %.5 6.0 1 5.5 0.0 ATTAC ENT 4 Page ne RACE/VTKNIC AND SEX DATA FOR PROMOTIONS JANUARY-JUNE A JULY-DECEMBER 1982 TOTAL UNITE BLACK SS SL ASIAN FILIPINO AMERICAN OTHER HISPANIC 84FLOYEE � INDIAN MINORITIES M P T M F T M P T M F T M F T fi F T Y. t T I I' P Y N F T January 15 49 64 13 32 45 2 9 11 6 6 2 2 1 1 3 3 5 5 February 12 24 36 9 17 26 2 4 6 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 31 1 1 March 37 27 64 28 14 42 7 9 16 3 4 7 1 1 2 1 1 21 1 3 4 April 10 25 35 7 17 24 1 2 3 2 7 9 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 5 5 May 11 23 34 7 21 28 3 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 1. 1 1 Juno 29 72 101 23 47 70 3 15 18 5 12 17 3 3 1 3 3 7 10 TOTAL 1 114 220 334 87 14B 235 18 40 58 12 31 43 4 3 7 6 6 2 2 4 11 15; 5 21 26 34.0 66.0 100 26.0 44.3 70.3 5.4 12.0 17.4 4.0 9.3 13.0 1.2 1.0 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.0 1. 1.2 3.3 4. 1.5 6.3 8.0 July 17 12 29 14 8 22 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 3 Auquot 9 9 18 7 7 14 2 2 1 1 2 2 Septembor 19 44 63 14 32 46 1 6 7 2 11 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 6 8 Octobor 16 21 37 12 18 30 2 1 3 2 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 Novambor 3 13 16 3 9 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Uocumbor 14 45 59 11 26 39 6 8 2 9 11 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 ) 2 6 B TOTAL 0 78 144 222 61 102 163 5 16 21 7 2734 5 3 8 3 3 1 1 5 7 12 6 21 27 35.0 65.0 100 27.5 46.0 73.4 2.3 7.2 9.5 3.2 12.2 15. 2.3 1.4 3.6 1.4 1.4 .5 .5 .3 3.3 5.4 2.7 9.5 12.2 GRAND TOTAL 1 192 364 556 148 250 398 23 56 79 19 58 77 9 6 15 9 9 3 3 9 18 27 11 42 53 35.0 65.5 100 27.0 45.0 72.0 4.1 10.1 14.2 3.4 10.4 14. 2.0 1.1 2.7 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.2 5.0 2.0 0.0 10.0 I ATTAC ENT 5 Page cne RACE/ETHNIC AND SEX DATA FOR SEPARATED EMPLOYEES JANUARY - JUNE AND JULY - DECEMBER 1982 TOTAL I WHITE SLACK SS SL i ASIAN FILIPINO AMERICAN OTHER IIISFARIC RESIGNATIONS EMPLOYEE I INDIAN MiNORITIEB h F T II F T N F T M F T N F T IR F T T F T Y r Y II F T January 9 23 32 6 17 23 1 1 2 4 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 3 4 ., February 6 14 20 5 11 16 1 2 3 1 1 1 March 8 21 29 5 14 19 1 5 6 1 4 5 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 4 1 April 9 16 25 5 14 19 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 I 2 2 May 9 21 30 7 14 21 4 4 2 2 4 2 2 1 1 2 2 Juno 6 18 24 5 13 18 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 Total 1 47 113 160 33 83 116 5 15 20 7 13 20 1 3 4 2 S 7 1 1 3 9 12 6 5 11 1129.30 70.63 100. 20.63 51.68 3.13 9.38 12. 4.38 8.13 12. .63 1.88 2.5 1.25 3.13 2.63 .63 2.0 5.6 7. 3.75 ].13 6.88 72.5 1 4.30 July 7 14 21 2 10 12 2 2 4 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 August 8 16 24 S 10 18 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 4 4 September 12 15 27 10 14 24 2 2 October 5 13 18 4 9 13 4 4 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 November 2 4 11 2 B 10 2 2 1 1 1 1 December 4 10 14 4 8 12 2 2 Total 134 77 115 30 59 89 4 10 34 4 7 11 1 1 2 2 4 6 3 5 8 1 2 3 • 33,0 67,0 100. 26.0 51.3 77.4 3.5 8.7 12.1 3.5 6.0 9.S .87 .117 1.1 1.7 3.5 5.2 -6 4.4 7.0.n7 1.7 2.6 GRAND TOTAL 0 85 190 275 63 142 205 9 25 34 11 20 31 2 4 6 4 0 13 1 1 6 14 20 7 7 14 31. 69. 100. 22.9 51.6 74.5 3.2 9.0 12.3 4.0 7.3 11.2 .73 1.4 2.2 1.4 3.3 4.7 .36 .34 2.2 5.07.3 2.5 2.5 5.0 ATTAC IMENT 6 Page one RIK:t/CIMNIC AND SIM FOR SEPAPATM ZWWYELR JANVMY -JUNE AND JULY .DECDIDER 1482 TAL WHM SUCK S5 Sl ASEAN FILIPINO A"RtCAN OTNES HISPANIC INFLOTEE INDI�NORITIES N P T H P T N P T N P T N P T 1f P T I Y. r T Y t I N F T January May hone June I 1 1 1 1 Total 0 1 1 1 1 100 100 100 100 July - December None GRAND TWAL S 1 1 1 1 , • 100 100 100 100 AT ACHMENT 6 Paie two RACE/ETHNIC AND SEX DATA FOR SEPARATED EMPLOYEES JANUARY - JUNE AND JULY - DECEMBER 1992 TOTAL WHITE BLACK SS SL ASIAtI FILIPINO AXERICliN OTHER HISPANIC REJECTION OF PROBATIONER WFLOYEE INDIAN MINORITIES M F T H F T M F T N F T H F T It F T R C 7' -7-r 7 N F 7 January Nona Februrary 1 1 I 1 March 3 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1' April 2 7 9 1 5 6 2 2 1 1 1 II May 2 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 Juno 2 4 6 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 l Total 10 14 24 5 9 14 4 3 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 2 1 1 r.f 41.6' 59.3 100. 0.8' 37.3 16.6 12.5 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1' 4.1 4.18-3 4.1 4.1 59.3 29.1 July 2 4 6 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 l August 1 1 2 1 1 2 September 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 October 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 November 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 Dn�:c+Aher 1 I 1 1 1 1 Total 4 e 9 17 5 4 9 2 3 S 1 23 1 2 1 s 47.0• S2.9• IOD. 29.4 23.5 11.7 17.6 3.8 11.7 et 11.7' 17.6 w~1 52.9 29.4: 17.6 CRAM TOTAL. I 18 23 41 10 13 23 6 6 12 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 43.9. 56.1 100, 24.3: 31.7 14.6 14.6 2.4 7.3. 9.7' 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4.4. 2.4• 7.3. 9.7 $6.1 29.2, - AT ACHMENT 6 Pa a three RACY/RYIMIC AND SER DATA FOR SEPARATED RNPWYEES JANUARY-JUNE AND JULY -DECENARR 1912 DISMISSALS TOTAL WHITE SLACK SS SL ASIAN PILItINO AMERICAN OI11ER HISPANIC EMPLOYEE 1 INDIAN MINORITIES N ► T N ► T M ► T M F T M F T 11 F T v r T I Y ► Y N F T January 1 1 1 1 1 1 February 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 March 2 2 2 2 I April 1 1 1 1 I May 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 June Nona Total S 4 4 B 3 3 61 1 2 2 2 0 50.0 50.0 100. 37.50 37.50 12.50 12.5n 25.00 25.0 15.00 25.00 July 3 3 1 1 2 2 August 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 September 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 October 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 November 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 December 2 2 2 2 Total 1 7 S is 4 4 S 3 3 6 1 1 • 46.69 53.33 100. 26.67 26,67 20.00 20.00 53.33 40.0 G,67 6,6 6.67 6.67 GRAND TOTAL 11 12 23 7 7 14 4 4 9 3 3 1 1 i 1 47.13 52.17 100. 30.43 30.43 17.39 17.39 -3,04 I3.1N4.35 4.35 60.17 34.71 ATTACHMENT 6 Page four RACVVW"IC Atm SLK DATA FOR SEPARATED lNEU)VLSS JANUAKT-JUNE AND JULY -DLCOMIX 1452 A4 ITL BLACK SS SL ASIAN RICAN OTHER 111STANIC SUSPENSIONS MPLOV" INDIAN NINOKLTILS N E 7 N F I I N T T N F T N F--T- N r T ►: r 7 t_ F Y N f T January 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 February 4 4 2 2 2 2 Match 2 2 2 2 April 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 may none June 2 2 4 1 2 3 1 1 'total 1 10 5 15 5 5 10 5 5 4 66.7 33.3' 100. 33.3 37.7 66.7 33.3 33.3 6.67 6.67 'y1Y 4 2 6 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 August 1 1 2 1 1 2 September 2 2 4 1 1 2 ! 1 2 October 1 1 2 1 1 2 November 2 2 2 2 Decaiber S 1 6 1 1 4 4 1 ! 1 1 fres% i is 22 7 3 10 7 3 40 1 1 2 l 1 2 0 68.2 31.5 100. 11.5*13% 4S.4 31.5 13:6 4.5 4.5 5,0 I.SS 4.55 9.01 45,,4 A GNM TOTAL i 25 12 37 12 S 20 12 3 15 1 . 1 2 2 1 S ♦ 67.5 32.4 100. 32.4 21.6 55.0 32:4 8.1 40.5 2.7 2.17-5.4, 5.41 2.70 9.1 ATTACHMENT 6 Pae five r RACK/ITIMIC AND on DATA POR BEPAIUITED ENPLOYLEB JIINUART-JUNK AID JULT-DLCumER 19x2 LBLACK SS/5L AMERICAN 01111a HISPANIC DEIDTIOM AL S EMPLOYEE INDIAN MINORITIES N ► T N ► t M ► T N ► T M ► T IM ► Y I: f T I I' C Y M F T JANUARY - JUNE NONE 1 Total I NONE I NONE JULY NONE I AUGUST 1 2 ] 2 2 1 1 1 1 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBRR NONE NOVEMBER 1 1 1 1 DECEMBER NONE Total 0 2 2 31 1 • . SO.0 50.0 100 25.0. 50.0 75. 25,0 25. BRAID TOTAL 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 • 50.0 SO.0 100.00 25.0 SO.0 75. 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 1 AT rACIDIENT 6 Pale six RRCs/W7mRC AM i6Y DATA POR RLPAm m mpLOYLES JANUARY -JUNE AND JULY -DLCLIO)LR 1992 TOTAL WHITZ $LACK SS SL ASIAN FILIPINO AMERICAN OTHER HISPANIC INVOLUNTARY MOTION INPLOTEL __ INDIAN MINORITIES N F T N F T M F T M F T M F T It F T v F 7' f: F Y M F T January - June None July None August 1 1 1 1 1 1 Septewber - Deceaber None Total S 1 1 1 1 1 1 41 100 100 100 100 100 100 GRAM TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 100 100 100 100 100 100 TACHMEN 6 Page seve RACE/ET112C AND SEX DATA FOR SEPARATED EMPLOYEES JANUARY - JUNE AND JULY - DECEMBER 1902 RETIRE2tEHT3 TOTAL 4M[7E BLACK [L SS SL ASIA %'CACAN�JO#OTHER 1SFAN[CEMPLOYIAN MINORITIES M r T M F T M F T M F T M F T it r T f: r 1' t' r T IMF= January 6 4 10 6 4 10 1 1 February 5 5 10 5 5 10 March 24 21 45 21 20 41 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 April I 1 1 1 May 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 June 6 1 7 6 1 7 1 1 Total N 43 32 75 40 31 71 1 1 2 3 51 2 3 4 57.3 42.6 100. 53.3 41.3 1.3 1.3 2.7 40.0 6.7 3 2.7 4.0 44.6 July 3 6 9 2 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 August 2 9 11 1 9 10 1 1 September 4 9 13 4 7 ii 1 1 1 1 October 3 3 6 3 2 5 2 2 - 1 1 1 1 November 2 8 10 1 6 7 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 December4 4 Total # 16 37 53 3 29 42 1 3 4 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 3 30.1 69.8. 100. 24.5 54.7 79.2 1.8_ 5.6 7. .3.7 5.&. 9.4 1.0, 1.8 3.7 1,0.5. 5.6 5.6 +ar GRAND TOTAL ! 59 69 120 53 60 113 1 4 5 4 6 10 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 4 1 5 6 • 46.1 53.9 100.00 41.4 46.9 98. .8 3.1 3.9 3.1 6.7 7.0 1.8 1.0 .6 ,e 2.3 .8 3.9 6.7 ATTA HMENT 6 Page eight Mcal"we AND an DATA TOR SEPARATM wt>wyns JRNUARY-"M AND "IT -bRCMER 1982 DEATHS TOTAL LTL iL►CK —SSM ASIAN pILIlINo AttLRICAN OTNLR t.i$FANIC Ot►tATLL INDIAN NINORITILS N f T M f T N f T N F T it f T it F T r I T t'. S Y January 1 1 1 1 February Nona Nasch 1 I 1 1 l April 1 I 1 1 may None t June Nana t 100 100 100 100 July I I 1 1 August Nona septa"t 1 1 1 l Octobr Nona November Nona Oaerbr I 1 I 1 Total i 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 100 loo 4644 ".61 33.3 33.3 Gum"VAL 1 3 3 6 3 3 5 1 1 I .50-0 50.0 100. 5O.0 33,33.63. 3 16. 7 1t {i I ATT CHMENT Pag nine RACE/ETHNIC AND SEX Or UNCLASSIFIED NEN HIRES JANUARY-JUNE AND JULY-DECEMBER 1902 TOTAL WHITE BLACK SS SL ASIAN I FILIPINO AMERICAN OTHER HISPANIC EMPLOYEE I JINDIAN MINORITIES N P T 11 F T M F T M F T N F T it F T 1: F 7' I r F Y 11 F T January 7 6 13 5 5 10 1 1 2 .2 2 2 February 4 9 13 4 9 13 March 3 3 6 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 April 3 5 8 3 5 8 May 0 2 10 6 2 0 1 1 2 2 11 1 Juno 7 2 9 6 1 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 1 32 27 59 26 23 49 2 1 3 3 2 5 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 4; 1 2 3 54.0 46.0 100. 44.1 40.0 03. 3.4 2.0 5. 5.0 3.4 0.5 3.4 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 2.0.7-02.0 3.4. 5.0 July 7 2 9 6 2 0 1 1 1 1 August 4 3 7 4 3 7 Septcmbor 8 6 14 7 6 13 1 1 1 1 October 1 1 1 1 November 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 December 2 4 6 2 3 5 1 1 Total 0 23 17 40 21 16 37 2 1 3 2 1 3 • 58.0 43.0 100. 53.0 40.0 93. 5.0 2.5 7.5 5.0 2.5 7.5 GRAND TOTAL 1 55 44 99 47 39 66 2 1 3 5 3 8 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 4 3 3 11 56.0 44.0 100. 47.5 39.4 87. 2.0 1.0 3.0 5.1 1.0 R.1 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 6.1 ATTACH ENT 7 Page o e RACE/ETHNIC AND BEY DATA FOR UNCLASSIFIED SEPARATIONS JANUARY -JUNE AND JULY -DECEMBER 1982 TOTAL WHITE FLACK SS SL AS1AM pILIPINO AMERICAN OTHER HISPANIC INDIAN MINORITIES UNCLASSIFIED RESIGNATIONi EMPLOYEE M F T M F T M F T M F T N F T H F T' x. r T• t' F Y tl F T January None February None March, None April 2 2 2 2 May 6 6 5 5 1 1 1 1' June None Total 1 B 8 7 7 1 1 1 1 • 100 100 87.5 87.5 12.5 12.5 12 12.5 July 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 August 3 5 8 1 5 8 September 4 1 7 3 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 October 2 2 4 2 2 4 November 1 4 5 1 3 4 1 1 December 2 2 1 1 1 1 Total / 11 19 29 9 15 24 > D 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 38.0 62.1 100. 31.0 52.0 10.3 10.1 1.4 7.4 7.0 1.4 3.4 7.4 3.4 1.4 1.4 83.0 GRAND TOTAL 1 19 18 37 16 15 31 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 . 1 1 • 51.4 49.0 100. 41.2 41.0 84.0 8.1 6.1 2.7 2.7 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 2.7 2.7 ATTA HMENT 8 Page one RACE/ETNNIC AND SEX DATA FOR UNCLASSIFIED SEPARATIONS JANUARY - JUNE AND JULY -DECEMBER 1952 TOTAL WHITE SLACK SS SL ASthtt FILIPINO AMERICAN OTHER HISPANIC UNCLASSIFIED RETIREMENT EM?LOYLE I INDIAN MINORITIES N F T H F T H F T N ► T N F T ti F T Y. F T t F Y H F T January None February None March None April None May 1 1 1 1 June None Total 0 t 100 100 100 100 July-November None December 2 2 2 2 Total 1 2 2 2 2 • loo 100 100 100 GRAND TOTAL 1 3 3 3 i 100 100 180 100 ATTAC MENT 8 Page wo RAC=/L7101C AND In DATA FOR UNCLAUMED SEPARATION! JANUARY - JUIN AND JULY - DLC=n 111: TOTAL VHITZ UNCLAlSIFIED MAYNE pOLOM !LA SSISL AffAM /ILIFINO BDIAM RICAN MIMORITIES s R HISPANIC M M F T M F T M F T 11 / T /: r r I I' ► T N r T January None February Mone March None April None May 1 1 1 1 June None Total 1 1 1 1 1 t 100 100 100 100 July - December None GRAND TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 t 300 100 100 100 i UNCLASSIFIED O15HISM January - June None f July - September None —~ October 1 1 1 1 November 1 1 1 1 December None Total 1 t so so 100 so so so so GRAM TOTAL 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 so so so ATTACHMEN 8 Page . thre :' •is ,' ' TIMETABLES AND GOALS* • ANALYSIS FOR 1982 There are eighty-eight (88) timetables and goals of which twenty-one (21) have race/ethnic and sex representation and twenty-two (22) have representation in all areas except one. The goal of the County is to have race/ethnic and sex representation in job classes that have ten (10) or more positions. Under Representation Representation Job Classification Under Represented Group 1. Account Clerk I, II 1. Account Clerk III Blacks 2. Central Supply Technician 2. Associate Appraiser Females 3. Clerk/Intermediate Clerk 3. Branch Librarian I Spanish Surname/ 4. Collection Services Spanish Language (SS/SL) Assistant I, II 4. Clinical Lab. Tech. Blacks 5. Deputy Clerk I, II 5. Clinical Social Worker Other Minority 6. Deputy District 6. Cook SS/SL Attorney III 7. Custodian I, II Females 7. Eligibility Worker I, II 8. Data Processing Equip. 8. Equipment Operator I Operator II SS/SL 9. Fire Captain 9. Deputy District 10. Group Counsellor I, II, Attorney I, II, III Other Minority III 10. Deputy Probation 11. Junior and Assistant Officer I, II, III Other Minority Civil Engineer 11. Deputy Sheriff Females •12. Library Clerk 12. Eligibility Work 13. Library Student Supervisor I Blacks Assistant 13. Engineering 14. Licensed Vocational Technician I, II Other Minority Nurse 14. Engineering 15. Occupational Technician III Females Therapist 15. Firefighter Females 16. Programmer Trainee I, 16. Librarian Blacks II 17. Physical Therapist SS/SL 17. Public Health Nurse & 18. Psychologist Other Minority Senior Public Health 19. Probation Supervisor I Females Nurse 20. Registered Nurse Blacks 18. Secretary II 21. Secretary I SS/SL 19. Social Worker II, III 22. Superior Court Clerk Other Minority 20. Social Work Supervisor II 21. Typist Clerk/ Intermediate Typist Clerk ATTACHMENT 9 Page one • * Based on 1980 Compilation. DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS 1982 REPORT Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Filed* 11* Closed 4 Settled 2 Department of Fair Employment and Housing (FDEH) Filed 11 Closed S Settled 1 Internal Complaints Filed 3 Closed 3 Settled 0 *Six (6) complaints were also filed with DFEH. ATTACHMENT 10 Page one DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS • 1982 REPORT Department/Type of Complaint Filed Closed Settled Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Clerk-Recorder Age 1 Assessor Sex-Male 1 Bay Municipal Court Race-Black 1 Health Services Race (Black) and Age 1 Religion (Christian) and Age 1 Sheriff-Coroner Age-Investigative Inquiry 1 Sex-Female 1 Probation Race-Black 1 Social Services Sex-Male 1 • West Fire District Age-Investigative Inquiry 1 Contra Costa County Allegation Unknown to County 1 TOTAL 5 4 2 Internal Medical Services Race-Black 1 Probation Race (Black) and Color (Black) 1 Social Services Sex (Male) , Age and Handicap 1 TOTAL 3 • ATTACHMENT 10 Page two • DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS 1982 REPORT Department/Type of Complaint Filed Closed Settled Department of Fair Employment and Housing Bay Municipal Court Race-Black 1 Health Services Race (Black) and Age 1 Religion (Christian) and Age 1 Clerk-Recorder Age 1 Probation Race-Black 1 Public Works Age 1 Social Service Race (White) and Sex (Female) 1 Sex (Male) 1 Sheriff-Coroner • Other-Retaliation 1 Sex-Female 1 Contra Costa County Other-Physical Handicap 1 TOTAL 6 4 1 • ATTACHMENT 10 Page three RACE/ETHNIC AND SER DATA FOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEE TRAINING PROGRAM JANUARY-JUNE i JULY-DECEMBER 1982 IOTAL ITE BLACK SS SL ASIAN FILIlINO AMERICAN OTHER HISPANIC EMPLOYEE I INDIAN MINORITIES N F T fl F i M P T M P T N F T R F T f: C T v P Y N F T July 2 20 22 1 17 18 1 1 2 2 21 2 2 August 2 6 8 2 3 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 September 34 85 119 23 62 85 9 14 23 5 5 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 4 51 5 5 October 40 39 79 35 30 65 3 3 6 2 7 9 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 41 1 3 4 Novembor 12 46 58 10 40 50 1 6 7 2 2 1 1 1 1� Ducember 7 16 23 4 9 13 2 6 S 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 TOTAL Y 97 212 309 75 161 236 17 31 48 3 16 19 4 3 7 4 4 1 1 4 0 12: 1 11 12 • 31.4 67.0 100 24.3 52.0 76.1 5.5 10.0 15. 1.6 5.2 6.2 1.3 1.0 2.3 1.3 1,3 .3 .3 1.3 3.0 4. •3 4.0 4.0 January 57 50 107 46 39 85 7 6 13 3 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 4 G robruary 23 61 86 6 46 52 5 10 15 2 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 4 1 5 6 March 21 58 79 16 '51 67 1 4 5 1 5 6 2 3 5 1 1 2 4 c 2 4 6 April 11 25 36 10 21 31 3 3 2 3 5 1 1 2 May 37 60 105 36 51 87 1 9 10 6 6 12 2 2 1 1 35 5 June 29 104 133 22 82 10 6 10 16 1 16 17 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 4 S 8 IWALI 178 368 546 136 290 424 20 42 62 15 33 46 4 7 11 2 6 8 1 1 6 13 19 6 27 33 32.6 67.4 100 25.0 S3.1 78 0 4.0 8.0 11. 3.0 6.0 9.0 1.0 1.3 2.0 .4 1.1 1.5 .2 .2 1.1 2.4 ]� 1.1 5.0 6.0 kew GRAND TOTAL 1 275 :80 855 211 451 66 37 73 100 18 49 67 0 10 18 2 10 12 2 2 10 21 31 7 30 45 32.2 68.0 100 2S.0 53.0 77 4 4.3 9.0 13.0 2.1 6.0 8.0 1.0 1.2 2.1 .2 1.2 1.4 .2 .2 1.0 4.4 5.3 ATTACHMENT 11 Page one 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT DEPARTMENT PROFILE OF HANDICAPPED EMPLOYEES DECEMBER 31, 1983 TOTAL TOTAL 2 3 4 5 EMPLOYEES HANDICAP VISUAL HEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DISABILITIES M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M, F T ADMINISTRATOR # 16 13 29 1 1 1 1 55.2 44.8 100. 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 AGRICULTURE # 17 8 25 68.0 32.0 100 ANIMAL SERVICES # 28 19 47 2 2 1 1 % 159.6 40.4 100.-1 4.3 4.3 , 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 ASSESSOR # 71 45 116 2 2 4 1 1 2 61.2 38.8 100. 1.7 1.7 3. .9 .9 1.7 .9 .9 .9 .9 !UDITOR-CONTROLLER # 69 112 181 2 1 3 2 1 3 38.1 61.9 100. 1.1 .6 1. 1.1 .6 1.7 :UILDING INSPECTION # 31 13 44 3 3 1 1 2 2 %i70.5 29.5 100. 6.8 6.8 2.3 2.3 4.5 CLERK-RECORDER # 14 90 104 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 % 113.5 86.5 100. 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.9 1.0 1.0 COMMUNITY # 5 12 17 1 1 2 1 1 2 SERVICES ADMIN % 129.4 70.6 100. 5.9 5.9 11.8 5.9 5.9 11.8 COOPERATIVE # 2 2 EXTENSION 100. 100. COUNTY COUNSEL # 12 13 25 % 48.0 52.0 100. COURT/BAY # 45 45 % 100. 100. COURT/DELTA # 13 13 % 100. 100. DOES NOT INCLUDE MULTIPLE HANDICAPS NOTE: THE PERCENTAGES ARE BASED ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IN THE nF.p.ApTmr. .4T ATTACHMENT 12 - Prn,cip, onp DEPARTMENT PROFRE OF HANDICAPPED EMPLOYEES DECEMBER 31, 1983 DEPARTMENTS TOTAL TOTAL* 1 2 3 4 5 EMPLOYEES HANDICAP VISUAL HEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M FTIES S COURT/MT. DIABLO # 36 36 _ . ._ 100. 100. COURT/W.C.- # 2 31 33 DANVILLE 61.0 93.9 100. DISTRICT ATTORNEY# 74 134 208 4 3 7 2 2 4 1 5 35.6 64.4 100. 1.9 1.4 3.4 1.0 1.0 1.9 .5 2.4 FIRE DISTRICT # 239 13 252 2 2 1 1 1 1 C.C. COUNTY 94.8 5,2 100. .8 .8 .4 .4 .4 .4 FIRE DISTRICT # 24 24 MORAGA 100. 100. FIRE DISTRICT # 32 1 33 1 1 1 1 ORINDA % 97.0 3.0 100. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 FIRE DISTRICT # 80 5 85 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 RIVERVIEW 94.1 5.9 100. 1.2 1.2 2.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 FIRE DISTRICT # 24 1 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 WEST $ 6.0 4.0 100. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 HEALTH SERVICES # 419 1330 1749 13 19 32 5 7 12 1 2 3 1 1 5 8 13 3 1 4 $ 24.0 76.0 100 .7 1.1 1.8 .3 .4 .7 .1 .1 .2 .1 .1 .3 .5 .7 .2 .Z .2 MEDICAL CARE # 385 1083 1468 12 ' 14 26 5 5 10 1 1 2 4 7 11 3 1 4 DIVISION 26.2 73.8 100 .8 1.0 1.8 .3 .3 .7 .1 .1 .1 .3 .5 .7 .2 .1 .3 PUBLIC HEALTH # 57 258 315 1 5 6 2 2 1 Z 1 Z 1 1 2 DIVISION 18.1 81.9 100 .3 1.6 1.9 .6 .6 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .6 *DOES NOT INCLUDE 'MULTIPLE HANDICAPS NOTE: THE PERCENTAGES ARE BASED ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IN THE DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 12 Page two t CONTRA COSTA CONTY WORKFORCE SURVEY REPORT DEPARTMENT PROFILE OF HANDICAPPED EMPLOYEES DECEMBER 31, 1983 TOTAL TOTAL' 2 3 4 5 DEPARTMENTS EMPLOYEES HANDICAP VISUAL HEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT , B M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M DISAF ILITTIES LIBRARY # 26 190 216 1 5 6 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 12.0 88.0 100. .5 2.3 2. .5 .5 .9 .91 .5 .5 1 .5 .5 .5 .5 MANPOWER # 7 12 19 2 2 1 1 1 1 36.8 63.2 100 10.5 10.5 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 MARSHALL # 28 14 42 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 MUNI COURT % 66.7 33.3 100 4.8 4.8 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 PERSONNEL # 14 32 46 1 1 11 % 30.4 69.6 100 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 PERSONNEL # 1 1 MERIT BOARD 100 100 PLANNING # 24 16 40 1 1 1 1 % 60.0 40.0 100. 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 PROBATION # 189 193 382 4 4 8 2 2 3 2 5 1 1 2 49.5 50.5 100. 1.0 1.0 2.1 .5 .5 .8 .5 1.3 .3 .3 .5 PUBLIC # 30 34 64 2 1 3 2 1 3 DEFENDER 46.9 53.1 100 3.1 1.6 4.7 3.1 1.6 4.7 PUBLIC WORKS # 95 70 465 23 1 24 5 1 6 4 4 2 2 11 11 3 3 --84.9 15.1 100 4.9 .2 5.2 1.1 .2 1.3 .9 .9 .4 .4 2.4 2.4 .6 .6 RETIREMENT # 1 8 9 1.1 88.9 100 SHERIFF-CORONER # 388 156 544 7 3 10 1 1 1 1 7 1 8 1 1 -1.,3 28.7 100 1.3 .6 1.8 .2 .2 .2 .2 1.3 .2 1.51 .2 .2 DOES NOT INCLUDE MULTIPLE HANDICAPS NOTE; THE PERCENTAGES ARE BASED ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IN THE DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 12 - Page three DEPARTMENT PROAE OF HANDICAPPED E14PLOYEES DECEMBER 31, 1983 TOTAL TOTAL 2 3 4 5 DEPARTMENTS EMPLOYEES HANDICAP VISUAL HEARING SPEECH PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T IM F T DELTA REGIONAL # 5 10 15 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 COWUNICATIONS CTP- '- 3 66.7 100 4.8 4.8 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 SOCIAL SERVICES 4 138 801 939 5 23 28 1 4 5 1 2 3 4 15 19 3 3 % 14.7 85.3 100 .5 2.4 3.0 .1 4 .5 .1 .2 .3 .4 1.6 2.0 .3 .3 SUPERIOR COURT # 2 10 12 ADMINISTRATOR/ 16.7 83.3 100. JURY COMMISSIONER TREASURER-TAX # 4 22 26 COLLECTOR 15.4 84.6 100 VETERANS SERVICES# 3 3 6 50.0 50.0 100 TOTAL COUNTY 2434 3519 5953 81 66 14717 17 34 14 9 23 2 3 5 44 33~ 77 11 8 19 40.9 59.1 1001 1.4 1.1 2.511 .3 .3 .6 .2 .2 .4 .03 .1 .5 .7 .6 1.1 .2 .1 .3 DOES NOT INCLUDE 14ULTIPLE HANDICAPS NOTE: THE PERCENTAGES ARE BASED ON THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IN THE DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 12 Page four ATTACHMENT 13 , Page one SUNKRR► LA►-WF REPORT FOR 1982 ASIAN/ AMERICAN TTFS OF JOS TOTAL {TRITE SLACK RISPANIC PAC. IS. FILIPINO INDIAN NONIR LAT-W D@ART"m CtAllincalov K F T M F T K T K F T N F T it T K T JUNE LAID OFF 1 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 AUGUST LAID OFF 16 31 47 15 22 37 0 6 6 1 1 2 0 2 2 S.P. ER LAID OFF 2 0 2 2 0 2 OCTOBER LAID OFF 1 0 1 1 0 1 NW910 ZR LAID 0" 0 1 1. 0 1 1 DECOIBER LAID OFF 3 7 10 3 7 10 TOTAL 23 41 64 21 32 51 1 6 7 1 1 2 0 2 2 PSSCSNTAGES 36.0 100 33.0 83 1.6 lI.0 1.6 3.1 0 3.1 64.0 50.0 9.1 1.6 3.1 AUGUST Voluntary 9 3 12 8 2 10 0 1 1 1 0 1 Dmotion in Lieu of I.y O!! DSCOOSR 4 1 5 • 0 4 0 1 1 TOTAL 13 117 12 2 14 0 1 1 1 1 2 PIRCISTAGES 76.5 100 71.0 62.1 0 6.0 6.0 12.0 24 12.0 6.0 6.0 AUGUST Involuntar TOTAL 30 15 45 26 11 37 0 1 1 1 3 4 2 0 2 1 0 1 Drotibn i PERCENTAGES 67.0 100 58 82.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 9.0 6.4 4.6 2.2 3.2 Lieu of 33.3 21.1 0 7.0 0 0 Lay O!! ATTACHMENT 13 Page two LAY-O" PXPONP POR 1"2 ASIAN/ AMERICAN TTPL OF JOS TOTAL MNITE SLACK HISPANIC PAC. IS. FILIPINO IN MONTH LAY-0R D"ARTKIfT CUSS: CATION M T M T M P T M F T M P T M F T M P T JUNE Lay-off RMT" SERVICLS Noce Econaoist 0 1 1 0 1 1 Ly-off MANPOWER Manpower Analyst III 0 1 1 0 1 1 Ly-off Sf1EAIPP Cook 1 0 1 1 0 1 i TOTAL 1 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 PEV:t"AGE 33.3 100% 0 66.6 11.3 13.3 66.6 66.6 JULYNONE--------- ----- voluntary ' AUGUST Damtion in AUDITOR Auditor-Appraiser I 1 0 1 1 0 1 Lieu of i.y- TOt Auditor I off Deputy Probation Offieer " PROBATION I11 2 0 2 2 0 2 Tot Group CounsellorlII Dep. Probation Officer I Tot Group CounsellorIll 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 Dep. Probation Officer I " TO. Group Counsellor 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Kquipmenc Supervisor • KOLIC IIW= Tot Equipment Mechanic 1 0 1 1 0 1 Senior Drafter " Tot Engineer Tech. I 1 0 1 1 0 1 ATTACHMENT 13 Page three LAY-Opp REPORT FOR 1982 Page 2 ASIAN/ AMERICAN TYPE OF 105 TOTAL WHITE BLACK HISPANIC PAC. IS. FILIPINO INDIAN MONTH LAY-0n DEPARTMENT CLASSIFICATION M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T Voluntary AUGUST(cont.) Demotion in PUBLIC WORKS Wgts/Hess. Shop I Lieu of Tay- Tor Jr. R.P. Agent 1 0 1 1 0 1 off Social Worker III SOCIAL SERVICES To, Eligibility Morkorl 1 2 3 1 1 2 0 1 1 TOTAL 9 3 12 8 2 10 0 1 1 1 0 1 PERCENTAGE 75.0 100% 66,6 83.3 0 8,31 i8.3 8,3 16.6 16.6 8.3 involuntary Desotion in ASSESSOR Associate Appraiser 5 1 6 5 1 6 Lieu of Lay- off (current classes) Clerk Experienced Level 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 Clerk Senior Level 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 Principal Appraiser 2 0 2 2 0 2 i Senior Auditor-Appraiser 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 Supervising Auditor- Appraiser 1 0 1 1 0 1 " Supervising Appraiser 3 0 3 3 0 3 Supervising Personnel �— PERSONNEL Analyst III 1 0 1 1 0 1 ATTACHMENT 13 Page four LAY-OPT REPORT FOR 1902 Page 3 ASIAN/ AMERICAN TYPE OF JOS TOTAL WHITE !LACK HISPANIC PAC. IS. FILIPINO INDIAN MONTH LAY-OFF DEPARTHM CLASSIFICATION M F T M F T M F T M F T M ► 2 M F T M F T Involuntary AUCUST(cont.) Devotion in PROBATION Deputy Probation Officer 1 0 1 1 0 1 Lieu of Lay-- off y off (current classes) Deputy Probation Officer 3 1 4 3 1 4 II , Deputy Probation Officer 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 0 1 I Probation supervisor 1 1 2 0 1 L i 1 0 1 SHERIFF Lieutenant 1 0 1 1 0 1 Sergeant 1 0 1 1 0 1 Senior Coswunication Technician 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 supervising Conswunication Technician 2 0 2 2 0 2 SOCIAL SERViCLB Clerk - Sr. Level 0 1 1 0 1 1 Social Nor or III 1 4 S 1 3 4 0 1 1 Social work supervisor I 1 0 1 1 0 1 Supervising Clerk 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 ATTACIMENT 13 Page five LAY-Orr REPORT FOR 1982 Page 4 ASIAN/ AMERICAN TYPE Or JOE TOTAL WHITE SLACK HISPANIC PAC. IS. FILIPINO INDIAN MONTH LAY-O" DEPARTMENT CLASSIFICATION M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T H F T Involuntary AUGUST(cont.) Demotion in SOCIAL SERVICES Vocational Services 1 0 1 1 0 1 Lieu of Lay- Supervisor I off (current classes) TOTAL 30 15 45 26 11 37 0 1 1 1 3 4 2 0 2 1 0 1 PERCENTAGE 66.6 100 57.7 52.2 0 2.2 2.2 0.8 4.4 4.4 33.3 24.4 2.2 6.6 0 0 I I Lay-off AGRICULTURE Mgts/Meas. Inspector I 0 1 1 0 1 1 ASSESSOR Clark - Beginning Level 0 1 1 0 1 1 Dept. Supt. Spec. 1 0 1 1 0 1 AUDITORS Sr. Auditor-Appraiser 0 1 1 0 1 1 HFALTI( SCRVIL'SE Mat. Health Officer 2 2 4 2 1 3 0 1 1 f Ch. of Ccewunity Health 0 1 1 0 1 1 Services Disc. Fac. Director 0 1 1 0 1 1 " Health Educator PS 0 1 1 0 1 1 Soc. Program Planner it 0 1 1 0 1 1 ATTACHMENT 13 Page six LAY-OFF REPORT FOR 1982 Page 5 ASIAN/ AMERICAN ME OF JOB TOTAL WHITE SLACK HISPANIC PAC. IS. FILIPINO INDIAN MONTH LAY-0R DEPARTMENT CLASSIFICATION M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T AUGUSTfcont.) Lay-off HEALTH SERVICES Soc. Rehabilitation Asst. 0 1 1 0 1 1 Therapist Aide 0 1 1 0 1 1 ' PERSONNEL Personnel Analyst III 1 0 1 1 0 1 I i I i PLANNING Planning Specialist 0 1 1 0 1 1 Planner I 1 0 1 1 0 1 PROBATION Psychologist 2 0 2 2 0 2 SHERIFF Director of Food Services 0 1 1 0 1 1 I Sheriff Service■ Asst. II 3 0 3 2 0 2 1 0 1 SOCIAL emmicES Clerk-Beginning Leval 0 3 3 0 7 3 " Clerk-Experienced Level 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 " Social Worker III S 11 16 S 6 13 0 2 2 0 1 1 ` Social Mork Supervisor 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 ATTACHMENT 13 Page seven LAY-OFF REPORT FOR 1962 Page 6 ASIAN/ AMERICAN TYPE OF JOB TOTAL WHITE BLACK HISPANIC PAC. IS. FILIPINO INDIAN MONTH LAY-OFF DEPARTMENT CLASSIFICATION M F T M F T M F T M F T N F T M F T H F T AUGUSTtcont.} LAY-Off TOTAL 16 31 47 15 22 37 0 6 6 1 1 2 0 2 2 PERCENTAGE 34.0 100 31.4 76.7 0 12.7 2.1 4.2 0 4.2 66.0 46.6 12.7 2.1 4.2 SEPTEMBER Lay-off COUNTY ADMINISTRATOT Chief Program Evaluator 1 0 1 1 0 1 HEALTH SERVICES Program Evaluator II 1 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL 2 0 2 2 0 2 I PERCENTAGE 100 100 100 100 0 0 OCTOBER Lay-off HEALTH SERVICES Program Evaluator II 1 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL 1 0 1 1 0 1 PERCENTAGE 100 0 100 100 0 100 NovrxeEli Lay-off AGRICULTURE Peat Doct. Spec. 0 1 1 0 1 1 ' TOTAL 0 1 1 0 1 1 PERCENTAGE 0 100 100 0 100 10 DECEMBERLay-off SOCIAL SERVICE Group Counsellor 1 5 6 1 5 6 ATTACHMENT 13 Page eight IAr-aP �ssarts POR 1fD2 Page 7 ASIAN/ ANLAICAN TTFs 01 JosTOTAL ifHIis DUCK HISPANIC M. IS. FILIPINO INDIAN MONID L#T-0R Dy"T"UI CtUSIFICATION M P T M 7 T M-FT M P T M P T M P T M P T ooenett Lay-off SOCIAL P-MICt Group counsellor P.I. 2 2 a 2 2 (cont.) TOTAL 3 7 10 1 7 10 P-ZWZWTACt 10 70 100 130 70 100 Voluntary SOCIAL SOIVICC Institutional sup. I 3 0 3 7 0 3 Demotion in Lieu of Lay- off tli4ibility Worker I 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 TOTAL B 1 S 4 0 4 0 1 1 ttxc=rAGK s0 20 100 0 DO 0 20 20 { • CALIFORNIA FIRE-FIGHTERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INTRODUCTION On December 14, 1982, thirteen (13) Contra Costa County Fire-Medic apprentices signed apprenticeship agreements with the California Fire Fighter Joint Apprenticeship Committee (CFF-JAC), becoming the first group to participate in this statewide Fire Fighter apprenticeship program. These apprentices are initially involved in a 12-week academy train- ing cycle which began on January 3, 1983, at the Consolidated Fire District Training Center in Concord. Following completion of this intensive class- room, drill and practical training, successful graduates are then employed by. the District and assigned to stations within the Fire Protection District to complete the 3�- year Fire-Medic apprenticeship program. In cooperation with Los Medonos Community College, training curriculum • and fire department training staff have been certified by the Contra Costa County Community College District and all apprentices will receive credits toward an AA Degree in Fire Science. CFF-JAC The California Fire Fighter Joint Apprenticeship Committee is sponsored jointly by the State Fire Marshal 's Office and the Federated Fire Fighters of California, AFL-CIO and uses funds from the California Worksite Education and Training Act (CWETA) and Montoya Educational Revenues for Apprenticeship to help defray administrative and training costs for participating local jurisdictions. Contra Costa Fire Chief, William Maxfield has been elected Chairman of this state-wide committee and other members include: Harry Cisterman, Asst. County Administrator - Contra Costa Personnel Director; Phil Favro, former State Fire Marshal ; Dan Terry, President, Federated Fire Fighters; Ben Wright, President, Fire Fighter Local Union 1230; Tony Campbell of Local 1230; Patrick McLaughlin of the Fire Marshal 's Office; and, Brain Hatch, Legislative Advocate for the Federated Fire Fighters. • ATTACHMENT 14 Page one - 3 - . then involved in another preparatory cycle designed to assist on the physical agility and oral examinations. . District Fire Fighters participated in all phases of these outreach efforts. Recruitment A total of 1 ,122 potential candidates completed applications for the June 26, 1982 Fire-Medic exam. An analysis of the outreach component indicated that 55% (620) of those who completed the application process had been recruited thru the offices in Richmond and Pittsburg. The impact of the outreach efforts resulted in the following ethnic dispersement among the potential candidates: POTENTIAL CANDIDATES Total Outreach % of Ethnic Ethnicity Candidates Participants Group Caucasian 441 (39%) 132 30% Black 376 (34%) 346 92% . Asian 25 ( 2%) 10 40% Hispanic 154(14%) 52 34% Am. Indian 23 ( 2%) 9 39% Women 89 ( 8%) 71 80% INA 14 ( 1%) - TOTAL 1 ,122 (100%) 620 55% Successful Candidates Of the potential candidates (780 (70%)) , including 426 (55%) women and minorities entered the selection process with 412 (53%) successfully meeting all requirements on the written, physical agility, and oral examinations. The following is the ethnic composition of both categories: ATTACN.MENT 14 • Page three - 3 - • then involved in another preparatory cycle designed to assist on the physical agility and oral examinations. District Fire Fighters participated in all phases of these outreach efforts. Recruitment A total of 1 ,122 potential candidates completed applications for the June 26, 1982 Fire-Medic exam. An analysis of the outreach component indicated that 55A (620) of those who completed the application process had been recruited thru the offices in Richmond and Pittsburg. The impact of the outreach efforts resulted in the following ethnic dispersement among the potential candidates: POTENTIAL CANDIDATES Total Outreach % of Ethnic Ethnicity Candidates Participants Group Caucasian 441 (39%) 132 30% Black 376 (34%) 346 92% • Asian 25 ( 2%) 10 40% Hispanic 154(14%) 52 34% Am. Indian 23 ( 2%) 9 39% Women 89 ( 8%) 71 80% INA 14 ( 1%) - - TOTAL 1 ,122 (100%) 620 55% Successful Candidates Of the potential candidates (780 (70%)), including 426 (55%) women and minorities entered the selection process with 412 (53%) successfully meeting all requirements on the written, physical agility, and oral examinations. The following is the ethnic composition of both categories: ATTACMEENT 14 Page three - 5 - Eligibility List The present eligibility list will be in effect for two years from October 14, 1982, and excluding the present 13 apprentices there are an additional eleven (11) minority group members among the next 27 positions on the list. Therefore, it is likely that other minority candidates, including the first woman, will be employed prior to the expiration of the present eligibility list. Success of Outreach Efforts When analyzing these 412 successful candidates, it is significant to note again the impact of the outreach preparatory cycles on the success ratio of the various ethnic groups. A total of 222 (54%) of the successful candidates received preparatory services at the outreach offices in Richmond and Pittsburg with the following ethnic dispersement: Total Outreach Candidates Candidates % of Ethnic • Ethnicity (Successful) (Successful) Group Caucasian 237 79 33% Black 85 85 100% Asian 13 6 46% Hispanic 50 33 66% Am. Indian 13 5 38% Women 14 14 100% TOTAL 412 222 54% It is significant to note that 100a of the Black, 100% of the Women, and 66% of the Hispanic candidates on the list are products of the outreach efforts. CONCLUSION This model employment and training program has demonstrated what can be accomplished when total community efforts and resources are committed to accomplishing specific objectives. The cooperation of the Contra Costa Person- nel Office, the Fire District, the Fire Fighter Union, Community Organizations, • the CFF-JAC, and other interested individuals has successfully obtained capable ATTACHMENT 14 Page six TME BOARD OF SUPERVISOR* CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Oar on Aril 12, 1983 by aN tloNlowinp wolf. AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ABS : Supervisor Schroder SUBJECT: International Faire Competition Week w At the request of Supervisor Robert I. Schroder, in recognition of the need to expand business horizons and explore International trade; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the week of April 17 through 23, 19839 is DECLARED "International Faire Competition Week", in Contra Costa County. an WUM talon Wd OW.e'M on ft Vf";11163 Of tfn fowd W Supemwn on t.`.a em,.:Garan. ATTESTED: J.R.OLENSO :, Cot.?Lt "j CL,Eag Old 4=oi:'tdo Clark of#tn►Board 7 Orig. 00PL: Clerk of the Board cc: County Administrator Public Information Officer ` � 23 11E s01ilD OF SWOMISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COWff, CALUMIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Consulting Services Agreement with Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. to prepare a traffic report for the Shappel Property (Laurel Village) in the San Ramon area. ' Project No. 0662-6R4193. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to sign a Consulting Services Agreement with Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., to prepare a traffic report for the Shappel Property (Laurel Village) in the San Ramon area. The full cost of $5,000 will be borne by the developer. Maximum payment may not be exceeded unless authorized by the Public Works Director after consultation with the developer. 1 h^�-sby csrlMy Wd IhNlsabaaaadeaneloopyst a::action taken and es-owed on tiw n*wMeal Ilw sorra of supsnbors or:the dale shown. ATTESTED: ;•-p 12, Mos J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK and ex pffido Cleric of dw 9owd 1___'' 6y 1 r D"MP consvcsagrmt.barton.t3 ORIG. DEPT.: Public Works Transportation Planning cc: Public Works Accounting Auditor-Controller 24 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Agri 1 12, 1983 , by 1hs foNowing voM: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Property Acquisition South San Ramon Creek Flood Control District Drainage Area 75 LUP 2061-82, Project 40171 San Ramon Area The Board of Supervisors, as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, ORDERS that the access easement dated March 24, 1983 from the Dublin San Ramon Services District is hereby ACCEPTED, and the Real Property Division is DIRECTED to have said easement recorded in the Office of County Recorder. I WSW arftVW*"itorwwweaeaelomof ae Bad=%ken and -dI- d an to adanita of M. Board of Supt WW9 on Ow dw dwmw ATTESTED: 12. 15 JA.OLSSON,Cown CLiEwK and a C*k of 910 Booed BIr � ,oegeeq Orig. Dept.: Public Works (R/P) cc; Public Works Accounting Dublin San Ramon Service District (via R/P) ' 25 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Use Agreement End of Ardith Drive, Pleasant Hill (7520-688377) IT IS BY THE WM ORDERED that the Use Agreement with Paula A. and Daniel A. Young dated April 1, 1983, for use of a portion of vacant District property on Assessor's Parcel No. 153-161-001 is APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to sign on behalf of the District. The Agreement is on a month-to-month, "as-is" basis, in consideration for a one-time processing fee of $100.00 and continued maintenance of the premises, effective April 1, 1983. 1hatby eweb IMtt Mit Is a hwaa/owndoWaf M -00 horn and W*W4d an M mhw tt a Mt Ooad of SMwW at on Mf loft shwa. ATTESTED.- J.R. TTESTED:J.R. OLSSON,CO�AfTY CL!l11� and a of0elo Clark of No flew/ h ` o Public Works Department-L/M Orig. Dept.: Public Works Accounting (via L/M) cc: Auditor-Controller (via L/M) 26 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 'Adopted this per on April 12. 1983 . by NIS fbNowft MON: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Phaden, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder SUBJECT: Resignation of District II Representative Task Force On The Employment And Economic Status of Women On the recommendation of Supervisor Nancy Fhaden, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following action is APPROVED: NAME ACTION Mary Jo Anne Main Resignation as District II Representative. 1 Mraby�tMt M+Is b atruaaMcaraotoopyM an action ftken and entered on Ute en ndw d Ow Board of Supemlom on do daft dion ATTESTED: J.R.OLSSN",CCS TY CLERK and ex offiafo Clerk of Elea Booed By .DepWr Orap. D@pL: Clerk of the Baord Cc: Advisory Committee on the Employment and Economic Status of Women 2 County Administrator Auditor-Controller THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Oder on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Appointment of Manuel A. Mello to West County Fire Protection District Name Action Term MANUEL A. MELLO Reappoint as City of Full term expiring 14000 San Pablo Avenue San Pablo Representative* December 31 , 1986 San Pablo, CA 94806 *City of San Pablo letter of nomination attached. As recommended by Supervisor Tom Powers, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid appointment is APPROVED. lb orob Got"thattMar.awaNerwaleapyof as action taken and on ow ahAae of tM Board of supftvh z on t49 data almmm ATTESTED; �i.a�.L/�P. /9 J. J.R.OLSWN,CCI%NIKTY CLOW and ear oMkb Clwk of the Dowd �r .Dawwr Orig. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cx: Manuel A. Mello West County Fire Protection District County Administrator Auditor—Controller 28 -7 TV: * BOARD OF SUPERVISORS I MM: M. G. Wingett, County Administrator G Wft coft DATE: April 6, 1983 C*^ SMJECT: Allocation of Special District Augmentation Fund to Oakley Fire Protection District S1•EC 1 F 1 C MMUEST(S) OR RCOMWIE IO AT 1 ON(S) • SAOCMNXM AND JUST 1 F 1 GT ION Approve allocation of $3,237 from Special District Augmentation Fund to Oakley Fire Protection District and appropriate said allocation to cover cost of hazardous spill clean-up by IT Corporation. BACKGROUND Last summer the Oakley Fire Protection District was called on to respond to two spill incidents for which the services of IT Corporation were required. Invoices in the amounts of $1,714 and $1,523 resulted from these two incidents and extensive review failed to identify the responsible party. As a result, the responding public agency is responsible for payment of the bill, but the agency involved, the Oakley Fire Protection District, lacks funds for this purpose. It is recommended, accordingly, that $3,237 be allocated from the Special District Augmentation Fund to the District and that said allocation be appropriated to cover the bill submitted by IT Corporation for the services provided in responding and assisting in the clean-up of these spills. CONTINUED ON ATTACFAENT: — YEA S1ONA7%Wr6 W_ RECOMENOAT i ON OF C OLM Y AOM 1 N 1 STRATOR MCCO0ACNb*TIGW6r GOJWD COM/I TRE YZL APPROVE — OTHM: SIGNA'nMZ(Sj: -YZ_'4,e ,21L L �Y/ ACTION OF SOARO ON: 3 APPWM D AS OMoe— VOTE OF atloevlSOls 1 MEMY CWTIFT IMT 7MIS IS A 7RIs WMN I IOIM (ATM Aim OOIOlCT O!Y Or AN ACTION TARN AYU: NOEi: ASO O#MKD ON "a MIIWM or IM @DSM A8Ss14r:' AISTw 1 N OF al/oevls ON THE DAIM •OMI. ATTESTED , & oc: County Administrator J_R. . MUNTY doK.Am 29 Auditor-Controller WC Or/telo ft c v WE 110AND Oakley Fire Protection Dist . .may CONTRA COSTA COUNTY " ,� • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT COOtfi 1. DEPARTMENT 01 NCAN12AT11N INIT: Oakley Fire Protection District OICANIZATION S01-0IJECT 2. FIXED ASSET 01JECT OF EXPENSE 11 FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. 111111INUTT I RECREAS> INCREASE 7014 2310 Professional & Personel Services $3,237 7017 6301 Reserve for Contingencies $3,237 7017 6301 Appropriable New Revenue $3,237 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER YL42 - G ¢/6/ To provide appropriation to cover cost of By: "bots cleaning up two hazardous chemical spills. COUN Y ADMINISTRATOR By; Date BOARD OF SUPERVISOR &#W 747--pa"-,�Pa1.u..�w YES: Hyl C`�l,Il /.e On Al 11Z1,0 3 J.R. 0 SS N, CLERK 4. a ` By: f ONATYAE TITLE DATE 0"ILn APPRIPRIATIIM ADJ. AMYL MI. (N 129 now 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 30 ow P CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 ACCO91T C11116 1.11FAITNEtT It 01CANIZAT10t IIT: - OakleyFire Protection District ,ICAIIZATltt lEtE10E t INCOMEOE MEAS ACCOutt 1E11E10E DESCtIfilOt 7017 9591 County Aid to Special Districts 3� .?/�✓'' APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REOUEST UDITOR-CONTROLLER" To appropriate supplemental allocation from Dofe the Special District Augmentation Fund. - TY MINISTRATOR Date / _ BARD OFAUPERVISORSQ�� p YES: 4w ��.e.�T DateZ w R. OLSSON. CLERK HVEt11E Au. RA00 5-160 �otttAE ��. 5134 T/ss) 31 r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 1. DEPARTMENT 01 ORGANIZATION BRIT: ACCOUNT CODING Tassajara Fire Protection District 016ANIZATION SUB-01JECT 2. FIXED ASSET 4QECREASQ INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. RETITT 7023 2283 Grounds Maintenance $3,400 7023 6301 Reserve for Contingencies $3,400 7023 6301 Appropriable New Revenue 3,400 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AU T -CONTROLLER ��� TO provide appropriation to repair collapsed By: '� tgg-s_ 'e ` v" ""Dot� /�•�d septic tank at fire station. COUNTY ADMINIS ATOR By: Dote 4/A'B3 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2"ImImn pomr.F&h&%% YES: ynh..M�s�.►.r„rl.t...+ NO: ADPR 1/2 1983 J.R. OLS ON, CLERK 810MATY TITLE *AT[ APPROPRIAT111 JA POO f6 73 ADJ. ANNUL 11. (M 129 now 7/T7,) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE TIDE 32 1 t a ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 I.OENIIIEIT 01 O16AIIZATICI 0/IT: ACCO01T 900116 Tassaiara Fire 41CAIIZAT10/ HHoiE L 1EtE10E GEs9111tie1 INCOME <U(Clf1S1> uueet . 7023 9591 County Aid to Special Districts $3,400 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REOUEST .UDITOR-CONTROLLER''/� ly: 11,'fc a'Jl..rlQ� l_ Dote OUNTY ADMINISTR OR Y: ( Dote Ot.RO OF SUPERVISORS lyeedlws ter,Fapmbn. YES: #ARM MBeat.Tuda4rm NO.. A Date /Z 3 R. OLSSON. CLERK eErE1rE .u. RA00 73 JO01011 Ie. 33 c CONTRA COSTA COUNTY / c • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 T I DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT ACCOUNT CODING Moraga Fire Protection District ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <bECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE ON FIXED ASSET ITEM 40. OUANTITI 7050 1070 Workmans Compensation Insurance 23,000 7050 4953 Purchase two cars and radio equipment 2 23,000 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDI TOR-yq(74TOLL r. /The money is to be used to purchase two cars and equipment / )•: Dote as per conversation with T. McGraw. Please see attached � information. COUNTY y: oat,,, -/6 RR iOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: afto e,lues,,r. NO: ILS{—xL/ Q,Q„�„� �.J�, ,. •r APFire Chief 11/9 /82 1� 17%3 I.R. OL SSON, CLERK �. • f1�M�TYAC TITI[ OST[ y: APPIOPNIATIOR A POO 5'081 ADJ. JOURNAL Ro. IN 129 Rev 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIOE 34 1 Moraqa Fire Diftrict 1280 Morava Way, Morava.CA 91566 Do.Sk w fes.CMW (415)37+6-5454 INFORMATION SHEET The request is to replace two cars now in service, one a 1975 Plymouth and the other, a 1976 Dodge. Both cars are in need of major repairs and are heavy gas users. The present units are getting approximately 10 miles per gallon of gas and the new units average approximately 25 miles per gallon. Projecting the cost at 10,000 miles per year (normal usage), it compares as follows: 1. Present car at $1.20 per gallon - $1 ,200 each 2. New unit at $1.20 per gallon - $480 each 3. Cost savings per year per car - $720 4. Total cost savings for two cars - $1 ,440 5. Projecting the cost over the 8 year average life of the cars, the savings would be $11 ,520 for two cars in fuel. These figures do not include the major repairs which will be needed on the present cars if they are retained. Sincerely, Skinner Moraga Fire Chief DS/af ptioyr8/ � L 33 ` ` E CONTRA COSTO COUNTY .04� C� APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPANTNENT DA OBCANIZATION HIT: Sheriff-Coroner NCANIIATION SUI-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET OBJECT OF EXPENSE ON FIXED ASSET ITEN 10. Tlfl DECREAS> INCREASE Communications Division 2511 4955 Ambulance Radio 1 $2,910.00 0990 6301 Reserve for Contingencies $2,910.00 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Pursuant to a letter from Cadillac Ambulance Service By. �, Dote 3 Inc. (attached) a request is made for the purchase 47 of an additional radio for their new ambulance. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: Date / / BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of v+on Rme►.laltiw. YES: 3*An6r.McPcJ T-w6k..n NO: X*- - J.R. OLSSON, CLERK 4. c ASA III 3/15/83 i�•N•7Y•t TITLE DATE Reed L. McDonald U/ By: AIMOHIA111N A POO Ali. JONNNAI No. (N 129 Rev. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 36 Sheriff-Coroner �0,;;. .- J, Gounity HIP1 d K.Raine Contra Costa County ��; `:-7:i E� SHERIFF-CORON `R awn.J.atan P O. Box 391 Assistant Sheriff Martinez, CJItBr�ia 94553 If r� 1 i 1933 ttllarrsrt E.Rupl (415) 372- Assistant Sheriff C {ico Of T ,, M. G. Wingett, County AdGbt*igpyV"jr1i�&j-�0rMarch 10, 1983 Attn: Tom Welch F+om: Richard K. Rainey, Sheriff-Coroner Subject: Ambulance Radio by: Assistant Sheriff W. j~o) Rupf Acquisition Tt has been the practice that county radios for private ambulances have been furnished upon request by the County. Funds for this purpose have come from the Unappropriated Reserve. Attached is a letter from Cadillac Ambulance advising that they are increasing their fleet by one vehicle and will require an additional radio. Their contract with the County specifies that they may not engage in ambulance services without a county-owned radio installed and operational. The unit price per radio is $2 , 907 including tax. Attached is an Appropriation Adjustment. RKR:AB:ab File: 47 Attach/ AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER t �, _ 37 Cadillac Ambulance Service Inc. 4601 NEviN AVENUE • RICHMOND-CALIF.94805 PHONE 234-$242 March 4, 1983 Capt. Alan Burton Communications Division Contra Costa County 50 Glazier Road Martinez, California 94553 Dear Alan, We have purchased an additional ambulance that will be put into service as soon as possible. We will receive this new unit during the week of March 7. Please accept this letter as a formal request for one new Sheriffs ambulance radio complete, which will be installed as soon as we have received it. Yours truly , dJames A. Runions President Cadillac Ambulance Service, Inc. 38 CONTRAICOSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT �• 2� T/C 2 7 I DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING ORINDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <1,,ECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT Of EXPENSE ON FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. iWITITY 31 '4 7080 4953 4-wheel drive, Chevrolet Blazer 15,000.00 7080 4953 1983 Chevrolet Impala (to CHP specs) 12,000.00 7080 6301 Reserve for Contingencies 27,000.00 7080 6301 Appropriable New Revenue 27,000.00 PROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR" LL The Blazer will replace a 1973 Chevrolet suburban which is a i first response emergency vehicle used to transport personnel By: Date/ IAA and equipment. It is also used to transport injured victims from remote wildland areas. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR The Impala will replace a 1976 Dodge sedan with high mileage G Jrwhich is currently being used in Fire Prevention section. By: oot� Both of these vehicles will be purchased through State bid BOARD OF SUPERVISORS using State specifications. skvg"ir+erPower.Fah&1%. These funds are presently being held by OFD for purchase of YES: 00aw..mcpcA.rvK►.kwn vehicle acquisition and will have no negative impact upon our present for future budgets. N0: ��.. APR 98 J.R. OLSSON, CLERK Fire Chief 1 27 83 416NATUOE TITLE DATE By: APPROPRIAT101 AP 0 .5/93 AIJ. JOIRIAL 10. (N 129 Row 7,177) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 39 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 ACCOUNT CODING I.DEPARTNENT 01 ORGANIZATION UNIT. Orinda Fire Protection District ORGANIZATION AtEVENCCOUNT Z REVENUE DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE" 7080 9975 Misc. Non-Taxable Revenue 27,000.00 PROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REOUEST AUDITO /ROLL / By. Do,-,/ To appropriate new revenue received from State ! Compensation. Workers Compensation Insurance 4OUNTYAD INISTRATOR SCif Pol 99960-81 Orinda DPOS7542 10-15-82. By: Dote EiOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: sopmhe+vow"Ir*j6h. JiiRlrer,MCPnk.Torlakwn NO: �;r At&1 ^ _ J.R. OL N. CLERK �[4��_ 1 • tZ-83 SIGNATURE TITLE DATE By REIENNE ARU. RAOO JPIO J1111A1 11. (ME134 Rev.2/76) 1O CONTRA gOSTA COUNTY Z l APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT COOING 1. DEPAITNENT 01 HCANUATI/N 14IT: Oakley Fire Capital Outlay 0I6AN12ATION we-OBJECT 2. FIRED ASSET IIJECT OF EXPENSE 11 FIXED ASSET ITEM N0. TIiT DECREASE' INCREASE 7032 4953 Truck 003 4,324.00 7032 6301 Reserve for Contingencies 4,324.00 7032 6301 Appropriable New Revenue 4,324.00 W x PPR 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR R R appropriate additional fund balance and interest ey: , Doti / / earned on investments for new equipment on Van Pelt truck. C LINTYADMINISTRATOR 0 ey: 2 Dab BOARD OF SUPERVISORS b" bW INPUN F.AJna YES: 11�whT,Mai'eak.Trlak.� NO: 7 983 J.R. OL N, CLERK 4. a /2C/f3 NI�N TUNE LE DATE By: APPN/PMATI11 00 42�5y ADJ. JNNYL 11. (M 129 Raw.7/7T) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERIE NIDE 41 s CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 ACCOUNT CDDI16 I.0EPA1T1E17 01 ORCANIZAT10N 1111: Oakley Fire Capital Outlay 0ICA112AT10N ACCOUNT 2. REVENUE DESCRIPTION INCREASE <IECREASE> 7032 9990 Fund balance available 1,495.00 7032 9181 Earnings on Investment 2,829.00 P OVER 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR- 104y1tpLLE f� Y� To appropriate additional fund balance and By: e / / interest earned on Investments. COUNT NISTRATOR ey: DWA/ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ft mower,F3hk". YES: Ywir,W?eaL Tudak-ml /) APR N0: 7 '' Dote �J J.R. 0CLERK • �//m/4_ SIGNATUNE TI E DATE l Sy: . 011111E ANI. RA00 's1 Sy (Y6134 Now.2/79) 42 r - - c CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ' °'h w• ` APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C *2 7 ACCOUNT CODIRC I. DEPARTMENT 01 OICARIZATIll INIT. PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. (4500) ARI2ATION SUR-OIJECT 2. fIYEO ASSET OBJECT Of E1FERSE OI fIIED ASSET ITEM NO TITI OfC1EAi> INCREASE BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT 0841 4153 1. AIRPORT STORAGE SHED 5,000.00 684i 63w-1 1. APPR9PRIABI:E NEW REVENUE . 98 0841 6301 1. RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 5,000.00 0841 4951 2. OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE 2,600.00 0841 2315 2. DATA PROCESSING SERVICE 6,500.00 0841 2328 3. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 43,370.00 0841 2310 20. PROFESSIONN/A//USPEC SVC 52,470.00 ow Re v APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTR LER I. TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A By: Dot 1/5 )983 STORAGE SHED. 2. TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR A NEW SOFTWARE PACKAGE AND DATA PROCESSING SERVICES FOR BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 3. TO MOVE APPROPRIATIONS FROM PROF/SPEC SVCS TO A By: Date�� SEPARATE ACCOUNT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. � BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E' Ct 4/),.f 3 hope ms Ager,]P kA , l YES: idwmr.11cPe,k,rurLi,,,,, NO: X -ftlf� k'A4A--* APS I 1 J.R. OLS ON, CLERK 4. VJ1I1/_.titXll/ -CLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 3/15/83 f1AbATY11E TITLE DATE By: AMMO/RIATIONA 100d ADJ. JONUAL 10. (M 129 Rev. T/T7) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 43 YONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 2s ACCOUNT C811�c I.oEPARtNENt 11 otCAuII zAtlo� NIt PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. (4500) 1ICANIZATIIl ACCOUNT t' REVENUE DESCRIPTION INCREASE <DECREASE> BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT 0841 9522 FEDERAL AID—AIRPORT CONSTR 2,500.00 0841 9591 CO AID TO SPEC FUNDS 1,500.00 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONT LER' MM 1 TO RECORD REENUE I VIED FROFAA By: Dore / 5 AGR CULTURALVDEPT.TFFORETHE�CONSTRUCTTION OFAAD THE STORAGE SHED (AGRICULTURAL DEPT WILL PAY AN COUNTY ADMINISTGATOR ADDITIONAL $1,000 IN FISCAL YEAR 1983-84) . By: wxm IN A& Dote j )j C/ �- BOARD OF SUPERVLSORS f r � � ir« fG�� >o �p Goua ipre.l�lb.er,FahAm. �1`�• YES: �erMderk,TKlak�n NO: � ArlDat: /l9p3 PUBLIC WORKS D I RECTOR 3/15/8--- J.R. OLS N, CLERK SIGNATURE TITLE DATE By: OE�E�OE y1. RA00` 5/0 JMNIAL It. a.13. Nov.IIAM) 44 CONTRA OQSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT ; T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTNENT 01 ORGANIZATION ONIT: It f Public Works 0 .9 r' ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. • /!j � FIXE/ ASSET OE6tEAi> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM N0. TITT 0695 3570 County aid to special fund 1,500 3305 4951 Metal Storage Shed --1- 1,500 .0900 Heser-ve for eentin- �d APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTRO ER The Department of Agriculture would like to /,Z transfer $1,500 from organization ORG 3305, By: D019 / / account code 4951 to the Public Works Depart- ment, ORG 0695, account code 3570. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR The purpose of the transfer is to facilitate By: -Date-5-ma/ the construction of a storage shed at Buchanan Airport. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: sw"tn"P.'.PAA&*. NO: y am- APR 12 198 On // J Agricultural J.R. OLSSON, CLERK 4, /J OAC Commissioner 3 18A3 f1�NATYA[ TITLE DAT[ By: APNOPRIATIBN A POO .�d23q Ali. JONR/AL is. (M 129 Row 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE TIDE 45 CONTRA :.00TA COUNTY / Z APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTr We it T ACCIIIT Cellos 1. IEIAITREIT 11 NCAIIZATIII NIT:0588 Community Services, Direct WeatherizatioA Org.1453 NCAIIZATNI p1-11JECT E. i11E1 ASSET EC1EAt4> INCREASE INJECT 1f EI►E/fE 11 MEN ASSET ITEI 81, TT -- 0588 1013 Temporary Salaries 54,000 1042 FICA 3,780 1063 SUI 270 1070 W/Coup Ins 162 1081 Labor Received 5,320 2100 Office Exp 2,500 2110 Telephone 350 2160 Clothing b Pers Supp 700 2261 Occupancy Cost Rented Bldg 6,000 2270 Maint Equipment 300 2301 Auto Mileage Employees 300 2303 Use of County Equip 12,500 2310 Prof/Specialized Svcs 170,830 2479 Other Spec Dept Exp 41,000 4953 Truck 5 50,000 0990 6301 Reserve for Contingencies 348,012 0990 6301 Appropriable New Revenue 348,012 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER CAL/NEVA Direct Weatherization Contract 13032, Sr: Date 3 February - June 1983. COUNTY AO NISTRATOR Trucks - 4 Pick Up w/Utility Rack 1 Cargo Van w/Sliding Side Door b Ladder Rack By: Date 90ARD OF SUPERVISORS !NPe*ti-n Pbw. Foi&n. YES: Siler!►.AfiPea►.'1'.w,:. ,. NO: 0.jn ,� SPR 2983 J.R. OL ON,CLERK Ida Daniel Berk Director, CSD 31 83 tIMATYtt TIT6t RATI .y: AE' MIATIM ♦PAO2'y9 ADJ. JNM L 11. (Otto Rev. 7/TT) SEE IN10TRYCTION• on R[VE1111IIE soca I 46 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 I.OEPANTNENT 02 ONCANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT COOING Community Services - 0588 OICANIZATION NEYENUE 2. CCOUNT REVENUE DESCRIPTION INCREASE AE6IEASE> ACCOUNT 0588 9895 Misc Current Services 348,012 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER' oolr3/T/P3 Funds under CAL/NEVA Direct Weatherization Contract #3032, February - June 1983 COUNT ADMINISTRATOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: fter"Df Pow Faris+. - jr.w..McPr_l.l'Mak-n APR 1 NO: J.R. OLS CLERK Ida Daniel Berk Director. CSD 3/18/8 SIGNATUfla TITLE [T[ uvgm mm. RAOO j . M JNIuL /O. .V9136 Now. :STs) ' r 47 CLAIM BOARD OF S[JPFRVISORS OF CORM COSTA COLZVY, CA1IP0FKLA BOARD ACTION Claim Against the County, ) NOTE Tp CEAUVM April 12, 1983 Routing Enc3orssaents, and ) The copy of this diocvnent Z01ed to you is your Board Action. (All Section ) notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below) , CDverrment Code.) ) given pursuant to GDvernment Code Sections 913 & 915.4. Please rote the "Warning" below. Claimant: Steven R. Cunha Attorney: Kent C. Wilson, ESQ. 1899 Clayton Rd. , Suite 100 !' 1 0 1983 Address: Concord, CA 94520 Amount: $5009000-00 By delivery to Clerk on Date Received. March 7, 1983 By mail, postmarked on March 4, 1983 I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors T0: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim. DATED:March 7, 1983 J.R. OLSSON, Clerk, By , Deputy Reeni Ma atto II. Fes'!: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) (� ) This Claim ooplies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FA31S to couply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on ground that it was filed late. (5911.2) DATED: —� JO�FIIN B. CI�USIIN, County Counsel, . Deputy III. BOARD OiDF:Et By unanimous vote of SuperVi s FFewN (x) This claim is rejected in full. ( ) This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: /a? YJ J.R. CSSSON, Clerk, by , Deputy 09 SING (Gov't. C. 5913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your choice in c=xwt= with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: 1) County 2 County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim by mailing a copy of this docanent, and a mono thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. mm: 40e-/J-83 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, Deputy V. FROM: County 2 County Administrator TO: Clerk of the Board Of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim and Board Order. 4 DATED: y/3—83- County Counsel, By County Administrator, By cum ouA w Ur' aurr;xV1bU!(J OF CUNTRA CUS8kutit2 f#Ji*il application to: Instructions to Claimant P.0. OX 911 oard • P.O.Box 911 • Martinez,California 94553 A. Claims relating to causes of action for death or for.injury to person or to personal property or growing crops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other cause of action must be presented not later than one year after the accrual of the cause of action. (Sec. 911.2, Govt. Code) B. Claims must be filed With the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. . E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, Penal Code Sec. 72 at end of-TFiis form. RE: Claim by )Reserved for Clerk's filing stamps STEVEN R. CUNHA ) FILED ) Against the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA) MAR 7 i�93 ) or DISTRICT) I a oissoN (Fill in name ) , CON of WKRvG= The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the county or-Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum ,of $ 500,000.00 and in support of this claim represents as follows: 1. When did the damage or in3ury occur? TGive exact date an(1hourT November 30, 1982 at 6:00 p.m. �. W�iere aid-tie damage or sn3ury occur? �Znc�ude city and county Victoria, near -Highway 4, Contra Costa County, near Oakley and Antioch. 3. How did the damage or injury occur3 (Giveu�I �eta�Is, use sheets -- sheets if required) Due to improper maintanence of roadway, the claimant's car left the road; due to improper positioning of roadway, claimant's car struck a utility pole. 4. what particular act or om�ss�on on the part off-county or d�str ct officers, servants or employees caused the injury or damage? The county failed to maintain the roadway in a manner required to prevent accumulation of mud and water; the county negligently failed to position the roadway an adequate distance from roadside utility { poles. (over) I �- 49 5. What are the names of county or district officers, servants or employees causing the damage or injury? Unknown. 6. What damage or in3uries do you claim resulted? ZGive Zull extent of in urie or d e$ c a��d. Attach two estate for aut damage) Plaiantiff s_6ldsmobi`le Cutlass, Supreme was destro ed. Plaintiff sustained head injuries, jaw in]uries, and lower back injuries affecting the left egg, and injuries to his right knee; claimant has suffered emotional distress end possible loss of future employment capability- -------- ------------ ------------------- ----------------------- 7. How was the amount claimed above computed? (Include the estimated amount of any prospective injury or damage.) Property damage $10,000.00, medical treatment $20,000.00, prospective medical treatment $100,000.00, pain suffering, and emotional distres to date $200,000.00, other economic loss to date $20,000.00,Prospective economic losses and pain and __ _ _ suffering $150,000.00. --------------- 8. Names and addresses of witnesses, doctors andhos dtaia. Most of this information is still unknown to claimant; claRimant was treated by the Contra County Hospital. 9. List the expenditures you made on account of this accident or injury: DATE ITEM AMOUNT Claimant is unable to compile a complete listing of these expenses at this time. +rt*#*t�tf*�*��r*�.t**:���tt*�r�**:f*��:�:�*:::::#�r::l::*w::•�••s•••:.:•*:+r.+r� ' Govt. Code Sec. 910.2 provides: ' "The claim signed by the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) or by some person on his behalf." Name and'Address of Attorney C a nt gnature RENT C. WILSON, ESQ. 1899 Clayton Rd. Suite 100 1899 Clayton Roadr s Suite 100 Concord, CA 94520 Concord, CA 94520 Telephone No. (415) 686-0200 Telephone No. (415) 686-0200 NOTICE Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: "Every .person - ho, .with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, town, city district, ward or village board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any -false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony. " CLAIM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA 001XIT'Y, CALIFOWA BOARD ACTION April 129 1983 Claim Against the County, ) NOTE TO CfAIlMANr Routing Endorsements, and ) The copy of this document wiled to you is your Board Action. (All Section ) notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below) , Goverrment Code.) ) given pursuant to Govmvent Code Sections 913 & 915.4. Please note the "Warning" below. Claimant: Kathryn M. P. Willey, 83 Terrace Ave. , Point Richmond, CA 94801 Attorney: Counsel Address: 10 1983 Amount: $1090009000.00 Hand.-1)eM1%W&d By delivery to Clerk on March 4, 1983 Date Received: March , 1983 By mail, postmarked on I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted DATED: March-41, 1983 J.R. OLSSON, Clerk, By , II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) ( ) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to ccuply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (section 910.8) . )4�) Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on ground that it was filed late. (§911.2) RATED: JOHN B. CIAUSEN, County Counsel, By ► Deputy Z W— III. BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present ( ) This claim is rejected in full. (x) This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. RATED: 4t/;?- ?,3 J.R. OLSSCN, Clerk, , Deputy WARMING (Gov't. C. 6913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: 1) County 2 County strator Attached are copies of the above Claim. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim by mailing a copy of this document, and a mesmo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's Copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: yc-/3- 8.3 J. R. CLSSON, Clerk, �- -Deputy V. FTM: County Counsel, 2 County Administrator 10: Clerk O Of supervisors Received copies of this Claim and Board Order. DATID: if-/3-P3 County Counsel, By - � 51 County Administrator, By clam CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY ALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 9n5 ; 905 .2 ; 91!1; 91n.2 911 .2 3 �IAk j � TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, THE :av**!RE IDING JUDGE OF THE BAY JunICIAL MUNICIPAL COURT DISTRICT CLERK BOAR CO. C c CO551�_ ND THE COUNTY COUNSEL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY , CALIFORNIA U s I. 6 I KATHRYN M. P. WILLEY , hereby makes a alcim against the 7 iI COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA and the BAY JUDICIAL MUNICIPAL COURT 8 CISTIRCT, THE COUNTY COUNSEL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY in the sum 9 �I of ten million dollars and makes the following statement in 10 1; support of the claim: 11 i 1 . Claimant 's address is : 83 Terrace Avenue , Point Richmond , I� 12 California 94801, I' 13 I�) 2. 'Notices concerning the claim should be sent to : 83 14 I Terrace Avenue , Point Richmond , California 94801 . 15 3. The date and place of the occurence giving rise to this 16 claim was : March 5 , 1982 , the Office of the County Recorder 17 County of Contra Costa , California , concerning the recording 18 of a MARSHAL 'S DEED on the real property of claimant. Said 19 MARSHAL ' S DEED acknowledged by the MARSHAL of the BAY JUDICIAL 20 i MUNICIPAL COURT DISTRICT , COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF 21 I CALIFORNIA, on March 5 , 1992 . EXHIBIT A I 22 i 4 . The Statute of Limitations for filing Claims against 23 i a Public Entity on Contracts is ore year. CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT 24 CODE 911 . 2 25 5 . The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as 26 follows : 27 a . A Judicial proceeding inititated in BAY JUDICIAL 28 MUNICIPAL COURT , COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA known as BAY JUDICIAL -1 - 52 •I MUNICIPAL COURT DISTRICT , COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Action # 57674 , MINNIE ALVES , vs KATHRYN M. P. 2 WILLEY . 3 (h) The action was an Application to sell the dwelling 4 house of Claimant based upon an abstract of judgment from 5 ! YOLO SUPERIOR COURT Action # 3655n of MINNIE G. ALVES vs 6 j KATHRYN WILLEY ir. which F1I.NNIE ALVES had obtained a ten 7 +I thcusand dollar judgment agaisnt Claimant , WILLEY , on March 8 25 . 1930. 9 �i (c) The Action in BAY JUDICIAL FUNICIPAL COURT was 10 I; originally instigated on or about July 29 , 1980 by the plainti f 11 �� therein , MINNIE ALVES. 1 12 (d) done of the statutory procedural safeguards for the 13 sale of the dwe' ling house as set forth in California legisla- 14 tive and statutory authority were conformed with . 15 (e) This fact was brought to the attention of the JUDGES i 16 of the BAY JUDICIAL MUNICIPAL COURT DISTRICT , DAVID CALFEE ; 17 GEORGE CARROLL ; THOMAS CURTAIN ; the Clerk of the BAY JUDICIAL 18 MUNICIPAL COURT ; and the MARSHAL OF THE BAY JUDICIAL MUNCIPAL 19 � COURT DISTRICT ,. by Claimant in numerous Court plLAdings . 20 (f) The violation of each and every section of the law 21 applicable to the sale of dwelling houses was known to the 22 + COUNTY COUNSEL , COUNTY OF COITRA COSTA , JOHN CLAUSEN , and 23 the said staff of JOHN CLAUSEN directed the MARSHAL to follow 24 his illegal path of procedures . 25 (g) Ey the time that the MARSHAL ' S DEED was recorded in 26 the Office of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County on 27 March 5 , 1982 in Book 10699 , Page 369 , there had been ample 28 time to revoke and/or cancel the sale of February 4, 1981 -2- L 5 !I I as the MARSHAL supposedly sold a dwelling house on which 2 j several causes of action were pending concerning title to y 3 the said property, thereby precluding the MARSHAL , by statute i 4 i from levying on said property, 5 ( As a direct result of the violations of the law by those i 6 ; who at the same time are fraudulently receiving funds from 7 this County to uphold the law, CLAIMANT has been damaged in ij 8 !I the amount of over ten million dollars {510, 100,000. ) The 9 �f basis of the computation is as follows : 10 ! Further litigation expense resulting from legal procedures 11 �� to undo the violations of the legal procedures committed by 12 i• JUDGES : CALFEE ; CA,RROLL ; CURTAIV ; the MARSHAL and the Clerk 13 of the said Court. 14 Severe emotional distress , mental anguish , mental torture, 15 apprehension and fear resulting from the continuing harassment 16 ! resulting from the illegal actions of CALFEE : CARROLL : CURTAILN 17 CLAUSEN ; the MARSHAL and the CLERK. of the said Court. i 18 ! Further humiliation , emotional distress resulting from 19 ' the contempt and mercenary attitude of the judges of the 20 i Court' s of CONTRA COSTA COUNTY due to the fact that Claimant 21 ! is attempting to uphold the law while the officers of said 22 ! Court are using their tax paid position under the guise of 23 I molding the law to deprive the claimant of her property. I 24 The only justification of said officers of the Court for 25 committing the unlawful acts that they did is the excuse that 26 I they were ignorant of what they were doing, thereby immediate) 27 I warranting and justifying the immediate removal of said 28 { officers from the payrolls of the COUNTY OF COVTRA COSTA . l � - 5 _3_ 4 I i F 1� 1 • ] ,h,it� M I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is ' 2 � true and correct. 3 t 4 4a&4�if DATED: '- 19 at Point Richmond. 5 California 6 7 'JTT7WM. fP_. WILLEY 8 :i 1• 9 10 11 i 12 f!' i� 13 !� 14 15 16 i 17 18 i 19 I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- r ;%� '''jfi'•�' �a, ar,` .L jr•[.s +w•e+n' !" •.it Y;:•t„T'aa:` •ti: rf:t.Y.�'!� f��+►t;,c t!.�.T'`!�='t,+t• �STIYLt3T~ >~ r, . f` - �•:.• ti t••. :!`-�• ttC 'a t •-^f�a tL'•.." .. i'i:.:a At.: Lr•,#•�t +S.Fr-r t t.�,*, r - � t J t: s .t::j�� 31Yij.• t L rt -..-�i r a:• ;«..e�+'S••.'7�{j•a _ t• ,a •." f � rs a. lys h r `r. '• r it4�1, 1 ,• , w� !�•i x1 ► +- s:?r=fit.' -.•t y'� - r�•ar i a.r !., a I9b2 lrtftt -5 1S^? ?' ,• ., '. L; ttECGt+;:Tx:.KE+'. .:}�eY � L'LCl,:...axJ 6T LsQ;,'£;i{�jt''�`r ;w r• .1 • :,',4 E. xtx llrrrn:^': —�..�4�=.�,,.s.�.» '' � 'r '�.r. :! t!»R 51962s ` •::; i ries retarded aall to `- t2'!r2(2:is'aii.:lrZL1T.--tti_ U:v1:;,It2t M U"CiCt l all a = rIC� Y ,� IW-37t1t zt.. itusa 1.71!1 - CCv:Irw COTTA.CtXJNrYOitt iw ,,.//,,�� •„ t�6.:1tt:'LA STSG J. t O2SSC#rl r COUNTY FfEcx oEp r .t r t OFft[L•OF THE MARSHAL.1tURICIPAL COUNTS.C014TRA COSTA COMITY ft. I'. r1Lz,•Y 57:11 _ l' t YS. ti • ;,,t tHz::(t;A:.,:11!_'1»1•M. OW=- L•arsAil of ewmicipal court.Cawir at CanVa Cai.a•. •-� t.4111a u:a,41•huar o1 an ta[cutl.n In L•+e short tal::led!Colony t;µ t� ` S hautd w ;t{•te::a.•t .13 Jt2 ,td ai tM..rtL.:S::P.d. Cows e:tht s • ••tl i \:• ..t_..__....,_._t... 'Ch4>t(of Crsraa C#S:a, •r• { .. �t . r •_ .� :ta:t a C.i:tvw•a a p+.t:ar»t a.:ed vt Ti r!!' .lr tlu ,in favor at. t l t..•t11:i:::r •�l:.,_:1 L':' !1_a�tttr.:t ;a•r'13UT:< 111:1ir t2.. 1w',�, ,tS^t'• r •' .. ( t. ••� � .. •..,.•!}:i:, :il:a`I: .}ntp.#tnt trt3:larlSr, r t'. _ -at:.. tr.:eC:_,art•; arta J.'.p,.utnt Saul tt fur 1 at Me ,tr MAI etttrtt%):t4retA a..::rr •` . ' r t t=te•r r 3 e ' f :». .}..a.• • 19 EY .�i: _r10 Galt a.r uptn all C�dJra.title dna«rw[at tl - 1' ��' ,y - �� i..a:tds,. tt. !•. :iJ_-r. 1 Fit • Y •. 1�,t�te44 jeuts,lit ! 2 ,. •'• , IA told•ct:oo.M lfr.t•!Natcrtr hc.ticaflCr do CriWII t •s A.a-r.tas.sst aitt.ihit pu011s4Iap utC PaNl..p rwtltt of CK Ilse a'td plata of salt According to Iav,saiII x` Ita+tnit dt:,en li:t:atyty i ,1Y tll ,at 131W1 ''a. G.,Sell Saf0 real t•• tt proee.tf.f -alit ao.tlorr In tat City of hie]Ctial Cwadf$I Cenva Cot:a f , ' 1 Kie•CSrrS to the itildtes to tiKtt tail's audt and tYaVICCC.that Yid profartf was Citarec tet sate to-st:Tst!G03 • dltUnct 1.14 or t_scali of tans.and:aUinp to mctl.e a Did ewetts,us cll:teS tow sate as a dock.and all uw - t, f j i title&&Z b.ttrnt to i:td Ju'y.cent ee Dtw Tat in Ua wt.p,le of tatd poptrlr was Gulf SnU to _ ,� j• t j \ia�x !Matt.•:r '} =� � Iw Irw s...w ='L'•I!«7 71117.:l'.r .ra! t4;/`' - - - -- .oitars. ti_,, -• r Lrtut twt.tf 0_.e Wwt S;rtcs.It*said ow%%astr Mai tre bigness 61Cde8,ari t.'Jt&=a www o fasticst E12 Lana { i Saw wl'olt pit*taild wor.fJ,t•cet.9t of wttich Is births acLAAwIaCZad. �•� s ±{ ! And.lamas•alta r[ath lat said pvchos-mcnet•SAN CarsrAt e=el to Said ptateratu a eertltlea:a tl:ale as is 1T it.tt.ec ted tt se of een•ar.f tiled is try#like at tra ftttat4a tt 114 Comt7 of Ctasta Caua a duslttiltt at sucA catllii:atr. (ier.inl_'a tea. 81-1:1:617 { 4 : -E X-TH, (' - ,•'..' :.i iii - - _ ,.;'. 1.9 .�,rq -'-.t ,) u„,, ”" ' ' "Ys r y'.r�,aK,p.°C. y?'i ,.''^• r^"',s'L,_fi -' .�`�`�,-' ', •t' .�•,.- .y -s w ♦ `r-' z ° °^`? „i..3' ,tet,,. 2� r x..'" r "h ryx'11`�,;y'r^`' 11 - , , '_'�', ­, . is y ' ' ''C:S! S '•' ^' "''✓'�'+,+t- t`2i s+:+ x amok 61, r„ .s.1+ z r � - , .. _.. r t:i r' ♦�• lItl. ..�� a a -• - -• d t . t')4�' �`S tt.'CaT; +: ?f, .!' j - dl Y a'F_• f R`S1 �A (��' .) '; 1 :T 1 j �T •t z• j•r,(i.a l.. I c ♦ I tt s ( I.a: • / r r 1 � a v t ,c. '.t_i �. e , r:a t :. J zs et; .t. - __ .jam, _ at:"I _ _ �� t , 1..: rt •,, •t t' �� 7 J 1 {•� 3 t 1. Sf, c • -.- - Yi r .f.( 1. _ ✓ t tis I t t p I z� r _ ` T c-- r:t .?� �1 Eq Y I ANLL eltkh .1.,aralvt soaml Stty lack aua Ilavin' .apkta almoma an resauptl.i ii Yp s j w i L15 •� ' -Ycftlles"lap iota&Ais. 11 I �.: 1ti SL i a _c '� rk. l 1. l �r `- j _ r y tf Y S h a .\(:.1) 1 '- ..IW airrraa,Ca lFarrattal Lavel"Aw nasdA Wal it"rue ItysI ww.to oar Italro(1) �.� `� kr ,. ,:z r �. . 1�1 \' r at a.�A CartY:u•c tl ti4: -,J a t ) NC.t 1. UZ&KW r. :77.vlI:. - ,Yarsut n= '. . to ! `- •; 1.:V LsM«•1 :1_lc4a t\acca tasr at.::.u10 pro.Ia.4.b.07 Cant to1. ,q a- _ t r{�r j•_ 11 T , I, I -> {( r :". { all.�•.rlC.t,tn:a..:Iw.tat at atsJ lam:Asir u:aacu!!a r a.aa!prol.n tt►a Y,a C"tt of $t r•.; , f 1 Cs.a,a\,aau•�u.r as L'a11tt..za,Ga:rgeJ as Ictlosa: 5 3,. ,;,- i .;J5• ,_ , j t S. i - rr f,,4ti r r A tya •, - . <... � :. ,c ''a' .�." Y 1• w i --(^w�y�„ 'C'a't } -. •. - 3 _ir 1 r=.,.�it.,, t :at�tntz:I r_s1 tc:.I:a n a.t: -r�►t rr` rtlt�r rJ_, ��a ! ;. ` k d •_ - -t ' c.cl. 1:' It 1\t:l t 1 rl:Cru.- lr:1, ♦ Irl t(tt 12 111. 'R^+ '*- x 1 :. !t. .11 tp•'71r_ At 1.1_11! IC1r7?tr. Cltl21 S(Ia - • rc ,�-'".a'.r .'>' - ` I t y ► --I nu•�. ozu•.utly i2it•ts a•a rt s*tr c ` r r F )i ; * 1". - - `d1-til 1..1W«r67.... 1 ,. s FF 11 I- ' _--- �,. IK,.hlllha2l, tAlal. tI\ .`-' z t � y . � _fir+- r p9 s ,`t I 1 } � "; J l r ; 1 s U. • ; 11, V y Y 11+7` :,at.. K t1,_ Ir 9� .ii�iA!.J !'._ :'!}^illi , t`', •h,s ,!"' _ I _s •.•I..i.K,'.t.tovaVCaG.t•a/ !4� }� K• t.` I , C4.1 •lY•1.,it la YI C •Ilaa ,a' j }, i . �� , . � r�`� ! w 1 Ut .. .- -� , a PS ••- .. , C.U:IY C+ CtlCa r a � ,' .,a Cts �j ��� � 1. {S - -TE GF Cwc.J i 1 U J 1• r t. 11 -• - i I. I `.° t� / �. T/--' •! _wf 19)l Dalua u,Ua ua ant,rta,petawlll t :gym t i= /rc.' : - 11 ' Ylta«i lastrucret,,avl acln"k9j;aa1. ,4 aw that tf a•rt•tcr Ilio Ytat as sYQ1� x k -1. �:� - ; I)••t+R, "U ! •,.t rn!..41,4!1 a!Umn rias!Vus:al. � ' ? �" . •a 1 ;_: �i HA`� �r t_ : tat t+Ilctat:c+L__ ' r ro . ..•r«7 0 1 i t w .i';. > i i •�-- ...' . J I � , L ) r s: I... . `, ,..I j r j `L. r x `t t ,zlI xc.1.�.�. .lilt.•o1 twa Cattail x . 11 {P• L aacllt&L•I' ileeo �� `uE J t � C.: '' �m � ((F � A 1 f .�'� WC HK ..711 '' }sY +f� .... 14 11 ►.'.r♦ • �„ ..1,r , S f-,r l t ,L a� s� _ _ 1,A+�.1 'x r : a ._ 11 �^u t� r - { -• 1,J t '~ X l - aw.� f Z- - lat ..`t _. _ ry .,z _,E ,r ry. - �a aa.r .-- ..• 3 h 1,...y r f 5 .. .. �. _ ' " �'� '' .�Tn�...� •yn�a��+r��s��-- �. ;'x xFy`x• '9s�oiYs. .n- , 1 r x� 'J ftr :.:{ f� f1 Fl �.kti to - •r t(.t,'•��t }r♦_.;: '•� � `j3 i ta'. z �. illy r 1 ✓. I CBS s- LwnzU. l rt.. cod, c f Z?JGl'.7, C'Crt t I of art+ Penalty: . r�• f. + t a t.+a !,r• sut.:tg se-�), t•n e r <!oe I:.r Y.t Y att:rc!t.• to vh1�h tta s iF J.-reach. es (ullo.•o. out ♦ 1.• :a_•a of Vr,iet lfa. . :. • �(( t LI•~a. (_ 1' + •� 1+ :uat}'e C✓h l+L, it•t•.1 still r %'f +•' 1, �] i'• t ..:tr ♦u:r_•a1 SSSOn ,+ 1:x1 1001h, 7a j3 r r j PACT t not .' ♦ � Lh041 pG;L'ktitT i s • t, � _ �; .tet {. t +3r•t r � t t1 ,. s t r t °•, [t r r . t.i 1 s r; • CLAIM BOARD OF SJ EWISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COM-=, OMUMRNTA BOAIRD ACTION Claim Against the County, ) VOTE TO CL%UgLvr April 12, 1983 Routing Endorsements, and ) The copy of this document wiled to you is your Board Action. (All Section ) notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below) , Government Code.) ) given pursuant to dovernrent Code Sections 913 & 915.4. Please note the "Warning" below. Claimant: John C. Slager, 431 N. Buchannon Circle, /7, Pacheco, CA 94553 Attorney: Address: t`-'P 10 1983 Amount: (301.14 Ec` ....y- CA 9-1553 By delivery to Clerk on Date Received: March 7, 1983 By mail, Postmarked on illegible I. FFC2: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted CRATED: March 7 198 a J.R. CISSON, Clerk, , Deputy Reeni Ma1P to II. FTM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) ( k) This Claim om plies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. (, `) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on ground that it was filed late. (5911.2) DATED: O- !!'& JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, By -415:� , Deputy III. B0AY0 ORDER By unanimous vote of SupervASors prdbent (�) This claim is rejected in full. ( ) This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: -/o'?- 83 J.R. OLSSONI, Clerk, � �. Deputy Jv WATOMIG (Gov't. C. 5913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: 1) County Counsel, 2) County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim. We notified the claimant of the Board's action an this Claim by mailing a copy of this document, and a mem thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: �!-/3-�3 J. R. OLSSONI, Clerk, AX�*—Deputy lor V. FTM: County Counsel, 2 County 211 RriListrator TO: Clerk of the Board Of Swpesvisors Received copies of this Claim and Board Order. 9 DATED: iol- 83- County Counsel, By County A& nistrator, C LWX ' J CLAIM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Instructions to Claimant A. Claims relating to causes of action for death or for injury to person or to personal property or growing crops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other cause of action must be presented not later than one year after the accrual of the cause of action. (Sec. 911. 2, Govt. Code) B. Claims must be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (or mail to P. O. Box 911, Martinez, CA) C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, Penal Code Sec. 72 at end or this form. RE: Claim by ) Reserved for Clerk's filing stamps FF ' ED Against the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA) M�7 I n,. 1. 04 or DISTRICT) J. R. 0OWN (Fill i n name ) WAM OF SuFERVI u T The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the County of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum-of $ and in support of this claim represents as follows: ---------------------------- --------------------------------- ----- ---- 1. When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date ani hour] c. • : rc - : rt) 2. Where aid tfie damage or injury occur? (Include city and county) ;uch,:.n,-.r_ i:ir!-lc 7, .c}: :c , C&lii :rz_iL: 9455 (:,ee re;r.:-rt) --••-- ---------------------------------------- -- - --T - ------------ 3. How did the damage or injury occur? (Give-full-details-, use extra sheets if required) C•_.unty c3 eputi e,= tryinE t- enter the nrer..i C ef�. 4. What particular act or omission on the curt of ecunty or district officers, servants or employees ^aused the injury cr Yr_nt 00,-.r r ? - kicked in by county 6e-uti e .•s. mat are'the manes of ccmty or dixtriat offia wa. Arr�rl�s awlerees caaAaq the dayege or lat=T? ' report; E. ;_l :�n .. 54592 Wig_____ 3 ��- _—_—___—.r..—..e__ e or a cries �o you claim reasu�MY Wv; i"astent of injuries or damages claimed. Attach two estimates for auto damage) (eo &ttachcd c-*P' of invui cc) ?r�rit c air ;sic?�c: iri, br: cn an:: ?�elsz and e-. or kn.*.)bc broken 7. ---ow-was-the-amount claimed above computed? (Include the estimated amount of any prospective injury or damage.) (:BGG c, lrliotj .: --------------- 8. Names and addresses of witnesses, doctors and hospstals 3.:hn C. sicgcr - C:z•:ner �lJaEcr. kiachine• s. inSt. {� c = .Itt-cii.f' :)tjote copy --f report for officers an duty) �:--List the expenditures you made on account of th�.s accident or injury: DATE ITEM AMOUNT -.--r tt-.hr` inv:?ic, f^r Govt. Code Sec. 910.2 provides: "The claim signed by the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) or bX some person on his behalf." r Name and Address of Attorney f C aig 41YU�a,Addrttu-r$$ C!/! lL�" est� Telephone No. Telephone No. y -JAg7->79 NOTICE Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: "Every person who, with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer; or to any county, town, city district, ward or village board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony." ..C: . FOAM!A2X R rr ef2Cdaaslf"at Na. 4IWCra/a S-s1GTEitsatsaswtwiftCalksrtlution vattrm V (left.Fast. Fin"Nono) �. Sas ya S O. .�. S. 19 woo"Burs Cif W to -* 11stuefrinJ " t3."oRsa Phone ti.VNNAre's Af:1iI j Iv 1�"fior Tamar"Oalsrtaa ,?� FbR c ! S EewNopnlfnt5cfwo► IS M4tar .T Rfpetrt/np Crimeom lit.mom P1woa ia.D.O.S 20.Ooewslion 21.Waft"ours ,�", --- _ -- to 22 #wasnew&4Oreas 23.Duw alm Pfww 24.9-lially WK/Scftol �� iii• 'S lotateon COW 25 Location Of Occurrinulr 27 Day ate.TIRit, NL OccunAO ?•OsT.Oats.TNrtla 2a .Ow.Tw,awrtllari 30..IlMaatltar ae -tQ- a 4,151 -i98'3 Cu9k - 31 Mhtn"ll amm 'FAR Ase 32.iaaeMPtifrlA 33 EnKINeh N _�Ovf �EJsZflPc� �'" .1336 ]I*faNmrfC4'At34rlsi —_ _ _ ++iw:i+t». � it'�+.�i v.w 37.9wowma aPbone M RACE Of STOUCIrkm ❑STNEET'ALLEY Q Oyf** tttaCMtlOk OF rA SICENTIAL IaC*EATIOIIAL 113 OTNNn ATTACK O vEHiq E SLOAMUNDBOO SLINK= OMBTITUTtDMAL AINLA — n 9 OPAIN WINIQ10 TY.E Of 57lkuCTy1I,E41 00047 OF ENT*Y 42.NETTCCKEgTlh, 141Ot AGTIOSLS O wA O S" D WA O t Name"Ma. is iMaa.I/M 113601 D =F.•iceww* 1 sal'Ift—i' smoky D to LEv D i arm o., mow— ttr aepme IF FIM D 36 Sewell V.ar. •,a *talk O w LEv D:w FAIs D 2 V&vAWW f O is Panama w D w oww Falls O 3 mwuw.w a•+ ❑2 Co.Aa ❑ •u"Now l D 3 X"Ams © 30 O 0 kvbww w4wv D v oawas of O •wba a",,, ❑3 T~ ❑ 1 weer !Reef,Faroe . D •Oaasaw Das Fww ate all co* D s asnsrasaf O s a«5w..an O ft,.. •„ ,. 7 rssff. s se.+Orremvo D a•mate An Pa. ttaAs waw C a mm.r, .r. O s Off. C33 S"AM m �a w.s,w.,a D aa a weemaft FYplea, O 21 um,L«rwlYak. D s"No Two" D 7 ❑ .O"ON w r Cluleiel Lea; D 7{sell mama,hr O 22 Talsslww mmr D 40 Mac :E.Wu,A. TA,C-.,. O s Awl awaiie O a Nide as aiw tide eman O at talo 10 Public 6--o'.p 1 Aeic ❑ a neeuFtew D s us,Mee O a Arra Onaaiow O a3 Too mews waft D a?owlrfw s aMr „ we.,I C3 man is arK�+Rlxr f wO mom=$ O as ow P"m 43 Fees wean O 1;Oat« ❑ a«.rttr• o a G•we D i i t,•. pry ser 0 a Know Lowell of 0 a swam mw w D M Omer ❑ . , ❑ a ewww a D 1!was Coastal •%@an Gan O it a w cw ftw TMyt.fl 05 i oil)Oteer FAen IB saftflb.rA leD r glaworatlspa awe ❑ Cat*lkw o.e.« ❑ s F mors. 0 13 P~ 11 Teas Oft War" D a1 uta owate ns M O :O-W a.... ❑ T Iry EaIT D u waft.s, , 13 tt Teo.Owls Nf.rq O a1 Frwf ponwlr w 133 set•so. ❑ a K O is Tawvh e O 13 yews Oar,,c o. 111- -0 yt ❑s vNVH•0 Ma:«.+,e ❑ s t A4_ AtA*M SYSTEM S is aeeh•6nver aealalrt 0>♦fi"weif C, is 9 ❑ s o.wa »�► ❑to sI k,•O 0 1?Oerr O is Wq vre tram, D 31 um,valor woe 0 6 ❑ Sois V4,- M womp w 0 32 Mamma www ' -Om«. M. *Ment pie"v D 33 UnwaW Oawfsl as •tN;OTOS T FIBERS t0 TOOL MARKS 13 WEAPONS is OmtlOS ss.OiaPosltron Of 47.Total Value of awe FEN TAtkF %-0'Pw1NTS U s SKETCHES f HAIR 11 TOOLE F1 16 FIREARyS 17 ACCELERAMTS EvedeeNa Ebf++fp Prop. O •tpgoty e' U s Trot TRACK! L}s.,LAS3 (J 6 Ta..CE IE It u 1,0 OtMaw I-HiN;a U lb OJCuIMtkls{..I 1.va's Lb, ' C y S T uc j/ -t-TE-alS Dep Pc ,- A) "` l-A 6Re Aa OaOutr (Pnrn) Eelltloyfa No. .ApWW4rS Supwvjsw_(Print) Eat11., Na la OisrMIMM 1.AdwNA Jaw. 15 QLSpQ 1 �.�1 a►�1 i ZL i�?,� OA CIOOR CRIMES V CRMIAES V GRMIMS TICS ..�S,1lf�lSTICS —V= i IFAS$ _COAOW_R 53 J'—PAT I _PERSOMtS 0 PU A"sT CCCCAP 10T"ER oFs/lA 3/at CONT"COSTA COUwv 11111INNI"CQMOa113 OWWATUtslT—PIG,Ma a".a ow"s.C&arra — 4CAS "M1 - 62 NATO(OL M' FORM B f KNITIGAT" O 55 'rime / 56 CanFilee 57 Day.Date _ 56 L 1 1p.� ICCtNtINUAl1UN St:1'1'IERtEN: SIA:EMFrd: 59 Victim 160 L tion C Locatt0"No r we-S I 16VCf AN j6,j Q01-4 62 1 No t 47 lilt rnq n❑ ■ S9 Ape .M. W M M Nor Etres OV fypT - -�O 71 AKA t12 Ar9NM 73 �1tOrte 7s Bus,neq lee , �1 a o5C Co P 75 Employment'School 76 Occupation 77 Driver's Licen— o N:r.•t.r.:;N•• r. ti. 1 No z so D o B. W.Raoe 62 Sea 63 Ape 64.M 65 wt 96 Ne.,7w Eys d6 AKA M RI9191r1crAt991raa9 60 Horne Phone 91 Business Phone 92 Emplovrnent'Scriml 93 Occupation 94.Drivers Ltttxtrtse No u, H.••- N. 915 H^lR LGTH TYPE 97 14AIR STYLE 99 FACIAL HAIR 9f COMPLExioN 100 GEN APPINCE 101 O M ANOR 102 SPEECH 103 VOICE 1 2 SUSPECT 1 2 SUSPECT t 2 SUSPECT t 2 6USKCT t 2 SUSPECT t 7 SuSftCT 1 2 SUSPECT t 2 SUSPECT t t 0 Un. 0 Unk 0 Una 0 Unk O 0 Unk cum Q 0 W. 0 Link } Bao t C,.-;.r 9.,. T Acne n t Conlon, s A'FV 1I"Jr Accent 2 Cote, 2 Bra.edd 2 FW.See 2 Dara 2 Dirty i At»lacer.. ' :.ax I •.,;•v'•-- 3 tong 3 Gushy 3 Fu Wancnu 3 Freckled 3 oleeurae 3 Cann 3 ournelr. 3 move I 4 Snowed, a Greasy a Gagoo 4 L.9nt a Flea" 4 Otae'g 4 Ort"I've a Left Pacn I 5 S-0,t 5 M...tary 5 Ldwr Lle S Meerurrt 5 Go Look-ng !Irro !O:••dr `��,• ❑ ❑ 6 pecee•np 6 Ponyle•: 6 saualecas 6 Pato 6 Wiwi, 6 Nerdous /flae e f UanrinrK Proe"bire 7 Full '7 POtked 7 Unkempt 7 04mat 1310 ''Nati• T Corse •S1,81"t 6 S'surm I fluedy 6 UnuWat BO 6 Pn~l 6 Stut»r9 a P.aea t 2 F•ne a wa.y'Curly 9 UnsMren I TennW 9 welt G, 9 itueor 9 Tataa:•re a aasor 3 Thick 10 W,g 10 Omer 10 Omer 10 Other 10 V~t 'Q Slurred 1J Son a Th.hn.ng 11 Cre.cul 11 Leh rero 11 Otherrt Otaw !w.ry 12 Other g g] 12 flight Mo 6 Other 104 Further Suspect Description p e 13 Tattoos.Teeth.BlrthrMtks.JettrNry,Scars Manrwr.c•nc Ctotr..no vn• 0 t: Scon 4e Jr4c KfT , JArti(c t�i9tv73 _ 105 Vehtc:e-rear•Make.Model.Color.License No.Other Identifying Characteristics Suspect• Victim C / 106 Registered Owner `07 Address IR O) 106 eft 5- S r 6s�D S"'ndet1 . 109 Who Mastro Keys 11 option Of Vehicle 111.Fill— Red to I+REAMidle Uto t r .. M.ccngPwrSonPRC Rate Sell Age 11,4 R9stdenceMddreas 1t5 No to 116 DOB 117 EmptoymenvSchop 116 Occupation 119 Work Nous 120 Business Phone 1 1 Race Set Age 122 Restdenp•'Address 12Momma one 124008 125 Employmer,;Sch 126 Occupation 127.Work Hours 126 Business Phone to ,N W- WM ffflL�1.1►r�uJ G -tmAT SciE I -n,E! l_)ASiI, ;Ttstt_L__t�s�CE- OF :111C F12�gftponing -ty Ipnntl mpbyae 1 wq r(prim) No 13 13? Adult 133 Jive CQWES V CRIMES V CRIMES V PEhbONS JOVE PROPERTY NARCOTICS lC>: VWk t r rte, 'tT SO- POOP_CCAP —OTHERaS CONTRA CMTA COUNTr SIUt911iF-rn n 0 IS OSP"TWOOT—P.O.Slee M.UbPOOL Ca 0083 — fCA!!q111111111► .. 63 FORM C - EASE I'l:• i ;Av paTE _ 7 i ,if •CO\TINUaTIOk -5T&'EMEE.T � 13? Lhcat•r Cot!+` t i= l'.•_.hlM1n w J C Ah&3QA %W ._ ... - -.. •• — +•.n St .rn.+:•^Nu ••t.f r qua^t.'. •�^O!d»r M�n.,l•r•..••s M,^e^•Nu++�•• Sr•.•+Nu+n:�• M.Kr+:`^rova 0•=L'•DnOn . . ,.. � - �•.: .+5-+1r•ii-, .�..N:..a�:_ 4+C�•enc. bm.aP ..r.• +G.Gotrnp►. .C.. ,•1•sE.v"'•rE•n.,r..N•.r• .0.a:.cTVsncGl:u�• t iS• IS.+ 153 f ,� C•i♦ t•a;oc R1t5'EaANFOUS DESCRIPTION VALUE Q t✓t S CIS W(t WMRA0 7., _rcq b�gy)EP W ,t*bE6"FF_A9D_ m WAS _,F=_ WAJ41A�_ 916 IA �itJ DEIZ �4 _ - = MtMrM ►Ano i4 EAELO& A F'iCN__5-CArOLF uNDEQ q e99Sr 029, By TftE Deb& w L- W &_kSQAJAL =TEMS 9rlXW11A.) A3 NIN �-T�s c•��72E t� B�? �5�.acR� ---�5 '� C.1'z!L[ra�—�%�E.C..< <_"tl�r%--a✓� �.:-, ""�' i��./_-�J4••�� _�. .tIti l 533tg: E �^ r. ^.. Pr.^t• Em; vegNo 156.ApprevmgSuWvttior-IPr+ril Employ"No tS% O+splasroon 15ti Aan..CORONER r:••� ... -. 7 � 1L (-",AIE�V CRIMES V CRIMES V PERSON' JOVE __PROPERTY -NARCOTICS __STATISTICS VICE PRESS CONTa4 COSTA COUNTY SNERWF-CORON"'S DEPAIITMENT—P.O.Stns W.MmfMts.Ca MW — (CAM7EM0► ,, � ` - 6`t t FORM C ASE FILE■ / t3a [riv DATE 139 Q ��^ —.29A (� — &CONTINUATION .•S LOPPL FME NT STATEMENT til Ltx..;•nn C:xfe 143 l mat.!"Ot Oc—:rence T �i4Ct1i�J� 1 1 .r n-i'.O O is :.tb bou..•.y N!r i t 1 o wr e'.^p C�:.r- -.'c :rnnq: ter. ...•.r3 �.�..n❑ mac• Gtn.�r•rtern No ^,I,c c QuAnw, 9r■nt1 MA-e MAnurMtUres Mort Nurv:!w SMuu grr.•lper 1MrKllWntou•De�w•'17nQn T,.,n;•ta :oss• .:S'tNfp;a eaNf.�pDEr,A ICurr•ncY.NOtt•s9 lJowfiry C IClotn.no Furs D r Wn•rrnE rG'r.crEw+Cr^entF,Wero TVs■rc G rise- 153 154 f__ F,'r� „a•ara �• .a.t.,ra,F we MISCELLANEOUS DESCRIPTION VALUE • _• •_., .a ,aq�. '::Ft f MISCE_L E �l F xw AN T tt AT 44 A D 19l /42✓C THE 72W LS 'A" Szy)s�—gg2'aSttt:_S AN b COME eAC,9 aA& WHILE bc7P__FiltAe`. . ���5 ._ �.n ���t ,�•�C.,_ S- �F---Q ' jr�pE GAFF_ A43o Z tfecKe_TttE: &EA ,Reit .4,v FO «6 CA R� T Sd A .J s-1�EIK S�DA�J �_iZh 3�_...Pf►1".-� '.� >� - �A R� X45 T 0,rfrj&-XS 1zmJLM(j Dca,>., E ►tel 4 A)bOtJ *AAS S ems) T _aOCA. SOM id 40WICAL le" -7 Z-34-14(j- RO r 7ltE - A Syez- cE _`��•��_-JJoy� E _Q�7 rf r T sit, I�s �D 'Ta IP Aa SF Ljt_ ea S-C6f.QQEtG - �•••t`art.ny •pu;t•IPnr:• EmpicyeeNo 156 Approving Supervisor-4Prmt1 Employee No i57 isposdrur.. 158 Anclt 1 W ztet4 t ~ CP1rrES V CRIMES V CRIMES V PERSONS JtIVE PROPERTY _ ._NARCOTICS __.STATISTICS VICE PRESb _ CORONER 161 COMPLAINT fage AP —c-THEM CONTRA COSTA r OUNTr SmFo.ee(-000060'!npoARTMFMT— n o .N� w.«+..... r. "••-I A"■-•••e• FORM C "e•, . CRIME t37 CASE FILE a 136.DAY.DATE 139 4 _ !CONTINUATION r)rSLIPPLEMENT r.STATEMENT A Ar I 14: TIM 142 location Ct1oe 143 Lecauon I Oc urence 4j 14.: SL SPECT Ia5 D 0.8 _ 146 Boor rrgNo ClteNo f C 10 bo oaOPERTv VESCA•c+ 1ti •lmoounaetl Reco.ereC FDunC Lost Stolen)nem No.Ankle_Ouanbty.Brana•Maae Manutactum--c i Nut►ber Seng%u"ww Mtacenanecus Qaacnption a:al•a�wvre take^ .A." I.C1uoe:ata,Loss-- LIST IN FOLLOWING ORDER A(Currency.Notes B I j"mlry.C)Clothing Furs D t Vlh*da.E)On•ceEou•pnlern F•Paow TVs Mc G 1 Frre- �•T5•t NO..S!•n�^.GDnos I 1 Ccnsam4Dir Item$.11 U.esloc\K)MRC 148 1:4 150 1 151 52 153 754 SEp:A_ "ANIMaw=CA MODEL NArrE a OT5 A;z l:_E NAME v.•.•;F�� MaNJriCTuREti MODE( NVVIRERS MISCELLANEOUS DESCRIPTION VALUE 1 'Ccs Ecipm IN �tlo.CfAr0 4Z C45"A_J 1 -,70 9( ( . 4,01_c a�l� Tt }-? t� �c FRem Pc-rr�r ['�}s rt Neuf �,�t�o oN �-Ca�ct ea,•� l ttE s •� fi:oF2ry Tfw%�a til >A—;o IbEa cLt - JeApnr _ 1- �•R C�c�aN�Jct t_.oc_ �c-R tee - -aew - i- C R f15 et0 �Nc%A 1- flmmm!�0 LW L'5�i�pvortmgDepuly-(Pnnll EmpioyeeNo 1 156.Approving Supervisor-(Print) EMPloyee No. 157 Disposition 158 Aowt 154 J::•.� Cc-6 e5 �► 2G �S� .O -L CRIMES V CRIMES V CRIMES V rll PATROL PERSONS _.JUVE. PROPERTY _NARCOTICS _STATISTICS -_VICE _--PRESS _CORONER COMPLAINT 161. Page COMPLAINT _SO•CCAP _OTHER o� P.'4` �t CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 2Wft FF•CORONER•f DEPARTMENT—p.0.Max Ml.867fMnR.C&WW — (CANIMOF) 66 CONTRA CO A COUNTY—SHERIFF—CORONER ABANDONED. WOLINDED.RECOVERED,STOREQQR , USE VERSE FOR RENDR7WG MINEZZLEVIRELEASED VEHICLE REPORT ML EV VEHICLES AND PLA TES 'RIME , BEAT (VISION DATE FCN• I'c— i ILE• � P4tRo� -Il-s YPE OF REPORT(CHECK ONE) IF A RECOVERED STOLEN VEHICLE,HAS NEIGHBORHOOD OR AREA BEEN DABANDONEDIMPOUNDED OSTORED CHECKED FOR LEADS OR CLUES? (��� D ABATED D RECOVERED D RELEASED D YES D NO SEE�ARAEAOS 0 TI UES IN REMARKS OR _RSON REPORTING OCCURRENCE ADDRESS PHONE TAp IME AND DATE ` �C C C7 �M- REPORTED DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP f(r YEAR MAKE MODEL BODY TYPE LICENSE NUMBENIS) YEAR STATE COLOR ICOMBINATIOM) �o2 b pf 2 to�7 3 QlA GR.e�.✓ VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (YIN DOES VIM COMPARE DOES VIN APPEAR 11 VIN CLEAR IN LI MYMBER(f) [NGIME MYM{ER ([Nl WITH 6.CARD' ALTER EO' fVS� CLEAR fYf. R QX ' ES ONO YES 10 2Ef ONO m 0NO IF STOLEN,NAME.DATE AND CASE NUMBER OF REPORTING AGENCY WAS WEN RETURNED TO STORAGE AUTHORITY OWNER' ❑VIES ONO LOCATION TOWED FROM WN RED TIME AND DATE TOWED NAME OF GARAGE ADDRESS PHONE I REGISTERED OWNER ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL OWNER ADDRESS PHONE CONDITION AND INVENTORY ODOMETER READING DRIVEABLE) WM[CKED' STRIPP 0, HAVE YOU ENTERED MISSING. IDENTI- OVEf ONO WKNOWN 0Ycs o O."o o,a Wo FIAMLE PARTS IN SVS; [3YES []NO ITEMS YES NO I ITEMS YES NO ITEMS YES NO ITEMS YE ITEMS CONDITION SEAT( )-BUCKET CLOCK ENGINE TRANfMIss10M TIRES/WHEELS RAT• IFRONTI IGNITION K[Y CARSUR[TORIf) , AUTOMATIC( ) LEFT VONT BEAT MEAN) REGISTRATION ALTERNATOR 000, S B►EED (P4 RIONT FRONT RADIO // DR. LIGHTS(■ IGENERATOR &0- 4 SPEED I 1 LEFT REAR (... TAPE DICK S.MIRROR(f)IR 1 BATTERY NUB{APs 1 I RI{MT R[AR TAPE$ 1• =,I GRILL AIR CONDITIONER I MAG WM[ELS SPM[ LIST PROPERTY. TOOLS, AND DESCRIME VEHICLE DAMAGE IN REMARKS SPACE. REMARKS (IF ARREST MADE, INDICATE FULL NAMES.CHARGES.AND WHERE DETAINEOI(USE ADDITIONAL BLANK{MEET{. IF SEQUINED) J ol OFFICER ORDERING VEHICLE STORED REVIEWED BY: GARAGE (NCI►AL QfAGCNT 1100111116 YEN(SI{NATWEI TIME AND DATE (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) APPRAISAL.RELEASE.DI TOM RECOVERY TELETYPE(DATE AND REQUIRED NO(ICES SENT TO TO STORAGE AUTHORITY CONCEREDDATE NUMBER) REGISTERED E LEGAL OWNERS A [3 YES D NO GARAGE(SEC.22q IF NO IS CHECKED.INDICATE REASON AVA PROGRAM RELEASE VEHICLE APPRAISED TIME AND DATE SIGNATURE OF PERSON AUTHORIZING RELEASE VALUE OF APPRAISAL APPRAISING OFFICER'S SIGNATURE I.D.NUMBER ADDRESS SEC.22704 VC ROUTE TO CRIMEEVs NS CORONER OTHER CERTIFICATION:/ THE UNDERSIGNED.DO HERESY CERTIFY THAT !AM LEGALLY Af1THORlZED AND ENTITLED 7O TAKE POSSESION OF ABO V£DESCRIBED VEHICLE CRIME K SPEC.SVCS PATROL SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING POSSESION. PROPERTY PF-09 REV.2/79 PAGE s 4�- � _ u1 .,6n 3amsom INVOICK NO. aama lwAms 1340 WAX=$!1! -' 3t RTam e►. gm - (416)milli-m SO D TO SHIPPED TO S tT NNO. 7 STREET& NO.Abift _ CITSTA E ZIP CITY STATE ZIP CUSTOMER'S ORDER SALESMAN TERMS F.O.B. A E v S • LAR'SCx�I LU Mrt � a-V al"Ge- ff-ML, 114 NANK �uv 68 s CLAIM BOARD OF bVrZKV 90RS OF 02a?A CI STA 0W.VY, C1UXPaWIA BOARD ACTION April 12, 1983 Claim Against the Cotmty, ) NC►IE 70 CLAIMAW Routing Endorsements, and } The copy of this document araiWto ym is your Board Action. (All Section } notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below), Government Cade.) ) given pursuant to Government Code Sections 913 & 915.4. Please note the "Warning" below. Claimant: Richard Milton Clapp, P.O. Box 275, Bethel Island, CA 94511 Attorney: Gt:' `"tot Address: ,.,n Q 19$3 Amount: $100,000.00 Hand Dellvered - , By delivery to Clerk on March % 1983 Date Received: March 7, 1983 By mail, poste on I. FRCM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 70: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted DATED: March 7, 19 8 3 J.R. O SSON, Clerk, By Deputy Reeni MaIrgto ii. FROM: County Counsel T0: Clerk of the Board of Supex V,*Mrs (Check one only) ( ) This Claim oanplies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAIIS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( } Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on ground that it was filed late. (5911.2) DATED: ;?=2r -G,f JOM B. CLAUSW, County Counsel, ► Deputy III. BOARD CSR By unanimous Vote of sols present (r) This claim is rejected in full. ( ) This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: /c?'8 J.R. 1, Clerk, , Deputy WATCUNG (Gov't. C. 5913) Subject to certain emoeptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was persopally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Gcmeranent Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. IV. FROM: of the Board T0: 1 County 2 Ommty ninistrator Attached are copies of the above Claim. we notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim by mailing a copy of this docunent, and a mems► thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DAM: 4-13 J. R. CaSSQN, Clerk, Deputy le V. FROM: County Counsel, 2 County Ac strator TO: Clerk of the Board Of Supervisors Received oopies of this Claim and Board Order. County Counsel, By County A&d nistrator, CLAIM 1 CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES F I L ED GOVERTZIENT CODE §910. R. OLSSON ARD OF SUPER ISORS Claim of Richard Milton Clapp vra, r Against COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA and/or CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA: You are hereby notified that Richard Milton Clapp, P.O.Box 275 , Bethel Island, California 94511, claims damages from the County of Contra Costa, in the amount, computed as of the date of presentation of this claim, of $ 100,000 .00. This claim is based on personal injuries sustained by Richard Milton Clapp on or about December 22, 1982, in the vicinity of the Bethel Island Fire Station, Bethel Island, California, under the following circumstances : Richard Milton Clapp had asked for assis- tance regarding the execution of an order to show cause in relation to a family law matter. Officer Millis of the Contra Costa County Sheriff's department did respond to assist Mr. Clapp in execution of the order to show cause. Mr. Clapp and Officer Millis did get into an argument at which point Officer Millis came from around the desk, grabbed Mr. Clapp , shoved him into a wall, handcuffed him and placed him under arrest for interfering with an officer. Officer Millisthen placed Mr. Clapp in his patrol vehicle and proceeded to take Mr. Clapp to County Detention Center. For no apparent reason, Officer Millis returned to the Fire Station ten minutes later and released Mr. Clapp. It is believed that Officer Millis assaulted and battered, and falsely arrested Richard Milton Clapp. The injuries sustained by Richard Milton Clapp, as far as known, as of the date of presentation of this claim, consist of emotional distress , pain and numbness to his left side, and bruised and sore wrists . The amount claimed on behalf of Richard Milton Clapp, as of the date and presentation of this claim, is $ 100,000.00. All notices or other communications with regard to this claim should be sent to Richard Milton Clapp, P.O.Box 275, Bethel Island, California 94511. Dated: March _;L, 1983. R HARD MILTON CLAPP 71 -2- �- CLAIM • BOARD OF S()R$ OF C ONM COSTA COE!TY, CAIIPaFKLA BOM ALTION Claim Against the County, ) NDRE TO CIAM9M April 12, 1993 Routing and ) The cry of this doctment =1 led to you is your Board Action. (All Section ) notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below), Government Code.) ) given pursuant to Goverment Code Sections 913 & 915.4. Please note the "Warning" below. Claimant: Robert H. Elkinton, 9 Lind Ct. , Orinda, CA. 94563 Attorney: Address: NAR = 1983 Amount: $79.84 Hand Delivered By delivery to Clerk on March 10, 1983 Date Received: March 10, 1983 By mail, postmarked on I. FCM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 70: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim. DATM:March 10. 1983J.R. OISSON, Clerk, By XM— , qty Reeni malratto II. FIM: County Counsel T0: Clerk of the Boar O Supervisors (Check one only) (x) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAIIS to cmply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on ground that it was filed late. (§911.2) DAM): - JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, By , Deputy III. BOA OFUR By unanimous vote of Supervi s (X) This claim is rejected in full. ( ) This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. M=: yC-/;?-j3 J.R. 0LSSON, Clerk, . Doty WAFOQING (Gov't. C. $913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your choice in cmumwtion with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: 1) County Counsel, 2 County for Attached are copies of the above Claim. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim by entailing a copy of this doament, and a mom thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DA=: 4/-/.7-4P3 J. R. OIS.SON, Clerk, Deputy V. FRONT: ) County Counsel, 2 County trator 70: clerk of the KZ�r— Of Servisors Received copies of this Claim and Board Corder. '72 DATA: y-��-p.3; County Cocuisel, By Canty Administrator, 71T— • CLJ1 M TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Instructions to Claimant A. Claims relating to causes of action for death or for injury to person or to personal property or growing crops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other cause of action must be presented not later than one year after the accrual of the cause of action. (Sec. 911.2, Govt. Code) B. Claims must be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (or mail to P. 0. Box 911, Martinez, CA) C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. . E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, Penal Code Sec. 72 at end of this form. RE: Claim by )Reserved for Clerk's filing stamps R o 6i•,t H. L c K, TK FILED Against the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA) or DISTRICT) J. R. OLSSON F1 in name ) ��/^B�OARD OF 500"" "" NTR- The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the County of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum of $ Jcf. t'5/ and in support of this claim represents as follows: --------------------=---------------------------------------- ---- --- 1. When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date ani hours 1"VCve11,, i3-CA �---Where did the damage or injury occur? (Include city and county) -----------•�------------------------occur?-------•►------ -----T--------------- 3. How did the damage or injury (Give full details, use extra sheets if required) (�- izc c x'N't S - ------------------------------------------------------- -------:--------- 4. What particular act or omission on the part of county of district { officers, servants or employees caused the injury or da:c►age? 1:a, pc` - t, JC,b ay. k l�� �GK.1 yr tMG r,�" v►�v�CQ i Gr 'r n!�`CS k.ec C f ru,hry �s�c� ��,.�- 411 p��..�•�ca`'''t 3CJw-i- � �.,C� C�:.r-:n��j►�t Sit�, 1'�i.iv►� C.�� cTtC,Kp' — 5. `fiat are the names .of county or district. officers, servants: or ` employees causing the damage or injury.? ' 1 a3sc,r..1't�`� �=r t e.�'1 Ma h1'e�.�,kms. C•u, of ttG,,-,tj Re- Nix iw 6 What damage or injuries do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed. Attach two estimates for uto ctc,t�,4,!�,� da�'age) t 1-epinc�,w,.T i1a�,;..F���e. �"c�u� F►c�.. AItF ;, A-V,50,vc, �e�y ;..•;.t o.sn�t !� t 4.- cvL,a�R B 7.SL - - - - - - - - &W �.0 IM i►,_"i�� Y="r=--------- 3 s.s� 7. How was the amount claimed above computed? (Include the estimated 7Y.yy amount of any prospective injury or damage. ) Sale p �� Ct+-tt K 0 u-�u,(' .k:b pY vi fev .a, ac tixovy,t►,;.t°!CaJ'4 ,I, ►w- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Names and addresses of witnesses, doctors and hospitals. IVaru; Aulft COL,t t 1CL t k w Il. , 6`1 ( Stas 3 cq rs 6't-t%t sa)me to c, vtA-1 9. List the expenditures you made on account of this accident or injury: DATE ITEM AMOUNT I l 3 Y.34 1�13u 1�3 C+1 PSM tZ"— y,,m`.-t- 3 S'.50 4 Govt. Code Sec. 910.2 provides: "The claim signed by the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) or by psome�j person on his behalf. " ILL Name and Address of Attorney C 'et T�. C aunan Is Signature 61 LA c Uress �-t�K-cO, I C A ql-( ti XTelephone No. Telephone No. NOTICE _s Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: "Every person who, with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or j for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, town, city Q district, ward or village board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony. " ci A= 1 I !-ease +1,1'5 Gtt t ti.% LIS C G 6 o+.,. tt+- h�!S y P T ttwu 1 U&-,. l u.,t i Se+ tib' lw+n�ut�te,ly cufiu.... '� 1 G ca'te -Ik- , l-t,c(k fl- �►��5 eve-in - `; �4�. • M (rvi ^e, j ��Ya�r,�, A- U1' i-tz. ucc,S C� rtw� '{� LcerYt i� �vr R6eo.% S tvd. rtt' tlL )nma?1Cd-lw,. }j PY%VC 9.,U QArd 4 CJs.' 4-ti � �AG pYtYiU�J rC Vc vm,z� a� t'4 -vl-9kC kk%,6 Nov moi~ pafawd lay i. Coc,-,st, �oa� t ��wa Cc-.�� 'f�. (,,t,rZ.��o l�'f" � '�.►ci-�'1.',;,C,Xs pR.Suf� G VGi-%� Lu r jkl^- '-s tc t Car? u� �v.:��lS �1c�Ym i��r , C►� 1L`�� He a 1- � . 14� 1 I-05Ar � -t L -/44U G 4;, Gt"e- i V%* H,& G V:4 i j4�►I�c � ���-r t�' �� we,�•� ���-Ltt,;.,t i �z: �- w� app i-e�c�.►- �.��/',t,�.s}e�..�- C) jj 15b i � I'LL tZ rua C CR'LO i h �� W�1 F Gw, c4✓`�wiG.h�fie. �►� �e., ar►G� G f,1 CICAI,G LA - t G G t h 1''VI511 5 e 4-C�� �vu� j G`fi ci Lf j � G i���E �'1�'�►t � C�t i"EG"f lc.. U T�U+•� u� 1 ice,F�ti. - Civt S�ci ver' �i � GL/�.t�,t"�, t.c,-�:�.� �r�!tc.C'�irv��� f K�a �^ic.- �G�"� � X74•l H ��C �1�VI.QL�LCIJ ��,rti.c� 3e.}�i✓J Gc�►� -�'�. w�Q 4�f�hcEH""� L(1Gr�J #1 koG�{eCS G�- v A 1 JV7528r.j . MINU PAINT. StNVICt ` 1 LUUI !CNCCN FLU Lli Iii• "' • ���� '' '"tf700 M. NII•ti ! ,,,,.^� .. 2 CHANGC OIL* • •r. • a«w[• }1rr +r j:' "w!• .r t�YATA WALNUT.C8M,Nfe. r wAuw c'Let eA w•r ;"t€"s 2 a tw + «•nE1•�•MM1•r•MM s+;t fAi61G1#M�iM q l� ' , • ! �e[I!/tD ter wtM - �+' '' , �VI ' 7 FILTER ! l t ` r�I M MMMA t1MM01•r t•IMA ► _� 1�-` a�.r�t r • itNliFRI. iQ �NN1S1 o-�-ir .. 'yi �• - max.l"Gs ! [ •tN• �♦C C YC aI ii S i1ttLAtt I .',j�� pNiOOC*t01T CARO IAOON!!S„•„_ iLr�.��'�3 •.C.V. •X. �''�j'� y A.M. vALvt • CNN.��•IIARt ., ` ` / • ININlS• 10t tAiI ATMIO kA •n ALL PART*TO IW.0-I • :a 2 yN TRANS.s' TNa. SAL[ • M lin"Ft T�• 11A TOTAL • • ACAq 61 F NOTICE AMU An �HlT[M S 1 �` ENINKME IGINAL T "•ruL --_--_---- • nTints OgM3tgl1 ulwn 1 N U C T 1 N O IMAM LA•a • A 10 •N[{[ 10 It I 12 11LEtN11NG• L � a 177iL� rI =(�� SHOCKS 12 • 17 CTCACMISSION I ^Y CL 14 17 E % `� L.+'••S� 14RCPL ACC It!G.S. • FILTCR I• N !J5946,TVML IS 1 I S\t.J i� �Lti�V.� 16 ApOSN NAD,• COOLANT 16 17 S S Rm.FUIEt7 I • i• CN.A/C L;J Ca "Zi ►1� t �T JA.UNT •Hc►nN6 1• ` IM POLISH DESCRIPTION 22UNDERCOAT I-ISINSTAL'10 ARE NLW O FAC ;PvTOYOTA WALNUT CREEK, INC. LABOR MECHAMICAI 27ILIUNIL` rSPEGIIIEUUTI RV/I2100 t10 Elruadwav SU•L[T REPAMS IrAr11 LABOR SUMMARY 5PLCiAE aRDLR WALNUT CREEK.CAL.94696 PAN IS OROfR NO /ARTS•AINAU ACH. 25 0 INY4 Z yA'�t�i4ar5 C' PHONK 13'3.7440 J Y 4EM o LEY.• T NA GING WE REC MEND THE FOLLOWING REPAIRS. TIME! wz.3 2T LI`H«T OX ITS.OIL �-�" W UO �i�tPUR GAS.OIL.GIIEASE f 2i«t•i Ii ! tES.'GPAA69 0 •OXY atop MATanu caw, ya0. 24 YpANs.29 TS,AUTO.TRANS.FLUID N _E.--"� lwDru 11, RCP AIA.r T� TAX > Bilivt r 14 s CRAM 71 Tom 1 7 3 I P °TIC SE CONiULTA"! LM04SAVC CAW AVLAv+IAANTIpI'll.INSRClCRvCD INC. - r ati,r Aar3aAlf+►�s«it _ .. CYfOMiR WMOICE ;I: { lag as" 00110111101 iX,a-�;,"k--i;z m � 1 aFa5 0 ALL REFUNDSr,u5T BE A C.uM- + c PANTED BY HI "RE EIP Lum W. off CKMOE � M r•'U r+�+ rY 77,11 IIS KLi ��� s C_i � J L &-a" A I RIPTION A PRICE ru kp Inx I'zo`rl� .0 91I44 0I r i s CORE CHARGE# 1j ALL MERCHANDISE'LISTED ON THIS RECEIPT CARRIES A .LIMITED 100 DAY WARRANTY. EXACT TERMS AND 1 t CONDITIONS OF THIS WARRANTY ARE 1 r•` j AVAILABLE AT THE SALES COUNTER. 4', ON ALL RETURMEO K TAX } MERCkANQISO z1worEcE0 TOTAL59L' 4 4 i Xr r CLAIM BOARD OF CORS OF CO[?TRA COSTA COU:TTY, CAi.I UtUA BOARD ACTION Claim Against the County, ) NDM TO CLADM April 12, 1983 Routing Endorsements, and ) 7he copy of this document Coni d to you is your Board Action. (All Section ) notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below) , Government Code.) ) given pursuant to Government Code Sections 913 i 915.4. Please note the "warning" below. Claimant: Frank and Ann Gimbel, Parents of Dana Gimble ,gild Dana Gimble Attorney: Newfeld 6 Bybee ?1AR 11 1983 Newell Plaza Address: 1211 Newell Ave. , Suite 110 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Amount: $150,000.00 Hand Delivered By delivery to Clerk on March 8. 19 8 Date Aeeeived: March 8, 1983 By mail, postmarked on I. FR{M: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 70: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim. DATED:March 8, 1983 J.R. CUS90N, Clerk, xG- , Deputy Reeni Ma t to II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) (X ) This Claim omplies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to ecnply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on ground that it was filed late. (§911.2) DATED: JOLT B. CIAUSEN, County Counsel, . Deputy III. BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Su s (X) This claim is rejected in full. ( ) This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: -/o?" bf3 J.R. CI.ScM, Clerk, by , Deputy WAFOUNG (Gov't. C. 6913) Subject to certain exoeptions, you have only six (6) months frau the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See government Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. IV. FRM: Clerk of the Board TO: 1) County Counsel, 2 County for Attached are copies of the above Claim. We notified the claiaent of the Board's action on this Claim by mailing a copy of this document, and a mom thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: y[-/?•83, J. R. CWSON, Clerk, ,sem' Deputy V. MM: County , 2 County strator TO: Clerkof Of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim and Board Order. DATED: County Counsel, By 8 County Administrator, 1 . LAW OFFICES i NEUFELD& BYBEE NEWELL PLAZA F I L 1 1211 NEWELL AVENUE.SUITE 110 WALNUT CREEK.CALIFORNIA 94M r TELEPHONE(415)909-2171 {' 3 J. R. OLSSON BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 4 CONTR��OSTA t S ATTORNEY FOR Claimant 6 7 8 9 10 In re the claim of ) 11 FRANK GIMBEL, ANN GIMBEL, ) CLAIM AGAINST THE COUNTY Parents of DANA GIMBEL, ) OF CONTRA COSTA 12 and DANA GIMBEL, ) 13 VS. ) 14 THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, ) and its employees, DOE ONE ) i5 through DOE ONE HUNDRED, ) inclusive, ) 16 ) 17 TO: THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, JAMES R. OLSSON. 18 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT claimants, FRANK GIMBEL, 19 ANN GIMBEL, parents of DANA GIMBEL, and DANA GIMBEL, whose 20 address is : 3557 O'Connor, Lafayette, California, claim damages 21 from the County of Contra Costa and its employees, DOE ONE Z2 through DOE ONE HUNDRED in the amount of $150,000.00. 23 This claim is based on thepersonal injury received 24 by DANA GIMBEL, on or about November 30, 1982, due to an accident 25 arising out of the defective condition of a building, owned by 26 the County of Contra Costa, located at 10 Irwin Way (26 Orinda 27 Way) , Orinda, CA. 28 As a result of the defective condition of the said -1- I building, boiling water was being transported through the premises 2 and said boiling water was spilled on DANA GIMBEL, the daughter 3 of claimants, FRANK GI14BEL and ANN GIMBEL. 4 The County of Contra Costa and its employee, DOE ONE through 5 DOE ONE HUNDRED and each of them, had notice and knowledge of 6 said dangerous defective condition of said building for a suffi- 7 cient amount of time prior to aforesaid accident and should have g taken measures to protect against said condition, but defendants, 9 and each of them, carelessly and negligently failed to make such 10 protective measures and carelessly and negligently failed to 11 remedy such dangerous and defective condition, and carelessly 12 and negligently failed to warn users and invitees of said building 13 of said condition. 14 As a result of said negligence of this County of Contra Costa 15 and its employee, and also as a result of the dangerous condition is present at said building, DANA GIMBEL sustained severe personal 17 injuries and her parents, FRANK GIMBEL and ANN GIMBEL have been 16 required to, and will be required to, pay for the medical bills, 19 treatment, and other costs resulting from the injuries to their 20 daughter. 21 The names of the public employees contributing to the 22 claimants' damages under the described circumstances are not 23 known to claimant. 24 The amount claimed as of the date of the presentation of 25 this claim is $150,000.00. 26 All notices, or other communications with regard to this 27 claim should be sent to the Law Offices of NEUFELD & BYBEE, 28 1211 Newell Avenue, Suite 110, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, Attention: ,,.0-M3 tSI'LL��K 3uA[ C Mo.,Comm Qftwaw u -2- }RO jblMd� lT1t I Daniel H. Neufeld. 2 3 March 7, 1983 Law Offices of NEUFELD & BYBEE 4 d By: D H. EUFELD 8 ttorney at Law 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U.rpw1�.E y w NtBl7tLp i 11YSEE .. t'Yf1llMl41 MUMU[.Wrti tq .k.� . ..... -3- TEIEMOENIMS"?, L e //'� CLAIM / / BOARD OF OF CXbTTRiA COSTA C OLD. Y, C7UJIOVIA BCW AC'T'ION Claim Against the County, ) NMTO C LAU4= April 12, 1983 Routing Endorsements, and ) The copy of this docummt too you is your Board Action. (All Section } notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below), Government Code.) } given pursuant to Government Cade Sections 913 & 915.4. Please note the "Warning" below. Claimant: Judy L. Wilson, 1205 Frances Rd. , San Pablo, CA 94806 Attorney: RAR 11 1983 Address: -� Amount: $8,150.00 Hand Delivered Date Received: March 10, 1983 Bdelivery to Clerk March 10, 1983 By mail,, postmarked on I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim. RATED: Mar. 10, 1983J.R. OISSON, Clerk, . Deputy Neeni mawazzo Ii. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) (N) This Claim omplies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( } This Claim FAILS to amply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on that it was filed late. (5911.2) DAM: .5041 -e JOHN B. CLVJSEN, County Counsel, By , Deputy III. BOARD OR4'M By unanimous vote of s polesent tX) This claim is rejected in full. ( } This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: R. OUSo x3, Clerk, , Deputy W4RNM (Gov't. C. 5913) Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (5) ucnths from the date this notice was pens g ally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Governnent Code Section 945.5. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your choice in cosvx=twn with this matter. If you want to oonsult an attorney, you should do so iv mediately. TV. FTM: Clerk of the Board TO: County , 2 County ator Attached are copies of the above Claim. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim by mailing a copy of this document, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed an the Board's copy Of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: 'Sl-/ - Sri J. R. lata SON, Clerk, by Deputy V. FUN: County Cmmsel, Z County strator TO: CLerk Of the Of supervisors Received copies of this Claim and Board Order. DATED: ,3- 8.3- County Counsel, By County mm astraisr-, By CLAM -.r-LK'K' TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Instructions to Claimant A. Claims relating to causes of action for death or for injury to person or to personal property or growing crops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other cause of action must be presented not later than one year after the accrual of the cause of action. (Sec. 911.2, Govt. Code) B. Claims must be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (or mail to P. O. Box 911, Martinez, CA) C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, Penal Code Sec. 72 at end o his form. RE: Claim by )Reserved for Clerk's filing stamps Si-3 Au k-- W i VS o rO Ad, swti igzgo F ! LED Against the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA) mi r n 10 1 A.M. or DISTRICT) i. L OLS50N (Fill in name ) CLEcK BOARD o: SUPERVISORS CONMA COST:. M t The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim Bgamnsr En County of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum of $ and in support of this claim represents as follows:T ------------------------------------------------------------- ----- 1. When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date ani hour] � 913 S' P m - -- - T ---------- ------------------------------------------ --- '�.- W�iere �i� the damage or----injury occur? (Include city and county) -----------------------------------------i-T---- - --T--------------- 3. How did the damage or injury occur. `Give fuii details, use extra sheets if required)` &UA ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 4. What particular act or omission on the Fart of ccunty or district officers, servants or employees ^aused the injury cr ft_ aago? .7�/T` cMui �'1rU1�1"� Q .,�1��'�.t�•�'�P►1� �d.tkL4 n Q /� �L1�cl'asiGC� 13 re-qL)feJ -..s�f jL 7T H✓d p�Z 1`a 3 1 , ••w 3. jflha are the -manes of y 3istri�t f�toQm, AOR 00010yQes pausing the r moury=' *t6l, hZAA6trvd&t o- - - ^-OWL Brow -�r- -- -------- 6. t amage or in ries do you claim resulted. �Give� ull •wxtent of injuries or damages claimed. Attach two estimates :for auto damage) See kks4 q,�4AChe4 -w- ----------------------------------------------------------------- 7. How was the amount claimed above computed? (Include the estimated amoun�� any prospActive injury or damage. ) '�. �a u-�� .sly,n.� �.S►�:o�c�.ol, K• * .,vx U a u-t- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Names and addresses of witnesses, doctors and hospitals. -----T-------------T-------------------------------T-----T--------T-T---- 9. List the expenditures you made on account of this accident or injury: DATE ITEM AMOUNT Govt. Code Sec. 910.2 provides: "The claim signed by the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) or by some person on his behalf. " Name and Address of Attorney a& , asmant s Signature a A r s (A 9V 06 Telephone No. Telephone No. NOTICE Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: "Every person who, with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, town, city district, ward or village board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony. " 84 �f avid CLA C. �- �,CLJ JYY 4 z 'i t 1 (, ' 85 1�.: ''-`'L �S SC.- y. Cc,uc(� 4� 2 �:. j cf t� rte. , F-t,c��- (ZZ X a-' 4 C �, {�; l lis 1 ��=s�t�z�►- 1 (� ems._ G � � l ��' Z C C- (C, Drzyes , 4- c:.,e,, c S--L) 2 Cc. t3. WL-Lt_c-b-eux game r- r (4, S-tz = ��, F��ti��k! cn� �.��cc� t kwll r u i(•, 5 LL-e-t�LT-f / 17. Sh.c•c.s, (- �1� C-.�c � �� t�cL-f'�i� v� 4-- $ (S- t C. e- 1 .Z1, j a�e- P'eccrrier 7� ZZ. 17ry 4-t� � McsL Z5' 11 t Put 241 Itis i,5 r tuc ill�'%5 3C 2-. 17c;i(s �ir- (s f 12 C, 1 ZG 2Y. C I eD-AN l Orl Lr.4-A-nC 1 �"X d15� 2U hrs Cr-- � �- /h r S� 2"`i, Oov►til ax vL5e ��h u.Iac dc-' . Z� mcg►� SGC .,C Lcx4 J t I*,-y G yPyek.sittJ S *-/AcL 1%iS 2f 211r, -k' 1 CTA-L- -,r c � _ �•-C�U�T ��I�+cQ /i1L�NL�� - �_��' � --�� ,3—JAS=t?3 'err/,,s:,j '��►,.,?� c�v Gic�., CLAIM BOARD OF S[MPERVI90RS OF CMMh COSTA CaT.IIN, CALI aWA BUM ACTION April 12, 1983 Claim Against the County, ) NNE TO CI.i1IMAW Flouting Enda--Q F P ts, and ) 7he copy of this dost ii=to you is your Board Action. (All Section ) notice of the action taken on your claim by the references are to California ) Board of Supervisors (Paragraph III, below) , Goverry ent Code.) ) given pursuant to Gmmrnoent Oode Sections 913 & 915.4. Please note the "Warning" below. Claimant: Troy Marshall, 1041 Lindell Dr. , El Sobrante, CA 94803 Attorney: Address: 'iAR i 1 1983 Amount: $300-00 S By delivery to Clerk on Date pceived: March 10, 1983 By mail, postmarked on mar. 8, I. FxM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim. DATED: Mar. 10, 1983J.R. OLSSON, Clerk, By aT Deputy II. FROM: County Counsel T0: Clerk of the of Supervisors (Check one only) ( x) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. (/ ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should reject claim on ground that it was filed late. (S911.2) DATED: JOM B. CEXZW, County Counsel, By000, Deputy III. BOARD OFft By unanimous vote of sq*rVi'Ars (X) This claim is rejected in full. ( ) This claim is rejected in full because it was not presented within the time allowed by law. I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: 'Y-/c?-A-3 J.R. Oou 9 , Clerk, , Deputy Ar wNnn NG (Gov't. C. S913) subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Gmmrrmient Code Section 945.6. You may seek the advice of any attorney of your dice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney, you d=ld do so imaaediately. IV. FFCM: Clerk of the Board TO: ) county 2 C mEty ator Attached are copies of the above Claim. We notified the claimant of the , Board's action an this Claim by mailing a copy of this document, and a nIP o thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Clam in accordance with Section 29703. J. R. O1&9W, Clerk, Deputy V. Fill: County , 2 County trator 70: C3erk o of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim and Board Order. DATED: 1�4-/ Cbunty Counsel, By County Administrator, G CLA31i CLAIM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRAtp- Instructions to ClaimantC•e*of#w Board - .O.Box 911 rbnez Q dff0mia94W A. Claims relating to causes of action for death ormfor injury to person or to personal property or growing crops must be presented not later than the 100th day after the accrual of the cause of action. Claims relating to any other cause of action must be presented not later than one year after the accrual of the cause of action. (Sec. 911.2, Govt. Code) B. Claims must be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. . E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims, Penal Code Sec. 72 at end of-T is form. RE: Claim by )Reserved for Clerk's filing stamps ) F I LEE) . .... Against the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA) • •• 1 :? M-3 l ) or DISTRICT) '• ~ Ll- DISTRICT) n name CLEW bJA� o: suevisoas s � _ The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the County of Contra Costa or the above-named District in the sum of $ and in support of this claim represents as follows: 1. When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date and hour] wfiere did tFie amage or 1n�ury occur? (Include city and county 3. How did the damage or injury occur? (Give full details, use extra . sheets if required) 4. What particular act or omission on the part o county or district officers, servants or employees caused the injury or damage? (over) 89 5: what are the names of county or district officers, servants or employees causing the damage or injury? 6. -What damage or 1n3ur1e d-o you im esu to ?- ZGive u extent of injuries or damages claimed. Attach two estimates for auto damage) -- ----- iiaSs - --- ------- --------------7. Bow the amount Qa ed above com ted? (Include the estimate amount of any prospective injury or damage. ) S. Names and addresses of witnesses, doc ors and hospitals. --1Z ---T---------------------------- -- -----: ----- -t---- �.- List the expenditures you made on account of this acci$ent or-in�ury: DATE ITEM A140UM Govt. Code Sec. 910.2 provides: "The claim signed by the claimant SEND NOTICES TO: (Attorney) or by some person on his behalf." Name and Address of Attorney nt Is Xigna re ddress Telephone No. Telephone No. NOTICE Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: "Every person who, with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, town, city district, ward or village board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony." 90 Ta: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS M. G. Wingett, County Administrator calm TE: Aril 4, 1983 DA-M: p Coda QWY susiEcT: Legislation--AB 292 SPEC I r 1 C REO UEST(S) OR RECOKPOAT I ON(S) ! SAOCCROUAD AND JUST 1 F I CATION Adopt a position of opposition to AB 292 (Floyd) BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: AB 292, introduced by Assemblyman Richard Floyd of Los Angeles County, would give a minor the right to a trial by jury for a wide variety of felony offenses. Such a provision would destroy the juvenile court system as it now exists and would add dramatically to the costs of the Superior Court, District Attorney, Public Defender, and Marshal . AB 292 provides no additional reimbursement for these increased costs. The Superior Court urges the County to take a position of opposition to AB 292. CONTINUCD CN ATTAC004EW' YES SIGNATURE: RECOWCNOAT1oN Cr COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMKNOATICN Cr SOARO C004ITTEE X MWWO IE S 1 GNATUNC S : ACTIM or SOARD CIN: AO AppmwED As RtCommomE0 2L, anew , 01 VOTE Or aLWWW18CM 1 Noway COLT1/T TMT r11S Is A VMX �( 1NANImax IAS WrAAM CI01WiCT OWT O/ AN ACTION TAMN -rA �l AM WrrWW0 ON M NINVRf OF M amno ATM Nms:� OI @LV=V Is=S ON 7W Owls Sam. AsstMT ASTA 1 N cc: County Administrator A**�T!° a";( /a � IfM Superior Court Administrator IM C CID °DAY so m Aro District Attorney roc Melo tiollc v rs SauRo Public Defender Marshal G ,SswrY 9 CSAC Assemblyman Floyd (via CAO) t BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ` 1, 33 Soo M. G. Wingett, County Administrator Cart DATt: April 4, 1983 cow susitcT: Legislation--AB 862 S"CIrIC *CQutsTIsj CO3 *CCCwaM'iAT/CNM) ! •ACItt KKK AND JUSTi"CATION Adopt a position of opposition to AB 862 (Konnyu) BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: See attached letter from Roy L. Chiesa, Clerk-Administrator, Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal Court, to County Supervisors Association of California dated March 15, 1983. CONTINUED ON ATTACi9IE'JdT: X TEs SIGNATURE: _. i CCOMMMOAT I CIV Or Cou y ADM I N I ST"TaM _ IMCONNEW AT I C" or SOMD CC I i TTEE X SIGNATURE I s : , ACTION CF iOARD CiV: CVEp AS I= r ma ;- �.�. VOTE OF dKw= V I @=w / Mol' CIDMT'ry "AMT THIS is A Una tNANIMMMNs (Ammr AMD ""MCT C W V Or AM ACTION TA/O:N AYCS: lOt;; � AND IMOWD ON VW MINt,"S CW Tilt 0 00 ASStNT:� ATTAIN Or SUPOMYISOIMS Of IM DAW MIPAMW. JW cc: County Administrator ArMSTRI) d& Assemblyman Konnyu (via CAO) . COMM 068W Ano Roy Chiesa, Clerk-Admin. RK G"ICICI CLOW 4w M @O*M �2 CSAC Assemblyman Elihu Harris, Chaim my Judiciary Committee (via CAO) •Oc"'"r" 3 MUNICIPAL COURT WALNUT CREEK—DANVILLE JUDICIAL DISTRICT 640 YGNACIO V ROAD.WALNUT CRM.CALIFORNIA 94596 ry JOSEPH R LONGACRE JR_JUDGE ROY L•C/11ESA JOHN C.MINNEY,JUDGE CLERM AND ADOWNISTRATOR G/THE MICHAEL J.PHELAN-JUDGE ' ' r-• NUNICIPAL COURT March 15, 1983 RICHARD P.CALHOUN.comm t1oNER "= iVED Miki Vohrysek-Bolden Esq. CSAC fnNR 16 193 1100 K Street, Suite 101 Sacramento, Ca. 95815 COLIMIV r.r"ifliStfatof Dear Miki, I have reviewed the two bills you forwarded to me and here are my comments. AB 350-Harris This bill which would change some time requirements related to serving and hearing of motions for summary judgments presents no problems for us. The only possible thing I would question is the absence of any exception for unlawful detainer cases although application of this process to such cases would be rare if ever experienced. AB - 862 - Konnvu This bill would 1) continue provisions for amending small claims cases to reflect legal names of companies and 2) would impose a new method for seeking financial infor- mation from small claims litigants. We have no problem with the -ormer. As to the financial statement form, I must admit that in twenty five years in this business this ranks right near the top_ as one of the most onerous proposals I have ever seen. I sincerely hope that some clear heads will recognize the folly of such an approach. Several years ago the legislature, in its wisdom, sought to make collection of small claims judgments easier by intro- ducing an "asset sheet" requirement into the picture. From what we can determine, the asset sheet (enclosed) which we mail to all judgement debtors has been a complete and laughable failure. In the last year we have had only one judgment creditor report to us that the asset sheet was received from 93 the judgment debtor. As a referee in small claims orders of examination, I question each judgment creditor as to re- ceipt of the asset sheet form and I can attest that none have ever received the completed form from the debtor. This bill deals with the same subject and attempts success via a different route. But that route too is re- plete with procedural pitfalls, lack of knowledge as to real occurrences and, quite probably, infringements of people's rights. Here are some of my observations : 1) The bill anticipates that litigants will submit a financial statement to the court "at the commencement of trial" but in approximately 70% of cases the matter goes by default without the appearance of defendant. What happens in those cases, the invoking of more procedures? 2) By what reasoning can a litigant be required to divulge all his assets (or those of a company or corporation) prior to rendering of judgment? 3) What is to prevent filing of small claims actions as a guise to the true purpose of discovery or harass- ment for whatever other reasons? 4) Attempt to envision the paver handling involved, tickler systems to be implemented, mailings to be made. security controls to be developed, and the onerous acti- vities springing from the failures to comply which in our experienced opinion will be humongous. 5) This bill has the appearance of another set of mechanics which creates another false hope for the judgment creditor and places the court in a bad light because, in the creditor's thinking, we have again failed to cause money to be paid over to him in satisfaction of the judgment. 6) The sanctions for not complying with the provisions of the bill are cited as those in Sec. 708. 170 CCP. That means bench warrants. But the bill restricts sanctions to cases of "willful" failure. Are we to assume then that ` courts are to first issue orders to show cause to determine if the failure to comply was "willful"? Are we prepared for the volume of courtroom and clerk's office activity that will be generated by these procedures? What happened to the old order of examination process which serves the same purpose but limits the activity only to those cases in ,. which collection is an issue? 94 7) Why place this ponderous, demeaning infringement only on small claimants while their countero_ arts in civil against whom huge money judgments have been entered enjoy a different set of rules? 8) Does the state really want to spend the amount of money that this process is going to entail? It's not just forms, it's clerical time, judge's time, postage costs, etc. , etc? Wouldn't a small dollar expenditure be more eff- ective at the front end, i.e. , educating the public on the zealities of collecting small claims judgments? erely, Roy L. Chiesa, Clerk-Administrator RLC:j lm t 9Z5 MUNICIPAL COURT, SMALL CLAWS DIVISION, WUNUT CREEK-DANVILLE JUDICIAL DWOKT COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CAUFORNIA 60 YGM00 VAUEY ROAD WMNW CO K,CALIF.90% (415)935-6378 CASE NO. S.C. 1 PLAINTIFF(Name and address) DEFENDANT(NrM and addraas of NCIr) L JUDGMENT DEBTOR'S STATEMENT OF ASSETS The ludgmert debtor In this small claims case Is the person (or business) who lost the case and owes money to 'he winner The winner of the case is the judgment creditor TO THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR: The small claims court has decided you owe money to the judgment creditor. 1 Unless you pay. appeal or move to vacate, you must fill out this form and send it to the person who won the case within 35 days atter the Notice of Entry of Judgment is mailed to you by the clerk. 2 If you tale an appeal or a Mot:on to Vacate. you do not need to till out this form unless you lose your appeal or mot!on to .acate Then you will have 30 days to pay or complete this form and deliver it to the judgment Creditor. IF YOU F:-:: TO DO SO YOU MAY HAVE TO GO ,O COURT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS OR THE COURT CAN IMPOSE PENALTIES ON YOU It you were s-ec! as an :nd�v:dual skip this bcx and begin with no. L below. Otherwise. check the applicable box, attach the dccuments indicated and complete no. ;2 on the reverse. a (Cor:�orat:on or partnership) Attached to this form Is a statement describing the nature. value and exact location of all assets of the corporation or the partners. and a statement showing that the person signing this form .s authorized!o submit this form on,behalf of the corporation or partnership. b.` (Gove•nmental agency) Attached to this form :s the statement of an authorized representative of the agency as to whey the agency will pay the judgment and any reasons for its failure to do so. EMPLOYMENT 1 What is your occupation? 2 Name and address of your business or employer: 3 How often are you paid7 a. f_-daily =weekly ;every two weeks (]twice a month CDmonthly =other(explain) 4 What :s your gross pay each pay period?5. 5 What is your take home pay each pay period?S 6 It your wife or husband earns any income give the name and address o1 the business or employer (Continued on reverse) Fpm approved o)me _ --- JUDGMENT DEBTOR'S - - - - — E�iactne.W uanca,9e1N STATEMENT OF ASSETS Q SC-13ASI) (S#"LL CIMS) .roc.Car.S+i)i9(to) v 6 CASH.BANK DEPOSITS 7. How much money do you have in cash? S S. How much other money do you have in hanks. savings and bans. credit unions and other financial institutions either in your own name or jointly(list)- Name and address of financial institution Account number Individual or joint? Balance a. s b. S C. s PROPERTY 9. List all automobiles.other vehicles and boats owned in your name or jointly Legal owner if different Make and year Value from registered owner Amount owed a. S S b. 5 $ C. S $ d. S S 10 List all real estate owned in your name or jointly: Address of real estate Fair market value Amount owed a. S S b. S $ OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY[Do not list household furniture and furnishings.appliances.or clothing.] 11. List anything of value not listed above owned in your name or jointly: Description Value Address where property is located a. S b. $ C. S d. $ e. S t. $ g. $ J h. $ i. $ j. $ 12. 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the toregoing.inckWing any attach- ments,is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on(date): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . at(place):. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Type or print nwo) -- Mono") Mail or deliver this a mpkted Perm to the ilr lnmt aediter at the address sMw ea the NO=N ENry ei,hl/j mW �= BOARD OF SUPERV� AS r `/' / �•,j� vow: M. G. Wingett, County Administrator C4crft DATi: April 1, 1983 Comity smizcT: Legislation--AB 443 (D. Brown) ADCC I r I C MMULST(S) a IMCO WMMAT I aN(s) • NACKOIK MO MUD JUST I r I CAT ICN Adopt a position of opposition to AB 443 BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: Assemblyman Dennis Brown of Long Beach has introduced AB 443. Under current law, neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable for injury caused by the failure to make an arrest or by the failure to retain an arrested person in custody. AB 443 would make both the County and the individual employee liable for death or physical injury caused by a person who is on parole, probation, or who has been granted a temporary release of any kind. This could lead courts to substantially expand the liability of public employees to the point that it would discourage ever releasing anyone from jail. County Counsel 's opinion on AB 443 is attached. AB 443 is set to be heard in the Assembly Criminal Law and Public Safety Committee on April 20. We urge that your Board oppose AB 443. CONT INtMO ON ATTACMMM TMS f 1 ONATI ME: IMCOMMNDAT 1 OJ OF COUNTY ADMIN 1 STIMTOR — IMCCIOCHI AT 1 ON OF ARD CO W I TTEE X APPWOVE OTHOt. S I ONATNIt S : ACTION OF 110M CN; tA)A,,WJ3 m tow= As �— 98 ",O'�T °W Vim 1 I MMY COITI/Y V MT WIi 18 A 11116 = 11UAPt1101i (A IR �� AM C IVIECT OMr CI Al ACTIM TMON AM OafMIED SOU "a 111NuTIi Cr 11i SOIAM ATIM: N�:: 4W yRylsolls ON 11M OAT! 1040101. AAOTAIN ATTESTSD Cz: County Administrator a.m. aLsvl. Mum aim me County Counsel Ot arrlCle eOOCc v 116 ODAM Probation Officer Sheriff-Coroner Assemblymen D. Brown• B. Sher;" �, Z��'='' l�� •� Baker, Bates (via SAD) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Ilk raw: M. G. Wingett, County Administrator Caft DATs: April 1 , 1983 Q9a C*^ xMiECT• Legislation--SB 930 SNKC I i 1 C RMCST(S) Ot REC 0@t14OAT 1 OH(s 1 • SAOO NI Mp sm JUST I I I CAT IOi Adopt a position of opposition to SB 930 (Keene) BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: Under existing law, a defendant in a civil action may be liable for punitive damages in specified circumstances. SB. 930 would provide that when such a judgment becomes final, 25% of the punitive damages in excess of $10,000 shall be paid to the State and deposited in the Court Salaries Fund. Salaries of Superior and Municipal Court Judges would be paid from this fund until exhausted and thereafter from the State General Fund. However, each year the Department of Finance would calculate the amount of State General Fund money used in the prior calendar year for Judges' salaries. The County would be required to reimburse the State for this total amount out of existing fines and forfeitures. This would have the effect of increasing the County's net cost for Judges' salaries from the current 15% to 100% of any amount not covered by the punitive damages assessment. This is clearly another cost shift from the State to local government and must be opposed. CONT 1 Nt ED ON ATTACMiNT: VIM S 1 QNAT we: RECOM MT1ON Or COUNTY ADMIN1STRATOt — 9[C0Ai10AT1=4 Or SONO COMtTRE i 1 QW►TM2E _ j^ ACT 1 OV OF SDARO ON: AI'rROVRO am mot volt: or wupoev1� 1 "=MY COITI/Y MAT W118 10 A IMM , , 1�NAN 1IOIi (QIIS[Nf, �� AM CvrISCT OWW OF IIII ACTION TASN AM OMMD Or US IIINUMS Or M Somo AM89OrT� AiTA1N AIOss: CWSII>ERVISOi ON 11S SHIN SON. ��, / Bf3 aAT@< gmp a : County Administrator � �.R. � =wry a,oetrrto Superior Court Administrator - WCarslC/o dwc v ws monleo Senator Keene (via CAO) ����.,��,,►,QQ �� -� 99 Senator Petri s (via CAO) /� ��'L�,(Ll�(�.�.t>t, CSAC or (� .00pu" 9044D OF SUPERVISORS = COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR calm Costa DATE: April /2 , 1983 Cotirty sIHJECT: Senate Bill 888 (Robbins) wr6c 1 r 1 c REauc sT m ca RE cC**CP yAT 1 ON(s) a lAcKa cuND AND .NiT i r 1 cAT 1 ai Opposition of Senate Bill 888 (Robbins) This Bill proposes to remove expenditures for construction of interstate highways from the county minimum allocation requirements. Under existing law, 70% of available highway construction funds are to be distributed on the basis of population and state highway miles among California's 58 counties. Because a majority of the money is federal aid of the interstate, nine counties (including Contra Costa) are well above their minimum entitlements, and 47 counties are below their minimum entitlements. At the outset, county minimums were recognized as a controversial issue when Senate Bill 215 was being considered by the Legislature in 1981. The inherent problem with county minimums is that the highway construction program is basically a federal program. More than 84% of capital outlay in the 5 year fund estimate are federa —do"ars. Of that amount, 74% are interstate funds that may be spent only in counties that have interstate mileage. SB-888 by Senator Robbins was introduced at the request of the Los Angeles County Trans- portation Commission, because of large expenditures proposed for completion of the Century Freeway Project (in excess of 2 billion dollars). L.A. County is one of the nine counties in the State of California that exceed their minimum entitlements under the county minimum provision. Changing the allocation formula (by removing interstate completion projects) will not create any new money, and therefore new projects in Contra Costa County (or any other surplus county). The Board of Supervisors believes that SB-888 fails to offer solutions to the overall problem (shortage of revenue) and that the problems created by the county minimum provisions of SB-215 should be addressed in conjunction with a comprehensive evaluation of transpor- tation financing in the State of California. wrg:sb888bdord.t4 CONTINUM ON ATTACMIENT: _ VES =1�JW1TMtE: REcommmmT 1 oN of CouNrry mw i m I sTRATm REccmwNcAT I aI of samo COMI TTEE APPROVE OTTER: S 1 GNATIME IS 1: cza ACTION oP �o+lllo al: APPRorED ws R[OOMl1HN0 anew__ VOTE of mtIPoeVl>oIi 1 "MDT CINTIPY V MT THIS 18 A 7Ike X WAN110�i (Aasc�It �� AM CO CT GWY or AN ACTION TAIEN AND 04 �0 aN M NINIMW dI M @ARO AYES: /H<f: or VOIV1aO1: a" We OAT[ SHOW. ARfIN! AaiTA 1 N cc: ATTlSTICp dao /.?� 10,41? County Administrator J.R. Ca dWK &qo Public Works Director oc WFIC10 CUNK °r TWIT 11"M County Legislation (via CAO) • x BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - �*0i'= M.G. Wingett r lra SATE- April 12, 1983 �cog•, SUBJECT: Board Support of AB 647 - Attorneys' Fees @ QYJV NEC 1 F 1 C REOWtST(S I CM RE CCROCH AT 1 O4(s) • aA04O1OI01W AND JU ST I F I CAT 1 ON Support the •passage of AB 647 (Bradley) dealing with attorneys' fees. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION The County Administrator and the County Counsel recommend to the Board of Supervisors the support of AB 647 (Bradley) that would authorise the County to collect attorneys' fees when it successfully defends the County in public interest law suits. Under current law the County can be obligated to pay attorneys' fees but has no authority to collect attorneys' fees when it prevails. CONTINUED a ATTACWCNT: ,�. YES s1MATURE: .A- RECOMM4ENDAT 1 ON OF COUNTY ADMIN 1 STRATOI! RECOAiNDAT 1 O4 Or BOARD COMMITTEE -X- APPROVE OMR S 1 GNI►TURE S � � '�. ACTION Or BOARD ON• ���A -'� �Z ,/9�3 APPROV[D As MCCOMADMD Ong* VOTE OF sy'Oev I sma 1 "tIMSY CMIRT I FY TMT 7f/l s 18 A TWAX UNAN1INXX (ASSENT AND "' CCT GWY CW AN ACTIOI T&Wm AYES: "IMS: AM MWIT ;O ON M MI"L"ES OI M NDARD AbSCW ANSTA I N OF SIL04MV 101M ON M DA1t 01 OW. Cc: County Counsel ATTWT= dwuza /r1 1-i Assemblyman Bill Bradley J.R• asp. ODUWVV CLOW MDA D 41tgislative Delegation (via CAO) sx 0"IC16 CLOW Or wt 20Mu1D county Administrator 101 10/j MY je &&CZW— - 10aft v BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MOM: M.G. Wingett Cmtrd ZATr: April 12, 1983 C oga SUNJECT: Redevelopment Law Reform SPCC t r 1 C REOUCST(S) C" RCCCb*4CFC%AT I ON 1 s) o SACKCROCM AND JUST 1 r I CAT iCN Request the Board support passage of SB 617 and the concept of redevelopment law reform that protects the financial interests of the counties. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION The County Administrator recommends that the Board support CSAC sponsored SB 617 that makes various changes in the redevelopment law, and advised the Board that another bill (AB 1545) had been introduced by the League of Cities which also changes redevelopment law, Mr. Wingett recommended that the Board support the CSAC sponsored SB 617 but also support the concept of redevelopment law reform so that the county officials could work with our Legislative Delegation and the County Supervisors Association of California to achieve significant reform to the redevelopment law in a manner that would protect the financial interests of the county and other special districts of the county when cities form and/or expand redevelopment agencies. CON"' Muto ON ATTAC#- I : _ _ yES S I GNATURE: .„X, RC COMB NOAT I oN or CowNry ADM 1 N 1 sTRATOR RECOMwNDAT 1 ON Or soMa CO�MII TTtr _2L APPROVE f O R: s I cavATuec I s ACTION Or WO^It ON: APMOVED AS RCCOM*f MXO, On CR , VOTE Or SUrlmv:SORS ` 1 WPWSY C=RTIrY THAT THIS 1s A TRUC LI NNIWOUS (AMSENTJs: J **NoC.'CMCCT OXY or AN ACTIOi TMOrN AYES: AND CWMMWD ON THE M/NCrMS Or THC MdARD AMS[WT: AMSTAIN Or sCJPCJIVIoms CSV THC DATC 00w. cc: CSAC ATT>zsTCD _ ....G a�3 Legislative Delegation J.R. CLASM cmu4K a„�Am— (via CAO) CX OIrICIO CLEM Or Tim S ^"O my _ A/ � � .oEq,tTY 102 .: I Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS M.G. Wingett Untm DATE: April 12, 1985 Coga SUBJECT: SB 747 - City-County Contracts @ C*^ SPCC I r I C OCC t ST I S P OPI RCC OM04C DAT I ON I S a SAC CW#C1UAp AF= JUST I r l CAT I ON Adopt a position of support of SB 747 which authorizes counties to collect bath direct and indirect costs, subject to negotiated approval of the cities, for services county provides under contract to cities. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION The County Administrator recommends Board support of SB 747 that would amend existing law which provides for only additional costs to be charged in city-county contracts by making it permissive for indirect costs to be included, subject to negotiation with the cities. The County Administrator recommends that this is a more appropriate vehicle for negotiating city-county contracting arrangements. CONTINUED ON ATTACISQ"JVT: YES S 1 GNATUIRE: Y..._ RECOP.SENCATION Or COUNTY A=MINISTRATOR _ RCcOmHENWATION Or WARD C04MITTCC X APPROVE OTHER: S i GNATUIRC J S / ACTION Or SOARD ON: If P-3 Apm-a-E= As RECOMamco Orwit VOTE Of BRAMMVIS1".PlS 1 SY C'MTIPY ?"AT THIS IS A TRUAE . UNAN i M A ("WENTi � AND CORRECT ODPY Or AN ACT 1 ON TAIQN Ayes: s&-) AND ChITIQEO ON M MINUTES TES Or THE •DAR= ASftT1T �` ASSTAiN or SLWWtV1 ON TW OAT! WWM. AND County Legislative PCN. Cato#" CLOW Delegation ax C FICIO CLOW 4W M 2DA*O _By �(�� �l7 , .�1/l}- r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS M. G. Wingett, County Administrator Coft IMAIM: April 6, 1983 suejarr: Marshal's office Personnel Transactions @ prat eric WCOULST(s) Opt "9=04CMATION(s) & SACKGMXM AND MOST 11,1CAT ION After review of the personnel transactions involving an attempt to rehabil- itate and place a Sergeant Marshal in a clerical position, that the Board allow stand the creation of a Deputy Marshal in lieu of a Deputy Clerk II approved on March 15, 1983. BACKGROUND: Following a heart attack in 1981, Sergeant Marshal in the Bay Municipal Court District agreed to a rehabilitation plan which would have allowed him to serve in a clerical position which would be less strenuous. Through a series of personnel transactions, a Deputy Marshal position was cancelled and a Clerk position created to facilitate this rehabil- itation plan. Following bypass surgery in 1983, the employee's physician and the County's Rehabilitation Program Coordinator agreed that the Sergeant could not work in the clerical position. To reestablish the staffing pattern that existed previously, we recommended, and your Board approved, the reestablishment of a Deputy Marshal position in lieu of a Deputy Clerk II. The personnel transactions relating to this are outlined in the attachment. After taking action on this matter, Supervisor McPeak requested that the matter be again placed on the agenda for reconsideration by the Board. To insure that departments are encouraged to work out appropriate rehabil- itation plans for disabled employees, it is important that they not be penalized for attempts which are unsuccessful. Consequently, we urge the Board to retain the staffing pattern that existed prior to the Sergeant's heart attack. The permanent position of Deputy Marshal will be held vacant because of the personnel freeze, although as indicated in the attachment, a temporary Marshal has been undertaking these duties since January, 1982. CONTINUM ON ATTACHMENT: _X_ YES X I ONATLIPM: re X rtccawwNDATicN or couwy ADM iNjxTmTm vmccmwNDATiaN or APPMW OTHM: ACTION or @CMD ON: Aril 12 i83 APMOVED AS vers or girmV18=0 "MBY C=TIPT 7MT T0418 18 A IWIX ~INOW (AIIWNT I AM CONSCR QWW OF AN ACTION TAPOM AM: 99*8:�„__„ AM WWIWWD and Im HINU"M or TM Mum Anv4T:, AWTAIN CW SUPMV1111OW CIN IM IIIAM 040111N. cc: Co. Administrator ATTZW= Bay Marshal J.R. VIIAMON. MUNTY CI. W jM_ Personnel Director 09 4"ICID CLOK W US 000AD 104 " 94a d- , saftmv Personnel Transactions Involved in Attempted Rehabilitation of Sergeant Hamm Employed By Bay Municipal Court Marshal 10/81 thru 3/83 Bay Municipal Court Marshal (A) (B) (C).' Sergeant Deputy Marshal Temporary Deputy Marshal 10/81 Position encumbered; g ai in Wor n Hi.g er eTmporary Deputy (Following Hamm drawing 1 yr. 4850 Classification to cover Marshal hired 1/82 to Heart Attack) Labor Code Benefits. Sgt. Hamm's position. take duties of (B) . 1/1/82 -- Countywide Marshal Consolidation Takes Effect -- 1/82 -------- Steps are taken by involved departments to rehabilitate Sgt. Hamm in a classification to that will not be dangerous to Sgt. Hamm's health. A plan is approved by Sgt. Hamm's doctor 9/22 and Jean Haskell (Rehabilitation Program Coordinator) ; sends Sgt. Hamm to training. (A) (B) (C) Process Clerk Deputy Marshal Deputy Clerk II Add 1 position and Cancel 1 position as off- �(see ol position vacant 10-19-82 promote Deputy Clerk II. set to add a Process (A) ) for placement (Concord Office M r. ) Clerk. tof Sgt. Hamm. 2/83 -- Sgt. Hamm undergoes bypass surgery and plans to rehabilitate him are cancelled. 3/83 -- Board is asked to reverse process initiated by P-300 action on 10/19/82. (A) (B) (C) Deputy Marshal Deputy Clerk II Temporary Deputy Marshal 3/83 Add position to replace Cancel 1 position^to Terminate F.T. Deputy position cancelled offset (A) . This was Marshal - Temporary 110/19/82. held vacant for Sgt. when (A) is filled. Hamm. TSW:1mj CAO=4/5/83 Fj C CJ1 .� �• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Imm Finance Committee Coft coda OATS: March 22, 1983 QY^ SIOJECT: East County Fire Prevention Services SPE C I r I C REOULST(S) OR IW OO MIDW l►T I OU(S) • SACKOKKI O MID .IIiT I/I CATION The Finance Committee recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Riverview Fire Protection District to provide certain fire protection services to the East County volunteer fire districts and that the annual cost of the proposed program of $28,000 be funded by an appropriation from the Special District Augmentation Fund to the Riverview Fire Protection District. BACKGROUND The Contra Costa County Fire Service Study (Ryland Report) includes a recom- mendation that the volunteer East County fire districts contract with either Riverview Fire Protection District or Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for the provision of additional levels of certain fire protection services such as plans review, code enforcement inspections, fire investiga- tion, weed abatement, and public education. Accordingly, there have been a series of meetings with the Riverview Fire Protection District, the County Administrator's Office, and the Bethel Island, Brentwood, Byron, and Oakley Fire Protection Districts to determine the interest and feasibility of implementing the Ryland Report proposal. Alternative approaches such as the use of temporary personnel or contract services also were considered. However, it is the opinion of this committee that the proposed arrangement with Riverview Fire Protection District is best in that it will provide uniformity as to applicability of code enforce- ment and the level of services provided within the entire eastern area of the county. The Riverview Fire Protection District has proposed to provide the above mentioned fire prevention services for the named east county fire districts for an annual cost of approximately $28,000; this amount is to be appropri- ated to the Riverview Fire Protection District from the Special District Augmentation Fund. Most of the $28,000 will be used to fund a new position which will allow for the provision of the fire prevention services to the volunteer districts. The program will require that Riverview Fire Protection District maintain monthly activity reports indicating the volume of work activity in each district for distribution to each of the volunteer districts with copies to the Office of the County Administrator. CONTINUED ON ATTACMACNT: ,LX VES S1QNATME: RECOMILNDAT I ON of couNTY ADM 1 N 1!THAT= _ RECOmwNDAT 1 aN OF SDARD CASA 1 TTZE Sla"ATURE ): Sup rvisor T. Torlakson Supervisor S. W. McPeak ACTION OF SOARO CIN: April 11. 1 883 APPROVED AS 11ZCOISa10p _� an=._ VOTE or RlOIVISOIS 1 "=BY CWTIFY 7MT IMIS IS A TDIX X III MM COrlSCT COPY as IMI ACTIOI1 TAMN IM WWMKO Or Tia MINNRS OI 1St SOARO AYti: Nncs: A or yp�V IS 11 Or M OAI9 0A 1. ASSlNT: wSSTA1N wrnstso �3 Ax: Riverview F.P.D. J.W. ��. ' Caufft �� &1WCounty Auditor-Controller oc orrlelo errollc 4Wws nowllO County Administrator SY .asrurY 106 s 2. Initially, not all of the volunteer districts will utilize all of the services offered by Riverview Fire Protection District. Accordingly, ' subsequent to the approval of the program by the Board of Supervisors, cooperative agreements will be worked out between Riverview Fire Protection District and each individual volunteer district for the provision of such fire prevention services as may be desired. w_ .10 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 T ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTMENT 01 OIGANIZAT111 BRIT: Riverview Fire Protection District ORGANIZATION SUI-OBJECT 2. FIXER ASSET OBJECT OF EXPENSE It FIXED ASSET ITEM NI, TITf OECAEAf> INCREASE 7200 1011 Permanent Salaries $28,000 7200 6301 Reserve for Contingencies $28,000 7200 6301 Appropriable New Revenue $28,000 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER To provide staff for fire prevention services /6/ to be performed for east county fire protection By: Doti districts. COUNT ADMINIS OR ` By: t• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson NO: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder on "2/83 83 � n J.R. OLSSON, CLERK 4. lam- /Wett [I�MATY[[ TITLE L�GATE By: � �`' �� �tV1Q �• PnIP11ATI1N A POO / 2 AIJ. JIN1Yl 11. (M 129 Raw. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTION• ON REVERSE SIDE 1108 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C a4 Otittl2�Tttt ttlT: ' iccoctT co/Itc I.IEFAITIEIT 01 Riverview Fire Protection District tcutlt+tict tErE11E L tErEtoE OESc111T1o� I191EcS1 </EttEAs� WINIT 7200 9591 County Aid to Special Districts $28,000 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REOUEST AUDITO�jR�CONTROLLER' p ey: -----�- To appropriate supplemental allocation from the Special District Augmentation Fund for COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR fire prevention services to be performed for l (� .By: Dot• east county fire districts. ��" (1M� /6 - SO-RD OF SUPERVISORS YES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson 4/1?/8 No: None Dol. - . ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder TR. OLSSoN. CLERK D- Br: &10191 AN. RAOO �cotut i�. (N 1171 T/77� ' 103 TIME BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY9 CALIFORNIA April 12, 1983 Adopled this Order On . by thfi IONOff h wow: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. SUBJECT: Ray Lehmkuhl General Plan Amendment Request, Walnut Creek Area As requested by Ray Lehmkuhl and as recommended by the Director of Planning in his memorandum of April 4, 1983, the Board authorizes a review of the County General Plan and public hearings as necessary before the County Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. 1 hwebyau ft that fhb b a wmandooeere awaf M aetl I taken and antand on On•ekoft of In llowd of Supra on Ow def rwwn. ATTESTED: J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLOW and ex offido Clark of ueo 8 d Orig. DW.: Planning cc: Supervisor Schroder County Administrator Ray Lehmkuhl 3397 Mt. Diablo Blvd. , Suite C Lafayette, CA 94549 - 110 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by tw W11owing vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: taw Day Week IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that May 1 , 1983 is herehY declared as "Law Day" in Contra Costa County. IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the week of April 25 through May 1 . 1983 is hereby declared as "Law Week" in Contra Costa County. ��el1 aM+lhr tlwt ws r.aw•_ar..n.aa.rn il aw aabn wan and aarad OR rw aha 01 aw Dowd N**Nv m an Mw deb dmft ATTESM: APR 12 1983 ,j.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK OW ex OMCIC Clwk o/Ma Dowd Diana M• �� Orig. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cc: Public Information Officer County Administrator Charles A. Risby, Coordinator, Law Day Week 11:i THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Apri 1 12, 1983 by Vw faftionew voM: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson . NOES: None. ASSENT: :Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Contra Costa Water District/East Bay MunicipalUtil-ity District Merger Study The Board on April 5, 1983 having deferred to this date action on the following recommendation contained in its Water Committee's report relating to the proposed merger of the CCWD and the EBMUD: "3.. The Board authorize the establishedment of an Advisory Committee for the Study if the two Districts decide not to include an Advisory Committee as part of the Study. The Advisory Committee would report to the Water Committee." Supervisor S. W. McPeak having noted that the recommendation was no longer an appropriate matter for consideration by this Board; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Recommendation No. 3 from the April 5, 1983 Water Committee Report is TABLED. �t�.n�r..rwyu+aR ttits r.trwaMaw�aataa/Daf M1 aCt10f1 t.kM1 M1d MMMrd M M.���� owd of supwdwn on Ow do*dWw• ATMOTM: APR 12 =1 J.R.OLSSON,COVNTY CUM and ex GWk d so 111 id DOW pi�ta'M.Nim�an Orifi. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cc: Public Works Director County Administrator 112 • /• S� Tc: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 1190"= M. G. Wingett, County Administrator calm Cnsua oATE: April 1, 1983 C*y 15WWJECT: Public Health Steering Committee--Expenses SPEC 1 r 1 C MCQUEST(S) OR REOOMPCHDAT 1 Or(s) • SACICOIOXM AND JUST 1 N'I CAT I OI Authorize the Auditor-Controller to pay actual and necessary expenses for members of the Public Health Steering Committee appointed by the Board on March 8, 1983 upon presentation of an appropriate- demand approved by the Health Services Department. BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: On March 8, 1983, the Board of Supervisors formed a Public Health Steering Committee, appointed eight members to the Committee, and approved the charge to the Committee. At the time .the Committee was formed, payment of actual and necessary expenses were not specifically authorized. Because some members are traveling some distance to meetings of the Committee, and are otherwise donating their time to serve on the Committee, payment of actual and necessary expenses seems appropriate. CONTINUED oN ATTAC69401IT: KS s1ONATUIE: REcawcNDAT 1 cN of CouNTY ADMIN 1 sTRATcot — mr6com mDAT 1 OH or BOARD cOMM l TTEC AI pvtwE O SIl' ZZ OIATUtE s l#: ACTION of BOARD Or: �Z AIVRpVSD As �� wTE OF surotvlsaRs t HSRcstr C=TI/T "AT THIS Is A Tma /YIANIMDIAf (A/sitR ) AND QlrOCT CWV o< AN ACTIOI TAIQN AND rIMO, Oil TM MINLMKS 0/ M BOARD AYES: fps: OMOr amyls Or THE oATs 11040111N.AsflM�� A�iTA1N cc: County Administrator ATTsST= � �a I If13 Auditor-Controller a�' aotam Cort AmO Oc o Health Services Director r►Ic/o e>Lawc ar THs ■oweD Gordon Soares, Health Svcs. 1 1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS V11014'. Finance Committee co" oATt: March 21, 1983 C*^ sMJ[CT: Assessment of Fee for County Solid Waste Enforcement Program unc 1 s 1 c RAQUEST(s) at R cowdc Mir I ON(s) a NAOUIOIOW AM JUBT 1 F I CATION The Finance Committee recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve, and the Chair, Board of Supervisors, be authorized to execute an agreement with waste disposal site operators for the payment of $90,000 to finance the county solid waste enforcement program in fiscal year 1982-1983; the parties thereto have approved the agreement with the understanding that the fee to be negotiated for county enforcement in fiscal year 1983-1984 shall not exceed $90,000. BACKGROUND Government Code Section 66796.20 authorizes the County to collect fees or other charges from each operator of a solid waste facility in the County for the purpose of financing the solid waste enforcement program. The amount of such fee and the method of collection have been the subject of a number of meetings between the solid waste facility operators and staff of the County Health Services Department. The county objective has been to recoup the cost of the enforcement program through imposition of a fee. Considerable study has been devoted to enforcement activities and their cost. As a result, the Health Services Department has implemented revisions to enforcement procedures which have reduced costs substantially. The staff of the Health Services Department has advised. that as a result the cost of the enforcement program has been reduced to $90,000 and that it will be monitored to remain within this level for both fiscal years 1982-1983 and 1983-1984. Therefore, the operators of the solid waste sites in the county were requested to pay to the county the estimated total cost of the enforcement program for the 1982-1983 fiscal year of $90,000. The distribution of the total cost between the three operators at their request was left to the operators. CMT INUM ON ATTAC004IM' r!f s 1 ONAT ME: _ RECO MMOAT1Od of CoUNTT AOMtN1sTRATOR YZL R9COKMDAT1ON/Or NOMID COA11TI[E _XX. 4000111"Wr 510"Tutc(s): Supervisor T. Torlakson Supervisor S. W. McPeak ACTION or IMM" am: April 12. 1983000� APPRwso AN IleOcwN�so _� olf�lt_— VDTs or s INEWIS M 1 NNEW CNRTIrV THAT vans Is A Ims Y�MM11010 IYN[uR II� ASO oONtCT oa/Y OF AN ARIM Ti IWI Nl MUD OI M Vino" Or M @DMO Ate: Am or st/qlVls QI us 9M19 I>AI. A0N04T: ANSTAIN ec: health Services Director ATVMBTm ag- Aa.. County Counsel J'R' 416� CUMK Aye County Auditor-Controller oc anlclo dwc • wit snlln0 - 114 County Administrator Acme Fill Corp, • � �°�'�— C.C. Solid Vaate, Inc. •��*�► Richmond Sanitary Service TME BOARD OF $MRYI�ORs CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AdopW this�f on April 12, 1983 by the p vcft: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: Clone ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder SUBJECT. Dissolution of Lafayette Neighborhood Preservation Committee The City of Lafayette has requested dissolution of the Lafayette Neighborhood Preservation Committee. The Director of Planning recommends that the dissolution be approved and that certificates of commendation be issued to the following persons: Agnes Brockway Robert Headley Ann Gimbel 101 Lafayette Circle #1 1008 Willow Drive 3557 O'Connor Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 Ken Graunstadt James Peacock Charlotte Lescure 760 Old Jonas Hill Road P.O. Box 38 863 Moraga Road Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 Susan Renno Ann Davis Tom Thomas 3320 Moraga Boulevard 101 Lafayette Circle 3512 Moraga Blvd. Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations are APPROVED. MwebyeeNW WMrsisatrueandeonwicopyof im action taken ar•i' .: ".'. tno minuet of f.1 AOard of Scp3• ­'e shoran. J.R. __--RK and ax., ._.,, w -mac.- . Daiputy Orifi. DOW Planning CV. City of Lafayette NPC Members County Administrator 115 To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IOC1: Finance Committee C40rft SATs: March 21, 1983 C ^ GMJECT: Assessment of Fee for Solid Waste Management Services Performed by the Public Works Department ![C 1 F 1 C RMULST I f) Ci WOODOG i0AT 1 Or l s) • NMOCOIO ND AM JUST 1 r I CAT ICI The Finance Committee recommends that staff develop an agreement with solid waste disposal site operators which will require payment of $50,000 in fiscal year 1983-1984 to cover the cost of solid waste management--exclusive of recycling efforts--as estimated by the Public Works Department. It is also recommended that County Counsel be directed to prepare legislation to clarify the law to expressly allow for imposition of fees upon either disposal site operators or collectors or both to cover the cost to maintain and administer the solid waste plan. BACKGROUND The proposal by the Solid Waste Commission that the county impose a fee pursuant to the provisions of AB 3302 and AB 3433 on solid waste operators to recoup the cost of solid waste management was referred on November 9, 1982 to the Finance Committee. After considerable discussion with Mr. George Gordon, Attorney, representing Acme Filland staff of the Public Works Department and the Office of County Counsel, it was apparent that the imple- menting legislation should be clarified to expressly provide the county can impose a proposed fee considered to be the most reasonable, equitable, and cost-effective; namely, to impose a fee on the disposal site operators. Inasmuch as it will require some time to obtain the necessary legislation to impose the desired fee, it is recommended in the interim that staff of the Public Works Department be directed to develop an agreement whereby a total of $50,000 will be paid by the disposal site operators in fiscal year 1983-1984 for the cost of solid waste management. After careful analysis, the Public Works Department has determined that this amount accurately reflects the cost of the solid waste management program which appropriately should be recovered. CONT INLZD Or ATTACMMPff: - Y[f S 1 ONAT RE _ 011ECOWCNOAT1Or OF COUNTY AOMIN1STIIATM ,GXL RECOKNOAT1ON OF 801MO 03MITTU XX �E -1-117 r mC �/Ili, s1ONATLM s : Supervisor T. TOrlakson Supervisor S. W. McPeak ACTION OF SOARO Or: Avril 12- 1993 A�Rwso As VO'm OF !«y'� 1 M PIMY C TIPT 7 MT INIS 18 A 7WX X 1NAN11011 ArlNf III & IITj AM CQ CT OXY Or AN ACTION TAION Alio O MUD O1 M NIOR R>i Or M ROIARD AY@: N1Nf: Or 10LORM I!ONIS ON TNI! OAIK MOMN. Aasa� _ wssTwlN _ AT�TasTNm - /t / f-3 cc: Public Works Director County Counsel a arrlc/o dawc ar couwf M moo` 116 Health Services Director County Administrator ��� THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by Use Following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Public Forum on Proposed State Block Grants Supervisor McPeak having noted that the Governor's proposed Budget for 1983-1984 would combine some existing public health, alcohol and drug programs into two State block grants, and having suggested that, prior to the Board taking a position on the proposed block grants, a public forum be provided to receive input from concerned sectors of the community; and On the recommendation of Supervisor McPeak, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Human Services Advisory Commission is REQUESTED to undertake the sponsorship of a public forum on the proposed State block grants and their relationship with recently enacted federal block grants and to submit a recommendation thereon for the Board's consideration. �r„r,��►c«wr rnr air r a avaardoonraoo/t►ef an salon ftWn sed warm on w atiwws d Me Board or Supwyiora an w.dr.&Wm ATTESTED: %2, ZV JAL OLSSON. COUNTY CLERK .and ex ON06 C1W*o/Mie fiord by gt�g= DOW CC: Supervisor McPeak County Administrator Health Services Director Chair, Human Services Advisory Commission Chair, Alcoholism Advisory Board Chair, Drug Abuse Board Jane McCoy, Staff, Alcoholism and Drug Boards Genelle Lemon, Acting Chief, Public Health Programs Chair, Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Advisory Board Norma Kruse, Chief, CCS Program v - 117 TME BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisor Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None• ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None• SUBJECT: Availability of Contra Costa Health Plan to Employees of James Bartneck dba Diablo Hitch and Trailer The Executive Director, Contra Costa Health Plan, having advised the Board that James Bartneck dba Diablo Hitch and Trailer wishes to make the Contra Costa Health Plan available to his employees; and The Board having considered the recommendations of the Director, Health Services Department, regarding approval of Health Plan Service Agreement #29-712 with James Bartneck dba Diablo Hitch and Trailer, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said Health Plan Service Agreement is hereby APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the Health Plan Service Agreement as follows: Number: 29-712 Group: James Bartneck dba Diablo Hitch and Trailer Term: April 15, 1983 through April 30, 1984 l husbr eat tbat thk k atnwsndeonrele Wef an sc""taken r-nd entered on the ndrmn a ow Dowd of',upwv.' .-t zn L%e ga.,Q sho+ m ATTESTED: Wa9a", ./ 1IM 3 J.R.OLSSOrl,COUNTY CLERK and OR oM'o QWk of Yw Hoard 9 r.. Orig. Dept-: Health Services Dept./CGU cc' County Administrator Auditor-Controller Contractor SH:ta � - 118 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Judy Ann Miller, Director Department of Manpower Programs costa •• April 12, 1983 KWMCT: AUTHORIZING ATTENDANCE OF PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL CHAIR AT "PARTNERSHIP III CONFERENCE" acct F I C I1colssT(s) Co IaNI(s l a sACKWKWIW AM itArrI r I CATICH That the Board AUTHORIZE Bob Mimiaga, Contra Costa County Private Industry Council (PIC) Chair, to attend the "Partnerships III Conference" sponsored by U.S. Conference of Mayors and Atlantic Richfield Company, to be held on April 26, 27, and 28, 1983, in Long Beach, California. This conference will focus on areas of joint partnerships between the public and private sector, and techniques of implementation, i.e., the public/private partnership role in combating unemployment, matching the needs of the current and future employment market with education and training opportunities, local partnership problem solving and discussion, community and economic development. Mr. Mimiaga's attendance at this conference will further the County's ability to formulate plans for a joint effort to meet the needs of Contra Costa County' s unemployed. A Travel Request for Mr. Mimiaga is attached. Costs for this trip are 100% federally funded. CONT I Nt1ED ON ATTACIslNT: _ Tis *I SNATURE: RtCOWMDATION OF COYNTV ADMINISTRATOR MCOWCR44TIA OF NOARD COM1ITTii APPROVE _ O 1CHAT M 11 44. ACTION OF SOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON: 0109dAZ /90 APPROVED AS RECOIMNMO OTMR VOTt or supow i scm 1 MIKSY C WTIFY TMT THIS Is A TWM MMNIWX1W 1AssWT _� AND CO CT CCVV CF AN ACTION TAISI AYW NDaf: ANO IMIMD a TK MIN111Rs CW 710 WMA1lD ASQIT: ABSTAIN: CF Sups IsmaAAZ Ci�l700 DATICCc: County Administrator AT IKSWD Q, /9�3 County Auditor-Controller .I•R. dLamm. COIa/T1I mons Private Industry Council AM Q C/FICIO CLi1K CW T10 ■CAND s+r � %'`7 .otrlrmr THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. ' NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF 1983/84 COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM SUBVENTION PROGRAM APPLICATION The Board having received from the County Justice System Subvention Program Coordinator through the County Administrator a report on the Certification of 1983/84 County Justice System Subvention Program Application, dated April 5, 1983, which states that the California Youth Authority through its memorandum of 2/7/83 has provided instructions to counties concerning the requirements for the certification of the 1983/84 County Justice System Subvention Program application; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation from the County Justice System Subvention Program Coordinator and the County Administrator is approved as follows: Certify to the California Youth Authority through this Board Order that 1983/84 County Justice System Subvention Program funds will be spent for the purposes set forth in Subdivision (a) of Section 1806 of welfare and Institutions Code. i�a.syo.�nren.�w.a.aueanaoa�aaAa On setbn taken a.,d ente:ad an tke uumft ,of go NO"of duoonr m an Ow date sten. ATTESTED: 3 J.R. OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK and ss*Maio Clsrh of 0110 Pond .awa► Orig. Dept.: Criminal Justice Agency CO: County Administrator Auditor-Controller 1 ?� J8N ✓ PWITIaM ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No. Date: 4/5/83 Dept. No./ Copers Department Community Services Budggt Uni*E&gv&:Q588 Org. No. 1453 Agency No. 59 rERSONNELQEP -, Action Requested: Allocate classes of Weatherization/k66ORepair Specialist - Project; lead Weatheri zati on/Home Repair Speciali*W lroldftftMerization par rvisor Project; Assessment Assessmen Specialist --Project; and Senior Assessment c--ialM - Project Exempt salary schedule. Propoi-ed Effective Date: Explain why adjustment is needed: Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes [] No [] Estimated cost of adjustment: S Cost is within department's budget: Yes Q No [] If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to b funded Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. L Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. /C ' or partment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: y -- - X-3 Establish the following classes and allocate them to the salary levels as follows: Weatherization/Home Repair Specialist - Project, Salary Level H5 884 (1212-1337) Lead Weatherization/Home Repair Specialist - Project, Salary Level H2 026 (1265-1538) Weatherization/Home Repair Supervisor - Project, Salary Level H2 166 (1455-1768) Assessment Specialist - Project, Salary Level H2 026 (1265-1538) Senior Assessment Specialist - Project, Salary Level H2 166 (1455-1768) These classes are not exempt from overtime. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: ;9 day following Board action. E) � - 6 A,, ate or rector Sonne County Administrator Recommendation �,3 Date: Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel t) Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 13 Other: for County Administrator Board of Supervisors Action Adjustment APPROVE 0/012MAWD on APR 12 1%3 J.R. O1 County Clerk Date: APR 121983 gy; APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M 6/82 121 •.�� ) N 3 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQKST Date: 2/4/83 Dept. NWitf*. , c.. Copers Department Health Services/Public Budget o4 oC4 Org:-'No. Agency go 54 Health Action Requested: J niv-PnrTiNE: Establish the class of Public Health Program Specialist I and allocate it to level #H2-631 of the sic salary aTiedUe Propose ffective ate: Explain why adjustment is needed: to accomplish reconstitution of the existing P.H. Program Specialist class (see attached aemo Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes [] No [ Estimated cost of adjustment: S 0 (to establish Cost is within department's budget: Yes [3 No [] " U"NIX onlyY If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are t;hilbto be Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. gay rsonnel Services Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. Afint- (for) rtment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: Establish the class of Public Health Program Specialist I and allocate it to Level H2 631 of the basic salary schedule, (2316-2815) This class is exempt from overtime. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: j day following Board action. �j ate or ect ersonne County Administrator Recommendation Date: vloelrs A Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel +' D Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel G Other: Ufo,�County r n'tAdministrator Board of Supervisors Action APR 12 183 Adjustment APPROVEDIDtfi MRSM on J.R. Olsson, County Clerk Date: APR 12 1%3 By, _ APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M6/82 122 1-43 • POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No. / Date: 2/4/83 PERSORKEL Dept. No./ a�r �p Copers Department Health Services/Public Budget UnitEso O�rg. ' Agency No. 5 Action Requested: Revise and retitle the class of Public Health Progra_s_ Specialist to Public Health gran SpecUalez Proposed Effective Date: Explain why adjustment is needed: to acemplish reconstituting of the existing P.H. Program Specialist class (see attached Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No Estimated cost of adjustment: Saglablisli Cost is within department's budget: Yes © No class only) If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be fu Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Ray Phi1+i noel Services Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. or artment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: y S -fi'3 Revise and retitle the class of Public Health Program Specialist to Public Health Program Specialist II, Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104). This class is exempt from overtime. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule., as described above. Effective: ® day following Board action. D4ate o r o ersonne County Administrator Recommendation Date: `� E 3 Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel D Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel Q Other: for CountyAdministrator' Board of Supervisors Action Adjustment APPROVED/ on APR 1 z 1983 J.R. Olsson, County Clerk Date: APR 121983 By; APPROVAL •OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M6/82 123 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No. Date: 3/28/83 Depit:4:. V E L 6395 Copers Department Health Services/A/DAME Bupget Un30 it No. 540/6900 Org. No. 6�_ Agency No. �` Action Requested: Decrease hours of vacant fu31-'Mime occupational Therapist sition (org. o ; . pos on 5 FTE 20 to org. . Proposed Effective Date: /13/83 Explain why adjustment is needed: ROUTINE ACTION: To provide fun time R.N. co"rage on Psychiatric Unit; to reduce Me nours or Occupationalerap coverage at at -_ orge er WEst. Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes ❑ No 13 Estimated cost of adjustment: s Cost is within department's budget: Yes No ❑ If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be funded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. is Fisher, administrative UV or Department Hea yo Personnel Department Recommendation Date: y- S-?T3 Decrease hours of vacant full-time Occupational Therapist position #729 to 20/40, Salary Level H5 372 (1971-2173); increase hours of R.N. P.I. position #1534 (FTE 20/40) to 40/40, Salary Level V2 572 (1660-2526). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: W day following Board action. Ll (2A,P, � Date JftrT_UirectorW rsonne County Administrator Recommendation 411011k,3/ G3 Date: (/ d Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel D Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 0 Other: for County Administrator Board of Supervisors Action Adjustment APPROVED/ n APR 12 J.R. O1 on, County Clerk Date: APR 12 L40 By: APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M6/82 12� POSITION NWSTNENT REQUEST No. .Z Date: Department Health Services/HIS �~ �� i' "`540 6555 Cgenc Uiii�"t `Nopers o. Org. No. Agency No. 54 .1 . Action Requested: - e: Reallock le ?osltricff� of Health Information Systems - Project #54-1425 and person (Virginia a to Asst. Directo—r-off-WaRth Services. abandon HIS Mr. - project. Proposed Effective Date: To reflect elevation of s' �3 Explain why adjustment is needed; po itian to Division Director Status (see attached memo). Description of Duties attached: Yes ® No [] Estimated cost of adjustment: S (See Wmo) Cost is within department's budget: Yes ® No [] If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be funded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. Web Beadle t. Pers. Offe. or Department Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: Establish 'the exempt class of Manager of Health Information Systems and allocate it to Level H8 983 (4002. This class is exempt 'from overtime. Cancel Health Information Systems Manager - Project position #54-1425, Salary Level H8 869 (3571) and add one position of Manager of Health. Information Systems, Salary Level H8 983 (4002); effective May 19, 1983_ Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: 10 day following Board action. Ll .22 ate or) Director OrPersonnel County Administrator Recommendation ` Date: ,X Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel O Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 0 Other: for County Administrator Board of Supervisors Action Adjustment APPROVED/o� D on APR 1 2 19e� J.R. Olsson, County Clerk Date: APR 121983 - By; 46��_ - APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M6/82 125 ' POSITIN AD;IUSTMENT REQUEST No1.2 YJ Date: 3/29/83 Dept. No: Copers Department Health Servicea/Med. Care Budget Un� o � No. 6383 Agency No. 54 Action Requested: Cancel LVN II position 4%*WA/4$ 3 (P.I.); add one (1) fulltime R.N. one ,..u.• SEA"WE Proposed Effective ate: Explain why adjustment is needed: ROUTINE ACTION: ,provide more specialised coverage in eoargonnX room Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No [� Estimated cost of adjustment: S 15,000 Cost is within department's budget: Yes No [] If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs ar to be funded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Lois Fisher Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. Adninistratite Anal amt j orDepartment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: Cancel LVN II position #439 (40/40) and #1583 (P.I. ), Salary Level H2 084 (1340-1629); add one fuiltime R.N. and one P.I. R.N. positions, Salary Level V2 572 (1660-2526). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: W day following Board action. Ci ate r rec ersonne County Administrator Recommendation Date: 1v1 4-3 A Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel C3 Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 0 Other: �"'1.►,,.d 'tear (for) County Administrator Board of Supervisors Action APR 2 193 Adjustment APPROVED/Dii�iO on J.R. 0 on, County Clerk Date: APR 121983 gy; d�-- APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M6/82 y 120 - POSITIM ADAM ENT REQUEST No. A Date: �0/S�_ Dept. No./ '"i E 1. E I V E ^ Copes No. Department%ukith Sarvicaaftd. Care Budget Unit No. 5�+0 6 Oi . No. X08 Agency — Action Requested: a LVN II f1ull:4ime ositions #55 id ;�� n P.I. nition #1604 add two (2) full time and one (1) P.I. R.A. P080*i*ERV1Ci:_t1fral Proposed Effective Date: 1 Explain why adjustment is needed: ROUTINE ACTION: To provide priaary care nursing in Intensive Care Unit Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes [1 No El Estimated cost of adjustment: s 201,000 Cost is within department's budget: Yes Q No If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be funded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Loin Fisher Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. Adainistrati t orDepartment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: fl-S"1?3 Cancel LVN II full-time positions #554 and 1122 and LVN II P.I. position 1609, Salary Level H2 084 (1340-1629); add two full-time and one P.I. R.N. positions, Salary Level V2 572 (1660-2526). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: Jg) day following Board action. aterec ersonne County Administrator Recommendation 4__3 Date: Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel D Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 6 Other: orCounty Plaministrator Board of Supervisors Action �R 2 ��3 J.R. Ols , Adjustment APPROVED/ on County Clerk Date: APR 12 1. 3 By: APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. K6/82 127 POSMON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No. Date: pERB�pY: No./ a1Copers Department Health Services/CCHP BuJ9 -1et2UpJ , 860 Org. No. �_ Agency No. �_ SPR Action Requested: - t' e: Reallocate the exempt position of #54-1368 and personKaplan) to the exempt class of Assistant rvices, abandon the class of Executive Director CCHP. _ Proposed Effective ate: Explain why adjustment is needed: To reflect elevation of position to Division Director status (see attached memo) Description of Duties attached: Yes ® No Estimated cost of adjustment: s (See Memo) Cost is within department's budget: Yes No If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be funded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. Web Beadle t. Pers. Offc. orDepartment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: y— 5- Cancel Cancel Executive Director/CCHP position #54-1368, Salary Level H2 980 (3282-3990); add one position of Assistant Director of Health Services, Salary Level V3-380 (3715-5940; abandon the class of Executive Director/CCHP. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: ® day following Board action. �A & 0 Date o rector vot gersionne County Administrator Recommendation Date: Z641tr3 )( Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel D Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 6 Other: AlAtIAL for County Administrator Board of Supervisors Action APR 12 1%3 Adjustment APPROVED/DWWOOP WD on J.R. O1 County Clerk Date: .APR 3 „�, By: APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY--RESOLUTION AWNWNT. M6/82 128 POSITION ADJUSTIENT REQUEST No. /,:,I->�/ rFCEi-t . ." Date: March 2, 1983 Dept. No./ Copers Department Animal Services Budget Unio .Jr W;3 No. 3340 Agency No. 36 Action Requested: Cancel Animal Control Officer position #23; add one Administrative Services Officer. Proposed Effective Date: as soon as possible. Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide necessary administrative support to the Animal Services Department. Classification Questionnaire attached: YesX[] No [] Estimated cost of adjustment: S 3,648 Cost is within department's budget: Yes X[] No (] If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be fronded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. or) Departmbft Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: April 5, 1983 Classify 1 Administrative Services Assistant III position,. salary H2 646 (2351-2857) and cancel Animal Control Officer, position 36-023, salary level H2 100 (1362-1656). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: 10 day following Board action. O Date or rect o 4eif s6nne County Administrator Recommendation Date: Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel O Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 13 Other: for County Administrator Board of Supervisors Action Adjustment APPROVED/H on APR 12 $83 J.R. Olsson, County Clerk Date: APR 121983 By: APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. (M347) 129 POSM0 11DJUS WW REQUEST No. Date: Dec. 29, 1982 Dept. No./ V3ki�. Copers Department Animal Services Budget Unit N 0365 Agency No. Action Requested: Authorization of one (1) Exper, nceLe 1k Clerk to implement do licensingf rre t C erk in the amount of $9.661 to finance for the remainder of Fiscal a -1983. Proposed Effective ate: Jan. 15, 1983 Explain why adjustment is needed: It is necessary to have at least one permanent clerk added to coordinate implementation of the license program. - 1 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes [] No Estimated cost of adjustment: s 9,230, Cost is within department's budget: Yes ® No If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be funded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. 1,ZJA 4A or partwen a Personnel Department Recommendation Date: April 5. 1983 Classify 1 Clerk-Experienced Level position, salary level H1 887 (1103-1341). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: 0 day following Board action. a Date or rec or of Posonnel County Administrator Recommendation Date: Z )( Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel O Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel Q Other: for County Administrator Board of Supervisors Action Adjustment APPROVED/ 15ANNOWD on APR 12 J.R. OIs County Clerk Date: APR 121983 BY: APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL SALARY RESOLUTION AMENT. M / - - 1�0 / All ✓ ��- POSITIM AOJtIMM "EST No. / Date: 3/18/83 Dept. No./ RECEIVED Copers Department Health Svcs./Medical Care Budget Unit J0. 540 ��Org. Noir 6390 Agency No. 54 Action Requested: NON-ROUTINE; Reclassify Clerk Senior edeOloMon 54-0034 to Supervising Clerk UIVIL SERVICE fl AT Proposed Effective ate: 4/1/83 Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify the incumbent (Linda Eekhof) according to the duties and responsibilities performed. Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes ® No E Estimated cost of adjustment: S 3048/year Cost is within department's budget: Yes ® No If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs alyso=e.funded. Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. lbin Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. Services Assistant r partment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: Ay- S -� 3 Reclassify Clerk Senior Level position #54-0034, Salary Level H2 012 (1247-1516) to Supervising Clerk, Salary Level H2 167 (1456-1770). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: p day following Board action. Qg 4- I —Y__"> Date 2erect ersonne County Administrator Recommendation 6 Date: V 3 Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel D Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel L3 Other: for County Administrator- Board dm nistratorBoard of Supervisors Action APR 12 Adjustment APPROVED/.01.5---- E�D on 1983 J.R. Olsson, County Clerk Date: APR 121983 By; APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M / 131 POSITION MMUSTIENT REQKST No. _ Date: 2AAA -PERSDW' EL DEPth,TF:E*,i T Dept. No./ Copers Department health Services/Public Bufpt ?Jnit 9b«PW Org. No. Agency No. 54 Action Requested: NON-ROUTINE: Study the positions on the attached list to dote they should be proper y assified as Pablic Health Program Specialist I or II's Propose ffective Explain why adjustment is needed: to properly classify the incumbents according to the reconstitued P.H. Program Specialist I II aeries Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes ® No Estimated cost of adjustment: $Probably savings Cost is within department's budget: Yes ® No will result If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be f Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Ray Phi rsonnel Services Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. or An— al Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: See attached list of recommended classification actions. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: Ja[ day following Board action. a\ � C1 Date o rector o Frrsonnel County Administrator Recommendation Date: 19 Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 0 Other: forCounty Administrator Board of Supervisors Action Adjustment APPROVED/ on APR 121%3 J.R. 01non, County Clerk Date: APR 12 1983 By. APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. (M347) 679F- 132 1) Reallocate Public Health Clinic Coordinator position #54-1817, Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104) to Public Health Program Specialist II, Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104). 2) Reallocate Public Health Program Specialist position #54-2158 and incumbent (Peggy Tolley), Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104) to Public Health Program Specialist II, same salary level. 3) Reallocate Public Health Program Specialist position #54-2012 and incumbent (Sue Hayes) to Public Health Program Specialist II, both at Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104). 4) Reallocate Public Health Program Specialist position #54-2015 and incumbent (Ruby Aldinger) to Public Health Program Specialist II, both at Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104). 5) Reclassify Public Health Nurse position #54-1865, Salary Level W5 591 (2113- 2705) to Public Health Program Specialist II, Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104). 6) Cancel Public Health Program Specialist position #54-2233 (24/40), Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104) and add one (1 ) Public Health Program Specialist I (24/40) position, Salary Level H2 631 (2316-2815). 7) Cancel Public Health Program Specialist position #54-2152, Salary Level H2 729 (2554-3104) and add one (1 ) Public Health Program Specialist I position, Salary Level H2 631 (2316-2815) 133 PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAM SPECIALIST Attacbment to P-300 Nass Current Class Functional Title Pbsition Aldinger, Ruby PEPS Ont of Home Nursing Coordinator 54-2015 Hayes, Sue PEPS CCS Specialist 54-2012 Jacobs, Bev FNP Adolescent Program Coordinator 54-1946 Lilly, Linda PHPS Dental Program Coordinator 54-2233 (24/40) Pridemore, Karen PHPS Immization Program Coordinator 54-2152 Rose, Liz P.H. Clinic MCH Program Coordinator 54-1817 Coordinator Tolly, Peggy PHPS* WIC Coordinator* 54-2158 Wise, Francie PEN ACD Program Coordinator 54-1865 *Acting Assignment 134 HOARD OF SUPERVISORS r101 M. G. Wingett, County Administrator oxft DATE: April 1 , 1983 costa susitcT: Memorandum of Designation--Hazardous Waste Enforcement @ co^ *P"I r 1 C REOMST(s) CR REC MMOMAT I CIN(s) A sMX=WUpp AM JLiT1I1 CAr CN Approve and authorize the Health Services Director to execute on behalf of the County a Memorandum of Designation between the County and the State Department of Health Services providing authority for the County to enforce State hazardous waste statutes and regulations pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25180. BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: On March 8, 1983, your Board agreed to delay approving the proposed Memorandum of Designation in order to provide the Hazardous Materials Task Force time to make recommendations on the process which should be followed in its implementation. Your Board also indicated your intent to execute the Memorandum of Designation on April 12, 1983. CS rlmutp C*i ATTACWCNT VCs -X- RECCM;NMT i C14 C«< COtRITY Ai1M/N I sTRATM RECCAWN",r/Cr4 or somo COW i TTEC X APPMr.X o s 1 GNATutE s , ,f ACT 104 ar MCAND ON: APR 17, APPWCVEo As vols or stom9wisma / _ 1 "OWDY Can-1 PT 7WT TWO is A V*W _h WANINDLK (AMsew �.:..... AIO COMCT COPY CW AN ACTIM TAfON AYES: I=$: AM WCWWo CIN THE UINklm o► M mmm ADS04T: AWTAIN o► *LFWtV18=W OA= MOM. +cc: County Administrator A17RST!>7 APR X683 Health Services Director .I.*. CLAMM. ooWTY Ciat AM Office of Emergency Services a G"ICIO CLOW dr VW NDNp Hazardous Materials Task Force (via OES) 3`" DiNm M.Hen1tn •� r THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the IoNowhi vow: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Contra Costa Crisis & Suicide Intervention Services. As requested by Supervisor T. Torlakson, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator is to write a letter, on the Board's behalf. commendinn the Contra Costa Crisis & Suicide Intervention Services for initiating a support line for unemployed workers. 1��o�e1Nr1Mt Md�r attir�eMrualaa�la� M acftn IMM @"MMM on IW MUMW of as raard at supersw an sw dew dWim ATTESTED:_ APR 121963 J.R.OLSSON.COVNTY GUMK end ex alllelo pwrt Of Me Been/ pwna M.hkrnrn Orig. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cc: County Administrator \ 136 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 12 , 1! 83 b the Matter of Ordinance(s) Introduced. The following ordinance(s) which amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County as indicated having been introduced, the Board by unanimous vote Aof ppel$ent�i¢� present waives full readingthereof and fixes p as the time for adoption of same: Amending Section 33-5.313 to delete 33-5.313 (f) and add in its place the following: The Manager of Health In- formation Systems is excluded, and is appointed by the Director of Health Services. PASSED BY THE BOARD on April 12, 1983, by the following vote: AYES : Supervisors Powers , Fanden, 14cPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. Absent: Supervisor Schroder. - 1 hereby aNify that Ow lo going M a trw and cornet aW of m erir enftmd oe the Wnwn of said board of Supwvbm an the data aforesW& Witness my hand and dw Sod of do board of SUPWVbcft 12th April . 19 83 J. R. OLUM. Cleric Amtkz� . Oapwy citric C. Matthews 137 N-24 WM 15M THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 19 1983 . by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: -Water Committee-Fish and Wildlife Study Committee Report At the April 4, 1983 meeting of the Water Committee, the Committee held a hearing on the Interim Report by the Fish and Wildlife Committee (FWSC) entitled "Recommendations on Improving the Fish, Wildlife and Recreation Qualities of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Delta." The Water Committee discussed the report with members of the FWSC and suggested several modifications to the report to be considered by the FWSC. The FWSC met on April 7, 1983 and made several modifications to the Interim Report. The Water Committee recommends that the Board take the following actions: 1. Approve the Interim Report from the FWSC. 2. Authorize the Chair of the Water Committee to present the findings of the Interim Report to the State Water Resources Control Board. 3. Authorize distribution of the Interim Report to the County, State and Federal Legislative Delegation and other interested parties. Sunne Wright McPeak Tom Tor akson Supervisor, District IV Supervisor, District V IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of its Water Committee are APPROVED. • 1 han�by eMit!►rtatlMa M-bwaedarraelea/rd Ori g. Dept. Public Works-EC -n-crop tatan and a-1wed on Se mlift a«Ms Smd of SupemW=on Ow dale doom cc: County AdministratorAPR 19 IN3 Public Works Director ATTESTED: Auditor-Controller j.R.OLSSOK COUNTY CUMK FWSC Members, via EC and oltkio Clark at as Se d dbo:WCBOfwsc.t4 By I .OMS 138 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12,-1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Pourers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Completion of Improvements, ) Subdivision 4575, ) Orinda Area. ) The Public Works Director having notified this Board that the improve- ments in Subdivision 4575 have been completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Tri-Smith Company heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the Subdivision Map; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements have been CMUED for the purpose of establishing a six-month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: DATE OF AGREEMENT SURETY October 28, 1980 Fidelity b Deposit Company of Maryland 6047842 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund the $1,000 cash security for performance (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 34871, dated October 17, 1980) to Tri-Smith Company pursuant to the requirements of the Ordinance Code. lb"81011GOWN"WObleebweedoe aWsWel en etftn tekan end w*wed en It wAnkfts elft bond of ee No dmle aborw. ATTESTE 12 la$3 J.R.OLSWK COUNTY CLOW and a=Ck* .bo" b .oMba Originator: Public Works (LD) cc: Public Works - Accounting - Des./Const Tri-Smith Company 2076 Mt. Diablo Boulevard Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Fidelity b Deposit Co. of Maryland P. 0. Box 7974 San Francisco, CA 94120 133 RESOLUTION NO. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 1 12. 1981 . by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Approving and Executing Agreement with the City of Concord for Bridge Widening and Street Modification at San Miguel Road and Galindo Creek as Part of the Corps of Engineers' Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks Project, Phase III, Flood Control Zone 3B, Concord Area. Project No. 7520-6B8697. The Public Works Director having reported that the City of Concord has requested the widening of the San Miguel Road Bridge from its present width of 28 feet to its planned width of 54 feet as part of the Corps of Engineers, Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks Project, Phase III, and that the City has agreed to reimburse the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for all costs incurred by the District and the Corps of Engineers for the planning, design, and construction of said bridge widening and street modification work; and The Public Works Director having recommended the approval of an agreement between the City of Concord and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the aforementioned work. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED, as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED and the Chairman of the Board is AUTHORIZED to execute said agreement. 1 hereby c& h chat tMs YavwandaarrveleW41 an ac*m taken and cawed as the 10105108 Of BM Board of Supewrleora on dw rata d a -I ATTESTED: J.R. OLSSON,COUNTY CLOW and ex Ciark of Ow fllowd my 0"VAIF Orig.Oept.: Public Works Department, Flood Control Planning cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Accounting Flood Control Planning City of Concord, 1950 Parkside Dr., Concord, CA 94520 FC.4.12GALINDOBO.T4 140 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Ap ri 1 12, 1983 by the folkmdng vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Contract for Attorney Services - John Swett Unified School District. The Board having before it a contract for the provision of Attorney services by County Counsel to the John Swett Unified School District for the 1983-84 fiscal year, and the County Counsel and the Administrator having recommended approval of said contract; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said contract is hereby APPROVED and that the Board Chair is AUTHORIZED to execute same. 1 co o�ow W*WW o sosoa. was s1� ann scow d oe 11a� on Ma dale; o ta. � 3 — ATTESTED: — -f _ and o 1CI, CM**I Mood Orig. Dept: CC: County Administrator County Counsel Auditor-Controller John Swett Unified School Dist. 141 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Apri 1 12, 1983 by the foilowiop VOW AYES: Supervisor Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Authorizing Acceptance of Instrument(s). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following instrument(s) (is/are) hereby ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING ONLY: INSTRUMENT REFERENCE GRANTOR AREA Offer of Dedication SUB 5858 Larry B. Reynolds, Martinez for Drainage Purposes (LUP 2097-78) et al. aKwn 4rw.r 11 of an -Con rrM aM saw"so 1w ON&* 0 0t M �Rsd et I�+iNore M*w it @ftVm jit.OLMO .Coulwmr SLOW asd 0x Ckok of 401100+ wMrn Orig. Dept.: Public Works (LD) cc: Recorder (via LD) then PW Records Director of Planning 142 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPesk and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Granting Permission to Completely Close Parker Avenue, Rodeo Area. The Public Works Director, having recommended that permission be granted to John Swett High School to completely close (except for emergency traffic) Parker Avenue between Pacific Avenue and San Pablo Avenue on April 14, 1983 and April 21, 1983 between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. for the purpose of conducting band practice subject to the following conditions: 1. All signing to be in accordance with the State of California Manual of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices; and the County Manual of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices; 2. A letter be furnished to the Public Works Department from the Fire Department and the California Highway Patrol stating that they approve the closing. 3. Furnish the Public Works Department a Certificate of Insurance for a minimum of $500,000 Combined Single Limit with the County named as additional insured. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. �1MKsbil o�eNhr fn.e wsYabwasdaa�etoe/�al an�Cf10e Wnn snd NdMM 01�■iMMM N fM Board of SupsMMI oe ew dift d-a P� ATTESTED: +2, 193 J.R.OI.ssM COUNTY CSI am= of tow Booed b .armor Orig. Dept: Public Works (LD) cc: John Swett High School (via PW) Rodeo Chamber of Commerce County Sheriff-Coroner Rodeo Fire Protection District California Highway Patrol 143 po THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12. 1983 . by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Terminating Road Improvement Agreement, Exonerating Surety Bonds, and Refunding Cash Deposit, LUP 258-71, Bethel Island. On June 13, 1978, this Board approved a Road Improvement Agreement with The Willows at Bethel Island, developer, for construction of improvements as required by the Conditions of Approval for LUP 258-71, Bethel Island area. This agreement was accompanied by security to guarantee the completion of the improvements in the form of a surety bond (No. YS 786-8943) in the amount of $76,780 for Faithful Performance and $38,390 for Labor and materials, issued by Industrial Indemnity Company, plus cash deposits in the amount of $1,000, made by Builders Central Service and The Willows at Bethel Island. On January 28, 1983, the Zoning Administrator approved Conditions of Approval for LUP 2056-82 on the same parcel of land, which requires the developer to execute a Deferred Improvement Agreement. This agreement covers the improvements required by LUP 258-71. The developer having executed the Deferred Improvement Agreement, and the Board this day having approved said agreement; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Road Improvement Agreement with The Willows at Bethel Island, approved June 13, 1978, is hereby TERMINATED and the surety bond (No. YS 786-8943), issued by Industrial Indemnity Company is EXONERATED, and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund the cash deposits to Builders Central Service ($500, Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 112418, dated November 9, 1973) and to The Willows at Bethel Island ($500, Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 9709, dated June 1, 1978). 1 I @broadffy*at*kkguwmderwatftff@1 an scNon fair and entend on M inked a at M Board of Svpindao on tfia data dwvm ATTESTED:_ l•�' I J.R.OLSSON,COUSM CLIM and ex Chnh of me Mord f Dow Orig. Dept.: Public Works (LD) cc: Public Works - Accounting - Des./Const. Director of Planning The Willows at Bethel Island c/o George S. Hedley, Jr. P. 0. Box 15178 Long Beach, CA 90815 Industrial Indemnity Co. P. 0. Box Drawer E Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Builders Central Service 314 - 27th Street Oakland, CA 94612 144 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on _ April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN:None SUBJECT: Approving Assessment District Screening Committee Recommendation for Assessment District 1983-2, Alamo Oaks Sewer Extension, Alamo Area. The Assessment District Screening Committee has submitted a report dated March 31, 1983, with a recommendation that Assessment District 1983-2, Alamo area, be formed in accordance with the Board of Supervisors policy for small assessment districts as contained in Resolution No. 82/126. The Committee also recommends that Public Works Department staff be given the flexibility to expand the boundaries of the Assessment District within a time frame acceptable to staff as additional property owners consent to participating in the District. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of the Assessment District Screening Committee are APPROVED. 1�bY�rnry thatthb batnru�dconreloogN an action wan and WMW*d on the mkWn of Sm Dowd of Supenft m an Ne dela t---i ATTESTEW: Q, 19 g J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK and ex C11"of Ow ftwd By l .� Originating Dept.: Public Works (LD) cc: Assessment Dist. Screening Committee Bob Brunsell Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell b Sperry • P. 0. Box 8806 Emeryville, CA 94662 Mike Majors, Civil Engineers 2500 Old Crow Canyon Road, Suite 428 San Ramon, CA 94583 Lowell Tuni son 1 j 293 Smith Road Danville, CA 94526 7K MO OF SWWISORS OF COMM COSTA CO1A T, CKNU IA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Pursuant to Section 22507 ) TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2867 - PK6 of the CVC, Declaring a ) No Parking Zone on ) Supv. Dist. V CANAL ROAD (Rd. #53488), ) West Pittsburg. ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and reconisiendations thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken as indicated): Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code, parking is hereby declared to be prohibited at all times on the south side of CANAL ROAD (Rd. # 5348B), West Pittsburg, beginning at a point 115 feet west of the center line of Madison Avenue and extending westerly a distance of 193 feet. !her.by cer:tty that this fa a tale andcorreateopy of an ,:ctle^t_xan ani eatemed on the minutes of*0 6o:..y o?Sureriisors on the date zhown. Ar`::TL : APR 121983 ij apc: c�otfEcio c:erk of the Board By .Deputy clnn:i P-1. 14ermatt to.res.canal.t4 Orig. Dept.: Public Works Traffic Operations cc: Sheriff California Highway Patrol 146 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Approving Deferred Improvement Agreement along Willow road for LUP 2056-82, Bethel Island Area. Assessor's Parcel No. 29-020-004 The Public Works Director has recommended that he be authorized to execute a Deferred Improvement Agreement with The Willows at Bethel Island, as required by the Conditions of Approval for LUP 2056-82. This agreement would permit the deferment of construction of permanent improvements along Willow road which is located in the Bethel Island area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. 1 harm,artify that"t:is is a true and correct COPY of ,.-m taker and ontanad on the minutes of the ^,zu-erc':sors on iho data shown. ��: APR 121983 AT:��� - ' R. CR aa:, CoUicT4' MBK and ex amcio Cierk of the Board Ciy . Deputy Orig. Dept.: Public Works (LD) Cc: Recorder (via LD) then PW Records, then Clerk of the Board Director of Planning The Willows at Bethel Island c/o George S. Hedley, Jr. P. 0. Box 15178 1.4 7 Long Beach, CA 90815 - THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Apri 1 12, 1983 by the Mowing vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: Pone. SUBJECT: Authorizing Acceptance of Instrument(s). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following instrument(s) (is/are) hereby ACCEPTED: INSTRUMENT REFERENCE GRANTOR AREA Grant Deed MS 88-80 John M. Cahill, Orinda of Development et al. Rights 111�1e�oarlNylMat fi11e Ma 1rwaMNwwlMAat an aeeea taken sad en§wW M 8*ia4 Mae of Ir Hoard of Supwob re as Me Bala dwvm AMSTED: APR 12 M3 J.R.OLSOM COUNTY CUM and es eMdo CMT of So S{e" r - G.Lic Diana M.Herman Orig. Dept: Public Works (LD) cc: Recorder (via LD) then PW Records Director of Planning 148 TD. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ro o": M.G. Wingett �! WM Balm: April 12, 1983 Cma s6aJCCT: AB 696 - Development Adjacent to Cities NIriG 1/1 C RN:OtisT(a t 011 R[COO!MDAT 1 aM t s O 111ACItUROU�,p MO JMT 11►1 CAT tem Adopt a position in opposition to AB 696 (Cortese) BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION The County Administrator and the Director of Planning have recommended Board opposition to AB 696 which would require a 45 day notification period for the county to advise cities of development in areas included within the city General Plan but outside the city limits. Staff has advised the Board that this masure is in contradiction to our local policy of streamlining the developmnt processes. Such a requirement would also create the possibility for a procedural error to overturn a Board decision. WNTINUED ON ATTACHMOn: VtS - sIQNATUIE' .$ RCCOM MM-r1ON Or COUNTv MWIN1sTRATM R[cObKItDAT1ON Or BOARD COMITTI[ ..L &-Pm z MR: ACT 1 ON of •OARD ON; Armtww As 11<OOMALl�O onan AB 696 is referred to the City/County Relations Committee formed by the Cdjtra Costa County Mayors Conference for coament. volt or aupoevlaotW 1 KIIOT N=JITINrY THAT 7MIs Is w T� WANI"an (&MCHTJNo QCT �Y OI AN ACTION TAIU M AM: sL:- Alo IMMKO ON TK NI"LMM or TM MINWO A8811WT:_ AAOTAIN Or r►7s elO■M. cc: Assemblymn Cortese At'1=T>Zp a 3 If 3 - - 149 County Legislation a'e' OLorc Ato (via CAO) we WFIClo SAM es ws ecow Director Of Planning le. 4 orwo,PPf To- BOARD OF SUPER. SORS IMMM: M. G. Wingett, County Administrator a" DATE: April 4, 1983 cost" susiECT: Legislation--AB 10 (Moorhead) @ QY^ SPEC 1 i 1 C REQUEST(S) OR REOOW E/OAT IDN(s) ! SACK=K AAp AND JLMTi r1 CATION Adopt a position of opposition to AB 10 (Moorhead) BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION: AB 10, introduced by Assemblywoman Moorhead, and 13 Assembly co-authors and 9 Senate co-authors, makes it possible to find a 14 or 15-year old as unfit to be tried in juvenile court because he or she has committed one or more of a specified list of crimes. In these instances, the minor would have a right to a jury trial, thereby increasing county costs. In addition, the minor would be held in Juvenile Hall, frequently for months or years, thereby increasing county costs and creating problems for the Probation Department. In the final analysis, the most the court could do would be to commit the minor to the California Youth Authority, which a juvenile court can already do. Finally, this kind of legislation should be delayed until the Commission on Juvenile Court Law Reform can complete its task and make comprehensive recommendations for changes in the Juvenile Court law. The Chief Probation Officer recommends that the Board of Supervisors oppose AB 10. CONTINUED ON ATTACIMCNT: PES SIGNATURE: -_ RECOWENDAT1ON Or COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR - RECOmWraAT1ON Or SOARD 03WITTEE X A/PRONE - OTTER: S I GNATURE f : G 14f .f - ACT I ON Or �mARD CNN: rl APPROVED AS 111ECO061ENaED CRN" AB 10 is referred to the Contra Costa County Juvenile Justice Commission for analysis and the County Administrator is requested to obtain additional information on the Bill from CSAC . VOTE Or Sti7lV1SO115 1 NEWBY COLT1/Y V MT !MIS 18 A TRUE LMN1"an (A"tNT AND CORIIECT COPY Or AN ACTIC94 TAIMN AY": s; AND WWraWo ON V VM MINM CW rE go&JD ASatNT' AWTAI_ OF SttOlVISCM ON M D►Tt 21OM. Cc: County Administrator 'A1981ami �� �ycf 3 Probation Officer ■Jo CWFIC10 CcamV LUK Or M mem Presiding Judge, Superior Court Juvenile Court Judge 1 CSAC - tY .QPVrY Assemblywoman Moorhead (via CAO) Committee on Criminal Law & Public Safefw THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on Apri 1 12, 1983 by the foNowon vote. AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Reports on County Purchasing Practices and Environment. The Board having received.a March 30, 1983 letter from Judity Rooney, Foreperson, 1982-1983 Contra Costa County Grand Jury, P. 0. Box 111n, Martinez, California 94553, transmitting interim reports of the Committee on County Purchasing Practices and of the Committee on Environment; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid reports are hereby ACKNOWLEDGED and same are REFERRED to the County Administrator for review and renort. t Mw.syoMw�►w�w.r.rw�w�..�wr� M1�y0f1 SNI and SOW /M OW=NOW G'6W so"of Supwdnn"taw Oft ire A APR 1213 J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY yLM wd ex 00M0 CWk o1 tM Bed .Dow Diana M.H~' Orig. Dept.: Clerk of the Board cc: Grand Jury County Administrator 151 File: 25041221(F)/a.4. %P&R?l W �OFQ&%9%fi%R DTECTI ' S ICT i" Adopted this Order on Apri 1 12, 1983 by Ow folloaifg vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: In the Matter of Approving Plans and Specifications for Repaving at Fire Station No. 13, 251 Church Street Martinez Area Project No. 7100-4764;0928-WH764B RESOL.OTION 0. 83/S31 WHEREAS Plans and Specifications for Repaving at Fire Station No. 13, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, 251 Church Street, Martinez have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS Plans and Specifications were prepared by the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS the Engineer's cost estimate for construction is $20,000, base bid; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and WHEREAS the Board hereby finds that the project is exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class lc Categorical Exemption under County Guidelines and directs the Public Works Director to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk; The Board of Supervisors, as the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, RESOLVES that said Plans and Specifications are hereby APPROVED Bids for this work will be received on May 12, 1983 at 2:00 p.m., and the Clerk of this Board is DIRECTED to publish Notice to Contractors in accordance with Section 13885 of Health and Safety Code, inviting bids for said work, said Notice to be published in MARTINEZ NEW GAZETTE 11M @by Cowl awf 9ft le summd"wedes/ysf an.coon u*m and a deed an 9w whwlra of Ow Board of Supenismm an Ow dab shorn. J.R.OLSSCNI COUNTY CLEM C6wk of rw Nowd h .01POs Orig. Dept.: Public Works Dept. - Architectural Div. cc: Public Works Department Architectural Division P. W. Accounting Director of Planning Auditor-Controller Fire District (via A.D.) 152 RESOLUTION NO. 83/5 31 /-7 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, NcPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJEVT: ending and Extending Subdivision ) RESOLUTION NO. 83/532 Agreement, Subdivision 5709, ) San Ramon Area. ) The following substitute security to guarantee the road and drainage improvements for Subdivision 5709, San Ramon area as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, was presented for Board approval this date: Security with Tangerine Court Associates as principal in the form of a corporate surety bond (Bond No. 50118) dated April 4, 1983, and issued by Developer's Insurance Company in the amount of $8,600 for faithful perfo- rmance and $4,800 for labor and materials. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Subdivision Agreement approved by the Board on March 30, 1982, is hereby MENDED to allow substitution of the performance portion of the above-mentioned corporate surety bond in place of the performance portion of the letter of credit issued by Ampex Employees Federal Credit Union, and to allow the labor and materials portion of said letter of credit to be reduced by the $4,800 amount of the labor and materials portion of the substitute surety bond. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement extending said Subdivision Agreement through September 1, 1983. t Mnbtr�h►tMt thb y a�aaweorr� �an taken and a �' ATTESTED: 83 J.R.OLSgOK COUNTY CLERK aad Clark 0O1 00 Rord h � �h► Originator: Public Works (LD) cc: Director of Planning Public Works - Accounting - Des./Const. Tangerine Court Associates 21 Del Rio Court Danville, CA 94526 Developer's Insurance Co. P. 0. Box 1519 Lafayette, CA 94549 Ampex Employees Federal Credit Union 940 Douglas Redwood City, CA 94063 1 53 RESOLUTION NO.83/S32 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 1 19RI . by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 83/S33 SUBJECT: Approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 5402, Oakley Area. The following documents were presented for Board approval this date: The Final Map of Subdivision 5402, property located in the Oakley area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A Subdivision Agreement with Kaufman & Broad of Northern California, Inc., subdivider, whereby said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said Subdivision Agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; Said documents were accompanied by: I. Security to guarantee the completion of road and drainage inproveeents as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: A. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No.63552, dated March 25, 1983) in the amount of $4,338 made by Kaufman & Broad of Northern California, Inc. B. Additional security in the form of a corporate surety bond dated January 18, 1983, and issued by American Casualty Company of Reading, PA (Bond No. 796 33 69) with Kaufman & Broad of Northern California, Inc. as principal, in the amount of S429,462 for faithful performance and $216,900 for labor and materials. II. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and that the 1982-83 tax lien has been paid in full and the 1983-84 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March, 1983, is estimated to be $11,000; III. Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, in the form of a surety bond, No. 796 33 72, issued by American Casualty Company of Reading, PA with Kaufman & Broad of Northern California, Inc. as principal, in the amount of $11,000 guaranteeing the payment of the estimated . tax; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is DETERMINED to be consistent with the County's general and specific plans; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Final Map is D and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Subdivision Agreement is also WNW. 1 im bl owfltltl deftbnlma dumdoWd an action Ian and w w d oe Nw■Mama M flw Originator: Public Works (LD) tiowdoffupwMomaowrwddealalft cc: Director of Planning Public Works - Des./Const. AT7E5"tED: --�- Kaufman & Broad of No. Calif., Inc. JJ4 OLSOM COumv CUM 6379 Clark Avenue acid e:elNdf�Clap d ilM�oatr - - 1,54 Dublin, CA 94566 American Casualty Co. of Reading, PA - 600 So. Commonwealth Avenue 9111 l* Los Angeles, CA 90005 RESOLUTION N0.83/533 NJ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Approval of the Parcel Map ) RESOLUTION NO. 83/534 and Subdivision Agreement ) for Subdivision MS 88-80, ) Orinda Area. ) The following documents were presented for Board approval this date: The Parcel Map of Subdivision MS 88-80, property located in the Orinda area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A Subdivision Agreement with John M. Cahill and JoAnn Cahill, subdivider, whereby said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said Subdivision Agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; Said documents were accompanied by security to guarantee the completion of road and drainage improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: A. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No.63882 , dated April 4, 1983 ) in the amount of $1,000 made by Founders Title Company. B. Additional security in the form of a letter of credit dated April 1, 1983, issued by Capital Federal Savings & Loan Association, with John M. Cahill as principal, in the amount of $23,500 for faithful performance and $12,250 for labor and materials. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is DETERMINED to be consistent with the County's general and specific plans; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Subdivision Agreement is also APPROVED. 1herabyowtilythat016MapwandeomdeMet an anion taken and«Aged an Ma mhaft of Ma Board of 8upurbm an On day tI--- ATTESTED: (a. I9g3 J.R.OLSU M,COUNTY CLEIIK MW ofMdo CNhc of On D d Originator: Public Works (LD) cc: Director of Planning Public Works - Des./Const. John M. & JoAnn Cahill 32 Broadview Terrace Orinda, CA 94563 Founders Title Co. 3685 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 110 Lafayette, CA 94549 Capital Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. 3614 Mt. Diablo Blvd. 155 Lafayette, CA 94549 RESOLUTION NO. 83/S34 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, NcPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ASSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Conveyance of County Owned Property RESOLUTION NO. 83/535 (240 Eighth Street, Richmond) (Gov. C. Sec. 25365) to Richmond Redevelopment Agency, W.O. 5527 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, by vote of at least four-fifths of its members, RESOLVES THAT: This Board on March 8, 1983, passed Resolution of Intention to Convey Real Property No. 83/395, and notice fixing April 5, 1983 at 10:30 a.m., in its Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place when it would meet to consummate the conveyance of the real property described therein to the Richmond Redevelopment Agency; said Resolution was duly published in the Contra Costa Independent. The Board by the aforesaid Resolution found that said property is no longer required for County use and the sales price of $180,000.00 represents its market value. On April 5, 1983 the Board continued the consummation of said conveyance to April 12, 1983 at 10:30 a.m. in its Chambers. This Board hereby APPROVES the Real Property Purchase Agreement dated April 12, 1983, between the Richmond Redevelopment Agency and the County and the conveyance of the property located 240 Eighth Street, Richmond, California, to the Richmond Redevelopment Agency, upon payment of $180,000.00 to the County; and the Chairman of the Board is hereby AUTHORIZED to execute said Agreement and a Grant Deed to the Richmond Redevelopment Agency on behalf of the County, and cause its delivery to Richmond Redevelopment Agency for acceptance and recording. harass►a�Ily►u�atthla r•�nmaawoawaataaAaf W 400n Wean and mrd an 8*adwAn ai M Sawd of SupmMO s on Sm dit abom ATTESTED: _L2_1_ I&3 JA.OLSM",C011NTV CUM ana tOslo a«r of+1110 Newd Orig. Dep Pub 1 i c Works (RP) ichmond Redevelopment Agency (via R/P) Administrator Assessor Auditor-Controller Recorder (via R/P) RESOLUTION 00. 83/S 3S 156 B00412.0 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 2983 by thelaiwinp vow. AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT. Conveyance of County Dowd RESLlRIO1 NO. 83/S36 Real Property to the Concord (Gov. Code Sec. 25355) Redevelopment Agency Assessor's Parcel No. 126-101-013 Project No. 0077-6GS525 Concord Area The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES TINT: This Board on March ZZ, 1983, passed Resolution 83/468 and Notice fixing April 12,1983 at 10:30 a.m., in its Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place when it would meet to consummate the conveyance of the real property described therein to the Concord Redevelopment Agency; and Notice was duly published in the Contra Costa Times. This Board, by the aforesaid Resolution, found that said property is no longer required for present or future County use and the sales price of 3270,000.00 represents its market value. This Board hereby APPROVES the Right of May Contract.between Contra Costa County and the Concord Redevelopment Agency and the conveyance of the property located at 1600 Galindo Street, Concord, to the Agency upon payment of the $270,000.00 to the Canty; and the Chairman of the Board is hereby AIRIR MED to execute said Contract and a Grant Deed to the Agency on behalf of the County, and cause its delivery to the Agency for acceptance and recording. f hereby CW dtJ Mut Mds 1a s bw wdaanoteWef an woon taken and wowed an Mw wNww of tM Board of supw.teoreAon Mt-ed STEam.eUa�rn. ATTED: i- «. 19 J.R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLOW OW sx o Clark of IM board BY 0 P-11 Orig. Dept: Pub 1 i c Works (RP) cc; County Administrator County Assessor County Recorder (vta RP) Family Stress Center (via R/P) RESILIRIft §L 83/ 136 157 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the fO11craing vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Sandhill Area Boundary ) Reorganization (LAFC 82-) RESOLUTION NO. 83/537 24) , ) (Gov. C. SS56439, 56450) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Application for the subject Reorganization was filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission of Contra Costa County by the Oakley Water District on May 6 and June 29, 1982. This Reorganization is comprised of the following concurrent changes of organization: 1. Annexation to Oakley Water District (OWD) 2. Annexation to Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) The reason for this Reorganization is to provide the subject area with water service. The subject Reorganization has been designated by the Local Agency Formation Commission as "Sandhill Area Boundary Reorganization (LAFC 82-24) " . As determined by the Local Agency Formation Commission, the territory proposed to be annexed and detached is legally inhabited. This Reorganization was approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission on February 9, 1983, subject to the conditions that the territory proposed to be annexed and detached be as described in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto, and that the territory be subject to the ordinances, rules, regulations and contractural obligations of the Oakley Water District. At 10 :30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 12, 1983, in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, this Board conducted a public hearing on the proposed Reorganization. At that time all interested persons or taxpayers, for or against the proposed Reorganization, were heard and any protests were received. This Board hereby certifies that it has reviewed and considered the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared. -by OWD acting as Lead Agency on the project. This Board finds that the mitigation measures specified in the EIR are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of OWD as set forth in OWD Resolution No. 82-13. This Board finds insufficient protests to require an election and hereby approves the reorganization. 158 April 12, 1983 Page Two The Clerk of this Board shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, along with a remittance to cover any applicable fees as provided by Section 56450 of the Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission. j W0"CM"*mVftbabwandevNeditffd an aejon a,.an and @ Isnd an Ow whu"a w an- d a 8upa«bom en tlw d@bMaw. ATTEaMD: APR 121983 J.R.OtSSON.COUNTY CUM MW e: CWk W IM Dod Oi�na ..Herman cc: LAFCO - Executive Officer State Board of Equalization County Assessor County Recorder Public Works Director Leonard Celoni, General Manager Oakley Water District 278 Main, Oakley, CA John DeVito Contra Costa Water District P. 0. Box H2O, Concord, CA Frederick Bold, Jr. , Legal Counsel 1990 N. California Blvd. , Walnut Creek, CA 94596 RESOLUTION NO. 83/537 159 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 30-83 Contra Costa County, California Revised Description Revised Desc. DATE: 2/9/83 BY:190v-' ,,. (LAFC 82-24) SANDHILL AREA BOUNDARY REORGANIZATION (Annexation to the Oakley Water District and the Contra Costa Water District) EXHIBIT "A" Portions of section 36, T2N, R2E, MDB&M, and Section 31, T2N, RX, MDB&M, Contra Costa County, California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 36, 172N, R2E, MDB&M, thence southerly, 990 feet more or less to the point of intersection with the southern boundary line of the Oakley Water District, thence westerly along said southern boundary line, 22.5 feet, more or less to the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway 4, the true point of beginning; thence leaving said southern boundary of the Oakley Water District, and following along the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway 4, southerly, 1650.00 feet, more or less to a point on the east- west mid-section line of the aforementioned Section 36, T2N, R2E, MDB&M; thence leaving the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway 4, and following along said mid-section line, westerly, 1556.70 feet, more or less, to a point on the boundary of the East Contra Costa Irrigation District, thence following along the last mentioned District boundary, southerly, 1171.50 feet, and easterly, 1577.50 feet, to the center line of said Highway 4; thence leaving said Irrigation District boundary, north, 22.00 feet, to a point which bears north, 1491.00 feet, from the southeast corner of said Section 36, T2N, R2E, MDB&N; thence east, 2200.00 feet, southerly, 9.87 feet, and easterly, 444.52 feet, to the north-south mid-section line of Section 31, UK, R3E, MDB&M; thence northerly along said mid-section line, 505.62 feet; thence leaving said mid- section line, north 89. 29' 23" west, 1322.24 feet, and north 00. 46' 04" east, 652.57 feet, and north 00. 42' 05" east, 670.87 feet, to the northwest corner of Parcel "A", as shown on the neap filed January 12, 1982, in Book 99 -of Parcel Maps, at Page 21; thence westerly, 1292.50 feet, more or less, to the eastern right-of-way line of the aforementioned Highway 4; thence northerly along said last mentioned line, 990.00 feet, more or less, to a point which bears east from the point of beginning, said point being on the southern boundary of the Oakley Water District; thence west, along said last mentioned boundary line, 45.00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 127.80 acres, more or less. 160 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AdoptUd this Order on April 12, 1983 by the fbilowing vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak. Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: DP 3046-80 ) Annexation to County ) RESOLUTION NO. 83/538 Service Area L-42 ) (Gov. C. SS56310, 56311, (LAFC 82-47) ) 56312, 56313) RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR CHANGE IN ORGANIZATION The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Application for the above-captioned change in organization was filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission's Executive Officer in January of 1983. On February 9, 1983, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the application, declared the territory proposed to be annexed as legally uninhabited and designated the proposal as "DP 3046-80 Annexation to County Service Area L-42 (LAFC 82-47) ." The exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed are as described in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. At 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 12, 1983, in the Board's Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, this Board conducted a public hearing on the proposed Annexation, when all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the proposed annexation were heard and any protests were received. This Board finds insufficient protests to terminate the annexation and hereby approves the annexation. The Clerk of this Board shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, along with a remittance to cover any applicable fees as provided by Section 56450 of the Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission. t�,.fr 0wft*dvftb atawasdew=deWd w action talon and a*NW as tan MINE a 41 90 hoard of supwvbw an Ow deft 089M ATTESTED: ePQ 12 3 cc: LAFCO - Executive Officer jit.OLMN,COt� "CLEK State Board of Equalization and o0do Clair M 60 BOLA County Assessor County Recorder Public Works Director h OMS Pacific Gas & Electric Co. P. 0. Box 5308 Qiilna M.HaneaA Concord, CA 94524 Attn: Lighting Engineer Steven D. Billington 1226 Warner Ct. , Lafayette, CA 94549 RESOLUTION NO. 83/538 16i LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 55-83 Contra Costa County, California Revised Description Revised Desc. Date: 2/9/83 (LAFC 82-47) D.P. 3046-80 Annexation to County Service Area L-42 EXHIBIT A All of lots 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36 as designated on the map of Dewing Park, filed July 24, 1913, in Book 10 of Maps, at Page 242, also the East half of a 40 foot vacated road known as Hillside Ave, and the West half of a road known as Tice Valley Boulevard, and a portion of the Rancho San Ramon, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly right of way line of Olympic Boulevard, as it now exists at the intersection thereof with the center line of Hillside Ave, now vacated; thence from said point of beginning, North 58. 42' 05" East, along said Southeasterly line of Olympic Blvd., 270.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the centerline of Tice Valley Blvd., thence Southerly, along said last mentioned center line, 500.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Northeasterly prolongation with the Southern Line of the aforementioned Lot 32, Dewing Park, (10 M 242), said line has a bearing of North 70• East; thence leaving the center line of Tice Valley Blvd., South 70- West 232.00 feet, more or less, to the Southwest corner of the aforesaid Lot 320 Dewing Park, (10 M 242); thence Westerly and radially, 20.00 feet, to the center line of the aforementioned Hillside Ave. (vacated); thence Northerly, following along the last mentioned center line, 437.00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 2.05 acres, more or less. 162 � 7 11E ARD OF SI MISORS OF C0 M COSTA CWT, CA ff 1A Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Intention to Levy Street ) RESOLUTION NO. 83/ 539 Lighting Service Charges ) (Pursuant to Co. Ord. No. 79-42) In County Service Areas ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: This Board hereby approves the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Board levy street lighting service charges under the provisions of County Ordinance No. 79-42 within the boundaries of County Service Areas throughout the County. This Board hereby DECLARES its intention to approve the Engineer's Tentative Report and to levy and collect street lighting service charges pursuant to County Ordinance No. 79-42. The purpose of the service charge is to finance public street lighting within the County Service Areas. The Tentative Report of the Engineer, on file with the Clerk of this Board, contains a list of the County Service Areas, the method used to determine the service charge, the identification of each parcel of real property subject to a service charge and the amount of the proposed service charge for each County Service Area. This Board will hold a hearing on May 10, 1983, at 10:30 a.m. in the Board's Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, on the question of levying the proposed service charges. The Clerk of this Board is hereby DIRECTED to give notice of said hearing pursuant to Section 6066 of the Government Code and the Public Works Director is hereby DELEGATED the duty of giving notice of said hearing pursuant to Section 1012-2.608 (b) of County Ordinance Code. 1 webl ow"that tfda le ahmanreoeaelaaN►of an action;yctr.and Wend on tM MkWW of 00 Board of supwvim s on 09 rola shown. ATTESTED: Q. 3 JA.OLS8ON.COUNTY CLEIIK ate.: CN*a"�o" my .DOW TO.SLSC.TENT.BO Orig. Dept.: Public Works Traffic Operations cc: County Administrator County Counsel Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 83/S39 163 11E •CARD OF SI MISORS OF CONNA COSTA CWT, CALNMIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak & Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Allocation of Federal 85% RESOLUTION NO 83/S40 Highway Funds The Surface Transportation Act of 1982 provided increased funds for Federal Highway Programs through a new five-cent federal gas tax. While providing substantial increases in the funding of the Federal Aid Interstate, Primary and Bridge Replacement programs, the funding levels for the Federal Aid Urban (FAU) and Secondary Programs (FAS) was not increased at all. The FAU and FAS Programs are the primary method by which cities and counties receive federal-aid highway funds. The Public Works Director having advised that the Surface Transportation Assistance Act provides additional future allocations to assure that states receive at least an 85 percent "return to source" of the gas taxes contributed by its residents to the Highway Trust Fund. California will receive an estimated additional $23 million under this provision in 1982/83 and $370 million over the next five years. The 85% monies can be assigned at the State's discretion to any of the Federal Aid Highway Programs. The Public Works Director further advised that the crisis in highway funding is not limited to state and interstate highways. Cities and counties have billions of dollars worth of street and road deficiencies which need correction statewide. County-wide needs alone are estimated to total over $15 million per year for each of the next five years. City and county revenues are down because of the weak economy, reduced fuel consumption, and reduced State bail-out assistance. The State has also diverted motor vehicle in-lieu funds which have historically been available for use on local streets and roads. The City-County Engineering Advisory Committee, on March 11, 1983, met and recommended that the State of California allocate the Federal Aid 85% Discretionary funds to the Federal Aid Urban and Federal Aid Secondary Programs. The Public Works Director recommended that the Board concur in the recommendation of the City-County Engineering Advisory Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors requests the State of California allocate the Federal Aid Discretionary Funds which California receives in accordance with the 85 percent return to source provision of the Federal Highway Act to the Federal Aid Urban and Federal Aid Secondary Programs. 1 hwW.?eerlM!►1hs11his N•hw ae0 werwttopl/e! al loc.fed.fnds4.t4 an mcdon lakan and adwd on the xftAn of ft ORIG. DEPT.: Public Works Bowdof SuPaNkmanVwdeft M10- -. Transportation Planning cc: County Administrator J.R.OLOWK CouwfY CLERK City-County Engineering Advisory Committee and—emido CW*of do Dowd V. Pottorff, Sr.Leg.Rep., CSAC, Sacramento L. Trombatore, Director, DOT,Sacramento D. Reed, Dep.Sec.for Transp., BT&H, Sacramento By NJ M. Evanhoe, Exec.Dir., CTC, Sacramento L. Dahms, Exec.Dir., MTC, Berkeley Mayors, 17 Cities, Contra Costa County RESOLUTION NO. 83/ S40 164 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA RESOLUTION NO. 83/541 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA HOME MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, 1983 ISSUE A, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INDENTURE, BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT, ORIGINATION, SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT, DEVELOPER AGREEMENTS, COMPLIANCE AGENT AGREEMENT AND OFFICIAL STATEMENT, ADOPTING RULES AND REGULATIONS, ESTABLISHING MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, APPROVING AVERAGE AREA PURCHASE PRICE, APPROVING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO TARGETED AREAS; APPROVING A FEASIBILITY STUDY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AND APPROVING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, Chapters 1-5 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act") authorizes counties to incur indebtedness for the purpose of financing home mortgages authorized by the Act, and the Act provides a complete, additional and alternative method for doing the things authorized thereby; WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Contra Costa (the "County") hereby finds and declares that it is necessary, essential and a public purpose for the County to finance home mortgages pursuant to the Act, in order to increase the housing supply in the County for- persons and families within the income limitations established by the Act; WHEREAS, this Board has, by Ordinance No. 82-5, adopted on January 5, 1982, adopted a home mortgage finance program (the "Program") for such purpose, and has determined to borrow money for such purpose by the issuance of revenue bonds as authorized by the Act; WHEREAS, certain cities within the County have agreed or may agree with the County, pursuant to the Act, to cooperate in the Program and have agreed or may agree that the County shall exercise powers to finance home mortgages pursuant to the Act with respect to property located in the geographic boundaries of such cities; WHEREAS, each qualified lending institution which transacts business in the County has been permitted the opportunity to participate in the Program on an equitable basis with other participating lending institutions; 16� RESOLUTION NO. 83/ 541 WHEREAS, this Board hereby finds and determines that the Prograr.. complies with the land use element and the housing element required to be included in the general plan of the County by Section 65302 of the California Government Code; WHEREAS, this Board hereby finds and declares that this Resolution is being adopted pursuant to the powers granted by the Act; and WHEREAS, all conditions, things and acts required to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in the issuance of the Bonds (hereinafter defined) and implementation of the Program as contemplated by this resolution and the documents referred to herein exist, have happened and have been performed in due time, form and manner as required by the laws of the State of California, including the Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, as follows: I. Pursuant to the Act and the Indenture (hereinafter defined) , revenue bonds of the County, designated as "County of Contra Costa Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1983 Issue A, " in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $37, 100,000 (the "Bonds") , are hereby authorized to be issued; provided, however, that in no event shall the aggregate principal amount of Bonds issued and sold exceed the sum of the allocations of the County, the City of Concord and the City of Walnut Creek which, at the time of sale of the Bonds, have been approved by the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee pursuant to Sections 50189 and 50191 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, have been assigned to the County and are unexpired. 2. The proposed form of indenture, dated as of May 1, 1983, between the County and Security Pacific National Bank, as trustee (the "Trustee" ) , presented to this meeting, is hereby approved. The Chairman of this Board, the County Administrator or the Director of Planning (the "Designated Officers") is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, to execute and deliver an indenture in substantially said form, with such additions thereto or changes therein as such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. The date, maturity dates, interest rate or rates, interest payment dates, denominations, form, registration privileges, manner of execution, place of payment, terms of redemption and other terms of the Bonds shall be as provided in said indenture as 040511-0008-161-1982f 2 - - 166 RESOLUTION NO. 83/ 541 finally executed (the "Indenture") ; provided, however, that the terms of the Bonds shall be such as to result in a rate of interest on the Home Mortgages not to exceed ten and one-half percent (10-1/2%) per annum and a true interest cost on the Bonds not to exceed ten percent (10%) per annum. 3. The proposed form of bond purchase contract, between the County and Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. and E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. , as representative of the several underwriters (the "Underwriters") , in substantially the form presented to this meeting, and the sale of the Bonds pursuant thereto, are hereby approved. Anyone of the Designated Officers of the County is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, to accept the offer of the Underwriters to purchase the Bonds contained in said bond purchase contract and to execute and deliver said bond purchase contract in said form, and to approve any additions to or changes in the form of said bond purchase contract (consistent with the final Official Statement approved by the Chairman of the Board in accordance with section 7 hereof) which such officer may deem necessary or advisable, approval of such additions or changes to be conclusively evidenced by such officer' s execution of said bond purchase contract as so added to or changed. 4. The proposed form of origination, service and administration agreement, dated as of April 1, 1983, among the County, the County as Administrator, the Trustee and the lending institutions identified in Exhibit A hereto (the "Lending Institutions") , in substantially the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved. Anyone of the Designated Officers of the County, as issuer of the Bonds and as Administrator (as defined in said agreement), is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, as issuer of the Bonds and as Administrator, to execute and deliver an origination, service and administration agreement with the Trustee and each of said Lending Institutions in substantially said form, with such additions thereto or changes therein as such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. The County is hereby designated to administer the Program in accordance with the Act. S. The proposed form of developer agreement, dated as of April 1, 1983, among the County, the Trustee and the developers identified in Exhibit B hereto (the "Developers"), in substantially the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved. Anyone of the Designated Officers of the County is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, to execute and 040511-0008-161-1982f 3 167 RESOLUTION NO. 83/ 541 deliver a developer agreement with each of said Developers in substantially said form, with such additions thereto or changes therein as such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. 6. The proposed form of compliance agent agreement, dated as of May 1, 1982, among the County, the Trustee and a Qualified Mortgage Insurer (as that term is defined in the Indenture) , in substantially the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved. Anyone of the Designated Officers of the County is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, to execute and deliver a compliance agent agreement in substantially said form, with such additions thereto or changes therein as such officers may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. 7. The proposed form of final official statement relating to the Bonds, in substantially the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved. The Chairman of this Board is hereby authorized and directed, at the time of the sale of the Bonds, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, to execute a final official statement in substantially said form, with such additions thereto or changes therein as such officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution thereof. Such changes may include such changes as to the principal amount, maturity schedule, interest rates and redemption features of the Bonds as effectuate the purposes of this resolution, provided, however, that no change resulting in a stated Home Mortgage interest rate in excess of ten and one-half percent (10-1/2%) per annum or a true interest cost on the Bonds in excess of ten percent (10%) may be made. The Underwriters are hereby authorized to distribute copies of said official statement, as finally executed, to persons who may be interested in the purchase of the Bonds and are directed to deliver such copies to all actual purchasers of the Bonds. Distribution heretofore by the Underwriters of the Preliminary Official Statement, dated April 8, 1983, relating to the Bonds, is hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. S. Based upon the report and opinion of The Land Economics Group, dated November 1, 1982, this Board hereby finds and determines that, in accordance with United States Treasury Temporary Regulation §6a. 103A-2(f), the average area purchase price of all single-family residences which have been previously occupied for the standard metropolitan statistical area in which the County is located (the "SMSA") set forth below, for the period January, 1981 through - 040511-0008-161-1982f 4 168 RESOLUTION NO. 83/ 541 December, 1981 which with respect to such SMSA is the most recent 12-month period for which sufficient statistical information is available shall not exceed $126,364. This Board further finds and determines that the above average area purchase price is based on more accurate and comprehensive data than the average area purchase price limitations published by the Treasury Department for the standard metropolitan statistical areas noted above. The above average area purchase price is subject to adjustment from time to time by this Board by resolution in accordance with the rules and regulations referred to in section 10 hereof. 9. Based on the report of The Land Economics Group, dated April 8, 1983, this Board hereby finds and determines that, in accordance with United States Treasury Temporary Regulation §6a. 103A-2(h) (2)-(3) , the portion of the lendable proceeds of the Bonds required to be made available for home mortgages with respect to residences in targeted areas is equal to $934,569, being 40% of the average annual aggregate principal amount of mortgages executed during the immediately preceding three calendar years for single-family, owner-occupied residences in targeted areas (as defined in §6a. 103A-2(b) (4) and (5) of said Temporary Regulations and as of the date three months prior to the date of issuance of the Bonds) within the unincorporated area of the County (including all cities within the County which have signed or are expected to sign cooperative agreements with the •County pursuant to the Act) . 10. The Home Mortgage Finance Program Rules and Regulations Establishing Eligibility Criteria For Mortgagors And Home Mortgages, in the form submitted to this meeting, are hereby approved and adopted. Pursuant to said Rules and Regulations, this Board of Supervisors hereby finds and determines that median household income for the County for 1983 is $36, 760, subject to adjustment from time to time by this Board by resolution or Board order in accordance with the rules and regulations referred to in this section 10. 11. The Home Mortgage Finance Program Rules and Regulations Establishing Eligibility Criteria for Lending Institutions, for the County' s 1983 Program, in the form submitted to this meeting, are hereby approved and adopted. 12. The report entitled "Market Feasibility Study for Mortgage Revenue Bonds for the County of Contra Costa, " prepared by The Land Economics Group, is hereby approved and adopted. 5 169 040511-0008-161-1982f RESOLUTION NO. 83/ 541 13. Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $37, 100,000 shall be executed by the facsimile signature of the Chairman of this Board, the facsimile of the seal of the County shall be reproduced thereon and attested by the facsimile signL-ture of the Clerk of the County, in the form set forth in and otherwise in accordance with the Indenture. 14. The Bonds, when so executed, shall be delivered to the Trustee for authentication. The Trustee is hereby requested and directed to authenticate the Bonds by executing the Trustee' s certificate of authentication and registration appearing thereon, and to deliver the Bonds, when duly executed and authenticated, to the Underwriters in accordance with written instructions executed on behalf of the County by the Chairman of this Board or the County Administrator, which instructions said officer is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, to execute and deliver to the Trustee. Such instructions shall provide for the delivery of the Bonds to the underwriters in accordance with the bond purchase contract, upon payment of the purchase price thereof. 15. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the County with respect to the establishment of the Program and the sale and issuance of the Bonds are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified, including but not limited to (i) execution and delivery of the Cooperative Agreements between the County and the cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, E1 Cerrito, Hercules, Martinez, Pinole, Pleasant Hill, Richmond and Walnut Creek, respectively, (ii) the establishment of appropriate escrow and other accounts to hold deposits and commitment fees paid by developers for purposes of the Program, and (iii) the selection of the Lending Institutions and Developers and allocation thereto of moneys to be made available by the sale of the Bonds for the financing of home mortgages (subject to such changes in such selections and allocations as such officers and agents may deem necessary or advisable prior to issuance and delivery of the Bonds) . The Chairman of this Board, the Clerk of this Board, the County Administrator and the Director of Planning are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the County, to do any and all things and take any and all actions and execute and deliver any and all certificates, agreements and other documents, including but not limited to those described in the Indenture, the bond purchase contract and the other documents herein approved, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the lawful issuance and delivery of the Bonds in accordance with this resolution and resolutions 040511-0008-161-1982f 6 _ 170 RESOLUTION NO. 83/541 heretofore adopted by the County and in order to carry out the Program. 16. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1983, by the following votes: AYES: Supervisors Povers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Surervisor Schroder. CHAIRMAN, Board of Supervisors `:crtra Costa County ATTEST: J.R. Olsson, County Clerk, County of Contra Costa, By:_ y• U J i Deputy Clerk , C. Matthews CC: Planning via P1aT.ninV Dean Witter ReVnolies Orrick, I:errir_gton c_ E. F. Euttor. O'1-Zelverp & Meyers County kd^ir_istrator County Counsel 171 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 by the fo0owing vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor. Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: FIX FEE FOR COST OF PROCESSING RESOLUTION NO. 83/542 OF FINE INSTALLMENT ACCOUNTS WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 1205(c) of the California Penal Code provide counties with the ability to add a fee to cover actual administrative and clerical cost for the processing of fine installment accounts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to said legislation, this Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the addition of a fee to cover actual administrative and clerical cost for the processing of fine installment accounts, not to exceed thirty dollars ($30.00); and said fees shall be paid through the Probation Department into the County General Fund for the County Treasury for the use and benefit of the County. 1hW*lq=ftMatd tratrwaadeeneetea/ye1 an aetlon t@iwn ead a deed on M!wdaul s el Ow Board of on Me dMt ahown. ATTESTED: 9 J.R.OLSSOtA,COUNTY CLERK OW ex oflido Cleat of the Dowd Orig. Dept.: Probation CG County Probation Officer County Administrator County Auditor-Controller County Counsel 1'72 RESOLUTION NO. 83/542 TME SOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 12 , 1983 Adopted this Order on . by the follow ft vow: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. RESOLUTION NO. 83/543 SUBJECT: Amending Resolution No. 83/438 - A Resolution Conditionally Providing for the Issuance of Bonds to Finance Housing to be Constructed and Owned by Lincoln Property Company WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted on March 15, 1983 Resolution 83/438, an Inducement Resolution conditionally providing for the issuance of bonds to finance a rental housing development proposed for development by Lincoln Property Company; and WHEREAS, Lincoln Property Company has requested that the Inducement Resolution be amended to specifically reference the potential for use of a structure wherein the security for the bond issue is a Certificate of Deposit insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC); and WHEREAS, the Director of Planning has recommended that said amendment be approved; NOW, THEREFORE IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that Resolution 83/438 be amended by adding Section 6 as follows: 116. In order to provide adequate security for mortgage revenue bond financing the Senior Managing Underwriter is hereby authorized to pursue financing structures based upon Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corpora tion (FSLIC) insurance, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance, Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insurance, or other acceptable financing structure." f hereby oMlh that tlris b a trieandeons�otaopyd GO MUM taken and entered on the nNnutss of the Board of Sups-visors on the da:e shown. ATTESTED: ,—Q ZR- top e3 J.R. OLS JN.COU-14TY CLERK and ex offido Cktrk of die fioand my 0007 • Orig. Dept: Planning Cc: Via Planning Lincoln Property Company Dean Titter Reynolds Orridc, Herrington, do Sutcliffe County Counsel County Administrator 173 RESOLUTION NO. 83/543 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the foQowing vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor. Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Determination of Property Tax ) Exchange for Detachment No. 83-1 ) RESOLUTION NO. 83/ 544 From East Contra Costa Irriaation) District (LAFC 83-5) ) WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Fast Contra Costa Irrigation District has initiated proceedings for detachment of certain territory from the District; and WHEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that a jurisdictional change affecting one or more special districts shall not become effective until the Board of Supervisors agrees by resolution to an exchange of property tax revenues among affected agencies; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Super- visors of Contra Costa County does hereby DFTFRMINE the amount of property tax revenue to be exchanged in detachment proceedings where no subsequent annexation actions of the same territory are taken shall be as follows: Property tax revenues which would have accrued to the detaching agency (the East Contra Costa Irrigation District) from the area detached shall be apportioned among the agencies continuing to receive property tax from the detached area accord- ing to their percentage of the total_ share of the tax levy. Said property tax exchange agreement shall apply to affected ter- ritory as submitted to or revised by the Local Agency Formation Commission. 1 hsr t►ae"Mdmbkakwoweoneleo"al on adon bk"and wftmd an ow nehu"ol VW Bowd of Supenhocs on Vw d0v s umL ATTESTED: J.R.O1 SS094,COUNTY CLERK OW ax olNddo Clerk of the Roird Orig. Dept.: County Administrator Cc: Anthony Dehaesus, County Planning Director Ross Rogers, General Manager; FCCID James Cutler, •LAFCO Planning Advisor Robert Selders, Planning Director; City of.Brentwood Dewey Mansfield, LAFCO Executive Officer REPOLUTT_ON NO. 83/ 544 174 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 12, 1983 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder. ABSTAIN: None. SUBJECT: Rejecting Prior Bids and ) As Ex-Officio The Governing Readvertising for Bids for) Board of the Byron Fire the Byron Fire Protection ) Protection District District ) The Board of Supervisors having received bids on April 5, 1983 for 1983-1984-1985 exterior fire hazard control work (rototilling and/or rubbish removal) for the Byron Fire Protection District; and The Chief of the Byron Fire Protection District having advised of certain irregularities relative to the bids and having recommended that the bids be rejected; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the bids received on April 5, 1983 are rejected and that the Clerk is directed to readvertise for bids to be received on May 10, 1983, at 10:30 a.m. for the above described fire hazard control work. 1 AwMr oNrfy N�f MY 1�s t+waMowwota�sl M ago"ftfl end 006w"M on=bubo o1 so Owd of t;- an rN rle dumm ATTESTED: - �a JA.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK ..a ex anao Clerk of w.Sid b .DOW Orig. Dept=' County Administrator Cc: Byron Fire Protection District Auditor-Controller County Counsel The Board recessed to meet in Closed Session in Room 105 , the James P. Kenny Conference Room, County Administra- tion Bdilding, Martinez, CA to discuss litigation and personnel matters. The Board reconvened in its Chambers and continued with the scheduled hearings. And the Board adjourns to sect in regular session on TUESDAY , April 19- 1983 at 9:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Roos 107, County Administration Building, Martinez, CA. Tom Torlakson ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk i s