The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 05041976 - R 76D IN 1 „y �5 i f i i THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.M. , TUESDAY, MAY 4, 1976 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ,. CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman J. P. Kenny, presiding; Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. CLRRK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator. and Public Works Director. JAMES- P"KENNY,mcNMOND CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P.KENNY CHAIRMAN ALI-RED M.DIAS.EL s06RwNTE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EDMUND A,UNSGHEID 2ND DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN JAMES E.MORIARTY.LArwYETTE AMDrOR JAMES R OLSSON.COUNTY CLERK 3Ro ocs,TRrcT SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD ANO Ea OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS,coNCORo MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL 41H CmSTRICT BOARD CHA RDER&ROOM 107 ADAMPOSTRATION BUR.OM/G CHIEr CLERK EDMUND A LINSCHEID,P/TTSBuRG •0 BOX 911 PHONE 94151372-237t 5TH DISTRICT MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY MAY 4, 1976 9:00 A.M. Meeting of the Board of Directors of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 7-A to consider staff recommenda- tion to reject all bids for construction of wastewater treatment dechlorination facility at Shore Acres Treatment Pian , West Pittsburg area. The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9: 15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9: 15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9: 30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees including Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) on certain referrals which include the following: a. Matter of security at county buildings complex in Richmond; b. 1976-1977 County Mental Health Plan; and c. Status of the Social Service funding problem. 9:45 A.M. Service Pin Awards. 10:00 A.M. Executive Session (Government Code Section 54957.6) as required, or recess. 10:30 A.M. Hearing on proposed Bolla Annexation , Alamo area , to County Service Area P-5. 10: 35 A.M. Hearing on Proposed Whitegate Farms Annexation (Subdivisions 4685 and 4686) , Danville area, to County Service Area L-45. 10:40 A.M. Hearings on planning matters (see attached agenda) . 11 :00 A.M. Receive bids for the following: a. Castro Ranch Road Pavement Widening Project, E1 Sobrante area; b. Moraga Way Overlay Project, Moraga area; and c. Arlington Avenue Improvement Project, Kensington area. 0M Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 4, 1976 11 :00 A.M. Hearing on Planning Commission recommendation with respect to General Plan Amendment, Kensington area. 11 : 15 A.M. Mr. Gilbert P. Lazzareschi will address the Board with respect to aviaries in single family residential districts . 11 : 30 A.M. Decision on Planning Commission recommendation with respect to request of Blackhawk Corporation to delete certain land from the currently approved Blackhawk Ranch Planned Unit District (1840-RZ) , Danville area; and to rezone said land to an independent Planned Unit District (1995-RZ) ; Hearing closed April 27, 1976. ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 8: CONSENT 1 . APPROVE minutes of proceedings for the month of April , 1976. 2. DECLARE certain ordinances duly published. 3. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll and cancellation of certain penalties. 4. AUTHORIZE extension of time to June 24 , 1977 in which to file final map of Subdivision 4687, Byron area. 5. ADOPT Ordinance No. 76-36 (introduced April 27 , 1976) which amends the Ordinance Code pertaining to regulations for land improve- ment contractor' s yards and recreational facilities and activities in residential districts. 6. FIX June 8, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. for hearing on appeal of Fisk , Graves , and Plourde (applicants) from the Planning Commission denial of application (L.U.P. 12130-75) to establish a non- . profit community tennis facility and professional offices , Alamo area. 7. FIX June 1 , 1976 at 10:40 a.m. for hearing on appeal of Mr. Robert A. Hagler, et al from Board of Appeals approval of application of Mr. Chris Boddum (L.U.P. 2191-75) to establish a non-profit tennis club facility, Walnut Creek area. 8. DENY the following claims: Security Data, Inc. , $30,826. 49 ; Beverly Jackson , S25,000; and amended claim of Martin Bros. , Inc. , $13,032.09. Items 9 - 19: DETERMINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item. ) 9. MEMORANDUM from County Administrator transmitting copy of a notice from County Supervisors Association of California indicating that its membership dues will increase from $26 ,646 to $30 ,406 for fiscal year 1976-1977, and requesting the Board's position with respect to same. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF INCREASED FUNDING REQUEST 10. MEMORANDUM from Director of Planning advising that the Mayor of the City of Pinole has nominated Mrs. Ann Kesti for Board appointment as an alternate member representing said City on the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council . APPOINT NOMINEE 11 . LETTER from Veterans Representative , State Employment Development Department, requesting Board assistance in the observance of "Hire a Veteran" week during the week of May 278, 1976. ADOPT RESOLUTION URGING EMPLOYMENT OF VETERANS ow P! w `m Board of Supervisors ' Calendar, continued May 4, 1976 12. LETTER from County Auditor-Controller transmitting audit report of the Contra Costa County Employees Retirement System for the year ended December 31 , 1975. REFER TO ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR REVIEW 13. LETTER from Executive Vice President, California Association of Health Facilities , requesting that the Board proclaim the week of May 9-16 , 1976 as "National Nursing Home Week" in . Contra Costa County. APPROVE REQUEST 14. MEMORANDUM from Director, State Office of Emergency Services , urging that state and local governments review and update their emergency plans , and transmitting an emergency planning check- list as well as a summary of earthquake safety information. REFER TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 15. LETTER from Griffin, Conway & Jones , legal firm representing San Luis Drain Ecological Association, advising that said Association is opposed to open ditch construction of the proposed San Luis Drain from Kesterson Reservoir to Antioch Reach , and urging that alternative solutions be considered. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR (ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL) 16. LETTER from Executive Director, Association of Bay Area Governments, advising that said Association conducted a review of the proposed General Plan for the City of Livermore and recommends that certain policies be considered by the Alameda and Contra Costa County Boards of Supervisors to ensure that development in the Livermore-Amador Valley is consistent with regional policies. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FOR RECOMMENDA- TION 17. LETTER from Chairperson , Alameda/Contra Costa Counties Health Systems Agency Coordinating Committee, submitting proposed modifications to the East Bay Health Systems Agency applica- tion for Health Systems Agency designation to strengthen the role of locally elected officials , conditional on the with- drawal of the Joint Powers application. REFER TO GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, AND DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR RECOMMENDATION 18. PETITION from county residents requesting that agencies responsible for senior citizen projects adhere to state and federal regula- tions on hiring and employment. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR REPORT 19. LETTER and enclosure from Vice President and Chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the Alameda-Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association urging that the Board approve a request for two additional Superior Court judgeships ; and LETTER and enclosure from Attorney Daniel Van Voorhis , former bar association president, urging that the Board support two (rather than one) additional judicial positions for the Contra Costa County Superior Court. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT Items 20 - 23: INFORMATION (Copies of communications listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties. ) 20. NOTICE from State Lands Commission of meeting to be held May 27, 1976 which will include consideration of an application for placement of a communication cable on the bottom of Carquinez Strait between Dillon Point and the City of Crockett. QM Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 4 , 1976 21 . NOTICE from State Department of Hea? of public hearing to be held May 24, 1976 on proposed regu:ation changes including certain Medi-Cal provisions. 22. COMMUNICATION from six county residents urging that the Board reconsider its support of $1 .1 million federal funding for design and dredging of the Baldwin Ship Channel in view of the State Department of Water Resources study, which indicates said project could cause salinity intrusion problems in the Delta. 23. LETTER from Interim Director, East County Resource Center, Pittsburg, expressing thanks for previous and current support of the Center' s vocational project to provide comprehensive services for ex-offenders. Persons addressing the Board should complete the form provided on the rostrum and furnisF the Clerk with a written copy of their presentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5 P.M. NOTICE OF MEETINGS OF PUBLIC INTEREST (For additional information please phone the number indicated) San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission 1st and 3rd Thursdays of the month - phone 557-3686 Association of Bav Area Governments 3rd Thursday of the month - phone 841-9730 East Bay Regional Park District 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of the month - phone 531-9300 Bay Area Air Pollution Control District 1st Wednesday of the month - phone 771-6000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission 4th Iaednesdav of the month - phone 849-3223 Contra Costa County %later District lst and 3rd Wednesdays of the month; study sessions all other Wednesdays - phone 682-5950 0 BUARD OF SUPLRV1SO16 CALENDAR May 4, 1976 - Tuesday Planning Items: 10:40 A.M. - 1ZEZONIAti: PUBLIC HEARING: (S.D. III) PLMING C0,01IS5ION INITIATION (1955-RZ) To consider rezoning land from Single Family Residential District-10 (R-10) to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20), comprising 14.9 acres, more or less, located to the crest of the most westerly terminus of isacon Court: halnut Creek Area. STAFF RECO;4 ENDAT10N: Approve. CO-24ISS1UN RECO142iNDATION: Approve. 10:45 A.M. - REZONING: PUBLIC ilEARING: (S.D. 111) PW,LNIAG OXOUSSIUN INITIATIU (1959-RZ) To consider re-zoning 5.3 acres from Single Family Residential District-10 (R-10) to Single Family Residential District-IS (R-15); property fronting 231-ft., on the south side of Springbrook Road, .approximately 1,100-ft., northwesterly of Camino Diablo: iialnut Creek Area. STAFF Approve, southerly half only. COHI-I1SSION I'.cCOIY-IE4DATIO,:: Approve, as recommended by staff. 10:50 A.M. - RcZOiNING: PUBLIC 11EAk1hG: (S.D. 111) P"XING C0I%ZUSSION INITIATIO. (1360-RZ) To consider rezoning .81{ acre from Retail Business District (R-B) to Single Family Residential District-10 (k-10), fronting on the south side of Saranap Avenue, approximately 400-ft., east of El Curtola Ave., Saranap Area. STAFF RECOri">ENDATIp\: Approve. C0i•MISSION RECO:4Zt� UATIOh'S: Approve. 10:55 A.M. - REZONING: PUBLIC HEARING: (S.D. V) I RIL• DEVELOPMraNT (Applicant) - JAMES & ARLENE SfIAN (Grners) (1998-RZ) To rezone 3.75 acres from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District-12 (R-12) ; property located at the most westerly terminus of Silver Chief Way, approx., 110-ft., west of Allegheny Drive: Danville Area. STAFF RECO.•AENDATION: Approve change, A-2 to R-IS. C0MMISSION RECEZZENDATION: Approve, A-2 to R-15. oms i OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions May 4, 1976 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS I. Reclassification of positions as follows: Cost Department Center From Td Auditor- 010 Account Clerk II Account Clerk III Controller #05 District 245 Collections Collections Services Attorney Investigator Officer (all positions) Departmental Collections Services Collections Assistant II Assistant (all positions) Health 450 Intermediate Senior Clerk Typist Clerk #03 Social 509 Administrative Administrative Service Services Services Assistant III Assistant II ST-01 Social 509 Administrative Administrative Service Services Services Assistant III Assistant II *04 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: - Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Agriculture 335 heights and -- Measures Aide Salary Level 691F (class only) To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5-4-76 Page: 2. I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS - continued 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition ' Cancellation Assessor 016 1 Assessment Senior Clerk #01 - Services Clerk Assessor 016 1 Assessment Senior Clerk #02 Services Clerk District 245 Collections -- " Attorney Services Assistant Salary Level 213 (705-858) (class only) Il. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS 3. Name and Destination Department and Date - Meeting Helen Roop Chicago, Illinois American Library County Library 7-19-76 to 7-24-76 Association (time only) Conference Kathryn Crossley Phoenix, Arizona Association of Social Service 5-19-76 to 5-22-76 Family Conciliation (time only) Courts and Services Conference III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 4. Planning Department. Add $4,900 for preparation of County's Economic Development Program. 5. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for following budget units: Auditor-Controller (Central Services, Various Budget Units) , Public Works (Road Construction, County Service Area R-7, Flood Control Zone 3B) , Planning , Superintendent of Schools, Social Service. I To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5-4-76 Page: 3. IV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS 6. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to initiate legal action in Small Claims Court against Gerald Thomas Wheeler to recover $41.51 due the County. V. BOARD AND CARE PLACEMENTS/RATES None. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRAFTS 7. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: AgencX Purpose Amount Period State Board of Agreement Modi- $31,602 7-1-76 Education fication to (State to provide additional CETA 12-31-76 CETA funds for funds) expenditure in the County for vocational education MSC Associates, Staff training $10,700 5-3-76 . Inc. and technical to assistance to 6-30-76 CETA program Val A. Kositsky Nutrition training $60 5-11-76 for foster parents David J. Social Service $75 5-4-76 Schwartz, M.D. staff and foster parent training Gary Schmidt, Social Service $170.60 5-11-76 Ph.D. staff training to 5-12-76 Nancy Van same $141.36 same Couvering, Ph.D. Russell Lee, same $151.56 same M.D. O 1 To: Board of Supervisors From: County ildministrator Re: Recommended Actions 5-4-76 Page: 4. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS - continued 7. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period Phil Manfield & Medical Services $50 4-26-76 Mary Mullin staff training Marilyn Ream Emergency Medical $3,000 4-22-76 Service consultant (Grant to services funds) 6-30-76 Association of Amend agreement No Charge 10-7-75 Bay Area for Emergency to Governments Medical Services 6-30-76 planning and evaluation Sun Valley Allow Sheriff- Waiver of 5-10-76 Merchants Assn. Coroner to parti- Liability to cipate in Nat'l Only 5-17-76 Law Enforcement Week display and information program Office of Consumer Action & No Extend from Criminal Justice Education Program Addi- 5-31-76 to Planning Grant Extension tional 8-31-76 Cost VII. LEGISLATION None. VIII.REAL ESTATE ACTIONS None. IX. OTHER ACTIONS 8. Acknowledge receipt of report from County Administrator regarding contributions to the Delta Advisory Planning Council for fiscal year 1975-1976, and authorize payment of $11,250 by County Auditor-Controller as recommended therein. OW10 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5-4-76 Page: 5. IX. OTHER ACTIONS - continued 9. Adopt resolution seeking the support of other counties for the passage of Senate Bill 1881, which fixes the allocation of Federal Social Services funds to counties for the 1976-77 fiscal year at the amounts allocated for the 1974-75 fiscal year. 10. Approve policy for CETA Titles II and VI (Public Service Employment) of maintaining the June 30, 1976 employment level of all subgrantees through September 30, 1976 provided it does not exceed the April 30, 1976 employment level, and of filling only those vacancies which result from transitions to unsubsidized employment or which occur in administrative staff positions, as recommended by staff and the Manpower Advisory Council. 11. Adopt Complaint Resolution Procedure for CETA Titles II and VI (Public Service Employment) and submit said procedure to the Department of Labor, as recommended by the Manpower Advisory Council. 12. Adopt Proposed Budgets for fiscal year 1976-77 for County Fire Protection Districts, pursuant to Section 13902 of the Health and Safety Code, and fix Tuesday, July 20, 1976 • at 11:00 a.m. as the date and time for a public hearing to be held by the Board of Supervisors on the Proposed Budgets and changes thereto. 13. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to sign application to the State Department of Health for renewal of license to conduct a County Adoption Agency. NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested . citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specified time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5:00 P.M. COEITRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARPMENT Martinez, California May 4, 1975 EXTRA 8 U S I N E S S SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I Item 1. ROLLINGW00D STREETS - INCREASE CONTRACT C011MIGENCY FUND - Richmond/San Pablo Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve an increase of $2,000 in the contract contingency fund for Phase 1 (base failure and pavement surface repairs) of the Rollinqwood Area Street Repairs project in order to provide for repair of additional areas in preparation for the Phase 2 (slurry and fog seals) contract. Sufficient funds for this increase are available in the work order for this project (Work Order 4234). (RE: Project No. 1075-4284-76 (Phase 1) - 'fork Order 4?34) (C) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 2. SUBDIVISION 4498 - APPROVE SUBDIVISION AGREE!1F T - Ala-mo Area It is recom*mm. nded that the Board of Supervisors approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4493. Owner: D. C.-Hail Limited Partnership, 2353 Boulevard Circle, Suite 2, Walnut Creek, CA 94595 Location: Subdivision 4498 is located on the south side of Ridnewood Drive, adjacent to the west side of the Southern Pacific Railroad. (LD) EXTRA BUSINESS Public 'forks Department Page i of 1 Flay 4, 1976 0M CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California May 4, 1976 AGENDA REPORTS Report A. STATEMENT REQUESTED BY CROWN ZELLERBACH CORPORATION This report is being submitted in response to the Board Order of March 23, 1976, referring a request of Mr. Edgar A. Noyer, Steam, Power and Utility Superintendent of the Croom Zellerbach Corporation. Mr. Noyer has advised that his corporation intends to apply to the California Pollution Control Financing Authority for assistance in financing a secondary wastewater treatment plant prior to July 1, 1977. A statement as to the availability of local public pollution control financing is required by the Financing Authority. He is seeking assistance from the Board of Supervisors in obtaining such a statement. Local pollution control financing is not available for the Crown Zellerbach project. it is therefore recommended that the Chairman of the Board be authorized to sign a letter certifying that local public pollution control financing for the proposed Cxown Zellerbach project is not available. (EC) Report B. BRIDGE TOLL INCREASE - The Board of Supervisors, through its action of April 13, 1976, referred a letter from CALTRANS to the Public Works Director for recommendation. In this letter, Mr. T. R. Lammers, District Director of CALTRANS, advised that in all probability the cost for the new Antioch Bridge •will be more than CALTRAI'S has available, and requested a recommendation from the Board as to its preference how the additional funds are to be raised. Setting tolls is the sole responsibility of the Toll Bridge Authority. It should be pointed out that the increases proposed would result in tolls which are similar to those charged on other bridges in the San Francisco Bay Area. In view of the above, and because the Board, on numerous occasions, has supported construction of the new Antioch Bridge for safety and traffic reasons, it is recommended that the Board reaffirm the urgency of early construction of the Antioch Bridge, but leave the decision as to which user charge to increase in the hands of the Toll Bridge Authority, with the understanding that the charges be no more, both in amount and time, than necessary to finance the new bridge. It is further recommended that the Board approve this report and direct the Clerk to send a copy to Mr. T. R. Lammers, District Director, CALTRANS. (MLK) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page I of 3 May 4, 1976 X13 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 1. SUBDIVISION MS 95-72 - ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS - Port Costa Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors issue an Order accepting the construction of improvements in Subdivision MS 95-72 as complete. Subdivider: James Maguire, 200 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, California Location: Subdivision MS 95-72 is located at the east end of 11th Street in Port Costa. (LD) Item 2. 100 ELDER DRIVE - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Pacheco Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a Rental Agreement, dated April' l, 1976, with Margaret V. -> - ' Spowart and Patricia J. Beck, for rental of County-owned property located at 100 Elder Drive, Pacheco, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County. The rental is on a month-to-month, as-is basis at $225 per month, commencing April 1, 1976. (RP) Item 3. POMONA STREET - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Crockett Area The work performed under the contract for reconstruction of a sidewalk on Pomona Street between Second Avenue and Sixth Avenue was completed by the contractor, C. M. Marsh,, Contractor, Inc_ of Vallejo, on April 23, 1976, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications at a contract cost of approximately $4,400. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of April 23, 1976. The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project No. 2191-6083-76) (C) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 4. COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-8 - APPROVE GRANT OF EASEMENT - Walnut Creek Area it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize its Chairman to execute a Grant of Easement to Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company on County property acquired for park purposes for County Service Area R-8. The easement is being granted at no cost to Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company as it covers existing and new facilities which serve County-owned and private property, and such conveyance is determined to be in the public interest. (SAC) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 2 of 8 May 4, 1976 ON14 Item 5. OAK ROAD - ACCEPT DEED - Walnut Creek-Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the following Grant Deeds and Contracts, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the Contracts on behalf of the County. A. Dated April 23, 1976, from Crocker National Bank; consideration: $3,564; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-245378. Payment is for 3,330 square feet of residential land and landscaping. B. Dated April 22, 1976, from Marion G. O'Bryan; consideration: $1,375; payee_ Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-245400. Payment is for 1,206 square feet of residential land and landscaping. C. Dated April 22, 1976, from James E. Cummings, et ux. ; consideration: $1,406; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-245399. Payment is for 861 square feet of residential land, miscellaneous landscaping and improvements. D. Dated April 18, ,.976, from Homer M. Conyers, et ux. ; « ' consideration: $1,796; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-245396. Payment is for 1,231 square feet of residential land, miscellaneous landscaping and improvements. E. Dated April 17, 1976, from William E. Hoch, et ux.; consideration: $1,100; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-247651. Payment is for 917 square .feet of multi-family residential land. _ F. Dated April 19, 1976, from Gordon B. Olson, et ux.; consideration: $1,448; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-245381. Payment is for 1,350 square feet of residential land and landscaping. G. Dated April 17, 1976, from Ralph D. Hanna, et ux. ; consideration: $1,933; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. OK-245383. Payment is for 1,450 square feet of residential land and landscaping: H. Dated April 17, 1976, from Ralph D. Hanna, et ux. ; consideration: $485.00; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-245382. Payment is for 500 square feet of residential land and miscellaneous landscaping and yard improvements. I. Dated April 17, 1976, from Medard T. Mitchell, et ux.; consideration: $2,382; payee: Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-245395. Payment is for 811 square feet of residential land, extensive landscaping and fencing. It is further recommended that the County Auditor be authorized to draw warrants in the amounts and to the escrows indicated above, and deliver to the County Real Property Agent for payment. (RE: 4054-4189-74) (RP) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 3 of 8 May 4, 1976 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV No Items - SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 6. SAN RAMON VALLEY BOULEVARD - PARTIAL RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE - Danville Area The traffic signal system at Site 1, Town and Country Drive, under the contract for San Ramon Valley Boulevard Traffic Signals was completed by the contractor, R. Flatland Company ' of San Mateo, on April 27, 1976, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications. In accordance with Section 7-1.15 of the standard specifications, -the contractor has requested relief from maintenance of and responsibility for the traffic signal system at said Site 1. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors grant such relief as of April 27, 1976. (RE: Project No. 5301-4239-75) (C) AGENDA CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 8 May 4, 1976 ON16 Item 7. SUBDIVISION 4362 - ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS AND REFUND DEPOSIT - West Pittsburg Area The one-year satisfactory performance period after acceptance of the streets for maintenance has been successfully completed. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the street and drainage improvements have successfully completed the one-year satisfactory performance period and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected. 2: Authorize the Acting Public Works Director to refund to Earl -W. Smith Developers, Ltd. the $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement, as evidenced - - by the Deposit Permit Detail Number 112202 dated November :l, • 1973. Streets were accepted for maintenance on November 12, 1974. Subdivider: Earl W. Smith Developers, Ltd. , 11000 San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530 Location: Subdivision 4362 is located on the west side of Anchor Drive, just north of the East Bay Municipal Utility District Aqueduct. (LD) Item g. COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-7 - APPROVE FUND TRANSFER - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the transfer of $3,000 of County Service Area R-7 funds to the San Ramon Valley Unified School District to assist in the development of park and recreation facilities at Nontair School Park. - The transfer of these funds is in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement between the County and the School District previously approved by this Board on October 21, 1975. It is further recommended that the County Auditor be authorized to draw a warrant in the amount of $3,000, payable to the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, and forward to the Service Area Coordinator, Public Works Department for delivery. (RE: Work Order 5450) (SAC) A G E N D_ A Public Works Department Page S of g Nay 4, 1976 ON17 Item 9. COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-7 - APPROVE AGRMIENT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a Consulting Services Agreement with Fong, Jung, Nakaba, LaRocca Associates, Landscape Architects, to provide a study and drawings related to a future neighborhood park, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County. The consulting services will be provided at a cost of $1,500, financed from County Service Area R-7 funds. The Citizens' Advisory Committee for County Service Area- R-7 has recommended the use of the above consulting firm. (RE: Work Order 5242) (SAC) Item 10. SERVICES TO CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT - NUCLEAR TESTING - Diablo Road, Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Acting Public Works.-Director to- have materi:al.& tests,performed-re--i:�^ for Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, as provided for in the Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 1077. The work will consist of performing approximately 20 nuclear compaction tests at an estimated total cost of $1,200. (RE: Work Order 5548) (M&T) GENERAL Item 11. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 15 - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Bethel Island Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio Governing Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District no. 15, approve the Agreement for Engineering Services and authorize its Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the District. The Agreement with Raymond Vail and Associates provides for performance of survey work necessary for the completion of final contract plans and specifications for sewage collection and treatment facilities in the Bethel Island area. Survey work to be performed under the contract will cost $42,500. The State and Federal governments will pay about 87.5% of the contract cost. (RE: Work Order 5400) (NOTE TO CLERK OF TFIE BOARD: Chairman to sign three copies of the Agreement and return two copies to the Public Works Department.) (EC) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 6 of 8 May 4, 1976 0018 Item 12. GENERAL WAGE RATES In accordance with Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors for the County, as the Board of Directors of the Bethel Island, Brentwood, Byron, Contra Costa County, Crockett-Carquinez, Eastern, E1 Sobrante, Moraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pinole, River, and Tassajara Fire Protection Districts, and Sanitation Districts 5, 7-B, 15 and 19, and as ex officio Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and dater Conservation . District and the Storm Drainage District, approve and cause to have published a legal notice specifying the general rates of wages prevailing in Contra Costa County. The form of the legal notice has been prepared and submitted to the Clerk of the Board by the Public Works Department and the County Counsel's office in cooperation with the City of Concord. The City will coordinate a common publishing of the notice for the County and several cities and school districts. (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please return a certified copy of the Board Resolution to the Public Works Department for transmittal to the City of Concord.) (RD) Item 13. CROSSING GUARD SERVICE - APPROVE AGREEMENT It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize its Chairman to sign an Agreement with the California Highway Patrol to provide adult crossing guard service for the period of July 1, 1976 through June 30, 1977. Adult crossing guards will be provided at the seven locations listed below: 1. Mountain View School - Palm Avenue at Martinez Avenue, Martinez 2. Vine Hill School - Pacheco Boulevard at Camino Del Sol, Martinez 3. Gehringer School - State Highway 4 at Douglas Road, Oakley 4. Kensington School - Arlington Boulevard at Rincon Road, Kensington S. Olinda School - San Pablo Dam Road at Castro Ranch Road, El Sobrante 6. Vista Grande School - Diablo Road at Arroyo Drive, Danville 7. Pacheco School - Center Avenue at Deodor Drive, Pacheco (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please return five copies of the Agreement and Board Order to the Traffic Operations Division for further processing.) (TO) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 7 of 0 May 4, 1976 Item 14. HIGHWAY USERS TAX APPORTIONMENT The Controller of the State of California advises that the April, 1976 apportionment of highway users taxes to Counties has been completed and that a warrant in the amount of $336,664.73 has been mailed to Contra Costa County as its share of these taxes. This is $27,436.47 more than the April, 1975 apportionment and $27,431.33 more in total fiscal year- to-date apportionment in comparison with the same time period . last fiscal year. (B&S) Item 15. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HOSPITAL - APPROVE CONTRACTS - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve contracts for inspection services, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the agreements, for the Re-Roofing of Buildings at the Contra Costa County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez. These contracts are effective May 10, 1976, and are with Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady. Payment is provided for services in accordance with the 'standard' rates, as- indicated in the agreements. (RE: Mork Order 5263) (B&G) Item 16. VETERANS' MEMORIAL BUILDING - APPROVE CONTRACTS - Pittsburg Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve contracts for inspection services, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the agreements, for the Veterans' Memorial Building located at 9th and East Streets, Pittsburg. These contracts are effective May 10, 1976 and are with Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady. Payment is provided for services in accordance with the standard rates, as indicated in the agreements. (RE: Work Order 5264) (B&G) Item 17. BAYVIE11 PARR RECREATION BUILDING (COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-17) - APPROVE DOCUMENTS - San Pablo Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Design Development Drawings and Specifications for the 'proposed construction of the Bayview Park Recreation Building (County Service Area M-17) , San Pablo area. it is further recommended that the Board approve the revised construction cost estimate of the architect of $118,500. The Design Development Drawings and Specifications were prepared by the architectural firm of U. S. Barbachano and Associates, Richmond, and were reviewed by the Public Works Department, Office of the County Administrator, and the Citizens' Advisory Committee for County Service Area M-17. (RE: Work Order 5220) (B&G) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 8 of 8 May 4, 1976 00020 Contracts, Agreements, or other documents approved by the Board this day are microfilmed with the order except in those instances where the clerk was not furnished with the documents prior to the time when the minutes were micro- filmed. In such cases, when the documents are received they will be placed in the appropriate file (to be microfilmed at a later time). V y 7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 76 In the Mauer of Proceedings of the Board during the Month of April, 1976. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the reading of the minutes of proceedings of the Board for the month of April, 1976 is waived, and said minutes of proceedings are approved as Vrritten. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors offixed this 4thday of April , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ByDeputy Clerk .Rondalinn Shackles H-24 9/76 15m 000122 In the -Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 76 In dire AAottar of . Affidavits of Publication - of Ordinances. • This Board having heretofore adopted Ordinances Nos. 76-31 , 76-33, 76-34, 76-35 and Affidavits of Publication of each of said ordinances having been filed with the Cleric; and it appearing from said affidavits - that said ordinances were duly and regularly published for the time and in the manner required by law; NOW. THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said - ordinances are hereby declared duly published. The foregoing order was passed by unanfmous vote of the members present. .1 herby certify that the forapoi 4 is a km and correct copy of an ardw avowed on the u6nuoes of said Board of Supanrison on the dote oforasoid Mrdh may hand and the Sed of the Board of oRaei tills 4 t h of M a v . 19 .�7 66 J. A. OLSSON �� r�wk Byo Deputy'Cleric •i+ 24 12R4� � - bi a tierrez •Form #30 4/7/75 0(ft3_ In the Board -of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) -Adopted. This being the date fixed �o adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County and was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board ORDERS that said ordinances(s), is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law; Ordinance Number Subject IZevrspaper 76-36 Regulates land improvement CONTRA COSTA TIMES contractor's yards and recreational facilities and activities in residential districts. PASSED on May 4, 1976 by the folla:-ring vote of the Board: Supervisors AYES NO ABSENT J. P. Kenny M ) ) A. Ii. 'Dias (X) ) } J. E. 1�oriarty (X) } N. Boggess (X ( } E. A. Linscheid (X ( ) ( ) I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of May^T 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By & Deputy Cleric H 24 12;74 .15-U Bonnie Boaz 00024 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 1976 In the Moller of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS W THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is o trw and cord spy of an order errbred on lire adnubs of soil Boord of Supervisors on fire dab ofore a Willes my hoed and the Seal of fire Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th► of May 19 76 ('} J. R. OLSSON, Clerk by t�C — ftn&al Dwity Clerk "I'l—oro y ac nal H•24 U76!Sm '0M POS I T I CN ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: SID y(- Department Auditor-Controller Budget Unit 010 Date _1/14/76 Action Requested: Reclassify Account Clerk II position #05 to Account Clerk III Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To align classification with level of duties being performed. Estimated cost of adjustment: .;;;jaC Ccs► Amount: 1 . Sa ie&=an4-vages: RECEIVED$ 200 2. Fi c Amts& (tiet .items and cost) ra of > Estimated total 7• $ 0, Signature c• > Depar H Ani ti al Determination of County Administrator Date: / ZY / 17•3'I�wok►i Ddu'"'-ac.�nq'/�+.'��j Icr,�O�T L:/aJ.?.J/t<.� "tea' -"«—J z't .L �''"'�/L`rl�w�..``"f�t47f+0a.'''' ✓ ..IASL. yC/. s:�X.�(G Count minlstrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Account Clerk II to Account Clerk III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Account Clerk III, Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the re- classification of Account Clerk II position #05, Salary Level 234 (752-914) to Account Clerk ILI, Salary Level 265 (527-1005). Assistant Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator 'jute: May 5. 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective May 5, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors t�ftY 4 .�s6 Adjustment APPROVED f ) on J. R. OLSS03, County Clerk Date: MAY � ilio _ B1 Deputy Geri APPROVAL o6 th.cs adjustnent eojtst tutX-5 a)i App.%op iati.o;t Adjustinent and Peucnnee Rcdotut on Amrjtdnemt. 000,26 l fGo7 POS I l 1 0 ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department DISTRICT ATTORNEY Budget Unit 245 Date 2-2-76 Action Requested: Classify 4 positions to Departmental Collections Assistant - Trainee or 1 equivilent (New permanent classification for Family Supp proposed effective date: 4-"1-76 Explain why adjustment is needed: 4 eligibility worker positions being transferred frau Social Service Department. Proposed salary range (712-8655) Estimated cost of adjustment: (Balance of 1975-76 and all 1976-77) Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: (4 positions) Ccnpira C_',S,.c! 44,016 2. Fixed Assets: (t.is.t items mast coat) 4 desks at $282Me -i1� 4 posture chairs at $120 ea; 8 side s a ea, 4 bookcases at ea c�_� � �,, 3,128 Estimate total Gt .e $ 48,144 ty Signature _partment H Initial Determination of County Administrator Dat _ To Civil Service: Request recommendation. ;; J�' t k-C-ounty Amin rato Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class Collections Services Assistant; reallocate class and positions Collections Investigator to Collections Services Officer and Departmental Collections Assistant to Collections Services Assistant II. 2 = On April 27, 1976, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Colleetiola; Services Assistant and recommended Salary Level 213 (705-858). F The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 and 71/4q by addi't!g Collections Services Assistant, Salary Level 213 (705-858) and to reflect the�xetl+ling--,and reallocation of class and positions of Collections Investigator to Collections--Se;►ices_bffice , both at Salary Level 256 (804-978) and Departmental Collections Assistant to 4114tions Services Assistant- IIS both at Salary Level 296 (909-1104). Can be effective 4y M11`i�ng Board action. Ott Crb The above class is not exempt from overtime. �. Assistant Personnel irector Recommendation of County Administrator 61 Date: May 5, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service ' Commission approved, effective May 5, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on MAY 4 1976 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk r- ' Date: MAY 4 1976 By:/f, . ':.zl �/,%�-•rel,I�/� IDeputy rJWk APPROVAL 0J .flus adju;stmejtt ea;id. itmtes an Appf;op4iation Adjustment and Pelusonret Resotutiou Ameadment. • 4j POSIT 1 ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department stealth Budget Unit 450 Date 12-12-75 Action Requested: }, Reclassify Intermediate Typist Clerk position #30 to Senior' Clerk Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify position according to assigned duties and responsibilities. Estimated cost.-flf adjustment: Contra Costa County Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: RECEIVED 252.00 2. Fixed Assets: (VAt .items and coat) . DEC t 6 11,576 Estimated tam -Y Administrcror $ 252.00 Signature Department Flea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: In- I(o-- S To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Couflty Ami istr for Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify Intermediate Typist Clerk to Senior Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassificatio to Senior Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the re- classification of Intermediate Typist Clerk position #05, Salary Level 206 (691-839) to Senior Clerk, Salary Level 247 (739-951). 030 --/—Zz,� � - Assistant Personnel D ctor Recommendation of County Administratorate: May s, 197A Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective May 5, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED IQ on MAY a 1976 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: MAY Y 19;a" _ By: J APPROVAL oS thi.b adjustment constitutes an Apprcopniati,on Adjustment and Petsonnt00% Redotuti.on Alncndmmt. POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department SOCIAL SERVICE Budget Unit 509 Date 1/7/76 Action Requested: Reclassify (1) Administrative Services Assistant II position 901 to the Administrative Services Assistant III level Proposed effective date- ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify the position occupied by the incumbent (Charles Couch) Es timateT"cosjof5,djustment: - - ' Amount: I . SaTarie mad wages: L) $ 2. Fti and se�: (ZiAt items and coat) .J f L*-1� 77—. stimated tot ;�,(/ data.� ...�..... Signature �' Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: February 3, 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Co istrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission UDate: April 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recomnendation Reclassify 1 Administrative Services Assistant II to Administrative Services Assistant III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassificatio to Administrative Services Assistant III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the r:,Jassification of Administrative Services Assistant II position #01, Salary Level 392 (121S-1480) to Administrative Services Assistant III, Salary Level 456 (1480-1799). Assistant Personnel rector Recommendation of County Administrator // ate: May 5, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service # Conli-nission approved, effective May 5, 1976. County Administrator lAction of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED - 'rT D) on MAY 4 16-16 f i J. R. OLSSOV, County Clerk j Date: MAY i By - _[ - f 11- !/.tic D•sF�fi; rre.� APPROVAL o� tltiA adjustment eopt tituted an A;ppnopniati.on Adja&bnent and PeA4onnee ' ReAotution Ame,Ldmec+Lt. 11 - POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department SOCIAL SERVICE Budget Unit 509 Date 1/7/76 Action Requested. Reclassify (1) Administrative Services Assistant II position #04 to the Administrative Services Assistant III level Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify the position occupied by the incumbent (herb Putnam) Estimated cost of adjustment: "'`S `_?t'::t.• Amount: I . Rl al?Ws nn�d wages: 2. L Oxek1sst s: (l i e.t items and coat) •' ;- 1 r .^ Estimated total . $f f`. Signature Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: February 3, 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Dunt A rator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission6',-Yate: _ April 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation t II to Administrative Services Assistant III. Reclassify 1 Administrative Services Assistan Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassificati ca to. Administrative Services Assistant III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the 11 sition reclassification toofAd inistrativeeServices Services Assistantt111,Salary LevDef 456ary Level (1480-1799). 392 (lzls-l4so) ZA Assistant Personnel Rffector Recommendation of County Administrator /A ate: May 5, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service ( Confission approved, effective diay 5, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED { x3iA s} on 149i .x J. R. OLSSON, Cofunty Clerk WAY S t a.?6 By: Date: i DPP-wy_ Clerk APPROVAL ob tjzi s adjusbzntC con6trtutes an Appy op4iati,o)z Adlub.tme.►tt and Pm4onneZ Reao&ti.oa Ameztu'sr.ezzt. 00 J t. POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: lrz�o`-7 Department Agriculture Budget Unit 335 Date February 20, 1976 Action Requested: Establish classification of Weights and Measures Buyer (limited term) as soon as Proposed effective date:passible Explain why adjustment is needed: _ Special class needed to more clearly outline qualifications, duties and responsibili'E3rdb: 015k0 C°ul-11"` Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: l :: iJ0 1 . Salaries and wages: $ —0— 2. Fixed Assets: (tiAt .items and cost) of Estimated total $ Signature Department Heaod- Initial DetermiBzatian of County Administrator Date: i � To CixTil Secvi Request recommendation. --� C nt Personnel Office aild/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Weights and Measures Aide. On April 27, 1976, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Weights and Measures Aide and recommended Salary Level 691F. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Weights and Measures Aide, Salary Level 691F. Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant Personn Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: May 5, 1976 +' Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service i Commission approved, effective May 5, 1976. j County A 'h.-ni strator r Atioofthe � the Soard of Supervisors 4 " + IA�justr-ent APPROVED t Y) on 4 J, �QN , County Clerk Date: _ SAY 4 13-" By: App-o '-k-' o; Aau.z aajmstr.ent cor6t tuteA an App7optection Adlus.tmo-tt and PeAAor_neZ 000 ►<1.Sottltion Arend! ent. z POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Assessor Budget Unit Olo Date 4/14/74 Action Requested: Classification Study of Lead Clerk TII Position #04 Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: 7epartment has made provisional appointment to this position.. It is appropriate at this time to study position to determine if i t is nronerly cla«ifie•7 at th-:* i "at Clark TFT loynl _ Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: $ -0- 2. Fixessets• aqui co6t) T i r Estimated total $ -0- Signature O- Si nature AM A654. Department Head Initial;Heteffmnation of County Administrator Date: JUJv 298 197L1 To Cavil "riAce: i Rec}uestE:pla-. sification recommendation. a _ C= County Adhinistrator Personriaf Off*eaand/or Civil Service Commission . Date: April 27, 1976 Cl ass i f i cats o'er aad Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Assessment Services Clerk and cancel 1 Senior Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify reclassification as Assessment Services Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Assessment Services Clerk, and the cancellation of Senior Clerk position#01, both at Salary: Level 247 (739-951). Assists Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: May 5, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commaission approved, effective May 5, 1976. County Admtnistrator Action of the Board of Supervisors ,! Adjustment APPROVED �} on " � -� :=•o .. LSSON County Clerk Date: MW -' 1973 Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o3 -tl.i.s adjustment constitutes ra: Appatoat-iotior. Adju6tmewt and Pe�usunrtee Re,.satatiou Amendment. 000M J POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: O 1 � Department Assessor's Budget Unit 016 Date 2/3/76 Action Requested: Reclassify Senior Clerk Position 02 to Supervising Clerk I Proposed effective date: ASAP. Explainwhy adjustment is needed: To classify Dosition in line with exist{nP duties and responsibilities. C��;, Estimated cost of adjustment: - - Amount: $ 1 . War��iggs d wages: 306 2. #i-keXsgs: (ti6t Ztems and coat) f-1; i! ' � ca $ gone Estimated total $ 306 Signature s" > g Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: 7G (." Z Gc»s7� �IATJr1 .7�sv� v�.�--.Y s�cCL-K �f ----►},r. 11 Count Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Assessment Services Clerk and cancel 1 Senior Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify reclassification as Assessment Services Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Assessment Services Clerk, and the cancellation of Senior Clerk position #'02, both at Salary Level 247 (753-951). Assistant Personnel erector Recommendation of County Administrator / Date: Max 5. 1 976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Corm-nission approved, effective May 5, 1976_ County Administra or Action of the Uoard of Supervisors MAY � 1��5 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. OLSSO�N,,County Clerk Date: 11AY 4 19'i - Qy: D",'Clerk APPROVAL o f ,tW adjas.tin",u'- eonat.Zturtes an APAIOAtiati.on Adjaztment"and Peuonneb= Reao.£�;tion Ame,.'idem_. e In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California may 4 . 19 76 In the N1aMtr of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on Hay 4s 1976. 1 hereby certify that the forego e k a true and comd copy of on order ownad on the minutes of said board of Supervisors on the daft afamaid. Witness my hand and Ow Seal of the board of Supwvisan affixed this 4th day of May 1976 J. R. OlSSON, Clerk by Deputy Clerk oro y cDonald H-24 3/76 ISm 3 00031 : CGNTRA COSTA COUNTY 0 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR•CONTROLLER•S USE Planning Card Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Code Quantity) BudgetUnit Ob ecr b.Acct. CR X IN 66) al 1003 357 2100 Office Expense $1,400 1003 357 2301 Auto Mileage Employees 1,000 1003 357 2473 Specialized Printing 2,500 1003 990 9970 Reserve for Contingencies $4,900 PROOF ______ _K_P: _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Expenses for preparation of the overall Economic Develop- Date Description ment Program to allow the County and its citizens to qualify for Economic Development Act funds pursuant to the County Administrator's memorandum of February 20, 1976. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— 17 76 CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATORI tAIC BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: &WWdWM Kenay. XUX )Moriarty. Boggeaw, I.laac3tetd k. ehaesDire JAY 4NO% —AvIu—.f. R, ouwN cLEwc4thon or P1 an _,3/15/76 V ign re f ADDrop.AdjTitle Dote , pZd (M 129 Rev. 2/68) Journal No. See Instructions on Reverse Side U= CONTRA COSTA COUNTY . APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Auditor—Controller Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMIncrease Code Quantity) Fund Budget Unit Ob ect Sub. Decrease Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 320-2100 Tran to Gen Fund AeSYI/ 20 -2170 586 1 -7750 703 176 321-2100 160 -2160 20 -2170 50 S72-2300 89 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies Gen Fund 1,101 1120 994-9970 Reserve fox- Contingencies Rev Shar Fund 1,101 1120 320-2100 ERC CARRY FlhO 20 1 -2170 586 1 -77S0 703 176 321-2100 160 -2160 20 -2170 50 S72-2300 89 PROOF �_"'p _ _K'P:_ _V_ER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REOUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) -8 TOTAL ENTRY Date Description To transfer enc=brance carry forward's from general to revenue sharing funds, in those budget units financed by revenue sharing funds. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— CONTROLLER: ALM- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: SUPM' ors Kenny- Dias. 110rfarty. MAY 4 1170 ' NO:. >teW_, an J. R. ot.SSOSSON cLN:Rx Budget Analyst D" " Siynomr Title ote C. D. n01PsOH 0 �p►ap.Ad;. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) Journal No. •See Instructions on Reverse Srq�= l CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I CEPARTMENT OR BUDGE f UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT Z. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantic ) Fund BudaetUnrt Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 149-7753 002 Fork Lift - 10 Ft. .4610 3600 01 1 1003 149-7750 CCX Steel Rolling Safety Step 300 Ladder 01 1003 148-7751 006 Recordak Reliant 700 1000 01 1003 011-2477 Education Supplies 2900 PROOF _COQ _ _t`•P_ _ _VER* s_ EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 1. Cost of fork lift authorized by Hoard of Supervisors April 6, 1976, understated by Date `""`''°n 3600.00. The above adj70' ment is jieeded to obtain this machine. r 9 2. Steel Rolling Safety Ladder is used to remove material that will be stored on racks installed in the warehouse. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— /' CONTROLLER: Cu COUNTY f ADMINISTRATOR. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: lett Ke=y, 'M's� lAuriartp. Bogge=6 Ilnacheldi. MAY 4 1976 No:. 7Le�,:c., ,.. t � R , a ,�-1 ,. ff. Serv. Manager 4-23-76 J. OWuty eek Siature Title Date �Approp.Ado. (M 129 REV. 2/75) S02�/ Journal No. • Car Instructions on Reuerse Side CONTRA COSTA COtWW 0 • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Animal Control RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code Quantity) Budget Un#t Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 6 1003 366-7750 001 Animal Cages Tran to 2479 1,06S 01 1003 366-2479 0th. Spec. Dept. Exp. 1,065 Control RECEIVED PROOF K.P._ _VER.— 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitol outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To transfer budgeted fixed asset items under $200 each Date Desct-ptmn to the proper operating object of expenditure. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR- (��4PR 2 7,6 CONTROLLER: �j � COUNTY cJ ADMINISTRATOR: ` BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: allp ls= Kenny, Dteie ASoriany, B099606 6 LLMMWd. Q+�•�If:7itrKc. YAY 4 1316 NO% led J. R. ct.ssoN CLERK by a Budget Analyst 4-24-76 oittfylerk Si ature Title � Date j C. D. TIlPSON Approp.Adj. 15:.� ( rnol No. M 129 Rev; 2/66) 0(06 •Ser lustrt+ctioss on Reverse Side (` �`I/( i • � CONTRA. COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT CEPARTME-i c� S OGEr u`�tT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE CardSpec,al ACCOUNT '. OLUECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Decrease CR X IN 66) Code Quantity) Fund Budaetun,t Obtect -b_ACCT. SELECT ROAD CONSTRUCTION .01 1003 661-7630 429 1. Port Chicago Hwy 4,000 528 2. Livorno Rd 44,593 531 3. Marsh Creek Rd 10,000 532 4. Kirker Pass Rd 60000 566 2. Stone Valley Rd 44,593 995 1, 3, 4. Design Eng 20,00() SELECT RQAD B�ERMENT_S 662 3192 5. Treat Blvd 137 990 5. Betterments i37 MINOR ROAD BETTERMENTS 666 990 5. Betterments 1 444 5. John Glenn Drive 1 PROOF EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital eutlaY, list items and cast of each) TOTAL _ - — 1. W.O. 4311 Pre l Ila i fwy eng i neer i ng to realign curves ENTRY 1000' north and 4500' north of Clyde Dote Descr,ptian 2. W.O. 4257 Pre 1 im i nary and Right of play Eng i neer i ng to reconstruct 2680 to Trotter Way. 3. W.O. 4309 Preliminary Engineering to widen It overlay Walnut Blvd to SPRR track, now Byron. 4. W.O. 4310 Preliminary engineering to install barrier Clayton Valley C.L. to Pittsburg C.L. 5. W.O. 4333 Transfer funds b cover expenditures on APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE completed wcrk order. AUDI TOR— � j[ I R 2 976 CONTROLLER �+1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: !lUPMIrors Kenny. Dl&% Y. Boggess. Ltnschel& `�Z": )Z',NOi1A7t 1976 _. )t nzt, C-n ) Acting Punic works Director 4/2� 8_/7 J. R. OLSSON, CLERIC br , '$igr+atur Titlr j��I Dalt w1y Clkt Approp.Adj. ; Jaumai Na. (M 129 REV. 2/75) !.:,!ructions fill Rea erse SidO G P M 1 t CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 0 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I DEPARTMEN OR SUDGE f UNIT Pub l is Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT ?_ OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantit 1 F n` BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct, CR X IN 66) COUM SERVICE AREA R-7 01 2754 2754-3580 1. Dev Rec Fac FM 007 30000 S 7700 097 1. Park Land to 3580 3,000 FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 38 2520 2520-2310 2. Profess b Person FM 015 2090154 . 7712 015 2. SR Crk to 2310 2090154 PROOF CO"p _ _ _P_ =- EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 1. W.O. 5450 Additional funds for development of Date CrsCriptecn recreational facilities per school district J.P. agent of 10/21/75. 2. W.O. 8171, 8178, 3184, b 8185 To provide appropriation for channel studies and zone plans. APPROVED: / GNA T AUDITOR— f *� CONTROLL COUNTY (- ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Keane. DIRS. A%Xlarty. Boggess. Llaacbeld. No:. MAY 4 S9;6 6 .1. R. OLSSON. CLERK b,/ A& �-. Act I ng Pub I is Works D irector 4/28/76 ftPY1► 0319"k Sjgnatur Tide Date Approp.Adj. (M 129 REV. 2/75) OOJournal No. • Sed- 111structiorls on keterse Side I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE 44CXX K VAt L rl Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code Quantity Fund Budgeturlit 04tec Sul�,.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 1003 357-2310 Professional and personal services $250 01 1003 357-7752 Of?- Conference table $250 PROOF VER._ I EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost Of each) TOTAL ENTRY This adjustment is necessary to order a conference Date Description table for the second conference room which is about to be constructed. APPROVED- SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— R 2 B'M CONTROLLER, WC COUNTY 3 ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES- Boggens. 'Ic CONTROLLER: MAY 4 1976 NO:. —xr� on J. R.OLSSON CLERK by Title Date sok Anthony Anthony A 5"DeaWaleshs, Director of Approp.Adi- Q.4 ournal No. M 124 Rev. 2/66) See Instructions on Reverse pnin '60 W s _ • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ARJUSTMENT t. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOWCONTROLLER'S USE Curd Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET TEM ' Decrease Increase Code Qjantit 1 Fund Sud et Unit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 0016 601-1013 Temporary Salaries 2,500 601-1011 Permanent Salaries 2,S00 PROOF COf"p __ _K_P__ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of eocb) TOTAL ENTRY Date Description Supervisor of School Records position is vacant. Need specialized, temporary employee to fill in until replacement for perlmnent position is hired. APPROVED: SIGNAT RES DATE AUDITOR— rte• � CONTROLLER: tel' COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD F�ERYI�pRS ORER j YES �I>fOt� reu ►. 1: : 130ggeje„ l.tnSCLeld J.- ncG MAY 4 5916 NO:. �2.nzL on 3. R. OLSSON (!��fo4JU4 Associate Superintendent: 4/16 CLERK b 2 Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. II v ( M 129 Rev. 2168) L" Journal No. `See faa strrctios on Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ` • APPROPRlATiON ADJUSTMENT t. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Social Service RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Code Quantic ) Fund BudoetUnrt Obiect b Acct. Decrease CR X IN 66) AFDC-BHI 01 1003 518-3311 Federal Aid $19,800 01 1003 518-3312 State Aid $ 9,700 01 1003 518-3313 County Aid, Basic $ 4,800 01 1003 518-3314 County Aid, Supplemental $35,200 01 1003 501-3316 Service Connected Aid $40,000 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies, General Fund $29,500 01 1003 990-9970 Unrealized Revenue $29,500 PROOFComp._ K;P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capita)outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL --- - - -- - - - ENTRY To provide appropriations for day treatment for dependent children who would otherwise D°" require placement in institutions at a higher cost. i Sufficient funds will be saved in AFDC--BHI and County Board and Care to cover placement costs of these children. APPROVED: ES DATE AUD{TO - Due to the limited Federal Services allocation, CONTROLLER: '} County funds are being transferred to cover COUNTY both County and Federal shares of the cost of ADMINISTRATOR- these schools. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: '^�-� _<<� v� �^cc�� Caez (LsE1M�. SCS(( YES: Supen's m Kenny. DI" 2d4aq&x%y, cJ BoggeK Lin3cheid. 5. i. !o /to MAY 4 1976 NO:. 5;0s an C. L. Van Marter, J. IR. OLSSON CLERK f'• Director, HRA 4-26-76 CIA Signature Titlep Date Approp.Adj. S;ZA;L (M 129 Rev. 2168) 'See Instructions on Reverse Side nA' urnal No. Human Resources Agency Date April 27, 1976 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY To Arthur G. Will, County Administrator From C. L. Van Marter, Director Contra Costa County RECEIVED Subj BUDGET APPROPRIATION; SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT ASR G r 170 County Administrctor The Board of Supervisors approved by Board Order (attached) the specialized foster home program and the necessary appropriation of $40,000 in support of the program. I am forwarding the appropriations to your attention for processing, due to the unusual accounting transfer. The appropriation decreases unrealized revenue and transfers only the County match for use in the new program. CLVM:nt cc: Ron deVincenzi On C 2 r: w G. rO f7'i ooa44 r - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPIUATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT social Service, r'R RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE eV'tJ' Q Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantity) Fund Budget Unit Object - b.Acct. CR X IN 66) AFDC-BHI 01 1003 518-3311 Federal Aid $19,800 01 1003 518-3312 State Aid $ 9,700 01 1003 518-337 County Aid, Basic $ 4,800 01 1003 518-3314 County Aid, Supple tal $35,200 01 1003 501-3316 Service Connected d $40,000 01 1003 990-9970 Re rve for Cont' gencies, Ge eral Fund $29,500 01 1003 990-9970 Unreali ed Re enue $29,500 0 5n � fll _ N PROOF _C_o_mp.__ _K_P:+VER.— EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitaloy, list items and cost of each) TOTAL o provide appropriations for treatment for depen- ENTRY dent children who would otherwise''require placement in oate Description dent at a higher cost. Sufficient funds will be saved in AFDC-BHI and County Board and Care,£#i4dren to cover placement costs of these children. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DTE Due to the limited Federal Services allocation, County AUDITOR- funds are being transferred to cover both County and CONTROLLER: 1 Federal shares of the cost of these schools. COUNTY ! ADMINISTRATOP: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: (/ • ? ^ YES: NO:, on r �.c..UGC r,�G.T,-.Q►��.. -uk'�? W.T.PAASCH. CLERK by ipnature Title / Date App,: Add. ( M 129 Rev. 2J68) 0`` 45 Joumot No. See Instructions on Reverse Side � . III THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORDNIA In the ?latter of Proposals ) for Establishment of Two ) March 30, 1976 I Programs for Care of Dependent ) Children. ) The Board on March 16, 1976 having referred to its Government Ooerations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) proposals of the Human Resources Agency for estab?ishr..ent of a specialized foster home program and day treatment arogran for dependent children; and The Com:nittee having this day reported that after meeting with with County Administrator and the Director, Human Resources Agency, it recommends that the Board take the following actions: I. "Provide program approval for the specialized _ foster home program and authorize the Director, Human Resources Agency, to develop contracts with specific foster homes to serve in this specialized capacity. These contracts would " identify specific foster parents and specific locations in the County where these homes will be located. This matter would be returned to the Board for-final approval before the homes are established or any children are placed; 2. "Approve the Appropriation Adjustment for $40,000 , recommended by the Director, Human Resources Agency, in order to provide for day treatment of dependent children who would otherwise require placement in institutions at a higher cost. This Appropriation Adjustment is covered with funds from the Social Service Department's existing foster care appropriation." IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that -the recommendations of the Government Operations Committee are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on Sarch 30, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 30., 1976. - cc: Board Cor^.mittee Witness my hand and the Seal !7. i3"2CLor, Human Re3ource3' of the -Board of Supervisors affixed Agency this 30th day of March, 1976. Probation Officer County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, CLERK 20�.� BY ✓ o Deputy Clerjc Ifrai OW40 n ` .. I"�� :moi♦ .2.�L _ .k`�. '.i• - o In t7 tet' /1 � • iI. .� 1 ;. . - f.] . .n1• •ifs .♦ 1 T_N THE BOARD OF SUI ERVTSORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/363 of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) !-.TiEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction_ of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, IVEREFOR22 BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1975 - 1976 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from capers in the assessor's Office whet was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; and in accordance with Sections 1;986 and 5096 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assesses may file R cl 0 m for cancellation or refund: Code 07013 - Assessment No. G1I[l, boat rF 6812 CT is erron- eously assessed to Delbert E. Randall, assessed value $720. Since 11r. R.,undall was not the owner of this boat on the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. Code 79111 - Assessment No. 424G9, aircraft 2538 F is erron- eously assessed to Stefan P. Taylor, assessed value .fi3650. Since fr. Taylor was not the o:.rner of this aircraft on the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. FURTHER, for the 1971,,-75 fiscal year: Code 79111 - Assassment No. A23-UI, aircraft 2538 F is erron- eously assessed to Stefan P. Taylor, assessed value X3650. Since Mr. Taylor was not the owner of this sir-raft on the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: JOIR� R. CLAUS-InAi County Counsel R. 0. Seaton Deputy Assistant Asse3nor cc: Assessor (Giese) .:a Auditor t't:e 8ocrd Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 76/363 Page 1 of 1 00047 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF OOHTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Flatter of Cancellation of ) Delinquent Penalty on 1975-?6 } Resolution No. 76/364 Unsecured Assessment Ro11. The County Tax Collector having filed with this Board a request for cancellation of the 6% delinquent penalty on Rill No. U3001/9035 on the 1975-76 Unsecured Assessment Roll; and VHERUS, due to inability to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date, which resulted in penalty being charged thereto; and so The County Tax Collector noir requests cancellation of the 6% delinquent penalty. IT IS HER:-MY ORDEMM pursuant to Sections 11985 and 4986 (a) (2) of the Revenue & Taxation Code, State of California, that the penalty be canceled. EMIAM. W. LFAL I hereby consent to the above COUNTY TRE.ASURM TAX COI3ZC70R cancellation: JOHN B. CLAUSEN COUNTY COUNSEL Deputy Tax 061 ector /f putt' i Adopted by the Board on.- 14AY 4 ..1971 ....-. cc: Tax Collector Auditor RESOLUTION NO. 76/364 OOCAS IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF M CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Cancellation of ) Delinquent and Additional Penalties ) Resolution No. 76/3b5 Accrued after March 31, 1976 on ) 1975-76 Unsecured Assessment Roll. ) ) The County Tax Collector having filed with this Board a request for cancellation of the 6% delinquent penalty and additional penalties accrued after March 31, 1976 on Bill No. 6007/1066 on the 1975-76 Unsecured Assessment Roll; and WHEREAS, due to inability to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date, which resulted in penalty being charged thereto; and so The County Tax Collector noir requests cancellation of the 6p delinquent penalty and additional penalties accrued after March 31, 1976. IT IS HEREBY ORDEREO pursuant to Sections 4985 and 4986 (a) (2) of the Revenue & Taxation Code, State of California, that the penalties be canceled. E IARD W. LEAL I hereby consent to the above COUNTY TREASURER TAX COLLECTOR cancellation: JOHN B. CLAUSEN � COUNTY COUNSEL Deputy Tax Collector By , •� l,, ��/�/ putt' Adopted by the Board on.--MAY-J,--M. cc: Tax Collector Auditor RESOLUTION NO. 76/365 9 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF - CONTRA, COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Cancellation of ) Additional Penalties on 1975-76 ) Resolution No. 76/366 Unsecured Assessment Roll. ) The County Tax Collector having riled with this Board a request for cancellation of additional penalties on Bill No. 2002/9028 on the 1975-76 Unsecured Assessment Roll; and WHEREAS, due to inability to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date, which resulted in penalties being charged thereto; and so The County Tax Collector now requests cancellation of the additional penalties. IT IS HEREBY OP_DEW pursuant to Sections h985 and h986 (a) (2) of the Revenue & Taxation Code, State of California, that the penalty be canceled. WYARD W. LEkL I hereby consent to the above COUNTY TREASURER-TAI COLLECTOR cancellation: JOHN B. CIMSEN COUNTY COUNSEL Deputy Tax Collector eputy Adopted by the Board on—MKA...1 f _...... cc: Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 76/366 00mo �tc7 4 BOARD OF SUP-MVISORS OF COMMA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORMIA Re: Cancel Delinquent Penalties, etc. ) on 1975-76 Secured Assessment Roll. ) R=LuTiou M0. 76/367 TAX COLTZG*MR'S IM: 1. Parcel Nos. 068-181-018-0, 263-090-020-3, and 263-M-027-8-01. Penalties and costs have attached to the second installments due to inability to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date. Having received payments, I now request cancellation of the 6,00 delinquent penalties, costs, redemption penalties and fees heretofore or hereafter accrued pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4985. 2. Parcel Ido. 1894tl2-039-1. I received second installment payment, but due to clerical error the payment was not credited to the applicable tax bill, which resulted in 6% penalty and cost being charged thereto. I now request cancellation of the 6% delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty and fee having heretofore or hereafter accrued pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 4966 (1)(b) and 4985. Dated: APR 2 7 1976 EY-I $D 1L LEAL, Tax Collector I consent to these cancellations. JOIRI B. CLAUSFII, County Counsel Asst. Deputy By: - .rr By: ter.f. 0�' /, /�..- , BOAUDIS OIRDM: Pursuant to the above statutes, and showering that these uncollected delinquent penalties attached because of inability to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date and clerical error, the Auditor is ORDEM to MECEL therm'. PASSED ON MAY I ig76 , by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. APL:jan cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector RiSOMITIM NO. 76/367 100061 e IN THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, In the Matter of Cancellation of Penalties on Unsecured Roll and ) Discharge of Further Accountability ) Resolution No, 76/368 for Collection of Tax. ) The Office of the County Treasurer Tax Collector having received a remittance in the amount of $55.39 from Irving J. Kornfield, Receiver Trustee in Bankruptcy, whish represents a first and final dividend on bankruptcy claim. covering the following: Fiscal Year 1961-62 Fiscal Year 1962-63 Code 7305 Assessment 21jO9 Code ? Assessment 2152 Joyslen, Jack F. Joyslen, J. F. 1041 Stuart Street - 1041 Stuart Street Lafayette, California Lafayette, California DBA: Lafayette Tool & Inst. Co. DHA: Lafayette Tool Sc Instrument Co. Equipment Equipment Assessed Valuation--Personal Property $290 Assessed Valuation--Personal Property $360 Tax, Tangible Property $29.51 Tax, Tangible Property $36.19 8% Penalty 2.36 8% Penalty 2.89 31.E7 W3-$r.07 F;,.scsl Year 1971-72 Fiscal Year 1972-73 Code 6601JIJ Assessment 2057 Code MAssessment 2073 Original Engineering & Mfg. Original EW. & Mfg. Corp. 3361 Fostoria tray 3361 Fostoria 'Flay San Ramon, California 91:583 San Ramon, California 94583 Inventory, Yhchine:7 & Mfg. Equipment Inventory, Machinery & Mfg. .Equipment Assessed Valuation: Assessed Valuation: Personal Property $12630 Personal Property $2,500 Exemption 300 Exemption la50 Tax, Tangible Property $173.0 Tax, Tangible Property $304.04 6,-.r Penalty 10.L0 6% Penalty 18.24 U3.53 $322-28 RESOLUTION N0. 76/368 0OW2 2. Fiscal Year 1973-74 Code 6&= Assessment 2083 Original DW. & Mfg. Corp. 2931 Cloverdale Avenue Concord, California 9h520 Inventory, Machinery & Mfg. Equipment Assessed Valuation: Personal Property $3,000 Fxeipu on 675 Tax, Tangible Property $343.33 6% Penalty 20.59 3 and the Treasurer Tax Collector having requested that authorization be granted for cancellation of the 8$ and 6% penalties and additional penalties as provided under provisions of the Bankruptcy Act; and The Treasurer Tax Collector having further requested that he be discharged from further accountability for collection of the unpaid balances thereby reducing the tax to $55.39, pursuant to Sections 2923 and 2925, as amended, of the Revenue and Taxation Code, State of California; The Treasurer Tax Collector having further certified that the above statements are true and correct to the best of his kn(rwrledge and belief. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid requests are APPFDVED. EDWARD W. LEAL Treasurer Tax Collector Deputy Tax Collector ALopted by tha Board on—ALLY-A.—.. lq72....... cc: Treasurer Tax Collector Auditor usowTION N0. 76/368 00053 i•.)s ^•t It"r.Ctr:i's �.�3�'� —moi i i�ii l: i'i lii"tli?Tw 6 T Ti 4 ltl i w :•"i• ft".• f1: .✓•, �anti , TO CLiIERK BOLRD OF at 0'CIO c): y I14. SUPYMVISORS Contra Cos;:a Coun-y Records J. R. OLSSON, Cogan ty Recorder Fee S Official BDARD of St. nquISORS, CONTRA COSTA COW.TY, CAMFOR1,11A In the Matter of Aecept:ing and Giving RESOLU.1011 Or ACC'?TAKCE Notice of Completion of Contract with ind NOTICE' OF CO :PLEiTOil C. M. Marsh Contractor, Inc. (C.C. 03086, 3093) (Proiect No. 2191-6033-761RESOLUTION: 210. 76/369 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ARESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra, Costa on April 5, 1976 contracted -with C M Marsh Contractor, Inc., P. 0. Box 107, Vallejo, California, 94590 :ame and Aa rens- of Coni_actor) _ for reconstruction of a sidewalk on Pomona Street between Second Avenue and Sixth Avenue in the town of Crockett, Project No. 2191-6085-76, Vii'`3�2 �Sba6ti�t�5cl�� for work: to be Performed on the Crou.^_3s of the County; and The Public !lor'•:s Director reports that said uork has been inspected and complies with the approved plar_s, special provisions, and - standard specifications, and reco=ends its accePLance as complete a3 of April 23, 1976 Therefore, said work is accepted as- completed on said date,- and the Cler3: shall file :with the Coi:.ity Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a 3lotice of Completion for said contract. PJM D 1-1%"D A L PTED 021 May C, 1976 CERTIFICATI0311 and YERIFICATIO;i I certify' t.?iat the fore" izg is 4 true 4.`:3 correct cony of �z "esolu- •tion aid acce�Ounce duly adopted and entered on i.e ninutes of ibis Jc?"t� S 1;Ce�?h� On the above date. I d;ecla-re und::•r penal�y of perji:ry that t::c forcuoirg is trice and correct. Dated: May 4, 1976 J. R. OLSSO:: IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALifornia In the Matter of Agreement with ) San Ramon Valley Unified School ) District and transfer of County ) Service Area R-7 funds, Danville) RESOLUTION NO. 76/370 Area ) j (Work Order 5450) j The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: This Board on October 21, 1975 approved an agreement with the San Ramon Valley Unified School District providing for the transfer of certain County Service Area R-7 funds to the District for development of Park and Recreation Facilities, and In accordance with the provisions of the agreement this Board authorizes and approves the transfer of additional funds in the amount of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) to the San Ramon Valley Unified School District for the purpose of acquiring materiai and equipment for development of a Tri Course recreational facility at Montair School. The County Auditor is hereby authorized to draw a warrant in the amount of $3,000.00 payable to the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, and forward it to the Service Area Coordinator, Public Works Department for delivery. PASSED on May 4, 1976 unanimously by Supervisors present. JDF:pse Orig: Public Works S.A.C. cc: County Administrator Public Works Director (2) San Raman Valley Unified School District County Auditor RESOLUTION NO. 76j 370 Qm BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the matter of adopting ) scale of prevailing wage ) RESOLUTION No. 76/ 371 rates - 1976 ) (Labor Code SS1770 et seq.) RESOLUTION ADOPTING GENERAL PREVAILING RATES OF WAGES The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County for the County, as the Board of Directors of the Bethel Island , Brentwood , Byron, Contra Costa County, Crockett - Carquinez, Eastern, El Sobrante, Noraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pinole, River, and Tassajara Fire Protection Districts , and Sanitation Districts 5, 7-B, 15, and 19, and as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the Storm Drainage District , RESOLVES THAT: A scale of general prevailing rates of wages has been presented to this Board as set forth in the Ilotice attached as Exhibit "A." This Board , pursuant to State law, hereby adopts the rates specified in the attacsed Notice as those general rates of wages prevailing in Contra Costa County and the above Districts as of the date of this Resolution. The Public Works Director is hereby directed to cause the attached Notice to be published at least one time in a news- paper of general circulation in Contra Costa County PASSED on May 4, 1976, by this Board . Originator: Public Works Department Road Design Division cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller Flood Control Director, Department of Industrial Relations County Administrator Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 76/ 371 00055 ' u c c o W O • s.+ w O � n n n n n n n n n n n n n � n 7+ O 1a 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 ! 1 t t t n f U A O O O %a O O O O U ta t. M M M M ri ei M C11 M M c9 c"1 ell rf C7 y t+1 > a m u . ,.► r.. a y O ZJ L -o ~ u O 00 to c .a N o 0 0 0 �n n .a .a o M R. H o c 0 F� Q .1 U a a a Co O N N -a .-t O O Q O .� N O Q N y. tj 44 O N U F .-t -•� C M T .O O r1 O a u,+ is U R -Iritn V O OCD Ems-+ Qfa .i v U m .ri t: a te4 m in o •n M %o un Co cn in 0 I-# to M M cv C7 O a •.4 .a ri 0% O Q• at N M v1 .-E %0 n a* O N41 T3 n U U O 4J a Q4=1 to :Sa U tj 34 vi O 43 O c fl 43 a U w C3 C: V4 O cd E r X At lc K Ic W A V-4 m ~ 0 `O V4 N n O O Ln U1 r'-t cn O O Q Q O O N M O N O a fw u f: r1 O o in n .o n N .-1 M .-1 a+ Q 0o n to N O ti C3 0 a 41 Z 41 g G O ac ra 0 to O o c c� a .-f .1 u n +1 -4 O :4 to w .s: cc m :s7 H id t . ai w a ? x u194 S4 V 0 u to U -W4 cl O .'z m H H 1+ aJ to �% 3 " �a cs O u 1 to O N N O n M O .T Q► .T O O C a 0t1 4 C %" Ch n co O n n O co n ao n • %a a (i R x 3 ci `a to A O a C) aN i' uo+ on to M a t Ln n c � r f M Cl Q a► U4 u 1+ aA M .-1 %O Cl s a► .Y M tt 1 CQ %0 .-I N n :j. O n O .4 a0 .-i rt .-c n .{ .-1 O O n a% O O ao N O P. !\ a ¢. aC .-1 rt rl .-1 r/ .-i .-1 .-f u 1+ 94 C O U >» >•a w H O f-. •4 to aJ tj .14 u -A C�1 cn -�+ x s+ •�t t+ a0+ p m la tai cD ty 10 u 0006� x G u J m ci �� a -•� al ami 54 i :3 G >. o ri a u .a 14 u s404 s+ u s+ r. ai t+ U o 0 u u a m ai ¢, q to c m a aC -V. a G u •r! 3 1.+ nl a O eE •-+ u u a to u a O o s c to rn B l 12 A u c -.�4 s .a .4 1+ H a a 0 A u ti-f at a :3.c q C t0 0 fi+ s+ ti fU .^I O O t. 0. r-t rt O � ter- r- o , � cot x = s m w a k iA � ' Oa N ZA .-iZU w G ' ,-# t3 G � -el tl l .Q-3= ,ort N.Z n . tt C12 :4 � o 0 I, c 7 o Ic 04 cs w c: �+ d O 3 C d V v O co IA tl t0 � O eh u N N ¢+x tl . CA d + 3 V tl A Oma' i+ tl 't3 �eS 4 i i J � n u a " QX! N w in V cn W-4 G w tl y vAi ta H 3 of 3 DR.%,w 3-22-76 • For classifications not shoran refer to the current edition of monthly publica_ion of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency Department of Public Works Division of Highways, entitled, "Equipment Rental Rates and General Prevailing Wage Rates", and to the Master Agreements of the following union locals: UNION LOQkL N0. MION LOCAL NO. Operating Engineers 3 Lathers 88 Laborers 324 Painters 560 '& 741 Teamsters 70 & 315 Plasterers 112 Ironworkers 378 Plumbers 159 Piledrivers 34 Roofers 81 Cement Masons 594 Sheetmetal Workers 216 Carpenters 642 & 2046 Tile Layer 19 Auto-Marine & Specialty 1176 Tile Helpers & Finishers 7 Painters Boilermakers 513 & 749 Asbestos Workers 16 Fence Constructors Floor Layers 1861 Housemovers Line Drivers 468 Dredgers bomber Handlers 939 Drywall Installers Hillmen 550 Elevator Constructors 8 Hillwrights 102 Bricklayers 8 Shinglers 478 Carpet & Linoleum Layers 1290 Stationary Engineers 39 Electricians 302 Stermfitters 342 Glaziers 169 Terrazo Workers 115 Hod Carriers 166 Operative Plasterers & Cement 825 Masons PASSED AND ADOPTED O(09 r t IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of the map of Subdivision 4498, ) RESOLUTION PiO. 76/372 Alamo Area. WHEREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4498, property located in the Alamo area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with D.C.-Hall Limited Partnership, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. OND 209 04 13) issued by Pacific Insurance Company with D.C.-Hall Limited Partnership, as principal, in the amount of $104,300 for Faithful Performance and $1044,800 for Labor and :Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 135689, dated April 30, 1976), in the amount of $500.00, deposited by: D.C. Development and Construction Company. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full, and the 1976-77 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of (•.arch 1976, is estimated to be $6,000; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by 'Title 9 of the CoZnty Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. 8110 209 04 24) issued by Pacific Insurance Company with D.C.-Hall Limited Partnership, as principal, in the amount of $6,000 guaranteeing the payment of the estimated 1976-77 tax; NOW THEEFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on Hay 4, 1976. Originating Department: Public Horks Land Development Division cc: County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director County Treasurer-Tax Collector Director of Planning D.C.-Hall Limited Partnership 2363 Boulevard Circle, Suite 2 Walnut Creek, CA 91595 RESOLUTIO3 no. 76/372 O a , SUBDIVISION AGREEHMM ' (31) Subdivision: 4498 _ • °' (B. a P. Codg 5.6 -12) (31) Subdivider: 0 Ka-I I Lted F I L E • Partnershi Cal) Effective Date: (31) Completion P ear MAY if 1916 (a) Deposits: A. (cash) 500 B. (bonds, etc.) J. a GIRM I. (faithful performance - - CUM eeaM W su E oes 4 maintenance) $104 300.00 — _ 2. (labor 4 materials)k104,W0,00 I. PARTIES 4 DATE. Effective on the above date, the'County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called Mbunty", and the abovenamed Subdivider, mutually promise and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. L•ft+MEMTS. Subdivider shall construct, install and complete road and street impxovmcnss, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9, and including future amendments; aid all improvmcnts required in the approved improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the County's Public Corks Department. Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called 1%wk") within the above completion period from date hereof as required by the California Subdivision Rao Act (Business 8 Professions Code 8911500 and following), in a good work- monlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a canner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement.plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GUrit+ WEE 6 M.1Ihi F3KANCE. Subdivider guarantees that the work ;s and wi:2 be free from de ccts and a: i I perform satisfactorily in accordance with Article 94-4.4 of the County Ordinance Code; and he shall maintain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance. 4. IMIIDVF-ML%T SEWRITY: DEPOSIT $ BOh'DS. Upon .executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Bus em Business 4 Pro ess s Code 511612, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $500 cash; and.... B. &+nes, etc.: (1 - faithful performance 4 maintenance) additional security for at least theabove-specified amount, whish is the total estimated cost of the work less $S00, in the fora of'a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bad, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agreement and maintenance of the vorx for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against any defec;.ire workmanship or eateriials or any unsatisfactory performance; plus (2- labor $ materials) another such: additional security in at least the above-specified aeoourat, which is the full amount of said estimated cost, securing payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to then or to the Subdivider. S. KARRA•1TY. Subdivider warrants that said Improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any time before the Cauaty's resolution of completion for the subdivision, the irprovenent plan proves to be ln.: Iequate In any respect. Subdivider shall make changes necessary to accomplish the work as prawised. Micr+afilmsd wilt RMU exert - 6. .:O U'AUVER BY COUNTY. In>pcction of they wort: and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, anent or employee of the'County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirc .ents of this ,'lreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising- from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. INDDNITY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers,. agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage oi- any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), actions) or other proceeding(s) concerning these. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them. D. Aon-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, o'r has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Commissioner-Surveyor. 10. NONPERFOWN1UNCE AND COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the time specified in this agreement or extensions. granted, County may proceed to complete then by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay- the costs and charges therefor mediately upon demand. If County sues to compel performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' feed, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. 11. ASSIQ\N*.E,\T. If before County accepts these improvements, the subdivision is ainicxec3 to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. - - 2 - OUG.62 �11-az!llrc lit onsideration hcr2of, County shall allow Subdivider ap for said Subdivision. - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Vernon L. Cline, Acting Public Works Director . A C.-HALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, By e 41. 7a limited partnership. Deputy - - - SUBDIVIDER: (See note Blow) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: _ By Gregory Cherezian, General Partner BS -- (Designate official capacity in the business) Assistar:t P is WQrfksrector ' � Note to Subdivide. : (1) Execute acknowledgment _force below; at: (2) If a corporation, affix corporate seal. FORIM APPROVED: JOH\1 B. CLAUSEN Count; Counsel By Deliuty (CORPORATE SEAL) State of California ) ss. (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership County of ) or Individual) On the person(s) those name(s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who is latown to tae to be the individual and officer or partner as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. (NOTARIAL SEAL) Notary Public for said County and State (Subdiv. Agrmt. CCC Std. Form) (LD-9; Rev. 5/74) It State of California ) [Acknowledgment by Cnrnnration, Partnership STATE Of CALIFORNIA ss Contra Costa signed above for COUNTY oF� - on April 29, 1976 _ 6efafe the ufKW.:q ted. notary vubk in and far ?artner as Stated u said State• person p appaated Gregory Cherezian <not.ledged to ne , ; executed it. e E - }nv.,, to ene to b.one of paft+.e.s of the patnenl+ip n that executed the within instnt+nertt and aclnowkdged b"W that « ne :T.531::3/ i7t:3it.C+e:a7::17;:+. 1 o such patt +ship eaeouted the salt*. CL _ ^t� •.fit. "%'(k ity and State T 1N11a.tESS my fiartd afrd official seal. 'fj�'� '�e n.. ,c.-,Z•N, j n \`�_/ elf:,z+—.fs..r tf3.e•+TMN-.wry:.iiC6 � ! ) / ...i'723eiitlt�ltltilNttWftlityaYllq►ay,> „�; Eft o signature . ti Chrystina y _ �- Name(Typed or Printttd} ([M 0,0&for official notarial seal} i Microfilmed with board order 0�063 " b �r 'i; ;_r41lillll�lRll'ill v IT Inl cduSiir:tra1!:: IDfI li�E,.Lt'i,li, (, ,..',L1 'i I IJ � . 1 IIII�I�iIli iili, �ii�lll�ii'Ij:lsill"i, �nl 11 r o OXI C all 1p Ol.. S,i3 d Subdivision_ I q n� �I I n ..i ill id l y 111 ,� � :� 1. � �f'i ,°r s„.t �., `s e "`r.- t y - .�J: i -- ,r�,t S Y ,,. u _ i : f r ..SJy t� .. __ +,: 2 rI � �✓-, a G - 1 o- ''c.ly,-a' yt�.E'� , �� a ,c f a ,�y ,t ,,, {�-� _ - ; ri'l�, tI, `� y-ids��.s'„� - 7�- a S2:' £ p - ,y s s r F,s ��.I'll -i i. - r. - _ a x sf CONTRA *COSTA COUNTY,a. �... ➢a ,. T /f _ y �. -'.r �P..rlaOA ,Lt• Cline, 4 "y, ,.'”` �y Y+. ��s�o� 4�"i-r,'r� ..� .� M>i��,..�._ J 47 Acting ,Public Warks DirectI ' ll - Or, a rs a ��s t t H � �"� rr�n k xr p e - x C. HRCT. LI�iITEO PARTNERSHIP - r: ,t ng � - , a 1,un ted�partnErsb�p ' n �'. ��'�,l x s 4 f ,�, ` :t ``,,f>r^r Y�•'�+,'„`'x. r a s. �-.r - - �' i t �' 1 .� "' .,�- i P " - �"y SUBDII'IDER Se ``, �r �'"4' e note `eloI )- f 4. .: - 3. k rnrF"' .'�r� `4 pFa. w.. 3tEC0I MENDED FOR APPROVAL: r . , " , r,§ 1,Alt �� , - E yll l G,k' y } 11 1� ♦<i- — -- �� , s s Y{C t'e t; 9 - By Gregor re anGeae Tae sWO - y: ,Lt�* ,: — «• �� _ 11 �- , (Designate oc `rZ�capact tii os� " �� Assn tart : c W cto -, ,T Vim-IRW�Rerr* ,.� , Note to:`Subdi�rade�. . ��Z�)�Execut� a"ckAo'wr e" er a ox, 2) T a�cOxorat ;a£f arm bel c0 rat@ S ,.x. ,=� - .= - � �yz Gtr fi r , � I�� _ - m.s.' rF rer-- i vV��.. -1 4 :_ a 1 RAI APPROWD� _JOHN, .$: CLAUSEI� �� h :',,-�„� r� -_ �'x 7 tk f F Count;► Counsel �. j Deputy.. �'IL - ( (CORPORATE;SEhL) < R ,`K t" , s � Y� }r. M, h. — 4`*.-d'.R ';' * * �' * * '.* '*' * * *' * * * *' * * *'w* '� *� �' *j �. '�.'!, *' n'�4'f'�.'r �"! �, I qty��A.�, a,'-! �` tate of-talifornia . - ti -�" .ss_ (AcknaacTcdg�tent by COrPoraton eas sI I - C-Ill Ioantj of _�I 11 �" " I Ior�Indatndua2)r �� r, �* .. ' , the°tperson(s) xbose{narae�S� xs�are sI .1ane b e�n -= �°xibdvder and A'i>to a.s know'u to .tai to�wbe ttcinda�t�xdwil:�andofcexopan �ta' "e I ;, , t e xho signed this anstr=ent, persol#4j appearccP bcf'ore�mm and ackna rzc � � Chat 1►G e�:ecuttxi 1t' and :that the corporation or partnersh pmam�d��ahoer execu�e t„ xr� tit _ _ - iyµ. rte11�11.,��S ^ x ,�, L t7 x { '� �, "' _ ,s a {'i r�-�a ar p '�jt� > ��{ ,sem xrsir— , Y, Nf ,I(t�`OTAR,M' SEAL) Y s-,,, a trxt E a� -_- a -P xfm - Hotarr Iic;. Or, sal CotmtyA. Stan '.--- - »~'4',4 - - r. w r +` r� _ aha tt '. . ' (Subdav Agra�t. CCC-Std 'FOlA) ,�,'� M 111 -11 ;� f ., CLD`9,,,Rey a/7A) 1 s ` . y ", - 4 �nr,,� r -,�-- I'll ", �",,�," t& ,a r t " r �°.�`"%b .'a- 1`^ - aft- ->s-` '-cwt �" �,.a��,'`.� ,r r -- _� + 7 u i..; .a �, 4 +` �. I�i ,r4"%rF '� rt y,, 'x ..,¢ora tem ', ti " .;r- i d �' ,a+r Ir * �t� �# # it , :=k t � — 11 .� ,i.'�c ti vc;�C", 5 r �1i ,' '" x a�s �J��¢� r .1 ..'r,�--I - °P I` S'i_ -_- 11 -STATE QFC tlrl yl i a �. �V ri': t"� �Y�� >. aoirnr 'Contra;Costa ( r s2gnedabou nA -il 29 i 9T6. ` `� - - -` , ' °qne sante -- V`ipr Ch�rez�an� �� k` o .1 e t rix - t S • ^"Z �1#>R. P�1 n r >�f`7CCCu syx� C - pp CA a ✓t,y Kt' �JAd 11 K fyt - rL Y�r�°`y�2? I of , t1. ,r . -- , I ;; 'y ale , bre '�`-!W ,� - t� n x riot execvbd she+r�kl�ia iastn�ee�t.ad+ nor.bd9�d k►,aK tint �` y 3}} y 1 +Fa= a - r" CR �" ..y'[h � 1A?VM'. t Rif sem. -Y 1�+'�' � iww� _ Y 1Iz 11 ..yam ``ps��j - 4 _ 'A F..4 1NI11l�tESS anV S Yttl�gr.ac�rr MAY : �ty 3I1(jE7�Staa�.' a".c� n r s CDR7Ri `I� x t - Mn sbl�w�T y_Jr19l0ie-�' R"I �°M fig. ~ ..' * f � �. - y hr. &, -.--- - .r 'c a; . 4 - 3' '�' � '�' ✓ , t t t R a.s/�{t,,,. ri s i ti_ u r ' �� x 0 4 a � �r # �a �y9llf ,m.. N �8."hCt1� ' .>k a �.. ''� a� "k .a r n 'rj f'a --= 3 :1 .r i n r - , ,'�,� f 4 ,,,l i t'w� .:j rr. r 1 -'�-`sem fi'` 'b @. ti tf ' ,M+ +"tt ;+,ortr0, '^c 1 S .xxZ°j 'p.'. #r5 '? ,� 8+f !+ r llI `� J,°,4� `; '�* '� '+ %a ti ^'d'1 I �, I ll i � ' a R:.r tr y ?,: - r ,�`. b i' ,x. ( . .,f IIS I,y tq ,g9"i �la.r� 'a' �v�, �,fr _+y.� .rte yYe e �IIt ro ! g �I � 3 t ,; ig ,,i�11� rl ,b {�i rt�bf i� tF s :� �" �`- I;i P:x�.f8e`.,.�i 1�� '.,� �.�-+�N` �'' 5. . 17� i R.:..;r i'., €ETI i � ��:� ki. ,t;i I ..�,.i R G ''�--•�--� Ih lj' w i:4 i ..�. ,,..1UU11UQJ, l .a!< - Fs I'„” p � ,x:,}�'2 rV�:,i}�,. •x;i,s � '` §i' v �. i i,r r � tdr :'�,.3 � .t d':l ! 5rG trN s rii Ili Illi ,li,'il it �I' —U. �� 7:65_00 �� >x. � � �� 4�� .p°.ill i��s��>�# ,� .t�l/i"g ,.`µ'i�. .., +.,.rte, „�c.�` .::' � :�,.,. '3.�� € "�''>.4.:�; � �.�.s�i"` z ,. �: ;��• � 9fx �` �:��,j,� it# 0 4¢I� 119,�I�F'. -- �{� ..?»# $� �„„„+�+�, �..t.., ...,,.V.rxz. ,.��' t" `�,��'�fi,�„z�""'. ,,,. +�'>4 + ��'�� .s wr .c I� 1p� �'�,Is•""€� �yy$.$r l'� I �4�,yVil}} -- �$WParig3 .I� �t�• 1+CLi1 �+`�� . ., -t "sra � mg ^fw`-� �,�. �sa4+y '4r• x � r 'r'�x` k xx.„ 3`• _a:; �r^ -k t u-¢�x� H 'rte.�.,., MUS�vrr.:C TOaW�t .ii, - Vz n a ��' r°k'�"'•y�y'�.� �*e'�s1�8� ''��n �t ��,,,� �� ;�rr�� aii�.. fir �'w1,. � 1 _�� flJUIV CB '°"s''��Y,�a't. �,7 A�iV'< �' < 2 rki:* fii+k ,i �� Y. Wril�+�i�+•! MM+�F` —=— . s�;�,jsS, '7w`.�i. irll,riaw �s� �' .wi w�S� Qis Lra Q' �yF • 13 - x — � � ,�,.:.t«.«`�'r-�X'FS '"��",is" ♦`ra tw'�r�`n..,.�.. ��tw ixk+' ��TM''S' y "„�wi�,tT'° r�',�a i-.� � `� EQRED FOURTH�UD �Tfi�iOREQ�Do e's C � =� Sic• -- rr. �ohi�cz# e #o� rc. ale ak y ///��.<w �a:,'k �y*�'4£" '�•:/..y .�^� r {��2'///��'' .'".g if 'lu�. (Ai,gi►b. �3''tVn, t +�M+� ,} '" . M11• w"s�+�'�t xp M �a k k s�s�.�r""`.N.� ,'x,7u''ss � � •� k !� a ?9 �,ddx5i :- u ' +S► 1a•3JG:x .h �,�'3 '' .w'w,■�� i. R, i i.�..a., A�f.w+�.♦• • i � �♦ �tw. c� c ,�•w�: Irl' s'E � �. �k ®s_= ;ZW�#M ��..4w1-,r�f►w '•t"s*U+�i#e#a.* MiQ�# ` re+ f r.� c�t�r«j.,+.m, 4s*�t'rt, �� 3 JeRQ.�.r, ,-aa, i*, s w ^. ec �, 't. e Y +�• •.r �4��'rte. � ,n '•i } � Kxi# 2} ��,.cs�c#uer#Lv ala,} ` � a ... ' M° ,�� +�' !�� t�9�a.A'r ��•►'�/#dam fifI7F1M��"��F.IM' �',+k'.. '�s+M�'�• irt'_� �' �.:�z*,aa�3+�c� � u.* r r t .i i r 4.� '� .:;^-a"�/•� �"+Se. • �s, . Hca , io.�x pari ::sem Sytv �a #eo � ` th6reur,;ar ` �ard g '"V �.,t'^ a •q,,., :� - ^v as rw,:" f <` T.,e5 i *r` `�' ay,«.wrst�5� Xv.,�, � n • - —_ ar,A vap or r,ar H.ls'm"yfwy.re �3m�'* ..,nx,�'�.,.,m,.�d,i•�.�,.,•atlp4-t n< ,s it�.>•~``'S'�'��`�' �hv"`� ��,�4„�€• ,,�;�n .ry.� � — +A ,>=`,;+ 3� ��7^,) x ^■=Z ' 3 s z� '�'dk,•F.*x A of- &`,k• 't*i: c«>3 .c �} sf ., Y _ t�� v.. ,ak ,C :rx .' •,-`5�r - t s �' �! �'k0 � s3' y vJ' r aa'"a'"��y�,?� > _ __ — �t�-� fl �� `� a s r., h,€„y :� :r' f? a 4 v...#c•fi;1,1�. v xns*`ts �#�'+� ( � �� _ Qr y �W a rk. r r,1 ,�`^ +, t ?4 fid" rs*w� ! =ts R"Tt�`�' � 5 �' ?` •' "° .� "'^ .�' `•S"-a xrt �a�, #r ,� '#r�• s„e w r t �; �xs<c� e• x ,xk�'R '�:>'•�^,_>�� '�'�^ ��^�. �ir, Mo. r iAema i�.�rlT '• • �w .+...��° +a«'�`J "h. '" '€ - ,d• t "rO.a .5 Frzr, m- mom " � 3.:rte, . ".� !" `+► G?L' . ♦s� is �ci"" +rs 'Roc G a27M ,.a$� �� } `�+��'� ��'�x�+, '#JAL r�� ro �� >A��tu�� r � � �� r� M,•�"'� — ��a xue ir#Zen p �t�M k +'a^ra. `db' '1 r �-,., v ; ,`"a•x-`` .k ° xa• `"., ,&.'"�,�;u, a,•' .,int �--- ire '� of ouz Ccs: II��o� �� _,e • , — N '�� Z�f{o��# '-i'�"^`��`�'".u; , °"'C'm.,.,`a� s� �. s n"t�-� �.z �...�''��`'�s �s«�a.'�,t, /3'140 ar>'•�s�.e .�..�. �,. _ ` ��` '�► ��otb�er�►�i.Mse#� �� ca�'c�r�' ��n� 2 �>4,`c an � � � t z -�_ p�..-n 5 •�k �. .. , a ��x-,t,F s^" '� y' �`, `�#^` 3n a�,<.yt EaS� Inrr .$ t i� sot ?;w ✓. ,. e-" v, ,(,. ,;�,ae "��.�. ,. I e'+�. 5%dr + d►i'� o.��,q►#J�3t�,�sp�c.��ed��h+�r��or,�.�h��,� � be��nc� ud��cos�s w "`s'�'^•gs.�+.a»" ';s ash r ::� r�,a4�e �' u.? '- t '' ss 9 s" rss �a"" ' �su •+2P:a?vYr a .. - ». '•, 4i.+ i4' ..:: . 51 .ssr� x '"c►Im. 01-1nr hct ass{ c � #n suc{ccss 12 en77, ocn�sccc. :o - a s axei� as �osl s and uc Sw n R mer fitP'3c _Aa"� � air x F' �, s. 7^ � '� i�/� Yl." •t ,' ,i►M/ �4��'. Y'�".rt'' w..�' Vsri 't "'�„�Ci,V' ""`� t"y.. e! w i�F- .VRips"� *,i x `+P".t'C'is'"'sraw'Ya t6 XS' ,r,•. >F • �s r t� �,�"44��t+,�a.,<eM' .+.*i;t, s,-wrfilr�hn (n•'�k .�..�' - ...� *��t.M1�`�.,w��wnitw.�.,�Y.�awr r�v` .'•,t;.`k"I's �*" — — r.,U....'� .�R, ��« as;- eserp c + a f. �r� s„ z"/"y. yam," "`",�y.-c +� � {� ��1 �+y��'""..,. a'R:i°,:"'rx' _. •i�`. �� ` ^�, � fi��,r�tQ .t�MZ�r .i,►,�i��ix �.' �+�� ne��'+«�i4ry�i�. �iio�i ; ' yP �st: .c s}>�rox, `tc � a. ,Y�r°+,g' ,H,^Y 9",�.*' ^g�'"fw��.".. fit"' r:,�".• ,�,o� ,:'�.k' � _ �o`� �►� �ar�.,,�`��aJ�c: ;��ex►.3aY o*�� `.or�� e... Q r 'I a �-� � /•A .. j� .>„'t�.�A. w* + try �zx 'R �r`N#.n`S .nXi ,.s '�� .� �� x el I t IW1. sx yl I SURETY PARTHERSHIP ' P IFIL IMSUME COMPANY { f '' - =1�: •• +�!/;try • ��.�•tat-. f`ej: e fr S e o is f Ora 0 O O f tF 3 8. .c a 9 2 �� r to at:ni:y ofss. (�iC?'.flO'aF;.F,[=Gv,rilt4' i3Y Stl1iETYj tn _ , the perron(s) vha3c is/are signed Surety z '�u rho fs/are kno-'n to cue to be lttorr:cy(c)-in-yatct or thia Corporate SurLty, personally appeared before ere and ackroxledSed' ' o izv! that !ie sifned the name of the Corporation as Surety and his/ 1icir awn name (s) as its (110t.�IMAL SEAL) ..:v..u'f i'Uilllc 17oa County and Stade 1tt:1'. ref 6? STATS OP CAUPORM . CWr AM f"N" on this 29th d p or APRIL in d w yew Ow Tliorsaod Moo ffu d ed aid SEMM CY-SIX + bdoea air. "& i_R I a Notary Pauk is and for the cm.Q comer of rR•Ns-cern . State of cala"ia, tes;c*i + . thereha. dab►ooeressioead and sem' prsonaRr appeared _ HOLLY E PILAR L REMO A,ao.ra to sae to ie the person hrhoer par is subscribed to the within rustsdnat 4 i.ICCALSOBU as the anergy of an M D couch OF PACIFIC 1M9Mhtx't: Q2M e(A C.orporadoa) S:H FRANdSCO and��,d to mw that hr m4scribed tb.r hhsaht of said Corporation tbatsto Catntai +oth E.a.as ApN?.3,1977 as sareryr gad hes own aaahe a:atteen�et + M BrITNEW WHEREOF. I ham hm-awo we mW hand and affissd hq official seer at aQ Offiae in the said L County of us lRJI die AW and rear in this certificates first 'tan. Notary Public is and for � of SM la • . my coressim Estins � Wi* board ads[ ••Pac and M4 A r do CW CAUR30M • j —41I r4Di Coat ra COSH =.. •: April 29. 1976 behm w .hrw t d.r.s,..r: • No" Pwbk in and for f MW Summ. 0.....,► .....�.+ g'�rY CtIQrlZiaa wehr�w b wr w"ne Of er s.,,er...t Ow r.awiP + ++»t"bo-mm -0 dw M ctofibned with board otdK wdt vt+e•►�...a.+ hln srw�. o �= Men s�r wed.W.id.i rd. CHR1rSTiNA MAY s . err oma`r c.,co"T" ceosr�`�`w w e......,,r..■.r�.r L h» � chkr7ystim I —t<�•s�+er�I O wr ts.rsr.wre d OW4 EDWAI'.7 W.LEAL ALFRED P.LONEU county Treasurer-Tae Cotl.etor Assistant County Treasurer- TAX COL.L.EC3nR'S OFFICE Tax Collector rirsLik lment FiVat Due end a yahle of Taxes CON rte d COSTA COT NTTV Dolio lastaa=.at of Tales Due and Paya�l. CONTRA jam] <,jJ j l 1 1. 4.11j j j Deiiaquent an the Flint Day of Noveaber as the Troth Day of Drea¢.r ------------- YARTMEZ.CAUFORYIA ---!" Second L-mleAm.n!of Texas Ptd 2ta-3m•Est.23aS Second Installment of Taxes Dus cad PayoWo Delinquent on the Firs!Day as February Z April 29, 1976 ars the Tenth Day'of April - IF ASIS ma is NOT Fnm Br OCTmH 31, 1976 , ms Lir Is VOID Ihis will certifly that I Nave exard d the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: - MA1n3T NO. 4498 and have deterired frac the official tar_ records that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map. The 1975-76 tax lied has b---P. paid in full. Our ssti=te of the 1976--77 tax lien, which becaa lien on the first dap of YArcb, 1976 is S 6,000.00 • MAMRD W. TEAL Tax Collector m Microfilmed-with board ceder 0OUD0 ..;U�;}----1}^-^�t---xf.^---��. :r^---Yi---�y�-7;Y'."_'"'y�i�:�"""""�►�-----ti;k c�_ .- -r a C-7 lei 3'r1i: rr:C.�:rt,?s I'OR TILS 110,\7l is III[: sU:1 or $ 60.00 Pial: ;.;NU,�i. v,! BOND 1\0. 13tJU 209 04 14 / f MAY Z/ 1976 J. a_ CL=" 7hc 01;rc eoAav o~ asptRIr.'soZ SUl3MITSI01i TAX BMW �tsu cqs co .L& Izr:urancc &_ _ t� - MOW ALL, 'MENI BY THESE PIII:S1XrS: y. �i4T IJE, n_c' .-HALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP � �s -s Principal, and PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY �1 a California corporation licensed to do business 1 in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto' COUNTRY OF CONTRA COSTA , in the penal su.-n of CTX TP011SAtln Arm mallflflTHS - - - - - - ($ 6,000.00 ) Dollars, lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the COUNTRY OF CONTRA COSTA , State of California, for which payment, well and truly to be .,rade, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. t THE CONMITION OF TRE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCri THAT: r' 17111ER£11S, the above Warned Principal is required to file a Subdivision Tax bond for Fiscal year 1976 - 1977 for SUBDIVISION R 4498 RIDGEWOOD and iTiiCP.£AS, there are no liens against the Subdivision or any part thereof for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local Taxes or special assessments collected as taxes exec special t taxes or s a s � P p i l s E..srrients notY E t payable. P Y • 11 1`all, 'Ml:fl1% '0F.F2 if the said Principal shall pay all taxes for 1976 - �l 31 1977 Aisv-al. year to tine _COUNTRY OF CONTP.A COSTA tlien this obligation is to be void and of.-no effect; othenirise to remain in ftil.l eorce and effect. r SIGNED, SMALEU A\TD DATED MIIS 29th DAY OF APRIL � 19 76 1 n. r „� 5 _ , .— v-uiu ourselves, our heirs, .t.,uwi.., uwaelnlstrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. f THE COINDITION OF THE r'MFE OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT: ,= 1-7111ER£11S, the above named Principal is required to file a Subdivision Tax bond for Yiscal year 1976 1977 for SUBDIVISION R 4498 RIDGEWOOD and i41MAS, there are no liens against the Subdivision or any part thereof for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local Taxes or special assessments collected as taxes, except taxes o special ass ssaitents not yet 1 NOW, '1'II1:1:1.Pt1'.}:, if the said Principal shall pity all taxes for 1976 - ! 1977 x i%cat year to the COl1ltTRY OF CONTP.A COSTA then this obli!,;atlon is to be void and aT_'no cfiec&-; othemise to remain in full force and effect. , t SIGNED, SD*tLEU AND DATED THIS 29th DAY Or APRIL � 19 76 - D. C. IMM _-ALL. LIliu ,PAJI-Tum i P__,_ . fT't.'1lIC.Sisitl.� . By: PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY Microfilmed with board ocdor (:ictrc'ts) (t:St;C11'1'1:11 TN 1101%lr.,V1'i:) HOLLY E $LL, l�I�t"t�rjl:�+t i ys STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND ss. 4CM.1ty of___ RAIN kM�NCVSM On this 29th _ day of APRIL in � �0 �. Ousand Nine Hundred And SEVENTY-SIX before me. ---. a Notary Public in and for the i CXrY AND onantf of , State of California, residing thrrrin. duly caamisffLy'tdfare� P�sonall appeared =� PILAR L. REK M1Q ^'Y e!'^!!C td+L1iCl�ltiiA 1 kno+_-a to we to be the person whose nate is subscribed to the within instrument - �1- as the.attorney of 1 ' ? C1ry AND COUNTY OF PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPAHY S A.ti f RANCISCO (a Corporation) �l;0o,mni;s'oa E.a,es�a 20. 197 � .grad acknowledged to aaar that he subscribecf the name of said Corporation thereto =;�=��.•-._<.=•-.-. .,,?cc _e� as surety and his own name as attorney . IN ii7TNESS WHEREOF. 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official s4- at any office in the said QTY AND County of 8AW F7t-'�-';C'SCO the day and year in this certificate fire ritten. i Not Public in and [a the Y MAW SAN M �Y County of ,Califoso'- .Nv Commission Expires___3rf, AY pia •' ' n PACIFIC INSUP,ARCE COMPANY Microtilmed with board ordw M 1}UI'i.1 r.;yn:) HOLLY E. LL, h"c"1�'.jt:!' "• 1 r r....�-�...�.. r. • _•— •i._^�'�•t ,•1♦ .�•,"""'�t:•�'�]iw�w_��-�r�t��. ...._._....-.a-a.....��/tt�+ a•:--– 7: t1 r. 1. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND as. County of SAM JMOD } Oa this 29th _ day of APRIL inPl1.AF. .. .c. SEVENTY-SIX before rat, , a Notary Public in and for the- MY AND County of r�'�',' � L-q , State of California, residing _ l�'.3'��`�..��...+a�.�c�,...e"�'�'2.Z•'» '�-,� tihc-rcin, duly cacmi ffLr!fare- a e- personally appeared `.� PILAR L. REMO ?� f'~• '`t h0 Y i C f!C t;I.Lir'[!�hIA kna+_y to me to be the person whaie na. a is subscribed to the within instrument .� ��', as the attorney of T. Cl AND COtfNTY OF (a Corporation) •.,,,�+: PACIFIC IPlSURAt�CE CC�tPAtlY S k1j f RANCISCO l,' :.omt•.;i;s'cit E-,:) es fir!20. 197% and acknowledged to me that he s0scribcrd the.name of said Corporation thereto as surety and his own name as attrxney . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, f have hereunto set nW hand and affixed my official so-al at my office in the said CITY A-'`90 County of B" F7L6-2�CISCO the day and year in this certificate firs ritten. Qi7l Aar1W __ s •r/� 1 Notary Public in and for the County of BAX FRANCISCO CaIifomia .Ky Commission Expires IM 00M MION 133nFM AMM 2& 2947 Microrlunm with board order -:r STATE Of CALIFORNIA ' COUNTS' Of Contra Costa CL Apr TZ91 1976` - t E On .before me. the under:Ggrred, a Kotuy public in and for U said State. personally appeared Gregory Cherezian • — _�_�_ + U E known to me to bie Qne-JQf__.tire partners of the pattn*41b%p a that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to we that s t such partnership executed the same. �=iitil.ulifNll,rµNft,f,,Wigitti3l.Ii,:.IitbQ,r..;; 0 7 W1iNESS my hand and official seal. �}yf?' 't?'fin �y / /fir '✓ ' ,11n4tets,urunu+t,ue,muuttuu,uuu,uru,taitt� LL Signature� •�`--�---- Mlcrotilmeu wan board order C�rystina Pay Nam.(Typed or('rioted) V oh—w-hr 094.4 aaarwt saaty � 1 r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proclaiming; ) May 2 through 8, 1976 as ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/373 "Hire the Veteran Week. " ) WHEREAS veterans of service in the Armed Forces of the United States in war and peace have made possible the American slay of life; and WHEREAS the Wagner-Peyser Act, June 6, 1933, established the Veterans Employment Service and the State Employment Services; and WHEREAS disabled veterans and veterans are living proof that "Ability -- Not Disability -- Counts" in maintaining America's economy by their performance in all fields of industry and commerce; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLVED that the week of May 2 through 8, 1976 is proclaimed as "Hire the Veteran Week" and all government agencies, businesses, labor organizations and commercial enterprises in this county are urged to contact the local Employment Development Department for the purpose of hiring veterans. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1976 by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. cc: Veterans Representatives, Employment Development Denartment, State of California: Mr. Jack Adams, Brentwood Mr. Cicero Finley, Pittsburg Mr. George King, Pleasant Hill ir. Feliciano Salcido, Richmond Ve--erans Service Officer County Administrator RESOLUTION X30. 76/373 00M BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Annexation of ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/374 Subdivisions 4685 and 4686 to ) (Gov. C. §5563202 56322, County Service Area L-45 ) 56323, 56450) (Danville Area) ) RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGE IN ORCANIZATION BY ANNEXATION OF SUBDIVISIONS 4685 AND 4686 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA L-45 (DANVILLE AREA) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On March 30, 1976, this Board adopted Resolution No. 76/270 initiating proceedings for change in organization by Annexation of Subdivisions 4685 and 4686 to County Service Area L-45. Subdivi- sions 4685 and 4686 and County Service Area L-45 are located entirely within Contra Costa County. This change in organization by Annexation of Subdivisions 4685 and 4686 to County Service Area L-45 had been proposed by the representatives of the owners by application and filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission on February 3, 1976. The reason for the proposed annexation is to provide the said territory with extended street lighting services. On March 3, 1976, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved proposed Annexation to County Service Area L-45 subject to the condition that the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed be as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said Commission also declared the said territory to be legally uninhabited and assigned the proposal the designation of "Whitegate Farms Annexa- tion to County Service Area L-45". This Board fixed 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 4, 1976, as the time for a public hearing on the annexation of the above said territory. Notice of said hearing was duly given by (1) publication in the "Valley Pioneer", (2) posting on the Board's Bulletin Board, and (3) mailing notice to all persons and counties, cities, or districts which had filed a written request for special notice with the Clerk of the Board. This Board, at the time and place set for said hearing, heard the determination of the Local Agency Formation Commission read aloud, called for evidence or protests as provided for by Government Code Section 56314, and heard and duly considered such evidence and protests. This Board hereby finds that this proposed annexation is in the best interest of the people of County Service Area L-45. This Board hereby finds that the territory to be. annexed is uninhabited, and that no landowner therein filed a written protest. This Board hereby ORDERS this annexation without election and without being subject to confirmation by the voters. The Clerk shall file his certificate of completion with the Secretary of State in accordance with Government Code Section 56451. After receipt of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing for this matter, the Clerk is directed to record a counterpart -1- RESOLUTION NO. 76/374 00069 w original of the Clerk's certificate of completion and the original or counterpart original of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing with the Contra Costa County Recorder in accordance with Government Code 556453• PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 4, 1976, by a majority of Supervisors present. cc: Secretary of State State Board of Equalization County Administrator County Assessor Public Works Director Mr. Harry E. Harvey Bryan and Murphy Associates,Inc. Post Office Box 287 Walnut Creek, California 94.597 County Auditor-Controller County Recorder P G & E RAB:tag -2- RESOLUTION NO. 76/374 r 00070 00M AG W CY FON4ATION TON 59 — ?? ••'Cont ZA Costa County, Califo..ia �. Description Dates 3/3/?6 S®IT eAw Whitegate Farms Annw ation to County Service Area L _ k5 Pbrtion of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15 and Portion of the Northeast 1/ of Section 161, lbxnship 1 South, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as followst Beginning at the southeastern corner of County Service Area L-459 said point being the southeastern corner of Tract 4594, filed September 18, 1974; in Hap Book 173, at page 15, said point also being an the eastern line of the parcel of land described in the deed to Western Title Guaranty Company Contra Costa County Division, recorded December 15, 1970, Book 62759 Official Recorda, page 398; thence, leaving said County Service Area L.45 boundary, along the eastern and southern lines of said'Western Title Guaranty Company parcel as followst South 10 071 420 £est, 511.58 feet; South 650 579 East, 930.00 feet; South 10 07. 49" East, 221.66 feet; South 880 52. 09" West, 2W.39 feet •and•South 880 130 47N West, 1680.81 feet to the soc:theastern corner of Lot 3, Tract 4184* filed June 7, 1972, in hap Book 147, at page 13, saict point being CO2 the southern boundary of County Service Area L-45; thence in a. - general Northeasterly direction, along said southern boundary of • County Service Area L-459 3625 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 49.33 acres, more or 1038. M�a�� tel oU BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Bolla Property ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/375 Annexation to County Service ) (Gov. C. 5§56320, 56322, Area P-5. ) 56323, 56450) RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGE IN ORGANIZATION BY ANNEXATION OF THE BOLLA PROPERTY TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA P=5 (ALAMO AREA) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On March 30, 1976 this Board adopted Resolution No. 76/269 initiating proceedings for change in organization by Annexation of the Bolla Property to County Service- Area P-5. The Bolla Property and County Service Area P-5 are located entirely within Contra Costa County. This change in organization by the Bolla Property Annexation to County Service Area P-5 had been proposed by the Board of Super- visors by resolution of application and filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission on February 9, 1976. The reason for the proposed annexation is to provide the said territory with extended police service. On March 3, 1976, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed Annexation to County Service Area P-5. The exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed are described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said Commission also declared the said ter- ritory to be legally inhabited and assigned the proposal the designation of "Bolla Property Annexation to County Service Area P-5". This Board fixed 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 4, 1976, as the time for a public hearing on the annexation of the above said territory. Notice of said hearing was duly given by (1) publication in the "Valley Pioneer", (2) posting on the Board's Bulletin Board, and (3) mailing notice to all persons and counties, cities, or districts which had filed a written request for special notice with the Clerk of the- Board. This Board, at the time and place set for said hearing heard the determination of the Local Agency Formation Commission read aloud, called for evidence or protests as provided for by Government Code Section 56314, and heard and duly considered such evidence and protests. This Board hereby finds that this proposed annexation is in the best interests of the people of County Service Area P-5. This Board hereby finds that the territory to be annexed is inhabited, and that no landowner therein filed a written protest. This Board hereby ORDERS this annexation without election and without being subject to confirmation by the voters. The Clerk shall file his certificate of completion with the Secretary of State in accordance with Government Code Section 56451. After receipt of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing for this matter, the Clerk is DIRECTED to record a counterpart -1- RESOLUTION NO. 76/375 00072 original of the Clerk's certificate of completion and the original or counterpart original of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing with the Contra Costa County Recorder in accordance with Government Code 556453, PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 4, 1976, by a majority of present. the Supervisors cc: Secretary of State State Board of Equalization County Administrator County Assessor Public Works Director Citizens Police Advisory Committee (Round Hill area) County Auditor-Controller County Sheriff-Coroner County Recorder -2- RESOLUTION NO. 76/375 00(0'73 Dates 1/20/76 Bys Ehibit "A" Bolla Amwmtian to County Service Area P-5 Being a portion of Rancho San Ramon, described as follows, Beginning at a point on the western boundary of County Service Area P-5, said point being the northern most corner of Tract 4092 filed April 11, 1972, in Map Book 1451, at page 25; thence leaving said County Service Area P-5 boundary, Southwesterly.and South. easterly along the northwestern and southwestern lines of said Tract 4092 as follows: South 590 50' 05" West, 615.32 feet and South 250 0?' 40" East, 448.18 feet to an angle point on the southern line of Int 6, of said Tract 4092; thence North 850 5011 36" East, 53.24 feet; thence South 00 0?' 26" East, 183.67 feet; thence South 150 09' 57" Fist, 61.14 feet to the northeastern corner of Int 34, Bolla Acres unit No. 3, filed April 10, 1953. in Map Hook 509 at page 17; thence South 40 07' 26" East, along the eastern line of said Lot 34, 180.00 feet to the southeastern corner thereof; thence South 120 33' 19" East, 208.08 feet; thence South 690 37' 08" West, 197.00 feet; thence South 640 02' 33" West, 241.68 feet to a point on the eastern line of Tract 4376, filed January 189 19739 In Map Book 153, at page 40; thence South 120 01' 40" East, along said eastern line of Tract 4316, 80.00 feet to the northwestern cower of the parcel of land described in the deed to George L. • Kennedy, et u34 recorded July 22, 1954. in Book 2352, of Official Records, page 335; thence along the northern and eastern lines of said Kennedy parcel (2352 O.R. 335) as follows; North 890 58' 15" East, 204.62 feet and South 120 43' 45" Fast, 160.07 feet to a point on the northern line of the parcel of land described in the deed to Mary S. Steiner, recorded May 4, 1959, in Book 3366, of Official Records. page 248; thence along the northern and eastern 00074 i • - 2 _ lines of &aid Steiner parcel (3366 O.R. 248) as follows North . 87e 23' 450 Bast, 202.30 feet and South 2e 36. 15M west, 307.13 feet to a point on the northern line of Stone valley Road; thence Basterly, along the northern line of Stone Valley Road, 980 feet, more or lose, to the western boundary of County Service Area P_5; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said western boundary of County Service Area P-5, 2425 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 37.98 acres, more or less. 00075 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proposed Amendment ) of County General Plan for the ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/376 Kensington Area. ) (Gov. Code 5$65355 & 65356) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: There is filed with this Board and its Clerk a copy of Resolu- tion No. 28-1976 adopted by the Planning Commission recommending an amendment to the County General Plan for land located in the community of Kensington as designated therein to change the Land Use Element designations for said lands to appropriate land use designations, to achieve consistency of the General Plan-Zoning ordinance and with existing development, and to reflect the County policies on future development patterns. On May 4, 1976, this Board held a hearing on said amendment proposed by Planning Commission Resolution No.28-1976. Notice of said hearing was duly given in the manner required by law. The Board at the hearing called for testimony of all persons interested in the matter and Mr. Joseph B. Barnwell, representing the Kensington Improvement Club, appeared in support of the proposal. The Board members having fully considered the amendment deter- mined that the recommendations as submitted by the Planning Commission are appropriate. This Board hereby finds that the proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment and that a negative declaration has been prepared and processed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Finally, this Board further directs the County Planning Depart- ment to incorporate this proposed amendment into a combined amendment to the General Plan which this Board will consider for adoption during the 1976 calendar year as one of the three permitted amendments to the Land Use Element of the County General Plan. PASSED on May 4, 1976 unanimously by Supervisors present. cc: City of El Cerrito Kensington Improvement Club Director of Planning .z RESOLUTION NO. 76/376 76 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Social Service ) Program Funding for Fiscal Year ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/377 1976-77 ) WHEREAS this Board on April 20, 1976 passed Resolution No. 76/333, indicating the financial difficulties this county faces because of the reduced Social Service allocation for fiscal year 1976-77; and WHEREAS that Resolution supported and endorsed Senate Bill 1881 introduced by Senator John Nejedly; and WHEREAS this Board seeks to enlist the support of all other California counties adversely affected by the proposed services allocations for fiscal year 1976-77, in order to obtain successful passage of said Senate Bill 1881; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors immediately send a copy of its Resolution No. 76/333 to the twenty-eight other California counties adversely affected by the services allocations for next fiscal year, requesting passage of similar Board Resolutions to be forwarded to their respective legislators and to Senator John Nejedly. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. Orig: Director, Human Resources Agency cc: Social Service County Administrator County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 76/377 000i / +E IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Reaffirming Support ) of a Joint Powers Health Systems Agency. ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/378 WHEREAS this Board has heretofore considered alternative organizational models for the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Area; and WHEREAS after thorough consideration this Board favored the joint powers agency approach to best assure accountability to local government officials; and WHEREAS the East Bay Health Systems Agency has proposed amendments to its non-profit organizational model, contingent upon withdrawal of the proposed two-county joint powers application; and WHEREAS this Board continues to favor the joint exercise of powers agency approach; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY that it hereby REAFFIRMS its support of the proposed Alameda-Contra Costa Joint Exercise of Powers Health Systems Agency. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board on May 1E, 1976. Orig: County Administrator cc. Alameda County Board of Supervisors Director, Human Resources Agency County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 76/378 010078 S IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proclaiming May 9 through 16, 1976 as "National Nursing Home Week." RESOLUTION NO. 76/379 WHEREAS long term care facilities in our community have dedicated themselves to providing quality care to those entrusted to their care; and WHEREAS many of our convalescing aged and chronically ill citizens spend varying periods of time in long term care facilities; and WHEREAS the nursing home industry has forcefully demonstrated its dedication by continually striving to upgrade standards of care and improve services under the most difficult conditions; and WHEREAS member homes of the California Association of Health Facilities and the American Health Care Association are sponsoring many activities in observance of "National Nursing Home Week" beginning Mothers Day, May 9; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Contra Costa calls upon all residents of this community to join in this observance and participate in a demonstration of recogni— tion, support, encouragement and appreciation for the high standard of care long term care facilities are providing in our community; and BE IT -FURTHER RESOLVED that citizens of our county endeavor to visit a nursing home or convalescent hospital some— time during "National Nursing Home Week" and bring a moment of cheer to the elderly ill therein. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1976 by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. cc: Calif. Assn. of Health Facilities 1401 — 21st St. , 202 Sacramento, CA 95814 Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator Public Information Officer RESOLUTION NO. 76/379 W079 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Request of Blackhawk Corporation ) (1995-R4 to Amend a portion of ) RESOLUTION NUMBER 76/380 Existing P-1 DISTRICT (1840-RZ) ) and to rezone to a separate P-1 ) DISTRICT ) This being the time fixed for decision on the request of Blackhawk Corporation with respect to the recommendation of the Planning Commission of any responses to the concerns expressed by the three speakers in opposition to the request on April 27, 1976; and The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Resolution Number 32-1976 adopted April 6, 1976, by the Planning Commission was received by this Board on April 7, 1976. In said Resolution the recommendations of the Planning Commission are set forth with respect to the request of the Blackhawk Corporation (1995-RZ) to amend the existing P-1 Ordinance (1840-RZ) and to rezone certain land in the Diablo-Tassajara area from Planned Unit District (P-1) to an independent Planned Unit District (P-I). An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared by the staff and independent consultant was certified by the Commission, made public, and presented to the Board by the Planning Commission prior to any public hearings by the Board on the Blackhawk rezoning application. After notice thereof lawfully given, public hearing was held by the Board of Supervisors on April 27, 1976, on the rezoning application (1995-RZ) during which all interested persons were heard and the public hearing closed after three persons came forward to speak being the following: Ms. Linda A.--- Moody, representing Amigos de Diablo; Mr. Rudolph Ulrich, soil scientist and Ms. Sally Ann Phelps on behalf of the American Indian Movement. The matter was continued to May 4, 1976, at 11:30 a.m, for decision with direction to staff to prepare responses to the concerns expressed by the three speakers. The Board has seen the subject site, has reviewed and considered the EIR, and has fully considered and evaluated all testimony and evidence (including County General Plan documents) and is prepared to make appropriate decisions. In reviewing the EIR the Board has deemed it in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to endorse, adopt as its own and make a part of the final EIR this Resolution and the attached staff comments and responses. The Board hereby makes the following Order, Certification and Find- ings: A. EIR - Order. That the within Resolution and the oforenoted Staff Comments and responses be and the some are hereby made a part of the final EIR and that County Rules adopted by Board resolution pertaining to the preparation of EIR's not in conformance with the procedures followed in this matter are waived. B. EIR - Findings. There are no feasible alternatives or feasible mitigating measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environ- EESOLUTTON NO. 76/380 00080 mental effects of such project, or changes or alterations have been made and required for such project which satisfactorily mitigate or avoid signif- icant environmental effects of the project. The project is justified in spite of the significant environmental effects thereof because of economic reasons (including employment, tax base improvement and the developer's investment), social reasons (including the pleasing environment the project offers future homebuyers which will be an asset to the community), or other considerations (including but not limited to the General Plan for the area, the reduction of densities from the prior approval, the dedication of land to Mt. Diablo State Park, the County's housing policies, the unanimous approval by the County Planning Commission, the favorable recommendation of County staff and approval of the local Valley Citizens Planning Committee) and, those reasons set forth in "responses" in the EIR, Vol. 1, Sec. 4, Vol. I, Sec. 6, and Vol. IV, Sec. 18 and the within resolution and staff. comments. C: EIR - Certification. The Board certifies that the four volume EIR as received from the Commission with the additions ordered above is the "final" EIR, that said EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State guidelines (any variations in local County rules deemed waived) and further certifies that the Board as lead agency and decision-making body has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information contained in the said final EIR. D. Findings. With reference to this approval and the orders set forth below the Board finds: (1) That the applicant intends to start construction within two and one-half years from the effective date of the zoning change requested. (2) That the various land uses to be authorized by the Ordinance (with the conditions of approval to be imposed) are consistant with the County General Plan (meaning the composite General Plan and all of its adopted elements) in that the various land uses authorized by the Ordi- nance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land use and programs specified in the General Plan. (3) That the proposed planned unit development (with conditions) substantially conforms to the County General Plum. (4) That the development will constitute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability, in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and community. (5) That with reference to the neighborhood commercial center: (a) That such center is needed at the proposed location to provide ade- quate commercial facilities of the neighborhood type proposed. (b) The traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed center, or will be obviated by presently projected improvements and demonstrated provisions in the plan for proper control of traffic and parking. (c) That the development will be an attractive and efficient center which will fit harmoniously into and will have no adverse effect upon the adjacent or surrounding development. (6) That the development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exception from the normal application of the County Code. (7) That the phasing proposed by this application is consitent with good Plan- ning practices and each phase is capable of standing alone. PIE-SOLUTION NO. 76/330 W081 (8) That the Board determines that there is a need in the community for the land use proposed by this application and that the uses proposed are com- patible within 1995-RZ, 1840-RZ as amended, and uses as authorized in adjacent zoning districts. E.Order- val. This Board orders: (1) The current Planned Unit District(P-1) (1840-RZ) be amended to totally'delete and remove said 943 acres thereof; (2) The Pgeliminary Development Plan and the rezoning request to create an independent Planned Unit District (P-1) for the 943 acres deleted is approved subject to the attached 30 conditions of approval. (See Exhibit A) (3) That the conditions upon the residual 1840-RZ be amended as set forth in "Additions and Amendments to 1840-RZ Conditions." (Exhibit B) (4) That the Director of Planning and County Counsel prepare and present to this Board an ordinance to reflect and give effect to the above orders. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations are APPROVED. cc: Blackhawk Corporation Mr. Dan Van Voorhis Director of Planning County Counsel -~ Public Works Director Building Inspection Danville Fire Protection District NOTE: The Environmental Impact Report is microfilmed on Reel 1220. R S011UTION N10. 7061330 W004 09% a Exhibit "A" Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Development Plan for Hidden Oaks at Blackhawk (1995-RZ) / 1. This approval is based on the revised Preliminary Development Plan for Hidden Oaks &t Blackhawk, received by the Planning Department on March 9, 1976, and the following exhibits listed thereon, as modified- by these conditions: Exhibit #1: Revised Natural Features Map, received by the Planning Department February 20, 1076, scale 1" = 100', map shows existing trees, limits of 20% slope, slide areas, ridge lines, etc. Exhibit 12: Slope Classification Map, received by the Planning Department December 17, 1975, at a scale of 1" = 200'. Exhibits 13, 14, 15: Revised map of Blackhawk Road, received March 8, 1976, at a scale of 1" = 40', showing treatment of Black-- hawk Road. Exhibit 16: Section through site indicating location of proposed East Bay Municipal Utility District reservoir, received December 17, 1975. Exhibit 17: Blackhawk Ranch Phase 1 Final Soil & Geologic Investi- gation, prepared by ENGEO Incorporated November 28, 1975. Exhibit 18: Drainage Study prepared by Riffe, Peters & Jones September 9, 1975, revised November 11, 1975. Exhibit 18 (su=pplement): Estimate of Increased Storm Water Runoff, prepared by Ri fed , Peters & Jones, December 23, 1975. Exhibit 18A: Estimate of Increase in Runoff Due to Construction of Subdivision 4738, prepared by Riffe, Peters & Jones, December 16, 1975. Exhibit 19: Feasibility Analysis of Public & Quasi-Public Areas. Exhibit $10: General Plan Conformance Map, scale of 1" = 1001, received December 17, 1975. Exhibit 111: Application for Rezoning, expanded, requesting modi- fication of conditions for approval of 1840-RZ. Exhibit 1128: Plan & Elevations for Guard Hiuse & Gates received December M. 1975. Exhibit 113: Preliminary Development Plan with lot dimension, receiveFebruary 20, 1976. Exhibit 114: Traffic Analysis by John J. Forristal November 14, 1975. 00083 (iUcrossaac:a �Pntn r ourd order Conditions for Approval of1995-RZ Page 2 Exhibit #15: Typical lot with setbacks and yard standards, received February 20, 1976. 2. The maximum number of units shall be 206. 3. Development rights to the open space shall be deeded to the County with the recording of a Final Subdivision Map. 4. Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions, Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws for a mandatory homeowners' association shall be submitted with application for approval of a Final Development Plan. These documents shall provide for establishment, ownership, and maintenance of the common open space and private streets. 5. Yard and height measurements on each lot shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of Planning. The R-15 Zoning District, excepting the requirement for a 30-foot setback, shall be used as a guide. 6. The second phase of review by the Planning Commission will be review of the Final Development Pian and tentative map. The plans shall refine and include more details of grading and drainage and may require some revision of street alignments, lot lines and grading with further review. 7. The recommendations to correct and stabilize existing landslides incorporated in the Blackhawk Ranch Phase 1 Final Soil & Geologic Investigations, prepared by ENGEO Incorporated, dated November 28, 1975, shall be implemented. Preliminary details of proposed stabil- ization work shall be submitted when the Final Development Plan and tentative map are submitted. The soils engineer/geologist shall review and approve those plans before they are submitted. The Final Development Plan, including locations and improvements, shall be specifically reviewed by a soils engineer with special emphasis on location and slide potential (old and New). B. Interim on-site silt control basins shall be constructed as required by Grading Engineer of County of Contra Costa. This shall be reviewed with the Grading Engineer and Public Forks Department. Graded slopes shall be reseeded with grass and no grading should occur during the rainy season except with special permission by the Director of Public Works. 9. Comply with the fire protection requirements of the Danville Fire Protection District. 10. Street names shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of Planning. 00084 Conditions for Approval of 1445-RZ Page 3 11. All utilities shall be placed underground. The project shall be served by a cable television underground system. No individual television antennas shall be permitted. 12. The road widths shown on the preliminary development plan are less than County public road standard. However, they are acceptable for private roads and potentially acceptable as public roads, and shall be constructed in accordance with the County Ordinance Specifica- tions. 13. Street lights shall be installed at the intersection of Hidden Oaks Drive with Blackhawk Road and the intersection of Hidden Oaks Drive with Mossey Oak Drive. The details with regard to lighting will be reviewed when the Final Development Plan and tentative map are sub- mitted. 14. Asphalt concrete dikes shall be built along the edges of the Black- hawk Road payment in lieu of drainage swales, or an alternate plan acceptable to Public Works. The face to face distance between the dikes shall be 36 feet. 15. Blackhawk Road shall be improved from the Diablo Road - Mt. Diablo Scenic Boulevard intersection to Lot 47 to provide a proper transi- tion of improvements from the project to the intersection. The time limit for the construction of these improvements may be extended beyond that required for the subdivision improvements by mutual con- sent of the developer and the Public Works Department. 16. All paths along roads shall be portland cement concrete. 17. A landscape and irrigation plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, showing the street rights-of-way including medians, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning prior to the filing of a Final Subdivi- sion Map for each unit. Landscape and irrigation details shall be shown on the improvement plans and shall be subject to bonding requirements and an inspection fee. 18. The developer shall form a homeowners association, Service Area or a special district for the maintenance of the streets and the portland cement concrete paths within the security gates and the landscaping, path, open space, and trails. The developer shall form, and a Service Area or Service District shall assume, the obligation for maintaining the detention basins and the landscaping and paths along Blackhawk Road. 19. Any section of the storm drainage system which conveys storm water, to which the public streets contribute flow, shall be installed in a dedi- cated drainage easement. 00085 Conditions for Approval of 1995-RZ Page 4 20. Preliminary calculations for the storm water detention basins shown on the Preliminary Development Plan have been reviewed by the Flood Control District. These detention basins are acceptable in concept. The design and implementation of the detention basins will be reviewed with the subdivision improvement plans. 21. The detention basins and appurtenant structures shall be installed in easements dedicated to the County and shown on the Subdivision Final Map. The detention basins shall be maintained by the Service Area or Special District created as required by Condition #18. 22. All surface flows and storm waters entering and originating within the development shall be collected and conveyed to a natural water- course or an existing adequate storm drainage facility. Besides on-site improvements, this may also require off-site drain- age improvements to adequately convey these surface flows and storm waters southerly of Biackhawk Road, across private properties, and into Green Valley Creek with adequate outlet protection. Drainage easements shall be offered for dedication to the county for off-site drainage improvements. The documents, consisting of easement descriptions and maps, shall be filed prior to or concur- rently with the filing of the Final Map. If prior adequate easements already exist, they shall not be duplicated. No work shall be conducted in existing off-site drainage channels from October 1 to April 15 unless the developer obtains written per- mission from the County Public Works Department, Construction Divi- sion. This permission shall only be granted when the extended weather forecast does not show the possibility of heavy rains and the ground is sufficiently firm to support the proposed construction activity. 23. Provisions shall be made to protect lots from surface waters flowing onto the developed lots from the hillside slopes. 24, The developer shall create an Architectural Review Committee consist- ing of the Blackhawk Development Company and one member of the San Ramon Valley Planning Committee to serve until the units are developed. Responsibilities of the Architectural Review Committee shall include but not be limited to review 8f energy conservation measures, water conservation measures, elevations and fence detail. 25. A report shall be submitted with Final Development Plan applica- tion from a qualified tree expert to recommend any measures which can be taken in connection with the trees to be preserved and measures to be taken with the Final Development Plan. 00086 Conditions for Approval of 1995-RZ Page 5 26. The details of future ownership and maintenance of the proposed "rest stop" park shall be resolved prior to recording a Final Subdivision Map. 27. Construction traffic shall be routed via Sycamore Valley Road _to Tassajara Road and Blackhawk Road or from Dougherty Road. Developer shall put this provision in construction contracts. 28. The developer shall comply with the San Ramon Developer's Policy with regard to provision for schools. 29. Each segment of this proposed development shall be subject to fur- ther review when the Final Development Plan is submitted. It may be that additional requirements, conditions and/or modifications may be specified following review of the Final Development Plan. 30. With the approval of the final development plan and the tentative map for 1995-RZ, the County Planning Commission shall conduct hear- ings regarding added conditions, if any, to be imposed on said approval pertaining to the identification, protection and treatment of any archaeological finds. As a minimum, if during construction, grading or excavation, any items of potential historical or scientific interest are discoverdd, the County Planning Department shall be notified and the Director of Planning shall have the authority to issue an order appealable to the Planning Commission, to stop work in the area of any find pending verification of the discovery and the development of methods for the protection and treatment of areas of significant in- terest. 00087 Exhibit "B" Proposed Amendments to 1840-RZ Conditions: A. For the purpose bf applying the conditions attached to 1840-RZ amended, Hidden Oaks shall be a portion of the first phase of development. B. Prior to recordation of a Final Subdivision Map, the developer shall offer to contract with the County for a design study road study of the Green Valley - Mt. Diablo Scenic Road Section of Diablo Road and deposit a sum not to exceed $10,000. The study should be concluded in six months and should cover, among other things (a) extent of desirable and feasible width and alignment; (b) road capacity expected because of the improvements, if any; (c) safety proposals including pole relocation, shoulder improvements and construction of -pedestrian, bike and horse paths; (d) cost estimates for each suggested improve- ment. Residential densities may be reduced in subsequent units of the Blackhawk Planned Unit Development (1840-RZ as amended). If it appears from this and other ongoing studies that such reductions are necessary. C. For each Final Development Plan the developer shall submit a detailed phasing schedule which deals with the phasing for utilities, schools, roads, drainage, commercial areas and all residential units and pro- jections as to how many units will be developed on a phase basis. (This amends Condition #2 of 1840-RZ.) D. The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 3,733. It may be that this number will be reduced subject to Final Development Plan reviews or traffic studies. (This amends Condition #7 of 1840-RZ.) E. The project site shall be annexed to the P-2 (police district, if possible. (This amends Condition #21 of 1840-RZ.) F. The applicant shall initiate formation of or annex to a Park and Recre- ation District or County Service Area and local parks shall be dedicated to that district for development and maintenance in accordance with the Park Land Dedication Ordinance. The location and type of park shall be shown on the revised Preliminary Development Plan. (This amends Condi- tion #22.) G. The development of the westernmost golf course and appurtenant facili- ties shall be developed as follows: (a) The first 9 holes and clubhouse with Phase II as shown on the revised Preliminary Development Plan. (b) The second 9 holes with Phase III as shown on the revised Preliminary Development Plan. (This amends Condition #24 of 1840-RZ) H. Detailed plans and reports on the golf course administration and manage- ment shall be submitted with the Final Development Plan for Phase II. (This amends Condition #25 of 1840-RZ.) Proposed Amendments to 1840-RZ Conditions Page 2 I. The availability of school housing and the agreement between the San . Ramon Unified School District and the development shall be considera- tions in determing whether subsequent phases of the project shall be approved as each phase is reviewed for approval. (This amends Condition #29 of 1840-RZ) J. The general area surrounding the shopping center, including the shop- ping center, shall be especially reviewed as to its land use relationship prior to approval of the second phase of development. The neighborhood character of the shopping center shall be emphasized. . (This amends Condition #30 of 1840-RZ) K. The developer shall provide a private feeder bus service after 1,000 units have been occupied and not later than 1,295 units. The feeder system shall furnish service to the nearest Bay Area Rapid Transit District feeder line during 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, so long as such system is feasible after one year of operation. (This amends Condition #33 of 1840-RZ.) L. The developer shall create an Architectural Review Committee consist- ing of the Blackhawk Development Company and one member of the San Ramon Valley Planning Committee to serve until 796 units are developed. After that, the developer may appoint a resident of the Blackhawk Development. (This amends Condition #34 of 1840-RZ.) NUi:jps Art RESPONSES TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PRESENTED AT THE APRIL 27, 1976 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HEARING ON 1995-RZ: BLACKHAWK PHASE I INTRODUCTION As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , a public hearing on the draft EIR was held with written comment received up to March 17, 1976, and responses to these comments were prepared and adopted. The EIR is technically closed. (See Final EIR Vol. I) At the public hearing before the Board of Supervisors on April 27, 1976, the three speaker in addition to the applicant were Linda Moody (individually and for Amigos de Diablo, Inc. and Sierra Club, Inc.) , Rudolph Ulrich and Sally Phelps. Moody and Ulrich had previously spoken to the draft EIR and their comments were answered in the earlier responses. Phelps, however, questions for the first time the adequacy of the archaeological study done as a part of the draft EIR. The EIR itself being closed the matters raised at the Supervisors hearing do not require answer under CEQA. Further, these remarks, in most instances merely reflect disagreement or reiterate argument with matters already covered in some detail. The formal EIR process must be closed at some point or it may evolve into an endless debate. Regardless, the Board of Supervisors desires that the issues raised by these speakers be answered directly by these responses prepared by County staff in the interest of full disclosure of the decision-making process that takes place after the environmental documentation required by CEQA is itself complete. I. Comment Re Engineered Lots Ms. Linda Moody and Mr. Rudolph Ulrich made oral presentations centering on two project related considerations. They contend that: a. Engineered grading design for building site development is not the most appropriate for the 1995-RZ project area, and b. Residential development should be prohibited from areas within the project site which have natural slopes in excess of 20% (5 to 1) . Ntfcrofitmed with board odder —1 W090 Response Re Engineered Lots: The questions of "engineered lots" as opposed to "natural" subdivision and construction on greater than 20% slope have been previously raised in Planning Commission hearings concerning 1995-RZ and the EIR, and are thoroughly discussed in responses contained in the EIR. In summary, it was concluded that the engineered lot approach was most appropriate for the project site due to an inherent natural instability in various slope areas which could be corrected by the grading, and the methods capability for advantageous mitigation of potential drainage and sedimentation problems. This conclusion has the concurrance of the County Public Works Department. Given existing soils conditions, downstream flooding conditions, the existence of three seasonal drainage swails on the property, county road safety standards and the desire to insure that the subdivision will work to its maximum efficiency from all vantage points it is again concluded that engineered lots are preferable. Once the homes and landscaping is in place (after the subdivision has matured) the differences between the proposed subdivision and the same land use with natural lots from an aesthetic vantage point will be minimal while the superior efficiency of the engineered subdivision will be obvious. Normally a developer would prefer to avoid these engineered features because of short run cost savings in grading, but the county and the developer's engineers and staff agree that (for this site at least) the engineered approach is preferred. II. Comment Re 208 Slone Ms. Moody cites a portion of the Board's 17 page statement made in approving the entire Blackhawk project in 1974 (1840-RZ) wherein the Board said; "The developer is planning to build only in the valleys (under 20 percent in slope) on some 1500 of 5000 acres." Mr. Ulrich and Ms. Moody then claim that 1995-RZ has 25 lots with average slope of over 208 and 43 lots with half of the area with slopes over 208. -2- own Response Re 20% Slope: Preliminarily it should be stated that the 1995-Rz plan calls for engineered building pads on all but a few lots and that, after grading, all building sites will be level. Accordingly references herein have to do with land slopesrp for to any grading. To the extent a variation is being sought it is also well to observe that 1995-PZ is a rezoning separate from 1840-RZ and that the 20% slope design guideline was not even made a condition of approval for 1840-RZ itself. The reference to 20% slope in the original Board comments was a recognition of a general overall design criteria for the entire project that buildings and roads should be located in the valleys. Staff and the developer are of the view that the "20% language" was intended only as a general definition of a valley for planning purposes. It . was a design criteria from which reasonable exception would be allowed consistent with the overall objective of the criteria. There is, of course, nothing special about the 208 slope line per se. The key planning concept in 1995-RZ is that housing should normally be kept in the valleys. This is the root concept behind most "hillside ordinances", or slope density ordinances and the Planned Unit District and transferred density approach to land planning. See Attachment A for slope comparisons. With regard to the building on slopes of greater than 20%, the EIR states succinctly that "There is no known legal or engineering requirement which imposes such a -blanket restriction. The General Plan for the area contemplates development on slopes of over 20% but requires that there be a reduction in net density to 2 DU/acre when such development occurs". The project as designed meets the General Plan criteria. The lack of a condition of approval specifically restricting construction to slopes of 20% or less emphasizes that this is a generalized design goal for the entire project, from which reasonable exception consistent with the objective of the goal could be allowed. The design goal, or criteria, does not imply that no lot may average over 208 in slope but instead that a building should not be located on that portion of a lot exceeding 20% slope. From this viewpoint building pads, areas or envelopes (wherein house construction must occur) as shown on the preliminary development plan do occur on areas of less than 20€ slope except in 10-15 cases. This small percentage seems reasonable on the basis of a desirable flexibility to adapt lot design to site specific criteria, and the overall commitment of the project to open space retention and low density large lot design. -3- 9 What must not be lost sight of is the minimal impacts of these variations from the rough criteria as it relates to the total planning concept. That is, the 208 guide (or any other guide) works only with reference to all other planning critQria and the specific site under review. Flexibility is vital In land planning and rigid adherence to any criteria is unworkable. For example, rigid adherence to a 208 "rule" alone could be used to authorize development of land now slated for open space use. With consideration of the plan for 1995-RZ as a whole, it is concluded that the small degree of development on 208 slopes does not produce an unacceptable adverse impact. III. Comment Re More Lots Suggestion Ms. Moody proposes as mitigation measures that lots which average over 208 be deleted and relocated within the flatter portions of the subdivision, presumably without going below a 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot area, and that the 43 lots with parts of their area in over 208 slopes have buildings thereon located in the under 20% slope areas. Response To More Lots Suggestion: As noted above, with few exceptions, those lots having slopes from under to over 208 have building sites in the under 208 slope area. The transfer of 15 to 25 lots as proposed to eliminate those with average slopes of over 208 would reduce the overall average lot size of the project to the detriment of the expressed adjoining community goal of large lot sizes and to the detriment of the entire spacious low density appearance of the subdivision. The 206 lots now average 27, 000 sq. ft. a piece. The community wants these large lot sizes and they are necessary in order to produce the front and side yard setbacks proposed. The Moody proposal would further reduce usable lot space and not only make the homes appear more crowded but also actually crowd the residents closer together. This increase in land use intensity seems inconsistent with the developer's proposal for luxury homes and with the Diablo community's desire to foster that approach on this portion of the project as a buffer between their neighborhood and the potentially more dense later phases of the Blackhawk Project. It is to be noted that the local San Ramon valley Planning Committee endorsed this plan and that the Diablo Homeowners Association/Diablo Services District (during commission hearings) had no objection to the land use plan as proposed. -4- 00093 IV. Comment Re Storm Runoff in addition, Ms. Moody questioned the effectiveness of the proposed storm water retention basin concept in controlling potentially adverse effects of increased storm water runoff occurring as a result of the development, particularly as related to high frequency/low rainfall storms and siltation. Response To Comment Re Storm Runoffs High frequency storms and their runoff (i.e. , those occurring as frequently as one to two years apart and thus precipitating what could be considered "normal" rainfall for an area) were considered in the design and downstream effect of the proposed drainage detention facilities on the project site. The response of the hydraulic consultant to this same comment which was previously presented at Planning Commission hearings on the EIR is contained in a letter in the responses section of the EIR. There was an error in the Bliss letter of March 22, 1976, and Mr. Bliss has asked to apend a correction to this reply. In addition to presenting his rationale the consultant states that "it is my opinion that the existing natural creek channel for Green Valley Creek downstream of the subject development is a seasoned mature channel. Any increases which may occur in the [high] frequency runoff flows from the development will be minor and will have little, if any, affect on the natural creek channel." ' In any case the percent of increase to the flow during the high frequency flows (1-2 year storms) caused by 1995 will be about 5% which is not enough to make significantly increase what little erosion may be occurring as a result of the high frequency storms. The answer by Bliss that the 1-2 year storm is of limited consequence or impact is concurred in by county flood control. The primary reason for the detention basins was that during extreme flood conditions Green Valley Creek through Diablo Country Club now floods. The alternatives were to either improve the existing creek through Diablo or to design the detention basins to hold enough peak flow water to improve or at least not worsen the current situation by construction of 1995-RZ. All experts consulting to the County agree that this goal can and will be met. -5- ON94 Regardless, this issue has definitely been called to the attention of the county and in making its final recommendations (final plan and tentative map stages) flood control will review this issue (among others) in determining the proper sizing and operations of the basins as provided in Conditions #7 and #20. If such further review leads to a change in opinion, the county can and will order any changes that might be required. Moody is urged to provide any expert authority she has now or during the further review. V. Comments Re Archaeological Survey Sally Phelps, as an archaeologist, and the American Indian Movement questioned the adequacy of the Busby study for 1995-RZ (Appendix to Draft EIR) and suggested various approaches to protect potential sites of archaeological interest on the project site. Added comments are addressed in the "response" section below. Response To Archaeological Comments: The Blackhawk Ranch has been ranched, farmed and/or inhabited since the early 1900's and, to date, no records of the discovery of items of archaeological interest have been found. The University of California has worked and is having dedicated to it with a later phase of the Blackhawk property a five acre palentological dig located near the second phase of the project. The entire 5000 acre ranch project was the subject of a general archaeological reconnaissance survey during generation of the base 1840-RZ EIR. This preliminary study revealed no evidence but a condition of the 1840-RZ approval required supplemental EIR's for each subsequent project phase. Implicit in this requirement is a requirement of added archaeological field studies for each phase. 1995-RZ is an independent rezoning of a 943 acre portion of the 5,000 acres covered by 1840-RZ. Archaeological studies on the balance of the project will be covered by supplemental EIR's. In furtherance of the 1840-RZ supplemental EIR requirement and because of the requirements of CEQA an independent EIR was prepared for 1995-RZ. Included in this study was a field study and report by Busby concerning the 943 acres covered by 1995-RZ. (See Appendix to Draft EIR Volume I) . Of the 943 acres encompassed by 1995-RZ only about 150 acres is proposed for development, most of the 150 acres has been under cultivation for several years and no year-round streams are found on the site. -6- W95 To date there is nothing unique to the parcel suggested by any study or other discovery that leads one to specially suspect the existence of items of archaeological interest other than found throughout the region in general. As stated by Ms. Phelps the failure to discover any items of interest on a survey of the nature performed by Busby in- no way establishes that the area may not have been inhabited at some time past. An absolute determination of previous inhabitation may not be possible even after extensive investigation, including excavation. Such investigation and excavations are time-consuming and very expensive such that most of the state is unstudied and most discoveries occur as the result of random excavation arising from construction activity. Accordingly, it is generally recognized that various lesser stages of investigation (reconnaissance surveys) are normally adequate to recognize those few sites of sufficient significance to warrant intensive investigation prior to construction. The county accepts the Busby archaeological study as objective and adequate for purposes of environmental review of the proposed 1995-RZ site and successive action related to development of the parcel of land as required by CEQA. The study was performed according to U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management standards. Further study of the site prior to excavation would provide little added thoroughness and is not indicated by the findings to date. The concern regarding ongoing study is thought to be met by Condition $30 of the conditions of approval which, as usually stated, requiring notification of County Planning officials who have the power to require work stoppage in areas where archaeological materials are discovered until independent professional appraisal of the significance of the find can be made. Notwithstanding the above opinion, it is the county's desire that, to the extent reasonable, parties interested in the archaeological aspects of this project be satisfied such that the county is proposing to modify Condition #30 to provide for a hearing during hearings on the final development plan and tentative map for 1995-RZ to have the county Planning Commission hear and decide if it should impose (subject to appeal to the Board) more stringent conditions respecting the identification, protection and handling of archaeological finds made during grading (which is the next logical time when items of interest -7- a7� might be uncovered) . Commensurate with this amendment concerned individuals or institutions are invited to write or discuss with the County Planning Department their concerns and suggestions. Sally Phelps notes (including supporting references) in two comments that the ethnographic statement incorporated in the report incorrectly calls the probable historic indian residents of the project site vicinity Costanoan, subgroup Chochenyo, when in fact they were probably Volvon, and that in the interest of accuracy and respect to a vanished race the correct name should be used. The correction with its references is recognized. -8- 00097 y 50 33�-- ATTACT A SLOPE CO-MPARISONS 00098 FE RIFFS, PETERS and JONES It T.aIM CMIL Mans" GLUM QAM CIVIL ENGINEERING - SURVEYING J01NS.KTW uasn�a crva awowt. May 3, 1976 Mr. Asold 9. Jonas Chief Environmental Assessment Contra Costa County Planning Department Martins, California 96553 As: Ramming Aoolicatioa 1995-82 Dear Sir: I have been asked to review the County's comments to Linda Moody$& letter concerning the remain& appliation 199S-B2. In doing so, I came across soma reference errors contained in my letter to you dated March 22, 1976. I would like to make a clarification at this time. A low-frequency storm is one which occurs infrequently (once in 50-100 yrs.) and generally causes flooding. A high-fregwsncy storm is onewhich occurs often (1-2 year storms). In my letter the terms low frequency and high frequency were reversed. However, I wish to point out that the statements contained in the County's response to Mr. Moody's letter are correct and I an in agreement with them as they relate to drainage and the detention basins. Very truly yours, . RIFP[, PETERS AND JONES Ga G. li GGB:ms w0M 3264 BUSKIRK AVENUE - PLEASANT HILL, CALIFORNIA 94523 - PHONE 939-0511 • Resolution No. 32-1976 RESULUTIOil OF THE PLANNING CUHHISSIOri OF THE COUiITY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIF- ORiiIA, IdCORPORATING FIaDI 166 AND RECOMMENDATIONS Oil THE REQUESTED CHANGE BY THE bLACKHAW& CORPORhTIOA (APPLICNNT & OWNER), (1995-RZ), IN THE ORDIUWICE CODE SECTI(W PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZQIING FOR THE DANVILLE AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by the BLACKHAWK CORPORATION (Applicant & Owner), (1995- RZ), to delete 943 acres from the currently approved Blackhawk Ranch Planned Unit Dis- trict (P-1), (1840-RZ), and to amend conditions for approval in consideration of the deletion; and WHEREAS, the applicant requests approval and rezoning (1995-RZ), to an independent Planned Unit District (P-1), for 943 deleted acres from the Blackhawk Ranch Planned Unit District (P-1), to develop Hidden Oaks at Blackhawk Ranch as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan and received in the Planning Department Office on December 17, 1975; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing was field by the Planning Commission on March 9, 1976, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WlkREAS, the matter was continued for further hearing and discussion on the iaarch 23, 1976 Study Session and the March 30, 1976 Planning Commission Meeting; and WdLREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was presented at said public hearings and this Commission considered and evaluated all testimony during its deliberations and found toe said EIR to be in compliance with the provisions of the California Environ- mental Quality Act (CE4k) and adopted as part of the final EIR the conditions of approval (Exhibits A and B) attached hereto, including the Further Responses (Exhibit C) attached nereto, and the reasons set forth in the responses to comments (see Volume I, Part U and E); and WHEREAS, the Commission has seen the subject site, has reviewed and consid- ered the Final EIR and has fully considered and evaluated all testimony and evidence (including County General Plan documents) and is prepared to make appropriate decisions and recorviendations. The Commission hereby wakes the following recommendations, certifications and findings: A. EIR - Order. That the within resolution be and the same is hereby made - a part of tiie Final EIR. '%%i"0"'M Q with board/ons 00100 i Resolution No. 32-1976 8. Elft - Certification. The Commission certifies that the four volume Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the state and local guide- lines and further certifies that the Commission has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information contained in the said Final EIR. C. Findings. With reference to its recommendations set forth in (E) below, This Commission finds: (1) That the applicant intends to start construction within two and one- half years from the effective date of the zoning change. (2) That the various land uses to be authorized by the ordinance (with the conditions of approval to be imposed) are consistent with the County General Plan (meaning the composite General Plan and all of its adopted elements) in that the var- ious land uses authorized by the Ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. (3) That the proposed planned unit development (with conditions) sub- stantially conforms to the County General Plan. (4) That the development will constitute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability, in harmony with the character of the surrouding neighborhood and community. (a) Taat with reference to the neighborhood commercial center: (a) That such center is needed at the proposed location to pro- vide adequate commercial facilities of the neighborhood type proposed. (b) That traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed center, or will be ouviated by presently projected improvements and demonstrated provisions. in the plan for proper control of traffic and parking. (c) Tnat the development will be an attractive and efficient center which will fit harmoniously into and will have no adverse effect upon the adjacent or surrounding development. (6) That the development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exception trom the normal application of the County Code. (7) That the phasing proposed by this application is consistent with good planning practices and each phase is capable of standing alone. U. That the Covoission determines that ;where is a need in the community for the land use proposed by this application. E. necoiahendations - Approval and Determination dotice. This Commission recoimiends and dpproves the applicant's request that: 00101 s ( C Resolution No. 32-1970- (1) 2-1976(1) The current Planned Unit District (P-1) (1840-RZ) be amended to delete 943 acres from the effect thereof and to amend the conditions pertaining to said residual 1840-RZ as set forth in "Additions and Amendments to 1840-RZ Conditions" (Items A-L attached). (Z) The Preliminary Development Plan and the rezoning request to create an independent Planned Unit District (P-1) for the 943 acres deleted is approved sub- ject to the attached 30 conditions of approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary Of this Commission shall sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to the uoard of supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution for its consideration was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, March 30, 1976, by the follaiing vote: AYES: Commissioners - Jeha, Walton, Anderson, Compaglia, Milano, Stoddard, Young. HOES: Commissioners - Hone. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - done. I, Andrew H. Young, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, April 6, 1976, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission: RECEIVED AYES: COmmi5Si0nerS - Jeha, Milano, Anderson, Walton, Stoddard, Young. NOLS: Commissioners- Kone. APS r 1976 ABSENT: Commissioners - Albert R. Compaglia. J. R. OLIZON AUSTAIiI: Commissioners - none. G'ERK WARD,OF SUP£RMORS \ti%A COSTA CO. Chas-Wan of th Planling Commission of the County of Contr Costa, State of California ATTEST: $eco ar�'of th-e P anning ComTmjssion of the bounty of Contra Costa, State of California 00102 Exhit A Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Development Plan for Hidden Oaks at Blackhawk (1995-RZ) j I. This approval is based on the revised Preliminary Development Pian for Hidden Oaks at Blackhawk, received by the Planning Department on March 9, 1976, and the following exhibits listed thereon, as modified by these conditions: Exhibit fl: Revised Natural Features Map, received by the Planning Department February 20, 1976, scale 1" = 100', map shows existing trees, limits of 20: slope, slide areas, ridge lines, etc. Exhibit f2: Slope Classification Map, received by the Planning Department December 17, 1975, at a scale of 1" = 2001. Exhibits 03, 14, f5: Revised map of Blackhawk Road, received March 8, 1976, at a scale of 1" = 40' , showing treatment of Black- hawk Road. Exhibit f6: Section through site indicating location of proposed East Bay Municipal Utility District reservoir, received December 17, 1975. Exhibit 17: Blackhawk Ranch Phase 1 Final Soil & Geologic Investi- gation, prepared by ENGEO Incorporated November 28, 1975 Exhibit 18: Drainage Study prepared by Riffe, Peters & Jones September 19, 1975, revised November 11, 1975. Exhibit 18 (supplement): Estimate of Increased Storm Water Runoff, prepared by Riffe, Peters & Jones, December 23, 1975. Exhibit 18A: Estimate of Increasein Runoff Due to Construction of Su- bb i�v� los n 4738, prepared by Riffe, Peters & Jones, December 16, 1975. Exhibit 09: Feasibility Analysis of Public & Quasi-Public Areas. Exhibit f10: General Plan Conformance Map, scale of 1" = 1001, received December 17, 1975. Exhibit 111: Application for Rezoning, expanded, requesting modi- fication of conditions for approval of 1840-RZ. Exhibit 012B: Plan & Elevations for Guard House & Gates received December 17, 1975. Exhibit 113: Preliminary Development Plan with lot dimension, received February 20, 1976. Exhibit 114: Traffic Analysis by John J. Forristal November 14, 1975. J4liaofiimod with 600rd65YO3 Conditions for Approval of 1995-RZ Page 2 Exhibit 115: Typical lot with setbacks and yard standards, received February 20, 1976. 2. The maximum number of units shall be 206. 3. Development rights to the open space shall be deeded to the County with the recording of a Final Subdivision Map. 4. Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions, Articles of Incorporation and By-laws for a mandatory homeowners' association shall be submitted with application for approval of a Final Development Plan. These documents shall provide for establishment, ownership, and maintenance of the common open space and private streets. 5. Yard and height measurements on each lot shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of Planning. The R-15 Zoning District, excepting the requirement for a 30-foot setback, shall be used as a guide. 6. The second phase of review by the Planning Commission will be review of the Final Development Plan and tentative map. The plans shall refine and include more details of grading and drainage and may require some revision of street alignments, lot lines and grading with further review. 7. The recommendations to correct and stabilize existing landslides incorporated in the Blackhawk Ranch Phase 1 Final Soil & Geologic Investigations, prepared by ENGEO Incorporated, dated November 28, 1975, shall be implemented. Preliminary details of proposed stabil- ization work shall be submitted when the Final Development Plan and tentative map are submitted. The soils engineer/geologist shall review and approve those plans before they are submitted. The Final Development Plan, including locations and improvements, shall be specifically reviewed by a soils engineer with special emphasis on location and slide potential (old and new). B. Interim on-site silt control basins shall be constructed as required by Grading Engineer of County of Contra Costa. This shall be reviewed with the Grading Engineer and Public Works Department. Graded slopes shall be reseeded with grass and no grading should occur during the rainy season except with special permission by the Director of Public Works. - 9. Comply with the fire protection requirements of the Danville Fire Protection District. 10. Street names shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of Planning. 00104 Conditions for Approval of 1995-RZ Page 3 11. All utilities shall be placed underground. The project shall be served by a cable television underground system. No individual television antennas shall be permitted. 12. The road widths shown on the preliminary development plan are less than County public road standard. However, they are acceptable for private roads and potentially acceptable as public roads, and shall be constructed in accordance with the County Ordinance Specifica- tions. 13. Street lights shall be installed at the intersection of Hidden Oaks Drive with Blackhawk Road and the intersection of Hidden Oaks Drive with Mossey Oak Drive. The details with regard to lighting will be reviewed shen the Final Development Plan and tentative map are sub- mitted. 14. Asphalt concrete dikes shall be built along the edges of the Black- hawk Road pavement in lieu of drainage swales, or an alternate plan acceptable to Public Works. The face to face distance between the dikes shall be 36 feet. 15. Blackhawk Road shall be improved from the Diablo Road - Mt. Diablo Scenic Boulevard intersection to Lot 47 to provide a proper transi- tion of improvements from the project to the intersection. The time limit for the construction of these improvements may be extended beyond that required for the subdivision improvements by mutual con- sent of the developer and the Public Works Department. 16. All paths along roads shall be Portland cement concrete. 17. A landscape and irrigation plan, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, showing the street rights-of-way including medians, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning prior to the filing of a Final Subdivi- sion Map for each unit. Landscape and irrigation details shall be shown on the improvement plans and shall be subject to bonding requirements and an inspection fee. 18. The developer shall form a homeowners association, Service Area or a special district for the maintenance of the streets and the portland cement concrete paths within the security gates and the landscaping, path, open space, and trails . The developer shall form, and a Service Area or Service District shall assume, the obligation for maintaining the detention basins and the landscaping and paths along Blackhawk Road. 19. Any section of the storm drainage system which conveys storm water, to which the public streets contribute flow, shall be installed"in a dedi- cated drainage easement. OOlUV Conditions for Approval of 1995-RZ Page 4 20. Preliminary calculations for the storm water detention basins shown on the Preliminary Development Plan have been reviewed by the Flood Control District. These detention basins are acceptable in-concept.- The design and implementation of the detention basins will be reviewed with the subdivision improvement plans. 21. The detention basins and appurtenant structures shall be installed in easements dedicated to the County and shown on the Subdivision Final Map. The detention basins shall be maintained by the Service Area or Special District created as required by Condition #18. 22. All surface flows and storm waters entering and originating within the development shall be collected and conveyed to a natural water- course or an existing adequate storm drainage facility. Besides on-site improvements, this may also require off-site drain- age improvements to adequately convey these surface flows and storm waters southerly of Blackhawk Road, across private properties, and into Green Valley Creek with adequate outlet protection. Drainage easements shall be offered for dedication to the County for off-site drainage improvements. The documents, consisting of easement descriptions and maps, shall be filed prior to or concur- rently with the filing of the Final Map. If prior adequate easements already exist, they shall not be duplicated. No work shall be conducted in existing off-site drainage channels from October 1 to April 15 unless the developer obtains written per- mission from the County Public Works Department, Construction Divi- sion. This permission shall only be granted when the extended weather forecast does not show the possibility of heavy rains and the ground is sufficiently firm to support the proposed construction activity. 23. Provisions shall be made to protect lots from surface waters flowing onto the developed lots from the hillside slopes. 24. The developer shall create an Architectural Review Committee consist- ing of the Blackhawk Development Company and one member of the San Ramon Valley Planning Committee to serve until the units are developed. Responsibilities of the Architectural Review Committee shall include but not be limited to review of energy conservation measures, water conservation measures, elevations and fence detail. 25. A report shall be submitted with the Final Development Plan applica- tion from a qualified tree expert to recommend any measures which can be taken in connection with the trees to be preserved and measures to be taken with the Final Development Plan. 00106 Conditions for Approval of 1995-RZ Page 5 26. The details of future ownership and maintenance of the proposed "rest stop" park shall be resolved prior to recording a Final Subdivision Map. 27.. Construction traffic shall be routed via Sycamore Valley Road to Tassajara Road and Blackhawk Road or from Dougherty Road. Developer shall put this provision in construction contracts. 28. The developer shall comply with the San Ramon Developer's Policy with regard to provision for schools. 29. Each segment of this proposed development shall be subject to fur- ther review when the Final Development Plan is submitted. It may be that additional requirements, conditions and/or modifications may be specified following review of the Final Development Plan. The conditions of this approval serve to give direction to the applicant in his preparation of the Final Development Plan. 30. If during construction, grading or excavation, any items of poten- tial historical or scientific interests are discovered, the County Planning Department shall be notified. NIH:lsw - 4-7-76 Exhibit 8 Proposed Amendments to 1840-RZ Conditions: A. For the purpose of applying the conditions attached to 1840-RZ amended, Hidden Oaks shall be a portion of the first phase of development. B. Prior to recordation of a Final Subdivision Map, the developer shall offer to contract with the County for a design study road study of the Green Valiey - Mt. Diablo Scenic Road Section of Diablo Road and deposit a sum not to exceed $10,000. The study should be concluded in six months and should cover, among other things (a) extent of desirable and feasible width and alignment; (b) road capacity expected because of the improvements, if any; (c) safety proposals including pole relocation, shoulder improvements and construction of pedestrian, bike and horse paths; (d) cost estimates for each suggested improve- ment. Residential densities may be reduced in subsequent units of the Blackhawk Planned Unit Development (1840-RZ as amended). If it appears from this and other ongoing studies that such reductions are necessary. C. For each Final Development Pian the developer shall submit a detailed phasing schedule which deals with the phasing for utilities, schools, roads, drainage, commercial areas and all residential units and pro- jections as to how many units will be developed on a phase basis. (This amends Condition #2 of 1840-RZ.) D. The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 3,733. It may be that this number will be reduced subject to Final Development Plan reviews or traffic studies. (This amends Condition #7 of 1840-RZ.) E. The project site shall be annexed to the P-2 (police district, if possible. (This amends Condition 121 of 1840-RZ.) F. The applicant shall initiate formation of or annex to a Park and Recre- ation District or County Service Area and local parks shall be dedicated to that district for development and maintenance in accordance with the Park Land Dedication Ordinance. The location and type of park shall be shown on the revised Preliminary Development Plan. (This amends Condi- tion #22.) G. The development of the westernmost golf course and appurtenant facili- ties shall be developed as follows: (a) The first 9 holes and clubhouse with Phase 11 as shown on the revised Preliminary Development Plan. (b) The second 9 holes with Phase III as shotm on the revised Preliminary Development Plan. (This amends Condition #24 of 1840-RZ.) H. Detailed plans and reports on the golf course administration and manage- ment shall be submitted with the Final Development Plan for Phase II. (This amends Condition 125 of 1840-RZ.) Microfilmed with board order UU108 • Proposed Amendments to 1840-RZ Conditions Page 2 I. The availability of school housing and the agreement between the San Ramon Unified School District and the development shall be considera- tions in determining whether subsequent phases of the project shall be approved as each phase is reviewed for approval. (This amends Condition #29 of 1840-RZ.) J. The general area surrounding the shopping center, including the shop- ping center, shall be especially reviewed as to its land use relation- ship prior to approval of the second phase of development. The neighborhood character of the shopping center shall be emphasized. (This amends Condition 130 of 1840-RZ.) K. The developer shall provide a private feeder bus service after 1,000 units have been occupied and not later than 1,295 units. The feeder system shall furnish service to the nearest Bay Area Rapid Transit District feeder line during 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, so long as such system is feasible after one year of operation. (This amends Condition #33 of 1840-RZ.) L. The developer shall create an Architectural Review Committee consist- ing of the Blackhawk Development Company and one member of the San Ramon Valley Planning Committee to serve until 796 units are developed. After that, the developer may appoint a resident of the Blackhawk Development. (This amends Condition 134 of 1840-RZ.) NLH:Isw 4-7-76 W.iUZI AZ {^-- -•`. . . �-- --=-� `�':;%:%/i//"��1.i�,�/,�;��%�i; �� , . 8000"" �. F-AIj , l f j!//•r i - r _ ��-= '�/ / `, _ --7 'ri a , �. - = i�12.. .i i _LJ~ ,ht�.•t :" ss Ms/,/�/,� S-a Z�_ ,C..-�FaS:._.f_1 *.�_• C 'Jf/ -�'• -'"`!w .:' 'w:jam.fl.'f •. `.1-f••�•..•r „'� ' " ... is •.: ;•ice • -r'. - {f .. •.�.r'I..r' /r ,.l ,i�•,. -+T �s i ` - �'�:�fJ:'i:J •-/l�r"rr/-!l.,J"�•�: j/j;f, \ lit } ., .. ,. =t :, , r �� // / r,js f ► /►/ .„ '00"- , :, ./,.. ;.._may i ":a4«rte ...,�' �i ��i ir .,:,,�.. .,.•. . .'/:'r//j .e jq,jz:,-er., area of ia{tt,IOSA !, A. -t.YoUt4G , Chairman of the Contra Costa County } Planning Commission, State of California, do heresy certify that this is a true and correct copy of L► Ponmor•: OF TUE p15rP-lCrS IA&PTORTME DtALLO AaF-U. tt4S'El'TM4P NO.23.AN0 MT.DiAGLO DIVISION , SECTOMS 4.5.i 48 indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of 5LA1CVMNW K COZFO 2A t tON i Chairman of I Contr Co�':a County # Planning Comma ion, tate of Calif. �f AT3 EST* r r Secret6 ry of the Contra Costa Zlif.t+ 1 t'lanning Commfs:.ion, State ofi ' '� �+ }• 'i, � � �UU11�- A'SMAU604iic" wiin loontd 090K IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Appeal of ) Fisk, Graves & Plourde from ) action of the Planning ) May 4, 1976 Commission on Land Use ) Permit 12130-75, Alamo Area. ) NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPEAL Prudential Realty & Finance, ) Owners. ) WHEREAS on the 13th day of April, 1976, the Planning Commission denied Land Use Permit # 2130-75 of Fisk, Graves & Plourde for establishment of a non-profit community tennis facility and professional offices; and WHEREAS within the time allowed by law, Fisk, Graves & Plourde filed with this Board an appeal from the aforesaid denial; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing, be held on said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107, Adminis- tration Building, Martinez, California, on Tuesday, the 8th of June, 1976, at 10:30 a.m. , and the Clerk is directed to give notice to all interested parties. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of May, 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By Bonnie Boaz cc: Fisk, Graves & Plourde Deputy Clerk" Prudential Realty & Finance Company List of Persons Provided by Planning Director of Planning 00111 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMISS10N CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In The Matter of Appeal of Land Use Permit Application ` No. 2130-75, FISK, GRAVES S PLOURDE (Applicants) , to establish a non-profit community tennis facility and professional offices for accountants, attorneys t architects. WHEREAS, on July 21, 1975, the applicants FISK, GRAVES S PLOURDE, filed Land Use Permit Application 2130-75, to establish a non-profit community tennis facility S professional offices for accountants, attorneys and architects; and WHEREAS, the property is described as being a descriptive parcel fronting 308 feet on the east side of Danville Highway, approximately 50-ft., north of the intersect- ion of Hillgrade Avenue, in the Alamo Area; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a Single Family Residential Dis- trict-20 (R-20) ; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Contra Costa County board of Adjustment on February 18, 1976; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment referred the application of the full Planning Commission for public hearing; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Planning Commission on March 9, 1976 and April 13, 1976, whereat all persons Interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, at said public hearings, persons did appear and speak in favor and in opposition to the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission viewed the subject property on Field Trip on March 15, 1976; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was preapred by the Planning Staff, presented at said public meetings, considered by the Planning Commission during its deliberations and was found to have been complete in compliance with CEQA and the State guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fully considered and evaluated all the test- imony and evidence submitted at said public hearings. DENIED the application of FISK, GRAVES s PLOURDE 12130-75, for the following reasons: (1) Traffic generated by the tennis corVlex would be greater than generated by a single family residential development. on the same property. (2) The intensity of the proposed use would cause widening of Danville boulevard. (3) The character of the surrounding residential area would be adversely affected by the intensity of the proposed non-residential use. The foregoing order was given by vote of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, &"1iuofi!mrd with board order FIsk, Graves S Plourde - 1213C1-75 April 13, 1976, as follows: AYES: Commissioners - Milano, Compaglia, Young. NOES: Commissioners - Walton, Stoddard. ABSENT: Commissioners - Anderson, Jeha. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. ANDREW H. YOUNG Chairman of tFe Planning Commass on of the County of Contra Cost State of California DATE: April 13, 1976 ATTEST: "onV A. Dehae , Director o anning, Contra C to C y, State ofCalifornia RECEIVED APR J7 1676 I a. c LSM CM 80AW of 5UnWjS0As M ACO. . ...'' �3:L',.•3� `,'R�":i�::-;�. '�• ''; C=` �' IV " `ti`s ? r -•,•.-' " .'• �`'� ,. yt :�a, �. ll�� •-, ; i -i�./( ^•-�`�. ti 0 ,: • �•! es f .} �"� ' �' y »irL'`• f,.�Yf/i t= �. _�d'yr'"' • wear• \*+C •� _ (� r t a i��A.''.• r„' *yam� -"L+..`„r Y i Phi' -• •t 1,,,••�.. +w.s ♦ f . �•• r•• ••�4'•- Yf.R.� • y .�.,A�......• „{"�K�I' :.+. "'�r7V•d"° I ')'n ` 9 �' •.�'�i:;�3z. * 1ti " •';�•r• ,/'\, .,--�' !A.,—� ,�••t• t'r: . y'`•f •,'Y.f . •�4w•,.s. �i,a,_ K {'Y -.)•b� .+O _?i-/". VV � • 1t:s'•Y.�.- `�(�.';,-Jf �•��•*.f •• K:�• •� "ice ..�� t (,.�i 6,0 iii 'Y� i'�'" •�l' - r y i� i]i•.7 .. s �,«;f ass+ J.F..••, .,�.•t✓'E•tfs,.� ys . �,•� tr •':�► �=�.`'�G• . ++.*:`yam�y�...T r"1':...�! 3' • a.,, i'�•,� �• •:�"• i r * -.`' •,.'t �„ ./• : �.•r►.•p.,•.f'•, �. , - �. . `* ruts• •-,.-.- �w. t Etat�� ,+-t:3�!`•••.2+� '��,` /�-„,�-`r ��,�,:\,!”" " - ,.R? ....T �• .j ft A • t . •�i•sw =-t_ r ti- �•. .... •� a.� • O _� �'� '� n t;;;,: •1a'Lam..r...•o`"'r"•'{:-•.� tit r.i,� . Com.. • i~'" •S T •-t• � •s• �• �•..... s'. '�s s�M•7f�' . �}y,' t •S. � ;;, t J J urt. Sti�a�i•s3 �'v-.-_�_,._,,,,,�, + .'•:1 _ •♦ .� g, O E3-$.E%1'A ' �► , f .1.1111 � f •' �j"r V � �`4 .�� •Y`} ..+ss ;�,.,��• ,R. IL At Cl IP ..• :• ��. \ _\ ..1- it . V ' ( •Ctt •��" �. .�,' �ti. ♦ . , •"=. ��,�� i , ._, ,1'!' . . �"•�; _ �;� 3 •�' .•'fir � '��< <,.K� , 44 411 po 0;5 Vail or t , ,• •t— .•, •� ,.�''►� .` r.•,-M, �1 �'' r .�•,•' "V/'fit If' s3t1c„ `�� > ' .?� •�.t •--a'• � � s 1 +.''• tip: a' '� �.r..• �� . •° Stone ,. 4F Ila to ul .� - �%� 1'- • �'� •�� 'tai��I�'p•�'"+��«: `�• 'T()�� - 9;• y/1 ` ��. :`:1��`:'.�•+1 a�� '"�r. .A� .�t� �-i' •+•a•'M"�tONC•'• 1{.�i � t ��--�r -��1 i•*`'j"�` C r n / e'' rC� �'•1A - `='- ' ,• r�; =:�aC'' � E \!C`. - •t.�•-i• ,,c—r Q phis+ gar {C .} ai -� �� . ti• 2; T pogo \�� - - lc� ._ • }obit _ { �_ 3� •�.- 1RU�'�,`2AL IiipAa end nageraePOICT nt Company Lod bpord , Use permit 75 - �,the'r e _ 4 nlltcara'�►trt� Land Us nj 1�� _ TABLE OF CONTENTS • Page I. Introductory Discussion 8 - A. Project Description 8 B. Environmental Inventory of Region •8 1. Physical Description 8 2. Existing Use and Surrounding Area 9 3. Utilities and Cowunity Facilities 9 4. Circulation 9 S. Plans, Ordinances, and Policies 10 6. Soils and Geology 11 7. Hydrology and Nater Quality 12 8. Vegetation and Wildlife 13 9. Recreation and Open Space 13 10. Socioeconomic Characteristics 13 11. Air Quality and Noise 24 12. Historical and Archaeological Aspects 15 11. Environmental Impact Analysis 16 A. The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action 16 B. Any Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided If 20 This Proposal is Implemented C. ttitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact 21 D. Alternatives to the Proposed Action 21 1. Project Alternatives 21 3. Energy Alternatives 22 E. The Relationship Between Local Short-term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-teres Productivity 23 00115 t • F. An Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would be Involved in the Proposed Action Should It Be Implemented .23 G. The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action - 24 H. Organizations and Persons Consulted; Documents Utilized 24 1. Qualification of E.I.R. Preparation Agency 25 Exhibit 1: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Cover page Exhibit 2: REGIONAL MAP 1 Exhibit 3: SITE PLAN 2 Exhibit 4: PERSPECTIVE 3 Exhibit S: PARCEL MAP 4 . Exhibit 6: ZONING NAP S Exhibit 7: TREE INVENTORY 6 Exhibit 8: NOISE MA (COMMM NOISE EQUIVALENCY LEVEL) ON SITE ^�T 00116 - suisur. vAr ---- • fit♦ � .... \ �� __ It:• .. WAR T/ME2 /ITTSt)URO C .r... 'CONCORD 1 � i PLEASANT HILL r .� CLAYTON r , :. *ALMUT CREEK ` LAFAYETTE , e ► . ""'• YL Oieb(e OJE.Cl SITE Aw.. "we" \ s Sam Remop. N -.0.. _B000_16000 CENTRAL PORTION ANTIOCN ...••••••'•• soma. ••� .M CONTRA COSTA COUNTY .. • �••�••••� 4004's _.CALIFQRNIA_ ---- -&... ..... ... .....s. REGIOM FLAP Exhibit 2 .. . _ 1 00117 s �Mzh ~`„'ter`" mal dom too "' `t` e s '"��"`r t �t � ��•fay. aft � �w a K a✓� ra � 3*3 rr z ''•"�_ +� .�� . �.� t .��=. ;fir �,,, � � • i w f Al ",� R� �./ '"/ C+�L!!•Olt�t A\"'��/!Y%' rv�!Y'rr ur..f' 1 Ile .i.e ' r�SG—G'.%.►:t'!j j..a u�caesas un r..x:su ..,.o,w...w.s. .�s.l. r,wwa•V++sassrlas.wu w.aw •\�...t'i{•r.t..bi..• Exhibit 3: Site Plan r s z • s•Z t fWV • r sy ry 1 r r ( •L��i%aft;' . lip it ` , f:.? t 'r-'f i• cor Au cetive `'gin • "• .y��.. ,;�;�,. QSi YZSK L t,,s r.sfs*. sp bit 4! Y �;j11 DANVILLE BOULEVARD � �c S o�. .. � 3!E�f • to rs e ♦ r - y • r4 '/ S.P•.l'•� Al-lee 1 • SC f J .r st lb N' Y J � }T-c- w i t �u 1 . a .y `{� `�,i� �s.` ...� - -.rte�r?Y,:�%'.i�'rS_ 6-;w.,?''tea''•r�""x;�Nw__ �'yrr."_.ytrS,pR�•��3 l!•/ . F ro r L � \' \ fj �' •moi X • j ! • 00 4 vwl� 1 R 20 I� �lbiti � - 5 1+ O t ,/ as Z• � � � � ` £ £ _� Nis �' 9-1 owl SIC a o / p � 'L� � r 7j•2 7 1t 4 c�� 22$' +a►� 4 a -t► G p22 t 2 C. i!ti ti Q 4 io 21� 2 �zblt s ` \ 487 `; t" : �* \il -7! • � � y` t ij�ti 65 lk .. • \ J 1 . � `,moi - •_ �• ! - i { ''^'"' :^t•*. �.r+ �- '• - � • s'� -sem - '' f•� t- r t . ITIDQt1 L ON SITE NOISE dBA (� YIS£ £ IVpLEAIGY LEVEL) Exhibit 8 00120 I. Introduction A. Project Location and Description Under County File 2130-75, the applicant, Mother Lode Land Management Company (Messrs. Fisk, Graves, and Plourde), and the owner, Prudential Realty and Finance Company, are request- ing approval for a land use permit to establish a private, nonprofit tennis facility, and professional offices. The preliminary development plan map (Exhibit 3) indicates that a two-story 6,000 square foot gross (4,500 square foot net) professional office building-and a parking area for 26 cars are proposed for the western portion of the parcel. This portion of the site is bounded to the west by Danville Boule- vard and to the east by San Ramon Creek. The applicant proposes to establish a private tennis facility on the eastern portion of the site (i.e., the portion of the site which is east of San Ramon Creek). This facility is to consist of an existing house remodeled into a clubhouse and pro shop, a swimming pool, 13 tennis courts (one with bleacher seating for tournaments) and a parking area for 36 cars. The project site is situated in the Alamo area. It front. approximately 308 feet on the east side of Danville Boulevard, SO feet north of the intersection of Hillgrade Avenue. The site is bounded to the rear (east) by the Interstate 680 right-of-way. (See Exhibit 6.) The site falls within census tract 3440 and is identified by Assessor's Parcel 187-100-08. The objective of the proposed project is to provide profes- sional offices and a proprietary membership, tennis facility. B. Environmental Inventory of Region 1. Physical Description The project site comprises 5.89 acres fronting on Danville Boulevard. The dominant topographic feature on the site is the northwest trending San Ramon Creek. (Exhibit 1.) The topographic map of the site submitted by the applicant indicates that the creek is entrenched in a channel which is approximately 12 to 1S feet below the elevation of the valley floor. The channel is approxmimtely 100 feet, bank to bank. Side slopes are steep (30+ percent) . A topographic feature of secondary importance is a northwest trending scarp or step 10 feet high. This feature, which trends subparallel to the creek and lies about 100 to the east of the creek, represents the eastern boundary of the floor of the San Ramon Valley- in the area. 00124 2. Existing Use and Surrounding Area The major man-made feature, an existing residence, is on a small knoll immediately east of the scarp. The home is poorly maintained at present. Natural features include attractive and unique rock outcroppings on the scarp, a variety of trees, and the remnants of an old walnut orchard east of the scarp. The surrounding area is low density residential development or vacant. To the northwest, however, there is a rela- tively large vacant parcel containing a hill. This shields the site from an architectural office complex in a uniquely designed building. The immediate neighbors to the southeast are two houses on large lots. The house with frontage on Danville Boulevard is separated from the proposed professional office building by a driveway. 3. Utilities and Community Facilities Fire Protection and Emergency Services Fire protection is provided by the Contra Costa Consoli- dated Fire District. Police Services Police services are provided by the County Sheriff's Department. Water Water service is to be provided by the East Bay Municipal Utility District. SanitM Sewer Service Sewage service is to be provided by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. Solid Waste Solid waste disposal service is available from the Valley Disposal Service, Incorporated. 4. Circulation The project site has access from Danville Boulevard, an arterial street. According to Contra Costa County Public Works Department records, in 1974 there were 2 accidents 9 00125 nearby (1 property damage during the day - 1 personal injury during the day). For the first 10 months of 1975 there were 4 accidents (1 property damage during the day - 2 property damage during the night - 1 personal injury during the day). These accidt;irs occurred on Danville Boulevard. within 300 feet north and south of Hillgrade Avenue. Danville Boulevard is two lanes (40 foot roadway within a 60 foot right-of-way). The Public Works Department has planned left turn pockets at intersections (76 foot right-of-ray). One norts:bound to westbound left turn pocket is planned in the area of Hillgrade Avenue which intersects Danville Boulevard from the west in a 'IT" configuration. The access of the proposed project is about 200 feet north of the Hillgrade Avenue intersection on the east side of Danville Boulevard. There are 8 foot bicycle lanes on each side of Danville Boulevard. The most pertinent traffic volume information is 4 years old (1974 Land Use and Transportation Study). Danville Boulevard at Rudgear Road (0.7 miles north of subject property): ADT 6,505 vehicles; Horning Peak hour 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. 394 vehicles; Evening peak hour 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 692 vehicles. Danville Boulevard at Livorna Road (0.6 miles south of subject property): ADT 7,324 vehilces; Morning peak hour 7:45 to 8:45 a.m. 425 vehicles; Evening peak hour 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 445 vehicles. Hillgrade Avenue at Danville Boulevard (200 feet south of subject property): t ADT 1,105 vehicles. There has been a steady increase in traffic and County Public forks Department estimates a current 7,300 ADT on Danville Boulevard in the vicinity of subject property. Forecast traffic for 1990 is 10,200 ADT. S. Plans, Ordinances, and Policies The Alaimo-Danville General Plan indicates low density, single family residential use for the project site. The zoning for the area, including the subject site, is R-20 single family residential; i.e., one house per 20,000 square foot minimum sized lot. 10 00126 It should be recognized that while the uses proposed by subject application are permissible with approval of the use permit under the present zoning, there is a history of letters and and complaints on file from residents and community groups of Danville Boulevard area stressing their desire to keep the boulevard fronting properties in single family use. A nonprofit tennis club and profes- sional office building can be allowed under the land use permit process in an R-20 district. However, a profit making tennis facility is not allowed under R-20 zoning. Danville Boulevard is on the-,Contra Costa County Bicycle Paths Plan and both Danville Boulevard and Highway 680 are on the Contra Costa County Scenic Routes Element. 6. Soils and Geology Topography and Geology The project area is located at the extreme north end of the San Ramon Valley, in the Alamo area. According to the mapping of the U.S. Geological Survey the western portion of the site (including the proposed office complex, swimming pool) is underlain by alluvial soils which were deposited on the valle; floor. The eastern portion of the site is underlain by folded sedimentary rocks (upper-. most Nero:y formation or lowermost 0rinda formation). The site is relatively flat with average slopes of less than S percent. Local areas of steeper slopes occur along the banks of San Ramon Creek, and there is a promi- nent "step" in topography at the alluvium-bedrock contact. The alluvial soils which underlie the western portion of the site are deposits of San Rcmon Creek. As such they consist of channel sands and associated floodplain deposits (consisting of mixtures of sand, silt and clay). It is reasonable to assume that the rate of sedimentation has been relatively rapid in this area. Consequently, the soils and underlying alluvium are geologically young. Based on previous experience in this area, the alluvium tends to be clayey and stiff; channel sands, where they occur, tend to be relatively loose at the surface but rapidly increase in density with increasing depth of burial. With regard to hazards interpretation, clayey - alluvial soils are rich in expansive material; channel sands may have a high liquefaction potential, depending on the characteristics of the sandy material and the characteristics of the earthquake. It should be recognized that potentially hazardous soils conditions are not unique to this site, and that detailed, site-specific 11 00127 information soils information is necessary to define and delineate potentialy hazardous conditions and recommend appropriate mitigating measures. The geology of the eastern portion of the site is dominated by fine-grained sedimentary rock which is dipping easterly at a high angle. No faults are mapped through the site and there is no evidence of landsliding. As mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey, the Calaveras fault passes approximately 1 mile vest of the site. This segment of the Calaveras system has not been included in a Special Study Zone by the State Geologist. With proper site preparation, the potential for soils and geologic impact appears minimal. 7. Hydrology In geologically recent times San Ramon Creek cut deeply into the heavy alluvium on the valley floor leaving a narrow ravine with precipitous sides. The creek has been engineered (i.e., improved) and consequently has limited value as an ecological resource. It is pertinent to note that in the vicinity of the project area the channel is relatively straight, trending approximately N40 W. Consequently erosion o: the creek banks is not considered to be a severe problem. The project site receives about 22.5 inches of rainfall in an average year. - Interpretative Report 4 of the U.S. Geological Survey identifies flood prone areas in the.San Francisco Bay Area. This map suggests that at least the western portion of the site lies within a 100 year flood- plain of San Ramon Creek (Limerinos, Lee, and Lugo, 1973). It should be recognized that the U.S. Geological Survey map is a product of an areawide study. Consequently, it is less than an ideal source of information on local conditions. County Flood Control personnel have reviewed the capacity of this portion of San Ramon Creek to determine if the site is likely to be inundated by runoff generated by the 100-year storm. Their calculations, which are based on knowledge of channel improvements and the hydrologic characteristics of the San Ramon Creek drainage basin, indicate that the project area is not flood prone and that the existing channel is adequate to convey anticipated runoff generated by the 100-year storm. San Ramon Creek is defined by the Department of Fish and Game as a natural watercourse. In accordance with Section 12 00szs 1601 and 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, the developer and/or his representative shall notify the Department of Fish and Game of any proposed or existing construction project within the site that may affect the stream. 8. Vegetation and Wildlife The site is 9S percent open and covered with weeds such as grasses and thistles. Because the creek has been • engineered, the natural riparian vegetation has been disturbed. A formal wildlife survey has not been conducted at the site. It is reasonable to assume that numerous small animals and insects inhabit the site, such as racoons, lizards, frogs, and songbirds. Exhibit 7 is a tree inventory. It indicates that the majority of important trees--including four oaks--are to be saved but that a line of pines are to be removed. Not shown on the inventory and slated for removal for parking are six English walnut and one black walnut tree. The black walnut tree and three of the six english walnuts are relatively large. 9. Recreation and Open Space The site is not indicated specifically for any type of recreational use in the General Plan; hence the project would create no recreation impacts. 10. Socioeconomic Characteristics The project area has experienced rapid growth over the past 20 years as it is swept into the suburban orbit of the metropolitan San Francisco Bay Area. The Alamo area, of which the project is a part, has become a highly desirable residential area of expensive homes on large lots. The assessment of the land in the area is based on its potential for this use; hence, taxes are high. A commercial use such as the office building proposed generates more net tax revenue than single family homes; the tennis club will not cost the taxpayer as much money _ as it will generate in taxes. This positive fiscal situation is caused by the fact that these uses--unlike single family homes--do not generate additional educational costs to the school district. On the other hand, the proposed vehicular generating uses put pressures on Danville Boulevard for widening and various road improvements. R 13 These capital expenses are costly and must eventually be borne partially by the public as a whole through taxes. 11. Air Quality and Noise a. Air Quality Because of its physical setting in an area of poor air giality and its location adjacent to a busy freeway, air quality is an important aspect of this project. The San Ramon Valley is an interior valley particu- larly subject to concentrations of air pollutants. This problem is due to a tendency to form stable inversions and to poor ventilation because of the absence of coastal winds. In addition to oxidant generated by automobiles within the valley, on-shore winds tend to move air pollutants produced in -other parts of the Bay Region into the interior valleys. While air pollution readings are not available near the site, they are available for Walnut Creek. Following is the information for air pollution at the Walnut Creek station by contaminant in 1974: the oxidant maximum was 15; the State oxidant standard of 10 pphm was exceeded 18 days; the Federal oxidant- standard of 8 pphm was exceeded 31 days. It is assumed by most experts that pollution is worse further south within the San Ramon Valley. There are public health hazards relating to heavy exercise in an air polluted area. These are discussed in the impact section. b. Noise The poise Element of the County General Plan identifies the site as an.area of special concern. Specifically, the Noise Element !taps (Exhibit 8) indicate that the site falls in a freeway corridor which has a noise level of 60 to 70 dBA (CAML*). Hence, if the site *Community Noise Equivalency Level (CKEL) CNEL is intended to reflect the total noise environment of a given location for an entire day, rather than the maximum sound level which was experienced. Calculations are made for a 24 hour period, with extra emphasis placed on the disruptive effect of noise occurring in the evening and night hours. Thus, evening noise levels are increased by 3 dBA, while night levels are increased by 10 dBA. The Aweighted Sound Level, of dBA, is a convenient way of expressing sound intensity as it is perceived by the human ear. In urban areas the CKEL typically varies from 4S dBA to 75 dM. 14 00130 were proposed for multiple residential uses, an acoustical report would be required, and structures designed to protect the interior of buildings from exterior noise to f below 45 dBA. While this project does not legally require acoustical studies, it might benefit from it. During a special study of noise inventory sites sponsored by Contra Costa County as part of the Noise Element preparation in 1975, the front portion of the subject site was measured for 15 minutes on Danville Boulevard at 8:45 a.m. and 2:50 p.m. During the morning period, the predicted CNEL was 66; the measured L1O (dBA)** was 76 and the measured LSO (dBA) was 66. This was based on a 15 minute traffic volume of 145 vehicles (1 percent trucks) traveling about 45 miles per hour measured 26 feet from the road. In the afternoon period, the predicted CNEL was 66: the measured L10 (dBA)** was 7S and the measured LSO (dBA) was 65. This was based on a 15 minute traffic volume of 132 vehicles (3 percent trucks) travelling about 45 miles per hour measured 21 feet from the road. 12. Historical and Archaeological Aspects The site appears to be between the Boca De La Canada Del Pinole land grant and the Arroyo de Nueces y Bolbones land grant. There does not appear to be any significant recorded sites of archaeological importance on the site. The closest sites are a cluster of four recorded sites near Stone Valley Road about one and one-half miles to the south. If any artifacts are uncovered, a qualified archaeologist should be called in to evaluate their significance before further disturbance-occurs. i **Equivalent Sound Level (L,,,,) In cases where the sound level varies over time, the total sound energy is measured and an equivalent continuous level is computed. This level can be thought of as a continuous tone having the same energy content as the time-varying sound. is 00131 II. Environmental Impact Analysis A. The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action 1. General Physical, Aesthetic, and Land Use The proposed project would cause significant change in appearance of the existing site. The property both fronts and backs up to scenic routes (Scenic Routes Element, 1974, Contra Costa County) Danville Boulevard and Interstate 680 (State). A scenic route is a road, street, or freeway which traverses a scenic corridor of relatively high visual or cultural value. It consists of both the scenic corridor and the public right-of-way. The scenic view from the freeway should not be significantly impaired. With regard to highway 680, a fully landscaped tennis facility could have a relatively high visual value. . However, the appearance of a 2 story office building and parking lot fronting on Danville Boulevard with only 15 foot setback is not consistant in visual character with the single family, low density residential character of Danville Boulevard. Hc%reover, the proposed office use is a different kind of land use with different performance standards than the surrounding single family land uses, Stith the exception of a neighboring professional office which was originally designed as a single-family residence. The pro shop is a fora of commercial service use and night lighting for tennis courts and possible tournaments may be a problem in a predominantly residential area. 2. Utilities and Community Facilities The proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the capacity of the service area utilities and community facilities to their detriment. 3. Geology and Soils As discussed in an earlier section of this report, available information suggests that there is potential soils and geologic impacts upon the project. Of chief concern are (1) liequfaction potential of fine-grained granular material, and (2) expansive clays. Much can be done to mitigate such hazards through careful site prepara- tion work. _ 16 While the EIR does not recommend future studies, it should be recognized that potentially hazardous conditions should be evaluated at some stage in the development_ process. Certainly evaluation of the liquefaction poten- tial of soils underlying the proposed professional office complex should be given special consideration in the preliminary soils investigation performed for the western portion of the site. 4. Circulation and Parking Impact Access and egress from the subject property may cause a problem. Left turn movements will cause backup traffic and accidents unless adequate refuge in the form of special turning lanes is provided. The project as proposed will generate S90 trips per day; about 295 cars will be assumed going to the north towards the Walnut Creek area and about 295 cars will be assumed going to the south towards the Danville area. The project trip generations are based on the following general assumptions by the Contra Costa County Public Works Department: All courts will be in use throughout the day and evening and each person will stay lh hours. Thirty people per day will be attracted to the pool and pro shop in addition. Thirty office employees are assumed at a maximum (4,500 net square feet office building - 150 square feet per employee) . At 71 trip ends per day per net acre*, the office building totals 140 trips per day. In total, trip generation daily estimates are: - 140 trips for the office (including employees salesman and service vehicles) 30 trips for the pool and pro shop 420 trips for the tennis court (including participants, employees and service vehicles) Total: 590 trips This will result in an 8 percent increase in the trips on - Danville Boulevard in that general area. Thirty-six parking spaces are provided for the tennis club. A study of 9 clubs carried out by the applicant concluded that parking standards for tennis clubs without organized swim programs provide parking at a ratio of *SOURCE: Eighth Progress Report on Trip Ends Generation Research Count, July, 1973, State Department of Transportation 00133 about S spaces per court. Normal weekday use appears to require about half of those spaces. Total spaces seem adequate for all heavy use except several reported overflow parking of 10 to 20 percent on rare special occasions--3 to 6 times per year--weekends or holidays only. A conversation by the Planning Department staff with Mr. Joseph Morales, Golden Gate Tennis Club, about his experi- ence resulted in the following advice: The heavy use case should be assumed; that would be assuming use by doubles; i.e., 4 to a court with each using their own car. The Golden Gate Te-mis Club has 30 spaces for 10 courts. They figure sometimes at big courts, 40 cars would be better based on 10 courts. On tournaments considerable more parking spaces are necessary but the number is based on the type of tournament proposed. Bleachers for considerably over 100 persons are indicated. This number must be clarified and limited. Based on this analysis, between 39 and 65 parking spaces should be provided for adequacy rather than the 36 indicated. The parking for the office building--based on normal County Zoning Ordinance standards--of one space per 200 gross square feet of office space--should be 30 spaces. Only 13 are provided. It can be concluded there would be a severe parking space shortage. S. Public Health and Safety A recent article ("Roadside Air Pollution Hazards in Recreational Land Use Planning" by Michael D. Everett, Journal of American Institute of Planners, March, 1974) indicates that convincing evidence points to the dele- terious effects of air pollution on the health of general populations. Increased morbidity and mortality rates from lung cancer, stomach cancer, emphysema, and other respiratory diseases have been noted for populations in highly polluted areas. Persons engaging in recreational activities near major concentrations of automobile traffic are probably subjecting themselves to particularly high levels of air pollution. The more vigorous the recrea- tional activity the more hazardous may be the effect of the pollution. The roadside location of a tennis court mould result in the exposure of tennis players to the high concentrations of carbon monoxide associated with automobile traffic. Humans are especially susceptible to the negative health 18 uv134 impacts of carbon monoxide exposure while active, as when playing tennis, for two reasons: a. They are in an area of relatively high concentration for an extended period of time while playing tennis. b. As tennis is played, the ventilation rate is increased. Study data shows that the uptake of carbon monoxide by the blood increases with -the length of exposure and the ventilation rate. JAir 9!nlity Criteria for Carbon Monoxide. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. March, 1970.) Carbon monoxide is a nonirritant gas which interfers with the transport of oxygen through the body. By displacing the oxygen content from hemoglobin and other proteins, carbon monoxide reduces the ability of the blood to carry - oxygen and of muscles to store it. This interference with the oxygen transport occurs when carbon monoxide reacts with hemoglobin and forms carboxyhemoglobin. As levels of carbon monoxide increase, a spectrum of symptoms begins to appear, including perceptual and behavioral impairment, and possible asphyxiation. Final Draft; Air Quality Land Use Planning Handbook for California. State of California Air Resources Board. September, 1975. Pages II-11 and I1-12.) 6. Legal, Policy, and Institutional The proposed professional office building conflicts with the Contra Costa County General Plan which currently designates the area as low density, single family resi- dential. However, as noted earlier, the project is not in conflict with the current R-20 zoning, in which the propo::ed uses are allowed subject to Land Use Permit approval. 7. Vegetation and Wildlife Most of the site is grass and weed covered. There are, however, many trees (See Exhibit 7) . Most of the grass will be destroyed to be replaced with impervious surfaces and ornamental landscaping. About a dozen trees are to be removed. Half of these are walnut trees along Danville Boulevard and the other half are Monterey pines which appear sickly. 19 0013 8. Recreation and Open Space The proposed 13 court tennis club, and swimming pool, will provide a valuable additional private recreational resource in the Alamo-Danville area for the 300 families it is designed to serve. It will provide visual relief from standard low density, ranch homes. It is important to recognize, however, that the applicant proposes to remove some large trees, replacing them with a paved parking area. Unless the remaining open space areas are fully landscaped (and an effort made to save large existing { trees) the visual quality of the project may not be an asset to the surrounding area. 9. Socioeconomic The tennis facility would employ four persons and the office building would eventually house approximately 25 to 30 persons (immediate occupancy is to be 23). The assessed valuation of the site will increase substan- tially from the existing. 10. Air Quality and Noise There will be only incremental detrimental impact on air quality emanating from generated vehicular emissions from the S90 estimated trips generated daily. Similarly, the noise generated from the project--both from construction of the complex and its operation--should not be unusually adverse. 11. Archaeological Aspects_ Because the site is relatively flat and has San Ramon Creek flowing through it, there is an unknown potential for archaeological findings. B. Any Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided if This Proposal is Implemented The project will change the land use character of the site from open and single family residential. The use will introduce (in conflict with the General Plan) a commercial and private recreational facility into a primarily low density, single family residential use. There will be more adverse circulation and traffic impacts generated than if single family homes were built on the site, and some trees will be removed. Moreover, there will be more noise generated from traffic. t ?" VU136 C. Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact 1. The Contra Costa County Planning Department proposes that only courts not adjacent to residential property be lighted. 2. The Contra Costa County Planning Department proposes that fewer tennis courts be constructed on the property to improve landscaped open space and design, to save the pine trees scheduled for removal and to minimize traffic congestion. 3. The Contra Costa County Planning Department proposes that the championship court and adjacent bleachers be eliminated to prevent traffic congestion from occurring as a result of spectator attraction to tournament events. 4. The Contra Costa County Planning Department proposes that tennis courts be placed further away from the freeway to decrease possible health hazards. S. The Contra Costa County Planning Department proposes that either considerably more parking spaces be provided both for the tennis courts and office building or that the scale of the project be reduced. 6. The Contra Costa County Planning Department proposes that if any archaeological artifacts are uncovered, a qualified archaeologist should be called in to evaluate their significance before further disturbance occurs. D. Alternatives to the Proposed Action 1. Project Alternatives a. No project 11is alternative would retain the potential for increased residential use of subject property. Though the site is not being currently utilized except for one hoose, it is planned and zoned for low density single family homes. If maximus development could be obtained--which appears unlikely because of the constraints of the circulation, creek, and existing house on knoll--up to about 9 more homesites could be developed on the parcel. 21 00137 i b. Tennis Facility Only The site could be completely developed as a tennis club only, and the professional offices could be located elsewhere. This deletion would produce a development more in keeping with the adjoining . residential area, offer more space for landscaping and parking, and reduce commuter-based traffic problem potentials. C. Alternative Location for Project The proposed project could be moved elsewhere in the San Ramon Valley where traffic conflict potentials are less and the area is already planned and zoned for more intensive uses. The applicant states a site on the west side of Danville Highway opposite Sunnybrook was rejected because of drainage problems _ and because it mould have a greater impact on adjoin- ing residential uses. 2. Energy Alternatives Tennis Courts Energy saving potential for this project is associated with tennis court lighting. Where lighting is considered' • essential, the most energy efficient illumination systems could be used. For example, the high pressure sodium vapor lamp (HPS) is a fairly recent development in street lighting and other outdoor illumination which may be suitable for tennis courts. It has a shorter life than the widely-used mercury vapor lamp; but because it is approximately three times as efficient, it translates into a total life cost- of approximately one-third that of mercury vapor. The permit might restrict lighting to only a few courts, during bad weather when few persons will be playing, or could allow light only enough for safety reasons. Office Building Office building energy consumption is related primarily - to illumination (SS percent) and air conditioning compressors (32 percent). By improving lighting efficiency, both illumination and air conditioning energy requirements can be reduced. The most common lighting type--incandescent- -is quite inefficient. The major portion of electricity 22 Otf138 i used in this system is converted to heat instead of light. This adds to the air conditioning load. When more efficient lighting practices are used, there is a net reduction in energy used for heating, as well as a reduction in cooling load of up to 25 percent. Energy use for lighting can be conserved fairly easily. Savings could be as high as 43 percent £or conservation measures, including relamping to more efficient lighting types, and reduction of usage. Recent lighting trends have been towards excessive illumina- tion in all areas. The second conservation measure should be reduction of illumination levels. E. The Relationship Between Local Short-term Uses of Manes Environment and the Maintenance and'Enhancement of Long- term Productivity The development of the office building and tennis recreation facility will preclude use of approximately 15 acres for agricultural purposes. The short-term impact most likely to be disturbing is traffic. The important long-term effect which should be noted is thzt of not conforming to the General Plan which calls for a less intensive form of urbanization. The developer believes that this project is necessary now in the short-term because there is a market for a tennis club where nsnagement policies can be controlled by the membership, and there are existing tenants for a professional office building. F. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would be Involved in the Proposed Action Should it be Implemented Change in land use from a large vacant parcel, some of which is used for horse pasture, with a variety of trees and one single family home to a developed recreation and office complex is irreversible. Even though the tennis courts are not as costly or substantial as residential construction, the office building is more so. Residential construction is usually considered an irreversible environmental changes for at least 50 years. The paving necessary for the tennis courts and the office building will create considerable impervious surfaces, thereby increasing total runoff. Nonreplenishable materials will be consumed to build the project, and demand for fuel, power and other services will increase. 23 00139 G. The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action The professional office building proposed will be growth inducing for two reasons. First, it will be directly growth inducing because of the employees employed in the office - building. These employees may wish to live in the San Ramon ' Valley area, increasing demands for housing in the area. This situation is mitigated somewhat by the fact that all of the office space is occupied by firms existing in the area. .M Because the San Ramon Valley is a "bedroom community" a pool of potential employees are already living in the area. Secondly, it will be indirectly growth inducing because office I uses will be allowed in an area planned and zoned for low density single family uses. This act may set a precedent in other parts of the San Ramon Valley, especially along Danville Boulevard, for additional uses of this type. The direct growth-inducing impact of the tennis facility can be considered slight. It will employ only 4 persons for on- site services to the facility. However, the allowance of a pro shop facility and other than single family residential uses may indirectly set a precedence for commercial uses on Danville Boulevard. H. Organizations and Persons Consulted; Documents Utilized During the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports, written and oral communications take place between the Planning Department and other County. departments. The General Plan and its various elements are also scrutinized regarding the proposed action. If additional consultations, contacts of consequence and documents were used, they are referenced below. Herman Chang, Caltrans Jim Collins, State of California Air Resources Board Jean Cone, State of California Air Resources Board Ronald Foote, Caltrans Robert Jackson, Contra Costa Public Works Department David Jewett, Contra Costa County Flood Control District Paul Lee, CALTRANS Peggy Littell, Instructor, Peninsula Sports Center _ 24 O0140 Charles Shine, Environmental Design Library, University of California I. Qualification of E.I.R. Preparation Agency This Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the Contra Costa County Planning Department. The majority of the reports are prepared by the Environmental Impact personnel of the Current Planning Division and the County Planning Geologist where applicable. Other Planning Department and other County personnel were utilized where necessary. Ordinarily the person directly coordinating and writing the report is listed as the contact person in the Notice of Completion or Arnold B. Jonas, Senior Planner can be contacted. EIR Team Melvin J. Bobier, B.S. Bus. Ad, M.C.P. City Planning Bruce N. Bowman, B.S. Urban Planning Arnold B. Jonas, A.B. Economics Darwin layers, B.S. Math., B.S. Geology, Ph.D. Geology Dale Sanders, B.S. Biology, Ph.D. Entomology MJB:lh 11/10/7S ?S -GORDON FISK & ASSOCIATES DESIGNERS LAND PLANNERS 1717 N CALIFORNIA BLVD a WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 . 935-5582 s July .17, 1975 Contra Costa County Planning Department Administration Building Martinez, California . Gentlemen: Earlier this week I submitted a land Use application, with required exhibits, for a community tennis facility and professional office building on a parcel of ground on the east side of the old Danville Highway south of Rudgear Rd. The application has not yet been assigned a LUP number. - The tennis facility will be a community type facility of proprietary member- ships. It will be set up as a non-profit corporation. It is my understanding that the Use Permit application can be processed without first preparing By-Laws and Articles of Corporation but if approved such approval would be contigent -upon the County's review and acceptance of the By-Laws and Articles of Incor- poration. The offices shown would be used by the applicants. lair. Plourde maintains an accounting practice, is a CPA with a staff of several accountants and book- keepers. Mr. Graves is an attorney and would occupy space along with other attorneys and their staffs associated with him. I am in the building design and planning business and would occupy space with my staff and associates in the architectural business. Yours very truly, GORDON FISK E AS Gordon A. Fisk GAF:me ti r �, N _ -•c t i.71 00142 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTI►iEN'j• NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415)Ba$Ii. RRSI M 372-2024 Phone EIR Contact Person Melvin J. Bobier Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FISK, GRAVES, 8 PLS (Applicants) — PRIDEMAL W'ALTY 8 'FINANCE CO. (Owner), County File 2130-75: The applicants request approval to establish a non-profit community tennis facility E professional offices for accountants, attorneys E architects. Subject land is described as fbUmzs: A descriptive parcel fronting 308' on the east side of Danville Highway approx. 50' north of the intersection of Hillg�ade Avenue, in the Alamo area. (R-20) (Cr 34110) (Parcel 0187-100-08) It is dete.-mined from initial study by of the Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. XXX The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: _ Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North wing, Administration Bldg. Pine 6 Escobar Streets Martinez, California Date os i`�a• 26 ��5 Final date for review/appealL�=.3E ISR Q a)6'." By Planning Departm U Representative AP9 1/74 00143 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COYTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA t In 'the Matter of Appeal of ) Mr. Robert A. Hagler ) from action of the Board of ) May 4 19_�L6 Appeals on Application ) No. 2191-75 Walnut Creek area. ) NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPEAL - Horizon Associates, Owner. ) WHEREAS on the 30th day of March 19_16, the Board of Appeals approved with revised conditions Application No. L.U.P. #2191-75 of tor. Chris Boddum . for establishment of a non-profit tennis club facility and WHEREAS within the time allowed by law, Mr. Robert A. Hagler filed with this Board an appeal from the aforesaid approval i NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing be held on said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107, Adminis- tration Building, Martinez, California, on Tuesday _, .the 1st of ; June 1976_, at 10:40 a,m, and the Clerk is directed l to `give notice to all interested parties. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my.hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of May , 19 76. J. R. 0LSSON7, CLERK cc: Mr. Robert A. Hagler Byk- Horizon Associates Deputy Clerk List of Persons Provided Bonnie Boaz - by Planning Director of Planning 00144 RECEIVED BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS A Q R ;Z-2-1975 CONTRA COSTA COUWV' CIALIFOENIA, I L OLSXN CUU WAM OF SUMV U In The Matter of Appeal of Land Use Permit Application A cc. #2191-75 - CMUS BODDUM (Applicant) , To Establish A Non- Profit Tennis Club Facility - In The Walnut Creak Area. ! WHEREAS, on November 25, 1975, CUM BODDUM. (Applicant) , HORIZON ASSOCIATES (Owner) , filed a land use permit application 82191-75, to establish a non-profit tennis club facility; and WHEREAS, the property is described as being a descriptive parcel fronting approximately 276-ft., on the east side of Lancaster goad and approximately 700-ft., on the southwesterly side of the South Thin Street ora-ramp to 1-680; and WHEREAS, said property is located in a Single Family Residential District (R--10) ; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Board of Adjustment on January 21, 1976 and February 17, 1976, where- at all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing persons appeared and spoke in favor or the application as well as in opposition to the application; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment on January 21, 1976, CLOSED the public hearing in order to view said property on field trip; and WHEREAS, the Board of Adjustment and the Planning Comaaissicn on Friday, February 13, 1976, visited the subject property; and WHEREAS, no Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the Planning Staff inasmuch as it was determined by the Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHERAS, the Board of Adjustment fully considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted APPROVED said application with conditions; and 14HEREAS, the decision of the Board of Adjustment was appealed by the opposition to the Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on said appeal was had by the Board of Appeals on Tuesday, !larch 33, 1976, whereat all persons in favor and in opposition appeared and were heard by the Board of Appeals; and Microfilmed with boom Order 00245 Chris Boddum - #2191-75 / WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals fully considered and evaluated all the test- imony and evidence submitted at said public hearing DENIED the appeal and GRAFTED the permit to the applicant, CHRIS BODDUM, #2191-75, with revised conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the land use permit application of CHRIS BODDUM (Applicant) , HORIZON ASSOCIATES (Owner) , #2191-75, is APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit to the Zoning Administrator for review and approval articles of incorporation which have been filed with the State of California prior to any development or improvement of the site. The tennis facility shall be established and maintained as a non-profit organization and the permit shall be granted to the established organization only and shall not be transferable. 2. !Membership shall be limited to a maximum of 320 single and/or family memberships. 3. Variances are approved with this permit to allow fences in excess of 6-ft.-0-inches high on the property line, as per the approved plan. 4. Development shall be as shown on plans submitted with the koplication, dated by the Planning Department November 25, 1975, subject to final review and approval by the County Zoning Administrator. The applicant shall satisfactorily comply with all of the following conditions prior to the issuance of a building permit or the commencement of any on-site improvements. 5. Comply with landscape and irrigation requirements, as follows: A. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the County Zoning Administrator. A cost estimate or copy of contract for landscaping improvements shall be submitted with the plan. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to use of the property as approved or occupancy. B. Existing trees on the site shall be retained as indicated on plans submitted with the application. C. Provide additional landscape planting, masonry wall or heavy wood fence a combination of both to obscure the view of parking from the adjacent properties at the southerly property lines. D. If use or occupancy is requested prior to the installation of the landscape and irrigation improvements, then either (1) a cash deposit; (2) a bond; or (3) a letter of credit, shall be delivered to the County for 100 percent of the estimated cost of the uncompleted portion of the landscape and irrigation improvements. If compliance is not achieved after six (6) months of occupancy as determined by the County Zoning Administrator, the County shall contract for the completion of the landscaping and irrigation improvements to be paid for by the held sum. The County shall return the unused portion within one (1) year of receipt or at the completion of all work. 6. Exterior lighting shall be of a non-glare nature and deflected away from the adjacent properties. There shall be no exterior night lighting granted by this permit for the tennis facility. -2- OU146 Chris Boddum - #2191-75 / 7. One sign is allowed with this permit for purposes of identification, which shall be subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. 8. No loud speakers or amplified music shall be permitted. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed office and observation deck, elevations and architectural design of proposed buildings and structures shall be subject to final review and approval by the County Zoning Administrator. The type and color of exterior materials for the roof and walls of all buildings and structures shall be indicated. The roofs and exterior walls of proposed buildings shall be free of all objects: i.e., T.V. aerials, air condit- ioning units, water or electric meters, etc., or screened from view. 10. The rooftop observation deck shall be designed to include an attract- ive screening from the adjacent property to the south. U. The on-site circulation and parking shall be revised to include addit- ional landscaped areas for visual relief. Off-street parking areas shall be surfaced with an asphaltic or Port- land cement binder pavement, or similar material, so as to provide a durable and dustless surface, and shall be so graded and drained as to prevent the ponding of water. 12. Comply with the requirements of the County Flood Control District as follows: A. The portion of the property adjacent to the existing swale through the northwesterly portion of the property lies within a floodway which accepts overflow from Tice Creek. The developer shall maintain the floodway through this portion of the property by allowing no fill or structures other than drainage structures to be placed or constructed within 30-ft. (right angle measurement) of the center line of the existing ditch or swale (excepting the area within 25-feet of Lancaster Road) . Pavement for parking and parking lot access will be permitted within the floodway including parking blocks and asphalt berms if not over six inches (6") in height. B. All surface waters entering and originating within the subject parcel shall be adequately collect3d, conveyed, and discharged into the existing swale, mentioned above. C. The developer shall make an offer of dedication of storm drainage ease- ment to the County encompassing the floodway as described above within 30-ft., of the center line of the existing swale on the northeasterly side of the swale and all that portion of the property lying southwesterly of the swale. A metes and bounds description of the drainage easement shall be prepared by the developer and shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division for review and approval. D. The developer shall provide by document and by actual physical access, ingress and egress for vehicular maintenance equipment from a public way to any and all drainage easements dedicated to the County. E. The developer shall obtain the necessary permits and easements prior to doing any off site work. F. This office wishes to review the development's improvement plans prior to issuing any building or grading permits for this subject parcel. G. A portion of the subject development is in a "Special. Flood Hazard Area" as shown on sheet 20 of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Special Flood Hazard Area Flaps which were received by the County an November 1, 1974. -3- 0014'7 Christ Boddum - #2191-75 / 13. Comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department as follows: A. Construct 4-ft. 6-inch sidewalk (width measured from existing curb fame), on Lancaster Road. B. Install all new utility distribution services underground. C. The applicant shall install street lights on Lancaster Road. The final number and location of the lights will be detersined by the Traffic Engineer. This property shall be annexed to the County Service Area L-45 for the maintenance and operation of the street lights. D. Submit improvement plans to the Public Works Department, Land Develop- ment Division, for review and approval, pay an inspection fee (5% of estimated cost of the work), and applicable lighting and fire hydrant fees. If occupancy is request- ed prior to construction of improvements, the applicant should execute a Road Improve- ment Agreement with Contra Costa County and post the bowls required by the Agreement to guarantee completion of the work. E. Repair and/or replace all damaged curb and pavement along South Main Street and Lancaster Road. F. An encroachment permit must be obtained from the Public Works Depart- ment, Land Development Division, for driveway connections and other work within the rights of way of Lancaster Road and South Main Street. G. Relinquish abutter's rights of access along South Main Street. The deed for the relinquishment will be prepared by the Public Works Department, Land Development Division. 14. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District as follows: A. The applicant shall provide one 2A minimum rated all-purpose port- able fire extinguisher. The extinguisher shall be mounted so as to be visible and accessible within the office area not higher than five-feet from the floor level. (13.301) UFC. 15. Tennis activities shall not commence prior to 8:00 A.M., on any given day. The foregoing order was given by the Board of Appeals on Tuesday, March 30,- 1976, by the followiu vote: AYES: Commissioners - Jeha, Anderson, Walton, Compaglia, Stoddard, Young. HOES: Cawomissioners - William L. Milano. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. ANDREW H. YOUNG Cha# of the Phan" g Commission of the County f Contra Cos , State of California 1ATED: 30 March 1976 ATTEST: (_'.,jWthor1y f. Dehaes Director- ,,,dfPlanning,' Contra Costa CounAr Planning Department. -4- 00148 COA'TRA COSTA COUNT': PLANNING DEPARnIENT NOTICE OF u Completion of Environmental Impact Report XX Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94SS3 Phone (415)- XXGKNXEUX 372-2024 Phone EIR Contact Person Dale Sanders Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CHRIS BODDUM (Applicant) - HORIZON ASSOCIATES (Owner), County File 12191-75: The applicant requests approval to establish a non- profit tennis club facility. Subject property is described as folloi►is: A descriptive parcel fronting approx. 270' on the east side of Lancaster Road, and approx. 700' on the southwesterly side of the South Main Street on-ramp to State Freeway 680, in the Walnut Creek area. (R-10) (CT 3420) (Parcel 1184-392-29) The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because: This use should cause no significant environmental impacts. The only potential impacts would be related to night lighting and traffic generation. Each tennis court should generate the need for 3 to 5 parking spaces (30 are provided). No commercial sales will occur and no tournament play will take place. It is deteimined from initial study by Dale Sanders of the =XX Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. _71The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North tying, Administration Bldg. Pine 6 Escobar Streets Martinez, California j� c pp UF-C 23. i X15 CtePostd LIEC 9�5 Final date for review/a eaI�- Y Planning Department Representative 00149 . AP9 1/74 NlicrofilrAed with board ordet C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Hearing on the Recommendation of the Planning Commission that Land in the Saranap Area be Rezoned (1960-RZ) . Mr. Albert Kessler, Owner. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission that a .81 (more or less) acre fronting on the south side of Saranap Avenue, approximately 400 feet east of El Curtola Boulevard, Saranap area, be rezoned from Retail Business District (R-B) to Single Family Residential District-10 (R-10); and No one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised that no Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the Planning Staff inasmuch as the Amendment to the General Plan for this area indicates high density single family residential development; and The Board having considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and the County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Mr. Albert Kessler Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Super County Assessor affixed this 4th day of May 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By QQDeputy clerk onn a oaz H-24 iJiG!Sm 00150 C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In dw Matter of Hearing on the Recommendation of the Planning Commission that Land in the Walnut Creek Area be Rezoned (1959-RZ). Mr. C. T. Smith, et al. Owners. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission that 5.3 acres fronting approximately 231 feet on the south side of Springbrook Road, approximately 1,100 feet northwesterly of Camino Diablo, Walnut Creek area, be rezoned from Single Family Residential District-10 (R-10) to Single Family Resi- dential District-15 (R-15) and that the northerly portion of the property remain Single Family Residential District-10 (R-10) ; and No one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised that no Environmental Impact Report was prepared inasmuch as the General Plan for the area designates low density single family resi- dential use for the subject property; and The Board having considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and the County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct co"of an order enured on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesai& c c: Mr. C. T. Smith 1A/dnres my hand and the Sea of the Board of Mr. A. Kessler Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 4 day of May . 1976 County Assessor J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By L. CI Deputy clerk Bonnie oaz 11-24 V76 151n 00151 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Hearing on Recommendation of the Planning Commission that Land in the Walnut Creek Area (1958-RZ) be Rezoned. 1Ir. E. H. Roybal (Owner) This being the tine fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission that 14.9 (more or less) acres located to the west of the most westerly terminus of Bacon Court, Walnut Creek area, be rezoned from Single Family Residential District-10 (R-10) to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20) ; and Ro one having appeared in opposition ; and Hr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised that no environmental impact report was prepared by the Planning Staff inasmuch as the Amendment to the General Plan for this area indicates low density single family residential ; and The Board having considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is APPROVED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and the County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foreloinp is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. • Wdness my hand and the Sial of the Board of cc: r. E. H. Royb a 1 • Di rector of Planning Supervisors County Assessor affixed His 4th -of- "4&YL -, 1936 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By , Deputy Clerk H 24 12!74 - 15-M Robbie Gutierrez 00152 l I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , i9 76 In the Matter of Request of Lawrie Development Company (1998-RZ) to Rezone Land in the Danville Area. James and Arlene Swan (Owners) This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to the request of Lawrie Development Company (1998-RZ) to rezone land in the Danville area, and no one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus , Director of Planning, having advised that a negative declaration of environmental significance has been filed for this proposal ; and . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Lawrie Development Company, 1998-RZ, to rezone property at the westerly terminus of Silver Chief Way approximately 110 feet west of Allegheny Drive, Danville area, from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District-15 (R-15) is APPROVED as recommended by the Planning Commission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and ' County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance, amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County, giving effect to the same, said ordinance -to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in a newspaper of general circulation published in the county. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Lawrie Development Company Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of James and Arlene Swan Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 4th day of May 1976 County Assessor J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By AkkfilDeputy Clerk ~ 24 12n4 ' 15-M R bbi a Gu 'errez 00153 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 4, 1976 In the Matter of Releasing ) Deposit for Subdivision 4362, ) West Pittsburg Area. ) On November 12, 1974 this Board issued an order stating that the improvements in the above-named Subdivision were completed for the purpose of establishing a beginning date for filing liens in case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been maintained for one year after completion and acceptance against defective work and/or labor done or defective materials furnished in performing the Subdivision Agreement, and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected; and Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406 and the Subdivision Agreement, it is by the Board ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to refund to Earl W. Smith Developers, LTD the $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail Number 112202 dated November 1, 1973. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an Order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of May , 1976 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By _.., Deputy Clerk H. I aham Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public Works (2) Earl W. Smith Developers, Ltd. 11000 San Pablo Ave. El Cerrito, Ca. 94530 00154 f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4, 01976 In the Matter of Completion of Public Improvements in Subdivision RISS 95-72, Port Costa Area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the public improvements in Sub- division MS 95-72, Port Costa area, are ACCEPTED as complete. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of MaY 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By . Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 • 15-M td. In sham Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public Works Director Director of Planning James Maguire 200 Gregory Lane Pleasant Hill, Ca. ooi p� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California l4aY 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Partial Relief of Maintenance and Responsibility on Contract with R. Flatland Company, San Mateo, Project No. 5301-4239-75 The County of Contra Costa on November 10, 1975, having contracted with R. Flatland Co., 333 North Amphlett Blvd., San Mateo, California, 94401, for the installation of traffic signals on San Ramon Valley Boulevard at Site 1, Town and Country Drive, and Site 2, Sycamore Valley Boulevard, Danville area, Project No. 5301-4239-75; and The Acting Public Works Director having this day reported that the traffic signal system at Site I was inspected on April 27, 1976 and found to comply with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications, and having recommended, in accordance with Section 7-1.15 of the standard specifications, that the contractor be relieved of maintenance of and responsibility for said system as of said date; IT IS BY THE BQkRD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and coned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisors Construction Division affixed this 4 t h day of MaY 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk cc; Contractor By_ Deputy Clerk Public Works N. Ing ham County Administrator H 24 WS 10tH 00156 IN' TIE BOARD C:' SU1'1'.!ZVIS01!3 O CL1:TP0, COSTA C00TT, STiiTE OF CALIFORNIA May 4 In the ;,atter of ApprovinP; ) and Irut hori.zin;; Ila-next for ) Prolv,:�rLy AcquisiLivz�(s) . ) Project No. 4054-4184-74 ) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement(s) and Right of flay Contracts for Oak Road Widening, Project 04054-4189-74, Walnut Creek,Area, are APPROVED and the Public forks Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said contract on behalf of the County: Contract Payee and Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount Crocker National Bank April 23, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust $3,564.00 CD-245378 Marion G. O'Bryan April 22, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 1 ,375.00 CD-245400 James E. Cummings , et ux April 22, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 1 ,406.00 CD-245399 Homer M. Conyers , et ux April 18, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 1,796.00 CD-245396 William E. Hoch , et ux April 17, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 11100.00 CD-247651 Gordon B. 01 son , et ux April 19, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 1,448.00 CD-245381 Ralph D. Hanna et ux April 17, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 1,933.00 OK-245383 Ralph D. Hanna et ux April 17, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 485.00 ' CD-245382 Medard T. Mitchell ,et ux April 17, 1976 Title Insurance & Trust 2,382.00 CD-245395 The Court_; Auditor—Controller is AUT11ORIZED to drag ::arrant(s) in the anou:M s) sreci:ied to be delivered to the County Supervising Real Property I:gent. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed(s) from above—named grantor(s) for Lhe County of Contra Costa. The foregoing ord r : as passed May 4, 1476 by the Board. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. :Fitness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of May , 19 76 . cc: Public li.lorks llirector C0u:14y Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, CLERK County Administrator County Assessor B7 N. In aham, Deputy Clark Of 1-157 r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 � 19 26— In the Maher of Increase in Contract Contingency Fund, Rollingwood Area Street Repairs, Phase 1, Richmond/San Pablo Area. (Project No. 1075-4284-76, Phase 1) On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an increase of $2,000 In the contract contingency fund for Phase 1 (base failure and pavement surface repairs) of the Rollingwood Area street repairs project, Richmond/San Pablo Area, is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and cored copy of an order entered on tl+e minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote ofanoo d. Originator: Public Works Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Department, Construction Division supe affixed this 4th day of May . 19 76 cc: C. N. Harsh P. 0. Box 107 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Vallejo, CA 94590 By T Do" Clerk Public Works Director Sean L. Miller- County illerCounty Auditor-Controller Arthur G. Will , County Administrator H2; ons ?to" 00158 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Bids for the Arlington Avenue Improvement Project, Kensington Area, Project Number 1451-4525-72 This being the time fixed for the Board to receive bids for the Arlington Avenue Improvement Project, Kensington area; bids were received from the following and read by the Clerk: Gallagher and Burk, Oakland Branaugh Excavating, Inc. , Castro Valley Ransome Company, Emeryville Asphalt Surfacing Company, Richmond McGuire and Hester, Oakland Bay Cities Paving and Grading, Richmond 0. C. Jones and Sons, Berkeley IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said bids are REFERRED to the Public Works Director for review and recommendation on May 11 , 1976. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. -" 1 hereby certify that the forettointt is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: Public Works Director Wdnm my hand and the Seat of the Board of County Auditor-Controller Supervisors affixed this 4th day-of May 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By /a-/ / Deputy Clerk " 2'"v" ' '5-M bbie G# ierrez,�' OU159 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Bids for the Moraga Way Overlay Project, Moraga Area, Project Number 0961-4316-76. This being the time fixed for the Board to receive bids for the Moraga Way Overlay Project, Moraga Area; bids were received from the following and read by the Clerk: Gallagher and Burk, Oakland Asphalt Surfacing Company, Richmond Eugene G. Alves, Pittsburg Ransome Company, Emeryville 0. C. Jones and Sons, Berkeley Oliver de Silva, Hayward Bay Cities Paving and Grading, Richmond McGuire and Hester, Oakland Martin Brothers, Inc. , Concord Antioch Paving Company, Antioch Branaugh Excavating, Inc. , Castro Valley C. M. Marsh-Contractor, Inc. , Vallejo IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said bids are REFERRED to the Public Works Director for review and recommendation on May 11 , 1976. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. cc: Public Works Director 1Noness my hand and the Seat of the Board of County Audi tor-Controller Supervisors offxed this 4th d of May . 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 4czeDeputy Clerk H 24 12M . 15-M A o b b i e &utierre' 00160 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Bids for the Castro Ranch Road Pavement Widening Project, E1 Sobrante Area, Project Number 1461-4147-74. This being the time fixed for the Board to receive bids for the Castro Ranch Road Pavement Widening Project, E1 Sobrante area; bids were received from the following and read by the Clerk: Gallagher and Burk, Oakland L and L Equipment, Pleasant Hill Ransome Company, Emeryville F. D. Marron Company, Brentwood George P. Peres Company, Richmond Eugene G. Alves , Pittsburg Asphalt Surfacing Company, Richmond Miyashiro and Son, E1 Sobrante Martin Brothers, Inc. , Concord Independent Construction , Oakland McGuire and Hester, Oakland - 0. C. Jones and Sons , Berkeley Bay Cities Paving and Grading, Richmond Delmas and Marof, Inc. , Napa C. M. Marsh, Vallejo IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said bids are REFERRED to the Public Works Director for review and recommendation on May 11 , 1976. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. c c: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller SuPO" 0rs ofFixed this 4th day May . 19 76 _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 '2M - tSM R bbie G 6"errez o�ss1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Extension ) May 4, 1976 of Consumer Action & ) Education Grant ) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the Office of Criminal Justice Planning to extend the Consumer Action and Education Program Grant from June 30, 1976 to August 31, 1976, at no additional cost to the County. Passed by the Board on May 4, 1976. CERTIFIED COPY ?certify that this is a ittTl, true &c correct capy,of the origtnsl docum-nt nWe.-h is on Msin rny--office and that t; -va!, I,%iierl r.. �,3optG-,d Ll 0, Uwrd of Saperrtsors of Ct-r-a C t^ Cu4z,-!. 001fornla, on, the date shown. :'r"I'E:>T: .l. It. 01.0800. County Clerk&exotficto Clerk of 3ald Board of Supervisors,. �b Dewtcr G'1 on Origz District Attorney cc: District Attorney Administrator Auditor-Controller Office of Criminal Justice Planning 00102 cTow STANDARD AGREEMENT -- APPROVED BY THE Q7 STA TRAGID4 ATTORNEY GENERAL ST ATP -�G3.NCV - STA IV OF CAS. :-.NNLA ('') .,.ri ,� �•.•-. LL1 4 DEPT. OF GEN. BER.. 8th April 0 CONTROLLER C'C�lti \t:}.C:} �1t: '1',r.►atle and cnttrtYl tutu thio day of 19_76, j ill the Statt- Ill Caldontia, by and llrte.een State of l':aLforuia. through its duly ch-cted or appointed. t <it:afiiitYl and :u-ting Q '11ME OF OFFICER ACTING PDR STATE ^6F.CY _ ..QTZ raC.-_..._�• EXECUTIVE DIRECT+IR OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING IA-2254-1-75 F;creareer covAd the Sta f, OtvJ? No District Attorney of Contra Costa County 2254-1 1wrr•I:fter ZaNed-he L:onfMCtOr. WII'NESSl71V •1 at the (Contractor for and in consideration of the coveitarlb, conditions, 'agreements, and stipulations of the Ctate heminafter expressed, does hereby agree to funaish to the State services and materials, as follows: 1,rt f urth%e"'Ir.•:(I ty.rrsa.rtr+rd by contrecmr,amount w be paid rontnxvir,time fur perfurmmtee or completion,and attach plane and specifilcatione,if any.) GRANT AWARD A-2254-1-75 BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO IS HEREBY AMENDED TO CHANGE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THE PROJECT FROM June 30, 1976 TQ August 31, 1976 ALL OTHEP PROVISIfNIS OF THIS CONTRACT RE14AIN AS PREVIOUSLY AGREED UPQ4. FORM APP11.ONTED J01101 0.CLAUSEN, Cozi ty CC-ainsd B7r ar:b.aLl�`�WfrX�lr - 'Iia provision%on the reverse side hereof cott%litette a p krt of this agreement t\'ITNESIS lt'111:RF0 F, this attrt•entt•nt huts been exmited by the parties hereto, upon the date first above written. s•rA'1'1-_ OF CALIFOItN1.1k CONTRACTOR A:f.NCV .._-� .�.-� GOA TRAGTOA tVO'rMQR 71tAM AIe 1ItOW/sIt►L.1MTi Tfie�Tf1;RACOM01►ATIO/1. _OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING �i strict Attorne qQf Contra Costa County t+- At{THORIZED SIGNAruREI all ticafz=til ATIPS r r TITLE __ --- inj e �'KE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR airman P .Board Supervisors AODAESS 1L:ONTINUED ON _-. SHEETS.EACH tlEAAING YAtdE o:C,OHTRACTORI 651 Pine'street, Martinez CA - 94553 -R AMOUNT H OF TIS ESTIVATE wPP TOPRI ATION FUND Do Nor IN rife In TUU a 4s No additional funds required _ h UNENCUMBERfD BALANCE 1170" Clla!'tEa STATUTES iISGAL YgAR p ADJ. INCRGSING EHCUV- FUNCTION (TRANCE a A AOJ QECREASING ENce.-M. LINE ITC" ALLOTMENT "� bRaNLE , S a 16a r.I,y r.rafg I tx.a ntrt uu n P,-r.orud^'no-ytidze that budge.ed funds T.a.w. NJ i e.a. .aD. s.r. at atii.'• 't" o,*p K:t:':el pzarx!sE Of LL.d tbatt. � IG•CiHATUR -Zor ACCO4. 'IN,OiF,r- ' OA:Q f _ April 9, 1976 t�i•.- - �- -�; s "urlci�irms for rsemph000 wet f in State Adminatratire Maru:l.Seetien 1201,13 Isarr Ift-en tri-.ttird u auk!Heil d scumrnt is---Tempt fr n rs view bq the Ver( ment of Finance. • � litGNATURE OAF OJ<i:CER SIGHING ON B[HALT OV THE AGENCY DATE _..�.�_ __ __.___— tYUCC..£ '( �v� ti1i}fl LrJ.'�f� OC el• �^ —� ,.r:,,,res. 00163 - Q atri M h r at •a.' M in Cl co t0 I 4.)< ' •co 0 M C) O Ln t0 � U!.-1 Li r H V• 4 < O o a •r4 t� � -- a ..� r � v 0 �1 LT► ^ <s o 7WC U s O 0-4 M h ,?r'ri rn M to O 00 t0 e) 0 O W O M Ci Cl In to Wzx Li f+ V W :3 ,_,.,r} N J W 44 a �i O to w O V k �- •D OO to CIO O i.' � � �' m a W � z o in Q O O O a o z r{ it 14 O K V Wp.i Ln M C> �•" CEJ �+ a ]t W a: M t^R, O u o rvi ate. r O W .. 6-0 H 0 rd W � S r�y a c ,J 4 W}y O 3 .� a old �� W•,� a3 K f < 4-2 V V 34 i o " Cr��3� O O x i O x W 0 F. W p. � O K Ln < Na c a tpa 0 r, u) 0 C) -P Q) V w ¢ c%j Co Ln V 0. t 1i O M V+{•r 4) 0 — O o t? 0 �„ N 0 0 M O :5 O a CO) to O tC1 GO O M O Ci to tCs K { W K t.ri"Cl H K Y < ~ V • N tN W ��y�y V 2 O •1• N M J r"I W 14 tl b ♦ V 4J 0 O u h u 04 ¢ • W♦ A ¢♦ v z ! u s NOa x Q) q w to () •rl s s •e-1 �/�, t0 £ r W O N C) Cl to t0 Y 'J a Qf a a.cc 0 .0w O D 11 w> 4J HCIf w Ari"V7 t O v ✓ C> C1 ri co O % • 0 w s a a on C> Cl Q {per 0 � x O O O Ca Cr O ct O z i Co ��[ �� s N N M V Yi V K .r to "V W 2 Q O O 6 W-4 • tQ �2S r"! Q1 M M O "ins/ U `� 44 ci Q x >4 Q) 0 14 E-4 cc Y ..• as w q rT I.- u Q' cr Gs W » > -s ra > n > » ¢ a.e •- . 2 .• o O U w u r c a' !, z - - •r z w r4- r' O r w c N W r GD-C w+ u X: .., or o w O 4 rt Co +4 = s� s s� W o .- u as ca O .. v v { Ci? Q3 W. d s. O ZN < u rte. �- QIS1 �' h u W c¢aW►, QI 040 0 at w a z ►+ Kt 3 as U O• x O » . . . . O aq V O 1!! f. W n' K • ..1 Ci W Y. V • "� !-a. c � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 19 2§- , In tfle Matter of Installation of a Stop Light in the Rollingwood Area. Supervisor J. P. Kenny having this day called attention to a petition signed by residents in the Rollingwood area requesting installation of a stop light at Glenlock and El Portal Drives and expressing concern as to the frequency of automobile accidents at this intersection; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Public Works Director for review. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I 1 hereby certify that the foreVokV is a true and cored copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Boord of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. W"M my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Rollingwood Residents Supervisors _ c/o Ms. J. Bequest Public Works Director an. this 4 day of May . 19 Z6 J. R. OLSSON, Clark By (- D71,J? Deputy Ckrh Bonnie Boaz H-24 3/76 15m 00165 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Agreement with California ) May 4, 1976 Highway Patrol with Respect) to School Crossing Guard ) Service. ) The Board having considered an agreement with the California Highway Patrol providing for adult crossing guard service for the period of July 1 , 1976 through June 30, 1977 at the seven locations listed below: 1 . Mountain View School - Palm Avenue at Martinez Avenue, Martinez; 2. Vine Hill School - Pacheco Boulevard at Camino Del Sol , Martinez; 3 . Gehringer School - State Highway 4 at Douglas Road , Oakley; 4. Kensington School - Arlington Boulevard at Rincon Road , Kensington: 5. Olinda School - San Pablo Dam Road at Castro Ranch Road , E1 Sobrante; 6. Vista Grande School - Diablo Road at Arroyo Drive, Danville: and 7. Pacheco School - Center Avenue at Deodar Drive, Pacheco; On the recommendation of the Public Works Director ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid agreement is APPROVED and executed in behalf of the County. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976 CERTIFIED COPY I cerins that this is a hill. true A correct acral the original document which is on file in m7 office, and that it was passed & adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. California, on the date shown. ATTEST: 1 R OLSSON, County Clerk&exWficio Clerk of Maid Board of Supervisors, by.Deputy Clerk. ion MAY 41976 . Originator: Public Works Department Traffic Operations Division cc: California Highway Patrol (via P.W.) Public Works Director County Auditior-Controller County Administrator 001615 #23-76/77 SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on April 2, 19762 by and between the DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, State of California, hereinafter called "State" and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA hereinafter stalled "County." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa is desirous of providing adequate protection for school pupils who are required to cross heavily traveled streets, highways, and roadways in said County; and WHEREAS, such protection could be afforded such school pupils by placing crossing guards at various locations in said County; and WHEREAS, the State is willing and desirous of providing such crossing guards; NOW, EFORE, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. The State shall provide the services of crossing guards and relief guards as necessary at each of the locations shown on School Crossing Guard Location List attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, during the hours when pupils are walking to and from nearby schools on school days during the school year ending not later than June 30, 1977. Salaries and wages shall be at rates usual for such services, as the State may determine. A"X6 2. As consideration for the satisfactory performance of the foregoing services, Cot ty agrees to reimburse State for sala- ries and wages, for the State's share of retirement contributions for such guards, applicable administration costs of the State Employees Retirement System, health and welfare benefits, OASDI contributions, and in addition shall pay an amount equal to 17.10 per cent of such reimbursable salaries and wages for general administrative expenses. 3. Not later than 30 days after the cl►.,se of each month, State shall bill County for all sums due for that month and County shall promptly pay the same. 4. From time to time during the term hereof, County may by resolution of its Board of Supervisors and delivery of certified copy thereof to State, delete from said Location List one or more of said locations, whereupon State shall promptly remove such guard and the obligation of County to pay therefor shall cease thereafter; and in the same manner, County may add one or more locations to said list, whereupon the services there provided shall thereafter be subject to this agreement. 5. The term of this agreement shall be from July 1, 1976s to June 30, 1977, but this agreement shall be subject to termination by either party upon giving the other party thirty k30) days written notice prior to date of termination. -2- 00168 1 r 6. Notices and communications hereunder shall be given by each party to the other at their respective addresses as follows; , Dept. of California Highway Patrol County of Contra Costa Accounting Section Public Works Department P. 0. Box 898 6th Floor, Administration Bldg. Sacramento, CA 95804 Martinez, CA 94553 7. County shall indemnify and save harmless State, its officers and employees, from all liability for damages caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in the performance of their agreement. DEPT. OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL County of Contra Costa By By Antt� R �� George N. Schatz, Fiscal Officer le Chairman, Bcar f Supervisors ATTEST J.R.Ot�son,Cietit By X- Deputy Clerk FORMROYEn XNN IL C. a ' I -3- 00100 EXHIBIT "A" SCHOOL LOCATION Mountain View Palm Avenue @ Martinez Avenue, Martinez Vine Hill Pacheco Blvd. @ Camino Del Sol , Martinez Gehringer State Hwy. 4 @ Douglas Road, Oakley Kensington Arlington Blvd . @ Rincon Road, Kensington Olinda School San Pablo Dam Road @ Castro Ranch Road, El Sobrante Vista Grande School Diablo Road @ Arroyo .Drive, Danville Pacheco School Center Avenue @ Deodar Drive, Pacheco ` 001 - - EMIM G. BMW's Jit. STATE OF CAUFORNIA �Ce..nwr DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY D P.O. 80X 848 SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA 4580 U APR 51916 April 2, 1976 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT File No. : 71.A1687.A24n County of Contra Costa Public Works Department 6th Floor, Administration Bldg. Martinez, CA 94553 Gentlemen: We are attaching for your consideration the School Crossing Guard Agreement for the period of July 1, 1976, tbrough June 30, 1977 . This agreement has been completed except for your supplying the School Crossing Location List ubich should be attached to all copies of the agreement. Vhon completing the location list, please indicate the school and the location on of each crossing pertaining to the particular school. On page 3 is a space provided to show the address to which in- voices should be forwarded. You will note the term of the agreement are for the fiscal year July 1, 1976, through June 30, 1977. Tie request all agreements have a starting date of July 1 in order to cover vacation payments to crossing guards which in many cases extend into the July pay period of the nest fiscal year. Your prompt review and return of the agreement for our further processing will be appreciated. Please attach a copy of the certified resolution authorising the signature on the agreement , to each copy of the asreerat. Upon final approval, a copy of the agreement will be returned to you for your records. very truly yours, N. NOoar Commander Accounting Section Attachments cc: Contra Costa Area . - 441171 In the Boal zf Supervisors of Contin Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving Consultant Service Agreement for Landscape Architect Services for County Service Area R-7. San Ramon Area. Re: W.O. 5242 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to execute a Consulting Service Agreement for Landscape Architectural Services with Fong, Jung, Nakaba, LaRocca Associates, to provide a study and drawings related to a future neighborhood park. The consulting services will be provided at a cost of $1,500.00 which amount will be financed from County Service Area R-7 funds. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor offixed this 4th do,, of 14a.y 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY— , ,_,, Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 35-M N. Irgraham JDF:pse Orig: Public Works S.A.C. cc: Public Works Director (2) County Administrator Director of Planning County Service Area R-7 County Auditor-Controller O0172 1H.r SI _ — k a _ r;' Am—— 3 .-- 9 t 4 x% , i a E -- A r� _ �« .. .a side° $ : 41 �Q '�e+ �dJ IIII iOrss , ;11r s a ';�_�� ' 1.yI I� ` �. �,, 3 r),p a ` t' , ' -cam+ r.. .3 �S '�f, f � ,,,?.. t 40f ! ,. r�4.hJ1 9 i z,t. !,i 1Y i1�S�ia pS 3E 9 �` - 11tir/�✓ �� •,CO of _`12"S e�-O JCAiiIII,fCfflla '� 1 �T fgt �r�` .� m^ _ 7 S- s'` w, T s c,v,�. r°ir't*rz s '..TG ''"'f {'f."rr' �'"' '1'�h � {* 1 . Maw 4 - j -- a - r z �,'7 Syh� y Fye;~-r t 11 l� sk _ - der .r rY L v z t i°��>�>w-�,F'n r E; <a; _ _�sP six ,:. J �-. 'F r imams - _t , i1it 11 ) 'a, ��. �y �`,---- .;� I +:- � 7 yam"a ""; �;�'+�:� '�''3�, k§^r _ /fir `�" _ ''� "+'fi1 <s'} _ M Ei �'r+'d�� — �. C 1.i'� 'lq � ��flld� � 1 } 'tom A f ,y N+ i33 t+h�Ri7 .I1� 1. `w^' r - > .a? k �'a�'r5 1 11.1.111,FJ-1> AP now�ng1.Consultant Service Agree�aent � s_, � 11�_ - for Laindscape rArchitect Services for .} , ` ' ;,i7 ,r�v � � ,-� ' , County Service Aires R=7 'San Ramon = }° r �?4 �`�. Y y�� ,.Area• P f a �t I -i...�.(y .w_ F){ 4� �aRe: N 0. X242 I ,w �o"F@ 0 i a l d s 1 .411 a t+1+r �`, 1 ,S .�r J _ 1. WJ ,� ,� Y h ^3 {J � �2 'fGTy'9 � siq�*�'� rA�� KKrr ,oda,:; :�� 4 � ,.,, acs X i s `f ;,� F'11%11,w r - .n __. 11 iF3' '.t, b�, �� x�� J- �I? IS BY 7t1E�BOARD'ORDERED�that", aif�ubi�ac�Morks,�Direct_ i au Iu zed X;- r1 K ,mom x F ,. 1. 3 oto execute to �Consuit ng Service Ag ,e i ,fair Landscapes Archi`te r - '-- x,. 1 ) ,a�r aro s d e .,me ..yc aLr x Wathfong, Jung,=�iakabar LaRocca;Associates, toy provide, a�studyr anddrawiin a�� — reiated to a`futurexneigbborfaod�park ° " � ' � 't�` � - - *K111a Y `�-0,y� a :. a. TrGY xr -� 1. , f- hThe.iconsuI, ,services wli be�lprovidedr at a cost afi$14,500:OO weir rch � b amountatai l: be,financed_It ,frog Countyf Service Areas I'llR£7-funds yr 12 A*pmts PASSED by the Bawd on Irfay 4' 1976. s s, -, I 1 ��fne„.x a - - iR'!✓,'✓'MT �65J3' 9- �' }.�1 -•E Q,{_-T ter'11 �. _ 4'fir,. y e a avex- 6 I 11 -, i a'l r t1. I�rr.s�i > r-`'� c �",rn` e t4 ,y"nor nL . x� - 7 d , .»� �`, .o ``� ,X�"ler ,,. s _ _ _ i� z�'�'� 4 �'�is`k . F fa r �. '�.fr ea•ti ,, g ____ _ ��rr r t P.' t t r� ,, y 'Kr F`: .", ; - >'a it , !'�.r ',I,�Ir�. a n.c i'i c a F x s.it 1 gtr ti $:b ^s'a"®” �, t yw� 11 �, p r r r.mr �{'� c 4 U ,+ d�+Y. '� .i'l tSW�„>i�d. A. x�4 Y Y"1 _ a$ �a `' �G .�Sw x4� x ��xenf r a4 n - l a _ �, 1'� l q �1 fy rr y _ ;r `� `4 rte ' ✓w a orf v) t� amrn.-- .xL., \ t �. t , 7 J r'Ygmr } �.+ t T L 4 rF - c "S L.C^ __ "� 'A. -F Y Nf xFw t J _ b a, S , :^�J. �" J .k! Si pYh •��T •+f TT.. r pA' , Y, L .. h f + `- r" Et ,am 1 N �,. x a Gi+ ro� t,erobj► eertNy that tbe.fons�oilg is.a,�iRuelsad;corred�'000ro «IteKelo tb J , 4 �" F' - �' fbrk. wz,-m �N � - — - -1 I�ZIl1aYfOS Of SCld Board of S.uperrlsoa177 oaYthe dat�a#arosold.ti "�1 . ,.ma y } e; :. ori �'J � �,�r,Y �s tea.. 1V�.L j .a Mew. _ .. .,,r. _ w c iid "T th ,oF� :.'1 7�' , �, - x� .1 R OtSSE?N;�CtY � Jy 11 : "'' �. I 11� �,.1��" , , , .1I a.-,e-�_ _,I I �_ f.;w, F,4j JDF.pse r I , "V w F}Orifi: Pubiac Works S.A.C. n �" a ` J .,cc Pubiac :Works Director {2) 11 z � + 'jam"' Country Adaainistrator " ,, ,a`4" n rN ^;a� Darectorof3Planning - r — n „ - 1. 4 . z — x County Ser�noe Area R 7 ,*r �`' ` , ��, ,r' - -r .�. �s t3 „' r r rr s ,y. .. {"'' y I ^` e,'1� f' ty ��ff�ee "`'� )c '� 's 'i�c,_wwr�;, v tJ r County , d: tor.—Controller }>V ;,.� L air,, 1 M �s",, a"�',�'t".�°s4m( yi' a �>F Fz m .,�Mu.>a r i. T - s ;��,� 3 �t u' vi:Yth *r a jtl , a r , + +.» .4 �'' aRk �l p"'a,x; a `Y �` S 4 c .-"' w 4 sem' r „ rte -rr '.�n a af�t.1 Iy� � ,_ R� P evf. x g' w+ t ,� R t a+ g: 'S3 i h 2 f ;-m r i � tl q ^r, tiI 11 �, y� 4 *.,.y.. �.r. ? 't 4 ?'��; r uv..id-t�"k p i�''F F r ,j'y'i. ¢��' '9:'y��.,f..-r 6 i r.:A e 9, �n .. {Ifurci �j ","f. oes�..,_>z.:� `?',.Ek.:c;� mJy� x.?,d,�lE"!c; 11 ;��;.;P.:,�.�': a,...v:�r xe5t, .,. :3s,�il.u.. ,$c x. ... a3c3..e�'�f. '9,9k'Eii3wN ,.a..n�, ,. _ .. .. �u«,r, SCOPE OF SERVICE Site J17 Park Schematic Review Sketches for the southern portion of San Randa Valley Park System 1. Optimum availability of recreational opportunities appropriate for this portion of the service area. 2. Optimum circulation both -dthin and adjacent to the project area: for public access. 3. Maximum utilization of space and facilities to be provided on proposed school site. 4. Implications of development as proposed relative to future growth in the area. 5. Consideration of park development (Athan Downs) scheduled for construction by UCSD. 6. Consideration of potential for application of future park dedication or in lieu payments. 7. Requirements for additional land to provide necessary recreational facilities. ,APPRRaIX "A" -00 .'74 PAYMENTUPOR �omPletioa and aPProaa3 for theas proffessionai se ified in Appends A fttL rvices 1 $OM.pp -iU be Payment is the amount of (b) of this a�eement. to the COasuLtant an named in Sec. l APPS nIIa In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of a Non-Financial Agreement with the State Board of Education under the Comprehensive Fkployment & Training Act On the relation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Board Chairman is AUM)RIZED to execute, on behalf of the County, a Non-Financial Agreement Modification #5 with the State Department of Education, providing for $31,602 in State Comprehensive E3mployment and Training Act Funds to be spent in this County for vocational education between July 1, 1976 and December 31, 1976, under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said agreement #75/03807/9998/5990. PASSED BY TIM BOARD on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corred copy of on order emend on the minutes of sold Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of Orig: Director, HRA Supervisors cc: Attention L. Knapp aWuNd this 4th day of May 1976 Manpo yr Project Director — State Board of Education J• R. OLSSON, Clerk County AdministratorDeputy Clerk County Auditor-Controller cine M. Netffold NVH:A H 24 4/75 10M 400176 l�•:tliti..L`l$ • Fora CE*_rA--1i-.-3 VON-FINANCL1L ACRE -^ir*T SIGZIAT M. ' SHEET (l.-i6) L original: UNDER THE 4 Copies Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-203) (Section'112) lion-Financial Agreement Number 1. Prime Sponsor; 1 1 l t Board of Supervisors 7610.g._3 t$ g . 17- 9t c t t , � ►q Contra Costa County odification Approved 651 Pine Street umber: # 5 Date: Martinez, California 94553 : Contact Person: 2, State Board of Education: _ ... Nancy Van Huffel, Manpower Project Direstor California State Department of p-ducation 721 Capitol Mall Phone: (415) 372--4735 Sacramento, CA 95814 3. Agreement: Pursuant to Section 112(c) of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, (P.L. 93- 203), this Agreement is entered into by the State Board of.Education and (1. Name of Prime. Sponsor) Board of Sur_enri_Sc+,-s rt%gt:* rh-*.!-, This Agreement consists of this sheet, the Project Operating Plan and the Program Narrative. -As per this Agreement the State Board of Education of California is committed to provide for the Prime Sponsor the needed Vocational Education Services and Training outlined in the Program Narrative. The training and services will be provided upon receipt of funds from the Governor. _ 4: The estimated costs of training and 5. USE FOR MODIFICATIONS ONLY services -by--cost category are: -THIS ACTION: COST GATEGOdY CODE ESTIM--TED COSTS CV INCREASES O DECREASES _Adainistration 306 $30,589 O DOES NOT GRANGE THE ALLOCATION FOR THIS AGRE NT BY Training 307 $197,690 (this action) $ 31,602 Other - 308 TO A NEW TOTAL ALLOCATION OF (new level) $ 258,868 Services 309 $30,589 . TOTAL $ 258,868 MM 6. Approved for tht: grime Sponsor 7. Approved for the State Board of Education BY: 5: P,, Kenny By: Nam& and T, c: . hcitman_ Board of Supervisors Name and Title: Signature. PSignature: 16 MAY 4 1976 Date: . Date: *See Instructions`on Reverse Side 00Y17 , Fotp Cr. ZP VP.-1 INS_RWIII01S FOR COH?I.r•t'ING' h0?`-FINANCIAL AGP.LE.IiEP1T SIGNIVr RE SLf ET Agree,e:t ,:•s=5_r: Provided by Department of Education. _ 1. Prime S?orsar: Enter the name and address of the Prime -Sponsor in whose area the training and services will be provided. - Fater the name and address of the Prime Sponsor Contact Person and phone ::• = _ number of work site. o 2. State i:oa_d of Education: Eater the nnme and address of the State Board of Education_ - . 3. Enter the Prime Sponsor's name.--4. ' Enter theestimatedamount of Vocational Education ,funds .from the Governorls Special'Grant �.-hich will be spent for the listed cost categories. Refer to ~. CSA Rules and Regulations, 8 48.12, "Allowable.Federal Costs." - 'S:' Use this section for modifications- to the original allocation_; Check-'the =" appropriate boot. The amount of money in the specific action-will be entered 7 .,in first blank (this action) and the total allocation will be entered in the second blank (new level).. Any increases or decreases should also be entered in the appropriate estimated cost categories and TOTAL (Section 4). Signature of Prime Sponsor or authorized designate; • 7. Signature of staff member of State Board of Education_ � -. �.....-. _ ...w_ . --M� •' .f _a•_--_••ice._... �r Distribution, by Department of Education - �_ L = j_ . ..-• -- _ -Origira?-=-Vocational. Education Support Unit/Manpower,Education Unit Original - Prime Sponsor Copy _- - Manpower Education Regional Offices - Copy Copy -- Depart ent of Labor - Copy - Rork and correction copy for Central•Office~files. STATE OF CAT-FOR iL� � ' "..__ L`,:•^.CSL_'._ PROGRAM P1..4NMING SU:MT.tY Fora CEPA VE-2 SPECIAL GRA - VOCATIONAL EDUCATIM (4-75) • Under The 2 Originals Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 4 Copies (P.L. 93-203) (Section 112) 1. Prime Sponsor: Board of S1221ti422rs 2. A reement Humber Contra Costa County 1 1pp Address: 651 Pine Street 17 15,10 1 .318 0 t7 9,9 1 9,8 N 5 19 19 10 M itication T "'"Apptove hartiHaz,_ Cali f_ ornta 94553 Mo. Date: 3. Name of Contact Person: fancy Van Huffel, Manpower Project Director ( 419 372-4735 Title Phone Number 4. Period Covered by Agreement: From: 7/1/76 To: 12/31/76 5. GRANT YEAR-TO-DATE PLAN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION PROJECTS 9130 10 Z, A. Total Enrollments (Sum of A.1,A.2 and A.3) 34 134 168 177 1. Participants entering this grant year from regular CETA 34 82 116 177 R. Participants entering this grant year from outside regular CEPA 0 0 0 0 . Participants carried over from previous grant year 0 52 52 0 B. Total Terminations Sum of Bl. through B.4) 18 111 129 177 1. Entered Employment 7 59 66 92 2. Other positive terminations 4 15 19 25 3. Transfer to regular CETA 0 0 0 0 4. Lion-positive terminations 7 37 44 60 C. Planned Enrollments (End of Quarter (A minus B) 16 23 39 0 0011'79 STATE Or CALI-701NLA Tentatife BUDGET LNFOR. T ION SL':L`IARY - Fore CETA-VE-2A SPECLAL GRANT - VOCATIONAL EDUCATION (4-75) Under The Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-203) (Section 112) 2. Agreement Number 1. Prime Sponsor: Board of Supervisors ontra Losca Countyj70r 3 1 810 17 9 9j 9 815 : 9,9 . 0 Address: 651 Pine Street o i xc- on - pprove - — 03 5 . Date: Martinez, California 94553 3. Name of Contact Person: Mincy Van Huffel, Manpower Project Director (415) 372-4735 Title Phone Number BUDGET SUM_14ARY COST CATEGORIES 6. ESTIMATED 7. NEW OR TOTAL COST CATEGORIES UNEXPENDED REVISED FUNDS BUDGED CODE Voc. Ed. Voc. Ed. ,�.-,,,�, ti 1. Administration0 _..� S 12 2 2. Training 307 _.., S 82,156 3. Allowances 308 -0- ..,, 4. Services 309 ;�_._ : "'" 12,972 5. TOTAL $ 108,100 $- $108,100 CUMULATIVE QJ" RTERLY PROJECTIONS OF OBLIGATIONS AND FXPWDITURES 9/30 12/31- - 3/31 30 ACTIM1 a b c d 1. Voc. Ed. Obligations E, .1arances 108,100108,100 2. Total Projected Voc. Ed. L�cpenditures by Program Activities S 108.100 ; a. Classroom Training, Voc. Ed. S 8L-07 81-0751 b. Services to Participants, Voc. Ed. 2Z.0254- --s' 27-Q25 00,180 C'^R\ \ Tc-nt VOC-ATIONAL EDUCATION i.ARRATIVE PlI.00KAM STATDIENT CEiA-L'% (3-75) Under The 2 Original, Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 4 Copies (P.L. 93-203) (Sectio: 112) Agreement Number _ 7" 5 0,381017 , 9 , 9-9c8 5 , 9j9 p odificrion Approved Prime Sponsor:`mrd of SPnervisors/Contra Costa County :umber: 5 Date: Contact Person: „:!;cv_ Van Nuffel 2401-D Stanwell Drive #440,Concord 94520 415) 372-47:35 Address Phone Plumber 1. Plan for Use of Vocational Education Funds Under the Twelve Functions of Vocational. 'Education o Check under,Colu= "a" .those functions that may be all or partially the responsibility the California State Department of Education included in tbi.s Mon-Financial. Agxeentent. o. Check the entity Who may be responsible for Chose related functions not specifically, responsibility of the California State Department of Education under the Columns "b" through "d'. If a function is not applicable, enter N/A. RESPONSIBILTPY . OF RELATED SERVICES OR FUNCTIONS TO BE PROVIDED • _' State _ - _ Employment Department Of Prime Development Other TWELVE FRICTIONS OF Education Sponsor Department Agencies VOCATIONAL EDUCATION a b c d Po ulation Needs Anal sis ..:z'. - - _.%Job Market Anal is g - `fob Performance Requirements - - g Pro ram Plan.-yin X 'Vocational Education Promotion - % - Student Recruitment , X Curriculum Resources X Ancillary Services Guidance and Counseling_ x X Placement Vocational Instruction x Program Review x x Evaluation x - (over) 00181 r STATE OF CALIFORNLA Tentative PLAN FOR USE 0r VOCATIO::.aL EDUCATION FUNDS WIDER THE Fora CETA-VE WELVE FUNCTIONS 0. VOC.ATI0:;3L EDUCATION (3-75) Under The Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-203) (Section 112) INSTRUCTIONS: - .. The Prime Sponsor shall develop a Financial, Statistical and Narrative Plan for the expenditure of funds by the California State Board of Education. To assist the California State Board of Education's staff in preparing your Non— Financial Agreement for review, please attach your plan to this Form CEPA-VE-3- following the format below_ -w�- Agreement Vumber will be provided by the Department of Education'.' ... � - z2 7 -_ - y 1. List one or more of the twelve (12) functions of Vocational Education, as identified in�Column "e, which will be used to deliver training services. . ::. �;:. :• to the Prime Sponsor's clients by the California State Board of Education ., - upon receipt of the necessary funds from the Governor.. - 2. The need and objectives for the training and services-.. - If ervices:If the Prime Sponsor opts _to provide a copy of his Title I Comprehensive - Manpower Plan to the State Department of Education, he may refer to applicable - sec tion the plan in lieu of providing separate narratives for this. portion of the Non-Financial Agreement: :•-=- A. Information regarding projected manpower needs and job opportunities. _ _V ._ B.• Statement regarding need for Vocational Education training and services.--,,- ^-- C.% Characteristics -of-clients -to be served. . D. Number of clients to be served. E. Goals;.of the Vocational Education training and services. =-- -• ` F. Measurable or observable objectives. _ G.- Planned- activities-.to accomplish the objectives.of each funetioii listed. H. Evidence of consultation with representatives of the educational. and training resources:available in the:area,:-•-� I.-~Explanation of evaluation process. - •- - - J. -Other_information_ac Prime Sponsor's - - --, _---K. The results and benefits expected from the training and services. . - _- L. How the training and services are a part of and are being coordinated•=-,=, -� With the Prime Sponsor`s_CEL4 grant activities. ` _` 3. Estimated categorical budget. r. CALIFOELNTA DEPART-b .tiT OF EDUCATION Agreement No: VOCATIONAL EDUCATION 75-038079998-5990 j NARILATIVE PROGRAM STATE'1E,`NT Modification-C 5 COXraA COSTA COUNTY CM TITLE I Transition Oudrtei (7/1/76 to 12/31/76) A. Projected Manpower Needs and-Job-Opportunities The Prinz Sponsor has done extensive research utilizing both available published data and surrey initiated by the Prime Sponsor staff to determine projected manpower needs for this area. Evidence of tnis assessment is included as Attachment 01 from the Prune. Sponsors Title I Comprehensive Manpower Plan. This consists of pages 10, 3.1, 12, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32 and the outlined portions of pages 34 and 35. B. Statement 8elarding Needs - She need for providing Vocational Education is well established within our Title . I grant application. Attacbment #2, containing pages 16, 17, 18, 23 and 24 . outline the area's obvious need for vocational assistance. ' We have determined = ; from our Job Opportunities study (see Attachment $1) that employment prospects, ' especially-in the current job market, depend to a great extent upon possession of good skill levels. We anticipate that use of vocational training will upgrade enrollee skills to make them competitive in today's job market. .- /1 C. Characteristics of Clients to be Served tit - .=�:.: Clients served through these Vocational Education funds will be CFTA Title I eligible as determined by the Department of Labor, that is a person must be unemployed,-underemployed or economically disadvantaged. Specific client groups-addressed will.be 1) disadvantaged minority groups, especially heads of households, 2) female heads of households, who are receiving public assist- ance;.. 3) ssist-ance;,. 3) veterans, especially Vietnam-era veterans, and 4) youth. D. Number-of Clients to be Served - �� `:'tea. •-. =�• � The Prime-Sponsor intends to enroll 34 individual clients throuszh vocational education referrals. � E. Goals of Vocational Education Training and Services The provision of vocational training on an individual referral basis for CETA Title I enrollees is the goal of this program. Individual referrals will be utilized to place clients in programs that are not currently available th:ouoh the County CETA program. Individuals Will be provided intensive counseling prior to referral to an individual slot. These training slots will be with private and public schools that have been approved by the Bureau of Schools. t mote; Attach=ents referred to from Title I Grant were submitted to your office With prior Non-Financial Agreement in September 175. - 00183 - F. Measurable or Observable Objectives The classroom training is organized so that a participant may enter at any tie. The ongoing, process will allow any student who is able to pass the basic tests to be referred to employment. G. Planned Activities to Accompli.sh-Objective-of 'Functions Listed 1. Population Needs Analysis: This is provided by the Prime Sponsor as demonstrated in Attachments #1 and #2 from Title I Grant Application. 2. Job Market Analysis: This is provided by Prime Sponsor as denoted in Attachments 01 and #2, 3. Job Performance Requirements: These are determined by the training agencies themselves. 4. Program Planning: Program planning is provided by the Prime Sponsor. The overall program C.' plan is outlined in the Comprehensive Manpower Plan Delivery System. (See Attachment f3) S. Student Recruitment: -_ Enrollees will be referred to vocational education individual referral slots by the Assessment/Orientation Component of the Manpower Delivery System. Intensive personal counseling of clients in this component gill identify what particular training they will be enrolled in. - The full range of - " supportive services will be provided by the CETA A/0 Unit, including '- transportation, child care and legal service_ In addition, CETA Title I -�•- will_provide allowance payments to enrollees. 6. 1 Curriculum Resources/Ancillary Services: These will be provided by the State Department of Education. 7. Guidance and Counseling: Guidance and counseling will be provided by the Assessment and Orientation component of the Panpower Delivery System. Agencies providing this service are noted on Attacn—eat #4. C ' - 2 04184 8. Placement: Placement is the joint responsibility of the Prue Sponsor's Job Development I and Job Finding 11"orkshop components and the training facility. \ 9. Vocational Instruction: This is a joint responsibility of the training facility and the State Department of Education. 10. Program Review: - Program review will be done by both the Prime Sponsor and the State Depart— ment of Education.. Prime Sponsor review will be accomplished by periodic monitoring and evaluation of the overall referral program. (Specific methods for review are noted in the discussion of evaluation procedures under Item I.) The State Department of Education will conduct program review using its standard procedure. 11:. Evaluation: ' Evaluation sill be conducted by both the Prime Sponsor and the State Department of Education. The Prime Sponsor evaluation procedure is out— lined utlined in detail under Item I. The State Department of•Education Will provide evaluation per their standard procedures. H. Evidence of Consultation with Representatives of"the Educational and Training " { Resources Representatives of educational and training resources in the area are fully integrated into Contra Costa County's CgTA Title I program. There are various representatives of these resources on the Manpover Advisory Council'and on its subcommittees. Evidence of this is presented in Attachment P. I. Explanation of Evaluation Process _ ,11 The Evaluation process to be used by the Prime Sponsor is outlined in the Comprehensive Manpower Plan on pages 36, 57 and 58. (See Attachment 05) J. Other Information The Comprehensive Manpower Plan outlines the rationale for recommending use of Vocational Education funds for individual referrals. Attachment 06, containing pages 42 and 42a of the grant application, indicates the Prime Sponsor's basis for this decision. E. Results and Benefits The anticipated results are outlined under Item E. (Goals) and Item F. (Measur— able Objectives). t _ 3 _ 00185 L.- How Training and-Services area Part of and are Being Coordinated with the Pri^e Sponsor's-CETA Grant Activities r Individe:al referrals under vocational education funds are a fully 'integrated component of the Manpower Delivery System for Contra Costa County CETA Title I. They represent a valuable training option for certain clients. Specific referrals will be determined through personal counseling in the Assessment and Orientation 'omponent. Supportive services and allowances are coordinated and authorized by CEZ4 Counselors. Individual referral graduates will be assisted in job placement by the Job Development and Job Finding Workshop components. In addition, the Prime Sponsor's evaluation and follow-up system will be utilized in review of all individual referrals and for the evaluatiqu of the programs' effrectiveaess. - III 'ESTIMATED CATEG03TC-AL BUDGET This is not appLcable to individual referrals. 00186 — 4 — - .human Resources Agency b Health-Medical-Social Service Claude L. Van Harter, Director CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 651 Pine St., btartinez 94553/228.3000 MANPOWER PROJECT 2401-D Stanwell Drive, #440 Concord, California 945ZO telephone (415) 372-4735 April 26, 1976 Bob Charlton, Supervisor Manpower Education Unit 1111 Jackson Street, Room 4064 s Oakland, California 94607 Dear Bob: This is a letter of intent to transfer the balance of $18.75 (as noted in Mr. Tibbetts letter of 2/5) from Project No. 75-03807-0001-4505 to Non- Financial Agreement No. 75-038079998-5990 Mod 5. This transfer doers not change the grant amount noted on the attached VE-1. It represents no change in either the attached VE-2 or VE-2A. Your assistance in this matter would be appreciated. Since ely yours, Nancy Van Huffel Direct MANPOWER PROJECT NVA/BW/rw QU101 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Contract #26-022-1 with Phil Manfield and Mary Mullin to Provide Training in "Fair Fight Techniques" for Medical Services - Mental Health - Medical Social Services Staff IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDER® that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the following contract for training in "Fair Fight Techniques" for Medical Services - Mental Health - Medical Social Services staff, under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. Number: 26-022-1 Contractor: Phil Manfield and Mary Mullin Term: April 26, 1976 (one day only) Payment Limit: $50.00 PASSED BY THE BOARD on May 4. 1976. I hereby certify that the foregob* Is a true and corned copy of an order emer- on th► minutes of said l oord of Supervisors on the dote oforesoid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witne s my hard and the Seol of the ffoard of Attn: Contracts S Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed 4th day of May ig 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clark Medical Services - Mental HealthGj Medical Social Services Sy Do" Clerk Contractors a M. Neufeld H 24 ens low Q0 ab Contra Costa County Standard Form tIRORT-FORM CON-71A, 1 1. Contract Identification. dumber 26 - 02 ,b_'/ Department: Medical Services - Medical Social Services Subject: Staff training - "Fair Fight Techniques" 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: PHIL MANFIELD AND MARY MULLIN - A Partnership Capacity: Self-employed individuals (Training Consultants) Address: 33 Quail Court, Suite 102, Walnut Creek, California 94596 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is April 26, 1976 and it terminates April 26, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day -advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Pati-ment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 50.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 50.00 per service unit: (1) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one (1) service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction, and training in Fair Fight Techniques for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least two (2) full hours of such services. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000; Welfare and Institutions Code, Div. 5, Part 2, The Short-Doyle Act; and California Administrative Code, Title 9, Subchapter 3, Community Mental Health Services under the Short-Doyle Act. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA - CQXTRACTO ,p J. P. Kenny ay U� $y CSC. zt: Designee By Recommended b} Depart=ent (Designate Afficial capacity) 12 e // By (Form approved by County Counsel) Designee (A-4620 10/75) Microfilmed with boord order 0U1CA In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 11976 In the Matter of Contract #20-081 with Gary Schmidt, #20-084 with Nancy Van Couvering, #20-085 with Dr. Russell Lee to Provide Training for County Social Service Staff IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the following contracts for provision of training in special problems related to organic and behavioral dysfunction, "The Chronic Patient in the Community" for County Social Service staff and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contracts. Number Contractor Term Payment Limit 20-081 Gary Schmidt, Ph.D. May 11 & 12, 1976 $170.60 20-084 Nancy Van Couvering, Ph.D. May 11 6 12, 1976 $141.36 20-085 Russell Lee, M.D. May 11 5 12, 1976 $151.56 (Two days only) PASSED BY THE BOARD on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corned copy of an order erNered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Mftm my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed " 4th day of Nay , 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Social Service Department ContractorsBy puty DeClerk Maxine M. Ne'utild H24 ARS IOM 00190 Contra Costa County Standard Form 176 SHOWr FOR`! SERVArCE M14TR CT 1. Contract Identification. Number 2 O _ O V 1 Department: Social Service Subject: Social Service Staff Training in the treatment of special problems related to organic and behavioral dysfunction, "The Chronic Patient in the Community" 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: GARY SCHMIDT, Ph.D. Capacity: Self-employed individual (Training Consultant) Address: 347 Ferne avenue, Palo Alto, California 94306 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is May 11, 1976 and it terminates Hay 12, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day -advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 170.60 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a, properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 140.00 per service unit: (X) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one (1) service unit(s). The Payment Limit shall include mileage reimbursement for 180 miles at $.17 per mile (180 x $.17 = $30.60). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction, and training in The Chronic Patient in the Community for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session, for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least four (4) full hours of such services. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Zontractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Con:.ractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR J: A. Kenny $ ti gy y Designee Recommended by Pepartmi-nt (DD ignat o ictal capac'rI) gy (Form approved by County Counsel) Designee (A-4620 10/75) Microfilmed with board order 00191 ,Contra C.-sta County Standard Form SHORT RM SERII IC? CONTRUC L 1. Contract Identification. .lumber 20 - 084 Department: Social Service Subject: Social Service Staff Training in the treatment of special problems related to organic and behavioral dysfunctions, "The Chronic Patient in the Community" 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: NANCY VAN COUVERING, Ph.D. Capacity: Self-employed individual (Training Consultant) Address: 408 Village Drive, E1 Cerrito, California 94530 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is May 11, 1976 and it terminates Hay 12, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day mdvance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 141.36 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 140.00 per service unit: OC) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one (1) service unit(s). The Payment Limit shall include mileage reimbursement for 8 miles at $.17 per mile, (8 x .17 = $1.36). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction, and training in The Chronic Patient in the Community for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session, for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least four (4) full hours of such services. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By / iii L' Kenny By Designee f . Recomme ded by Department (De gnat' ffic' 1 capacity)2. By (Form approved by County Counsel) Ees:b-_e_ (A-4620 10/75) Mkrofilmed with board ftGO -Contra Co,-;; .= i o'111ty Standard Fora 1. Contract Identification. Number Ad 0 - 085 Department: Social Service Subject: Social Service Staff Training in the treatment of special problems related to organic and behavioral dysfunctions, "The Chronic Patient in the Community" 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: RUSSELL LEE, M.D. Capacity: Self-employed individual (Training Consultant) Address: 1628 Euclid Avenue, Berkeley, California 94709 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is May 11, 1976 and it terminates May 12, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day •advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 151.56 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of'services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 140.00 per service unit: (g) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one (1) service unit(s). The Payment Limit shall include mileage reimbursement for 68 miles at $.17 per mile (68 x $.17 = $11.56) 7. . Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction, and training in The Chronic Patient in the Community for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session, for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least four (4) full hours of such services. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR J. By P. Kenny B � � Y Designee P.ecomm{nu: i'. Depart n- t,f)e.;ignate of icLal capacity) yoBy _ . (Form approved by County Coun elJ93 Microfilmed with board order (A-4620 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Foster Care Training Contract #20-087 with David J. Schwartz, M.D. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTBORIM to execute the following contract for provision of training for the Social Service Department staff and foster parents who work with teenagers in "The Adolescent Life Style" under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. Humber: 20-087 Contractor: David J. Schwartz, M.D. Term: Hay 4, 1976 (one day only) Payment Limit: $75.00 PASSED BY TBE BOARD on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the fon"p*V is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the daft aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts b Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 4th day of May 19 76 County Auditor-Controllerr' , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Social Service Department ,,>� Contractor Do" Clerk Maxine M. Ne6ald N 24 Bps IOM 00194 a — 087 Department: Social Service Subject: Social Service Foster Care training program in "The adolescent Life Style" 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following narted Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: DAVID J. SCHWARTZ, H.D. Capacity: Self-employed individual (Training Consultant) Address: 1524 Tarrytown, San Mateo, California 94402 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is Play 4, 1976 and it terminates Hay 4, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day -advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Pa� ...ent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 75.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submissioa of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 7 5.00 per service unit: () session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one 1 service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction and training in The Adolescent Life Style for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session, for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least two-and-one-half. (2-1/2) full hours of such service. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Contractor sha'1 defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. State Mandate 14-200 Social Service Letter 75-10 Title XX Section 228.84. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNT' Ov CO\TP..A COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR B J. Pa may Byi��Q Y • Designee 24. , (D�si •nates fFi ial capa•_:t• ) By (Form appro•r-A? by County Counsel) (a-46 _ ;:;, JW�of,l� with board order 00195 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 ?6 In the Matter of Contract #20-082-1 with Val A. Kositsky to Provide Training for Foster Parents IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDER® that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the following contract for provision of training in "Nutrition" for foster parents, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said Social Service Department contract. Number: 20-082-1 Contractor: Val A. Kositsky Term: May 11, 1976 (one day) Payment Limit: $60.00 PASSED BY THE BOARD on May 49 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing k a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 4th day of May , 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Social Service Department � 01 Contractor By ,L� Day Cly cine M. Nbuf6ld H 24 !/75 101 00196 Contra Costa County Standard Form 1. Contract Identification. Number 0 _ 0 " 1 Department: Social Service Subject: Foster Home Development (Training Program for Foster Parents) 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: VAL A. KOSITSKY Capacity: Self-employed individual (Training Consultant) Address: 1090 Miller Avenue, Berkeley, California 94708 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is May 11, 1976 and it terminates May 11, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day "advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. S. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 60.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 60.00 per service unit: (10 session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one (1) service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction and training in Nutrition for Foster Home Development Program for County-selected persons in the time, place and manner required by County including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session, for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least three (3) full hours of such service. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the Ccunty and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR 3. P. Kenny(5 BZ� By P. 0 4mon, Board Sv isors Designee J. . ,;t r t t L. A . r r L Recomme ded by Depart= rt (Designate official capacity) fx*4 By • 01.1" (Form approved by County Counsel) L'25:�..ce (A-4620 10/75) Miaofilmed with board order 00197 V . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Contract #28-421 with MSC Associates, Inc., to provide staff training and technical assistance for the County's CETA Title I Manpower Project IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #28-421 with MSC Associates, Inc., to provide staff training and technical assistance in the area of job development from May 3, 1976, through June 30, 1976, for the County's CETA Title I Manpower Project with a Payment Limit of $10,700, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said Contract. Passed by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregahM Is a true and cornd copy of an order entered on the minutes of sold Board of Supervisors an the dote aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Waness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts b Grants Unit Supwvhors cc: County Administrator affixed this 4th day of May 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neuf ld I 00198 H 24 805 IOU Contra "c<- 3 'aun,:v Standard Form STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. Number X8 - 421 Department: Human Resources Agency Manpower Project Subject: (1) Five-day Job Development/Staff Training Workshop (2) CETA Job Development Strategy for Contra Costa County (document) (3) Plan for a CETA Business Advisory Council (document) (4) Job Developer Handout and Needed Promotional Materials (text) 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: MSC ASSOCIATES, INC. Capacity: California corporation (for profit) Address: 58 Sutter Street, Suite 550,• Stn Francisco, California 94104 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is May 3, 1976, and it termEates June 30, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed S 10,700 S. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the teras and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Saecial Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by 'reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Contra Costa County FY 75-76 CETA Title I Comprehensive Manpower Plan (U. S. Department of Labor Grant Number 06-5004-10), Federally approved, and any modifications thereto 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Title I of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (CETA) , as amended (P.L. 93-203, 87 Stat. 839; P.L. 93-567, 88 Stat. 1845); California Government Code Sections 26227 and 53703 10. Signatures. Thele signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CO►rTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR 3, P. Kenny By By airman, Boa--M of pervisors r . Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk Designate-off icial capa:aty in business= ; and affix corporation seal) State of California ) ss. Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) Rec Sed by Department The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared By before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Forza A pro•.ea: Ccrnsel or a resolution not its board of directors. Rosemary Matossion Dated: By. Deputy 00 1 W MjQpfj(med with board order. Wotevyr%4&tdPkiz/Depu County Clerk (A-u61.7 ?'V 3/75) 1 C _ :a County PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) 2R - 421 6� �1 Humber IGr L3-— 4 2 1 i 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: [Check one alternative only.] [ ) a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ] c. $ , after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided, hereunder. [XI d. For provision of services, as described in the Service Plan: (1) $308 for each County-sponsored staff person for 5-day Workshop (2) $1,500 for provision of CETA Job Development Strategy (document) (3) $500 for provision of CETA Business Advisory Council Plan (document) (4) $1 000 for provision of Job Developer Handout and Materials (text) 2. Payment Dema~ndy Contractor shall submit written demands monthly for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is wade or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, wort: or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. k. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Initials: Contractor County Dept. (A-6619 REV 6'75) oo�oo Contra ,'ounty Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) Humber 8 - 421 CP 1. Compliance with La::. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner _t chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements m.-,y be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially charge the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan, Initials: Al Contractor County Dept. (A-4616 :'EV 5/75) 00201 Contra Cos'., County Standard Form +"aF.,'i£RAL &,)NDI710?iS (Purchase of Services) dumber0 8 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Law Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the teras and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 19. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of t e most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. _initials: Contradior County Dept. (A-4616 REV 5,75) -2- 002012 Contra ; -i Count,i - Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 2 Number 8 - 421 18. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts Administration Unit, Ninth Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. Initials: , Con or County Dept. (A-4616 REV 5/75) -3- 00203 SPECIAL CONDITIOYS Number 28 - 421 1. Compliance with Federal Requirements. Contractor shall comply with all Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars applicable to Title I of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, as amended, including Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Parts 94, 95, and 98, as published in the Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 101, Friday May 23, 1975; as may be revised and amended; and which are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Insurance. Paragraph 20. (Insurance), page 3, of the General Conditions is hereby deleted. 3. No Implication of Contract Renewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation or implication whatsoever that this Contract shall be renewed; i.e., that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract or other such agreement following termination of the within Contract. Initials: Con for County Dept.; 00204 SERVICE PLAN Number 28 - 421 Contractor shall provide for County certain professional services, training, consultation, and technical assistance oriented to the County's CETA Title I Manpower Project and the Countyvide Job Development/Placement & OJT Program pertaining thereto, as follows: 1. Job Development Workshop. Contractor shall provide a 5-day Job Development Workshop from May 3 through May 7, 1976, for up to 25 staff persons who shall be referred and sponsored by County. Contractor shall provide staff training in business, marketing, and sales techniques which are applicable to the development of unsubsidized jobs for CETA-eligible participants (i.e., unemployed, underemployed, low-income, disadvantaged, unskilled, and newly trained persons) in Contra Costa County. Contractor's training Workshop shall cover, but is not limited to, the following topics and subject areas: Introduction Techniques For Questioning Employers Overview and Expectations dandling an Employer's Objections Psychology of Approaching Employers "The Close" (closing the deal) Basics of Communication How the Businessman Thinks The Art of Listening The "Employment System" Surveying the Local Job Market Using of a "Sales Kit" Data Gathering on Potential Employers "The Professional Call" (a demonstration) The First Contact With A Potential Employer Time Management Using the Telephone Territory Management Establishing Rapport Review of the Fundamentals In conducting this Job Development Workshop, Contractor shall provide speakers, films,, and other visual aids and shall utilize lectures, demonstrations, role playing, small group discussions, and other training techniques. Contractor shall conduct the 5-day Workshop at the training facility which shall be provided by County. For provision of the above specified Job Development Workshop, County shall pay Contractor the fixed fee of $308 for each County referred and sponsored staff person who attends the 5-day Workshop, subject to the Payment Provisions of this Contract. 2. CETA Job Development Strategy. Contractor shall research, plan, develop, and prepare in written document form a "CETA Job Development Strategy for Contra Costa County." This document shall include, but is not limited to, the following subject areas: Organization Follow-up Training Responsibilities Management Responsibilities Market Research Plan Objectives Contractor shall submit said document and County shall pay Contractor -in accordance with Paragraph 6. (Submission Schedule and Fees) set forth below. 3. CETA Business Advisory Council Plan. Contractor shall research, plan, develop, and prepare in written document form a "Plan for a Contra Costa County CETA Business advisory Council." This document shall include, but is not limited to, the following subject areas: Objectives Organization Size Responsibilities Identification of Potential Business Members Contractor shall submit said document and County shall pay Contractor in accordance with Paragraph 6. (Submission Schedule and Fees) set forth below. Initials: ;,/�,-�s # Cont or County Dept. -1- 002a5 SERVICE PL&I Plumber 28 - 421 4. Job Developer Handout and Promotional Materials. Contractor shall develop and prepare the text of a "Job Developer Handout" and other needed promotional materials, for use by County's CETA Job Developers to inform local employers about the County CETA program. The text for this Handout shall include, but is not limited to, the following subject areas: Description of CETA Programs CETA Objectives and Needs CETA Participants as Potential Employees Advantages for the Employers and Business Community County shall be responsible for the actual layout, typesetting, photographs, graphics, printing, and production of the Handout and promotional materials. Contractor shall submit the teat of said Handout and promotional materials and County shall pay Contractor in accordance with Paragraph 6. (Submission Schedule and Fees) set forth below. S. Technical Assistance. Contractor shall provide County with such technical assistance as may be required by County in connection with the Job Development Workshop, CETA Job Development Strategy, CETA Business Advisory Council Plan, and Job Developer Handout and promotional materials, including, but not limited to, consultation on County's optimal use and implementation of these activities, strategies, plans, and materials. Contractor's fixed fees include a portion as full compensation for all such technical assistance services. 6. Submission Schedule and Fees. a. Prior to final completion of the products specified in Paragraph 2., 3., and 4. above, Contractor shall submit a complete rough draft of each document, text, or promotional item to County for review and approval by County regarding completeness. Following approval of each rough draft by County, Contractor shall complete each product in final form, to include any modifications as may be prescribed by County, and shall submit one copy to County prior to June 30, 1976. b. For provision of each final copy as specified above, County shall pay Contractor the following fixed fees, subject to the Payment Provision.R of this Contract: CETA Job Development Strategy (document). . . . . . . . . .$1,500 CETA Business Advisory Council Plan (document). . . . . . .$ 500 Job Developer Handout and Promotional Materials (text). . .$1,000 These fees shall constitute full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided or incurred by Contractor under this Contract. Initials: Contr or County Dept. -2- 00206 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Progress Report of Administration and Finance Committee with Respect to Security at County Building Complex in Richmond. The Board on April 20, 1976 having referred to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) the reported thefts of several vehicles from the parking lot adjacent to the RichmondCounty Building Complex, and the proposals of Marshall Charles E. Iversen, Richmond Judicial District, for the prevention of such thefts and the costs involved thereto; and Said committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny serving in place of Supervisor Boggess) having this day submitted a progress report; and Supervisor Kenny having presented a petition of approxi- mately 316 signatures of employees at the Richmond Building Complex expressing interest in obtaining a security system for said parking lot, and having recommended that the Administration and Finance Committee consider said petition in their study of this matter; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the progress report and the petition is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. c c: Board committee W'h'y my hand and the Seal of the Board of City of Richmond supervisors Marshall C. E. Iversen affixed this_,,_ day of May 1976 United Clerical Employees County Administrator r- J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director - County Sheriff-Coroner 8y -i✓u:_ �.Ti�., Deputy Clerk Robbie Gutierrez H ..'-.4 1!711 lint 00207 The Board of Supervisors Contra k - Kni► CostaChairman jamm R.Olasam County Administration Building .-f L✓s> County Clerk and P.O.Box 911t' �} E:Officio Clerk of 00 acerd Martinez.California 94553 ,' ,• County Rom Gwdiwa Rued/ Chief Clark �� ,:. Jamas P.Kenny-Richmond Mme, 4 (415)372-2371 1st District Alfred M.Dias-El Sobrante . t 2nd District Jamas E.Moriarty-Lafayette 3rd N. DistrictRECEIVED Worm WarBoggess-Conead ,.�t 4th District Edmund A.Linschaid-Pitt*wq `►ter= }�. 5th District v May 4, 1976 MAY `t 1976 Ctf£!C BOAM Or SUPC-RVWRS Or RA iA Oti>t+N PROGRESS REPORT OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AT COUNTY BUILDING COMPLEX IN RICHMOND On April 20, 1976 the Board referred to the Administration and Finance Committee for review the matter of theft of vehicles from parking lots at the Richmond County Building Complex, and proposals submitted by Marshal Iverson for dealing with this problem. These proposals include the provision of a guard service at an estimated cost of between $19,500 and $23,750 per year, and. fencing and control gate at an estimated cost of approximately $17,500. The Committee met and considered this on May 4, 1976 and was advised of the arrest of two men last week on a charge of burglarizing a car in the parking lot. This may substantially relieve the problem, but the Committee believes the items cited above should be continued under review taking into account an indication of willingness, by some employees, to contribute to improved security, such as through a parking lot fee. J. J. E. MORIAR!X Superviso 'strict I ///Supervisor, Tfzstrict III (substitu -n for v Supervisor W. N. Boggess) M aofilmeed with bwrd ordw 00208 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 7�( In the Matter of Application for Renewal of County Adoption Agency License WHEREAS the regulations of the State of California require that an application be submitted in order to renew the adoption license of Contra Costa County; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board is authorized to execute application to the State Department of Health for renewal of license to conduct a County Adoption Agency for the purpose of accepting relinquishments and placing children for adoption, as outlined in Title 22, Division 2, Chapter 3, of the California Administrative Code. PASSED by the Bo?rd on rfay 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Director, NRA Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Welfare Director Supervisors State Department of Health affixed this 4th doy of Mp 19 -7-6 County Auditor-Controller .J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By2�11 �11 1�'11'7.ee57 Deputy Clerk mh !� ►0209 t42-% alis roti, _ t .;aTt Oi :a_:c.a�+a L:ataivfsi pt I.eaitn , APPLICATION' FOR LICENSE TO CONDUCT AN ADOPTIO4 AGEttCY Lw PVI VI.c. \a•:. OK ai:\C• aasrw Contra Costa County Social Service Department A—RZI%% 467P C: Z-"% Ct.::r :Kt Cacti 'BtCDa0%F 63. ,2401 Stanwell Drive, 0'200 Concord Contra Costa 94520 372-4640 For specific case details: _ 85 Cieaveland Road, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 ♦t:aiKD%. :, aR�a3 to 5:5:�+:i�• Contra Costa County. Occasional studies or services in neighboring counties, with consent of County Agency, if any. a14\a:..: .. ,..j L.ej••. .�11�C',' 7-77-';77-7-7 j J- P. Kenny MAY 1976 PPWA =Kcy 3� t e 00210 Microfilm-ed with board order. 1 � 'r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 14ay 4 ' 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Waiver and Indemnification Agreement in Favor of the Sun Valley Plarchants Association IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a waiver and indemnification agreement in favor of the Sun Valley Merchants Association to allow the County Sheriff-Coroner to participate in a display and public information program at Sun Valley Mall during "National Law Enforcement Week" from May 10, 1976 to May 17, 1976. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Sun Valley Merchants Supervisors Association c/o Sheriff affixed this 4th day of May . 19 7F County Sheriff-Coroner County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Mar raig tr� ►+24 ans iota 00211 �ifi�l�f Al�fOtjOHM - Gentlemen: You have agreed to cooperate with the undersigned in the conduct of , certain promotional exhibitions to be held by the undersigned at the S=Valley hall from XV 109 197 � 6 , to kay IT, . 1976 In consideration for the foregoing, the undersigned, jointly and severally: 1. waive any and all c? s or rights of action which may accrue to the undersigned as a result of any act or oraission, not constituting gross negligence, by you or any person or organization employed by or associated with you. she undersigned has been fully advised of the contents cf Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California, and said Section and the benefits thereof are hereby expressly waived. Said Secticn 1542 reads as follows: "Sc`c~z_. 1542 :Certain clsi:..s not a*treetr:d b:: gene:al rel ease.) A gen-C_-al -release does not extend to cl iT:- which the creditor does not :enc:: or suspect to exist in his favor at the tine of executing the release which if known by him must have materially affected his settlrr+ent with the debtor." 2. promise and agree to indemnify and hold you harmless from any and all claims, der-ands, actions, liability or loss which may arise from, or be incurred as a result of, injury or damage to persons or t property, or loss of property, suffered or alleged to have been suffered by any person or organization by reason of any act or omission on the part of the undersigned or any person or organization employed by or associated with the undersigned; and, further, agree to de;end you against any and all such claims, demands or, actions, or, at your option, to reir_b•urse you for any and all costs and attorney's fees incurr__d b; you in defending against such claim, deriand or action. microrMmad with board order 00212 _ 3. the above waiver and indenmification are given for the benefit -of both Sun Valley shopping Center and Sun Valley Ierchants Association and all persons, associations and organizations employed by or associated in any way with either said Center or said Association. ' ACCEPTED FOR Contra Costa Ca=ty I BY �- Kerin Authorized Ag t omon, Dard pChair rvisors MAY 4 1976 Date GUARANTY The undersigned hereby guarantees full performance of all of the obligations provided in Paragraph 2 of this Agreement. Dated: MAY 1976 I P. Kenny . . . . Chairman, Board of Supervisors f t. ' s 00213 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 4 !� . 19 In the Matter of Complaint with Respect to Aviary in Single Family Residential District. The Board on April 20, 1976 directed the Planning Department and County Counsel to withhold legal action to effect removal of an aviary located in a single family resi- dential district (on property of Mr. and Mrs. George Turner) until public hearings could be held to determine whether the County Ordinance Code should be amended to allow such use; and Attorney David Dolgin, representing Mr. Gilbert P. Lazaareschi, 3090 Hedaro Court, Lafayette, California 94544s appeared before the Board this day to urge that it reconsider said action, stating in connection therewith that two aviary structures had been built, one on the property line and one approximate'"r two feet from the property line, and that neither a permit nor a variance had been obtained prior to construction, and therefore even if the code should be amended to permit aviaries in single family residential districts, there would still be a violation of sideyard requirements; and The Board members discussed the matter and noted that the 3oard action of April 20 simply postponed final determination until the Planning Commission could conduct its hearing on the proposed ordinance change and that a progress report would be forthcoming from the Planning staff. MATTER OF RECORD ONLY a matter of ^ecord I hereby certify that the foregoing is a trw and cored a W of -lion the ndmw of said gourd of Supervisors on the dere afinesoid. Witness my land and dw Sed of die bard of supervims th rumd this T a day of Mai' i9 76 J. R. OLSSON, CNrk f jr by l r v' v t!_ C may'_ / Del1i1y Clerk • l H.24 3n6 1$m 00214 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Conveying a Grant of Easement to Pacific Telephone and Telegraph (Gov. Code Sec. 25526.6} Company on County property acquired for park purposes for County Service Area R-8 It Is By The Board Ordered that its Chairman is authorized to execute a Grant of Easement to the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company on County property acquired for park purposes for County Service Area R-8. The Easement is being granted at no cost to Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company as it covers existing and new facilities which serve County owned and private property and such conveyance is determined to be in the public interest. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesoid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of supervisors affixed this 4th day of Mav . 14 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By _ . Deputy Clerk N. In sham JBF:pse ORIG: Public Yorks S.A.C. cc: Public Works Director (2) P:T.& T. (via Public Works) County Administrator City of walnut Creek R-8 (via Public Works) 009)11 5 c R/W 7 (5-71) RECORDATION REQUESTED BY FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY COMR& COSTA CCIIN"MY, a political subdivision of the State of California Grantor. hereby grants to THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND 'TELEGRAPH COMPANY, its successors and assigns. Grantee. the right from time to time to construct, place, inspect, maintain. replace and remove communication facilities consisting of aerial and underground wires, cables and other elec- trical conductors with associated poles. crossarms. anchors. guys,•fixtures, conduits, manholes, service boxes. marker posts and other appurtenances. together with a right of way therefor and the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom, across, upon. in and under the following described real property in the Cit4 oz Walnut, Creek County of Contra Costa State of California: A portion of that certain real property designated Parcel Ore in the deed from Cortese Lai=d Co., a limited parrtnarship, and Paul John Cortese, as surviving joint tenant, to Contra Costa County, a political subdivision of the State of California, dated 2qy 1, 1975 and recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California on June 18, 1975, in Book 7540 of Official Records at page 33, said portion being more particular?,y described as follows: A strip of land having a uniform width of thirty five (35) feet lying contiguous to and southerly of the following described line: Beginning at tha intersection of the most northern boundary line of said real property and the western boundary line of that certain real property designated Parcel Cie in the dead 1!rom Doris D. Hughes to :. X. Driscoll, et ux, dated i$y 31, 1973 and recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, on June 18, 1973 in Book 6973 of Official PBcords at page 356; thence from said point of intersection and running along said northarn boundary line South 760 531 30" East, 504.37 feet; thence South S00 061 36° East, 53.19 feet; thence Soeth 760 "1 39" East, 16.s1 feet. Grantee shall use Pacific Gas and Electric Cols existing poles or pole locations wherever possible. Dated: May 4 196 CO.I''rRl COSTA COUNTY, a political stfodiv;sion of the State of California Witness: AtJ .Olsold Byl. gr m Deputy Clerk $� chaihmn Beard o ervi rs FORM APPROVEII JOHN B. bY, Cau asci Mcrotihned with board order 00216 Or■ Z v_ _ V 4 tn�.i OWO cr wo Ul � o: •0 1 t iZ.. :j 41 fn w C% 73Ms 4.��,• .w wf ulm s ,•s = M• g z ..•'� V �+. ry +- '.tet ♦i ch J BOol O �j�'� xae {:{ �ca Z Z a v •• i �l V i W W J 9 Or-- 3.. w Z - O � Ofl c o ar-CD ZE to s w J.Ns ~_ 0Z gr La LZJ ct x Q Z r oc r sr c P . .uC. •'�• d r.J .•. d1 1/7��.�L J M M w LAS I�lf JSc CS pO 1 r•.. i ��L'�� • t .�,+ X13. .: �. V H &AS 4L W N� •r'+r � � N �, t �V _..+r a ci '� " o .� s✓ A.n Gar y ex '•0 cc 60606 claw •T' N t ! •: f .. `+�...-- _-__,..,,.+^ a I'''mo,•„. �,,.,�,.,.,,,....'"'.+'"�� v r i s't � 1 O �. a✓ •4 J •� c� "'-`_'"..,,-j.,.,.,Stn1t:J Att h:�31�(s_ j.`� "y Z � 0 7 u p� ^'� •r.,. � • 1 +-o c•�� f�C' r c* t n ay_ ii t�0f' .yam Zfyf• �Ar ;.:j � x.. ►'s ��o,,,r`n 4• Y� _N Jcc / . Q o CO 00 it t 911 r. ? ✓ I q Z 2 ©� a .w- 4k DO 3 C IN o us 11- �tE"r l ..ti '�j b .. SSO .• .-n . O fl fl O to d x`„ � / -! .f,,tb o r •'Stiff .5102•.., J f o ;. 1w qcc M�ww.. •�.D i w a0 �` e► 'T a -•�-o �r `o c?3J � ,t,S�� O dam,✓,,,,�,. :e � •,,,...r e�+.•x a 11 F'"tr �� y'�`i� t''" l:yOjtlS`3_:Z45.�Uy -� J .4/�'iiM titi��?•.y�1�3Zi� �M"'G�.i ? ~ iitl L^""•i9�,S•.f2f U.Yj • 'blK - • 5� ��``• s1r� ��4�}• . L �.•?Xj �C{!� .. .re i. •• r? ='4.,l�'�;� 4t.wit orr" t� '�^ 1j S C. _-o int 73 �- "= '%•Y.., All 'JJw't Jl •f.' .� , Jl� C'Ft ':f If'Jr. i "+ '� " ++<'•";e' 'fJJ' J,j Or '` '�,'. if.L} � .•� .,- vee..+' .: > >. 'p� �� :n• =ir,;;jllj '�: _ \ !'•. .:`mss I�^/ ! �� s�::.�� ''Cflcp�:�• i \'mss' :,,: 1 VII Vv •C i', w � is rSC. W �.•C'• f.. :...fir !r Ct,.� y It ")• J�,�„ jf All. ` 4.I vJ SIX -At �• Zr�Jl. .. t't ,r stay \ '•r}lf:r� 1� ^< 'iS<t v ••rf"- ! psi �t- S St:Jy�l !✓f-�: ✓ �. �. 41 S:_ . .� tr,•~`.^ ,�•�lStD. jJll.ftill Y " t ,�.v 'e' 1p Of thboOta In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Mav Is 011976 In the Matter of Approval of Contract 122-049 with Marilyn Ream for Consultant Services Related to Emergency Medical Service Planning IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #22-049 with Marilyn Ream for the purchase of emergency medical service consultant service " planning as required by the Association of Bay Area Governments Contract #29-219 for the period April 22, 1976 through June 30, 1976 at a cost not to exceed $3,000 of federal funds. PASSED BY THE BOARD on May 4, 1976. i I hereby cer ify that the foregoing is o true and correct appy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this uth day of May , 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Health Department By O Clerk Emergency Medical Care Committee MC Craig Contractor c/o HRA H 24 W5 IOTA 00219 Contra Cosa Counr7 S tanaao Form STANDARD CCN i RAC: (Purchase of Services) 22 - 049 1. C��' ^� �yent:=ica:i�^. tS,unber _• Department: lk aith Department Subject: Emergency Medical Services Consultation Service 1 ! 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: MARILYN REAH Capacity: An individual Address: 224 Sixth Avenue, San Francisco, California 94118 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is April 22, 1976 and it i termini to es June 30, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. i 4. Pavment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed S 3000 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described r Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Bay Area Emergency Medical Services System Grant by HEW, August 5, 1975, to ABAG (association of Bay Area Governments) and ABAG/Contra Costa County Agreement dated October 7, 1975 and as amended. 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code 53703, Emergency Medical Services Systems Act of 1973, and California State Plan for Emergency Medical Service. 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By ,J. P. Kenny Byc� airman, Board of S rvisors Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk Designate official capacity in business and affix corporation seal) By, State of California ) ss. Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) Reco-amended by Departmen The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared By before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they si ped it and that the corporation or rship named above executed the th4' i trursent pursuant to its bylaws Form Approved: County Counsel ��,#„Feso cation of its board of directors. ♦r ji By J OSi�GI , 421 Go°„ Un Motu 9o DIpu�y County Clerk fA-4617 ^�,� �Cr40 me �r;fey 1 crd order `x/75) ��:»_re�..._J Con-..--i .-,:sta County Form PAINIM PROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) 049 .cumber' 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: (Check one alternative only.] ( ] a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ c. $ , after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided hereunder. (X] d. According to the following schedule: $ 450 April 30, 1976 $1,275 May 31, 1976 $1,275 June 30, 1976 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands Monthly for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 4. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extant such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to per-Eons properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Initials: AI& Contractor County Dept. (A-4619 REV 6/75) 00221 'lun`y Standard .Orm. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 22 - 099 . Number 1. Co=pliance with Lair. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including _ut not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized represenza;ives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Con-^actor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County apree to retain a.11 documents pertai::_^.`, to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final pavnent demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. a. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may termina-e this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Conrractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is teminated. 5. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or othe:--dse, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Infor--al Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such In=o-tial Agreements when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any require'_ Srate or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amend-7.-a -:.-!y not :sateri3t17 cl:,a_^.Pe the tayment Provisions or the Ser rice Plan. Initials: A11 rdr-OW-6- _— Contractor County Dept. 00222 Y Cantr3 '_a .OL'n:y Standard Corm GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) Plumber 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Law Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of !said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Initials: Contractor County Dept. (A-4616 REV x,,75) _�_ 00223 Cont r a ;- ai.v Standard --arm GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 2.2 - 049 (A 2 — 0 4 9 ,ieun3er _. 18. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of .property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies Faust include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts Administration Unit, Ninth Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any.term of the General Conditions. Initials: Contractor County Dept. (A-4615 ^.:.r � '"�) (}V�27A -3- SPECIAL CONDITIONS Number r r � � 9 Paragraph 20, Insurance, of the General Conditions is amended by changing a. Liability Insurance to read as follows: "a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $15,000 for each person and $30,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $10,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence." All other provisions of the General Conditions remain unchanged and in full effect. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 00225 SERVICE PLAN Kumbe2 2 — 0 4 9 The Contractor shall provide not less than 360 hours of consultation service for the County Health Department in relation to emergency medical service planning. Services shall conform to guidelines contained in the California State Plan for Emergency Medical Services and Contra Costa County Emergency Medical Services Plan - 1975, which are incorporated herein by reference. Specific services to be performed shall include: 1. Planning and coordinating the establishment of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation - Life Support classes throughout Contra Costa County with the advice and cooperation of community agencies involved in First Aid and CPR teaching programs (e.g., Red Cross, Heart Association, Los Medanos College, various fire departments). Activities will include the stimulation of new public programs for: a. Senior citizens b. Labor and industry groups c. School teachers and pupils d. High risk or high exposure groups. These functions will be carried out with the consultation of the Contra Costa County Emergency Medical Services Coordinator, the County Health Officer and EMCC. 2. Development of an Emergency Medical Technician II pilot project proposal for submission to the State Department of Health. Responsibilities include developing the ENS system's portion of the proposal and integrating it with the teaching portion being developed by Los Medanos College. 3. Reports to be submitted at the end of Hay, 1976 and June, 1976 in the form required by County on services provided in 1 and 2 above. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 00226 in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19`76 In the Matter of Approval of Amendment #29-219-1 to Contract with Association of Bay Area Governments for Emergency Medical Services IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Amendment Agreement #29-219-1 to the contract with the Association of Bay Area Governments approved by the Board October 7, 1975 for the period October 7, 1975 through June 30, 1976 in the amount of $53,600, in order to amend certain budget provisions with no change in payment limit or term. PASSED BY THE BOARD on May h, 1976. I hereby certify that the forepaing Is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date oforesoid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Wkntss my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 4th day of Fav 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Health Department Emergency Medical Care Clerk Committee A1r roig Association of Bay Area Governments c/o HRA H 24 6P5 JLoSA 0� '7 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVEIVOU iTS REGIONAL PLANNING PROGRA4 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES RELATING TO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES number 29 — 2 i THE AGREEMENT, entered into the 7th day of October, 1975, by and between the Association of Bay Area Governments, a joint exercise of powers agency, hereinafter called "ABAG", and the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "County' , and which is incorporated as though set forth at length is hereby amendecl as follows: III. Compensation D. ABAG shall pay to the County the amount set forth above which" shall constitute full and complete compensation for the County's services hereunder. Payments to the County shall be made on a xeimbursable basis for allowable costs incurred during the preceding quarter. Payments shall be made after invoices have been sul—fitted to ABAG which contain appropriate documentation for total incurred project costs. The County shall not exceed the"individual budget items by more than 25% or $1,000, whichever is less; provided, however, that in the event of such excess expenditure, the County shall submit an explanation of the need therefor, and the budget items shall be readjusted so that the total expenditures of ABAG funds shall not exceed $53,600. EXHIBIT B EMERGENCY TICAL SERVICES BUDGET Total Source Required County ABAG Personnel Services Consultant Services $37,355 -0- $37,355 Clerical 4,000 -0- 4,000 Associated Salary Costs 2,245 -0- 2,245 Operating Expenses Office Rental 1,500 -0- 1,500 Office Supplies 3,050 -0- 3,050 Purchase of Equipment 3,350 -0- 3,350 Travel 700 -0- 700 aa22s W1cr0fi1m,d `lith b�0ra c'o" r ;BAG Regional Planning Program Meunber 2 9 219 Contract for Services Relating to Emergency ,Medical Services Page Two EXHIBIT B EPlERG ENCY MEDICAL SERVICES BUDGET CONTINUATIO14 Total Source Required County ABAG Operating Expenses (Continued) Printing -0- -0- -0- Mailing -0- -0- -0- Telephones 400 -0- 400 Public Education Materials 1,000 -0- 1,000 Ambulance Contracts 71,173 71,173 -0- Communications -0- -0- -0- MCC staffing -0- -0- -0- TOTAL $124,773 $71,173 $53,600 All terms and conditions of the Agreement not amended hereby are to remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS 14HEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized representatives, have affixed their hands on ASSOCIATION OF BAY COU1JTY OF AREA GOVERNMENTS CONTRA COSTA By: By: T• P. Kenny a rman, BoALM as Title: Shoervisors ATTEST: ATTEST: J. R. OLS OV, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 0 By:� / a,r Q •,: An Depgty Mary 'g 00229 _ . ------------ . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the AAa"er of Dues Increase for County Supervisors Association of California. The Board having received a memorandum from Mr. Arthur G. Will, County Administrator, transmitting a notice from County Supervisors Association of California (CSAC) advising that its membership dues will be increased from $26,646 to $30,406 for fiscal year 1976-1977, and requesting the Board's position thereon with respect to same; and The Board members having discussed the matter; IT IS ORDERED that an increase in CSAC membership dues Is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an order eiw u a on tlwi re=routes of said Board of Supervisors an the daft oforesaid. cc: County Administrator Wdnew my hand and the Sed of the chard of Supervisors affixed this 4thdoy of May 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Oepuly Clerk Mildred 0. Ballard N-24 1176!Sm In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Stats of California My 49 , 19 76 In the Molter of Authorizing the Public Works Director to provide Nuclear Testing for Central Contra Costa Sanitary District an Diablo Road, Danville Job X2571 (Work Order 554 8) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Public Works Director is authorized to provide materials tests for Central Contra Costa Sanitary District as provided for in the Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 1077. The Work will consist of performing approximately 20 nuclear compaction tests at an estimated total cost of $1,200. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976 i 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Dept. Wdnas my hand and the Seol of the Board of materials and Testing SuP*wa cc: Public Works (2) affixed this 4th day of May 19 76 N&T Lab. J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator ByUkja�� Deputy Clerk Auditor-Controller N. In aham H 24 any IOU 00231 t f. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , i9 76 In the Matter of Granting Extension of Time in which to File the Final hiap for Subdivision 4687, Byron Area. On the recommendation of the Director of Planning, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Coleman & Isakson for a one—year extension of time in which to file the final map for Subdivision 4687, Byron area,, is GRANTED, thereby extending the final filing date to June 24, 1977. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesoid. cc: Coleman & Isakson witneu my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors Public 11orks Director affixed this 4th day of Mav _ 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BYC..G.,.,.r. ,yam ' , Deputy Cleric Rond�ynn Shackles H-24 3/76 1$w 00232 I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Nay 4, , 19 76 In r:Ae Matter of Rental Agreement for County-owned Property. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director- is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement, dated April 1, 1976, with Margaret V. Spowart and Patricia J. Beck for rental of County-owned property at 100 Elder Drive, Pacheco, on a month-to-month, as-is basis at a rate of $225.00 per month commencing April 1 , 1976. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on-the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors cc: Public Works Director Real Property Division affixed this 4th day of May 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk icy Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 - 15-MN. I sham 00233 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California may 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Appointment to the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County. The Board on April 20, 1976 having approved a procedure for appointment of tenant representatives to the Board of Commis- sioners of the Housing Authority of Contra Costs County for two- year terms (effective on day of appointment) whereby the appoint- ments be by nomination of the Supervisors from the districts with the greatest number of Housing Authority units initially, and subsequently by nomination from the Supervisors from the remaining districts With the next largest number of units (wader which procedure the initial nominees would be by the Supervisors from District II and V); and Supervisor A. M. Dias having recommended that Mr. Bebe dill, 110 California Street, Rodeo, California 94572, a resident of District II, be appointed as the tenant representative over 62 years of age on said Board of Commissioners, for a two-year term ending May 4, 1978; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDAM that the afore.-aid recommenda- tion is APPROVED. PASS3D by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby codify that the forepdnp is a true and correct caput of an order *ntrnd on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the dote oforesaicL cc., Mr. Sebe Hill Witness my hand and the Seol of the Board of Contra Costa Counts Supervisors Housing Authority Contra Costa Council this 4th May . 19 76 on Aging J. R. OISSON, Clerk 2450 Stanwell Drive-224 By '..,�' _ _. - /%a . 1� .,, Cleric Conaord, ;allfcrnie 54520 Jean L. Miller �� County Auditor-Controller r Counter Adcdnistratwr Public Information Officer H 24 WS BOM 00234 In the &mrd of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May k . 19 .76 In the Matter of 1 t Contra Costa County Grand Jury Resolution Number 3. Supervisor J. P. Kenny having called to the attention of the Board an April 29, 1976 memorandum from Mr. Arthur G. Will, County Administrator, transmitting a copy of the 1975-1976 Contra Costa County Grand Jury Resolution (Number 3) which supports eliminating the multi—million dollar deficit in the Social Service Department by selective reduction in personnel and/or services; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid resolution is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify That the fongainp is a true and carred copy of an order erNered an tlw minutes of said Boo rd of Supervisors on the date ofannaid. cc: County Administrator Wd n m my hoid and die Seal of dw Board of Director, Human Resources-SuPwvhm Agency oRxsd tlis4th day of tray 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Cork RV Clerk Rondal Shac es H-N 3n6 ism 00235. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May k . 19 Z§. In the Matter of Audit Report for Contra Costa County Employees Retirement System and Request for Cost- of-Living Increase for Retired County Employees. The Board having received an April 27, 1976 letter from Mr. H. Donald Funk, County Auditor-Controller, transmitting the annual audit report of the Contra Costa County Employees Retire- ment System for the year ends * December 31, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid report is REFERRED to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) and the County Administrator for review. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the December 16, 1975 request of Mr. William K. Taylor, President, Contra Costa County Retired Employees Association Chapter, that the Board assure retired employees at least a 5 percent yearly cost-of-living increase, Is TRANSFERRED from the Government Operations Committee to the Administration and Finance Committee. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 Denby certify that the fan p kV is a tno and correct copy of an order on the nunutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date ofornoid. cc: A & F Committee Members Witness my hand and**Sed of the Board of Gov. Op. Committee MembersSup.rvnoes County Administrator awxed this 4th day of May 19 76 County Counsel -- County Auditor-Controller Personnel Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk C.C.C. Retired Employees Assn. By, 4Z. Deputy Clerk �d ed 0. BaIlard 14-24 3176 ISnl 00236 r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California May 4 . 1971- In 19► 71- to the Matter of Executive Session. At 10:44 a.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, California to consult with its representatives in connection with discussions of salary matters. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. At 11:05 a.m. the Board reconvened in its Chambers and proceeded with its regular agenda. 1 hembY Y OW the f«evoi V is a tow resod correct CW of an order entered on the aunutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Witness my hard and the Seal of the hoard of Supwvh=s affixed this 4th daY of May 14 76 tSSON, Clerk sya _ DNwtir Cleric e M. Neutel 04 24 OR5 IOM 00237 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May. 4 , 19 U_. In the Manor of Two Additional Superior Court Judges. The Board having received an April 21, 1976 letter and enclosure from Mr. Peter J. Hinton, Vice President and Chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the Alameda-Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association, P.O. Box 1828, Oakland, California 94604 urging that the request for creation of two additional Superior Court judgeships be approved; and An April 27, 1976 letter and enclosure having also been received from Mr. Daniel Van Voorhis, former Bar Association President, 1855 Olympic Boulevard, Walnut Creek, California 94596 urging that the Board support two (rather than one) additional judgeship positions for the Contra Costa County Superior Court; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the afore- said communications is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and cored copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Hr. P. J. Hinton Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. D. Van Voorhis S+Pervbm County Counsel affixed th64th day of May 19 -7.E County Administrator 11 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By C'.1 C. u.2�/�.�1' . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall H-N 3176 Urn 00238 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Maw 4 , 19 ZL In the Moller of Approve Contracts for Inspection Services with Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady for Re-Roofing of Veterans' Memorial Building, Pittsburg. (Work Order No. 5264) . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute contracts, effective May 10, 1976, for inspection services by Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady; said services to provide for inspection of the re-roofing of the Veterans' Memorial Building in Pittsburg. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. ' I hereby cm ify that the foregoing is o trio and coned copy of on order a owed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Originator: P. W. Dept Witness my hand and the Seal of the 800rd of Buildings and Grounds Svpervaors cc: J. M. Nelson affixed this 4th day of May 1976 R. G. Grady J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Department By .e...._ , Do" Clerk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator H" W5 IOU ONO ! Spt-CInAty;irI-r:ri.t: w'wI i.rr'ativC .5�rvLeaa t rvf. i n .;Ism,)eri�nn L Vn�1een. These variables are incorporated below by reference: a. Inspector's Weme A Address: J. :4. RMSON, 1905 Pacheco Boulevard, Martineez, California 94553 b. Effective Date: Mev 10, 1976 C. Project's Name, Location, A Public Entity: Veterans Memorial Building ReroofI 9th and East Street, Pittsburg, Work Order #5264 •• d. Rate of Compensation: $12.60 per hour 2. SlmaMMs. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. IRIM • COSTA 7 • BY Acting Public ltorks Director Form Approved: John B. CLov County Counsel Art irs-94 3. rties. Hffective on the above dare, Contra Costa County (County- Osner� the above-named Inspector mutually agree and promise as • fol].o�ra: ' 4. fig&pgral Owlifications & Conditions. County herebycontracts With . Iaspactor, as onr. specially trained, experienced, and competent therein, to perform the E-ngineering and administrative services of a construction • supervisor and inspector, including those associated with the continuous constructionaup�cvision position commonly known as Clerk-of-the-Works, fn connection with the above constrnctivn pro oct, Which services are necessarily incident to the services performed for the County by archi- tects and i, the design and construction supervision of con-' " struetion projects. This agreement does not preclude other employmut of the Inspector if it does not interfere with the duties and hours of Maack required herein. ' S. ',Term. The duration of this contract is the duration of the said con- 'E project, but either party may terminate it by giving 30 days advance written notice to the other. . 6. finMgI unties A Instructions. The Inapector's construction super- vision and Inspection services ludo the Following• general duties :. and instructions: a. Status A Relationship with County A Architoct. Ris independent •. contractor r0J.*tJa%n511Lp WIth the County para s tt C which ezis.:s be- tween the County and'•.the Architect; but he is subordidate to the Archi- ' tact because than Architect is responsible for the design of the project and for general supervision of its construction pursuant to the County- Architect agreement. FI I'm fib nd with board acdw • 00240 } ::r E? �+ry s+x� t t$ r#.fid'$ap €�� ' S �i`! mac= 4, h it y� -�.. K _ h I a y+. , p n�i:rr;,,,�, t< � j«" ..1 tyt�._ i'�,;> 4 } :th„ 'des, :;,° 'as"'s.�'' J. �I�19T`,�„ �k rt' �i w x �:Ii. °**-i% 1171 . f*l I II x Z".I +l i tl..3:k,t.�,r�.C, ;:ttmctitri: - He wti[�r,�' ,"„ :° a-'`� 1 � �G��G��r �4 r4 3 - �; ;�uhde zt.-.Itwi.tu-. rcl,aLi�a.tnIi t»i t .,• u-.►rl-* �::c 1.I JO �iut ,Z" cocutw llk,iuojnc•. _ �` ".. . -;t, trout . Ll c contxaclaar s pub u riuLeadent:, uncl «� w21 ac a A3ets *5 the A _ " cicit.ics, .acuui Le.: :ttall Qot C3vc ia..I . a. - s f rc �Crucfio directly to bhe Coatacta =c se "ex1.ontract ox(::j a, had he�`�:hall�i�diately advise the A�rchite �oi�>sa1`111-1.111-y,ca.e v�Irher;ftli` tk 61 , aDw .v r+Gpri+rcntativc« rL re in:.tru:t:ioa to the Contrect+�rr �1�4cc:: ` �ITT� p, _;.. air f > "` "-ta s t ro 'c t a7:" I �" Cou�a -Cantu ctar- CoordinaLi-6a11 .:" of 1 c. II :;ball ei'tact;vcxy,_rrrin , -, clo.>, coorc n §tioa of ., afiractori s titoft aM-oI.a11 r req1�1.ui,rcmcatm,by, tr�qucat �reg<Cla�cat�e�ence o fir, k �othcr suiLabl� ,aa. specia];ly v xie pip jccti;,iavAlvc ultcrm�iau. oe ct:uilii' lR a or additiaas to $a exi`tiaG tuncticaic:<; Iocilit"ys;Which must be11, msiataiucd awui�v fiat; ;uait 3uritt coa�fuct of-coastructioa.;park, acxf thcreforeh xequixe spedibl a cte3 to fob cocu2itiaa.. ��ticb may. affect such coaCtnuiq; operetioaa: =Se�ssha l�icoo�rdfii ��. -_ accessary At errupti oas 'of normal CouaV:activities;with' the Couaty�aad Gene�u�`Con- l4`. trsc11 �tor beforehand. r;t �« II I 4 I�f, °� ,. iiiiii211 11 4 f *7'; :d.' ,Tat'.f' arity 'bltth "Caatract. He sball become tbaroughlyd find bi: wits' s can It 4 n tract.docuats iacluuing sicc;ficatioas; drawings.and, addenda, anile he chaLl fs� r acid check 11 the adequacy and. accuracy of requixed "as>bui lt" drawings grepar'11ed Atli � t oatractor'.s c�nloyees (see alio T-$, l;elov): F ;W�1," _ s — __j 11 � �� J . —_ �r F e. exsonaf Prr�:ccacc. �.Obvrstion: He~'shall.°be,personIlypresetlul11.�.breaeve itrwok = M s theins pe�ozz ed.-'.uvea oa overtime, night holiciuy or xeekead basis when"sj"d R e c Ak- a sha?1.4attec rteetie>�s.called by:the Courcy, Cciatractc� ark Archf ee ! '" 4h s , Oendirec` +,`.,_ersoaa]. Qbs+�rvafioas..of vark being irerfarmed by,,L Geaer8 Can a rti � � *, Asad subcoatxacto a s) for certikicatiaa to,,County-Ot:nerstbat such,'�worFr, bei � orme' ,in�a ki7.lful aanaer aced is accordaaee with the regaireme of"thm cont rticc� Q F "">- t d . Advice k Su¢Btistions. Re shall advise County oa ,- _ coasiAswctfoa�� suc -- as s ti .c3i � }� _-_ l; i� s sage :oars:or,revievittg constrndl iea schedules, hey sha71: ev$1 a sou ,, ,5al as cr. �odificatroa...which; have. bees:rade to.sccotam dat ,-%" n the ob pyo Ie a Tx�e�port the_t frith-.ieooa�-_ us to;the Az~chitett,, sail,i shall "rev ew ane redo _ I'llt� 4:: eodatioas ao :he Contractor on all pay estimates. ' _ 5 Sbecial Duties�� Instr�tinnpt .RUe Inspector's.dirties apecfalZy coacer� s ' r grass:of the �+ork°incluse :the=fes t a. General flee,-girdslF,�IAs. 8e shsT7.. maintain a'= 2e at, 8ndbe award th coaLents o. , the loca`, State, federal, .11 T, "1lFPA, :etc., codes`, =g0Iatfo , di eat �I_q xements, etc., x, ch-are"pertiaeat ta�this.pro ect,, ;ands arm' ec 11 - - ve aad,he shall maintain a ,complete tine of all.dravings, specifcatiocontrac -- , s �z k changerr o'rders, ,directilii etc., which d11ie:VC , to ba done bj,��th `"M ase p I -81x0 pal, .above . K ria;> ,31 � . �b. .Diary Departs. He shall main,_"'. a banal,dai:Iy, diazy,r notin'Aheixel o t _- s . ,r� ' z iunoblems7 .`confcreaces' aad'remairks; and he shaiZ subu#t aLt� reports deemed aecEssa Stateaad Federal aaeaGies; Architect soil County,-which,�7777 ,shsSl.laetfinel acuisncb - - detail to .satiety.the purpose 'oL the report. _;-, ' h i a _ y � � fir s ,C I�tateriel 'Records.:` fe.shall maintain records;oak ma and o {egicfsp a. __ t delivered at t site, shoaic�g manurf8ctu�rers! rimes,, cath ,to , ? serial numb 4A , _- x n x t " 4 , ._• s;� p a € "' iu4s. P"^�a�,.a «Y.M".a�fi� — ttype, 'nor other .identii'ylgg infor�aatioa«fibereon aad`aoting whetbe a� w co liaace'1.z1th:the,plans, shop;d» ,ngs�aad/off spetsi icaytioost* a approi e t Architect.1. .fie ".shall ce,„tt t4 Coaoty that all: materials.uusedtia caast~ructfo a. - specified is contract docunoents sail; on com�iletian sail/ortiins unto eacts ap ca _ "# Z. Meta, °He shall collect sail:assemble,:�celevent iaxormation `(ifagguaratrte ce = xcates, maiateanacenua7.s ,operating insttactoas,;Keying schedules! catalagaumie11 veadars" `addresses ;soil file nc contacts; etc:,,o= csaterialsaad aequ3 aea ; ia ; P _ Cr* g'_t, uirel), .sail at'the.cousQletion. of the prv�ect� be'shall deliver tlEiis fagormatfon 0, r Architeillct ;fo1.r delivery t0 tha'Chanty ` M, `$. �Pa ~iar..rervicCs &,-"Re. F a � I . x r y __--, e'*urscze at f r h�cpecwas. hi � , ,r - a a1, x^ IIII ,a. C�LtJ► :shall' AY.'Inspcctor for these scrvic.es, at th� atovrate, o�ae � r _ airy m�n#�hly pad.Yp+rxiods:of Che lst the 15th aa3 ;the 16t�itttxroro �tbc las 'da fo�tas �; Y iooath - paymixt will be crsde=on the 10th of the, month or on the 25th o ... he°Awath i est , ;L 3x =',.lie pay period ti a demand billing is,r,i4 , cdl.by the? Couaty Piiblicl ork11 o'De_e11 �ta� -- �a the last C ;xzit- v�rwi day of the period.' '''o � -- J . _ `fir b. Hiles authorlwc�3'by the tfioad tspianer-Surveyor (Public.,Wrk:.,-Dtrecrar cit r - his..deputy-shall be rciabur;ed at a rate to be mute wtsll j/ agreed:upas trona-tf me tar tfca {rt'�Y - rcSlect.iit�;.actual seri a:tths#;taC coat:.. ,�x y �: � � s t+".:y,"x"+" n ,� § 4., aa.v7 s r� x..r.7,°F .aFxlit ,�*x `aJ'„ R - � t. �i, �•. a -4 n r ,� '. �� „I i'1 ` 'ram ar r t Kart ,,,, �?, E +. 'N,t a.W,�tr, 4.F: J yes .'. �a k* ' i y .11 �� ,. '._d .,y.....,. ..,tw ,"t�!:�--�,�- �i:U, r �`tr`$;: "5°` r , . :.� 4 t ;`tz 3^'r ,gam s y' r `?.rX',.J«y'� aP. P I iil�l Iii '4. h. Q y4` .N ANJ Y' fy 'u ,yq 59 � {j�i�1�1A`g � k '� ..ii*-..,,to✓4s v^ `7"'t ,. *,. ,..nes,`'.". .&ii.+k.' ..- fi Y' amu.,:. .. ,:F;*;K;` .�, `,c"af!§rtkiW�1't6- C l�r< '1 �.�.�l,; q%d7aRFf�,��,{ '1��,. gg $. Insurance ReyuiY�:�:4, Be±ore performing a4rurk under this Contract, Inspector rN.-; at his own ek;eaf:e fu n3.:h Lounty with certi- ficates or oth.:- ::r:i : ' lu cL ide=e of his coverage by Public Liability Ittsurant-4 , �:.: •a.: ..Lao acts in performing the duties required by this Contract, in amounts of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence, and Property Damage Liabili- ty Insurance of at least $50,000, both of which shall name the Inspector • and the County as insureds. 10. Enforcement and Interoretation. of Contract. The County's agent for enfoand in this ontract shall be the County's Bold Com- U1ssioner-Surveycr (Public honks Director) or a deputy. 11. Ad ustment of C ansa an. The rate of compensation may be adjusted by nutua consent part imrolved for good cause shown. • .. '•{'.: •"fir• ••.. :_3- - - . 00242 • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costal County, State of California may 4 , i9 76 In the Math of Approval of Contracts for Inspection Services by Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady for Various Roofs at Contra Costa County Hospital, Martinez. (Work Order No. 5263) . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute contracts, effective May 10, 1976, for inspection services by Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady; said services to provide for re-' roofing various roofs at the Contra Costa County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the forepoiep b a true and correct cW of an order enNted on the minutia of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforewd& Originator: P. W. Dept - Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of Buildings and Grounds sup«v;wn cc: J. M. Nelson affixed " _41h—daY °f MAY . 19 lk R. G. Grady J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Department 44;X:� , p"uty Clerk County Auditor-Controller 00993 , H 21 AR5 low p A i n • �' • •i l�ie;:i:�:r•rin-s:�::�1 �•::t ::eCLs'. Scrvices Coen::t:a ur1:i.-Pa Sut.e ryisinn :t insivent .on 1. Vnrri_nhhles. These variables are incorporated below by .rcrerence: a. Inspector's ?lame & Address: J`M. Belson. 1905 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez, California 94553 b. Effective Date: ft 10, 1976 e. Project's Name, Location, & Public Entity: Re-Ro2fjag of Various Roofs at the Contra Costa Count hospital, 2500 Alhambra Ave ., Mtz. (WaMt UNerno. 3253) • d. Rate of Compensation: $12.60 per hour ' 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. F COMM COSTA USPECTOR / •� 2 J;1 . gy ` • Acting Public Vorks Director K• Mels Form Approved: John B. Clausen County Counsel • • .: 10) Depqq 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra Costa County (County Owner the ab eve-named Inspector mutually agree sad promise as follows: 4. General Rualifications A Conditions. Couaty hereby contracts with Inspector, as one special y train , expeirienced, and competent therein, . to perform the engineering and admiristrrtive services of a constriction supervisor and inspector. including those -associated with the eont2.nuous construction supervision position commonly known as Clerk-of-the-Works, In connection with the above construction project, which services are necessarily incident to the services performed for the County by archi- tects and engineers in the design and construction supervision of con= itruction projects. This agreement does not preclude other employment of the Inspector if it does not interferes with the duties and hour:- of vwk required herein. . 5. ' Tenn. The duration of this contract is the duration of the said con- strn t-En project, but either party may tendnate it by giving 30 days advance written notice to the other. 6. General fi=ties & Instructions. The Inspector's construction super- vision and inspection services uiclude the following general duties • and instructions: a. Status A Relationship with County h Architect. Us independent • contractor re ations :ip with the County pa_a les that which exists be- tween the County and* the Architect; but he is subordinate to the Archi- teat because the Architect is responsible for the design of the project and for general supervision of its construction pursuant to the County- Architect agreement.. Microfilmed .wish board WE -1- •,. . • 00244 '�; „ - r ;,: + t � 1y'Rt�9I r r 4 Yxr �.,j, s ,:u.ti; ,s �I � °I ��1�- srx�.Il 1111-111-_{^� ,S �.� 11 Ii qua = �z'x: ,�y, ,.t,x§trn �r{Y s,.s rt''� ''y,'3s,�y�" �r'� ',; � y i.:-- eJ; t' :_+ �� ,: it ra .X" .*:%i +?#t Z^ *,.s: +.C Z,i1 � ,�il:,, a"s Q 3� LL nkf�d��jLl C 1.bU Ma+I _ "' aiidcr CaaJ3,�7 . ". cLit; c.:,3 ul t-he vi rt»en on' ttie- ja►b buts ltc t;lf4 ,rcdcutucu.Gb r a 4�,, `duly t gW h the etaritruetar.:; b su�iwinteadcnt,�and shaltz aot a sttc, tIiiW`Cacitrsii Lo dutriew, aid l,C - -wi , tzot: CwC i=Lruct1oan c��arectZy.!to ttic Coatrncto es�'C ` �� x u contractor(r. , aad he.�-fi l . ,i=:L,cdiately�,, v,i a77-7,the Arckl�hitect ot11', , "cased s�her Gaunllflty r+� z�i:^calative'.. ^t t ..� c to-- : : hr s r �� ar p jilve nr* Ila+. oa.. t0�the Cacl rJc.L » %-,,, Q-a , N ,R�coa,.,*,,.;� ?: ! �i ,, '" -' ,r, .9'.r�'S.p i xfs rW.°s s •�: M.y , C-m` CO-Unt 1�Ca'atrui : " .�'"' }r'S ti 4 M ' Qr CootYt3r�L nn II shalLr ct ectivcly,Zolatas cnc,los c _ tion of Lbatrnctor's rlc aad o�►aer':� equiresedtx bye 2Ye�uc�nt . :reg, coi ezea a �'o h � rc� ,r ' - 'Zn meg. r '�lLlvFa, ii7 4r� �M, �s,"s..a:' ,�" _ ,� yotfiersuiLeilcrmu ,� �gec3a],l�Y;uhcrt: pro]ccs�imralvc al > rads ;. �J.:l1ic ° � = or�ddition11 � t� ��so.^exictia� ivactioaaC iact. y; jibich mast teantliaincdu �f c - '`~ � t3�tiQ unt cluriz. ; coculuct of coaaiuctk6w-varx,� and - hcrefore�rcqufr sgecf� 2"e n� ��- �w � fiolob , Witions vbich ,,Ot affect.,. uch:�continuiu; ogeration f �H� ��ial��cooidf�a�tt ��ary i:itcrrugtioos of aormcil County�1 .ac1'1151tivI.itics ui�.h3 the County aad Genera?�Co trsctor beSoreh d. 1. `��`� iVC� �. g 3 _ .q,, '=e t ' &r-` j y..rS.sY,7ix a. �' - - x r d. Fmci?3 xity-arith Contract. He shc�,13:.�becoace �A�a,,�� '� - k r,{, ,* teat dxc_eatsx aclu i gg=sgcci�ficat3oast",drawl ngs ands iddeac3a, as> 1 a # dad eck '..he $d uac aad acc at uir�ed, "as_'"bu12t" drsnri ' il � Ke - Coati ctor's een see algia -e' tie t ` ,t1m" �k �l��p t 2. '�'�.^�J - . ar & a Y 1 h, ,r`.y 3 X. 'F� Si 7'ri'' ^y s 11, hIt' Vie. Pe�-soae]. :tcoce & Abse stfaoR. k be rsoc�crl�y f Ak, ea +r _ - Hey shall L� z.�, G3 _a,' . l:;. -verfsiiLif'Y► ,��r• wQ V I'll 11 t7,7� Ate. �"�fil r:L�, t��iii `S {�.m2;NAr• ,(A � 11` 1,uhall.`-attecld etitt$s r.caR];3.cci by theF Cannty ,COntrsCtOr #(�p��{w, he " _4� `TJ ."C 1diTeCtlersdSl81 Ott►�P11i8t.iDAS ai vOrk" gexlOr�ed {�10 /sem X - ¢ ��' *eye x '�. f dcid subcontractors fcr�il cert3,>- 4--eba to -owner that such �rar ; s;R tbei o r ci�a ki, , u3 a atter aac'. o accordance vi °c �^ _ - 1. ,; rec�nirec eats o they coatrac docame .�#:� Advice & Swa enti oas. 'He r,W,l advise County on aI1 waift sts ti1i 1on Lniat' 2 suc ,:�'.s11 uggeszi,A ^^c aage':o f I -_, �g construciioa schedules;, hee,shelf rev" a I a� gest� aasIW WE or„ �adiiicat act.. vrhich lave=been made to sccoamactate oar the �ob� o i a� a T',� report tie With reco«�ciea3atioras to h� Architect, aod.he sba11 re+;teur�and mai �r llw� iaeadatioas oto the Contractor as:all ► estiiemrtes. ' ` ,"_ , ;< � - q 1 e,^ # :^ ., *.a, r , t a ,�a.rrrrr,M y.3•, x E a - :x * * r e "f r iw ' fi x ' r 3, , :SaeCis].��ltt�e5 de �laStTll�:f .OR$.. le IRS�e i W dntie$ cone I - �af xtie-',wrk Sac ivae tbee fal�R�iiS.RS CfBZiJ► rf ' v' r a w. '11, 1. [�.'Zal' i'" a �a-Ft OS. � �r - si 4 t `t ^r 4 '' 1�1 t _ h,4 � .,ra�r�rr � ilw ,�.�� well! � J�� 11 M/� Y�4��jtS•�ys�1�4''+..r0�f I N + coatlentsa. W ) F4.��t�� r�o�11►, LT t OtM1 fs ch Y/ � �i Y � 11 IUla. IKSe ",.i '�It:1 �Ch �1e ]�ICk�"I�p'�isk?:�CCtx BRf�O4.' jq�lItb ,- w: ,,; .,.�, �,r. ,, . . ,r, -r 11:. - �p 8 5mataiR i� lr:i>� =f IR aL:% t�QR6 SCA - 1i'.Y w ?+. i '.r+ I "' rt hfi '9141 chngge:ceders, direr#ves, etc., �I'llah3.ch detexafaea r�a�ck to tieF done thCea" „9: ,, �„ � F' fi11- tkF,+t t-V Sn r{s.#4'.Y 4*01& It .,,i S .r4 o� wig .F •i �: �r ^„ TBb"tom .•a„� y�” 7fl.^ a►ad ar aa11�d�3be g sub�itrall1. "I I — te a; � LL rr1`111a `tea# " '^'„' r L 4 W..w�y.a '1 'LY x to ^die 1 S?,f b t f�' ,za f ,.+� waW l s _ '4411 M r" .T.i+� i. Y5 "Sr' a'*4 . 'a.. M "4.`. P rj 4 : Y s k <•-.dye ! �3"f'.' ? _¢ -- 'A i. ^"X 3111� �Y,1. Y ♦ S t i ::: '` w, �;, .�t >:: '�P�ey� yr'f ` I __ ► . 't�: � # 4af as aTOT Z ...: d+M+.y,*�'4 r f ,g ��II��Y�� 1+/ '!•' j Ift n � Y M 4W ice '... x , - i_..s �I 11' ter.: ..aaf .,..�.-.. 'r,4t 1^ L,_-;b,.x' t -I-(WI 4iu e"atraet doe mwou , A!Iop+oa 1UOat hod, as a �'` 4, $r ,a.: -jac � ;41I aid "�. 4M7r�MYM '—'�A�._�'—_ .... w� r. r 11. '_a�rT f,'" '>ip ,a 14 O .r a �� F:�M .,*,.lttC.,� a •J�WiriP ,f ' s �iJ"�'' r S 11 l�' a of o the yaat� .ba sbi damar too ter **CUteet dor +deliver► to tti�"Co=tY- _11 &, `_ 11 Iit k 11 I �.A , _ 114' .DRi C�M "'44 1 L'i w�✓•gI.�11M�i. �sm MY�1► �., �y4 I t„ 'J,�, >._11 ' Tx, ,.� _I.� ■II/ Y �!■ .1�� lll�.t•1II.t1�� IIAII�. - - e"` _ �" ( " , '* :o- Y t i.?t- y+ FW. v'� .',I„pmt�t _ a. d .shs� j IRalacetor Sor CSO ��Csr, ut is a Q� r ' f r #� i$t�� ° tbntbu, y=pal' lX�$:O ,tom"U ,'C- �Ae'�J " , ; lC l� t" ti, Q �- , h ,� N "� Ai.;` fit �1'>� �. b�! !! OR 1 ! Q !`. #Il t " OR t�iC Rf Ii4'F f „`+ i "- ,#sq :per► period .if <a dca", 1ailliR$ LS ecce Yt�t.bit.thct":' Ifa r ' k " .:°ilfi�t t. "y/ R1�1 � Q# ier�.fad. '�zx '^s�E� f `�-4,. :. ttiear;e si:aUi+ar3�. bat tba Aoad t�aoaOt rrt�r-8utwI'llay�ir (Fiih► tdrte�D€reet�oi xB � r i +'i ' ?!ly��'71 4t Q rate �i0 �Q t s�t�'►C� {I�Q4:�'QRf,.t 'tRYa t r 1� 11, _ x - .. 4b�w.+. Y £ w . �. JY + w r .1 I I.I 11 'w .�� a .,,,gt�;'fid ,: �w`M: 1. •.' • �.. #1. -„.t 1 ..%,:I, - Lf. - Y., », _ - �^ _ - R v _ % _ t .F .. c.- OI 11 r1� - tgIIl 11 A t4. 7 ti =2 .-'"'ta- 4 with Wil- + x , �� , ; , .. .. its isrla tb� da& rogalrad � i ,►wants of at t $25a0OoO for a.12 a�iaa out of badtly Injuries or death L any one paraun and $5COvOOO for mdo at paroons in ow ace dont cc q aid 4PsaoMt7 t Immmuce of at IA"t ASO„000,0 both► of W shallseam t�; IA.. AW that County as laawrada, 10. t.. Mm Coon, l s agent for be dw Coast a Road.,Coin- u. 'tea rata at ca�poAs t3cw� say be adjustm&" consent of Me pare as, Imolned for soW cause ate. t 002, Z r, K� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 .019 76 In the Matter of Approval of Contracts for Inspection Services by Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady for Various Roofs at Contra Costa County Hospital, Martinez. (Work Order No. 5263) . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute contracts, effective May 10, 1976, for inspection services by Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady; said services to provide for re-roofing various roofs at the Contra Costa County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a trw and correct appy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: P. W. Dept - Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds S"Pery sora cc: J. M. Nelson affixed the t —day °fY . 19 JSL R. G. Grady J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Department By 27 D"Ksty Clerk County Auditor-Controller 4€ 243 H to W5 IOU Spc•ci:tAn.%ii. :I-ring--44:41iis;st ::CrVi.cca _ Inspection 1. Variables. T11oze variables arc incorporated below by ,reference: a. Inspector's Mame & Address: . J. M. Belson. 1905 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez, California 94553 b. Effective Date: May 109 1976 c. Project's Name, Location, & Public Entity: Re-Roofing of Various Roofs at the Contra Costa County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Ave . , Mtz. o r . o. =31 �. ' d. Rate of Compensation: $12.60 per hour " 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. CONTRA COSTA INSPECTOR //.1.Z116 . gy Acting Public works Director M. Mels Perm Approved: John B. Clansen County Counsel _ ./ 17 11 aw 77—Deputy 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra Costa County (County-- , Owner the ab we-named Inspector mutually agree sad promise as follows: 4. Generaltuelifications & Conditions. County hereby contracts with Inspector, as one specially train-0, expeirienced, and competent therein, to perform the engineering and administrative services of a constrt:ction supervisor and inspector, including those associated with the continuous construction supervision position commonly known as Clerk-of-the-Works, In connection with the above construction project, which services are necessarily incident to the services performed for the County by archi- tects and engineers in the design and construction supervision of con-' itruction projects. This agreement does not preclude other employment • of the Inspector if it does not interfere. with the duties and houra of work required herein. 5. ' Term. The duration of this contract is the duration of the said con- struct n project, but either party may terminate it by giving 30 days advance written notice to the other. 6. General Putles & Instructions. The Inspector's construction super- vision and inspection services uzclude the following general duties • and instructions: as Status h ReLationshie with County & Architect. His independent contractor re ations iilb with the County pars les that which exists be- tween the County and' the Architect; but he is subordinate to the Archi- tect, because the Architect is responsible for the design of the project and for general supervision of its construction pursuant to the County- Architect agreement.. !1l ofio in .with hoots DFAC • - -1- " 00244 - I ts4 0l i 1 1 M t .2 .,,. +y k a s a t i�';, '.`s pa"�"', Aj} i y s1ST las k:�, sst�i�at`AZ, tN.,i I.,�'zg 11 ��I s� 11 I - ___ "i is rx t t- x i 5$ t t a .'"- i g;..� ,x s$,.. � � y c i ld',,i�,75 Sit s ike:SBsi p,.i. i'; 1 ; � t.� ,..aY .�M .:c c•» h;yu t 1::,z". rs 7 a t: 7 L SI "'i;�.f, i E;, 4 s7,7r.. :��1, rl I�� i I t :;�. ;°..: ,,',,'<. ,,., r ».; fs 4L t A,, , c a A -'s r a ., , ,,' {@gt'say x uV tex.. r!+`3 G�ttL Er a,tii S YB� 4.,I rl''I is k,. c:s ,v= ,.�?.� # 't'" .'* k4 ,?,., ..` :# `:s''i! W t pie 5'�S inu,7 z Hl� .�,Rk` _,i.6 3i�1 �s' VISI i 'S6. !p 3 11 ._.,� * ''I'll . is .rp. IL rR "•` "I!i �n �i%�IICt.,'III R�ff, 4"�;:,y U1lI 1,II i�yl�}4.55 a�°�';`�s'yryy{�yy =� ::y_�it �w: �`t }� }py'��., ,.yyy.,. �. +t_,. ��.r,...�/�.'...�.t- ;:/:m� f,�*{'as{ t,,M.,W „.�,`as :`.'.Pra�y[r.. . '/� 'x^i■}5' �z�{'�i Ic14 3,> - tka LMMM7r$,M�r111Y ,. $�1.. �4,iM�Mi*�► s §... ..� ,..,� ct� ea�, .itc k„IGb+ NkM,��b.t V! �TGI�RWr +..RWJe �r}iyjJk l,�» _ a r ''x 'r t Tyt a g a. 'fit "'"1° `* aP4'. _ , . w O i.itC cR a1x*c ttjr .► .l"' ase QAC Q "a«S • `f• �/y .r - ,�i 3 '^SYS,i '�i�^ ,m M �t'� .1 'F-I ,1 anV, — F ,x x >W y r s ll/w , ,,.,r..;.k � a :i p: -,. ,,aes.... .. arap', ✓^^ ks x'�^11na? ,s.,. r�, a - � �1 1�i i :,�tC ..x itll itRC L e 1txt �Ost i tC 1 Codlkile �G'oit tam. MA w '''.k'"'a, a t F x � # xZ,"3�, .,.c> 4zfq, cAw-�`„twx 4';r, swr >ra'S ' t 0a racLc r(.��, uali Atte,;>at tc ad-4 they t►ccfi. �ete,�&I _ e7 ;rr..aura .:. F. 4Y "t `4 ft4 "" MsFD'. >~ij-N .r`-`>., '`, 14;� �i�ctt;� pry:,^R;rRt.hive;. i,�te; tr .:t# Q x Cs�Rlt ct►»e �- " , .�, ' r r ` r h' i u ft�+ "a .3,^S r P :. r '' a`r `k' ` r'�i,• 'h'° t'"L ,�..fNr 11" tf dam,.,�' :.n sa r: r frw. '4 ,: � ,y,Pp' ,c�� ..�;s .�, tet, r�t��"Y _=5��#fir,'`+ ..,�`�.�'�1`��',+`�'� ' R R x 40uRt r- aaRtra'�+tz►r°°Chord iGi0n I�' s�7:LJ xffttivi:.i iR�4Aii c1o" c..� a I'llW"'r t 1 r r r S. waw 5n' -» G a -A,W i 3 ra ,a* opot, �.brxtrcr'� mrk tad Winner, ata by�,!"rct�eu ; ecciei � nt* o x I'll ,RR, thcr sui�.able baa.. ,. lyallq sRhere.: g ..uta vc al �ttfoa �cR G Q o , x-1 �� r.,_a `21 w 4 ',�' w.�"", rR � i"�''^'�1r-. ,µ 4N"' Na ,.3�. s''3;a " •%,s!0� rY't'L�27Y,,r 4e"' - }° nor I t3au as �xi i SuactiC4,1.1 tamul' ', wbfc �muiata ae a a „ I � ,1Lx' ► ;L�DQd3WC� O� C4t7�t�a:`�t $ z,tR thcre:Ornlik, tar s C� tit t;C3 >,��, y.s +.,fir *s'r . r .x ,t-1r r is �: f a r "`•9 wa r' +ria Ilia* #aD�R)b C6iid t Otl,3r ticb Cyt 81�IeC� such.-COAtLQtitt>„ O ]'a��,oR -1 Ae sb��ct�Rl d " 'F+2 "I 11M 7 h {te,:- ,. € X: rw # ra, r,-n,� v 3. .p' ,+ p,ta$,4 rte"'"* u,.w aecd�ss-Inar1-1�1y11 „ n til . aas of i t CoacdlGy Rktivitfes Frith then Ceaunt O ad 6e ea xct+Or bei4taehaad. _ int ,�� Tl� t ., i ; v �Z `1 r f .+ .«. .!A n t5, .Y 4� sig•# 'r, t' fii ,! i, .ii ,v,t YepllS � } /�/� to ��dkyf'��I{d 1n V}' i�,{�1 v' } f fi,,�tr8ct b�dac""�eats,' aCRRt SL`tMCBttRRfa►t diRagsfi aqd addGtRtIRi,� aha i w$ d cttgcx edt:�uacy-aad ��k o��'»aa�¢buil�'" draW►i re b' th � .v .,Y dor y i"" `^ .s a-5-4 -7715%x'�'r• �a'`+.;eV. ''°" K f4 �r .✓" --- - �s"is itor"5 e� s S0. 4O -$ e,�o + a *tEvi'a' `�^:; y`".+r , rn�4.,Y, 1 *' fl ,"S+t' a#Yd e*57"� C ar hl ( M � fr ';Ferad,=l p"..5;RLef.' k �1`."1 trf fla ;tt6'stla "be eradll lXy resell she stCrs� - 'Y ';-, �..r r� 3 t iFn ql*'�,9$ y,. R�t'4amr.'m'^ >'6` = _�,, 0) ?' �v.�i/Ca Oa t1Ya " tt ��Q d a H.�'i°T�iR'e C1l1 S lA f�$ - .w- ,ice - { - s,8,u rr` ts.Re'"'a ak' t°"n t �'.a4+ a, zztr*-Q�.� a mss: - ,11 sbguC 13 the � ,I , , y �G � ^+ p_•y.7cak'. t 7 E4'! C1Y 3 .tz.� � `4-. �j4�/+�e�'. /�, '7777' ,' e�i {moi'kL10.oM J Y�Yand'"' `FfK '`" $ k """M"' r . '-.;,, z• r r a -Y t a •1.y::`*' t 3 't, �S'; '. ,m.,s x' .. `� v srf�.t�)y,,a ' r"riw, ,y , M �' dt�S c trac or�� #r ��c ti��lh rQIt- "M* tr¥$�UC� fit - r tea- MiMIwK. 111,11.1" '" 4: +. ,u a.11--�rw ., t " iYr u�>ts,4C*'n; y,SS .iD �I�;t ' C�IICC 'T�tt ,��l' tttli. Ol ' 1jC011traC ddCW . . Y�ezTpiae.?TMsr"`' '` R 5 ra4 A�' R i. "F a? '° aye' F�R".J�"'s ,4}� 4"Y� �t''S?s4`{ie�,' r'^.'bi.,'`' +w r�. Fit Sa;raiw '� _— p. d -k=y' c- .. '� ..' .>R r .'sr` /'2r,'F e t>+dt `"9 `¢v �-° t«x arrr y, '• .. s t sea'+' C� �;' � m{ i a.r t..r ''x t.� ia'+ Cha ;#, :',t»'4'„�w _ r Y3Ce 'dc°Su ,m: +D!!S. $e 5�18�.1. ��.'ORl 0 -,Ol van-."'CO j (' _ P�3`.,u spy . .mow Sx .a uq s„Y" 4, r aB�tz` .tfR) RitiC 1»! � t50>.` Or l 'e CQastt'gC1.tOQ S e8 I �� , �`'C /�� i1 /��1T�e�� 'blic bav beeRiy mad�Vto ac fob' b _ „R�.,t,�,-;K?. c.a - u .,+. s » f~ r ,rte.. s �,`t"ti,aw .zx Q �W R epOr e� ith x:cndatioas =totx,,,�xrbfifit a�R>dhesl ° �'z amps eci is a R x }0.r�/'v�;y�^fhc,',�u r"".3,4,�y�.'�S� ..r fi - /.��,z7 L .r arc cd . ,,.ra"�3'y,,Y1 r a..e.,BMs p r 4 w,.,y Kf W a WxMMV 1{I{/ �/{ZG YM f twY ' i'p M.,s P Y '�{L, # ,i �`.'..,'^ 2'�� "' *"� — MMIy ^t $ "^*ti sr ,a, te-;. a _y ,S '-19?- I X'". i e t.rte" 4�'c+, h. 5k,,P'Ni-",'?"#,.t ,q. ,".,' '`d," 5 t` ``, yr,: a 1 „x ?-:p w t '^ fic >• p s , -t r• 4 N.r �,k ( . _ e4r y a t`'`"' {�L Or Rraf '",�s�'+ ',�•e ,.� Se9ecis3 �IltieS de 516 .L'A1G flQB• .'`i RiB�JCJIMC�xR3 '' . CA[iG ''' ��y+z w. ,tm, § €mf 3cz 2zy [r"1. 't-... xar » ''� �'� #I�Vi:A tiz� f ��M +s` ^^,,� r l.'.3ss .k``"�a. ,, :.� .7"kis # x>F.. " kro lq " a`°''" T a y c �x., ,.b"{.`niraw'x:r` r;,r` ,.M b s xG a `iP .ty rn"R . .43gfk z- I arn` l.,ra f >i ^.. 1" v` .. r a.+3:,rtrtSo yy"' �''",�, c ,'�+` .0 ra o- + "�,y'i,.' rn w"K - r "a.,�, "#i,"'$'a '. `} w-x�xe i''s3 F li y ks df r t5.-^�' G �i�' ttr. J A0... a t aka fi =x�,Sk'p r 'fir, `^4 p *-' f♦ I +. z �.' - sr { '�r 1'4 3 ^sg f ry '41.11 .. 'f., ,x y� .f „'e„�„�,t ..w,3�.^t"Al <'4..j " k !,' �'ieRlR!1"a� ' let'OI S l!!R� $ � ltaigg Z QN" `Ij4 f _ t ? .,s .er r,fi v`, „ w�if^uM 1 L r; a , "re tuts`off, she*. oval State, de.11sk, ..31 T X11 etc.; nodes z segnlatic"I '° d" a ve` Y *' ats etc" �idlie� ase �leinR'ut tO tSpaaeCtk a � Af ��' a 11 . "'� ..y s tit r s A' 4 ' ,y'r p ;J t�,tzit,r 5 k.m g"k'`; -:`�. v:Fx a1t�8iQpl1?! COet+a ;t��.G, O a2lds'avfttgs S�„eCi �C82t0 co �tx r �C r ,-^ ,max,} - S ,,y Fm^I'll s,xm... : - v- ,, yx= t att Y{f`"� zr ;�,.,i _ d h 1- .1 deZs, dir11-ectl. , etc., �dezersdae#vda�cl�ato�sale�Riaa � Co se' Q' w1� `* 's Y% k "r s"`'.V4,7 y�c'rs ,` ,, s a^1'1 `5T¢ yi`Y s ` 'w`�.,' ,h '@QN4i • >r k .4 11'.11 ,w. ^�, N#'i":s a "ae,�+b..a:. p: ,� 6 g ,` S F4 A,1�X y� ue 5`. us zi } ,ex s r a}� r, a '�#Sk;, z a i°fir a�' ,.� "�Yw..4 s t� "' 5 �iI �' d'�' (� +Y 'r d M 1A f+r.Y ''"�y';44 , ip"- -a.A .+-, `"-� ,•v Q{�'�� p(L�. M� t�}�ll ,( ,�1� 5n�/��<^��+'SS `' .4 p�� $i7� JgY�; Iilm i VM�F,i ��t vJ'. { My r'. 1.� , ��/i Y��ne � l prob3.ems,� coafcreaces°a� remarks; aad he shRsll: R�ubrr�#t,all reports,,do iaec ss a i * a ,z i x r � *, ^a >a. tatea ea edera% i�encics; As*chitect nadir Couaty ;which sha]- bei aix� a e >�et'�, r ""'+kl. ,i' W v r�' t t .. .t �. P'e 4srxwrvrK�t: 'r'y'< .. ar 4 -� 6ai3 fiis of,'. ..," ' fr �. xi � t� � � _ p F-« - �h" T♦ :.� kp e" t �,l i ! .id`S ,}, S3.KW,� .. t' 'K.' "�''t"„# j dA'Y'v s"�h' c� 'ti r �,, _ 'r' t 3 a. a� s ! _;.�sz,�s 5 ;in g ,, ✓. y 4} 'a 'wP pv, I — cr waterial Ae�S.� e Sb�tl . ae zeCOz+dS O mafierial�8a"Qd,�auegRW me°+r _ ��. x ., "' >'dus.,;b a '' ��.+*"S+kc.-r`,,..�-.' :rt�,.l�" `z -�•4*',x'fid', =_ de 1.33�vex+ed aV site, lou3c g maantact�' clam # catalogs me it seism's-.'aurzber Aix *. .�n ,jam M `�- L' >s yuy�e�,�j ,j.�� rt . *s J't<y r, s. , . rll other idetlti'fyigg' iaiasdrdatiOQY W J+zVM. � ,h. "'i ,my; v{'4,'>�'2w ,,�' myf '+;, iY�wM1+w,.n "tr' liaace-m th =the�j?;40 nj I'llsho aadfo�s�ci 3catioas a raae �jpt m ttCt• �C Sh8�.3 �CEtI' tfa COaalty x �►a 8,x:1. IDttI QW;UseR� Q CO CC O A "rwudsxxz�{.-ten.* ;:r # x x it r 3t w`�>" w.>; r,, _. ..in coatract�docu+aents; aw ons � >w � 23oa aad�or ioaalla O: each�„a�mu tetil$, Silo l ColleCL,�T1d BSSCti �e re :ell8titr€`iQ=Orl�tiOt1� �Iitic2uRl m; 4...� - i guarantee c I mates, iatetmace RsaRivalsi opera ill g iastrnctioas, keyi111tdigxschedalesr }cata o�quilm � s ►ei dars' ad esses and t srlcphoae cOatacts e#.c o��RmeteriatR; idiot �',�ufgri ie = i li q. � w a t-a r ti red , 'i1R7d� at tttR: C0 letioa R t. e► eIs',` shad.lade2tyer,tbts�.,�Iafirmra�Q to t = . ct Zor f del very o> the Coaa�ty• x ,r ", r,, , g� � # __ a i i 4:x' 4V 2'f t $ �lza"` ,rttr,>.r� _- r w 1: c tomt . !-" :'ar .,�rui+ccs k R�R tu�sc n't i;-r flcpea:es. s �` A �. > � ti4rq p w z ^) S ¢ t . jYl any _ r � `11 ' , "` , �X � kr 11 � a� _tbua1,11111,11 1ty shill .> Iaspcctor t for these s.ertrices,,atw th+* abaverat� 'f se O1% 30-V pCrftX;R's Of'thc ,, , R7 Ntlj i �IBr1,S aad� twl!16th tht'OtR�,J j�"� rdti i" - �aaatil S mem r L'k c ✓,z •'£ yRs nC xill`�br,Ride oa 'thc lI of thc��mOath,ar>otL�they tI 0, th mynt -- x : tit .� ,sod 3f a dR bills 3s receives 7 the Il Co �' - er Pte' .,, byY rkIIetwLisn " Q the 3, R,'�unit,/:vorNiR> day of �hiC„pR:�ttxl. ,_ s 1 x �Y 11 ;w,ur-� - - .: ,. - r ;r 1. ll A�, �b. 4�1t, c6Ae autituri«cd b� Chi: end Ccam�at «fOtR4'L survcyarr (PubtEc hurl D�rccXto "Q` , . 4 , ,, � em �,Ulhis tde1-11 1,pniy sl all.:be rciaLurs+ed at,a rate to.be »utuollyr agrccd upon troo�timc � ti �cS3.cct tt actual acyl h:b:Ru�IgC...co=tts. . '$ � - i * K r �i" ' "k -,.a *- `#,w y`m .r r c 7 • f a a' x z',-�'.�r 'Y'v — a s `.E'c ,'. P .�. w ,K u "4Yz` "`x r t.:'xro ,,.- 'z"�' �� <x 4r` r �7 y,, 1 , .__ 'y�?. :a & - ,.rgav >r"{A nw' w x 'y t,$ .,,,,,�tl ai'krT ;ice t9-7 x`.. -� r ,,,, `ate x` ,'t+ - s i�'a 5T, I Ax�r,,¢a {.,.. ,b„ rzz --15 �" °M x` t ,y > s xt t T� 4 .nr A }'f 5 -+s -l"rE"^55,''. .xr K*.fw �tt •. , 'i. l' { 'S'as L' W t' -t+' Ii, t ,s 4 '' ai �� +sT ``'Wx 4 `"'$' '.0"rr. f -K{ �t^a:< �ih r La * k yr TI a'' :`�.�► '�'M ,9 mom'", ^', i'�."t '. a Ce` "I Elf .- .. 9. Insurance lteoutreoul. Before performing any work under this .Contract, Inspector shaLL at his own eeense furnish County with eerti- ficites or nt!a. :.- :.crc,..;'s•la «•fie'. a • c f- 1-7- ce urage by Public Liability Insurance, ic;: .�il .iia sets in 7usLoruu •* the duties required by this Cf tract, in amounts of at least $250,0 for all damages arising out o bodily injuries or death to any one person and $500,000 for two or more persons in ova accident or occurrence, and Property Damage Liabili- ty Insurance of at least $50,000, both of which shall name the Inspector and the Canty as insureds. 10. hnforcement and Intospratation of Contract. The County's agent for enforcing t ret s Contract s be the County's Road Com- missne -SuryoraPublic Works Director) or a deputy. 11. Ad ustment of Cgmenzation. The rate of compensation may be adjusted by mutual consent or the partles involved for good cause shote. • ' 7' - 00246 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4, , 1976 In the Matter of Statement with Respect to Proposed Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant, Antiocb Mill, Crown Zellerbach Corporation The Board having received a March 12, 1976 letter from Mr. Edgar A. Noyer, Steam, Power & Utility Superintendent, Crown Zellerbach Corporation, advising that, by order of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board- Central Valley Region, Antioch Mill is required to install a secondary waste- water treatment plant prior to July 1, 1977; and Mr. Noyer having further advised that Crown Zellerbach Corporation intends to apply to the California Pollution Control Financing Authority for assistance in financing said treatment plant, that a statement as to the avail- ability of local pollution control financing is required, and that he seeks assistance in obtaining such a statement; and The Acting Public Works Director having reported that local pollution control financing is not available for the Crown Zellerbach project; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board is authorized to sign a letter certifying that local public assistance for the proposed Zellerbach project is not available. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witnen my hand and the Seal of the Board of ORIGINATOR: Public Works Department Supervisors Environmental Control affixed this 4th day of Mav . lq 75 cc: Mr. E. A. Noyer J. R. 01 N, Clerk Public Works Director ey Deputy Clerk Environmental Control Jean L. Miller County Administrator HS Slam00AW-Z 7 N ,.a A o 4 o'Ott LA. Ile r � n •�, 'fin '�� s C A� Wei. O .G 10, .t'° `fir. 46 �►' �` c+ v4 + C° fit+, v�,.y.•,: ° bs d'`1aN �Ger r � �G4-- 0 � co leo �t ° 'yrs °s erQ 'pOle- ,� Vol e"ro 00 POO. .?0, 0. od ZA a a k, j.. Y.I. C C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Ma 4 . 19 2A_ M the Matter of Approving Design Development Drawings and Specifications for Bavviaw Park Recreation Building, San Pablo Area. (County Service Area M-17) (Work Order No. 5220) . The Public Works Director having recommended that the Board approve the Design Development Drawings and Specifi- cations for the proposed construction of the Bayview Park Rec- reation Building, San Pablo Area; and The Public Works Director having reported that the drawings and specifications were prepared by the architectural firm of U. S. Barbachano and Associates, Richmond, and have been reviewed by the Public Works Department, Office of the County Administrator, and the Citizen's Advisory Committee for County Service Area M-17; and It having been further recommended by the Public Works Director that the Board approve the architect's revised estimate of cost of $118,500; this estimate having been approved by the Citizen's Advisory Committee for County Service Area M-17: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid Design Development Drawings and Specifications and re- vised estimate of cost are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. hereby certify that the torepoinp is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Originator - P.W. Dept. W'�� my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds Supwvisors affixed this 4tk_day of May , 19 _76 cc: U. S. Barbachano J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Citizen's Advisory Committee County Auditor-Controller By— Deputy Clerk County Administrator Public Works Department 00248 H 20 8/75 101A a 1=4 5.4ti PAVIO AVI?Wt '.r EL CERRITO. CALIF. cux 9:a sass A S S C i A T E S , t N C 141516 •30 A ! C H I T E C T rlao( ,s -E IV itecfk r OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS For MtMARABAY RECREATIQZ CENM COMM COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-17 March 10, 1976 FI� L f-AA f 7/ iso 6 J. R a CLEU 9QA2� tj%- WnrjlM= GURA c rA CO, r� Mi roffired with board order J 00249 MROOUCTICK The proposed 3,100 square foot recreation building will be located on a flat site to the southwest of the two junior league baseball diamonds. The 3.2 acre site is bounded by Southern Pacific Railroad and San Pablo Bay on the north; San Pablo Sanitary District property and lift station on the west; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad on the south; and a sight-of-way unimproved road on the east. Important considerations in the placement of this building were accessibility to the baseball diamonds and the south service road that will serve the building. The Center will be provided with a snack bar readily accessible to serve outdoor patrons from the kitchen in the building. A hexagonal glometrical design was conceived to accomplish an interesting architectural appearance of the building from the various angles from which it will be viewed. The roof lines,due to this unique shape for a building, allows the roof to rise at the center of the structure. Six glu-laminated arches will support the main roof framing and smaller glu-laminated purlins will also support the 2-inch thick wood decking. This framing will be exposed from the interior. A skylight will be placed at the vertex of the roof arches allowing sunlight to penetrate the interior of the main hall. The building is absent of any windows to maximize security. The main entrance of The Center is placed nearly facing the service road for an effective and practical approach. Since this recreation center will serve both youth and adults of the area, the various roomas.within the building provide for these requirements. In addition to the main hall, the plan provides for a kitchen, office, workroom, baseball uniforms storage room, men and women restrooms (and vestibule), and a large storage room. Reinforced masonry block units will make up the exterior wall system. The roof will be of heavy,colored asphalt shingles; however, if the budget allows, our preference is light-weight concrete color tiles. The main hall contains 1,635 square feet and can provide activities for many occasions, i.e. group meetings, exhibits, dancing, lectures, games, etc. Finish floors in most rooms will be vinyl tile. Because it is not practical to bring natural gas to the site, electric heating and ventilating will be provided. Heating by baseboard units is considered for most of the rooms. Fluorescent lighting iii most all of the roams will be provided: • -1- 00250 • r 0 The interior walls of the building will be exposed =isunry block in those areas where the exterior walls are used. Gypsum wallboard and paint will be used in all rooms except the wood frame portion of the main hall where the gypsum wallboard will be covered with vinyl wall covering. The building proper, exclusive of off-site utilities, landscaping, irrigation and other site work, is estimated to cost approximately $130,000, and once construction is started, would be completed in approximately six months. a . f , • -z- 00251 GETdML INFORMTION Site Flat ground on a parcel containing 140,200 sq. ft. approx. or 3.2 acres approx. Building Total Floor Area: 3,100 sq. ft. (one story) Meeting Hall 1,635 sq. ft. Office: 12'-0" x 10'-6" 126 sq. ft. Work Room: 8'-0" x 12'-0" = 96 sq. ft. Kitchen: 12'-0" x 11'-0" = 132 sq. ft. Uniforms Room: 12'-0" x 18'-0" (average) = 216 sq. ft. Storage Room: 12'-0" x 9'-0" (average) = 180 sq. ft. Women's Restroom: 8'-6" x 9'-0" = 76.5 sq. ft. Men's Restroom: 7'-6" x 9'-0" = 67.5 sq. ft. Men & Women Vistibule: 3'-6" x 4'-0" each = 14 sq. ft. x 2 = 28 sq. ft. Janitor: 4'-0" x 3'-9" = 10 sq. ft. Storage: 10'-0" x 12'-0" (average) = 120 sq. ft. Lobby: 7'-0" x 12'-0" = 84 sq. ft. Outdoor Storage &7 Equipment Roams: 2 @ approximately 54 sq. ft. -3- 00252 sa ARCHITECTURAL Building Structural System: hexagonal configuration, 6 equal sides L 34'-4". Foundations: Reinforced concrete footings with concrete diagonal foundation tie grade beams. Exterior Walls: Concrete masonry block units 8 x 8 x 16. Height of exterior walls 9'-4" = 14 courses. Waterproof exterior wall surfaces with.approved Elastomeric material. �M�+�ik . .c 'L LL i,:: J Roof Framing: Six glu-lam arches supporting roof with mini glu-lam purlins (exposed ceiling) supports 2" thick wood decking. Roof pitch 3:12, approximately. Roof Covering: Heavy composition shingles (brar.rn color). Alternate: Concrete tiles (cuolor_dark_browril. �_ i._i, _CGs�s.i::�t'.r Nd Ta w..4tr•::. fl 3QGA►ccG.� Roof Overhang: 3'-0" exposed rafters (eaves). Redwood facia: Continuous 2" x 12". Floor: 4" Thick concrete floor above grade. Rock base 6" thick, 2" sand and poly- ethylene vapor barrier. Interior Walls and Finishes: Masonry block units exposed but clean exposed surfaces and wood frame and gypsum wallboard covered with vinyl wall covering on main hall side only, balance paint finish. Lavatories and kitchen, enamel. Masonite wainscote 4'-0" high on Men and Women's Restrooms. Ceiling Finishes: All rooms, exposed wood framing stained, except storage rooms and janitor's closet, furr gypboard ceilings to 8'-0" and paint.- Main Hall: Acoustical treatment only on wood frame walls above 8'-0" ceiling. Floor Finishes: Vinyl asbestos tile, 12" x 12" x 1/8" thick and 4" topset vinyl cove base in the following rooms: Meetiug, kitchen, office and workroom. Restrooms: Steel trowel smooth finish floors. Rote: Lobby, restrooms, vestibules, janitor's closet, uniforms room and storage roams, cement floor finish mainly speci- fied because of baseball players' cleat damage to vinyl tile finish. Cabinets 6 Millwork in Kitchen and Workroom: ;;A:t, wl`oO Cases: Hardwood, i.e. ash, birch or similar,\natural stain and varathane finish. Tops: Formica, self-edge and full back splash. Doors: Interior - Solid core wood "Lifetime" quality flush veneer. Exterior - Bouderized metal flush doors and metal frames, and paint. Main Entrance - Metal bonderized finish and paint. Pair Steel Gates at entrance to exterior porch, lockable. E:i—V Skylight: Hexagon shape (approx. 4'-0" long sides) 60 sq. ft. approximately. -4- 00253 PLUMBING Refer to Drawings Sheet P-1. Service to building, by San Pablo Sanitary District, main sewer located approximately 25' south of proposed building. Plumbing Fixtures: (Manufacturer's sample illustrations attached) Women: Water Closets - two American Standard Madera No. 2222.016, flush valve Sloan Royal No. POM w/Church seats No. 5320.114. • Lavatory - One QeLtVn No. Wim. Faucet No. 2248.433. Stop Speedway No. RSST-1715A. Trap No. 4402.012. eaJP.>6%— !"}t oo, Men: Water Closet - American Standard Madera No. 2222.016 w/Church seat No. 5320.114, flush valve Sloan Royal No. 110FYV. Urinal: American Standard Washbrook No. 3650.011 w/flush valve Sloan No. 186-11FYV. Carrier Josam No. C-222. V%,o .d5� Lavatory: American Standard, one No. p Faucet No. 2248.433. Stop Speedway RSST-1715A. MAP cioZ•m�z--.l'srrurrJ°sww• °o. Service Sink: American Standard Akron No. 7695.018, rim guard No. 8379.026. Trap No. 7798.176. Faucet Ho. 8344.11. Workroom Sink: Zeigler-Harris No. 01919 S-ZL7. Faucet Chicago No. 1021; strainer ZH-29, Trap No. 4403.010; stops Speedway RSST-372RA. Drinking Fountain: American Standard Saratoga No. 8310.112. .No. 1 Hose Bibb: Acorn No. 8120, 3/4" rough brass plated. No. 2 Hose Bibb: Acorn No. 8125, mount on 18" high steel pipe. Flocr drains, floor cleanouts, plug and grade cleanouts, see Schedule on Drawings Sheet P-2. Jp _2 L't PLcue+� Chtu�° lot' je4&hem 7,-wk: Zet'gtw— Na,r1c t �13'It RD 4frs&hor Z44©3 01 o . 54*F5 5per.ltvo�.z�72o�. -5- 00254 a: MECHANICAL, HEATING & VEWIIATING Refer to Drawing Sheet M-1 Heating system consists of baseboard electric heaters with integral thermostats; fan with electric heating coil to prcn ide tempered air for ventilation. Manual operated outside air and return dampers that can be adjusted for 25% outside to 1007, outside air. ' 30 Callon water heater (electric) Hoyt Model No. SC30NC, 6KW 208V one 6, 24.6 gallon rise per HR. ASME rated temperature relief valve. ELECTRICAL Refer to Drawing Sheet Nos. E-1 and E-2 for general notes, layout and details. Typical wiring, copper in conduit, no aluminum. All equipment, fixtures, etc. shall bear the Underwriter's Laboratories Label. All work shall conform to the National Electrical Code, latest applicable codes and requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act ((SHA). Service to Building: 400A, 3P, 120/208V, 3 6 4w. Estimated total load 100 kw. Under- ground to building main panel. Main panel to be Sylvania or approved equal arranged for 3 6, 4w, 120/208 solid neutral. Lighting Fixtures: Exterior - "M" security night light (5). prescolite WB2-2G (w/guard) Cast aluminum w/2-75W lamps. Porch - "C", Shaper Lighting Products (1) No. 458.69-%- PG Pl.gl. color brown baked enamel w/one 100w lamp w/redwood slats. .� Interior - "A" main room (34) pendant fluorescent fixtures w/two tubes (2-40WRS W W. lamps) 8" wide x S" high w/white alumin. egg-crate lease cut-off Ca 45°.---s, lam! "B" Equipment rooms - (1 each) porcelain keyless Bryant No. 5228100w lamp.#`_l_ "D" Uniform rooms, fluorescent 'Acme 524-40RSPS WNW . "B" Emergency lights, remote heads. Locate battery unit in closet. Remote heads, soffit Exide Model B-0-120 2 remote flush heads - 25w laraps. ''I"F" Kitchen, men, women, office, workroom, storage - fluorescent Acme No.524-40RSPS W/ 4-40 V RS l::mpps warm white. "K" Nen, women vestibules - Acme SLPS4 With 150w 1z=p. "U" Track lights in main room - 8'-0" "Lite Trac" W4-15OW Par 38 lamps mounted in Prescolite No.A-93440 Trac Hd.Trackto be suspended to 11'-3" from ceiling with Unistrut. Unistrut and fittings to be finished in matching color of "Lite-Trac". "X Exit lights - Exide WP 426 green letters and 2-25W lamps. AC and 26CP DC lamps emergency mounted above door. All fluorescent fixtures to be furnished with Class "P" ballasts. -6- 00255 E i� ._... _ ,.. ... .._ _..... _. 1. ._. _ ._...... SIL ARCHHYI'ECrWAL Builellas SLructurai System: Hexagonal configuration, 6 equal sides Q 341-4". Fouialations: Reinforced concrete footings with concrete diagonal foundation tie grade beam. Rxterior Walls: Concrete masonry block units 8 x 8 x 16. Height 'of exterior walls 91-411 - 14 courses. Waterproof exterior wall surfaces, with approved Slastomeric material. •• • . . .A w,y - Roof Fr=Lxm-. Six glu-lam arches supporting roof with min£ glu-las: purlins (exposed ceiling) supports 2" thick wood decking. Roof pitch 3:12, approximately. Root Coveria};: Il wavy conpositioo shingles (brawn color). Alternate: C_gwrgte toes (color dark bran). ! • .. a 8.!et-v•*..A1 . DA. :s vb a4go 1'.r-! S&CAAM.& Roof Overhang: 34-O" expased rafters (eaves). Redwood facia: Continuous 2" x 12". Floor: 4" Thick concrete floor above grade. Bock base 6" thick, 2" sand and poly- ethylene vapor barrier. Interior Walls and FLaisbes: Masonry block units exposed but clean exposed surfaces and wood from and gyps= wallboard covered with vinyl wall covering on main hall side only, baltace paint finish. Lavatories and kitchen, enamel. Masonite wainscote 4'-0111 high oa Man and Wawa's Restrooes. Ceiling FLnishes: All roo=m, exposed wood framing stained, except storage rooms and Janitor's closet, furr grpboar+d ceilings to 81-0" and paint. Main Hall: Acoustical treatment only on wood frame walls above 8'-0" ceiling. Floor Finishes: Vinyl asbestos tile, 12 x 12'1 x 1/8" thick and 4" topset vinyl cove l base In the following rooms: Meeting, kitche+, office and workroom. Restrooms: Steel trowel smooth finish floors. Note: Lobby, restroams, vestibules, janitor's closet, uniforms room and storage roams,.cement floor ffaish mainly speci- fied because' of baseball players' cleat daonge to vIzWI the finish. Cabinets b Millwork in Kitchen and Workroom: dft is wllle?h Cases: Hardwood, i.e. ash, birch or similar natural stain and varathane finish. ; Tops: Formica, self-edge and fall back spLs%. Doors: Interior - Solid core wood ''Lifetime" quality flush venear.AAl tpokeP . 11 Pik. ; Exterior - Roaderized metal flush doors and metal frames, and paint. ds,.Vi1v a Main Entrance - Metal boaderized finish and paint. Pair Steel Cates at entrance to exterior porde, lockable. G"M ftlight: Nezagan shape (approx. 4141" lagg sides) 60 sq. ft. approximately. 00255 BuildiM Structural System: Hexagonal configuration, 6 equal sides @ 34r-4n. Faualatl.aw: Reiufurced concrete footings with concrete diagonal foundation tie grade beams. Exterior halls: Concrate masonry block units 8 x 8 x 1& Height of exterior wnlln 9'-4" a 14 courses. Waterproof exterior wall surfaces wtft approved Slastainarle ' material. . . . r;'�:r'. J Roof Framing: Six glu-lm arches supporting roof with mini glu-lam purlins (exposed ceiling) supports 2" thick wood decking. Roof pitch 3:12, approiimately. Roof Coveriag: lk-avy composition shingles (brown color). Alternate: Cwr%te tiles (color dark brown). -: . #„,q f: :[ •� art We Ts vrw4:�.i:t► 9 tIC�R c r. Roof Overhang: 3'-0" exposed rafters (eaves). Redwood facia: Continuous 2" x 12". Floor: 4" Thick concrete floor above grade. Rock base 6" thick, 211•sand azul poly- ethylene vapor barrier. Interior halls and Finishes: !lasanry block units exposed but clean exposed surfaces and wood frame and gypsum wallboard covered with vlayl wall covering on main hall side only, balance paint finish. Lavatgries and kitchen,.enamal. Masonite wainscote 4'-0" high on Men and Wumen's Restrooms. Coillrg Finishes: All roods. exposed wood framing stained, except storage roams and janitor's closet, fury gypboard ceilings to 8'-0" and paint. Dain Hall: Acoustical treatment only on wood frame walls above 8'-0" ceiling. Floor Fiairdies: Vinyl asbestos tile, 12" x 12" x 1/8" thick and 4" topset vinyl cave base in the. following roams: Meeting, kitchen, office and workroom. Restroomm: Steeletrowel smooth finish floors. Moto: Lobby, restrooms, vestibules, janitor's closet, uniforms room and storage roovsr cement floor finish mainly speci- fied because of baseball players' cleat dmsge to vinyl tile finish. ; Cabinets A Millwork in Kitchen and Vorkroam: AM 6 oj^%d. Cases: hardwood, i.e. ash, birch or similar,`natural stain and varathane finish. Tops: Formica, self-edge and fall back splash. Doors: Interior - Solid core wood "Lifetise" quality flush veneer.-A.*, Exterior - Bon lerized metal flush doors and metal frames, mad paint. Main Entrance - Metal booderized finish and paint. - Pair Steel Cates at entrance to exterior parch, lockable. &ALV 31q►13ght: Hexagap shape (approx. 41-0" lag sides) 60 sq. ft. approximately. -�- 00257 it . r. a eac to Ott � _l,-1,. Seawl" to ba 67 S U SWIG bui S ads saw located 25 Saw* at PC""" utus,4, A -Ni+ t3 Vftw Cl two AgmUm StmAmA Xmism Now m4m. �1►3e n lavatacy .. Q �y�b. J1 ,e leo.. 22MI"' . 2J �� l�. -I' . T�tp «1�1�„ ��,�ar��,Jew► ,rq,�; �� Mr Mmt Water Closet - Amwl=n StandaW *oft= 506 n=016 IV/CbwWk,,:4mGr NO., OW114o an* v►a biet Slow l JIc6 UNW. =Vdxd: Ammdao StandardV/flwk.�,U49i Sii6-1IMO C a c mr Jams Var. 0" ; 1%wast Naw 21&+433. ,St+op Sperms. -I", * .�,o►� A �_ Sos too Siolt Aumde a► Staoadamd Atzm Mo )69A-0160, rfa.smd;IW. .On. No. 7MV6. faucet W. #34.31. WOdMVM SSA, � a ,r-s s� xa. son ►-gra. as � u�a: r r 3k ��9� 'trap xa.-db03.010„ st+ap' � R&ST•37 . � DrLuldrg Pauataft: Aaarftm Stmdwd Saratgp No. 8310JU, ; . MP�-- " rataut bcass piatad ;ito..:2 8asn Bibb: scam r oa it hist steet pire V 1 Floor drains floweleimoats, p7aag wade cam,, see,seer aaDxax.pli ,r k r+r�.. Ze�+�lar-[-�`�n.c t►l.. avjat,"t�-2 a �# or -Z az-14 . 1"t' 44S-�►ps; z o Wu pp t t Y , f 3 i MECHANICAL, HEATING & VENTIIATING Refer to Drawing Sheet M-1 Heating system consists of baseboard electric heaters with integral thermostats; fan with electric heating coil to provide tempered air for ventilation. Manual operated outside air and return dampers that can be adjusted for 25% outside to 1007. outside air. 30 Gallon water heater (electric) Hoyt Model No. SC30NC, 6161 208V one 6, 24.6 gallon rise per HR. ASME rated temperature relief valve. ELECTRICAL Refer to Drawing Sheet Nos. E-1 and E-2 for general notes, layout and details. Typical wiring, copper in conduit, no aluminum. All equipment, fixtures, etc. shall bear the Underwriter's Laboratories Label. All work shall conform to the National Electrical Code, latest applicable codes and requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). Service to Building: 400A, 3P, 120/208V, 3 6 4w. Estimated total load 100 kw. Under- ground to building main panel. Main panel to be Sylvania or approved equal arranged for 3 6, 4w, 120/208 solid neutral. Lighting Fixtures: Exterior - "M" security night light (5).prescolite WB2-2G (w/guard) Cast aluminum w/2-75W lamps. Porch - "C", Shaper Lighting Products (1) No. 458.69-%- PG Pl.gl. color brain baked enamel w/one 10ow lamp w/redwood slats. Interior - "A" main room (34) pendant fluorescent fixtures w/two tubes (2-40WRS W W. lamps) 8" wide x 5" high w/white al umin- egg-crate lease cut-off @ 45°.--� "B" Equipment rooms - (I each) porcelain keyless Bryant No. 5228 -100w lamp J_V 4_ "D" Uniform rooms, fluorescent -Acme. 524-40RSPS W/2W' lamps. . "A" Emergency lights, remote heads. Locate battery unit in closet. Remote heads, soffit Exide Model B-0-120 2 remote flush heads - 25w lamps. 4/"F" Kitchen, men, women, office, workroom, storage - fluorescent Acme Nb.524-4ORSPS W/ 4-40W RS lamps warm white. "K" Men, women vestibules - Acme SLPS4 With 150w lamp. "U" Track lights. in main room - 8'-0" 'Lite Trac" W4-1509 Par 38 lamps mounted in Prescolite No.A-93440 Trac Hd Tradcto be suspended to ll'-3" from ceiling with Unistrut. Uaistrut and fittings to be finished in matching color of "Lite-Trac". "A Exit lights - Exide WP 426 green letters and 2-25W lamps. AC and 26CP DC lamps emergency mounted above door. All fluorescent fixtures to be furnished with Class "P" ballasts. -6- 00255 Ce ARCHITECTURAL Kluilding Structural System: hexagonal configuration, 6 equal sides @ 341-411. Foundations: Reinforced concrete footings with concrete diagonal foundation tic grade beams. Exterior Walls: Concrete masonry block units 8 x 8 x 16. lleight of exterior walls V-0 = 14 courses. Waterproof exterior wall surfaces- with approved Elastomeric material. •; j.•� J Roof Framing;: Sir glu-lam arches supporting roof with mini glu-lam purlins (exposed ceiling) supports 2" thick wood decking. Roof pitch 3:12, approximately. Roof Covering: Ii.iavy composition shingles (brown color). Alternate: Concrete tiles (color dark brown). .. Ti `c'rM =.►: , D.J , vt►��1Abt`.+•t r3QC�a►f c.t.C; Roof Overhang: 3'-0" exposed rafters (eaves). Redwood facia: Continuous 2" x 12". Floort 4" Thick concrete floor above grade. Rock base 6" thick, 2" sand and poly- ethylene vapor barrier. Interior Walls and Finishes: Masonry block units exposed but clean exposed surfaces and wood frame and gypsum wallboard covered with vinyl wall covering on main hall side only, balance paint finish. Lavatories and kitchen, enamel. Masonite wainscots 4'-0" high on Meat and Women's Restrooms. Ceiling Finishes: All rooms, exposed wood framing stained, except storage rooms and janitor's closet, fury gypboard ceilings to 8'-0" and paint. Main Hall: Acoustical treatment only on wood frame walls above 8'-0" ceiling. Floor Finishes: Vinyl asbestos tile, 12" x 12" x 1/8" thick and 4" topset vinyl cove base in the following rooms: Meeting, kitchen, office and workroom. Restrooms: Steel trowel smooth finish floors. Note: Lobby, restrooms, vestibules, janitor's closet, uniforms room and storage rooms,.cement floor finish mainly speci- fied because' of baseball players' cleat damage to vinyl tile finish. Cabinets & Millwork in Kitchen and Workroom: z1A4 is v�tCdP� Cases: Klardwool, i.e. ash, birch or similar,,,natural stain and varathane finish. Tops: Formica, self-edge and full back splash. Doors: Interior - Solid core wood "Lifetive" quality flush veneer. kft, P-ttcci+ . Ah- Exterior - Bonderized metal flush doors and metal frames, and paint. �It '��r�'• P. Main Entrance - Metal bonderized finish and paint. Pair Steel Gates at entrance to exterior porch, lockable. (a►:v :� „�<<.r� w, Skylight: hexagon shape (approx. 4'-0” long sides) 60 sq. ft. approximately. -^ —4- 00255 ARCHITECTURAL Building Structural System: hexagonal configuration, 6 equal sides @ 34'-411. Fotam1ati"x1::: Reiiifurced concrete footings with concrete diagonal foundation tic grade beams. Exterior Walls: Concrete masonry block units 8 x 8 x 16. height 'of exterior walls V-0 = 14 course:. Waterproof exterior wall surfaces wtth approved Elastouieric material. �r, •• . .. _� �;�; Roof Framing: Sim: glu-lam arches supporting roof with mini glu-lam purlins (exposed ceiling) supports 2" thick wood decking. Roof pitch 3:12, approximately. Roof Covering: lk•avy composition shingles (brown color). Alternate: Cor rete tiles (color dark brown). is :C�^..-res•j r�; T., YA:li):��.E:�•E r']RrF►►R c,t.�_ Roof Overhang: 3'-0" exposed rafters (eaves). t Redwood facia: Continuous 2" x 12". ' i Floor: 4" Thick concrete floor above grade. Rock base 6" thick, 2"-sand and poly- ethylene vapor barrier. Interior Walls and Finishes: Masonry block units exposed but clean exposed surfaces and wood frame and gypsum wallboard covered with vinyl wall covering on main hall side only, balance paint finish. Lavatories and kitchen, •enamel. Masonite wainscote 4"-0" high on Men and Wumen's Restrooms. Ceiling Finishes: All roams, exposed wood framing stained, except storage rooms and janitor's closet, furr gypboard ceilings to 8'-0" and paint. Main hall: Acoustical treatment only on wood frame walls above 8'-0" ceiling. } Fluor Finishes: Vinyl asbestos tile, 12" x 12" x 1/8" thick and 4" topset vinyl cove base in the following roams: Meeting, kitchen, office and workroom. Restrooms: Steel'trwel smooth finish floors. Roto: Lobby, restrooms, vestibutes, janitor's closet, uniforms room and storage roomsf cement floor finish mainly speci- fied because of baseball players' cleat damage to vinyl tile finish. Cabinets & Millwork in kitchen and Workroom: ::A* t;, %ti^11, Cases: hardwood, i.e. ash, birch or similar,`natural stain and varathane finish. Tops: Formica, self-edge and full back splash. Doors: Tnterior - Solid core wood "Lifetime" quality flush veneer. t4tt R JQ_Ci% Exterior - Conderized meta'I flush doors and metal frames, and paint. Main Entrance - Metal bonderized finish and paint. Pair Steel Gates at entrance to exterior porch, lockable. l6AL-v 4 WK Skylight: hexagon shape (approx. 4'-0" long sides) 60 sq. ft. approximately. In the board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia May 4 , 19 76 In the Malta of Appointments to the Ridgelands itizens Committee. Supervisor J. P. Kenny on April 27, 1976 having proposed that each Board member nominate a citizen from his district to serve on the Ridgelands Citizens Committee to provide comments and suggestions to the Administrative Board of the Multijurisdictional Ridgelands Study Committee; and Supervisor 11. N. Boggess having recommended firs. Genevieve Sattler, 4050 Poplar Avenue, Concord, California 94521 for appoint- ment to the Ridgelands Citizens Committee; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having recommended Mr. Frank Pereira, 6040 Alhambra Road, Martinez, California 94553 as his appointment to said committee; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations of Supervisors Boggess and Dias are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4; 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing h a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. F. Pereira Wtes my hand and the Seal of the Board of *Mrs. G. Sattler Supwvhors Director of Planning affixed this 4th day of May 1976 County Administrator Public Information J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Officer eyer 7 Deputy Clerk 1� a y Shad . H . 14 00258 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 o, 19 -7-6 In the Mader of Proposed Policies with respect to Development in the Livermore- Amador Valley. The Board having received an April 21, 1976 letter from Mr. Revan A. F. Tranter, Executive Director, Association of Bay Area Governments, advising that the Association conducted a review of the proposed General Plan for the City of Livermore and recommends that certain policies be considered by the Alameda and Contra Costa County Boards of Supervisors to ensure that develop- ment occurring in the Livermore-Amadou Valley is consistent with regional policies and the findings and conclusions of the Las Positos Review conducted by ABAG last year; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having recommended that the Director of Planning be instructed to meet with Supervisor J. P. Kenny and him (the Board's representatives on the ABAG Executive Committee) to discuss this matter prior to making a recommendation to the Board; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recom- mendation is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the forrpoinp Is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesoid. cc: Supervisor J. P. Kenny � 1Mftew my hand and the aeol of the Board of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty mors Director of Planning affixed this 4th day of May . 19 76 Public :corks Director County Administrator `/ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey I"--JG � . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall H.24 3nu nm 00259 4 d � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May h. , 19 6 In the Matter of 1976-1977 County Mental Health Plan. As directed in the March 23, 1976 Board Order, 14r. C. L. Van ifarter, Director, Human resources Agency, having submitted a memorandum dated April 14, 1976 to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors ►J. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) with respect to recommendations for the 1976-1977 County Mental Health Plan; and The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny serving in the absence of Supervisor W. N. Boggess) having this day submitted a progress report advising that the financial aspects of the elan are still being reviewed and that the Committee vrill submit its report in tw:o weeks; and The Committee having recommended that the Director, Human Resources Agency advise the, State that it is anticipated that the 14ental Health Plan will be submitted in approximately two weeks; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation of its Administration and Finance Committee is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976- I hereby certify that the foregoi S is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Committee V;embers Director, Human Resources S"�rvaOn Agency this`� �th day of May . 19 76 County administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Bx a c` tc?n &''Deputy Clerk Rondalyr&i Shackles H •24 3176 15m 00260 The Board of Supervisors Contra Jaw-P.Kemy Chairman County Administration Building Co§' R.«'On Clerk and P.O.Box 911 Ex O�ffi io Clerk of the Board Martinez.California 94553 County PAm Geraldine Rums Chief Clerk James P.Kenny-Richmond (415)372-2371 1st District Alfred M.Dias-El Sobrante 2nd District James E.Moriarty-Lafayette 3rd District FRECEIVEDWarren N.Boggess-Concord 4th DimiCi Edmund A.Linsehas!-Pittstwrg 5th District ti ��a76 Y MA May 4, 1976 J. e. owON Ct= eOAM of SUPERVI°..02S L4�QN�RA COSI CO. PROGRESS REPORT OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE ON 1976-77 COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH PLAN At its meeting on May 4, 1976, the matter of 1976-77 County Mental Health Plan was briefly. discussed with the Committee_ The Committee was advised that staff is still reviewing financial aspects of the plan and, accordingly, the Committee will submit its report on this after Committee review scheduled during the next two weeks. The Committee recommends that the Human Resources Director advise the State that submittal in approximately two weeks is anticipated inasmuch as the plan is supposed to be submitted 45 days after receipt of the budgetary allocation. J. P. J. E. MORIARTY Supervisor, strict I //Supervisor, District III (substitute for Supervisor W. N. Boggess) 1976 j•i: x o a°� sow ; Mcfo: :<% wiih r board o; � 00261 'ri=an Resoles agency cc: Gf�dine Russell Date Apri 1 14, 1976 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Supervisors Warren Boggess and James Moriarty ��t�/T�D To Administration and Finance Committee From C. L. Van Harter, Director t, 5 1976 J, R. O:S.idV CLM BOARD r SUPERVISORS Subj RECOMMMEIINDATIOiNS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN SECTIONS c `0 OF THE 1976-1977 COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH PLAN Ref: Board Order, this subject, dated March 23, 1976 The referenced Board Order directed me to report to your Committee on the letter received from the President, Comprehensive Health Planning Association of Contra Costa County, in which CHPA commented on three specific areas of the 1976-1977 County Mental Health Plan. i The Mental Health Advisory Board has a formal ongoing agreement with CHPA to function as CHPA's planning body in the area of mental health. CHPA includes the dental Health Pian in its overall County Health Plan. In return, CHPA reviews the Mental Health Plan and makes-recommendations to refine the Mental Health Plan to better meet its own planning needs, especially in the areas of beds and facilities over which CHPA has planning and authorizing responsibilities. The Mental Health Advisory Board has always found these comments useful and constructive. The following pertains to the specific comments of CHPA: Planning Process: 1. Recom�.endations (a) and (c) are organizational details to assist community participation. We find that retention of community participants is not easy and is as important as initial recruitment. Orientation meetings, workshops and ongoing training for task force members were all undertaken this year toward this end. Times and places of task force meetings have been determined by the task force members themselves in order to reflect the wishes of the members; this seems to be the best way to handle this matter. Recatmeidation l (b) is less useful since the task forces are open to every- one. The trental Health Advisory Board, by law, is responsible for reviewing citizen and professional involvement and asks each task force to so identify its members. Since we do not want to restrict membership in any tray, we have deliberately not developed any one set format for task force composition. 2. The Steering Committee, composed of elected representatives from each taks force plus designated administrators, reviewed the administrative imple- nentation section prior to its inclusion in the Plan and will continue to monitor it throughout the year. The dialogue between task force recomenda- tions and the administrative implementation of the Plan will continue in order to ensure direct accountability of the Plan to the community, Mcrofilmed with Boom orget 0U262 ! 0 Administration and Finance Committee April 14, 1976 Page 2 3. This recommendation is confirmation of the Mental Health Advisory Board's belief that the task forces should be countywide in scope, rather than regional. The task force in question, the General Mentally Disordered-Continuing Care CG.MD-CC), will be urged to reorganize on this basis. 4. Definitions of different bed licensure categories: The GMD-CC Task Force will ask CHPA for assistance in training members. Specific Recommendations from the GMD,CC Task Force: 1. 100 long-term skilled nursing facility beds: The need for 100 beds was arrived at by noting the closing of 112 beds in two facilities in the County in 1975 and the increased use of Napa State Hospital and inpatient services at County Hospital which resulted from the closing of these beds. The consensus of the GMD-CC Task Force was that such beds were needed throughout the County and, therefore, no specific geographic distribution was included in the Plan. Adequate and appropriate funding is indicated because Medi-Cal reimbursement by itself is insufficient to fund a well-run program. The-new Cambia Way sub-acute program is an example of a treatment facility with adequate and appropriate funding, combining several State sources. 2. Provide additional acute psychiatric beds: The Plan did not speak directly to the issue of the number of licensed psychiatric beds at County Hospital since the additional psychiatric beds could be developed at existing community hospitals which are available to all residents. These beds would not necessarily require the de-licensure of County Hospital beds. The Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Services Guidelines developed by the Mental Health Advisory Board and adopted by CHPA now set a policy for review of psychiatric bed applications. 3. 24-hour holding unit in blest County: There are two models for a holding unit in West County which are being explored. One is for a unit at a community hospital; the other for a holding unit in a community setting. Since a major objective of the holding unit service is to attempt to decrease utilization of inpatient services, we expect minimal transfers of people from the holding unit to inpatient , services. The implementation of either model is expensive and would require additional funds in the 1976-1977 final Short-Doyle budget. I recommend that you report these comments back to th- Board of Supervisors at the time you return the 1976-1977 Short-Doyle budget to them for approval and submission to the State Department of Health. I anticipate having the budget ready for your review during the week of April 19. I hope you will be able to make a final report to the Board on April 27 since that is the deadline for submission of the 1976-1977 Mental Health Plan and Budget to the State. CLVM:cig . 00263 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California r.-Tay 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving a Policy for the Continuation of County and Subgrantee CETA Titles II and VI Employees through September 30, 1976 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the policy for CETA Titles II and V1 (Public Service Employment) of maintaining the June 30, 1976 employment level of all subgrantees through September 30, 1976 is APPROVED, provided it does not exceed the April 30, 1976 employment level and provided further that only those vacancies which result from transitions to unsubsidized employment or which occur in administrative staff positions are filled, as recommended by staff and the Manpower Advisory Council. Passed by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Civil Service witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors CC: County Administrator affixed this Itt:h day of May 19 76 HRA Manpower Project J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller i By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M /rS+ tctig 00264 g 4 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costar County.. State of California rav is . 1976 . In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of Report on Contribution to Delta Advisory Planning Council and Authorizing Payment of Annual Dues IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the report from the County Administrator regarding contributions to the Delta Advisory Planning Council for fiscal year 1975-1976 is ACKNOWLEDGED; and payment of $11,250 ($7,500 annual dues, $3,750 one-time contribution) by the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED. Passed by the Board on Mav h, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator iNtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: DAPC Superv'sors Boards of Supervisors: affixed this 4th day of r"ny 197E Sacramento County /' J. R. OLSSON, Clerk San Joaquin County Solano County By n��i (-�� Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M .ta aig Yolo County Director of Planning Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller Recreation and Natural Resources Commission 00265 RECEIVED MC-AY s! 1976 LSSON J. P. Kenny CLERK sow OFF A. 23. Dias � � c J. E. Moriarty •°� W. 11. Boggess April 300 1976 E. A. Linscheid Arthur G. :fill, Amount of County Contribution 1 County Administrator To Delta Advisory Planning Council On ttarch 30, 19766 your Eoard- approved the recomendaEion of the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. P. nenny, substituting for jl. N. Boggess, and J. E. Moriarty) authorizing allocation of up to $15,000 For support of the Delta Advisory Planning Council on the condition that the other Delta Area Counties contribute a percentage increase above previous fiscal , year contributions equal to that of this County. The County Administrator was directed to recommend the actual contribution a=mount for your Board's consideration pending determination of the amount of contributions from the other Delta Area Counties. San Joaquin, Solano and Tolo Counties have approved a one- t 59% increase over their previous fiscal year contributions. : we have been informed by Sacramento County that Supe- visor Henry floss, their representative on the Delta Advisory Planning Council, has recommended a one-time 50% increase and that his recommendation will go before the Board of Supervisors on Monday, May 3, 1976. In light of the above decision, it is recComended. that the County pay a one-time 50% increase in the amaunt of $3,750 in . addition to the normal $7,500 contribution for fiscal year 1975-1976 for a total of $11,250 to the Delta Advisory Planning Council. ADLzes t lncssEdrh.. A9266 . -�d with beard f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California may 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Complaint Resolution Procedure for CETA Titles II and VI. The Board having received a recommendation from the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council that the Complaint Resolution Procedure for CETA Titles II and VI be adopted and submitted to the U. S. Department of Labor; and Mr. Theron Nelson, Director of Administrative Services and Labor Relations for the City of Concord, having appeared in opposition to the proposed complaint resolution procedures; and Mr. H. H. "Bud" Harr, Chairman of the Manpower Planning Council, having appeared and urged the Board to adopt said complaint procedure; and Supervisor W. N. Boggess having recommended that a public hearing be held to allow interested persons to express their views; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having suggested that the matter be referred to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisor A. M. Dias and Supervisor Linscheid) for review; and Supervisor Dias having stated that he was in favor of holding a public hearing on this subject; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is REFERRED to the Government Operations Committee for review and report to the Board. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: Supervisor A. M. Dias ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a tno and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: City of Concord W„new my (and and the Seal of the Board of Board Committee -%Pervisors Manpower Planning Council affixed tbis 4th day of May , 19 76 Civil Service J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Human Resources Agency �� County Administrator By j Deputy Clerk K&WCraie, H 24 SPS IOU 002�� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Provision of Legal Services to School Districts. In response to an inquiry from Mr. George H. Renworth, Superintendent, 'foraga School District, the Board on April 13, 1976 having approved the recommendation of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty whereby County Counsel 's staff Mould provide expanded legal services to school districts in the County, with the dis ;' ' s.` tracts reimbursing the County by paying proportionate shares of the additional cost involved; and Supervisor Moriarty having this day called attention to an April 26, 1976 letter from Mr. Renworth advising of cer- tain difficulties arising from the aforesaid proposal , and suggesting that the Board consider having the County underwrite the services , with participating districts paying a fee based on student enrollment; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the proposal of Mr. Renworth is REFERRED to County Counsel and the County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order er iso on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Moraga School District W'enou my hand and the Seal of tike Board of 1540 School Street supervisors Moraga, California 94556 affi,d this 4 day of May 19 76 County Counsel — County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �; i46c_! � Deputy Cleric Robbie Gutierrez�4 H-,,11-76 hsm 00268 moraga schbo"t district District Offices•1540 School Street •Moraga,California 94556•(415) 376-5943-Geor. 1ge EL:Renworih,.Superintendent .J ,r.L'R f/.. •• •U.... R EIV D April 26, 19 6 MAY y 1976 �. X ate,„ RUJO OF Supervisor James Moriarty °` RA COXA �so� 3338 Mt. Diablo Boulevard Lafayette, California 94549 Dear Jim: Thank you for your support in encouraging County Counsel services to be cooperatively paid for by the school districts. We do not object to that concept per se, except that to provide reasonable services we would need most of the districts participating, particularly the large ones. - This appears to be impossible. Secondly, our funds are frozen and white the County has major budgetary problems, these funds are not as restricted by SB 90 as are school district funds. Thirdly, the County currently provides a very low proportion of County Counsel services to school districts. Our understanding is that approximately 25% of County Counsel services are devoted to school districts, while Contra Costa County provides 16%. Perhaps an alternative would be for the County to underwrite services and participating districts pay a fair fee based on student enrollment. Your help and consideration are appreciated. Sinc fly, Geo a H. nworth UR:la re..arJZ— .r c.CTi`7^^'� .�.C.t�.•'yJGGiY..�atL a02ss Governing Board David L.Goodman Constance Mueser Maridel Moulton Martha Bali Sandra Hilt In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 1976 In the Mather of Petition opposing the moving of "Saint Francis of Rome" Catholic Church from Port Chicago to the Shore Acres area. Supervisor E. A. W nscheid having brought to the attention of the Board a petition signed by 35 residents of the Shore Acres area, West Pittsburg, opposing the proposed moving of a building previously known as "St. Francis of Rome" Catholic Church, from its present location at Port Chicago to the Shore Acres area, said building to be used as a chapel and recreational facility for young people; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Director cf Planning and the Acting Building Inspector. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 4 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct cW of an order asom on tht minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc; Director of Planning W*ms my hand and the Sent of tho Booed of Acting Building Inspector Supwvaon County Administrator oW, W this 4th day of May . 19 76 Mr. & Mrs. Chas. Culbreath - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk a440:4- Do" Clerk Maxine M. Neufeld 002'I V N 24 4R5 1Wrt PITtSSURG.CAUFORNWA ViEDNESDAY.APRIL 14. 1976 4t Pages. Vol.4.No.U hir' e15 tk 01 T e,old Catholic church at active in the West Pittsburg the Contra Costs Builders`* ; Port Chicago has found a Community Church of God in Exchange. home. Grist. Persons or Cysas interested: • The church. which was "The Kavy is going to move is helping vs remodel the'" saved from + destruction the church bFz%"White said, building slordd contact W16te several }ears ago. has been " - noun that state Sen. John at his Pittftrg office: 43:- gi%ca to the Rev. 1AAverdis Kejedly; Walnut Greek.was 0332 Foster by. thee'Mvy which _ instrumental in acquiring the 'ii=s-V* church and Port Navy's assistance. The churchwhich formerly ; Chicago. " . White, a former. boxer. homed St:Runes of Rorre Fos+,er i;worldng with Billy founded the youth center more Catho&o Church, becaane dee . H'hite.founder and diracmr of than three years ago." center.,of controversy in M1 Arstanda Pittsburg Youth dedicativg his life to belping whthe Catholic diocese: en Center, to transform the troubled and deliquent young. didri t move the ch..urch after -: -church into a combination stets. the Navy purchased Por[. •oath center, chapel and "Re want to provide a• Chiasgo. chapel and recreation Many persons In the area The. =ch. according to faculitits where kids can be didn't vmat to see the ctauch, • Mte,will soon be moved to supervised. especially in the which waazt built in 1912, torn %Fest Pittsburg, probably to r summer;'he explained., dawn and:.protested the -the 200, block of Driftwood The youth center director is proposed action.-The Navy, - Drive.Nodate has been set for currently, seeldng donations however, decided is have it the move.he added. and help for remodeling the moved intact bq •sosz►e is Both Foster and MUe are church. Ile is being aided by terested party: .t Microfilmed with board order 002'"71 Ve, the ucdersl<Ase 1, living is tb Ehore area cd face tc tte propoaed lamtltan the ."--,Ah Car_'—ar, z-3 app z 3 the =cement of the buildIng previously kni in as "Saiut Fr=is cc-* Nw° ftthoij-, Clrjrch from ite present 1wa:iyu u'- 236zt Cihi g* to Stara A-rezc area for the fbl lowing reauona.t�.lz. i' Z� Pruper:yy is j ZOU Por otaC� 1283. 23 'ire brildtrz La beluv all u-XI.-J na Cou.:y ecdan. 3) I%e buUdirb- is uuuzafe (ca3laa hold buildicg frail sepa=tIng). k) The heat'-fou f sm the city limita of Mttaburj to approxImtely five rAles. num ;ddreas 1 Microfilmed with board order . *vpr w Us =-Mono I of Da'tMUG U bd RU Ge-O amu• . UwMw ftva '+stirs i%r 2Sdit at P3�'. U appaea � aw go". • i MOM 1p oyj m4 911 -3 it tat SL r044%; 4c;e- sos . • emasi mW %ft board o w . ♦r r �r �iM�i��M 00273 . i 3 y 3^ .. •• z �r Ys�k W$3 fte ;v;imp in t::3 moor? Isms ts'nad ' 11'= to rte ` f ' V=Pon-,d 3�.a of tim pil:-ick :��i E�.��r, � o�sp►-:: : Rl�, II':sY'::kLtt: �2" � fhe bn,+.ldUW previoaus3y � as "taint;'s=ar � o L�rr�: a bo r x 3�m 3ts preseoA imouna ub ftA cd=v tc'.eame A=w,area for v4',followimg re" u �• 3� 3��s�' � rts', � �'+o� $sem , ' er�`� �r t 2� Me +'f l ltc 13 aU matin a*= 33 Viz LaDdiva :Ej = (cabu:x3 bell buW.W-Ing".4 s., 4) the 30m -fr= m eity ISmitz td' five r+ las. � d� 4mJ Ince Mrmi In- Ul r 1 F� ,( k 'tl Y r Y j Y" f x a v� U Y lar w.r � f' r F �✓7~' .w�ra� M.+.e _ '; .- } �4d+'ME�l{T�'`j.�.sf,� a In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 in this Ma"er of Proposed Modifications to East Bay Health Systems Agency Application for Health Systems Agency Designation. The Board having received an April 22, 1976 letter from Mr. William R. Zion, Chairperson, Alameda/Contra, Costa County Health Systems Agency Coordinating Committee, submitting certain proposed modifications to the East Bay Health Systems Agency application for Health Systems Agency designation in order to strengthen the role of locally elected officials, said modifica— tions to be conditional on the withdrawal of the Joint Powers application; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid modifi— cations are REFERRED to the Government Operations Co=ittee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid), County Adminis— trator, and Director, Human Resources Agency, for recommendation. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 2976. I hereby certify that the foregoing b a true and corred ropy of on order @row on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Mir. William R. Zion WenM my hand and the Seal of the Board of Board Committee Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 4th day of May 1976 Director, Human Resources Agency Public Information Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey Lc O.puty Clerk Helen . Marshall of NVl= • EAST BAY HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCY April 22, 1976 R E CEEIVED James P. Kenny, Chairman Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors AE)R 2 ? 197h 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Ca 'M CO. Dear Supervisor Kenny: n---_%. _o,. Lt- As you know, the Alameda/Contra Costa Counties HSA Coordinating Com- mittee responsible for the East Bay Health Systems Agency application has been and remains most interested in reaching a workable and mutually satis- factory compromise between the three applicants for NSA designation in the two-county area. At its meeting on April 20, therefore, the Coordinating Committee approved a number of significant modifications to their applica- tion which would substantially strengthen the role of local elected officials in the HSA. These modifications, outlined below, are the result of substan- tial dialogue between committee members and representatives of local govern- ment, and will be made conditional on the withdrawal of the "joint powers" application. PROPOSAL: The East Bay Health Systems Agency application would be modified to include the following: 1. Appointments by Alameda Board of Supervisors Four (4) consumers, to include at least two women, one person over age 65, one elected official and one person with recent CHP experience. Two (2) providers, to include a public health official and one provider from the "open" or 'other" category as specified in the Coordinating Committee's application. 2. Appointments by Contra Costa Board of Supervisors Three (3) consumers, including at least one elected official , one woman, and one person with recent CHP experience. One (1) provider, a public health official. 3. The remaining ten (10) consumers would be selected by the nominating committee, from nominees submitted by the two SACs. Six would be selected from Alameda County, four from Contra Costa County. 4. Of the above ten consumers, six would be representatives of the medically underserved, four from Alameda County and two from Contra Costa County. These persons, while directly elected to the SACs, would be nominated by the SACs and selected by the nominating committee. , 100-36th Street, Room 1600 : Richmond, California 94805 : 233-7060, Ext. 3591 7!. ,f Cmc._ �� 'ct'- Micrdilm�lTiC:'��aid order `St-pervi.sor Kenny -2- April 22, 1976 6. Four of the above ten consumers (two from each county) would also be persons with recent CHP experience. 6. At least two providers on the Governing Body would have to be physicians. 7. At least one of the individuals on the nominating committee would be a representative of the medically underserved. 8. The length of term for members on the Governing Body would be two years, with no member serving more than six consecutive years. However, half of the initial appointments would be for one year and half for two years to assure a smooth rotation. 9. The Governing Body should give high priority to increased staffing for sub-subarea councils in order to provide for increased input and participation. HEW has indicated its willingness to accept compromise applications or mergers between two or more applicants, and in fact urges such action wherever possible. We hope this proposal will be acceptable to your Board, and look forward to an early reply. Sincerely, WILLIAM R. ZION Chairperson Alameda/Contra Costa Counties HSA Coordinating Committee WRZ:lp 002'77 In the board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 197,L In the Matter of Eucalyptus Trees in the Vicinity of Star Street, Crockett. Supervisor A. M. Dias having brought to the attention of the Board complaints from residents in the vicinity of 1225 Star Street, Crockett, alleging that eucalyptus trees, on property believed to be owned by Southern Pacific Railroad constitutes a nuisance condition for adjacent property owners; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that tre aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Public Works Director and the Director of Planning. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. i 1 hereby certify that the foregoing h a true and correct appy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of �� Director of Planning County Administrator mixed this 4th day of may _,, 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clark By sm^ ZS4=.W P,&Deputy Clark Rondalynk Shackles H-24"ism 0OZ78 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 7.L in the Maher of Agencies Responsible for Senior Citizen Projects. The Board on April 28, 1976 having received a petition (83 signatures) from county residents requesting that all agencies responsible for Senior citizen projects comply with state and federal regulations on hiring or employment pursuant to the Older Americans Act; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid petition is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for report. PASSED by the Board on May 41, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing h a hue and correct Dopy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dole oforesoid. cc: Mr. Francis Mefford w*ms my hand and the Seal of the Board of (Petitioner) Supervisors Director, Human affixed d,;s4th day of Mavv.�. 19 7& Resources Agency Director of Personnel County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By �r1�-'.�1�, , Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall H-24 3176 lim W2rl9 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Use of Fluoride Compounds in Food and Yater. The Board having received an inquiry dated April 30, 1976 from Mrs. Millicent McCormack, 81 David Drive East, Moraga, California 94556 regarding the use of fluoride compounds in food and water and expressing concern as to possible injurious effects to human beings; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communication is REFERRED to the County Health Officer for reply to Airs. McCormack. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing h a two and correct copy of on ordrr wed on tiw minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: Mrs. M. McCormack Witness my hand and Ow Seal of dw hoard of County Health Officer suporwhaft Director, Human Resources this 4th day of May 19 76 Agency County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Ne-u-feld 00280 H 24 Ann ]OM � s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 11971- in the Matter of San Luis Drain from Kesterson Reservoir to Antioch Reach. The Board having received an April 21, 1976 letter from Griffin, Conway & Jones, P.O. Boz 966, Modesto, California 95353, legal firm representing San Luis Drain Ecological Association, advising that the Association opposes the open ditch construction of the San Luis Drain from Kesterson Reservoir to Antioch Reach as proposed, and urging that alternative solutions (such as undergrounding) be considered; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERBD that said matter is REPERRED to the Public Works Director (Environmental Control). PASSED by the Board on May 49 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corns copy of an order entered on thf minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Griffin, Conway & Jones Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Environmental Control affixed this 4th day of May 1976 County Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clark % l ' By i a<i 1?4 l Deputy Clerk Helen C. MarehaIl H-24 3/77615m 00281 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Hay 4 , 1976 In the Matter of Earthquake Safety Information. The Board having received an April 20, 1976 letter from Mr. Charles Manfred, Director, State of California Office of Emergency Services, P.O. Box 9577, Sacramento, California 95823 urging state and local governments to review and update their emergency plans, and transmitting an emergency planning checklist as well as a summary of earthquake safety actions for individuals; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communication is REFERRED to the County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the fonigaing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. C C: Office of Emergency Wes my hand and the Seal of the Board of Services , State of Supervisors California County Administrator this 4th dolcof E;ay 19 76 Director, Office of J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Emergency Services, By Deputy Clerk N 24 r2nCogMa Costa County R bbie 6Aierrez,' 00282 In 11e Board of Supervisors Of- Contra Costa Count*, State of California Mayo , 1926 In the Matter of Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council A letter having been received from Ms. Elizabeth Grimes, City Clerk, City of Pinole, advising that Mrs. Ann Kesti, 3793 Victor Street, Pinole, has been designated as the city's alternate representative on the Contra Costa County Comm mitt' Development Advisory Council; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that mfrs. Kesti is appointed to the Council as the alternate representative of the City of Pinole. PASSED by the Board on May 41, 1976 I hereby cer!ify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig. Planning Department Supervisors cc: Ann Kesti affixed this 4th day of May 19 76 Director of Manning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Cotatty Administrator County Auditor-Controller $ Deputy Clerk Ronda ynn Shackles *4 zz Afib tam __ _ 002Q1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 1�tav tz . 19 . In the Matter of Claim Martin Bros., Inc., P. 0. Box 5638, Concord, California 94524 by and through its attorney, 141r. Keith M. Richards, 915 Financial Center Building, Oakland California 94612 having filed with this Board on April 20, 1971 an amended claim for damages in the amount of $13,032.09; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid amended claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesoid. cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Public ?Works Director Supervisor Attn: M..r. Broatch affixed thist:th day of liay 19 76 Cou: ty Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk c Ce ; eputy Clerk Rondalyr1n Shackles H•24 3/76!Sm 00284 - c BOARD OF SUPERVISORS F I LED Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 7-A County Administration building Pine & Escobar Streets APR -0 1976 Martinez, California nrgGm . aE B64Z sumer a CLAIM •? Nr to. TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: This claim is presented by MARTIN BROS, INC. The office address of claimant is P. O. Box 5638, Concord, California 94524, and all notices respecting this claim should be sent to KEITH M. RICHARDS, Attorney at Law, 915 Financial Center Building, Oakland, California 94612. The date and place of the transaction giving rise to this claim is that certain contract entered between the DISTRICT and the CLAIMANT, to wit: Cons-Shore Acres Sewer Outfall, and the claimant furnished labor, material and equipment to construct a new wastewater outfall, a 60-inch manhole and other related work between October 1975 and March 1976. Said claim is based upon damages incurred by this claimant as a result of the breach of contract by CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT as follows: 1. Balance due under the contract-in the sum of $11,363.78. 2. Extra work over and above contractual obligation in the sum of $1,668.31. The amount claimed is the sum of $13,032.09. Said damages are based upon the actual records and books of claimant. DATED: April 1976. MARTIN BROS. INC. By -1- 00285 VEERIFICATIOR I.p the undersigned, say;: I am the Viae President and tanager of the claimant corporation, and author zad to na3 this verification on its baha3f; the foregoing is true of rV orn ?cn=ledge, except as to those ratters which are therein stated on my inform-abi.oa or belief, and as to those natters I believe it to be true. ` I decluv ::osier penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true And correct. Executed oa April 191u, at Concord, California `v 00286 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Claim Ms. Beverly Jackson, 164 East 15th Street, Pittsburg, California 94565 by and through her attorney, Mr. James E. Marks, Marks, Hawkins, Jacobs & Ladd, 102 Park Center Plaza, San Jose.. California 95113 having filed with this Board on April 23, 1976 a claim for damages in the amount of $25,000; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Claimant Supe ;son Public ,Storks Director Attn: Mr. Broatch affixed this4th day of May 19 76 Countv•Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk r,__ C UI;Deputy Clerk Rondalybn Shackles H-24 30.76 Ism 0028'7 =LDIALC i JAMES E. MARKS MARKS, HIVIKINS, JACOBS & LADD F I L E D 2 102 Park Center Plaza San Jose, California 95113 APR 2 3 1976 3 (408) 998-5959 ll=o-6 4 awc W.%v su2. nw M 5 Attorney for Claimant 6 7 8 �s a"v 9 N 10 11 BEVERLY JACKSON, r -� NO. a 12 Claimant, Z .. tn 'g4 13 vs. ) Uu Z P ) CLAIM FOR INJURIES AGAINST < < 1,1 _°!: 14 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, � A PUBLIC ENTITY N = O � J V U o z < x W 15 Respondent. ) X u � w . p < Qoz 16 1 Y 17 s✓ < is TO: THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 19 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT BEVERLY JACKSON, whose address 20 is 164 East 15th Street, Pittsburg, California, claims damages 21 from THE COUNTY OF CONTRA CONSTA in the amount computed as of 77 the date of presentation of this claim, of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND �3 DOLLARS ($25,000.00) . 24 This claim is based on personal injuries sustained by 25 claimant on or about January 27, 1976, on the premises of the 26 courthouse of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, in the 27 City of Martinez, County of Contra Costa, State of California, 28 under the following circumstances: 00288 1 Claimant was exiting the Contra Costa County Superior 2 Courthouse at approximately 5:00 p.m. on said date and then 3 doing so necessarily walked downstairs in the front of the 4 courthouse. Due to a chip which had broken out of the concrete 5 stair, Claimant fell to the sidewalk and sustained physical 6 injuries. No warnings were given to Claimant of the existence 7 of the dangerous condition. " 8 Claimant alleges that THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA was 9 negligent and careless in it maintenance and control of the 10 property heretofore described, to wit: the premises of the 11 Superior Courthouse of Contra Costa County in that on January 27, 12 1976, and prior there to, said property was in a dangerous 13 condition, which created a substantial risk of injury when said 14 property was used with due care in a manner in which it was 15 reasonably forceable it would be used, in that the steps infront 16 of said courthouse were broken, cracked, and otherwise unfit for 17 the normal purposes for which they were intended. 18 Claimant further alleges that said dangerous condition 19 created a reasonably forceable risk kind of injury which is 20 hereinafter alleged, and that respondent had actual knowledge 21 of the existence of condition, and knew or should have known 22 of its dangerous character, a sufficient period of time prior 23 to January 27, 1976, to have taken measures against dangerous 24 condition. 25 � Claimant further alleges that it is a direct and proximate 26 result the failure of THE COUNTY OF CONTRA CONSTA, it employees 27 and agents, to repair said dangerous condition or to warrant 28 potential users thereof of the existence of the dangerous condition, -2- 002S9 1• Claimant was hurt and injured consisting of loss of strength 2 and activity, sustaining injury to Claimant's body and shock and 3 injury to Claimant's nervous system and person, all of which said 4 injuries have caused and have continued to cause Claimant• 5 great mental, physical and nervous pain and suffering, all to 6 her general damage in the amount of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS 7 ($25,000.00) . 8 As a further direct and proximate result of said failure 9 to repair a dangerous condition or to warrant Claimant of the 10 existence of said condition, Claimant has incurred liability of jll medical aid and attention, hospitalization, x-rays, nursing care 12 and drugs, for proper care and treatment of said injuries and 13 Claimant will amend her claim to state the exact amount when they 14 have been ascertained. 15 As a further direct and proximate result of the failure 16 to repair said defective condition or to warrant Claimant of the 17 existence of said condition, Claimant has incurred and will in the 18 future incurr loss of income and wages, the exact amount thereof 19 being presently unknown to claimant, and claimant will amend 20 her claim to state the exact amount when it has been ascertained. 21 The total amount claimed as of the day of presentation 22 of this claim is TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAPID DOLLARS ($25,000.00) . 23 All notices and/or other communications with regard to 24 this claim shall be sent to Claimant's attorney herein, 25 JAMES E. MARKS, of MARKS, HAWKINS, JACOBS & LADD, A Legal Associ.at'or 26 102 Park Center Plaza, San Jose, California 95113. 27 Dated: 28 JAMES E. MARKS, Attorney for Claimant 00290 sr � • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of Claim Security Data, Inc., by and through its attorney, Mr. Irving J. Kornfield, Kornfield and Koller, Suite 153, 12th and Oak Building, Oakland, California 94607 having filed with this Board on April 26, 1976 a claim for damages in the amount of $30v826-49; I1 IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Sup"sors an the dote aforesaid. cc: Claimant witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director supewoors Attn: Por. Broatch affixed this 4th day of April 1976 County Counsel County Administrator J. R. Ot_SSON, Clerk ctL)Deputy Clerk Rondaly Shackle s N-?i 3J76 ism 402U R FF1 L E D APR ,:;24P 1976 1, R. OL530-1 To; Board of Supervisors CLW b°AW O. su Contra Costa County, California CLAIM FOR REFUND OF TAXES Claimant, Security Data, Inc. , alleges: 1. That claimant is the lessee of certain personal property hereinafter described which is now and at all times herein mentioned was situated and located at 1500 Newell Avenue, Walnut Creek, Cali- fornia. 2. That said personal property consists of the following items: One IBM Model 3046-60741 Power Unit One IBM Model 3135-60268 Processing Unit One IBM Model 3125-13155 Console keyboard One IBM Model 3803-14440 Tape Control Unit One IBM Model 3420-36329 Magnetic tape Unit One IBM Model 3420-36330 Magnetic tape Unit One IBM Model 3420-36332 Magnetic tape Unit One IBM Model 3420-36331 Magnetic tape Unit One IBM Mode- 651244 Core storage One IBM Model 623237 Integrated file adapter for disc drive 3. That all of the items other than the last two items were leased by petitioner from Security National Bank by leases dated i Nov. 15, 1972, each of said leases being for 97 months. -That the last two items listed were leased by petitioner from Security National Bank by a lease dated Dec. 26, 1973, said lease being for 82 months. 4. That the lessor of said personal, movable property was and is Security National Bank; Security National Bank is a national banking association formed and organized under the laws of the United States o,: America. 5. The County Tax Collector has heretofore issued its tax bills on said personal property tax as follows: (a) Tax bill issued some time prior to August 31, 1974 for tax rate area 9000 No. 3642 assessing taxes in the amount of $14,670.18 for the fiscal year 1974-1975. (b) Tax bili issued approximatzly June 1975 for tax rate area 9000, No. 8019, purporting to be an escaped assessment for the year 1. 1974-1975 and assessing taxes in the amount of $2,564.56. (c) Tax bill issued approximately June 1975 for tax rate area 9000, No. 2650 purporting to assess taxes of $13,591.65 for the year 1975-1976. 6. On March 29, 1976, claimant paid said taxes to the Tax Collector of Contra Costa County under protest. 7. The assessment of said personal property by the County Assessor was erroneous and illegal and the.said personal movable property was and is owned by Security National Bank, a national banking association, and pursuant to Article XII, 516 of the California Constitution, said personal property taxed is exempt from Ad Valorem taxes in view of the fact that Security National Bank pays a special tax in lieu of any and all other state and local taxes. 8.. No refund of said taxes or any part thereof has previously been paid. WHEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of 85096 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, claimant hereby requests that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County make an Order directing and authorizing the Auditor of Contra Costa County to refund to claimant total of said taxes paid being $30,826.49 together with all penalties and interest paid, and together with interest on said sum from the date of payment to the date of refund. Dated: April l'� 1 , 1976. �1K�RNF�IFZD` & IRVING .f K0 IELD Attorne s fo Claimant 2. 00293 i 1100 I, the undersigned say: That I am the Secretary of Security Data, Inc. , claimant in the above-entitled claim for refund of taxes; that I have read the within and foregoing claim for refund of taxes and know the contents thereof; that the same is true of my own knowledge, ex- cept as to the matters stated thereon on information and belief, and as to such matters that I believe the same to be true. Executed on April 20 1976 at Walnut Creek, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. E t i THOMAS K Q�129� i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May tt , 19 76 In the Matter of Adopting Preliminary Budgets for County Fire Protection Districts for the 1976-1977 Fiscal Year, and Fixing Date for Hearing Thereon The County Administrator having presented to this Board Preliminary Budgets for the fiscal year 1976-1977 for the following County Fire Protection Districts under the jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors: Bethel Island Moraga Brentwood Oakley Byron Orinda Contra Costa Pinole Crockett-Carquinez Riverview Eastern Tassajara; and E1 Sobrante Pursuant to Section 13902 of the California Health and Safety Code, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said Preliminary Budgets for County Fire Protection Districts are ADOPTED; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that Tuesday, July 20, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. is FIXED as the date and time for the public hearing to be held in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California on the Preliminary Budgets of the County Fire Protection Districts and any proposed changes thereto. Adopted by the Board on May h, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: County Fire Protection Districts affixed this 6th day of May 1976 -- County Auditor-Controller [ ' J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk. N za IV74 • 15M 06ry Doig 00"5 N.'d-MALD FUNK DIVISIONS avalfow.co«TwoLLu ACCOUNTING `DONALD L. BOUCHET AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OFFICE ROY O. McEK - A5SISTA«T AUDITON.CONfgOM1,L[!f COST ACCOUNTING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAMES A. HORST DATA PROCESSING FINANCE BUILDING GLEN G TAYLOR IAARTINE7- CALIFORNIA 94553 INTERNAL AUDIT JOHN A. ATLARO PHONE t4251 226-3000 PURCHASING WILLIAM A. SCHMIDT A pr27 1976 SYSTEMS p A AMTHUR T. STUR095S TAX AND SPECIAL DISTRICT ACCOUNTING SAM KIMOTO Supervisor James P. Kenny, District I Supervisor Alfred Wt. Dias, District II Supervisor James E. Moriarty, District III Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, District IV Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid, District V Proposed Fire District Budgets for 1976-77 Enclosed is the material covering the proposed budgets of the County Fire District, which we request Board approval on May a, 1976. The revenue to the districts as represented by revenues other than tax, unsecured tax, and secured tax will change. Chapter 1 of the 1968 First Extraordinary Session provides for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption. Tax losses to the districts from these exemptions will be reimbursed by the State. When these reimbursements are determined, revenues other than tax will be increased and tax revenues will be decreased. H. DONALD FUNK Auditor-Controller HDF:dc Enclosure RECEIVED 1976 J. L MSSON CLERK 60AR0 Or Wi-_-2VISORS ONTRA t C , AAiaofi!mrd with board order QM o Q s 000v000vuuv vu v�-. 0 < to O NN r ? r > rrr .-+ ta W N W N000 J W p t: r• WNt700o L4--j OrWW 01 co VCA -4W W rt K re u o A w O p to < -� :u "J OOO = t^.' 'sA nn C7C� RQs SJR A K A CA O 5 w .+•K K a a O ►•- :.t K K K O 7 `C '< It O et = Q 7C• X K O 000 0 3 'i K O " K w O u O O Q Q r r Q W r+ n c n o o rt rt 0 6 =s O' p 40 7 p :J K r a r. O O C7 O n Y. rt Y Y CA K ►t Q Q r► O x .^- < to �-- < O Z3 9 `G `'C :3 v K p r O O A = CD r O O t1 w K O rt P rt r* K 3 r* Q O K O r O ti "X r* rt < n CZ :J O ►-� 'O 1 r* r+ O s v O Q t 0 0 0 0 0'7 G to rt k O r P 7' rf n = n : u W w r r K A C]o r► O ty O u CD r► rt rt fD O iJ `< •: K to K K Q Q ti Q :3 =I O N a 0.0.0 r G CA a." r* O O C K G C C) a :. K w < b.- b.- O O u x 9 rt < = O Q O 'Q G p Q w O 0 0 w e► n 0 cn n r4 N N r• �-+ C X rt O O Ls fy •2 O tJ rt 0 A r `< O a k < O 7 CA."3 . r• •O O C* n r► w A C•t w C O rt rt M Q O to G r O O r 7 K p K `C < r„ r•n < o O to r r• rj ►t n G p O r* O G �K 3 w. C O Ct CA r r O O c� 0C O NC% rtog Cn aO >Co N V N OrIJ V r WCI-0 L O u O Cl So V W NNN >WO W r V coCPB COcoA ot00 rt -Q .•t Q•n ALoVNL% ON1%ANC70D0 :AO VACS VA 3 rt r p SA 0 - N > 00t70o >WtJAAt7 CAN Ot7? CAO O •L� "L3 es K O C7 CAOOOtAV ACnamz. CAa >W rLW :s Q r � to ups p ri Q rf •CZ 3 Q c CA W to O r N r N cn r to p "• *a M Cwr• N ? tAzoO C,tnO Go CA AV 0W us *-2 rG O n •t rr 03AQo0% Z-N V w 00 r? V V Q N ►a� t CA O V CAG%ONtoWO ato tohA rt? Ntn %a n O N 3 ©n C.7 V N Na V V W W up Go ? to A O W r AA O t O T� V Cf Q 74 CA O K V V C's t✓O 3 A 92 C�If LC K Q 0 0 7 (A CA Pft O Q Q'a :r O O K 3 O In r O p r •-3 O r O < O OD 3 p < r N N N CD Q O Q O to n O G O O O W w co ry O 1 K N K p 3 O r* K v '. =r r* r A :. r► O C7 K > r N to N K CD `< rt O V to to r r co Oo Cc N W CA K t+ L1 k ooONGD V NCo t7aA to O OrP.- t) X t7rgoWwWC7Go0 > V N NAC% O !s.a }t a C 9 3 W `-r* N r V ;D cn Q —0 am r O V V t0 n O p = NVrNO WCkVao N to N V W C C CA n WGoOV W ►+ OW VN N N VOA wK CA K Ll . . . . . . K CD O Q Cn V OC7rChoGoG% OsG% r r N 0% O p f� O. CnVrNO W C7OamC7 O t3 N00t0 3 to 9%30.- ulW000 VLhr-'Ck O N OOf.% W O O � X 00297 J 2003 Comparative Budget 6 Secured Tax Requirements Bethel Island Fire Protection District - 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Re{uested Salaries Employee Benefits 34,397 36,109 41,492 Services $ Supplies 15,187 15,414 28,725 Other Charges Fixed Assets 800 1,300 33,786' Reserve for Contingencies 10,400 General Reserve Total Budget 50,334 52,823 114,403 Secured Tax: Amount 46,152 53,387 34,093* Percentage Increase 15.67 (36.14) * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -3- 01Map 2004 Comparative Budget $ Secured Tax Requirements Brentwood Fire Protection District 1974-75 197S-76 1976-77 Budget; Actual Estimated Requested Salaries 6 Employee Benefits 26,667 29,160 37,720 Services 6 Supplies 12,753 20,775 29,87S Other Charges Fixed Assets S,723 19,500 4,000 Reserve for Contingencies T,lS9 General Reserve Total Budget 45.143 69,4SS 78,7S4 Secured Tax: Amount 45,863 53,342 70,686* Percentage Increase 16.31 32.S1 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -4- 2005 Comnarative Budget & Secured Tax Requirements Byron Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries 6 Employee Benefits 4,952 6,220 8,360 Services & Supplies 9,239 11,722 13,000 Other Charges Fixed Assets 1,408 11,538 4,950 Reserve for Contingencies 2,631 General Reserve Total Budget 15,599 29,480 28,941 . Secured Tax: Amount 17,736 20,IS2 27,258* Percentage Increase 13.62 35.26 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowners property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. . t -S- nW 2007 Byron Fire Protection District Capital outlay Reserve Budget- 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Building Construction 2,000 Fire Truck 9,000 General Reserve 2,493 Total 13� 4 3 ....... 0omn".. -.... t 2037 2038 Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Capital outlay Reserve 1974-7S 1975-76 197 Wit' 27,024 Land Purchased 27,02_. Total - I. 00302 .,, 202S Comparative Budget 6 Secured Tax Requirements Contra Costa County Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested' Salaries Employee Benefits 5,204,794 5,S87,824 6,397,448 Services $ Supplies 1,078,856 1,351,472 1,889,400 Other Charges 375,591 19,SS2 6,540 Fixed Assets 319,896 1,484,946 580,825 . Reserve for Contingencies 334,491 General Reserve Total Budget 6,979,137 8,443,794 9,208,704 Secured Tax: Amount 6,848,232 7,1SS,S49 7,992,192* Percentage Increase 4.49 11.69 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -7- d 2029 2028 2'_42 Comparative Budget & Secured Tax Requirements Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries $ Emaloyee Benefits 18,423 17,070 20,090, Services & Supplies 23,009 25,488 29,425 Other Charges - Fixed Assets 5,719 4,739 171*340 Reserve for Contingencies 5,000, General Reserve Total Budget 47,151 47,297 71,85S Secured Tax: Amount 36,003 40,608 SS,106* Percentage Increase 12.79 35.70 Debt Service: Principal 7,000 7,000 7,000 Interest 6S7 394 132 General Reserve -- -- 11,716 Total 7,657 7,394 18,848 Secured Tax: Amount -0- -0- -0- Percentage Increase -0- -0- -0- * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and 1�usiness inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -9- 0030Q ■ 2030 Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District Capital Outlay Reserve 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 .. teaget' Actual Estes Requested Fire Truck: —_...._ 23,094 Total Budget 23,094 -10- __ . 00305 2023 Comparative Budget $ Secured Tax Requirements Eastern Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77" _ Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries & Employee Benefits 43,964 43,730 4S,S00 Services $ Supplies 19,402 19,616 19,96S Other Charges 2,249 80 Fixed Assets 270 18,480 Reserve for Contingencies General Reserve . Total Budget 65,885 63,426 83,945 Secured Tax: Amount 64,289 57,907 82,696* Percentage Increase (9.93) 42.81 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -11- 2011 2944 Comparative Budget 6 Secured Tax Requirements E1 Sobrante Fire Protection District 1974-75 197S-76** 1976-77** Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries Employee Benefits 270,341 621,S72 723,550 i Services $ Supplies 45,052 103,390 144,74S Other Charges Fixed Assets - 13,408 92,000 Reserve for Contingencies 94,929 General Reserve Total Budget 315,393 738,370 1,044,224 Secured Tax• Amount 213,762 682,522 777,681* Percentage Increase 13.94 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. ** THE 1975-76 and 1976-77 FIGURES ARE THE CMfBINED AMOUNTS OF THE EL SOBRANTE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AW T11E FOWIER SAN PABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. T11E FORMER SAID PABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT KAS AMEXED TO 771E EL SOBRANTE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT EFFECTIVE JUNE 30, 1975. SEE PACE 18 FOR 1974-7S FIGURES OF THE FORTIER SAN PABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. -12- 2010 Comparative Budget $ Secured Tax Requirements Morava Fire Protection District 1974-75 197S-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested" Salaries & Employee Benefits 574,762 612,094. 6S4,7S7 Services 8 Supplies 84,241 102,464 238,940 Other Charges Fixed Assets 52,947 II,S39 84,040 Reserve for Contingencies - 2S,000 General Reserve Total Budget 711,9S0 726,097 902,737 Secured Tax: Amount 636,109 726,294 763,606* Percentage Increase 14.18 S.14 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. VO . _.. 2017 2943 Comparative Budget Secured Tax Requirements Oakley Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries & Employee Benefits 4,850 6,100 7,800 Services & Supplies 47,419 48,1SS 47,150 Other Charges Fixed Assets 3,492 71110 7,295 Reserve for Contingencies General Reserve Total Budget SS,761 61,365 62,245 Secured Tax: Amount 40,722 49,346 50,897* Percentage Increase 21.18 3.14 Debt Service: Principal 2,000 2,000 2,000 Interest 240 160 80 Total 2,240 2,160 2,080 Secured Tax: Amount 2,088 1,957 1,830* Percentage Increase (6.27) (6.49) * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -14- 00M 2018 2940 Comparative Budget $ Secured Tax Requirements Orinda Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries 8 Employee Benefits 691,507• 781,150 824,960 Services & Supplies 127,608 179,167 198,130 Fixed Assets 2,822 13,422 15,600 Reserve for Contingencies 10,000 General Reserve 51000 Total Budget 821,937 .973,739 1,053,690 Secured Tax: Amount 816,400 943,809 1,005,108* Percentage Increase 15.61 6.49 Debt Service 1968 Issue: Principal 15,000 15,000 IS,000 Interest 16,900 16,000, IS,100 General Reserve 7,100 Total 31,900 31,000 37,200 Secured Tax: Amount 30,136 30,288 27,955* Percentage Increase .54 (7.70) * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exenntion and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -15- 0=0 :r -4019 Comparative Budget & Secured Tax Requirements Pinole Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested . " Salaries Employee Benefits Services $ Supplies 75,981 103,330 118,7OS Other Charges Fixed. Assets Reserve for Contingencies General Reserve Total Budget 75,931 103,330 118,7OS Secured Tax: Amount 78,899 _ 93,661 11O,91S* Percentage Increase 18.71 18.42 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -16- 00311 2022 Comparative Budget & Secured Tax Requirement Riverview Fire Protection District** 1974-7S 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries $ Employee Benefits 1,934,782 2,147,615 Services & Supplies 481,283 612,950 Other Charges 8S,000 85,000 Fixed Assets 91,012 229,384 Reserve for Contingencies 186,000 Total Budget 2,592,077 3.260,949 Secured Tax: Amount 2,665,769 2,878,771* Percentage Increase 7.99 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. **THIS DISTRICT W11CH INCLUDES THE CITIES OF ANtTIOCH ANM PITTSBURG AND SURRMNI)ING UNINCORPORATED AREAS WAS FOPMED MD CONFIDIED BY THE VOTERS ON NOVEMBER S. 1974 KITH EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUKE 30, 1975. DISTRICT STARTED OPERATION O.v JULY 1, 1975. -17- 0M . ■ 1 2021 Comparative Budget S Secured Tax Requirements San Pablo Fire Protection District* 1974-7S 1975-76 1976-77 Budget: Actual Estimated Requested Salaries 6 Employee Benefits 428,374 Services 6 Supplies 61,919 Other Charges Fixed Assets 3,491 Reserve for Contingencies General Reserve Total Budget 493,784 Secured Tax: Amount 368,172 Percentage Increase * TMS DISTRICT WAS AWIEXED TO THE EL SOBRANTE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT EFFECTIVE JUTE 30, 1975. SEE PAGE 12 FOR 1975-76 AND 1976-77 BUDGET FIGURES. t 2023 Comparative Budget S Secured Tax Requirements Tassajara Fire Protection District 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 Budget; Actual Estimated Requested Salaries S Employee Benefits 1,200 1,200 1,200 Services S Supplies 6,811 10,458 15,250 Other Charges Fixed Assets 6,SSS 8,200 13,000 Reserve for Contingencies General Reserve Total Budget 14.866 191858 29,450 Secured Tax: Amount 14,370 13,951 23,552* Percentage Increase (2.92) 68.82 * This amount will change when the state reimbursement for homeowner's property tax exemption and business inventory tax exemption is determined. The change will be decrease to this figure and increase to revenue other than taxes for the state reimbursement amount. -19- 00314 e I ' County Fire Districts 1976-77 Preliminary Budgets Estimates of Revenue Other Than Taxes Requested Actual Estimated Estimated Revenue Revenue Revenue 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 District Item Bethel Island Homeowner's Property Taut Relief 4,24S 4,490 Business Inventory Tax Relief 921 764 Indemnifying Proceeds 130 Other Revenue 920 6,089 5,384 Brentwood Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,825 4,129' Business Inventory Tax Relief 354 406 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 41 Other Revenue 140 4,220 4,675 Byron Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 493 S71 Business Inventory Tax Relief 100 122 593 693 Contra Costa Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 733,443 722,IS8 Business Inventory Tax Relief 109,97S 134,003 Weed Abatement 80,347 82,730 100,000 State Subventions 39,605 2,731 6,OGO Interest Income 21,163 19,205 3,000 Hydrant Rental Fees 6,876 1,440 3,000 Rental Income 4,334 4,250 License 6 Permit Fees US S24 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 712 300 300 Highway Rental 353 711 Sale of Personal Property 2S5 22,565 Fire Protection Services 160 95 Other Revenue S,730 3,214 10,000 1,003,914 993,956 122,300 __ _ 0=5 County Fire Districts 1976-77 Preliminary Budgets Estimates of Revenue Other Than Taxes Requested Actual Estimated Estimated Revenue Revenue Revenue 1974-75 1975-76 1476-77 District Item Crockett-Carquinez Business Inventory Tax Relief 4,097 6,682 Sale of Real Estate 7,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,578 3,642 Fire Protection Services 304 315 Rental Income 120 Sale of Personal Property 255 . Indemnifying Proceeds 70 - State Subvention 33 24 Interest Income 28 Other Revenue 368 428 Interest Income - Debt Service 1,164 399. 9,692 18,720 Eastern Ho.:.eowner's Property Tax Relief 1,426 1,534 County Subvention 4,330 Sale of Personal Property 2S0 Business Inventory Tax Relief 222 137 State Suhvention 157 23 Other Revenue 60 22 2,115 6,046 E1 Sobrante Fire Protection Services 92,421 87,665 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 35,231 101,761 Weed Abatement 3,228 5,874 State Subvention 2,079 S,OSO Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,010 22,475 Indennifying Proceeds 68 Rent Income 60 License F Permit Fees 27 Other Revenue 192 134,SS6 223,085 oU316 County Fire Districts 1976-77 Preliminary Budgets Estimates of Revenue Other Than Taxes Requested Actual Estimated Estimated Revenue Revenue Revenue 2974-75 1975-76 1976-77• District Item Moraga Homeowner's Property Tax Relief S9,986 67,076 Communication Services (from Orinda) 21,858 22,000 22,000 Business Inventory Tax Relief- 2,306 3,192 Weed Abatement 2,246 Sale of Personal Property 1,180 State Subvention 7S8 281 Indemnifying Proceeds 307 Highway Rental 16 17 Other Revenue 276 34 88,626 92,907 224000 Oakley Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 4,118 4,799 Business Inventory Tax Relief 969 896 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 101 100 Rental Income 40 Business Inventory Tax Relief - Debt Service 1.36 173 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief - Debt Service 133 114 Payments in Lieu of Taxes - Debt Service 3 3 S,SOO 6,085 Orinda Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 72,371 82,920 Indemnifying Proceeds 7,570 Business Inventory Tax Relief 3,233 2,632 State Subvention 2,837 46S Fire Protection Services 7SO Interest Income 339 Other Revenue 6 155 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief - Debt Service 2,668 2,662 Business Inventory Tax Relief - Debt Service ISO 98 89,635 89,271 WM .� , -4- County Fire Districts 1976-77 Prelininary Budgets Estimates of Revenue Other Than Taxes Requested Actual Estimated Estimated Revenue Revenue Revenue' 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 District Item . Pinole Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 16,669 18,063 - Business Inventory Tax Relief 311 310 16,980 18,373 Riverview Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 165,859 Business Inventory Tax Relief 100,188 Weed Abatement 70,000 State Subvention 6,000 License & Permit Fees 49 Other Revenue 140 5,000 266,236 812000 Tassajara Sale of Personal Property 950 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 429 479 Business Inventory Tax Relief 22 14 1,401 493 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 Zr2- In the Matter of Authorizing Suit to Recover Costs Due Contra Costa CoxLn y IT I5 BY ",W, 130MU-) GRMT RED that legal action be initiated in the Small Claims Court by the Auditor-Controller's Iffice against the following Aerson to recover the cost owed Contra Costa county: Gerald Thoras 101heeler ''ublic Works M-51. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Adr ;-nistrator Supervisors County Audi tor=Controller affixed this 4th �y of May 19 76 (p) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H 24 1284 - 15-M Maxine M. Neuf d au�s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meetings IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the person listed below is AUTHORIZED to attend the following meeting at her own expense on county time: NAME h DEPARTMENT MEETING DATES Kathryn Crossley Annual Conference of May 19, 1976 Social Service, Ass6ciation of Family through Conciliation Svc Conciliation Courts $ May 22; , 1976 Services Phoenix, Arizona PASSED BY THE BOARD on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify thud the fon pomp is a tnie and correct copy of an order entered on the nunutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Director, HRA Supervisors cc: County Welfare Director affixed this 4th day of May 19 76 Kathryn Crossley -� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Judge.,AradsOn Superior Ct. sy • 4l-a1� D*" Cts County Auditor—Controller Maxine M. Ne eld LK H 24 !,/7S 16M 00320 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 76 In the Matter of TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Helen Roop, Library Specialist, is AUTHORIZED to attend the American Library Association Conference in Chicago, Illinois from July 19, 1976 to July 24, 1976 (time only). Passed by the Board on May 41, 1976 I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Librarian Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 4th day of May 1976 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ByeDeputy Clerk (p) Maxine M. Neufelj� H24 695 IOM vo321 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matted of Social Service ) Funding Problems. ; May 'k, '1976 The Board having this day considered the report of the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny, substituting for Supervisor W. N. Boggess, and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty) on social service funding problems dated May 4, 1976 (a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board); IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that: 1. The Fnnman Resources Agency be considered a single department for the purpose of interpreting Article XI, Section 5, para- graph 2 of the Civil Service Commission Rules; 2. The Human Resources Director identify all major programs within the Human Resources Agency and their finding sources and report this information to the Administration and Finance Committee on May 17, 1976 so the Committee can consider the relative program priorities by the major divisions; 3. An informal committee comprised of chairpersons of all advisory committees under the jurisdiction of the Human Resources Agency, together with repre- sentatives of Local 535 and CITE (United Clerical Employees), be invited to most with the Administration and Finance Committee to discuss program priorities and specific program reductions; It. The County Administrator review and make a recommendation to the Committee on the Proposal that the Board employ a manage- ment consultant to advise on the level of staff required to adequately manage the Social Service Department; 5. The Human Resources Director explore fully with the State Department of Health and the State Department of Benefit Payments the possibility of effecting a transfer of the administrative costs of the In-Home Care Program from the County Title XX to reduce the shortfall of funds by about $1 million; 6. The County Counsel review an opinion from the Legislative Counsel of California dated April 27, 1976 addressed to Senator John A. Nejedly and furnish an opinion as early as practicable on whether State funding of In Home Supportive Services shall include funding the cost of having the County administer such services; 7. County officials diligently pursue enact- ment of SB 1881 and augmentation of the State budget for the $12 million estimated to fully fund all counties' Title XX programs at the 1975-1976 level, but no less than a $4 million augmentation, which would permit counties to choose either the 1974---1975 or 1975-1976 allocation; 8. The County utilize for planning purposes County funding of $2,795,000, which repre- sents the number of County dollars provided for Title XX programs in the 1975-1976 budget; 9. The Director of Personnel cease certifying names from eligible lists to any County department for vacant clerical positions in the classes of Typist and Intermediate Typist Clerk, Stenographer and Intermediate Stenographer Clerk, and Senior Clerk; said positions to be filled (where released for refilling) by transfers from the Human Resources Agency, except as may be other- wise recommended by the County Administrator and authorized by the Board Administration and Finance Committee; and further, the Director of Personnel and Human Resources Director shall make all possible efforts to accommodate voluntary demotional and lateral transfers, together with use of part-time positions to minimize the impact of any layoffs insofar as practicable; 10. The Human Resources Director draw up recom- mended reductions in staff to offset deficits of $3,270,000 and $2,270,000 and furnish the Administration and Finance Committee by May 17th with a schedule showing the number and classi- fication of positions which must be reduced to eliminate deficits of the magnitude cited; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administration and Finance Committee continue its review of other aspects of this matter cited in its report of May 4, 1976 and report to the Board on May 18, 1976; and IT IS F4IRVEM ORDERED that copies of the Committee's progress report be furnished to this County's Congressional and State Legislative Delegations with a letter inviting them to participate, or send a representative, to further meetings of the Administration and Finance Committee to be held for review of social service funding problems. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 00 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of May, 1976. - J. R. OLSSON, CLERK aDeputy Clerk L.- cc: Board Committee -- Human Resources Agency DRunty Administrator rector of Personnel 1 . The-Board of Supervis_.s Contra ( JCh'n"'' airman Costa Jam"n.f7l sa.n County Administration Building County Clerk and P.O.Box 911 Ex Officio Clark of the Board Martinez.California 94553County Mrs Gw*Wbw NwMM Chief Clark Jams P.Kenny-RicMaond (415)372-2371 1st District Alfred M.Dias-EI Sobrante 2nd District REC&VED Jams E.Moriarty-Lafayette 3rd District Waren N.Bgosss-Concord 4th District c Edmond A.Linutaid-Pittsburg M Y 1976 F 976 5th District MAY 4, 1976 J. O� tJ BO OF StJPERV CO' ¢` 1 REPORT E ` OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING PROBLEMS The Board of Supervisors received a report from this Committee on April 6, 1976. This report transmitted to the Board a memorandum from the Director, Human Resources Agency, making several recommendations to resolve the Social Service funding problems presently confronting the Board. The Board on April 6, 1976 decided to hold a public work session on the evening of April 12, 1976 and a public hearing on April 20, 1976. It was impossible to complete the hearing in one afternoon and it was, there- fore, recessed until the morning of April 21 and completed at that time. At the conclusion of the hearing on April 21, the Board referred all of the testimony to this Committee and ordered us to provide the Board with a status report on May 4, 1976. In preparing to make this status report, the Committee (with Supervisor Kenny substituting for Supervisor Boggess) has considered all testimony received at the hearing and has met at length with Mr. Will, Mr. Van Marter, members of their staff, and representatives from the Family and Children's Services Advisory Committee. As a result of this review, the Committee has reached several conclusions as follows: 1. Unless the Board of Supervisors takes some action, there will exist in the 1976-1977 budget for the Social Service Department an unfunded deficit of approximately $5,850,000. 2. This potential deficit exists for three principal reasons. First, there has been no increase in the Federal ceiling of $2.5 billion. Because of inflation and the implementation of Title XX of the Social Security Act, this ceiling has left California with inadequate funding for social service programs. Second, the allocation formula adopted by the State Administration has progressively and drastically reduced the amount of Federal funding available to Contra Costa County and many other counties in the State without regard to counties' willingness to support social services with the traditional 25% local share. of,rlorz Microfilmed with board order -2- 2. cont'd Third, this Board of Supervisors has traditionally supported a relatively high level of social services, particularly in terms of utilizing Federal funds extensively at a time when those funds were available on an open-ended basis. The Board should neither regret nor apologize for this high level of Federally funded social services. The Committee simply points out that when the closed-ended regressive allocation of funds was applied, Contra Costa County suffered more than any other county in the State because of its historic position. 3. Laying off public employees is and should always be a last resort after all other viable alternatives have been fully explored. The Administration and Finance Committee attaches for the Board's information a list of policy issues considered by the Committee in preparing their status report. Our recommendations relate directly to these policy issues. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The Board of Supervisors should consider the Human Resources Agency a single department for layoff purposes. It is reasonable to assume that when speaking of "department" in the Civil Service rules, the intent was that a department be defined as a group of programs and personnel reporting to a single appointing authority. Since the Board has clearly established (most recently in Resolution No. 75/449) that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is the appointing authority for all positions within that Agency, it seems clear that the Agency must be a "department" within the context of Article XI, Section 5, paragraph 2 of the Civil Service Commission rules and regulations. This means that all positions within a given classifica- tion throughout the Human Resources Agency will be included in preparing seniority lists for any eventual layoff purposes. 2. The Board should not limit program cuts solely to the Social Service Department. In connection with this, the Board should order the Director, Human Resources Agency, to identify all major programs operated within the Human Resources Agency and their funding sources so that this Committee can consider relative program priorities between the major divisions in the Agency rather than forcing all program reductions to be absorbed within the Social Service Department without looking at other programs in the Agency which may be of less overall value. 3. This report should be seen as a status report only. The Committee will be having additional meetings over the next several weeks and will be making further recommendations to the Board on a regular basis. However, we do ask that the Board act on the recommendations contained in this report. 4. Several people testified at the public hearing requesting that a Citizens' Committee be established to advise the Board on appropriate program priorities. The Committee intends to meet on May 10, 1976 with the Chairpersons of all Advisory Committees under the jurisdiction of the Human Resources Agency, and with representatives of Local #535 W&V w -3- 4. cont'd and CUE (Clerical Employees Union) to discuss program priorities and other items on which these advisory groups may wish to provide input. These discussions will be important in the Committee's eventual recommenda- tions to the Board regarding specific program cuts which will be necessary. 5. It has been recommended to the Committee that the Board employ_ a Management Consultant to advise the Board on the level of staff required to adequately manage the Social Service Department. The Committee recommends that the Board refer this matter to the County Administrator and that the County Administrator be ordered to review this request and make recommendations to the Committee in the near future. The Committee does.note its. concern that any staff reductions reflect appropriate reductions in administrative and supervisory positions, particularly in the top management levels of the Social Service Department. 6. It has been recommended that the Board discontinue the use of facilities at 28 Columbia Circle, Pittsburg, and 247 Rodeo Avenue, Rodeo. The Committee believes that it is inappropriate to make a final decision on these space requirements until the exact level of staff reductions has been determined and the Board is ready to consider program requirements. The Committee will make a further recommendation to the Board on this subject in the future. 7. At the public hearing it was recommended that efforts be made to transfer, the administrative costs of the In-Home Care Program out from under the closed-end allocation of Federal social service funds so that-these costs would not be a drain on the Title XX allocation. The Committee has determined that there is a reasonable chance that this can be accomplished and recommends that the Boa-rd order the Director, Human Resources Agency, to explore fully with the State Department of Health and the State Department of Benefit Payments the possibility of effecting this transfer, which would remove about $1,000,000 from the Title XX deficit. Further, the Committee recommends that the Board direct the County Counsel to review an opinion received from the Legislative Counsel on this subject and offer an opinion to the Board of Supervisors at an early date on whether State funding of In-Home Supportive services should include funding the cost of administering such services by the counties. The Legislative Counsel's opinion is attached for the Board's information. 8. It has been recommended that the Board anticipate an allocation of Federal social service funds for the 1976-1977 fiscal year in the amount of $5,327,000, which represents this -County's allocation for the current fiscal year. Legislative efforts are continuing in Sacramento toachieve a rollback of the allocation formula to the 1974-1975 level. It seems increasingly likely that these efforts will be successful so that the County will receive either this year's or last year's allocation of Federal social service funds. The Board has previously endorsed SB 1881 and has forwarded copies of their Resolution of support to those counties in California which would benefit by SB 1881. It has been determined that it would require approximately $12 million in State General Fund money to fund all counties' title XX programs at the 1975-1976 level. 00M -4- 8. cont'd The consultant to the Assembly Mays and Means Committee has suggested an augmentation of $4 million which would permit counties to choose either the 1974-1975 or 1975-1976 allocation. The Committee recommends that the Board of Supervisors instruct all appropriate County officials to pursue all efforts to achieve this augmentation at the $12 million level if possible but in no case at less than the $4 million level. The Committee also recommends that each member of the Board of Supervisors- personally accept a responsibility to assist these legislative efforts in whatever way he can. The Committee is not prepared to make a specific recommendation to the Board at this time on the level of funding which should be anticipated, although for planning purposes the Committee recommends that the Board anticipate an allocation of $5,327,000. 9. It has been recommended that the Board commit itself to providing $2,991,000 as the County share for Title XX funding in the 1976-1977 fiscal year. The Committee understands that this figure represents the number of County dollars provided for Title XX programs in the 1975-1976 budget plus a 7% inflation factor. For planning purposes, the Committee recommends that the Board anticipate a County funding level of $2,795,000 which represents the number of County dollars provided for Title XX programs in the 1975-1976 budget without the inflation factor. The Committee is not, however, asking the Board for any firm commitment to this figure at this time pending further Committee meetings and pending the outcome of efforts in the Legislature to increase the Federal allocation. 10. It has been recommended that the Board make available $555,000 in County money to fund the Conservatorship program and the workshops for the Mentally Retarded for the 1976-1977 fiscal year, directing that plans be made to fund these programs at an appropriate level with other revenue sources beginning July 1, 1977. The Committee is not yet prepared to make a recommendation to the Board on this matter. This can more appropriately be dealt with when the Committee is prepared to look at all program priorities within the Human Resources Agency. ll. It has been recommended that the Board commit additional funds (either Revenue Sharing or other County monies) to offset the proposed deficit in Federal service funds. The Committee is not now prepared to ask the Board to commit any County funds over and above those provided for in the 1975-1976 budget. 12. It has been recommended that the Board direct the Civil Service Department and all other County departments to permit lateral transfers from the Social Service Department consistent with existing Civil Service Commission rules. The Committee recommends that the Board order the Director of Personnel to avoid certifying names to any County department for clerical positions in the Typist Clerk, Intermediate Typist .Cierk, and Senior Clerk classifications and that County Department Heads wishing to fill clerical positions which have been unfrozen by the County Administrator's Office be required to accept transfers from the Social Service Department before filling such positions from eligible lists. The Committee further recommends that the Board order the Director of Personnel and the Director, Human W� C -5- 12. cont'd Resources Agency, to make all possible efforts to permit voluntary , reductions and lateral transfers, and that the use of part-time positions be fully explored in an effort to reduce to the maximum extent possible the impact of any possible layoffs. 13. The Committee plans to meet on May 10, 1976, at 2 p.m., with the Chair- persons of the several Advisory groups under the jurisdiction of the Human Resources Agency. The Committee plans to meet again with the Director of the Human Resources Agency and the County Administrator at 8 a.m. on Monday, May 17, 1976, to consider the specific number of positions which must be reduced in each classification. The Committee intends to make a report to the Board on May 18, with additional recommendations around both personnel and program issues, and requests that the Board schedule time on their agenda for May 18 at 9:30 a.m. for such a Committee report. 14. In summary, the Committee recommends that the Board order the Director, Human Resources Agency, to draw up recommended reductions in staff to offset deficits of $3,270,000 and $2,270,000, providing the Committee by May 17 with the number and classification of positions which must be reduced to eliminate either of these deficits. The larger of these two figures represents the maximum deficit which the Committee believes will result given the information now before the Committee. The lower deficit figure will result if we are able to shift the administrative costs of the In-Home Care Program out from under the Title XX allocation. Subsequent events at the State level may result in the Committee's being able to modify either or both of these deficit figures. TITLE XX PROPOSED BUDGET 1976-1977 $11,392,000'` 1975-76 Federal Title XX Allocation $5,327,000 1975-76 County funds budgeted for Title XX 2,795,000 Deficit #1 $ 3,270,000 In-Home Care shift in costs $1,000,000 Deficit #2 $ 2,270,000 ** Title IV-C (WIN) shift $ 379,000 ** Title IV-B (Child welfare) shift $ 125,000 *A reduction of $92,000 in Title XX claims is shown because we have more accurate information on charges from other departments than we had when the budget request was submitted. `These shifts out from under Title XX are likely. However, both programs also have closed-end allocations and we have no assurance that our allocations will be sufficient to cover these cost shifts in the 1976-1977 budget. Therefore, we are leaving them in the Title XX deficit at this time. 0M -6- . P. KENNY E. MORIARTY Supervisor District /Supervisor Distri III Attachments (2) _ r f 00330 ;[*"'Allo C'ZCSLA • • * - iiRLc,•t,YT* •. KJ a .. w.TTs •.• a....a. Ovt�K,KYw• ♦♦♦ Na1su.L wrer•s•u- . Cowaae K 0.A.rusceLL �♦rTT,� �• ,A+ IaYL A. A Rat� Nwlia<tR c RR•I•• G2u�' j"1s»4 D. .•KO ROL wacs C.AS*at MtMit.ptCwaTc14Y . • iJAws* a ws..•o1a RiR(TT►1.AYw:I y Re Q ti17 �My CO1i1i•t iTaw.ci N.LOY.,..o.w /,1I,11+ 1A�1111111••i�iI i1rHi• ApR I-$ IJ�o 0cr[.D.ac a,cwtwuc.JR. - � 1+A•+i�`Mf C.D&VI 1.C4WFWW s*Sal /.ww N.MACaci ��++' Q pai�w o�C.••1ar Mate F.NOwAK /saxes•S.Dome• Rwact6uL s,awuwo M•s.T CYLL4•tw,t ra�MMa►••/YTt•/ �Mt•ZLG�•.JR. L/LTnawtt H.r<:w J«us FOSscrTi s�tsieeeanoL MaOitiJ.ras.t. GEORGE H. MURPHY lracRY/pTo lSMA _ MOOT cacti rYj.L4.11/ • ALTms b.Coas• •07 f•YiN swo►ovar ftes"i D.C10+ss 6011Aw64.6ss•Gala . J"59 W.6068% • - Imams R.)1[bL• ' �ILtcwILJt�a,•s '_ NLLNacL J.Macs,+ • Jw icuwccws•�stt ' zlr Sacrament0, California vie ow/:o:�Casv ' surwcv C.LC1:L - awsucL LOY�i April 27 1976 - JAW99 A.~A•sALA r_ s DAVIS N.MCuta _ VXM F.bleLf.icas • NINO A.14mocnr." • s • 111418981 0.NStan< • JQsw A.Y.6CiA Nonorable John A. Nejedly.- - = TVACW`"oro.ra�11 - Senate Chamber - N..O991fTC ROTw Muc«R.c•RanLLLA NA.T SMAW " Public Social Services -. 1W16942 - Jwws W""T. T `Tact` T.sTV oLo.caL ' - swaK L t:aasr, .• 7b01Lu D.WMc•.w.v Dear Senator hejedly: - - Jls/wtw�wc • - Qi�WiTO,wt.zonas • Swungs QUESTION You have asked whether state funding of in-home _ supportive services includes funding of• the cost of admin- istering such services by the counties. . OPINION - State funding of in-home supportive services Includes funding of the cost of administering such ser- vices by the counties. ' ANALYSIS - ' - . 'rbe federal goverment grants a linfl, lump sum amount to each state for all social services, including in- bome supportive services (Sec. 2002(a) (2) , Title XX, Soc. Sec. Act) at a rate of 90, 75 or, in some cases, 50 percent . of the cost of services (Sec. 2002(a) (1) and ( 4) , Title X. Soc. Sec. Act) . Such federal-social service fmids include expenditures considered appropriate for the effective and efficient ackniristration of the state program for services (Sec. 225.90 (h) , Title 45, C.F.R.; Sec. 2002(x) (1) , Title XX, Soc. Sec. Act) . ' - ..�+ • • _ SO • HgAorable John A. Nejedly - p. 2 - #6942 • Section 15151.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code allocates this federal social services monies so --hat the counties receive at least 66 percent of the fece_al total and the rerzairder is allocated to the state. In addition, unused federal social service funds may be reallocated in • order to be fully utilized. - In-home supportive services are available trider the state supolere3ta_-y prccran for aged, blind, a=d dis- abled (SSP) to elicible recipients, not exceedinc a total cost of $350 per month, except that severely _=paired - dividuals may receive either the services o: cash to P•..r- ehase the services noz exceeding a total cost of $450 par - month (Secs. 12300, 12303.5, a:d 12304, :7.0-t I.C.) • Generally, each coi3"r is responsible for the • administration or social services in the county sur,jec= - • too the provisions on soca services under the SS? pro- gram (Sec. 10800, ti_b I.C.) . - Under the SS? progran the state, as recards _ homq supuor:.ive services, is recuired to pay the - • snatching fads rec-ai-ea for federal social services - funds frcm the General Fund -(Sec. 12306 , V.I.a i.C.) . • Sime federal soc=al services funds include costs • foX the appropriate adm r1 st=ation of such services, and - Since Section 12306 race-i=es the state to may General Fund • monies to =atch 1era' socia- .service fu:..ds, it is o•�:r • r opinion that s=te fu=rling of =-no-- supportive services • includes the cost of administering in-ho=e supporziva set- vices by the couaties. ' . Very truly yours, • 'z - George H. Pl rphy . • Ugislative Coul el Mary'Shaw Deputy Legislative Counsel i JOS:sms • - I ' i • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 . 19 76 In the Matter of Responding to an Inquiry from CALTRANS Regarding Construction of the New Antioch Bridge. The Board of Supervisors, through its- action of April 13, 1976, referred a letter from CALTRANS to the Public Works Director for recommendation. In this letter, Mr. T. R. Lammers, District Director of CALTRANS, advised that in all probability the cost for the new Antioch Bridge will be more than CALTRANS has available, and requested a recommendation from the Board as to its preference how the additional funds are to be raised. Setting tolls is the sole responsibility of the Toll Bridge Authority. It should be pointed out that the increases proposed would result in tolls which are similar to those charged on other bridges in the San Francisco Bay Area. In view of the above, and because the Board, on numerous occasions, has supported construction of the new Antioch Bridge for safety and traffic reasons, this Board reaffirms the urgency of early construction of the Antioch Bridge, but leaves the decision as to which user charge to increase in the hands of the Toll Bridge Authority, with the understanding that the charges be no more, both in amount and time, than necessary to finance the new bridge. The Board hereby accepts and concurs with the report of the Public Works Director on this matter, and directs the Clerk of the Board to send a copy of this Order to Mr. T. R. Lammers, District Director, CALTRANS. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors en the date aforesaid. Originating Department: Public Works Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Super"Sors cc: Public Works Director affixed this 4th day of MM 19 J County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Mr. T. R. Lammers, District Director 2! i CALTRANS, P. O. Box 3366, BY (� Deputy Clerk Rincon Annex, San Francisco, CA 94119 N. In-104-ham H 24 3/75 IOU c� C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 15 May 4 , 19 76 In the Maher of Agreement for Engineering Services for Survey Work for the Construc- tion of Sewage Collection and Treatment Facilities in Sanitation District No. 15 The Ex Officio Chief Engineer of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 15 having recommended that this Board approve the Agree- ment for Engineering Services with the Consultant, Raymond Vail and Associates, providing payment in the amount of $42,500 for survey work necessary for the completion of Contract Plans and Specifications for the construction of sewage collection and treatment facilities which would service the Bethel Island and Sandmound Slough areas; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Chief Engineer is APPROVED and its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. ORIGINATOR: Public Works Department Wonew'"y hand and fhe Seal of the Board of Environmental Contro uPw4'son affixed this 4th day of May . 19 7 6 cc: Consultant (via P. J.) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director Environmental Control BY Deputy Clerk County Auditor—Controller N. Irijraham County Administrator H 24 U75 101A 00334 r AGREEMENT FOR ENGI?JEERING SERVICES 1. GENERAL A. Effective MAY 4 • , 19760 the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTITfCV 15, a po tical subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "DISTRICT" and RAYMOND VAIL AND ASSOCIATES, 8830 Madison Avenue, P. 0. Box 265, Fair Oaks, California, hereinafter called "ENGINEER", mutually agrees as follows: This agreement is funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Neither the United States nor the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (hereinafter "EPA") is a party to this agreement. This agreement is subject to regu- lations contained in 40 CFR 35.9369 35.937, and 35.939. 2, RESPONSIBILITY OF 0AE ENGINEER A. The DISTRICT requires, and the ENGINEER is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform and furnish pro- fessional services in connection with the design surveys of the proposed planning and design of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities as set forth in the Project Report for Construction of Water Pollution Control Facilities 1974-75. (1) The ENGINEER shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, timely completion, and the coordination of all reports and other,.services furnished by the ENGINEER under this agreement. The ENGINEER shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies in his reports, and other services. (2) The ENGINEER shall perform such professional services as may be necessary to accomplish the work required to be per- formed under this agreement, in accordance with this agreement and applicable EPA requirements. (3) Approval by the DISTRICT or EPA of reports and incidental engineering work or materials furnished hereunder shall not in any way relieve the ENGINEER of responsibility for the technical adequacy of the work. Neither the DISTRICT's nor EPA's review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the services shall be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this agreement or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this agreement, and the ENGINEER shall be, and remain, liable in accordance with applicable law for all damages to the DISTRICT or EPA caused by the EN6GIHEER13 negligent per- formance of any of the services furnished under this agreement, Microfilmed with board ordw 3 (4) The rights and remedies of the DISTRICT provided for under this agreement are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. B. The DISTRICT hereby employs ENGINEER, and ENGINEER accepts such employment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 3. SCOPE OF WORK A. Except as may be otherwise specifically provided in this agreement, the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER shall include all services required to complete the task or step in accordance with applicable EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 35, Sub- part E) . B. The services to be provided by the ENGINEER shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Furnish all field surveys. 2. Furnish all note reduction. 3. Furnish all elevations of centerlines, culverts, bridges, houses, etc. 4. Premark all control points. 5. Furnish all record maps, assessors maps, etc* of the subject area. 6. Furnish any other pertinent data the county may have. 7. Prepare plan and profile sheets on 24" x 36" mylar using CDM format and containing the following information: a. Scale, north arrow, B?d data, date, and such miscellaneous items as culverts, bridges, valves, pipelines located by field survey. b. Road rights-of-way and centerline to be plotted for best fit, the lot corner and the lot number of parcel adjacent to the road. Bearing and distance will be shown on the road rights-of- way and house elevations and centerline profile.. C. Computed centerline stationing to be shown at 500-foot intervals and at angle point in rights- of-ways 8. Provide necessary office and field coordination to complete project. 9. Provide aerial photogrammetry along 40,000+ 1.f. to develop plan and profile sheets. 10. Provide aerial photogrammetry for 25+ acre treatment plant site. 11. Right-of-way calculations and plotting. Work shall not proceed without prior written "notice to proceed" by the DISTRICT or its representatives. -2- 0033S 4. CHANGES A. The DISTRICT may at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of this agreement in the services or work to be performed. If such changes cause an increase or decrease in*the ENGINEER's cost of, or time required for, performance of any services under this agreement, whether or not changed by any order, an equit- able adjustment shall be made and this agreement shall be modified in writing accordingly. Any claim of the ENGINEER for adjustment under this clause must be asserted in writing within 30 days from the date of receipt by the ENGINEER of the notification of change unless the DISTRICT grants a further period of time before the date of final payment under this agreement. B. No services for which an additional cost or fee will be charged by the ENGINEER shall be furnished without the prior written authorization of the DISTRICT. 5. TER14IIIATION A. This agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of substantial failure by the other .party to fulfill its obligations under this agreement through no fault of the terminating party: Provideds that no such termination may be effected unless the other party Is given (1) not less than ten (10) days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for con- sultation with the terminating party prior to termination. B. This agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the DISTRICT for its convenience: Provided, that no such termination may be effected unless the ENGINEER is given (1) not less than ten (10) days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the DISTRICT prior to termination. C. If termination for default is effected by the DISTRICT, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this agreement shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work, and (2) any payment due to the ENGINEER at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs occasioned to the DISTRICT by reason of the ENGINEER's default. If termination for default is effected by the ENGINEER or if termination for convenience is effected by the DISTRICT, the equitable adjustment shall include a reasonable profit for services or other work performed. The equit- able adjustment for any termination shall provide for payment to the ENGINEER for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination settlement costs reason- ably incurred by the ENGINEER relating to commitments which had become firm prior to the termination. -3- OO WM7 D. Upon receipt of a termination action pursuant to paragraphs (A) or (B) above, the ENGINEER shall (1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or otherwise make available to the DISTRICT all data, draw ings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by the ENGINEER in performing this agreement, whether completed or in process. E. Upon termination pursuant to paragraphs (A) or (B) above, the DISTRICT may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by agreement with another party or otherwise. F. If, after termination for failure of the ENGINEER to ful- fill contractual obligations, it is determined that the ENGINEER had not so failed, the termination shall be deemed to have been effected for the convenience of the DISTRICT. In such event, adjustment of the price provided for in this agreement shall be made as provided in paragraph (C) of this clause. G. The rights and remedies of the DISTRICT and the ENGINEER provided in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this agreement. 6. REMEDIES A. Except as may be otherwise provided in this agreement, or as the parties hereto may otherwise agree, all claims, counter- claims, disputes and other matters in question between the DISTRICT and the ENGINEER arising out of, or relating to, this agreement, or the breach thereof, will be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining, subject to the limitations stated in paragraphs (C) and (D) below. This agreement so to arbitrate, and any other agreement or consent to arbitrate, entered into in accordance therewith as provided below, will be specifically enforceable under the prevailing law of any court having jurisdiction. B. Notice of demand for arbitration must be filed in writing with the other party to this agreement, with the EPA Regional Administrators and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand must be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event may the demand for arbitration be made after the time when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. -4- 003W r C. All demands for arbitration and all answering statements thereto which include any monetary claim must contain a statement that the total sum or value in controversy, as alleged by the party making such demand or answering statement, is not more than $200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs). The arbitrators will not have jurisdiction, power or authority to consider, or make findings (except in denial of their own jurisdiction concerning any claim, counter-claims, dispute or other matter in question where the amount in controversy thereof is more than $200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs) or to render a monetary award in response thereto against any party which totals more than $200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs). D. No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this agreement may include by consolidation, joinder, or in any other manner, any additional party not a party to this agreement. E. By written consent, signed by all the parties to this agreement and containing a specific reference hereto, the limi- tations and restrictions contained in paragraphs (C) and (D) above may be waived in whole or in part as to any claim, counter- claim, dispute, or other matter specifically described in such consent. No consent to arbitration in respect of a specifically described claim, counter-claim, dispute, or other matter in question will constitute consent to arbitrate any other claim, counter-claim, dispute, or other matter in question which is not specifically described in such consent or in which the sum or value in controversy exceed $2000000 (exclusive of interest and costs) or which is with any party not specifically described therein. F. The reward rendered by the arbitrators will be final, not subject to appeal, and judgment may be entered upon it in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 7. PAYMENT A. The ENGINEER shall submit monthly statements requesting payment. Such requests shall be based upon the amount and value of the work and services performed by the ENGINEER under this agreement, which estimates shall be prepared by the ENGINEER and supplemented or accompanied by such supporting data as may be required by the DISTRICT. B. Upon approval of such estimate by the DISTRICT, payment upon properly certified vouchers shall be made to the ENGINEER as soon as practicable of ninety percent of the amount as deter- mined above, less all previous payments: Provided, however, that if the DISTRICT determines that the Work under this agreement, or any specified task hereunder, is substantially complete, and that -5- OM the amount of retained percentages is in excess of the amount considered by him to be adequate for the protection of the DISTRICT, he may, at his discretion, release to the ENGINEER such excess amount* C. Upon satisfactory completion by the ENGINEER of the work called for under the terms of this agreement, and upon acceptance of such work by the DISTRICT, the FJIGINEER will be paid the unpaid' balance of any money due for such work, including the retained percentages relating to this portion of the work. D. Upon satisfactory completion of the work performed here- under, and prior to final payment under this agreement for such work, or prior settlement upon termination of the agreement, and as a condition precedent thereto, the ENGINEER shall execute and deliver to the DISTRICT a release of all claims against the DISTRICT arising under or by virtue of this agreement, other than such claims, if any, as may be specifically exempted by the ENGINEER from the operation of the release in stated amounts to be set forth therein. E. At the time that authorization is given to proceed, DISTRICT shall pay ENGINEER for professional services a fixed price of $42,500, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. F. Any change in the requirements by the DISTRICT, regulatory or grant funding agencies after execution of this agreement, shall constitute a change of scope and the fixed price shall be subject to renegotiation. 8. PROJECT DESIGN A. In the performance of this agreement, the ENGINEER shall, to the extent practicable, provide for maximum use of structures, machines, products, materials, construction methods, and equipment, which are readily available through competitive procurement, or through standard or proven production techniques, methods, and processess, consistent with 40 CFR 35.936 -3 and 35.936-13, except to the extent that advanced technology may be utilized pursuant to 40 CFR 35.908. -6- 9710 B, The ENGINEER shall not, in the performance of the work called for by this agreement, produce a design or specification such as to require in this construction work the use of structures, machines, products, materials, construction methods. .equinment, or processes which are mown by the ENGINEER to be available only from a sole source, unless such use has been adequately justified in writing by the ENGINEER as necessary for the minimum needs of the project. C. The ENGINEER shall not, in the performance of the work called for by this agreement, produce a design or specification which would be restrictive in violation of Sec. 204(a) (6) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (PL 92-X500) . This statute requires that no specification for bids or statement of work may be written in such a manner as to contain proprietary, exclusionary, or discriminatory requirements other than those based upon perfor- mance, unless such requirements are necessary to test or demonstrate a specific thing, or to provide for necessary interchangeability of parts and equipment, or at least two brand names or trade names of comparable quality or utility are listed and are followed by the words "or equal". D. The ENGINEER shall report to the DISTRICT any sole-source or restrictive design or specification giving the reason or reasons why it is considered necessary to restrict the design or specification. E. The ENGINEER shall not knowingly specify or approve the performance of work at a facility which is in violation of Clean Air or Water standards and which is listed by the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities pursuant to 40 CFR Part 15. -7- 0M 9. AUDIT: ACCESS TO RECORDS A. The ENGINEER shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence directly pertinent to performance on EPA grant work under this agreement in accordance with accepted professional practice, appropriate accounting procedures and practices, and 40 CFR Section 30.605, 30.805, and 35.935-7• The ENGINEER shall also maintain the financial information and data used by the ENGINEER in the preparation or support of the cost submission required pursuant to 40 CFR 35.937-6(b) and a copy of the cost summary sub- mitted to the DISTRICT. The United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, the United States Department of Labor, DISTRICT, and the State Water Pollution Control Agency or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to such books, records, documents and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit and copying. The ENGINEER will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. B, The ENGINEER agrees to include paragraphs (A) through (E) of this clause in all his contracts and all tier subcontracts directly related to project performance which are in excess of $10,000. C. Audits conducted pursuant to this provision shall be in accordance with generally accepted auditing standard3 and established procedures and guidelines of the reviewing or audit agency(ies) . D. The ENGINEER agrees to the disclosure of all information and reports resulting from access to records pursuant to paragraphs (A) and (B) above, to any of the agencies referred to in paragraph (A) above. Where the audit concerns the ENGINEER, the auditing agency will afford the ENGINEER an opportunity for an audit exit conference and an opportunity to comment on the pertinent portions of the draft audit report. The final audit report will include the pertinent written comments, if any, of the audited parties. E. Records under paragraphs (A) and (B) above shall be maintained and made available during performance on EPA grant work under this agreement and until three years from date of final EPA grant work under this agreement and until three years from date of final EPA grant payment for the project. In addition, those records which relate to any "Dispute" appeal under an EPA grant agreement, or litigation, or the settlement of claims arising out of such performance, or costs or items to which an audit except.on has been taken, shall be maintained and made available until three years after the date of resolution of such appeal, litigation, clain or exception. 10. SUBCONTRACTS A. Any subcontractors and outside associates or consultants required by the EIIGINEER in connection with the services covered by this agreement will be limited to such individuals or firms speci- fically identified and in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, or as are -8- 003V specifically approved by the DISTRICT in writing during the perform- ance of this agreement. Any substitution in such subcontractors, associates, or consultants will be subject to the prior written approval of the DISTRICT. B. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, the ENGINEER may not subcontract services in excess of thirty percent (30,) of the contract price to subcontractors or consultants without prior written approval of the DISTRICT. 11. LABOR STP14DARDS To the extent that this agreement involves "construction" (as defined by the Secretary of Labor), the ENGINEER agrees that such construction work shall be subject to the following labor standards provisions, to the extent applicable: a. Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-7); b. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327-333) ; c. Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 U.S.C. 874) ; and d. Executive Order 11246 (Equal Employment Opportunity) and implementing rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor or EPA; and the ENGINEER further agrees that this agreement shall include and be subject to the "Labor Standards Provisions for Federally Assisted Construction Contracts" (EPA Form 5720-4) in effect at the time of execution of this agreement. 12. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY in accordance with EPA policy as expressed in 40 CFR Section 39.420-5, the ENGINEER agrees that he will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin. 13. UTILIZATION OF 314ALL AND MINORITY BUSINESS In accordance with EPA policy as expressed in 40 CPR 35.936-7, the ENGINEER agrees that qualified small business and minority business enterprises shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in the performance of EPA grant-assisted contracts and subcontracts. 14. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGZNT FEES The ENGINEER warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission,$ percentage, broker- age, or contingent fee, excepting bonafide employees. For breach or violation of this warranty, the DISTRICT shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 15. GRATUITIES A. The DISTRICT may, by written notice to the EZIGIIIEER, terminate the right of the ENGINEER to proceed under this agreement if it is found, after notice and hearing, by the DISTRICT that gratuities (in the form of entertainment, gifts, or otherwise). were offered or given by the ENGINEER, or any agent or representative of the ENGINEER, to any official or employee of the DISTRICT or of EPA with a view toward securing a contract or securing favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending, or the making of any determinations with respect to the performance of this agree- ment: Provided, that the existence of the facts upon which the DISTRICT makes such findings shall be in issue and may be reviewed in proceedings pursuant to Clause 6 (Remedies) of this agreement. B. In the event this agreement is terminated as provided in paragraph (A) hereof, the DISTRICT shall be entitled (1) to pursue the same remedies against the ENGINEER as it could pursue in the event of a breach of the contract by the ENGINEER, and (2) as a penalty in addition to any other damages to which it may be entitled by law, to exemplary damages in an amount (as determined by the DISTRICT) which shall be not less than three nor more than ten times the costs incurred by the ENGINEER in providing any such gratuities to any such officer or employee. C. The rights and remedies of the DISTRICT provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any rights and remedies provided by law or under this agreement. 16. PATENTS If this agreement involves research, developmental, experimental, or demonstration work, and any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of or under this agreement, such invention or discovery shall be subject to the reporting and rights provisions of Subpart D of 40 CFR Part 30, including Appendix B of said Part 30. In such case, the ENGINEER shall report the discovery or invention to EPA directly or through the DISTRICT, and shall otherwise comply with the DISTRICT'S responsibilities in accordance with Subpart D of 40 CF3 Part 30. The ENGINEER hereby agrees that the disposition of rights to inventions made under this agreement shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions of aforementioned Appendix B. The ENGINEER shall include provisions appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this condition in all subcontracts involving research, developmental, experimental, or demonstration work. -10- 17. COPYRIGHTS AND RIGHTS IN DATA A. The ENGINEER agrees that any plans, drawings, specifications, computer programs technical reports, operating manuals, or other "Subject Data" (as defined in Appendix C to 40 CFR,Part 30) are subject to the rights in the United States, as set forth in said Appendix C. including the right to use, duplicate and disclose such manuals, etc. , in whole or in part, in any manner, for any purpose whatsoever, and have others do so. For purposes of this article, "grantee", as used in said Appendix C. shall refer to the ENGINEER. If the material is copyrightable, the ENGINEER may copyright such, as permitted by said Appendix C. and subject to the rights in the Government, as set forth in Appendix C. but the DISTRICT and the Federal Government reserve a royalty-free, nonexclusive and irreversible license to reproduce, publish and use such materials, in whole or in part, and to authorize others to do so. The ENGINEER shall include provisions appropriate to effectuate the purpose of this conditions in all subcontracts expected to produce copyright able "Subject Data". B. All such "Subject Data" furnished by the ENGINEER pursuant to this agreement are instruments of his services in respect of the project. It is understood that they are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse on any other project. Any reuse by the DISTRICT without specific written verification or adaptation by the ENGI14EER will be at the risk of the DISTRICT and without liability or legal exposure to the ENGINEER. Any such verification or adapta- tion will entitle the ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the DISTRICT and the ENGINEER. 18. INSURANCE The ENGINEER shall, at no expense to DISTRICT, furnish certi- ficates or other evidence acceptable to DISTRICT of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person. and at least $50x,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. The DISTRICT shall be named as an additional insured. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 19. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT A. This writing constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties relative to the engineering services, and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Agreement. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties, or promises, with respect to the subject matter of this contract except those contained in this writing. -11- 00345 - B. If this Agreement with the ENGINEER is terminated and the work is completed by others, the ENGINEER shall be released from all responsibility for work performed after such termination. 20. STATUS The ENGINEER is an independent contractor and is not to be considered an employee of the DISTRICT. 21. INDEMNIFICATIOU The ENGINEER shall defend, save, indemnify, and hold harmless the DISTRICT and its officers and employees from any and all r liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided hereunder by the ENGIREER. 22. TIME OF COMPLETION The EUGINEER shall commence work upon receipt .of the "Notice to Proceed" issued by the DISTRICT. Work shall be completed within 180 calendar days after the date of delivery of the "Notice to Proceed". Additional time may be allowed at the discretion of the DISTRICT. The Corporate Officer-in-Charge for the ENGINEER is hereby designated as James J. Elder, registered in the State of California as a professional engineer, License No. Civil Engineer 14,600, Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto ENGINEER Design�ate official ca acity in Corporate Selo , busitfess) State of California ss ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC Section 1190.1) 9=t=ax4oa ka County ) Sacramento The person signing above for ENGINEER, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he signed it on behalf of the corporation or partnership named above and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument and if a corporation, that it executed the instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Date April 21, 1976 [SEAL] Not Public CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION FORH APPROVED DISTRICT NO. 15 John B. Clausen, County Counsel By tc Z4 es P. Kenny, C ai Deputy Board of Supervisor EBH:s:j W347 EXHIBIT A The DISTRICT hereby approves the use Of the f McCormick Aerial Surveys firm Iq�•r•ay_ California, to provideyalllaeri6220 - 24th Street Sacramento, by the ENGINEER to complete the worko� tatedain Sectreorou$e SCOPE OF WORK. ion 3, Wm . SAYRE & TOSO, Inc. N../.N•9661.one. VERIFICATION OF LNSURANCE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY x" TO: SANITATION DISTRICT :15, StEFFLOOR COUNTYADMINISTRATION BLDG. LMARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 J ATTN: ROBERT JACKSON We,the undersigned. hereby verify that the following described insurance is in force at this date,of which e is insured with Underwriters at Lloyd's, London % is insured with Certain Insurance Companies, London, England 100 % is insured with MISSION INSURANCE CO. Name of Assured: RAYMOND VAIL & ASSOCIATES, ETAL Address of Assured: 8830 14ADISON AVE. , FAIROAKS, CALIFORNIA Location of Risk: Kind of Insurance: UbIBRELLA LIABILITY Policy or Certificate No: M 828902 Period: ONE YEAR From: 7/1/75 To: 7/1/76 Limits of Liability: $1,000,000. EXCESS OF UNDERLYING IT IS UNDERSTOOD ARID AGREED THAT THE POLICY SHALL NOT BE CANCELLED OR ALTERED NOR THE AMOUNT''OF COVERAGE BE REDUCED, UNTIL AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF SUCH CANCELLATION, ALTERATION OR REDUCTION OF COVERAGE HAS BEEN MAILED TO THE ABOVE VERIFICATION HOLDER. This document is furnished to you as a matter of information only. The issuance of this document does not make the person ororganizationtowhom it is issued an additional assured,nor does it modify in any manner the contract of insurance between the Assured and the Underwriters. Any amendment. change or extension of such contract can only be effected by specific endorsement attached thereto. For particulars concerning the limitations, conditions and terms of the coverage you are referred to the original Policy or Policies in the possession of the Assured. The undersigned will have no responsibility to give notice of cancellation of this insurance except to the extent spe- cifically provided herein,nor are we Insurers,however Insurance has been placed by Sayre&Toso,Inc. SA O Q' NC. r Dated at SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. APRIL 23, 1916 fl y ,.. gs Microfilmed with board ordoW349 S&T 524-D(rev.10174.Replaces all editions of S&T 524) ENDORSEMENT# EFFECTIVE: IT IS HEREBY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDED AS ADDITIONAL ASSURED(S) HEREUNDER BUT ONLY AS RESPECTS _ &i-5;9 FLOOR IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT IRRESPECTIVE OF THE NUMBER OF ENTITIES NAMED AS ASSURED(S) UNDER THIS POLICY, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY IN THE AGGREGATE EXCEED THE COMPANY'S LIMITS OF LIABILITY EXPRESSED IN THE POLICY. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE POLICY SHALL NOT BE CANCELLED OR ALTERED NOR THE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE BE REDUCED, UNTIL AT LEAST ( ) DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF SUCH CANCELLATION, AVMlUffMN OR REDUCTION OF COVERAGE HAS BEEN MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDITIONAL NAMED ASSURED(S). ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED THIS ENDORSEMENT IS ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF ISSUED TO: DATED AT:USAN FRANCISCQ, CALTEGENTA_ DATE: SAY RE K TO SFT 159 (NEW 8/75) BY: 00 Iwo $Maofilmed with boo o�V • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 4 , 19 13 k In the Matter of Proposed Acquisition of Property on Oak Road, Walnut Creek Area, for County Service Area R-8. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having brought to the attention of the Hoard an April 30, 1976 letter from Mr. David E. MacLellan, Executive Vice President, Vermillion Development Corporation, P.O. Box 5409, Walnut Creep, California 94596 stating that the proposed County acquisition of the *Jones Property" on Oak Road, Walnut Creek area, for future development as a neighborhood park in County Service Area R-8, using monies from the Park Land Dedication Fund* appears to generate certain legal problems, and requesting a response to his questions; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to County Counsel for review and report. PASSED by the Board on May 4, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is o true and coffee espy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. D. E. MacLellan Wong my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Counsel S'per11fon Public Forks Director affixed this e#h_day of tav . 19 Zfi County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By. ";xUat , Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 . 15-M Helen C. Marshall OU351 DeVeLoffle0- *"TIOII��54W Wdnut Qeek CaikWid 94M . (ars)934.a3T3 , April 30, 1976 Q P. r,,t�f rd RE CHY ED CO/I *14. 4 T q If 41 Hon. James E. Moriarty Supervisor, District 3 UR Contra Costa County 3338 Mt. Diablo licwlcvard Lafayette, California 94549 re: Proposal to acquire property on Oak Road, Walnut Creek, for R-8 Park District Dear Supervisor Moriarty: Our firm is the beneficial owner of what is commonly known as the Jones property -- located just south of the Contra Costa Canal on Oak Road in Walnut Creek. On March 15, 1976, we made application to the County to consider an amendment to the General Plan to permit development of detached, single family cluster homes. The matter was scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission on April 20, 1976. As you know, on April 19, 1976, the City Council of Walnut Creek adopted a resolution whereby they requested that the County, using monies from the Park Land Dedication Fund, purchase our property in the R-8 District for future development as neighborhood park. On April 20, 1976, the County Planning Commission supported the City's request and established a S month period for the various agencies to consumate this purchase. While we are disappointed that our development plans are terminated or at least postponed, we frilly recognize the right of the County and the City of Walnut Creek to acquire properties for neighborhood parks. However, this proposed acquisition by the County appears to generate several legal problems, and with time being of the essence, we would appreciate a timely response to these items: � � RECEIVED . IMA 1 191Um 6 }- R. CfMW A CO WRS { ' M aol llmed VA Soc d order Hon. James E. Moriarty page 2 of 2 1. It is our opinion that the use of Park Land Dedication Funds for the purpose of placing property in a "land bank" is contra- venous to the language and the intent of the Park Land Dedication Ordinance. It is our opinion that these funds must be used for the acquisition and development of park and recreational facil- ities where nearby residential development has created a present need for these facilities. The City of Walnut Creek has gone on record stating that they have no intention to develop our property j In the foreseeable future, and some officials have placed this i time for development as long as 15 years; 2. lour other property owners whose land In contlguauH to ours have also been designated for inclusion into the it-8 District. On behalf of Messrs. Bartlett, Thomas, Whatford and Ms. Lea, I have been asked to :Hake inquiry regarding the passible inverse condemnation of their properties. With the , intended development of the park taking as long as 15 yrs., these four landowners believe they are being unfarily restricted with- out proper compensation with respect to their ability to sell, refinance, or develop their property. In short, they are being told to wait for an event that may never come to pass. Lastly, we must advise you that the amount of available funds known to us that are held by the County and the City of Walnut Creek to be made available for the proposed acquisition falls considerably short of the fair market value of our property. Independent appraisals of property In that area tend to show that approximately twice the amount existing in the Park Land Dedication Fund as of April 20, 1976, would be needed to consumate a purchase at fair market value. Your consideration is sincerely appreciated, and I look forward to your reply. V ry truly y s, David E. Mac Executive Vice President cc: Charles B. Jones Harry Bartlett Ann Lea Robert Whatford George Thomas Hon. Robert Schroder OU353'. And the Board adjourns to most on i� at 9WO ./Y. , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Admini3tration Building, Martinez, California. T. P. e , Chairman ATTEST: J. R. OISSON, CLERK Deputy 00354 SUMMARY OF PROCEEDIMS BEFORE TIM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, MAY 4. 1976, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK AND FX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved minutes of proceedings for month of April. 1976. Declared Ordinances Nos. 76-31 and 76-33 through 76-35 duly published. Approved personnel actions for Auditor-Controller, District Attorney, Health Dept., Social Service, Dept. of Agriculture (Weights and Measures), and Assessor. Approved appropriation adjustments for Planning Dept.; and internal adjustments not affecting totals for Auditor-Controller, Public Works, Planning, Supt. of Schools and Social Service. Authorized attendance of H. Roop, Library Specialist, at American Library Assn. Conference, Chicago, Illinois, July 19-24; and K. Crossley, Social Service, at Annual Conference of Assn. of Family Conciliation Courts & Services, Phoenix, Arizona, May 19-22. Authorized Auditor to initiate legal action against G. Wheeler to recover monies. Adopted Ordinance No. 76-36 amending Ordinance Code pertaining to regulations for land improvement contractor's yards and recreational facilities and activites in resi- dential districts. Adopted Preliminary Budgets for County Fire Protection Districts for FY 1976-77 and fixed July 20 at 11 a.m. as time for hearing on same and any proposed changes. Denied claims for damages filed by Security Data, Inc. and B. Jackson and an amended claim of Martin Bros. . Inc. Appointed A. Kesti to the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council as the alternate representative of the City of Pinole. Acknowledged receipt of report from County Administrator re contributions to the Delta Advisory Planning Council for FY 1975-76 and authorized payment of dues. Approved policy for CETA Titles II and VI of maintaining the June 30, 1976 employment. level of subgrantees through Sept. 30, 1976. Approved progress report of the Administration and Finance Committee re the 1976-77 County Mental Health Plan. Authorized one-year extension of time in which to file the final map for Sub. 4667, Byron area. Accepted as complete public improvements in Sub. MS 95-72, Port Costa area. Approved recommendation of Public Works Director relieving contractor of main- tenance and responsibility for certain traffic signal system on San Ramon Valley Blvd., Danville area. Authorized Public Works Director to execute Right of Way Contracts with various parties in connection with property acquisition for Oak Road Widening, Walnut Creek area. Approved increase in CSAC membership dues for FY 1976-77. Authorized the Public Works Director to provide materials tests for Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. Approved a $2000 increase in the contract contingency fund for Phase 1 of the Rollingwood Area street repairs project, Richmond/San Pablo area. W�V May 4, 1976 Summary, continued } `• y 1 Page 2 Authorized Chair-nan to execute the following: Amendment Agreement with Association of Hay Area Governments for emergency medical services; Contract with M. Ream for consultant services for emergency medical service planning; Grant of Easement to Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. on County property acquired for park purposes for CSA R-8; Waiver and lnder.,nification agreement to Sun Valley Merchants Association for participation of Sheriff In display and public information program during "National Law Enforcement Week"; Application to State Dept. of Health for renewal of County Adoption Agency license; Contract with YSC Associates, Inc., for staff training and technical assistance In job development for CE7A Title I Vanpower Project; Contract with V. Kositsky for foster parent training in "Nutrition"; Contract with D. Schwartz, F.D., for training Social Service Dept. staff and foster parents in "The Adolescent Life Style*; Contracts with G. Schmidt, Ph.D., N. Van Couvering, Ph.D. and R. Lee, M.D. for Social Service Dept. staff training in "The Chronic Patient in the Community"; Contract with P. Manfield and M. Mullin for staff training in "Pair Fight Techniques"; Non-Financial Agreecent 1.14odif1cation No. 5 with State Dept. of Education for funds to be spent for vocational education; Grant Extension with Office of Criminal Justice Planning for Consumer Action and Education Program. Adopted the following numbered resolutions: 76/363, authorizing changes in the assessment roll; 76/364, authorizing cancellation of delinquent penalty on 1975-76 unsecured assessment roll; 76/365, authorizing cancellation of delinquent and additional penalties accrued after March 31, 1976 on 1975-76 unsecured assessment roll; 76/366, authorizing cancellation of additional penalties on 1975-76 unsecured assessment roll; 76/367, authorizing cancellation of delinquent penalties on 1975-76 secured assessment roll; 76/368, authorizing cancellation of penalties on unsecured roll and discharge of further accountability for collection of tax; 76/369, accepting as complete contract wtih C. M. Marsh Contractor, Inc., for reconstruction of sidewalk on portion of Pomona Street, Crockett area; 76/370, authorizing transfer of certain CSA R-7 funds to San Ramon Unified School for development of park and recreation facilities at Montair School Park; 76/371, as Board of Directors of the County Fire Protection Districts and Sanitation Districts, and as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Eater Conservation District and Storm Drainage District, adopting scale of prevailing wage rates; 76/372, approving map and subdivision agreement for Sub. 4498, Alamo area; 76/373, proclaiming week of May 2-8 as "Hire the Veteran Week"; 76/374, approving proposed Whitegate Farms Annexation (Subs. 4685 and 4686), Danville area, to CSA L-45; 76/375, approving proposed Bolla Annexation, Alamo area, to CSA P-5; 76/376, aaproving anendnent to the County General Plan for the Kensington area concerning land use development; 76/377, seeking support of other California counties for passage of SB 1881 relating to allocation of Federal Social Service funds for FY 1976-77; 76/378, reaffirming support of proposed Alameda-Contra Costa Joint Exercise of Powers Health Systems Agency; 76/379, proclaiming week of May 9-16 as "National Nursing Home Week". Authorized Public Works Director to refund to Earl W. Smith Developers, LTD, cash deposited as surety in connection with Sub. 4362, West Pittsburg area. Authorized Public Works Director to execute Consulting Service Agreement for landscape architectural services with Fong, Jung, Nakaba, LaRocca Associates for CSA R-7, San Ramon area. As ex officio the Board of Directors of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 15, authorized Chairman to execute agreement with Raymond Vail and Associates for engineering services for construction of sewage collection and treatment facilities within the District. May 4, 1976 Summary, continued Fined June 1 at 10:40 a.m. for hearing on appeal of R. Hagler et al from Board of Appeals on approval of application of C. Boddum (LUP #2191-75); and fixed June 8 at 10:30 a.m. for hearing on appeal of Fisk, Graves and Plourde (applicants) from the Planning Commission denial of application (LUP 12130-75). Authorized Public 'Works Director to execute a rental agreement on a month-to- month, as-is basis with H. Spowart and P. Beck of County-owned property at 100 Elder Derive, Pacheco. Acknowledged receipt of communications from Vice President of the Alameda- Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association and a former Bar Association President urging the creation and support of two (rather than one) additional Contra Costa County Superior Court judgeships. Authorized Chairman to sign a letter certifying that local public assistance for a proposed secondary wastewater treatment plant, Antioch Mill, Crown Zellerbach Corp. is not available. Recessed into executive session at 10:44 a.m. to consult with representatives on salary matters. Acknowledged receipt of Grand Jury Resolution No. 3 on Social Service cutbacks. Appointed S. Hill as one of the Tenant Commissioners to the Contra Costa County Housing Authority for term ending May 4, 1978. Appointed G. Sattler and F. Pereira to the Ridgelands Citizens Committee. Approved request of Lawrie Development Co. (1998-RZ) to rezone land in the Danville area to Single Family Residential District-15. Approved recommendation of Planning Commission to rezone certain land as follows: 1958-RZ, Walnut Creek area, to Single Family Residential District-20; 1959-RZ, Walnut Creek area, to Single Family Residential District-15 with the and northerly portion of the property remaining Single Family Residential District-10; 1960-RZ, Saranap area, to Single Family Residential District-10. Adopted Resolution No. 76/380, approving with conditions request of Blackhawk Corporation to rezone certain land in the Danville area (1995-RZ) to independent Planned Unit District. Authorized Public Works Director to execute contracts with J. Nelson and R. Grady for inspection services in connection with re-roofing of the Veterans, Memorial Building in Pittsburg and various roofs at the County Hospital. Approved Design Development Drawings and Specifications and revised cost estimate for Bayview Park Recreation Building, San Pablo area (CSA M-17). Approved agreement with California highway Patrol for adult crossing guard service for various schools for the period of July 1, 1976 through June 30, 1977. Instructed Director of Planning to meet, prior to recommendation to the Board, with Supervisors J. P. Kenny and J. E. Moriarty (representatives on the ABAG Executive Committee) in connection with development in the Livermore-Amador Valley. Approved recommendations of Administration and Finance Committee on Social Service funding problem, instructed Co^..rsittee to report to the Board on this matter on May 18, and directed that County Legislators be invited to attend meetings of the Committee on this subject. Referred to County Counsel letter from Vermillion Development Corp. stating problems involved in connection with the proposed County acquisition of certain Oak Road property, Walnut Creek area, for future development as a neighborhood park in CSA R-8. Reaffirmed urgency of early construction of the Antioch Bridge, leaving the decision as to user charge increases to the Toll Bridge Authority. rrJ r. May 4, 1975 Summary, continued Page 4 Referred to: County Administrator letter from State Office of Emergency Services with respect to earthouake safety information; Public Works Director (Environmental Control) letter from legal firm representing San Luis Drain Ecolorlcal Association urging consideration of alternative solutions to open ditch construction of portion of San Luis Drain; County Health Officer inquiry from N. McCormack, Moraga, expressing concern as to possible injurious effects of fluoride compounds in food and water; Director, Human Resources Agency, petition from county residents requesting that agencies responsible for senior citizen projects comply with state and federal regula- tions on employment; Public Works Director for revort on May 11 bids received for Castro Ranch Road Pavement Widening Project, El Sobrante area; 14oraga lay Overlay Project, Moraga area; and Arlinrton Avenue Improvement Project, Kensington area; Public Works Director vetition signed by residents in Rollingwood area requesting installation of stop light at Glenlock and E1 Portal Drives; Public Works Director and Director of Planning complaints from residents in the vicinity of Star Street, Crockett, alleging that eucalyptus trees in the area constitute a nuisance condition for adjacent property owners; Government Operations Committee (Supervisors Dias and Linscheid) , County Adminis- trator and Director, Human Resources Agency proposed modifications to East Hay Health Systems Agency application for Health Systems Agency designation submitted by Alameda- Contra Costa County Health Systems Agency Coordinating Committee; Director of Planning, and Acting Building Inspector vetition signed by residents of Shore Acres area, West Pittsburg, opposing proposed moving of "St. Francis of Rome" Catholic Church to Shore Acres area; County Counsel and County Administrator proposal of Superintendent, Moraga School District, that Board consider alternative to reimbursement for County Counsel services by underwriting said services with participating districts paying a fee based on student enrollment; Administration and Finance Committee and County Administrator annual audit report of Contra Costa County Employees Retirerent System for 19.5, and transferred to said Committee from Government Overations Committee request of President, Contra Costa County Retired Employees Association Chapter that retired employees be assured 5 per- cent yearly cost-of-living increase; Government Operations Committee Complaint Resolution Procedure for CETA Titles II and VI. Approved recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee that said Committee continue to review matter of security at county buildings complex in Richmond. VLltJW The Preceding documents consist of 358 Pages. ■