Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 04201976 - R 76C IN 5
1976 APRIL TUESDAY - � R P t 1 4.... r ..y.?�. "' r f' .,., S . •a :� T." THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET iN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.M. , TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 1976 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman J. P. Kenny, presiding; Suvervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator and Public Works Director. 010001 GALCKDAR FOR THE HOARD OF SUPCRVISORS JAMES P KENNY JAMES V 1,LNNY.141C"U0%[" (/ � ii) ll COSTA `` // �} ` C-A's.A% 1sT DIST11cI �.1�:\•� RA 111�STA C.1�� � 1' l• EGMUND A LIwS=MEIrJ ALFRED M (�IAti.t I SPHSANT! VICE CNAMMAN 2ND DIST"IIT AqB FOR JAMES R OLSSON,COUutr CLERK ,TAMES E.NIORIARTN',LAFANLTTC At�O Ex OFFICIO CLER' OF T,4E 110ARD 3RD DISTRICT SPECIAL USTRICTS GOVERNED E3Y TLiE HOARD MRS GFRALDINE RUSSELL WARREN N f3JCGE1-5.CUNZOROA. CHIEF CLERK EiC?AKD C.awviiCR^� .i'f?:lM tOT 'W1Rd"��LutKJ".l3WLCM7K. 'TLI DISTRIL.T 911 PHONE 14151 372-2371 PO i.3x I S 00001 JAMES P I LNNY. CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ,iRn,fES f' rcEnc^er I57 I t. • CHA,.0A-. ALrRCD M EttA,;.t i sof+SANtf CO t I A COSTA (.()UN •l' EDMUND A U.`a5'.'nEtO 2ND Dis7Ric I VICE CHAIRMAN JAMES E N10RIARIV,LAFANLIIE A13F()a JAMES R OLSSOfY.COUNTY CLERK 3RD MSTRICt SPECIAL USTRICTS G0iVERt4ED©Y THE BOARD ANO Ex OFFACJO CLER- OF THE noARD WARREN N f10C+GESS.CONCORD MRS GERALDINE RUSSELL 41m riisi RiLI WWF DC"&WINEQS WkJ" IQ7 Aa fCati7RAtKY.HariLp7K. C041£F CLERK EDMUND A LINSCHOE).PiTTsauRG PO c.3A 911 vt10NE 44 f 51 372-2371 $TN vino 1CI MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553 i3:1SIDAY AP IA 20, 10706 The Board Will r.:eet in all its capacities pursuar_t to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recom-nendatiors of the Public Works Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "i Leets Submitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider rcco~=en-daticr_s and recuests of Board members. 9:30 A.:%. Consider reccm.--e:-dations of -Board C,omMittees including; Government O eraticns Co=it:ee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscieid) on various referrals. 9:45 A.M. Recess. 10: 30 A.I- Tire f ixr d to cone• m=ate sale of surplus county property (located in the City of Lafayette) to -Bast Bay Regional Part District for ::15,000. 10:30 A.M... Decision or appeal of l:r. Alfred A. Lurda on behalf of -� residents o:" v.c_ni t,, or galley View Court, El r' �U�Lt_ari'ce area, frcW Board c- Appeals approval path conditions of Minor Subdivision 7;-75 (deferred fr;)m January 20) . hearings on recor..:.enda+.ions of the Planning Commission as followz : 10:40 A.I-i. Ordinance Code a=er_dment pertaining to regulations for land i=-Prov e=en contra ctor's yards; 10:40 A.Y. feneral ?'lan u.:.endren 4 -o chanE:e ;he land use element desi€ .a%ion in the 1-o-we Road area, vicinity of Martinez, from Single FaWi'y :'esiden tial to light Industrial; and. 10: 50 A.M. Ordinance Code awendmert regulating recreational facilities and acti•:hies in residential districts. 11:00 A.M. :receive bids for the following projects: a. Remodeling of receiving; cell at County Main Jail; b. Reroofing of various buildings at County Hospital; =knd J 9:00 A.M. Consider recon. cndations of the Yubzic wo-ci.z D.Li,,L;t.Q. 9:00 A.II. Consider .reco=enddatiors of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Su rnitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider reco�:.end-aticr_s and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.:•.. Consider rCcc:_-::.pndations of Board Committees including Goverr_`went 0 era-. cns (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. j1.insch.ei-c) on various referrals. 9:45 A.M. Recess. 10: 30 A.I`I. Time fiXed to coni=ate sale of surplus county property (located in the City of Lafayette) to Bast Bay Regional Part District fog' :15,000. 10:30 A.Y. Decision on appeal of d:r. rli'red A. iurda on behalf of —� �ld''"lt� •� : +y. r Valley 5 Court �l SoQran-ce Nowresidents o� 1 cis_ o_ :�_Ie.0 View - area, from Board c_' rppeals approval `path conditions of Minor Subdivision 73-75 (deferred frD= January 20) . Hearin-s on reco=endations of the Planning Commission as follow&: 10:40 A.M. Ordinance Cede amendment pertaining to regulations for land i=prove=en contractor's yards; 10:40 A.M. feneral '_'lan amen: -gent to chanxe the land use element designation in the '?or:e Road area, vicinity of Martinez, from Single Family residential to Dight Industrial; and 10: 50 A.M. Ordinance Cede aWerd~ent regulating recreational facilities and ac;.ivities in residential districts. 11:00 A.M. Receive bids for the --ollowing projects: a. Remodeling of receiving; cell at County main Jail; b. Reroofing of various buildings at County Hospital; and c. Reroofing of ':e;,erans' '-.emorial Building, Pittsburg. 2:00 r.`:. F'earinr, cn ocia? Service funding problems. V1i .J n, . _r: t% . a:: e: :: .en t rcI1 a .d cancellation of c;•rn ;:y :Ie�S. 00002 � r Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued April 20, 197E 2. APPROIT proposed Subdivision .4016 Annexation (Clayton area) to County Service Area 1'-14 without hearing or election (Gove=ent Code Section 56322). 3. INITIATE proceedings and fix June 1, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. for hearing on proposed Subdivision 4658 Annexation (El Sobra.te area) to County Service Area L-41. 4. D 21Y claim of Julia T. :arias, -125,000; and application for leave to file late claim of Carrie Mae Kennedy, Brenda Young, Tina Kennedy and Darrell Young, 519,153.50. Iters 5 - 19: DETERMINATION (Staff reco_:encation shorvrn following the item. ) 5. CONSIDER letter from Judge Coleman F. Fannin, Chairman of the Contra Costa County Detention Facility Advisory Committee, with respect to composition and makeup of said Committee. 6. Y7R ORAN.TUY1 from Director of .Planning, in response to Board referral of request that the County Ordinance Code be amended to allow an aviary in a single family residential district, advising that the code is being reviewed for possible amendment but that any change would necessitate public hearings, and reco=ending that in view of the continuing violation County Counsel, in the meantime, be authori--ed to initiate proceedings to gain compliance with the ordinance code; and LETTER from Attorney R. L. Condon transmitting copy of a petition ina support of his clients' request to maintain an aviary in a sinEl.e family residential district. CONSIDER APPROVING RECO:'_!C- DAT:021 OF DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 7. FETTER from Chairman., Contra Costa County 24ental Health Advisory Board, advising that a review of the 1976-1977 preliminary budget allocation for county lIental Health Services indicates a deficit of ;,442,588, and requesting the Board of Supervisors to join in urging the State to add sufficient monies to allow a uniform cost of living increase for all. i:ental Health Services programs. ADOPT RESOLUTIO ► URGING T?-:AT STATE 1PROVIDE MONIES REQUESTED 8. LETTER from sir. John B. Thorpe submitting his resignation as a Commissioner of the Bethel _island Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County effective Iiay 1, 1976. ACCEPT RESIG2►A:'IO2: 9. Fa!CRA11DWXS from Direct-or of -Planning, (in response to Board referrals) redo-::encing refunds of 4300 park dedication fees paid by Mr. C'sca_r Anderson and Mr. E. A. Brassfield in connection with issuance of building permits for Parcels Numbers 376-031-027 and 130-031-04, respectively. APPROVE REC0:2:ENDATI C2i 10. XE1:ORANDIPY :ram County Counsel clarifying certain 1975 amendments to the Brown Act. AC T:O :LEDGE RECEIPT 11. TIDW�ORA IDUV. from Count, Counsel transmitting official "Certifi- cate of Reristraticn of Service Mart." issued by the Office of the Secretary of State for the County logo. ACf11010ILEDGE RECEIPT 12. ZET^ER from Chairperson, Contra Costa County Municipal Court .mud€es ' Association, with respect to co_-T_-it=ent of Yu..2cipal Co;:_:f.', i:::luCi^� t::e office_' of the :iarshals and the office: oftheC?e.zks, to affirmative action. AC1:1w :L 'Du REC:;1:i 00W S° Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued April 20, 1976 13. LETTER from President, The Orinda Downs Homeowners Association,, expressing concern with respect to problem of motorcycles and other off-road vehicles operating in the vicinity of residential areas, and supporting restrictions to curtail such activity. RECEIPT 14. LETTER from Co-Coordinator, Contra Costa Chapter, National Organization for ::omen_, recuesting that the Board preclude the use of federal funds (TfEAA) for construction of the 1lomen's INinirinn Security Facility until after the County Probation Department study of the needs of women prisoners is completed in June. R FER TO COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER AND COUNTY AMrINISTNUTOR 15. LETTER from State Senator John A. 2:ejedly, in response to Board resolution supporting legislation with ,pect to licensing for c^ild_ren's day care facilities, aclosing copy of a letter from tflhe State Department of Health regarding the present status of this program. REFER TO DIRECTOR, i ES0U3CES AGENCY 16. LETTER from *xecutive Director, County Supervisors Association of California, transmitting publication entitled "Opera- tional Guide to Revenue Sharing California Counties." REFER TO CCUINTY ADZ.I1►ISTRATOR 17. LETTER from Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Bi-Kett Corporation, transmitti^g report related to alcoholism problems of General Assistance recipients, and requesting Board consideration of same. REFEM TO DIR.:CTOR, ]iUZMAN RESOURCE'S AGEENMY, ANT COUIiTY A'MIMiISTRATOR FOR REVID-1 IN PREPARATI024' OF 1976-1977 FROPOSEE D BUDGET 18. COI•:-MTTICATIOI: from :r. Varren L. Smith notifying the Board of his intention to file a claim against the county. p^F^R TO COUNTY COUNSEL 19. LETTER from Office of State Senator Arlen Gregorio thanking the Board for its support of SB 1372, which -.ould increase alcohol excise taxes to fund local alcoholism treatment programs, and urging that the Board also support a proposed $10 million augmentation to the Governor's 2976-1977 alcoholism budget. R_ER TO COUI."Y ADMINISTRATO- Items 20 - 23: INI FORMATION (Copies of co=-runicapions listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties. ) 20. LETTER from President, Economic Opportunity Council, submit- ting list of standing committees and Executive Board for said co:�...ittees appointed by the Council. 21. LL•`TTER from President, Economic Opportunity Council, thanking the members of the special Oversight Committee, the County Administrator, and the Board for their assistance in connection with the election of officers for said Council. 22. RESOLU'"ION adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors supportinz- continuation of total federal funding of the Indo-C_..inese (Vietnamese) Refugee Assistance Program. 00004 r Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued April 20, 1976 23. RESOLUTION adopted by the Concord City- Council. reauesting the U.S. Array Corns of Engineers to expeditiously proceed to construct channel improvements in Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks for flood control purposes. Persons addressir_a the Board should complete the form pro:*iced on t^e rostra-- and IU:-nish the Clerk with a written copy of their presensailon. D£ADLINB FOR AGE:DA ITEMS: WE NEESDAY, 5 P.M. NOTICE OF PE£TZMCS OF PUBLIC INTEREST (For additional inform.-ation please Phone the number indicated) San Francisco Bay Conser,ration and Development Co*,ceission lst and 3rd Thursdays of the month - phone 557-3686 Association of Bay Area Governments 3rd Thursday of the month - phone 841-9730 East Bay Regional Park District 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of the month - phone 531-9300 Bay Area Air Pollution Control District - lst Wednesday of the month - phone 771-6000 Metropolitan Transnortation Commission 4th Wednesdav of the month - phone 849-3223 Contra Costa County ;later District 1st and 3rd [•:ednesdays of the month; study sessions all other Ilednesdays - phone 682-5950 OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions April 20, 1976 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Reclassification of positions as follows: Cost Department Center From To Building 430 Building Building Inspector I Inspection Inspector Salary Level 359 (406) (1101-1338) Building Building Inspector II Inspector Salary Level 402 (1255-1526) (all others) Health 450 Staff Nurse II Public Health Clinic (:03, 405, 409) Charge Nurse Health 450 Alcoholism Alcoholism Rehabili- Rehabilitation tation Assistant Aide (401, 402, *03, 404) Walnut Creek- 264 Process Clerk Supervising Process Danville (401) Clerk Marshal 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Assessor 016 Assessment -- Services Clerk (class only) Auditor- 011 Systems Software -- Controller, Analyst Data (class only) Processing Building 340 Building -- Inspection Inspector I- Project (VAN Salary Level 359 (1101-1338) To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator _ Re: Recommended Actions 4-20-76 Page: 2. I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS - continued 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Election 043 1 Election 1 Permanent Intermittent Adminis- Clerk Election Clerk (#801) tration Health 450 Home Health -- Nursing Supervisor Salary Level 404 (1263-1535) (class only) Public Health -- Clinic Charge Nurse, Salary Level 366t (1240-1367) (class only) Medical 540 1 Cook's 1 Hospital Services Services Assistant Worker I1 0 23) Probation 308 -- Senior Deputy'Probation Officer 005, #42) -- Deputy Probation Officer 11 (#02, #22,. #57, #56) Public 659 1 Laborer 1 Road Maintenance Works Carpenter (#03) Public 659 1 Laborer 1 Equipment Operator I Works (a 07) Public 650 -- Drainage Maintenance Works - Leadman (class only) Super- 601 Schools Office -- intendent Manager of Schools iclass only) County 240 1 Superior -- Clerk Court Clerk 01007 To: Board of Supervisors - From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 4-20-76 Page: 3. I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS - continued 3. Increase salary of Economic Opportunity Program Director from Salary Level 495 (1667-2026) to Salary Level 497 (1677-2030) . II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS 4. Name and Destination Department and Date Meeting Maxine Sehring, Reno, Nevada Child Welfare League - - M.D. , eague• -M.D. , 4-25-76 to 4-26-76 Conference Health (Child Welfare League r unds) Barbara Weidenfeld, same same Social Service (State Funds) Nick Rodriguez, Long Beach, CA Annual CAL-NEVA Chairman, 4-21-76 to 4-25-76 Community Action Economic Program Conference Opportunity Council III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 5. Oakley Fire Protection District. Add $2,700 from district funds for installation of fire hydrant. 6. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for following budget units: Public Works (Road Construction, Road Maintenance, Building Maintenance) , Probation/District Attorney Family Support, Treasurer-Tax Collector, Sheriff- Coroner (Radio Facilities, Special Projects) , County Medical Services, Moraga Fire Protection District, Contra Costa County Fire Protect--on District. IV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS 7. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Sub- ordination of Lien taken to guarantee repayment of the cost of services rendered by the County to Edward D. and Rebecca Morrison, as recommended by the County Lien Committee to enable Mr_ and Mrs. Morrison to obtain a debt consolidation -� loan. 00" To: Board of Supervisors , From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 4-20-76 Page: 4. V. BOARD AND CARE PLACEMENTS/RATES 8. Home and/or Effective Department Institution Rate Date Human Jones Family Care Home, -$306 4-21-76 Resources Richmond per mo. (adj.) Human Jody & Velma Lyons, $285 4-21-76 -- Resources E1 Cerrito per mo. (adj .) Human Devereux School, $1,068 4-21-76 Resources Santa Barbara _ per_mo. 9. Amend Board Resolution No. 75/523 approving child care institution rates for 1975-1976 to include Methods Youth Development Center, Carmichael, CA, at a rate of $880 per month. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 10. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period Community Food Community Food & $3,000 5-1-76 Coalition of Nutrition Program- (100% to Contra Costa purchase of protein Federal 8-31-76 County, Inc. foods Funds) Interactive Consulting Services, -- Extend Agreement Resources, Inc. Energy Resources completion date Study to May 31, 1976 VII. LEGISLATION - 11. Adopt resolution endorsing Senate Bill 1881, introduced by Senator John Nejedly, which provides a revised system for allocation to counties of Federal social service funds for the 1976-1977 fiscal year taking into consideration prior program levels. 00009 r To: Board of Zjupervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 4-20-•76 Page: S. VIII.REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 12. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a month-to-month lease -with Squire W. Knowles and Duncan M. Knowles for premises at 960 East Street, Pittsburg, for continued use by the Cooperative Extension Service. 13. Exercise option to extend lease for two years between County and Apollo Enterprises for premises at 3700 Delta Fair Boulevard, Suite 207, Antioch, CA, for continued use by the Health DEpartment (Alcoholic Clinic) . IX. OTHER ACTIONS 14. Appoint the following members to the 11-ianp6wer Advisory Council as recommended by the Council and the Director, Human Resources Agency: Name Category Mrs. Dona Willits Veterans Ms. Anna Aiello Cities Mr. Richard Beyer Economic Development Corporation 15. Approve amendments to the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency Joint Powers Agreement with respect to the powers of the Governing Board and alternate members of the Governing Body, as required by the final Federal regulations. 16. Authorize relief of cash shortage of $15 in the accounts of the (gest Judicial District, pursuant to the provisions of of Resolution Number 2702. 17. Acknowledge receipt of a five-Month Progress Review Report on the Community Food and Nutrition Program from the Office of Economic Opportunity, and authorize submission of the final formal document to the Community Services Administration. 18. Authorize use of the George miller West Multipurpose facility in Richmond by the Parent's Organization to hold a Spring Bazaar on June 18 and 19, 1976. 19. Approve procedures developed and recommended by staff of County departments involved in the National Flood Insurance Program to comply with requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. 00010 UUMV To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 4-20-76 Page: 6. IX. OTHER ACTIONS - continued 20. Adopt resolution proclaiming the week of May 9 - 15, 1976 as "Health Care Week" and authorize County Medical Services and County Health Department to participate in a public held care program to be held at the Sun Valley Mall, Concord, on May 13 and 14, 1976. 21. Authorize reimbursement of $26 to Mr. Larry Blackmon for repair of personal property damaged in the line of duty. 22. Acknowledge receipt of letter from President, Economic Opportunity Council, advising that a committee has been established, as directed by the Board, to review the Upsprout/Community Garden Project and submit recommendations thereon by May 31, 1976. 23. Refer to Government Operations Committee and County Adminis- trator for review,- letter from President, Economic Opportunity Council, transmitting copy of the 1975 evaluation report of the County's Community Action Program prepared by David S. Thompson Associates. 24. Acknowledge receipt of memorandum submitted by C. J. Leonard, Director of Personnel, and as recommended therein, deny request of Forrest H. Wilson and James Callander III for inclusion in Employee Group Health Plan. - 25. Appoint additional nominees to the Overall Economic Develop- ment Program (OEDP) Committee. 26. Acknowledge receipt of CETA End-of-Year Report for the 1974- 1975 fiscal year and authorize distribution to interested persons. 27. Authorize Chairman, 3oard of Supervisors, to execute Pre- application form requesting U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfar- Funds for Public Service Projects, as provided under the Housing and Community Development Act. 28. As requested by the Riverview Fire Protection District and as authorized by vote of eligible employees, approve Social Security coverage for district employees by adoption of the required Resolution and execution of the necessary Application and Agreement forms by the Board Chairman. 00011 Y Is ,wadi r To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 4-20-76 Page: 7. IX. OTHER ACTIONS - continued 29. Acknowledge receipt of memorandum from County Administrator regarding the position of the Board of Supervisors on construction of a single County Detention Center and instructions to the Detention Facility Advisory Committee. NOTE Chairman to ask for -any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specified time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5:00 P.M. 00012 i PUBLIC WORKS OEPARrmENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DATE: April 20, 1976 TO : Vernon L. Cline, Acting Public Storks Director FROM: L. J. Reagan, Assistant Public Works Director, Road Design SUBJECT: Agenda E X T R A B U S I N E S S Supervisorial District It Item High Street -- Contra Costa Canal Bridge - Lead Limit- Pacheco It is recorrne-nded that the Board of Supervisors approve Traffic Resolution '!o. . 219.3 which reduces the weicht limit of the Nigh Street Bridge over the Contra Costa Canal , Bridge Number 3975A-.20-, to 10,000 pounds maximum gross load. The posting will be effective immediately and will be in force until repairs are completed; not to exceed 90 cays. The posting of this bridge is recorrlended by the Acting Public Works Director. A field inspection revealed that the timber deck planking and part of the stringers have decayed making temporary posting and repair or replacement necessary. The posting will cause some inconvenience to public traffic; however, alternate routes for heave vehicles z re available. 00013 1 PUBLIC ♦% `IRKS DEPARTMENT 1111 CO\)TRA COSTA COUNTY DATE: April 20, 1976 TO : :lark ccioit, Deputy lublic '-!or%s Director, Transportation FROM: L. J. Reagan, Assistant public :rorks Director, Road Design i SUBJECT: AL:craa for Tuesday, April 20, 1976 G.T':U% Fuss Izss i Sb?Z-H%!rz0?1A L 7ISTRI✓1 V i Item Di BL.O RCAD - Apz)rove Plans and Arcs ertise - Danville Area It is reco=nended that Vie Board of Supervisors approve plans cnd specifications for the Diablo Road Reconstruction Project ` and advertise for bids to b received in four weeks, and opened at L a.m. or. =:as 18, 1916. The -Engineer's estimated construction cost is $140,OW. :his Droje:ct was previcusl r appm7ed by the Board of Supervisors a on July 22, 1977. Advertising of the project was delayed due to prable= in cuordinating ::ith an adjacent, developer. projcct involves tha .ideninr,, re-co:z:.truction and overlay- inL of Diablo -pad, from Hartz Avenue to Inter—,tate 660. B:r:irommantal and za:r_'atory, referral requirements have been previously complied with. Fro'ect -o. 1:721_1hi7?-71 ?W:bb 00014 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California April 20, 1976 A G Ell D A REPORTS Report A. BUCHANAN FIELD - REQUESTS TO LEASE LAND On November 12, 1975, the Board of Supervisors referred to the Public Works Director for recommendation a letter of intent to negotiate a fixed base operation lease from Canadian Limited, and on December 16, 1975, a similar request from California-National Air Service. On January 13, 1976, the Board also referred such a request from Mr. David F. Huntington of Santa Monica, California, to the Public Works Director and the Contra Costa County Aviation Liaison Committee. On February 3, 1976, the Board of Supervisors engaged the firm of Daniel, Mann, Johnson and Mendenhall to prepare an Airport Master Plan. The consultant has requested that action on any new leases be deferred until the Facility Requirement Element of the revised Airport MAster Plan is completed in order to assure that the leases will be compatible with the revised plan. This element is now under study and should be completed in three to six months. It is recommended that the Board approve the consultant's request. The Aviation Liaison Committee concurs in this recommendation. (A) Report B. BLUM ROAD RECONSTRUCTION - RECOMMEND BID AY:ARD - Pacheco Area Bids for construction of the Blum Road Reconstruction project were received last Tuesday, April 13, 1976, at 11:00 a.m. at the regular Board of Supervisors meeting and were referred to the Public Works Department for review and recommendation. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors award the construction contract to the low bidder, Independent Construction Company of Oakland, in the amount of $29,943, the lowest of sixteen bids which were received. (RE: Project No. 3887-4235-76) (RD) Report C. ROLLINGWOOD SUBDIVISION SLURRY SEAL - RECOMMEND BID AWARD - RollinQwood Area Three bids for construction of Rollingwood Subdivision Slurry Seal were received last Tuesday, April 13, 1976, at 11:00 a.ni. at the regular Board of Supervisors' meeting and were referred to the Public Works Department for review and recommendation. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 8 April 20, 1976 00015 Report C Continued: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors award the construction contract to the low bidder, Graham Contractors, Inc. , of Santa Clara, in the amount of $18,367. ,(RE: Project No. 1075-4284-76) (RD) - SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I Item I. AMHERST AVENUE - APPROVE PLANS AND ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - Kensington Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve plans and specifications for the Amherst Avenue Reconstruction project and advertise for bids to be received in four weeks, and opened at 11:00 a.m. on May 18, 1976. The Engineer's estimated construction cost is $54,000. The project consists of the reconstruction of the Amherst Avenue roadway between Arlington Avenue and Oberlin Avenue and .. the replacement of badly ,broken concrete curb. This project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class le Categorical Exemption under County guidelines. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors concur in this finding. (RE: Project No. 1552-4300-76) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II (No Items) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 2. SUBDIVISION 4604 - APPROVE SUBDIVISION AGREE14ENT - Orinda Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4604. Owner: Whitney S. Haist, P. O. Box 33, Orinda, CA 94563 Location: Subdivision 4604 is located at the end of Martha Road west of Glorietta Boulevard. (LD) Item 3. 981 CASTLE ROCK ROAD - APPROVE AGREF-HENT - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve an Occupancy Agreement, dated April 6, 1976, with Bryan McDonald, for maintenance of County-owned property located at 981 Castle Rock Road, Walnut Creek, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County. (Continued on next page) A_ G E N D A Public works Department Page 2 of 8 April 20, 1976 00016 Item 3 Continued: The Agreement provides that Mr. McDonald shall occupy the house as a caretaker and maintain the premises until the septic tank system has been rebuilt to satisfy the requirements of the County Health Department. (RP) Item 4. 2565 OAR ROAD - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a Rental Agreement, dated April 1, 1976, with Phyllis Carlson, for rental of County-owned property located at 2565 Oak Road, Walnut Creek, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County. The rental is on a month-to-month, as-is basis, at $450 per month, commencing April 1, 1976. (RP) Item 5. SUBDIVISION 4599 - ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: a. Issue an Order stating that the construction of improvements in Subdivision 4599 has been satisfactorily completed. b. Accept as a County road the street which is shown and dedicated for public use on the final map of Subdivision 4599. Subdivider: Albert D. Seeno Construction Company, 3890 Railroad Avenue, Pitts5urg, CA 94565 Location: Subdivision 4599 is located on the south side of Walnut Boulevard, opposite Terra Bella Drive. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV Item 6. PORT CHICAGO HIG!UgAY BRIDGE - APPROVE PROJECT - Clyde Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Port Chicago Highway Bridge Reconstruction project in the Clyde area. The project is located on Port Chicago Highway and Diablo Creek," approximately 3,000 feet north of Highway 4. The work consists of replacing the existing narrow bridge with a new bridge having a 40-foot wide roadway with one five-foot wide sidewalk and a bridge span length of 50 feet as shown on the preliminary plans dated March, 1976, prepared by Tudor Engineering Company, which are on file with the Clerk of the Board.. Estimated contract cost is -approximately $175,000, of which 90 percent is eligible for Federal-Aid Safer Roads funding with the remaining 10 percent being funded from budgeted County road funds. Pending State and Federal reviews of the project, work is expected to begin in August and completed in November 1976. (Continued on next page) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 3 of 8 April 20, 1976 00017 r Mix Item 6 Continued: it is further recommended that the Board of supervisors determine that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and direct the Director of Planning to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. A Negative Declaration pertaining to this project was posted and filed with the County Clerk on January 20, 1976. No protests were received. The project has been determined to conform with the General Plan. (RE: Project No. 4371-4283-76) (RD) (AGENDA CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) 1 A G E N D A Public Works Department page 4 of 8 April 20, 1976 00018 a t SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 7. ASSESSI.IENT DISTRICT 1964-3 - ARADOR VALLEY WATER SYSTEM - San Ramon Area The Public Works Department has been notified by the Auditor- Controller that the parcels of land shown as Assessor's Parcels Nos. 210-040-018, 021 and 022 on previous tax rolls has been divided. There are unpaid assessments on bonds issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, Assessment District 1964-3. The assessment numbers involved are 40-A, 40-C, 41-A and 41-D. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Acting Public Works Director, ex officio Street Superintendent, to file with the Clerk of the Board amended assessments for Assessment Nos. 40-A, 40-C, 41-A and 41-D, segregating and apportioning the unpaid installments of the original assess- ment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the original parcels and to apply a fee of $160 per original parcel to the segregation to cover County costs pursuant to the Board Order on this matter dated August 26, 1969. (LD) Item 8• ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1973-3 - San Ramon Area By letter of March 30,- 1976, the Engineer of Work for Assess- ment District 1973-3 (Bishop Ranch) has informed the Acting Public Works Director that all road construction has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, and recommends that the Contractor, Gallagher and Burk, Inc. , and M.G.M. Construction, a Joint Venture, be relieved from maintenance and responsibility in accordance with Section 7-1.15 of the Standard Specifications for all work except the sanitary sewer pump station, the pump station landscaping, and other minor items of work the Contractor has given written consent to perform. The Acting Public Works Director recommends that the recommendation of the Engineer of Work be approved, effective March (LD) Item 9. SUBDIVISION 4721 - APPROVE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4721. Owner: Dame' Construction Company, Inc. , P. O. Box 100, San Ramon,CA 94583 Location: Subdivision 4721 is located at the end of Borica Drive east of E1 Capitan Drive. (LD) Item 10. SUBDIVISION 3844 - APPROVE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT AND REFUND DEPOSIT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a new Subdivision Agreement with Imperial Savings and Loan Association for Subdivision 3844, and cancel the Subdivision Agreement with Larwin-Northern California, and authorize the Acting Public Works Director to ref-md to Larwin-Northern California the $500 surety cash deposit. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A_ Public Works Department Page 5 of 8 April 20, 1976 00019 F{er Item 10 Continued: Owner: Imperial Savings and Loan Association, 1849 Willow Pass Road, Concord, CA 94520 Location: Subdivision 3844 is located on the west side of Alcosta Boulevard just south of Montevideo Drive. (LD) Item 11. SUBDIVISION 3845 - APPROVE EXTENSION - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Subdivision Agreement Extension for Subdivision 3845. Owner: Larwin-Northern California, Inc. 6500 Village Parkway Boulevard, Dublin, CA 94566 Location: Subdivision 3845 is located on the south side of Montevideo Drive on the east side of the Southern Pacific Railroad_ (LD) Item. 12. SUBDIVISION 4627 - APPROVE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4627. Owner: Dame' Construction Company, Inc. , P. 0. Box 100, San Ramon, CA 94583 Location: Subdivision 4627 is located at the end of Como Way, east of E1 Capitan Drive. (LD) Item 13. SUBDIVISION 4761 - APPROVE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4761. Owner: Dame' Construction Company, Inc. , P. 0. Box 100, San Ramon, CA 94583 Location: Subdivision 4761 is located on both sides of El Capitan Drive just north of St. Christopher Drive. (LD). Item 14• CAMINO TASSAJARA - ACCEPT DEED - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed dated April 7, 1976 for road purposes from Joanne B. Smith. The Deed is _required as a condition of approval of Land Use Permit 2144-74 and Land Use Permit 2205-75. (RE: Work Order 4805 - Road No. 4721C) (RP) A G E N D A Public Works Department _ Page 5 of 8 April 20, 1976 VCNUfGV RV Item 15. LIVORNA ROAD - ENVIRO:-*ENTAL IMPACT REPORT - Alamo Area In compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970., a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the reconstruction of Livorna Road, between I-680 and Trotter Way, was prepared by the Planning Department. On April 13, 1976, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report. The rlanning Commission found the project to"be in conformance with the County General Plan as per Section 65402 of the Government Code, and that the Environmental Impact Report is adequate. The final Environmental Impact Report is hereby submitted to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. (RE: Project No. 4234-4257-75) (RD) GENERAL Item 16. WOMEN'S MINI.-SUM SECURITY FACILITY - APPROVE AGREE14ENT - Richmond Area It is recommended that the Architectural Services Agreement . with Armas Sootaru, Architect, be approved and that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Acting Public Works Director to execute the Agreement. The Agreement provides for architectural services- in connection with the Women's I inimum Security Facility in Rich-uond. This Agreement provides for a maximum fee of $21,000. (RE: Work Order 5268) (B&G) Item 17. AUTHORIZE DESTRUCTIOIN OF DUPLICATE RECORDS The Public Woks Department requests that the Acting Public Works Director be authorized to destroy any duplicate record, paper or document as long as the original or a permanent photographic reproduction is on file. This is pursuant to Government Code 26201. (AO) Item 18. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT - APPpOVE AGREEMENT - Pleasant Hill Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District, approve the Consultirg• Services Agreement with John Wilson, Architect, for an architectural program for Apparatus Repair Shop Expansion and authorize its Chairman to direct the Acting Public Works Director to execute same. (Continued on next page) A_ G E N D A • Public works Department Page^7 o-f 8 April 20, 1976 00021 1 f r Item 18 Continued: This Agreement provides for payment to the Architect on an as- earned basis with a maximum allowable fee of $1,000, which amount shall not be exceeded without additional written authorization by the Acting Public Works Director. (RE: Work order 5479) (B&G) Izem 19. THERAPEUTIC SWIM-MING POOL - APPROVE AGREEI►IENIT - Richmond Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors appoint the architectural firm of Sokoloff - Hamilton & Bennett, San Francisco, as Project Architect for the new Therapeutic Swimming Pool at the George Miller Jr. - West school, 2801 Hilltop Drive, Richmond. It is also recommended that the Acting Public Works Director. be directed to prepare an Architectural Services Agreement for their services. This appointment is recommended by the Office of the County Administrator, Publ:;.c Works Department, and the Hilltop Center Parents' Group. (RE: Work Order 5236) (B&G) . Item 20. ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY 1. The Delta Uater Quality Report is submitted for the Board of Sunervisors' information and public distribution. No action required. 2. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider attached "Calendar of tater Meetings." No action required. (EC) NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A G E N_ D APublic Works Department Page 8 of 8 April 20, 1976 00022 Prepared Jointly by the Water Resources Representative and the Chief Engineer of the Contra Costa County Water Agency April 14, 1976 CALENDAR OF WATER-,MEETINGS TIME ATTENDANCE DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE REMARKS Recommended Authorization Apr. 22 Thurs. San Joaquin 7:30 p.m. Public Hearing Staff - Valley Contra Costa Re: Program Review Interagency County Dater Report Drainage Program District Board Room 1331 Concord - Ave., Concord Apr. 29 Thurs. State Water 9:30 a.m. - Hearing - Re: Staff Resources Control Resources Protection of Fish Board Building and Wildlife in Sacramento Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta _ May ?? U.S. Bureau of ?? Central Valley Staff Reclamation Project Reanalysis- Not scheduled as yet 0023 Contracts, Agreements, or other documents approved by the Board this day are microfilmed with the order except in those instances where the clerk was not furnished with the documents prior to the time when the minutes were micro- filmed. In such cases, when the documents are received they will be placed in the appropriate file (to be microfilmed at a later time). 00024 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Avri 1 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and eorred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Dorothy a Donald 00025 V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: � Department Assessor Budget Unit 016 Date 2/3/76 Action Requested: Creat. the class of Assessment Services Clerk and allocate a required number of positions to the P'issessor's Office based on 10 cl s•firatinn study, Proposed effective date: SAP Explain why adjustment is needed: sn,-cialized clerical class required by Assessor to xPflprt actual job duties an:I extkrience recuirements. Estimates-sost.of kdjustment: - Amount: 1 . Sa�4i e�ane wages: �_^_;t _ $ �/A 2. Fixed Ansett (ti-6t .items cued coat) u- > _�'Jj U of ►J _J Estimated total: ...y $ N/A 0 Signature Departure t Heae Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: — _Z! 4.,.G»�7� iii•S.r��af+►3 '_ tom,,,/�'� � L�:1� z-4/ y"�"'" ''"""�""`"'�" "''�' Countyadministrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: Aaril 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Assessment Services Clerk. - On April 13, 1976, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Assessment Services Clerk and recommended Salary Level 247 (753-951). The above action can be accomplished _by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Assessment Services Clerk, Salary Level 247 (753-951). This class is not exempt from overtime. Assistant Personndi' Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. ' z _. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ! ) On A ' ' f' J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: _ A P R ' 0 ?9-76S4,. o� � � "c! , S.acklss Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o6 ttJti.6 adJu3tment eo►zstZtutea cr Apprcoptia.t%on AdjMtment and Peuonnet l N26 ReAotitti.on Amendment. IMF a , PDS I T 1 ON ADJ UST ct: T REQUEST No: 90815 Department Building Inspection Sudget t.;nit 340 Date 2/19/76 Action Requested: allocate class of Building Inspector I-Pruject and classify (1) position. Proposed effective date: =SAP Explain why adjustment is needed: Contra Costa Count/ RECEIVED Estimated cost of adjustment: FcG 2 0 i9 7'05 Amount: office Of 1 . Salaries and wages: County A:Iministre.o$ 2. Fixed Assets: (tUs.t Ztems ai!d cast) $ Estimated total $ Signaturettji ,_,� �J �,�,z•� Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: March 12, 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation, pursuant to �me�mLoindumdated March 11, 1976, attached. Count Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommndation Allocate the class of Building Inspector I-Project on an Exempt basis and classify 1 exempt position. ���� t►= The ab�"gacco on%%an be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592, Salary Schedule for Exempt Pei4onn3C, Up adding Building Inspector I-Project at Salary Level 359 (1101-1338) . Also amend ResglutlMn 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Exempt position of Building Inspector ,-T Progec q Can be effective day following Board action. L.-. N .M This class is not aempt from overtime. c� _. Assistant Personn&Y Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Adn,"I.'S trator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: [.r R 11) 0 1976 — By Ro�-'�r..,,n . es Deputy UA27 APPROVAL o6 this adjustr:estt cona.titutes rit ApppzopAiati.on Ad1u4.tment and Peltsonrtee POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: 1; � 5 Department Building Inspection Budget Unit 340 Date Action Requested: Establish classit'ications o_` Building Inspector I and Building Inspector II 100 % flexible staffing Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed. assist in implementing affirmative action goals, provide career ladder within depa--t=ent by recoa-mizing experience and training of department personnel. Estimated_ cost of�.adjustment: Ccnira ,_os,'o Coc:-i�� Amount: 1 . Sal ar-es aid wages: ' ECOW a 2. Fixed-Assets: (list .items and cost) tit y4_ _• �v nE'ice of �~ Estimated total _ Signature / Depal=tm�ent Hea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: 8/12/7 5 To: Civil Service � Request Recommendation. kt,' OLD iv� co—un-tv Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Building Inspector II; allocate the class of Building Inspector I and classify 1 position; cancel 1 Building Inspector position. On April 13, 1976, the Civil Service Co=ission created the class of Building Inspectorll and recommended Salary Level 418 (1318-1602) and Building Inspector I and recommended Salary Level 359 (1101-1338). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 and 75/592 to reflect the addition of Building Inspector II, Salary Level 418 (1318-1602) and the addition of Building Inspector I, Salary Level 359 (1101-1338) and the addition of 1 position; and the cancellation of Building Inspector position r06, Salary Level 402 (1255-1526). Can be effective day following Board action. The above classes are not exempt from overtime. Assistant personnel Director Recommendationof County Administrator Date: April_, 1976 1 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( J) on J. P. O:Sc^`t County Clerk Date: /j - (?,• r, :^ .7 �1 BJL `+- i_�t� ft 41 ✓�i� i 1/l L / p�.,.S.tl.rnn'_, cCkLIS r-� egflry erK APPROVAL 0J -th.,i.s adju,stwLt eo,istitutee an AppAopti.crtZon Adjustment and Pelwonneenntt���s�pp Ruotuti.on AmejtdmPnt. !!lJ 28 POS I T 1 0 N ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department , yor-,3 t . Pr')r�I;c i n , Budget Unit � 1 Date 121211 A Action Requested: Esta►alis!, class of Sees ----s Pro( rar:;^-,?r at Salary Level 407 . Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: ''-osition because of increased co;iiplexi ty Of i.iaintaining s0'fi4-::ar? for t`..o conuut,:r systers . Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa County Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: RECEIVED $ 2. Fixed Assets: (Zizt items ar:d cost) tt•: JAN T.9 1375 • Q6 $ •Q _.ice o u Estimate(P(WM Admin' pato $ � v . r+ ll r Signature Department -Head Initia eteppinjUion of County Administrator Date: May 6, 1975 Request recon'Yrntendation, pursuant to attached memoraq�duw. County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Systems Software Analyst. On April 13, 1976, the Civil Service Co=ission created the class of Systems Software Analyst and recommended Salary Level 420 (1326-1612) . The above action can be accomplished, by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Systems Software Analyst, Salary Level 420 (1326-1612). Can be effective day following Board action. This class is not exempt from overtime. Assistant Personnel` Director Recommendation of County Administrator / Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976_ County AdminiS ra or Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on County Cleric By ' Date: ern n � 1'a'� y< <.-.-�„ :�r n �.h��n h Cs t� Rcn.t�!ynn 5`+ r-kt�s D((e��p��uttyClerk f�11 APPROVAL oa tkiz adjtat i�tt eor:sti,'ut¢.b an Apprcopreccit`,iorc AdJuatment and PefcdortrC"10� Reaotuti.on Amendma t. POS I T 1 ON A D J UST1.IENT REQUEST No: Department r111111TV ;i F?< Budget Unit 1n Date 1.7 cvMfi pot 9 , 1975 Action Requested: Estabtisic Su-)g ion Coin` Ct t`: P06ition 014 Proposed effective date: 1-2-76 Explain y ad ustment is needed: Vew Farii ?u Lacy Corrmi.s5iotcon cjiff icencc.Lne a 9� Estimatf cosV•of�-$djustment: - Amount: 1 . ;Ul ari es 6d wages: "` $ 6, 450 2. t Fixe(J-Ass*Vts: (tilt .items aj:d cost) Gr; ,�- 7ctix7.l.s.L ne3E $263 ��`'n~/ A-�.., ,•. et .tir- Tureti : 503 ---c'c� 766 Estimated total $ 7. 256 Signature , Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator ate: Request recommendation. Aou-ntA mim a or Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Cofnission Dattr? April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Superior Court Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned Justify classification as Superior Court Clerk. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Superior Court Clerk, Salary Level 351 (1075-1306). Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant PersonneT Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. (0,4'g4" County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on J. R. OLSSON. County Clerk Date: tip' ;�;b By: , , r to f LI `:: r'aipRrt 5=a- fes Depu:yClerk APPROVAL o6 t1ii-S adju,sb+e,:•t eore-ti•tutea cat Apptop.,jti. .aon Adju6tment and PeAsonnAOOM Ruot u i.on AmemfmUtt. "UMMIF-77, RM �.a._._ APPROVAL 03 tili.5 adju.5tr,vtt co,:su ELLee cut Ai,µ:UF i. LAW.. . ,_ RUo.ucti.on Ame}Amott. M: WN" P0SITI0N ADJUSTME11T REQUEST No: Department Health Budget Unit450 Date 12-4-74 Action Requested: Revise Class Specification of Staff Nurse III to include duties performed in the Health Department. Reclassify identified positions as incumbents qualify by examination. Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly describe and classify positions in depart- ment that perform duties in specific areas of assignment described in attached documents. EstimateCcost of adjustment: CaCounty Amount: r °^CE(Vc 1 . Salaries a, d wages: J�_ D $ Cannot be determined 2. "Fixed assets: (Gist Ztems cj:d cost) until positions :j/:) identified S`,�q sc - Coin t 4n' nistrator 'Hif..AAN PESOUp;ZCEES�S A__GD�I,-y Estima e o a Signature Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: Fabruary 5, 1975 To Civil Service: Request classification study pursuant to memor- d fFebruary�5, , attached. Countv Adu nis rator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Home Health pursing Supervisor and the class of Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse. On April 13, 1976, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Rome Health Nursing Supervisor and recommended Salary Level 404 (1263-1535) and the class of Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse and recommended Salary Level 366t (1240-1367) . The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Home Health Nursing Supervisor, Salary Level 404 (1263-1535) and Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse, Salary Level 366t (1240-1367). Can be effective day follo,.ring Board action. Home Health Nursing Supervisor is exempt from overtime. Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse is not exempt from overtime. Assistant Personnel/Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. 01 County Administrator Action of the yard of Superviscrs Adjustment APPROVED ) or n'2 J. R. CILSSON, County Clerk Date: A?R 2 0 19-7r — By,;��. �cr,-i--�••-:, �-�.Lt�� Dapuh� Clerk APPROVAL o6 tJu,S ad j u 5ncatt co"ti tute.5 N;. Ad;stopt,iai un Ad jou tlrtejtt and Peh6 onne,P 00031 Ruo&aon AmcxAvj,.t. APPROVAL 06 tJv:4 adjusbne►Lt eoreti,tutea a:: :MI'Lot),ti,ation Adjustment an Rotuct Ye�r6onneP VVlJJ,I 'zt�i on Ame3AwiLt. POSITION ADJUSTtIENT REQUEST No: J�' v Department Health Budget Unit 450 Date 4/8/76 Action Requested: Reclassify Staff Nurse II positions 403, 05, 09 to Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify position according tQ duties and responsibilities. x _ Estimated cost of adjustment: Ariirnt�r, --� 1 . Salaries and wages: - 558.00 a .= 2. Fixed Assets: (t .at .t teins c,:d cost) CEstimated total 558.00 Signature Department Head Ini ial , et rmination of County Administrator Date: April 9, 1976 To �.vi� �ervice: Request recommendation. CourIWAftfnistrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify (3) Staff Nurse II to Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the re- classification of Staff Nurse II positions 103, 005 and #09, Salary Level 334t (1125-1240) to Public Health Clinic Charge Nurse, Salary Level 366t (1240-1367) . Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator �/ Date: April 21 f 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. J , I County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED �j -�) on n',r , '�7,c; J. R. OLSSOI, County Clerk Date: ;� P-3ndnlynn 5 nrkles Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o6 tzi,b adjcu,tment con,5ti.tutes rL: App.,.cp_ti,.:.ti"cn Adju stmt and Pet6onnet OV��� Resotation Amendmea. V POS I T I ON ADJ USTMEUT REQUEST No: � �-� Department HEALTH Budget Unit 450 Date 4/2/76 Action Requested: Reclassify Alcoholism Rehabilitation Aide position Vs 011, 0231- 03-& 042 to Alcoholism Rehabilitation Assistant Proposed effective date: 4/1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly describe position according to assigned ' duties and responsibilities. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: $ 780 2. Fixed Assets: (tiRs1 and cost) -0- ' Estimated total $ 780 Dates --7— Signature Department Head Ini ti�l .pet rmf ti on of County Administrator Date: April 12, 1976 To Civilerce; Requ:�t�ecommendatbn. County Admiait rotor Personnel Office and/or Civil Service -Commission a April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 4 Alcoholism Rehabilitation Aide to Alcoholism Rdhabilitation Assistant. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Alcoholism Rehabilitation Assistant. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Alcholism Rehabilitation Aide, position 101, #02, #03 and #04, Salary Level 175 (625-764) to Alcoholism Rehabilitation Assistant, Salary Level 250 (790-960) . Assistant Personne Director Recommendation of County Administrator / Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ? on 0 '�' J. R. OLSSONI, County Clerk Date: P.rn ,1 1-7.6 - By:, 0-^rrnivnn S lackles — Deputy Clerk Clerk / APPROVAL o f tk iz adju.dtmertt cons''' es a:: App-tcp-tiati.on Ad1usbnent and Peuonn2NuVV3 Reao&tion Ameudmes:t. P O S I T I O N A D Jft7 S tv T R E Q U E S T No: Department Walnut Creek-Danvil sh%b'k§ U76t 264 Date April 29,1975 E Action Requested: Upgrading g§,PtA yR rk III to Supervising Process Clerk Proposed effective date: A.S.A.P. Explain why adjustment is needed: Position has not been evaluated since 1962. Work load and responsibilities have increased. Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Cosa Cou�Ity Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: RECEIVED $ 209.00 p/mo 2. Fixed Assets: (.Ei..st items a,ad cost) - OR ire of $ o m Administrator Estimated o�ai $ 2,508.00 p/yr Signature Department Head Ntia.l Determination of County Administrator Date: January 6, 1976 o ivil Service: Request recommendation. 1 C unty AdmiNistrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Process Clerk to Supervising Process Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Supervising Process Clerk. The above action can be accomplished by aaending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Process Clerk, position #01, Salary Level 270 (839-1020) to Supervising Process Clerk, Salary Level 318 (972-1181). Can be effective day following Board action. f/ ,Y' Assistant Personnel �Director Recommendation of County Administrator / Date: A2ril 21 - 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED t l on J. R. QLSSON. County Clerk Date: �; ? v ��;o By: `�r1c,�ekz ?.ond3!ynn Shac4las Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o' tiL4Es adjuatm..ent const itc:tes cij Apf�p'� on Adjustment and PvLaonne.�1�V'3 Rezofuti,.on Amendmvit. P`0- Si N ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: I�I DepartmeW lie dl=�„'� nistration Budget Unit 0=3 Date 12-I-75 L S�;;vicE DEPT. Action RLsquested: Cancel Per;?n ent 1nter:iittent Election Clerk (301) and establish Permanent Electio.:: Clerk (003) Proposed effective date: 1-1-76 Explain why adjustment is needed: Er?'-ovee has worked full time for over 3 years Estimated cost of adjustment: Transfer costs frost Teriporary Amount: Salaries tonc�a3a� es 1 . Salaries and wages: 2. Fixed Assets: (fist hums and cost) t1•r:ce or Estimated total; Ac!rnini:itr`ticr $ Signature `,�'�--yr /�� � ,,�,,Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: Count A m�nistrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Election Clerk and cancel 1 Permanent Intermittent Election Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Election Clerk. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Election Clerk- and the cancellation of 1 Permanent Intermittent Election Clerk, position V'801, both at Salary Level 154 (559-716). Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant Personne Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976_ County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors SPP Adjustment APPROVED fl�ii�) on } ;r''� J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk .,,_ . Date: r.='? .. - By: e.LL. P.onca.ynn S;, teles Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o4 tlLiz adjustment cort6titutes cf: Apptop2i.atio►t Adjustment and Pe4Aonnee.� n Reaol uti on Amendn.eitt. WV i ^y POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT R E 0 U E S T No: 61/ -�-o Department CCCo. Medical Services Budget Unit54o pate 3/22/76 Action Requested: Cancel Hospital Service worker II Position 319-23; add Cook's Assistant Position Proposed effective date: 4/1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: to provide adequate staffing in our Food Service Department Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: $ 2. Fixed Assets: J i st 4 toms and coat) S Estimated total Signature WkCUam R. D ie , I , Chi�1, ed.Adm n.svcs./ - ` J� Department Head Ini tial�::bet ination of County Administrator Date: March 26. 1976 To Civ" Si!�)v te: ' r - Re"est recommendation. -' Count-Y Acrifiialsteator Personnel Of ice`and/or Civil Service Commission date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recormendation Classify 1 Cook's Assistant and cancel 1 Hospital Services Worker II. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Cook's Assistant. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Cook's Assistant, Salary Level 223 (727-884) and the cancellation of I Hospital Services Worker II, position 123, Salary Level 215 (710-863). Assistant Personne•1 Director Recommendation of County Administrator � Date: April 21 , 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED � -- _- } on J. R. PLSSON. County Clerk Date: 1`6 By: ,Imo, n ye r J P.onc^:yin Stn- mea Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o f .tlLiz ad j ustmej:.t eo►:stZtu tes ev: App xpn i.a tion AdJusbnenLt and Peu onn�� Reaotuti.on Ame►uime.►rt. x POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department PROBATION Budget Unit 308 Date 3/30/76 Action Requested: Cancel Sr. D.P.O. positions and'39 and D.P.O. If positions x-13, _26,-26, 46, 56 Proposed effective date: 4/1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: Back-up positions over Leaves of Absence - are no longer necessary EstimatE�cosPofj�djustment: Amount: 1 . S641rijE ad wages: 2. FVed Assets: (t-Est iteins and ccst) L12 $ _j Estimated totI 0 Signature ( Department Head ' Initial Determination of County Administratoratle L4_ k74 To Civil Service: (14 Request recommendation. v ml rator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 9, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel (2) Senior Deputy Probation Officer and (4) Devl�,ty Probation Officer H. Senior Deputy Probation Officer position-, #05 and #42 and Deputy Probation Officer II positions #02, 22, 57 and 56 were established to replace employees while on leave of absence. The employees have now returned to duty and the positions are no longer necessary. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling Senior Deputy Probation Officer positions r-05 and #42 and Deputy Probation Officer II positions #02, #22, #57, and #56. C, Personnel Director RecoTroendation of County Administrator '--,/Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Administrator_ __ ____ Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on a,P J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: BY r ftepuly�Clerk.� APPROVAL 0j tJliz ddjuatmejit eomstitmteA wt AppacpAiation AdjuAtment and PeuonneAOM Raotution Amejufiwzt. Y POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Public Works Department_ Budget Unit Date t (Position #659-29) Action Requested: Add one Laborer and cancel one Road Maintenance Carpenter (Position #659-03) Proposed effective date: ASAP t Explain why adjustment is needed: To staff Road Maintenance manpower requirements at t the lowest position. t Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: $ 2. Fixed Assets: (t is.t i teins and cost) Estimated savings $ X27 00/iqihth Signature �epartn� A 4 Initial Determination of County Administrator Da S. -7 G To Civil Service: Request recommendation. AA County A inistrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: march 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recen.-mendation Classify 1 Laborer and cancel 1 Road Maintenance Carpenter. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Laborer. Can be effective April 1, 1976. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of l Laborer, Salary Level 375t (940-1036) and the cancellation of 1 Road Maintenance Carpenter, position x03, Salary Level 353t (1192-1314). PersonneYTi rector ~�— Recommendation of County Administrator Date: April 21, 1976 -/ Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Sward or Supervisors Adjustment APPRO'►'i=D �"" ") on '' L I R- O«SON County Clerk Date: ;; 19 a Z°,'t� BYL' ^ref . .. h��r 1zf���_ F.o, Ipn �nac�tAs Deputy Clerk APPROVAL co' .th'L'5 adjtts;t!!«,it e�::st;tc�tcs �.r: A,�,¢�:ap�„ic.,tiuit Adju.6tme,.,t erd Pex6unnee t t q POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Public Works 659 3-5-76 p Budget Unit Date (Position =659-28) Action Requested: Add one Laborer and cancel one Equipment Operator I (Position #659-07) Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To staff Road Haintenance manpower requirements j at the lowest position Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: .S 2. Fixed Assets: (ti,s t .items a,:d cast) _3 $ F ;► V) } Estimated savings $ M12 00/month Signature LO 1��" artment ea , Initial Determination of County Administrator Dat To Civil Service: • 10 Request recommendation. County Adm nistrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: Ma=ch 23T 2676 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Laborer and cancel 1 Equipment Operator I. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Laborer. Can be effective April 1, 1976. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Laborer, Salary Level 275t (940-1036) and the cancellation of 1 Equipment Operator I, position #07, Salary Level 313t (1055-1163). AssistantFersonnel- irector Recommendation of County Administrator ! Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. r County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ) on ►.r J P.. Cf SSO"; County Clerk Date: �;rr`: `_' U i�,b By: R.sn i,7!,rn SWcklei. Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o3' this cens titutes cir A;ptUp*..atton Ad juet ne-nt cutd Pe t6onneb, RcsO�ttti��li A. i i P 0 S I T i 0 N ADJUSTME'! T ' R' '.GU'EBT No: Department Public ''orks Department 5ud;2Cfcdn" 65fl 12 Dat�64/7/76 RVIrE DEPT. 1 Action Requested: Cancel class Drsinare Haintensnc'e`teac;an 1 Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: Classification no longer being utilized. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: S 2. Fixed Assets: (Us.t Ztiimts cued cost) S Estimated f Signature Department Hem Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: —Q X17 6 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. A,j, QM n 41 AX— County A Coun mist for Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Remove class of Drainage Maintenance Leadman. On April 13, 1976, the Civil Service Comission deleted the class of Drainage Maintenance Leadman. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by removing the class of Drainage Maintenance Leadman, Salary Level 311t (1049-1156) . Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant Personne Director Recommendation of County Administrator ; Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: Apk ::U 12"0 — By:"Q�, �r : 6r 'S,F, P.o:iaalynn Sl -.Mes Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o6 tlLis adju,s.tmo+Lt eon-stitutes mt App:opti—ation AdjmtmerTt and Peuonrtee VV��O Re s o&t i.on Amuidnv . { . v. + P 0 S I T 1 0 N ADJUSTMIENIT REQUEST No: I Department Superintendent of Schools Budget Unit 601 Date 11/18/75 Action Requested: Classification review of the Supervisor of School Records position Proposed effective date: 12/1/75 Explain why adjustment is needed: Lhities of position have changed Estimated.cost_.of adjustment: Contra Cosa County Amount: RECEtVL=D I . Salaries-zand wages: -0- 2. Fixed Asseti,s:• (tcs.; - ems mid ccs-t) NOV 40 i37J - ._ ►caretar Estimated total $ -0- Signature Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: December 10 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. County R m r Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Comm-ission Date: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Schools Office Manager. On April 13, 1976, the Civil Service Coaission created the class of Schools Office Manager and recommended Salary Level 389 (1207-1467). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Schools Office Manager, Salary Level 389 (1207-1467). Can be effective day following Board action. This class is exempt from overtime. Assistant Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator j' Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976_ 11D'�,4 (-7) County Adr.:n strator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED Ci} on A:; J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: l• i97s _ By: . % [ , .. _ P.ondalynn 5-':a.kles Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o6 this adjustment eonsti,tu,'-es eu: Appicop,-,-c....tii.on Adjustment and PeA.6onnee Raotution Amend nett. 00 _x..• . , Y {I c.i3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and coned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of Atzri 1 19 76 (� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Oi Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - is,sx Dorothy-114a(bDonald �V QUP + ,CONTRA•COSTIt COUNTY APPROPRIATION AD3usTmea I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Oakley Fire Protection District RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLERS USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Decrease Increase Cade Quantic ) Fund Budoet Unit O#,iect Syl--, Acct. I (CR X IN 66) 01 2017 2017 7750 008 Fire hydrant 1,700 01 2017 2017 9970 For fire hydrant 1,700 a Contra COSta County RECEIVED Of f ice of County Administrator PROOF to_4_. _T K.P._ VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(I4 capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Date Description To provide for-construction of fire hydrant at Oakley Fire Station. '4� al►nyH' APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDI TOR- CONTROLLER; ' 'F COUNTY 17 ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 2UPeX%1sors FiennY, Utas, alv:t_ray, VMMMk L Zact-id_ Ak�xnt,- W. N. �f p cl rI Zr,�n J. R. OLSSON CLERK _Shttzical'eCsi 'C S'�it"4tttss'r'l�l.- Title -Dote Deputy 4/prop-Ad!��Dyuan Journal Na. �.�-- ( M 129 Rev. 2,66) See lwstrarlioss on Reverse Side 00 `043 a�.y yF ' ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT ;•.,_ 'iir PUBLIC doax3 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S _SE Card Special ACCCLNT ____ EAPEN:zE F!AEUET !TEM " Increase Find Decrease CR X IN 66) Cade Quont�t 1 fiosaetUn,t Ob�ra \c. - SM_ZC Jo..0 C0:ISnU('TI0?1 Ol 1003 661-76,30 L199 1. Cowell ioa d 4,477. 1198 1. Buskirk Ave. 4,477 514 2. 1976 Overlay Project 94,000 569 4. Fartz Avenue 600 99:1 L•. Lard Development ring 600 221 3. enry -venue 1,400 995 J. Design _`rgineering 2,965 NMR R0.01 CONSTRUCTION 665-7600 557 "u. Various Roads 2,400 994 u. Land Development rng 2,400 209 3. Downer Street 2,100 995 3. Design Engineering 535 ROAD �c B.�Du:: u.AI NT&LUGE 671-2319 2. Rub Asphalt FM S-514 94,000. rM q-t—7 le 4 01-1-11 PROOF _Ca7�' _ _ _I`.°_ _ _�_ _ EXPLANATION GF REQUEST( IF capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL I. dD 4336 - Cover agreement vita City of Concord on `'NTRYwidening of "oxell Road. Dote = *` -` 2. dO 4955 - Transfer funds fe. rubberized asphalt seal coat repair program. 3. 'mU 14337 - Base failure repair and overlay Pinole Valley Road. L. AD 4266 - Preliminary engineering for circulation study - Dandle area. APPROVED: SIGNATURES ^ATE AUDITOR- CONTROLLER �- COUNTYE ADMINISTRATOR. 1 fi 17 r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER YES: �npcsslssis )i:tnu�'• L. Li Fjb � W. N. 6 ggess nn .r fl t�,� ArR . . No% ncn J. R. OLSSON, CLERK -, � cting Public ''Works Director 4/14/76 ROndolyn 511oo-c r% 5= _re Title Date Approv Adj.�02 7� DeputyClot l.as:rournal No: (M 129 REV. 2/75) • t:., srctr�ur> �,u Ret rrsr Side ,VYV,/VjZn_' f CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S U�t_ ���« ee& Cord Special =i:C01,*NT .__.;+ FEX'' 0 FIAEDASSET ITEM ' n Increase F`n, Decrease Code O.ianwO Bw_r+Jn�t )r a-. (CR X IN 66) 01 1003 083-7712 602 Retain wall-Paint shop 377 01 1003 083-7711 601 Central storeroom 375 11 i PROOF &—p. T EXP! A ATIOft OF REQUEST( Ie capital outlay, list Items and cost of each) TOTAL FNTRY This appropriation adjustment not affecting Date De,z,.,,,:• department totals is requested is requested to cover the cost of shelving for the Bldg. . Mee. shop storeroom. APPROVED: SIGNATURES ��?E AUDITOR- CONTROLLER: R 1 76 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: superrigm I:eany, Diss. Muriaxty, fir, Linscheid. A bt-,f-t-- W. N. Bogge3s NO% �i1�' A�•� 10,E 1 � ^ Deputy Public Works 1`// Director 4-13-76 J. R. OLSSON, C1-ERK Title _ Date Rena fynn S4+ackles =.y:.,,_r° Deputy Clerk Apprap Adj. 2 7d (M 129 REV. 2/75 �„. Dt�Jructi ,?xRet ersr Tide Journal No. Ga ;a e cawrRw COSTA COUNTY APPROPWAno+ ADJUSTMENT t. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT FAMILY SUPPORT COLLECTIONS COSTS RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' DecreaseIncrease Fund Cods Quonntr) Bud etUn,t Ob,ea S,,la A:.cr. CR X IN 66) District Attorney Family Support p) 1003 245-2310 Professional Services 19,140 Probation Department C I 1003 308-8822 Cost applied Family Support 19, 140 PROOF CO"� __ -V'--P._ _VER•_ ?. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST? If capitol ootloy, Inst it and cost of each) TOTAL Probation Department collection costs for the Family Support ENTRY Enforcement Program are being transferred to that program Date Desc+,pt,on for twelve months thru June 30, 1976, at which time a shift in personnel is planned. Actual Transfer 7/1 - li/30/75 $ 29,618.34 " as 12/1- 12/31/75 5,592.72 rr at I/l/76- 3/31/76 18,015.19 $53,226.2G APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE Estimated Transfer 4/1/76-6/30/76 $ 18,013.75 iONTROLLER: " k QP I)NTY Total Est. & Actual $71 ,240.C= a(IntiINISTRaTOR: Less: Approp.Adj.#5143 2/11/76 52,10ox-- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: $19,140.0: t Supervisors I:e=Y, Peas. W. N. B�agesz n� NO:.Y-)Df-)e an t"A 'I J. R. OLSSON CLERK � BUDGET ANALYST 4/12/76 on yrn rkles S ^sa,_re Ti►le ���� Date I7tJry Clerk Approp.Adl. { M 129 Rev. 2t'66) rnO46 Journal No. • See Instructions on Ret rrsr lid 'r,4 r r 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT 015 RESERVED FOR AUOtTOR-CONTROLLER'S USE TREASURER — TAX COLLECTOR Card Special ACCOUNT 2. DEDecrease DEJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Code Quandt ) Fund BudoetUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) Ol 1003 015-2131 priRtiRq Galeul Vr<cl- ,: -'ting 590.00 01 1003 015-7751 003 Tran to 2131 (Calculator) 590.00 PROOF Camp.- -K.P. VER, 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - -- - - -- -- - - ENTRY Transferred to Object 2131; "lot Capital Item Dote Description APPROVED: SIrtzz' T ES DATE AUDIT - CONTROLLER: APR 14 76 COUNTY 1 `� ADMINISTRATOR:-TIM dJh BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 4upentiom fenny, Dias. Wuri,srta, .�„ I,ins•J:yid. Ab-!%�X.; W. N. Boggess n J•�rF)CLERK � a._ &vtLU Cly it-*I , Treasurer-Tax Collector 4/13/7 R�n:ltao inn §hcktes r Title Dote Deputv Cler EDWAARE11 `.7ittAL App p-AdI• '�'5 ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) Journal No. •See Instructions on Reverse Si 4 TY CONTRA COSTA COW APPROPRIATION ADJUSTME14T 1• DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNTOetrease Fund 4. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM Increase Code Quantity) BudoetUnit Obiect i Acct. (CR X IN 66) Ot 1003 055-7758 019 Tube Tester $150 055-2270 Repair a Serv. Equip. 40 055-7758 007 Si Tnal Selector Sys. $190 1 1120 303-7750 003 Television 2 to 3 —0— `C 1003 0557-77578 022 —Q— PROOF _CD14p _ _ _X_P. VER._ _. EX?L—*4:.TION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 055 Adjustment due to unanticipated price increase. Date Description 303 Adjust is quantitative only. GSS A ar . APPROVED: SIGMA ES DATE AUDITOR— CONTROLLER COUNTYP � 7� ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 2Supex%imrs Kenny, Lltss. N'larixrtp, AU W. N. Boggess JR. OLSSON Admin. Service Officer JW CLERK Reno Lynn Sha::kles Saynaf re Titler Date Deputy Clerk Approp.Adj. ��/�-�r ( M 129 Rev. 2168) I 1 f -Z Q Journal No. tr • Ser lrsrUo �l irrs r Kexerse X (,�•• ) Y t ' 1 i 1 CONTRA COSTA COLINTr APPROPRIATION AD:13SThW-J4T I. OEPARTUENT OR 3t:CGET''sIT -ar i 4f-Coroner RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENIH C? FIXED:.:,5_T -_Mincrease - Decrease Code Quontity) Fund BudoetUnit OSiect Suy Acct_ (CR X IN 66) Q( I 003 257-77513 009 Phone 1-1-a;a rReTo,e L-7- 5 378 J 060-7758 001 Code-a-Phone S 255 257-2310 Personal d Prof-3ssicra-1r:�i�s 123 PROOF -K_P+ — VER.- 3. EXPLA.YATIGN OF REXEST ' :isr items and casr of each) TOTAL - - - - ENTRY Date Description Transfer of fiunEs .i i =i l: . rce:n-j Strike Force to purchase a M=c a ^.cre -rcn the surplus supply n.-4 nal, ;v ?,b: is 'forts. Item wi I I fulfill __-Ie _.jr--cses as Phcne Mate Remote UniT. Ex=-.ss -onias will be placed in 2310 to im:.-=esing costs in APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE this area. AUDITOR- Ay, CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: , YES: SUPenlwri Keni:y, Dias. Mortartr. �-� W. N. Boggess , 41k No-- not)ebp , ,I OLSSON o:r ic_�F-. r - : S ASSISTANTCLERKR�n�civnn S+nasure QQ Tiris Date Deputy W"V '"DonaAdo.M i29 Rev. 2/68) Journal No. See Instructions ow Ree�erse Si:r rad rI I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MEDICAL SERVICES RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantit ) BudaetUno Obiect S---.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 1003 540-7754 095 Misc. Assistive Devices $1,700.00 01 1 1003 540-7754 1% E & J Pover Driven Wheelchair $"1,700.00 Contra C�s;a County RECEIVED 4 -,ce of Ccunty Admirlistrw r PROOF _Comp._ _ _!._P__ _VER._ ?. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capital outlay, Inst items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Wheelchair is over $500• #33 control unit, custom frame, wing a vay leg, 12 volt battery, heavy duty uphostery Dare Desc.:pten and frame color - red for Kelley Reed. J 1,58T.00 Tax 103.15 1990.15 Firm Quote APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR—fir— 1 CONTROLLER: ° PR I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. 7 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: supermacim Kenny, Deas, M-1-'MY. rt3, mss. Ltmcd:tl� RSetlt: W. N. 6oggest NO% %)CX)e c,,AF P 12 �'` ' ��� /��S� � �`ChieV, Medical J. R. OLSSON CLERK Administrative Services 4/13/76 ■ Rondol n Sha:kles S-,arse Title Dare Jeputy Glenn W. R. Dovney II Approp.Adj. i M 129 Rev. 2-65) Journal No. %r.., IMslrtrcfiues finRet rrsr Sidr r'; 4n CONTRA COSTA COUNTY i APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MEDICAL SERVICES RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quandt ) Fund &doesUn,t OFsec, -.�-Acct. t CR X IN 66) 01 1003 540-2250 Rental of Equipment $2,T50.00 01 01 1003 540-Tt'58 IS 7 ft1titone VHF Electronic Pocket Ping System $2,T50.00 Contra Costa County RECEIVED !{;tee 1 a iy%o ©nice of County Administrator 4000 PROOF VER.! 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY The paging item has been on lease for four years with Date Descriptian payments of $609.97 per month or $737.9.631 annually. We can purchase the equipment now for $2,T50 which is much less than the leasing price, APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR—"'e" '? {f l� CONTROLLER: ! f "`�? COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: FIN 4=0 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supenta m Kenny. 1)'"M X-1--nY- JAWWw LLnac2 rld. Ab�en :• W. N. Boggess �j �j p NO., rX)OE' on - i Chief, d1Ca1 J. R. Ol S30M CLEIuc Admin_i strative Services,X13376 Date n « Signoru.e W. R. II Title / p t+,n.in,vren-kfes Approp.Adj. �r C00 Deputy Ctefk Journal No. � — (M 129 Rev. 2/68) 'Ser instructions on Reverse Side fu 1051 \� • � CONTRA COSTA COMM • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MRDIM SERVICES RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantic ) BudoetUnit Object SubL.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 1003 540-7754 095 Assistive Devices $730,.00 01 1 1003 540-7754 1Vo Premier Wheelchair $730.00 r .J PROOF ._j K_P__ _V_ER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST E If Capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Wheelchair is Over $500. Date Description Wheelchair premier P8AU-260-618-770-3009ATAW #2 toot plates, heel loops #5010 Special depth 18" seat to be 21 1/2" above floor #A--5 any color Fiiaquote $683.00 for Ralph Tallest + 45.00 APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— CONTROLLER: UDITOR—CONTROLLER: COUNTY 1 f., ADMINISTRATOR: f BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervlsan; Benny, Lt.►a. :Hart rty. �l ,,ent W. N. Boggess No:. rn0r1P_ on Chief, Medical J. R. OLSSOIi CLERK nistrative Services 3/23/76 s Rond .ynn Sho:kles Signature Title _ Date Deputy Berk W. R. Dorney II Approp.Adi. of a2�-7( M 129 Rev. 2/68) Journal No. 'See Instructions an Reverse Side °k - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT ). DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Moraga Fire Protection District Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Code Oiantit ) Fund BudoetUno 0 ect b.Acct. Decrease (CR X IN 66) 01 8 2010 2010-7753 010 New car sedan 4,800 01 2010 2010-2361 Car LA1wk-4-C,r s(0"P--6U 4,800 FA -1 PROOFComp•_ K.P. VER. 3, EXPLANATION OF RECAJEST(if capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - -- - -- - ENTRY To provide for new car sedan. Date Description As Above APPROVED: A DA AUDITOR- � Avvi CONTROL4e Jr _ COUNTY' ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: dupe %nsors Kenny. Dias. Monar.}•. 4111MM. Lbu%chold. Ab5er1(.5 W. N. Boggess APR 20 i 376 _ NO-..flpaneo on J. It. OLSSON CLERK a� ' Randatynn Shackles SAgnan,rc TitleL Date ( M 129 Rev. 2/66) Uep� Clerk ��Abprap.Adj.�mal No. ,J See Instructions on Reverse Side u�y h a 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT v I. CEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Contra Costa County Fire District Card Special ACCOUNT 2. 08JECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantit 1 Fund Budget Unit Obiect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 2025 2025 7700 001 Prem-91 65 7750 52S Screens 39 626 Vacuum Clnrs 430 630 Resus Comp 94 632 Slide Proj 52 7751 667 Monroe Calc 335 7753 495 Truck Chass 39 7754 6S2 Power Expand 64 1 655 Power Shear Jams 12 7758 S27 Speakers 3 ( 658 Strobe Lights 43 7750 637 Elec 'Megaphone 7 1 631 for elec meg 7 7753 342 Chassis 4278 7710 611 for chassis 1000 1 612 for chassis 800 7712 427 for chassis 616 for chassis v,'T 1200 7750 620 for chassis 124 7753 492 Siren 300 7758 659 Radios CG 1 7 1 s= 0 634 for siren & radio ,..,/ ;r Ci 271 635 for siren & radios 30 7758 514 Radios 959 1 660 for radios 728 665 for radios 231 a�o� ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY a APPROPRfAna ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Contra Costa Count Fire District Cord Special �CCOL'NT 2_ OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM" Decrease Increase Code Cluontity) Fund -Obtect r Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 2025 2025 77533 644 Generator 9811 7710 609 for gener 6000 7750 619 for gener 1467 620 for genet 6 629 for gener 110 633 for gener 202 635 for gener 5 636 for gener 103 639 for gener 886 7751 642 for genet 560 7752 645 for gener 280 7754 654 for gener 188 7758 665 for gener 4 7790 000 Fixed Assets PR yr 710 7750 619 9W F A Adj 710 3550 OOt1 Int 6 Court Costs 13087 2120 000 Adj to Utilities - k 13087 7753 668 Graders (2) t 14000 2474 000 for graders r.rc n tom••4 !#`�� 14000 PROOF Unit'_ K_P. V£R.! 3. EXPLANATION OF REQJEST t If capital outlay. list items and cost of each) TOTAL — — ENTRY Adjustment of appropriations for actual expenditures Date Description Price increases New calculator needed in Admin (2) Graders for fire trail grading(letter of justification attached. APPROVED: /, ATUR D TE AUDITOR— CONTROL COUNTY - � � r4 let 1js ADMINISTRATOR: CJ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: supertzacirs Nenl.Y. 1)13& Mondr y, JUNNOW j int. i'ld f "ft; W. N. Boggess oA CY 9 '2 ,Q' J.R.OLSSON CLERK Chief 3-11-76 _ y 'Sc-ktes 1 Signature Title Date 'Rondnly^n S. Approp.Adj. (M 124 Rev, 2168) Deputy Cletkournal No. ' Ser Isstricctiass as Rerersr SideV 055 E CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT FIRE CHIEF BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS A.V.Streuli Ralph L.Aldrich,Chairman 2010 Geary Road Harold E.Wildes,Vice Chairman Pleasant Hiit,Californiaichard F.Holmeslifornia 935_3 Robert 1.Schroder TELEPHONE(313)939.3300 Leo F.Smash March 11, 1976 Explanation of Request for Graders The Fire District has maintained the fire trails within their jurisdiction by commercial contractors. Last year's contract bids for this work ranged from $7500 to 9000. The low contract bidder who has been doing this work for sev- eral years is going out of business and the District has the opportunity to purchase his equipment. The District's Apparatus Supervisor has indicated the equip- ment is in excellent condition and should last from 6 to 7 years without any major repairs for our projected use. By obtaining the equipment, the District will maintain the fire trails . eliminating any hazardous trail grading and ex- panding the trails system to include master trail breaks in critical fire areas. Cost analysis indicates the District will save enough on the fire trail contracts to pay for the graders in 2-3 years. The District Board of Fire Commissioners has reviewed the dis- trict fire trail program and approve the purchase of the graders. r. Serrfne Ow conm+nitks of Clayton.Concord:Lafayette,Martlnea,Pleawnt H1//, Warnut Creek,and some unincorporated County areas I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNT:', STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/320 the Map of Subdivision 4604, ) Orinda Area ) WHEREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4604, property located in the Orinda area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with Whitney S. Haist, Subdivider, wherein said Subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. M 98 76 16) issued by Insurance Company of North America with Whitney S. Haist as principal , in the amount of $48,600 for Faithful Performance and $48,600 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail- No. 135136, dated April 14, 1976), in the amount of $500, deposited by: Whitney S. Haist. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full, and the 1976-77 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March 1976, is estimated to be $5,500. Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. M 98 76 17) issued by Insurance Company of North America with Whitney S. Haist as principal, in the amount of $5,500 guaranteeing the payment of the estineted 1976-77 tax; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on April 20, 1976. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Whitney S. Haist, P. 0. Box 33, Orinda, CA 94563 RESOLUTIO3 NO. 76/320 0(07 i r SUBDIVISION AGREE M%T (§1) Subdivision: 4604 _ (B. F P. Code §§11611-12) (§1) Subdivider: Whitney S. ais 1) Effective Date: April 20 , 1-97-6 (§I) -Completion Period: one year (§4) Deposits: A. (cash) $500 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (faithful performance 8 maintenance) S 48,600 2. (labor 6 caterials)$48,600 1. PARTIES 6 DATE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Co-4ta, California, hereinafter called "County", and the abovenamed Subdivider, mutually promise and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. IMPROVENMNTS. Subdivider shall construct, install and complete road and _ street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements- as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9, ane including future amendments, and all improvements required in the approved improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the County's Public Works Departtrent. Subdivider shall corplete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work") within the above completion period from date hereof as required by the Califoi-nia Subdivision Map Act (Business $ Professions Code §§11500 and following) , in a good work- manlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings rade thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the Cotnty Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GU.4RA.\TEE & KART -MANCE. Subdivider guarantees that the work is and will be free from defects and will perform satisfactorily in accordance %ith article 94-4.4 of the County Ordinance Code; and he shall maintain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective workmanship 9r materials or any unsatisfactory performance. 4. IMPROMIEE\T SECURITY: DEPOSIT f BONDS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business 14 Professions Code §1I612, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $500 cash; and.. .. B. Bonds, etc. : (1 - faithful performance 6 maintenance) additional security for at least the' above-specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of the work less $500, in the form of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful perforrance of this agreement and maintenance of the work for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory perforrance; plus (2- labor _ & materials) another such additional security in at least the above-specified amount, which is the full amount of said estimated cost, securing payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Subdivider. S. WARRANTY. Subdivider warrants that said impro:•ertent plan is adequate to accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any tire before the County's resolution of completion for the subdivision, the improvement plan proves to be inadequate in .any respect, Subdivider shall hake charges necessary to accomplish the work as promised. _ 1 _ Microfilmed with board order 12. RECORD MAP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to fil and record the Final clap or Parcel Hap for said Subdivision. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) 'Vernon L. Cline, Acting Public Works Director 111J ? laBY Deputy (Designate official capacity in the usiness; RECOI►1AIENDED FOR APPROVAL: Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknow- ledgment form below; and if a corporation, affix corporate seal. BY _ Assistant Pu .orks Wect (CORPORATE SEAL) FORM APPROVED: JOIE B. CLAUSEV, ` County Counsel Deputy To sal a ta-sat !at on, Partnership, mM Br61JnM�IQE (Individual) �ANDMIST STATE OF CAUFORNIA •nmtrnsrnrsr Alameda �- ed above for COUNTY OF or partner(s) On April 9, 1976 before the undersigned. a Notary Public in and for said d acknokledco State, personally appeared Mitney S. Haist ove executed it. M i Y -t i Y komnrn to me i to be the person__whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the the sane. WITNESS my hand a1 seal OFFICIAL SEAL unty and State /1IJT}K)NY tiOFftAAN �r"�- Nr JAKY PL13UC CAUFORMA Signature ALAMEDA COutirn = E Ant Hoffman =uu,nurwnnntunrnnnunnnrunnrruuuuw N (typed or Printed) tTbAs w 6r sIMM.want can 6. N0 1tiAI1'ER BY COUNTY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval - of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any of the teras and conditions hereof. 7. INDBNITY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, cormissions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly- suffered, incurred or threatened-because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as co^pleted, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these. C. The actions causing liability- are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them. • - D. Non-Conditions: The precise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Irder:nitee has prepared, supplied, or - approved any plan(s) or*specirication(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that. the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent ar willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including, inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set establish survey wonu»ents in accordance • with the filed map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Co=issioner-Surveyor. 10. NONPERFOPMANCE AND COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the tire specified in this :agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete thea by contract or other-vise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges therefor immediately upon dernacd. If County sues to compel performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of cocpletirg the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. 11. ASSIG:\SIE\T. If before County accepts these improvements, the subdivision is annexed to a cit}•, the County ray assign to that cit}' the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. WWV - - 2 - Ak AP 10 1 ` Iflip fi0.`i::71 I4. SFCURI T: 3Gi.D FOR SU'DiViSION hi,Ri:EMEW1;T ,�x ea^D ,w:_oTZ3 (Performance,, Cuaru::tee, and Payment ) (Calif. Government, Coje SS66491-1-66499.10) 1. OBLIGATION. "rl;iT?." ' S. H JS`I' as Principal, and DIZ3 t10ME UO>•aA rY u- _ KHCERICK a corporation organized and existin under t-he laY:s of '--e State of PENNTSFLV&NIA and authorized to transact suret., busireys in California, as Surety, hereby joirtly and several, bind ourselves, our, heirs, executors, administrators, successorJ, and assigns to the County of Contra Costa, California, to pa,: it: (A. Performance & Guarantee) FORW EIGHT THOUSMID SIX HUNDRED AND NLS/109M _ iso I?a„s (� � Q0.')0 ) for Itself o r any city-assignee under the beior:-county subd4vision a-re-meet plus (B. Payment ?') FJ^ FIG>'f iHOUSk`:'7 SIX MPIDRE) Aibt NO/100TH,S Dollars (;; 48 �0O.0O ) to secure the claims to tilliich reference is maue in Title " f:itis Sect-ion of Part 4 of t)i��ision 3 of the Civil Code of t:re State of Califor- nia, r7 2. NECITAL OF Sig''.DIV!,"UON nLi ^ _ ':he Principal has executed an agreement :Sith the CounL, to instail and Wit' for street , Cirainu�k3, and other improvements in Subuivi: ion :.::^Ler 4604 , as speci:'ied in th-e- Subdivi;i--n Arree:dent . and to cccmn.l£`•e s4i,. ::Cr' the time S7eci f':e(� for completion in the dui`division r:ree er:,, SII in aCG'Cr:;a^L'e '.4itir State and local 1c11?s and ruli::%s there:ul'.aer In ora£r to satisif condi tier:.; for filing of the Final "ap. or _'arced .:ap for saidu;,divlsion. 3, COI.I)ITIO`a. A. The condition of th.._s obligation as to Section 1. (/,) above is Such that if t:^.e above bounced principal , his or its heirs, executor's , ad111inistrators , successors or assi z ns, si:a i? in all thin:::, stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep anJ perform the covenants , conril-t►.oris anti provisions in t:=.L said agreement: and an, alteration. taerecz t'Hci,. as therein Provided, on his or its :part, t0 tie kept a ndi perfor:red at the time and in the manner therein, srecif'ied, and in all respects accordin- to their true intent and meanin ,, and shall indemnify and save harmless the County of Contra Costa (or cit_; as;irnee) , its officers, agents and employees, as therein stinusated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall to and remain in full force and effect . As a part of the oblir-at.ion szcureu hereb.: and In addition to the face amount specified therefor, .t^ern shall be included coats and reason- able expenses and fees, incluciinr reasona-ble attorney 's fees , incurred by Count;; (or city assignee) In successfully enforcing. such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in anY judi,.n.ert rendered. B. The condition of t:11s obl=gation as to Section l , (B) -above is Such that said Princip4l and tile undersil,ned as corporate surety are held firmly bound unto the CountL.;; o'' Contra Costa and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers , material-en and other persons employed in the performance of the aforena_ci a;•roe:yam':.t and referred to in the aforesaid ' Civil Code for materials furnish,,d or labor thereon of any rind, or for Microfilmed with board or&)�l F' amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, .ill pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by County (or city assignee) in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixes: by the court , and to be taxed as- costs and to be included in the judgment therein ren- dered. It is hereby expressly► stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (coru.-mencing with Section 3082) ,of Part 1; of Division 3 of the Civil Code , so as to give a right of action to then or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall Le and remain in full force and effect . C. No alteration of said subdivision agreement or any plan or snecification of said s:o„k agreed to by the Principal and the County shall relieve any Suretyfrom liab;lit;; on this gond ; and con- sent is hereby given to make such alteration: without further notice to or content by Surety; and the Stiret: teres;;: e:aives t"he arovis;onz of. Calif. Civil Code §2839, and holds itself teun d '-ithout regard to and independently of any action a-ainst Principal whenever taken. SIG?•;F:D AND SEALED on An- ri1 12, 1976 PRI?;CIPAL SURETY By x plc �'c «° # x i Ali it .. � r' _ � � i r a » zy�r •i f _ � � z � i it ji to of California )ss. (ACKNOWLEDG:,"ENT BY SURETY) my of ) the person(s) chose name(s) is/are signed re for Surety and who is/are known to rte to be kttorney(s )-in-.'act this Cornorate Surety, personally appeared before me and ackno:•rled�ed :.e that he signed the name of the Corporation as Surety and his/ r own nameTs) as its Attorney(s)-in-Fact . NOTARIAL SEAL) Notary YuLlic for County and State 2/76) btir -2- OU(*2 6rv51 :nts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such or labor, that said surety till pay the same in an account not cding the account hereinabove set lorth, and, also in case suit is � :t;ht upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount •eof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable .. .,ca .1c rrve _ incurred by Count; (or city assignee) in successfully j STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF S&*J F:uu."Ctsco �S& On this 12TH day of April in the year 1976 before me C. 1• 111C?s a Notary PubCc in and for the STATE OF CALIFORNIA peisorrally appeared Larry C. Cerrman known to me to be the puson whose name Is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney-in-Fact of the INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,and acknow. ledged to me that he subscribed the name of the INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA thereto as surety and his own name as Attomey-in-Fact. NOTA QV rjatlt• == Notary Public in and for ka of California SAN Ty t;q•caiwa:roc ecP: July IQ 19741= a::,,.a:;ii�lalx:luaxGs:.i:u:ori::•.;a.::r».ra'.fi.x: rintcd in U.S.A. EDWARD W.LEAL ALFRED P.LOMELI county Treasurer-To*collector Assistant County Treasurer- TAX COLLECTOR'S OFFICE Tax Collector L-k First and a gable of Tares CONTRA COSTA COUNTY First cent tareat Of Tares Due cad Pcysble Dellnqueat _ on the First Day of November on the Tenth Day of December -------------- NAATLIEZ.CAUFORNiIA ------------- Second Installment of Tares Pttaee ZU-30W.Ext.2385 Second lnstollment at Taxes Dae and Payable Delinquent on the First Day of February Agrsl 5, 1976 ea the Tenth Day of April IF -TM TRACT IS NOT FII ME BY WI-MER 31, 1976 , THIS IEMM IS VOID Theis brill certir'y that I have examined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: -MOT IzO. 46M. and have determined from the official tax records that there are no unpaid County Laces heretofore levied on the property included in the w-p. The 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full. Ocr esti=ate of the 1976-17 tax lien, which beca-te a liens on the first clay of '.khrch, 1975 . is b rio0.co Z= s"T�ri�RG its. L '.L La �• Tax Collector • d Mtcroiilmed with board girder - 000-64 I T tG�C'1 4604 I,"= Hot, Bond No. M 98 76 17 i L I L RM I R. Off'"N, SUBDIVISIO:: TAX BOND R. SOAP,) O' :W-r V-'SJZi l:f`OW ALL :IE.. BY THESE PRESSi:TS : THAT I.E. %III-rNEF S. HAIST _ a s P r i n c i p a 1 , a n d 1?4SURMICE CO^�IPAIEIY OF PIOrRM AnERTCA as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the County of Contra Costa , State of California, in the penal sum of _$5,500.00 Lawful monev of the United States of Anerica . to be paid to the County of Contra Costa , State of California , for which payment , well and truly to be made , we bind ourselves , our heirs , executors , administrators , successors and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these presents , to assure payment of 1976-77 taxes and assessments which are a lien, but not payable, as provided for in Section 66493 Government Code, State of California . The conditions of the above obligation are such that WHEREAS , the abo.e named Principal is about to file a map entitled Subdivision 4604, Contra Costa County, California , and t,'IIEREAS , there are no liens against the subdivision or any part thereof for unpaid state, county, municipal or local taxes or special assessments collected as taxes , except taxes or :special assessments not yet payable . NOW THEREFORE, if said Principal shall pay on or before Decenber 10 , 19 76, all taxes and assessments which are now a lien a-gainst said tract , or any part hereof, but not vet payable at the time of filing of the nap of said tract , then this obligation is to be void and of no effect ; otherwise to remain in full force and effect . Signed , Sealed and Dated this 12TH _ day of NCI '1 SURETY t�� �l...c,,T., I1ISU�, f�"�i A.�;RTCA it TN S l iLkl T , LARRY C. u R " A F ADDRESS OF SURETY T^-=a mac^tT*T- 1100 .31UI s''_'- O"'ISO- 0, CA. 94120 APN 269-202-023 r i IWcrOitUT1t'(I an oourd order 001C i MON, M— MI'W N w� TRACT 4604 Bond No. ra OR '74- , LEVI 70 447 C • 11ndi%idual) t� STATE OF CALWORNIA +j COUNTY OF Alameda On _ April 9- 1976 before me, the undmigned, a Nutary Public in and for said j State, prr_«,naUy appeared WhitneXS. Haist E w a w 2 w known to me L to 1x•the person volra.e name- is-_---_sul►cribrd 1 m t,, thy %%ithin imtrument and acl,nuwWgrtl that he ,,X,vutml the .amr. - smtum»nusustttwnuntruutttnua.rusutr= \\ITN USS my han nn tial : 1 OFFICIAL Sr—%L t — Ah'iliC1.W HO�MAN •"' MARY PtTWC CAWORMA � 1 I•*Sirnaturc "� ALAMWA COUNTY !y t fr.*n9cL4.1279 i Anth fII �.unumrtersnnrtsdmrmnarur,nmmruurr= ame . )pcyi or l'riated) 4TN66 we&sot 4st""U"a,U) �t STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Sit F.:.fes_.... On this l2T- day of April In the year 1976 f before me C. Y'. Lucas a Notary Public in and for the STATE OFCALIFORNIA personally appeared lar-T7 C. Germ= known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within Instrument as the Attomey-inrFact of the INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, and acknow- Iedled to me dlat he subscribed the name of the INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA drereto as surety and his own name as Attorney-in-Fact. NOTARY PU3,IC-CAttM-NIA Notary Public in and for the Sate of California =�`�� `•''^��, 5:.70 FwgeQp "` XO LO:/NTY ?; My C---7asfon uses July 10.19:d 85.6733 Printed in U.S.A 00066 66 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving Plans ) and Specifications for the ) Diablo Road Reconstruction RESOLUTION NO. 76/321 Project, Danville Area ) (Project No. 4721-4159-75) ) WHEREAS Plans and Specifications for reconstruction of Diablo Road, between Hartz Avenue and interstate 680, in the Danville area have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Specifica- tions are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on May 18, 1975 at 11 :00 a.m. , and the Clerk of this Board is directed to publish Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law invit3'Jag bids for said work, said Notice to be published in the Cg&KETT-AMERICAN . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on April 20, 1976 Originator: Public storks Department Road Design Division cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 76/321 OV W7 DIABLO ROAD PROJECT NO. 4721-4159-74 IL E DRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT � -�- ( h,ARTInEZ. CALIFORNIAA. R ;�c 319'6 NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS J. R. OLS ON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NIRA `A CO. B ... rIOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, THAT THE CLERK OF SAID BOARD WILL RECEIVE BIDS UNTIL 11 O'CLOCK A&Me ON MAY 18 1976. FOR THE FURnISHING OF ALL LABOR. MATERIALS* EQU I Pt'ENT-* TRANSPORTATION AND SERVICES FOR DIABLO ROAD RECONSTRUCTION HARTZ AVENUE TO INTERSTATE 680 THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON DIABLO ROAD BETWEEN HARTZ AVENUE AND INTERSTATE 680 IN THE DANVILLE AREA. THE WORK SHALL BE DOME IN ACCORDANCE WITH OFFICIAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED IN REFERENCE THERETO. BIDS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE ENTIRE WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN. ENGINEERS ESTIMATE ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT OF NO* QUANTITY MEASURE ITEM 1 LS MOBILIZATION 2 LS SIGNING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL 3 1 EA RESET MAILBOX- 4 LS CLEARING AND GRUBBING 5 (F) 2.000 CY ROADWAY EXCAVATION 6 450 LF TREE AERATION SYSTEM 7 4.000 TON ASPHALT CONCRETE (TYPE B) 8 85 LF ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE 9 6 EA MIAOR STRUCTURE (TYPE A INLET) 10 160 LF 1511 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 1II ) 11 410 LF 18" REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 1I1 ) 12 1*350 LF MINOR CONCRETE (TYPE S1-6 CURB) 13 170 LF MINOR CONCRETE (TYPE Sl-6 CURB 18" WIDTH) Microfilmed with board ordu QU N — 1 - 'NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS (CONT. ) --------- --------------- ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT OF N0+ QUANTITY MEASURE ITEM 14 109700 SOFT MINOR CONCRETE (SIDEWALK) 15 2#000 SOFT MINOR CONCRETE (DRIVEWAY) 16 LS MINOR CONCRETE (STEPS) 17 3 EA SURVEY MONUMENT 18 110 EA TYPE D .PAVEIJENT MARKER 19 60 EA TYPE G PAVEMENT MARKER 20 15 EA TYPE H PAVEMENT MARKER k - 2 �� E NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS (CONT. ) ----------------------- EACH PROPOSAL IS TO BE IN ACCURDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECI-- FICATIaI:S ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF THE -CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUFER— VISORS• ROOM. 103• COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BLIILDIs%G9 651 PINE STREET► MARTINFZs CALIFCRNIA. THE PLANS AND SPEC I F I CAT I OZ.S 14AY BE EXAMINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS C)t AT THE PUBLIC WORKS CEPARTmENTs STH FLOOR OF SAID COUNTY A?"INISTRATICt. BUILDING. PLANS AND 5PECIFICA— TIONS (NOT INCLUDING STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS INCLUDED BY REFERENCE ) AND PROPOSAL FORMS9 MAY PE OBTAINED EY PROSPEC— TIVE ROSPEC— TIVE BIDDERS AT THE PUBLIC VORKS DEPARTMENT s 5TH FLUOR s COUNTY AUMI N I S TRAT I ON BUILDING 9 UPON PAY%!E%l OF A PR I NT I%G AND SERVICE CHARGE IN THE AMOUNT CF FIVE AND 86/100 DOLLARS (55.96 ) ( SALES TAX INCLUDED) t:HICH AMOU,NT SHALL_ NOT BE REFU:;nA9LL& CtirCKS SHAt L BE MADE PAYABLE TO ' THE COUNTY OF CONTRA CCS-TIA ' s A.":D 54ALL BE +u.ILtJ TO PUBLIC WORKS CEPARTMENT9 5TH f'LUVRs niJIL:.I-%Gt t/ART I Zs CALIFL)kNIA 945534 EACH 21D SHALL BE MADE ON A PROPOSAL FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE PUBLIC WORKS VE-PARTMENTs 5TH FLOORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. BIDS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE ENTIRE 't.ORK DESCRIBED HEREIN-; AND. NEITHER PARTIAL NOR CUNT I NGENT BIDS WILL BE CONSIDERED. A PROPOSAL GUARANTY I14 THE AMOUNT OF TEN ( 10) PERCENT OF AMOUNT BID- SHALL ACCOMPA:.iY THE PROPOSAL. THE PROPOSAL GUARANTY MAY BE IN THE FORM OF A CASHIER1'5 CHECKS CERTIFIED CHECK OR BIDDER'S BONDS MADE PAYABLE TO THE ORDER OF ' THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. ' THE AR0VE—YENTIC`:ED SECURITY SHALL BE GIVEN AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE BIDDER BILL ENTER INTO A CONTRACT IF AWARDED THE WORKt AND WILL BE FORFEITED BY THE BIDDER AND RETAINED BY THE COUNTY IF THE SUCCESSFUL. BIDDER REFUSES9 NEGLECTS OR FAILS TO ENTER INTO SA10 CONTRACT OR TO FUR141SH THE NECESSARY BUNDS AFTER nEING REQUESTED TO DU SO BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. BID PROPOSALS SHALL BE SEALED AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CLERK OF THE BCARD OF SUPER V I SORS s ROOM 1039 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING* 651 PINE STREETS MARTINEL9 CALIFCRNIA9 ON OR BEFORE THE 18TH -DAY OF M.AY s 19769 AT 11 O'CLOCK A.M. AND WILL BE OPENED IN PUBLIC AND AT THE TIME CUE IN THE CHAMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS* ROO.1 1079 ACtzINISTRATION BUILDINGS MARTINEZ9 CALIFORNIA* At;D THERE READ A::D kECORCED. ANY BID PROPOSALS RECEIVED AFTER THE TIME SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE WILL EE RETURNED UNOPENED. 00070 N — 3 •NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS (CONT. ) THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH A LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TU FIFTY PERCENT OF THE CONTRACT PRICEE AND A FAITHFUL PERFOPMANCE ROAD IN AN AMOUNT ECUAL TO ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE CONTRACT PRICE* SAID BONDS TO HE SECURED FRO+4 A SURETY CO-MPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BIDDERS ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1773 OF THE: LAEOR CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA* OR. LOCAL LAW APPLICABLE THERETO* THE SAID BOARD HAS ASCERTAINED THE GENERAL PREVAILING RATE OF PER D I•EM. WAGES AND RATES FOR LEGAL HOLIDAYS AND OVERTIME WORK In THE LOCALITY IN WHICH THIS WORK 15 TU BE PERFORMED FOR EACH TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC REQUIRED TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT WHICH WILL BE AWARDED TO THE SUCCESSFUL RICDER. TH= PREVAILING RATE CF PER DIEM WAGES IS ON FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THE 40ARD OF SUPERVISORS* AND 15 INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE THERETO* THE SAME AS IF 5£T FORTH IN FULL HEREIN. FOR ANY CLASSIFICATION NOT INCLUDED IN THE LISTS THE MINIMUM WAGE SHALL BE THE GENERAL PREVAILIIIG RATE FOR THE COUNTY. THE SAID BOARD RESERVES THE RICHT TO REJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS OR ANY POkTIOR OF ANY KID AND/CR WAIVE AnY IRREGULARITY IN ANY BID RECEIVED• . BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY J.R. OLSSON ' COUNTY CLERK AND EX—OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BY Lac Deputy Clerk DATEn— APR 9 0 1976 PUBLICATION DATES— ------------------------------- -------------------------------- 010'71 N — 4 I DIABLO ROAD PROJECT NO. 4722-4159-74 BIDS DUE MAY IS 1976 AT 11 O'CLOCK A.M. R=*d! IC3. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING* 651 PINE STREET* j MARTINEZ9 CALIFORNIA 94553 DATEn— APR w 01976 PUBLICATION DATES— -------------------------------- 010'71 h — 4 DIABLO ROAD PROJECT NO. 4721-4159-74 BIDS DUE MAY 18 1976 AT 11 O'CLOCK A.M. ROOM 1C3• COUNTY ADMINISTRATION RUILDING+ 651 PINE STREETS .MARTINEZ+ CALIFORNIA 94553 TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ* CALIFORNIA P R 0 P 0 S A t F E D APR 20 1976 F 0 R J. R. OCS:ON CLEalc COAk0 O. SUPERVIJOQS %i l" WSTA CO. DIABLO ROAD RECONSTRUC HARTZ AVENUE TO INTERSTATE 680 NAME OF BIDDER BUSINESS ADDRESS ---------------------------------- PLACE OF RESIDENCE ------------------------------- TO THE BOARD OF Sta'PERVISOORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THE UNDERS I GoNED• AS fz I DDE2• DECLARES THAT THE ONLY PERSONS OR PARTIES INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE THOSE riA'4ED HEREIN— THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS �AADE WITHOUT COLLUSION' WITH ANY OTHER PERSON O FIRM OR CCRPORATIGN— THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE LOCATION OF THE PRO- POSED WORK* PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS— AND HE PROPOSES AND AGREES• IF THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED• THAT HE WILL CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF CONTRA = COSTA TO PRCVICE ALL NECESSARY YACHINERY• TOOLS* APPARATUS AND OTHER MEANS OF CONSTRUCTIONS AND TO DO ALL THE WORK AND FURNISH ALL THE MATERIALS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT• 1-N THE MANNER AUD T IYE PP.ESCR I BED s AND ACCORD— ING TO THE REQUIRE41E:':TS OF THE ENGINEER AS THEREIN SET FORTH, AND THAT HE WILL TAKE IN FULL PAYMENT THEREFOR AN A.!OUNT BASED ON THE UNIT PRICES SPECIFIED HEREINHELO':� FOR THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF FORK* THE TOTAL VALUE OF SAID WORK AS ESTIN.ATED HEREIN EEING S --------------- ---- ( INSERT TOTAL) AND THE FOLLOWING 4EING THE UNIT PRICES BID. TO WIT— Microfilmed with board order P - 1 00072 PROPOSAL (CC%T. ) (PRICE 140T TO EXCEED THREE (3) CECINALS ) — ---------------------------------------------------------- ------ --------- ITEM TOTAL ITE`; E57 IMATED' U:.;T OF PRICE ( IN ( IN NU. QUANTITY MEASURE ITEC; FIGURES) FIGURES) 1 LS 0 3 1 L 1 "AT.%Q:: — ------------------------------------------------------------ ------ -------- 2 LS SIGUI::G AND, T:AFFIC CONTROL 3 1 E.. .ESE' :;:.I.COx 4 LS CL._"1:4G AND GR UPMI::v 5 29000 CY ROADWAY EXCAVA7IC:. ( F) ---------------~-------------------------------------------- -------- r-------- %, • .n •• G 450 LF Tnr - .. E _rR••T,....•. S'PSTE.•. — ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- --------- 7 49000 • TON ASPHALT COUCRETE (TYPE (3) - - ---------..----- ----------------.---------------rr-r- ---r-rr -----r-rr 8 85 LF ASPHALT CCONCRETE [)IKE ------------~--------------------------------~--------------- --~-~--- -r---r--r 9 L EA MI:COR ST ZIUCTUR` (TYPE A INLET) 10 160 LF 15 ' 0 :C%CRETE PIPE tCLASS I1I ) -----------------------;------------------------------------- ------- --------- 11 410 LF I V I REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS III ) 12 1 9350 LF .I:ori C:%::CRE T E (TYPE S1-6 CURB) ----------------------------------------------------------- ------ --------- 13 170 LF :4I::JR1 Cw^::CRETE ( TYPE 51-6 CURB 18 " wIDTt() _. --•--- -.-. ------------------------------------------------ --------- ---------- P ------ --r-.------ P — 2 00073 Fa f. PROPOSAL (C^.tiT. ) (PRICE NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) DECIMALS) ITEM TOTAL & 6- EST I;f*T L'::iT %, PRICE( IN c !ra ;\vs QUANTITY MEASURE ITE. FIGURES) FIGURES) 14 10 t 7 03 SvFT MINOR C::r:CRETE t SICEWALK) 15 2:300 S FT MINOR CONCRETE t:;RIVCWAY) ------------------- ------------------------------------ ------- 16 LS 41 NOR CJ::CRETC (STEPS) 17 3 [A SURVEY ;:0;;;;:E:T .-------------------------------------------------------.r..-- ------ -------- 13 110 [A TYPE PAVEIM-EN T i:::,RKER ------ ------ -------- 1S 63 EA TYPE G PAVEMENT MARKER --- — — -----------------------------~------------ -------- ------- -------- 20 15 EA TYPE N PAVE,*1'.CA%'T PARKER ------------------------------------------------------------ -------- —~--- "OTE ---- 5N'Jk' TOTAL O: (':.C'iE P-1 TOTAL — ---------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- P 3 -------------------..---P - 3 00074 ' PROPOSAL iCONT. I IN CASE OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UNIT PRICES AND TOTALS# THE UNIT PRICES SHALL PREVAIL. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE QUANTITIES OF WORK UNDER EACH ITEM ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, HEING •GIVEN FOR A BASIS OF COMPARISON Of PROPOSAL• AND THE RIGHT 15 RESEPVED TO THE COURTY TO INCREASE OR DE- CREASE THE AMOUNT OF kORK UNDER ANY ITEM AS MAY BE REQUIRED# IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT* IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MONEY SET FORTH FOR EACH ITEM OF WORK OR AS THE TOTAL AMOUNT BID FOR THE PROJECT• DOES NOT COM. TITUTE AN AGREEME&T TO PAY A LUMP SUM FOR THE WORK UNLESS IT SPECIFICALLY SO STATES• IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE USDERSIGNED9 AS BIDDERS SHALL FURNISH A LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND IN A61 AMYUNT EQUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF T1115 PROPOSAL AND A FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND TO BE ONE HUNDRED P:RCEAT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS PROPOSALP TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AND AT k0 EXFEASE TO SAID COUNTY• EXECUTED BY A RESPONS— IBLE SURETY ACCEPTABLE TO SAID CQUNTY9 IN THE EVENT THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED BY SAID CVUNTY OF CONTRA COSTAs IF THIS PROPOSAL SMALL BE ACCEPTED AND THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL FAIL TO CONTRACT AS AFORESAID AND TO GIVE THE TWO BONDS IN THE SUMS TO BE DETERMINED AS AFORESAID. kITH SURETY SATISFACTORY TO THE BOARD of SUPERVISORS• WITHIN SEVEN 171 DAYS• NOT INCLUDING SUNDAYS* AFTER THE BIDDER HAS RECEIVED NOTICE FRrx THE 9UARO OF SUPERVISORS THAT THE CON— TRACT IS READY FOR SIGNATURE* THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY* AT ITS OPIION• DETERMINE THAT THE SIDDER HAS ARANDUNED THE CONTRACTS AND 711EREUPON THIS PROPOSAL AND THE ACCEPTABCE THEREOF SHALL BE NULL AND VOID AND THE FORFEITURE OF SUCH SECURITY RCCO.'%PANYING THIS PROPOSAL SHALL OPERATE AND THE SAVE SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA• SUBCONTRACTS THE CONTRACTOR AGREES+ BY SUBMISSION OF THIS PROPOSAL* TO CON- FORM9 WHEN APPLICABLE9 TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 4100 THROUGH 4113 OF THE GOVERNMENT COTE PERTAINING TO SUBCONTRACTORS* THE SAME AS IF INCOR- PORATED HEREIN* A CORPLETE LIST OF SUBCO•=TRACTORS IS REOUiRED9 AND THE BIDDER MILL BE EXPECTED TO PERFORM WITH HIS .OWN FORCES s ALL ITEMS OF WORK FOR WHICH NO SUBCONTRACTOR 15 LISTED* THE FOLL041XG IS A COMPLETE LIST OF ITEMS OF WORK TO BE SUB- CONTRACTED CN THIS PROJECT• IF A PORTIOY OF A%Y ITEM OF WORK IS DONE BY A SUBCONTRACTOR• THE VALUE OF THE WORK SUBCONTRACTED WILL BE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED COST OF SUCH PORTION OF THE CONTRACT ITEMS DETERMINED FROM INFORMA7104 SURVITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR* SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. THE UNDERSIGONED9 AS BIDDER• DECLARES THAT HE HAS NOT ACCEPTED ANY BID FROM ANY SURCON74ACTUR OR NATERIALMA% THROUGH MY BID DEPOSITORY9 THE BY-LAWS* RULES OR PEGLLATIONS OF bHICH PRUHIBIT OR PREVEAT THE CON— TRACTOR FROM CONS10ERI:.6 A'.T I!ID FRLa! ALT SUhCGhTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN• WHICH IS NOT PROCESSED TwROUGH SAID BID DEPOSITORY• CR WHICH PREVENT ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR KATERIALMAN FROF 9IDDItIG TO ANY CONTRACTOR bNO DUES NOT USE THE FACILITIES OF OR ACCEPT BIDS FROM OR THROUGH SUCH BID DEPOSITORY& . nwm PROPOSAL (CONT. ) ----------------- NO. ITEM SUBCONTRACTOR ADDRESS ---- ------------------------ -------------------- -------------------- ---- ------------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ---- ------------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- .....,..,Y;.,. TH. S PROPOSAL IS A P ROPOISAL GUA.RA.":TY I": TtiE . . ,.�, IVGNT OFF •. 1 0 hrn C., O .-M- fit(. T t� t j v l t ..�C..t.T ..F ...•.....,.J B 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- (C.ASH I CR'S CiiCCK• C:RT&F I ED CHECK 0% BIDDER'S BOND ACCEPTABLE) THE AN'WIES OF ALL PERSON'S INTERESTED If: THE FOREGGING PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE AS F OLLOWS- IASr''•ORTM4.T U0710E ---------------- IF THE BIDDER OR GIBER INTERESTED PERSON IS A CORPORATION+ STATE LEGAL NA'�:E OF CORPURAT IG's ALSO NAMES OF PRESIDENT * SECRETARY • TRCASURERs AND MANAGER THERLOF& IF A COPARTNERSHIP* STATE TRUE NAML OF FIRMO, !F 9I1'DER OR OTHLR INTERESTED PERSON 15 AN INDIVIDUAL# STATE FIRST AND LAST NAME IN FULLe --------------------------- -------..-- —....---------- ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- IIC :SEC TO DO vA SVah.TCV�T::.CT ALL CLASSES OF ::OP.K INVOLVED IN THE f ROJECT • IN ACCORDA;:CE '"'I TH AN' ACT PRCV i J I NG FOR THE REGI STRA— T I DI: OF CONTRACTORS• LICENSE is 0 (CLASS— 1 ------------ ----..—� . -------------------------- �.-----N- --------—.----------------------——N--- ---------------------:--------------- --------------------------------- OF Bliu,R) BUSINESS ADDRESS ----------------------------------------------------- PLACE OF RESIDENCE ----------------------------------------------------- DATE 1S P — 5 00070' V /i' r BIDDERS" CUTATICATION r2 r 9t d y� ceriili '.,that" x Y + Y 1. it'lnte_-ads'i to =ulav _the.z"csllowinS listed'construction traces;` _ _ �Il "1i5 idAZr2 UU eZ ,tne"Contract 'r r $SIf s t x r r rs 2, �a as: to .biose trades sct.forth Lh the prec`64 zs p;:ra�capix aA ;.he�ceor, £air k�r;ich it. as cl:Exble .undc":Part I or these Zi Condstsoas rt10 in-the "Contra Cosy .Plat, it will copZ}• _Mtn th, Gontra: Costa"?Ian Qn, this'and all fu ure .construction work id CczncxaE Costa CQ.tr��,�► s ��� �� of cavexa„a o,' mat Lin;' -those trades l-+n etFli> as to those trades fox~ -hirh it is requare 3 by ti�asc Bid `f " eitsf 'Cone ,nous rc cdmply-with Part 11oz, these did; Conditions, 3,t}aaopts til£ CS A2' �i:I1DZ2�i'SL.1:i'A,we- ut�lzzation., Q+�?S and,: . _. tae Y sp@C22 c 3Zc g Zpa�1, 5` Z,:atIN, dCt] )n $t<C Sr contained 7A .Swd TMQa 't ��, '# , . �l2S and ail fsttuxe cons rMction. 5rk,.,in Contra 6�su ;-.ch ec to then*. 3 it vi:lIobtain £rots a„ch oi::. its sxbconxractars and subsssi.r contracting or"a4minis.erinC agency ,;grigr to thL a•.satrd.,of an}► ,subcontract, unser°.this comtract the zubcoutractor certification required by these,BsdF Csaditzous. , - � (Signature of auttYorired” rrpcL�cntatxac. af" R.sdcicr) ' �MI f �¢ F T r t k ry _ pp 7t� r �' s t tr r �� a� 3wyn.i 4dyI ( titaCAiiCr,3CLd:� a a f-4 Srr �� p i.,� S 4E i fin♦ � F• M11�'�/V yi!rM w �R M�• if•F Mi.VYfr*+4M• w•M4C� 4Yns 4.y Y�s �w�YMdy�ycJ^,,tp.C�, fiz++k • «�cr nL� •t „yp� + j.�r.� �1ryw1/.}r { i yg1 'a.. +..�a 'A �RT Z'}ry��M '��w�� N�LY.i.. ��� .i�M l��wV'n4yFM4i• � � Y m �' 7��� �p�S� r' a".� ��� � v xn - _ 3,a•��,,<y Y�"�"�„a�rr�`'�,r [. �� .u#�Sr p�,a�. r ' a 'as ` diose ,trades seL ..Qrt i ui LPte pzccu ° r_ � t� ? z #terua Ert` h el moble,itadea c►z tite $xd, C,aac"t err. cl asr. n .m he Conus Costa �1 � xc rcc�a Z � t �« A Cc►sza aritius �qQ d fistiaze 4°hs cox oa' rpxk"3 t; (VY ,�4Y iCoL�. -TAXQs1M� � s ¢"g _� t".: ,x a a-' ..✓�� X u -.t.t e�dpptks � � .,kms .r �^ e,�=_ '1 k 7 f� � S< r 4 �f � `� f x ;� N ;{y� f✓��f�pi1�^HiF.*���XTiy'�Wp,»��y,�, t�•" � T t S 3 N Af4M7sF �1n4MtiV �MI� 1 � 4.taMY xb'n• ,t. _ Condi ,sfl ztp c tzag3 • witb T,a r`t x�2 0t tbi seh Ea�d Candi t ois��� ail"g�� -i�i: ==jJAz►q1' iit3..l- t7.On OAS ,+' me 5p4'�IC� nc�VR-i.ssteps con aan Axa sand £:a I� +� tips auid> allw�xtt e 'ct�tistzzs o ,ware. nCoat.•acs"•.a Cc�uucy subleco t3s� $zd. Caudx ,#�cto e MPP kT.e» RF -- ♦ , 3` obtain z am ca h a zis Suaconrl s'iCt0« ptrl4r to;tits a �' 4 0 Brant#isn+3cr the sihconrzacx wthc .scibce�ztac ^ F,ccrtcLcn �` scqu�xed by rtes hid, ConLou % 41 - �S� ariize o eitbora�xed p�c$an rz v� a bxddc TM 4 " xII flrd� fid; c3iSxixC $ Chek�.2�ti subcau racts�r ill"+EQ'LC 2C 2Ri1 �y ccuaes ° erste ai71 sbcoiitacts undcx premie norr.�cc n ,suboaz sh 3 .....be c:+ecuc+�d unt3.1 aii avthQr.xe rep cM+ zz at�v aCbc Go ts'Ce�st r z GaUnC+y Pu#J.�c +lo�ri.s.:i�cpa�-tsa . as ,sit z, = awn i 3n a ha fi.Yz r ry said carstcatou h corpora , eaessptuan3u N' o tier. 5sabcaz act ezapbuta ,i thaw such a - � �-- ^4'Sh?4���5���� Y '�•3u��� � { "`� a' S� A }'.#uKk '� - S r I I�i6g,_ — '*, Tim.,�7�. h EI ll,.,{J, lEi CI Diablo Road Reconstruction Project No. 4721-4159-75 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON COUNTY HIGHWAY DIABLO ROAD RECONSTRUCTION COUNTY ROAD NO. 4721E Microfilmed with board IA69 VERNON L. CLINE. ACTING PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA April 20, 1976 000'79 THIS SHEET 1S FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THE CONTRACT Your attention is directed to thq requirements in Section E, "Affirmative Action Requirements - Equal Employment Opportunity." This project is within the area covered by an Area Plan on Equal Employment Opportunity and the contract contains a special section of bid conditions dealing with the implementation of • that plan. There are two methods of qualifying for contract award, one of which is described under Part 1 and the other under Part 11 of the specification. We have received information from Federal authorities that specific crafts, listed below have been approved as participating crafts for the Contra Costa Area Plan.- PLUMBERS - No. 159 QUALIFICATION UNDER PART 1 Any or all of the crafts listed above may be qualified under Part 1 . No contractor can qualify completely under Part I but may qualify the listed crafts under Part 1 and must qualify all remaining crafts under Part Il . Partial qualification under Part 1 Involves completing Paragraph 2 (a) of the Bidder 's Certification of Affirmative Action for Equal Employment Oppor- tunity in the Proposal for the listed approved crafts. QUALIFICATION UNDER PART 11 In connection with responsibilities assumed by contractors bidding on this project , your particular attention is called to Paragraphs B-1 "Goals and Timetables," and 5-2 "Specific Affirmative Action Steps" of Section E of the Special Provisions. You must -complete Paragraph 2(b) of the Bidder' s Certification of Affirmative Action for Equal Employment Opportunity which Is contained in the Proposal or submit an Affirmative Action Plan to the County Public Works Department that meets the requirements as outlined in Part 11-6. Particular attention also should be given to the sixth para- graph of Section E. Part It' of the Special Provisions, which states "It shall be no excuse that the union with which the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement providing for exclusive referral failed to refer minority employees." In order to be a responsive bidder eligible (or contract award under Part 11 , the contractor must complete the bidder ' s Cert- ification of Affirmative Action for Equal Enployment Opportunity at the time of submitting his bid. INFORMATION - 00080 Diablo Road Reconstruction. Project No. 4721-4159-74 N D E X SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PAGE 1 . Location A-1 2. Description of work A-1 3. Contract Document A-1 4. Beginning of Work, Time of Completion b Liquidated Damages A-1 5. Permits A-2 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . Definitions and Terms B-I 2. General B-I 3. Proposal (Bid) Requirements and Conditions B-I 4. Award and Execution of the Contract B-3 5. Scope of Work - B-3 6. Control of Work - B-4 7. Control of Materials B-4 8. Legal Relations and Responsibility B-4 9. Prosecution and Progress B-9 10. Measurement and Payment B-ll SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT A1.D EQU 1 P14ENT RENTAL 1 . Definition C-1 2. Labor C-1 3. Equipment Rental C-1 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . Lines and Grades D-1 2. Materials D-2 3. Public Convenience, Public Safety and Signing D-2 4. Cooperation D-5 5. Obstructions 0-5 6. Measurement and Payment D-6 7. Existing Highway Facilities 0-6 8. Clearing and Grubbing D+8 9. Watering D-8 10. Earthwork 0-9 11 . Clean-up D-10 12. Aggregate Base 0-10 13. Asphalt Concrete 0-11 14. Notchine or Removing Existing Pavement D-14 15. Asphalt Concrete Dikes D-15 16. Minor Structures D-15 17.• Reinforced Concrete Pipe D-16 18. Tree Aeration System D-16 19. Minor Concrete 0-17 20. Misscellaneous Iron and Steel D-t8 21 . Survey Monument 0-16 22. Pavement Markers D-19 11 00081 Diablo Road Reconstruction Project No. 4721-4159-74 INDEX PAGE SECTION E - 81D CONDITIONS, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT E-1-9 ATTACHMENTS CC 105 CC 302 CC 306 CC 306A CC 3010 CC 3011 CC 3040 CC 3050 V1 Drain Box 0OOQO M SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1 . LOCATION The project is located on Diablo Road, between Hartz Avenue and Interstate 680, in the Danville area . 2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work in general consists of the widening and the recon- ' struction of portions of the existing road, the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, the installation of drainage facilities and such other items or details, not mentioned above, that are required by the Plans, Standard Specifications, or these special provisions to be performed, placed, constructed or installed. 3. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The work embraced herein shall conform to the Plans entitled, "D1ABLO ROAD RECONSTRUCTION," the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, dated January, 1975, insofar as the same may apply, these special provisions, the Notice to Contractors, the Proposal , the Contract, the two contract bonds required herein, any supplemental agreements amending or extending the work, working drawings or sketches clarifying or enlarging upon the work specified herein, and to pertinent portions of other documents included by reference thereto in these special provisions. , 4. BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION & LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 8-1 .03, "Beginning of Work," Section 8-1 .06, "Time of Completion," and Section 8-1 .07, "Liquidated Damages, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The Contractor shall commence work upon receipt of directions to proceed as stated in the "Notice to Proceed" issued by the Public Works Department and shall complete the work within the allotted time of : 50 WORKING DAYS counting from and including the day stated as the starting date in the "Notice to Proceed. " A - 1 °. 00083 SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 4. BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION d LIQUIDATED DAMAGES (Cont. The Contractor shall pay to the County of Contra Costa the sum of $75.00 per day for each and every- CALENDAR DAY of delay in finishing the work in excess of the number of working days prescribed above, and authorized extension thereof . 5. PERMITS Grading - The Contractor shall comply with the applicable provisions in the County Grading Ordinances (Title 7-Division 716 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code) in the process of disposing of the excess material as fill on private property within the County. Full compensation for conforming to Permit requirements shall be considered as included in the price paid for the item of work In which the permit is required. A - 2 R - 00084 I B r REVISED 2-14-75 SECTION B - GENFRAI PROVISIONS 1. DEFINITIONS AND TERMS As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires , the following terms have the following meanings: a. AGENCY means the legal entity for which the work is being performed as indicated on the Notice to Contractors , Proposal and Special Provisions . 1 b. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS means the governing body of the Agency. c. ENGINEER means the Contra Costa County Public Works i Director (Road Conmissioner-Surveyor; ex officio Chief Engineer) , j or his authorized agent acting within the scope of his authority, who is the Agency ' s representative for administration of this contract. d. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (S .S . ) means the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency , Department of Transportation , (hereinafter sometimes referred to as S. S. ) , dated January, 1975. Any reference therein to the State of California or a State agency, office or officer shall be inter- preted to refer to the Agency , or its corresponding agency, office or officer acting under this contract. i e. EQUIPMENT RENTAL RATES -*.,:D GENERAL PREVAILING !MAGE RATES means the latest edition of the Equipment Rental Rates and General Prevailing Wage Pates of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation , adopted annually by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County , and on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . f. OTHER PERTINENT DEFINITIONS - See S.S. Section 1 . 2. GENERAL a. State Contract Act. Unless otherwise specified in Section A of these special Provisions , or elsedhere by special order, the provisions of the State Contract Act (Government Code Section 14250 et seq. ) shall not apply to this contract, and reference thereto in S.S. Sec. 1-1 .40 is hereby waived. b. Standard Specifications . The Standard Specifications (S.S .) referred to above are by reference fully incorporated herein except to the extent that they are modified herein. 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREI,ENTS AND CONDITIONS 1 The provisions of S.S. Sec. 2 shall apply except as modified herein. B - 1 _ 0008r i 5 SECTION B - GEINERAL PRCVISIONS 3. PROPOSAL (FID) REQUIREMEt:TS AUD CONDITIONS (Cont. ) a. Examination of Plans , Specifications , Contract and Site of :fork (S.S. 2-1 .03) - Records of the Department referred to in the second q paragraph of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .03 may be inspected in the office of the Public l-:orks Director for the County of Contra Costa , Martinez, California. 1 b. Proposal (Bid) Forms (S .S. 2-1 .0:) 1 (1 ) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 concerning j the pre-qualification of bidders as a condition to the furnishing 1 of a proposal form by the department shall not apply. i (2) All proposals (bids ) shall be made on forms to be obtained from the office of the Public Works Director., at the address indicated on the Special Provisions ; no others will be accepted. j (3) The requirements of the second paragraph in S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 are superseded by the following: All proposals (bids) shall set forth for each i item of tirork, in clearly legible figures , an item price and a total for the iten in the respective spaces provided, and shall be signed � by the bidder, who shall fill out all blanks in the proposal (bid) form as therein required. (4) The requirements of the last two paragraphs of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 shall not apply. C. Proposal (aid) Guaranty (S.S. 2-1 .07) The requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .07 are superseded by .the following: (1 ) All proposals (bids) shall be presented under sealed cover. (2) Each proposal (bid) must be accompanied by a Proposal Guaranty in an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the anOL.it bid. Guaranty ra;; be in the form of cash , certified check, cashier 's check, or bidder 's bond •payable to the specific Agency. d. Comoetency of Bidders (S .S. 2-1 . 11 ) aThe requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 . 11 shall not apply . Attention is direct^d to S .S. Sec. 7-I .01E and the requirements of law referred to therein relating to the licensing of Contractors . B - 2 00086 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS (Cont. ) T.7—Competency of Bidders . 2-1 . 11 Cont. All bidders must be contractors holding a valid license to perform the required work as provided by the Business and Professions Code , and may be required to submit evidence to the Agency as to their ability , financial responsibility, and experience, in order to be eligible for consideration of their proposal . 4. AWARD AND EXECUTIOU OF TH..E CJi RACT (S.S. 3) a aThe provisions of S.S. Sec. 3 shalt apply except as f modified herein. a. Award of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .01 ) As used in S.S. Sec. 3-1 .01 "Director of Public Works" means the Board of Supervisors . b. Contract Bonds (S.S. 3-1 .02) i The successful bidder shall furnish a Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of the total bid and a Labor and ,Materials Bond in an anount of at least fifty percent (50%) of the i total bid, each in the form approved by the Agency. c. Execution of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .03) Within seven (7) days after its submission to him, the successful bidder- shall sign the contract and return it, to- gether with (1 ) the contract bonds , and either (2-a) a certificate of consent to self-insure issued b,: the Director of Industrial Relations , or (2-b) a certificate of Woremen 's Compensation Insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (2-c) an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director or the insurer. A sample copy o; the Agreement (Contract) to be executed by the Contractor can be obtained from the County Public '.forks Department, at the address indicated on the Special Provisions . d. The Guaranty of the successful bidder will be returned within fifteen (15) days after the contract is finally executed and approved , and Guaranties of other bidders will be re..urned pronptly after the execution of the contract. 5. SCOPE OF ' ORK (S.S. 4) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 4 shall apply except as modified herein. !� In lieu of the provisions in the third paragraph- in Section 4-1 .1133 , "Increased or Decraasee Quantities ," of the Standard Specifications , the foilo--in g shall apply: B - 3 . - OUC8#1 a SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S.S. 4) (Cont. ) If the total pay quantity of any major item of work required under the contract varies from the quantity shorn on the Proposal by more than 25 percent, in the absence of an executed contract change order specifying the compensation to be paid, the compensation payable to the Contractor will be determined in accordance with Sections 4-1 .03B(1 ) , 4-1 ,038(2) , or 4-1 ,038(3) , as the case may be. ' A major item of work shall be construed to be any item, the total cost of which is equal to or greater than 10 1 percent of the total contract amount, computed on the basis of the Proposal quantity and the contract unit price. 6. CONTROL OF WORK (S.S. 5) i The provisions of S.S. Sec. 5 shall apply. t 7. CONTROL OF MATERIALS (SA. 6) i The provisions of S.S. Sec. 6 shall apply, 8. LEGAL RELATIONS A11O RESMISIBILITY (S.S.7) i The provisions of S.S. Sec. 7, except as modified by the agreement ( Contract) or these special provisions , apply to this project. a. Insurance (1 ) The Contractor, before perforaing any work under the agreement, shall , at no expense to the Agency obtain and maintain in force the following insurance: (a) With respect to the Contractor's operations: i i 3 - 4 00088 SECTION B - GE'IERAL PRO':ISIONS I 8. LEGAL RELATIONS MID RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) a. Insurance (Cont. ) (i) regular Contractor's Public LiabilitX Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars $250 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of any one person, and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,300) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; a and (ii ) regular Contractor's Property Damage ! Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50 ,000T— !or all danages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence and, subject to that limit per accident or occurrence, a total (or aggregate) coverage of at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100 ,000Y for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property durin-g the policy period; and (b) With respect to Subcontractors' operations , Contractor shall procure or cause to be procured in their o::n behalf: (i ) regular Contractor's Protective ! Public Liability Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars 256�,300) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of any one person, and :or at least Five hundred Thousand Dollars ($500 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or deaths of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; and , (ii) regular Contractor's Protective Property Camace Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars J�u ,C-O) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence, and, subject to that limit per accident or occurrence, a total (or aggregate) coverace of at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars (5100,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property during the policy period; and 1 (c) Hithout limitation as to generality of the foregoing subdivisions (a) and (b) , a policy or policies of Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance in amounts not less than 5250,:000:500 ,000 Public Liability and $50 ,000 Property La-mace- Insurance, insuring the contractual liability of Contractor ung=r t::e provisions of t`iis Section as hereinafter stated, T:.E P'LICY OR PCLICIES , OR RIDER ATTACHED THERETO, SHALL NAME U5 SPECIFIC AGENICY AS A NAIIED INSURED. 3 3 - 5 0000CA 0 a SECTION B - GEUERAL PRO':ISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIOUS AND RESPOUSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) a. Insurance (Cont. ) (2) Form, Term, Certificates 5 (a) The insurance hereinabove specified shall be in form and placed with an insurance company or companies satis- factory to the County, and shall be kept in full force and effect until completion to the satisfaction of and acceptance by Agency of all work to be performed by Contractor under the agreement. (b) The Contractor shall furnish , or cause to be furnished, to the Agency certificate(s) of insurance or certified copies of the policies of insurance hereinbefore specified. Said certificate(s) shall provide for notice of cancellation to the Agency at least ten (10) days prior to cancellation of the policy . b. Public Safety - The provisions of S.S. Sec. 7-1 .09 shall apply except as modified under Section D - "Public Convenience, Public Safety and Signing" of these special provisions. Maintenance of all project signing, portable de- lineators , flashing lights , and other safety devices , shall be the responsibility of the Contractor at all times . The Contractor shall respond promptly, when contacted by the Engineer, or other public agencies , to correct improper conditions or inoperative devices . Failure to frequently inspect and naintain lights and barricades in proper operating condition when in use on the roadway, or failure to respond promptly to notification of im- properly operating equipment, will be sufficient cause for suspension of the contract until such defects are corrected. - '; All expenses incurred by the Agency because of emergency "call -outs ," for correcting improper conditions or for resetting or supplementing the Contractor's barricades or warning devices , will be charged to the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due him. c. Preservation of Property The provisions of Section 7-1 . 11 of the Standard Specifications shall apply to all irnprovemests , facilities , trees or shrubbery within or adjacent to the construction area that are } not to be removed. i B - G 000910 �i SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIO':S AUD RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) c. Preservation of Property (Cont.) The last two sentences of paragraph 2 of Section 7-1 .11 of the Standard Specifications are superseded by the following: If the Contractor fails to make the necessary repairs to damaged drainage or highway facilities in the vicinity of the construction area or to other damaged facilities or property within the rights- of-stay or easenients shown on the pians , the j Engineer may make or cause to be made such repairs as are necessary to restore the damaged facilities or property to a condition i as good as when the Contractor entered on the work. The cost of such repairs shall be borne by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due the Contractor under the Contract. d. Rights-of-:day and Easenents The rights-of-ray , easements , rights-of-entry , fill permits and other permits acquired by or on behalf of the Agency are, as far as can be determined, adequate for the perfor- mance of the work under this contract_ . Any additional rights-of- way, easements , or permits which the Contractor determines are necessary or convenient for the performance of the work shall be obtained by the Contractor at his expense. e. Access to Construction Site The Contractor shall make his own investigation of the conditions of existing public and private roads and of clearances , permits required, restrictions , road and bridge load limits , and other limitations affecting transportation and ingress and egress to the job site. The unavailability of access routes or limitations thereon shall not become the basis for claims against the Agency or extensions of time for completion of the work. f f. Responsibility for Damage The provisions of the sixth , seventh , and eighth paragraphs of S.S. Sec. 7-1 . 12 , regarding retention of money due the Contractor shall not apply. i 8 - 7 t OOGQ1 i SECTIOI: B - GEN'ER.AL PROVISIGtIS •8. LEGAL RELA-11045 AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) g. Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal 'lave or Earthquake_ Subparagraphs A, C, E and F of Section 7-1 .165, "Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal Vave or Earthquake, " of• the 1, Standard Specifications are amended to read: 1 . Occurrence--"Occurrence" shall include tidal waves , earthquakes in excess of a magnitude of 3.5 on the Richter Scale, and storms and floods as to which the Governor has proclaimed a state of emergency when the damaged work is located within the territorial limits to which such proclamation is applicable or, which were, in the opinion of the Engineer, of a magnitude at the site of the the work sufficient to have caused such a proclamation had they occurred in a populated area or in an area in �;. which such a proclamation was not already in effect. 2. Protecting the Rork from Damage--Clothing in this section shall be construed to relieve the Contractor + of his responsibility to protect the work from damage. The Contractor shall bear the entire - cost of repairing damage to the .,ork caused by the occurrence which the Engineer determines was due to the failure of the Contractor to comply with the requirements of the Plans and Specifica- tions , pecifica- tions , take reasonable and adequate measures to protect the work or exercise sound engineering and construction practices t in the conduct of the work , and such repair costs shall be excluded from consideration under the provisions of this section. 3. Determination of Costs--Unless otherwise acreed between the Engineer and the Contractor, the cost of the work performed pursuant to this Section 7-1 . 165 will be determined in accordance with the provisions in t Section 9-1 .03, "Force Account Payment," except that there shall be no markup allowance pursuant to Section 9-1 .03A, "'"sork Performed by Contractor," unless the Occurrence that caused the damace was a tidal wave or earthquake. The cost of emergency work, which the Engineer determines would have been part of the repair work if it had not previously been performed, will be determined in the same manner as the authorized repair work. The cost of repairing damaged work uhica was not in compliance with the require- nents of the plans and specifications shall be borne solely bv ;,he Contractor, and such cos €s shall not be considered r in determining the cost of repair under this Subsection E. t 1 S - 8 ! 0Q0AAM SECTIGN B - G-7aERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AtsO RESPO'ISIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont.) 4. Payment for Repair Mork--When the Occurrence that caused the damage was a tidal nave or earthquake, the County will pay the cost of repair, determined as provided in Subsection E, that exceeds 5 per cent of the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes . When the Occurrence that caused the damage was a ! storm or flood, the County will participate in the cost of the repair determined as provided in- Subsection E in accordance with the following: (a) On projects for which the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes is $2 ,000,000 or less , the County will .pay 90 per cent of the cost of repair that exceeds 5 per cent of tie amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes . t (b) On projects for which the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes is greater than $2,000,009, the County will nay 90 per cent of the cost of repair that exceeds $100,000. i 9. PROSECUTIOrt AID PROGRESS The provisions of S.S. Sec. 8 shall apply except as i modified herein. i B - 9 000010 SECTIO;l B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS (Cont. ) a. Subcontracting (S.S. 8-1 .01 ) The items of work in the Engineer's Estimate preceded by the letters (S) or (S-F) are designated as "Specialty i Items. " b. Assignment (S.S. 8-1 .02) 5 Neither the contract, nor any conies due or to become due under the contract, may be assigned by the Contractor without the prior consent and approval of the Board of Supervisors , nor in any event without the consent of the Contractor's surety or sureties , unless such surety or sureties have waived their right. to notice of assignment. c. Beginnina of Work (S.S . 8-1 .03) In lieu of the provisions of S.S. Sec. 8-1 .03, the i Contractor will be issued a "Notice to Proceed" by the Engineer within five (5) working days of the date .the contract is approved by the Agency and the wor;:ing days charged against the contract shall be counted f ron the day stated as the starting date in the "Notice to Proceed. " The Contractor shall not start vrork prior i to the date stated in the "notice to Proceed" unless a change to ;i an earlier date is authorized in writing by the Engineer. d. Pronress Schedule (S .S. B-1 .04) The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer a practicable progress schedule before starting any trork on the project and, if requested by the Engineer, supplementary progress schedules shall be submitted within five (5) working days of the Engineer's written request. • i e. Tire of Completion (S.S.--8-1 .06) The following days are designated as legal holidays : January 1 , February 12, 3rd Honday in February, 3 last Monday in May, July 4, 1st Monday in September, September 9 , 2nd itonday in October, 'rtovenber 11 , 4th Thursday in November, December 25,. Statewide election days , and any other day established as a general legal holiday by ;roclama'ion of the Governor of Cali ►ornia or the President of the United States. B - 10 0OC94 SECTION B - GENERAL. PROYIS103S 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS (Cont. ) e. Time of Completion (S.S . 8-1 .06) (Cont. ) If any of the foregoing holidays falls on a Sunday , the following Monday shall be considered to be a holiday. 10. MEASUREMENT ARD PAYMERT (S.S. 9) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9 shall apply, except as modified herein. a. Determination of Ri hts (S.S. 9-1 .045) The provisions of S .S. Sec. 9-1 .045 shall not apply. b. Partial Payments (S.S. 9-1 .06) In lieu of conflicting provisions of the third paragraph of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .06 and the fourth paragraph of S.S. Sec. i 11 -1 .02 , the Agency will withhold 10 percent from any estimated amount due the Contractor. c. Payment of Withheld Funds (S .S. 9-1 .065) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .065 shall not apply. d. Final Payment (S.S. Sec. 9-1 .07) t (1 ) Upon satisfactory completion of the entire work, the Engineer shall recommend the acceptance of the work to the Board of Supervisors. If the Board accepts the completed work, it shall cause a notice of Completion to be recorded with the Counts Recorder. (2) Thirty-five (35) days after the filing of the Notice of Completion , the Contractor shall be entitled to the balance due for the completion and acceptance of the work, if he certifies by a sworn written statement that all claims for labor and materials have been paid, and that no claims have been filed i with the Agency based upon acts or omissions of the Contractor, + and that no liens or withhold notices have been filed against said work, or the property on which the ►cork was done. Payment of the balance due will be made on -he dal following the regular day for payment of County bills by the County Auditor. e. Adjustment of Overhead Costs (S.S. Sec. 9-1 .08) � The provisions of S.S . Sec. 9-1 .08 shall not apply. i ' B - 11 i 000M SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 10. HEPSURE14ENT APID PAYWEIiT (S.S. 9) (Cont.) f. Clerical Errors (S.S. Sec. 9-1 .09) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .09 shall not apply. 9. All prior partial estimates and payments shall be subject to correction in the final estimate and payment. i i B - 12 i z 00096 6 F i SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT AND EQUIP-IENT RENTAL (S.S. 9-1 .03) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 shall apply except as modified herein. 1 . DEFINITION'. As used here, "force account" means the method of calculating payment for labor, equipment and/or materials based on actual cost plus specified percentages to cover overhead and profit for work not included as a bid item in the contract. When extra work is to be paid for on a force account basis , compensation will be determined in accordance with the provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 as modified herein. 2. LABOR. 3 a. The actual Mages to be paid, as defined in S. S. Sec. 9-1 .03A(la) , will be considered to be the prevailing rates in effect at the time the labor is performed, and no revision of payment for labor already performed will be made for any retroactive increases or decreases in such rates. b. Preni urn stage rates ui l l not be paid for any labor employed on force account work unless such rates have been approved, in writing, by the Engineer. The labor surcharge percentage to be a plied to the actual wages paid as provided in Section 9-1 .03A( lb� of the Standard Specifications will be 20 percent for all work, except that for the following types of work said labor surcharge will be as shown below: Type of Vork Performed Labor Surcharge Percent ' Cleaning and painting metal bridge - - - - - 29 Concrete construction - bridoe - - - - - - - 31 Erection: of structural metal for metal bridge, excluding sign bridge - - - - - - - 29 Piledriving , not including cast-in- drilled hole piles - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 3. EQUIPMENT RENTAL The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03A(3) shall. apply except as modified 'herein. a. No payrient will be trade for idle time due to breakdown , lack of operator, weather conditions prohibiting work , or other circumstances beyond the control of the Agency. r b. Equiprent shall be delivered to the extra work site equipped as ordered. } c. Idle tine waiting for the arrival of trans- porting equipment to more the rent-ed equipment ::iii not be raid for. C - 1 00097 6 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . LINES AND GRADES Lines and grades shall conform to the provisions In Section 5-1 .07, "Lines and Grades, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. One complete set of stakes for each of the following items will be set by the Engineer after notification by the Contractor as specified in Section 5-1 .07 : (a) Right of way and clearing; (b) One set of final alignment and grade control stakes outside of curb limits for use by the Contractor to control the basement material and surfacing. No additional stakes or marks for alignment or grade control will be set by the Engineer within these limits. The Contractor shall provide such separate grade controls for the basement material and surfacing as are necessary to secure conformance with the plans and final stakes. (c) Curbs. Where curb stakes are set, they shall be used as final alignment and grade control stakes for the curb and for control of the basement material and surfacing. No additional • stakes or marks for alignment or grade control will be set by the Engineer. The Contractor shall provide such separate grade controls for the basement material and the base (driveways and entrances) and surfacing as are necessary to secure conformance with the plans and specifications; (d) Inlets and storm drain pipes; (e) Survey monuments. The Engineer shall be the sole judge of the adequacy and sufficiency of the stakes and marks for the purpose for which they are set. If the Contractor requests additional stakes, hubs, lines, grades or marks other than those set by the Engineer, the cost of labor, equip- ment and materials required to comply with the Contractor' s request shall be deducted from any monies due or to become due the Contractor. The cost of labor, equipment and materials involved in resetting stakes destroyed or displaced because of the following reasons, will be deducted from any monies due or to become due the Contractor: (a ) Negligence in use of construction equipment. (b) Stakes ordered by the Contractor that are not used for a long period of time and are lost in the interim. (c) Poor planning of sequence of operations by the Contractor. D - I 0` 098 A SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 2. MATERIALS Attention is directed to Section 6, "Control of Materials, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. In accordance with the proivisions in Section 6- 1 .07, "Certificates of Compliance, " certificates of compliance will be re- quired - for reinforced concrete pipe, asbestos cement pipe, pavement markers, and epoxy. The aspha ! t concrete and portland cement concrete mix design shall be designated by the Contractor subject to the approval of the Engineer. The Contractor shall provide the Engineer a minimum mix design review period of four working days for a design from an "approved" commercial plant and five continuous working days for a design from an "non-approved" commercial plant. For "non-approved plants the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary aggregate samples. Refer to Section "Asphalt Concrete" and"Minor Structurres" of these Special Provisions. The Contractor shall give the Engineer not less than 4 working days advance notice to permit adequate testing and plant in- spections of materials for asphalt concrete, aggregate base and port!and cement concrete from recognized commercial plants and for aggregate subbase and any other material from other than the usual commercial sources. The relative compaction will be determined by comparison with the maximum density as determined by Test Method No. Calif . 216. The field density may be determined by Test Method No. Calif . 216 or by nuclear density gage determination (Test Method No. Calif . 231 . ) 3. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 7, "Legal Relations and. Responsibility, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Section 7-1 .09 "Public Safety" of the Standard Specifications is modified as follows; Signs, lights, flags, and other warning and safety devices shall conform to the requirements set forth in the current "Manual of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices For Use in Performance of work upon County Highways, " issued by the Department of Public Works Contra Costa County, California. D - 2 00099 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE. PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING (Cont. ) Construction operations shall be performed in such a manner that there will be at least one 10-foot-aide traffic lane open to public traffic at all times. At the end of the day' s work and when construction operations are not in progress, a passageway shall be maintained through the work of sufficient width to provide for 'two 10-foot-wide paved traffic lanes for public traffic. In lieu of the conflicting provisions in Section 7-I .OB, "Public Convenience, " and 7-1 .09, "Public Safety," of the Standard Specifications, the Contractor shall bear the entire cost of furnishing flagmen, of furnishing, (except those signs shown on the plans to be County-furnished ) installing, maintaining and removing all signs ( including County-furnished, signs) , lights, barricades and other warning and safety devices. Signs shown on the plans to be furnished by the County, to- gether with 4" x 4" wood posts, galvanized carriage bolts and brackets for assembly shall be picked up by the Contractor at the County Maintenance Yard Sign• Shop on Shell Avenue between farina Vista and Pacheco Boulevard , in Martinez. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer at least one ( 1 ) working day in advance of the time he proposes to pick up the signs, posts and fasteners and said time shall be during the County Yard working hours of 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Signs shall be erected and covered with burlap prior to commencing any other work on the contract. Covering shall be removed immediately preceding the start of work when directed by the Engineer. Wood posts shall be securely set a minimum of 2' - 6" in the ground and shall be located so that the attached sign is at least two feet clear of the edge of pavement. Signs shall be placed on the post to provide a five-foot clearance between the sign and the pavement or ground surface, except that when signs are located in sidewalk areas, or where there are pedestrians, the clearance shall be seven feet. Exceptions to the location provisions of this paragraph shall only be on the written approval of the Engineer. .Upon completion of the project and at a time directed by the Engineer, the signs, barricades and lights shall be taken down, dismantled ; and the County-furnished signs and posts shall be delivered to the County Maintenance Yard Sign Shop on Shell Avenue during the County Yard working hours of 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Lane closure shall conform to the provisions in Section 7- 1 . 092, "Lane Closure," of the Standard Specifications except that the taper length for each lane width of closure shall be determined by the Contractor with approval by the Engineer prior to its use. The Contractor shall also provide and station competent flagmen in advance of any closure. The sole duty of the flagmen shall be to direct traffic around the work. D - 3 00100 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGN1UG (cont. ) Temporary pavement striping shall be done by the Contractor to provide for the safe and convenient passage of traffic through or around the work. Temporary pavement striping, other than cat-tracking, shall not be p? aced on the newly completed pavement surface. If the pavement is not to be resurfaced, the temporary striping shall be removed as provided in Section 15-2.02B, "Traffic Stripes and Pavement Markings, " of the Standard Specifications. Full compensation for striping the pavement and removing the striping shall be considered as included in the contract lump sum price paid for Signing and Traffic Control , and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. Full compensation for conforming to the provisions in Section 7 of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions, including full compensation for furnishing all labor including flagmen, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and for installing, main- taining and removing all signs and lights and barricades as shown on the plans, as specified herein, and as directed by the Engineer, including picking up, hauling and returning County-furnished signs, , and posts, shall be considered as included in the contract lump sum price paid for Signing and Traffic Control , and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. The replacement cost of all County-furnished material lost or damaged between the time it is removed from and returned to the Shell Avenue Maintenance Yard Sign Shop shall -be borne by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due to the Contractor under the contract. Payment shall be made in increments of the contract lump sum price for Signing and Traffic Control in the following manner: First Increment - 40 percent of the lump sum price upon satisfactory completion of installation of County furnished signs. Second Increment- An additional 30 percent of the lump sum price upon completion of work amounting to 50 percent of the original total contract price. Third Increment - Balance of the lump sum price upon satisfactory completion of removal and dismantling of signs, fights, barricades, posts and framing and delivery of County-furnished materials to the Shell Avenue Maintenance Yard Sign Shop . D - 4 00101 i SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 4. COOPERATION Attention is directed to Section 7-1 . 14, "Cooperation," and Section 8-1 . 10, "Utility and Non-Highway Facilities," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The following work by other forces will be under way within and adjacent to the limits of the work specified, as follows: Utility pole and miscellaneous underground facility relocation work ( including manhole adjustments ) by ' Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company. Manhole and valve cover adjustments by the Sanitary District, and the Water District. In lieu of the compensation provisions in Section 7, "Legal Relations and Responsibility," and Section 8, "Prosecution and Progress," of the Standard Specifications, full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this special provision shall be considered included In the prices paid for the various contract items of work, and no separate payment will be made for delay or inconvenience to the Contractor' s operations by reason of his conformance with • this special provision. 5. OBSTRUCTIONS Attention is directed to Section 7, "Legal Relations and , Responsibility." and Section 8-1 . 10, "Utility and Non-Highway Facilities, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Attention is also directed to the presence of water, sewer, and gas pipe lines and overhead utilities in the construction area . The Contractor shall give the utility companies two (2) working days advance notice before work may start. The work specified shall be so conducted as to permit the utility companies, the water district and the sewer district to maintain their services without interruption. i D - 5 00104► SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 5• OBSTRUCTIONS (Continued) Abandoned pipe lines, conduits, culverts and foundations, if encountered, shall be removed and disposed of off the job site, In , accordance with the provisions in Section 7-1 . 13, "Disposal of Materials Outside the Highway Right of Way," of the Standard Specifications. Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this special provision , not otherwise provided for, shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract Items of work, and no separate payment will be made therefor. 6. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT Attention is directed, to Section 9, "Measurement and Payment," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Attention is directed to Section 9-1 .015, "Ficial Pay Quantities, " of the Standard Specifications, the provisions of which are applicable to one bid item on this contract. 7. EXISTING HIGHWAY FACILITIES The work performed in connection with various existing highway facilities shall conform to the provisions in Section 15, "Existing Highway Facilities," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Existing street signs and traffic signs shall be removed and salvaged. Frames and grates from the existing inlets to be re- moved shall be salvaged. D 6 0/ UQ 7. EXISTING HIGHWAY FACILITIES (Continued) Existing mail box shall be removed and reset on a por- table mount consisting of a concrete pedestal formed in a 5-gallon can or bucket in accordance with these special provisions. Concrete for the pedestal shall be produced from commercial quality aggregates and cement and shall contain not less than 470 pounds of cement per cubic yard. During the construction operations, the mail box shall be moved as necessary to clear the way for the Contractor' s operations, but at all times shall be accessible for rural delivery. When construction is complete , the post and pedestal shall be removed and disposed of and the mail box shall be installed in final position on a new redwood post. The redwood post shall conform to the requirements for sign posts in Section 56-2.02B, "Wood Posts and Braces," of the Standard Specifications. Newspaper boxes attached to existing mail box post shall be removed and fastened to the new mailbox post and no separate payment will be made therefor. The contract unit price paid for reset mailbox shall inclutle full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and for doing all the work involved in removing the box, constructing the portable mount, installing the box on the mount, moving and setting up the portable mount as required, installing the mailbox on new post and placing the mount in final position, including all necessary concrete, excavation and backfill , as shown on the plans, as specified in the Standard Specifications and these special provisions, and as directed by the Engineer. D - 7 00104 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 8. CLEARING ARID GRUBBING Clearing and grubbing shall conform to the provisions in Section 16, "Clearing and Grubbing," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Vegetation shall be cleared and grubbed only as necessary within the constuction limits. All existing vegetation, outside the areas to be cleared and grubbed, shall be protected from injury or damage resulting from the Contractor' s operations. All activities controlled by the Contractor, except cleanup or other required work, shall be confined within the graded areas of the roadway. Nothing herein shall be construed as relieving the Con- tractor of his responsibility for final cleanup of the highway as provided in Section 4-1 .02, "Final Cleaning Up," of the Standard Specifications. The contractor shall provide a physical barrier around the Valley Oak tree of sufficient strength to prevent damage to the tree during construction operations. Full compensation for the construction of this physical barrier shall be considered as included in the contract lump sum price paid for cleaning and grubbing and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. 9. WATERING Watering shall conform to the provisions in Section 17, "Watering, " of the Standard Specifications, except that full com- pensation for develop water supply and for water used for dust control for public traffic shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involving the use- of water and no separate payment will be made therefor. D - 8 00105 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 10. EARTHWORK Earthwork shall conform to the provisions in Section 19, "Earthwork, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The surface of the grading plane at any point shall not vary more than 0.05-foot above or below the grade established by the Engineer. The provisions in Section 19-2.02, "Unsuitable Material , " of the Standard Specifications, providing for payment for removal and disposal of unsuitable material as extra work shall not apply. The removal and disposal of all unsuitable material will be paid for at the contract price per cubic yard for the class of material for the quantity involved. The provisions in the third paragraph in Section 19-2.09, "Roadway Excavation-Payment," of the Standard Specifications are superseded by the following: Full compensation for overhaul shall be considered as Included in the contract price paid per cubic yard for roadway excavation, and no separate payment will be made therefor. At the option of the Contractor, backfill material conforming to the requirements for Class 2 aggregate subbase may be used for structure backfill . At the option of the Contractor structure backfill may be 3-sack portland cement concrete from the trench invert to the pipe springline. Native material may be used for structural backfill only in accordance with Section 19-3.06, "Structure Backfill , " of the Standard Specifications. In lieu of the relative compaction requirements in Section I9-5.03, relative compaction shall not be less than 90 percent. The requirements of paragraph two of Section 19-5.03 do not apply. Attention is directed to the possibility of tree roots within the roadway structural section. Tree roots encounted within the structural section shall be cut off outside of the limits of the ex- cavation and treated with an approved tree seal . The cutting and treating of these roots shall be performed as directed by the Engineer and will be paid for as extra work as provided in Section 4- 1 .031) of the Standard Specifications. It is anticipated that there will be an excess of approximately 2000 cubic yards of excavated material, which shall be disposed of by the Contractor off the job site, in accordance with the provisions in Section 7-1. 13, "Disposal of Material Outside the Highway Right of Way," of the Standard Specifications. D - 9 00106 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ll• CLEAN-UP All construction debris, materials, and equipment in the area of construction and any adjacent areas used by the Contractor, shall be removed and disposed of outside of the construction area In accordance with the provisions in Section 7-1 . 13, "Disposal of Material Outside the Highway flight of stay," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Full compensation for clean-up shall be considered as - Included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work requiring clean-up, and no separate payment will be made therefor. 12 AGGREGATE BASE Aggregate base used under driveways shall conform to the provisions in Section 26 of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Aggregate base shall be Class 2 and shall conform to the grading for the 1-1 /2 inch maximum or 3/4 inch maximum grading . The aggregate base provided must comply wholly with the specifications for 1-1/2 Inch maximum or 3/4 inch maximum. A combination of the two separate specifications will not be permitted. Full compensation for furnishing and applying all water after the material has been delivered to the roadbed, including water required for dust control , shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per square foot for driveways and no separate payment will be made therefor. The provisions in Section 26-1 .04, "Spreading," and Section 26-1 .048, "Spreading Class 2 Aggregate Base," of the Standard Specifications, are superseded by the following: The use of a spreader box for spreading Class 2 aggregate base will not be required. Class 2 aggregate base shall be spread with equipment, to be approved by the Engineer, that will provide a uniform layer conforming to the planned section, both transversely and l.ongitudinally, within the tolerance specified in Section 26- 1 .05 , "Compacting." Equipment or methods which cause segregation of the material will not be permitted . D - 10 • 00101011 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 13. ASPHALT CONCRETE Asphalt concrete shall be Type B conforming to the pro- visions in Section 39, "Asphalt Concrete, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Unless otherwise directed by the Engineer, asphalt binder to be mixed with the mineral aggregate shall be steam-refined paving asphalt having a viscosity Grade of AR 4000. Aggregate for driveways and sidewalk may be one-half inch maximum, medium grading at the option of the contractor. Asphalt concrete for the surface course shall be supplied from one plant. Paint binder shall be asphaltic emulsion, Type RSI and shall be applied at a rate of 0.07 gallons per square yard . . Asphalt concrete shall be spread by paving machine and compacted in layers. The top layer of asphalt concrete shall not exeed 0. 15-foot in compacted thickness, and_ any lower layers shall not exceed 0. 35-foot in compacted thickness. Each layer of asphalt concrete base shall not exceed 0.35-foot in compacted thickness. No layer shall be placed over a layer which exceeds 0.25-foot in com- pacted thickness until the temperature at mid depth, of the layer which exceeds 0.25-foot in compacted thickness, is not more than 1600F. Asphalt concrete except driveways shall be spread with an asphalt paver conforming to the provisions in Section 39-5.01 , "Spreading Equipment, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. ' The finished surface of any course except the final course shall not vary at any point more than 0.05-foot above or below the grade established by the Engineer. All trimming of the surface shall be completed while the temperature of the mix is above 2000F. Spreading and compaction of asphalt concrete in areas to be leveled shall be completed prior to beginning any resurfacing. The Contractor shall furnish and use canvas tarpaulins to cover all loads of asphalt concrete from the time that the mixture is loaded until it is discharged from the delivery vehicle. Asphalt concrete courses shall be placed one-half width at a time and the remaining one-half width of roadbed shall be kept free of obstructions and open for use by public traffic at all times until tha half width firs - aced is ready for use by traffic. Asphalt concrete surface courses shall be spread. one layer at a time over the entire project. D - 11 04�NO SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 13. ASPHALT CONCRETE (Continued ) The sequence of paving shall be such as to avoid paving a lane width with a cold joint on both sides. Conforms between existing pavement and newly constructed pavement shall be made by cutting the existing pavement to a neat, smooth line at the conform line and constructing a vertical-face butt joint. Temporary transitions shall be constructed to conform with the existing pavement at each end of the project. The transitions may be constructed using asphalt concrete, or cut back material , with a paper joint and to a minimum length of 10 feet. The material used to construct the transition shall be removed prior to placing the surface courses. Asphalt emulsion shall be applied to any asphalt concrete surfaces used by vehicles as a detour or roadway, before spreading additional layers of asphalt concrete. _The rate of application shall be 0. 07 gallons per square yard. In lieu of the requirements of paragraphs I , 4, 5, and 6 of Section 39-6.03, "Compacting," the following special provisions will prevail : The relative compaction of the various layers shall be not less than the following: Base Courses 94% Finish Course 92% Said relative compaction shall be determined by comparing the average (not less than three) density of the asphalt concrete inplace to the maximum density determined by ASTM Test No. 02041 . This maximum density determination shall be conducted on uncompacted material sampled from the subject areas and in accordance with AST!! Test No. D2041 or from the cores sawn from the compacted subject material . The core field density shall be determined by ASTM Test No. D2726 and shall be the average of not less than three cores. Test sites for field densities and field sampling shall be determined in a random manner as described in Test Method No. Calif . 231 , modified to include nuclear testing by Contra Costa County' s backscatter method on asphalt concrete materials, or by core densities. 0 - 12 00109 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 13 . ASPHALT CONCRETE (Continued) Prior to applying any asphaltic emulsion on the pavement to be overlayed, the existing pavement shall be cleaned, to the satis- faction of the Engineer, of all material such as, but not limited to, leaves, sand, gravel and dirt. No traffic shall be allowed on the asphaltic emulsion with the exception of vehicles unloading asphalt concrete. All vehicles involved with the Contractor' s operations shall turn around only at public street intersections. Paint binder shall be applied no farther in advance of the overlay than that distance which the Contractor can maintain free of traffic. Attention is directed to the provisions in the first paragraph of Section 39-6.02, "Spreading, " of the Standard Specifications. The extent of the areas where a surface course mixture shall be spread to level irregularities, as shown on the plans, shall be subject to revision by the Engineer, depending on actual conditions prevailing on the project. This material shall be spread in layers, not to exceed 0.20 ft. in thickness and by any means that will produce a surface or uniform smoothness and texture in accordance with the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The contract price for Asphalt Concrete shall include full compensation for the following: (a) construction and removal of temporary transitions; (b) construction of driveways, road connections and side- walk conforms; (c) cutting existing pavement for conform work; (d) furnishing and applying asphaltic emulsion. 14. NOTCHING OR REMOVIhG EXISTING PAVEMENT Existing asphalt concrete shall be planned at the locations and to the dimensions shown on the plans and in accordance with these special provisions, and as directed by the Engineer. Planing asphalt concrete pavement shall , at the option of the Contractor, and subject to approval of the local Air Pollution Control Officer, be perforried by either cold planing or heater planing. Cold planing machine shall have a cutter head at least 30 Inches wide and shall be operated so as not to produce fumes or smoke. D - 13 O0110 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 14 . NOTCHING OR REMOVING EXISTING PAVEMENT The heater planing machine shall have, in combination or separately, a means for heating and cutting the asphalt concrete surface and blading the displaced material into windrows in one continuous forward motion. The cutting width of the blade shall not be less than 3 feet. Heat shall be applied uniformly to the area to be planed and shall be accurately controlled according to conditions and 'road surfacing being planed. Heater planing operations shall not be carried on at any time where, if an open flame is used in the heater, there is danger of igniting untrapped gases from sewers or gas mains. Existing trees, shrubs, and other improvements shall be protected from damage. Care shall be exercised to protect wiring of existing traffic detector loops from damage caused by heat. The depth, width and shape of the cut shall be as Indicated on the typical cross sections or as directed by the Engineer. The final cut shall result in a uniform surface conforming to the typical cross sections. The outside lines cf the planed area shall be neat and uniform. The road surfacing to remain in place shall not be damaged in any way. The material planed from the roadway surface, including material deposited in existing gutters or on the adjacent traveled way, shall be immediately removed from the site of the work and , disposed of as provided in Section 7-1 . 13, "Disposal of Material Outside the Highway Right of Way," of the Standard Specifications. The removal crew shall follow within 50 feet of the planer, unless otherwise directed by the Engineer. Full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment and incidentals for planing or removing asphalt concrete to conform to the lip of gutter or existing pavement shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per ton •for . asphalt concrete, and no separate payment shall be made therefor. D - 14 00111 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 15. ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKES Asphalt concrete dikes shall conform to the provisions In Section 39, "Asphalt Concrete, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Fog seal coat conforming the provisions in Section 37, "Bituminous Seals," of the Standard Specifications, shall be applied to the completed dikes. In lieu of the provisions of Section 39-8.02, "Payment," full compensation for fog seal coat, shaping of dikes at spillways and driveways, and for furnishing asphalt concrete placed as dikes, shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per linear foot for asphalt concrete dikes and no separate payment will be made therefor. 16. MINOR STRUCTURES Minor structures shall conform to the provisions of Section 51 -1 .02, "Minor Structures," and Section 90-10, "Minor Concrete". Drop inlets are identified as minor structures. The third paragraph of Section 51-1 .02, "Minor Structures, " shall not apply. Precast units will not be allowed. Three-inch diameter Keep holes, backed by filter material in burlap sacks, shall be provided in the inlets as shown on the plans. Filter material shall conform to the provisions in Section 90-3.04, "Combined Aggregate Gradings," of the Standard Specifications for I " maximum combined aggregates. D - 15 _ 00112 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 16% 111!JOR STRUCTURES (Continued ) Forms for minor structures shall conform to Section 51-1 .05, "Forms," of the Standard Specifications. The provisions in Section 51 -1 .02, "Minor Structures," and Section 51 -1 .23 "Payment, " of the Standard Specifications concerning payment for minor structures are superseded by the following : Minor structures will be paid for at the contract price per each, which price shall include full compensation for all structure excavation and structure backfill , furnishing and placing bar reinforcing steel and miscellaneous iron and sttiel ( including metal frames and grates) , furnishing and placing sacked filter material , and doing all the work necessary to construct the minor structures complete in place, as shown on the plans, and as specified in these specifications and the special provisions, and as directed by the Engineer, and no separate payment will be made for these included items. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE Reinforced concrete pipe shall conform to the provisions iri Section 65, "Reinforced Concrete Pipe, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. i The provisions of the last paragraph of Section 65-1 .02A, "Circular Reinforced Concrete Pipe," shall not apply. Full compensation for structure excavation and structure backfill shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per linear foot for the various sues and class of reinforced concrete pipe and no separate payment will be made therefor. 18. TREE AERATION SYSTE1' This work shall consist of furnishing. and installing perforated pipe and drain rock as shown on the plans, in accordance with these special provisions, and as directed by the Engineer. The pipe shall be asbestos-cement and shall conform to the provisions in Section 68- 1 .02D, "Perforated Asbestos-Cement Pipe," of the Standard Specifications. Elbows and risers shall not be perforated . The drain rock shall conform to the provisions in Section 90-3. 02, "Course Aggregate Grading," of the Standard Specifications for 1 - 1 /2" x 3/4" primary aggregate. D - 16 0' 113" SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 18. TREE AERATION SYSTEM (C ntinued) All compaction of the subgrade shall be done prior to the installation of the tree aeration system. Compaction of the drain rock will not be required. 6" diameter asbestos cement caps shall be epoxyed to the exposed ends of the 6" diameter aeration pipes. Four 1/2" diameter holes, equally spaced, shall be drilled through the caps for air passage. Perforated pipes shall be laid with the perforations down. VI Drain boxes (with grate) will be installed to provide drainage for the area around the tree in accordance with the details shown on the plans and as directed by the ,Engineer. The length of tree aeration system to be paid for will be the slope length of the pipe installed. Pipe or drain rock placed in excess of the length designated by the Engineer will not be paid for. Elbows and risers will be measured along centerlines. The contract price paid per linear foot for tree aeration system shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, ( including drain rock) tools, equipment, and incidentals and for all work involved in the construction of the tree aeration system, complete in place, including all necessary structure excavation and backfill , connection to Type A inlets, and V1 drain boxes, as shown on the plans, as specified in these special provisions, and as directed by the Engineer. -19. MINOR CONCRETE Minor concrete for curb, sidewalk, steps at apartment entrances and driveways shall conform to the provisions in Section 73, "Concrete Curbs and Sidewalks, " and Section 90-10, (Minor Concrete," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The combined aggregates for minor concrete used in the work shall conform to the grading limits for the one-inch, maximum size specified in Section 90-3.04, "Combined AggregaTe Gradings," of the Standard Specifications. Minor concrete shall contain not less than 470 pounds of cement per cubic yard. The sidewalk surface shalt be finished with a fine hair push broom. 8rooning shall be delayed until the concrete has set sufficiently to as to just retain the marks rade by the broom hairs. D - 17 00114 i T i SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 19 . MINOR CONCRETE (Continued ) Sidewalks and driveways will be paid for at the contract price per square foot for each item, which price shall include full compensation for furnishing and placing the aggregate base blanket as shown on the plans and as specified in these special provisions. Full compensation for saw cutting existing sidewalk and for construction of the pedestrian ramp as shown on the plans shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per square foot for sidewalk and no separate payment will be made therefor. The contract lump sum price paid for steps shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals- and for doing all work -involved in construction of the steps into the apartment complex, complete in place, as shown on the plans, as specified in the Standard Specifications and these special provisions, and as directed by the Engineer. 20. MISCELLANEOUS IRON AND STEEL Inlet covers, frames and grates, and all structural shapes and bolts in connection therewith, shall conform to the provisions in Section 75, "Miscellaneous Metal ," and these special provisions. Full compensation for furnishing and placing inlet covers, frames and grates shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per each for the inlets on which the frames and grates are installed and no separate payment will be made therefor. 21 . SURVEY IdONW--ENT Survey monuments shall conform to the provisions in Section 81 , "Monuments," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Survey monuments shall be constructed as shown on the plans. The contractor shall notify the Engineer five (5) working days in advance of the date that he intends to begin construction of the monuments to allow the County Survey crews to set the exact monument locations. The Contractor shall furnish the brass survey markers. D - 18 00115 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 22. PAVEMENT MARKERS Pavement markers shall conform to the provisions in Section 85, "Pavement Markers," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Pavement markers shall be placed to the line established by the Engineer, which will consist of a painted line or new stripes, one for each line of markers. All additional work necessary to establish satisfactory lines for markers shall be performed by the Contractor, including correction of minor irregularities In the line established by the Engineer. The first and second paragraphs in Section 85-1 .06, "Placement," of the Standard Specifications are superseded by the following: Rapid Set Type adhesive shall be used to cement the markers to the pavement. D - 14 ' 00116 SECTION E - BTB COMITIO'S. i+=_'Y ��"_'I�':: ACT10:: F=,'UL-'^• N.-TS, E%iJ:::. :: Part I: The prcvisions of this Part I apply to bidders, contractors and subcontractors with respect to those corst_ructicn trades for which shey are • parties to collective bargaining agreements with a labor organization or organizations and u;no toget.iier arith such labor orgardzations have agreed to the Tripartite Agreenent for Contra Costa Cc =y, California (but only as to those trades as to which there are cc-ntments by l.bor organizations to specific goals of minority r:anpaLer utilization) tegetfer with, all i. olerenting agreements that have been and may hereafter be developed pursua-t thereto, all of ,:hich documents are incorporated herein by reverence and are hereinafter cu--mlatively C referred tc as the Contra Costa Plan. i g Any bidder, contractor or s bcontractor using one or more trades of construction employees must cc-ply with either- Part !' or Part II of these Bid ? Conditions as to each such tra3e. 7hus, a bidder, contractor or subcontractor may be in -empliance with these co:Aiticns by its inclusion, with its union, in the Contra Costa Plan a specific cr._-nit:-znt by that union to a goal cf minority manpower utilization fcr such trade "A", thereby meeting the prcvisions of this i Part I, and by its co.•-itnent to Part L in re?ard to trade "B" in the instance in which it is not included in the Contra Costa Plat: and, therefore-, cannot meet the provisions of this Part I. To be elis ble ,for award of a contract under Part I of this invitation for Bias,. a bidder or subcc ntractcr execute and submit as part cf its bid the cer:.ifi ca;.ic, rec_uired Far'. III hereof. Part II: A. Covera:-e. The prcvisiors of this Part II shall be applicable to those bidders, ccnLractors and subcontractors, who, in regard to those construction trades to be employed by the= on '.he protect to which tll. se bid conditions pertain. 1 . Are not or hereafter cease to be signatories to the Centra Costa Plan referred to in Part I hereof; 2. Are signatories to the CcntraCosta Plan but are not parties to collective bargaining agreements; 3. Are sir-_natories to the Contra Costa ?Ian but are parties to collective barga_ni - a-rec-t.nts -- th labor or,anizations Vzo are no, or here- after cease to la signatories to the C"tra Costa Plan. 4. Are sirnaterics to the Contra Costa Plan but as to which not specific cc =itrent to goals cf mircrit_. rmanDcwer utilization by labor organ- zaticn have beer. executed purs.:ant to ...e Centra Costa Plan; or • E 00117 7' x 5. Are no longer participating in an affirmative action plan accep- table to the Director, Os CC, including the Contra Costa Plan. B. Reouirerient -- An Afairmative Action Pl--a. The bidders, contractors and subcontractors described in para,apiss 1 through 5 above will not be eligible for wzard of a contract under this Imitation for Bids, unless it certifies as prescribed in paragraph•2b of the certification specified in Part III hereof that it adopil the mini-_.^ goals and timetables of minority manpower utilization, — and specific affirmative action steps set fourth in Section B.1 mad 2 of this Part II directed at increasing minority manpower utilization by mea-ns of applying good faith efforts to carrying out such steps or is deemed to have adopted such a program pur- suant to Section B.3 of this part II. Beth the goals and timetables, and the affirmative action steps est meet the requirements of this Part II " as set forth below for all trades which are to be utilized on the project, whether subcontracted or not. 1. Goals and Timetables. The goals of rdnority manpower utilization ' for the bidder and subcontractors are applicable to each trade not other- wise bound by the provisions of Part I hereof for the following time periods, i for each .trade which will be used on the project within Contra Costa County; California. _ +I The ranges for all trades to be utilized on the project shall be as follows: j From 10/1/74 17-05-- 19.5% t� i In the e ent that under a contract t-hich is subject to these Bid Con- ditions any vcrk is perforne3 in a year later than the latest year for �rhicli acceptable ran7es of ninor:Ly msn-newer utilizaticn have been deterndned herein, t the ran es for the period 10/1/71L th-ouZh 9/30/75 shah be applicable to such :.-ork. r Trp percentages of mincrity canpo er utilization above are expressed in terms of m3T^curs c; trait:=:- and e._nloymenl., as a prcportion of the tcta]i. nhours to be wort o-d "by :zc bidder's, ccntractor's and entire .:ork force in that trade on all prcjects in Contra Costa 1oun,y, California during the { perfomance o: its contract or sub-c=t-act. The ranhours for minority work and' trainir.r nest ^e substantially u niforn thnrou7ghcut the length of the contract, on all pro;ec_s and for e=h or the trades. Further, the transfer of ninority emT%loyees or .rairecs free erplo.=ar-+.o-e:1aloyer or from project-to-project for the sole parncse of meti%.; the contractor's or subcontractor's goals shall be a violation o: these conditions. i i._nor_ Is de__..=3 t:; i;;c?:_;i^. ::egroes, Spanish Surnamed Americans Orientals and Ar.:-_rica n Alfnians. JP E - 2 i s 00118 r=i 14%1* and and for each of the trades. Further, the transfer of minority employees or trainees from ew?loyer-to-c-Dioyer or from project-to-project for the 1 _ sole purpose of neetin- the cer-rractor's or subcontractor's goals shall be a violation of these conditions. In reaching the goals of minority manpower utilization required of bidders, contractors and subcontractors pursuant to this Part II, every effort shall be made to find and e✓aloy qualified journeymen. However, where minority josrneymcn are not available, mminority trainees in pre- , apprenticeship, apprenticeship, journey-mu-nn training or other training programs =ay be used. In order that the nonworking training '-hours of trainees may be counted in meerino the ooal, .such trainees mist be e=ployeed by the con- i tractor during the trainin- period, the contractor trust have made a cc=- j mitment to empicy t::e trainees at the comp_et-ion of their training and the trainees =st be trained pursuant to established training programs d which Lust be the equivalent of the training progra.s now or hereinafter M provided for in the Contra Costa P1an with respect to the nature, extent and duration of training offered. : A contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed to be in coLpliance with the ters and reo_sirer-eats of this Part II by the employment and training of m:norities in the appropriate percentage of his aggreorte work force ir. Contra Costa Count}, Cal:fo_nia for each trade for which it is eom~_tted to a goal under this Part II. i However, no contractor or subcontractor shall be found to be in noncompliance solely on account of its failure to meet its bowls within ! its timetables, but such contractor shall be given the opportunity to demonstrate r— at it has iastiZ:ted all of the specific afi w-ative action steps specified in this Part II and has made ever: good faith effort to make these steps :cork toward the attaiert of its goals within its time- tables, all to tie purpose of ex-)anding mi^-ority manpower utilization on _ all of its projects in Centra Costa County, California. In all cases, the compliance or a bidder, contractor or subcontractor will be deteri^-rd in --ccordrnce with its respective obligations under the terms of these Bid Conditions. 7bere=ore, contractors or subcontractors who are governed by the provisions of -Z:his Part II shall be subject to the requirements of tbat Part regardless of the obligations of its prime con- tractor or lower tier subcontractors. f All bidders and all contractors and subcontractors performing or to perform stork c^ projects subject to these Bid Conditions hereby agree to inform their subcontractors of their respective obligations under the and re'.quire7_ents of these Bid Conditions, including the provisions rtl. ':ng to Stals of minority E_ploy--ert and training. I E _ 3 0` 119 Y I • 2. Si)ecific i;ffi- Mare miction Stens. Bidders, contractors and subcontractors subject to this :'art I1, =st en-age in affix---ative ac- tion directed a: increasing minority r.:apower utilization, which is at least as extensive and as specific as the following steps: a. The contractor shall notify co=unity organizations that the contractor Eas employment opportunities available and shall maintain records of the organizations' response. b. The contractor shall maintain a file of the names and ad- dresses of each ^incrity.worker refferred to hi= and what action was taken with respect to each such referred worker, and if the worker was : not employed, the reasons therefor. if such worker was not sent to the union h;-in4 hall for referral or if such worker was not employed by the t contractor, the contractor's file shall document this and the reasons therefor. c. The contractor sha?1 prcrptly cotify the IMI A COSTA COUNTY ' FUBIJC :X-U:SILF:=_: i;'. ::hen the union or unions with whom the contractor has a C011ec:iJe ba-t, ?I'3i:? .3 ='E'f`'P-:ate has :got referred to the contractor a minority :corker sent by the contractor or the contractor has other information that the union referral process has i=eded hin in his efforts to meet his goal. 1 i d. The contractor shall participate in-training programs in f the area, especially those funded by the Deparrent of Labor. Z e. The contractor shall dissem_:nare his EO policy within his own organization by including it in any policy r_anual; by publicizing it ' in company newspapers, annual reports, etc.; by conducting staff, employee and union representatives' ceetings to ex.)lw;n and discuss the policy; by posting af the policy; and by specific review of the policy with minority employees. i f. The contractor shall disseminate his EEO policy externally : by infor=ing and discusging it with all recruitment sources; by advertis- ing in news media, speci-fically irclud:ng =inority news media; and by i notifying and discussing it with all subcontractors and suppliers. g. The contractor shall m.:ke specific•and constant personal (both written and oral) recrui4'.ent efforts directed at all ainority organi_ations, sc:foals with minority students, minority recruitment organizations and minority training organizations within the contractor's i recruit4cnt area. ' U. The contractor shall make specific efforts to encourage present minority e_:.ployees to recruit their friends and relatives. i. The contractor s:all validate all rsan specifications, selec- tion require ens;, tests, etc. s E - 4 00120 1 ' J. The contractor shall make every effort to promote after- school, suer and vacation e^ployment to minority youth. k. The contractor shall develop or.-the-job training opportun- ities and participate and assist is any association or employer-group ' training progr--s relevant to the contractor's employee needs consistent with its obligations under this Part II. i a 1. Tne contractor shall continually inventory and evaluate all minority personnel for rro=otien opportunities and encourage minority em- ployees to seek such opportunities. i it m. The contractor shall make sure that seniority practices job = � classifications, etc., do not have a discriminatory effect._ t n. The contractor shall rake certain that all facilities and 3 company activities are non-segregated. i o. The contractor shall continually monitor all personnel ac- vities to ensure that his EM policy is being carried-out. p. The contractor s:.all solicit bids _`or subcontracts from available minority subcontractors engaged in the trades covered by these Bid Conditions, including circulation of minority contractor association. 3. Contractors and Subcontractors Deemed to be Bound by Part '? 1 In the event a contractor or sLecontrac_or, whc is at the time of bidding i j eligible under Part i c.= ti2ese Bid Conditions, is no longer participating in an aff r ative action plan acceptable to the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Cc=p licence, including the Contra Costa Plan, he shall be deemed to be co=ined to Part 11 of these Bid Conditions. Further, when- ever a contractor or subcontractor, who at the time of bidding is eligible under ?art Ii o: t::ese Bid Conditions, uses trues not cont"-plated at the time he submits his bid, he scall be cc=.si:ted to Part II for those trades. benever a contactor or subcontractor is deemed to be co—.fitted to Part 11 of those Bid Conditions, he shall be considered to be cc=itted to a manpower utilization goal of the minis-_m percentage range for that trade for the appropriate year. 4. Subsequent Sir^atoty to the Contra Costa PIan. A.zy contractor or subcontractor subject to the requirements of this Part II for any trade at the tilde of the sub=;- ssion of his bid uao together with the labor or-ganization vith Vac= it has a collective barbairing agreement subse-cruently beccr--es a signatorti to the Contra Costa Plat, either individually or through. an associtatien, -ay meet its requirc-ents under these Bid Conditions for such tri�e, if s:-c` coater:cto; or subconaractor executes and submits a new certification a_nsel f to Part I of t---se Bid Conditions. No i contractor or subccnttt_ctcr s!;_-ll be dee_-ed to be subject to the require- vents of Part I until !euc:i cer:ifieation is e::ecuted and submitted. i E - 5 00121 a 5. Kon-discri=ination. In no event may a contractor or subcontractor utilize the goals, tiz.cLa=les or affir=ative action steps required by this Part II in such a manner as to cause or result in disci -ination against any person on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Part II_: Certifications. A. Bidders' Certification. A bidder will i not be eligible for aw--rc of a contract under this Invitation for Bids un- less such bidder has sub=irted as a part of its bid the following certifi- cation, which will be deemed a part of the resulting contract: � BIDDERS' CE IFICATION _ certifies that: (Bidder) 1. it intends to e--ploy the follo;:ing•listed construction trades iu its work under the contract • and 2. (a) as to those trades set forth in the-preceding paragraph one hereof for Vaich it is eligible under Part I of these Bid Conditions for participation in the Contra Costa Plan, it will comply with the Contra Costa Plan on this and allfuture construction work id Ccntra Costa County. wit!dn the z=op? cf cc—:er=-a of .that t�Z<Z^� Diose trades Wing: l and/or (b) as to those trades for which it is required by these Bid Conditions to comply wita Part II of these Bid Conditions, it adopts the nini==^ mirorir =rAp3wer utilization Foals and the specific affir- • f mative action steps contained in said Part II, on this and all future construction work in Ccr z Costa County su!.4ett to :hese Bid Conditions, those trades being: t and 3. it will obtain from each of its subcontractors and submit to the contracting or ad^i^is;e_ing agency prior to the award of any subcontract under this contract the subcontractor certification required by these Bid Conditions. - t (Signature of a:taarized representative of bidder) 3. S_centr:ctors' Cert;—Hca—tions. Prior to the a-ard of any subcontract under this ::vitaticn -`c: zds, regardless of tier, the pros2ective sub- contractor r. :st e-:ccurc ran.i to ti:e ^_:me Contractor tae following certification, w1hich will be dec-ed a part of the resulting subcontract: E - 6 O0122 .34 i SUB CO`-URACTORS' CERTIFICATION - -- - certifies that: • (Subcontractor) 1. it intends to e=ploy the following listed construction trades in its work under the subcontract I 2. (a) as to those trades set forth in the preceding paragrapli one } hereof for which it is eligible under ?art I of these Bid Conditions for participation in the Contra Costa Man, it will comply with the Contra Costa ala_-I on this and all future const:I ction work in Contra Costa County , subject to these Bid Conditions, those trades being: and/or, (b) as to those trades for which it is required by these Bid Conditions to cc=aly with ?art 11 of these Bid Conditiors, it adopts the f slir:imum minority nannower utilization goals and the specific affiraative ! action steps contained in said ?art II on this --nd all future construction ! vork in Contra Cas w Count—; sub.,ect to these Bid Conditions,those trades being: and 1 1 3. it will obtain from each of its subcontractors prior to the ward" of any subcontract under this subcontract the subcontractor certification -required by these Bid Conditions. (Sigr:ature of audherized rE?resenzative of bidder) In order to ensure that tee said subcontractors' certification be- ! comes a part of all subcontracts under the pri^e contract, no subccn tract sr-all be execute-_ until aut --rized representative of the Contra Costa {{ County Public ::orks Department :_ss de:ez7i_r:gid, in writing, that the a said certificatiz ::as beer in:orporated in such subcontract, regardless of tier. Ai;y su.contract executsd without; such :aritten approval shall be voided. I C. The certifications required to be rade by the bider pursuant to these '-id Conditions is material and will .govern rt bidde_'s per£o—ance on the project and will be made a part oA his 1=4. Failure to submit the certification will render the bid nonresponsive. E - 7 t ' a O0123 _ G'w a . I Part Its: Ccopliance and Enforcef-ent. Contractors are res.onsisle for informing their subcontractori_ s ecardless of tier) as to their respective 1 oblinations under Parts 1 and 11 hereof (as applicable) . The tiler, cc.:tractor or subcontractor shall carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of F the equal opportunity clause including suspension, termination and cancellation . of existing subcontracts as nay he imposed or ordered by the Cortra Costa County Public Lorks Departient. Any bidder, or contractor or subcontr_ctor who shall fail to carry cut such sanctions and penalties shall be deemed to be in noncore- pliance with these Bid Conditions. Violation of any substantial require-Tent in the Contra Costa Plan by a contractor or subcontractor covered by Part 1 of these Bid Conditions includiaq the failure of such contractor or subcontractor to na ke a good faith effort to f meet its fair share of the trade's goals of minority manpower utilization, or of the requirements of Part It hereof by a contractor or subcontractor who is covered by Part 11 shall be deened to be in noncompliance by such contractor or subcontractor with the Equal Cpportunity Clause of the contract, and shall be grounds of imposition of the sanctions and penalties provided herein. The Contra Costa County Public Works Department shall revied its contractors' and subcontractors' employm.ant practices during the performance of the contract. in regard to Part 11 of these conditions if the contractor or subcontractor meets its goals or if the contractor or subcontractor can demonstrate that it has made every good faith effort to :meet those goals, the contractor or subcontractor shall be presumed to be in compliance with these Bid Conditions and no formai sanctions or proceedings leading toaard sanctions shall be instituted unless the agency otherwise determines that the contractor or subcontractor is not providing equal employment opportunities. in judging whether a contractor or subcontractor t has met its goals, the agency kill consider each contractor's or subcontractor's minority manpo►:er utilization and will not take into consideration the r.inority manpower utilization of its subcontractors. Where the- agency finds that the 'contractor or subcontractor has failed to conply with the requirements of these Bid Conditions, the agency shall take such action and impose such sanctions as may be appropriate including, but not limited to: �i 1. Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the E contractor canplies, and/or 2 Cancellation, termi. ination or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part, and/or 3. To the extent allcxm-ed by applicable State Statutes, the contractor nay be declared ineilgible for further County Public 'Works contracts until lie satisfies the County that he has established and is implementing an Equal Employment Opportunity program which conforms to the provisions contained herein. When the agency proceeds with such formal action it has the burden of proving that the contractor has not net the raquirersents of these Bid Conditions, but the contractor's failure to meet his coals shall shift to him the recuirement to come forward with evidence to shot, that he has net the "good faith' requirements of these Bid Conditions by Instituting at least the Specific Afflr^ative Action steps listed above and by making every good faith effort to make those steps work toward the attainment of its coals within its tiretables. ;he pendency of such formal proceedings shall be taken Into consideration by Contra Costa County E - 8 0'0124 in Bete mining whether such contractor or subcontractor can cc-ply with the requirements contained therein and is therefore a ,"responsible prospective ; contractor." It shall be no excuse that the union with which the contractor has a e collective bargaining agree=ment providing the exclusive referral failed to refer minority employees. The procedures set forth in these conditions shall rot apply to any contract when the Contra Costa County Public Works Department determines that , such contract is essential to the national security and that its award without t following such procedures is necessary to the national security. Contractors and subcontractors must keep such recores and file such reports relating to the provisions of these Bid Conditions as shalt be required by the Contra Costa County Fublic Works Department. Subnittal of CALTRANS form HC-7, FEDERAL-AID •HIC,41'AY U STRUCTIC': CO':T".ACTO?S EEO REPORT or optional form bb, MO.-MILY 11LUPOWLI UTIL1Z;T1Q`I rEPOF,T will be required monthly. Additional forms or reports that may be required will be presented at a pre-construction conference to be held prior to the start of ir.,ork. For the informatira of bidders. a copy of the Contra Costa Plan may be obtained-from the Contra Costa County Public Works 'department. E E E - s f 00125 Eti.:vE it4 � L SCJ'•.:=t;'� _`C,E'- i AIT- Or A`OHALT l• COUCRETE SURFACING. i A - A I r c„S T IR % L F %.EC:+SZ U..I.- CRETE CONCRETE CORM CO'.I R s.:s? WITH BRASS MON- (BROOKS SHOWN. UMENT MARKER. SEE t.OTE 1-3 PL A N FINISHED T0i; _ 5„:'.r:, WITH j GRADE CHISELED CROSS AND R.E. CR 24, u 2� ASPHALT tntiC�E`= tcUTE: J/ J/r.. d ^To I'` +j • 1 CC )VE P 3P. CRAVE SN;.LL BE BkG0mS NO. 47 T- 1720 Sk FCRUI,IROt1StDE51 i 1 P• r 8n _ Iq 6 GR APPROVED EQUAL . 1) � t D,1 •� •P' C - r- - ?` J'` C0'tER SHALL BE 7.IARKE0 &1OtJiirr:E:1 I )( '• •'_-1•• •� —` -��- AtJD BE DESIGNED TO CA=RRY A 16,000 � n r D •? Itt ? ' 411 1H. fAINI%IJ d V.HEEL LOAD. •�ii\ �fl���+Ij:\%y' •? �i•=:�� . , .f + , 2 kt5ER ASSEVSLY AVAILABLE (VST �M01YN.) J i r ELT PAPER 3 6-0:CH DIAMETER COLLAR FORMED OF TYNCAL '`\ i> ' u ti.. 1. PAVEMENT �� _ �fQ~_ �9�RT �C0L0 ��1 �JO FELT• t-INCH 5ELZoV CQLU JOT, SECTION ;, I . .f• IZ E %OTC 4 4. TAPERED METAL CONE. OR 3/32'• (OR • I O HrAVPER) CHIPBOARD. SEE MOTE 3 30'. __L4 REv. 10-8-7v AI,(,Fiv ruR101 1-9J145I.E5' TO NOTE 1 . REV. 5-11-66 ADDED A C SURFACING 1 , ! CONTRACOSTA COUNTY - PUBLIC :YORKS DEPARTMENT N. MARTINEZ CAL IFOR.N'lA ?. ---- �' STREET SURVEY MONUMENT SECTION A-A Pj3LIC kuH�S L+�EC'! P E CER NO 5709 TYPI CAL 1 N STALLATION S"°.�'. ! Cate4 / 9 / 64 — ti'-ALE ii:-�1' 0' - -- - --_ . I I j Cnec; rt �• q: 1 t ?cP R .=Ww YY L O_M W er t o C. r p �.► _ l.Jv XFXF lYJ}Q'��N J b/ v IxV s!u u o► AS �"��v�t0 1- �sf 4 •f I-s���� � i O < o ,.� . !• o E < Z a ►a, , X L w w F af. u � r J IT N. `{s 03T- = a i L y + G 7S w :r •'«".Y—off--'+ 3'"0 0 �-•-•�-�- F—� {Z ��,n g �b +QIP psi :�•6 0 •.._ - �L O V o • u mow _ - � - '•,.��' � mi fla o •L� 1 At - ft7 YY .7tA �.v � � '! a � •Z►a -• � '•� - p::�•L�i or .�*�� _ •x� �� " ' • . � a �.�1 f-'•:f� I � !oM' joa loon 1'�3-�"_'t— �< = Sia a t._� t? - ___. r77 r" cW, 18 icirl, 00127 W 1.0 a'r • r . .a + ' �! a a� ♦ '"« _-'" • ' - t r .r i �� +� 1 j a..« �GAF iF� «J - � ♦� � .'.I :.G �• - e � s ♦ . .K-�^ .. O •aYt- "s'. N N- uu ■[ ,•- �r � -f i x ♦ O ![ l A f .�•s.y o woo ' - Cta .♦+ j. •• - w.' ,Q =�•:!t :w- •• t'.'.'4 i W :i �- y- W HCl�'N'�3'z CL .. ♦ r . �{ .� Y N 2 aif=Y_O ♦•• ! may � - .f♦g --.. • � *f t" {}.o .�tR :i * ai FEZ ' ,. '=:� V ' i i ! ♦'iIl: qr bn Y i♦ `.a .•7. �-a :- -�s+� W ;♦Z'v Z-A o:�I. ! `- as "'♦ •,.�._ •`�f t 1". • r ,«^+ I i �+,• v.'. «.`�:..�",b .?� iii a. * i • !" ♦`F :'� �r- :f-- ' t:~ --.'!-""''•'...U 1 "" is> ,t L �*��,:+r ..+ � •:iia Y � �F�', cl. �'- -..11.. ey. �v ~< '.7 �~ �;l '• ii��i �' '`.J .J r.+ ;., � 4 1 iTf�� �_ s�� ',� �I•?! Ws �� -�r L Lai. ` .. �.; �� j �y��-..,�i�_ ol �- jliM © ♦ .� `--•"' jJ y.lr ►.. � �..� r 3 1 `If r �.. J!� t �♦ W �♦il G i h�'! 7J r�"-}1 1.:2 may[\` i"{•�•�4 •µj`+ ~ = V '�4 jCC W r � : ♦�• I 1'a gn us V J i ♦,v 1 '2t♦i�::'j u - '� r � ♦ J r ..S„��� u i..--tl♦A♦7��}� W I. r:u 1 �q o W i �JYt"• III i t t u Vt# sey a J ♦ - t _ ze if ` 71, � 00128 { LOCATE AT MIDPOINT OF RETURN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON � PLANS COARSE BROOM FINISH IN DIRECTION SHOWN o - PLAN SCALES i"=S* R SIDE WA L K 4' SCORE MARKS (TYP.) 4.5' SI-6 CURB 0.04 T-3 8" ELEVATION SCALE= NONE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARDS PEDESTRIAN RAMP FOR THE HANDICAPPED APPROVED= PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR eE. CERT. N0.15709 SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: JUNE 1973 DRAWN: R HARNESS FILE NO: Z /� N0. REVISIONS BY DATE CHECKED: CC 306A 00129 r. f i IOW ' '• Z)s s a e, Y fit' x i ; ty3♦=}" ' a r . vsis • 1�Y / :i o Z: ^' ''k. v •' p i �' / �.. art$ Y' i Q i a 1G 41 Is .• \ w J ,l lri b 4 0 � s l• i�r'- t` � r 'ir1: rl • �" E% brei" fir' '-:. � � � \s taf- w - rV tv lip • 4 , �;1 V \ V c r 61 lm �_�,.-� `� �(► a \� Vd ' •¢� �` � • ,� I � • 9t �ti li Av�i tib 136. WLn U i 40 • A n . • L 7G 15 , as 0 N J , U z r� Ct o N Q 0 .a w GL U- 'a Z ._1 � W N � z �- W Z < rt tt1 CL d t1Ei Q U a 41 Ll jw— z 3 w a }- c Cr z 0 H L-' W i , Y zi oUw J >- Z -) .t 2 < ? tD z d0 ,� F -; W 4 ,11 Li rn a tr`# s- U3 :Dl w u " ra stt r5rr"��ir U- cc u� r ' 4z�1a#Yt 4 f� eI O V OO 0 0� r t 2 �W • ¢ uJts- EJ CL (3 . tai!Er Q ti LL- uj ►- cn O �." "".r E2 tJ t tj i nu r � � QC _ll0 cc }- 3 Q rI dF- D � t!_ 1� ^ 2 0 C.) W � CL tt! U �` d G 'n O } ( i a ., C.. Y z a O O } p z t ".. i— I �t t w cr LA- w Y C 4! cn J r z N i r r cr N r LUN WW 2 W cr i } w O Y c !c1 Ix }Q- Z a. H �uH a z 1 r Ir v� a GI 180 ;n u `av z o t a a Cl ,'�• LI f 1 t'f Q _ � tY Z fr LJ Ln 0 cr v � t a- 00132 . i N is R Z �1,V . .Z �1 .. � •"[t�: Zj a YS ♦ �:+� Z1 �• ►i {' :; _ Arlo S ca¢ Is +.. f�� �� ; �;; i i i� t.y� z{••L 4�4 s. �3 r\ �r '� tt'� to S ::a t, „ ='1: . a�`- o t i!s t 'J v '� ,,+•rs�I;%= V 1 m• ! L •t Z! SS �i4 �� .J'. .r✓�" rye 16 Sip i , t � �t _ 1. ., ` S �', `2 t i � s Z 1 .�.• 0-t ISS to io r i � 4 e •'' :t * �/-'- �'• tORPtER H0.00 SEwEit S DRAIN . . y•r� �'�='' A reinforced concrete duan purpose box dem-ned for FIC. either light parpos< drainage installations or enclosing r �•,J '•::tet 1144,,x•+ seer cleanouts in foot traCnc areas. Taperini shoulders preve-it settling. Notch accommodates up to approxi- •• mately 4- O.D.pipe or drain tile. !al r••• ,fr Ow � : I•. r •%L t tr '• 4r6 rC49 FIG, i!a ;� >< �' ` : .-'�.�• f``;;t r a.: 1 r .1'•1 :lir TZ'�'1CfA 14N i I:LLA T ION G Fir- I illustrates n drainn a instnlintion when used with grate- V Fi£. IA illu^>trates s^urr cleanout application FIG. 2 Dl:; 1�!:,!Oi��st S::L•TC1l when used with concrete Ed. TABLE OF EA C C D E F GFta. 2 S.• E.�•. _ _ _ _ 1.�., 1S ,. ,. 53 11CCESS"^!ES AWALISLE FCl IMS CH AttCSs Orev %U"SCw APPROX. AND OKSC"PT+O•. RT. COS. D213 LID Reinforced Concrete ----------..................._---------------..... ............... 10 71013• GRATE Cost Iton...................................................._........... :.... ....... ... 12 • 00134 a r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,'-STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Completion ) RESOLUTION NO. of improvements and declaring ) certain roads as County roads, ) Subdivision 4599, Walnut Creek ) Area. ) WHEREAS the Public Works Director having notified this Board that improvements have been completed in Subdivision 4599, Walnut Creek area, as provided in the agreement heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: Subdivision Date of Agreement 4599 May 27, 1975 (SAFECO Insurance Compan - 245 2593)'- ( Name of Performance 13ond Carrier ana Bond No. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 126241 dated May 23, 1975) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described road, as shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4599 filed May 30, 1975, Book 178 of Maps at page 19, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, is accepted and declared to be a County Road of Contra Costa County: Mandaia Court 32/52 0.13 PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Auditor Gentraller Recorder Public Works Director Albert D. Seeno Construction Company 3890 Railroad Avenue Pittsburg, California 94565 RESOLUTION t10. *7 22 0013-5 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR$ OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the map of Subdivision 4721, RESOLUTION N0. 76/323 San Ramon Area. ) WHEREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4721 , property located in the San Ramon area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. U806404) issued by United Pacific Insurance Company with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., as principal, in the amount of $250,400 for Faithful Performance and $250,900 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 134998, dated April 9, 1976), in the amount of $500.00, deposited by: Dame' Construction Company, Inc. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full, and the 1976-77 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March 1976, is estimated to be $10,500 in combination with Subdivision 4761; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. U806405) issued by United Pacific Insurance Company with Dame' Construction Company, Inc. , as principal, in the amount of $10,500 (in combination with Subdivision 4761), guaranteeing the payment of the estimated 1976-77 tax; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. The Foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYSS: Supervisor J. 3. 1roriarty, A. Linscheid 1:033: 'None. ABSE;?': 3,rper v isor :•!. N. Bo?f7ess. AB3TAIT. Su-oervisor A. !i. Dins . Sur,,_-rvisor Bias s zated tha� h- ::.s^ed the record to show he abstafreci from votin=, for th r-ason `1-t. he is an ea:nlnuA - ..r Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Dame' Construction Company, Inc. OU13 J P. 0. Box 100 San Ramon, CA 94533 • -- SUEPIVISM AGRF.=%f . • - (11) Sobdirisson: 4721 (So 4 P. Cole Ail 1611-12] - (fl) Subdivider: Co. Ingo, a corpora _ on 1'Ei` ect L e te: (11) Cosiplotion Per a Zear • (U) Deposits: A: (cash) 0 Do (bands, etc.) 1. (Mtbful poser r Cance • 4 maintemance) $ 250.400.00 2. (,labor 4 matft-Wap, 2 Q.0O 1. PARTIES G UN E. Effective on the above date, the tansy of Contra costa, California, bora na ter cal ed 'Touatto and tba aborenaoed SuWitidor, mutuailr promise and agree as follows concern z: this subd3risian: 2. 1Sn*dievider shall construct, install and complete sued and street irprovementf, tract dra±nz�;a, street sigas, fire hydrants, and all impruvemoats • -as required by the Co ntr OrZirante Code, especially Title 9, and Including future amer Amts, and all Jagworawats required ft-tW"prrored b9act o :ent play of tbls subdivision on file Ia the County's Public Corks !•.rtr-.nt. ' Subdivider shall eonplete this work and itrprormants prorsinafter called Nork'') within the above completion period fan date hereof as required by the California Subdivisic`n ;bp Act (Business f Professions Cade 9111500 and folloving), in a good wn t- ` • mmiuliku =near, In accardcace citb accepted construction practices and in a =umw ogcal or superior to the requirements of the aunty Ordinance Code and rulings Bade of ,@un-ver; and whore there is a conflict between the impror=eot plan and the County Ordinaaee Code, tho stricter requireacnts shall govern. - 3. GUARANTEE S liAl:►TE MVM. Subdivider guarantees that the work is and will be free from Ceferts amd will per:o:•a satisfactorily in accordance with Art:cle 94-4.4 of the County Ordinance Code; and he sball maintain it for one year after its completion mad ccccpt== against any defc:tive worinausbip or materials or nay Zntsatisfectory performance. 4. liil' &BIENT SEOMI .: DOSIT 1 3MMS. Upam executing, this Agreement, Subdivider MAI. pursuant to Business 1 Pro essioms Code 111612, deposit as security with the County: . A. ash: 5500 cash; amd.... B. IMs etc.: (1 - faithful parfosnauce A natatenance) additiomai i • security for at least the a otic-s•`ec!fled amount, ahicb is she total rstinoted cost of -the work less $502, in the fora of a casb drp sit, a certified o: csshler's check, or-an acceptable corporate surety 1'w:d, guarsntraing bis Wtbful performance of this agraement and maintewace of thr uvrk for one year after completion o d acceptance tberaof against axW defective. wor1rmaship or ea:erials or any unsatisfactory perfozza ace; Plus (2- labor i materials) auo:her such addi do:al sec uritlr in at least the above-spoeifI a amount, which Is the Bull a~auat of said clti:=tel cost, se..•urierg pa.Ment to the contractor, to his subcaat:acters. and to persons renting .quilacut or furnishing labor or materials to theca or to the 4bJitider. S. 1�T M10itilder warrants tb--t said iciravc`;wnt pian is adcgwto 'to accomplish thtx xrrn csf ranisr.: In Section and if, at any time before the County's 92 of cearletioe for the sul-latiision. the irprove:neat plan proves to be iradvquato in air respect. Subdivider shall :al.r c:har4es necessary, to ateocplish the work as proolse:d. dGPcoN 1 4 wW boom orris • - 1 �U13`7 G. 1:0 I:AIVER I:Y_COU::i'Y. I»spccUion of the t:ork and/or varcrials, or approval of t:ork, ancl!�r Ia:lLciiills 2llshi:ctcda , or statallt by am, officer, agent or employce of the County -Sm4c.itink the v-ork or any part thereof colnpl ics With tIle requiremcat= of this Arrecrient, or acceptance of the :„sole or any !Fart of said .:ori: and/c.r ta:ttcrir:l::, or payments t2tiz-xvfor, or any combin-ition or all of there acts, shall not relieve the Subdivid'•. of his vb]iCnLion to fulfill this coatraet as proscribed; Ivor shall the County he thereby estopped fro:a bringing any action for damages :!rising front the failure to. comply with any of the tcrrs and conditions hereof. 7. INDDNITY. Subdivider shall hold Ilarl:.lcss and inder_nify the: i.rdc.;:nitces from the li bilitics as defi ed in this section: A. The indemnitecs benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective avid appointive board_, commissions, officers, agents and craployces. D. The 1 i,bi l iti cs protected ,gainst are :tny liability or claim. for da*age of any kind alae-n fly suiic.-e-1, incurred or thrcate-swd because of.actions defines'. bolo::, and nclilding personal injury, death, property dater.-ge, inrcrse condemnation, or any of these, and regardless of %-J:;ther or not such liability, claim or damne lids unfor c seevItI c at any tim b:-fore tl:e; Comity approved the ir-prove^..cnt plan or -accepted the inn'ovemcnts as conpletcd, and incluJing the defense of any sttit:(s), action-CS) or other procccl irg(s) concerning these. C. The ::ctiont liabilitt• are any act or omission (rcgligc:.t or non-netili ent) in coluiection i:ith'the natters covered by this Agreer,:t:t and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one _ or r..ore of t.}:c_a. • 1). Non-Conditions: The promise and at;recwmt in this section is not conditioned ordo:1ell:ieset on liisetlaer or not any lndc:-.nitcc bas prepared, supplied, or approved Lnv plan(s) or specification(s) in connection i:ith this vmrlk or subdivision,- or hss insurance or other irc?c.nnific tion eo:ering any of these Matters, or that the silez,ed t7-3=z--C resulted partly from any ilea iigcnt or willful misconduct of any Indetanitee. S. COST Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including inspcctions t1lmreof sed relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. SubSivider shall set and establish survey MonLrm.ents in accordance with ilia file"' man and to the satisfaction of the County Road Commissioner-Surveyor. 10. AN-D COS S. If SuLdivider fails to complete the wort: and inprovc-incllis vilhia the In this A ree:.ent or extensions Sranrcd, County r v procecJ to eom.plete ilio- by contract or c:here:isc, and Subdiiider shall pay the costs and cha r-c•s tllcrefor upm ce.-wnd. If County s:es to compel perfor—marce Of this Agrec.-.ent of recover the cost. of eo=pletian the iglrmemlents, Subdivider shall p.^_\• all reascl alty),` atio:I-eys' :ees, costs of siti: , and all other expenses of litigation incurred by Cowit y in eonucet i oI: illere i tit. 11 . ASS C--\MINT. If before County accepts these improve erts, the subdi:•isim is mme\ed It1 a 6"N.. the co.1:1y r,-,r assiJ;^ ,a t'r,at cit." the County's rights under this lgrec.zient a:al/or zin.v cieposit QS bc'Ld :Coin-ilq., the !. 001nQ . 12. RECORD MP. In consideration `ierco.`, County shall alloy: Subdivider to file and record the Final :Map or Par:e3 Map for said Sub:ivision. CONTRA COSTA COUA%7Y SUBDlVIDER: (see note below) VERNON L. CLINE, . Public Works Director Dame Construction Co. Inc. , a corporation 4 By �tJ�._� B?•_ _ President Deputy _ (Designate official capacity in the business) :rote to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknot.ledLTt::t RECOXNIE\DED FOR APPRGVAL: form below; and (2) if a cor orae:on, affix r corporate seal. By Assistant }'u ori: Z)itor (COnpOF.A?'E SEAL) r,'• r FORAM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, ` County Counsel , lrii Deputy— k tk * tk >t # tt * Yr # = t air # t # : i • * # > al r # � # # s # # * # # # * * M # # # * * * it x State of California ) (Ac%no::ledcment by Corporation, PartPcrslup, County of Contra Costa ) ss' or Individual) On April 14,. 1976 the person(s) whose namc(s) is/are signed above for Subwividcr and Cillo is/are knourr, to me to be ►he it'ividua-I (s) and of.icer(s) or partncr(s) as stated above who signed this instrument, p erscnally appeared before me and aekrowdedged to :,e tf at -he executed it and that the cor:aration or partnership named above executed it. a.• 0172n22an29_su3:-=- aZWj"I y,I VOT-;..Y PUS= C (NOTARIAL SEAL) cc4; - ,.:. __��-rr 2 t' `- _' v {,a Lillian L. Worth i ':o.ar y Public for said County and State (Subdiv. Arrmt. CCC Std. Form) LD-9 (Rev. 9/75) -3- 00139 INPROl•LQIEP.T SECURITY BOW Bond 1)U 806404 A?R A0 L SUBDiti'.S103 At;RBE-%t2%r Premium: $3764.00 • aithful performance b maintenance. AND labor 4 materials) 0"- (Calif. Bus. 4 Prof. Code-91161Z) �t;RK SOAM Cly Sll?_KV1;0M I CONIRA QSFA C9. Gv. - 1. OBLIGATION. (Principal) %kMEK is Principal, an (Surety) itntrrrn pb!'r Tyr-.LYS► r r•Ovn,�•r► a corporation organized and existing under the li•s of the State or WASHINGTON and authorized to transact surety business in California, as Surety, hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves, our heirs. executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the County of Contra Costa. California, to pay it: (A. faithful performance 6 maintenance) TIDO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND roTlg ut"mgrn axn N[1/tnn --Dollars (S 2sn-400- ) for itself or any city-assignee under the below-cited subdivision contract, plus (B. labor 6 materials) TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND NTNF Hit�InRFO A*1D nnJ10Q------ Dollars (S 250.900 ) for the benefit of persons protected under Cal. Bus, d Prof. Code §11612. 2. RECITAL OF SUBDIVISION CO:TRACT. The Principal has contracted With the County to install and pay for street, drainage, and other improvements in Subdivision Number 4721 , as specified in the Subdivision Agreement, and to complete said work within the time specified in the Subdivision Agreement for completion, all in accordance with State and local laws and rulings thereunder in order to satisfy conditions for filing of the final map for said Subdivison. 3. CONDITION. If the Principal faithfully performs all things required of him according to the teras and conditions of said contract and improvement plan and improve- ments agreed on by him and the County. then this obligation as to Section 1-(A) above shall become null and void, excert that the guarantee cf maintenance continues for the one-year period; and if he fully pays the contractors, subcontractors, and persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to then for said work and improvements, ..::d pruzzects :.hc prc:scs frw ctai= cf suzh !iens, then this obligation as to • Section 1-(B) above shall become null and void; otherwise this obligation remains in full force and effect. ' No alteration of said contract or any plans er specifications of said work agreed to by the Principal and the County shall relieve any Surety zrom liability on this bond; and consent is hereby given to cake such alterations without further notice to or consent by Surety: and the Surety hereby waives the provisions of Calif: Civil Code §2919, and holds itself bound without regard to and independently of any action against Principal whenever taken, and agrees that if County sues ca this bond, Surety will pay reasonable - attorney fees fixed by court as costs and included in the judgment. SIGNED AND SEALED on April 9, 1976 PRINCIM p•�, * ONSTRUCTION CO., INC. SURLTr UNITY PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY Sy Gefilte H. rueei% Attorney in fact ♦•rf••��I��tl�►�1fa�r��f.i�1���1t�f•��st•���••�����������•/��t�If if•1I��t l��if I�MIR•�♦I N' State of California ass. (AW)OWLED4�tENT BY SURETY) County of Certra Costa On A ril 9, 1976 the person(s) whose aa=e(s) is/are signed above. for Surety and wtio is knoun to me to be the Attorney(s)-in-Fact for this Corporate Surety, personally appeared before re and acknowled„e3 to me that he/they signed the name of the Corporation as Surety and his/their own nanes(s) as its Attorneys)-in-Fact. ' (h•OTrtRI.1L�.StL/1Lj, ' - �' � Notary Fublieforszid Ccuz[ ar--' State f S. Ann Krueger '� _ Miarofitma with8oara ori l . 04140 k • APR a'sl0 _� AGAINST rte Bond U ' Z' ?;;) u.i�;...►1 i..�:i-:.S 806405 ✓ R.:� Eo.1 0 -~" Premium: $105.00 TV A TDA2 ' CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.- , a s principal. a;:7 {S�;:• ; UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY , a corporation w org-Inized and existln udder t-he la:::; v" the State of WASmGToN anti authorized to trzinsact surety business in California as surety are held and f irnly bound unto the County of Contra _ Costa, St:aie of California, in the pens1 sum of TEN THOUSAND.FIVE HUNDRED AND N0/100 Dallars 10,500.00 to be paid to the said County of Contra Costa, for the payment of which viell and truly to be made, ve end c ach of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, alzllmiinistrators and successors, jointly and severally , fJrnly inti► t}iese presents. Scalcc: -vith our seals urea dated this 9t& day of MApril 1976 _ The cot::3i-ionn of tint' alis v e oblit-;a tion is such that WIECRDIS, the above Pr:it:^.inal iu about to file a c!ap entitled Tracts 4721. &- 4761 s z-nd i`.C)L' •l`; a, c)--- :. tro, : of land in said Cove tJ of Contra ,r. ^a r" L� .a i-:.ai �1 qac• `:e� ca Z s . C .t p :q s Cc._,t:�, ..:I.: i:. c •e a3 � c� .._. Il _e ._ 'a. t't:•: _ �.r:.. .sac...ta as.�e ...nen E Cu?_ CC.t::: �, .ct:.. 1 _. s:..i6 TI'aut- of land covered by Said Gi:: �1 t:i:s t`3? t�Xz :T: i '1�'i::i.c^.� :1:;5�:^•: �•tti,^ eol j ectcd as tees, are Principal �h•! 11 pay ?11 C the .:II S '•�_ ''_�.I :l:.:; :.�!l�i:t:� CU2lec tecl c'2v c". of laca r..l by ..:tj..l ::1=.t1, c:t• f::__ i:til:tC` :�: �_:' '0 in-_ t of Tract thr,n ti -s b z. .•i,'. -1:... o n l;1.ZaII �.t! sig-:�? iC��•:.� t�..., C•: �C'�•ti DCON CTION , IHC. Frinc i f):;I UNITED PACIFIC_INSURANCE COMP&MY !; t � 'i.`Cruer`Atorey in ffact .Ceoge .'i ' Contra Costa 0,) April 9, 1976 ' . S. Ann Krueger - !',M-: 1.Y _... George H.-Krueger ! ., ` „ i.:, attorney in fact-- ---- t _^- t: :> �• L.tt �2 Q,�- __ 00141 S. Ann Krueger ;, -.,:-,..-Y.:�._ . _-_-....r . A�iuc;Ilrne:� rr;rt; ;�t.:�ru c ��•.. ALFRED P.LOUELI County Treasurer-Ta:Collector Assistant Ccunty T:easwor- Tax Collector TAX C^.LL�3'S t;FFJCE First Fi COLNTY COST.k a raLlt of Taxes COI14TRA � Flat uatalle�eat of Tees Due end Paya63a Delinquent on tire First ila) at Novecber on the Tenth Day of Deceaber ______`______ MARTINEZ.CAU!-OntilA See;.nd Installment of Tans Prime 223-3-=.Eat.233S Second Installment of Taxes "e and Payable Delinquent on the Firt Day of February F ebMary-9, 1976 on,the Teat%Day of pard IF TRIS r1:�i,T 'rz NOT ,IL.t: 9I WILMER. 31, 1976 , THIS I:. " IS VOID This will cer`..ify that I have examined the Mau of the proposed subdivision entitled: TRACT NO. 4721- and TRACT NO._ 4761 aro have Bete:-,fired from the oTTici:l tax records that there are no unpaid Cour y taxes heretofore leried on the property included in the r p. The 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full. Oar esti:.ate of une 1976-?? tax Len, zihich becalm a lien on the first day of narch, 1976, i; $ _10,500.00 ETi:MI W. I1 Tax Collector n .9 �..• � ��� Lam• •, '�- dl btcrofiimed wl*ih beard of cer OU142 IN THE BOARD 9F SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORPIIA In the Matter of Approval of RESOLUTION NO. 76/32It. the Replacement Subdivision } Agreement for Subdivision 3844, San Ramon Area. WHEREAS the following documents relating to Subdivision 3844, having been presented for Board approval this date: A subdivision agreement with Imperial Savings and Loan Association, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. 5008046) issued by Hartford Accident and Insurance Company with Imperial Savings and Loan Association as principal, in the amount of $213,900 for Faithful Performance and $214,400 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 135136, dated April 14, 1976), in the amount of $500, depos—Tted by: W. W. Dean and Associates. WHEREAS said document replaces the Subdivision Agreement with Larwin- Northern California dated July 10, 1973; WHEREAS the Public Works Director having recommended that the Subdivision Agreement with Larwin-Northern California be exonerated and that he be authorized to refund to Larwin-Northern California the $500 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail No. 109360, dated July 3, 1973. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the new subdivision agreement, exoneration of the old agreement and the cash deposit refund authorization are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Imperial Savings & Loan Association 1849 Willow Pass Road Concord, California 94520 CERTIFIED COPY LarWi n—Northern California I eertifc that this i.�s s furl. true & correct copy of 6500 Village Parkway the or;4'wtt t!u.•eirtr--nt which i- on file tit my office, and t!znt It saws Pas-urd & adopted by the P,-)ard of Dublin, California 94566 Suporsisors of Contra CnataCounty. California. on t!:e datp �Fatrn. ATTEST: J. H. OUSSOK. County Cterk & ex-officio Clerk of said Board of Supervisors, W. W. Dean & Associates DY vary Cierb 151 West 20th Avenue APR 2 0 1976 San Mateo, California 94403 oa RESOLUTION NO. 7 6/324 4014.3 A SUDDIVIS106V AGREEIT ' 01) Subdivision: 3M (B. 8 P. Code 5§11611-12) (§1) Subdivider: —` 1 APER 1 At SAM NGS AND MN ASSOCIATION (213 E ect re ate: (51)'Completion Peri E YW 04) Deposits: A. (cash) 5300 . B. (bonds, etc.) •• 1. (faithful perfor-..ance 4 maintenance) S 2! 900.00 2. (labor 5 nateriais) _2! 00.00 1. PARTIES 8 DATE. Effective on the above date, the County. of Contra Codta, California, hereins ter called "County", and the abovenmed Subdivider, rustually . promise and agree as follows monorne�ing this subdivision: - 2. INPROti'E'dMTS. Subdivider shall construct, install arX cozplete road and street improver••ients, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all i:nroeceents as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 3, and including future amendments, and all improvements required in the approved improse:ert ;lar. *f this subdivision on file in the County's Public rarks Departrent. Subdivider shall complete this work and inprosements (hereinafter called '"work"') within the above completion period from date hereof as required by t}e California Subdivision Nap Act (Business & Professions Code 011S00 and follorx:rb), in a good work- manlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices ar.' in a :arrer equal or superior to the requi:enents of the County Ordinance Code and rul!ngs rade thereunder: and where there is a conflict between the improrenent plan and the Ca*r.t;• Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GUARANTEE 8 RAIN-IMA.NCE. Su- ivider guarantees that the work is and will be free from de acts and will perform satisfactorily in accordance wi:l: Article g41-4.4 of. the County Ordinance Code; and he shall maintain it for one )-ear after its completion and acceptance against am defective work=nship or materials or any tansat isfactory ' performance. - 4. INPROVENL\T SECURITY: DEPOSITS DOMS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business S ProfessiWs- Code §11612, deecsit as security with the County: A. Cash: $500 cash; and.... B. Nis etc.: (I - faithful performance S naiirterarce; additional • security for a: Iea t the aacre-specifle.: arAxot, which is the tote". =s:irated. cost of the work less $500, in the fora of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful perforranze of this agreement and maintenance of the wort: for one year atter completion and acceptance tl:ereo-- against any defective workmanship or materials or airy unsatisfactory performance; plus ( labor $ materials) another such additional security in at least the abosc-specifaevunt, ' which is the full amount of said estimated cost, securing pa)=ent to t o contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or raterials to them or to the Subdivider. S. iiARRAWY. Subdivider warrants that said irprovenent plar. is adequate to accomplish this wor s proM1sed in Section 2; and if, at any tire before the County's resolution of completion for the subdivision, the improvermt plan proses to be inadequate in.any respect, Subdivider shall =.lake changes necessary to accocplssh the work as promised. - 1 _ oust 6. NO IiAIVER BY COUNTY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work anal/or materials inspected, or statecert by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with . any of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. INDONITY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The-indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened-because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any co:abination of these, and regardless of 1.-Nether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any ti-me before the Ccurty approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s) , actions) or other proceeding(s) concerning these. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with the Watters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or ec: loyee of one or more of then. D. Iron-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has- insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the allebed de-nage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including inspections thereon and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and 'establish survey mopuments in accordance with the filed map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Commissioner-Surveyor. 10. N0\PERFOPIMNCL a.\D COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the time specified in this Agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract or othertcise, and Subdivider shallpay the costs and charges therefor L-m-ediately upon denard. If County sues to conpel performance Or this Apr t_'enent nr recover _Le cost of ca=p.',- ti.-.g the it pro [dents, Subdi o der shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection, therewith. 11 . ASSIGNME�\T. If before County accepts.these impro:•enerts, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County ray assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any de=posit or bond securing tlme^. _ 2 _ 00145) 12. RECORD MP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to fit and record the Final Map or Parcel Asap for said Subdivision. CONTRA COSTA COUNIT SUBDIVID . (see note below) IMPERIAL ¢ INGS ANj> LOAN ASSOCIATION Vernon L. Cline, . Acting Public !Forks Director BYl` I B f y Deputy (Designate ice apacit' in the business_ M.W. $HEEHYY AS,pfSTANT StCRETARY RECOI'ZIE\DED FOR APPROVAL: Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknow- ledgment form below; and if a corporation, affix corporate seal. Assistant Pu forks .erect (CORPORATE SEAL) FORS APPROVED: JOM%% B. CLAUSEN, County- Counsel ' Depu— r v- ' at ,t * * * * ,t •t yc tic t t � � � ; * ! _ � f * * = a t : 'is : t * # : # t !r t ,t # # ,: ,tr : s ,t s State of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership, County of Los ANGELES ) ss' or Individual) On APRIL 0, 1970 the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above for -Sub ivi er an 0110 is are known to me to be the individual(s) and officer(s� or partner(s) as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before rye and acknowledged to me that The Yexecuted it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. _ OFFICIAL SEAL; �/�� � ,��Litj�.✓ BEA McMURRAIN (NOTARIAL SEAL) X01M FMC - CAUMM a r.-: ' P81hGi'Al QFACE L4 BEA �yC MURRAIN LOS "MYES C01.•`ITY Sian e.a..n April 3% 1977 Notary Public for said County- and State (Subdiv. Agrnt. CCC Sid. Form) LD-9 (Rev. 3/76) -3- 0014.5 � C TOrOaf,,C�� (Corporation) STATE OF CAUFOMIA Los Angeles COUNTY OF . On April 7, 1976 K. Wore,�the undeersiewrd•a Notary Public in and for said pulp State, pp app—edingery known to me to be the n1 Or 7 Ge PteIWCW.and - QeAy m known to me to he Assistant Sead„n of the corporation that executed the within Instrument. = known to we to be the persons who executed the within ft ln,trument on behalf of the onrporation therein named. and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the withinOFFICIAL SEAL instrument pursuant to its by4aws or a tesolutioa of it:baud BEA �r2CMURRAIN of directors BEA S t CLW Ptt e. CAttF0�11/A WITNESS my hand and official seal WMxwaS Atw'Et 0MC Y ty foaanttaion Signatute..� t� i...�f1, Ewp"°s Awu aa. 2977 Bea Hdiurrai n +. N=,e (Typed or Printed) ttbb arse w.esirt"b"reap 00147 1 ' s' EXECUTED "IN DUPLICATE- Bond leo.. 5008046 ' •:. Premium: $3,216.00/Term IMPROVEM-11T SECURITY BOND LF FOR SUBDIVISION? AGREEMENT (Performance, Guarantee and PaymenPR 0 G 1976 (Calif. Governm ent Code $166499-664991. OBLIGATION. IMPERIAL SAvINSs AND LOAN AssocIATIONcm OLMM Boweas Princ pa , an RTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDAa corporation organized anal existing un er the laws of te o CONNECTICUT and authorized to transact surety business in Cal _ornia, as Surety, hereby jointL- and severally bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, ta the County of Contra Costa, Califo:•nia, to pay it: (A. Performance & Guarantee)Two HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOusAND AND NINE HWMDRED AND NO/100 cellars (S 21 , 00.00 ) for itself or any city-assignee L:nzder t^e below-cou=7 sutdiv sion aeree::ent, plus (B. Payment-) Two HUNDRED FOURTEEN TNOusAND AND POUR MIMORED AND NO/100 ---------------------------------Dollars (;; 214 400.00 ) to secure the claims to which reference _s etade in I'Itle Y> tcor..>~ene-::g xith Section 3082) of Part & of Divis±c:: 3 of the Code of the State of Callfor- nia. 2. RECITAL 0?' Sb:;DIT3SIts::' OGREE:•'. .he Princical has executed an arreen eft with tae Co�.:.nt;: to instal3 and sy for street, drainage, and other improvements in Sun-41v cion N=ter IM , as spec:f led in Utee anSubdivision Arreement, aa to complete sE3d work.. withir. :.he Lime specit'ied for completion in the SuLdivision d:reeaert, all in accordance with State and local lags and rulirrs thereunder _. crder to sat=s p:: condition.: for filing of .the Final Vlap or Parcel .::3p fcr said Subdivision. 3. CONDITION. ;:..:.; •�..:;- e NN A. -The coedit.on or this o:_s ation as to Section. t '<<) °ar, rs r Is such that if••t::e above bounded pr+.ncip_l, his or its 'stelrsy 'axecuLorfs' administrators, successors or assigns, s^all in all things stand::to abide by,, and wel'1 and truly keep and perform the covenants, and n_•ovisions irk the said agreement and an alteration. thereof t"ai�:-:"`�s :.• therein provided,- or. his or Its part, to :e kept and aerfer-:ed at ••the tine and in tre manner t::erein opecifled, and in all respec 3 according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless s the County of Contra Costa (or city ass!rnee), its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then t'.:is obligation shat= became null and void; otherwise it shall Le and remain In full force and effect. � As a part of the obliEation secured: hereby and in addition to the ;. face amount specified therefor, there stall be included costs and reason- able expenses and fees, including; reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by County (or city assir,.nee) in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to- be taxed as costs and included in ans judGment rendered. B. The condition of this obl!gation as to Section 1.(B) above is such that said Principal and the undersigned as corporate surety are . held firmly bound unto the County of Conga Costa and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, raterialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the arcresatd at-reement and referred to in the aforesaid Civil Code for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for 00148 amounts due under the unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety ::ill pay. the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond, will pay, in addition to the Face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by County (or city assignee) in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be at:arded and fisted b;; the court, and ' to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment th..erein ren- dered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commen^ing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code , so as to zive a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the corditior, of this bond tie fully cerfoHred then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall ie and remain in full force and effect. C. No alteration of said subdivision agreement or any plan or specification of said torn agreed to by the PrincicGl and the County shall relieve any Surety f.-c—m liability on this gene: ; and con- sent is hereby given to make suet, alterations without- further notice to or consent b- Suret;; and the Surety hereby waives the p-ovisions of Calif. Civil Code §2819, and holds itself bound= ::it:?out re:.-ard to and independently of any action a C,ainst rrincipal whenever tz;:en. SIGNED AND BEADED on APRIL o. 1976 i T SURETY MPERiAL TiiV1NGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION HARTFORD ACC1 ENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY � . -in-Fact{y . gtf, At f / �r.t•�. HE HY 71 syT4J �1`c jR A»RY State of California ) County of Orange )ss. (ACnFIO:�LEDG;•:E:F'r' 3Y St'?c^_Y) On April 6 , 1916 the person(s) ::Nose name(s ) is/are signed above for Surety and who is/are kr:o :n to me to ::e A4torne;-(s )-in-pact for this Cornorate Surety , personally appeared be:ore me and acknowledged to rye that he signed the name of the Corporation as Surety and his/ their own name Ts) as its Attorney(s)-in-Fact. r (i:QTARIAL SEAL) k..' �/c• S OFFICIAL SEAL D. CAROL LEAVITT •�•�. ttJlt3tY PS:i+J:GGLtFC,,,jZoPary PuLlic for County and State (Rev. 2/76) ~' _ PRIUCIPAL CWFMt Irr courmr _ EBH:b W Aly CXn.missian Expires June 20, 19% � 00149 { Hartford* Accident and Indemnity Company H 1RTrORD. CO%%ECT►CCT POWER OF ATTOPUNEY Know all men by these Presents, That the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut. and having its principal office in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford. State of Connecticut, does hereby make,constitute and appoint BECKY L. YOST of SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA its true and lawful Attorneys)-in-fact, with full power and authority to each of said Attorneys)-in-fact, in their separate capacity if more than one is named above. to sign, execute and acknowledge any and all bonds and undertakings and other writings obligator in the nature thereof on behalf of the company in its business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons holding places of public or private trust; l;uaranteeing the performance of contracts other than insurance policies; guaranteeing the performance of insurance contracts where surety bonds are accepted by states and municipalities, and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or nernitted in all actions or proceedings or by law allowed. r11 F D APR -V,C' 1976 1 2. CLS.ZN Ux 80A2u O: 5U7c2vI502S CON RA cgSr CO. By _ Ds and to bind the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY" thereby as fu y and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND 1 N DEM N 1TY COM PAN Y and sealed and attested by one other of such officers, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that its said Attorneys)-in-fact may do in pursuance hereof. This poorer of attorney is granted under and by authority of the following By-Law adopted by the Stockholders of the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 10th day of February, 19.13. ARTICLE IV SECTION R The President or any l ace-President, acting with any Secretary or Ase.6tant Secretary,shall have power and authority to appoint, for purposes only of executing and artesting bunds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, one or more Resident Vice-Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries and Attocnvys-in-fact and at any time to remove any such Resident Vice-President, Re.ident. Assistant Secretary.or Attorney-in-fact.and revoie the power and authority given to him- SFXTIO\ 11. attorneys-in-fact;list!have r t.er and authtvity,s.,bject to the terms and limitations of the power of attorney issued to them, to execute and deliver on behalf of the Compasty and to attach the seal of the Company thereto any and all bonds and undertakings, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereoi.and any such instrument executed by any such Attorney-in-fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by an Executive Officer and"--AW and attested by one other of such Officers. This poorer of attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Directors of the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 13th day of \larch, 1956. RESOLVED,that,whereas the President or any\act-President,acting with any Secretary or As&6tant Secretary,has the power and authority to appoint by a power of attorney,for purposes only of rxecuting and atte;trng boats and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,one or more Resident\3ce-Presidents.Assistant Secretaries and Attorne)s-in-faet-. Now therefore the signature,of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile,and any such power of attorney or cvrtiircate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Cnnipan•in the future with re prct to any N+nil tv urxlertakiar to which it 6 attached. In Witness Whereof, the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vice-President,and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed,duly attested by its Secretary, this 17th day of January, 1965. Attest: HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY z Vico Preliderrt STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ' COUNTY OF IIARTFORD, On this 17th day of January. A. 1). 1966, before cur personally came John F. Beardsley, to me known, who being by me dtily sworn, did depose and say- that he resides in the Count- of Hartford.State of Connecticut; that he is the Vice- .President of the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY. the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument;that he knows the seal of the said corporation;that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. 'i V• f STATE OF CONNECTICUT. 1i s_•�N t ss. Nulary Public COUNTY OF HARTFORD. CERTIFIG3TE .11y c,n n-ission export Starck 31, 1977 1, the under:i-ned. Assistant Stcretsry of the HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, a ('onnecticut CUrpU:atillil, Dl) HEREBY CERTIFY that teat fu:r..,)I 4:and attachtA POWER Of ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furtherrsure, fl.-at Article IV. Sections S and 11, of the By-Letts of the Com- pany, and the Resolution of the Bwrd of Director,, art forth in tate Power of Attorney. is noir in force. Signed and sealed at the Citi of I lartf-ird. I►.a;rd time 61.^ dray of April 1976 .sem Y • Form S-3507.7 Vrinml in l'.&A. < :` o0.{r5 w1 Secretary .41iCacilmad Zvi:h bca:d order Form S.3507.7 f`rinted in P.S..\. a.'L` V V.Ltt A&xt asaetary fi1i�oiiimad Zvi:h bcQ:d order IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, .STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the map of Subdivision 4627, ) RESOLUTION N0. Z6/325 San Ramon Area. ) WHEREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4627, property located in the San Ramon area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. U806402) issued by United Pacific Insurance Company with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., as principal, in the amount of $147,400 for Faithful Performance and $147,900 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 134988, dated April 9, 1976), in the amount of $500.00, deposited by: Dame' Construction Company, Inc. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full, and the 1976-77 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March 1976, is estimated to be $5,500; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. 806406) issued by United Pacific Insurance Company with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., as principal, in the amount of $5,500 guaranteeing the payment of the estimated 1976-77 tax; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to nublic use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED_ The fore;oing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisor J . E. r:oriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. 'Kenny. hTo ES: ?lone . AB3ENT: Supervisor d. Bo—ess. ABSiu IiV : Superviso^ A. M. Dias . S,spervisor Dias stated that he wished the record to show he abstained from voting for the reason that be is an employee of tl.e r oundern '_ri ti e ^r.ri:%ar . Originating Department: Public storks Land rev-2lopment Division cc: County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Dame' Construction Company, Inc. P. 0. Box 100 San Ramon, CA 94583 0 ,0151 r SUIP Yl SIO: AW'EMIM i . (51) Suhrlirision: 4627 (S. ; P. Code 3411611-12) (31) Subdirlder: Osme3' Construction tion -- 't act reDate: (31) Crooplction ash (54) lleposits: A: (cash) 500 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (fultbful performance maintenance) Sl.47 400.00 . 2. (labor ; materials)F.141-g00.00 1. PARTSES S KITE.. Effectire on the abotre de-c. the Canty of Contra costar California. he v-lahl cs Ii'1 "Cc+asty", and the abvrenaxd SwIvider, mutually praeAse and atm as follows cm—ccr-a-Ls.. this subdirisioa: 2. 'MMMMIS. Subdivider shall eomstract, install and complete road and street M*-psvresrasi, tract dra!npio, street silos, fire hydrants, and all ioproveaeats .as :nquircd by the :runty Or.3c ance Cody, especially Title 9, and including :uturo amendments, mad al: Is;rov .s .rquired in the approved more IC plan of this subdivision an file in the County's Public K its lbpertr at. SaMit1der shall roeiplete this iron and ILlwwou■nts (hereinafter tailed ''v rle) within the A-xe cwVletioo perlaol from date hereof as required by the California Subdirlsim :pp Act (Eusiness & Professi=s Code 3311500 and folloving), in a (rood wart- - maulite rs war, in acca dance with mccepted construction practices and in a Wanner ocheal or superior to tLe r equare nmrs. of the Ce emty Ordinance Code and rulings Dade thereunder; and wbo rs there is a conflict between the i pmvenent pian and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter ragnirements shall tovern. . 3. 6'JAMONTCE 3 ]+9Il:TE ME. Subdivider tuarantees that the wort is and Will be free from debts uW will perso= satisfactorily in accordance with Article 94-4.4 of the County OrdJwmce Code; aid the shall maintain it for one year after Its completion Md e:ca.::=nco ate inst mW defe-ccive wortmokship or materials or any sntsatisfaetory portemance. 4. 1AMB&NT S.EOM PEPOSIT 6 WINDS. Upon owcuting this Agreement, Subdivide: shall. .pu surant to business ; esshons Code 311612, deposit as security with the Co=t}: A. Cash: $500 cash; and.... B. lGils etc.: (1 - faithful parfomswe i as"tenonce) adaitionai security for at bast the -e-specified aaohnht, which is the total estimated cost of the work less $503, in the fc3-.. of a cash deposit, a cartMcd or cashier's chow-t, or an acceptable coarl-orate sa.epty bvcd, gusrao`eeigg his faitbfvi performance of this agreement and masrteexace of the wwa for one yea: after completion anJ acceptance thereof against W defectir- exarl-wnship or mterlals or coy unsatisfactory parfannace; plus (2- labor i materls2s) ancaker such ad:::-conal security in at trast the ,bare-spoctff amount, whle:h is :1+e full ar.�x- t of sail: eni::atej cost, serurin paymnt to the contractor, to his su`cz::;-a::ors. =d to r:rsons r=tim2; equipment yr furuisbing labor or materials to the-- or to the 5 adi r idcr. S. KRERAXIOT. SrUiridsr L-.rrants that said Ina arercrt plan is adegwto to accaWlsle t.�3s e.t=:. 3 r:ec•.ised in Section 2; and if, at any ti.o before the County's ry-solu:3on. of cc:r.etio:: :or :!sr -.0- irision, the iearoremsit, plan proves to be Inadequate In coy rcr-a mea. SubCd Odes sL:.:l : akr clw ;ces nrcea;a,y to &uxed.pi lsh tlw wart: as p~1sed. 00152 - - 1 - Jl�oio�lOnsd mob booed ocdar b. 0 AlYlat BY CMC% Iuspeet3on of the work and/or materials, or approval • 'a work.aukl/or caterials inspcctexda or statraek by any officer, agent or em Viorue of 'time County SWIcatia: the eaork or may part tbermf complies with the requirtments of this Agreement.ant. or acceptance of the chole or ary part of said .+oris amiAl/or materials, or ' payments therefor. or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estappod from Waging any,action for damages arising from the failure to comply with ow of the tarts and conditions hereof. 9. Ik7q?MM. Subdivider shall hold hameless and indemnify the Ando naitees from the liabilities us defined in this section: A. The indemmmitec. benefited and protected by this promise ase the County, and its specl al districts. elective and appointive boards, emissions, officerst, agLats " and aaployoes. N. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claims for damaZo of any kind alleg ly `ercd, incurred or threatened because of actions dofine d below. and Including personal injury, e:ca:h, property davave, inverse condemnation. or any cooaWnc:lien of these, and regardless of ud ether or not such liability, clair or dama le: was unforersee nb3c at mW time before the County approred the: fu proveecnt pian or • accepted the improvements as twiplete:d. sod incluiiug "the defense of-any suit(s), actian(s) era o'thor proe:c eding(s) concerning these. � . C. The rations o min.Is!; liability we ammy act or emissionligent or =A-negligent) in conuection wi Lite LUtters cores by this Agreement and attributable to lime Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or explorgoo of one or more of thea. • D. Roam-Conditions: The pra ase and atreene:nt in this section is not conditioned or de�cut on c ct cr or not any Indemnitee burrs prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subarlsion, or has insurance or other indt :ification coming any of these setters, or that the alleged damns• resulted partly iron any negligent at willful misconduct of any Inde mite:e. . 8. OASTS. Subdivider shall pay when duo,•all the costs of the work, Including Inspections th�u�ard Velocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURMTS. Subdivider shall set and establish surrey comments in accordance with the filedms� to the satisfaction of the County Bond Commissioner-Surveyor. 30. IM'i'LT.IUMM AV. CATS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and iopr+c+ve"men-.s within the time specs fied in this Agreamout or extensions granted, County mm:.�p proceed to complete thew by contract or otherwise, and Subdirlder shall par the costs and charges therefor xam;diately upon detcnd. If County s:.es to compel perfornaree of this Agree-.Amt or recover the cost of ce--pleting the s, Subdivider shall pay all ra aserable• atto a cys' -fees. costs or suit. and all ether expenses of litigation Incurred by County in connection therewitlt. 11. A.SS1GMD"6f. If before Cwmty accepts tbese: Im pronreneats, the subdivision Is annomw W a ei:�tT.mr Countg wy* assign to tkit city the Countyls rights under this Agreewnmt and/or any deposit or bond securing thea. . .00153 13: Rb:C0F1M `•::XP. In consideration -iereof, County sh_:11 allow Subdividcr to fisc and record the Final Map or Parcel Xap for said Sub::'ivision. CONTRA COSTA COU;:?= SUBDIVIDER.: (see note below) VERNON L. CLINE, . Public W `rks Director DAME' COVSTRUCTION CO. INC. , a corporatio s - f By / ,?,!�.t'� r` ;/�! By eYX� President D ty _ ' (Designate official capaeity in the bossiness) Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknor:ledgma-t RuCO.101E\DED FOR. APPROVAL: , form belo%; and (2) if a cor orat-on, affix corporate seal. Assistant Purl s U= ector (COti'0?.A1'£ SEAL) - FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CL USE.\, County Counsel By L e;- c• Deputy 1 State of California ) (Acl:nowledg=ent by Corporation, Partnership, County of Contra Costa ) ssor Individual) On April 14, 1976 the perso:i(s) hose ramc(s) is/are signed above for Subb:!:vidar and w:ho is/are knour, to mC to be the im:iliidua:(s) and officer(s) or partncr(s) as stated above who signed this instrument, rer_caally appeared before me and acknowledged to Zia t::at -he executed it and that the corparation or-partnership named above executed it. �a7..!'. .`*i.'I'_'J'G.'..."..^i.7a-i-'� 711=.1C (NOTARIAL SEAL) CO's _'')uj.,,Ty r' 1' =� sw: CAU.,;,,A Lillian L. Worth ny C �a�iaa�zpir , . cJ I2.U76 13 Notary :or sa.d Co::::ty and Stat; . (Subdiv. Agrnt. CCC Std. Form) LD-9 (Rets. 9/75) 00154 !'l:•tiSL C.LL.1L ALFRED P.LOUM-1 vassnt+Z'eesa:um Ta:Collector AsrLsIml Couatj Tteoswer TAY CQLlEC70iCS OFFICE Tax col:eetor First lnsta cd of Tans qallaant of Taxes Due and P. ahL CONTR1COSTACOU 1j Delinquent on the First Gar of November eo the:&nth Day of December ------------- UARTLNFZ.CAUFOPMA --- --------- Second Installment of Tam Phm*M-3C30•Gut.2311S Second Installment of Tozes Due and Payable Delioquent on the First fkT of Fetnxsy February 9, 1976 00 We Tenth Day of April IF 'T:iT'a TRACT IS 16W FTM BY OCTMER 31, 19 76, THIS LT.-=, - IS VOID This will. certijry that I have Wined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: , QCT NO. 4627 . and have dete.zir_e3 from the offic;al tai: records that there are no unpaid Co=ty taxes ::nretofore levied on the property included in the arp. The 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full. 0 estimate of the 1976-77 ta,: lien, wh_ch became a lien on tI:e first day olf X--rch, 1�,is S 5,500.00 .WED 'r'. ISI. Tax Co'Lucto. dl AL-crofitrllecl with bard Order 00155 EA' R,I f . t . U Bond #U 806496 BOND AGAINIST TAXES Premium: $55.00 i JN t•hI1I0�I�,A ,�121ll, Y TIES£ PR1S£.�:,S: THAT - DAME CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. , as principal ' and (Surety) UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE CG.MPA.4Y a corporation t organized and existing under the la::s of the State of WASHINGTON and authorized to transact surety business in California as surety are held and firmly bound unto the County of Contra 's Costa, State of California, in the penal sum of FIVE THOUSAND . FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 - Dollars ($5,500.00 ), to be paid _ t to the said ,County of Contra Costa, for the payment of which well and truly to be made, ti:e and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Sealed -with our seals and dated this 9th day of April , 19 76 The conditions of the above obligation is such that WHEREAS, the above bounded principal is about to file a map entitled - Tract 4627 ' s j and covering a subdivision of a tract of land in said County of Contra Costa, and there are certain liens for taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, a,ainst the said Tract of land covered by said map, which.-taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, are not as yet due or payable, 21017.. THEREFORE, if the said PRINCIPAL shall pay all of the taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are a lien against said tract of land covered by said Leap, at the time of the filing of said map of said Tract, then this obligation- shall be void and of no effect. Otherwise it shall .re- main in full force and effect. DA-14IMSi CONSTRUCTION ., INC. • Principal . UNITED PACIFIC INSURANC E COMPANY Surety / /-- By �j ; Georgy .'Krueger, Attorney in fact (BY SUiLTY) State of California Coull t y a i Conrrn Cr►arw • County In .:;.ich ac .no:=ledsericnt is taken. On April 9, 1976 , befog-e r,:e, S. Ann Krueger , a Notary P=take, in and for said Courty� anti State, perzonaily appeared George H. Krueger knw-•n to me to be attorney n tact • o? Lhe corpora 41on tl:a t exec).L'ecl the ::;.thin also kno,.: l to s::e to be tl:r: E,E::;C)n who e.:ectitc.d it or. �)C•�Ia] !' V i :L1�1: CC)T'j)�t;',. is S_% l: + t'C:;P. l t'.."�.' to me t!i:1 t '-1nth corporal:.on e:ceilt=Cu the pur.stl::ni. to 7.t:i by--la*-"-i or a resolutiolI LTI.trRt lig}137 Efi'J.11l� �. . . - r� rac of tir►f.:T'y S. Ann Krueg er 9156 w. . �i" Bond #U 806402 • ^s. INPROI'E M T SECURITY BO`N'D Premium' $2219:00 . ! SUBO1�'1510:'i :.GR1641.'iT ' (f 1 performance 4 maintenance, AND labor b materials) (Cam. Bus, 6 Prof. Code 311612) c_;: : :;; ION. r�•-- ........(Pr.iAcl aTT' CONSTRUCTIONCO. INC. a as Principal, an (Suretyr rr r , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of w ()q and authorized to transact surety business in California, as Surety, hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the County of Contra Costa, California, to pay it: (A. faithful performance 6 maintenance) ONE HUNDRED FORTY SEVEN THOi SAND • Ealrm wmnopn A" %inftgn Dollars ($147.4Q(]_QO ) for itself or any city-assignee under the below-cited subdivision contract, plus B. labor 6 materials) ONE HUNDRED FORTY SEVEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND %"-) 100 Dollars ($147.900.00 ) for the benefit of persons protected us: __ Cal. Bus. C Prof. Code §11612. 2. RECITAL OF SUBDIVISION CONTRACT. The Principal has contracted with the County to install and pay for street, drainage, and other improvements in Subdivision Number 4627 as specified in the Subdivision Agreement, and to complete said work within t e time specified in the Subdivision Agreement for completion, all in accordance with State and local laws and rulings thereunder in order to satisfy conditions for filing of the final map for said Subdivison. 3. COND MONK. If the Principal faithfully performs all things required of hila according to the terms and conditions of said contract and improvement plan and improve- ments agreed on by hiss and the County, then this obligation as to Section 1-(A) above shall become null and void, except that the guarantee'of maintenance continues for the one-year period; and if he fully pays the contractors, subcontractors, and persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to then for said work and improvements, :::d p:uiects the premises =r= c_airs of 5=h :iens, then this obligation as to • Section 1-(B) above shall become null and void; otherwise this obligation remains in full force and effect. ' No alteration of said contract or any plans or specifications of said work agreed to by the Principal and the County shall relieve any Surety from liability on this bond; and consent is hereby given to make such alterations without further notice to or consent by Surety; and the Surety hereby waives the provisions of Calif: Civil Code 52819, and holds itself bound without regard to and independently of any action against Principal whenever taken, and agrees that if County sues on this bond, Surety will pay reasonable attorney fees fixed by court as costs and included in the judgment. SIGNED AAD SEALED on APRIL 9 1976 PRINCIPAL SURETY D4A• ,CONSI �i CO., INCL--- UtIII ACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY By t/ 7*..r. xa;"�i✓ t {Q facer •�tt.N.......�.••�..�................r.►.u..^.` rTi.w.•....�+ 0....as •s�rs.�r7t r► stare of California )ss. (ACKNOWLEDOIENT BY SURETY) County of -Contra Costa ) On A13ri1,9, 1976 the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above. for Surety anU who is known to we to be tht Attorney(s)-in-Fact for this Corporate Surety, personally appeared before re and ackrowIet!ged to ee that he/they signed the name of the Corporation as Surety and his/their own ranes(s) as its Attorneys)-in-Fact. a OIfiICi_\L S�1L /� ,�i�n...�-/' .�.� R Ct CZCIO -c—� � •' .". _,;.-.CALIF,?' . (NOTARIAL SEAL)T,,a CC;T;, Chu`:iY Notary Public for said"Ccunty a State S. Ann Krueger (LD 3174) 116crOtilmed with E>J:..Q 0:ciet 0915 • F, I IN THE BOMD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of the map of Subdivision 4761, RESOLUTION NO. ?6/126 San Ramon Area. ) WHEREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4761, property located in the San Ramon area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. U806403) issued by United Pacific Insurance Company with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., as principal, in the amount of $132,000 for Faithful Performance and $132,500 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 134998, dated April 9, 1976), in the amount of $500.00, deposited by: Dame' Construction Company, Inc. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full, and the 1976-77 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March 1976, is estimated to be $10,500 in combination with Subdivision 4721; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. U806405) issued by United Pacific Insurance Company with Dame' Construction Company, Inc., as principal, in the amount of $10,500 (in combination with Subdivision 4721), guaranteeing the payment of the estimated 1976-77 tax; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is also APMMD. the foras,oin,, ordar was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Surervisor J. 3. lioriartr, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. A9S3 dT: Selz r:Tis�^ ?o��ess . A33T_A,T . Sure_-visor ,x. Dias . Supervisor Dias st-ted 4:.at he. wished the record to show ha abst!3 nt e fre h :=oti:- for the reason t+_at he is =art employee of the Foundo-s Tit-I., Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Dame' Construction Company, Inc. P. 0. Box 100 San Ramon, CA 94583 ' SURSIV1SION AGI EBMT . ' •' (51) sumie3sfo:e: 4761 (8. 4 P. Code 10511611-12) (51) I dirJda i:o ns rue n • - till F.stectty aDate: (51) Caopletion Period: ne year ' (54) Deposits: A: (cash) 4500 B. (bonds, ate.) . 1. (faithful formaace • i majutenaaco) $132.000.00 2. (labor 4 materials)$- 00 I- PARTIES DATE. Effective on the-above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, horoMier called '�Ce_�y", and the obor:as=ed Subdivider, mutually ' • promise and agree as follow conccsnuC this subdivision: 2. 1I+Pib>i' 1'S. Subdivider shall connruct, install and complete road and street frprospmts, tract drainage, street si ,' s, fAre hydrants, and all foprovements .as required by the County OrZinancc Code. especially Title 9, and IncludIng future anewhents, and al: iar+rovcmcccts required In the agpr8ved 3asproveomt pian of this subdivision on fila in the County's Public t:crks Dapartrumst: . Subdivider shall complete this work and ILpro►eoeats (hereinafter calla: "irork'') within: the above completion period from date hereof as required by the California Subdivisicm )tap Act (Business & ftvfessia s Code 1511300 and following), In a good Work- • aaaliku manner, In accordance with accepted construction practices and in a mor egisl or superior to tbas requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and whore there is a conflict between the impsovz=&t pian and the County Ordinance Code, the'stricter requ=rcaents shall govern. 3. GUALENTC@ G MAiaTEMMME. Subdivider guarantees that the work is and will be free ITUMS md will person satisfacrorillr in accordance with Article 94-4.4 of the County Ordinance Code; said he shall maintain it for one year after Its complatiow and rccep:ance against any defective crorkranship or materials or any uesatisfactory performance. . 4. 115 :El59►T SHIPR ice: DEPOSIT G VMS. thorn executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to business 4 P6 essio:es Code 511612, deposit as security with the County: . A. Cash: 4500 cash; and.... • -Be -2 s. etc.: (1 - fai=hsial perfQ:rance G mas.tenance) additional security for at least the above-srecifled amount, which is the total estimated cost of. the-work less 4300, in the fry of a cash d-osit, a cortificd or cashier's chock, or an acceptable corporate surety turd, guaraeteeing his faithful perforrance of this agreement and nainterrace of the work for a-.e year .after completion and acceptance th.croof against. ate• defective. aae3cr.anship or cz:erlals or imy nes=:is:„ctsry performance; plus (2- lelor 4 materials) another such addizienal security in no. least the alrjre-speei s�`Te` amount, which is trie full acount of said esti-.—ted cost, securi:.p pay--enz to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons re.-Lin; equipcent or furrishirg labor or materials to thrs or to the Subdivider. S. KArUIXTT. Snadivider w:.rrants that said irrrovenment plan is adequate to • accomplish thi k s prwdsea -"n Section 2; arA if, at•an;: :i=v beforesIK• Courtyrs • resolution of completion for the scllirislou, the improremat plan proves to be irad.r:czto Ju any respect, Subditi idcr shall :aLe charges necessary to aeco=pl ish the work as provis:•d, Mkiabo d with board - 1 - VVU • 12: Ri-CQ:;D `•:1P. In consideration =:ereo.`, County shall allot. Subdivider to file and record the Final Map or farce; l:rp for s:.id Subdivision. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) VERNON L. CLINE, . Public Works Director Dame' Construction Co. Inc . , a corporation By By President Deputy _ (Designate official capacity in the business) Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknoi:ledg.-a.t RKONVEND£D FOR APPROVAL: form below; and (2) if a cor oration, a::fix corporate seal. Br /.-moi Assistant Publ r s ecto (CORPORATE SEAL) FORM APPROVED: JOI?,\ B. CL USEN, County Counsel By Deputffl * * * * * State of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership, County of Centra Costa ) ss. or Individual) On April 14, 1976 the persons; ::hose name(s) islare signed a:oce for Sub-':ridar and who is/are knoun, to me to be the ireividuai(s) and officer(s) or partner(s) as sated above who signed this instrument, rerscnally appeared before me and ackrow.ledged to ne, zEat -he executed it and that the corporation or-partnership named above executed it. 13 ,. Vaasa:.=aaaa.a�:a9areiaraat �i%� LILLIAN 1 Vr ::ti a ti — (NOTARIAL SEAL) ► cert-.. _s::, , �Jsav a Lillian L. Worth ii biy Cp^sissioa Yrirz3"ty It.1976 Notary Flub!_;c :Or Said COL•:ILy 3 c: State.�" ' (Subdiv. Agrnt. CCC Std. Fort:) LD-9 (Rev. 9/75) -J- 0016Q w_ 6. 1.00 h'JlIM I'M CMC.7Y. Inspection of the work and/or Lsiterials, or approval . "of word: and/or materials inspecLi , or statement by any officFr, agent or ouplayae of eke County InOcatinl; the work or any part thereof carplics with the requirwMits of this Aireeiaent, or acceptance of the whole or any Fart of said cork and/or nat`rials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of those acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions Isereof. 7. 110MOVITY. Subdivider shall held harmless and indemnify the indmnitees from the liabMiticc-us defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by ibis promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, cacmissions, officer.4, rgents .am employees. S. 11w liabilities protected .against are any liability or claim for 'danago of any kind allegedly suffered. incurred or threatened because of. actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, propdrty damage, inverse condemnation, or any eonbirstion of these, and regardless of whither or not such liability, claim or damage was cnforeseeaale at any tine before the County approved the icprovecent plan or •accepted the inproti eaents as cc mplcted, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceedirg(s) concerning these. • C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (rogligert or non-negligent) in connection lith tha matters tatered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of thea. - D. Iron-Conditions: The promise and a%reement in this section is not conditioned or dcp6Wc_nt on whetior or not any Indonnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged nam se resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Inceanitee. 8. CAST:.. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the stark, including Inspections thereof and'Yelocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed cap and to the satisfaction of the County Road Co=lssioner-Surveyor. 10. WNPLTIFOR11-MME AND COM If Subdivider fails to complete the York and Improvements within the tine specified in this Agreement or extensions granted, County nay,procec3 to complete them by contract or otherwise. and Subdiilder shall pay the costs and diargcs therefor i-mediately upon dermnd. If County s:.es to compel perforranco of this Agreement or recover the cost of cra•,leting the irpro:-ements, Subdivider shall - pay all reasonable attorneys' -ilrees. costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation Incurred by County in connection therewith. 11. ASSaC'-\'t EXT. If before Cot my accepts these improvements, the subdi t=sion Is annexed to 4 city, the County r..ay assign to that city the County's rights under this lgrecaeut and/or ant deposit or bund securing them. oU�ss � v t3 j FON ARD W.iCAL ALFRED P.Lo!»EI.I 13 cou.�ey Tr.a»urrt-Tax cotlwetm Xaas!=t Geaat j T:wswrr- Tax co!:--tog CL`LL='C.TQ::'S OFFICE rimt U11211aen1o:Taxes /�� -�jr+r`� �,tt c •-i (' Tri �'(j FUZZ xis!oftment of Taxes i Dua cnJ Payal,le COIN R-A .C..027A 1. OU-NI 1 1 Delsngti.sst on 1-4a.i?rst Dat 0 Novecbet so the Trath Day of CsC*=htr �AcTL\EHAUSt:�IA ————f ——— Eacvnd bstctlmrnt of Taxes Cat.:ISS Se — tmxnt oTaxes r.6e and Por*hle Dstin •eat on 11,n Firt Da of Fotxvo R- r tr Febrr4.zy 9s 1976 on the Tenth Day of Aped i { ' IF ?-ITIS `l:�i 15 ::OT FILED BY Q:iTSE-P. 31s 1976 s THIS LETER IS VOID This wkU certify that I bave exra*rired the fr'.D of the proposed subdivi,icn entitled: IMACT 1.0. 472 -a�d j TRACT NO x:76.1 ara bare Bete=i.red from the oaficir-1 6.ax r"ords that there arty ra um-?-'d Couni..' taxes heretofore levied mi tLe property inclu::sd in the trap. The 1975-75 tax lie.* Baas been Fail in full'. OuresLi=-ta cf th; 1976-71 tam. Z=eus which oecz=e a _cn on the first day of 2arc::s 1(r?c, 10,500-00 BDI.-'l. J t•. MILL _ Tar- i:ollector . APR ,� t G,, tt. dl t{ t . 11 ja0fiimed with board order 0:)162 Fc-a D IMPROYE'n%1' SECURITY BOhD Bond #U 806403 _ R SU ::BDIVISIO A;RF,E"ft.'.`r Premitri: $1988.00 AP;? 19'16 ( aithful performance & r-aintenance, AND labor b materials) J. R. O_SSON (Calif. Bus. b Prof. Code x11612) CLEwK COA: : Or SUPERVZORS 1 CO;:•.k.k COSTA CO. 1. CATION. (Principal) PAMF1 : n •r , As Principal, an (Surety) MITPD PaCTFIr TNS GO'iPA?3Y , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of yj6,qgTyr and authorized to transact surety business in California, as Surety, hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the County of Contra Costa, California, to pay it: (A. faithful Qerfor-.-ance6 maintenance) 011E HUNDRED THIRTY TWO THOUSAND • AND NO/1 -------- ---Doll azs (S 132,000 3 for itself or any city-assignee under-the below-cited subdivision contract, plus (B. labor 6 materials) ONE HUNDRED THIRTY TWO THOUSAND FIVE LumnRFn AT1A uQ/100---------- Dollars (S 132.500 ) for the benefit of persons protected under Cal. Bus. 6 Prof. Code §11612. 2. RECITAL OF SUBDIVISION CONTIMM The Principal has contracted with the County to install and pay for street, drainage, and other improvements in Subdivision Number 4761 as specified in the Subdivision Agreement, and to complete said work t within e time specified in the Subdivision Agreement for completion, all in accordance with State and local laws and rulings thereunder in order to satisfy conditions for filing of the final map for said Subdivison. 3. CONDITION. If the Principal faithfully performs all things required of him according to the teras and conditions of said contract and improvement plan and improve- ments agreed on by him and the County. then this obligation as to Section 1-(A) above shall become null and void, except that the guarantee'of maintenance continues for the one-year period; and if he fully pays the contractors, subcontractors, and persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to then for said work and improvements, =-.d p_u:ects :he pr=:scs `rza c:airs c` s::zh liens, the:: this obligation as to • Section 1-(B) above shall become null and void; otherwise this obligation remains in full force and effect. ' No alteration of said contract or any plans or specifications of said work agreed to by the Principal and the County shall relieve any Surety from liability on this bond; and consent is hereby given to rake such alterations without further notice to or consent by Surety; and the Surety hereby waives the provisions of Calif: Civil Code §2819, and holds itself bound without regard to and independently of any action against Principal whenever taken, and agrees that if County sues on this bond, Surety will pay reasonable attorney fees fixed by court as costs and included in the judgment. SIGNED A\'D SEALED on APRIL 9, 1976 PRINCI DA`i$' r, %NST4UCTIO1.4 CO., INC. SURL"1 Y•_Uk. iTED PACIFIC INSURMICF. CO`I?AN.Y 8y CaorRe It. •Kfrdeger, Attorney Tn acc irfl/f•!ff!!•�..lff!!!f►!�!lflfflflfl�flff!•!!!!!!!f!f!!.!f!♦!f!1111!/ff llff lli►w1f!l11M , State of California )ss• (ACYNO LEDDIEN-r BY SURETY) County of Contra Costa ) On Anril 9, 1976 the persen(s) whose names) is/are signed above-for Surety and who is known to tae to be the Attorne.v(s)-in-fact for this Corporate Surety, personally arpeared before re and ackn,- let!ged to me that he/they signed the name of the Corporation as Surety and his/their o:.n nanes(s) as its Attorneys)-in-Fact. 2i0T.1RIAL SIALr- �� " � ;H.,, ( ) _ ', •• tar?- Publicfor said Ccunty and S6Acc S. Ann Krueger ••' ,moo. ;n;_:,_-... } . '.. " (LD 3/7C) ;.►:uu.i. ied with board ord10163 ,;, 5 i e � t % �, r; z e k df w� I` ,li ';!Y `13s 4!j I s III% j� j PI I k y' I e ppk's i.s r. J 15r to+ + O:IM e R µ4:;'$t?S'�a' �S,a L.f r 9 d a t"e,+e i ggi f isss .1i 49 zz �,r �i,i ) f I'.:,I 7 ii liY I,n' ,rgli Cao ,NIII �1 c..,1xi i}t,Y .,.4 S �`3 '':...vA x. t ay �',� -,a, �' § �.¢5c1 Y�3 I {7 ': );P! ,f. 3101 ',I Ili' ', II!,C '.y �gg l�t,.fi ile� `bFu ., et`' ,y"�:`� M tiR f'2 'E� R! :A ' 4 ...,,z t :s z w r+`t .jt ai7ei S � ��17 j I s �I.!.,o II �'i II�'i r, §I�i i 4 K b$r�r 6 rl 3 F'^'�r7,,g .a k;,4 ea t• �h .� r q C €.f r' �r t.t.� •� .-3 ter P I$I k a �'��"'l�� _ r� +;II+���j MMy;4y s� " , t .:, 4 K ,� s,, t t n n k s § k I`I.. IIS 11 p,` ?.,}4ff138 .s:� .,��•/ 'V aK,L r r+ a'`. x. R' n. .n x} ,ye �„ ^{ i' F,r, `hk,r..ra- r raiJl niIl 8 III i�',. � 1a Baa "t .a t: + +f art s€ . y r s,I i >;-a`talh x rz •,3 6 o ,i. ��. nu 'iI ppI a. 'h*d re� y ._ z z`"' �E £�.s'y"s -. n /� � �`k t rk � R d 3 ililll III�!�1; °� rf k. •e. r? q ,A et rb l't/ LH •#1.# �J.#1s!R F fII���tlt'�Q� gp,l x y� a srR31I ':11 ti, VV, $pill4p j0 € � -�� s '`�Z t111i: ogyw. $ ' n' bb41 1 Pr = w'' }r f f aU� Yfi '}^. 4. .m• Q„E i F' f%94 ;b.'�, u',`:'Y�/,i.n14Wf .r� f5 fi "` J S', "',S �' . da'`-t� E� x"^3.1 "� „. �Zat^ti�7 tJ.� i • 3 s,, ay r ,,,.; ��, �t� 's�i,.-'J;��� - s A ,m., r.: �. '4� x'` �'>u .t' ;, M 1` jl} x j 'mT,-'Ai �"'Fy�eh'. z �"' .'� 34; s�ii. -`f4IM,,',T � W . � vq �,t" , IMm p V � ..a< �'�"€ -- ,,- ,z t ,`r ✓x s � s's 'ys slr ` „v- <a r., §N ,t4"'yy' S 'J 'w ^r ;r-' r5 'P15 '' ,.i` �. f. X'n Y' 1 sl'" s. *3, �- €rs a� a. a x a f ~4• b y x u s ?- a"n' a ;:�',6p,�d --- a z_, ;. �,m a w r t x + A ' � � al�d" Sa.33'Li.•:'� Iri �0�1�1aa#RcsWa s r tolE� �: �r a Ciro4 . .r c r `,ice * ��� ,fa r ..sY tt '• "€Ii�Far _— xg under the la�S of the Stade lot ,, , 3 or.�a��'i.�e l and exist- ,,,, k �.�.I, - . _ 9„y' "'`a,ar,...,.,t.5'-,�^Y`s t's«.. t $ �,, fi r r °S3"XSt g. ski ^T c a — `` x 4 F �_1 , 6 t sand autho;*izi to tkAnsac �sux'oty business in�.Ca�l a n -_ a ��u -I � u t t ri k x ,t a J' W, ., ,'�''�, e �.. `ani �. r f W , f a t ris r.�. k 1_ � ,� 5 �eLyreh+ sand Firmly bound unto the= Counter o ,C.on � �� iVx'��'�£`�'k` 4ie- w,x k ,.t y a '.z >ti ?,, ws-, #a.t ..,:f ° ,13.r��s�,€ tro„� ' ro}^>-. rr ► H @ - f iaPLR*` �Ai1iRS1M1 .,#�l, �lCos .a;- ��;� a .xeroF� a3 iornia, in the .per.>s.l sum o }t .i'SS' 4. ' j h .,.x -Y' � 3 � itl1+1DRFsD �AND.,�O% ,� f Do?.lars �, °lo,sIQQ.Qo gip, , - bei 1, qti A. , "' .g ' i z x i X y i w � k ' x 3, �. ,i,`'y} ;, �i.��e said Courby off' Gon�ra Cosa, fair chez p _ __cn. o rah ch 1 n y I "af i. a �� G Y t ,�"3t.4 ro'"§" .. Via- t F t a . ;�. � . ` s a nd ourselves ou hefrst,,;�, ys to be ma3e Tie nd eac2i of us bi ' r M1 r , '� , a � 8?!d `Seib'@ ' �'d'mi: is tors anti successors �oint�y~ " e�.ecutors, M A rtP � I __ � � .sv }L2ese presents: > ,� ��x _ f � �� ��L",.az e?, 7,1 ? ♦3 $`'",# t x ir" k �ps.s f - 9riA 1'f f 9thF E da; o , `, 4, 3 rad.c aitlT oTTr' :tale and dated this �; , t , 3Y, �� -- �x E '< h �� � a v Ay x '`y , e;,`i i rh `r rv7"2. w 1�,�„w!. .�„+��` r F z�}, ,�k";. L �' - k „ ' 4`` ,� ' �The cont�3i.ir�tis ar Lhe atiie o3li�atibn is 4such�tha � IER�S Z >�$"'` n v •3ec1 *3�r�ci 1 is about i<o File a a entVtlec fi � ti - �, t�3e zab6 ,I_ dun. p 1{ - x�x w lractst 4721 4761 �" ��r��` a . ' y �4 P b " ",. - p zr ,�w�. �� y , r roF w - � � d. ,iaion o£ aracL off' `a and ;ins s �,d ,C�tT�t'�ot. r� -ztd� nv �: �,,, a �,�. +�_ , Erb o t� 3TC �in♦,ia�... t1���:-j �tl..l 4Ct ,,j /�',(' t 2i C1►2 tt�1' • 'apeV..La�k t' ov ♦ ' # s+CG 3 an �x , " gyp} ': /�j } � p7 s t tn�: s.tp, Fract oi' r� covercd b � � . ._i. ,�V �e"M{► 4i •. +VY o•►� .'"'+�:��a "" V ,.r k t 'Y ";wA, ,,- rd's Ly ,r,X`F.sy siaYy,r A e ,a� — Y map �j j *,c 1 r., xg. end ,gccial,y assessmc�ats co],l�cLc as xe ,►� - a 3Tot c1& �C . t T1C O ' pry' l� L r es�� r �,. Y I ;. f >F n.: 1 r '.s Wim, — r >•1 < t e *":F r 3",'! 8M S.uwW sz,y^.c i'a"a " " n {�i'Ui, 1�1�.1�3bi , F er3ncpal. � �R _-- ni s col pec :4 a �j, :�a 3 E Y aj� ;ot' #.he s an% speciA 3 assess.R - „ u c" �'> f,°, y ��cl�;=ai�C 11. ,2t S4 said 'tract: of is io covee e.��rb�sa - t .tlxe ti znc aF the :f ilii o said a p, of said ;�t then' th i , Pa --- b ° o, s x: . 'ot :•bid az:c `aF - " z�'tect. O he' s ;I, sYia t � - ' 9 �.uFull 'a�c : :�,a ei'F�ct� wx � y -_ Y R ! r c � ; k ", €' � — t4 k t s _ a.z ,t,r' aa`r 3' �t t'`s`{� F � r ' : ,.3 .mA,! :°`" y' 'w 5 +," ,'.4 Z7p' ! y �i y, rf 4"µ �-1 _ II" ,,x,t`�` M,, i ,� I " e '' zap`'?F: "4"". Xaa 8 `'v*,,,•& ��-i! DNLTED°PACI ZNSUItAt+TCF M ',�. r a,$, '� ur '�-e elf h . ( t +: ,"` " s,+'.. E�N Y .k 4 C lf�q S„ •f``t � +A,�iiw —_— a x C is �. frF- ,a w , ry I,�;` �" ,�* ,.A. r"g'^n x `^ i2 •" P x '�` ''"s{fF w, '4 "�y.ew-.j �' Az*✓`•d,"'+y3 a " s 71# sa+ 11; lir. fi ... • w �.a l.A 1 •a,� -YY{iLiM. ,W�ta'� ' syr ...,« `� o'er . "�* o-vm " rr # �: ;� T..t1a,�il aR'ia L.' 1`-kiF�':1 1.i Cr air.•1Z `'' � a""f ;w T2a•• C��� 1►pril 9. 197bp , ;..+=,.�•.. •aJ ;S. tNAa Krueger ,, UPP, x;J Pttt�,r' c_ ;�•2`����t� atlas': .�;a~ „+ia A .�I_' 4+ i �. .�.t;f La�"i �. . L .. ; i!:"",4•a3 L �r r .�....,,�....�t' .. ^.a a. George 8 :Krueger _ ktl+s �•, �:tI f� h attoXlle$ in ;faCG � ��� • �' u�i:a t.tr` ;+yt#' uiCti't 1,F«. l•X{�cz�l�L~Cj; € t�♦: Ca Gx "Yk ,raa, ` � u , K Gtr : a a� .� i. + t i :t,F♦ . : :�: i _1 +t tt.,' i �� Al _ �T �' I+baa i i . a s L { t �. IS • a. i ;' v uI } w. 1,-�" ;'„ :.*. R+' aka.* . ai . �;..* ,�00� -ara; Cj" ! • :tS' iF:' a.TTGfi Cil i-c? � aF.{�F (,/++ 2 ,C' Z.3'31 :3t, to i aatt, q tw ," 33 + • _.y 1 a ; a+ ',♦ �' , Ni t`• '(�aiii•t' �t. ' Ti'it'•+�-- 't - lE YIr °>at �. I t. .� i w 1 j* * a s 1 • � » .. E}1 .f.�. "' ,,L,+ z, prc�.`� X s =` r F x"t a. - , 1+,r •t a e.,,� z �.'�wr�/.�y��'z�.t�t#a te* - ,r _ ♦ �_( ,:;t, tt""" f,n,;t4T.� ,,.. k�� {�� �3 .s... '. Vis'.¢+ i.i�ia.'.w7,s:ew � .1.� S "'l,.�k R.�k$ t JCI ♦ �:,, • k'*,£�M" �F" ftp xrur y"" ws ♦+�"+ fi a !aa ��+M.a" 'wtF�,3'a« ;� ti y' ar - "rne ' s, t't e 1v,°1+,k S;•s. wis..,,v, x .. #I A I„„dt'" (� u�w ;� �r i W CI '� dE !all P '+gy �,p3ia q}:Yp,. fD"+ ' > ''_:. '?"' ..'.,�" ,� .r+�:.�{r +4r # z t, ..•7�+. �►.4YP.. a��' a, ;t. e� I�.VISI �I��o�,l t .a f ' # " ' ta � �a ; ' } ��I �I�!i611���1�1!IO�IIiIf�1l y' t a a g 5,�'?:> '1k L k�'" s �,r � t ,Jf`i ., `' '.�. " .-v°A s �� �I II N III �'� I�f, y+ o-r '` n.9 3.s z`e 'tY . xw.r<,�-. r ren--r'",� &L" uz' III ii l 11 I, s ,, ..t,,.ro .,.` .„k ,., h..r. «...a. t ? a�gi III' + h.^~ t k,'r rS..-.,. ,I# ',.a. ....; -a..:.` :i, p h.s'�T.-,b* $, , ,. I 3: P .' ' "I i' ! o f z� {, �>4,,.w. ''`.s..a.roa">w.fd.d..' ; ., t..rir ,.:v'nFr a ,•,Y'... 'k �•€�., ;,'4�"`:g''# .. rs. ,.� t,li§,. ala....�M },Si 4�- Ii�1 tls IP s�!S�I�II�'�I�� III �I $ «,N ;.>�`„' ` ,,,-r.:," i�"!F'R,�r:."�'`.�" "r'llnlo9s �_r*.+* l', :,;. .I R1 w"a „!�,",:�.�ais 'r,�. , .�,R. �n �Iv .. .4_��,�.8. �. . „ _ n 1 _ IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION N0. 76/327 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 197S-76 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished by the assessee which caused the assessor to assess taxable tangible property at a substantially higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll had the _ information been correctly furnished; therefore, assessor certifies .. to the auditor that the following corrections should be made on the assessment roll in accordance with Section 4831.S of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund. An audit discloses the following changes should be made on the unsecured assessment roll in the name of Gallagher $ Burk, Inc: Year 1975-76: Class of Original Corrected Amount Code-Assmt.# Property Assessed Assessed of Value Value Change 02002-32 Pers Prow 515, 3'T5 — - 0S 08001-3398 Pers Prop 26,7S0 21,120 - 5,630 09000-2864 Pers Prop 14,670 9,77S - 4 ,89S 66129-2001 Pers Prop 232,930 226,890 - 6,040 Year 1974-7S: 79038-2101 Pers Prop $4S,870 $41 ,785 -$4,085 I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON, Ass' t. Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel t 4/8/76 By Depu cc. Assessor (G. Giese) Atl�ptzd by th2Eoardor+..__ Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 76/327 Page I of I 00165 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/328 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous a„essments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessment: For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund: FURTHER, in accordance with Section 4985(a) , any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached shall be canceled by the auditor on order of the Board of Supervisors on the following assessment. Assessor used an incorrect address on the tax bill, erroneously changing it from the correct address. As a result, the assessee did not receive the tax bill or notice thereof. Code 02002 - Assessment ,No. 2832 - For Year 1975-76 In name of Robert B. Pence Assessed dba Thrifty Wash Coin Laundry Value 4665 Springwood Way Pers Prov 320 Concord, CA 94521. Imps 970 I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEAT N, Asst. assessor JOHN B .-NCLAU C t ounsel t 4/8/76 ' " By Deputy Ac'optcd by the Board on---AEP...?.0-12ZE_�..... cc: Assessor (G. Giese) Audi for Tax Collector RESOLUT-10:: NO. 76/328 Page 1 of l __. 00165 -44 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COMM, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOWTION H0. 76/329 - RE: Rescind Board's Resolution Number 76/260 Relating to ) Parcel 018-110-015 in Code Area 58016 . ) 1 Upon application of the County Auditor for rescission of Board's Resolution relating to transfer of tax lien to the unsecured roll, the Board of Supervisors finds as follows: 1. The Board's Resolution Number 76/260 where tax lien for 1975-76 on Parcel No. 018-140-015 was cancelled and transferred to the Unsecured roll Was improper because both installments of taxes were paid before valid procedures could be completed by the Auditor's Office. 2. Since both installments have been paid, there are no outstanding taxes due for 1975-76 . NOW, THEREFORE it is by the Board Ordered that the Board's Resolution Number relating to transfer of tax lien to the 1975-76 unsecured roll on Parcel No. 018-W-015 in Code Area 58016 amounting to 3.69 be rescinded. I hereby request the above action: I hereby consent to the above amendment JOIN B. LAUSEN, UNTY COUNSEL 1 v! ' r BY , Deputy H. D0�1 DD�FU11K' COUM AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Adopted by the Board this 20tnday of April 19 76 . cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector (2) County Administrator County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 76/329 00167 IN THE BOARD OF SUPF-:RVISORS OF COUTRA COSTA CO:TY, STA'T'E OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) RESOLTITION NO. 76/330- of 6/330-of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) ?iEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NON'j THE? FORE, IBIE IT RE30TX7EU that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1970 - 1976 It has been ascartaired from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessorts Office what was intended and what should have been assensed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/nr form and clsrical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; and in accordance with Sections 4086 and 5C96 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessee mRy file a claim for cancellation or refund: Code 600CI - assessment No. CO211 boat CF 7820 CH is erron- eously assessed to Jay R. Finch, assessed value $390. Since Mr. Finch was not the ormer of this boat on the lien date, this assess- ment should be corrected to zero value. Code 76CC6 - Assessment No. 0036, boat CF 3560 Fm is erron- eously assessed to George IT. .Harrions, assessed value :'BGC. Since Mr. Ham-tons was not the ormer of this boat on the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. Code 79111 - Assepament Nn. A2128, aircraft #8h397 is erron— enusly assessed to Rob Fergusson and ?Mike voungauist, assessed value 98C0. Since the situQ of this aircraft has been determined to be Marin County where it hA s been gsnesied for 1975-76, this a messmert should be corrected to zero vsl ue. R. 0. Seaton As3istRnt !_a2e.3s'or cc.: Assessor (G_ese) Audi for Tax Collector REs•or ease 1 of 2 �.,�U .Zo.<N <„o. 76/330� 00168 i Code 79111 - Assessment No. A2172, aircraft ;;1827 M is erron- enusly assessed to Roger 11. Goreell, assessed value $34CO. Since this aircraft was moved out of state prior to the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. Code 82014 - Assessment No. CC50, boat CF 2849 AR is erron- eously assessed to Joseph H. Docmock, assessed value $680. Since this boat was sold prior to the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. Code 82C4. - Assessment No. 01592 boat CF 7160 AF is erron- eously assessed to Michael C. Boss: assessed value $220. Since this boat was sold prior to the lien nate, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. FURTHER, .for the fiscal year 1973-74 Code 82C38 - Assessment No. Q,%6, boat CF 5544 BR is erron- eously assessed to Gale talker, assessed value $184C. Since this boat was sold prior to the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: JO1W B. CLAUSEN County Counsel 1 R. 0. Seaton Deputv Assistant Assessor _ Adopted by tl:c Board on-.-ARB n=19111 RESOLU'T'ION 110. 76/330 Page 2 of 2 00169 f n 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving Plans ) and Specifications for the Amherst ) Avenue Reconstruction Project, ) Kensington Area. ) RESOLUTION N0.76/331 (Proj . No. 1552-4300-76) ) WHEREAS Plans and Specifications for the Amherst Avenue Reconstruction Project in the Kensington area have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and 14HEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and WHEREAS the Public Works Director has advised the Board that this project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class IC Categorical Exemption under the County Guidelines, and this Board concurs and so finds : IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Specifica— tions are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on May 18, 1976 at 11 :00 a.m. , and the Clerk of this Board is directed to pulTish Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law, inviting bids for said work, said Notice to be published in the EL CERRITO JOURNAL . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on April 20, 1976 Originator : Public Works Department Road Design Division cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller County Counsel RESOLUTION IO. 76/331 00170 AMHERST AVENUE PROJECT N0. 1552-4300-76 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MARTINEZ . CALIFORNIA NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS ---------------~----- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY% THAT THE CLERK OF SAID BOARD WILL RECEIVE BIDS UNTIL 11 O'CLOCK A.M. ON MAY lEs 1976% FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR. MATERIALS+ EQJIPf'-`E:ZT• TRA4NSP0RTA1 :ON AND SERVICES FOR AMHERST AVENUE RECCUSTRUCTION THE PROJECT IS LOCATED' ON' AMHERST AVENUE IN THE KENSINGTON AREA THE WORK SHALL BE D3XE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LFFICIAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED IN REFERENCE THERETO. BIDS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE ENTIRE WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN. ENGINEERS ESTIMATE ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT OF NO. QUANTITY MEASURE ITEM 1 1 LS SIGHING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL 2 IFI l 600 CY ROADWAY EXCAVATIO! 3 550 TON ASPHALT CONCRETE 4 1!050 TON AGGREGATE BASE 5 1.250 TON AGGREGATE SUBBASE 6 90 LF ROLLED CURB REPLACEMENT 7 20 LF CURB AND GUTTER REPLACEMENT 8 258 LF GUTTER ONLY REPLACEMENT 9 600 S SAWCUT DRIVEWAYS (CONTINGENT SUM — � PAID AS EARNED) f I L E D APRit ZC ,. A, 04:"--4 CL-CM BOARD 0;= 1RA TA crofitro,,u v,c►rrs board ordai N - 1 00,171 NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS ICONT. 3 �rrrrNi�rrM-�YrrrrMMrr� FILCH PROPOSAL IS TO RE IN ACCORDAXCC WITH THE PLANS AND SPECI— FICATIONS ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPER— VISORS• ROOM 103• COUNTY ADVINISTRATICR BUILQING9 651 PINE STREETS M1IRTINEZs CALIFORNIA. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR AT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. STH FLOOR OF SAID COUNTY ADMINISTRATIUN BUILDING& PLANS AND SPECIFICA— TIONS INOT INCLUDING STATE STA::DAR7 SPECIFICATIC41S OR OTHER DOCUMENTS INCLUDED PY REFERENCED AND PRCOPOSAL FORMS9 4MY BE OBTAINED BY PROSPEC— TIVE BIDDERS AT THF PUBLIC WCRKS DEPARTIMFKT* STH FLOOR9 COUNTY ADMINIS— TRATION BUILDING* UPON: PAYMENT CF A PAIRTIXG AND SERVICE CHARGE IN THE AMOUNT CF THREE AUD 73/1C0 DOLLARS 153.731ISALES TAX INCLUDEDI WHICH AMOUNT SHALL NOT BE RE;:L'%r..:?LE". _04ECKS 514ALL RF MADE PAYABLE TO 'THE_ COUNTY CF CONTRP OST:' s AXD SPALL Pf PAM!.!. TO PURL I C WORKS CEPARTMENT s 5TH FLOCR. AO' I NIS RAIIOX PuILDI'ws PARTINEZ. CALIFCRNIA 94593. EACH SID SHALL RF MADE ON A PROPOSAL FORK TO BE OBTAINED AT THE PUBLIC WQRKS DEPARTMENTS STH FLCOEt9 COUHTY ADMINISTRATIOIN BUILDING. BIDS ARE REQUIRED FOR T"E ENTIRE WORK DESCRIBED HEREI`j AND NEITHER PARTIAL NOR CONT I I•GENT P I DS k I LL BE CONSIDERED. A PROPOSAL GUARANTY IN THE AMOUNT OF TEN I10 PERCENT OF AMOUNT BIR SHALL ACCO:IPANY THE PROPOSAL. THE PROPOSAL GUARANTY MAY BE IN THE FORM CF A CASHIERS-S CHECK. CERTIFIED CMECC OR BIDDER'S BOND9 MADE PAYABLE TO THE ORDER OF 'THE COUNTY OF CURTRA CCSTA. ' THE ABOVE—MENTIOUED SECURITY SHALL BE GIVEN AS A GUARANTEE THAT THE BIDDER WILL FNTER INTO A CONTRACT IF AWARDED THE WORKS AND WILL BE FORFEITED BY THE BIDDER AND RETAINED BY THE COUNTY IF THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER REFUSES• NEGLECTS OR FAILS TO :ATEA INTO SAID CONTRACT OR TO FURNISH THE NECESSARY PONDS AFTER BEING REQUESTED TO DO SO BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISCRS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. BID PROPOSALS SHALL BE SEALED AND SHALL RE SUBMITTED TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS• ROOF 1039 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING* 651 PINE STREET. MARTINEZ• CALIFOPKIA* ON OR BEFORE THE 28TH-DAY O YAYs 19769 AT 11 O'CLOCK A.M. AND WILL BE OPENED IN PUBLIC AND AT THE TIME DUE IM THE CHAMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS* RCOY iC7% ADN INISTRATIV: BUILDING* MARTINEZ9 CALIFORKIA9 ANIC THERE READ ANy RECURDE:D. ANY 010 PROPOSALS RECEIVED AFTER Tf4E T I VE SPEC I F I EIS I'll THIS N*DT I CE WILL BE RETURNED UNOP EKED. . NOI I £ TO CORTRACTORS 1CO`2Te l THE SUCCESSFUL P-IDDLR WILL HE RECUIRED TO FURNISH A LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND IN AN AMOUNT ECUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF THE CONTRACT PRICE AND A FA i THrUl. PERFORVAUCE 00e:0% IN AN AMOUNT ECUAL TO ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE CONTRACT PRICE. SAID -IONDS TO BE SECURED FROM A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO RUSINFSS Ih THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BIDDERS ARE HERESY NOTIFIED THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1773 OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE CF CALIFCRNIA9 OR LOCAL LAW APPLICABLE THFRET09 THE SAID BOARD -HAS ASCERTA114ED THE GENERAL PREVAILING RATE OF PER DIEV WAGES AND RATES FOR LEGAL HOLIDAYS AAD OVERTIME WORK Ih THE LOCALITY IN WHICh T11I5 USRR IS TU BE PERFORMED FOR EACH TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC RECUIR_n TO £x:_--CUTE THF CCUTRACT hHICH :ILL BE AWARDED TO - THE SUCCCSSFUL 919DER. THE PREVAILING RATE OF PEP DIEM WAGES IS ON FILE WITH THE CLERK OF "!!E !?CARO OF SUNERVISURS+ AND IS UNCORPCHATED HEREIN . BY REFERENCE 11iEr%E;0* THE SA'%E AS IF SET FORTE: IN FULL HEREIN. FOR ANY CLASSIFICATION NOT INCLUDED IN THE LISTS THE MINIMUM WAGE SHALL PE THE GENERAL PREVAILIAG RATE FOR THE COUNTYs THE SAID BOARD. RESERVES ThE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS OR ANY PORTION OF ANY SID A:D/OP. WAIVE ANY IRREGULARITY IN ANY BID RECEIVED. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY J.R. OLSSON COUNTY CLERK AND EX—OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BY HPUT If Deputy Clerk DATED- APR 2 01976 PUBLICATION DATES— ----------y------M---------- N - 3 00173 AMHERST AVENUE PROJECT NO, 1552-4300-76 BIDS DUE MAY 18* 1976 AT 11 O'CLOCK A.M. ROOM 103* COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDIXG9 651 PINE* STREET* *ARTINEZ* CALIFORNIA 94553 TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CCNTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZs CALIFORNIA P R 0 P O 5 A L F O R LED A R a-4 1976 AMHERST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTI N J. R C=N Gt.R1C PAARi) OF StJPER�/)NABS iRA CO. NAME OF BIDDER BUSINESS ADDRESS - -- _-------r------N- - PLACE OF RESIDENCE TO THE BOARD OF SL'PER`•ISORS CF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THE UNDERSIGNEDs AS BIDDER* DECLARES THAT THE ONLY PERSONS OR PARTIES INTERESTED Iry THIS PROP::SAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE THOSE NAMED HEREIN— THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS 'MALE WITHOUT COLLUSION WITH ANY OTHER PERSON* FIRM OR CORPORATION— THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY EXANIVIED THE LOCATION OF THE PRO— POSED WORKS PLANS AND SPECIFICATIO%S— AND HE PROPOSES AND AGREES* IF THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED9 THAT HE MILL CONTRACT WITH THE CCUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MACHINERYs TODLS9 APPARATUS AND OTHER MEANS OF CONSTRUCTIGNs AND TO DO ALL THE WORK AXD FURNISH ALL THE MATERIALS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTR ACT s IN THE MANNER AND TIME PRESCR I BED* AND ACCORD- ING TC THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE E`aGI SEER AS THEREIN SET FORTH* AND THAT HE 'WILL TAKE IN FULL PAYVE%T T14EREFOR Al AMOUNT BASED ON THE UNIT PRICES SPECIFIED HEREINBELOW F:R THE VAR!CVS ;TE'IS OF WORK* THE TOTAL VALUE OF SAID WORK AS ESTIMATEC HEREIN BEING S ( INSERT TOTAL.) AND THE FOLLOWING BEING THE UNIT PRICES BICs TO WIT— I&aofi(m-u with board orsa 40 P - 1 i PROPOSAL (CONT, ) (PRICE NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) DECIMALS) ---------------------------------------------------------------+--------t--------- ITEM TOTAL ITEM, ESTIMATED UNIT OF PRICE( IN ( IN NO* QUANTITY MEASURE ITEM FIGURES) FIGURES) - ------------------------------------------------------------ — --- -------- 1 1 LS SIGNING A%D TRAFFIC CONTROL 2 19600 CY ROADWAY EXCAVA T ILS\ ------------------------------------------------------------ 3 550 TON ASPHALT CONCRETE 4 1905C TO'I%* ACCREGATE BASE ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------- 5 19250 TON A i::EG:TE SUBBASE -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ------------- 6 . 90 LF ROLLED CU:t3 REPLACEMEc:T --------------------------------------------------------------- — -------------- 7 20 LF CURB AIND CUTTER REPLACEOM.EiI'T - -----------------------------------------------------------r ------- -Y------fir 8 258 LF GUTTER 001ILY REPLACEMENT •------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 --------------- ------ -------- 9 5 SAWCUT v:IVEwAYS (CONTINGENT SWA, — $600 .00 600 PAID AS CARED) — ------------------------------------------------------ NOTE—PLEASE SHOW Tv^TAL ON PAGE P-1 TOTAL ------ --- ------------------------------------ P — 2 PROPOSAL (CCNT. ) ---------------- 1 P� CASE OF A D I SCREPA`;CY BET AE-E&; D'N%'!T PRICES AND TOTALS* THE UNIT PRICES SHALL PREVAIL, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AAD AGREED THAT THE QUANTITIES OF WORK UNDER EACH ITE'a ARE APPROXI"ATE C1LY* BEI,%C= GIME% -0R A BASIS OF CL)NPARISON OF PROPOSAL* AND THE RIGE:T 15 RESERVED TO THE COUNTY TO INCREASE OR DE— CREASE THE AMOUNT OF WORK u%,DER ANY ITEM, AS MAY BE RECUIRED* IN ACCORD— ANCE WITH PROVISIONS SET FC-.TH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECTS IT IS FURTrER oo�DERSTO:;;; AND AGREED THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MONEY SET FORTE; FOR EACH ITE OF e.ZRK CR AS THE TOTAL AMOUNT BID FOR THE PROJECT* DO'ES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AGRLEyENT TO PAY A LUMP SUM FOR THE - WORK UNLESS IT SPECIFICALLY SO STATES. IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE UNDERSIGNED. AS BIDDER* SHALL FURNISH A LABOR AND "ATER!ALS POND 1N A., AMOUNT EQUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS PROP-_'SAL AND A FAITHFUL PERFORr6!ANCE BOND TO BE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT GF THE TOTAL A�JUUr,.T OF THIS PROPOSAL* TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AND AT NO EXPL%SE TO SAID CCUNTY * EXECUTED 5Y A RESPONS- I ULE SURETY ACCEPT ABLE TO SA I U COL:NTY* J% THE EvENT THAT THIS PROPOSAL 15 ACCEPTED BY SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTAo IF THIS PROPOSAL SHALL nE ACCEPTEb AND THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL FAIL TO CONTRACT AS AFORESAI✓ A.%'-'! TO 61VE +'-!E TWO BONDS IN THE SUMS TO BE DETERMINED AS AFORESAID* �,:TH SURETY SATISFACTORY TO THE BOARD OF SUPLRVI SOBS* .:I TH I.X SEVEN (7) GAYS. P,OT I%CLUD I NG SUNDAYS* AFTER THE BIDDER HAS RECEIVED NOTICP_ FROv THE RCA.RD OF SuPERVISCRS THAT THE CON— TRACT IS READY FCR S!5NAT'JRE * THE BVA. RD OF SUPERVISORS MAY s AT ITS OPT 1 ON* DE T ERr,I NE THAT THE BIDDER HAS ABA%D'v%ED THE CONTRACT* AND THEREUPON THIS PROPOSAL AND THE ACCEPTA`.CE 'HEREOF SHALL BE NULL AND VOID AND THE FORFEITURE CF SaCH SECURITY ACCO.MPANY I NG THIS PROPOSAL SHALL OPERATE AND THE SAME SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA• SUBCONTRACTS THE CONTRACTOR AGREES. BY SUBMISSION OF THIS PROPOSAL * TO CON— FORM- 19 WHEN APPLICAE:LE9 TO THE RECUIREMENTS OF SECTION 4100 THROUGH 4113 OF THE GOVE'RNYE NIT CO__^.E PERTA I*•I r;G TO S',;:iCO;:TPACTORS* THE SAME AS IF INCOR— PORATED HEREIl�. A COMPLETE LIST CF SUaCUNTRACTORS IS REQUIRED* AND THE BIDDER WILL BE EXPECTED TO P►RFOR%! WITH HIS 0614 FORCES* ALL ITEMS OF WORK FOR WHICH NO SUBCLNTRACTCR IS LISTED'• THE FOLLO:%ING IS A COMPLETE LIST OF ITEMS uF WORK TO BE SUB- CONTRACTED ON THIS Pte.,JECT. IF A PORTIO% OF A%Y ITEM OF WORK IS LONE BY A SUPCONTRACTCR9 TF.: VAD':::_:' OF THE :;Oq< SUBCONTRACTED WILL BE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED COST OF SUCH PC'RTICN, OF THE C;;riTRACT ITEM'* DETERMINED FROM I NFORMAT I C`; SUF"I TTED BY T4E COP;TRACTOR, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. THE UNDER5IG4%ED* t,S BICD=R* DECLARES THAT HE HAS NOT ACCEPTED ANY BID FROM ANY SU!zCQ%TR ZC T:;R LR S'AT ERI AL THROUGH ANY BID REPOS I TORY * THE BY—LAWS* RULES JZ REG,:LAT :C%5 Lf kh,ICH FROHIRIT OR PREVENT THE CUN— TFACTOR FROM 'CU%SI--ERI:.:: A%Y }'.Ig FROM, A*.Y SJ;_CU%.TkACTCR CR KATEFIAL.MAN* WHICH IS `OT PRCCE55£^ Tk4RCL'C4 SAID, BID ;)CSiTORY* UR tr.HICH PREVENT ANY SUBCONTRACTOY OR %*ATER:AL**A . FRUN BIDDI"•G TO ANY CCNTRACTOk WHO DUES NOT USE THE FACILITIES OF OR ACCEPT BIDS FROM OR THROUGH SUCH BIO DEPOSITORY. P - 3 0075 .PROPOSAL (CONT. ) ---------------- N0. ITEC' SUBCO%:TRACTOR ADDRESS ---- ------------------------ ---------------------- -------------------- ---- ------------------------ ---------------------- -------------------- A C C 0 -------------------ACC0 4r ANY 14NG THIS PROPOSAL I S A PnCPCSr4%L GUARAP:T Y IN' THE AMOUNT OF TEN ( IG) PERCENT Of A."O.:: T BID -------------------------------------------------------------- CASHI E:'S CHECK s CERTIFIED CHECK OR BI ODER'S BOND ACCEPTABLE) THE %:A+-ES OF ALL PERSt:::S INTERESTED IN THE FOREGOING PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE AS FOLLOWS— IMPORTANT NOTICE ---------------- IF THE BIDDER OR OTHER INTERESTED PERSON IS A CORPORATION• STATE LEGAL T:APIE OF CCJRPORATIv%:s ALSO NAMES OF PRESIDENTS SECRETARY• TREASURERs AND N!ANAGER T=iEREL'F. IF A CCPART-NERSHIP, STATE TRUE NAME OF FIRM* IF BIDDER OR OTHER INTERESTED PERSON IS AN INDIVIDUAL. STATE FIRST AND LAST NAME It. FULL. ------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- LICENSEu TO DO C :::GC::.::.^.:.CT ALL `LASSES CF WORK INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT* it. ACCOR::.':CE ::iT :.P: :,CT Pr.CV:DiNG FOR THE REGISTRA— TION OF CONTRACTORS s L I CENSE NO (c LASS ) s ----------------------------- ------ ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- (SIGNAIG'URE OF BIDDER) BUSINESS ADDRESS -------------- --------------------------------- PLACE OF RESIDENCE - -------------------------------------------..-------- DATE 19 P - 4 001' 7 A Y CM 1 f^Xr r # certZ mii diiir ;: i z t t ,fid x rk';, _ ztuzeads to craglop the fallaroaxnC �xsted constructzantraacs�� n r �s k+� unde�ce cansrract t r. 21z�pe why - JAY—�as ,ta thd�e trades.,set forth .gin the preced'sugp O8 ��ain � + aacx�cpatzou rhe Coats;;Casts P]»a, z t �rilZ cacxg� tb t�iCan , k $C.tstalan au and a' � ' u n thagrades btg � 7-77 '- : thaw trades fat � x :st �s �equ%Xedb�r tiresej Bd - Cox�d...zonS to c+a l l} iY.%lTth AA t1�?vI of thgc}s� . Rid Cayn/d���a�apncs,p`�l� adFc� e mznorzty MNM= Ow'.Cr ,Ia,4 Izat1MiR fr�M„i#,iiY +M.•�e. 1i inM �f% iT .l i V ' qi n. t .- w x�a�.�.e actsoz� steps cox�taix�od iu� saz.d.P.�... -I, caastru,ctaon �a n Coma.-iCOqu Co" i cb,�ect ta, tte B Caexiitf , � —R p'p } , 3. it sa.?2 ohta frau each of its s�zbsacttractors ands srn E 4 for th e 41 con acx=g ar ad un2aste a eacg prior to the awardv =bit on�trac under thss contract xbc subcaataractor cert ficatim reguIS d' r iese�x tsiLnatll�CC of ,31lt lOr17e't`d rapacu;entar. ve of trldRt�zJ� z J_ {mss 4 � w "9 « S0Cw.-1RAC--3RS' UM:::KATION (• i _+ certifies that: (.lY:`ar�Yr:Y.. 1. it IMLends is cmplop the !ol:ovisg listed construction trades is its work under the subcontract 3. (a) :.s to dwse trades not fart:. in the preceding paragraph ons bereo: for tide h it is e13;file =de:r Part I of these Bid Conditions for participation in the Cantra Costa Plan, is will comply vith the Contra Costa Plan on this and all -future coast=etion work 3n Conus Costa Coe:ott e Moat to thm BLd Cand:tlawq thoos trados MUM . and/or (b) as to Chase trades for %&Icb It is re:quq fired by chose Bid Condition to c=ply xi:: Part 11 of ::fest Bid Coaditio:s, it adopts the aininum aivarity :a:.romae: ue-IlLc.atica goals and the specific affirmative action steps contained in said P=t 11 on this and all fsosre construction Vork in Contra Cm%a Cc--.-V s1:bja-. , to Wm Ud Caoditi,ons,tboset trades beings and e 3. it xi11 ob:aLr. from emb o: its s:t':,eontractors prior to the sward of say subcontract nater this subcontzract the subcontractor cereifieation required by these Sid Conn_tions. (Sigasa--e of author i e-4 repro sas.:ative of bidder) in order to enasre that the Said SUbco:etraetors' certification be- comes a part ai all suScaatraets Bender t:.a priue contract, no subcontract shall be ac:ue:ed until r:. rt; :se::ct:ve of the Contra Costa Ca:nt. Publ lc '+brks bervrt�:t h.. d••.x.::::r�-i, +:a ::situ;, that the said hm been Ina orperawd In mob indmutrsct, regardless of tier. ACY snbeorrraoti executed Idthont ::ne:h Writt" approval sha11 '. • .. . be 'added. . _ r "r k ;.r 7 r,c�3i:id ° , t "�` ,wk 9" ii ' it r; tis�;z 74 YT'sa,i �i9t i'�By iy�! ]I iIul j�,.I II IIS, '�: �" @�E§ 1�1, �i�'$!i§ w 1° #�. s ��. �' t,, t a u "u 1' Yri,r '8� �.°:} `+ tr I=��1 i+ �(�i1 II t ilk PE,E,,s��� i aE+ .iA}k�" .;, �, a zy a a t�, j .K�ur ���"3 ��%i l 71 0} i �lai lillI 1 li II I.,III I E. r ;C t, , Y d� # '" _` t w" °'�`t` r ''r r Y fI 1 II 'f`Sx x u�" �' y*y � y�� �fl"'�.� ,r ya. .7 ¢� `' e '��,� ��S�vs�, p°� L E. II 71 '" i. ; L x �`n My .'t w ,'''Egw si+t;lll I:' IE x -� r y r C -t'" Far V �;.i�;.= Sry ; �! �n t y. - k".,Yiv -.Ykr r�A N �" h+�4 K �k u'• � a } � a - i ..t g , r r>> n: r rs� - ,' NY r x. j Vit. .. 'r��. �� Z k xBGA�tD MJF SUPEr�VZSflRS, C Ct?S CQt1N , GA ► ORI . mtca. .: ="s :JSP S'•. ,Y'x.. wF�- _- c i � r a t �'#';„. "`r t ,,'"gyp `� - � "F In the �3atter of `the Proposed ) � ?:, �a uftent of the County General 3 RESOL�E)N` Nt1.�"� 45f' � � N - - flan 'ar ;the Hoi�e `Boad Area, (Gov. G:W $ �55`` t5r35 -- N � r - S Y ;,n x^'. r Y� K / x - ��—, the 7Board of Supervisors aP Camra Costa County RES4F.YES µTHA � Its C3er on Inca I.2< 1976 received a:coo 7o� esolut�o �� � = s G '�fk , +Ta, ,., ,adopted by the Ple iningf Co aaiss a- p4gacomm.n amendment oto a County Generali rl for land�`loca�e�_ th . " Ho ce zRosd area , a;the :vic i�ityk of l art nez as de .gna ec Y er r 3 'l a .change the F Ind Use Elememtk desgnatonoc�`" ds � ` , 1, ' +$. . le f8mi3.y xes: , 1 $, deusit�' to Ugl' Indus„i�&M, Fx>x reflect the ,County po3icies on.rfutture development i�aeas. , a d, #� On Api%Ja—,�2Q,. X 975, this $oartx held" a heacin on F sa #agase ' -_ r � . 1� 4 ameni ment,. Novice of. sad d hearing ;,xas "duly �e ,i th i� mame s - �requ .red ,by 1sx� T'he"<Hozara at the hearing calleci;r fob teSt ion `�, - #xrN aAf A"?3. .persax .nterested a .the matter,; 3nt� lease rates � � :� � v1 t -rPpeared ana Basked for and received clariffcatioi asvitoe whethex �" -x the act- -,, - �dendment xouid of Pect property ,died b � they , e - ilssocia�irn. _ .�. x +, e ._ � f �� Jf Nor}�,' `' �N ., �c', ., the Boa *d members having Yu]. considered £the ame, Aiiit ,*-'--� � ° ik, - z*A"ed ,t.�at the recaranendations as Subiii t b 2, �C :s } k ,'a.�. l �►( "Y E "2�" - ' �:a ;Lssian arre',E p, opriate t{ 3�� r 'a Oaa'dwaereby f nds that the propt7► ed t k amendmerr °` 3, Piave a a 3.�icaxat Ii zct on tie env .ranment "dV',VF V annexa ti m � �dt'.c13.�ration as",;, fte�nl�i �epared ={aryd�j":�Aprocessed inf �omol anc� i i 5*z Y Cali, a.�i.ii a .F Q4aMaR�rri�L + -M .s`it - a}a� - ^r- ,,,,,, "+1k{' �.z.1 - SY` t , a, Yea fsX sem " 1 —— x s ,,', 1 r'` gl� e x t' .f y;. #''„vmr�%,,, ^�k,!, N r€€, Q Y hn� 4 Murw3er # Ath33iaard hereb determines th$tthe �s U J 7 s, y x a Ae : hoIz d -be c ed in tete Coon 's Geaner�l Plan` a:�recnn m�;ene3e r �b" - -- hang q� t a thePlanni C+�amissian and as rer�ected in they amenc�enfie an - a � r y. F } - �� F . t33.lya: thiG Eoard fu*'the " dr#:ct3 the County ' n �j�e g1 a- 4 ' -a, +r n. t r a ay) w ri, ftb- O� --, eut ;to ince► aar to tY s �i ►po: a amendment :�: tc� a� -c w, w �, �„-mn �to the E�a3, Plua h .ch ytbi s Boa l x i �Gonsi eta o o -- , , d�zrin ; tyle - �5`cit ends r year 8s one of the Althree�pe tte x n �R 11-x`1 't `menus to cha wand ;Use "�Ele fent f h Caunt r �+GeneraL E an,,�- " p*.ry t 1 �\ .� 4 3 IY 1� .1 I" iSS�� on fpr l 20, 1976, 'unan ou uy by Supery sons present- #, � r �� 3 ' S t 3 S a.y- .0 s i^, J'Jk�rp cc City of Martinez ., �f Director. of Planning �` rr tis Y. k d "moi+` . R �, 3 { } c?r f +i3.. .Y+:. l 4 4 h 4 {Ya----.. �[r� +ems �/�■, ]f� rw}y < 1 N � Sc '„f i';?'-" r�(�'° 4, Y " t' T � !U,SOMTXO� OF- 7"x/3, j t` "i i p 'F(�' r�i�¢T:'l;''��'��i".. •v "R,R r _ w t y},+� '"'Gk'1w 'f'a fir.'- y. '°y d> -r^ T. 3 � ''h z ��', tea'"' mak' T f x cc 4 r 4., t` N, S,�' k '� y 'i i "#'fii . �,,e r° x7, w-+*.. ut a; y '"T'a � vK r - S$�2 y g4 R ''4 Ya x ,t^57AA fir '.Jr �. �:v 1E 1 E I --- , ry.. t a , a l��d,r��1�I II _ kd '+ t "i4`"ir n-w a. t >€.tw ,1 4 u ` 3 k '°,,u�'z a.,�, h % ��' 1 I ,F Il',t li I�I���II.� p s i#,,"'" xx t , x#c at�`r-;r'{`r,` ,.; ' r r �:. t ..rr y.' K ... s .,.. � . IL III �i iii I ir= �. ,. r�:.y 'wry,.• ""a.«: `g4 www �c, 11i ` �� sM �uEa� ,�1�,��� aa� �+ Pd�ys,2E9111, .r .,.W! .�. qq�v#�'��"I .:µ#.,; �f `` 33, r •�� fir t�llh� I} & ���b �I „�I ' RIE �i�6�u,In 1il����'i�19A ik��R ei'1�t1� ir�ii4l� lilj E r1 I�wm �tGJ a!�i1�1 :.>9r 5' N 'o 1:19��'f 11 ll�III II IIII' �P I�P��Yt.��4119 ..�t�!ri�r its �' � I � Y IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of: ) Social Service Program Funding ) for Fiscal Year 1976-1977 j RESOLUTION NO. 76/ 333 Support of State Executive and ) Legislative Governmental Solution.) WHEREAS the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has received reports from its Administration and Finance Committee, County Administrator and Director, Human Resources Agency, in the matter of Social Services Program funding for fiscal year 1976-1977; and WHEREAS these reports describe how Contra Costa County, along with other California counties with developed Basic Service Programs are being systematically fiscally disadvantaged and how Social Services for low-income people in these counties are being disproportionately underfunded from Service program levels in previous years; and WHEREAS the State Department of Health has used a formula to allocate Federal funds to counties for Basic Service Programs and has applied this formula in a rigid plan over the last several years which has resulted in gross inequities in the distribution of Federal funds to counties that have developed service programs in the past; and WHEREAS the reductions in Federal funds for Basic Social Service Programs administered by the County now present a fiscal problem of serious proportions and a program problem of substantial magnitude to these several counties; and WHEREAS the State Department of Health has not responded by either constructive suggestions nor timely action to assist in resolving the persistent problems and progressively worsening fiscal conditions presented to these California counties in maintaining Basic Social Service Programs; and WHEREAS a timely legislative solution to the continuing problem has been presented by the introduction of SB 1381 by Senator John Nejedly; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors endorses Senate Bill 1881, which bill proposes an equitable remedy to this situation and encourages appropriate action to assist in the resolution of this matter for fiscal year 1976-1977. PASSED ON April 20, 1976. cc: Human Resources Agency County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Governor Edmund J. Brown, Jr. Dr. Jerome Lackner, Director, State Dept. of Health lir. tlario Obledo, Secretary, State Health & Welfare Agency Senator John A. Nejedly Assemblyman Daniel Boatwright Assemblyman John Knox Assemblyman Ken Meade Senator Nicholas Petris (?) RESOLUTUOiN NO. 76/ 333 r I?: THE BOARD O? SUPERVISO"S Off'' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OP CALZ=Op?TT". i. RFmLCTIOii EO. 76/3311 (To Acco=any Application and Agreeaesst) I*MREAS, a division of the CWna!% COSTA CO. £'LpLoyMs R., ;T with Retirea;nt System ASSN. respect to eligible employees of the RIVER'JIv1 FM PROMCTIO`T DISTRICT Public Agency hereinafter referred to as "Public Agency", vho are ambers of and in positions covered by said retirement system, has been conducted in accordance with Federal and State Laws and State regulations for the purposes of coverage under the insurance system established- by the Federal Social Sacurity Act and a deemed retirement system, hereinafter referred to as Group B CO_TRk COSTA CO. E,PLOY'=E-St R:''T MMM ASSti. hes been established Retirement Syste= thereby as provided in Section 218(d)(6) of the Federal Social Security Act, composed of positions of members of such retirement system who desire coverage under the said insurance system; and WRg MS, the Public Agency desires to file an application with the State and to enter into an agreement with the State to extend coverage under the said insurance system on behalf of the Public Agency to services perfo_•-med by individuals as employees of the Public Agency as members of a coverage group, as defined in Section 1 218(d)(4) of the Federal Social Security Act, of the said Group B rOROA COSTA CO. ELTLOYEESt Retirement RMIREMOM ASSN. ; and System— jM^,AS, official fora "Application and Agreement Ret. SS 32W containing the terms and conditions under Vnich the State will effect such inclusion has been examined by this bcdy: r:0W, Z .r�'ORr, Bu I<s tR%SOL' r!`?J, That said App licatioa and Agreement on said ; official form be executed on behalf of th_ Public Agency and sutmitted to the State to provide coverage under the California State Social Security Agreement of March 9, 1951: of all services perfor=ed b, individuals as esployees of the Public Agency as members of a coverage group (as defines: in Section 218(d)(4) of the Social Security Act) PERs ssD 33D VT2 00182- 1 of the said Group B COMM-ft Oz. : RPI :• a i except the follocair.E,: Retirement System 1. All services excluded frcm coverage under the agreement by Section 218 of the Social Security Act; and 2. Services excluded by option of the Applicant as indicated in Resolution rlo. uL853 adopted at a meeting of the COUwr MM Op SUv_ER1jTS08S the 27 day of OCTOBER , 19-75--: no OFTIMAL EXCLUSIONS Effective date of coverage of services under said agreement to bre: jury 1, 19__7t; ; and BE 33! FU r� RESOLVED, That J P Kennv , Flame) CE.ARN%N CO. BD. OF SUPEMSORE S 315 HEST 10TH SMEET AMOCH CA Title of Position Address of Public Agency be and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute said.Application and Agreement on behalf of and as Authorized Agent of the Public Agency and to forvard same to the State for acceptance and further action; and BE IT FUFMM RESOLVr'Ii, That authority hereafter to act as Authorized Agent., and so to conduct all negotiations, conclude all arrangements, submit all reports, and sign all agreements and instriz—zents which may be necessary to carry out the letter and intent of the aforesaid application and agreement, in conformity with. all applicable Federal and State laws, rules and regulations, is vested in the position of COU`lTX AUDITOR-COIMOLLER (T le of Position -2- PMS Mr. 33. 1/72 cc: State c/o Auditor Piverview Fire Protection District Retirement Board County Auditor-Controller Director df Personnel County Counsel County Administrator 00183 F II t . • 'SEND wo COPSES T0: SS DIVISTON THIS IS YOUR CO2�'3Y FOR SOCL46L k=G EMOYEW SYSTEM SECURITY' COVERAM PLEASE HEAP P. 0. BOX 3.953 CAREFULLY. FILE STATE APPRR(PIM SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 93809 COPY IM PER«.AMU FILE. APPLICATION ARD AG.REENMR For the purposes of this application and agreement, any reference made herein to any State or Federal statute or statutes, or regulations, or part thereof, applies to all amendments thereto now or hereafter =aae. For the purposes of this application and agreement, "Federal System" means Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability and Health Insurance system established by the Federal Social Security Act, "Federal agency" =ears the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, or successor in function to such officer, "Bcard" means the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, acting on behalf of the State of California. The RIMVIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT , a public agency (Official Name of Public Agency as defined in Section 22009 of the Government Codel/hereinafter called Applicant, hereby makes :application to the Board to execute a modification to the California State Social Security Agreement extending thereunder the Federal System to all services performed by iadividuals as employees of the Applicant in a coverage group las defined in Section .18(d)(4) of the Social Security Act2-/) of the Group B CORM COSTA COUM MEWYEES' Retirement R£TIRENT ASSOMTIOR , a deemed retirement system established System by division of a retirement system pursuant to Section 218(d)(6) of the Social Security Act, composed of positions of members desiring coverage under said insurance system, except the following: See Attachment 91 See Attachment t 1 84 PERS ssv 32D :31%/68) Application Agreement (Division Coverage Group) Microfiim:!d with board wdar { (1) Those services mandatorily excluded from said agreement by Section 218, Social Security Acta/. (2) The folloring services excluded by option of the Applicant pursuant to Resolution No. 75/853 adopted on OCBXM 27 , 19-7.5-_: NO EXCLUSIONS In order to carry into effect the cocoon governmental duties under such statutes and in consideration of the mutual promises hereir3fter made, the Applicant and the Board agree as follows: 1. The Bcard will execute a modification to the California State Social Security Agreement to extend thereunder the Federal System to the services of employees of Applicant as hereinbefore applied for. 2. Applicant will coap2y promptly and completely, throughout the term of this appli- cation and agreement, with the letter and intent of all statutes of the State of California, and Section 218 of the Federal Social Security Act, and applicable Federal and State regulations adopted pursuant thereto. �. Applicant vin Fay to the State at such time or times as the State may by regula- tion prescribe, amounts equivalent to the sum of taxes (employer-employee contributions) which would be imposed under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act if the services of employees covered by the application and agreement constituted employment as defined in such Act. Applicant shall beep or cause to be kept accurate records of all remuneration for such services, said records to be maintained as required by Federal or State regula- tions, and said records shall be available for inspection or audit by the Board or its designated representative. 3/ See attachment 00185 y J t , 4. Applicant will prepare and sub-4 t such wage and other reports to the State as may be required from time to tine by the State. 5. Applicant will pay and reimburse the State at such times as may be determined by the State: (a) Any sums of money that the State may be obligated to pay or forfeit to the Federal government by reason of any failure of the Applicant, for any cause or reason, to pay the contributions, penalties, or interest required by the agreement between the Federal agency and the State at such time or in such amounts as required by the said agreement and any State or Federal regulations adopted pursuant thereto. (b) In such amounts as may be determined by the State, its proportionate share of any and all costs incurred by the State in the administration of the Federal System as it affects the Applicant and its employees. (c) In such amounts as may be determined by the State, the cost of any and all work and services relating to any division for the purposes of coverage under the Federal System held with respect to the coverage group for which coverage under the Federal System is requested herein. (d) In such amounts as may be determined by the State, the costs of any audits of the books and records of the Applicant rade by the State or its designated representa- tives pursuant to Section 22559 of the Government Code. 6. The coverage herein provided for shall be effective JULY 11 19 , and this agreement shall continue until terminated as provided herein. 7. Applicant shall have the right to terminate, subject to approval of the Federal agency, upon giving at least two years' advance notice in writing to the State, effective at the end of the calendar quarter specified in the notice, its coverage under the Federal System pursuant to the provisions of this application and Agreement, either in its PERS SSD 32D (168) -3- 001 S'h entirety or with respect to acy coverage group, as defined in Section 218(b)(5) of the Social Security Act, of the Applicant, but only if the agreement between the State and the Federal agency has been in effect with respect to such coverage from the effective date of coverage under the Federal System as set forth in this application and agreement for not less than five years prior to the receipt of such notice; provided, however, that any such termination shall be subject to the provisions of Section 218(g) of the Social Security Act and Federal regulations adopted pursuant thereto and rules and regulations promulgated by the State with respect to coverage under the Federal System, and provided further, that if the Federal agency should terminate the agreement between the Federal agency and the State for the administration by the State of the Federal System, the State shall have the right to terminate this application and agreement in accordance with the same rights and powers as the Federal agency exercises in terminating the agreement between him and the State. That, subject to the aforesaid provisions and applicable law, this application and agreement may be terminated or amended by the mutual consent of the parties in writing. 8. After the filing of this application and agreement, its acceptance and execution by the State shall constitute it a binding agreement between the Applicant and the State of California with respect to the ratters herein set forth. Signed g Official 2tarae of Public Agency y P. Kenn 1 h :rrn. an ° And By ACCEPTED: (Title) County Auditor roller STATE OF CALIFOMUA (Date) Anri l 20, 1976 BOARD OF ADYINISTRATIOh' PUBLIC EIMPLOYEES' R"'TIRF1--?T SY=,-'l BY a-ecutive Of'f'icer PEFs ssr 32D 6-i/68) —�— 00187 s AiTAC�N£ 22009 (As amended by Chapter 1993, Statutes of 1957): "Public Agency" means the state, any city, county, city and county, district, municipal or public corporation or any instrumentality thereof, and boards and committees established under Chapter 10 of Divisica 6 of the Agricultural Code, Chapter 754 of Statutes of 1933, as amended, or Chapter 307 of the Statutes of 1935, as amended, the employees of which constitute one or more coverage groups, or retirement system coverage groups. 2/ Section 218(d)(4): For the purposes of subsection (c) of this section, the following employees shall be deemed to be a separate coverage group: (A) all employees in positio .s which were covered by the sanx retirement system on the date the agreement was rade applicable to such system (other than employees to whose services the agreeaeat already applied on such date); (B) all employees in positions which became covered by such system at any time after such date; and (C) all employees in positions which were covered by such system at any time before such date and to whose services the insurance system established by this title has sot been extended before such date because the positions were covered by such retirement system - including employees to Whose services the agreement %as not applicable on such date because such services were excluded pursuant to subsection (c)(3)(B). The following services are randatorily excluded:- (a) xcluded:(a) service perfo-T-,ed :Ln a policeman=s or firemn's position, covered by a retirement system at the t=e coverage is extended to the Public Agency; (b) service performed by = individual who is employed to relieve him from unemployment; (c) service perftrred in a hospital, hose, or other institution by a patient or inmate tL wreof; (d) covered transj.,rtstion service (as defined in Section 210(k) of the Social Security Act, as amended); (e) service (other tbsn agricultural labor or service performed by a student) which is excluded from e=loyment by any provision of Section 210(a) of the Social Security Act, other then paragraph 7 of such section, or service the re=meration for Vaic`n is excluded Brom wages by paragraph (2) of Section 209(h); (f) service performed by an inditi*idual as an employee on a temporary basis in case of fire, star--, sraw, earthquake, or similar emergency. (g) Services performed bti election: officials or election worIkers for each calendar quarter in Lnich the remuneration paid for such service is less than $50. PEF,S ssn 32D (`1/6,9) -5- 400 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) ) Commemorating the Silver Jubilee ) of the Ordination of The Reverend) Resolution No. 76/335 Gabriel J. Meyer ) WHEREAS twenty-five years ago The Reverend Gabriel J. Meyer was Ordained into the Holy Priesthood; and WHEREAS during the period of the Korean Conflict, Father Meyer served with the Corps of Chaplains in the United States Air Force; and WHEREAS Father Meyer was subsequently assigned pastoral duties in Contra Costa County including those of Associate Pastor of St. Perpetua Catholic Church in Lafayette and, for the past six years, Pastor of St. Cornelius Catholic Church in Richmond; and WHEREAS Father Meyer has been a member of the Social Justice Commission of the Diocese of Oakland since its inception; and WHEREAS the Parish Council of St. Cornelius Catholic Church is sponsoring a Concelebrated Mass of Thanksgiving commemorating the Silver Jubilee of Ordination of The Reverend Gabriel J. Meyer into the Holy Priesthood on May 16, 1976; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California extends its best wishes to The Reverend Gabriel J. Meyer on the occasion of this anniversary in respect to his years of service and spiritual leadership to the citizens of this County. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th Day of April, 1976 by the following vote of the Board: AYES: A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny NOES: None ABSENT: W. N. Boggess Y cc : County admiristraLor OO189 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CQNTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the natter of ) Proclaiming the Week of May 9-15, ) RESOLUTION NO. ?6/336 1976, as "Health Care Week" ) WHEREAS it is important for the Citizens of Contra Costa County to be aware of the services of their local hospitals and health services; and WHEREAS Contra Costa County Medical Services and the County Health Department wish to observe National Hospital Meek in this County as "Health Care Week" by holding a two-day activity for the general public, to be held in the auditorium of the Sun Valley Mall on May 13 and 14 for the purposes of contributing to the health of the citizens participating and hence, to the general health of the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA RESOL'V'ED that the reek beginning May 9, 1976 and ending May 15, 1976 is proclaimed as "Health Care Week" and that the Contra Costa Medical Services and Health Department shall participate in this National Ohservance by holding a two-day activity at the Sun Valley Mall on May 13 and 14, 1976. PASSED BY THE BOARD on Anril 20, 1976. Orig: Director, HP_k cc: County Medical Director County li:alth Officer County Administrator Public Information Office: RESOLUTION NO. 76/336 LK IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Reallocation ) of Salary of Economic Opportunity ) Program Director, for the Office ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/ 337 of the County Administrator ) BE IT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVED that the class of Economic Opportunity Program Director is REALLOCATED on the Basic Salary Schedule from Level 495 ($1667-$2026) to Level 497 ($1677-$2039) , effective April 21, 1976. PASSED and ADOPTED by this Board on April 20, 1976. Orig: County Administrator cc: Director of Personnel Acting Economic Opportunity Program Director County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 76/ 337 W1J1 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Office of Department Economic Opportunity Budget Unit 004 Date 4/6/76 Action Requested: Reallocate class of Economic Opportunity Program Director to the basic salary schedule at Level 497 Proposed effective date: asap Explain why adjustment is needed: To align salary level comensurate with duties and responsibilities of this position. Estimated cost of adjustment: , Amount: 1 . Salaries, aad wages: $ 2. F��Ced Zsse�: (tizt turn card cost) J _ Estimated total , Signature ZZ De a ea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: April 7;�1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation, pursuant to m dum April 6, 1976, attached. County mini ator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission UD 6e: April 13, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate Economic Opportunity Program Director to the Basic Salary Schedule. Study discloses a new salary recocmendation, consistent with the responsibilities and difficulties of the work as outlined in the class specification as is indicated by the per- formance of position, is appropriate to Salary Level 497 (1677-2039). Reallocate the class of Economic Opportunity Program Director from Salary Level 495 (1667-2026) to Salary Level 497 (1677-2039) by amending Resolution 75/592 to reflect the change. Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant PersonneY Director Recommendation of County Administrator i Date: April 21, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective April 21, 1976. t County A ministrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on APR n ITS J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: ► 1 'q- _ B_%- hr��,z�` r .. .. ���. c A Rin t �ry�R ;:klez Daputy clark . APPROVAL o6 tiht s cd1us reit a,: ^rait`L. i:�E.r: A:fjU6trreLt and Pvrscnnez •.• RezotatLon Arrancbrext. 140TE: Top section and reverse side of form be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00192 I11 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. STATE OF CALIFOftl1IA In the Matter of Amending Resolution No. 75/523 Establishing Rates to be Paid to Child Care Institutions RESOLUTION 110. 76/338 WHEREAS this Board on June 30, 1975, adopted Resolution No. 75/523 establishing rates to be paid to child care institutions for the fiscal year 1973-76; and WHEREAS the Board has been advised that certain institutions should be added to the approved list; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that Resolution No. 75/523 is hereby amended as detailed below: ADD THE FOLLOWING GROUP HOME MONTHLY RATE Methods,Youth Development Center/Carmichael $880 cc: Director, Hunan Resources Agency Social Service; M. Hallgren Probation Officer County Administrator County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 76/333 00193 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Mental Health Services ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/339 Funding for Fiscal Year ) 1976-1977 ) WHEREAS the County has received notification of its prelim- inary Mental Health Services funding allocation for the fiscal year 1976-77; and WHEREAS the preliminary budget allocation has been reviewed by representatives of the Mental Health Advisory Board, Alcoholism Advisory Board, Drug Abuse Board, Developmental Disabilities Council and the Mental Health Association; and WHEREAS review of the 1976-77 :dental Health Services prelim- inary budget allocation indicates a projected deficit of $509,355.00; and WHEREAS this allocation will not be sufficient to continue current needed programs with an allowance for a uniform cost-of- living increase; and Therefore, on the recommendation of the Mental Health Advisory Board, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY that it urges the State to increase its Mental Health Services allocation sufficiently to allow continuance of current programs with a uniform cost-of-living increase. i�iSSED and ADOPTED by this Board on April 20, 1976. Orig. Dept. - County Administrator cc: Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Mario Obledo, State Secretary of Health and Welfare Jerome Lackner, M.D. , State Director of Health Assembly Ways and Means Committee Assemblyman Daniel E. Boatwright, Chairman Assemblyman Louis Papan, Chairman, Subcommittee #1 on Health and Welfare Senate Finance Committee Senator Anthony Beilensor_, Chairman Senator Howard Way, Chairman, Finance Subcommittee #3 Senate Health Committee Senator Arlen Gregorio, Chairman Senator John A. 14ejedly Mental Health Advisory Board The Reverend Palmer Watson C. L. flan Marter, Director, Hamann Resources Agency George Degnan, M.D. , County Medical Services H. D. Funk, County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 76/339 00194 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Supporting ) Regular Direct BARTD Service ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/340 between Richmond and ) San Francisco-Daly City. ) 11HEREAS Supervisor J. P. Kenny on February 24, 1976 requested that this Board support direct Bay Area Rapid Transit District rail service between Richmond and San Francisco-Daly City; and 111HEREAS communications from Nello J. Bianco, Vice President, BART Board of Directors, and Frank C. Harringer, BART General Manager, have been received by this Board which indicate that said service will be inaugurated without adverse effects on the Concord to San Francisco-Daly City line; and WHEREAS Mr. Bianco reiterated assurances on said matter in his address to this Board on March 23, 1976; and WHEREAS said direct service is proposed to be implemented by BART only when approval has been received from the California Public Ut:,lities Commission for operation of a modified train control system on closer headways, thus permitting a higher frequency of trains through the transbay tube; and WHEREAS the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny serving in the absence of Supervisor W. N. Boggess, and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty) has this day recommended approval of the proposal for direct BART service from Richmond to San Francisco-Daly City taking into account passenger safety and operating costs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THIS BOARD RESOLVED that it SUPPORTS regular direct rail service from Richmond to San Francisco- Daly City as soon as such service is technically feasible and necessary approvals have been obtained by the Bay Rapid Transit District. PASSED AND ADOPTED by this Board on April 20, 1976. Orig: County Administrator cc: Board Committee Mr. Nello J. Bianco Mr. Frank C. Harringer Public Works Director County Counsel County Administrator 00195 s� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Conveying County Property ) to East Bay Regional Park ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/ 341 District (Former S.N. Rwy R/-4 ) (Gov. Code §25365) - Lafayette) (Between Reliez ) Station Road & 4th Street) ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: On March 30, 1976, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, by at least a four-fifths vote of its members, duly passed and adopted Resolution No. 76/254 declaring its intention to sell to the East Bay Regional Park District certain real property as described in the aforesaid resolution and notice attached thereto. Said notice was published as required by lair. This Board finds that said portion of the property, westerly of Reliez Station Road, acquired by Contra Costa County by deed recorded March 31, 1961, Book 3836 of Official Records, page 299, is no longer needed for County purposes and that said conveyance of surplus property is categorically exempt from the provisions of the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Section 15112 (Class 12; Surplus Government Property Sales) of the California Administrative Code, Title 14. The Chairman of this Board is AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED to execute a quitclaim deed of conveyance to the East Bay Regional Park District for and on behalf of the County of Contra Costa, and cause same to be delivered for acceptance and recording, upon payment of the sum of FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($15,000.00) as consideration for said property. PASSED on April 20, 1976, by at least a four-fifths vote of the full Board. EBH:g cc: Recorder (via R/W) East Bay Regional Parks District (via R/W) Public Works (2) County Auditor County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 706/ 341 00190 Recorded at the request of.- EAST f:EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Retort to: East Bay Regional Park District 11500 Skyline Blvd. Oakland, CA 94619 Attn: (Surplus Contra Costa TMS to:tat eaatasnre use Of tetnaoet County Property QUITCLAIM DEED ORDERNO For value receiwd CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California QUITCLAIM *o EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT �k all that teal property situate in the City of Lafayette, County or Contra Costa .State of C-Mornia„described as follows: FOR DESCRIPTION SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said County has executed these presents xta mm on xxx this 20th day of April .19 76 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY B : Cha rman, BoarSupe r ATT . J. R. OLSSON, Cler rr By: ?/ 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Deputy County Of t �N.t7:.�►:c#otiwo�lod,oww:.ta.iw. Or. 19 before ere, t w6ro N typo no.no of notary a Notary Public,in and for said" County and Sate, per—Hy appeared known to me to he the person tt•hosr name srhsceihed to the within inirr rment,and acknowledged to me that--he exeeured the same. For joint teraancy deed add after grantee rams-`asµ+:re:erttrtts- **I f nota y is commhuirsned in another County r.e"'; .to sknatwe hpo of p.:tr"me of notary strike"said"and name county. Notary Public to.n, No,s•t•sv QUITCLAIM DEED Microfilmed with board o%1W, SiAtt: O RCC:-M!DSV¢'rT M%'Qt,t;1�TA t��.:1 ( ss `.ST P 1 : 3•~:"r _James P. Kenny see tal-w NV az..rax.t`.s:d o ..t Czz :.:.a ....t: J._• GaT_-Cr3 • this G=sr..e.N. County:»:.: _ i s.i._„_r.ct 5-:.t!-4Wz%t%zM s,�,a APR 2 01976 `_ Microfilmed with board order C. N d W W 0U K yj I K V p V W Q IL U K IL IL - K a X Y" : Q p"o L 4 QQz „aQ rd s 0 x ;o Zv oy`r d o��,a paua � a°►xuin Q Z ' o o3U— i s-C • it a wo 2 0vtssi wen a U ¢ co %; VL ox�al. Q ci"A Q ,20K °z}'s 03 z j Lx C d i itY 0 ul ts� d aV N d a W am o 0 - II _ a u F Z Q F. 0 Z bi q U_ Z V Z Y o o f W !r - us a F 3 Z MA x d Q u 00198 EXHIBIT "A" Those parcels of land in the City of Lafayette, County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: The interest conveyed to Western Title Guaranty Company ContrA Costa County Division by deed from Utah Construction & Mining Co. , et al, dated March 3, 1961 and recorded March 31, 1961, Book 3836, Official Records, page 299, in those parcels of land described as follows: PARCEL ONE The strip of land described as Fourth under rights of way and easements in the deed from Horace W. Carpentier, to Oakland and Antioch Railway, dated August 24, 1911.and recorded August 25, 1911 in Volume 170 of Deeds, at page 102, as follows: "The fourth strip or parcel" - "is located in aforesaid Tract Number One of said Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados, and extends from Ghiglioni Tract, so called, to the Kinney Tract, so called, and contains Eleven and three-one-hundredths (11.03) acres, more or less. The center line of location of said Railway through said tract is described as follows, viz: Beginning at Survey Station 526+13, a point in the boundary line of the Ghiglioni Tract, so called, which point is Eighty-four (84) feet Westerly from the Northeasterly corner of said tract; thence by a 60 40' curve to the right Fourteen hundred ninety and forty-five-one-hundredths (1490.45) feet to Survey Station 541+03 E. C. of said Railway Survey; thence South 800 33' East, Eight hundred sixty-one and seventy-five-one-hundredth (361. 75) feet to Survey Station 549+65.2 B.C. of said Railway Survey; tnence oy a 30 curve to the right Nine hundred eighty and forty-four-one- hundredths (980.44) feet to Survey Station 559+45.64 of said Railway Survey ; thence South 51° 00 ' Ea: r, Fourteen hundred ninety-four and .,eventy-seven-one-hundredths (1494.77) feet to Survey Station 574+40.41 -ji said Railway Survey; thence by a 410 curve to the left Ten hundred :ortu--eight and seventy-five-one-hundredths (1048.75) feet to Sury y .,Lation 584+89.16 of said Railway Survey ; thence Korth 870 03' E:aat, Thirteen hundred ninety and righty-four-one-hundredths (1390 .84) feet Lo Survey Station_ 598+80 of said Railway Survey, a point in line -►f Ainney or Naphtaly Ranch, so called. The Northerly boundary line of said strip or parcel is paral)-- ; :.stn said location line and Fifty (50) feet distant northerly tncrE- :rom from the Ghiglioni Ranch, so called, to Survey Station 531+00 of aaid Railway Survey; it is paralled with said location line and Thirty ( 30) 1"eet distant therefrom from said Survey Station 531+00 to Survey Station +596-00 of said Railway Survey; it is parallel with said center line and Orie hundred (100) feet distant therefrom from said Survey Station 596+00 to the Kinney Ranch, so called. MtuOfiiMed with board order -1- 00199 � r 1 • The Southerly boundary line of said strip or parcel is parallel with said location line and Fifty (50) feet distant therefrom from the Ghiglioni Ranch, so called, to Survey Station 531+00 of said iiailway Survey; it is parallel with said location line Thirty (30) feet distant therefrom from said Survey Station 531+00 to Survey Station 596+00 of said Railway Survey; it is parallel with said center line and Fifty (50) feet distant therefrom from said Survey Station 596+00 to the Kinney or Naphtaly Ranch, so called." EXCEPTING FROM PARCEL ONE: 1- That portion of land described in the deed from Utah Construction Company, et al, to Henry J. Kaiser Company, dated June 9, 1955 and recorded June 23, 1955 in Volume 2560 of Official Records, at page 187, as follows: "Portion of Lot 12 as shown on the map of Sectionization of Part of Rancho Laguna De Los Palos Colorados, filed August 8, 1916, in book 15 of Maps, page 308, in the office of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County, described as follows: Beginning on the southeastern line of Lot 12 as said lot is shown on the map above referred to at its intersection with the ,northeastern line of the right of way of the Sacramento Northern Railroad said point being the northeastern corner of the right of way described as the 11.03 acre parcel of land listed as 'the fourth strip' , in deed from Horace W. Carpentier to Oakland and Antioch Railway, dated August 24, 1911, recorded August 25, - 1911, in book 170 of Deeds, page 102; thence along the exterior line of said railroad right of way southwesterly along the arc of a curve to the left the center of which bears South 30 05' 47" West 2392.01 feet distant, an are distance of 233.756 feet; Scuth 870 29 ' 50" west 128.95 feet and South 20 30' 10" East 70.00 feet to a point which is 30.00 feet northerly, meazured at right angles from the center line of said railroad right of way at station 596+00 of the survey thereof as so., forth in the deed to Oakland and Antioch railway above referred to; thence northeasterly parallel with and 30 feet north, (measured at right, angles) from said center line 280 feet to the Southeastern P of said Lot 12; thence North 410 5' 13" East along said southeautt.r-.. line 90.66 feet to the point of beginning." 2- That portion thereof lying westerly and southerly of the d1, ten:,'-on northerly of the east line of Fove Drive, formerly Fourth Str#:et as deisgnated on the map of Tract No. 2045, which map was filed in the office of clic Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of CalifornSa, on OcLob er 19, 1954 in Volume 56 of gaps, at page 4. 3- That portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly line of Reliez Station Road. -2- (440 c PARCEL TWO Commencing at a point on the southwestern line of the Sacramento Northern Railway right of way, located thereon South 580 49 , West 64.50 feet from the most southern corner of Lot 62, as the said right of way and lot are shown on that certain map entitled, Lafayette Manor, Contra Costa County, California, etc. , filed November 12, 1936, in Volume 22 of Maps, at page 635, Contra Costa County records, from which said point the center of a circle having a radius of 1880.08 feet bears South 36* 53' 35" West; thence from said point of commence— ment running along said southwestern line of the Sacramento Northern Railway right of way, northwesterly along the circumference of said circle 488.10 feet, to a point from which the center of said circle having a radius of 1880.08 feet bears South 220 Ol' 05" West, thence leaving said southwestern line and running South 60' 32' 40" East, 486.74 feet to the point of commencement. Being a portion of Lot 6, as the said lot is delineated and so designated on that certain map entitled, Map of-Sectionization of part of Rancho Laguna de Los Palos Colorados, Contra Costa County, California, etc., filed August 8, 1916, in Book 15 of !taps, at page 308, Contra Costa County records. Containing 0.12 of an acre. -3- 0M IN TIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Delegation of Authority ) to Allow, Compromise or RESOLUTION No. 76/342 Settle Liability Claims Against the County ) WHEREAS on November 4, 1975 the Board of Supervisors deter- mined that it would be in the best interest of the County of Contra Costa to self-insure the primary general public liability risks to a limit of $500,000 and to tentatively self-insure the medical malpractice exposure; and WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors on April 20, 1976 approved the self-insurance process and procedures proposed by the County Administrator for administration of the self-insurance program; and WrEMkS Government Code Section 935.4 provides that this Board may authorize an employee to allow, comproaase or settle a claim against the County and its officers and employees if the amount to be paid pursuant to such allowance, compromise or settlement does not exceed $5,000; and WHEREAS the County Administrator was designated by this Board on April 20, 1976 to administer the County's insurance program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that in order to administer the self-insurance program properly and effectively, this Board of Supervisors does hereby delegate to the County Administrator or his Assistants the authority to allow, compromise, or settle claims up to a maximum of $5,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the allowance, compromise and settlement falling within this amount shall be the responsi- bility of the County Administrator or his Assistants and no further formal authorization from this Board shall be required. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. cc: Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 76/342 00202 { MMMMMMM�7 IN THE BOARD OF SUMERVISORS OF COf 1 A COSTA COUt.''i'Y, STATE OF CALIFO:ttFIA In the Matter of ) Establishment of ) RESOLUTIOiY 110. 76/343 Public Liability ) Trust Fund. ) 1-ME.Ri 5. The County Administrator shall provide the Board . of Supervisors at least annually with a management sur-mary of trust fund activities and the County Auditor-Controller's statement of its financial condition. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976• CERTIFIED COPY I certify that thL% Is a full, true d- correct copy of the original dorurnent w hieb L4 on fib, In my office, and Owt it wax r--wed r: adoptrd by the hoard of SutperviTorx of Coutts Ovaa C wjnty. California, on the date chow n. ATTF:�;T: J. It. OI SSON, County Clerk S ex•officto Clerk of said Boast of Supervisors, by Deputy Clerk.' RR a 1976 Rondo yth Shackles Orig. Dept.: County Administrator cc: County Auditor-Controller County Administrator County Counsel Public Works Department Director, Human_ Resources Agency ''""''j°;"�.�:- :'C. Pref�►:� J- o0��� �9 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CO::1'R.A COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Subdivision 4315 ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/3114 Annexation to County Service ) Area Vi-14 ) (Gov. C. 5156261 & 56450) ) RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGE IN ORIANIZATION BY SUBDIVISION 4016 MINEIATIO4 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA I4-14 The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLMES THAT: The Subdivision 4016 Annexation and County Service Area M-14 are located entirely within Contra Costa County. This change in organization by the Subdivision 4016 Annexation to County Service Area M-14 had been proposed by the representatives of the owners by application and filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Com-mission. The reason for the proposed annexation Is to provide the said territory with extended street lighting and parkway maintenance services. On April 7, 1976 the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed Subdivision 4016 Annexation to County Service Area M-14 subject to the condition that the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed be as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this referen=ce Inco„poz-ated herein. Said Commission also declared the said territory to be legally uninhabited and assigned the proposal the designation of "Subdivisio=n 4016 Annex- ation to County Service Area M-14”. Further, the Commission, pursuant to Government Code 556261, authorized this Board to annex the territory described in Exhibit "n" without notice and hearing by this Board. .y This Board on April 20, 1976 heard the determination of the Local Agency Formation Commission read aloud. This Board hereby finds that this proposed annexation is in the best interest of the people of County Service Area ;:-14. This Board hereby finds that the territory to be annexed is uninh-mbited. This Board thereby ORDERS this annexation to Count;: Service Area .'•i-14 without election and without being subject to confirmation by the voters. The Clerk shall file his certificate of completion with the Secretary of State in accordance with Government Code Section 56451. After receipt of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing for this matter, the Clerk is directed to record a counterpart orIgInal of the Clerk's ;:ertlf;Cato •if completion and the original or countervar t orls-Inal of the ::ec;a any of State's certificate of fi.;ng with the Can:hra Costa Cas.!nt;: Recorder In accordance with Government Code 55525-3. PASSED on April 20, =92c, unaninously ty Supervisors present. cc: Secretary of State State Board of Equalization P. G. and E. County Assessor County Auditor-Controller �tyc Works Director County Recorder D. M anc^ari =?��:--�± ::f. 7../3,' -', Western iYtle Insurance Post Office Box 5255 Walnut Creek, California c!��rc5 002H LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CO` 3SICN 75-77 Contra Costa County, Calz.ornia ' Description Dates 4/7/?6 By$ :57 EXH IT "A" Subdivision 4016 Annexation to County Service Area M-14 Portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13 and portion of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as followss Beginning on the eastern line of the parcel of land described in the deed of trust made by Rahlves and Rahlves, Inc., recorded January 12, 1970, Book 6042, Official Records, page 406, at the southern line of the tract of land designated on the map of Subdivision 4240, filed December 14, 19721, Map Book 153, page 3, said point being on the south- eastern boundary of County Service Area M-14; thence, along said south- eastern boundary of County Service Area X-14 and said southern line, North 890 28' 40" West, 7?6.15 feet to the eastern line of the tract of land designated on the map of Subdivision 4014, filed March 12, 1975, Map Book 177, page 35; thence along the exterior line of the tract of land designated on said sap of Subdivision 4014 and said south- eastern boundary of County Service Area X-14 as follows$ South 390 16' 13" West, 148 feet; South 500 43' 47" Fast, 108.59 feet; South 480 47' 38" Bast, 56 feet; South 410 12' 22" West, 7.47 feet; South 480 47' 38" East, 211.33 feet; South 410 30' West, 100 feet; South 310 West, 25.14 feet; South 3B0 30' West 98 feet; South 400 52. 09" West, 272.96 feet; North 520 54' 24" West, 90.81 feet and North 820 West, 89.36 feet to an eastern line of the tract of land designated on the map of Sub- division 3576, filed February 11, 1970, Map Book 129, page 26; thence along the exterior line of the tract of land designated on said czap of Subdivision 3576 and said southeastern boundary of County Service Area M-14 as followas Southerly, along the are of a curve to the left with a radius of 100 feet, through a central angle of 120 58. 19", an are distance of 22.64 feet; South 150 15' Fast, 109.585 feet; Westerly, along the arc of a curve to the left with a radius of 45 feet, through a central angle of 2611 15', an arc distance of 20.615 feet; North 410 30' West, 87.50 feet and Westerly and Southerly, along the are of a 00205 2 curve to the left with a radius of 20 feet, through a central angle of 980 351. an are distance of 34.41 feet; thence, leaving said 'south- eastern boundary of County Service Area M-14, Southerly and BiLsterly, along the arc of a compound curve to the left with a radius of 154 feet, the center of xhich bears South 500 05• East, through a central angle of 1020 42' 04". an arc distance of 216.04 feet; thence South 620 47' o4" East, 96.25 feet; thence Southeasterly, along the arc of a curve to the right with a radius of 595 feet. the center of which bears South 510 30' West. through a central angle of 340 201, an are distance of 356.54 feet; thence South 000 15. 54" West, 93.49 feet; thence, South 60 West, 160 feet; thence South 84• Hest. 437 feet; thence North 60 Bast. 3B feet; thence South 840 Bast, 105 feet; thence North 870 23# 58" But. 217.45 feet to the eastern line of said Rahlres & Rahlves deed of trust parcel. 6042 oR 4o6; thence along said eastern line as followiss North 20 36' 02" West, 367.43 feet; North 890 14' 02" West. 20 feet; North 20 06' 57" East, 535.35 feet; North 210 20' 320 East, 463.38 feet; North 250 46' 54" Fast. 167.97 feet; North 60 03' 53" Bast, 61.47 feet and North 370 32' 40" West. 24.29 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 27.88 acres, more or less. 00206 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Platter of the Proposed ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/345 Annexation of Subdivisions 4673 ) to County Service Area L-41, } (Govt. Code §§56310, E1 Sobrante Area. ) 56311, 56312, 56313) RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDING FOR CHANGE IN ORGANIZATION TO ANNEX SUBDIVISION 4618 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA L-41 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Change in organization by annexation of Subdivision 469$ to County Service Area L-41 has been proposed by the representatives of the owners by application filed with the Local Agency Forma- tion Commission on March 51 1976. The reason for such proposed annexation is to provide the said territory with extended street lighting. On April 7, 1976, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed annexation of Subdivision 4678 to County Service Area L-41 subject to the condition that the exterior boun- daries of the territory proposed to be annexed be as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said Commission also declared the said territory to be legally uninhabited and assigned the proposal the designation of "Subdivision 4678 Annexation to County Service Area L-41st. at 10: 30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 1, 1976 in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California, this Board will conduct a public hearing on the proposed annexation. At the hearing the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the proposed annexation will be heard, and any in- terested persons desiring to make written protest thereto must do so by written communication. filed with the Clerk before the hearing. A written protest by an owner of land must contain a description sufficient to identify his land, and a written protest by a voter must contain his residential address. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board of Supervisors shall either disapprove the proposed annexation or order the annexa- tion in accordance with Government Code §§56320 through 56322. The Clerk of this Board is hereby directed to publish the text of this resolution once a week for two successive weeks in the "E1 Sobrante Herald Bee-Press", a newspaper of general circulation published in this County and circulated in the territory wherein the proposed annexation is situated, the first publication to be made not later than fifteen (15) days polor to the hearing date. The Clerk of this Board is also directed to pont the text of this resolution on the bulletin board of this Board at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date and such posting will continue to the time of the hearing. cz The Clerk of this Board is further directed to give notice by mailing notice of hearin; at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date to all persons and counties , cities, or districts , which shall have theretofore filed a :mitten request for special notice with the Clerk of th:s Board_ PASSED AND ADOPTED o.-: April 23, 19706 , by this Board. !:a:r;':;:.�J�vn•' CERTti'trt� Copy` } ^^ ( ,h..'(. ti,Yt JjA1 b, sr 12- 1— j rormct COOT of �r , n: Eon nfHce, �1a1 i l: Wor'-s 7!re 7 4---4_ b^eR a V iE is:x 1i b*. the Boal C Oi l�. L Admi ra u zi.xr4 r., f'nr)•r;. ('.i :a 1"O:7L'v, f'liffornia, oR . t r• .I+r�• .=:. ��n :1 'i'"C1;aC: J. ;L. OLS�(:X, County Mr. Pau? Nelson 01 •i-•-. ClerLof ai•! iio:isd of Supervlaor9, by f)r�uEf C:rEd 197E �.I.DCAL AGENCY FORMATION COA ;iai 74-77 Contra Costa County, California Revised Description Dates 4/7/76 Bys EIKUT "A" Subdivision 4613 Annexation to County Service Area 1,41 - Being a portion of Rancho EL Sobrante, described as follows% Beginning at an angle point on the northern boundary of County Service Area L-41. said point being on the western line of Parcel as shown on that certain snap filed May 2. 1972, in Book 22, of Parcel Maps, at page 8. said point being at the northernmost corner of Lot 11, Tract 3956. filed February 9, 1971, in Map Book 134, at page 50; thence, leaving said boundary of County Service Area L-41, North 7e 28' 44" West, 549.96 feet to the northwestern corner of said Parcel "B"; thence South 750 58. 440 East, 443.11 feet; thence South 69 39' 30" West. 591 feet, more or less, to the center of Amend Road; thence in a general Westerly direction along the center of Amend Road, 1200 feet, more or less, to the southern extension of the western line of Lot 1. of said Tract 3936; thence North 120 12' 16" East, 30 feet, more or less, to the southwestern corner of said Lot 1, said point also being an angle point on the southern boundary of County Service Area L-41; thence IDLsterly and Northerly along the southern and eastern boundaries of said County Service Area L-41, 1410 feet, more or less, to the paint of beginning. Containing 6.40 acres. more or less. 00;08 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STA'T'E OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Subordinating ) RESOLUTION HO. 76/347 Lien Against ) SUBORDINATION OF LIEU AND RESOLUTION A MORIZING SA14E EDWARD & REBECCA MORRISON ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: On April 29, 1959, Rebecca Morrison executed a reimbursement mree.en"C and notice of tien in -favor of Contra Co3ta County which :ABs recorded on May 4, 135O in c::e Office of the County Recorder in Volume 3366 of Official Records at page 179. EDWARD and REBECCA MORRISON noir desire to have said lien made subordinate and subject to a note and deed of trust executed by them in favor of Adelle Ossman and Abe Weinstein, sister and brother as joint tenants, in the amount of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000) . EDWARD and REBECCA MORRISON desire subordination of said lien to enable them to obtain a loan for the purpose of consolidating debts; and The Lien Committee has considered and recoamends this. NOW, THEREFORE, the County of Contra Costa, the owner and holder of said reimbursement agreement and notice of lien above- mentioned, does hereby subordinate the same to the deed of trust above-mentioned as they relate to the property described therein upon the condition that joint tenancy interests, if any, existing or created in the subject real property be severed as to. the interests of the County of Contra Costa, and it is ordered that the Chairman of the Board sign a certified copy hereof to constitute and effectuate the subordination. PASSED and ADOPTED on Arril 20, 1976. Rid:S cc: Auditor Administratcr County Counsel 00209 i SUBORDIIIATION OP LIEN Pursuant to the above Resolution, the subordination therein ordered of the County's lien against the property of EDWARD AND REBECCA 14ORRISON is hereby made upon the condition that joint tenancy interests, if any, existing or created in the subject real property be severed as to the interests of the County of Contra Costa. I P. Kenny Ch B an of the and o Supervisors of-We— County of Contr Costa State of California 0€ 210 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Safe ) Driving Award Program ) and Retention of Service ) April 20, 1976 Revolvers by Retirees. ) The Board on February 3, 1976 having referred to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) the proposal by the County Sheriff--Coroner for a Safe Driving Award Program which would provide awards to Sheriff's personnel who reach various plateaus of accident- free driving as follows: 25,000 miles - black leather, wallet size standard uniform badge holder for use with non-uniform case 50,000 miles - gold badge duplicate of uniform badge issue, flat style for use in leather case ?5,000 miles - $50 U. S. Savings Bond Series E 100,000 miles - 3100 U. S. Savings Bond Series E 150,000 miles - Smith & :lesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Revolver, stainless steel, with appropriate message engraved to commemorate the occasion Supervisors Dias and Linscheid having concurred that an incentive program to help minimize driving accidents is warranted and recommended approval of the first four awards but were of the opinion that some other award should be substituted for the Combat Magnum Revolver proposed for the 150,000 mile plateau, and having further recommended that County Counsel, with the change cited, be directed to prepare an appropriate ordinance; and The Government Operations Committee having also reviewed a Board referral of April 13, 1976 concerning a proposal that would permit retiring Deputy Sheriffs to retain their County- issued service revolvers and having recommended approval thereof (Resolution Number 70/346); IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations of its Government Operations Committee are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Committee Members Ilitness my hand and the Seal County Sheriff-Coroner of the Board of Supervisors affixed County Counsel this 20th day of April, 1976 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Director, Human Resources Agency BY61�.5� ` Count Audi � tor-Controller Ron a ynn ac les Deputy Clerk 00211 k�w 4Y i' : The Board of Supervisors CorAra JChaman ames.Kenny Costa R.OlDimonCount County Administration Building Calory Cterk and P.O.Box 911 �'County_ Ex Officio Clerk of the Board Martinez.California 94553 Mr&Geraldine Rumelt Chief Clerk James P.Kenny-Richmond (415)372.2371 1st District Alford M.Dias.El Sobrante 2nd District James E.Moriarty-Lafavette 3rd District Warren N.Boggess-Concord 4th District Edmund A.Linschaid-Pittsburq April 2 1976 5th District p REPORT OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE ON SAFE DRIVING AWARDS PROGRAM AND RETENTION OF SERVICE REVOLVERS BY RETIREES The Board on February 3, 1976 referred to the Government Operations Committee a proposal by the County Sheriff-Coroner for a Safe Driving Awards Program which would provide awards to Sheriff's personnel who reach various plateaus of accident- free driving as follows: 25,000 miles - black leather, wallet size standard uniform badge holder for use with non-uniform case 50,000 miles - gold badge duplicate of uniform badge issue, flat style for use in leather case 75,000 miles - $50 U. S. Savings Bond Series E 100,000 miles - $100 U. S. Savings Bond Series E 150,000 miles - Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Revolver, stainless steel, with appropriate message engraved to commemorate the occasion The Committee has reviewed this and concurs that an incentive program of this nature to help minimize driving accidents in this high accident-risk work is warranted. The annual costs are estimated at about $5,000. The Committee is concerned, however, with the pro- posed Combat Magnum Revolver proposed award for the 150,000 mile plateau, and recommends that some other award be substituted for that item. County Counsel has suggested that this program be authorized by ordinance and, accordingly, the Committee recommends that the Office of County Counsel, with the change cited, be directed to prepare the ordinance in final form for adoption by the Board. Microiiimed with board order t, ' 2 The Committee has also reviewed a Board referral of April 13, 1976, concerning a proposal that retiring Deputy Sheriffs be authorized to retain their County-issued service revolver. The Committee has determined that the average age of these guns is approximately twenty years, and that the Sheriff's Department does not re-issue them for further use. County Counsel has advised that the Board may approve this request by adoption of a resolution and the Committee so recommends. DIAS E. A. LINSCHEID Su rvisaz, Districts Supervisor, District V 00213 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Authorizing County ) Sworn Peace Officers to Retain Their ) County-Issued Revolvers Upon ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/ 346 Retirement ) WHEREAS the County Sheriff-Coroner has proposed that certain retiring peace officers be allowed to retain their County-issued service revolver; and WHEREAS the County Sheriff-Coroner has advised that the average age of these weapons is generally in excess of twenty years, and that said weapons are not typically reissued to new recruits; and 1,MEREAS the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) has reviewed and approved this proposal in report dated April 20, 1976; BE IT RESOLVED that those sworn peace officers of Contra Costa County designated peace officers by the California Penal Code and eligible for Safety Membership in the Contra Costa County Employees` Retirement Association are AUTHORIZED to retain their County-issued revolver upon retirement. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board on April 20, 1976. Orig: County Administrator cc: County Sheriff-Coroner County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 76/31;6 00214 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COi'TRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report } April 20, 1976 on Self-Insurance of ) Public Liability Risks. ) The Board having on February 10, 1976 referred to the Administration and Finance Co=ittee (Supervisors d. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) a report from the County Administrator on liability insurance afforded the County and having recommended " the process and procedures for implementation of the self- insurance program; and The Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny serving in the absence of Supervisor Boggess) having this day reported that it had reviewed the aforesaid report and having recommended the following actions. 1. Designate the Office of County Administrator to administer the County's insurance program, including retention of such risks as deemed appropriate. 2. Authorize an additional position, subject to Civil Service classification review, to be assigned to the Office of County Administrator to assist in administration and management of the County's insurance program. 3. Approve the self-insurance program described in the report of the County Administrator and in connection therewith, agree to extend coverage to officials, commissioners, employees and other parties under similar terms and conditions as previously afforded under the terminated policy to the extent the County may lawfully do so. Also direct the County Administrator to again solicit proposals for medical malpractice coverage with a substantial County retention. 4. Adopt a resolution to authorize the County Administrator or his Assistants to allow, compromise and settle claims against the County, its officers and its employees if the amount to be paid does not exceed $5,000, pursuant to Government Code Section 935.4, with the understanding that such amounts paid will subsequently be reported to the Board. (Resolution Number 76/342) 5. Establish a pre-Funded system to provide for potential claims so that funds will be budgeted for the period that liability exposure exists and accidents occur; in connection therewith, agree to establish a Public Liability Trust Fund to which funds appropriated in operating budgets till be transferred as prescribed by the County Ad^+inistrator. (Resolution Number 76/343) 6. Authorize County Ad=ministrator to solicit proposals for self-insurance consulting services to assist with the prograr. as necessary. 0045 7. Direct the County Administrator and County Counsel to attempt to develop procedures which will permit County special districts to participate with the County in the Trust Fund under a policy arrangement, pursuant to Government Code Sections 990.4 and 990.8. 8. Adopt order directing County, department and agency heads, County special district and service area chiefs and supervisors and employees to devote careful attention and care to identification and minimization of risks, thereby reducing damages and costs to taxpayers. The cost of losses are to be recorded by department, district, and service area and reported semi-annually to the Board of Supervisors for review. Department and agency heads and chiefs will be held responsible for the loss experience of their departments. (Separate order) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of its Administration and Finance Committee are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. bfitness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of April, 1976 J. R. OLSSOH, CLERK By, ����,�..tt__f�k f,�2 Q-AJ Rondalynn SAackles Deputy Clerk cc: Board Committee Public Warks Director County Counsel Director of Personnel County Auditor—Controller Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator 00216 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 19 76 In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County Pertaining to Regulations of Recreational Facilities and Activities in Residential Districts. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to a proposed amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County which would allow recrea- tional clubs or activities, whether organized for monetary profit or not, in all residential districts by issuance of a land use permit; and No one having appeared in opposition; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having recommended that the proposed amendment be approved, and that the Director of Planning and County Counsel be instructed to prepare the appropriate ordinance; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director of Planning Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 20th day of April ig 76 �f yJ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �'-y�`'�-- /I ��•2_ , Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 • 15-A1 Vera Nelson 00217 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 14 76 In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County Pertaining to Regulations for Land Improvement Contractor's Yards. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to a proposed amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County which would eliminate land improvement contractor's yards as a permitted use in the General Agricultural District (A-2) and define and establish a contractor's yard as a permitted use by Land Use Permit in the General Commercial District (C) , Light Industrial District (L-I) and Heavy Industrial District (H-I); and No one having appeared in opposition, and the Board members having discussed the matter; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having recommended that the proposed amendment be approved, and that the Director of Planning and County Counsel be instructed to prepare the appropriate ordinance; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the Minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: Director of P1arLning Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 20th day of April 1976 J. R. OLSSON. Clerk By ��t-iz- �� Deputy Clerk ++ 24 12174 - 15-MVera Nelson 00218 J IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the ?Satter of Appeal of ) Mr. Alfred A. Burda et al ) from Action of the Board of ) Appeals on Application ) April 20, 2976 No. M.S. 73-75, E1 Sobrante } Area. ) Mr. Tom Gozzano, Applicant. ) i i.i =" The Board on January 20, 1976 having; deferred to this date decision on the appeal of Mr. Alfred A. Burda et al (resi- . dents in the vicinity of Valley View Court) from Board of Appeals approval with conditions of the tentative map for Minor Subdivision 73-75, E1 Sobrante area, filed by Mr. Tom Gozzano, and having re- quested that staff meet with all parties concerned to develop a master pian for said area; and �-' Garvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Planning, -- --- - having advised that staff has developed a proposal which is acceptable to residents of the area, but that the applicant has not had an opportunity to review the conditions of approval; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having noted that Mr. Gozzano was not at the meeting, suggested that the matter be continued for 60 days, and that the applicant be provided a copy of the proposal approved by the neighbors and staff; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having expressed the opinion that a 30-day delay might be more appropriate; and Supervisor Dias having recommended that staff expedite review of the proposal and notify the Clerk when this has been accomplished, so that the matter can be calendared two weeks from that time; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that decision on the appeal of Mr. Burda is deferred to June 22, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. or, in the event agreement by all parties is reached prior to said date, a taro-week notice be given before the matter is scheduled for Board consideration. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of April, 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By c-1tiJC�YL.?�LrLJZ Bonnie Boaz cc : 1,4r. T. Goxxano Deputy Clerk *•fir. J . Amdahl Mr. A. Burda Director of Plannin; 00219 l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 1976 In the Matter of Approval of Surety Tax Bond(s). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the surety tax bond(s) in the amount(s) indicated for the following tract(s) is(are) APPROVED: Tract Bond No. Location Principal No. Amount 4784 Martinez Zocchi Brothers, U806408 $7,677 a partnership 4817 Walnut Creek Terra California SL 6304583 $9,000 PASSED by the Board on April 203% 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. VAtness my hand and the Sea[ of the Board of cc: Tax Collector Supervisors - with copy of bond(s ) affixed this 2 ,-- day ofd, 19 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By- :C t,,., *, ektaLPeputy Clerk Rondaly n Shackles 31 UUM _ Bond U806408 D01NM AGAINST' 'TAXES Premidm: .$77.00 - KNO1. ALL 1'1:34'11 BY THS1JL' PI IESE 1!'2S THAT ZOCCHI BROTHERS, a partnership , 'as principal ' ' UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY and (Surety) a corporation organized and existing under the lags of the State of WASHINGTON '... and authorized to transact surety business' in California as surety are held and firmly bound unto the County of Contra Costa, State of California, in the penal sure of sEvEN THousAND sTx HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN & N0/100 Dollars (y� 7,677.00 ), to be paid to the said ,County of Contra Costa, for the payment of which well ani truly to be made, we and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors, jointly and severally, z firmly by-these presents. Sealed '�lith our seals and dated this 14th day of April , 1976 . The conditions of the above obligation is such that WREREAS, the above bounded principal is about to file a map entitled Subdivision 4784_ • and . coverin`r a subdivi::ion of a tract of land in said County of Contra Costa, and there are certain liens for taxe3 and special assessments collected as taxes, against the said Tract of land -covered by said map, which--taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, are not as yet due or payable. NOW THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall pay all of the taxes arid special assessments collecte:iias - taxes i-.hick are a lied against sail tract of land covered by said map, at' the• tine of the filing of said trap of said Tract, then this _ obligation. shall be void and of no effect. Other' e it shall re- main in full force and effect. ZOCCffI . O RS, a partnership B 4"r-In P incipa PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY • � �-S`�:c ty State of California 1 ss: County of CONMACOSTA On April 14 19 76 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared- George If. Krue. er knavn to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as Attorney-in-Fact of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the narne of UNITED PACIFIC INSURAI ICE COMPANY,as Surety,and h is own name as Attorney-in-Fact. ' 00221 tr!� Commi�;ion expires Nowry 1�jATtn and for County S. Ann Krueger r { t !g+ t Y s 2 u., r �� s t 3 n,... y I ��s r a�s 5 3 � '.M? d i'. , I', _-- x ,� �, f�`s#'� "`"w'n �' 3. v z-'� F� s d'$ a -t„s n . ` z '�vtFil 41; ; II 'I,� y ��, 3 3,t . .airt k '� a- F' ,M'R"'s*`� iiia t t -7 • Fs � a, 33 Ho..sz�AI i '' Mh f Y •MV t ',6-f t : ��:,�A■\�..rw■ 1///��\ ,�.T�\A •��.•�A`'fi' .3 fet n't 7a4' {l"z, ,, _ ,��y;s, t "3 F i/VM./ib r \�� �..r.//\I:( "� �r A ,rt^ti' ,-+S: t ✓'�` L A3 _ * s # f�* - ;; ,: n 'S '"+ur« -c n t _ +, r " c ua•' " P��' "rts mar °`'" •' ;': : .:i: -' r` v ,- r /.. ,n ., .�w�,'+� �is {may «., ^}. wwrrw�v _. , Y ` �i� 'V` Yr�e KhaA,."'£''�'�t�.dt ,..+1$n - �,..� r� r 5'u .* - t k'S'� —`,r V 'Oi, , h" wf •.►J... r sYS" P M 4 s wiw.�'e�..b g•....4.r x';boZ.n U.c..W"' Pir �LT2S'� G�fO , . ' .. : _ J" �`t of k rZr x 3N tr a i, Smote of Cho: , sa :he s o:� '�' ! , �� �Y ,� A .� 2 L. d� } E,. �.. YZS ems, Sf "Y S^ iyro�yy4.. d5 r'•+ 3"1.',1 W y 3} . + :� c 7 .�'�o �� 8�L ..i�� Said � i of v�.Z} s VGr' S 9.L��ai e��ra w. - �, ,.« v o yr* a4 .+� n. S r "'. t s n d r' Ytb�^-Rhw `„ ° cz kwsa esc o� rs' 3 ` oselnes, cume �s, exece:�or &&`� `` ' .".olSr 2.".,� sCCCLSSors, ]G" - , severa_:I. , ..2 '". M`' i �a r ttH+ s -- s ,i_'r x, , t o _ { S F ,'' U.liecJe �..e.,..._ R w, ✓ 5 .6 'Sk,�r. .: - " �4 , r . yv� ` rr# I '3i .7 in +� r L1 Y LS. y+,.,,{.,,.�. a ,a1'mak' a � .. �C0..4�2�..oa5 O� •'e c�J'OV2 0��2.�da.�o914L 2 .e . ggol .�w,. i-) , �x,� tiny , .> n �'n { {q '�Z" ' `• ' e eaoae :3o� ,ec a"",+.~:C1 :.s , u�� to# €s:le F_ a ,I IV35T{il[ mw 683. 1TAI+ . „ ak s : ^«,}f `"4w""#' ",mss-ir�5�'1't 3��'�7r.et a5 x __ d s 3 S �`` �s f r✓ '�.' 'v'V,3 e`a x _ .;, }' t :.a a z v` r .,��y�.�.r, +� ����..� ,_�/ /:�1� �j �r f /�,{� r`�q "F"'s'°s�.j�e �/���4'v��t '`�` " _ '� �� '�f iiL $Wr�ih� G `+.7W/w �YM^ Vim. i. �r+\i►\r of t ri - :�Gi�{/VMiw. �j ' v { ` �:. Costz, I , ..b :� �.*zµce. . 3.zeas zo t�xzs *�-� � -. "u I � aZSS�: �S Co'�� SS BC" ski :�""c G��G ""t - Y ,Qw��i ,� ��_ ',! MC.� r �J�."f'r�i ��g�JeS�i.eiZL �C�+e`�A91e. `°>. J s V a .� e Si' - "�f ,,y".�++c �+r '" r w,x :_'s ' -"' 3 w- �" S t � �s,.�-F'P r z h.";p. � . �a ,�.� .t 6 ,+: r. ' y,!\,� hy\�a�..."•',t►�.�.oM�.� •M. rN4►�. ..., _._.., ^'49 + �" �H .,�`. z ? 1 1. y.. Q.•1 w O !1L `" M "I _ *�' w - r M < L. D..V moo... ,. e �c� �Sz......c._ u.?'CC-. C\. - ..£C �'S �"`': k +s, • +R.ii.s4vS aZ3�' Ca *ti+..'"v c1,. �.]..+.i 2.�'�'1�► \� 5�:\►r-a.:.4'..w.a.cr,o�"',s'" \'wYy„�-,w.. �'� — §J'�1f{ : 'y i § \y\,. S yF �y�/� ,W /�3' ,L t'�i p3"a�2" '$'S�'>vr�43[t �'y�� ,�.,. �e.1�5 kk '_ 'N 3, 4 .A�•n► ? '• 'AT\ o �.. T�may, or ='L ' *M .7Mi���w z \wM�w - ,-111 r �.� �.� �....3 be vow. o 'roe pec ' .bes-ti, i I s;`�F ,t k �w..� 4,r? ' r t n 4»ra:: asa'c µ 'din* _'�i c .aG� �.Ar,. � ,?''a �.* ► `: 3 1 r 3~,a•• N t '� ' .' � �v r h .,wa'� ' +. I ..�... . .+:. :,, ter. SS. 1- 5 5��,,, WAI�'BR F. i d �f. fC'df^_ Y ".M� rf - ;_ = +.i. i.. .., A_ •...v V \..�V ,:�...\r�.+.—J ..+i.,� G....y -,.. .fir ..f.....,I \a _ F is i�:.. . '*�r .�. ...� .+r w. '�.:.•,�,.,,• r ,ia,,+ /� �..�►'►. ....I M� tb .•....i. M•. \� ./fir -o 'e f cma3 ? � •zes, edCl�Z.w� o�'2i�"�. �.. '� e1 ,,.����. _ � �� l _. • « _P '� � l —.. ..w V..� `Y ��� Uh n.l«22 `},. •yrs r y : 2 k a t 3 +hI d y`'d5a"xp^� - Xrk '+, �^b 'k. i t d n +^�' ?may,tJeq s" . F', Y '.� kx"` rtJ,+�S�Sn 'tx �`� � � 1 '� `i.h t �� akita7 � 1 t .a��. �r I i ..�..,�'.. �-Pt *.,.if'�tr x'� fy of ,. � i"�,.k. ��a � � fi' � "0"e ,.��!.:'Y r r�y�,'"sev''�-"+a ` '` ''"kh�j �3-`"�`, ...m. ,."'.w „�.," �".«` :i.:.. { r �' V.y. a.,w`".s""�yi�-, +i II ii', L'�=. y�� ,�,,, C�'f.�,�, a,�'��-.as-z.�:: ,�'3 �s � ,..ls �,r�:z ' e =f+s�^� :~..'��� S •`�� v�>a`�+rF' � '�I � � �'II '.r,. :Rn-' ?'wa�sr`@ �^...'.,_sok-,`, 5��.... h .w,., �..,' *�:c.>~...'`. , �.rF:. .'9 s.^:er§ai aii>•., `�k'^�.'r`r.�, �. �i 6.:.. '`A t ,,..: r � �I�i�l ��i TO tq C _ (Corporation) 11 O „ STATE OF CALIFORNIA j COUNTY OF Contra Costa )} SS. On AQ ri 1 9. 1976 before me, the undersigned,a Koury Public in and for said • State, perwDavid B. wood nslly appeared ' to known to me to be the President,and -- ms known to me to be Secretary of the corpoc[tion that executed the within Instrument, -- = known to me to 6e the persons who executed the within A Instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named, and ' < acknowledged to tae that such corporation executed the within • instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a rewlntion of its board sussssssaq of directors. OMCIAL SEAL 3 WITNESS my hand and official seal = BETTY L PEIF = : -s NOTA?V 101:7i1C LitlfOrrfl/A „ • M"TY OF CONTRA COSTA .Signator � � tri cmm"'i"[a)bes fetraah li•19" r • r ! �•1�1tl>ii[[YSf!�13fUi•rSY•11YfYiY.M•t7lgtitl�iHA - �r Bet L. Peif A Name (Typed or Printed) (Tlb area aw Nasiar.•tarty.eat) •. - ILEDGM ENT—ATTORNEY IN FACT ARCH CALIFORNIA On this-_ 5th day of � _,- ,. , -�____ _ ,19 76 before County of .S. " - _._ __.ilV•K7_�e_S74rV.L irLa ail._._.__.,a Notary Public in and for _... ALA�DA :r NEDA said __ .___. _..__. Cotmty,SWv aforesaid, residing therein,duly eommts- s sinned and s-wmm, personally appeased.- VAT.'1 E F.—MEMS.__ known to rte to be: the peumn w•hase (tame is subsesibed to the within butrument as the aftomey in bet of ' FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY c . M and adaow�ledged to me that be sulne•ribed the name of FIRESfA, S FUND INSURANCE _.: ..,.„„.� „� M„_ —COMPANY thereto,and his own as attorney in bel .:-�..` IN 1' MESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set hand A official seal,ALAMM • my office in the said N' day and year in this cerbilcate fiat above Wrlttert: A �_ ��� A E • Notary Public in and for the ._,_._______..______County ofALAMA State of California. I►ty commission expires_ �U223 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , , 19 76 In the Matter of Reconstruction of Port Chicago Highway Bridge, Clyde Area, Project No. 4371-4283-76 The Public Works Director having recommended that the Board approve the replacement of the existing narrow bridge with a new bridge having a 40-foot wide roadway, one 5-foot wide sidewalk and a bridge span length of 50 feet on Port Chicago Highway and Diablo Creek, approximately 3000 feet north of Highway 4, in the Clyde area, for which a Negative Declaration was posted and filed with the County Clerk on January 20, 1976; and The Board having determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, requested the Director of Planning to file a Notice of Determination; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid project is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Originator: Public Works Department afiAd this 20th day of April 1976 Road Design Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By %� -� Deputy Clerk cc: Public Works Director N. In sham Director of Planning County Administrator N za sus son: 0224 r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: ) Declaring a load limit on ) TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2193 - LDL County Bridge No. 3975A-.28) (HIGH STREET, Rd. r3975A) , ) Date: APR '?0 1976 Pacheco ) (Supv. Dist. II - Pacheco) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On the basis of an engineering and traffic survey and recommendations thereon by the Acting County Public Works Director and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Chapter 46-2 (§46-2.002 ff. ) , this Board hereby determines that County Bridge No. 3975A-.28 across HIGH ST. (Rd. #3975A) , Pacheco, is in a dangerous and weak condition, therefore, pursuant to Section 35754 of the California Vehicle Code the permissible weight on said bridge is hereby reduced to a gross weight of 10,000 pounds and no person shall drive a vehicle over or allow a vehicle to be on said bridge when the weight of the vehicle and its load exceeds 10,000 pounds. Be it further Resolved that said 10,000 pound weight limit shall remain in effect for a period of not more than 90 days and the Acting Public Works Director is hereby authorized to erect appropriate signs indicating the weight restriction at the entrances to County Bridge No. 3975A-.28 AdooW 5v the Board on--APR �0 1976 _ PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present. cc County Administrator Sheriff California Highway Patrol OU;z25 t c In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 ' 19 7-6. In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of Final Environmental Impact Report, Livorna Road Reconstruction, Alamo Area, (Project No. 4234-4257-75) The Public Works Director having reported that in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, a draft Environmental Impact Report for the reconstruction of Livorna Road between Interstate 6$0 and Trotter Way, Alamo area , was prepared by the Planning Department ; and It having been noted that on April 13 , 1976, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said Environmental Impact Report and found the project to be in conformance with the County General Plan, as per Section 65402 of the Government Code, and that said Report was adequate: and The Public Works Director having this day submitted to the Board for its consideration the Environmental Impact Report for said project ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said Environ- mental Impact Report is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Originator: Public Works Department ° ed this 20th day of April 1976 Road Design Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By- Deputy Clerk Id. r. cc: Public Works Director Inaka Director of Planning County Administrator H24 8/75 lona 0046 t� FlyL' `i .AEtROYU LF;�I-dS NUF.Ct S Y,, KULKONkS tp 0. -01 Rp'o Typ*•-- ) �_1 ; - ��j "T'. C'�7 1 1 •u FT CJ ECT ITE.: . -� o :• ;�' -y. � Sy :�'' �,• ,. "'= � •i •/. . I, .. -�!' %F. +� •••.•: t / !• � Cil eclj C: nasi!'. -J� 5:'• • • � '� ,� � '� �t• . 'r �• � � ' •\ s I .. ALT. • :� 1 ` Vis' �'. t ''% ��•' H _.�.,..� �„.� � `. r •. Sch �� .�. •, ,cam, ` ,1\• \ • : Ston-e ��" k •:�. ,%t1, • �\•�'i��2 ,� rpZ 2 j � � •�� _ - • /spy�, . . r�r.�. .• r o' - -: - .� •F. �� �„�\ - ,lam .\:- � • � 'Q „ v P�. ,.__.._ 1_7 e. � `-> •`•-'J `� Jam.' cin :{! i' - _ �ry. ,,�G } - f' �•,. �\ -i-- � - cam. - - • � t ,� '• ��� . -�_• � << � '*•` I 2000' • ___` ; 1 •-' � �� jAL I'!PACT REPORT LiVo2•na Road Reconstruction Microfilmeu with board ordee VIJ��Fr I g a x ��•J� `p C �; M ` � u .J'' �y'a ��f ,�,,�^s. '� '..�;���'�.�;��•5 � '� � us. !^ems" �.ry�� .diF^g7i �, �."^,k .,��,a��ti ,", .: '.. ..„ !' - � ,n..... s a•,.":ygnazm ;;*r:* z7"••tY5'3G _ 1 • t/? �C LU Z 4M c� J ON Be Mfr+�`':• 't� /^ ft� _ !'� / • , , �'W `•:� •4A'n til •fes �r.�r co 5 tJ T - V CL �7 i - w228 IM �.- .i, '. •1.:5. ;f - -- -- � C -tom � Iti�� .V, Y 77-7 e � j 19 t W a ., ysS 3AJrM wYt.••A� . W M i , � a V U a O } 1•,�\_ IIID � . V ."7 I. Introductory Discussion A. Project Description The proposed project involves the reconstruction of Livorna Road east of Interstate 680 in the Alamo area. Approximately 1500 feet of new roadbed Mould be constructed beginning roughly 300 feet east of the northbound Interstate 680 on-ramp and extending to a point approximately 130 feet west of Trotter Way. The project is located in census tract 3461. It is proposed that the road would be paved to a width of 34 feet--two 12 foot wide traffic lanes and two S foot wide shoulder/bicycle lanes. Livorna Road would be straightened and the two sharp curves near Wilson Road would be eliminated in order to improve horizontal sight distance. The existing road profile which includes rolling undulations that restrict vertical sight distance would be smoothed through cutting and filling. The maximum grade would be 9.9 percent or approxi- mately 10:1, horicontal:vertical. . A good indication of the proposed cutting and filling can be obtained by comparing the Horizontal Alignment Comparison with the Vertical Profile Comparison. The control station numbers permit identification of any point along the road on both diagrams. Estimated cost of the project is $150,000. Road reconstruction is expected to require 3 months. B. Environmental Evaluation and Impact Assessment 1. Physical Description The proposed project is located in the low foothills of the Diablo Range which border the easterly side of the San Radon Valley. The road crosses a prominent ridgeline. This is indicated by the Vertical Profile Comparison. Undulations in the existing profile also are evident. A shallow drainageway crosses under the existing roadbed between stations 28 and 29 and trends to the northwest. A grove of oak trees is also present in this area. 2. Existing Use and Surrounding Area The use of the surrounding area is low density single family residential. Residences are scattered over the landscape in an irregular pattern. Northeast of the project along Trotter hay and within the City of Walnut Creek is a single family residential development. 1 M t 1_ ' ' OOM An area north of Livorna Road and adjacent to the east side of Interstate 680 has been acquired by County Service Area R-8 for park purposes. It is possible that Livorna Road could be used to provide access to the park but it would first be necessary to purchase additional property to directly link the park with Livorna Road or to obtain an access easement. It is believed that the park would be utilized for passive recreational activities such as hiking. Alamo Elementary School is located at the intersection of Nilson Road and Livorna Road. This school, which is run by the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, accepts students in grades K through 5 and has a present enrollment of 288 students. Two sessions of kindergarten are held each day. Children attending the school use Livorna Road in travelling to and from school. Impacts a. The realignment would place the roadbed an estimated 8 feet closer to the residence located north of Livorna Road and west of the intersection with Laverock Lane. The minimum distance between the edge of the pavement to the residence would be • reduced from roughly 59 feet to roughly 51 feet. b. The residence north of Livorna Road but east of Laverock Lane would not be affected by the proposed realignment since the new roadway would be placed slightly south of the existing roadbed. C. The other residence which might be adversely affected is located south of Livorna Road across from Alamo School. The minimum distance between the edge of the roadbed and the house would be decreased from approximately 7S feet to slightly over 50 feet. The distance from the garage located northwest of the house to the road would be reduced from 60 feet to approximately 27 feet. d. It would be necessary to acquire approximately 6,000 square feet of right-of-way where the road will be shifted to the north (see a above). e. Where the new roadway would be placed south of the existing roadbed just before the intersection with Laverock Lane (see b above), it would be necessary to acquire 3,700 square feet of right-of-way. 2 {� f. In the vicinity of Vernal and Wilson Roads right-of- way acquisition is proposed as follows: (1) 9,500 square feet along Vernal Drive approximately 200 feet south of Livorna Road so that the alignment of the Vernal Drive intersection may be improved; (2) 13,000 square feet southeast of the intersection between Livorna road/Wilson Road to permit straight- ening of the road; (3) roughly 7,200 square feet northeast of the Livorna-Wilson Road intersection to permit imporved alignment in the intersection; (4) 700 square feet (in a 2 foot wide strip) along the southern side of Livorna Road in the vicinity of the hump west of Trotter Way; and (5) 600 square feet (in a 2 foot wide strip) north of Livorna Road and west of Trotter Way. g. It would also be necessary to obtain slope easements for cuts and fills which extend beyond County right- of-way. h. The proposed project would improve bicycle circulation along this section of Livorna Road as well as vehicular circulation. The safety of motorists and cyclists would also be enhanced. Livorna Road east of the improved section in the vicinity of Trotter Way would remain unimporved and the hazards to bicyclists and pedestrians would remain unchanged. Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact An attempt has been made to keep right-of-way acquisitions to a minimum while meeting the requirements of proper roadway design. 3. Plans, Ordinances, and Policies General Plan Land Use - The area surrounding Livorna Road is designated for low density single family residential use. The existing plan which was adopted in 1967 is presently under review. It is expected the area devoted to resi- dential use would be reduced and open space. use expanded in the new plan should changes be made in the vicinity of the proposed project. Open Space - Conservation (1973) - The section of Livorna Road which would be reconstructed does not border any designated Open Space Areas. •fir ` �. # M2M Scenic Routes (1974) - Livorna Road is not a proposed • scenic route. Recreation - Interim Bicycle Paths Plan (1972) - Livorna Road is not planned as a primary or secondary bicycle path. The nearest planned bicycle paths are located along Stone Valley Road, Rudgear Road and Danville Boulevard. Interim Hiking Trails Plan (1972) - The nearest planned hiking trail is located along the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way west of Interstate 680. Zoning Unincorporated property along the project section of Livorna Road is .zoned R-20. This is a single family residential district in which minimum lot size is 20,000 square feet. Impacts The proposed project does not conflict with adopted plans, ordinances and policies. Although the Interim Bicycle Paths Plan does not place a bicycle path along Livorna Road it should be recognized that (1) Livorna Road does link directly with Danville Boulevard (a primary bicycle path); (2) the road is used by school children; and (3) there is potential for additional residential development east of the project. It is reasonable to assume that shoulder/bicycle lanes on Livorna Road would be used and would add to the amenities present in this area. 4. Circulation Livorna Road is one of several roads in the Alamo area which link with Interstate 650. Other nearby interchanges are Rudgear Road roughly 1 mile to the north and Stone Valley Road about 3/4 of a mile to the south. Rudgear Road and Livorna Road are joined by Stewart Avenue and Trotter Way. Livorna Road and Stone Valley Road are joined by Miranda Avenue. The pattern of roads, the amount of development in the area of Livorna Road, and the location of shopping facili- ties and employment centers largely explain the light traffic volume on Livorna Road. Current and projected traffic volumes are summarized in Table 1. Accident records maintained by the County Public Works Department indicate that from January, 1974, to November, 009-/ • TABLE 1 LIVORNA ROAD RECONSTRUCTION EIR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ADT) Existing Imminent 1990 1990 Location Traffic Traffic* Projection** Projection*** Livorna Road east of Interstate 680 3,120 4,100 4,740 4,060 Miranda Avenue north of Stone Valley Road 3,160 4,080 9,230 8,610 Stone Valley Road east of Interstate 680 8,160 8,620 20,600 14,730 *Based on approved and proposed development' in the area. **Based on adopted County land use policies. ***Based on likely development in the Livorna Road area. SOURCE: Contra Costa County Public Forks Department 1975, three traffic accidents have occurred on the project section of Livorna Road. Two of the accidents involved personal injury while the third was restricted to property damage and/or animals. All three accidents occurred on the western portion of proposed reconstruction. The narrowness of the road (paved to a width of 20 feet), the presence of vegetation and trees close to the pavement, and the hill may have contributed to these accidents. It should also be recognized that elementary school children use Livorna Road in travelling to and from school. This increases the accident potential over the length of the proposed improvement, particularly in the vicinity of Alamo School. In general, roadbeds are not well suited for pedestrian use. The proposed road improvements are designed for a vehicle speed of 35 miles per hour. Curves will have a radius of 500 feet compared to the present 40 foot radius of the sharpest curves near Vernal Drive and Wilson Road. ' Impacts a. The proposed project would improve traffic circula- tion on Livorna Road by increasing traffic safety. • b. The proposed project would increase the safety of cyclists, pedestrians and school children. It would join already improved sections of Livorna Road to the west near the freeway and to the east in the City of Walnut Creek. C. It is possible that traffic volumes would increase very slightly (less than 5 percent) because of the road improvement project. It is felt that Livorna Road is already used by those for which it is con- venient and advantageous. The condition and alignment of the present road have probably not substantially discouraged use by residents of the area. It is not expected that the proposed project would attract a significant amount of traffic which has heretofore used Rudgear Road or Stone Valley Road. S. Soils and Geology Soils Mappin- of the Soil Conservation Service (1974) indicates that two soils are found in the project area: Lodo clay loan (LC :) which is found on 9 percent to 30 percent 6 00236 ® slopes; and Loco clay loam (LCF) which is found on 30 percent to 50 percent slopes. Both soils display medium to rapid runoff, moderate to high erosion hazard when the soil is bare and exposed, moderately slow permeability, moderate shrink-swell potential and moderate corrosivity on uncoated steel. Depth to bedrock averages between 1 and Ih feet. Geology Bedrock consists of folded sedimentary rocks of the Orinda Formation. The bedrock dips to the east at 25 degrees to 50 degrees. The slope stability of the Orinda Formation is poor. Landslides are abundant in both soil and bedrock, on natural and cut slopes. There are, however, relatively few landslides mapped in the project area. This is apparently due to the lack of very steep slopes and the average annual rainfall of between 20 and 22.5 inches ("Mean Seasonal Isohyets Compiled From Preci- pitation Rocords 1S19-1973," Contra Costa County Public Works Department). No faults are mapped in the immediate vicinity. Impacts a. Roughly 13,000 cubic yards of cut and 4,500 cubic yards of fill are proposed. This will generate an excess of approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil and rock material. The excess material would be disposed by contractors for the project at an approved disposal location. Cuts and fills would be finished to a slope of 1.5:1, horizontal:vertical. The highest fill slopes would be slightly less than 20 feet high north of the road near the shallow drainage- May (stations 27 and 28). The highest cut slopes would be approximately 15 feet high near the Vernal Drive intersection (station 35). Erosion can be expected on cuts and fills following project con- struction. Erosion will continue until the slopes become stabili=ed. In may be several years or more before stabilisation is achieved due to the difficulty frequently encountered in establishing vegetation on newly exposed bedrock. b. Minor siouoliing could occur on cut slopes. It is expected that the Orinda Formation should stand reasonably well at 1.5:1 because the slopes created would in general be relatively low. Major problems with sloughing are not anticipated. w i ` lltl 403*7 5 h Mitigation Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact a. Beyond standard procedures relating to the compaction of fill and engineering of cut slopes, cut and fill slopes would be seeded with grasses (a mixture of rye and barley) following grading. This should aid in retarding erosion and in maintaining slope stability. Fill slopes and cuts would also be rounded as shown on the diagram of a typical section. b. Retaining walls could be used where fills would be deepest to prevent erosion and sloughing and to free land area which would otherwise be covered by fill. In this case oak trees could be protected. It would also be possible to use a combination of fill and retaining walls to limit the fill area. The use of retaining walls would increase total project cost. 6. Hydrology and Eater Quality The proposed project does not cross any major creeks or streams. The nearest intermittent stream mapped by the U.S.G.S. is located north and west of the project and empties into San Ramon Creek, west of Interstate 680. As previously mentioned, Livorna Road crosses a shallow drainageway which trends to the northwest along the Western section of the proposed project. It is likely that development in the area, including Livorna Road, has 'contributed to the formation of this small drainageway. Impacts a. Stormwater runoff would be slightly increased by the expansion of impervious road surfaces. b. Erosion is expected on engineered slopes until vegetation becomes established and the slopes become stabilized. Such erosion will result in minor silting. Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact a. Engineered slopes will be seeded with grasses, a mixture of rye and barely. b. Engineered slopes would be rounded at the top and interceptor ditches would be used to channel storm- water runoff. s 0E1238 7, Vegetation and Wildlife Vegetation The most significant vegetation constraint consists of the grove of oak trees located north of Livorna Road near the shallow drainageway. Other vegetation along the route of the proposed project is comprised largely of grasses and orchard remnants (i.e. walnut trees). Wildlife Wildlife in the area of the project is consists of those species foiuid in rural-urban areas. Birds should include the acorn woodpecker, white-breasted nuthatch, flicker, western meadowlark, screech owl, etc. Rodents would be the most numerous mammals. Larger mammals such as deer may be found in or pass through the area from time to time. No known rare or endangered species are present in the vicinity of the project. Impacts The principal vegetation-wildlife impact attributable to the project involves 11 oak trees averaging 2 feet in diameter along the shallow drianageway. It is anticipated that these trees would be removed. These oaks provide habitat for wildlife, although the habitat is subject to disturbance from passing vehicles and human activity in the general area. The trees also provide visual interest for the passing motorist and serve to screen the upper portion of livorna Road from the view of people traveling on Interstate 680, Significant wildlife impacts, beyond those relating to removal of habitat are not foreseen. Mitigating Measures a. The proposed reconstruction could be aligned slightly to the south in the vicinity of the oak trees to more fully utilise the existing roadbed. Minor cutting or filling of the existing roadbed might still be required to attain the proposed road gradient. This would be preferable from a purely environmental standpoint because the amount of land which would be covered by fill would be reduced. It is not expected that the cost of the road improvements would be increased and some of the oaks might be saved. b. A retaining wall could be used instead of the proposed 1.5:1 fill slope to limit impacts on the 00 %cla i - existing oak trees. This would increase the cost of the road improvements. Erosion and sloughing would be reduced under this alternative. The visual impact of the retaining wall could be found objec- tionable since it would be as much as 20 feet high. It would also be possible to utilize a combination of fill slope and retaining wall. This would reduce visual impacts but road improvement costs would still be increased. S. Air Quality and Noise The San Ramon Valley is a narrow inland valley in which there appears to be a tendency for air pollutants, notably oxidant, to concentrate. Air quality data specifically for Alamo is not available from the Bay Area Air Pollution Control District. The nearest BAAPCD air quality moni- toring station is located in Kalnut Creek. Table 2 suarizes BAAPCD oxidant data. Another automobile-related air pollutant is carbon monoxide which can concentrate near roads and freeways. Information on the concentration of carbon monoxide for Livorna Road is not available. It is not expected that ambient air- quality standards would be violated due to relatively light traffic volumes. Moreover, residences are set back from the road a sufficent distance to allow for the dispersion of carbon monoxide. Impacts a. Air quality impacts are expected to be minor since the proposed project (1) would not significantly increase the traffic using Livorna Road and (2) would not stimulate substantial increases in auto- mobile use. To the extent that vehicular traffic increases, air pollution emissions would also be increased. Large traffic increases, could result from additional residential development in the area. Although improvements to Livorna Road would enhance the marketability of new residential development, it is unlikely that the decision to undertake new residential development could depend upon the proposed reconstruction. b. Air pollutants would be emitted during the 3 month project construction phase but would be limited to weekday working hours. Because the majority of construction equipment is now diesel powered, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emission levels will be 20 00240 TABLE 2 LIVORIvA ROAD RECONSTRUCTION EIR OXIDANT SUMMARY - WALNUT CREEI: AREA Year 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 2974 Number of daps state standard was exceeded (10 pphm or more) 54 34 36 30 22 18 Number of days federal standard was exceeded (more than S pphm) -- -- -- 43 27 31 SOURCE: Bay' Area Air Pollution Control District 11 s : 00241 less than from standard gasoline powered equipment. Sulfur content of diesel fuel. Limited amounts of dust will be generated during earth moving operations. Air quality impacts from construction will be tem- porary and are not expected to be significant. Noise Mapping contained in the Poise Element of the County General Plan indicates that the 60 dBA MEL contour parallels the freeway and crosses Livorna Road just west of Laverock Lane, the 55 dBA C_%EL contour extends east to the midpoint between Trotter hay and Kilson Road at the _ present time. The term "C1EL contour" refers to a method of representing noise levels over a 24 hour period in which evening and night noise levels are given propor- tionately greater weight. Evening noise levels are increased by 5 dBA and night levels are increased by 10 dBA. Traffic on Interstate 680 is the principal noise source in this area at the present time. Projections for the year 1990 which are based in part upon results of the Land Use and Transportation Study, indicate that changes in noise levels are anticipated. Noise emissions from Interstate 680 are expected to decline but noise levels on Livorna Road are expected to increase with additional traffic. Traffic estimates used in making the noise projection were 6,000 trips per day just west of the Miranda Avenue intersection and 10,000 trips per day just east of the Interstate 680 interchange. The 60 dBA MEL contour is expected to extend in a band roughly 200 feet wide along Livorna Road to the intersec- tion with Wilson Road. The 55 dBA MEL contour would extend along Livorna Road to the Miranda Avneue intersec- tion. This band would also be roughly 200 feet wide. The 1975 and 1990 noise contour daps are displayed on the following page. Impacts The proposed project would alter noise levels along Livorna Road. Noise emissions are largely dependent upon traffic volume, average speed, the design of the road, the nature of the pavement surface, roadway gradient, traffic patterns, and the amount of truck traffic. a. Traffic volumes are not expected to increase sub- stantial1v because of the proposed project. The noise impact from increased traffic due to roadway improvements is not expected to be significant. 12 00942 �, � 1 Aisl:cxYt�_i►b: 1..tt NL;Lk;Fi a HOLR( \ _" • '7" 1 ��` ` ` •�• �,'^"•�� .yam ��-� ,...? ;•SS' l+ll •`.,'S• r'l„ .., �+- ••+�i`• i R '(�/"jjJ^r, '•� -..'+ i Hill •! S StOn 1975 • z .ii'.�C}]R3.I1F,;1.1�"ti�i:t;f:: 'i bcJLF3v,.r::: StOne\' ��` ^ � •� - t { `'.,�..� �.3 �-�,-� "''-r;,.lam r fig///� �=".,,, 1990 NOISE CONTOUR MAPS 1`; 00243 i b. The increase in speed of vehicles travelling on Livorna Road after road improvements have been completed will slightly raise noise levels. Speed will be increased from a minimum of roughly 20 mph to 30 mph. The present 30 mph speed limit would not be changed. An automobile travelling at 30 mph creates a noise level of 60 dBA at a distance of 50 feet and at 35 mph a noise level of 62 dBA. C. The pavement surface would be improved and the average road gradient reduced. These improvements could tend to slightly lower noise levels. d. The volume of truck traffic is not expected to change. e. The traffic pattern would be essentially unchanged. Vehicles turning onto Livorna Road and travelling west would have less difficulty accelerating since the road gradient would be reduced. This would slightly reduce noise levels for accelerating vehicles. f. The volume of traffic in the evening and early morning hours relative to the daytime hours is not expected to change. An increase in evening noise levels would therefore be limited to that caused by the change in vehicular speed. The noise level in evening and early morning hours •is important because of possible interference with sleep. g. The increase in noise levels due to higher average speed will affect nearby residences to a slight degree. Peak noise levels would be slightly raised. Peak noise levels occur when one or more vehicles is passing a given point along the roadway. Compared to peak noise levels, average noise levels would not be increased by an equivalent amount since the passing of vehicles would be more widely spaced in time (assuming that traffic volume is unchanged) . Noise levels in the interior of residences are often reduced by 10 to 15 dBA as the walls of the house provide noise insulation. Noise impacts are not expected to cause significant disturbance or discom- fort to residents along Livorna Road. h. Noise levels along Livorna Road would be increased significantly by the use of diesel equipment (trucks, bulldozers, etc.) during project construction. The use of diesel equipment would be confined to weekday i 14 00244 daylight hours during the 3 month construction period. Uitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact It is recommended that the present 30 mph speed limit on Livorna Road be retained in the future. 9. Historical and Archaeological Aspects No known hisotrical or archaeological sites are present in the project area. Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact Should archaeological remains be encountered during road reconstruction it is reco=ended that all construction activity within a 30 meter radius of the discovery be halted and a qualified archaeologist be retained to assess the importance of the discovery and recommend appropriate mitigating measures. 10, Energy Fossil fuel is currently consumed in the form of gasoline and oil by vehicles travelling over Livorna Road. The presence of the two sharp curves which require braking and then acceleration contribute to slightly increased gasoline consumption, in contrast to an automobile travel- ling at constant speed (i.e., 25 or 30 mph) . Impact Project impacts can be divided into those relating to construction and those relating to vehicular operation. a. Fossil fuel would be consumed during construction of the new roadway. The amount consumed would depend on the types of construction equipment, the condition of equipment used, and how efficiently equipment is employed. b. Without a detailed study it is impossible to quantify the proposed project's impact on gasoline consumption by automobiles. Operating efficiency and gasoline economy involve a trade off between the use of higher gear ratios and wind resistance, friction and other power demands which increase with speed. Many cars operate most efficiently in the 30 to 40 mph range. Elimination of the sharp turns which require 7.5 00245 � .3 deceleration and acceleration would slightly improve fuel economy, mp III- Any Adverse Environmental Effects lthich Cannot be Avoided If This L111-- ll4_- i nt, the condition on the types of constructioncondition of equipment used, and how efficiently equipment is employed. impossible to quantify b. Without a detailed study it is gasoline consumption the proposed project's impact on g gasoline b . gutO�tDblles. Operating efficiency and g economy involve a trade off between the use and higher gear ratios and wind resistance, other power demands which increase with speed. '•lanY O to 40 mph cars operate nationfofcthetienly in sharp turns which require range. E1imi 00245 deceleration and acceleration would slightly improve fuel economy. III. Any Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided If This Proposal is Implemented A. The cutting of approximately 13,000 cubic yards of earth, 5,000 cubic yards of which would have to be disposed of by contractors of the project. B. The creation of cut and fill slopes which would be subject to erosion and to minor sloughing. C. Removal of an estimated 11 oak trees along the shallow drainage- way and associated wildlife habitat. D. Increased stromkater runoff due to the expansion of paved road surface. E. Increased noise levels due to the higher average speed of vehicles. F. Increased noise and air pollution during the 3 month construc- tion period. IV. Alternatives to the Proposed Action , A. No Project This alternative would preserve the present roadway and the associated circulation conditions. Environmental impacts relating to grading, erosion, slope stability, vegetation and wildlife would be eliminated. The safety of motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and horses would not be improved. Should traffic flocs increase over time because of additional residential development, the safety of cyclists and pedestrians would placed in further jeopardy. B. Limited Improvement Improvements to Livorna Road could be restricted to elimination of the two sharp corners at Vernal Drive and Wilson Road. The present alignment of the remainder of Livorna Road could be retained. The entire road surface could be repaved and widened by several feet if desired. This alternative would improve what is perhaps the worst section of Livorna road but would not solve vertical alignment problems created by the hump at the eastern end of the project. Moreover, the western position of the road where several • i 00246 R I accidents have occurred would not be substantially changed. Grading and filling impacts would be reduced as would vegetation and wildlife impacts. Cyclists and pedestrians mould be benefitted much less than by the project as proposed. C. Separate Pedestrian/Bicycle Path The width of the proposed roadway could be narrowed from 34 to 28 feet, for example, and a separate path constructed for pedestrians and cyclists (a dirt shoulder could also be provided for equestrian use). The safety of pedestrians and cyclists could be substantially increased, provided the improvements are properly designed. Important factors include the separation between path and road, relative position in terms of elevation and whether natural and/or artificial barriers (i.e., trees or asphalt berms) would be placed between road and path. To be most useful, a paved path width of S feet is desirable. The total area devoted to the road and path under this alternative would be greater than if paved shoulders for use by cyclists were provided. Because the path would be graded and paved separately and because it would be necessary to acquire additional right-of-way, this alternative would increase total project cost. V. The Relationship Between Local Short-Tera Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Lone-Tera Productivity The proposed project would expand the area devoted to Livorna Road but the reconstruction would essentially follow the current horizontal alignment of the road except in the area of I;ilson Road. The reconstruction of the road would not significantly narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment nor would it pose long-term risks to health or safety. Long-term safety would be improved. VI. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes 1%'hich Mould be Involved In the Proposed action Should it be Implemented The proposed project would not substantially expand or curtail the diversity and range of beneficial uses of the environment. Non- renewable resources would be consumed, especially petroleum and petroleum byproducts, during project construction. It is unlikely that Livorna Road would be removed in the future and the use must realistically be regarded as permanent. Topography in the area of the project would be irreversibly changed due to the proposed grading. V1I. The Growth-Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Action The growth-inducing impact of the proposed action is expected to be limited. The reconstruction of Livorna Road would enhance the 1-7 OU247 marketability of new residential development in the area but is • expected to play only a minor role, if any, in the decision to undertake new residential developments. The proposed project represents a reconstruction and not an extension of the automobile circulation network. The economic growth-inducing impact would be positive; construction workers would be employed during project construction and new materials would be purchased from raw materials suppliers. VII1.Organizations and Persons Consulted; Documents Utilized During the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports, written and oral communications take place between the Planning Department and other County departments. The General Plan and its various elements are also scrutinized regarding the proposed action. If additional consultations, contacts of consequence and documents were used, they are referenced below. "Fundamentals and Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise", Bolt Beranek and Newman, Incorporated, June, 1975. Dry:lh 1/2/76 -1 00248 i CC :A COSTA Comm PLATNNING DEPART. ..1T NOTICE OF XX Completion of Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 9S1 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (41S) .k' X\ ��1 .'1� .i 372-2035 Phone EIR Contact Person Dennis Mesick Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project involves the reconstruction of Livorna Road east of Interstate 6SO in the Alamo area. Approximately 1500 feet of new roadbed would be constructed beginning roughly 300 feet east of the northbound Interstate 680 on-ramp and extending to a point approximately 130 feet west of Trotter Way. The project is located in census tract 3461. It is proposed that the road would be pared to a width of 34 feet--two 12 foot wide traffic lanes and two 5 foot wide shoulder/bicycle lanes. Livorna Road would be straightened and the two sharp curves near Wilson Road would be eliminated in order to improve horizontal sight distance. The existing road profile which includes rolling tmdulations that restrict vertical sight distance would be smoothed through cutting and filling. The maximum grade would be 9.9 percent or approxi- mately 10:1, hori=ontal:vertical. It is detemined from initial study by of the Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. __..-------- Tlie Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North King, Administration Bldg. Pine & Escobar Streets !Martine_, California Date Posted 1.is�;t: Final date for revieti:/appeal �/ 7 74 By ..,Pdinfing Pepartma nt Repro eAentatite AP9 1/74 00249 f RESPONSE TO COMMENTS OF THE DRAFT EIR FOR THE RECOrSSTRUCTION OF LIVORNA ROAD, ALAMO During the public review period for the draft EIR, written com- ments were received from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary Dist- rict, the Danville Fire Protection District , the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District and the Contra Costa County Pub- lic Works Department. Continents on the EIR and responses to those comments are contained below. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC ti1ORKS DEPARTMENT Section 1-5, Soils and Geology _- Impacts Approximately* 95 percent of the excavated material will be used for contour grading along each side of the roadway to match road grades and existing contours. Only 5 percent (approximately) of the excavated material will be disposed of by contractors. Section 1-7, Vegetation and Wildlife - Impacts There will be removed approximately 22 oak trees averaging 1': feet in diameter and approximately 22 various fruit trees averag- ing 10 inches in diameter. The EIR references only the visually prominent grove of oaks along the shallow drainageway. These native trees would, as a group, be substantially afrected by the proposed project. other trees would be removed over the length of the project. The EIR should be amended to include the above statement that 22 trees mould be removed. Section 1-7. Vegetation and Wildlife - Mitigating Measures, Part a. There are disadvantages to realigning the roadway to the south in the vicinity of the oak trees; the amount of cut into the side hill will be increased; more trees will be taken on the south side slope; and slide potential will increase on the cut slope. The statement concerning realignment to the south was made in the context of placing a slight curve in the road to take advantage of the existing road and road cut in the vicinity of stations 27 and 28. This could require some increased cutting near sta- tion 29. The effect of the increased cutting on slope stability, aesthetics and vevetation would have to be evaluated against the possibly beneficial relocation impacts described in the EIR. Section III . Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Effects Part A. An insignificant amount of excavated material will be removed off the job site due to the use of nearly all of the excavated material in contour grading. Part C. Number of trees should be revised as mentioned previously. Microfilmed with board order 00250 i CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT An 8-inch seder line will eventually be needed to serve a small drainage area extending 1 ,000 feet east of 1-680. The location of the sewer may fall within the road right of way in- which case its construction concurrently with the road project will be desirable. We suggest that the possibility of a sewer line installation be mentioned in the road project EIR. If it will be necessary to construct an 8-inch sewer line as mentioned, such construction should be undertaken With the planned road reconstruction in order to reduce environmental disruption and interference with the movement of traffic on Livorna Road. DANVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The draft EIR fails to supply information on the water supply and fire hydrants now in service on Livorna Road. This utility may under,go some changes which shall be done only with this Fire Dis- trict's approval. Two fire hydrants are located along the proposed project; one at the northeast corner of the intersection with Lavrock Lane and the other at the northeast corner of the intersection with Stevens Lane. The hydrants may require relocation to ensure ready accessi- bility from Livorna Road if reconstruction is undertaken. CONTRA COSTA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT This project does not interfere with any existing or on-going RCD or Soil Conservation Service project. It is a project that is needed in the area. It is suggested, however, that the recommen- dation on Page 8 "a mixture of rye and barley" be more specific as to whether or not cereal rye is meant - SECALE cereale L. Rye or LOLIUM L. Ryegrass, species of. The Contra Costa County Public Works Department may wish to con- sult with the Contra Costa Resource Conservation Disttict regard- ing the particular species of grass used for revegetating cut and fill slopes. It is possible, for example, that certain types of grasses may be better-suited to particular soil and slope condi- tions and should be selected accordingly. C.C.C.P.D. 4/13/76 2 00251 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Establishment of a Policy for a Public Liability Self- Insurance Program. The Board of Supervisors having determined that the County and its special districts and service areas will self- insure general public liability risks including medical malpractice; and The County Administrator's report on the procedures to be followed for administration of the self-insurance program having this day been approved; and It is the objective of this Board to reduce to the maximum extent possible accidents resulting in injury to persons and damage to property and their resultant costs to taxpayers; and In furtherance o; this objective the County is to undertake a comprehensive loss control program and all depart- ment heads, County special district chiefs, supervisors, and employees are directed to devote careful attention to identi- fication and minimization of risks, and department and agency heads and special district chiefs will be held accountable for the losses attributable to operations for which they are responsible; and The County Administrator is directed to report semi-annually to the Board of Supervisors the losses experienced by County departments, special districts and service areas for its information, evaluation and appropriate action. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: All Departments Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Fire Protection Supervisors Districts County Service Areas affixed this 20th day of April 1976 Attn: J. Fears _ J. R. OLSSON Clerk 8�%•/- /i '% ,�'�/, Deputy Clerk i'axine i•:. Neufeld H 24 V,:5 CONI 00252 01 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Amendments to Alameda- Contra Costa Health Systems Agency Joint Powers Agreement. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency Joint Powers Agreement is AMENDED with respect to the powers of the Governing Board and alternate members of the Governing Body, as required by the final regulations published by the U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, with this action being contingent upon similar actions being taken by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Alameda County Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c/o County Administrator Supervisors Health Systems Agency affixed this 20th day of Argil 197E Director, Human Resources 1 R. OLSSON, Clerk Agency By _, Deputy Clerk County Administrator Ma �craiq (D) H 24 W5 10M 00253 A- 7 OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APR 20 !076 Administration Building Martinez. California CEE e A �55Gr: IsrOPZ A COSTA C To: Board qt Supervisors n - Date: April 20, 19 t / Fr�Arthu G. Ll, Subject: Amendments to HSA Joint County Administrator Powers Agreement Item No. 15 on my list of recommended actions for your meeting of April 20, 1976 is a request that you approve amendments to the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency Joint Powers Agreement with respect to the powers of the governing board and alternate members of the governing body as required by final Federal regula- tions. This memorandum briefly sets forth the circumstances of this matter. In January, 1976, your Board, along with the Board of Supervisors of Alameda County, submitted to the Department of Health, Education and Welfare a Joint Powers Application for designation of the Alameda- Contra Costa Health Systems Agency. Subsequently, your two Boards of Supervisors executed the Joint Powers Agreement which legally created the Health Systems Agency. The application in the Joint Powers Agreement was prepared in accordance with the proposed Federal regula- tions with the understanding that certain amendments would possibly be required upon publication of the final Federal regulations. On March 26, 1976, HEW published the final regulations and indicated that by April 26, 1976, Health Systems Agency applicants must submit any amendments necessary to bring their applications into conformance with the final regulations. Review of the final regulations by staff of both Counties has indicated that there is a need to make a couple of amendments to our original Joint Powers Agreement. The first amendment revises the governing board's power over the agency's budget to indicate that, rather than having the right to review and approve the budget, the governing board shall have the right "to establish rules and regula- tions for the excercise of the responsibilities of the governing body concerning the internal affairs of the agency, including matters relating to the staff of the agency and the agency's budget." The second amendment relates to the number of publicly elected officials who serve on the governing body. The original agreement indicated that "eight of the mezbers shall be publicly elected officials of units of general local government. Local elected official members may designate duly authorized representatives to act in their absence." 00254 Mjcrofjlmz�d with board order .MEENNOW i 2. The amendment indicates that after the first year's operation no more than eight nor less than two of the members of the governing body may be publicly elected officials. Alternates may still be appointed but would be subject to the composition requirements of the governing body as specified in the legislation. In reviewing our HSA application, the California Regional Medical Program recommended changes in the procedure outlined for nomination and selection of the 18 consumer members who serve on the governing body. The original Joint Powers Agreement provided that the 18 consumer members would be appointed by the governing board from among nominees submitted by the subarea councils, the Board of Supervisors of each County, and the Mayors' Conference of each County. In addition, each subarea was to have at least one representative on the governing body. Also, 16 of the consumer members were to be chosen from among the subareas on a representa- tion basis and two were to be representatives at large. The amended procedure for nomination selection of the consumer members is as follows: 1. The Boards of Supervisors for each County shall submit six (6) consumer nominees each for a total of twelve (12) nominees. Such nominees are not restricted to local elected officials. From these nominees, the Governing Board would appoint six (6) consumers, three (3) from each County, to the Governing Body. This procedure shall be in effect for all subsequent Governing Bodies, but in no case shall the total number appointments from this grouping exceed eight (8) . Also, in no case shall appointments from this grouping include less than two (2) local elected officials. 2. Initially, the Alameda County Comprehensive Health Planning Council and the Comprehensive Health Planning Council of Contra Costa County shall submit six (6) consumer nominees each for a total of twelve (12) nominees. From these nominees, the Governing Board would appoint six (6) con- sumers, three (3) from each County, to the Governing Body. Upon formation of the initial Governing Body, future nominees from this grouping are to be submitted by the Sub-Area Advisory Councils in a manner to be determined by the Governing Body. 3. Initially, the Joint County Community Steering Committee shall submit twelve (12) consumer nominees representing the medically* underserved population. From these nominees, the Governing Board would appoint six (6) consumers, one (1) from each medically underserved area. Upon formation of the initial Governing Body, future nominees from this grouping are to be submitted by the medically underserved areas in a manner determined by the Governing Body. In no case shall the minimum number of appointments from this grouping be less than six (6) . 00255 .3. It is recommended that your Board authorize the Board Chairman to sign the amendments and authorize their submission to HEW. GEB:es a�,�5s .t ^ AUENDHEN`i'S TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE ALA14EDA-CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCY THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT effective April 29 , 1976, is entered into by the County of Alameda and the County of Contra- Costa, political subdivisions -of the State of California. WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into an agreement -styled Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Establishing the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency, on January 27, 1976, hereafter referred to as "Agreement", and WHEREAS, on March 26, 1976 the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare promulgated regulations necessitating certain changes in the Agreement, NOWT, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: ARTICLE IV Paragraph C is amended to read: C. Powers of the Governing Board The Governing Board shall have the following powers 1. To appoint members of the Governing Body in accordance with Article V. B. of this Agreement; 2. To establish rules and regulations for the exercise of the responsibilities of the Govern- ing Body concerning the internal affairs of the Agency, including matters relating to the staff of the Agency and the Agency's budget; 0025'7 1Niaofilmed vAth board order �r ry� 3. To review and comment on the Health Systems Plan and Annual Implementation Plan; 4. To employ such staff and consultants as necessary to carry out its responsibilities. ARTICLE V Paragraph B is amended to read: B. Members of the Governing Body The Governing Body shall consist of thirty (30) members in accordance with the following provisions: 1. a. The Boards of Supervisors for each county shall submit six (6) consumer nominees each for a total of twelve (12) nominees. Such nominees are not restricted to local elected officials. From these nominees, the Governing Board shall appoint six (6) consumers, three (3) from each county, to the Governing Body. This procedure shall be in effect for all subsequent Governing Bodies, but in no case shall the total number of appointments from this grouping exceed eight (8). Also, in no -case shall appointments from this grouping include less than two (2) local elected officials. b. Initially, the Alameda County Comprehensive Health Planning Council and the Comprehensive Health Planning Council of Contra Costa County shall submit six (o) consumer nominees each for a total of twelve (12) nominees. From these nominees, the Governing Board shall appoint six (6) consumers, -2- 00258 three (3) from each county, to the Governing Body. Upon formation of the initial Governing n 1, P,.+-11r nnmi n I frnm 4_hi a o,rnTini nv arP to two (2) local elected officials. b. Initially, the Alameda County Comprehensive Health Planning Council and the Comprehensive Health Planning Council of Contra Costa County shah submit six (o') consumer nominees each for a total or twelve (12) nominees. From these nominees, the Governing Board shall appoint six (6) consumers, --2•- 00;158 r VOW f three (3) from each county, to the Governing Body. Upon formation of the initial Governing Body, future nominees from this grouping are to be submitted by the Sub-Area Advisory Councils in a manner to be determined by the Governing Body. The Sub-Area Advisory Councils Will be established in accordance with rules and regu- lations adopted by the Governing Board. c. Initially, the Joint County Community Steering Comittee shall submit twelve (12) consumer nominees representing the medically underserved population. From these nominees, the Governing Board shall appoint six (6) consumers, one (1) from each medically underserved area. Upon formation of the initial Governing Body, future nominees from this grouping are to be submitted by the medically under- served areas in a manner determined by the Governing Body. In no case shall the minimum number of appoint- ments from this grouping be less than six (6). 2, The consumer representatives shall be appointed so as to achieve the necessary balance of social, economic, linguistic, racial and geographic characteristics of the population of the health service area and will include representation of major purchasers of health care; 3. Ti,elve (12) member; shall be providers who meet the requirements of the Act. By rule or regulation, the Governing Board shah provide for such nominating pro- cedures as it may deem necessary to meet the requirements 00259 :. r b i ka e of the Act. Attempt shall be made to appoint provider members that meet the population characteristics of the health service area, to the extent practicable. 4. After the first year's operation, no more than eight (8) of the members may be public elected officials of units of general local governments. In no instance may the number of public elected official members be less than two (2). ARTICLE XV Paragraph A is amended to read: A. The Agency shall be financed by funds made avail' able for such purpose under the Act provided, however, that the parties to this Agreement may agree to con- tribute to the Agency additional funds for its operations. The Governing Board shall review and authorize any requests of the Governing Body to the parties to this Agreement for funds or other support in excess of those funds which are available to the Agency under the Act. Any party contributing funds may specify the use of such funds to assist the Agency in the performance of its activities. In all other respects the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. -4- 002060 T f t mom IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partes hereto have caused this Supplemental Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized and their official seals to be hereto affixed, as of the day and year first above written. County of Alameda County of Contra Costa By By Chairman of the Board of C a man of th Bo d of Supervisors Supervisors Approved to Form this day Approved to Form this day of , 1976. of 1976. ATTEST: ATTEST:J- R. OL.SSON Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Clerk of the Board -of Supervisors By By Deputy Deputy Maq/ crl GAB/j -5- 00261 c In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Extension of Agreement, Subdivision 3845, San Ramon Area IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Subdivision Agreement Extension with Larwin-Northern California, Inc., is hereby approved, extending its Agreement with the County for construction of certain-improvements in Subdivision 3845, San Ramon area, through October 20, 1977. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originating Department: Public Works Wtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Land Development S"perv'sors Division affixed this 20th day of April . 19 70 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By � /�'4 o(. /Lc Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 . I5,A' � Jean L. Hiller cc: Public Works Director Director of Planning Larwin Northern California, Inc. j 6500 Village Parkway Boulevard Dublin, California 94566 00262 I SUBDIVISION AGREE%IE!J EXTENSION Contra Costa Subdivision Number: Subdivision 3845 Subdivider: Lamin-Northern California, Inc. ' (Original) Agreement Date: July 17, 1973 Surety Nance: American Casualty Company of Reading, PA Bond No. : 558-98-06(17) Amount: •S269,900 increased to $389,400 Date: July 17, 1973 and April 9, 1976 Extension New Termination Date: October 20, 1977 This Subdivider and his Surety desire that this subdivision agreement be extended through the above date; and Contra Costa County and the Surety hereby agree thereto and acknowledge same. Dated: Faril 20. 1970 L T-112.1-`10."M1EPSJ GgLIFOIN VI, INC. COMA COSTA COON-P.' Subdiva er eor-.e iV. Joaes, ice _res. Vernon L. Cline American '01sualty ;zany of Reading, Penasyl- Acting Public ti Ls Dir ctor - va.iia By r Surety Beatrice E. Masters, Attorney-in-fact Deput REMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By �. Assistant Publi ork irector FOM APPROVED: JOHN B. CI-1JSEN, County Counsel Deput)- / i (NOTE: SUBDIVIDER'S AND SURETY'S SIGNATURES TO BE NOTARIZED) LD-16 (Rev. 2/76) 00263 . Microfilmed with board a.Cir TO 449 c �� ICOrpklrlLiOA) O STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES On —April 14,_1976 before me.the undersigned,a Notary Public in and fur said State, personally appeared George E. Jones - ia known to me to be the Vice President,and known to me to be Secretary of the corporation that executed the within instrument, known to me to be the persons who a=reared the within Instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named. and < acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its bora m of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. •`��1 OFFI-IAL SrAL s;gnatn JAN V ��3HT C:V ��r ..� t=c - CALWOR arA OFFICE tri Jan Wright .tz:c� Mj ire • Name (T)ped or Printed) '°, �`-:=::�".:.. U,-;Es �3:;sL•'• .,=� ry 91979 1 (T"am dr eAkW retwW.rah► .STATE OF CALIFOMIA BOUNTY OF LOS t"NGELES ) _. a JOYCE A. 4111TE I, Notary Public of r ~• LOS AN'Gl:LLS County, in the State of CALIFOILSIA , • ;';'y+ `,a i do hereby certify that BEATRICE E. HASTERSAttorney-in- Fact, of the American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, who iS personally known to me to be the same person whose name IS sub- i scribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person, and acknowledged that he signed, sealed and delivered said i ' r rl 00 instrument, for and on behalf of the American Casualty Company of ' D� Reading, Pennsylvania, for the uses and purposes therein set forth. �> C.) N� O'c 87-19 X S Given under my hand and notarial seal at my office in the City of _y m � PA.NOr\.a.1k CITY in sa County, this 14th day of April , A. D. 19 Sotary ubiic 00264 '7 CNACONLINENTR NAT/ONAL Rl�1ER/C1qN GROUP CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING,PENNSYLVANIA VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY General Office:Chicago For: Tract No, 3845 INCREASE—DECREASE RIDER LABOR & MATERIALS To be attached to and P-ade a part of Bond No.558-98-06(17) issued by the American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania (hereinafter called the Surety), on behalf of LARWIN-NORTHER,\ CALIFORNIA, MC. (hereinafter called the Principal), in favor of County of Contra Costa . (hereinafter called the Obligee), and dated the 25th day of June , 19__Z_3 In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond and other good and valuable consideration it is understood and agreed that effective the 9th �e day of_ April f 19_Z6 and subject to all the terms. conditions and limitations of the atto F[ngred tpe penal s;iouerenodshall be and the same is hereby (increased) (decreased!) from the sum of Zourr-Eiundred-and_D0,1100 - - - - Dollars, X70,400.00 Three Hundred Eighty Nine Thousand 389.400.00 ($ ). to the sum of Dollars, ($ ). It is further understood and agreed that subject to all the terms, conditions and limitations of the attached bond, the gggre ate liability-of the Serety for any loss occurring prior to said date shall not exceed the sum of Two Hun red Seventy ousan Four --A nnfinn . S_ oLfor any toss occurring subsequent -Dollarseeun a ignty ine ousan to said date shall not exceed the sum of-Fou"undred-and-401400_- - - Dollars, ($ 15�0.D_). In no event, however, shall the aggregate liability of the Surety exceed the larger of the aforementioned sums, it being the intent hereof to preclude cumulative liability. Signed, sealed and dated this 9th day of April, 19_Z6 LARWIN-NORTHERLY C�A-L-(I?FOECU LA, INC. ; The above is hereby agreed to and accepted: Bv= " Pnne►pal George E. Jones, Vice President American Casualty Company of Reading, Perinsvivania Surety Beatrice E. Masters Attorney-in-Fact Form G•23169-A 00265 =C7VAG ONT/NENTyL �yyT/O�yg1 yWER/Gf/N GRO CONTINENTAL CASUAL Ty COi/PANY �p NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COUPkUY OFTRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICANCASUkTYCo7�tpAnyOFRG fA X �TF04D TRAt1SCONTINENTAL INSURA?jCE COMPANY " VAti VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COIAPANY r• , I,ARNiAt-tionitEm CALIFOEU INC. - ' .t e B and accepted: Pri anrJpal The above is hereby greed to aGeorge E. Jones, Vice President American Casualty Company of nia Rea�_.dinr Penns •lvsurety n 0 Attorney-in-Fact Sy' - Beatrice E. Masters Form G-23169•A oV 265 If C 7VA WROWL 9WRION GROUP CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY TRANSPORTATION 114SURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY AIERICANCASUALTYCOMPANY OFREADIKPERNSYLVANtA VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY General Office:Chicago For: Tract No. 3845 INCREASE—DECREASE RIDER PERFORMANCE To be attached to and made a part of Bond no. 558-98-06(17)issued by the American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania , (hereinafter called the Surety), on behalf of LARWIN-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. (hereinafter called the Principal), in favor of County of Contra Costa , (hereinafter called the Obligee), and dated the_ 25th day of June . I9 73 In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond and other good and valuable consideration it is understood and agreed that effective the 9th hh-day ofd_ A2r11 t�� , 19___Z6 and subject to all the terms, conditions and limitations of the Attocged M.7 Te p yal,su61nwreofnouspall be and the same is hereby (increased) (deTased) frorq thg jlun of - =e !Wired_ all (10�T nn - - - - Dollars, nree Hund re ighty gine nousan (¢ 269,900.00). to the sum of Enur uA irssed and 11.121100 - - - - Dollars. ($ 389,400.001 It is further understood and agreed that subject to all the terms, conditions and limitations of the attached bond, the aggre ate liability of the Sure for any loss occurring prior to said date shall not exceed the sum of Tl.go Hundred ixty nine Thousan tt t t inn �T�ir DoiHundYedt ght}�tiin'eorthf for occurring subsequent to said date shall not exceed the sum of_] our-Hurtelred- -Dollars. ($ 389.400,,0Q_), In no event, however, shall the aggregate liability of the Surety exceed the larger of the aforementioned sums, it being the intent hereof to preclude cumulative liability. Signed, sealed and dated this 9th day of April 19_16 LARWIN-NORTHERN CALIFOR,YIA, iNC. The above is hereby agreed to and accepted: By: _`�=�--�• �� PrinupaI George E. Jones, Vice President American Casualty Company of e6APnfA Cc-C7�_C_xl�aOv r / Reading, Pennsylvania y Surety By: - , - Beatrice E. .'•tasters Attorney-i:-Fact J. Mi 4ae/ W l�rcr 010v IPaQ� �o�r.«istio.•er-Sar✓ey�r Form G-23159•A hr;iacifilmed with ' boas oraer, 00266 4 llr 12.Lt'.. t�UhltL VF Sutl':il V 1JU1LJ • OF COHTrRA COSTA CO WTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Mutter of Aw>zrdin� Contract ) April 20, 1976 for the Blum Road Reconstruction- ) Pacheco Area ) (Project No. 3887-4235-76) ) Bidder Total Anount Bond Amounts Independent Construction 740 Julie Ann Way $29,943.00 Labor b: fiats. $ 14,971.50 Oakland, CA 94621 Faith. Perf. S 29,943.00 Ransome Co., Emeryville F.D. Marron Co., Brentwood Martin Bros., Concord Eugene G. Alves, Pittsburg Oliver de Silva, Hayward 0. C. Jones & Sons, Berkeley L.&L. Equipment, Pleasant Hill George Peres Co., Richmond Branaugh Excavating Inc,Castro Valley Syar Industries, Vallejo Diablo Valley Paving, Concord Gallagher & Burk, Oakland, CA McGuire & Hester, Oakland Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Richmond R. E. Jones Const., Concord The above-captioned project and the specifications' therefor being .. approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director rQcor.:rsnding that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS ORDER;D thst the contract for the furnishing; of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall iresent two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Work's Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORD----RED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned .it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance, and the County Counsel has review ed and approved them as to form, the Public Ulorks Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon signaturo of the contract by the Public forks Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks submitted :or security shall be returned. PASSED by the Board on npril 20, 1976 Originator: Public Works Depart m. nt CE-RTtrtED COPY Road Design Division 1 crt;i`.c that tuts L-; ;L full. tnic & corract coir or the o ::i,a! du.usn.•ut t:+t+h b on lite In my, ofilce. Ai.d tt..-! It was Lu•cd L adn.-fed by the 11a:►rd of $ulN;:e ori of cuntta ru�ta Cuunor, ernfr+rata. on, ow rt.o-A r..ATTIN-T: J. I:. County cwt L L v,-vifiriu Ctcrk u:=ad uo::rd of SupervLora, cc : Public VorZiS Director by L..stY Clerk. County Counsel i �� �.�-�!u ,,___ oti APR 2 0 1976 County Auditor-Control-ler Contractor 00267 a ro a Ili TIL''. BOARD V_ SL3rr4ttii5u:►a OF CONTRA COSTA COiP:TY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) for the slurry seal project within ) April 20 � 1916 the Rollingwood Subdivision , Phase IIJ San Pablo Area. ) (Prof . No. 1075-4284-76) ) Biddor Total Amount Bond Amounts Graham Contractors , Inc. $18,367.00 Labor b: Mats. -9, 183 .50 P. 0. Box 4480 Faith. Perf. 18,367 .00 Santa Clara , CA 95054 Bay Area Sealers , San Jose Valley Slurry Seat , Sacramento The above-captioned project and the specificatior:s' therefor being approved, gids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director re.corn,iondi.ng that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS Os:DERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor wild materials for said work is awarded to said first listed biddor at the listed amount end at the unit prices sub.;.itted in said bid; and that said eonOrz ctor shall )resent two good a::d sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works, Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FUR117HO ORDS D th^t, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together urith bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved thein as to form, the Public :forks Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FURTHF.q OPDOIED that, upon signature of the contract by th© Public Works Director, the bonds posed by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks— submitted for security shall be returned. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976 Originator : Public Works Department - CERT!FN:D COPY Road Design Division 1 cettify tt.:tt this t-: a full. trite S corroet copy of ttae ori:;itYa 4!10•tad0t%t 'A hh h 13 Oit file In my Office. Rt.d ti.::t it ..rs vtt- if 1r: adn;•ted Ly the finard of tilSl+.'t11a:C^3 of Contra Cm.La 0,unl Y, Cetitcbrnfa, on. - me wet.- t!:u.n. .tTl•t>:C: J. l:. OrSSU". count? Ct•,tt: v,v:flrlo Clerk o'e:t!d Lo=d or Super%6ori. cc : Publ S c Uor:is Director by Tuts Clerk. Contractor 1 ? otz APR 2 0 1976 County Auditor—Controller County Counsel ou2s8 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri 1 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed Camino Tassajara - 4721C Work Order No. 4805 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Grant Deed dated April 7, 1976 from Joanne B. Smith, required as a condition of approval of Land Use Permits 2144-74 and 2205-75, is ACCEPTED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division cc: Public Works Director Supervisors Recorder (via R/P) affixed this 20th day of April 19 �° Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Assessor , ----�V)CLJ2 W e-1-)Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15M ?ondal, nn Shackles 0 269 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Anril 20 , 19 2k In the Matter of Traffic Situation at the Intersection of Rudgear Road and San I-Uguel Drive, Walnut Creek, Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having brought to the attention of the Board an April 12, 1976 letter from Mr. James F. Free, 2113 Alice Avenue, Walnut Creek, California 94596 alleging that an increase in the number of automobiles on Rudgear Road has caused a traffic problem at the intersection of Rudgear Road and San Miguel Drive, Walnut Creek; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Public `Forks Director for report to the Board. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: 11x. J. F. FreeWitness * Works Director affixedtha20th�y of_ April , 19 ?b County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ,cf�C -_ . uty Clerk on a yn c ems H -24 ;;76 Vim oo27 3 a • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of $10 Million Augmentation to the Governor's 1976-1977 Alcoholism Budget. The Board having received an April 12, 1976 letter from the Office of State Senator Arlen Gregorio, 1177 University Drive, Suite 2, Menlo Park, California 94025 thanking the Board for its support of SB 1372, which would increase alcohol excise taxes to fund local alcoholism treatment programs, and urging that the Board also support a proposed $10 million augmentation to the Governor's 1976-1977 alcoholism budget; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the afcri-said matter is REFERRED to the County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and comed copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of cc: Senator Arlen Gregorio Supervisors County Counsel affixed "20thday of April 1976 Director, Human Resources — Agency County Administrator _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Br[L' a Deputy Clerk RondalyAn Shackles H-_i i/7b 15m OOJ271 6 k In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri l 20 i9 76 In the Matter of CSAC Publication, 'Operational Guide to Revenue Sharing California Counties." `fie Board having received on April 14, 1976 a letter From Air. Richard 3. Watson, Suecutive Direct-ors Count? Supervisors Association of California, transmit-ting a publication entitled "Operational Guide to Raven:ie Shsring Qalitornia Counties"; IT IS BY Mfg BOARD QRDBRSD that said publication is REFERRED to the County Administrator. PASSED by the 3card on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By .,v �iZ. � Deputy Clerk canL. Miller H 24 8/75 lobi 00272 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Anril 20 . 19 76 In the Matter of Alternative Legislative Proposals Affecting BART Ooerations. The Board 'having heretofore referred to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny serving in the absence of Supervisor W. N. Boggess, and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty) alternative proposals (Assembly gills 3785 and 3506) affecting the financing of Bay Area Rapid Transit District operations; and Supervisor Kenny having this day recommended that Assembly Bill 3785 be referred to the County Administrator for review, and Supervisor Moriarty having recommended that Assembly Bill 3506 also be reviewed by the County Administrator; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations are APPROVED and, accordingly, the matters are removed from Committee. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Committee MembersSupervisors "7r. N. J. Bianco, Vice affixed this20thday of An-1 19 �F President, BART Mr. J. C. Beckett , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Chairman, Metropolitan � Transportation By'�*=- ^r�ht Deputy Clerk Cormission Rondalynn Shackles County Administrator Public Works Director County Counsel H-24 3f76 15m 00� 73 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri 1 20 , 19 75 In the Matter of Alcoholism Problems of General Assistance Recipients. ,n April 13, 1976 letter having been received from Mr. "ohn P. Tannery, Chairman of the Board of Trustees , Bi-Rett Corporation, P .O. Box 5487, Concord, California 94524 transmitting a report with respect to the alcoholism problems of General Assistance recipients , and requesting that the Board give serious consideration to the problems identified in said report; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency and the County Administrator for review in preparation of the 1976-1977 proposed county budget. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 herby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seel of tlw Board of cc: Bi-Bett Corporation Supervisors Director, HRA affixed this 20 day of Apri 1 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, /Clerk �, • Deputy Clerk Robbie Gujierre2/ j H-24 4;76 1`m U�, 2 74 i 'a A. April 13, 1976 C�'ti'NOT 00 BI-BETT CORPORATION Community Akoholism Rrcuvrry Programs 1530 ELLIS S TREET CONCORD,CALIFORNIA 44150 7465-7-250 P O.BOX 5,46:.CO\CORD,CA 94524 The Honorable Jame* P. Kenny, Chairman Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street Martinez, Ca. 94553 Dear Mr. Chairman: This is a letter of transmittal for the attached report about General Assistance (GA) recipients who have alcohol problems, as well as a request for your serious consideration of the problems that this report identifies. The problems of alcoholism affect over one-half of Contra Costa County citizens. The annual cost is an estimated Seventy Million Dollars ($70, 000, 000)* to all of us. Intervention before individual alcoholics become totally dependent is a savings in human suffering as well as cost savings for all citizens. Thank you in anticipation of your concern and early action. Respectfull , G-'ta JOHN P. FLANNERY, Ch trman. DEBjjn Bi-Bett Corporation Board of Trustees cc: Board of Supervisors Niernbers Arthur Will. *$25 Billion Dollar annual cost in U.S. reported to Congress by National Institute for Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA). Contra Costa County figure based on proportion of population distribution. A CALIFORNIA NONTROFITORGANIZATION O,`275- ' . V A CALIFORINIA N01-PROFIT ORGAN lt,A►0.�►y Ltr to The Honorable James P. Kenny, Chairman Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors April 13, 1976 bc: County Alcoholism Ad%isory Board Members C. L. Van Marter George Degnan, M.D. Charles Pollack, M.D. Robert E. Jornlin Orlyn Wood, M. D. Bill Stevenson Jerry Nava. Jerry Nichols Jan Black Jeanne Gibbs Duncan Bennett Barbara Chase Community Alcoholism Recovery Program Members Bi-Sett Trustees Bi-Sett Staff 00416 r , t z� ti r DIABLO VALLEY RANCH ALCOHOLISM RECOVERY PROGRAM NEW ADMISSIONS JANUARY, FEBRUARY AND MARCH - 1976 CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIVIDUALS ,REQUIRING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY GENERAL ASSISTANCE {GA) FUNDING DATA, COMAS MTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Submitted by: David E. Brown Executive Director Bi-Bett Corporation o,)277 . zr:......, ..ec..,c+...:.a a;x",..aat-•:.l+G• •i;rem.. c,a,-.. ,..,,'..<.. .a?, ,`. '.,' . .r _. * .'r.n ;rs o,.)277 wwww ;.. . . r.., ,. ;., •;„„... +.;.. .::ate ,- ,.,:.- ., ... 4c. n. , ..v.. fir•,§ , A. INTRODUCTION I• Community Model of Alcoholism 2• Background and Recommendations B. DATA RECAPITULATION C• COl'WNTS I* Three (3) Month Sample 2, County Residence Area 3. Prior G.A. Support 4• Sex 5, Age 6• Marital Status 7• Employment Status 3. Job Skills 9. Length of Unemployment I0. Education ll- Reason for Job Loss 12• Probation 13. Arrests 14. Jail Time 002078 V 00278 8 A. INTRODUCTION 1. community Model of Alcoholism 2. Background and Recommendations -1- 00279 vwrt h� 1 3 u i sl 4 x � THE COMMUNITY MODEL OF ALCOHOLISM AS ADOPTED BY THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ALCOHOLISM PROGRAM PLAN FOR 1975-76 AnD 1976-77 Definition of Alcoholism: "Alcoholism is an illness or condition which is a reciprocal relationship between the individual and his social environments. The condition is characterized in the individual by a developing dependency on alcohol re- sulting in alienation, dependency, loss of self-esteem, role dysfunction, and an apparent irreversible inability to safely ingest alcohol. The condition is characterized in the community by responses and practices which actively create social pressure to drink, and which reinforce in- dividual alienation and dependency. The condition is further character- ized by denial of the problem by the individual, and/or the community, unless and until visible dysfunction results in recognition." Discussion: The "Community Model" is presented as the approach necessary to end those conflicts in provision of service, to allow a definitive policy develop- ment, and to give overall objectives to alcoholism programs. Although it contains individual elements from a variety of models, it is not a compro- mise model. The Community Model is pragmatic rather than theoretic. It includes those elements which are known (or widely accepted) and those "treatments" which are apparently effective. It includes so-called "social influences" as part of the illness rather than seeing them only as "variables." A major concept adopted from the "Social Model", which is a departure from most other models, is that "alcoholism' as a condition is located in both the individual and the community rather than in the individual alone. In understanding community, the model uses "levels of community" to denote all the various communities which exist. Examples of some levels of com- munity are society, family, alcoholics, ministers, doctors, employers, helping professions, local community, state, ethnic groups, and any other grouping that may be appropriate. As the model views alcoholism to exist both in the individual and the com- munity, it may be seen as a model of "recovery" for both the individual and the community. -2- 00280 •.,,,,,,,a„x,,,r�,..,;• ^;-.-c ^M sr...ak -":+rq"F' mw .; ,i., a^'�"�k��4t'�'ggN`t •.;; _ J.rMit .. :... •_. .. :. x I BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATIONS From the community model viewpoint, a term which combines r r ,nr+ And case finding function or activity is • t-In f i 1A frnan this l:C .It.'..F7it auL pr_ A.& other models, is that "alcoholism" as a condition is located in both l.ue individual and the community rather than in the individual alone. In understanding community, the model uses "levels of community" to denote All the various communities which exist. Examples of some levels of com- munity are society, family, alcoholics, ministers, doctors, employers, helping professions, local community, state, ethnic groups, and any other grouping that may be appropriate. As the model views alcoholism to exist both in the individual and the com- munity, it may be seen as a model of "recovery" for both the individual and the community. -2- p 00280 N t, "*++.»..n..._s< ^ '"' r. Yy '!�+F E, :- Y., a ,a.'`1." fix• '' = y 4 OMNI +Y ! z: BACKGROUND AND REC0*1ENDATIONS From the community model viewpoint, a term which combines a prevention and case finding function or activity is "intervention." Effective helpers in the field from this viewpoint intervene with information, referral, construc- tive coercion or take whatever realistic action is neces- sary to honestly confront the alcoholic about his problem. Avoiding "confrontation" in the form of an honest and open appraisal simply adds to the denial merry-go-round. It actually supports the alcoholic's denial of his problem, i.e. consumption of the drug alcohol which is having a sig- nificant enough effect on his health, social or vocational life to come to the attention of "significant others" in the alcoholic's life. These levels of significant community surrounding the alco- holic include: Family, employer, criminal justice system (police), medical, social workers, and others. Non-inter- vention at any one of these levels actually adds to the social health problem called "alcoholism." For the majority of G.A. alcoholics, denial has already taken place on several levels. They have lost job, family; they are unable to support their children, and already have been involved with the criminal justice agencies several times. A study of public agency alcoholics conducted in Utah re- vealed that (some were followed for 26 years) on the average, individuals were not referred to alcohol treatment or recov- ery programs until after they had been involved with numer- ous public agencies for eleven (11) years. Studies by the National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) and the Canadian Addiction Research Founda- tion (ARF) estimate that general assistance type alcoholics cost an average of ten thousand doilars ($10,000) per year in public funds for multiple agency services. This cost doubles on the average to twenty thousand ($20,000) per year when this group of alcoholics suffers enough physical damage to qualify for disability support and the revolving door escalates to the medical care community level until death and public burial occurs. Contra Costa County has taken the leadership role in the state by diverting chronic drunkenness offenders from the public agency system into social setting detox programs. These programs are merely an introduction to a continuum of recovery aimed at guiding the alcoholic towards an absti- nent life style. Recovery also includes restoration of -3- 00281 ..+newRx.»1P.in.t le a !�_$e"e xCn S�.w�kl��, •.n mil. ��,� � { t' c .xr •"'� 'w �M �� *.y�i„wr kms' ��"•� �t, t �E y �-u y self-esteem, building healthy, supportive relationships and reestablishment of patterns of economic self-support. This recovery continuum in Contra Costa County is fully funded at the introduction point. Further steps along the path to recovery are only partially funded. The expecta- tion is that the recovery homes will collect most of the basic life support costs from the alcoholic resident. Costs for basic life support, i.e. room, board, transportation, including minimal supervision, have escalated far beyond 6 or 7% program (staffing) costs. Some of these residential costs have, in fact, doubled. These costs now average $250 to $270 per month per resident excluding program. General assistance (G.A. ) alcoholics only receive $110 per month. One hundred dollars ($100) is paid to the recovery home operator and $10 to the individual for personal Ueeus. Recovery home operators cannot afford to accept G.A. alco- holics who have the desire and ability to recover mentally, physically, socially, and economically. The Diablo Valley Ranch facility alone has lost $40,000 this year attempting to serve this population of Contra Costa County citizens in need. After reviewing the attached data, we hope there is agree- ment that these individuals deserve the opportunity to recover from alcoholism. Alcoholism is our number one drug problem estimated to cost seventy million doliars ($70,000,000) a year in Contra Costa County. We also hope that you will conclude from this report that intervention as the individual just begins to reach a higher level of public support is timely and will in the long run be less costly. At this level, the alcoholic individual is at the turning point. He can be directed towards self-support or allowed to become increasingly dependent. We encourage you to support adequate funding for residential costs in recovery home programs with the stipulation that these funds be time limited to motivate these individuals and the recovery home operators to diligently work towards self-supportive recovery. We also encourage you to support direct funding of these residential programs to divert these individuals from be- coming personally tied into a system where they have the opportunity to expand their chemical dependent life style to include economic dependency. This is especially criti- cal since a prime recovery program function is to build E self-esteem, self-determination, and self-support. -4- 00282 r v: O0282 Support by bed unit cost It would be ideal to not even ideentify these monies as G.A. funded but Basic Residendt=epo=ting responsibility borne by with full accounting and the recovery home op David E. rirown 5- 0U283 'g2,a,•r?'4gcs c'+.q:xx a,.a"-r'E*�.+n- m, r.'an-r.ya, .>,':'E."' .t K B. DATA RECAPITULATION DIABLO VALLEY RANCH -5- 00283 B. DATA RECAPITULATION DIABLO VALLEY RANCH 1976 NEW ADMISSIONS REQUIRING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY GENERAL ASSISTANCE (G.A.) FUNDING L Three (3) Month, Sample 2. County Residence Area Number % saber % Januar 9 36 West 22 48 March February 4 16 Central 7 28 12 48 East 4 14 N = 25 * Other 2 4 N - 25 * No permanent address claimed. 3. Prior G.A. Support 4. Sex Number 'r° Number No 80 Male Yes x5 20 Female 20 100 N = 25 N - 25 5. 6. Marital Status Number % Number % Under 30 11 44 Single 10 40 30 to 39 6 24 Married 2 8 40 to 49 6 24 Divorced 11 44 50 to 59 2 8 Widowed 2 8 N = 25 N = 25 7. Avlovatent Status 8. Jo�Skill s Number % Number % Unemployed 25 100 Skilled 18 75 Employed 0 Unskilled 7 25 N = 25 N = 25 -6- 00284 s 1 , .4 B. DATA RECAPITULATION (Continued) 9. Length of Unemployment 10. Education Number % Number Less than 1 Mo. 1 4 0 to 8 Yrs. 3 12 1 Mo. to 3 Mos. 4 16 9 to 11 Yrs. 10 40 3 Mo. to 6 Mos. 17 68 12 + Years 11 44 Not reporting 3 12 Not reporting 1 4 N = 25 N = 25 11. Reason for Job Loss 12. Probation Number % Number Drinking 24 96 No 14 56 Disability 1 4 Yes 11 44 N = 25 N = 25 13, Arrests 14. Jail Time Number % Number /a cvone 1 4 None 5 20 One 1 4 1 to 30 Days 8 32 Two to five 10 40 30 to 59 Days 3 12 Six to ten 2 8 60 to 89 Days 2 8 Ten and more 10 40 90 to 365 Days 2 8 Not reporting 1 4 * Over I Year 5 20 N = 25 N - 25 * I - 3.5 Years I - 8 Years I - 13 Years -7- 00285 `kt lossw. C. COMMENTS 1. Three (3) Month Sample Number % January 9 36 February 4 16 March 12 48 N = n This sample represents new admissions during the month only. Total G.A. residents for January were 21, new were 9 or 43%. February total was 19, new was 4 or 21%. Total G.A. for March was 27, new was 12 or 44%. 2. County Residence Area Number % West 12 48 Central 7 28 East 4 14 Other 2 4 N = 75 The majority (72X) were from other areas of the County than Central where the Ranch is located. This is prob- ably due to the Ranch's "open admission policy" of not screening out individual alcoholics because of lack of sufficient funding to support true residential costs. 3. Prior G.A. Support Number % No 20 80 Yes S 20 N = 75 Actually only 20% of the new G.A. admissions had been in public support previously. In order to get resi- dential income, the Ranch had to put 20 new Contra Costa alcoholics on public support in order to parti- ally meet residential basic life support costs not funded by alcoholism program funds. -8- 00286 z 7 '771 I 00286 C. COMMENTS (Continued) 4. Sex Number 79 Male 25 100 Female 0 N = 23 Although the Ranch does accept both sexes, none of the new applicants were women. However, only 4% of entire admissions during the year are women at this facility. Most women request the special women's program at the Frederic Ozanam Center in Concord as their first choice. 5. Age number % under 30 11 44 30 to 39 6 24 40 to 49 6 24 50 to 59 2 8 N = 75 The majority (68X) of the new admissions were under age 40. A significant number (44X) were under age 30. New G.A. admissions are definitely younger alcoholics. 6. Marital Status Number % Single 10 40 Married 2 8 Divorced 11 44 Widowed 2 8 N = 75 The maority (60X) had been married. Only 2 or 8% were still legally married. Of this entire group of 15 in- dividuals, 11 or 73% had dependent children who were currently on AFDC or potential AFDC recipients. Total children involved was 21 or an average of 2 children each. -9- 0028 ..,e. . v. .. . _.. __. � inomion C. COMMENN'TS (Continued) 7. Employment Status Number Unemployed 25 100 Employed 0 N = 75 As could be expected, since the individuals qualified for G.A. , all 25 residents were currently unemployed. Only one individual reported that he had a job he could return to when sober. 8. Job Skills Number % Skilled 18 75 Unskilled 7 25 N = '5 The majority (75X) of these individuals had definite job skill. Most had trades. One reported managerial experience. balance (25X) reported occupation of lab- orer. 9. Length of Unemployment mmiber % Less than 1 Mo. 1 4 1 Mo. to 3 Mos. 4 16 3 Mo. to 6 Mos. 17 68 Not reporting 3 12 N - 75 The majority (68X) reported being unemployed for a 3 to 6 month period. Most were 6 months without work. Program staff felt this was because this group had drawn all their SDI (State Disability Insurance) and were now seeking another level of economic dependency. _10- 00288 ., : 17 00288 C. COMMENTS (continued) 10. Education Number 0 to 8 Yrs. 3 12 9 to 11 Yrs. 10 40 12 + Yrs. 11 44 Not reporting 1 4 N - 23 A significant numoer of individuals (11) had a high school education or better. Ten or 40X had not com- pleted high school. Only 3 or 12% had only a grade school education. 11. Reason for Job Loss Number '/ Drinking 24 96 Disability 1 4 N = 75 Only 1 individual reported that he had lost job for reasons other than drinking. Twenty-four or 96% lost their job because of their alcoholism. 12. Probation Number % No 14 56 Yes 11 44 N 7 The majority (56X) of these alcoholics had involve- ment with probation. Eleven or 44% had not been on probation at this point in time. -11- 00289 WFW"r"' 'M, (� 4t�QQQ{� V0�GVJ MM 1 C. COMMENTS (Continued) 13. Arrests Number None 1 4 One 1 4 Two to five 10 40 six to 10 10 �8 Ten and more l 4 Not reporting N 75 Only 1 individual reported never having been arrested. The majority (52%) reported one to ten arrests. A significant number (10) had been arrested more than 10 tures. 14. Jail Time Humber % None 5 20 1 to 30 Days 8 32 30 to 59 Days 3 12 00 to 89 Days 2 $ 90 to 365 Days 2 8 Over 1 Year 5 20 N - 75 The majority (60X) reported having been in jail from one day to 365 days. Five individuals reported no jail. Five reported time in excess of one year, with three showing 3-112 to 13 year sentences. -12- 002m .,... IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proposed ) Cutbacks in Certain Social ) April 20, 1976 Service Programs and Social ) Work Staff. This being the time fixed for hearing on proposed reductions in certain social service programs and social work staff for the 1976-1977 fiscal year, in order to keep expendi— tures for social services within the level of federal funds allocated to the County; and Mr. Arthur G. Will,, County Administrator, having transmitted a memorandum from Mr. C. L. Van ILu-ter, Director, Human Resources Agency, (submitted in response to the Board's April 12, 1976 order) indicating that the possibility of materially affecting the deficit by cuts in either the Health Department or the Medical Services Department is not very promising because the expenditure programs of these agencies are so intimately related to revenues which would be reduced concurrently; and Mr. Will having commented that since the beginning of the fiscal year his office has been reviewing each position vacancy with the objective of withholding a replacement appointment wherever practicable, and that this freeze could be intensified in County ?Medical Services and in the County Health Department, should this Board so determine, as one way to gradually reduce the social services deficit; and The following persons having appeared and commented: Mr. Tony Cannata, Secretary—Treasurer of the Contra Costa Central Labor Council, having suggested the formation of a committee, consisting of one of the Board Committees and representatives of employees, to explore possibilities of cuts in other areas; and Mr. Frank b;'hite, Director of Community Services, Contra Costa Central Labor Council, having supported the request of Mr. Cannata and having suggested that local union people also be involved in said committee, as well as Mr. C. L. Van Marter, Director, Human Resources Agency, and Mr. R. E. Jornlin, County Welfare Director; and The Reverend Palmer Watson, Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, having recommended that a small committee be appointed by Mr. Van tarter consisting of staff and citizens and/or consumers representing the four areas of the Human Resources Agency (Social Services, Health, Medical and Mental Health) with input from the County Administrator's office, to determine actual needs set priorities and look for sources for additional money as well as recommendations onv.ays to reduce the budgets involved; and The folloiring persons having appeared and made presentations on behalf of the organization indicated, and having filed (unless other.:ise indicated) a written statement in support of their requests for continuance of the current level of Social Services being provided: 002 Name Department/ ization Mary Lou Laubscher Family and Children's Services Advisory Committee (Chairman) John McClure Family and Children's Services Advisory Committee (Budget Subcommittee) Chris Adams Contra Costa County Juvenile Justice Commission and Delinquency Prevention Commission (Chairperson) Charleen Raines Contra Costa Chapter of Social Services Union, Local 535 (Vice President) Ernest 11. Henderson Mt. Diablo Rehabilitation Center (Director) Carla Gatto, Marjorie Contra Costa County Social Service Stolley, and Sam Harris Department (Volunteer Services Committee) (no statement filed by Mr. Harris) Sebe Hill Rodeo-Crockett Area Council, Office of Economic Opportunity (Chairman) Louise Clark League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley (no written statement filed) read a letter from the Intergovernmental Relations Office of Revenue Sharing with respect to use of of revenue sharing funds for construction of County jail Bernadine J. Braud State of California Employment Development Department Otie Nicholson Contra Costa County Social Tdork Line Supervisors' Group 's Annie Hines Carquinez Coalition, Inc. Alton L. Wilson Family and Children's Services Advisory Board (Adult Protective Service) Art Schroeder Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging George L. Fogarty Associated Blind of California, Inc. (President) Cora Birch ::est Contra Costa Club for the Blind, Richmond (no statement filed) June Skarr Representing recipients of Conservatorship Services (Mrs. Skarr also presented a letter from Joan Haber, parent of recipient of Conservatorship Services) Joseph Hilton Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded James D. Strickler Citizens for Jobs (no statement filed) Marion Steinkellner Family and Children's Services Advisory Committee and Rodeo Child Care Center (no statement filed) Dorothy Gayles Gayles Residential Care Home (Owner- Administrator) Hilda Norek Recipient of Social Services Edie Harmon Brentwood Committee on Aging and Brentwood Senior Citizens 00292 Name Department/Organization Tim Downs East County Resource Center (no statement filed) Maria Morris Recipient of Social Services Leo Farr State Department of Vocational Rehabilitation Anelle Rouse Contra Costa County Social Service staff; and The Clerk having noted that written statements urging that current level of services be maintained had been submitted by the following: Mary Cantrell Contra Costa County Child Health and Disabilit Prevention Advisory Board (Chairmani Midge Cowart Rodeo Senior Citizens Nutrition Program Grace Fowler Rodeo Senior Citizens; and Due to lateness of the hour and prior commitments by members of the Board, IT IS ORDERED this hearing is continued from 4:30 p.m. this day to 9 a.m., April 21, 1976. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of April, 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Ro�ynn Shackles T Deputy Clerk cc: A & F Commitee Members Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator 00293 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 ' 19 76 In the Matter of Notification of Intention to File Claim Against Contra Costa County. An April 14, 1976 communication having been received from Mr. Warren L. Smith, 1100 Bailey Road, Pittsburg, California 94565 notifying the Board of his intention to file a claim against the County; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid notification is referred to County Counsel . PASSED F the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregok m Is o true and correct appy of an order «oared on the minutes of said Board of Supervisor on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. W. L. Smith Supe County Counsel affixed 20 day of Apri 1 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON. Clerk By 4 Deputy Clerk Robbie Gu�ierrez/D H-?i ij;d 15m 00294 RECEIVED BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. OL=N iso2s CONTRA 00STA COUNTYcos ne In the Putter of Regular Calendar of Board. REQUL..ST THAT MATTER BE CE.LFN'DARED FOR BOARD ACTION DATE: TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS It is respectfully requested that. time be allotted on your next regular calendar for consideration of the fol- lowing: (State specificically matter to be consid- ered and action desired by Boa--d. ) /10 if / / S 119174 4k1Z. 17e, 4 . 3!.L.,�-t:.:•,t � -:�--�-� - --cam--� f it is eimated that minutes will be requ ired - resenta..Tor_. Preferred tir :: a.m. p.M, 153-1 - 500 - 26.1 00295 t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California ABril 20 . 19 a In the Matter of Approving Procedure for Appointment of Tenant Representa- tives on Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County. The Board on April 6, 1976 having requested its Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) to review the report of the County Administrator pertaining to methods for appointment of tenant representatives to the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County; and The Committee this day having reported that it had considered the alternative methods proposed by the County Administrator: 1) that the appoIntments be by nomination of the Supervisors from the districts with the greatest number of Housing Authority units initially, and subsequently by nomination from the Supervisors from the remaining districts with the next largest number of units; or 2) a random selection among the members of the Board on the basis of drawing lots to determine the sequence of nominations for the positions; and The Committee having recommended that the first procedure be adopted for the initial appointments (under which procedure the initial nominees would be by the Supervisors from Districts II and V, the districts having the greatest number of Housing Authority units); and The Committee having further recommended that this procedure be reviewed upon the expiration of the terms of the initial appointees; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of the Government Operations Committee are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Committee Members Supervisors Housing Authority affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 County Administrator — Human Resources Agency J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel BDeputy Clerk jean L. Diller H 23 8/75 10M O V 2U0 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 2C , 19 76 In the Matter of Request with respect to Use of Federal Funds for Construction of Women's minimum Security Facility. The Board having received an April 7, 1976 letter from ms. Judy Imsdahl, Co—Coordinator, Contra Costa Chapter of the National Organisation for Women, P.O. Box 4794, Walnut Creek, California 94596 requesting that the Board preclude the use of federal funds (LRAA) for construction of the Women's Minimum Security Fa^.ility until after the County Probation Department study of the needs of women prisoners is couapleted in June; IT IS BY TME BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the County Sheriff—Coroner and the County Administrator. PA.SSRL by the :board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: : s Judy Imsdahl Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of . County Sheriff—Coroner Supervisors vounty Administrator affixed this20thday of April 19 76 County Probation Officer County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ` i Deputy Clerk By Helen C. /:arshall H-24 31`7615m 00297 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Licensing for Children's Day Care Facilities. The Board on February 10, 1976 having adopted Resolution Number 76/131 supporting legislation on licensing for children's day care facilities ; and The Board having received an April 5, 1976 letter from Senator John A. Nejedly, in response to said resolution, transmitting a copy of a letter he had received from the State Department of Health regarding the present status of this program; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communica- tions are REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Senator Idejedly Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of wvhm Director, Human Resources P Agency affixed this 20th day of April , 1976 County Welfare Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Public Information Officer By `liar Craig Deputy Clerk N L.3 aps inns 0020000 l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Reports of Stolen Vehicles from County Parking Lot, Richmond. Mr. A. G. Will, County Adr:.inistrator, having informed the Board that there have been reports of several vehicles being stolen from the parking lot adjacent to the Richmond County Buildings Complex; and Mr. Will having advised that he had received a report from Mr. Charles E. Iversen, Marshal, Richmond Judicial District, (a member of the Security Inspection Team established to review security at said complex) suggesting two alternative programs for the prevention of theft and vandalism and approximating costs involved in each; and Supervisor J. P. Kenny having recommended that the matter be referred to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) for report in one week; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having expressed the opinion that one week would not allow sufficient time to evaluate all the alternatives, and having suggested that the matter also be referred to the City of Richmond; and Mr. Will having stated that he would request a report on this situation from the City of Richmond; and Ms. Joyce Stripe, representing United Clerical Employees, having appeared and urged the Board to expedite this matter; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee for report on May 4, 1976. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc : Board Committee Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of City of Richmond Supervisors Pyr. C. E. Iversen affixed this 20thday of April 1976 United Clerical Employees % J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator WBy / ( ,,y Deputy Clerk PublAc Works Director County Sheriff-Coroner t'a'•'y=�C*-'a!Q 00299 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April ?0 , 19 76 In the Matter of Complaint with Respect to Drainage Fee. The Board on April 13, 1976 having referred to the County Administrator and the Public Works Director the complaint of Mr. and :yrs. 4. 0. -oatley. 1015 Mountain View Boulevard, Walnut Creek, :aiifornia 94596. ,ith respect to the requirement for payment of a drainage fee prior to obtaining a building permit to remodel their home; and Supervisor J. 'oriarty having called attention to a further communication from fir. Goatlev regarding said requirement; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communication is REFERRED to the County Administrator and the Public Works Director for review and report. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c• Mr. . _1. ;oat 1 ey U/uness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 24th - of Apri 1 19 76 County Building Inspector J. R. OLSSON, Clerk JA-1 Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Robbie Gutirrez 00300 April 12, 1976 VJ. ri f.%%o A ii.�i.9..ii�i� The cttached p_}tient is b.-Ing rade to avalu revocaw.ais of our o..J.i�a.a..�, perast. We wish, to make it clear however, that we are reserving all rights to recover these monies in full, and that in no bray is this payment an acknowledgement on our part that such fees are actually due and owing. We Lave contacted the 3oard of Supervisors requesting a hearing on this ratter. We feel that in accordance with the intent and purpose of Ordinance X71-81 we ire not subject to the payment of any fees. Our remodeling is sUmply that of caking existing space into living space. No additional land is involved in the building, no subdivision or new building is 1ntailed. Therefere, no additional land is being displaced fro-. drainage purposes. Furthercare, ve -are doing the re^odeling ourselves. We are not exceeding the 34WO.01 st'tpd in the ordinance as the base for fee payment. "tie do not feel that we should be evaluated as.-If we were contracting out all of the work. Finally, we fe?1 that the building department was in error by not informing us of this Crdina.-.ce and associated tees -at any previous tire. In the zany conversations regarding necessary fees prior to April 1, 1976 at no tire was this fee pentioned. Only after all plans were checked a=d approved were ve i nforred that this fee was necessary for us to acquire the bull-ding per-it. An additional 2,700 fee, which wss tot311y unexpected, code greatly impede our ability to do the rewodeling at all. We -6-auld appreciate = explan3tio n, In writing, fror. the :3uilding Departments as tj why this fee is applicable to us. If no 00301 response is forthconin-, x- ::ill assure teat you are in agreement with the positions stnte3 here in. sincerely, Fichael D. Goatley cc: Supervisor :•oriarty T �L . ;(..tisrrrs" q�-tt=?•r Apq go 1976 J. it %OPt cam° 00302 C C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 19 ,76 In the Matter of Composition of Contra Costa County Detention Facility Advisory Committee. The Board having received an April 15, 1976 letter from Judge Coleman F. Fannin, Chairman, Contra Costa County Detention Facility Advisory Committee, advising that the committee requests inclusion of minorities and former inmates to also serve on this advisory body; and An April 15, 1976 letter having been received from Mr. Robert S. Headley, Chairman, Orinda-Lafayette-Moraga Council for Civic Unity, expressing concern about the composition of the aforesaid Committee and urging the Board to add members who would be more representative of the community; and Ms. Diana L. Patrick, 1310 ?farina Vista, Martinez, California having appeared and suggested that consideration be given to appointing more representatives from the public sector to the Committee; and Supervisor J. P. Kenny having recommended these requests be referred to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) for consideration with other cor- respondence received on the subject; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Board Committee Supervisors Detention Facility Advisory- Committee affixed this 20 day of Anril . 19 Z6 Orinda-Lafayette-:'oraga Council for Civic Unity J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator B Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz H -24 i/76 1Sm oU3o3 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report ) of Government Operations ) Committee on Housing ) April 20, 1976 Rehabilitation Assistance ) Program. ) Following its public hearing on April 12, 1976 the Board referred to its Government Operations Committee (Super- visors A. M. Dias• and E. A. Linscheid) proposed policies and procedures developed by the County Planning Department to implement the Housing and Community Development Program, said hearing having identified certain differences between staff proposals and those of the Housing Subcommittee of the Community Development Advisory Council which initially developed the pro- gram; and The Committee having this day recommended adoption of the following policies: 1. The program be established as a grant program for the first year and move to a combination zero-interest and reduced-interest loan program during the second and following years. 2. The program be limited to single-family residences and owner/occupants of two-family residences during the initial year. 3. Eligibility be determined using the HUD Section 8 Schedule, adopted by reference, with a $10,000 asset limit. 4. Expenditures be authorized for the following list of items: a. Repairs and improvements necessary to the structure to correct health and safety hazards. b. Other necessary repairs and improvements, including exterior painting, in order to con- form to code standards applicable to existing residential structures to ensure safe, decent, and sanitary housing. c. Correction of any incipient deficiencies which would make it impossible for a structure to be brought to and readily maintained at code standards. d. Removal of unrepairable secondary buildings, structures, and other blighting influences located on the property. e. Replacement of built-in cooking appliances when required for safety reasons. f. Other general property repairs if funds are available and when the amount spent does not exceed 40% of the loan amount. 5. Expenditures be limited to $4,500 for a single-family residence with an additional $1,500 to be authorized for the additional unit where a duplex is involved. 00' 304 6. The program during the initial year be established on a first-come, first-serve basis. 7. Participation in the counselling program be on a voluntary basis with as much encouragement for participation given as possible. 8. The Board of Supervisors, under the regular appeal pro- cedures provided for in the County Ordinance Code, hear any appeals which may be filed during the initial year and with the understanding the Office of the County Building Inspector would assist appellants in the appeal process. 9. A loan panel of three members be established and appointed' by the Board comprised of two persons knowledgeable in the housing and finance field and of a citizen representative. The Committee having further recommended that the policy documents for this program be revised by Planning Department staff based on these determinations for final approval of the Board. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations of the Government Operations Committee are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Super- visors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of April, 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By ( / Bonnie Boaz Deputy Clerk` cc: Director of Planning; Community Development Advisory Council Acting Building; Inspector Director, Economic Opportunity Program Director, Human Resources Agenc;r County Administrator 00305 Jamas P.Kanny The Board of Supervisors Contra Chairman Costa ja^ew R.Olaron County Administration Building County Clerk and P.O.Box gl l ' County Ex Officio Clerk of tho Board Martinez.California 94553Mrs Garan RuaNl Chief Clerk James P.Kenny-Richmond (4151372-2371 1st District Alfred M.Dias-El Sobrante 2nd District James E.Moriarty-Lafayette 3rd District Wsrren N.Boggess-Concord 4th District Edmund A.Linscheid-Pittsburg April 20 1976 5th District p , REPORT OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE ON HOUSING REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM On April 12, 1976 the Board held a public hearing on the policy and-" procedures developed by the County Planning Department to imple- ment the Housing Rehabilitation Assistance Component of the first year Housing and Community Development Program. This hearing iden- tified certain differences between staff proposals and those of the Housing Subcommittee of the Community Development Advisory Council which initially developed the program. The Committee met and reviewed differences with staff representatives and Advisory Council represen- tatives on April 13, 1976 and, as a result thereof, recommends adoption of the following policies: 1. The program be established as a grant program for the first year and move to a combination zero-interest and reduced-interest loan program during the second and following years. 2. The program be limited to single-family residences and owner/occupants of two-family residences during the initial year. 3. Eligibility be determined using the HUD Section 8 Schedule, adopted by reference, with a $10,000 asset limit. 4. Expenditures be authorized for the following list of items: a. Repairs and improvements necessary to the structure to correct health and safety hazards. b. Other necessary repairs and improvements, including exterior painting, in order to con- form to code standards applicable to existing residential structures to ensure safe, decent, and sanitary housing. 00306 Microfilmed with board order „; -2- c. Correction of any incipient deficiencies which would make it impossible for a structure to be brought to and readily maintained at code standards. d. Removal of unrepairable secondary buildings, structures, and other blighting influences located on the property. e. Replacement of built-in cooking appliances when required for safety reasons. f. Other general property repairs if funds are available and when the amount spent does not exceed 40% of the loan amount. 5. Expenditures be limited to $4,500 for a single-family residence with an additional $1,500 to be authorized for the additional unit where a duplex is involved. 6. The program during the initial year be established on a first-come, first-serve basis. 7. Participation in the counselling program be on a voluntary basis with as much encouragement for participation given as possible. 8. The Board of Supervisors, under the regular appeal pro- cedures provided for in the County Ordinance Code, hear any appeals which may be filed during the initial year and with the understanding the Office of the County Building Inspector would assist appellants in the appeal process. 9. A loan panel of three members be established and appointed by the Board comprised of two persons knowledgeable in the housing and finance field and of a citizen representative. The Committee also recommends that the policy documents for this program be revised by Planning Department staff based on these determinations for final approval of the Board. A. M. DIAS E. A. LINSCHEID Supervisor, District II Supervisor, District V O0307 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976_, In the Matter of State of California Department of Water Resources Meeting on "Review of Delta Alternatives." The Board having directed staff to attend on April 13, 1976 the public meeting in Stockton conducted by the State of California on the "Review of Delta alternatives" and to submit a report to the Board this day; and Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Public Works Director, having requested an additional week for submission of said report; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Mr. Cline is APPROVED and staff is to report on April 27, 1976. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Widn°u my hand and the Seal of the Board of Environmental Control Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 ,c J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By fir• j'd z _ / !` f' t,,W- Deputy Clerk Mildred 0. Ballard H 24 8/75 IOM 00308 r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri l 20 19 76 In the Matter of Proposed Segregation of Assessment No.'s 40-A, 40-C, 41-A and 41-D, Assessment District 1964-3, Amador Valley Water System, San Ramon Area This Board, having noted that the Public Works Director has been notified by the County Auditor-Controller that the parcels of land shown as Assessor's Parcel No. 's 210-040-018, 021 and 022, on previous tax rolls, upon which there are unpaid assessments- on bonds issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, Assessment District 1964-3, have been divided; In conformance with Sections 8730 to 8734 of the Streets and Highways Code, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director, as ex officio Street Superintendent, is AUTHORIZED to file with the Clerk of the Board amended assessments of Assessment No.'s 40-A, 40-C, 41-A and 41-D, segregating and apportioning the unpaid installments of the original assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the original parcels, and to apply a fee of $160.00 per original parcel to the segregation to cover County costs pursuant to the Board Order on this matter dated August 26, 1969. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coffee copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Public works Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Land Development Supervisors Division affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ZA� Deputy Clerk TearL. Miller cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller County Counsel County Administrator 00309 } In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Appointing Sokoloff-Hamilton- Bennett, AIA, Project Architect for George Miller Jr. Memorial Center - West Therapeutic Swimming Pool, Richmond. (Work Order No. 5236) . The Public Works Director having reported that it is the recommendation of the Office of the County Administrator, Public Works Department and the Hilltop Center Parents' Group that the Board of Supervisors appoint the firm of Sokoloff-Hamilton-Bennett, AIA, San Francisco Project Architect for the new Therapeutic Swim- ming Pool to be constructed at George Miller Jr. Memorial Center - West, Ricbmond; and The Board having considered the recommendation and having concurred with same; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the archi- tectural firm of Sokoloff-Hamilton-Bennett, AIA is APPOINTED Pro- ject Architect and the Public Works Director is DIRECTED to prepare an architectural services agreement for the aforementioned project. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator - P. W. Dept Wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds &WerwiiOrs affixed this 20th day of Anril 19 _76 cc: Sokoloff-Hamilton-Bennett J. R. OI.SSON, Clerk Public Works Department County Auditor-Controller By f • Deputy Clerk County Administrator N. INGRA AX H 24 8/75 10M 00310 Bi HE BOARD OF S U PEtI v iS ORS OF CONTRA COSTA COU?tTY, STATE OF CALIFORZJIA In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) April 20, 1976 . for Remodel of the Receiving Cell ) at the County Main Jail, Martinez. ) (Work Order No. 5262) ; Bidder Total Amount Bond Amounts Goulden-Randall Associates $19,985.00 Labor & Mats. $ 9,992.50 P. 0. Boa 5469 Faith. Perf. $19,985,00 Walnut Creek, California 94598 Adapt Construction Company, Lafayette Edward Company, Edgard Ben-Eliezer, Walnut Creek The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; - IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall present two good and sufficient surety bends as indicated above; and that the Public Yforks Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERME that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks submitted for security shall be returned. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976 . CERTIFIED COPY I certlfy that this 1s a full. trite & correct copy of the orl4inal ducutnent rrkteh is on file In my office. and that It w.: µvsrd & adopted by the Do:ixd of Supeml=ors of Contra Custa Cuunty. Ceitfornia. on tae date Egos-- ATTEST: J. R. Of S ON. Cnunty Clerk exo'ttcio Clerk of said Ilo:rd of Supervlsora. cc: Public Works Director by Deputy Clerk- County Counsel APR 2 Q 1976 County Auditor Contractor Form 9.1 00311 Rair .?K r - ..._ =•- A wf �E in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20, , 19 76 In the Matter of - Reauests to lease Lanni at Buchanan Field. The Board on November 12, 1975 referred to the Public Works Director a letter of intent to negotiate a fixed base operation ground lease from Canadian Limited, and on December 16, 1975 a similar request from California-National Air Services, Inc.; and On January 13, 1976 the Board also referred such a request from Mr. David F. Huntington of Santa Yonica, California to the Public Works Director and to the Contra Costa County Aviation Liaison Catlittee; and On February 3, 1476 the Board engaged the consulting firm of Daniel, Harm, Johnson and Hendenhall of Redwood City to prepare a revised Airport )•:aster Plan; and The consultant having recomronded that the county defer action on any new leases until their f;rn has completed the Facility Requirement , crtent of the Study in order to assure that any new leases will be compatible with the revised nlsn; and Union the reconnerdation of t-e Public Works Director and the Contra Costa County Aviation liaison Committee, the Board APP.ROV--S the aforesaid request for defervent. PASSED by the ?oa•Y? on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Denartnent Su perrnon Airoort Div;Sit or. affixed this 20 day of April . 19 76 cc: County AcIrdnist*ator Coun}v Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director - Aviation Liaison Co=ittee By Ln _ ' i� J� /. Deputy Cleric Airport Ranager ✓ Ji,-an L. i�!zllor Daniel, i•'a.nn, Johnson end 'ends nhall PL--. David F. -Hhwtiz:z-ton Canadian Linitsd California-:dational Air Services, Inc. H-24 5,7615m 00312 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Anril 2.0 , 19 7F In the Matter of Authorization for Parents' Group of George Miller hest to hold a Spring Bazaar on June 18-19, 1976 hHEREAS the Parents' Group at George Hiller West wishes to hold a Spring Bazaar at the George Miller West facility on June 18-19, 1976; and W EREAS the Spring Bazaar will be open to the public and will offer homemade crafts and cakes as well as other money-raising functions; and KNEREAS the proceeds from this Spring Bazaar will be utilized by the Parents' Organization to take a number of the adult clients and adult staff of George Miller West on a one-day trip to Disneyland; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that authorization for this function is APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on Arri1 20, 1976. i hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Director, HRA Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Su cc: County Medical Director pervisols County Administrator affixed this 20th day of April 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By u Deputy Clerk LK H 24 SPS IOW 0 �3 ( In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Anr11 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Appointment of Additional Representatives to the Overall Economic Development Program (OEDP) Committee The Board having this day considered the recommendation of the Director of Planning regarding the appointment of certain additional persons to membership on the Overall Economic Develop- ment Program (OEDP) Committee; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following additional persons nominated by the Director of Planning be APPOINTED to the OEDP Committee: Name Representing Mrs. Ernestine DeFalco Town of Moraga Mr. Yas Aoki Japanese-American Passed by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Planning Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Administrator affixed this 20th day of April 1976 Aorointees - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk C/o Planning i p`'bi j-C Tnfornat 1 nn "If f+.ce^ By c . Deputy Clerk H 24 1217a t5a►� 1.,,- tat9:f 00314 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Appointments to Contra Costa County Alanpouvr Planning Council The Board on Alay 14, 1974 having established the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council and appointed 23 member representatives; and The Board on January 6, 1976 having approved the Council by-laws which changed membership composition to substitute a veterans' representative for the agriculture-business category and to add one city representative; and The Council and the Director, Human Resources Agency having advised this Board that a vacancy exists in the category of Economic Development Corporation caused by the resignation of Paul Hughey; and The Council having conducted a county-wide recruitment process to obtain candidates interested in serving on the Council, and the Director, Human Resources Agency and the Council having recommended the following persons to serve in the categories shown: Veterans Contra Costa County Cities (1 of 4) Atrs. Dona Willits %. Anna Aiello 3001 Terrace hay c/o City of Martinez rhrtinez, CAA 94553 52S Henrietta Street 'Martinez, CA 94553 Economic Development Corporation Atr. Richard J. Beyer c/o Pittsburg Economic & Housing Development Corporation 398 Railroad avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the above persons are APPOINTED to serve as members of the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council for terms to be selected by the Council at its annual meeting in September 1976 and thereafter confirmed by this Board. PASSED BY THE BOARD on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dare aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Director, HRA Supervisors cc : Appointees affixed 20th day of April 1976 Manpower Planning Council J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator County Auditor-Controller By .L Deputy Clerk H 24 895 IOM 00315 iii iiiv BOARD OF SUIrrin v ISO UrKS OF CONTRA COSTA COUTUTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) for Reroofing Various Buildings at ) April 20, 1976 the Contra Costa County hospital, Martinez. (Work Order No. 5263) ) Bidder Total Amount Bond Amounts Sparks Roofing Co. $7,790. 00 Labor & Mats. $ 3,895.00 4943 Laurel Drive Faith. Perf. $ 7,790.00 Concord, California 94521 Enterprise Roofing Service, Walnut Creek Roofing Constructors, Inc. DBA Western Roofing Service, San Francisco Sunset Roofing Co. , San Francisco The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public i+orks Director recozranding that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated Above; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FOi,TH&R ORD—'zRED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insuranfte, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FURTiFEEN ORDERED that, upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks submitted for security shall be returned. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976 CERTIFIED COPY I certify ti:-%t this is a full. true & correct copy of the oriri:al documont which is on file tit ray office. and thilt It was vaned 4- a►lopted by the Iio:trd of sup,mi,ers of Contra Char County. Co-Wornia. on the date et:orn_.*.TTFiT: J. It. Oi 9soN. Caunty CicrL.L e,o:ticio Clerk of said L'osrd of Supervisors, cc: Public Ulorks Director by lx;-s:y Clerk. County Counsel //. � � �.� on APR 2 0 1976 County Auditor Contractor Form 9.1 00316 r9v. 6-75 CWrrIZACT (Construction Agrecrsent) (Contra Costa County Standard 1'orpi) :^hese special terns are incorporated balow by reference. G!;213) t'artics: [Public .%gcncyj- Contra Costa County Sparks Roofing Co. [Contractor] 4943 Laurel Drive Concord CA 94521 complete lejal naike (,1) effective nate: May 3,, 1976 [5ce 54 fqr starting date.] (�3) rare ::Or::: Re-roofing various buildings at the Contra Costa County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, California, Work Order No. 5263 Tease Bid all in accordance with the pl4ns, drawing, and spectfi- cations & general conditions, prepared by or for the Public Works Department, and in accordance with the accepted bid proposal. (54) Corspletion ire: (strike out (a) or (b) and "calendar" or 'working"j S'�a11t'�J'i (b) itivan 60 from starting date. 65) Liquidated V=agcs: $50.00 per calendar day. (5b) PubUc Agency's Agent: Acting Public Wnrks Di- or (57) Contract Pric I * ZQ,�Tf1 (fcr unit price contracts: more or less, i accorua.ce brit.': inisFiled�qua.�tities at unit bid prices.) [Strike o`u parunthetical terial if inapoliceble.] SIC.IA:llrri.? u ACEJJULiiIC:"':1:' Public Acency,_ by: {� (President, chairman Or Other Vernon L. uesignated Representative) Acting Public Works Directo ) Contractor, hereby also ack-noYledging awareness of and compliance with Labor Co••�� tde 51361 concerning Workmen's Compensation Law. By: (P. CL. (,D . tea • O z.s (CORPORATE lVesigna— t—e official capacity in the businessT SEAL) by: Designate or ictal capacity in t,ie business !tote to Cortrac.'or fI1 .:zecute acknolle.:grient jour beZov, and !21 if a corpora- tion, affix Corporate CCC% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - State of California ) ACdJONLKDC::EJ'" (by Corporation, County of ) ss' Partnership, or Individual) The person(s) signing above for Contractor, k:roun to aye in individual and business capacity as stated, personally appeared before ma today and acknowledged that he/they e::ecutcd it sand that the corporation or partners�i nna ed above executed it. Dated: �itt (::ai•AItIAL SEAL) Notary Public PDXri A1'PROVxD: J. b. CLAL'SLU, County Counsel, <v.r - - - Deputy (Page 1 of 4) ap�xxicxxxxxar (CC-l; Rev. 11-73) OFFICIAL U E w L 01RIST05 C. ,4(OULIS Microfilmed withboard order ��^^,SSPool..+. "v0t.c-CA..IONNI.�cow,o,. cosi. • ooVZ7Ec COUNT„ ._ ut t.x1l:;sr:a[xrM[3 0[C.1x.[97J r J. +,Cues; (4) 1.; Lat+•ir si•.statura•s in :a cLiasn 2, uffeetive en ttW saxAm tu, thuse 1%%rL&%m proiamc asci attrubar as aut forth in thin contract, incorporating by these rafaerunces the naterial ('special terms'! in sec. 1. (b) , contractor shall, at his UWA w::t asah QZmW1WV, UZJ ism s saaarLJ: .a.alsCe s+.uaskr, fatly vAu faitlasully Euerform and eeutlute the: wear).: arse! W311 fursas::.a all eut.:rials, laa:aar, r:ervietis and tratnaportation uateaasssary, eonveniustt arw ipropor in ordur fairly to perform the rahjuirauents of this contract, all strictl;,• in ammuaueo with Cita: Pmulic Agency's plans, drawings and specifications. (c) Yhto work can be e:wnyaul only with Pudalic Aga:atef's prior written order specifying such ehamic and its cosh ayra.•osi to by the parties and too Puiblic Wincy shall novor have to pay macre than gk.-cifiud in Svc. 7 witsumt such an order. . 6. a IWI= TO PWCCEu. contractor shall start this work as directed in the speal- ficatims or tae Uotica to or mmur and shall conplete. it as specifies) In See. 1. S. LIQ ZDAnm DmAm. if tats! Contractor fails to oosxplate tale coattact and this work within tote tima. 7-therefor, -al!crane being mase far contingmpcies as provided herein, he beoonees liXalu to the Public j%quucy for all its loss &W damavo thomaefrads and because, from the nature of the case, it is and will be inprac:ticabla and extremely difficult to ascertain and fi:. the Pdalic Agatucy's actual dan+age from any delay in porforsamm hereof, It is avrws that Contractor will pay as ligeiadatod daeayes to the Public Agency the reasonable sun specified in sac. 1, the rusalt of the parties' reasonable endeavor to ostinato fair ave-rage compensation pensatieon tkarefor, for each calendar day's delay in finisbiaq said works and if the saga he not paid, Public Agony may, in addition to its other romodics, deduct the amw frm any ssonay ane or to bocorn due Contractor under this ooa- tract. if the Public Agency for any cause authorims or contributes to a delay, suspea- sion of wort or a=tension of time, its sA.tration shall he added to the time allowed for complotiea, but it shall not be deemed a waives our be wed to defeat any right of this Agency to damages for non-cocpletion or dela? hereunder. Pursuant to Government Cods Sea. 6215, the Contractor small not be assessed liquidated damages for delay In completion of the work, when such delay was caused by the failure of tho Peddie Agency or the =mar of a utility to provide for removal or relocation of existing utility facilities. 6. I1t'.7x2LITLb LOt ts:at'a:,as. %aha: plans,.aarawinvs and specifications or special provisiaas 72 M e: Agency s call for bids, and Contractor's aexxi tod bid for this wort: are horeby incorporated into m s contracts and they are Intended to co-oporate, so that aagr- tWLug exhibited is that plans or drawings and not smutieoesl in tho specifications or spateial provisions, or vice: versa, is to be e:-a.eutaed as if o9mibitsum, mentioned and set • lotto in Loge, to the true intent and meaning 'tlutroof woos taken all togothers asci differences of opinion concerning these small be finally e:otomined by public Agemay's Agent specified in lea:. 1. 7. PATMh21l. (a) For his strict and literal fulfillment of those pradises and saeaditioas, as n compensation for all this work, the Public Agency shall pay the Contractor the snot specified in Sec. 1, e=mpt that in unit price contracts tea payment shall be for .finished quantities at unit bid prices. (b) an or about the first uay of each calendar month the Contractor shall sa6dit to the Public agony a verifLL%l ayadtiicatiwt for pam. tout, supported by a statement shoving all naterials actually installed during deo pra.•eudlav soma, the laboroxpeuded thereon, and the cost thereof# w'.seraulmn, after dtockLage the Pd6lic Agsney shall masa to Contractor a certificate for tin aLm mt dotorninsd to be dee, minus LOf thereof pursuant to e:ovemuout Coale Sec. 53067, but not until d%-fcctivo work and npaterials have been rosnovreat, soplaced and ado good. S. 8AY18xiTlR WITlI MWO (a) :'tea PL611c Agency or its agent any withhold any payment, or for seovored evidence nullify all or any eortifieate for payment, to such extant and period of time only as nay be necessary to protect the Public Agency from loss because of# (1) Defoetivo work not roatedicd, or ustem4pletod words, or (2) Claim filed or roasottable evidence inlicaatiuy probable Tiling, or (3) railure to prwwrly pay suhscontraetors or for material or labor, or (6) Reasonable doubt taut the wort: mann his: ceytleted for the balance then unpaid, or (S) Damage to anotlior contractor, or (6) Damage to the Public Agency, other than edmmage due to delays. (b) ?ho Public ,lyuscy spall use reasonable a:iliyauee to discover and report to the Contractor, as the work progresses, the uawrials and labor ubiedt are not satisfactory to It, an as to avoid unnecessary trouble or cost to tate Cautractot•ia peaking good any defective work Or pasts. (o) 3, calendar days after the Public Agency files its nodal of complotiom of the entire (Paye 2 of 6) (CC-Is Rev. 12-72) OItQ . . • 0 v . 1 ,, I1, I : � `ffi % 11 o 5 P : $- e�rf` 1 I , . ,pri RM ti after'.aicuurCit�y awtl ar''''ll. punts w�iGtltC2d wu Llur eonGcack,provided �t oaYt�ca►a o �� , II a '� ; licntir.: t neat a 1`,cl.aita;s far,,lal.ur auat,zia�11ta:rJL, A ba<vz: L.:tiszt p zu►t naves*s�eot -��� g irru.:ttt.+ d to tint: lW*4 c,-4 :cv L�n-i :oa act.. or au..� o s o than CAMt,�acto� asi ..pe Ltcas , ,or ,wx di6ld uo, .live Lrx:p. ulasu.'agatz t the work or sttu, aWpzov �tbnl� k.wc �z zic► ,1xeasortaule inncattous Of tlefiectivt: Or wzxsfny ost3► Or Qf late-socot�rlc z:o O I � . �z1. aDr C32111i'i�tgatitxt iCvntractor. , L a syr u PPM, 11 I 11, � # .t, x' £ aax� `^,# , 6k' 9 Iii�l.lrnlx:L. ' (3-wic1�111,z Cods sMl$att-61) qa:s w%im this CcnttatAct, t aattaato cwstd gfr",� � c a►�enz:� tI) a +cscxtt.Etcae c.of coas�cat to self iztsur;: LS►� the u►3�recto o �� ,, � } Itu]ustraal sita7 tions; kor tt2) s ccrtzftoata of Ft�t acn,"s tionx-ps ��rt . . ".,.. a Cpil(1�g#uiA tis;_n ansau'wrlttul sn,.uzor. or t3) as as�act co orsIlacatc tbai of c�c? LY the#—�—ta71 �orc u =sttsurcr Conkraetar ss auaze of alar£"Leco ]Mi wstla,i«�Lor t;ocle�Sut;f 3?QOMiOr .`#i�5� 10G�stlliSSt�f�ll•,L 1f. rr . � M� oz -6!- ARSi iT 3{! �'Uxu�:i tUp ;si_��ntii� tba s txzrttraclt t.Oatrac11 tQr satall delivwc to-PuLlic f' � "'L", ot><I aaw:esu faieiaat :Lands h sw�retics.. fit;,at�ow:t(s) s% d cat its or�s�eezallilllll . 9 lass aitbful per�ozszwzice Ov tbisN'bocatrac ayr .nt mor �a17. 1,nlior g ut aratrxials ,tstastsaR#tst. 0 I .,-, ,; w ";q g �� �. �, � _ 1_L� l "1�t► t tai. Tll 1�Llttitlttli. If th `�contr tCtOr' at Uum ZGjtsaoili=�O r< - r w 11 3O a� , ,Ayat y,t oar stagy agczttt+) for su�zlf�saffictanti'iwt sr3als,,accts tbati� S RCot �letc= 2tts aqr at ata<i•irQac11 k as prQvfdcd berctn,,,'fOr &"PCz�igd�o��2Q�;days I � 11 +iirttten a otsoa tbarzagf b tbo 3vuLltc ligeit�I, the;3�uLlie y furztish aamei " " etc �t2tra x+as�atlable 'C7i�sailStS teicoof,fZOR tFtQ 04tttraCt jsrtQ:. d jh .>�� '�F"`'e �s ,y Lf. - - /�� r j^�,���t�, ��.�tj'�a" ;,ry ^,a�.�NG a �; .µ� `# ..i►i.i . , Qtk �"'t J^� 1 .Ri_ tM r . „i l��P��� �iF SY�ii q; - y *tom tC x l *111181tJttld t10BS f,. f!'s' Y t�.�' 3!A 7 Q ""w"t.�.a � .atzortbdt: (Laysiaatzt >Mi#.la' bCC. :"1�1U�';ands SCCS ].T35� ].??T Sr, �I,7Xti _t�Orb RItSCYt3s12.Tfat ilittl ` t�tat ttti'.i ��tYe =�.'til. t�w w S C + ► 3 - ' -- - titliRtC tatdt dxlta tC1BYaat{jsCn3ltto`S`attd�lforfeitusoss,,P-. thea xaizos �� � s W w ' - % �1pol �sOti>: 31 � 1 t Sacs,' 7�5 x itL3. o ►a.nsiny v-... rya " �' P Y� oktASe >� b,'ftzll�I �tAiY-iKiif:ii�w` 5� Y -- l� 5 A x S � 11 w a : si.7 .�iVll �3�.~ llt... tiQt/crtwaitt Cocas s��1Q�"'`11.3'`aT�., w 1r e °r r x moi. sddta.=lt�►s►�5.? (a) l!ursuaat to Lalaor Cone Ste. lCl3, tba,ga0-0, ;orl lttbllc -91z►ty�uss :tiu3 gaucral ,Pruvai.Iing.racQs; o� wa•, 4 l-C li�ert.k far hal£i2a " '!Marl.. to the x,los1_1—~ality is wWitst tl3s'z±_ 3 ;,is` Lo bo=:Pc orraest; oz 4 -r I os -: ► t R►f isstl to oxacttfas ttti��11s. eaawtract,, att111.11�d sala�rateta�aac ispectftett Ott Circ calf Z=,bolas. for ttttii wot It and:as:a Ort fflaY tan�t ibts�l'uib►Ii zllge 10 � » atad = .. • - ! �,^ is,.r ex.. d' i,,,, {ba , s sdtnlc of ,fs basad pts a wrksnq dxr o 8 w�Tcss o � � ;' x ;slxs,zita, ancl.tbe�alaaly:acata: is tba;hourly tate,sxtrltPll =''''•bye tTmtmtZie> o1ha"tes � - �t tuba 6t w�rktay day.' 'Hbtite lw"-ri:trwu t/aat �iaicir Of baaraza cc't�+wcclu�ctj;z;j >e cFa 1, y ata �zraizartioaately zcctec nt„ out.tile btzuz:ly zaty rawstna= as sWtexa '� " t C n Int��, I-1 'tsa,�'� Y(f_$$+�{a.�z � T C' y,+�4,J 'S' �h y * .F> ( , II M tractor Ww. {�i�7 ,��fiRiAff,iOrYMIIYwi� �TM.�� 11fi �td�f••rk=..c . fir,,,;.,,, ,.y` 11 y{' �t; i orJ t?�!S oft ce is SC 1�1ar�+� �LtIC�1M�3 .�3�.. trt1V131- SWiSlfitWlC4'! •++!'�Q AG 6a Pr -<�H tittR RzDr wlvlAw C�t�4` M.�? OS1.CttVR2-`-IN &-el,01:1443-u At itoj'a9rOCitlRnts" s�$ �e 'tip. x , ia1V/Q'�i�ilSt.atMZ jrMlitl yak r,li St t:tR; tA�C tii�a�C'CtitaIIIti�t.'ou �X Cp�tlO�1-131 �/Q LkIZg Ee IT» , Mor . 11111M I- L ca l rl,or aia ftthal lQCalttj wraeztis stink Mores.lsN L ral rfQ nerl:,Z It 1t L1s 1. T Qr�,1, at"-- QOnt:raiG Qr Or_' �' t0 #���,f. a�csa ,,,, cat�xoa,"l tIlly�aI'a work tcxoaru�t aaoacautivre. , "trat£voj cg! zbfi:a otEna a a itou-raaatsalI*mt *'S"S astadi) fa!,' T' 2�C11 —Z0 7 tt�.fatsil ` e C .f�Q-g rb1t"i�:Qil aGto ha "la,at�ily fizwttfy rte l+nisalia lacy tz tacit'aaalli ic0MRtl dato� p _ �+a►yes'xate t�tasicefor katal tate;Ceutrtctarr'vi tlas t.tass tc LasedEL;tirez:u� - tilttszW" s?taY3. a ,ly #rota�tpa ta.mo;:of:rias Zaitial:+ei�p]royraiaiit of lira parsauns ecto �ctur 1 �aattttttuartcie Of;�i�ii r � �+�t. y'• t {. a'r* 4 A17-1YAa p5d 4 .a y_ -.f� A- . =3iW33tS•D�-°L?�ilttt<w �itt boars Qf lal6ar to onQ. Cdlcntlar COaSt�tottCs x S ZCQdZ F�$ ar q 8 -� and,ix -. ;ct�z2oycd at aay :tiva .on tail iiott: lrj, .�elic Carcatrac o>;r rby�any utr,� �, = 11, , 3oouGcactoz ,shall La .,a4cgnis tx3 or pt:zaittcat to work lose r` t�R t-s ,CXCCIit as prcn i� Q ' t ;k r r .1825 i'. "rY `� •atia>;'�t�Od4` .aoGS. . - : ' , °,i �' r a, =� - v ' , - Es _ f s�. t�c_. 11 wY 11 l4 11R3.3!!.!2'.`Zt S. P,roparly'itulaatuzad: a^antiecs,lo.r/, 6O lwy*; 1.M tta r wQrle fA � � w_ cc2-lllTI1 LBl.Or i.Qde SCS. 'JMl1. . azul, 17Ln.6,, forbfiuldinrl" I 11 "`� zt t "*' 'i i - ip!agti 3,�= .d). c � 4 vt �t.Cs ► h. 3) " z � 2 :. x r a arty , , ,v1�',� ,k, t rx Fs*t;. °'''0.'3'd k f 4 ".tea,, Vis' t �.s +..:#' w 92.t+,, 5 t v,.f'. f'g "4 .G, wst ( § "z S i lx -,; ''�'T.y� {, Y ".d 5 y£i.€ ry �&, ,i.x �r L , t a, t ::'-tr s"1;y�, "'':a�> k J i1 j .tt' a ehr, '4fi .,.,,, ,x,,> .'.s ..,.n ::s.-f `, a%r� .x z. ,' mi�':rf�, ' ,P 17. MIXL1t1.= rqt; 21M1:1: AL.i. Ylw Public Agency desirrs to promote.the industries and USXUKUAy Of LVu1.ra cuv:ta C"Osty. .uw tuo.• Coatractor therefora promises to una the pzoduats, wusi&a.-u, la4us•urs and mam4a mads of Q . Cuunty in cw•sl► cud wdv;xu the pr3ae, fitsuss and yudliLy an equal. 18. ASS1=23M. .Itis agreedmust Limb the hairse sueaummos, assigns, and reprosontatives of thu tjntraCters but he eanuoc assign it in wko3Lw or in part, nor any monies dua or to beeches duo under it, witiusut the prior written consent of the Public Agency and the vautractur•s surety or sureties, unless they have w.tivai notice of assignment. 11. :Va MIVLR ar P1:1 UC Ati7=''T. inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of WorL ancUbt materia 1nsd ectcd, or statepent dry any officer, agent er eq.loyae of the Public Agency indicating the work or any part thercuf eoaplius with the roquiroments of this contract, or aceuptAnce of the whole or any part of sail work awWor•materials, or payaeatn therefore or any combination of these acts, scall not relieve the Cestraator of his abligation to fulfill this contract as putseribuds nor shall the Public Agency be t1mraby estopped from bringing any action for damages or onforeoaost arising from the failure to comply with any of the toras and coae:itions heroof. 20. at 3LU dwt1LLS i lin tx.`.;i:Y. ta) Contractor promises to and shall hold hazaless and &uduwdZ-y a s as dofinwi in this section. (b) The inskesits" ben efitua ane protected by this passise arm the Public Agency and its eluctivo a appo ntive hoards, eoumissions, officers, aywrts and employees. Ia) the liaLilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kine allegedly ser• e , incurrsu or threatened bucamm of actions dofined below, inaluding pornwuel injurys death• property eanage, inverse ooadesseatiana or any of these, tnyardless of waother or set such liaaility,, claim or daearya was unforeseeable at any time notate the Public Agency approves the igprovownt plan or accepted the improvements as cam detud, and including the defense of any suits) or aationts) at lar or equity concerning these. (W Who actions causing liability are any act or emission (negligent or nen-negligont is connection MEMO e matters coverou by this contract ane attributable to the contractor, subcontractor(a). or any officer(s), agents) or awloyua(s) of one or creme of them. (a) bm-tonuitiossi The promise and agrommat is this pection is not conditioned or dqPawent on w hr. mr or not any Ine m aitee has preparu%., supplied, or approved any Plants), drawisy(s), specifications) or sd+ecial previsions) in connection with this work, has Insurance or otner Loue+nification covariag any of tausee matters, or that the &IX& sd dmsagee resulted partly from ani negligent or willful misconsluct of any Indemnitee. 21. i."WAVAW10U. Costraetar shall ooaply with Csee provisions of Labor Code Sec. 6422, if app . •3-y Sul witting to Pui.lie Agc=7 a detailed plan sowing the design of shoring, bracinge sloping, or ot:wr provisions to be nada for woeloc protection from the hazard of caving ground during trench asacavation. (Page 4 of 4) ti:t•-1s T.ev. 11-731 00320 �yfi A � �r + � �- �a _ r_.4y '�.'"'py♦ x' ��I i�il� n — K \ i { ; ' ,a2 by The MS.tsic.cf } A.l;A.,Dad .t>i�o. A-31 i��•:r+� + ia7. 1958 Ecitttott " � �: `�`A� �'��;' � '�'�SPARt<5 DBA• �.SPARKS, •ROOfiiNG` UREt. 'DRIYL �CONGORD CALIai ORNI�A 94521."� �i"..,.�' - �,,,� ?'arcip4l� ;^�r�trat�..r call+ad Gonicac#cr, � MID-CENTURY •INSURANCE GOM�'ANY� ����� ::�t R.G+MI.++'�.�•M.ni W / �� F ,�-. l' k �� SmR. 4K, _ sazt3ftrnrty .unt COUNTY 0W .CONTRA „ rSTATI= flFCAL.IFORNIACOUMTY `ADtMINISTRATION BLDG. ,- MARTINEZ CALIiORN1A� ��t �:, !*�r,:ar+ax,cr caliod t�►►,rctcr,�;titc��+auas-,off `SYEh1 `TNOUSRIND� Sl VEI�I��Ht11�lOREDa AIII�I�T�Y„„ �; � t'`� �.r.�IsE1Y ."�Y,�YY. .M'r.�r'rr�..wrrr..'� �.r...�r..r• tt' �hv�e .�b�o`�i.Q�e'4.,� .t,... �Y��k`✓�,q� � a1t3dSttlC�/�13t1t�tltClt15C1Vt'��"i�1Ct�'�1Gt5� C�i�LGlf'7i�'a'�t11tRt/5��#t+ta��-,���►...C�,�x��>�.,� _ idseveizlly,ftrmiy by ttu,�c�preser�is. APRI,L • ZF.�s, z�raetor has Eby writtu�► �scemenc d.:ex! � ._. .:► �� ._ �� ,..•,.,. � - ��;�,�r REROOi=IidG :VARIOUS" BULLRINGS .�,� �. �,�:� �a,�`•� c'!.t^.tra�! ���#h�flwra<.r for ��1t�Na'Y �©SP>,I�T�At,. =MARTI#+iEZ '�C1�IOR#C �OROER �52fi3� 3AS� ,BLDrALa:.'�tl�E����ACCtf�„RDA�Cf�;�t�1��f a� Im5,; 6ENfERAI::�.CONDL'i'IDAS` EREP/#RED �. J4,ie10`�N��ACGORDARCE �lITH "I E AGC�P't'EQ� BE T DE'RO�,'OSAL� ��" i38Lt i?DitiCS �DEP'T�.�, d. k,, �cantr> sa�ayr �e�ence�acwd���part.�}ietco.,�3 ts�lxrei�a,�taa'�refercacl�t� �,� a,�a�?. ,,. «' �,»�.',+;'�..,'�D�Ya':�' 0.�.`?tilS,O�ii:.TiD� :x M far a.cc>r.•�ct xt�.cess such bid*a arsd Q,.�r"��:a�+t<"�s+�• �e��� R tt►ee+t shccdd mar dc�uls,.r�ar�s.-^ �"� �' ,��'�+ rt,"xt, tg�w rsct�„s1t�'i�roRt�►ti�/�►+d#1it2� t;,rd'�` �� tC�r+�, ��x�;t'a�,, t„gra �.�^.►#' s1►'!t be ��a -Misr it shad•; orrursec:areRr am �wz Pte* - ',` a� s�-'r"7�c-�a'+y s�u►v��et�iKre ofar�r aitcwtw�,,or axiarswos► off•: at tt�u�traet`tom"lwtl net ea�cc ,,�;�a',ct.:� �� - �xrd iiiartt�Cs,fcAr wttitlf tip�,s rtstY b� �fttr����*'” 'b13t:Zx�Jt+”Zi1l';'S�3��i'iT1d.�JICd�iQMrfltX',t0ift:�ltl�t` 'as uted �n ;�K; lisai�s '�t� s�obL�t� � `•�_ ,w..` `Y F►r +�+.t�N� �Y t +�< Y Att11tS tE>t.tCt4� 14:s tfC`.1riA0cict+:tra���' ��'�,����• ast: - _� -w�. g My sort iynciar this baud twct tre uuttuuc�h�€�.�tf���.r;.�sr� � ana oan�. ,.a t2,f,r�.s.�traas st+e dasG.oiti+ri�uci+fru�as.�xu� `=: c:�- _ ��, � �t �„�•�,.a ;.�str b3;�s���► �areo�+pkt+e�t�� .ti'a of act�cnr ,en�d�ts bc�E:r�z � t y`�' : �.�,,: ".+t��''�lYw �s:s+fSw��y oto tha�C�NC'it•R�S�10�i�C:�li�Ai�t."31waA,�.' 2.aa:�ii•�IFas«��.1sRi�trltGiS tftf.�C�?rS.ti� s� ��'���. .r �7���. MID-.CEA`Z;URY a DANIEL KLINGcW-, ttsu� OR1�tE1C �N��AC; Yux.�e- � ' < � �G 'v.' �x '�y. °�.;~�M~R~�-'F.� +n.+.x� +s•<.+7.,.re• �,..v. m°,�,,.«w.,+*ice. �' ,ur; 2.� �� — FQtA "� "'+ f .:..� fiO1�.�7V4{i� 4 x �f rP�a ,t '.�"4�,���.: rt _ 'r ,r°HOSKTN ,� �sf � r x x�: •� �t �°•�,s�.a5 tel' � A .� a►atdsmsd�uaw,,,e� �� D1biIE>. KLINGER w p��a�lt{xd�f.��� ....... MMS ti�� '� � '.r ���.���� F�"�Mw� �',",2�i�.' • any - �'�; d �• _ � ,:�'�'` - r` �' � '`.� '" �.�;, x.. � x� '� '� ;ate �€�y€r.+5?�""" _ I uy�: 'y, � �'"f'" �'g,„��L gfi tiu"1^£ � �, � �' � >. �s ��w �«e•,'� ? �'��•.ity15A �� i..�k � ;gpl M�•f�'':, t�iP�ii. � 7' rt ',,. Iz0 W �"I"7��_..;�dQR��^z ' Z'M",�,tsk:���"rM.:,. �,,.c�r„�rvi w �#,2�ta4a »wt,'�u4�5.'R`. r�.>�AG.,a'.�x„^�.�.���.;a. ..� ,dSur. k.ia.,� exwn,. .�'�'i�r�.�':-' ., 1. :tlR'�I � i��'.�� I� �II/P Iw.�..Vi. i �..�I • I�.Ib..II�'( �} f( Q itl i !, P 1� !iol�i - k i�eM• .� .! �nw,.x:M,r+ rn w �. rn+r..+.rr,+--.."., -o 777 .•ie+rr+« ,Rre�" • .... t w' k ,r� >k ;� ,� 11 I 1, i x3 .. ^' ,` n -� .; :; C ; .. ..�.` 3 n* �` �` .r,g f-' _ 4 xf`f"{.yL� i~ k Y yy f ! _ r , L+� .-, - t d! N f Yx i - "�0p• _ ,, +E�, h - !3' t� Rn F �� R , X -� x 11 u % a � z, 1, I e _ ' t$ b Y-'ll '. R. ANM h�AA ,L�:PAYM:NTS 6E3: D moi, - Appe4wed:by The Arrsec�can In3titu11"te-Of Architects t ;�� 4 ~ 1. .. s r. -. I'll, I .N 'C ITN*bpr%d•s atsued,sk#%ALvwwusly.with ano*icY 1 o d in fawor of the gw"W cane�*Mwd for tfte f A and faithb�t P Oft ttr�11 1. II M ' lEI�:OW AU.;.MEIN! BY`THESE'PRESENTS: .; G `r& r 3$x ,''i�at w PAUL .SPARKS, DSa.11 ' ,SPARKS RE34FING .. x, -: �� . a#oas-i=w the nti *ana.ad�Mar<4w,ft at Atte of twe C-Vnows - ,,.'. #943 LA4 UREL DRIVER CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94521 £ . , . , w .� , ll� as flt:rtupal, laereinaher`calwiPmri I.1,. MI0 CENTURY IhSURaNCE COMPANY. l 7 : , - r z s,?l,.", 0 ID 6 j ' �411P �}y_ Y rvi Th (Mlao inial,lha lepal,tille oG.Swettr# -, , M. as Suety, laeratnafter called Surety,'are held.and.fimnly.batittd..un*s COUNTY OE CONTRA COSTAE �d�w SiFIN, ,TE LiF 11 CACIF02:�IA ` COU:tTY ADMIfitI TRATTIQ s!_OG.R ' MART'INET CALIFOR.�lIAa � - tt#w int�+cr toe aid addrpsar teaal twte of the 4�.na1 � :9, jo itg�- seretnafter+called ,:, es,.#Or•list use and beci e#tt of clitrnartts as itereI 1,uti6eEaw de#`u�od;u► a 1'a 1. C � T: R�I= T#IOUSA�D EIGHT HUItiORED LINETY FIVE EMO/200 7]r.tJ , R 3;895.0i ,111-°° ; ',`", ititcn!s�wort a eu+w atw foat•l Mr,ClrahitF of the aoa�'DRKeJ F ' ,or tide"payment whereof;Prutct11111-1111 1-1 pal°and Surety bsn:i' he�nnseWes,.#heir i>acs, exeoutors� adnun►strato sciccesso xzass�a'►r�s.,lo,ntl, aim s�weratly,�ilrc,* b�►tr>es� Pt s- I- k, �- 1. 1. I Ir W!77-IEREAS P,rtnt�pal h"' written.age�ee t dated Rjl ?n, 1�"' 1A .5 a ; APR a. .l.LY w a it ? '�G °'k„A+;' ' REROOF. VARIOUS 3 t+tC:s T THL COMTR'-1 GOSH, ' I,�. .��ttt:rcd�tntoa;contcactewJtlu I "-, -r:� Ll"4. .4� 14T' ;COUXTY`� OSPITAL` MARThME2 !;t C .,A ft` E"," , ;,:�A „ORd C'r, 1 1'I` IDI• PSS, ;DRA1rIZi�1G5 AND SPECIFICATIOMS 0 O PR PAREBpOy ”" PlIBL C �. 'S Dc PT_' AMID I A ACO H T*!!= A P � P :, tHsex"tntenr full n.nrr,aa twig A s i 2 y i" - tCl , I iline"sS'by re��el ICl'trtadC apart lk' 0A }15 ll!te1�'!r7?te�G[ef iiww to Cilio, A'i '"""''+ $'i,, d*LI_ fs:w«.e'?« '•>tYy 't'� �' lai�,y 7d'4q .'t ;'t vs^' F '"`,j(a'�.�' Yx.2 y2' �. _._ ?l- �. w, ,. z a�«9�.�t; �SIV' t�ti;l#i 1 I wti+�A, t1.,•f it a rtne�psl slrellproinot#y twlia.oaYetteat to a!1`tlawtunts staneg wth su`aswrttiat aetatraelr the:�aetnaint;dauncd.and the ni .Q lea as itatc+e,aftcr.eicltned,far;alt tabor aitd tttaterial used or teastfnahly tc-; tfwr•twty to Mrltota tine mate swere:tt- -.11 ed�uorfae ! � t'�`lor u=to tlta�of t1wi Ca"kO.thm flus o~4m• cr.labor wis dolts of Datfa+ e+d. Such ttot si�a{t be sc r b :: shat"°,sr s+oid.oihrr�wsc u shill ratwtn:in full'to-ee and dfact.u b#ect` ,the saata by,,..ro stared ttwl o2.r Cc"&, edxmwt postaq�,L. > l►ttv+evi r,to she"-_ ,Ilrt9 catndit�oetst. arn"top11'e addressed to the Ptwtc�pa�,'tawnte�a oel�nws�_,I a . dsltoant ss dcf�nad: one#h �0 a aebct.txxtirau.,wttb'fhe office� M ei►auttatnedtfcxx dw� i+tmtti1w.pt�,'+�, a sv1>tx�tytra -" " f i the Ptwt1,1_ttpal ior;.labor.a�u er%t�,or "� �p k w OtoillCes- - kli iic+lSta?>sbll► 'flit+ Staa'Nt t # used or r itK_ Lt; of t#tc #s*ror Iona zrgatc+nw eon�ttuod a tnducfe prti=k of need nal ba'ttade brV),'a'-pub- ,offker:, %, ' cq►�ra:t. twttg 0 +rr t�v,`. i. ttil±t.,heaL';od.%�aiaitrtG to pltane":setwtoe+or swat`, bi Aftec>tl+e aq, +on� ane E�l bulla" o�' ,w ce►t 4 �c 1y a�pplieab2c 46 thch Contract: , Pruippat t", , - warkt aft ��i LLLL 2 'mh aDa,+c named PrirMc at at I. " ;U,telly taetetgr"� aid se+rco tt�u;i#aaa► rtuta.11%t�on e+libo�ial t# - _W." t� ` ..y .ec r+►t the O+nc�r twu ,Icwery�clar as.ha�einl rwiw �#iia aona +e" etec suds,Gnutstan b e r,..rtat-b yaatt to#ub before the yet anttota of a aerad of nett t1�= ba aertandod�sjo as toibe eqw Aa lite qnt± s` »tat,ortN fi ;s��s ;lW.d a gate on'14M #Ms fast-of sud++:Aaiansnc's waitc:;or t�boi% {L�_ � herr, • € � t� t '^ tl eta �'�.3 I-1 + ff1fSLDa, Or> S:Mert fttllisltod'by SNdtg� C� .•t�1ie1 pt,i StiLISt ti,CMCrrYtIStSGt %� r .sa sac aa,t :s Sor+dor t�rwc of sa+tit:ciatwsaKtt.' .suit the Y^or atftcr poGt�cat subdwa�as of,tete stste w t :, ; #or`s,+il+'sum or_suit�s,as tray be-lit►due.dainw owojecs.or any out tfwaeofOs'situated,of tnI-I 1� !Jr ._edrSta�ta%Q ur:c gra- s.+r�r.�.�.:+s an,thc�a "The Owne�.d+aq nor.br liable fior:th�Pad- Comrr sew'" "fic rn ia"ti c:RM- a•ank,owrt,1"r""F Vis► xr�r+;al,.may t:..,rx r +ses'of aary�srttit suit. ated%;and mr� �11� ;,, 3 , ss•z..r actson .a�t ba hCx�undor b9/ani►daUnaoS. 4.' The amo ft a ft,ttartd.sl�,&g,be;-rcducad� 11, amu`. _ sem, # c.s,-r.,�r,..zarac R.swrypwa oor,coa�eta_rrithZI! "� a >paapaniant or�etrad�siani'�pood(arils Fear .- - " �.- S�,s s�+stv�,,t,.�non.+Tr"ton r�otioe Iao.ae�r trio..oaf site > :O bN St+►ah►of Jw� emit 11 r r 1. }�• r, tl+e.Sw+ttyBowe+�atned.v fMet etia�r YAW, apsinst said iml �n I�tri�ed+ar ar twt eta 6artfi� �:xcrY z �d or q on�ned#heaastt of.tiera. rk•or lobos, ba P _k' 11 % � � l ,R x � , t ♦ ,_ „ r- ` h n Stgsze,� arta sided this STH ,day Of ______r._ MAYS .,.a" D i9 Zrs tl-.epreur+ce oI: " ' ' s ; , r Q Lw.ritiJ�n.� _ t .r - W,' r - � 11 _ ,� . r , li r° adec M.i t)—CF tTURY =T tkSUPAttir. C()j4 ,ft,"tY ` : 1QOt 1Atit�1 hoa�td `ERr..Yt . � I'll� q e �+ww �t1Sr� S�3 t +'" y S. h {cZ h ..i* ,lei " t: _ 9 ` ra .; 71a,7'"� �11 11 ,11 e, ?�.�r" "",x'� `• w T `+, r e Y-,a*` xh 4 �• TM�''{7.n I e s ,sy - 1,11.�.�"I, •a+' k'. i ' MERGED #' - 11 .:. % TH YIRGINTA L°.� QSKI S' MAY _� 7fi of 19oreare � se alalz i f e► be:,Ca�ei.ea si.�/ons % •a Rj►, � ,. a�auj � X srrwes N ., i '. DANIEL _KLINGER _ � �, �% " aoec te__' ; --., .,x�riw�r---r.a_ - �a:1O , so c7or�or-o F - is be jli attorx� 1.I stts.tLet � �s., t� R'',s a % "W OI<��,�It�IR 1fIRNfO ifs jj/�/eld O�C%taDt f�j I s�O CfR l!f l�►d allLla�rIZCOtajR � sK sir& l. a s�st.aiosre-.,t ta11 Isr. ,f ';` . � ,.. :� iM!�,�, r '., ,s,.� ,� „'ayl�^^" 1V1 v� �'s""cNf '- `p 'a+l :f C 5 a i eTt�"+"� -` r��/��t'Mr!�►" - ?- f f 3 ,;"t. i� s5+ '!.,x #7 ' ��iI1Yi Y{' r -1111, xS F `"y^+lyryn i re "F li� "i 3 _ ja.'{ r i t4 kMM'+5*"" �T"__e3"T "F artv''F-."'' s' °i.yf ' a Ea�t"f tkX>Fa ++`€'., '+se tI I � iWI�`., I��I,«�-w ii: THE BOARD OF SurZViSvuS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the flatter of Awarding Contract ) for Reroofing the Veterans' Memorial ) April 20, 1976 Building, Pittsburg Area. ) (Work Order No. 5264) ) Bidder Total Amount Bond amounts Caldwell Roofing Co. , Inc. Labor & Kats. $ 2,125 89 West Tenth Street $4,250 Faith. Perf. $ 4,250 Pittsburg, California 94565 Cornell Roofing Company, Concord Enterprise Roofing Service, Walnut Creek Sparks Roofing Co. , Concord Sunset Roofing Co. , San Francisco Roofing Constructors, Inc. , DBA Western Roofing Service, San Francisco The above-captioned project and the specifications' therefor• being approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS ORDER„t that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder, at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall iresent two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURT ORD-?=D that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks submitted for security shall be returned. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976 • CERTIFIED COPY I Certify float 016 t a full, true F_ correct copy of ne orhlnal o'n,utaettt wHot 1.4 on fife In fay offfee, and thAt It was ya,<ed t adopted by the Itoard of Superri-ors of ewitra Costa t'tounty. California, on. the date shoun. ATTEST. J. R. Otg30s. County Cie!L L ex-officio Clak of tt:ctd hoard of Superegory, cc Public Works Director by Deputy Clem. Counts Counsel 1 ot: APR 2 0 1976 County Auditor Contractor Form 9.1 00323 Rev. 6-75 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 -L�L In the Matter of Off—Highway Vehicles Operating in Vicinity of Residential Areas. The Board having received an April 8, 1976 letter from Air. James T. Barber, President, The Orinda Downs Homeowners Association, P.O. Box 477, Orinda, California 94563 expressing concern that motorcycles and other off—road vehicles operate in open spaces in the vicinity of residential areas, and supporting any restrictions being considered to curtail such activity; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid communication is ACK O*—IXDGED and the same is REPERREI? to the County Sheriff for report. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Fir. J. T. Barker Wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Sheriff—Coroner Super Public Works Director mixed this 20tbday of April 19 76 Director of Planning County Adrinistrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey 1 -1"(' 6 Deputy Clerk Helen C. _•tarshall H-24 3,J76 ISm 00324 IPc THE BOri4D OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Patter of ) Clarifying Board ) April 20, 1976 Policy on Two Jails. ) The Board having received an April 15, 1976 memorandum from the County Administrator forwarding a request by the Chairman of the Contra Costa County Detention Facility Advisory Committee for clarification as to whether the Committee is to consider one or two facilities; and The Board having previously considered this matter and on March 2, 1976 having adopted Resolution Number 76/201 which is intended to provide for a single facility at one location; and The Board having intended that in ordering a redesign of the detention facility based on either Alternative 3 or 4 of the County Administrator's December 22, 1975 report to the Board, that the two alternatives are mutually exclusive; i.e. , one or the other of location choices must be made, both cannot be financed at this time; and Ms. Diana Patrick, 1310 Purina Vista, Martinez, California 9 .553 having appeared and urged that the decision be left to the Committee's discretion; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having stated that it would be a waste of time for the Committee to study the matter further, that the Board had thoroughly explored the matter of two jails and had made a decision for one only; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having stated that only one can be constructed from available funds; and Supervisor A. K.. Dias having commented that he might be willing to consider a second facility at a future date but that at this time funding for only one is available; and Supervisor J. P. Kenny having stated that he still favored two jails facilities; and The Board having discussed the matter, IT IS ORDERED that receipt of the April 15, 1976 memorandum of the County Administrator is ACKNO1,11EDGE.D and the Contra Costa County Detention Facility Advisory Committee is DIRECTLD to: 1. Make recommendations for a single detention facility at a Martinez Civic Center location or a location outside of the Civic Center based on Resolution Number 76/201 and in the manner provided in Resolution lumber 76/202; 2. Not plan for two sera^ate detention facilities at ti-.,o separate locations; and 3. Not interpret these instructions to preclude two or more buildings at one location if that should be determined the most desirable approach. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Superviso-s A. V. Dias, J. E. Moriarty.. E. A. Linscreid NOES: Suoer:risor J. P. Fenny ABS-:1T: Supe:-visor ::. N. Boggess 00325 WO I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: Detention Faciltiy Witness my hand and the Seal Advisory Committee of the Board of Supervisors affixed Isis. Diana Patrick this 20th day of April, 1976 Director, Human Resources J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Agency Count Administrator Public Works Director Ro-nuc a `r ac es �= County Sheriff—Coroner Deputy Clerk 00326 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 00320 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri 1 20 , 19 76 in the Matter of "S" Curve on Stone Road, Bethel Island. The Board on February 24, 1976 having referred to the Public Works Director a communication from Mr. and Mrs. Roy E. Catlin, 3065 Stone Road, Bethel Island, California 94511 , calling attention to the frequency of automobile accidents occuring in the vicinity of an "S" curve near their property on Stone Road; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having this day called attention to a further communication from Mr. Catlin expressing his appre- ciation for the efforts of the Public Works Department in posting speed limit signs and installing barricades, but alleging that the road is still too narrow to permit two vehicles to pass at the same time, and indicating a possible offer of dedication by a property owner in the area of said curve in exchange for realign- ment of Stone .Road by the County; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communication is REFERRED to the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c• M r. R. E. Catlin Wdriess my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors affixed this 20th do" f--Ap ri 1 . 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk 24 12;74 - 15•t+t RQbbi e 6 f)errex 00327 J In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 19 76 In the Matter of Maintenance and Responsibility for Work in Assessment District 1973-3, San Ramon. The Public Works Director having reported that he received a letter from the Engineer of Work for Assessment District 1973-3 (Bishop Ranch), requesting that, effective March 30, 1976, the contractor, Gallagher and Burk, Inc. and M.G.M. Construction, a joint venture, be relieved of maintenance and responsibility, in accordance with Section 7-1.15 of the Standard Specifications, for all work except the sanitary sewer pump station, the pump station landscaping and other minor items of work the contractor has given written consent to perform; On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of the Engineer of Work is hereby APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. i 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Public Works Wftess my hand cod Ow Seal of the Board of Land Development Supe Division affixed this 20th day of Anril , 19 76 cc: Gallagher and Burk, Inc. r J. R. OLSSON, Clerk P. 0. Box 4520, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 By Deputy Clerk M.G.M. Construction N. _Tn aham P. 0. Box 5757, Concord, CA 94524 Coleman, Selmi & Simpkins 201 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, Greenbrae, CA 94904 Public Works Department - Land Development Division, Construction Division, Maintenance Division H 24 8/75 lOM 0 032 n In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 .76 In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of Various Communications. The Board having received the following communications: a. Memorandum from County Counsel dated April 14, 1976 clarifying certain 1975 amendments to the Brown Act relating to public agencies meeting in executive session; b. Memorandum from County Counsel dated April 18, 1976 advising that the County's logo has been registered in the Office of the California Secretary of State as Service Mark 4276 for the period March 31, 1976 through March 31, 1986; and c. Letter from Judge Bessie P. Dreibelbis, Chairperson of Contra Costa County Municipal Court Judges' Association, advising that the Municipal Courts (including the offices of the Marshals and the offices of the Clerks) are committed to the County's Affirmative Action Program; IT IS BY TIE BOAT D OM2 EIRED that receipt of the aforesaid communications is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Purchasing Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Personnel Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 24t}day of 411ri 1 19 U, County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey hc_ ,t�1 Deputy Clerk Helen C. Iarshall H-N 3/7,615m 00#100 i{.V-+fes T n e e In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County.. State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Compliance Procedures - Requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 The Board today having received a copy of "Contra Costa County Compliance Procedures to Meet the Requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973" developed and recom- mended by staff of County departments involved in the National Flood Insurance Program which the County entered on November 1, 1975; and The Director of Planning having recommended approval of the aforesaid processing procedures which are attached hereto, and transmittal of same to the Planning Department, Building Inspection, Health Department, Public Works Department, County Administrator, and County Counsel for their guidance; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of the Director of Planning are APPROVED. Passed by the Board on April 20 , 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Director of Planning affixed this 20th d9yof April , 19 76 Building Inspector J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Health Officer " ;� Public Works Director By .T Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Rob ie Gut errez Countv Counsel 0€1330 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Arthur G. Will DATE: March 16, 1976 County Administrator FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesu SUBJECT: Compliance Procedures Director of Pianni g Re: Requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 The attached report outlines the processing procedures agreed upon by the county departments most affected to meet the requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (National Flood Insur- ance Program), particularly regarding the minimum compliance activities delineated in Board Resolutions 75/830 and 75/831 . These procedures include revisions agreed upon at a staff meeting of the departments on February 23. These procedures should be called to the attention of the Board, and should then be transmitted to the staff designated by the various departments as follows: Frank Fernandez, Administrator's Office R. W. Giese, Building Inspection Dept. C. J. Jamison, Building Inspection Dept. Victor J. Westman, County Counsel 's Office Ted Gerow, Health Department Arnold Jonas, Planning Department Al Rangel , Planning Department Kathy Robinson, Planning Department Tommy Burlingame, Public Works Dept. Mike Wal ford, Public "Works Dept. AAD:E14A ours u s' COSTA COU.'-1'Y C+l':lPI•I.1.1'L!: 1'siO?CEDURFS, To ltl:fjtlll{1:MENTS OF TIII: F LWD ll I BASTER 1'I{OTECTI O.'. ACf OF 19731 A. I11(luirics - ` ap�� 4�I�A - Ry E! - UY.r [ .h w+.A A. G4UN l?Y t ' COUP.LI1i.NCE PROCEDURES T!Q Ili THE : jQIRB�tE r s s T ROT' M"IUB �f3x i k i S ref T y "r # �i 1 11 ��clu cs regard=, g flpod. plain management ands znformug4� on� whetl�+aac ax not 'specific, property is located xn.W r Qu P hazard o i'lockl Prnnc. area arc directed to tho Plonnang rRenartmeot f r ►+ Cten## � „a in 4#ri oar 11 be a�nswercd u� rrrttang using a formfi letter, bud nod sned ••certification•' -rri 11 be made. alv Ixedi •�duls. a;ill W 'i»fosad rrhethe .or notMV thcxr p�coperti taes9IM s � ` a Flood.Hai ird.;area as .Snowu on the''Fecicxal Insurance Admwsnsstiatiai` �' ' NF1 Flood hazardBomWix V, a s (FtIBdN) Incix nduals yea ` ai°sQ f� � �nf4rned an eifiether or.`i0dt the r .property la s snz a Floods ane a ea; - as Alela.nc:�ted in the County's..,(PuiaL c) Safa y leincnt sof, 'kthcr Can x i'lau", �souiccc. USfS Interpretive Report4) Noi written ccrtxfi'c: �77 , . taxon:will 'hc issued. „F " 3 Lenders .quid .r+ea l estate agents wil i -be.encouragedr to get:r 2 i"i, far. their a+�z► nse,,fra►w:the !* A a office sn► San p an�isco, erid � u „ and zeal cstat0 agents UI j.nfarmreci;,of the potential=flood p1as asanagnt. restrictans stated axi the Act" praperty a�n=�laoci`fEaxd� " ; - and Prone .areas. Specific;constraints and wr�ttenj cext��a�caa� to an cannot be given b�eimins of the E,i eil is o f.`det.-►all; �n the 'a�n fax,m<% ������� t2om avaa.lable: ' ; � �`err 1n �iew of special requirenchts-46i Fed r# Crcdat Una�ons, spcciat procedure. kill apply. Parsons with,proWou casc5i refer rcda tay they „ E'lannwg Uepart nc `for;inforrret�on akte screen:,pg, by the Cx�ecia�� Ung on, w� l;be.given anforsation y orally at the counter ' ]lie Klan _ naps;Dcpnt will then` call. a Loan:QfFacer at the Cr- dat tfiioat ��� a zy, a4,Y to confarws ti►e`inforaataoe The loan Offa.cer �+ul. certa�£ythdat e far thcaar fila. is p�roc daze x�1 apply anlp to loans fog xarpxa � f mens to ea�xsting structures, and}-the applicant wall have„to gro x(1 � ° a viiia ;sloar<ng .location of the.structure if a;,paxccl straddles 't6yYs . ilazrd`Saundary "line. rt 5 1f t#iere .is uncertaatty about;wEther. or naC :i pattcular buxld.eng � S#te .1s lin a .Fi+aad Prone ,aroaa#_'-the Kite KLL�} bo ZCSt1�l1E d 6y'ILz ' � coc►r~i�naCcd xoview hetrecen the,->:nvaronmental Ron C* SecG?�an of the fi$ k° Plannaa#R i paxtacnt anti;:the F1aod Controls i11 st rILM.- VOCILsaons ►ci � �, . , hy. tl�e 1,,lcnrd Guntrol Dist a11; he rep grtcd� to ,tt�c i�la�nn;x, W, t�+ci►art nit,,tw be recorded on the.p.-►a cc l Kooks far future rcfcrei�ccr, Vhcn a ra�riatc persons �riil.' bcs referred:darectl ., to.tha I"Iaod pp i !* y , tc�nrrnlQi;ci�rict u�wa�i sing, an appointntxithonc of".the fol- 'X0, lowing .E�crsrns aL 372-4470: ° , BoydU. (Dave) "Jewett i'. Sutra < Robert" (Bob) Conner Tummy BurlingaMe M err dP -i. f m r 1 � a c, 'aa� i• 1lm� aye '�.3.�.,S=h�' v x�,.� *r 3 a+9�”.a. ,k,, �„ 1 $ M.. ., - it�..=p 'ft l:� �i 3 I ,,i dry 4 k w _ r j F( t t r ��.. ua £fix , J d pF.y. r 7^ 'X-�'°-7' f h "' T Y Y'f' #SZ'4i t ix" TLc .uiquirer kill be advised hr„-dlo 1I'll I ►lannxng Acligrtaent� o1�1f�11 tql.howifarc ��,,'Y's- tl at a: , .det:�iled ince t gatictdn •aip rcquxace ksaaRct iii _ nit hay; r�M. ��” should supply ;xhc;parcel nuebcr and .site plana approxima a loci :"i tion of'buxldxri site 'gfa� `�"` � � >f � 41��; $ �2 lding Nerm�.t Pxaccdures': � r'' " d� 4 ;` - ; � z r ¢ a r 11 -1r � 17ae federal pxoraw.is desagnod to be xmplc,�cntcd atk tha b�uzlda�ggrauu °- kl- level ° IU 1 buildia cxu t aQ � zcailonsx ar .{y1��rocessed thro'll�{��,,,I hip,*uait n�rtg,Acparia�cnt for zonxng,;`and other regulatary,`con£oauaanco° " ?hefa ding procisdares,apply to Al new. builda,,,g per*at apnlxcations, 2ncludxn '�' those for.alar`and Dinar,subdivxst ons aippra►ved�,prIor toy Kavcmbpm --Ul' " ' ` xi �� w } a �7 u, 'Vit, �` .�-1. _ Bua lclxng pcaaai t rrocesszn ucnceIMI fog ind vatdual actaons 1, ' ' sa bj* iux:ldi Permit nppl..� taan ` �,_ I 1, ,�.� a �- a AppLicaut submits application to 13uxlding laspectio4 Dcpa►vtme �;y� • 3 sf d �'k'P'o 4x L1 K y,_ ` �� `� n iw v `,l, b Building Inspection Depaxtmcnt refers appla�c iAv to the plannxn �� nt far al l a cation >sa °;relatiitQ t oi"�ood�Nazair.21. d�aui �, x JY , d7G� t t " ,�laod �f,.iYn�R stti4J• �.� 21A -11 11 - { , 1 t F_ ,Rf S Y W c If �bal.dxrib 'site is clearly outside the FtIBN�'area,"'ands'thc�fto� �� ��-- fact proposal eonforass to other rcuI 11latory po11 ns"adar�rtastaet .11 car revxcs cd Uy the Alam ins Qcpa -tmeat,. appl'cant as re ex,red ,,I'l^` hack to.•the ltuildin ct: iO4 -Uc")artient far cont urued11, bu y !i Inpe ! x n ,porAit.processing r fi} r. ' ' K �� d. 1 f;i:hc-.build.ing site ;clearly �e thin the I'IIBl1 aa•Ga acr cs=gip detea.*xned to be 3 n a F,Iood Amnia ar1.ea s del4aancatcd_xo=4th � " admin"tra�iiile map, the 'applicant s x�It=' 64 tar the I�anci t to °° " ,, men 1_1t Divrsxon` of tha Publ�c.il"i, s:Ucpartmcnt afar,ciat eacr iriatto a flaAd clevataions, The Mood 'elevatxontybedetrmancilbtth� �,w FlOad Capitol; Dist'rxet., , the rc uCst`qf the Land=Deu lA ent i 11 - D vxsxan Flood .etavataOm? recordcdk.on f11 ox a Flti, 1776` ie r 3� a �� ,, tr rc erred applicants x, be�advased that Same t o dela maRl 4 be encauntiE ein�d in 11 fawxxng £lI 1)oad elevations e ala.t;,gation.mcasures, ncludlrtg specafxc flaoa elevatxons„ iarirl� - .k � I .. bc=cstablished,by the Bualding .LnspGctian Dc r .t, x coAr"l<���' _ donation )cith the Flood CAntrol District 1lcalttr�4Deprar mcnt � ' : -I - �1 s ,lI -IF apl,nval of Sewage.alSlp0- ' and potable`�+atar i uVply0s utec ca wall` be required ' idor elevation xs xecarde& foraar� if ;,- s �. r � � �x .' :, f. Moor cicvat1.ion da�.1 4hd,other requcred`"information xs ecardcd�; � cin '.tI'llhe:,buxldin carat a z p . 11pplicI'llatI'llxon by the BuI'llLdxng Inspcctxact� l�'' artamcnt aixl ;t copy is txa»sr►irted to'thc`.Plancrzng I?GplctmenG 1 to be retained far' public inspection. 1. 3" 11 , 11 _ � « In ;thy case of a buildin bite £or which location 4 i t*lAod?�'rdn r�1 N�k, t arca xs uncert a in, final deterutnation titan Iae wade by' tate I, , , "o[l,," . 11 ii6i iia :' t+4 ew, Section, of 'the'Wanning Ue t. n eanjunctiowml ��s tl►Q .Flood Control=Distxict. 7 ' f #t' �ST �'F i r `� � 9 S .i4`1 f '*G'? a x 7 . d 2 � � S 11 ' p11 j- e x xm pd r .z �'� `$ ,. t.. gg 31.AFI `.,.. x ; '- ,zCt� d b'�'' "(',* E�t'4�r .r�; P, MGP �L.I I. Z Pro�cCL xaVaCM prior t0 tha buy!ding paraaatLa atzsdsf$�slf i r tirwt�s - sY� s a At Ytlia t�me .thc pro"`act a alxcatian as rccovGd a detcxnaaaaaaaaa�ia of Flood hazard or �FlcwW l'r "no status xs tmade �l{cEe] a _ cies arc nota.i cd of.flooci hazaW detara inaita►ow vxas° CIUS11 - an t>�e standard acrficrral 2attc for the o ect They°meth reSpoi�d concurrently nth processing xav c �oxt thea ; tt4i' �l,�cak an ahcr'c flood hazard'w t tic tafccn info coris�dcralt op"P ba esaly ,enough to affect dcszga ccaa►sxdcr�tons foal ti and kprox�dc for top►lxancc xarth flood plaa m mama eotcn }` - aaaents Baa the pxo�ecti des ga aad as condi u tons o�appro - '` :Coa�ssxoa. ' r^n rcuxra'� b If an >inr TORIacntal,Tm�ct Report Is requicuc�C fcrr� aA aathn a Flood".;lt,aaard or Elaod Fronc araa,x Chas StaLux#sin -- ra gatao�i am;asures ill be discussed anrtthaClR T�nvaonntai `Impact Rcpoxt xs.not x'cryusredfog tcs pac , > . xnvcsta�gatiun bf the floc><1 hazard a�dma�t� t�on aieaur � £ occur•during"dcvclopwent'of the xcgulax staff rcpm�c: f s A 44,Wz — } .a.� Tt,�t a, !bard,=1tcs�l�ara.on' ?S/8a0, dcs�g,��:�tgcs thc� 131ann�ng xa �io - maa.��t�un #cx l►ul►t,�c inspecta,an a xcrord o� floo�%gtc�at?ions�o ���UX; dings Lo lrc constxu�ced an Flood hazard .+ZraaS. !lssuanc" copy of aha bui lciing paar .t, nth floor`cicvation' nformat�o be cnt to tho P"Iaaina�ng Department`arhare �t bo`rct t £T i Y4.N. 4rii.7 ,T rt kms. l.,,fi }F,• ' },f4;y; �` lan- 1'ursuan 'oto _Section 1910 G o£ the fcdGral rogulataans,' thrGobas ��sCee ` �g ' would ba xequiecd _ l ' rcrta var�ancc as an cacccpticm froaw a spaca;F c rcgulatlon uoptad ConnL • 7'hc'l ountX avauld requara,.a Flood Plar ri ZoaoF ax;°Ceiral%.1 Dtsrr�ct scLtng=fox tlt theri cstr ons,fa�owo 'ha ch Lha ex cii 3 ` ranted or aoul.d be r S , cqu�red?to Fully;ostablsh the cac�d; x management proc4ciures , cL aatcdtn an Beard Resolutsans 7S/&3fl aid 2 A Horace o1 vaa:xancc may be rccaanlcd on the decdRat thW¢O=tcedo the County ccorc cr At resan no apcchanasae=fo the ie c�irJx e�a a �raraance exists. Sectawn I91Q 63j tai} ofxrthe F, egulaton ` . spa ahs an al tcxnotarra?aethadw The County para �cc " t�`; an _ - fiA '" _ - x+cca pa ent o f a variance shad l`execute an agxeoa>i�aat Kherob�h' ,td � ,mma ,-- ba Uound=Lo au4art::a notice on any Future dcc�t oc athc zconv an oC-tha �rol,���...that the propcxty � loicotcd ins<a Fload�l�aaronc �xcx Thhais itotcc shall contaan a stcwent aE the nua�hcc aF`=faettha �� lcitcat noni-€lai+adl�raolccl. floor` lias'`lsclaer the e2avatron{ o 'thf tf?tl - year Cloud, and that actuarial Flcand 9aisuranC rates uacraasc as ` tlae first Floor c"levation decarcascs. " Aea� foriRs, £cu schedules, and ;processing proccdures atoulcl lac reg qui red and.siioutd be �snrked. out,lay all involved dcp�artmcnts andt� r� _ CouaLy Counsci�. � ` �' 25,; . i ^,`y X ,. � ,, �y� ' ,Ta•,`' y„sY'F .A,'•'�,,." ;' �"w terry. � - 4,,,, a. ,,;• � '�Y� r e rY: r t ,r=-rs��, .:3 + �..V �Ar.- s, i _ x s_',xa 3 t+A • r �a;'.�`� .�zy�tz•-� " �Sn, ,, s Y .,�.,� S$ .�P fx £�`p�� '•�c»��:'Hg � ���� - ��, .�' na»'¢;' c 'f, ;,,r,,,.. .. a st, fM,`..Mv-.K.a_..':Via, .�s yx..Y,.t, ^- ."'ate''#w! !• �.. " . ... v. .i & � ��il'3�i�ll'{CII�I�9: _. r , • ' » n y� } r z �`�`'�'¢ ?x 3 t+li,E f. r $' A `I a 1,XP i_ 3 Ns�t,114 '/eat�tt►n LA t11c State and �T+�} .1lti/1.SAI1j',, a►f t�i1C ltlrEaliCCr� sr - U tm ,r 1 � g , — Tl�e Gounty rias�noc boc:a idcnt� cd by iRiD as ha�aue,14�g Spccaal �� - ` Acis d� X11 ' Fir r [l�rreforc, ,�pecaal To,Iar�aoas rcgardIv-�n .1igadxli �e � �� 4.., k ^"III xrds iRavc nox an�ttutctl by Lbc County. '[bc standas�l�1 � � yI'llw �.nsuraUCA 1. lacy Covers uxl- , dau�1-11,111-1 aRcs not „including"' ain�ticnanc x �o�4Iu?lls d� ro rorty.`' Pay =t dor da!pft*S ca"Cd bY.',siast "'"ILde x P�f ■1w./� y 1+ /� ftp �� f■ •a L. •p '.MMiY•`*nV' YY �rp,4�Q Y YV..wvK+a�FQ .� { i"� tYl,? ' _ S '`��• ^4 x s,{' t s r*js ,� l't1t11rC 1ZGbltli►tlflnc r Q3e x 1401,1 °TheCount zbas ;acct Mac rclu�r111�1,caent:� of thei Act a11!�)3 $o �tsp�c '11. -1 I ^�s sta�t �s ;15:`�, Ct?mlfaWl,ltp bas becn not,�.;,Ered ;by �♦£7r a1.lS+fi $.,.s .x __ rccevc�1 .I�it13H,-`and ullaas entorcil.the .Natonal''l: aod;"[nsuiccv P'>•o ►raa � � � .' (Nov+caa�ia:r i, 1975 . in the £utuacc lwaKl 1lazard areas ull be rxaamea�e lay 1'T anal`a ilcterninatioa o£; tar�,ous fl+o�od otavaunns >t%11 htc a� sucl to tae Cc►unty. t111��111 caq�ucted',tbat.aa dc�.xncataon-a "1'�aa111�_,,rV to '� 1by-thom ,I ins gall also be `' ueat A that Toad further il,a,�n apc� ` egul'+ta�o-11 ns will be xcquizcd. end raxll be �nsaCuaa �n conioxaanc�c>�a�th tho lax Futuro x�cquuewcnts anclude the fat- orarn y r% L" ' l Fass1.t<ba�bi>taab�c l'laor of buy,, da.ng must bc.abovar the elcvatxaa��o _ ,, ,lqq y� flood or aaaust: be,a�lood proofed �' s �� fi t �'I'll �#^" �t p�� ���, Cncroaacbaont:o scxueturc,. atnclud n �bai idxnps, , ; . I beau, " �1 11 :` ;end,d.aas =aal�ich :Would increase thc� al,evaic of 'tha 1�I�i yew E��ia11 � �� � ' R4 l►y o��Q foal' or a a►r+�, ar�ll not ba peii^>!utt c! ?hasp applies a!o publ fi__ { and ��rxntc prof ects. �� . �: d g r , � u the folloaann persons acre des3ga3ted as contact mesons for thercn�k" _- f n,�@Ct1.vV &I I_- -111 -1 F �$ "i h �.F . • Lc. ''� � ``r T d�un� trat.or's:QFfice• kxanleexnandcr _ ��' x ' . IVm:tdImr, l6Spcct!on pcparta�aatt R K Gxesc, C. J. Jii i -� �r�W4- +Coun�e1 {i�Ca:or ,T 10estarttt h � ` 3 .j,`v� a Ifealtl� ilcl>axtawacnt: 7, Gcrotrr <O'. �, NlatuttR itcpartwenC: �l Rangers Arnold Jonas 'L ',Nm hublal c t1'orks�Ue-artment ,JU - ,iiaik,xd. ' l } Flood Control 1?istrict. Toney Burli»gaanc F x '' -11 , 4 `zV4� A' G A lauUl#c »for t a� brochure :bas been p'cpargd ands=1s available SfQr� _ distra but on ,� �fkd"�� , K r r I I- �k I , R z 'u.n-n e.-_ '� Ilt - W } i'4 A �,'F` j ryy h 1' p.w _- ir 4' £ e.v X ti x Air r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976 In the Matter of CSA Program Progress Review Report on the Community Food and Nutrition Program 1 T 1 S BY THE i .ViRl) C)RUEREED that tne f i ve-month Commun i ty Services Administration Program Progress Review Report on the Community Food and Nutrition Program is ACK MLEUGEQ and submission of the final formal document to Community Services Administration is authorized. Passed by the Hoard on Anril 2n, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 2 1 t h day of A r r f 1 19 Z6 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Orig. ilept: DEO cc: iounty Administrator Human Resources Agency County Auditor-;ontroiler Com unity Ser%••_ces Adr±nlstrat_-r c/o OEO Has ens ioM 0 � A rt t► -+l n D O .t G c y " -0 CD CL-S S C7 m Cr C)to .-. 3 O -S ••••--S W 3 m 3 a`.�C1 : ri G O M J- -+x CD O c+ 3 O C U3 —cm --i C A .n W Ch rt" 3A3to 'S M (a ris, A 0LJ-eco = ct 00 N „n .Y 4r+ 3'aa Ca -S C) H --+ ' •*t-S 3 3 m -'- 1 p a 3 n � -'S c-1 7C-C CD --••-�0 N t7 N -h� h -1 .1. O "S �O t V'w J.O CD a -1 c: -S C+ ri C+t< o -% t< CD -•ll>?-S 'S ct to S :E 00 C+ m a J� •�i N = < m O JO fJ O 3'CL< m '• n O c+ no-p A CD CL 3 3 N O o CD a -i -h n 2 O S 3 J-Jc CD�O C to -Cl CL O ° > O O n+ n cr m C1 A D Cr aA -t cA -0 O n CL Z, -C NLA 3 > > - 7C'v Ln t< O Tr O C to G 'S >O -i C C+ c _- n ' C7-0 "S to < -fi t+ cr 3 a S24' > `. "O a n = < N S J-to 3 O - c} Z n n 'S C')0 Ln n A N •J A CD c+ -h cD --�N CA A C+ C"S C <_ 01. O C 1 C t -�•3'a -S ri C. SL J. 00 O Y C+ -•1 O J ) : + c+ Qi 3 1 3 C)cr O 0. cr OCD �. c < Z. o Z ,� p J.N t .C) C+ -�O.--•3 •-••O CD m In C*A < = n 30 m -' 1 �O � _,�-o OCL J. -{ { to tCt A 3 C.CL CD a C+ t h m - La -S c+ -h^s a O -. CRITS 2'VCL 3 c+ O G Eno o mat( 3 "N > y a n w c+ ..a. m "•• 3 CD O < O 4 .Z1 > n O —'[D < C+ a O c+El- m L 'S CL-+-•. N "ts M r • m co 3 0 O v3 = < n.Oc o PC, to -S .J J. m A J.to Ca'O'0 _ o «: O 40 CA ry CL CD-O cm .c a < O C O T C j CD _�, m m a O m C*C+ J v N z 1 to �•O '.A to o n o i�• '� - O , �-O m fT ^ \ \ \ m 'a O ci a•1 0 -.a - -� -+ Cl r O 30 r %Uo Cl ((J ' x Gr n o W W _� v "t < -S r-n " p nt I O .O \ m C+ V3 O fnv -" 3 —i a• rn r _. til_ t, m S-. G !� \CD N O \ m > Z N o y C ri 4-4 ITI-t ncrt _ O ,a Oa L+ -+- O \O 4'1 r0 3 . - \ wCD n J V C+r .. Cal w a M ti A V t3, V tO (n N j •o �► X r,3 CO a OZa 4. rA �ZJ V • Cry m Z =yozm 34 'N 4 :-L 7 o•-Cl - - Gl -0 O CL .m z >o if► . Eff "S (D io on m 'S 2" mg O O ] •r O lf> _ CZ at b ;X Q J ti �a -a V N V - OD �o ;m 10 p to U:) � a W zp n^ w j DO = V O t7 W y jA C cc - o` '• o �q� IN -r n a _ an n Y o. .J�JC'S 3 A �A3 O 3 0 m. O no Z > Y09. 2 r1 ar S= C N O 3 ?rJ lD 'S C a n .t Z 0 O -I= 3 3 -'0 0 3 J-3�f3 -'•N 3 d r� ^l n c Z t Zi C O O S sm >�. to O-�+. O G A N C+ Z= ! c t { > .l n9 ._.•LJ r p to N .a O�.A O t< O -0 O J. c+ L' O'C* - s to < O "S A a t= O S D-' m aa c O 0 " • 3 C+ O a - C+ to to " O t 1 n I�' -+ c CD CD T m < O c+ :�;, a A v C< ,�, .--+ 'S S1-1 O to.a Zs La N O z D 1 t3 A T'-1 a -S c+ Ca S o 7c a s= -A. a rt, CL ^ a N -c r+ -+.p C? 3C.7 C 3 a 00 Ln A 'S '• CL G ^to 3 w ° > ♦ a \ C CD Z 0 o DfD N �< ^ 3 a ct �G J N a >� n to cn G (-) 'S C Ca 3 a t+ a T1 to C 3 i ` O C LZ..-0 -S J 3 -h C:3 3CT 0 4 CD CD C 3 AA 1Tto -ri may, j iV crCL r cyst c v _. C3 t3 CL a l7 O0 C CD X G _ CJ C1 O to CL -� c� -� • f 3 --h Z 3 tD 3 A -+ to ct S r+ " c+ fl . { O n 2 'S rt "S < 3 ''' _ z 3 -S n L'7 c+` rJ -S 3 CL 0- 0 -S t� L7 m 'S = W O �• C` t.7 to to L!f - .J O - r s p t1 . C C . .� • 3 A Cil CD S C+ c+' 'S ` a c* \ a 'A O -+ CL (O 3 a c V _ O e 6 'S J. O O 3 CL 'S til Gl an > 2 c O "S 3 O CJ -h 3 J.3 n r) O — --h-S CL O 3 e ] n�> •• D'S co S - .3 R 3 N O 1 0� O r n _. C'+ CL O 0-O A 0 3 0 tD C 3 G t _20. j O J.3 . ...•• 3 J. 1lb J v C+ r.+ rt3 a c CL SU 4 s > 0 p lA trt < -'•-i t�Tl s y 1 Ci C-8 a Ln 43 0033 Z a ANAt.Y:IS � > MFcrafi mccf with Eourd crde 3 ` . ... ...... ..... .... ... ... .. ... ... ... lei. xJ n.� •,!. j. �.:.i J-+-G �� n -1 CL -h-h O Q C7 Z t,• �; 0- N Q ct -S O C O O -+•.r O+ O CD 17 00 • c , ,• CL O 0-N 0 'S O D+ O -S M O. 3 n O 3 C, 13 •0 G t+n 3 CL 0 -S ct V w '-•• l-t'S N O Z7 C-t O N -'j 3.O J r a CL -1 O ! r -, W J�.t7 to O �.-•S W _,. -'i'L7 O �, CR SL • ► > i O CT O C+ ri CD 'S C+ G -+- CT< N -S'0 n O ) Cz N O G N -.-.C-P W C O O c --I/C-)rl • n . + m Co -•-- '0 N 0 —t+ C+C N n N O Q p n A C S W < CD - O CD 3 .{ N W O > w = tG O Sr-S G CD C) CL GL W CL > Z - C t-t a y: r` N -h--ft A CD n Or O O N•W a.O i '0 iJ v. C 0 CD 3---•-h-0 as --h O ct O CL , r 0 Z C 3-W W W CD C-� O ct -1 C2 a > O C r 0 O ta.. •• CD.--ft CD n t+ Ca CD- + -1 C+ O -'-C o � c N a n +j < ^ h CD -h9- 0'003 G 0 O :E Nn O + _< Z O e+z _ 0 -+-O 3 C -h CLW W 3 3 -+-ct ci '� tR S t C A c 2 tJ w -3 C ' Ct G C+CD C W 'S O O 3 O Cn CD O C Vn m v o n " "S 0 0 -S n 3 -h 3 -0 Q t*-S C+ -q > > n " C 70 -r CL 0 cr C+0 0 -:00 a .11 c +l n -s'0 G CD Cn CD O CD n o O.+ F O 'S'3-0 S:r O-1 0 `< N N C+ A p Zia x 0 C1 CD J G O W 3 at to ... O < -S �.< -Z to ::3 • W O Ss► > 1 0 tD 3 0 O CL--•< C+ -h 3 r : O S !a O G C1 to W 0'-r- CD CL N G7 _Z .. C-t c*0 c0 3•ct.O C+ CL•h C+ '1 O 1- n+ CD W O+ O Ct = O =r z j p J J Q � -0.0 C1�. t tS, CD N cx A J. tD • •II o/ w .•.� UOis O A p J J J m 9 .� r n 'a V._ V V z )-- �n O ^ CTI CJI CTI s 2 w O OD a n•y W _ W W z > > 'S Cno 3 A 1151 V V V V .0 3 -IRI a .� Y > F � tD 3"a + O :3. rnA O ^ O > Z V -300 + -CC n c a _ t0 N" to O O .a - C+C-1 Ct n Ct C-) ..O -P C+, 0 3 Z : "C Cn CD N W CD^ 0. . . 0 0 ct.t c C C + cn ;16t p In W -. - • . OIR^ I a W O • ( ° r 3. n ,o > '>j aq =� =too so Ina V v c � Im ,x c o n as - %► 's ;v r0 n t dA �.�,v OO i= tC m n J' - CTl 1.0 OD -J ;' z,A .cn O N a: �a�c > O< ? tO CT A " o O O N � � i.'� IN '~ o O C> _= n a v Ct t/) •S CX— GL L`.P n C•t"C7 ct -ft-c to CL ct< C7 US n O ^1� -Set CD O3 'S < O ElC) OOG -T -'•03'0 .� ,, � z > a z ►:s g, p 33 -+-:� C CD C 0CLLO -•S 0- 0to -30 c � Z L � O z '� -'-'S Cf ri vi < ---3 rj CL 3 V CD CD C ct N --Cl+ a + < Z ^ ti �' - G tL ct Q. CD --•C+ C+ O C`r O W GLA 'CI -S 0 O! t~' m C Z y i tt^ •- CJ t� --' Q N �c< CDN 0+CD CC W O N Q'-h fL'ct LJ E r Z i1 -if ct • -- < -h- O O -�tJ --•O C J -,a • CLW -+--z --. 0 0 -�- -h-h C 3 -+•-o C+ CD 3 e 6 O 0 to ri O - 3- N -+. Ct--- •.C+CD CD -S ca a p O e i r 3 G C C-t 3 3-3"O 'S O W J�--S CL C W m 1� Lv n -S 3--- •0 n n CD CD -S 7c 0 W --• CD > ` •` C+ (D CD CD J J J-S C+Ct 3 Ct Ct �•-S r,1 1�n a CD "S C CD ST C .a.f O O 3 3 < 0 -?f N `< v o,CL 0 tJ ►' V Ln -.0 W J. •^ < 0 0 C+-0 W C ri Q 3'- 3 CL CD CD tL O C C+ ^^ O t< N -+ Ot n V n W to cr-0 O 0 3 O'-0 -'-S V+ 3 n 3 C) C. •• -• S O C) Or CD Ct r N C/i W 3 CL Sit CD �-CL Ct 'S "S "f 3 3 o C37 C' p• I? J; O fi 0 O+ -h G ct C1 C+ A to W n CD -•to CD t0 \ c CZ O c C Q G G CD C-)::E G ..- 3• 3 CD _ 3 g' C) ; v i M.L= ^ CD t� •s W 3 � 0 Q SU C+ O, N CD t+3 t C � S � CR i i o t O C-t n iL N 3 -n--• Ca W n ct n = r to C n fu 3 cf�G �'ct O �cf --h - O SL CD 3.Or N Z O •h----' G W -h tJ CD 3 a -JS- '-h O -' 1 ct 0 < rF C1, CD 0# 3 w .. O C O+ O n O < � •f1 O-0 0 3 CD CD 3 .3 3 m CD G Z 3-O O 3- C O CD 0 C3.O n o.O -S Z < c- C -h S., R --•-J• n GD'S 3 G 3 O 3 _.. 3 .,. + -4 - O o c• _ • tv C"� -'S C -� C+ -'- C+ Of T7 I CD cr O+ CD 1'2 y. D .f t0_0 3 C7 W'i7 W 3' C.,. tL -0 W -"S C-t W t t c t O rJ C+ O 3 C S O "S 3 CD CD O �+ 0 C-) C ✓ 3 CD -S CD ct-S tL O+ O W O n> f n ct O -• 3 Lr CL C1 Ct -S -"- 3 L1 3 • C v o J S "S [D CL S C Of --•W C1 •S = i N -+-'L< vt O GL ct O W G N 3--h C) `• X31 v ►+ ^ w Ql CL O ort7 'S C •0 O O_0 -+ -� 0 C I -h W n > 3 n O -1 O -S --'3 N -Sto fl�l • n --- n r, v n 0 0 0 f t t✓ I In O -S S 3 N L 3 N n O -+.N-0 .. -- CA • ► c 1 3 n N - r✓ GL 3 --�iv to a zi > O• O '. N Cl I t0 C Q tTl Z b e O ^ i- � c '' t� z •` D 60 AHAI.YSCS C 0 r v v E. 'z r ■ _ -0 ri -h A - --:b A ri C+-0 Ca r C ' --% O • - O 3c N • ' •� C+CD O CLO 3 ca C 7 C+GL CL N r c s' v v O 0 -1 <-V c3 3 L* o -1 0 II -S C+ coa ^,� ^ •: 3 C-+ N -S -h 3 O C)C -+O 3 C+cf ct CD �. 31. 0 n t0 ct-% O CII O -S -"• C< -•-3'cn 3 3 0 Ct •S -y O O"o C+N 1 3 rJ• C) « O -S MlD _S -+-� CD Ct ' Or N 3 f.? i A N N n O- n = •-L7-%O al C•1 CL 0N N - CT C+Z 3 CD :ECD C-T N o > C C N A D J. ; ,� - O 3 Lei O N 70 O ---�•- O LL CL- CD 3'CD > 2 J O L, C+CT O ai • C: MO 3 .. C _.O.CD y O C") WO C+ G --j- —A-CD 3"C9 O t7 3' a > -G+.C P �+ QTO CL N A < O 3" G O CD 0. N 3 O c = C ri 3 --' .•.3'C O CL tY Ca O 4c O Ct a -+ e N •S 3 -h - .t0 3 3 N --� < •S --'3 c O 'S<< n •5CO C t O 7t7 a+ CO t-M O "0 CD N -+.C Z- Nn ? 3 CD -7,0 -•- =r 0 -Ot,0 C*C) can o CD �� { ` ' J, CL Cn -h Cn CD Cn O -S A 3 -S at, n y 03C+ Aa 4< O �- > oil �a 3 a.Q: - o W B C NIKON A o -S 3 3 0 o (T O -+ C'1 O+ -+CD 7C"CL C at -N• <• O 1 . < CD CD 3 t7 - 3 h O A C+ O > C, Itc 3 CL In Ct o _ CL 0 is CLH 2Aw n 40 �m O C• z•a V - V z '> - ,nom Ln -•• >n Mco w z Z •a ,�„� N - Z C) y O -+ O W A l_ r �-f z cn p n C v R a fT{z 16 { r �? N CD « o c1 N o a !M \ m > C'7 ca i s cn y r D 3 w 10 (72U{ o +m c�l1f�D ^ w = 1 c 1 W CD �s 1= Ct « • N '�1 �O O a• 1 n la n zOi w ' o 4� A >t i- y Co> 1 .>o `. Ix Z-C 2 ^ CC) f2 ZQ , C Ql }jn•o - n0 X.:9N Tz �A 1c U< u cn 2 c o 7J sr O `i a N an n :. . Z = w n �? ,� o .? •-h•-h•-+ C-Sr+ct •0 C7 CA A -+-3 W as-0 70-n - Jx r C•�f R O ^ a O a+ 3 O N-•- �-O +• O 3 a. -T rL tL -••-O > 9. O 3 3 O O C+O X 'C7 -+--S O CL 3 A CA a °` "' z > " O O ^ Cl--�•aJ Ct 1 3 C+Z" Ct << C+Ct C •••••Ci�Cf -= C i n _ -�fL rD W.. N �! .r... Z O Z c "a -�•Ct -S C) a'a1 - ct iL 3 3- ,< 0 -1 f c i > > y II a i• f= (D.-+• �7 C 3-a O -�CD r+ O 3 CD �� c Z Ct r a •S N c+ --'-+••-S CL C7 N 3 a d tZ iia su » • S C+O a+ 3" �m-A O • OR CD --1 O !L A • `a p M.N •S - CD O 3 A 3 C.+' 3 CL'S N -S Q On = CD O N 3 0-0 C-t -+3 CO - W N 'n ' Y C].c n CL —:m CA C+3 O CD = w C< M Cfl 3" 7dZJ N 3 3 a+ CD CD C+ -S A0 3 to -S 4�) N - 6 CA c -10 n a �D• � Ct c-+ CD CL 3 3"0 '0 CD 3 fi 'S 'T 3 .• ` !� c: Z AC7O L73rJO -0CnN < 3 - C`D -�- A c U .� o O+ O N CD a+ Q� -h Ca --•. CD U N 3 n O V i >1 . < N >_ CD 3 Ct "S O N N O O rt Ca J O -4•c'.L ` =r 3 cr 7c C+ O CL N 3 0 --•-..-h s + S -f to C' C+ a+ --s 3 -;>O • N A O 3 -h n'-S -.4 << 3 -+--hL-1 —0 CD `^ C- a y n O 7r W su rh A C O - a+ Ct -h CD CD • "Q 3 O o C+ C+ S 1 I p Q !• C+ W N 'S A CD CL Q • 'T s"-•-=3 3 a< -..I- � ' .�. z ten w O N CL i3 ^' C1 N -{ti < S CD _..c< LJ 3 + ¢ 2 •� D �. =1 ' 3 7�A < C+ O -+-X CZ Ct t:1 N + O n -t a N CD f-C) O-'S O CL 1'7 r+ a+ O =r 3 J •• I■; « C+ -+- CA Cn r-I -.•CL CJ -1 �rJ 7 O C, o N { -h CA cr CL Cn O C? caA"0 7 ' w� < c 3 'S << X N +Cr Oc N r-P CD 0 A 0 0 0 O O to O N0 C i A. :!i' v C1 CL C+CD CL E! :E Ln C,-Ct Ct �. 4 n y, N r7 Ct N N N 0 —:+ GCT :E 3• n s t « O Ct CD N ► .C-+ -a Ct t lq cr r7 O A + a o r n c O 3 O a+ 3 CT O i -S 3 O 'O ^ O C? tJl CL-�- 3 -1 p i > a 1 A C3 >f a 7 D p •, f n57` o > �• Atf�LYSts o o a WDZx - OU339 "D U C.N y , O ::2 to s:+ *1 n -h to ? O =1 C!t o R "O Cs r t a"c Cr a o c n ri n n CD -h 00 --i c+ b - 70 00 =3 =r -3 _ -s 3 CLo -1 O O O t A-0 a O 3 to cr a CA-•-G c+ ` ¢ Cr =3 rt O' stt U O-O 0O O C+ O C7 s! f+ -+- ct,O .. :r Ji , to 'S CS 2-S -S --+r.+ o -s O ca a -h + '- w u r> >!^ -46 Ct ct to T.+ Cr to «+- N to m A Do O -�- s n C-)to c+ C+ pr !!t -+- O :;EC% O S O - .T ? _ sr -t An • O -h o o to Ct O+.to G a Cr c+ a -i -is CIO • ^ Lsr _..O to O -+ O n O . �. _.. c+ ts+ n O ° 0- ^ • -'O O - -% O O 0-t7 to C) t O -�- a "{ to N O S.-+ '� -i -'• 0. X'-•"• ttt -S J C+ 00 _--I CD O C+ . x» r » c+x c+ to c+ nx c+ -s O O }O U r + i •M "O t+ O' s:+ n C.+ to CD N t-+ O C)%U '• C` a [ 1+ ^ O to O =r n O n 'S - -S c+ O O Its -S Cs t' c+ O G+ .3 3 a c G O c > O O - G to + C+ --� 3 `t O s: o -• t b i n to t G to cr -+- m O 3 O q- O rt-'4 z n rr _ 3=r c+ a -S C7 to -S -••n -i -S t'G ^ 4 O -"`Sri a+ o tG O �nt{tt �tm C+ .-3 W us '�" ..-a O UPt.7' y > ^ -• O cscr Or-+ 0 C Oc+ -+ O p+ O n S —A. G to O 3 (7 0 ^ aa-111%0a-' a C:+ m 0 O ars a 0 l? a ^ CO,C+ _ s+ ..4 to --� _ to•O C+ c r C D 5 .v to O n Q t h CDD G O- O .. r -. 0 z O O O _% 'Y a UP O w cm Cl cl N D+ "I to � c+ r }.r► J. O �•— b •q a•^ tC! YJ tSr tJ - t'„1" 3 ` czia �O >•., cn - z 0 i n T- 1.s1 ts1_- to tJs .- �,.m �► •--i x 2 rt r W W W W W z : > -r "S cno A A _ a - .a. �• .-+ .-► is '; < t'f""V O '+ 0 « {r H tV O m-t C)two=' •~• i v > r . fT1 t y •. C) n C'S n t'f ;�> F►ct n 0.O o O O O O O O O m'_ -t W-'S' a 9= O C O • ' C O . C O C 5 z ;,Irr cn m n » "; O, t O �. 110 .1 _ O s •O t O Wm:' 01 Ir > n t > O Obx ti� tQ Om Mo O n - - - �•n'.v z z • }= n.c 0< - %. m qw 3. o - on n A z o a. t� > g -h Cr cs" t n '2! �' to O a C) —A.O% '•S = .-.t�' O nth- =3 + (D +-C O ct m -S OO OCJO M G7 -► y .. z > o a t CD OC+ At m O O A ' n zto a no ct mtoic+ -•-Cn C -t C O O O =21 O Ct W a=3 Oc+-0 CD a • - 'Cs tD c+ 0 c+ -S m :3m a c+ ' —m 4G CL-0 - c is Z _ .a♦s N•1V O `h riLoco O ""S - lA CD A+-S N 4 •S O n ri a m -0 -•h M -+-(D-O rt,-S • O c+ -S C+'S C)to O O O to m O �.A 0 m a 3} s:+ to =3 Oto =3 r+ - �- O a CO a a n CD to El a n s a C+ 3 -16 f.+ CD O C+CL m cr c r r^ } O" to cs't -h-T a-+-O O to m O S M tT CD ca O C+O n e+ c+ -•'- a e hT O :1-.-,S O O O ta m m O '+«3 ► "S to c+'k< sv Ct- c+ Cr C to " .• or 0 1 ..-A.m O- J' m O OP .r �� 0 D -4 c. t<• n CLO a -rt-' -h `t. -S -"-O O a a Lo O sr o C m c+ O O t. O'=t O ct a -h sv 9 '� ; t -"•t O to c+ O O C L4 tG n p c+ rt -'• a O a CD to tm o w -r t o C O -it "S - ,-] 0 to -+- a a+ •Y O -h r G Z CSG O O -s o C1 t o r c O ^ -h (D 0 a m c n O c -S-0 to z `^ t C) cr O t-+ -h •!3 cr` -+-C c+ sy m s X O o p n O --n-r tL7 -K c+ C+ to (D i7 C3 -�-iSr 'b " Z a.. t =1 O O to C+n C+ to to to La -S yw m o •; c t ^ -J ' " Q. O•t a . 3CD A'(D O O O sy O O CL a- $ =i a c+ za 73 -S O O o -h to 3 H a -r 1.4 to c+ C)O tT to - t< - CL sir r.. . 0O t1 lJ CA 0 'mow c-+ 0 �• O + CJ tL -X O a su O CD 0* "± O : s ...QU o r. to m c -h-S -S m n O ct :S C+ n O c, p N rt to O O C+ -+. O p1 ` A vi •+ ^:. w n O Lm �' to to O ata Ls t-+ . 3 n•>y _% :3 C_+ N C')<n r r.to a c n tL S`.+ C =jr CJ O ` , q q vr c-r to - �O O � n -+-to to v 0 ri CJ -h --•c7 C C1 O .:. O v � )c o ►{ ri ct Cr N O a D+ 0 C p Ct fG =r " -+ _ 3 Q a! O =; t c t C+ c+tG CJt a 0 t - A!lAtY�tS O N r > 0 340` txoex r lJ • � r L C+ '•S C'l -+-N to cj N =1 O -+-C=-a ;u p C-} ' „ -�• o-o -s -ff-+ (D o 3 O M 0 . O -3 o —11o o ; r N ✓ D -r,O< ` r a `: ai o -+-O c o 0 o cl o -o r+--j-o o c+ 0 ri O-0 0 ..r• n ;; N Cl N C 3 N Ct. < to O 0 c+ • +-C+ 0- = -h--r-S < C `� c+ n C+ 'S tT =r-+- 0 -+.Or O N 0 '••S -S ar C a- �.-r. •p x w t t j a N C [� O C1 -S O < cl < M-•'-ri--0 O 3 C1 CL-S -S r LO LZ > e O.0-O 0 �$ -'-TJ 0 < -ff-+-c+ 0 rs Ct 3 C -•--•'-o 0 (I>- O r n ai -A.--h --A C -A. 3 in a 0 O a =- < n "Off C7 A _r ^ -s =1 a o CL f, 0 -•c43 O C3 c+-•-� N -h t<to 3 Cir -�- � -i O ^ +� o Cj- O-+f-+,�. (� -+,�' a -Oif`� --'- 'ts~ N aoi u0i tD ° -} C C+ O NOONO -SctanCl+ y D na -+O Gf t-f S -. CD to O C> -K C+O O�G C O -�. - -p a C) ! (D > r > �. C -' •-h 3 •--�0 O cl C]_c2 O a 3 r.* --3 t:T U -S -•'C+ -S ~ 2y r S C-) L C• ^ -• 'S C+ ('U -+-C -0 to O Cf. - -•h-S Ci -if O --+C.) 0 0 4< -r- O Rt < O ^ Cl -S — CL a O ra N C+ -h_•. O (D ap O to a ca :. (Sf O -S -•m -S L < ai r-A n N •. -S 3 O N -S O -S _ O ai n •- C-+to C.) no n 3 O C 0 ct(D -h 0 9D a ai c O c+ � O < .► ai t --•+to (9 CL N �t'-o tf to � � -ff -C7 L'1 h _< Z O N . J _...L- _-._C-t ai -S Oto 3 0.-} N n o O Y1.fD N -S 0 CD 3 a - o-0 t3 O N -S a -S (D . tD O 0 (D t-C N O ct N -1 0 N (D 0 C+ =$ < =r Q -S O N O O -j t-+O t/) -+---tf t'D N Cl fps N m -} > •+ " try "S < ai :E C+-h O —,Cr L< O N CD .�. ►- ,• •f. D ' a+ 0 -S O -, O O -•••(D Cl C+-S < C+(D C ' t q e C+ CL ca c+ a a o (D a. --o- ri -S -�-O to W 3 N C% C3.fa tl —0-0 O N 3 Y a, � m C+ a Q 17 „ O CL O L< -S Ci N -+-+ C3 --(Cl rri C+ -+_ - " sw C3- Ctr 02 O Cry cr DID O y 0. . tlf . O� -h(D O 0 10 r C3 a t c+ 0 - F (� a� ctnt x -so a.c f a -Y a -i-o c ^ A o ct s C. [l Int Cl r+ S►�f I on to C >T. n O tT CTS 01 X 0 Vii{ __. _ ._._ _ _.- _ . ? lR J6 R}O to 1•4 •V i 1. M S .L b f 1C4 at { O a " a - rz . N (D O•-. = i7t i° co - co C+ r r D: t f - • ^� co .�. --O RO CAft a O mi C+ �A ,. '.ice J " _ ••y-A. - C a Z M Ln..S ry h 0O u W(DD :: = • _ _ p 13 .q fob A �O} W Ya - • _ t ti7� •�"• F f0> - �- • i> ti El OD ;� rx - - _ a s"n #in . a cD, `X 0% Z p'< >• O LZ n 3 '• an na - x Y n -.Z 7O CLC t0 CL cr N ai O >-i A. ! y. Cl) C) O t3 O -•J-0 > (D (D O C O _ •.. �, � Z > o O a ^ C -0 Cl < O Ca N C+ 1 -S CL 3 -+- >a < Z C _ tt C O 0 3 r (l -A. I N < C7 C+ C-.�j Z O o a Inh +.-S -+ < C + < O C (D N (D -J. t: > y . r 'S CL O -+--S N --r- C+t7"a-O -S ar ••' r F7 } M ? r O N -0 O -�- N r+ O-3 - C --• a -. v f X n (D < ct -+-t< "S O to-sV Ca 0l 0 c+: O -S Ct 0 -ff N as N N (D O C+ N Ct N(D C do a. p'A C C-+ -•C- C+ =3 '+ -• O (D Ch-S D } s 2 �.i �CT ctto 0 (Y cr C Q Cf•"y 3 (D C�' Z^ s - e-+ -' O•ai O N m C+-0 co. w O -••-v O -.A.ct a+ C+ (D -.a N y } n try =r O -� Cl O Cs -S -'--h(D -'h a " IV,r+. •10 (D C+O C+ cl O C+C) (D N << C+a+ -S c+ - -S O -•Xl SL (D Of r n O y O, O CL-V <D -'17 to t< (D --'-S --• 3 !,• C2 -S rf Cl CJ "0 N < .�. ti 0 - ,� C rn i. 0 O O cr O C+ (D C+ -.. -:c -, -4.. < $ 3 C Cl 0 -1 S Cts C_> -J. .' V 1 � r r-1O C Cri ar CD CL O O 4 n C" _ M^ -+• -S 0.O ai O t< C1-•-O _ } CA -i Z O C+C rt . O S -h O s -. X Ln O c+ CJ 'S 0 � O t,C C+3 c-+ Z -S O • t0 CD C3 O C-ID « R >' n n a -h ''--+ (D ct O O cr . .- .{ O D y. =2 a CJ O C O %D -Y O-- 'C (a y 3 to J •s ti --".+ w Vf Gtt CTO -S En O - as tf ai � 3 ." to � ^1 ,,,,, •. r n" O 3 O C+ a _ O -S a (n,.•• h t'3 o ! `o e to n c > n O o -i, an uhf i o C7 , C3 3 0 cr a Lr O` A. a -S n C.+ ---•C3 to Z p u 1 > s - 00 -1 to •+ Z b O if n 4` n Z - ta% 2 7r n < n INDEX k - - � -.. .... ..�.».� .. _....rte ........ rLr:i: 3FF^ in fh,= r*CCcrJ •of Supervisors r Of Contra Costa County, Skate of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving the CETA End-of-Year Report for FY 1974-75 The Board having received the CETA End-of-Year Report for FY 1974-75 which was jointly prepared by Human Resources Agency Manpower Project and Civil Service Department staff; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said report is acknowledged and the Civil Service Department and Human Resources Agency are AUTHORIZED to release same to the general public. Passed and Adopted on April 20, 1976 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. 0 r i g: Civil Service Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: HRA Manpower Project affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12173 1$•M l4ar y 00342 CETA F-%1)-0E-YEAR REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1474-75 Prepared by The Manpower Project Human Resources Agency and Civil Service Staff County of Contra Costa I. Background Information II. The Year in Re Aev III. Title I Prograr Arcomplis rents IV. Titles It and VI 0 343 Microfilmed with board order. I. BAC?KCRJ::::D INFOR�LNTION The Comorehensive Employ=ent and Training Az: o: 79.3 (CETIA) was signed into law by President Nixon December 28, 1973. Provisions of :his manpower legislation decentralized and decatego rived all federal r-anpo::er programs. Prior to CETA, the Department of Labor (DLL) contracted with rare than 10,000 agencies to pro- vide manpower services. 11ith the initiation cf CETA, the responsibility of man- power programs was transferred to 550 chief elected officials of cities, counties and States which were designated as prime sponsors. The act represented a com- promise after a four-year effort by the administration to shift control over manpower programs to local governments under special revenue sharing, axed Congress's insistence in retaining a degree of federal control. CETA was the first of the new federalism bills to be passed by Congress. This leg- islation combed the numerous categorical programs of the Manpower Development and Training zt of 1952 (211DTA), the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 (EOA), and the Emergency F-?loyment Act of 1971 (ERA). The Board of Supervisors on May 7, 1974 ordered that "The Director, Human Resources Agency, is ci_ected to prepare the County Plan for the implementation of the Coc-- prehensive = 33oy-ment and Training Act of 1973" along the geographical/dollar allo- cation included' in the Board Order. On May 14, 1974 the Board Order set forth the organizational representation of the Manpower Advisory Council. The purpose of tae act is to provide job training and employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged, unemployed, and underemployed persons by establishing a flexible and decentralized system of federal, State and local programs. The act authorized federal grants to prime sponsors—States and those units of government exceeding 100,000 in population, or smaller governmental units under exceptional circumstances. Prime Sponsors then plan for and administer manpower programs based on their local needs. Contra Costa County applied for an operational planning grant in November 1973. In March of 1974 the County hired a Manpower Director to administer a manpower program for FY 1974-75. As part of the CETA legislation, Contra Costa County was required to appoint a 'aapower Advisory Council. Representation on this council had to con- sist of cc=--;--y agencies, client community, education/training institutions, busi- uessT unio:s, cities, the State Employment Development Department, and citizen advo- cate groups_ ?rior to the establishment of the CETA Program, manpower programs were coordinated ::rough Cooperative AreaManpower Programs (CAMPS), a voluntary body whose approximately 60 members consisted largely of representatives of public and non-profit community zz-ancies, This group, through its recommendations to the Board of Super- visors, took a very active role in helping select members of the Manpower Advisory Council_ One of the ,est serious problems from March to May was determining who would serve as County pri-me sponsors. Richmond, though a city of less than 100,000 residents, had applied for its own prime sponsorship because it had gained considerable experience in conducting manpower programs through the Concentrated Employ:-ent Program (CZ-10). Joining Ri.cr._^ond in its effort to get a separate prima sponsorship were the cities of San Pablo and Pittsburg. In `3y, fo lle.ing maetin-s which involved these cities, the County, and DOL, Rich=ond was granted its os-;i pr-;^e sponsorship. San Pablo and Pittsburg were denied their own prime sponsorship. Shortly after, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors appointed 23 members to the Contra Costa County `szpo%.er Advi- sory Council. 00344 -1- M milli I'l The Y-anpower Advisory Council has the for planning, evaluating, and to reco.^end funding of prot-ra:2 operators for C:_z.} nannower prograr.-z to the Board of Supervisors. The Covaicil had its first meting on May 23, 1974. Several additional -_etings fol- lowed in order to enable the Council to meet the Department of Labor deadline which required the submission of the County's Manpower Plan by the end of July, 1974. Fol- lowing its review, the Council submitted its recocaendations to the Board of Super- visors for its final approval. The County manpower staff gave technical assistance to the Xanpaver Advisory Council (KkC) to enable it to make recomndation-4 on the large nu--3er of issues for which it had the responsibility. The responsibilities were: 1. Detet_4--_ priority groups to be serviced in Contra Costa County. 2. Review al ^ rpower programs that had been conducted in the past, since these progr"_G under CaTA regulations, were -to be given due consideration. 3. Review a-11 proposals submitted by potential providers of manpower programs. 4. Review current labor market as it related to various training proposals that were ss. witted. 5. Recommend agencies/organizations for program funding. The establish-meat of CETA priorities for the client population, as well as the review of programs, was extremely difficult. Available labor market/employment information was generally classified on a Statewide 'or Bay Area basis, and often, if relevant, :it was outdated. The fact that this proposal preparation task was accomplished in a two-- month period of time was a credit to Manpower Advisory Council members and County Manpower staff. Programs were recommended to and approved by the Board of Supervisors in July. The zsanpower staff then developed a funding application and submitted it to the Departmeat of Labor. The County was awarded a contract in September, 1974. U. THE YEAR IN REVIEW A. Comprehensive Delivery System Adopted During t'ze Fiscal Year 1975 (September 1974 - June 30, 1975), for CETA Title I progra=mat c purposes, the County was divided into four geographical areas: (1) Was= County — Unincorporated North Richmond, San Pablo, El Cerrito, E1 Sobraate, Pinole, Rodeo, and Crockett; (2) Centra? Cot=tr — M3rtinez, Concord, Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek, Lafayette, O.inda, and N.oraga; (3) Pittsburg/A-.tioch —Pittsburg, tmircorporated West Pittsburg, E Pueblo, and Antioch; --- (4) East County -- Oakley, K- ightsen, Preat:rood, Bethel Island, and the surround- . ing area. The basic administrative unit established or providing services to each of these aforementioned geographical areas was the CETA Crit. Each CETA Unit consisted of -2- 0034 an Intake Interviewer b • a c�_� ____, organization desioaat_d to serve a specific area); Job Co;:-se2o: by the State E^playmezt Develpoment Department) ; Job Developer 'V-=c_ EM); and Emit Supervisor (also from EDD). Enrollees who had been processed through the Intake Interviewer and Job Counselor would be referred to a training opportunity, e.g., Work Experi- ence, Om-The-Job Trai-iiao, to a variety of, Classroom Training Opportunities, or directly to the Job Development component. The intended goal of these options was place-ment i-n permanent, unsubsidized positions which provided re=--eration cor-sistent with an enrollee's work experience, training and skills. T� addition, C� provided a work experience program for youth ages 16-21 c:zo were high school dropouts. The goal of this program was to furnish pa_ti`ipauts with meaningful work experience and, at the same time, to facilitate- their ret•-rn to school. Further, Supportive Services to clients, e.g., child care, transportation, sperm? ::ork and equipment, etc., was part of the Manpower Plan. The d+stributi"on of funds allocated for each activity was as follows: C3ass=x-m .raining $683,000 (35.9%) ( ..?micas 3234,000 spent on allowances to the trainees) OJT $ 32,000 ( 1.62) :.ori: �_-ie^.ce $724,000 (38.1%) (in�uz� adult and youth) Cr= se -;. g, Job Development, $460,000 (24.2%) Sunpo eve Services to Clients H. Prioritv Grouns Served In accordance with CETA Regulations which required the identification of client priority groups to be served, the Board of Supervisors, following recommendation by the `anpower dv sory Council, designated the following groups: (1) Youth; (2) Fe.3ale Heads of Household who are welfare recipients; (3) `inority Heais of Household; and (4) Vietnam Xre7erans. The table below indicates the planned and actual number of each of these groups served for the 10-Lonth period, September 1974 through June 1975. 00346 f 2 OF TOTAL PRIORITY GROUPS SERC r O Pi ANNED ACC'.- OF PLA.NMED E:.'RJLL=-;T You:: (excluding Su=--er 700 2,325 189.2 42.2 Program) Fera?= Welfare Recipients 500 885 177.0 27.2 Minority Heads of House- hold 700 856 122.3 28.2 Veterans 140 458 327.1 14.6 As a ?_i_= Sponsor, the Board of Supervisors is responsible to the V.S. 'Dspart- ment c= Labor for the administration of the CETA Program in accordance with the eriabLg.Iegr`slation and the federal regulations. Under the "new federalism" conczp= of this program, the Board of Supervisors is responsible only to the electo=_.t: of this County for the type of services provided and their relative success. Within t;e County organization, the Human Resources Agency is responsible for managing the CETA Title I program. The Manpower Advisory Council has been es- tablished to provide citizen and client input into the planning of neer programs. Members of the Council, in a manner reflective of the groups represented, serve on its four standing committees: (1) Planning; (2) Evaluation; (3) Proposal; and (4) Grievance. Each of the first three committees played an active role in the preparation of the fun^..i=& proposal for Fiscal Year 1976 (July 1, 1975 - June 30, 1976). *bre than. 500 -- curs were expended by the Manpower Advisory Council and its committees in the p_eparation of the Fiscal Year 1976 proposal. To assa--e that clients' rights are adequately protected, the Department of Labor has race-t?y directed each of the prime sponsors to develop grievance procedures which are iz accordance with commonly followed federal grievance procedures. - A plan is currently being developed for the clients in all CETA operated programs, i.e., Titin I, 11, and VI. This plan will make use of a County Hearing Officer to assure fa-mess and objectively in the handling of grievances. Qt:arterly program and Fiscal evaluations of all subcontractors of Fiscal Year 1975 program were conducted by staff of the County Manpower--Project and submitted to Lha :'_=power Advisory Ca-n cil. mese reports compared program results ::ith pro- gran performance standards and dete^ined the effectiveness of subcontractors' fiscal procedures. As a result of these reports, some subcontractors were not reco=ended for refurdin, for Fiscal Year 1975. The decisio: not to continue some Fl: 1975 programs was rade by the Board of Supervisors upon the recce---endation of the "3npower Advisory Co%;a=i1. This decision was based on time failure of the subcontractors of these pro;r=.s to achieve standards established for the educa- tion/training/job placemen._ of CETA I enrollees. 00347 D. Utilization of Coi..:.unit} Fes._--_s In conducting its Title I C_:- Program, =: "_apo::er Advisory Council followed the Board of Supervisors' that lcza= public and private agencies be given prior considerat_on for the trair_i-B of enrollees. Two school districts served as subcontractors for classroom :.raining programs. Several CETA ea7011-ees participated in Regional Occupational Progra= (POP) classes coordinated by the office of the County Superintendent of Schools. Support was also. recieved from the State Department- of Vocational Rehabilitation which assisted in the purchase of tools and equip=..,_nr for enrollees who graduated from classroom traifir_g pro- a=d required special equipment in order to take advantage of job openings. Of -the 15 Title I C=A subcontractors for Fiscal Year 1975, approxira_ely five .,are local co=unity agencies, one was a national agency, and another was an in- d�-.��d�t coasultan._. of these subcontractors had experience in operating manpower programs prior to tlha estahLshne=t of CETA. ... ?rc__zm =?er_bi__' and Resaonsiveness of Client Needs. The structure for the CETA I Programs was designed with the inters tion p v_=gig ?rime sponsors with a maximum of flexibility in responding to enrn'_- =.=-eZs. Consistent with this intent, the Board of Supervisors approved the 1975-1976 program in order to: (1) se=-e _ =teaer number of enrollees with its limited funds; and (2) enable iz to respond to changes in the labor market. III. TITLE I KnC-R_-'_v =eLISH2L:.�TS A. Program =_e-=as Provided Clients An a:):):nita1 o= :he CETA I program requires a comparison of programs and services p1a-med zzd provided to enrollees. The chart immediately following fur- �ishaS this '-^.-:J=azion: PLANNED ACTUAL 2 OF ?ROCR._M AC'iI= CLIEYTS SERVED CLIENTS SERVED PLAti ACHIEVED Ciassroo= Tr ni^3 (?r i1e Sponsor) 450 457 106.6 Classroom '_rraini=g (Vocational Education) 103 155 150.5 On-ire-.iob Training 53 14 25.0 l.o,k: :-?e=ience 1,3CO 1.512 166.3 - 1107AL 1,c'3 2,135 112.3 _�_ 00348 As can be seen in the precea __�: data, _ore C`A enrollees benefited from the program activities provide- .:.^.'_pr Title I 1975 than had been pla=ned in each activity except B. Place=ent in Unsubsidireu7,iD o%-_ent Only a small percentage o: first-year Title r participants have bean termimaz_d End-of-Year data reveals that only 776 of the 3,141 (2417x) clients who pexis- teres. for the CMA Title 1 Program were terrminated during the year. (Wi:h its available funds the program was able to provide services, such as counseling, job p'acemeat assistance, child care, transportation, legal assistance, etc. , to o^.+y 2,138 (68 ) of the 3,141 rostered clients.) Of the'776 ter,.inated, 347 (4=•;) were placed in permanent unsubsidized employment. Another 35 (4.5%) were cc---ted as positive terminations (e.g., returned to schuol, jo .ned the ser- vice;. Tae other 394 (50a) participants were listed as non-positive ter- i=atio^s (enro-e s looking for work, enrollees who could not be located). The factors help explain Why more enrollees were not placed i_^_ peraae*!t, unsubs:-zed emnloymnt and why more were not positively terminated. First, l nem- ployme-z _zreased drastically since the program's inception. In 1973, the nation~ .=emloymant rate was 4.9% with a total of 4.4 million individuals out of work_ =.-cent unemplo}-...ent statistics for the nation reveal that 8.4X, .or a total o= : -411ion people, are now without jobs. The unemployment rare for Contra Costa Coi=—. which was 5.5Z in 1970, increased to 9.2X in early 1975. This in- crease has li� a devasting impact on employment prospects of those who are con- sidered dix3vantaged, such as those with limited skills or work history. Second, the Board o. Supervisors, acting on a reco-rcendation of the Manpower Advisory Council, de:4ded that enrollment in CETA Title I Programs should be limited to .individuals who met federal poverty guidelines or who were welfare recipients. The net result of these requirements was that 1002 of the CETA Title I enrollees fell into the "economically disadvantaged" category, (compared with a national CETA average of 76X disadvantaged). In addition, 52X of the CETA clients were receivi:lg some form of public assistance, (compared with 26X on a national level). In su--r- Taary, the number of permanent unsubsidized CETA I job placements was inhibited by the ace lerated rise in unemployment and the decision to limit CETA enrollment to those persons whose educational/work experience backgrounds placed thea among the least desirable employment prospects. It should bz emphasized that within Contra Costa County over 20,000 �persons are unemplovetd_ The CETA Title I program received approximately $2 million for train- ing iariv- .als for permanent unsubsidized employment. The limitation of funds received i.= this County, as well as on a national level, prevented CETA from proviaimg services to a high proportion of the persons who registered for training. C. Affir.3=ire Action Part of rhe intent of the CETA Title I program is to provide traini::g to those. individuals who have peen traditionally handicapped in the labor market, such as woven a=d minorities. The table 10110wi-- p=Jt=�?i a tabuiaz:4zn of the extent Of particiDation in the 197:-1975 program by wo`en ani minorities_ -6- 00349 a to !In ATLIL Counseling 755 (2-;.3:;) 559 (17.9:>) 1,500 (48.1%) 3,119 Classroom Training 150 (25.2:x) 128 (21.C%:) 317 (51.90 611 Job Develo?men. Attempt 235 (24.6;) 145 (15.00 465 (48.1%) 956 Or-Tne-Job Training 2 (14.31-1.) 3 (21.4%) 2 _(14.3%) 14 ::o= E�:,e=ience 193 (25.92) 174 (23.47.) 399 (53.62) 745 . --OZAL E_ti3.OLLED 72; (23.12) 595 (18.9-%) 1,597 (50.8'/.) 3,141 Tot_J _e=^mated 200 (25.8X) 137 (17.62) 375 (47.0%) 776 Tozal E=oloved 75 (21.6X) 84 (24.2X) 163 (47.0%) 347 ?lace_-zc late 37.52 61.3% 43.5% 44.71 SLA _ =n light of _e -_i=e restraints under which the first year of the CETA Title I Pro- '-am Was results have been extremely favorable. The number of clients served (?, a) �_e3 the number planned (1,903). Although 100% of the program's enrollees -_ •- i—i ally disadvantaged, with 52% of the enrollees receiving public assistance, of the 776 enrollees terminated were placed in permanent, .unsubsidized employment. m making a small impact on-Co'unty welfare rolls; the training and job placement of this program provided a nuber of residents with a means of economic i—ndepe-m-d�.nce, vocational- satisfactioa and personal self-worth. IV. TITLES II ND Y_ Background Titles 11 and —1 a= CE-A provide federal funds for the establishment and operation of public (PSE) programs administered at the local level by the Cart^. _h-a =—.-ds a_--a sed to provide employment to unemployed and underemployed -sons =esid^g vi_;=-, z•-tis County but outside the City of Richmond (Richmond has is , se=-ate C'_A p=ogram and receives its Junding directly from the Department ofLabor), and to aro:_de for public service needs which have not been met or to inale=ent new aualic sem ces. Lu—IL-.e '_'_-jz 1, lit es 11 and VI activities originally did not fall under the juris- cict?on of the Ma.^.power Livisory Council (IMC). The Department of Labor (DOL) later changed rhi.s pol-icy. L::th PSE programs already operating at that time, the Council's ,role in Titles =i and ZI during FY 74-75 was naturally not as great as that in Title I. It is now the Co-uncil's responsibility to ad-.rise the Board of Supervisors in the set- . ting of basic goals, policies, and procedures for PSE programs. Fiscal Year 1974-75 In Re aw Upon bai a notified by the U.S. Depa___en_ of i.ebor of its initial Title II allocation for Fiscal Year 1974-75, Contra rvs_a �� ..__ s7.__ a letter to all the ci.__s (enz_+�ciag Richmond) and school districts ..__..__ its �.'cs'=dpi:_al boundaries to ascertain whather or not they wished to be consice_e' _or in Title 11 as a subgraatee of the County. The letter e\-plain__ at Title II =ozies were to be used to hire unem- ployed or underemployed County into public service jobs and also cozcaiaed highlights of the federal C£T3 r_---la:ions. Ten cities mad fifteen school d.-;:;:=ices 00350 k 1 v.. indicated a desire to pa.ticipa:e; al= of __re officia?ly a?p:clad for inclusion in the program b. _-._ C:=t 3c--- of the grata agreement on July 31, 197-., by _::e --?=- -_fent of Labor, _.._ Co:--=-;'s Title Ii nrooram was for=ally Departr:e::t was assiT^=d tie respczsibility for its av=::iistration, mete In cite absence of a:iy Mean?c::__ Advisory Co-ncil involvement wor:ced closely wit: tree Office of the Co;.-a=r Ad=i^istra- tor in mating reco=erdations to the Board of Suaervisors. TireCo• .^_r desi;nated the target groups to be served as follows: Veterans, welfare recirie:ts, and former =a-power trainees. The County and its twenty-rive subeca^_teas planned- o- b.ir_.^_g eligible persons into a variety of job classi.ficatioas i=lud_ng slots in a ; t1strative, teaching, clerical and manual labor fields. A number of factors :tate considered in arriving at the positions to be funded, with the ire imports^_= the aotantial of a position to provide its incumbent with eventual permanent, -z=-fedzra?1,y funded employment and the need of the services to be provided. During ear;- Z�ctobe=, 1974, the County was informed by DOL that it would be rece:-r_'ng an additi.o-%=- _`_=_e ?I allocation approximately equal to its initial allocation. This promo:-----; ..a County to send another letter to those cities and school districts which had dec'=-ad to participate and to all other public agencies (special districts, State offices, _c.) within the County for the purpose of determining their interest in participalf-g fn the program. This effort resulted in the addition of six agencies into the Coum=:'s program, bringing the total number of program operators to the fol- lowing thirty-z---o agencies: 1. City of Antioch 17. Liberty Union High School District 2. City of Brentwood 18. Martinez Unified School District 3. City of Concord 19. Moraga School District 4. City of E1 Cerrito 20. Mt. Diablo Unified School District_ S. City of Lafayette 21. Oakley Union School District 6. City of Martinez 22. Orinda Union School District 7. City of Pittsburg 23. Pittsburg Unified School District 8. City of Pleasant Rill 24. Richmond Unified School District 9. City of Wa:..-^..:. Creek 25. San Raison Valley Unified School District 10. City of S-- ?ablo 26. Ambrose Recreation and Park District 11. Antioch ,;� School District 27. East Contra Costa Irrigation District 12. Brentwood ---;oa School District 28. Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District 13. Byron i School District 29. San Pablo Sanitary District 14. John Swart L=ified School District 30. Housing Authority of Contra Costa County 15. Knights.✓. Schwl District 31. State of California 16. Lafaye=_e School District 32. County of Contra Costa Each of the above employing agencies is responsible for managing its own program. Thus, each ag�;.c: does its own recruiting when filling vacancies or new positions may examine eligible app_its, selects its participants, and is responsible for :ainta:rina re- cords in accordance with federal recordkc eping requirements. The national u--emaloy-.mert rate rose at an alai^.g pace in the fall or 1374. Tradition- ally, an =e=??oyment rate exzeeding 6% was ccasida:ed intolerable by most legislators and govar meant officials. The jobless rate crack.ed the S7. mark during the fall and kept creeping upward. In face of the sa3g_ng economy and spiraling Joblessness, the Congress passed and President .4_d si,ed (in lace December) the E=e:genc- 30>> and Uaemplo}m2at Assistance r�.0� .' �3 7- LiiCn, - .0. - other thin-s, creazed a r=-r Title VI in CE A. -8- 00351 Title VI fun-3s were to be used t^ area__ aft=_:_ca? public service jobs, and DOL inforced the County late in Dece=l er t'r. _ of _ e - -�r_az; ne-a jobs should be filled by the end of Jaauary 1975. This gave _:= Cc:._-, a_p::_:i .ely one month to plan and imple- ment its Title VI progra= at 92Z cf the prc7ac_ei erployment level. With itch time, nurerous problems and details had to be ::o_::e3 out_ In order to implement the p=o-- gr2-_ within the time coas_rai ts, staff reco=anded and the Board of Superriso_s approved sharing the. County's Title I'I fund-;::b with the same 31 subgrantees receiving Title H =ti:ding. L oder to quickly fill :ha positions it had established, the County advertised and bald a on_-day job fair in --;d-January at three different locations: Los Tte-daZos, all-ev and C--ntra Costa Colleges in East-, Central and West County, respectively. P_-csp=___ir_ Title VI ?'_a:ees were interviewed and a determination regarding their for the prog_am was made that day. The following day the Civil Service ? a_=�" staff racked _he eligible applicants on the basis of need. he Zzz fair s success was in good part attributable to those 75 County employees who S :h=e✓ sites. 'Nearly ?,000 applicants were processed, and from all reports the ote___-z'—_ z am v?-- s_wothly, even in the early morning hours when long lines rad or_zc. Jacarsz o = massive effort, the County met its hiring goal by the end of Ja:• :__xst -= of the 31 subgrantees also achieved their hiring objectives. During s _ -1975 (actually July 31, 1974 to June 30, 1975), the County and its sub—s— =xDa-^_d approximately $3,564,000 in Titles II and VI funds to pro- vide nea__y 1.- --• ployed and underemployed County residents with needed public service ;t:s_ -_ e total 1,100 persons served, approximately 100 were placed in permanent, ==: f=^�ri?.ly funded employment. While it is true that many of the unemployed e=a moL served because of the limited resources, it can be said that these perso:s --bo o`t-nerwise would have been jobless were provided employment and spared the f_=szon and anxieties of being without a means of support. -9- 00352 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Resignation from the Board of Commissioners of the Bethel Island Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having advised that Mr. John B. Thorpe has submitted his resignation as a Commissioner of the Bethel Island Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County effective May 1, 1976; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the resignation of Mr. John B. Thorpe is ACCEPTED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the doord of cc: Bethel Island Fire Supervisors. Protection District affixed this 20ttSay of April 1976 County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Public Information Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Bv, c►.-� -^ n Clerk Rondalynn Shackles H-24 ;/76 15m 00353 f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Complaint with Respect to Development in Minor Subdivision 8-75, Danville Area. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having called attention to an April 12, 1976 letter he had received from Mr. Hilliard E. Roze, 23 Sky Terrace, Danville, California 94526, transmitting related correspondence pertaining to a previous complaint regarding develop- ment of Minor Subdivision 8-75, Sky Terrace, Danville area; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Director of Planning, the Acting County Building Inspector (Grading Engineer) and the Acting Public Works Director meet on the subject site with Mr. David G. Earnshaw, Subdivider, in an attempt to arrive at a solution satisfactory to all parties concerned. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing h a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c. M r. H. E. Roze Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. D. G. Earnshaw Sx'pervisom Director of Planning affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 Acting County Building J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Inspector (Grading Engineer n�ji`'Counsel Public Works Directo y `'` ''` F Deputy Cleric" 2aMina Robbie Gutierrez County Administrator ` 00354 �, 1 3Ic' by } ;L 1 i� w ri 3 i3 K 1' 4 II r s � 9 �`., S "Y e 2 d k £ 3 e t'+ei,eai ray r 1.I ♦ " - r t"� ., ,, '�y' IV, 23 S Texrace° h$' 3� ` Llaay..33.e, :`Caufora .F' a v,µ I x3m . I , , ,- I I.I 1, I I , �I , _'� � �,I,��l I-i_�,� .�,,lrl 1� I ) .. t V I- .- Supervisor E. A.'AJj schaid � I x- " m ;43 C�.vc Arenas1. 't` * , p7.tt '11- Sbu11 rg, x03'.217.8 T* s5s a� je,� !_ = `�+ OkStJPER4h30 . 3?ear S merv_sor ,dzscheid: . s ■ ' �4*y You a� T,e, gc$ iasis co .catzoas tQ� yom fi~om� �,r.�;HobSa Sit x'oroer � � S Terrace Sor2eo�ers' Associatiaa k Aanv7: { ixh ' h ,gc sir ass7.stanc- +gas .solicited to ob.77 ta7 n zimmoi�ve=act an oaf Aesac o �� s x auerzes, conc�ernc andl' cacplaiats reg� dzaS the deac f2op�ent dace ¢4 � -- w Ito. " 3$ �13J=13.� £7.3.ea. :�I.S."$-?5. : You::�ray<aZsoecall tha �tle .Associ11 ation meat to .voa because of its exaepesatfaa az1c frustiatoat¢ repeated, uns:zccesszlil attecpts to el7.cit a reco77_1rd respanse� roa ` 33r. athQay haesus-, erector of glann3.ng: y k r m� ` , -or 2nths ,1. the ,�ssoc11 I iat7.on pressed'111-11 +nor aasr:ers but rtes aet, th�� � lllll � a rent y deLberate� avoiaanca "il :g'.and de erxa?"bIllg.County �+Y lclllaldd�' `lz �s - x � l �r� 3 tach sof the Assoc7.at7.oa's ezfarts to tract: Cvuatr, aI'llnds ccatratc orJi eve., n ccvunta�ia3�.tg den to`"not'a=ziS Wore hhaa s+�eace°or tor- 11tnred,r€aLiaa zatzo_ ° q o� I10. cn$one ar :�vnethi n�� el1.se has �nrisdictzoa*lljriso iha cease Jaz a -7 r 2� ".�,,i % v� y"` ski ,J,,r T r i8u_."t• z i } �.: + ,kjfN 3 riP� .Mfr .. �'f _ .: A vj P �F 9' bkt Yk l - 11 .1-1aTo refresh yo1:r ecaLecti_11oa and avoid a �-eueta tiaa Ili ;thfs^z ett,-- ..a„� x $r',have 'thy endu* tce), of"the hist o� � ". 11.1 , b ecause 1310 30 . � )~atter, rt I th7.s hiv' 8ttached CO .. pies. of ell, of the sage casespoadeac aid relsted�� } do1. cuz~ents prev�ons3y, sent to.you bg-the ssvci atioi:. 4 %: - ,� - 4 i S i y a,$'a 6 Y.:; - .� } l } C.,AT t3lrvugh t21is cerszste2tce tis rhessocsataton .7.aalZg abler tai Se1 � aaprgpr..ate ,Caun of ,cia?s to#confraat the Assaciatzoa's c ea y ad � thea on3,y 7 n ,an off the-recon: reet> an J Z�, 1 "Ja izrr Cau�1 �y offices au}3�arta�ez. >I `sa1.y "off the record:�F beca�ls�deieait�" t,04 e � , 99 a �tPxtorapher or othe*� Co2nty`:assistance to..transcribe, reca ;�c *a ; tt` Zeast ,".cuaaarsae ,ache nrccee 7.arl-taa�, :none :.as prov�.dedttht" fi 4 320 > a ttea response;•to cost of the :ssoci atioa's .q vers es s€as� eyed nra3e" hserihe3ess auk a because..,reuresexitat7.ves zxas the'' �.ssccxatio2bro' , s r iae recto- 75 '.the', e . g;uaa ,cap=,,,, 'om tape. �� rc -�4 . Without Scsz into-ill of: the contractor am _ CCu22t1r dit e£f ci`esz&l . xr! ���, .ol,tisane ev7.aence3 os: said taipe a :other Aesoca ct•*aur' docunan iwj�ax M < 1.i~ ue .t3Zat �ose �out of the ?•.idicrons scenes o of tc praise •n dais'+o'1111.u1!i- rzont �;;as . csasLtio�1 o . j n the perit aate3 to the deve?over .`zeeE at.tsche� + �. rr cca3• .of the hers t sated _sr�i 2;,, ? ?5, =th effective;` date; of r', r 2�vl_, � , $, 1 73. 3 gU©te this Coad3�i u. ""ra�cel 3 sha13 hcve access acral arca' t v3.a a 2�' access ,easeasent a: sban oo. the.�.ttcched, staff study. dais t to 4`g be uoae:s0:tags ttbe access as cel3: an the ut S sties sersring,,Farce's ,3 t r. � , � �. 4 aVOIA ,t}ae ..actjxe 'lira zlide area." 11. _ r11 � s.. w t ����� , + br i* +, 'S` +� 'h �., t s d 3 s f .,er ' y �� ' };-s*a. ''� �. R 7 fi n *.r sg t 7 r x a + ,Y ,„v - y may^+.,: { �: ti `,. r r. , qq x x� 1 '- a € " +,._.. w, ti .y a s 9 €' i�. k h ss.`' .r�ea.Rb.�y ry 'r t r rt k, q - ..„;r., .,. .., ;,..., `"{ 3.r d sh e� rv£ 11 .�.. s.wm c_v s„ �.� b>Fx,�, M`n' ,.. .3 -... . a, ^ .r5 . „-wz+. e'.:,.F> .. d�.is;� .e"Ur._'� s;,. �. 111 k,: Suoerv� or +. t d f br3.ngs Qe to .the .naia poi at of` this; i atter, s?�eci xcar22g }ti host recent' an=td d . ry ~3?�` Capra . 5 treach,+n�, has dna froa';the ressdezice an Parcel' tIc�u� ; th 3oer (easy? end..of sand. Farce? :out :to tha road,, -17 namZaa 1 . A'G k 4 r� yy access easement. across Frrcel .A uha,ch is at; the opposite- esti eiia Sof Parcel . This trenching Zs presus bly for the vu rpase of under roimc a� te3enhone, gas and e?ectrie coaaectons and cable. I'�st sere yau�end ;x`a � other rsasonarbLe pe==ons uonld.,'consider.'these to be "utslit es" �partfculaarl h h ;,,addd a.ntent of Conditiono. �,.`' Snst pr. o ta�� tl ` ►ara3.le1 trench Hong the sane ;route to theE romd wast dugs ta�acceg 3�ne--this 3atte: a�or has=bead co =ted. 1 ' r +ot�.ths a31 .of ,the- previous:da.a_99ae, correspondence, avis t `` tanda.ag etc., etc. s t„h the contractor and snpposedlg;resaonsa b2e Count of ,1d Y and .thaortaant erasies on xco�gl sarce nth Condition Aa. 5,�ths ; ; i P F ssocsatzoa zs left holding a bag of air: '?his latest epsi debasaso�* � ze .l /smaa.l yes ge Of faith` and >credibz2.ity tbnt they CO mg hai�e ` retsluea o n tha.s Batter u "tot a Ssr, there is no uav that. these latest acts can be cans;deec aagtbiia abut a b3ataat violation and :travesty of Conditiow,po. Tis Condi x y' haws as mach';fOroe :as the rhetoric we to on';" I noth�agaaore t'nan: '"jive".. '&e'.ve :�irtply been,shove?ing aixeeat thetde fo xt re than a,:year: in.our attempts to `overcoas..,County z:xegtitn a ands aasaroy a= cotaip3aaace,,becauae•of the laads3�de risks attendant to the develoFaeai a 1 � ,r�vp . i � ... MY pn �pr3]. 9a , cJ?S s I c;e33ed aTi County official..,uhO' E � sdect�knora da of sad :�:tensa bility for w car a aspects of this developcteai�iia X Aaccption. e . toad me phot .s nor an:obvious assent Cll ondition o.. County enforce butt'. Fee safc rth ` aCoridation �s ba cal 1. ,not enforceable rem the usiderauno N "Ur es. en\'I then."asked phot' a:t ora the perttatn they first`uce� j he.i3`ep�3.et On!�. ..�CItOT., why.�' �� "�������tg rVtl J, ale Zncongr.s:.ty of .a13 this is .even nor=;wind bagg'!.fng , heagau�'cau- _ cr u swder ;the #03,3.on sfiateaent front. . a'. Searfus, Gr$din eex ��p to`Iar. p. s e"nshau, ,coatraetor/deve2epers. .-n ax.letter c attic u13� 22� tree copy attached?: "shereforc, he a37w. ed that zf auk gradiugk`,o to tc .s :done 3 n the are= of std peed access oxt psrce! yov : b' 014 4 t�.+ a of,rxCOad=tion , ;and 'till "be res u�ced to;baud goo ;soil eag ne st:cuendataons for ars�per restorstoa of: naturalac2es." et encba �.s exactly iu the yes of the str;pied access.'oa Parcel.:B� - 1 m r '-_NPZ`'3i We've .come to the end--the kJ bottom lice. . played for,$uckers, chuee ;� n , kuch of the t:: d effort;atp? reati, tasted, a»sept for 'tie`bitter =ducat .on. ' :l his has o be<a ciao= classic in the reale of absurd � . . . _ � � : , is„ rear Contra Costa County,Ccvern..snt. Is it' e day. andcs` :.:s..x -peaaalc carr eatl; vie: Cove_ ent iastitut�on Lith: $o Much aontA x t- -3 also a Bove_ ent esp oyee (aur case confirm the suspicion. t'as t all along V-G*-sire been as,ks a� x�ra -'to . tcb .the blood bark. It is no lcaCex a c� that` "you; catn"t ii t ci To request and riecaund full coepli;,.nce with,' _�u bore :as mush mean#g and effect as-tie_.ans as 9*9eaa he'! .e act a tern fi � `� x d �.ni4i ell u Experwisor S. A � d • !pail 12, 1576 • Page 3 postserint: Dna to our exhaustion over this :hole scene and the feelinG that it could be uceleta to keep on the trecdcIll to mothere, the Association did not respond to t:.o partly false reports, each dated January-23--see copies attached. +:os that the opportunity 7resents Itself, you should be apprised of the followiuff: 2eference G 3 = 3 A. 3e:ort A. S:r ONVI:rM 1S 5-75 fhe folloWft quoted statements are false: . - Pang. 3 - "...there in no indication that the sever trench is within the attire slide area." the am er trench aervinG Parcel A does cut across the active slide area behind and below the pump house. We fact una f1mm237 acl= ledged at the aforementioned ceating on January 1;, 10,76 and recorded on the lazociatfon's tape of the pro- ceediara. �pparentll, the rerresentative from the Sanitary District % o npgroved this &-ever 13ne (and who :as also at the January 13 coating) tan not notified of ay active landslide area *_mor to or during his inspection. rarG. b - tl...no rradinG or trenchin;r in the construction - access tould be permitted and the area must be restored and not further used upon completion of construction." +his otateaent refers to the construction access to Parcel 3. I need onLy to redirect you, back to the farts of this 'Tetter pertaining to the recent trorehiaG on Parcel 3. It occurred along said - construction oceeri: area. Parg. 5 - "lb date, there have boom no drainage problems.1e More Ls a ceverre drriosge runoff from Parcel L In early !.C75 Lhich da`atred one of the residences on Sky Terrace--see f=ast narmeraph of the attached copy or Ii. Scith's letter to Fx. 3ehaesus dated Gctober 7, 19975• W. to janucry 17.9 X-176, there tore no sub- rtaat;ve dr;in--,e i:.provecerto to rectify thin .roblen. Zae .::accintioz Tan r:erely tr;int: to 7-reelude z -ecurromme of such :.cter damage. Gbvious;3y, up to this date t1here tare no further 4r_ia.ge p.-obleta because there was no rsinw-ank Unsone in California thin past Mater. Did we have to crit for a _food again to confirm the drainage def_eiency': of a<;k s 3 a r et '! i € iI� 'I! L, IIII i' t n i„L `; h4 ,i,e _ •v's�:i i. ^ a,i k ti ` t f€ �14 I't �1f E.i'v(�I„ ; E€� �+ (., } k.:�'+� +5 k. ,�,lL perrL suer:S yJLo �Lnsa"O' id '' {; "Al �„ w F w;Q Iu �i f iG s t I,i I I I.; r�x 'w i�° z�� f 3, � y[� E:; f ;a, 3 ��I€II�I€ % µ � �L,,»a§ k��fa'�'- n�2-k 6 €i€�'-.� l t�� SII I �.. yhx'zZ " k h �""k x�"!Q'4 '11111 ''s J3 <3"';td.P �f�„'�. ��+"kri �$�f`i ��� "gg I! iIV 1 C+ 4t r 1 b t '.+ s x r '&5 i¢a —�' �a e I, r m �,e� ,-ai. 11 tBJ3 W7 € �p�.. -s t t i ,'#,8._aA iiiiiliQ t E IIaf►S f M4a+RQd.llt ��$0),,"�,.,..,57R".;rn ,� �r"��r' : n , this sa�eort tue refereacto� re4 ITeca af:� !@.,K`te tt r CQYtlarmuc tgs"� C1LUF 1'.II ?.n31=.a z` os#aa ices, and the cowuat'ns,o� Ig mill c11 aatznue to .des sa•4 mat -��� J .,#. r `t z Nf t R s'S�"�W4C1' g x n �m ' r - a �. h11 r ...t%• F f b vi. k �M ^Y" #C R +e3he�CB " T1th@ .�attsr O ,` 3eoz't ri ACSIxad$2dII a���E� -11s iS '�8 Dane area3 " � 'llProblems �a .Subdi v3slan ?5, a <t 6 ift x' * k 4 g„"�. ¢✓F.i .a54 µa4 ! ate 3ooxing quoted stAte�ten111111tsµarer 3alse ° `* s z {4� 41. , r; ears �•� Bob 6IIZtlt to Press deAt PBr$'� b..�.a ],�tt8 3ra� r-2 ,"" 11 I ei'ra •� e cc. �0136ot hers. S14 -OC ,'-a are.:, Coacera tbar,i an cxeS81D� dx�e problems, caused cons I byes — ,_< Q ' a Se7r6r �� ..��}t � a�>� s ,� � � - x �� , ii ' 5%".tea, .' , . w' .Y'.� taOr�anyone"Ill e1S8'fratbe� sso . IIe9er 11 sand fihat._const I. Ftics ofd Mesa# - 4 f aA�x y r, k •x.'1 3 S dab 5 Caused.the .']l��ndsldew, dr�taa8e ] Thz6 stateneIIb bas3theyMatters.a� g a cense and effect::a12 garbs edgup. 3 �v T• Sias t _'s--Co rresswstdIII a 1 R € �� i r-:11 � }� — • '� I, i Marg. 2. ";,I'll Grades,s neer.•.bad 'Fouad no g - k arableas««.!� c r n r�:v, 11r�5 a . " 1. 3 y �§ - �, a �111 �a w F 11118 t b8 trues that>s ' ~ r �h x ,, ouad dry - bad res orted teat he:f ZIM ,, &� cane nsan that there sasHna►� n '` prablort is incori�Sct M 'I!ve -11 ead; c e e matter;. It!s a good exa�ale o bm, sta_Sl Can be tSchnz cairSct�bub ca11 �vey _ i* 1Lt�e882aII« {� yF r V. ,Tin'" �,5� �. rn £ d2'u -6 1 f � r y1 .� 5 � � x . c3osu s L.etter..,to S=CrV3 sor� , „« ..Z�nscItesd dated 12 ?7r� , !Order.fra»s 3oard `+of Suce,, , rs aated ,12/2�LLI1/' x } ; ,�� - s.;etter to Supervisor, 3. •:-ra nschead ,date311 L� 12/?5� � `1- I 11-1 ?W 11 etter to s1w der ace : seat erW j—__ .row. Camtra Co11,st�Go s-? naaa .Ce�at. dated 2Q/I /?5 t :r: �arsir I€K. e c a dste;��f�� I =ette'" `to Kr ,�. .pehaesus,. erector of � �� x "i a �� �' t x-�t"".a. pi`Cp ., a�etter..to p. -f. 4i:F3'nShB�c s�atsd° / � _ Z4.i r}, '" " 111 w `3ae tel 'ta "`' �« Cs. '31^Xtff `.8xt »Ated h ,/ �3' f O tS sr0 P+t:,=mit tedr�-/2SL./?5.. sf3cctiVel- ,f'9 ?5. ;fie: fa. I w assessor."11�s Paxce3` o.,2tlL--i3t�--22 � ��` Imp tt.C21ed11 -L to 5taf $ecat :eudot1ons, Boerd cf kdml ustaeni , ' 'j - .. 11 I "o tsc .pt :' c3as �cs� ;,"#-Re& iss O � PubUc Marts' Jep yda Ix 7� 11 C�rtzer .iron Bozrc� cf u:*erv?sCrs da' ed I/z?,E'7 ;„ 3 i.. �, l �� �_ ! 411 Ir c S 4 , N11 f y' 4} �`�3 ty '� t. k2. fi g 4 b ty. �t tl fi � ;� '�k 5�,} -', ;`s. ,r t_111 ., r +.,,�� P ret 3+ � ' MNw M d jr xrj s. a s a�"f^ .'n..S �w:2r""wspi,ry ' c�+i +�4r^b. `�r..c f rs ss., 3 '^Et y,}p"°«r -, :t d S r -Y^ a`u'�^�p!'y a 4„ I: vt :”. v5,_- "' .... D 'h':^'. t ',';.� a r ,xr:,r 't `thu;4' -',� „" .g ig, ISI ��!11jla ���' '�"" " �" 43a y ''y` ,$° `'.,�..,. .,. ..,..itil"�",.,s`+' p,na '�..,'".y�"',X"'S, .. r.; ^x Yt „v,C ~w ��° frk#e� r?'�.�,f :!� i �, I��i 11 II II4�' o �� 9€ it Q A r Supervisor E. A. cbeid � APril 12, IG?b Page 5 cc: A. . Youn , Plrnning Co=issioner A. A. Debaesus, Director of Planning . N. L. Halverson, Sr. P17nner County 3u_lding ins-pector J. A. Searfus, Gradinsr Enineer V. V. Sauer, Public :'I=rks Director I�. ;,*alford, Dept. of Public larks G. A. aorsthatte, Jr., General U-macer-Chi of Zagineer, Contra Costa aaWitary District J. HcCoy, Senior :-:n;.ineer, Contra Costa Sa i tarf District 00359 1 IMCZI at�B• iS SOCItTM • . 23Shy Terrace ' Dansi3le, ft"forma %N% i Decedber 5L9 1975 j Surervioor S. A. Lirraohoid 115 Civ�..c Avenue • . ;• . Pittsburg, crli.fo,-iia Dear St orvisor Mucabolds s In a 2afteir to you• '• . dated ..ovedbor ]2, 1;75 (copy attsohed), �•. we requested that yon investi.Gsto come problem regardinC the . • eievolopneat of tuo Vrseclm of Und at the upper northcemt and of Shy Terrace In Vahville--refs:once File Co. X.S. F-75. AmMepeor'o .•.. :._ •• .�f;:r:. Parcel Vo. 203-150-11. 3hese bsve•widuted for an iaosdivare •.r•, *taunt of tine and romilm norm olved. • Ce wrote to you be:cau.re ce bedu't received a reepanue (other than an admoclak- went of receipt--ce. nttoehod eo_jy dated October 1.3, 1;75) to our a ncs on to Er. AnthosW A. A'Ma.:..um, Director of P2 auIzC, In a. '•• . totter data i October 7, ISMS (espy e.tcehed). To dato, the 91;.nninG Deptirtment still basalt rW..Uod %.Seh ttr Eln4IvWu or r•nythiuS &In*. ' :�. i:viiasr�e .�.y re:uouL baa perLma +•ou d cumie<da Vaot P iupeaee of eti3most • ' : three coaths in more t*:-A ample 3ice for oacaaro to the uncoaplicatod que`ct;oun vne: rues In our letter. Le:m•h;le, eonatructiaa eaat.Lneo :•� . as tefor n.on the riasr aWadfvIclou, but our +ingoiriee remain an daed canter Uth the responalb?a Couatt cGoneleo. t .. ' •. •. 6 Aside freer the above, boLever, ce ease a,sin writing to you became of cur concern over :tat tppee:r in the Board of fuperviaors Order of ::env,.:mer 3.f, 1:15 (eop4 attaeaed) to be a Mzdtod interprets- !� tion of the is sues bran,-ht to your attest;on in our Coveaber 22 letter. :.::.. Tho I'd-mi.nage pr:ble:c" In only one of savant that sofa us apprehanaive • . over the SaWU prant of the tLo pr rcerlc. For emermple, r o c2so reforred to thea 0:1.2 .re2t l:Lsra=•tI=V Of the eeyor line froe Percel A (and now ;• -. L3.--o fro. kurc.l D) i:: coucLug con:rmention of Condition Ito. 5 is the porri.t E.tatod to the deerveloaor by the D!roet@r of PlVnUIaC6--t00 , . .. attached copy of the :erait dated April 25, 1;?5 crd effective dote , •y A!wll 2., 1•f?5. t: a learned that the Centm-I Contra Coats Bunit.•ery Motrict did not recai ve a copy of the pe:nit, nor sem it othmn.ice notified by ap-;rapric:to Cwmty W=Gimo of the poreit l s condition; the Inuftrlide areas, a-• the coil report.) In addition, ce es!urecead .. concern ever the e:on:trretion oece m to kareal I3, tbieh we believe in . u2co in violation of Condition ::o. 5 and apperrs intended to be wade ' the _v*= Lrut drive,-my cceeas to raid ti rc:l--:.c:.fa, a breach of Condition :10. 5. ' 003601 . Sone other I.-sues sere atipulated in the aforer_entioned letter to ; : Mr. Debaecuss of October ?, chich Me al:o bed enclosed tith our Rovers- f bar 12 letter to you. however, in :rder to =void rut-ir, you a tone an this ratter, se sinply referred -to "additicnsl p_robluca" and requested you to "InvestiGate the entire rrobleae. re rnt;cipated that you, roprocentativen from your office, er even respona:+bla officials. frog the eypropricte County agencies, .ould contact or root with the 51-,/ - Terrace Noseotners' Ascoeiaticn as ya_rt of the invr.tiGation to clarify mad %o over r_11 of the issues and E-ive us epecifie finding, mud tumors for the record--this hasn't happened. The additional orobleas are: 1. The building alto on Parcel D rpparently diffors fro= the location on the xrcel rap %blah vas: cr1,,-3nc2ly approved by the Board of•Ad justecnt and the P3snniag Department. 2. To cozT.0 r•:th Condition Yo. 9 of the pere{t, the developer Is reguireik to improve Bey Terrace &long the develo_rcont frontm;-e to a ''reasonable ridth". ' e went aceurarce that such widening r l= be. "ova solely an the north side (i.o., davelopcent side) of Shy Terrace. 3. In accordmee s.itb Condition Voe 9. the developer In also I •. required to leprose Shy Torr:co ales,, the development ;. . fronta,Ge to "renconable.....staudcrds tith pavenent and • . neceecnry drr1 Le." De.rite ie_uiriea to the County, se : hmve not been able to rnacffie.11y ascertzin 0:ather the ueveioner rill oe ro irm! to co--ol etely resurface thin � .'• portion of the road or cere]y perforu sore patehcork, The Major part of thin froucage himu beau too bad3 &-=red by heavy cons-ruction rehiclen to be corrected by mnything lean than full rarurfac r'G. -et, ce amnot get a cormituent on + thin tatter. . In ssutonry, our primary concornrover the doveloprent of thio minor ' - subdivision are rooted it the fact that it is occurring in a raosn, active 2anda2lde coram. You can, tberefore, understand that adverBe affect a Undrlide'could hare, not only an the development but alto an � the warmundind properties. Furteeercore, Sky T lu a private road sad the Acsociation han to bear the responsibility and costo of cointononee. ` the County De arteent of Public !oeks and/or other County vCencies appear not to have the jurisdiction or izn#erert that they do for County:-r:erviced i road::.) t ' Iy r-e are, tkerefaro, appeal5jW, to yeti for rerolutiaa of all of our i questions becaure &a have found.to cur di_•* cqq t1at the s;unpecodly �• res+onelble County cL,*o cies re Lave contz cted have generally boon non- roopoaaive, proerartivat;ng, or Sion-eouvitts:l roenrdinE; our rueries. Bather than continue threuGh :such a labyrinth of bureaucratic eireur- locut;on, we have turned to you. Your early response :.ill be r. rrec-4-ted. incorely, . ern-T,.!/c4+O r s. f$7[ i ti�a'.:.: �+Gi'.s�• rs�' ' I+:.:GCL:iIG.'f JPJ*- :�r•=•..N/•lv Dab SL`it'•!= Chair-nun if Mow.... ••,?r_MR,2% r 00361 - / ` In the Board of Supervisors • of Contra Costa County, State of California November 18 , 19 75 In the Matter of Complaint Regarding . Development o4 Lewd, Danville Area. • Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having brought to the attention of the Board a letter from Mr. Bob Smith, President. - Sky Terrace Home—• ovmers Association, advising of its concern that the development =of two parcels -of land at the end of Sky Terrace, Danville area is proceeding in such a manner as to possibly cause a drainage problem and requesting an investigation of the matter; and " IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid letter is RLPLRRED to the Public- Works Director and the •Acting County Building Inspector for review: and report to the Board. PASSED by the Board on November 18, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dcte aforesaid Witness my hand and the Sea) of the Board of cc: t/fr. Bob Smith Supervisors Sky Terrace Homeowners affixed ;his 18th day of Uovember , 192A Association Public 11orks Director9J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting County Building gy GY, _ „ n _A'let Cy.'� .� Deputy CIerF, Inspector Rondalr n Shac:les Director of Planning 611362 Ji 23 SJ7S Iptl Epp P T-crace Homeowners Association c j u -sub Smith, President 20. Sky Terrace Danville, CA 94526 November 12, 1975 Supervisor E. A. Linscheid ' 45 Civic Avenue _ Pittsburg, CA 94565 ' . Dear Supervisor Linscheid: ; The purpose or thin letter is to ask you to investigate a problem that exists in our neighbo-i:Io6d _�iti` Danville. We have con- . tacted the appropriate County offices in Martinez and have attended several -public meetings regarding this problem. Additionally, we have experienced frustration in our a_ ;?cmpts to resolve this problem with the contractor. -The problem is centered around the develonmenr of two Parreis of land on the end of Sky Terrace. in Danville. As the attached documents will show, there is an active landslide on this property. We are not convinced that the property is being developed in such a manner to preclude any further slippage. one of the conditions of the permit that was granted to develop the property was that all of the utilities will run across anjl ease- ment provided on parcel A. We believe that the sewer line serving parcel A does in fact run across the landslide area. We have tried to ascertain this from the County and they do not respond. A driveway for construction access on parcel B also runs through the slide area; we believe this to be in violation of the spirit of the permit. In developing this properly, the natural runoff of the water has been changed. While the contractor has assured us orally that he will provide for the safe drainage, we are concerned that the winter is at hand and the danger of water damage exists. j Last year one homeowner in our association suffered severe damage to his home as a result of this exact situation. We have asked both the County and the contractor to provide us with tem- porary relief; we have not received answers from either of them. 00363 . rt man Supervisor Linscheid . November 12, 1975 -• Page 2 J There are additional problems that we have not been able to resolve after trying for several months. The legal advice we have ., received is to ask you to please investigate the entire problem i for us. We do not want to litigate this matter, but we are pre- pared to do so if necessary. {, Although this is a condensed outline of this situation, we would be eager to provide you with a more comprehensive report. . , Please be in• contact with us at your earliest convenience. . • Thanking you in advance and awaiting your reply, Bob Smith 4: President Telephone: 376-0782 BS:tiv " 00364 NINO COMMIfiION M[M0�11ti ANTHONY A. OCHAZSUS CONWA COSTA COUNTY Q`" "TOR OF"ANN'N` � ALD E. ANDERSON, .a011�GA RT R. COMPAGLIA, MAMnNCZ TST A 7LT)+ T(� D PARDENT LARD D. HILDEBRAND. WAu+UT CRC" r'"J�('�J„�ji�t l.i.w .w ARO J. JENA. u. sOswaNtt IAM L MILANO.PITT"UNG COUNTY ADMINISTRATION OUILOING. NORM WING ' STODDARD. wICNMOND P.O.BOY 931 REW H. YOUNG, ALANO MAR71NE2'..CALIFORNIA 24353 PHONIC 226.1000 October 10, 1975 Sky Terrace Homeowners Association { c/o 23 Sky Terrace * Danville, California 94526 '` Attn: Bob Smith, Chairman of the Board Dear IMr. Smith: Our office received your letter of October 7, 1975 on October 9, 197S, in which }'ou requested that our office review the conditions of approval on Minor Subdivision 5-75. !ie have sent copies of your letter to the County Grading Engineer and Flood Control District and have requested that they inform us on the status of the improvements and drainage problems on Mnor Subdivision t` i� Ue will inform you of our findings when we have heard from the above County agencies, :,-, - Sincerely yours, F I. Anthony A. Dehaesus Director of Planniipg Norman L. Halverson Senior Planner NLH:1sw f .. . cc N.S. S-75 . Jim Searfus, Grading Engineer Flood Control District Bob Hodgson 00365 N " IF r4 f� ttlG. $ '` Y S aw'� , f d .� e� J 44 F Y S . v J A Y� { T2 _ y�. - K a :� Fay T z �.t a z i t i� I 1, , *;",�',,,�:','-, -4; , , 15 t: �iCS, I�S.SOG?.i13'Ztgt , d - � �' t�ft,Ai,'J6 f ,.� 1 w!g ..ti. ii :. �'1 ��t J r �i.. 'l ;k. �I !�:� �,I '.��4dc, t .Y. 4J^ t� NI S II,�;. 11, * Q'1 :CNii.iVi,iii j, 11- jx'� *�r.x� �d ��,iic� i� irvirt e�ni � 4, ti ft "`; K 2 Y i ,► • •p�K ��� � - �r } Ocf'o�te� +�kA '. Lt�2£ , . e , +M Y'Mtov V �IriM � S f.. µ 2,,,'`tIe';�,t q�}.fl #, Y :O".I 's'!t�+i �;iL►! �?7 ^ fi- i '^ 'o27 ;,,." ..'.Ctr► t' F w c s , :� �.� Lt� C 5= :',fi.FCG11u.r .trQCtfi ''. 1� .r '� 1 _ tia � �i <'I F w KS ' .' it \i V V� N • A �'Ie� YYtQ�F .A �, f�� F 3 r E a 4 f ��-- -'� !' E---7--. � 9?fi x !,' , , �'fr iTCtr.�Ote�n����min-I.ww rs'—ly_�t�s EF B a ��Or . �iw �, r t.,'k S.7F oft, :,YI t. ,L.RZQ�iYWr..r.�`ww..w, # r .� ✓ r Jo, " "11. ,K,� 7s , "'-''Ifthe �ara�aer�► - rceri�111s an 1.�vb-T=e n 1.�e a11 I�cc co3cp* A!bL,it-6 .� s` ;.� � �Q rra".:o't � fl mter to t'rc:= % �ept�=due11 toy the,u omt c 's ' K� , �r a rs:r r 3;:i'm. asl"`� :et tom toa o tie meet. �u a her �"11 2 ,4 1 �n� Ur a ater , a% 2 eosmeM�3 t*" 7ew er tr.ozacce ,,to�` I.� :r. ,. , `i s ce3 �� � r ;z'* z� � rarce3,.' f1c reC bo a S 'es aaer"aac Khe �, � 'st 3ag3.3 rssia;�si a ca �, -:.ev�irel'" aausznd *a � � y III- t: , .�.-11wur� c3., Eo. .rte .. 41`� ,w`ire tm a� f-* -z-=e f.-�,T,rk i� ?� r e1 A I aecsws,)ms boat,�c-a.=sd3,andl� --e ." �-ifa . � t Y w n h h .a ��s cul,erx�s�:'fig � builpar*s iasu�ce�co , ^ny. In o 3,e toy t� ,gym ' 'R 11u�� 11 GTs �'i°r s ��.$. r3T' "�I'llO';eate3 ;sP=2— �s ,1973 (Ctfoct3.vaAAgril-Gds 't Y d m ll , . ? tL srd of Aa tacnt :,aS fcrtb a scr3es o ,; oC W%dIUj=4 » c'.t° �I "',I � Ari, ou d xr- c, .7 t �acrvund=aa aroP To ,--11 fi tie caadf aEn corcer - `y ` act ,zrs a cars ra ?) has` aot . iasp2eaentad and �e�, j 1= .c m�O , e , au season. f ess eche ii" 'i dorso naR to centrQli'thei `c Jz. ;V aare'��.ro3 ear , rx��. P is a3�c:t coin. w+i� roaae�t thath the a{ u !� .<Z ��iL�'�72 't�mit73 13T., "2[._e �"'�?r"tS211`L`�e! �lQ .4'.fw'i3'L`@C�,.32"+«2 23' �Z _,80 t €`C@ Ls F Yfi' s, Qu�� 4b`7L'a'tT �� «L�LEt. �." �2«`e~C! �w'i�iei"rl:!w�• ia '4r'41.1r sr � + s s,+ 4trr1+ ,�j 3 t - `J+ ('-.� K t t. Kf "dk'7 '$" 'Y Y;}'^ "�r�,y""' 4„"n '" t fi. �`�' ' ,{ ..."�� ; $' .f.' tBT o i t2' �i3. 4 t?i CO, is► .ODtT �l.`�t £. �►O T1t lZ t�@ (►, r a �'Z1EZbSGC3'�tb`.� xb"=t$ tliE` astd&-tiles. Q� 5 16,20r�"� k A #�r?�r �r }ME Q �IL 6AIVY �tt�. :iea sad ecco o�F Ptirc � . 3.'De ranted t3eroa� ��ct�l �tbe"ecu t � r w p{�it3'£L'�. '3l: 'C`X`t�ex• t0 ,2?.Yf�3.L 4tbiLA t�rt►c�1.h �'.�`.$ n i$�i s" 'r a rZ a s� 14" 1 r _13%68 �s :at #«e sewer=:3�e ;frame the arcs: hawse'03 c+�l �»+as+ no ffa22� 1. h l s mute, 3Lt 3tQao.:run� tb�•on�h..t3te � edslfde. Iiot .�tnQri y' = y .„ , .tr. '.y l--G''. S' r%'..F.p�gpi r h` �Yt dat a '3ncpactar>zrr� Vie" Graatrs`Gaeta ZA3d-.rr D=ay c s z�[o aoare c ' E �- - z: .., , t 11 .Y,•�1@:'CO O`;tlt?i!5 Set i��i►u iai'.-'YiM4 �V�rt=ent,- :Lett YAWS M J ,„i , F ry k { n RI 'S • 4 F ) q ., , ,� µ "e y�r cnae t t�sst x�n�ro:iriato,a enesec and za�meators are r a r� � r" cb•• u � 'brn 2�*LL•' 1,146. r mad tkat tyet oa et tl atcirce =u :" a �,.Zl.�.�: Xlt: .. a, r .. EMB=r ``'Nw��Y�� a f' � �"w �� z �' n_r..d'ts :c ",a?=`,+z ,.�n�at;:,..,."�,x ,>tti =?.:,wt. t�"^.�?i� ,.�a�� .> .i .. "i ( ,11,. r�UI Ir SSI TAIMUM "GC?M= • a/o 2; MY '-orraoe Donvine, Ca]3fo=n" 94520 • July 27, 1475 '. CMUIrIm 'NAn--mi mm,t man mCEE m Mr. D. G. E=-Gh= • 426 Sl R3.o Road . Deavil:.e, Ca.1 ra3a 94526 w .. . _ _ .. Refe_ronce: Contra C=ta Co=ty Me H.f. 1975 . Dear har. &rnahax: . • At the An_uz Neat!--S of tho Gty tierraee 8o�ee=aors� Amcciat{env the.condi".10A of oetreet, re a result of your cemetruetioa, sac dieaaceed, e3an with otkar stens of Inpo:t.ce. I: x ould be haXpf-cl If Tcn could provide us si.th Four actrftl ob for ca-:73,-,1,; :•;.b the St— --u:'{� it the above- reiereacea mise mW for rexi.ri�- the dwczimp caused fiy your cosctructicn trucwo as the rem-im.:or of d- terrace. . .:o raderatrnd yon :.311 Im%wavc off-cite drainage d=n Sky . 'err:ee cad alomr tho road borderi:G the S:ith aad NattInSU proportion to the creak. Ve cha31 zLpprociate your `dvisiae; us of y6= 40--nG in wrI;tI6'. • with reSard to these =ttera r;thin fiftcon data. 4er7 tray you=,, . BCI I ' I 20 PALISMU^aIGD Do Sd th Chairma of :he Hoard BS:dr • cc: 21r. J. A. Sec-"ina, C-_-nZr.Z; SuCineer, H1d,S. Iaayeation Dept. Hr. Norma 341veraoa, I-3; Dept. 00368 CONTRA COA COUNTY BUILDING INSPECTION DENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ' MARTINEZ,CAUFCRmiA 94553 zrl� 219 1,075 D. G. L=mt;haw ,423 Ml FJ.o Rood Ds-Ville, Ca 94520 • • Re: U.S. 0-75 - Parcel "B" and Fia.:ato Road I� t3tts . I have inspected tl:e s;r�_r,.r� -,--ea-, on F.Yccl "," dth I:om t �a1Crsmn of the Fl:a ninY Pe_zz:mm t and ;.•luo ease_ -d the d,,^±a;,e dna to tree:. oZ Lhe Rose's ;�'or.r�;• 'Z.� :.Izc G�u:'3a~� done to :,;; Sc::2cc O1Q*:?, t�tc frac-Al .C;e of PvrC01$ n .?.'id J `,.`2 tiit3 "aZnOr JLu►"Gi'.svImi2. Ilii e the stz'?��inL mr''k dc-nc do-,, :�o� a the =tLt�:t of Ccnditae:� -,"5 for - II.S. C�-75 :'mac:- i ort 02 f-he slide area) it h= created onu-i ca^.i::siw: here mld ^' ' Jtr"1.=i.�:� Cllor-Z �f 012-IM-5 as, to Therefore, be cdv ccd that c.► •:r if; dono in the are os stria_e acce:,s c• -1c2 tion of Con.e..+.t_an 437 3:•u li.11 be rix"•.=rt d to ' " Y^ 1• C_'�?':.^.^.I' I?"_`:3 i$C�3^ls�1LiI�0:I3 fQ2' vrcr _•es:•aatimn of ::- ��;: L.---Ner reco.-n—aid tt:ct a3 soon as fol.-i a;.ioa �.-ork siaed to Fa�-c.1 "B" (as r Lard rJ cavi Zt O•^.s of s2�:-�c•:a.]j t: moi: —Z.-;•; access crea be rastored zid no lcafcr tsc8. uLis depart=--it x.-M muke al: i=:spectlons of thm "I;•rate roa-d" re , Ldc -:-n of :ll;; Ter-race and 1-ha rear of Tzrrace. . : o ::?.k ,4.all be dw:e idt.:o•. ri-or a�:��o=r-31, d r. 3. �.~J��: s7n=lZ co:Lo to t�2e nF�:c�c: �l.��LJ• Very • N ..,Dur-- rt. .,D Ir--r. k. Gic.o y M _ 7 L }�CS�it-s lK/ : :J`3 iTi.� z i JAS:d.-3 cc: I:O!m }Ialtsrsa-i, PIXLn-s::,: Dept. Slw e=ace llo-- hers i.ssoci:tion 00369 Contra Costa County Planning Department County Adsi:sistration Building . Pine' t Escobar Streets Martinez, California ' File Mo. M.S. 8-75 Assessor's Parcel No. 208-130-11 Land Use District: - R-6S Effective Date: April 29, .1975 AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTHENT a minor subdivision permit is hereby granted tov D. G, Earnshaw 428 E1 Rio Road Danville, California 94526 WITH THE F01=4ING CM;DITIQ'wS: 1. This request is approved for two (2) parcels. . 2. File Parcel Slap on entire parcel prior to sale or development of any parcel. The Parcel Sap roust be filed with the County Public Works Department and recorded within one year from the date of the approval of this minor subdi- vision or this permit to subdivide will expire. Upon approval of the Director of Planning, a one-year extension may be granted to record the Parcel Map. Effective March 1, 1975, new format and technical requirements are in effect for Parcel ?Malts. The County Public Z.orks Department should be contacted for details on the new requirements prior to.drafting of the Parcel Mmp. w 3. All new utility distribution facilities shall be installed underground. ; 4. Because there is an active landslide on this minor subdivision,a prelimi- nary and current soil investigation report, prepared by a licensed soil engineer shall be required. It shall report to the Grading Section of Building, Inspection on the ability of the site to support the improvements anticipated, 'and shall include recommended foundation -designs to achieve maximum stability of the proposed structures. - This shall be accomplished prior to the filing of the Parcel blap. S. Parcel B shall have access across Parcel A via a 25t access easement as shown on the attached staff study. This is to be done so. that the access as well as the utilities serving Parcel B will avoid the active landslide area. 6. The 25' access casement shall be paved to a width of 16 feet to the point of separation of the individual drivcs:ays serving each parcel. Paving sh Ii consist of 6-inches of base rock and 111-inches of asphaltic concrete and conform to all` County private road standards. • 00370 . D. G. Earnshaw - 2 - April 25, 1975 M.S. 8-75 The applicant is referred to Section 922-4.604 of the Ordinance Code and to the County Building Department for procedures to be followed in -connection with the required improvements which have to be fulfilled prior to recording the Parcel Rap. Section 922-4.604 provides in part -that required improvements can be either constructed or secured by adequate cash deposit or corporate surety bond. Storm waters originating on and entering the subject minor subdivision site shall be adequately 'conveyed to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate storm drainage facility. It may be necessary to construct off-site drainage improve- ments to comply with the above requirements. .71 r._ An alternative to the above iters is to obtain drainage releases from affected downstream oumer(s) receiving the surface runoff from and above the minor subdivision site. S. This minor subdivision is approved subject to the availability of sani- tary sewer service to both parcels by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. A letter or report from the sanitary district verifying the availability of sewers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Land Development Div sic::, prior to the riling of the Parcel XMP. The applicant shall improve Sky Terrace along the property frontage to a reasonable width and standards with pavement and necessary drainage. The plans and improvements shall be reviewed, approved and inspected by the Department of Public Works even though this is a private road. Park Dedication fee, as shown below, must be paid prior to the filing of the Parcel Map'. Under the provision of County Ordinance #71-84 (Park Land Dedication), dedica- tion of land or payment of a fee for park and recreation purposes is required as a condition of subdividing property. Therefore, when the Parcel Map is filed with the County Department of Public Works for checking and recordation, the applicant shall pay the following fee for park and recreation purposes to = the Department of Public Works: (P.D. 980-75) : Parcel A •5100.00 Parcel B $100.00 The amount of land to be dedicated is determined by multiplying the number of dwelling units to be included in the development by 500 square feet. The fee is required in lieu of land dedication. This fez is based on the current fair market value of ?and as determined by the Planning Department. The follo.:ing formula is used to arrive at the fee: Current Fair IMarket Value _ Value per sq. ft_ X SCO sq. ft. = FEE Area of Parcel (sq. ft.) D. G. Earnshaw - 3 - - April 25, 1975 � . M.S. 8-75, • In addition to the above requirements for dividing your property, various County agencies have submitted the following comments which you should be aware of before you apply for a building permit to embark on other improve- ments to your property: = a. The design of all improvements within the minor subdivision shall be suck that all surface waters occurring within the minor subdi- vision, as well as all surface Maters flowing into-and/or through the minor subdivision, shall be conveyed through the minor subdi- vision without damage to any improvements, building sites, or dwellings which may be constructed within the minor subdivision. Stora drainage facilities within the minor subdivision shall be designed to adequately convey the storm water runoff for the ultimate development of the drainage basin or watershed. • b. Due to the steepness of the terrain, the Contra Costa County Flood - Control and Eater Conservation District wishes to review the site grading and drainage plans prier to the issuance of a building permit. . Submit four (4) copies of plans showing the existing contours, the v extent of the proposed grading and drainage -improvements. These shall be reviewed by the Grading Section prior to issuance of grading or building permits. - d. A grading permit may be required for earthwork necessary to develop all parcels in the above minor subdivision. Under the provisions of the procedural ordinance, any person dissatisfied with. . - the conditions of a.oroval granted by the Board of Adjustment ::ay appeal the action to the Board of Appeals by submitting an appeal letter stating the rea- sons for the appeal and a $60.00 filing fee to the County Planning Depart-rent - _ within five (5) working days after the hearing. Therefore, the action of the Board of Adjustment Will not be final until 5:00 p.m. April 29, 1975 Anthony A. Dehaes+ss Director of P `�ni g - , XV . Orman L_ Halverson Assistant Director of Planning NW:lsw cc - County agencies File M.S. 8-75 - .......... l ::.... .... LJ .' V .• mss! 4it:7..�•`r 1 .'� action to the Boara of A , eater vy ac-za.a2�.+s�•7} au , .YF - s s..�.�_x i .a_a•i_" ,_ sans for the appeal and a $60.00 filing fee to the County Planning Department - within five {5} working days after the hearing. Therefore, the action of the Board of Adjustment will not be final until 5:00 p.m. April 29. 197S .� - - Anthony A. Dehaesus - Director of P i g Orman L. Halverson - Assistant Director of Planning '* NW:lsw cc - County agencies _ File M.S. S-7S ' .. • _ � • a - r 003 t2 OWN •s •• i a - •t • � • �• i • • Yrs»••tV • ' I• ..t.:w-• Y - � p�,i pt! _ r s•Ati'�..r-n_/.f-i.t.' ` ji, ,�'j���,�is ��.�•Sy "' j'' 003'"73 CONTRA COS OUNTY PUBLIC WORKAPARTMENT Martinez, California January 13, 1976 } AGENDA REPORTS i Report A. SUBDIVISION MS 8-75 On November 16, 1975, the Board of Supervisors referred !• a letter from Hr. Bob Smith, President, Sky Terrace ! • Homeowners Association, concerning landslide and drainage i problems on Subdivision HS 8-75 to the Public Works Director and the Acting Building Iaspector for review and report. j The property .concerned is neer the.end of Sky Terrace, a private road in the Danville area. There is a known slide problem on a portion of the property. The existence of the - slide was documented and considered during the processing and approval of the subdivision. One condition,atmapproval required a report to the' Grading Section of the Building - Inspection Department by a licensed engineer specializing in soils prior to filing of the-Parcel Map. This document i has been filed. Mr. James Searfus of the Building Inspection Department has reviewed the site subsequent to the receipt of lir. Smith's letter, and reports that there is no indication that the sewer trench is within the active slide area. `' + A construction access road has been provided through the !- slide area. This is not a perrar-ent driveway and the developer was infored in writing by Mr. James Searfus on July 21, 1975 that construction access was not in violation of the conditions of approval; however, no grading or trenching in the construction access would be permitted and the area must be restored and not further F ` used upon completion of construction. Drainage improvements have been approved by the Flood Control District aad bonded by the developer. The Agreement I • and Bond do not expire until July 15, 1976, one year after the Agreement was approved. To date, there have been no drainage problems. Both the Building Inspection Department and the Flood Control District have beer. inspecting the site regularly to insure conformance with County ordinances, and the conditions of approval, and will continue to do so. + It is recommended that the Clerk send a copy of this f report to Mr. Smith, 22 Sky Terrace, Danville, CA 94526. i (LD) i SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I ! . No I tears A G E N D A Public works Department Pia_ 1 0-f 9 January 13. 19(76 J 003~(4 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California. January 13 . 19 76 In the Matter of " Report Concerning Landslide and Drainage Problems in Subdivision PIS 8-75, Danville area. The Board on November 18, 1975 having referred to the Public Works Director and the Acting Building Iuspector for review and report a•letter from Hr. Bob Smith, President, . Sky Terrace Homeowners Association, Danville area, expressing- . - - concern that landslide and drainage problems, paused -by the construction of a sewer line' exist inSubdivision 14S 8-75; and The Public Worl:s Director having reported that Mr. J. Searfus, Grading Engineer, Building Inspection Department, had investigated the site subsequent to the receipt of the aforesaid letter, had found no drainage problems and had advised that inspections of the area would be made on a continuing basis; and The aforesaid report of the Public Works Director PASSED by the Board on January 13, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisu.•s on the date c`orescid. cc: ilr. Bob Smith Witness my hand and the,Seal of the Board of Public Works Director SuperVhors Acting County Building Inspector affixed this 13th day of January 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Br �� -- -%-A' Depuly Clerk 'N. Ingraham t J�lt,-1 tyle'h�c�1 �12_ _ H_i 8.7$ XO%X 00375 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 ' 19 76 In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Carrie Mae and 'dna Kennedy, residing at 933 Lincoln Street, Richmond, Ca14for3;a, and Brenda and Darrell Young, residing at 950 9th Street, Richmond, California, by and through their attorney, Mr. Jolln 3. Morson, 145 Park Place, Pt. Richmond, California 9:-.801, having filed with this Board on April 7, 1976 an application to file a late claim in the amount of $19,153.50; I" IS BY T-3 30ARD ORD3RSD that the aforesaid application to file a late claim is DOMD. PASSED by the 3oard on April 209 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: Claimant Wdness my hand and the seal of the Board of Pablic Works Supe Attn: Mr. Broatch affixed this 20th day of April _ 19 76 County Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �-1`'%r�. li%F, Deputy Clerk .lean L. Killer OU3 l6 H 24 8/75 IOM ' \ 1 JOHN E. THORSON GORELICK AND GORELICK F I L D ► 2 145 Park Place Pt. Richmond, California 94801 APR 7 1976 3 (415) 236-0755 J. R, OL=N 4 Attorney for Claimant U4 IC BOARD Or SUPERVISORS C a sr I oSTA-- o.— B . ..� 5 puty 6 7 8 9 10 In the matter of the Claims of 11 CARRIE MAE KENNEDY, BRENDA YOUNG, TINA KENNEDY, a minor, and DARRELL APPLICATION TO FILE 12 YOUNG, a minor, LATE CLAIM [CAL. GOV. CODE 13 Claimants, §911.41 14 vs. 15 COUI4TY OF CONTRA COSTA, TED BRASIER, and JOHN DOES I-X / 16 17 I, JOHN E. THORSON, attorney for claimants CARRIE MAE 18 KENNEDY, BRENDA YOUNG, TINA KENNEDY, a minor, and DARRELL YOUNG, 19 a minor hereby and on their behalf present this Application to the Y0 Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, pursuant to 5911.4 of 21 the California Government Code, to present in their behalf, a claim 22 against the County, which claim is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 23 I 24 The cause of action which is the subject matter of this 25 Claim arose on December 9, 1975 in the City of Richmond, Contra 26 Costa County, California. ZORELICK AND GORELICK uwvtas 145 PARK i11.4CE FZINT RICHMOND,M 94301 200 37rM sTarer 00377 RICHMOND.M 94805 ft151 256-0755 } J1 1 1 II 2 I am informed and believe, and allege thereupon, that 3 Claimants herein had difficulty, until immediately prior to the 4 expiration of the hundred day period specified in 5910 of the Califon- -5 nia Government Code, in locating legal counsel to assist them in the 6 presentation of their claim. 7 IZI 8 Since being contacted by the Claimants herein, I wasrequired 9 to spend time obtaining reports from County agencies and Veterinary 10 Reports from private veterinarians. 11 , IV 12 From December 9, 1975 to present Claimant TINA KENNEDY and 13 IDARRELL YOUNG have been minors. 14 V 15 In light of the foregoing circumstances, the failure to 16 present the claim, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, of the 17 above-described claimants caused by inadvertence and excuseful neglect. 18 VI 19 The County of Contra Costa has not been prejudiced in any 20 fashion by the failure of the above-described claimants to present 21 their claim within the time specified in the California and Govern- 22 ment Code §911.2. 23 WHEREFORE, the above described claimants, by and through 24 !their undersigned attorney, request the board of supervisors of the 25 County of Contra Costa for leave to prese eir claim against 26 the County at this time. .ICK Axa GORELICK / LAW r 4ZgS Dated: April , 1976i- la5 PARK Puce �TOH E. i ' POINT RICOMONO.CA 194801 n�36tb Att ney for Claimants 200 37r" STRECT v f ti • j / I 1\ 1 1 JOHN E. THORSON GORELICK AND GORELICK 2 145 Park Place Pt. Richmond, California 94801 3 (415) 236-0755 4 Attorney for Claimants 5 6 7 8 9 10 In the matter of the Claims of 11 CABBIE MAE KENNEDY, BRENDA YOUNG, CLAIM TINA KENNEDY, a minor, and DARRELL 12 YOMIG, a minor, 13 Claimants, 14 i vs. 15 ` COUNTY OF CONTEA COSTA, TED BRASIER, 16 and JOHN DOES I-X / 17 I, JOHN E. THORSON, attorney for Claimants CARRIE MAE 18 KENNEDY, BRENDA YOUNG, TINA KENNEDY, minor, and DARRELL YOUNG, a 19 minor, hereby and on their behalf present their claims to the 20 Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, pursuant to Section 910 21 of the California Government Code. 22 I 23 The post office address of Claimant CARRIE MAE KENNEDY and 24 TINA KENNEDY is 933 Lincoln Street, Richmond, California. 25 ' II 26 The post office address of Claimants BRENDA YOUNG and DARREL `?LICK&wo GORELICK LAWYER! 14S ,PARK PLkCE POINT RICHMOND.CA, 94=1 EXHIBIT A (�[�cJ~�J 200 3TT"&TREET �✓ RICHMOND.CA.9"05 14151 :174-0935 - ONION "�y I 1 YOUNG is 950 9th Street, Richmond, California. 2 III 3 Any notices„ letters, or correspondence relating to this 4 claim should be sent to Claimants' attorney, JOHN E. THORSON, 145 5 Park Place, Pt. Richmond, California 94801. 6 Iv 7 On December 9, 1975 TED BRAISER, Animal Control Officer for 8 the Animal Control Division of the Department of Agriculture, Contra 9 Costa County, came on to the real property of Claimant BRENDA YOUNG 10 and, without just cause, shot with a .38 caliber pistol and seriously 11 injured the dog owned by Claimant CARRIE MAE KENNEDY. This shooting 12 took place without regard for the safety of claimants TINA KENNEDY 13 land DARRELL YOUNG, minors, who were in the immediate proximity of 14 the dog, and who witnessed the shooting of the dog. Claimant Brenda 15 Young observed the entire incident from a further distance away 16 from the dog. 17 As a result of the aforesaid, Claimant CARRIE KENNEDY has 18 been required, and will continue to be required, to expend consider- 19 able money for the medical care of her dog. Claimants BRENDA YOUNG, 20 TINA KENNEDY, and DARRELL YOUNG have suffered severe trauma and 21 mental distress from their apprehension on December 9, 1975 that . 22 they would be injured as a result of TED BRAISER'S actions. Claimant ' 23 IBRENDA YOUNG has suffered severe anguish and mental distress as the i 24 j • ,asult of witnessing TED BRAISER'S dangerous conduct in the immedi- 25 Late proximity of her son, DARRELL YOUNG, and her niece, TINA KENNEDY. 26 That the foregoing event took place at 950 9th Street, GORELICK 4Mo GORELICK LAWVCRS 14S PARK PLACE POINT RICHMONC.CA. 9i80100380 200 99n"STREET —` .r 1 Richmond, Contra Costa County, California. 19 able money for the medical care of her dog. Claimants BRENDA YOUNG, 20 TINA KENNEDY, and DARRELL YOUNG have suffered severe trauma and 21 mental distress from their apprehension on December 9, 1975 that . 22 they would be injured as a result of TED BRAISER"S actions. Claimant 23 {BRENDA YOUNG has suffered severe anguish and mental distress as the 24 ! w-�!sult of witnessing TED BRAISER`S dangerous conduct in the immedi- 2$ late proximity of her son, DARRELL YOUNG, and her niece, TINA KENNEDY. 26 That the foregoing event took place at 950 9th Street, GORELICK 4AMo GORELICK LAWYCPS Z4S PARK PLACC POINT RICNMONO.CA. I (�(1t3, 8 V G( j 94801 V V 200 79r"STREET — — 1 Richmond, Contra Costa County, California. 2 WHEREFORE, Claimants, by and through their undersigned 3 attorney, make the following claim against the County of Contra Costa: 4 i. As to Claimant CARRIE KENNEDY for general damages in 5 the amount of $153.50 for medical care of her dog already incurred, 6 for the cost of medical care for the dog to be incurred in the 7 future, and for punitive damages in the amount of $1,000.00; 8 2. As to Claimant BRENDA YOUNG, general damages in the 9 amount of $1,000.00 and punitive damages in the amount of $5,000.00. 10 3. As to Claimant TINA KENNEDY, g general damages in the amou t 11 of $1,000.00 and punitive damages in tte amount of $5,000.00; 12 4. As to Claimant DARRELL YOUNG, general damages in the 13 amount of $1,000.00 and punitive damages in h _amount of $5,000.00. 14 15 ' Dated: April 2, 1976 j I 16 OHN Txn�rsnnr Attorn y for Claimants U 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 -ACK Aka GORELICK u►wrcRs 14S PARK PLAcC POINT RICHMOND, :a. -3- 94801 (� i(}[1 �J_{/"� 202 2T�TRrcr M 94805 U � R'r4+y0N0. 3 V Ny In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 -7.6 In the Matter of Cls it for Damages. Ns. Julia T. Farias, by and through her attorney, 1r. Alfred G. Johnson of Sullivan, Johnson and graham, 465 California Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, California, 94104, having Piled with this Board on April 7, 1976 a claim for damages in the amount or approximately $25,000; DElt'ISD. IT IS 3Y THE BOARD ORDMBD that the aforesaid claim is PASSM by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid ac: Claimant Wdnen my hand and the Seol of the Boord of Su Public Works Attn: Mr. 3roatch a8i� this 20th day of API . 19 76 County Counsel ? J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By Do", Deputy Clerk Jean L. Hiller H24 8(75 10M 001;82 I SULLIVAN, JOHNSON S GRAHAM F I L E D Attorneys at Law 2 465 California Street, Suite 200o San Francisco, California 94104 APR 1 19766 3 (415) 397-4677 1 IL ocs 4 =Sr COAW Or SU..n0-'W2S 4 Attorneys for Claimant a CON r cgsra Co. 5 6 - 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN AND POR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 10 11 In the Platter of the Claim of ) NO. 12 JULIA T. FARIAS ) 13 against the County of Contra Costa ) 14 ) 15 JULIA T. FARIAS hereby presents a claim for damages 16 against the County of Contra Costa. 17 Claimant's address is: 16930 Westerman Court, Hayward, lg California. 19 Claimant desires that all notices or other communication 20 be sent to: ALFRED G. JOHNSON, Sullivan, Johnson and Graham, 21 465 California Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 22 94104. 23 Date of occurrence: February 13, 1976 24 Place of occurrence: Richmond Clinic, Contra Costa 25 County Medical Services. 26 Said claim arises from the following circumstances: 27 While walking in the Richmond Clinic of the Contra 28 Costa County Medical Services, claimant Julia T. Farias slipped 29 . and fell on a puddle of crater that had accumulated on the 30 floor. 31 General description of injury or damages, so far as 32 is known at this time: ��w omcp a► SULLIVAN.JOHNSON S GRAHAM w[acWwra ciccw►wnc 4aa C4LlroaNA&arwccr suwrc soa UAN M^W C15CO.CA 94104 14151 397-4677 00383 I JULIA T. FARIAS - injuries to the left side of the body 2 including the left shoulder and left hand. 3 Name and capacity of employees of the County of 4 Contra Costa involved: 5 Unknown at this time. Will include those responsible 6 for failing to correct a dangerous condition. 7 Amount claimed: 8 Special damages to date: Unknown 9 General damages to date: Unknown 10 Estimated prospective damages: $25,000.00 11 Estimated total, to date: Unknown 12 Dated: April 2, 1976 13 SULLIVAN, JOHNSON & GRAHAM 14 15 By 16 7D G. 400SON, Attorney foclaim JULIA T. FARIAS 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ♦Aw OMC"or 5ut.UVAN.JOHNSON S GRAHAM "C"C«6"Ta LarM +acKoa. 46s CANr06M4A arecTr wirc soa SAN CRANCIRCO,CA 94106 14151 3974677 00384 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 19 76 In the Matter of Request of Retired Fire Fighters for Coverage Under County Group Health Plan The County Administrator having presented to the Board a memorandum report dated April 7, 1976 submitted by the Director of Personnel in response to Board referral regarding request of Messrs. F. H. Wilson and J. Callander III, retired Danville Fire District fire fighters, that County Health Plan benefits received by other retired fire fighters be made available to them as well; and The Director of Personnel having reported that employees of the Danville Fire District are not County employees and, therefore, do not qualify for the County Employees Group Health Plan; and further that in view of the fact that employees of said fire district are not included and are not eligible for inclusion in the County Employees Group Health Plan, employees retired from the district are also not eligible for membership; and, accordingly, having recommended denial of the request of Messrs. Wilson and Callander; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of aforesaid memorandum report is ACKNOWLEDGED and the request DENIED as recommended. Passed by the Board on April 20 , 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. F. H. Wilson Su affixed this 20th day of April 1 19 76 Mr. J. Callander III — CCC Retired Employees J. R. OLSSON, Clerk r Assoc. Chapter By Deputy Clerk H sa 12"rvsUor of Personnel Rdbbi e G i errez County Counsel Retirement Board 00385 w. CONTRA CiVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT ,• Administration Building _ 14iartinez, California Date: April7, 1976 TO: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator FROM: Charles J. Leonard, Director of Personne SUBJECT:Forrest H. Milson and James Callander III'�quest for inclusion in Contra Costa County Employee Group Health Plan By letter of March 13, 1976 the subject individuals request the Board of Supervisors to permit them to be included in the Contra Costa County Group Health Plan. Several of the critical facts listed by petitioners are not accurate. Although ' it is true that the Danville Fire District is included in the County Retirement System, the employees of the Danville Fire District are not County employees and, therefore, do not qualify for the County Employees Group Health Plan. The Danville Fire District is an autonomous district functioning and setting budget controls (including fringe benefits) outside the jurisdiction of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. The Danville Fire District is not a County Civil Service District nor was the County Civil Service Department involved in any formal manner in the establishment of whatever personnel program exists in that district. In view of the fact that employees of the Danville Fire District are not included and are not eligible for inclusion in the Contra Costa County Employees Group Health Plan, employees retired from the Danville District are also not eligible for membership. Since there exists no policy, procedure, precedence or appropriate justification for granting the petition of Messrs. Wilson and Callander, the Board should be advised to deny the request. CJL:mg AK63 00386 cis In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 19 76 In the Matter of Exercising Option to extend Lease with Apollo Enterprises for premises at 3700 Delta Fair Blvd. , Suite 207, Antioch County has in effect a lease with Rocco Battaglia and Salvatore Russo, subsequently assigned to Apollo Enterprises, for premises at 3700 Delta Fair Blvd., Suite 207, Antioch, for occupancy by the Health Department. Section Q of subject lease grants to County the option to extend said lease for two years upon the same terms and conditions, except for a rental increase from $300.00 per month to $325.00 per month. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County hereby exercise its option to extend the lease for a period of two years effective August 1 , 1976. PASSED on April 20, 1976 unanimously by Supervisors present. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Wtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division cc: Public Works Director Supervisors 20th April 76 Real Property Division affixed this day of 19 _, Lessor (c/o R/P) J. R. OLSSON. Clerk County Auditor-Controller �Y( f:A2 r br 2 t _A_,Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M F.ondal„ nn Shad c' es County Administrator Buildings & Grounds Health Department 0U-187 Milo In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorisation for a Public works Representative to Attend Drainage mater Management Meeting. IT IS BY 1'HS B0ARD atDEi3D that a representative of the Public Works Department is AUTHOR IZ3D to attend a public meeting on the San Joaquin Valley Interagency Drainage Program sponsored by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, the California Department of Mater Resources, and the California State 'dater Resources Control Board to be held at 1331 Concord Avenue, Concord, California, on April 22, 1976 at 7:30 p.m. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregab% Is a true and coned ropy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director VVdness my hand and the SeW of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of April , 19 76 _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Clerk t �c.-.11 I'�/��� /� Deputy Jean L. Hiller 00300 H 24 aps IOU In the Board of Supervisors of Control Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at CAL-NEVA CAP Directors and Board Chairpersons Conference IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Nick Rodriquez, Chairman, Economic Opportunity Council, is AUTHORIZED to attend the CAL-NEVA Community Action Program Conference during the period April 21, 1976 through April 25, 1976 in Long Beach, California, on his own time and with the understanding that expenses will be charged to Federal funds. Passed by the Board on April 20, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an' order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Orig- OEO Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Administrator affixed this 20th day of April . 1976 Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By .f_xpw:! h0• -a A, eputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Randalirnn Shackles 00389 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976 In the Matter of In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meetings IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the persons listed below are AUTHORIZED to attend the following meetings, charges to be at County expense unless otherwise indicated: Dr. Maxine Sehring Child Welfare League Conference April 25, 1976 Health Reno, Nevada to (Child Welfare League Funds) April 26, 1976 Barbara Weidenfeld Child Welfare League Conference April 25, 1976 Social Service Reno, Nevada to (100% State Funds) April 26, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors mixed 20 daY of April 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk -5hln�-beputy Clerk cc: County Administrator Rondalynn Shackles Director, Human Resources Agency County Auditor-Controller County Health Officer H24 8,/75 lOM 00390 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 . 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Relief of Cash Shortage Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution Number 2702 adopted by the Board on January 28, 1964, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that relief of a cash shortage of $15 in the accounts of the West Judicial District is AUTHORIZED. Passed by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enured on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: West Judicial District affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk �,r h t c ,e,)Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Rondaly n Shackles 00391 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri 1 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Payment for loss of Personal Property IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller Is AUTHORIZED to make payr-,ent of 526.00 to Larry Blackmon, 2038 Plum Tree Way, Fairfield, California 9:533 for repair of eye glasses damaged while on duty at the County Hospital . PASSED by the Board on Anril 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Ori q: Director, Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Chief, Mad. Admin. Services County Medical Director affixed this SOW day of Aorl . 19 Z.6_ Mr. Larry Blackmon County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By L pz ae es S Deputy Clerk xondalyn;i 14 2.4 alis 1CA1 00,192 e In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Aaril 20, , 19 76 In the Matter of Letter Relative to Upsprout/ Community Garden Project The Board on March 9, 1976 having approved the recommendation of the County Administrator that the Economic Opportunity Council be directed to establish a committee to monitor and evaluate the Upsprout/Community Garden Project on an on-going basis and furnish its comments thereon to the Board by May 31, 1976; The Board having been apprised by letter dated April 12, 1976 received from Nick Rodriquez, President, Economic Opportunity Council, that such a committee has been established and the following persons appointed to serve thereon: Mrs. Eunice Collins, Mrs. Eliza Johnson, Mrs. Phyllis Villa, Mrs. Margie Haynes and Mrs. Bea Goff; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of aforesaid letter is ACKNOWLEDGED. Passed by the Board on Ap^il 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Supervisors cc: Economic Opportunity affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 Council J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting Economic opportunity {^ Pr� o BY eputy Clerk Fon a v n 1 aH za 12/74 .rs ram Director Director, Cooperative Extension Service Agricultural Commissioner 00393 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 _' 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing Increased Board Rate for a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES increased board rate for a dependent child of the court (Court Number 29214) who is presently in the Jones Family Care Home in Richmond, California, to $306.00 per month, effective April 21-, 1976. PASSED by the Board on April 20; 1976. 1 hereby certify that the forepoinB is a true and cored copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and Ow Seat of t1w Board of cc: Director, Human Resources Agency Social Service smPervisorsafxed this 20th of April ` 19 76 Atte: N. Hallgren � — County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator �yh�.�„r�C�t��,,...�.. � h ,�.Deauty Clerk Rondaly n Shackles r+xa alrs ioa 00394 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California A pr31- 2 0 . 197.6— In 97,EIn the Matter of Authorizing Increase in Board Rate for a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES increase in board rate for a dependent child of the court (Court Number 42931) in the foster home of Jody and Velma Lyons, El Cerrito, California, to 5285.00 per month, effective April '24 1976. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order wowed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesokL cc: Director, Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Social Service Supervisors Attn: M. Hallgren affixed this 20th day of April____, 19 76 County Auditor-Controller County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Cleric Bondalyn Shackles H 24 8/75 10M 95 X3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing Placement of a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES placement of a dependent child of the court (Court Number 47071) at Devereux School, Santa Barbara, California, at a rate of $1,068.00 per month, effective April 21, 1976. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Social Service Supervisors Attn: H. Hallgren O#ixed this 20th day of April _ 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator jemnn„ Clerk Rondalyin Shac . es 00396 H 2.4 aps lam _f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorization to Destroy Duplicate 0. Records Pursuant to Government Code Section 26201, this Board authorizes the Public Works Director to destroy any duplicate record, paper or document as long as the original or a permanent photographic reproduction is on file. PASSED on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. ORIGINATING DEPARTtZENT: Public Works Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Administrative Supervisors Operations affixed this 20Th day of A.nri 119 ?p _ J. R. OESSON, Clerk cc: County Administrator B �� ��� �y' %.. , ,. Deputy Clerk Public Works Director y . P tY 0939'7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Ap ri 1 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Tassajara Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County request to acquire land for use as future fire station site. The Board on April 8, 1975 having referred to the County Administrator the request of the Tassajara Fire Protection District that the County assist in the acquisition of a parcel of land that had been offered as a future site for the District's fire station; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having this day called attention to an April 13, 1976 letter he had received from Fire Commissioner Gordon Rasmussen, Tassajara Fire Protection District, requesting Board assistance in expediting said acquisition; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Public Works Director (Real Property Division). PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Tassajara Fire Protection Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of District Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 20th day of, Apri 1 19 76 Real Property Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel County Administrator By -f « , , Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Robbie Guti. rrez 00398 P 9 TASSAJARA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (CONTRA COSTA COUNTY) 1650 FINLEY ROAD T E L E P H O c: E PLEASANTON, CA 94566 (415} 782 - 3233 11E EI Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid E '�E 5th. District 45 Civic Avenue R 90 IQlp Pittsburg, California &^ u. Cy-VIO_t O, SWEP. IlSo , Re; Property, future fire station site, Clausen �, ._.` :at Corr Dear Supervisor Linscheid; During our recent telephone conversation you suggested that I write and explain the facts as we know them. The site itself was chosen as it is ideally located and a cen— tral point for dispatchin emergency equipment in our district. The site is approximately 1 1/3 acres. Originally one acre was our re— quirement but due to future planned widening of Camino Tassajara Road we increased same to deed the extra width back to the county. The agreed upon price was to be $5000.00/acre plus the extra amount to cover the right—of—way for the county. We have made the necessary arrangements frith the county for the site survey and also Dermits for water and septic tank location. As time was of the essence we nroceeded with the water drilling test holes. tae were able to find and develop a good water source and had the well cased and capped. This particular area of Tassajara—Highland is "water poor" and we were fortunate in being able to find and dev— elop. a good water source. In the interim we have located and are aw— aiting to install the water storage system tank which is necessary for the fire protection of this area. It is the feeling and mutual agreement amoung the fire commissioners that the fair and agreed upon price with tor. Clausen was to be $5000.00 plus the extra amount for any land to be ddeded to the county for right— of—way. The county is apparently taking the position that the parcel is part of a 100 acre parcel and should be priced as if the whole 100 + acres were being purchased. s'de feel this is not in keeping with the original agreement with Mr. Clausen nor being practical with land prices as they now are selling land in this area. The parcel in question is flat and has frontage on Camino Tassajara Road. :*le doubt if the county or anyone could purchase property such as that for less than $10,000 to $15, 000 per acre in this area. As you can see, the District and the Contra Costa County tarp_nvers are getting a bargain at the $5000/acre price. LCC ttty Lt 1 OU3919 v �a We were originally promised by the County that the property would be purchased and cleared by the end of last year, 1975. At this time we are fast approaching the fire season and are without our site, our water storage system and all other emergency services which were to be included at this site. We would appreciate any consideration and help you maybe in clearing this matter. If you have any Questions please do not hes— itate to contact me. Very Tpaly Yours; Gordon Rasmussen, Fire Commissioner, T.F.D. G•Wdw/gr 13 April 1976 00400 t.,.. .._..rye .. .. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Ap ri 1 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of 1975 Evaluation Report of Contra Costa County Community Action Agency The Board having received a communication from Nick Rodriquez, President, Economic Opportunity Council, transmitting a copy of the 1975 evaluation report of the County's Community Action Program prepared by David S. Thompson Associates; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid communication and evaluation report are REFERRED to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) and the County Administrator for review. Passed by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Supervisors cc: Economic Opportunity affixed this 20th of Apri 1 19 76 Council J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting Economic OpportunityByDeputy Clerk ,� Pr ram Director y p H 2a Td'Sr'�'"Committee Members Robbie Gu errez 00401 { In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Adjourning in Memory of Nor. Dale Richard Bosley and Mr. James V. DiMaggio, Sr. The Board having learned with sadness of the deaths of Mr. Dale Richard Bosley, a man active in Veteran's affairs and in organizing the Veteran's Advisory Committee for the Veteran's Administration Hospital, and Air. James V. DiMaggio, Sr. , a pioneer in the-community of Pittsburg and one of its first councilmen, who was also active in various fraternal activities; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its official meeting of April 20, 1976 is ADJOURNED in memory of Mr. Bosley and Mr. DiMaggio. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witneu my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County administrator Supervisors affixed this 20 day of_ April 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By `-►i1(%i'! .-C� Deputy Clerk Bonnie boaz H-2a 3/76 lSm 004 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 df In the Matter of Agreement for the Laf ase tte-11oraga railway Project. IT IS 3Y , ,,E BOARD ORDERM that Chairman J. P. Kenny is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement to consent to disbursement by the State of California of $150,760 0£ State Beach, Park, Recreational and Historical (facilities Bond Act of 1974 funds to the East Bay Regional Park District for acquisition and development of a portion of the Lafayette-Ploraga Regional Trail located in Contra Costa County, pursuant to provisions of Project Number 07-0009. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: East Bay Regional Parts Warm= my hand and the Seal of the Board of District Superviams City of Lafayette affixed this 20th day of Arri l . 19 76 State Department of _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Parks and Recreation (2) (Via Sa s t Say Reg-onal BY ,7 W . Deputy Clerk Park District) ,Jean L. Puller Public 'storks Director of Planning County Administrator H 24 8/75 10M 00403 i • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ResourcesAgency Department of Parks and Recreation PROJECT AGREEMENT STATE BEACH.PARK,RECREATIONAL AND HISTORICAL FACILITIES BOND ACT of 1974 Project Tide Lafayette-`Ioraga Regional Trailway Applicant East Bay Regional Park District Project Number 07-0009 Project Perforrt+ance Period Date of Approval to June 30, 1977 Description of Project(and Purposes for which grant moneys were requested) This project is the acquisition and development of a portion of the Lafayette-Mbraga Regional Trail located in Contra Costa County. The Lafayette-Moraga Regional Trail is a hiking, riding, and bicycling trail and is used as a community circulation route as well as being part of a larger two-county recreation trail system. Development of this portion of the trail is being undertaken jointly by the City of Lafayette, the rloraga Park and Recreation Authority, and the East Bay Regional Park District. The section of trail involved in this project utilizes the abandoned Sacramento- Northern Railroad Right of clay and other publicly owned lands for approximately four and one-half miles. This section starts at Olympic Boulevard on the Lafayette/Walnut Creel: city boundary and runs southwesterly following the Sacramento- Northern route to the intersection of St. Mary's and Bollinger Canyon Roads. Tenure to the land for this section includes purchase of 5.97}acres of land from Contra Costa County, license agreements with East Bay 2funicipal Ut3Zity District and Contra Costa County Central Sanitary District, and a letter agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Development would include paving for bicycling, fencing, gating, signing, grass seeding, street crossing improvements, a bridge barriers, bollards, drainage, site preparation and demolition of concrete wall. BudgetActof 1974 as amended by ItemNurnew 412 A 27) Chapter 1522 of the Statutes of 1974 1, Allocated for acquisition $15.000 2. Allocated forde.eioarnent $135_,760 Total State Grant not to exceed S $150,760 The General and Special Provisions attached are made a Tart of and are incorporated into this Agreement. East Bay Regional Park District Applicant By c- Title General Manager Date STATE OF CALIFORNIA D_PA4TMEUT OF PARFS AUD RECREATION Tntle _-- --- By — pate — Date lylitrolilmedlw:tlh bwrd order DPR 463 19/7a 00404 STATE BEACH.PARK.RECREATIONAL AND HISTORICAL FACILITIES 8O"D ACT OF 1974 Project Agreement Special Provisions 1. State may elect to maize disbursement for deposit into escrow for negotiated land purchases. 2. Interest earned on grant money shall be used on the project or paid to the State. See attached . General Provisions A. Definitions 1. The term"State"as used herein means theealifomuState Department of Parks and Recreation. 2. The tam"Act'as used herein means the State Beach,Park.Recreational and Historical Facilities Bond Act of 1974 as amended. 3. The term"Project'as used herein means the project which is described on page 1 of this agreement. 4. The term"Applicant'as used herein means the party described as applicant on page 1 of this agreement. B. Project Execution 1. Subject to the availability of grant morr_ys in the Act. the State hereby grants to the Applicant a sum of money (grant moneys)not to exceed the amount stated on page 1 in consideration of and on condition that the sum be expended in carrying out the purposes as sat forth in the Description of Project on page 1 and under the terms and -- conditions set forth in this agreement. Applicant agrees to assume any obligation to furnish any additional funds that may be necessary to complete the project Any modification or alteration in the project as set forth in the application on Ude with the State trust be submitt-ed to the State for approval prior to disbursement of grant moneys. 2. The Applicant agrees to execute and complete dna Project in accordance with the time of project performance set forth on Page 1 and under the terms and conditions of this agreement. 3. It the Project includes development,the development plans and specifications shalt be-reviewed and approved by the State before construction is commenced. 4. The Applicant shall secute completion of the development work in accordance with the approved development plans and specifications. 5. The Applicant shall permit periodic site visits by the State to determine if devekKxne C work is is accordance with the approved plans and specifications including a final inspection upon Project completion. 6. All significant deviations from the Project shall be wbrrnitted to the State for prior approval. 7. If the Project includes acquisition or real property.the purchase price for such real property shall be determined from a State approved appraisal report prepared by a competent appraiser or through proceedings in eminent domain.The appraisal report and qualifications of such appraiser shall be submitted for review and approval by the State before initiation of the acgasition procedure_ Applicant agrees to furnists State preliminay title reports respecting such real propsrty or such other evidence of title which is determined to be suflic+ent by State.Applicant agrees in n!gotiated purchases to cornett prior to or at the close of escrow any defects of title which in the opinion of State mutt interfere with the operation of the Project In condemnation actions gaols title detects must be eliminated by the final jud,me:nt_ S. Applicant in acquiring real proprtty,the cost of sihtch is to be reimbursed witS grant moneys ursdrr this zGreement. shall comply•vith Chapter 16!commencing with Section 7260) of Divisran 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code and any ayplicabte federal. state, or la;al lams or ordinances_ Documentation of such compliance wilt be msda available for re6ew by the State upon request. 2 00405 C. Project Costs The grant moneys to be provided Appticant under this agraensent shalt be disbursed as follows: 1. If the Project includes acctuisition of real property, the State shall disburse to Applicant the grant moneys as follows.but not to exceed in any event the State grant amount attocated for acgsrisition as set forth on p�,r_ 1 of this agreement: a_ When acquisition is through negotiated purchase,upon dose of escrow.State will dh'rirse the amount of the State approved purchase price together with Stars approved costs of acquisition. b. When acquisition is through proceedings in eminent domain.State will disburse the amount of the total award as provided for in the final order of condemnation together with State approved costs of acquisition. C. In the event Applicant abandons sub+ eminent domain proceedings.Applicant agrees to bear elf costs in connection therewith and that no grant moneys slatl be disbursed for such costs. 2. If the Project includes drnlopment.after approval by State of Applicants plans and specifications and after completion of the Project or any phase or unit thereof.State shall disburse toApplicant upon receipt and approval by State of a statement of incurred costs from Applicant,the amount of such approved incurred costs shown on such stateman% not to exceed the State grant a i aunt allocated for development,as set forth on page 1 of this agreement,or any remaini.y portion of such grant a noant to the extent of such statement.State may disburse up to 90%of the State grant amount allocated for development as shown on page i of this agreement,upon receipt and approval by State of a statement of estimated costs from applicant.All moneys advanced to Applicant shall remain property of State until expended for project purposes. The statements to be submitted by Applicant shall set forth in det3J the incurred or estimated cost of work performed or to be performed on development of the Project and whether performance will be by construction contract or by force account_Statements shall not be uibrnitted more frequently than ninety day periods unless otherwise requested by Stale. Modifications of the development pian and s►hedule must be approved by State ptier to any deviation from the State approved plan and schedule. O, Project Administration 1. The Applicant shall promptly sub nit sr:3t wepotts as the State may request. In any event Applicant sha'1 pro,.;de State,a report shoc4i.^.3 total f in3l Project expenditures including State and all other moneys expended within sixty(JOi days atter eaarrtetion of Protect_ 2. Property and facilities acquaad o, d*ve!oped p,u;zuant to this agreern►nt shall be available for inspection by the State upon request- 3. The Applicant shall use any moneys advarse-M b f the State ur,3er the terms of this aa-,reement sokAy for the Project herein described. 4. If grant moneys are advanced, the Applicant&batt pl:ce suC%rnoneys in a se-r3rate interest bearing account,settin3 up and identifying such account prior to the edvince.Interest earned on grant morvzys a&zusced pursuant to this agreement shall be paid to State.If gran:nw—teys are advan ed and ter expended,dee urursaS portion of the;rant steal;be returned to the State within 60 days of coon-.letiun of the Project o:end of the P:oject performance period whichever is earlier. S. Gross income that is earned t: the Ap�,hcan,trans aSta:a aprMcived non recreationat us^on ars acquisition pro.,eel, subsequent to taking tide by t:.e Apr!-cant.nrust be u ,�J by the Applicant tot recreational purposes at the project. E. ProjectTerminat.on 1, The Applicant may unilaterally rescind;hs avecau nt at any time prior to the comrn�nicernent of the Project.After Project commencement this k3ree--teat rnaY tti rescinded,modified or amended by muft:al agr t'r:ent in writing.A project sh3ll be deemed cornmen ed tish-rr the Applicant makes any expenditure, ceseives an advance of grant moneys or incurs Any ahlrg3:iot,%with res,ect to We Project. 2. Failure by the Apple:v%; !o co.:!,:'.1,• v,!h the terms of this a.,yeenrent or,ny other wpeent?nt undar the A,;t ms/be cause.for susWmion of a!1 oW.ga:;vw of tncS:ate he:eund'r. 3. Failure of the A.-.,L-.,it tc, cC*-,'; ce l+• tt•^te",,of tri,- aTeen.rnt+hilt not be err- for the Sri-.Pension o.,a!I ob1,.33t,ons of the ,n r'•p of v%e St,:e s cl!facture v4a:6;, to no fault of the appl-cdnt. In s th cast, any 27 X2:'-`t n..'" i.n C-I:t i;+y.'revaeabe ot)lvi '-ons property wcurr@Q shall t,, eligible for rcirnbur At ent k n,l_, Y,.: 3 00406 4. Because the benefit to be derived by the Stats,from the full compliance by the Applicant with the terms o:this agreement, is the preservation, protection and net increase in the quantity and quality of beaches.parks,public outdoor recreation facilities and historical resources available to the people of the State of California and because such benefit exceeds to an irnrtr_asurable and unascutainable extent the amount of money furnished by theStat. by way of grant moneys under the terms of this agreement,the Applicant agrees that paytrmnt by the Applicant to the State of an amc :nt eQual to the amount of the grant moneys disbursed under this agreement by the Stare would be inadequate c rnpensistion to the State for any breach by theAppticant of this agreement.The Applicant further agrees therefore,that the appropriate remedy in the event of a breach by the Applicant of this agreement sl ali be the specific performance of this agreement. F. Hold Harmless 1. Applicant hereby waives all claims and recourse against the State including the right to contributione,for loss or damage to persons or property arcing from.growing out of or in any way connected with or incident to this agreement except claims arising from the concurrent or sole negligence of State,its offi=$,agents,and employees. 2. Applicant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend State.its officers,agents and employees against any and all claims. demands, damage% costs, experwits or liability costs arising out of the acquisition, developm-nt, construction,operation or maintenance of the property described as the Project wha_h claims,demands or causes of action arise under Government Code Section 8952 or otherwise except for liability arising out of the concurrent or sola negligence of State,its officers,a-,ents,or employees, 3. In the event State is named as codalendent under the provisions of Government Code Section 895 at.saq.,the Applicant shall notify State of such fact and stall represent State in the legal action un!ess State underra%es to. represent itself as codefendant in such legal action in whvh event State shag bear its auvn litigation costs,expenses, and attorney's fees. 4. In the event of jud,^r,rent entered agaonst State and Applicant because of the concurrent negligence o'State and Applicant,their officer%agents,or employees,are apportionment of liability to pay such judament shalt ba made by a court of competent jurisdiction.Neither party shall request a jury apportionment. G. Financial Records 1. The Applicant shall mainta'n satisfactory finarr-tal accounts,documents and records for the Project and shalt make therm available to the State for audi"at reasoraoie canes.Such accounts,documents and records shaft be retained by theAppli-.ant for tiaree years foltmving protect termicsation or completion. During regular offim hours each of Vw parties hereto and their duly authorited representatives shall have the right to inspect and male copies of any boo::*. records or reports of the other parry pertaining to this agreement or matters related thereto.Applicant shall maintain arad make availabfe for inspection by State accurate records of all of its costs,disbursements aid rre:ots vi:th respect to its activities under thisa%reement. 2. The Applicant may use any geiarrlty accepted accounting system Crmi o-d such v1stcm, meats th3 mirimum requirements as may be esti fished by State. H. Use of Facilities 1. The property acquired or de.eloped•%ith grae.t moneys under this agreement shall be used by the Applicant only for the purpose for which the State Grant nso.,.eys-ere requeved and no oche.- use of the area shalt be p_rmitt# accept by specific act of The tdjis!ature. 2. The Applicant shalt%%,Bout cait to State c;-v.tc an'nu.ntztvn the property acctuired or d:vetoped purvi.mr to this agreement in the malner ara i acca7deeg to Cs,standards at7ceptabte to Swe. 1. Nondiscrimination 1. The Applicant shall not dnt:ietn.riate xr.rst any P--C-->q on the blas of sax,race.color,er natior:al o6jorr in the use of any ptoperty or facility aCquvred or dire.-ted trursuant to this agreement. 2. The Applicant shall not di;�r.:ivnwe against ant; person on the ba--is of residence except to the extent that reasonable d.fferentes in nnzi•on or other fees may be mi ritain?d on the basis of and purs:r:n:st to liar, ` 0040"7 .m The County of Contra Costa; and the City of Lafayette, each in consideration of the execution of this agreecent by the State of California, consents to the disbursement of grant funds as herein provided; waives all claims and recourse against the State of California arising out of such disbursement, .which disbursement includes their respective allocation under the Act, and agrees that the property acquired or developed with Grant Monies under this agreement shalt be used by the applicant only for the purposes for which the Grant Money Funds were requested and that no other use of the area shall be permitted except by specific Act of the Legislature. COUNIT OF CONMA COSTA Cin OF AYEITE BY: DATE' ��?�'�L Z o�► jS7� DATE: 00408 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Extension Agreement with Interactive Resources Inc. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Interactive Resources Inc. to provide for an extension of the completion date to May 31, 1976 for con- sulting services in connection with the Contra Costa County Energy Resources Study, at no additional cost to the County. Passed by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orifi: Administrator Supers cc: Director of Planning affixed this 20th day of Agri 1 19 76 Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Interactive Resources Inc. By ;,/J, Deputy Clerk c/o Planning Department Rob ie Gu errez 10 00409 COS Tri COUNTY ENERGY RESOURCES STUDY Cl'}.iJU!1'A:i: SERVICE nORr.El•.Ci'ii k..c iJ.•tii Effective APR ?01976 the Countv o: Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, and Interactive Resources Incor- porated, a California Corporation, hereby a^:end parag -aph 0`7 of their agreement of ective December 3, 1975 to read as follows: 1:ork done pur s::ant to this agreement s�.al l be completed by 31s 197'x. These signatures attest the parties agreement herEtO: COUNTY OF CCi i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approval of Contract 120-070 with Community Food Coalition of Contra Costa County, Inc, for protein food purchase IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract f20-070 with the Community Food Coalition of Contra Costa County, Inc. for the period May 1, 1976 through August 31, 1976 in an amount not to exceed $3,000 in federal funds for protein food purchase for distribution through this organization's County food pantries. Passed by the Board on April 20 , 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid• Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts 6 Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 20th day of A p r i 1 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Social Service By _ Do" Clerk Contractor Robbie Gu rrez H 24 8/75 IOM 00411 Contra Ccs-a COUniI Standard Form S7.ViOARD CONT.RAC' (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. Number 20 - 070 Department: Social Service Subject: Protein purchase for community pantries for the needy 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: CCLTMNITY FOOD COALITION OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, INC. Capacity: Non-profit corporation Address: 404 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, California 94523 3. Tera. The ef-fective date of this Contract is May 1, 1976 and it terminates August 31, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Linit. County's total payments to Contactor under this Contract shall not exceed 3,000 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Cor:msnity Services Administration Grant (OEO) for the Community Food and Nutrition Program effective September 1, 1975. Grantee 090195-06 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code 53703 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALTFOR-11A CCNTR4CTOR B P h: �� ' BY / Y airman, Board of S ervisors / 1 tSILL Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk TDesignate official capacity i6lbusiness and affix corporation seal) By State of California ) ss. '1 Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) Recommended by Department The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared By—y" before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Form Co�_-nty ro :ns-! or :, re%o a~icn of its board of directors. �,,7Rr;tl ? - Dated: By CC ... � tom- D - ' 00412 /Deputy County Clerk to-4617 P,sV 5/75) 0(j .E Srandard -Worm PAYAF-14T PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) 2 0 — 0 Number 70 1. Payment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Contract. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to Contractor for all services provided for County under this Contract shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph 3, below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Contract. 2, Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, County will pay Contractor: [Check one alternative only.] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ] c. An amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred each month, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" included in the Service Plan. [X] d. $2,000 on May 1, 1976 $1,000 on June 1, 1976 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with: [Check one alternative only.] [X] a. General Services Administration Federal Management Circular FMC 74-4, Attachment A (Principles For Determining Costs Applicable To Grants and Contracts With State and Local Gover:usents) and Attachment B (Standards For Selected Items of Cost), and, subject to said Attachments A and B. such other documents (if any) specified in the Service Plan regarding: (1) Principles for determining and allocating the allowable costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, and (2) Standards for determining the allowability of selected items of costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, or [ ] b. Such State regulations and documents as are set forth in the Service Plan regarding accounting guidelines, including standards for determining allowable or non-allo•.eable costs. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly for payment in accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Initial: Cog ractor County Dept. (A-4618 REV 6/75) -1- 00 413 _._.. Standard Foran t PAYMMIT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) 2 U 0 rl !lumber in accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, Co,-,nty will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Initial: Cog ractor County Dept. (A-4618 REV 6/75) -1- 00 413 .3 Standard =or-n t PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) 20 - 070 U — 0 7 O !lumber V C 5. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion o: the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 6. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termination of this Contract, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment mounts) above, County trill remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to ti-le Payment Limit of this Contract. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan. Any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than 18 months from the termination date of this Contract. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjustments made pur- suant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. 8. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to t:e extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its ob.111gations under this Contract. Initials: 'ted C' tractor County Dept. (A-4618 REV 6/75) -2 00 414 Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDTI TO S (surcl-ase Of�- Service3) ^ Number 1. Compliance with La::. Contractor shall be suaJect to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and zeegulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including, but not limited to, licensing, e=ployment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Ir_snection. Contractor's performance, place of L;:siness and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the Co, -nty, the State o: California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and rake avai?a�:le for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. ?:^.e Contractor and Coun--v a7ree to retain all documents pertainin, to this Contract for three years =ron the date_ of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report G:h:c:ever is eater) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such: further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall rake available these recorjs to authorized representatives of the County, the State o: California, and the United Sates Government. S. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract .ay be ter:.:;nated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to .the other. b. Failure to Perform. The Counts, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor =ail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such: termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sera d•-,p the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. ?notwithstanding Paragraph S.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Soecifica_iozs for Qnera-=r.- 'roce3T��es. _tailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, ray be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements when entered shall not be amend--encs to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agree:ent entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. Gen"ral Amendrents. - This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa Coen-f Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State on Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Ad=inistrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially charge the Pay-ezt Pro•r:sions or the Service Plan. Initials: Cotetractor County Dept. 00415 y cr,. . Contra -'csta County Standard Form G£`iS?L:L C:. SITIO`tS (Purchase o, Services) . er20 -- 070 or Lul:� Lug L&%2%_L, LIA"uulllb .il, herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8, :codifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. . This Contract may be codified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any r:quired State or Federal (united States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payrent Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be ame:ded by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Ad=inistrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Pay^ezt Provisions or the Service Plan. initials: Cotitractor County Dept. 00415 a- Contra _'csta County Standard Fort GENS.Rz:-L C3:'YDFI ONS (Purchase of Services) 2 n li I;-.berg 0 _ v 7 S. Disputes, Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final dete=niration in writing by the head of the County Depart-ment for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Goverm-:ent. 10. Law Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of :he State of California. 11. Conformance with federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to ass,-,-e conforrznce with such Federal or State recuirevents. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Condit ons, inspections or approvals, or statements by Eny officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfil this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the teres and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or ar..end--ent thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor sha'_: not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract bids the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior :mitten consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as charges in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential con,lic-s of interest. 17. Confidentialit}?. Cc. -_ractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or -regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning an-i individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the admin_stration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disc_osinz such information other than as authorized b, lair may be guilty of a nisde=eanor. Initial: Contractor County "ept. (A-4516 RZV 5/75) 00416 -2- Contra Costa Countv Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS of Services) ((�� Number 20 - 0 V 7 0 . 16. NonC'iscriminator•., Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall he available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees fron all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or irj=ry to persons or pro?errr, including without limitation, all consequential damages, frra any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services o; the Contractor hereunder, whether or no~ resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or e:~ployees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor stall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless other-wise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $250,000 for each person and 5500,00+0 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injuz-f, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all da ages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. ='he Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the Counry with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. notices to the County shall be addressed to `he end of the Cos.:n- • Department for which this Contract is trade, c/o Contracts Admin s-rarion "Init, Ninth Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or o: other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 0041'7 (A-4616 REV 5/75) -g- SERVICE vLA.`i Number 20 - 070 0 .. The Co=unity Food Coalition of Contra Costa County, Inc., hereinafter known as the Contractor, operates a co=unity food and nutrition program throughout Contra Costa County whose purpose is to solicit and store, and ultimately to distribute, low cost and donated foodstu_`s to County-referred and other needy persons. The Contractor provides 1S pantry locations, certain operating expenses, and volunteer personnel to the program. 7-he salaries and fringe benefits of one social worker administrator, one cleric drive_, and one one-half-time typist clerk employed in the program are defrayed by federal funds through the Community Services Administra- tion Grant (OEO) for the Comity Food and Nutrition Program effective September 1, 1975.• The Contractor shall use funds provided by this Contract for the purchase of perishable and nonperishable protein foods such as meat, fish, beans and dairy products. These foods shall be collected, stored, and distributed through the Contractor's food and nutrition program described above. All service shall be performed in accordance with provisions of the Community Services Grant effective September 1, 1975, Oro Fora 7031.1, Program Progress Review Report submitted February 26, 1976. 1 Initials: wl/c i Lor County Dept. i t O0418 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF MONTHLY RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH DUNCAN KNOWLES, ET AL, FOR PREMISES IN PITTSBURG FOR CONTINUED USE BY THE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is authorized to execute a monthly rental agreement with Duncan Knowles, et a1 , for premises at 960 East Street, Pittsburg, California, for continued use by the Cooperative Extension Service, at $500.00 per month commencing April 1 , 1976. The foregoing order was passed on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. WAP:bb Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisor Real Property Division affixed " 2.0th day of Avril 19 76 cc: County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Auditor-Controller Cooperative Extension By Deputy Clerk Public Works Department Ma fo�9 Real Property Division Lessor via R/P Buildings & Grounds H 24 W5 lOM 00419 04t q LEASE Cooperative Extension 960 East Street, Pittsburg, CA 1 . PARTIES: Effective on -APP 2 0 1976 SQUIRE W. KNOWLES and DUNCAN H. KNOWLES, hereinafter called the "LESSOR", and the COSTA COUNTY OF CONTRA/a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called the "COUNTY" mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. LEASE OF PREMISES: LESSOR for and in consideration of the rents, hereby leases to COUNTY and COUNTY accepts and takes those certain premises commonly known as 960 East Street, Pittsburg, shown on City of Pittsburg Subdivision Map Book 17-357, Block 79 as parcels 7, 8, 9 & 10 and further shown on Assessors Map Boob 85, Page 18, Block 182 as Parcel 6 & 7 together with the improvements therein consisting of an one story brick building containing approximately 4,900 square feet together with adjacent paved parking. 3. TERM: The term of this lease shall be month to month commencing April 1 , 1976. 4. RE14TAL: COUNTY shall pay to LESSOR as rent and use of said premises a monthly rental of 5500.00 per month in advance on the 10th day of each month during the terry: of this lease. 5. NOTICES: Notices and rental for LESSOR shall be mailed in care of Duncan I.I. Knowles, 503 X.aple. San Hateo, California 94402. Notices to COUNTY shall be mailed to Public Works Department, Real Property Division, 6th Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, California 94553. - l - Microfilmed with board order 00420 " t s k 6. USE OF PRE,'•SiSES: Tne premises sf alk+ be used during the term and extension hereof for purposes of conducting various functions of COUNTY. 4 f 7. MAINTENAi:CE AID REPAIRS: (a) COUNTY urijl maintain any and a'.l interior electrical , interior water, interior plumbing, heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems except COUNTY shall not be responsible for major repair or replacement of said syste-r+ls. COU;ITY will replace any and all electrical lamps and ballasts in the lighting systFn. (b) LESSOR shall :ee: the exterior of the building in good order, condition and repair except for exterior doers and their fixtures, closures, and hinges, which snail be maintainer' by the COUNTY. COUNTY shall maintain P all locks and key s;;ste;rs used in the demised premises. COUNTY shall maintain the parking lot and chain link fencing. (c) COUNTY shall keep and maintain ton interior of the premises in good order, condition and repair, to the extent provided by routine maintenance and normal care but shall rot be responsible for major repair resulting from r age and deterioration. LESSOR shall repair damage to the interior caused by failure to maintain the exterior in good repair including damage to the interiJr cause3 by roof leaks and/or interior and exterior wall leaks. (d) COUNTY shall replace any glass windows broken in the demised premises. (e) LESSOR shall provide and instal at the direction of the Fire Marshall the necessary nur:ber of A-S-C fire extinguishers for the premises at no cosi to CUU: i. I.l:J.' TL snal l tF.ereafter maintain, repair, and replace said extinguishers. L (f) COUNTY shall not suffer any waste on or to the demised premises. � (9) COUNTY shall not be responsible fcr correction of Code violations which may exist in the demises prer;ises unless such violations arise out of or are related to a cnanue it the COUNTY occupancy or use of said premises. 8. UTILITIES AND JANITt)3.IAL: COj';"t shall pay for all water, gas, electric and '' refuse collection services Provided to the demise:: premises and shall provide its own janitorial set-vice. LESSOR shell provide separate utility meters for the demised premises. - 2 - 00421 ♦ X, r i 9. ALTERATIONS, FIXTURES AND SIG:,'S: CG"'iTY r!ay make any lawful and proper minor c alterations, attach fixtures and signs in or upon the premises which shall remain e COUNTY property and ,.ay be rerioved therefrom by MINTY prior to the termination of this lease, all signs to ;+gee ::itf) existing Code requirements and LESSOR's approval . Any such alterations, signs, or fixtures snail be at COUNTY's sole cost and expense. K 10. HOLD HAR;;LESS: It is understood and agreed that LESSOR shall not in any way be responsible for dar,uges to persons or prcperty in and upon said premises and r shall not be held liable `cr any liability, clam or suit for damages to the person or property while in or ve-or said premises on COU ITY business and COUNTY hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold har-.less LESSOR from any liability or charges t of any kind or character by reason of s::ch injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising therefrcn in, aroind, o►• upon said leased premises, except in r the case of any structurZj , re—zhanical , or other failure of equipment or building owned by LESSOR which results in dac;age to any person or property, LESSOR will be held liable. LESSOR agrees to defend, irdec:nif- and hold COUNTY ccrpletely harmless from � dairages to perscns or property and COUNTY shall not be held liable for any liability, claim, or suit for damages tG the persons cr property when and if said persons or property are invited or brought into tre demised premises by LESSOR. 11 . DESTRUCTION: (a) In the event of damage causing a partial destruction of the premises during the ter::i ;,f tis lease frc-► arcause, and repairs can be made within (c0) sixty days from the date of the date of the damage under the applicatle la;:s and regulations of governmental authorities, LESSOR F shall repair said dara(,e Fr inptly and within a reasonable time, but such partial Bestruc ic;n Ist,all in rostiise void ;.his lease except that COUNTY shall be entitled to a proportionate redlccion of rent while such repairs are being made, such proportionate reduction to be based upon the extent to which the portion of the pr•er.ises usable by COWITY bears to the total r area of the p!-Ei^iises. 00422 (b) If such repairs ciruot be �:,ade 'sr. sixty (CO) days, LESSOR may, at his option, r:;ake the same within a reasonable time, this lease continuing in full force and effect and the rent to be proportionately rebated F as provided in the previous paragraph. In the event LESSOR does not i so elect to +,?al:e such ►-epairs t:eich cannot be rude in sixty (60) days, or such repairs cannot be -made under such lads and regulations, this � lease may be terminated at the option, of either party. y (c) A total destruction of the premises or the building in which the premises r are located shall terMinate this lease. 12. ASSIGNVEt T AND SUBLETTING: COUNTY shall not assign this lease nor sublet i the premises without prior written consent of LESSOR. � 13. QUIET ENJOYMENT: LESSOR covenants that COL.N Y shall at all times during the said term peaceable and :lr;ietiy nage, hold, and enjoy the demised premises without suit, trouble, or hindrance fro: or or, account of LESSOR as long as COUNTY fully perforins rerecn3er. � r 14. DEFAULTS: In the event of COUNTY breach of any of the covenants or conditions k herein, including rent pa«.cnt, LESSOR rray re-enter and repossess the premises and F remove all persons and properly therefrcm. In the event of such a breach by LESSOR, COUNTY may quit the prEmises without further cost or obligation or may proceed to repair the building or correct the probleir. resulting from the breach and deduct the cost thereof fro,-,i rental pay-.encs due to LESSOR, provided that COUNTY has given LESSOR written notice of said breach and ;provide.: that LESSOR has not made a sub- stantive effort to correct said breach. a 15. SURRENDER OF FREMIISES: 0n the las: day of the said tern,,, or sooner termination F of the lease, COUNTY % ll peaceable and quietly, leave and surrender to LESSOR these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures (except signs and fixtures referred to hereinabove) in good order, condition and repair, reasonable use and wear thereof and dar.zge by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by c Act of God, or by circu-mstances over ::hici 00;17Jf has no control excepted. COUNTY shall not be liable fcr pa'anting the ir.teri;,r o" the der,+ised premises upon termination of this ;ease. - 4 - w423 f i 16. TAXES: COUtiTY shall pay to LESSOR within thirty (30) days after being requested to do so by said LESSOR, as additional rental, a suirt equal to the } increment, if any, in City and/or COUNTY taxes levied against the demised premises (Assessor's Parcel 185-182-06 a 07) in any year during the term of this lease or i extension thereof which may exceed the taxes for the fiscal years 1975-76 which are One Thousand Eighty and 3;/100 Dollars (S1 ,030.34). { 17. IMPROVEMENTS: COUNTY shall ray the sumof Nine Hundred and No/100 Dollars f ($900.00) for parking lot ii:provenents installed by LESSOR together with the first t+lontn's rent. r 18. INSPECTION: LESSOR may enter the premises between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. , Iiorday through Friday, holidays excepted, and may employ proper r r representatives to ensure that the property is being properly cared for, that no waste is being made, and that. all things are done in the nanner best calculated to preserve the property and in full c(r,pliance with the teras and conditions hereof. 19. SUCCESSORS: The terns and provisions of this lease shall extend to and inure '. to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns � of the respective parties hereto, jointly and severally. 20. RECORDING: A Mle:izoranjur: of Lease shall be executed and recorded by the parties hereto. This will be in lieu of recording the entire instrument. s s. r - 5 - 21 . TIME IS THE ESSENCE of each and all of the tears and provisions of this lease. COUNTY LESSOR COU14TY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California �Gt! Du n owles By P. - P. Kenny C ai man, Board of Super sors vire 11. Knowles, Sr. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk / By Deputy Maai9 RECO114ENDED FOR APPROVAL: By County Administrator BV , Deputy Pubic Works 10rkctdr Buildings and Grounds By Ileal—Property Agen APPROVED AS TO FO;U1: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By Deputy 00425 t' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 19 76 In the Matter of Request for U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Funds for Public Service Projects As recommended by the Director of Planning, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a Preapplication Form requesting U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Funds for Public Service Projects, as provided under the Housing and Community Development Act. Passed by the Board on Anril 21, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Orig: Administrator Wftess my hand and the Seol of the Board of Supervisors cc: Director of Planning affixed this 20th day of April 1976 U. S. Dept. of HEW c/o Planninr J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Auditor-Controller Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M 00426 t REQUEST FOR KW FM FOR PI18UC SERVICE PROJECTS AS PROVIDED UIMER TITLE I OF THE HOUSING Alit? CGMU-TY CEVELOPP9T ACT FMC 74-7 September 13, 1974 Attachment M40.'43 Aooro al No.29.RO219 I i 1. arse C1.ati.ghouN Idttttlfi.I 1 - PREAPPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE Not Applicable PART i z Appiicant•s A"licatioa,N.• Not Applicable ? 3. F.d.td G.or~Agency ` A"lica"Nava Contra Costa County �• Department of Health. Education and Pnnninng D_enartment ! • Orgatisotional unit Welfare Deve een. Secretary Region IX P.O. Box 951 Adtwlniswai.e Office Samw A4&oss-P.O.Be. j 50 Fulton Street Martinez Contra Costa j Str..t Adams*-P.O.Us city County ! San Francisco, California 94102 California 94553 City stat. Zip cod. stee Zip Cod. S. Doscripti.e Nawe of the Preiec+(refer to Part n f.r erevas zentl.e ststerr-^t Program Development and Counseling Staff for Neighborhood Center 6. Fed.+ai Catalog No, ). Fd-alk F.,td6n howaod S 23,400 s' It. Grow"Type t' Stat.. a cow". t.ry, Or%-iso.eif,l f a 9. Type of Assistance l - X Dont, Lon, Ota..1Sp«:ftl LL` lf%.Popusaien O:.ectiy botwitinj ita.w 0-Protect 12.Le-rh of Prei.ct f 2000-3000 12 Months jlll 11.Conq.ossionai Oiswict IL sopiam"Oat. a 7th, Sth, 9th Jul? 1, 1976 E a ld.Own,of Application 7th April , 1976 15. Th.applica.t c.»tii.s Mat to Nt.►.st e'his►na.:.dq*a•d Wool.try data t;..s,.esaoficatien we troe and co...cr,and the filift's of the pt.oppl+catien has fxaw a.ly..titeti,.d hr Lite ge.e.•ieq hod,of A...pplica.t.(Tars;=',IC serr:-e anject wartz till cmurtitr � Uet•lc>ar_st F:ra of thr Citi/c:1Mtl a: '3rfi^ta t2!t! i:'Ue t :f !:e xasizti z.: rAaaaCity Gsrsta?�erlt Wit.} f i f c }I 1 Typadnow. ett.(G+fef Esnvit»Oficer( T.t.phen.Nawthar James hairman, Board of i Jas F. I:enn} Euvervisors •af-coal 04jMc1• EAT. ( Signa.-.t a+o.Thwie.d r.pt.s.w•.+i..(�t±et Esr.ttin"fftCnr) f 415 372-2371 -tr — --- — -- -.— ,-- 4 Fr F.d...l Us.0..1, f 0042'7 II In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Al 0 r•v, nF^T rTn TNF rnpFIDNT r ^ Rn-nn nF THF Ue :!pr_tt F:rn of t%F citr/c�aty r dehme ve4r i:i!e 4 of ttw rmnsicw tad C"Noity aaeelapeest het.) i i Enervi t. Otlef Eseaslln Officer) Typal nrnw. T.rpl�en.Nuwb.. airman, Board of ! James P. Kenny sors ..4►Coat uuw.eR I .T. Sign -.0 .—,4 r.p....w.a.:..(C}1!!f IRWI i.e"iflcer) 372-2371 - order 0042/ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT April 2Q 19 76 In the Matter of Approval of Consulting Services Agreement with John C. Wilson for Architectural Program for Apparatus Shop Expansion, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, Pleasant Hill, W0. 5479 The Board of Supervisors, as ex-officio the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with John C. Wilson, Architect, E1 Sobrante. The Agreement provides for an Architectural Program for the Apparatus Shop Expansion at the Contra Costa County Fire Pro- tection District in Pleasant Hill, California. Said Agreement also provides for payment on an as-earned basis with a maximum fee of $1,000.00 which amount shall not be exceeded without additional written authorization by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. II In the Matter of Approval of Consulting Services Agreement with John C. Wilson for Architectural Program for Apparatus Shop Expansion, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, Pleasant Hill, W0. 5479 The Board of Supervisors, as ex-officio the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with John C. Wilson, Architect, E1 Sobrante. The Agreement provides for an Architectural Program for the Apparatus Shop Expansion at the Contra Costa County Fire Pro- tection District in Pleasant Hill, California. Said Agreement also provides for payment on an as-earned basis with a maximum fee of $1,000.00 which amount shall not be exceeded without additional written authorization by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator - P.W. Dept \Nitness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds Supervisors cc• John Wilson affixed this 20th , of April 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Department clerk County Auditor-Controller By Deputy Fire District ii. inilraham H 24 ens IOM 00428 1. S >c� ciol Conditions. Tl�eac Special Conditions are ic�coz�oi•ated beov y refervncc. (a) public Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (b) -Consultant's ITame & Address: JOHN C. WILSON, Architect, 3735 San Pablo Dam'Road, E1 Sobrante, California 94803 (c) Effective Date: April 20; 1976 Architectural Program for Apparatus Shop (d) Project Wame, Wumber, & Location: Expansion,- Contra Costa Count 6nso1id-1, Fire District, Pleasant H W.O. #5479) (e) Payment Liiait: $1,000.00 (Guaranteed Maximum) 2. Signatures. Th -e signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: CONSULT ! . - �, (Sole Proprietorship) a.)d i nate official capacity in business State f California ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACiaxrrn .DG.jL=. (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership nand above executed the within ins _nt pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. L` � NOUDAY PLUM-CAURN M CO CD CONN1Y ����rll•ast.tn» /PUBLI AGENCY Vernon LCline FORM APPROVED Acting PZL11-1c..:Wdrks ector John B. Clausen, County Counsel Deputy B3►= ��i. �, i • Deputy. 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency and Consultant nutually agree and promise as follows: Employment. Public Agency hereby e=loys Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Sc22e' pf Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A attached hereto.^ 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for tuo or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' not of policy lapse or cancellation iz required. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expens' for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) Without prior writte.. approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works Director. Consultant's statement of charge shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment vi11 be made within thirty (30) days aft receipt of each statement. 8. Termination. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agreement at any time by written notice to the Consultant, 'Whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon suc' termination, Consultant agrees to turn o.er to Public Agency everything pertaining to the 'Work possessed by him or under his control at that time, and will be paid, without duplica- tion, all amounts due or thereafter becominff due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. 9. Status , The Consultant is an Independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. 10. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, nave, indemnify. and hold harmless Public ALcncy and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury •or OnriDgeu arising from or connected t:ith. the aerviecs provided hereunder. Microfilmed with board order. 00429 t EXHIBIT '"A" SCOPE OF SERVICES To prepare Architectural Program for the proposed . Apparatus Repair Shop Expansion at Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District in Pleasant Hill. The Architectural. Program shall include space re- quirements, adjacencies, and schematic site and floor plan. Exhibit "A" 00430 ......... . ARCIIITECTMAL ACRE-F."TNT EXHIBIT CIMRGE RATES ' A. 1. Time by Classification of Personnel: Principal Architect as- 60 per hour Project Architect 22 times payroll Job Captain 2'k times payroll Senior Draftsman 2-� times payroll -Junior Draftsman 21; times payro I l Clerical - 2.� times payroll In no case shall the 2� tides payroll exceed the principal's hourly rate. 2. consultants: Architect's consultants' time shall be paid at Architect's cost which shall be computed by appltiing the applicable above rates to consultants' personnel. Detailed statements . of consultants' bills shall be submitted as part of Architect's bill fur services. 3. Tr_ ansz--ortation: Cost to Architect for transportation will be considered as includ_d in the above charges and no extra payment will be made therefore. Facpenses for essential trips to areas outside the Bay P.rea will be reimbursed by the County only when. the County has issued Prior written approval therefore. e t i -21- - i 1- 00431 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , i9 76 In the Matter of Approval of Architectural Service Agreement with Armas Sootaru for Womens' Minimum Security Facility in Richmond. Work Order No. 5268 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Architectural Services Agreement with Armas Sootaru, Architect, Martinez is APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute the Agreement, which provides for services in con- nection with the Womens' Minimum Security Facility in Richmond. The Agreement provides for a maximum fee of $21,000.00. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order snowed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator - P. W. Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Boo rd of Buildings and Grounds Supervbm cc: Armas Sootaru affixed th=_2Qth-day of Apr_ , 19 Public Works Department J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller syDeputy Clerk Sheriff-Coroner H 24 595 IOM 00432 Au"REEIMY'NT FOR ARCUITEC 1?^.AL SERVICES Table of Contents Pale ARTICLE I General Intent 1 ARTICLE II Description of Project 2 ARTICLE III Basic Services of Architect A. General 3 B. Schematic Design Phase 4 'C. Design Development Phase 4 D. Construction Documents Phase 5 E. Construction Phase 5 F. Documents and Drawings 7 G. Time Periods 8 ARTICLE IV Extra Services by Architect 9 ARTICLE V Architect's Fee 10 ARTICLE VI Payments Under this Agreement' 12 ARTICLE VIT Duties of Archite^_t - 13 ARTICLE V:-Ji Duties of County 16 ARTICLE IX Cancellation of Agreement or Suspension of Project 17 ARTICLE X Termination of this Agreement 18 ARTICLE X1 Supplemental Condition 19 . EXHIBIT "A" Fee Schedule 21 APPENDIX Microfilmed with board order. 00433 &GREF`:-lT FOR ARCHITEMM.41. %F r.VICES Contra Costa County, California This Agreement is made on April 13, 1976 , by and between the COMM OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "County", and Armas Sootaru, Architect, 610 Las Juntas Street, P.O. Box 601, Martinez, California 94553 (Name and Address of Architect) - hereinafter called "'Architect", and the County and the Architect, for the considerations named herein, mutually agree as follows; Article I General Intent of Agreement The County, acting through its Board of Supervisors, hereinafter called the 'Bozrd", intends to erect one or more buildings or to perform other related work as hereinafter more fully described. Professional arcti4ectural and/or i::agineering skills and services not available within the Coua.y organization are essential for the proper and satisfactory execution of this•project. For that reason the professional architect is hereby retained ' by'the-Ccunty. A clear understanding, at the outset, of the relationships and obligations between the County and the Architect is of the utmost iw-vortance. This Agreement forms the basis of the professional relationship between the County an-A the Architect. -1- - 00434 _._ t l• - Article 11 Description of the Project A. The project contemplated under this Agreement, and the general location thereof, are described as follows: Design and construct a Womens` Minimum Security Facility to house about twenty-five (25) inmtes on a 3-acre plus or minus parcel located in the City of Richmond adjacent to" the present Work Furlough Center and behind the County Corporation Yard. The facility to be basically residential in chara- cter with landscaping and other site improvements to be included. The gross building floor area is to be about 5,000 square feet. " B. All vritten commmxications from the County to the Projects Architect regarding the desier. progress for this project small be pa=t of the "Project Scope" and are hereby made a past of this Agreement by reference. A project scope "is provided as the basis of design program. C. The tentative construction cost is hereby declared to be ThrQp 11imdrs-d Thnunand nnA Niw/10 ; 1nn11gr� dollars Q-ADO-000-00 )- . .. . ... .. . . 00435 Article III Rnsic Services of Architect • The Architect represents and shall render the service's and furnish the items described as follows: A. General 1.' The architect holds current registration as an architect in the State of California and furthermore does by entering into this Agreement certify that he is professionally competent 444 able to provide the professional services outlined herein by reason of his personal knowledge and -skill and that of his staff of consultants retained and paid by him. 2. The Architect and his stafi of consultants shall be fully knowledgeable of and shall execute all work in full comptiance with all applicable codes, laws and regulations. 3. The Architect shall assist in preparing all necessary studies, presentations and 'Tnviron•rental Impact Statements" a. required to obtain environmental c,earance by the governmental agencies with jurisdiction over the project. it. When the County desires to obtain aid from Federal, state or other governmental agencies, the Architect shall assist ir. preparing applications and shall- furaish any information necessary to meet the requirements of such agencies. :Then the project is to be constructed wholly or partially with Federal, state or other governmental agency funds, the Architect shall observe all requirements of said agencies. S. At all times throughout the various stages of the project the Architect agrees to attend meetings and conferences as the County deems necessary or as requested by the County. -3- 00436 Architcct shall perform such duties as may be necessary and which art- usually performed by an Arcbitect and which are necessary for the successful completion of the project, even though not specifically called for herein. B. Schematic Design Phase shall be presented to the Board for its approval and shall consist of the following: 1. The County's basic requirements. 2. A master plan and when specifically requested by the County, provisions shall be included for future growth. 3. Studies indicating size, shape, and relationship of all spaces involved in the project, including the basic mechanical and electrical systems to be utilized. 4. Exterior elevations and a section of the facility. 5. An estimate of the construction cost based on square foot prices and the Architect's judgment. C. Dz!sigu Development Phase shall be an outgrowth of detailed study of the considerations deserit•ed in sub-heading•B. above. It will be presented to the Board for its approval and shall conssst of the following: - .l. Two line floor plans fully.dimensioned. 2. Calculations and outline specifications which clearly describe architectural character and materials. 3. Presentation of the structural system and all its essential features. 4. Presentation of the electrical and mechanical systems refined to clearly show their characteristics and the quality and control .of environment they will provide. Submit for County review yanutacturer's cut sheets for all electrical and mechanical items. 00437 Jk LIT- 5- Duildlrg elevaiions and sectionz as appropriate. 6. Final cost estimates. Me County will closelyand thoroughly revic--i the final cost estimate submitted by the Architect and the County may obtain independent cost estimates to assist in its evaluation. The final approved cost estimate will be agreeable to both parties. , D. Construction Ibcurtants Phase 1, Working Drawings and S�kecifications shall be prepared outlining, for bidding and construction purposes, the scope and details of the architectural, mechanical, electrical, structural, and general engineering work to be performed by the Cont1 actor. 2, Complete the selection of all colors and finishes and submit a display board shnwi g samples of same. 3. Unless directed otherwise b.- the County, the Working Drawings and Specifications shall be prepared so .that the work will be executed under one contract; lt. When so directed by the Cr%inty, the Architect shall in- elude in the bid documents provisions to receive alter- nate bids and unit prices. - 5. The Architect shall, as necessary,. furnish or cause to be furnished to the County adequate description of heating, ventilating, or other things the configuration, location, fa..teaings, as well as methods for inspecting and servicing, E. Construction Phase 1. Bidding Procedure will be administered by the County with assistance from the Architect who will do the following: a. Handle all arrangements and distribution of the con- tract docurents. . 00438 b. Prepare and distribute :ail edOcrda ff., the contract documents. c. Answer questions and provide clarifications directed to the contract documents. d. Assist the County in reviewing the submitted bids and advise the County concerning acceptance or re- jection of bids. 2. .Contract administration will be provided by the County with the Architect assisting in the general administration as follows: a. Advise the County in writing as to the true intent os the contract documents when so requested by the County. b. Review and anprove and transmit to the County all shop drawings, subuittrls, operating instructions, equipment lists, a aintanvmce manuals, etc. c. When requested by the rcunty, provide technical direction. (Such regr:!sts will be*kept to a minimum by the County.) d. The Architect and each consultant approved by the County shall cake three visits to the site during com- pletion of the cork under their discipline or as in- vited by the Comfy. e. The Architect and/or his consultant., when invited by the County shall perform additional assistance to the County in the adriaistratioa of the construction can- tract over and above those services spelled out herein, • and such "extra" services except when caused by errors -6 00 39 I:tiC].0 lit �1!+:.IC .;t`Tl'fi'(•: !.`•' a" 's :Lt.'C� ��'' •11 'x) or oriSsions in Ute contract documents, shall be paid for in accordance with Article YZ, B., Page 14. F. Documents end Dravings 1. All contract documents shall be prepared by the Architect except General Conditions, Bid Forms, Instructions to Bidders, and other standard County Items vhich will be provided by the County to the • Architect for inclusion with the Specification Book. 2. The following documents will be furnished • the Architect: a. Up to 8 copies of drawings and specifications of the + Schematic Design for checking purposes. b. Up to 8 copies of d-awings and outline specifications of the Design Dc a ionment Phase for checking purposes. Up to 4 copies o_ Architect's final cost estimate. c. Up to 8 copies of the working drawings and specifi- cations for finalczecking purposes. d. Upon final approval of the above-mentioned working' drawings and specifications, the Project Archite^t shall furnish the County up to shirt (JQT complete sets of plans and specifications. The County reserver the right to request additional copies of plans and specifications as may be required, " and only the direct printing costs cif-which will be at additional County expense. 1 3. Ps-Built Trecinges _ a. The County Lill. ra,.ce the "As-Built" corrections to the plans and specifications. Upon request the Architect shall deliver to the County the original tracings. "7 0044-0 a `d*'psr".'. .. a`•"'�La, r t_rI..: IlI Fa.ic :�� '�:r::� of �!: •ttit;:ct (car•t.a) - b. In the event this Agreccent is terminated by either party for any reason whatever, prior to completion, .2.11 the s original tracings and specifications and other pertinent E documents shall be turned over to the County and shall ' become the property of the County. c. The Architect shall beheld harmless by the County "- for liabilities that: (1) Result directly from modification or changes of the documents by the County, and 2) Result directly from construction execution or practice when the Architect is not retained to provide the construction supervision. G. Timerhe iods: It io understood and agreed that time is of the essence in this. Agrvemeeat and the Schematic Design Phase of the work shall start immr:diately. It is recognized that it is impractical to set uj- a tine schedule for Schematic Design. Phase and the Design Deve_op- went Phase because during these phh�Lses there is an inter-related exchange of information between the County's various departm--atc and the Architect. After the Design Develop=eent Phase of the work has been accepted by the County, the Architect shall" proceed with all due diligence to complete the Construction Document Phase. The Working Drawings and Specifications shall be ready for printing of the contract documents within Ninety (90) calendar days of the date authorization is given to the Architect to proceed with the Working Drawir-s Phase. Work on each item of service as specified in this Article shall proceed step-Uise upon written notification as provided by this Agreement and until such notification, Architect shall not proceed with any subsequent item of service. nntt • brC3.cic Yom' KXLI-A SCrVICCS by the Arc'.:;tect A. Tile folle:wiita services.. insofar as they cause the Architect extra . expense, .and if authorized by the County, will be paid for by the County.as provided in Article V. Par. D. - 1. Revisions and changes in plans requested by the County after approval of*Desiga Development Phase and final cost estimate. 2. In the event the County directs the Architect to prepare segregated contracts, the extra service over and above that 'which would be required with non-segregated contracts will be paid for as an . extra by the County.. . 3. Preparation of change orders, unless they are for the purpose of correcting an error or omission, regardless of whether the correction is beneficial cr nor-beneficial to the project. . 4. -uper ision. of repair of damage to the structure when so directed Ly the County. - - 5. The selection by the Architect at the County's request of movable furniture, equipment, or articles which are not included in the construction contract. 6. 'Arranging for the work to proceed should the Contractor default due to delinquency or insolvency. . . 7. The preparation of --gsured drawings of existing structures as - authorized by the County. 8. Providing and accodating'code and regulatory requirements of any applicable governing agency-which become newly effective after the date of advertisement for bids. 00442 "title V. Arcluttect's Fee A. 2`he County agrees to pay the {architect for full perforraunce of architectural services for the Construction Daruments and i Construction Pnases herein, a total fee of TLze�TQaa Thousand Dollars ($21,000.00) based upon the payment schedule on Page 12 of this agreement. In the event the County modifies the scope or the timetable, the Architect's fee may be adjusted appropriately as mutually agreeable. B. Errors and Omissions in the Contract documents which are dis- covere:i before the project is put to bid shall be corrected by the Architect without cost to the County. Architectural servirey required to make changes in constractioa resulting from errors and omissions in the Contract documents which are discovered after the contract is let shall be performed by the Architect without cost to the County. C. The Architect shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction work which is unnecessary and non-beneficial to the County, which is the result of grass errors acd/or omissions in the coatract documents. -10- 00443 rt"Cle V Architect's Fee (Cont'd) D. Dora services shall not be rendered by the Architect under this Agreement unless they are first ae.taorized in uriting by the County. The payment to Architect for extra services shall be at the rates set forth in "Exhibit A". - E. The Architect's fee specified in Paragraph A, above, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, shall constitute Pull compensation to the Architect for the services under this Agreement. -I1- - . - 00444 A. It is agreed that payments to the Project Architect.ahall be made a:, follows-. Payment Dumber Basis of Payment Total,Fee Due 1. Approval of Schematic Drawings 11� 2. Board Approval of Preliminary Plans and Specifications ISp 3. 54 Completion of Working Drawings _ 24% 4. Board Approval of V►beking Drawings and Specifications 24% 5. Receipt of Construction Bids 18% 6. Completion of 25% of Construction % 7. Completion of 755 of Construction 0% 8. 35 Days sifter "Notice of Completion" is Recorded 2% Total 100 1. Extra, Services: Payment for extra services shall be made - at the rate set forth in Article V, Para. D , on a monthly basis, upon submission of a statement of itemized cost therefor. Iia extra payment will be made •a,the Architect for expenser. ' incurred for items of work for which prior written authorizrVU-3a has not been issued. 2. Printing Costs: The County ray require additional plans and specifications and will pay only the direct printing costs of same. -12-- 00445 Article VTI ]Unties of Architect A. If the lowest bona fide bid received by the County for the project - exceeds one-hundred ten percent (. 107.) of the revised final cost estimate, and if the Couuty so requests, the Architect shall revise the plans and specifications without additional cost to the County so as to bring the cost of the project within the revised final cost estimate. In. the event the Architect is requested to make said revisions, he'sh:t11 ' furnish without cost to the County the revised plans and specifications in the number required by the County for rebidding. This provision. will be enforceable only if the Co=unty advertises for bids within ninety (40) days after final approval of the completed construction documents. B. Architect shall employ all civil, jechanical, electrical and st•.uctural engineers and other consultants �s'necessary to prepare any ireni of service listed in Article III.. Said consultants shall be Iizensed by the State of California to pr.rform their special services. All drawings prepared by consultants- and included in the contract documents . `shall bear the appropriate stamp and signature of the appropr?ate con- sultant. The structural consultant shall be a registered .structural engineer. Each consultant being considered shall receive a copy of this. Agreement and shall acknowledge to the Architect in writing, with carbon copy to the County, that he has read and understands tLe Agreement and, furthertsore, that he agrees to assist the Architect with all the services and duties mentioned herein as they apply to the specialties for which he is • retained as a consultant. All consultants retained by the Architect shall be approved in writing by the County. - 00446 _ - •Ar.ti.cle VII Duties of Architect (Cun't) . _ C. Every employer of labor performing; or providing the services to be performed or provided under this Agreement shall carry and pay for such Workmen's compensation insurance as is necessary to fully indemnify himself and 'to protect his employees under the Workmen's Compensation Insurance and Safety Act of the State of California and to relieve the County from all responsibility thereunder in connection with the performance of the Agreement, and, upon the execution of the Agreement, shall. file with the County, for approval as to adequacy, a certificate or certificates that such insurance is in effect. The Architect shall provide a cetti-gicate of insurance for errr•rs ' and emissions or malpractice satisfactory to the County in an amount - • not less than $100,000 which shai! be sent to the County within ten days after the order to proceed is given. A policy containing a delu:tible clause cf not more th-i ,$5,000 is permissible. In addition to the above, the Architect shall obtain Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance in an amount not less .than•two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any person and a total limit of not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of t%a or more persons in one acc'.dent or occurrence and property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) . • • - 00447 . p Article VTI Duties of Architect (Con-t.) ' D. The Architect shall not assign, sublet or transfer his interest or . any part- thereof in the agreement or any moneys due or .tobecome due hereunder without the written consent of. the County. r . 00448 . J:ricle ti'l)J ht:tics of COVOLV A. The aver-all -ndmiuist:•ation of the projecL, includiuL the federal achainistrati_on of tha construction Contract, «ill be Pccompli Shed by the Buildin- Vrojccts Division of the County 1'ubl"ic Works Depart- tnent, for and on behalf of the County. - B. The following will be accoL;plished by the County: 1. " Obtain and deliver to the Architect all necessary site information, i.e., topographic surveys and related information, soils studies and soil testing of Ouatever kind, etc. 2. The County will review all sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, contracts, and other documents presented to it by the Architect and will act promptly thereon, notifying the Architect of any and all decisions thereon. ' - 3. The rour•ty will act promptly in all matters requiring its attention so as not to unreasonably delay the work of the. 16 rc'►itect in the erection and constructi.n .;f the project. - 44 Provide one or more project in;Fectors who will conduct the .lay to - day construction inspection. : S. Provide all necessary construction testing-services. 6. Notify the Architect in shit i.!g of apparent deficiencies is materials and t.-orkmanship during the guarantee period. _ 7. pay all fees required by any division or department of the State of California for filing and checking of any item of service prepared by Architect. B. Provide 24"06" tracing paper for working drawings as required by the Architect. 9. County shall not assign, sub- let or transfer this Agreement or any part thereof without the written consent of the Architect. 10. County vill prepare all Change Orders. 11. lkwing the construction phase the County will contact Architect prior to (Waking significant changes to contract documents and Architect's response, it received, gill be duly considered by county. 0(1449 • Article 7X Gzncellntion of Ari-cement or a"uapen!:ioie of Project A. The County or the Architect cuy car.cel or suspend work under this Agreement upon written notice to the other party, for any reason whatever. The Architect shall immediately cease all work under this. Agreement in the event. of cancellation or suspension. B. In the event of cancellation of this Agreement or suspension of work by either the County or the Architect, the Architect shall receive compensation as follows: 1. For approved items of service under Article III, compensation shall be in the amount outline..' under Article V. for the item of service fully performed by the Architect. 2. For items of service on which a proceed order has been fssuei: by the County but which have not fully completed and appra:eo, the Architect shall be compensated for the service in an as--unt proportionate to the aunt of work actually accomplished. �3. In no event shall the total coopcnsation paid under the ia-x-diately 1•r aceding paragraphs exceed rc.e total of .the payments specified in Article V. for the respective items of service to be furnished by the Architect. C. Upon cancellation of this Agreement or suspension of work by either the County or the Architect, all rights of the paraIcs shall terminate except as to payments due the Architect under this Article. D. Upon cancellation of this Agreement or suspension of work by either the County or the Architect, the .irchitect shall furnish to the Courcy all documents and drawings prepared under this Agreement, whether complete or incomplete, including all reference material provided by the County as specified is Article VIII. -17- • 00450 Article X Termination of this Agreement . This Agreement shall automatically terminate one year from the recorded date of filing of the Notice of Completion. Architectural services required after that termination date., insofar as they relate to guarantees and warrantees of the project, shall be compensated as provided under . .Article V. Par.D., Extra Services, and shall be performed only upon written instructions by the County. Article XI Supelcrrantal Conditions s • . 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Architect have caused their names to be subscribed hereto by their duly authorized representatives on the date appearing on the first page of this Agreement. CONTRA CO A COUNTY Acting P lir Works Direr ARCHITECT: By By 04loJO -! Armas Sootaru, Architect dba RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Art G. 3i , County A strator stn, R. X.1 Rygh, Deputy Vublic or irector Buildings and Grounds Form Approved John B. Clausen County Counsel By Z!Leg elel, Ah .ter � DePurty -20- 00453 yy 1 I ARCHITf MIRZ•AI. AGIZERIFINT EXHIBIT "A" aikneE RATES A. 1. Time by Classification of Personnel: • Principal Architect - 2.5O per hour •Project Architect 2 timas payroll Job Captain times payroll • Senior Draftsman 2-1 times payroll -Junior Draftsman times payroll Clerical - 2.� times payroll In no case shall the 2� times payroll exceed the Principal's hourly race. 2. Consultants- Architect's consultants' time shall be paid at Architect's cost w1,ich shall be computed by applying the applicable above -sates to consultants' personnel. Detailed statements of ccn3ultants' bills shall be submitted as part of Architect's -bill for services. 3. Transportation: Cost to Architect for transportation will be considered as included in the above charges and no extra payment will be made ther:iore. Expenses for essential trips to areas outside the . gay Asea will be reimbursed by the -c:ouncy only when the County bas issued prior written approval therefore. i s .21— 0044 a e` � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Occupancy Agreement with Bryan McDonald 981 Castle Rock Road, Walnut Creek IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement, dated April 6, 1976 with Bryan Mc0onald for occupancy of County-owned property at 981 Castle Rock Road, Walnut Creek, on a temporary basis in exchange for maintenance. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and aorred copy of an order entered on tho minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supers cc: Public Works Director Real Property Division affixed this 20ch day of April , 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By_ 22 �.�ir--. Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M IN. Ir. aham 004Uri 5 S, P' §' 'r"- *f F..,sm t h.. " t�.,t^y A e a t?�,w, ,-,r r«^°'7 L"r }� �11 . -- . �, l �, k'C t i° '.air �"' a� 1� �t``.r..� :'z r x4 .�h r -s h r s ''a � ,.r,.+ f "i" ,t '9"' – +'u. t ¢ 'f,' ,� '%�'lr. I If � ,' y �t ;` i t r� I'll^ � s 4 � - rf. ae�- -b.f' , � OCC mic"Y �E..iiEtiT S a �A iLY RES © iCc � } $ a '`k,1 1 4 t f�"u> 7"" '1 br 'Y"n.�/ ,. �'�I- Lk tk �;� r, 04 1 T;�s Iicrs� ►t ode.in °de:p:scat 'tt:i; . cay o �� � � 11 '� ` � :K � b fiaMo L�:�,�ee:z .- C lH'TY Or;;C3IfiTRA CESTA, 'nere:nafter. des:;ys�afi as C(l l ana 5 < I 0. �. h arders�ga�d,g Qas:gnated «s ;TlENfHT, aho hereby agrees to renis propertmiedti' . -- - �� Couaty G '�CqA ra Cosxa <C crtibed' as follows ���y�> , , �; $��, t s 98I�Cast'7e -Rdck Read itainut C k l:.f : a. .}. M. 4' "� i eIm _ _ 1 ¢�� ' 11 � =T a`;T her y approves ay es and nsenfis ii7li :nn%g`te an -- pN d^F 1 F + t Y. b �' '4 " l f �e.,sE'�.. r^y �.1 '+.0 " _— �, tQ the cond:,tio ( T t �tne � �g, bf the aboI'llNe preQ:ses shal'I oe 7 � 8- 4 �rpe�'. x ;4 change or 4i__J iaa�ntenance begian:ng; rel T ; 1x76 ` ^'; � - �"4 ,e 'w.§�,"*'?at< ...,'d?1-::-"4.'�..'�.. *,,«.?.y.. �,�.� : - ,>`3 v.- .� ,nhr .»3t'a.. r - K "• ' • 'k cad^ °� 'tik; ,, •. s s v 4 =` i �«.*�a trt'�,.,� s .� a r z y^ x v�'rlx x u r fit^ _ « � g, � k it �' '' a ,:_ 7ro r a ,? ,� px "Z` ^" `, — 11 11 F� C t n 4 }, t "' �} Z�* .� { F $' rd k x¢5' 4 " X 1fyY -" S ••Y' .►e ,.fir? ,'7r +k� p 3 w � �� � c n j s,T��i� 5 I Ill 03 y 11 a. • • a '` 3 ,,,,�r', �.t° I 1 k q 'pi . il F t'� To P,,i =pro�aptly..x�hen due aII gas, it�ght, aater,�and ofi.herY utt�i i,Imo. s a�11ppl cAble ifio'4 fi�-te pi'ewises during 'EMA 11 s occupation and tu,#sa�ro�Cour�111111ety l�arat es n `' ` v`. A +/� p y t rain in the Interior and:extaraor o they}rer, edpts �� yc7uc:�c� glasx, z,�6' 3rd p;tnk%ng,�duri:•g. TEf�Ali�1.'s occs�paru:�rsa excep��Ffo zhas �� �.- -- r .t "'aLa�tL�dr�t! �Ch3rac cr:stics: # cessary for hab�.xat�on as.a D cet3l�ng" as fae1-1" icr 1. t. : .. ° ctaor 4 I of the Cal�, raia: civ l .W`; which characteristf' }� s ,�11t - f k 9.lanwa, abut ncz lnclssdjng .damages or d:lap:dat::ons caused bye T C � '� - : 3 n ti 5 ^*`"`t ri 1- t ", h t r� _ r a fir." "`; u,� kpgay' il ''¢ ^tilli ; �,. ilx�, �� ���x� "La = o let or sublet the whole or ani�port�or� of the pra e � a a Wg --_ �� s 4 R t i. as ��an..s to thud p,rfily nor to wale or suf�rer any al sera ons to o .� ° �' ` =,ten "t,41 property, ; tthaut first odta�ning fine written.11 'l1'-_-7 11"'.- t of :CQI " `x, ill - �. ?, t', u, 2 Yrs i ,ik,r �._ _ 11 , 5) IE3 3 wat gsxe:ire GW1HxY thirty �3G) days" nafi:c of :rite i u� o �Y a r; ri - a .n N�'.�,n ,, ?- wbcrt __ – x �►�ca..e _, µp vpert all upon °such yacapon agrees to µewe ,same :n oa o a � � } ,c.� d xas or the =iay passess:o;� ,of the' property:.was taken, aI iar�:r�g a� a }„ `r 0re,, lxwr�£ar•d ru►rmal usage dur:ng,:oecupancy;:'and to i -1m , rs CQtt �o�an;► do '�"� ito ,,dal. ro r caused b ms's ocu: tion orr tenarc ott er„'that t ai . tya Y _ Y d .,r ���R' �� 6 TT,o} ro �� in a eat, ,clean and' orderl ;cogi�t tj on a .. °d n ',i�ae. f,,; <5 �c�c+uj�ancy�, .aro not:peg it rubbish,_ b cans,, garbage, etc � ta► acc�la a a � -- oiiii. oto co wit. suffer or perm:L any waste r,�F` sand prem ses Q�za,, a �t �, du �` v�o a�iron of-anY 'Iaxs or, ,ordinances, nor t ,; use or pera 1t,, ” uses o��siiia�c jil,prey 5 a - ln;411y : legal +ar a rai;'; rposes; and ta► cowply with all.:°Sfiate laxer ancb Iota o, c ,oce;�aisag said proierfij anr� 'the .use ti�et�e�af fi , 11 T) Ct3UM -Shall :not be liable for,any i�n•jury .to proOerty of TE , a �p. j� . ', .ten ��ers�i::s or ,property ox third persons :n' or,about these prey ise during sa:d:�te _�g-11 ,41 i til v 17 i�adesa� fy,.and sa�ee CtAtiiT16 hana�less from_at1 such Iiabi=Ia:ty„ � � lt ���}� : � n t$ CGS tT)l ;rsiil °1.;est keep TF�tA►I#T"s .perscrtal ;property. ans�.►redraga�ns� �xre�„ o as ;n i 5 r.mfia�ernsurablekrisk, and TEtAMT :vesIli t'te right:to cta�,damag f ��{ Q a �� �x flw aamage �rosts , _pv t said propewty in fine event �fi �tsP<�daoag�or;desfi ay b. r k n f ,+z s ' • ! ! ,. Kocher�CauS2 _ �� *� a ��g h. .x,kfi^° '? j„e`. i a i+ .row '".epi�. x s I sf �`z 11 h�fi'' *, - C t t • u illli�, :, .e,, Mfg t *a ,a ! P u tea° .^i, �,f s t r` ,,:}� �,. tsY x'" -cy.#, aa "xaa,, w'm'* �4 dr ,x'1'" �L '� 3 1 alqi 7%,s ea..6 t;., ^� Y �„':.�''a'k, r'L'� �k fi^`s :,.x.�.,,,�,w<. `s �., .wia.� xi.,axua. ;:i .. � "..,°L`""'",: .. tl 'r Pa,.�. ii. it s� '.iP il. II�.� iW 4ili�',°h 1 To vacate sal jrrises at any .eve within this (30) dabs after receipt ,f a notice so to do frm COWTY; 4ad fat fsig to vscate as herein provided, agrees that „tNJKTY. or its autharized ag.nts, wage eat- : upon said property and remove TEltMT's *•Monal p>>operty therefrom and in this #-.-.at TEMIT waives any and all claims for uamagas against CWXTY. i;s &S-eats or e~aploym.s. (10) The County Assessor of Contra Costa County has Invoked a possessory interest tax an all rentals of C&MITY a:d other publicly-onned properties. This tax is mandatory Icy law and is levied on the TED-WIT and not the property. TOUVIT, therefore. cost recognize and unders-; ad in accepting this mental agreement that his interest therein any be subject to a possible possessory interest tax that the County Assessor way legally JaMe on such possessory interest held by the TENANT and that such tax pay=nt shall cot raducce any rent due the COUNTY hereunder and such teat shall be the 1 i ab i 1 i ty and be paid by the TEIIli.'IT. (,Oil) COLrITY's anent mag• inspect the preaises at any time during this tenancy after notifying TENUT at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the inspection. (12) COUKTY my terminate this agremacent at any time in the event of a violation on TENUT's part of any of the tens or conditions herein by giving written notice to TEWIT to surren ler possession of the pre v i ses. (13) The following additions or alterations were made and inserted in this Rental Agreesrzat before it was signed by the parties hereto: See Addenduv CONTRA COSTA COMITY Reeomae,nded for Approval: TENAUT: C r NeDonalif APPROVED: ----- Receipt ;s hereby acknowledSed of the sm-1 cf "P100-00 ,� frou the above tenant as and for a security and cleaning and damage daposit coffering the above described property. Said stag to be returned to the tenart upan vacancy providing all the above terms and conditions are c%k9lied with and the prouises are left in a neat, clean and orderly condition. nurr.al ,rear excepted. C f ..rruu ...rr_rd....r 1.nw l.N•- iL —� MCI #100, 4 W I .t 1 I a . i` I ' By per -X- -)Vi A9 Bryan McDonald / APPROVED: ------------ - _.,- FtCCeipt i r ereb3' ACt:7:L�:4iev; '� r «. a: ti;e �u;, C� ;100.00 as and ter- a szcuri ty ar:d froc.t the above tenant P►'oper" cl�a.t;nc, ar:� da: age deposit caserir1c� �' Said st:+.t to be reTurned to t11 LEr:;irC u the a;,ae-e described terms a.d conditions are c-%v)lie;� :itFt he the p, n 1a_ancy providing all tie above orderly ca,•�diti0l), nU1741 %,ear a Qr�eL'eires ar'e lefc ir. a neat, Clean and e excepted. BY 0045'7 ADDEP:i'i M (14) TENANT agrees that no more than one permanent resident shall occupy the premises, and water usage shall be kept to a minimum. (15) Contra Costa County Health Department may declare the existing sanitary facilities to be inadequate for any human occupancy, and in that event Tenant agrees to a termination of this Agreement and will vacate the premises within 10 days after receipt of a written notice from COUNTY. (16) TENANT agrees and understands that the monthly rental will be raised to $500.00 thirty days after the sanitary facilities have been improved to a condition satisfactory to the Contra Costa County Health Department. 0€1458 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri 1 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Rental Agreement with Phyllis Carlson IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement, dated April 1 , 1976, with Phyllis Carlson for rental of County-owned property at 2565 Oak Road, Walnut Creek, on a month-to-month basis at a rat„of $450.00 per month commencing April 1, 1976. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CPJ:dlb Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department, Real Property Division Supervisors cc: Public Works Director affixed this Z©th day of April _ 19 76 Real Property Division ) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By Q ,�/�` �„"J • Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - rs-M Jean L. Miller 59 QU4 __ _ _ _ doa� a In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 1976 In the Matter of Decision of the Court of Appeals in Connection with Superior Court Action No. 147366. Supervisor J. P. Kenny having called to the attention of the Board the decision of the Court of Appeals to uphold the judgement of the Superior Court in connection with Action No. 147366, Earl T. Meldrim, et al, Plaintiffs and Appellants, versus Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, et al, Defendants and Respondents, ruling invalid the initiative petition which sought to reduce Supervisors' salaries by nullifying Ordinance No. 74-49 adopted by the Board on August 6, 1974; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the decision of the Court of Appeals is ACKN0WLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Counsel Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 20th day of Anri l 19 76 - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. Z-tll a Deputy Clerk ?A.ar Crai- H 2 75 10M 00460 e� "a COT) V_Iec; •tip SEE CERTM�-ED req "Mal BON P �Satt. c IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE 4 0 L w EARL T. HMRIM, et al. , ; APR 191976 Plaintiffs and Appellants, ] V51rt of Al eu!-Fri-P.pq.0 . CLIFF0 0 C. PCR►ER, 4._r. V. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA ) 1 Civil 37487 , COSTA COUNTY, et al. , (Sup. Ct. No. 147366) Defendants and Respondents. In this taxpayers' suit, judgment was given in favor of defendants, supervisors and other officers of Contra Costa County. The taxpayers sought to invalidate an ordinance passed by the supervisors in 1974 which set the salaries of members of the board of supervisors at $14,282.80 per year, because a 1972 ordinance, passed by initiative in 1972 had fixed the salaries at $13,200 per year, and county initiative measures may not be amended or repealed (unless so provided in a measure),without approval of the voters. (Elec. Code, § 3720.) The initiative measure in turn had followed a 1970 ordinance in which the salaries had been set by the supervisors at $14,500. A referen- dum proceeding had been co=enced against the 1970 ordinance RECET_VL� I APD. 20 1917E ! re,: co:r --derBv. rn,rr 00461 - w r . I` but had failed to collect the necessary number of signatures. The trial judge decided that the 1972 initiative measure itself was unconstitutional and that therefore the 1974 ordinance was valid. We sustain the judgment. Prior to 1970, the Legis- lature set the salaries of supervisors in general law counties, of which Contra Costa is one. In 1970, California Constitution, article XI, section 1, subdivision (b) was amended by the voters to read as follows: "The Legislature shall provide for county powers and an elected governing body in each county. Except as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 4 of this article, each governing body shall prescribe by ordinance the compensation of its members, but the ordinance prescribing such compensation shall be subject to referendum." The language of the amendment is clear: the governing body (and not the "county" or the "voters") shall prescribe the compensation. In contrast, the State Constitution gives counties the right to make and enforce ordinances not in conflict with general laws (Cal. Const. , art. XI, § 7) and gives charter counties the right to' set the salaries of their supervisors. (Cal. Const. , art.XI, § 4, subd. (b) .) The constitutional amendment adopted by the voters could have added the authority to set the salary of the super- visors of noncharter counties to the general powers of such counties (Cal. Const. , art. XI, § 7) , but, instead, it specifi- cally gave that power to the governing bodies themselves, subject 2 00462 to referendum. If the initiative were held to be applicable, the voters could prescribe the compensation, in contradiction to the provision that the governin body shall do so. Although the clarity of the constitutional provision makes unnecessary a declaration of the reasons which might be marshalled to sustain the judgment, it is not amiss to state some likely rationale for the procedure ordained by the consti- tutional amendment particularly because of appellants ' assertion, as discussed below, that initiative and referendum are virtually interchangeable. (1) Before the 1970 amendment, the setting of super- visors' salaries was done by a legislative' body and not by the voters. The removal of the function from the State Legislature to the governing body of the county, as stated by one of its authors, was that it would "give citizens a voice at public meetings when supervisors ' pay increases are proposed" and would give "Local citizens the opportunity to vote against unnecessary salary increases. " There is no mention of giving the local citizens the right to set the supervisors' salaries by an initi- ative. (Voters ' Pamphlet on Proposed Amendments to the Constitution, General Election of November 3, 1970, art. I. p. 21.) (2) The members of the governing body can inform them- selves of comparable salaries in other counties or governmental units and also will be knowledgeable in the matter of the hours required for the work and so forth. Presumably they will act with 3 00463 appreciation that the voters may by referendum reject their decision. (Elec. Code, §§ 3752, 3753.) It is to be observed that in 1971 the Legislature enlarged the time for referendum in respect of salaries of the governing body from the 30 days which applies generally, to 60 days. (Elec. Code, § 3751.5.) (3) Once passed, an initiative measure (unless it made allowance of amendment or appeal) would freeze salaries until a- petition to raise them were drafted, signed for the requisite percentage of voters and adopted at an election. The Legislature, in proposing the constitutional amendment, may have regarded such inflexibility to be contrary to the public welfare. But our holding rests principally on the words of the amendment. It is not our function to alter them. Appellants say that the processes of initiative and referendum are essentially the same, wherefore if one is pro- vided, impliedly so is the other. There is cited in Duran v. Cassidy, 28 Cal.App.3d 574, in which it was held (at p. 582) that failure to assert a referendum petition within the statu- tory time does not foreclose the power to seek a charge in the legislative policy by the initiative process. But the case had to do with the provisions of a city charter, which by and large, is the supreme law as to municipal affairs. Duran v. Cassidy, supra, at p. 583.) The charter in unequivocal terms provided that the legislative power should be vested not only in the council but 4 00464 1 in the people through initiative and referendum. Ibid. at 583. In the present case, we are not dealing with a county governed by charter. Also cited is Dwyer v. City Council, 200 Cal. 505, in which there is reference to the initiative as a "corollary" to the right of referendum; but as was pointed out in Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134, 142, there was no need to discuss any distinction between the effectiveness of initiative and referendum in Dwyer because referendum clearly applied. But in the present case, a clearly worded specific constitutional amendment describes the precise procedure for a single function, the setting of salaries. It is argued that the initiative is a favored process, as an exercise of sovereignty by the people themselves, and that in cases of doubt, the right to initiative should be upheld. (See Martin v. Smith: 176 Cal.App.2d 115; Knowlton v. Hezmalhalch, 32 Cal.App.2d 419, 4314.) This proposition we accept readily. But the constitutional amendment itself was enacted by the people of the whole sate. In Hurst v. City of Burlingame, supra, at pages 1413 142, a zoning ordinance of a general law city, although it was passed by initiative, was held invalid because of its conflict with a state zoning act; a fortiori, an initiative measure which conflicts with the State Constitution is void. Finally, appellants contend that the subject of this lawsuit is res judicata. Following the passage by the supervisors of an ordinance in 1970 raising the supervisors ' salaries to S 00465 Y ,. 1 $14,500 and the failure to attract enough signatures for refer- endum with the time limit, the proposed initiative ordinance setting the salaries at $13,200 was adopted. Thereupon, a petition for writ of mandate to invalidate the initiative measure was filed by James P. Kenny, who was a supervisor but who brought the proceeding in his individual capacity, against the county and the county auditor. A distinguished judge,with whose opinion in this- case we disagree, decided that the provision for the $13,200 salary was valid. Air. Kenny did not appeal. Thereafter, the supervisors enacted the 1974 ordinance setting salaries at $14,240, an act which could not be sustained if the initiative ordinance were valid. (Elec. Code, § 3720.) It is our conclusion, as it was of the trial judge in the present proceeding, that the earlier judgment does not make the matter res judicata. The parties to the lawsuits are not the same. The identity of parties necessary to establish the defense of res judicata must be identity of parties in the same capacity. (4 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (2d ed. 1971) Judgment, § 224, p. 3358.) The supervisors in their capacity as public officers are distinct from the county which was a party defendant in the former case. Under the provisions of article XI, section 1, subdivision (b) of the California Constitution, the members of the governing body of the county have the right and the duty to prescribe the compen- sation of the members . The right of the supervisors, as such, has not been adjudicated. The right may be of value to the 6 00466 incumbent supervisors personally but their duty as public officers is to provide a fair compensation, one which will attract persons of integrity and competence. The former case is not res judicata against the supervisors sued in their capacities as such officers as defendants in the present case. Besides the earlier judgment upholding the initiative cannot be held res judicata and effective to annul the 1974 ordinance which, as we decide, was gassed in conformity with . the constitutional directive. The judgment declaring ordinance 74-49 of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to be valid and effective is affirmed, CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION Devine, 37 We concur: Brown H.C. , Acting P.J. good, J. Retired Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, sitting under assignment by the Chairman of the Judicial Council. * Retired judge of the superior court, assigned by the Chairman of the Judicial Council. 7 00467 IN TrtE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Request for Amendment of County Ordinance April 20, 1976 Code Section 84-14.402. ) The Board on February 24, 1976 having referred to the, Director of Planning and County Counsel for recommendation the request of Attorney R. L. Condon, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. George Turner, that the County Ordinance Code be amended to allow an aviary in a single family residential district; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having sub- mitted an April 12, 1976 memorandum to the Board advising that the code is being reviewed for possible amendment but that any change would necessitate public hearings, noting that in the meantime the zoning violation that prompted the request of Mr. Condon is con- tinuing, and therefore recommending that County Counsel be autho- rized to initiate proceedings to gain compliance with the ordinance code; and The Board also having received an April 12, 1976 letter from Mr. Condon transmitting a copy of a petition (containing approximately 375 signatures) in support of his clients' position regarding their aviary; and Mr. Condon having appeared and advised that the aviary is not a business venture, and having urged that it be permitted to remain until hearings are held on the proposed ordinance amend- ment; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having expressed the opinion that, in view of the violation, the Board has no alternative but to enforce the ordinance presently in effect; and The Board members having discussed the matter; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having recommended that the Planning Department and County Counsel be directed to withhold legal action to effect removal of the aviary until public hearings can be held to determine whether revision of the code is appropri- ate; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having recommended that Planning staff be instructed to submit a progress report to the Board within 45 days; IT IS BY TIE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommenda- tions are APPROVED. PASSED on April 20, 1976 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, J. P. Kenny. NOES: SuDervisor E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: Supervisor 1-1. N. Boggess. cc: Attorney R. L. Condon CERTIFIED COPY Director of Plarrini ng 1 certify that this la a fu:l, tri-.1- R correct copy of the oririsal do-ur.—n., i:hi,h or, ti!r- in rn; otave. County Counsel and t!•.'c: it t.., f: ;he [[ward of County Administrator ';v- J v.-titornla, un Cl.- ".1 1 ([t .fir:, (;w[nty Clerk E- rs o:u.• o la.::$of ;»id Loard of Su,)rrrisor,,. by Deputy Gerk. oa .�a0/976 00468 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving ) Recommendations of Board April qn- 1976 41 n ; PASSED on April 20, 1976 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, J. P. Kenny. DOES: Supervisor E. A. Linscreid. ABSENT: Supervisor If. N. Boggess. cc: Attorney R. L. Condon CERTIFIED COPY Director of Planning I certify that this fs a (tett. true R correct copy of County Counsel the original dw ur::nrt t tti !i i; or, ti!r- in m; office. and tha: it r:.,. r t ,! t; County Administrator SrJ,•r.,-i ." t :ne hoard of C1, �, •,':r.t•. f'afitarnia. un da! ,, . �•, :T: J .t 01_:k:6:;, t;ortnty Clerk f: ra o:1w'cp Ctc:;:of:-:1; f:nam,of Supervisor.;, by Deputy t:ierk. oa 00468 z IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving ) Recommendations of Board ) Government Operations ) April 20, 1976 Committee. ) ) The Board heretofore having made certain referrals to its 1976 Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) ; and Said committee having reported and recommended as follows with respect to said referrals: Referral Date Item Recommendation 12/23/75 Proposed formation of a Refer to Chief and Board of special fire protection Commissioners of the zone with the Contra Costa Contra Costa County Fire County Fire Protection Protection District and to District to equalize County Administrator for hydrant rental costs. discussion with the cities and other local government agencies who will be affected so the tax implications are understood if the proposal is approved by the Board of Supervisors applicable to the 1977-78 fiscal year. 2/10/76 Approval of awards Committee has determined that luncheon with regard to an awards luncheon of this Safety Program for Flood nature has been held from Control and road mainte- time to time in the past and nance crews of Public recommends that approval again Works Department_ be granted. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommenda- tions are APPROVED. Said committee having further recommended as follows : 3/2/76 Request from Senator Support SB 879, action consist- Nejedly that the Board ent with previous positions make its views known with of the Board on this subject; respect to proposed leg- committee believes County islation (SB 879) , which residents who have been paying would limit initial exten- taxes to BART since its incep- sion of BART service to tion warrant first priority within the counties of for service. Alameda, San Francisco and Contra Costa. Supervisor J. E. 'Moriarty having_ expressed the opinion that SB 879 would impose limitations that -.ay not be financially sound for the operations of the BART system, and therefore he could not vote to support the bill ; 00469 The Board having discussed this matter, IT IS ORDERED that the latter recommendation is APPROVED, with Supervisor Moriarty voting no on support of SB 879. PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Nitness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day.of April , 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK B Y' ie tlerr e eput Clerk cc: Committee Members Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Contra Costa County Water District _ City of Pleasant Hill City of Concord Senator John A. nejedly County Counsel County Assessor County Administrator Public Works Director Purchasing 00470 0 The Board of Supervisor` � ,, Contra cl';ai,, �'"'r" Costa .lams R.Olmon County Administration Building 7V� Costa County Clerk and P.O.BOX 911 / ps1 t Ex Officio Clerk of the Board Martinez.Csiifomia 94553 �+ '� \ '7 k?J County C fG k n.Rwul1 James P.Kenny-Richmond ��� (415)372.2371 1st District Alfred M.Dias-EI Sobrante 2nd District J 2 .lames E.Moriarty-Lafayette � r� 3rd District �l Warren N.Boggess-Concord RECEIVED 4th District Edmund A.Linscheid-Pittsburg 5th District APR 20 1976 April 20, 1976 ClFP B J. R. OL=.l OF SUPERVISORS REPORT 18Y.- .... a OF Deour� GOVERN_-HENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Item Date Recommendation Proposed formation of a 12-23-75 Refer to Chief and Board of Com- special fire protection missioners of the Contra Costa zone with the Contra County Fire Protection District Costa County Fire and to County Administrator for Protection District to discussion with the cities and equalize hydrant rental other local government agencies costs. who will be affected so the tax implications are understood if the proposal is approved by the Board of Supervisors applicable to the 1977-78 fiscal year. Approval of awards 2-10-76 Committee has determined that an luncheon with regard to awards luncheon of this nature has Safety Program for Flood been held from time to time in the Control and road mainte- past and recommends that approval nance crews of Public again be granted. Works Department. Request from Senator 3-2-76 Support SB 879, action consistent Nejedly that the Board with previous positions of the make its views known Board on this subject; committee with respect to proposed believes County residents who have legislation (SB 879) , been paying taxes to BART since its which would limit initial inception warrant first priority extension of BART service for service. to within the counties of Alameda, San Francisco and Contra Costa. A qty- DIAS E. A. LINSCHEID pervisor, Distr ct II Supervisor, District V 00411 f- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California April 20 , 19 2& In the Matter of Refund of Park Dedication Ft es. On the recommendation of the Director of Planning, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to refund park dedication fees to the following: Mr. E. A. 3:-assfield, 1144 Ridge Park Drive, Concord, Caifornia 9451139 the 5300 park dedication fee (P.D. No. 183-73) paid in connection with issuance of building permit for Parcel No. 130-031-04; Mir. 0. Anderson 243 Wooten Drive, Walnut Creek, California 9459, $300 park dedication fee (P.D. No. 23-76) paid in connection with building permit for Parcel No. 376-031-027; and PASSED by the Board on April 20, 1976• 1 hereby certify that the forepobv is a true and correct copy of an order adwed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Mr. E. A. Brassfield Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. 0. Anderson Supers Director of Planning affixed t{,;s20th-joy of April 19 76 County Auditor—Controller —' County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk `1 1 r Clerk Rondalynn Shackles A In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Apri 1 20 , 19 76 In the Matter of Report of Government Operations Committee. The Board on April 6 , 1976 having referred to its Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) the allegation of Ms. Lynette Lister that Animal Control had im- pounded and sold her horse within the required five-day holding period; and Said committee having met with Ms. Lister, Mr. A. L. Seeley, Agricultural Commissioner - Director of Weights and Measures and County staff, and Mr. Seeley having advised that a further examina- tion of Animal Control records did indicate the sale of a horse picked up in the vicinity of the Lister property, but for an amount and at a time (two weeks later) different than that cited in the complaint; and Said committee having this day recommended that a further effort be made by Animal Control to determine if the horse sold was the one that belonged to Ms. Lister and, if so , ascertain if the present owner would be agreeable to reselling it to Ms. Lister; and Said committee having further recommended consideration of the following alternatives which could preclude this kind of situation arising in the future: 1 . The sale of animals , such as horses , only on fixed auction days (weekly or periodically) with the right of the owner to redeem the animal anytime prior to the auction date; 2. Holding the animal for a longer period such as 30 days ; and 3. Placement of an ad in a local newspaper indicating that a horse is being held by Animal Control ; and Said committee having further recommended that Mr. Seeley furnish recommendations on this matter in a proposed revised ordinance which is now being developed; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the Government Operations Committee report is acknowledged. PASSED by the Board on April 20 , 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Ms . Lynette Lister Supervisors Committee Members affixed this 20th day of April 19 76 Agricultural Commissioner J. R. OLSSON. Clerk Animal Control County Administrator By. � �� - �c_ T- , . Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15M Robbie G}tierrez J 00413 a The Board of Supervisors Contra P �f'� Chairman JamesCosta Count R.Olsson County Administration Building County Clerk and P.O.Box 911 Ex Officio Clerk of the Board Martinez.California 94553 County Mrs.Geraldine Rumell Chief Clerk James P.Kenny-Richmond (415)372-2371 1st District Alfred M.Dias-El Sobtante 2nd District James E.Moriarty-Lafayette 3rd District Warren N.Boggess-Concord 4th District Edmund A.Unscheid-Pittsburg 5th District April 20, 1976 REPORT OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE ON LYNETTE LISTER'S COMPLAINT RELATING TO SALE OF HORSE In line with the Board referral on April 6, 1976, the Committee met on April 13th with Miss Lynette Lister, Mr. A. L. Seeley, l Agricultural Commissioner - Director of Weights and Measures, and County staff, to review Lynette's complaint concerning sale of her horse after impoundment by Animal Control. Air. Seelev advised the Committee that a further examination of Animal Control records did indicate the sale of a horse picked up in the vicinity of the Lister property, but for an amount and at a time (two weeks later) different than that cited in the complaint. The record shows that this horse was held for the required five days and, accordingly, that the sale was legal. The only action that presently seemed feasible to the Committee was a further effort by the department head to determine if the horse sold by Animal Control was, in fact, the one that belonged to Miss Lister and, if so, if the present owner would be agreeable to reselling it to Lynette. Committee review of this problem included consideration of alternatives which could preclude this kind of situation arising in the future. Possibilities appeared to be: (l) the sale of animals, such as horses, only on fixed auction days (weekly or periodically) with the right of the owner to redeem the animal anytime prior to the auction date; (2) holding the animal for a longer period such as 30 days; or (3) placement of an ad in a local newspaper indicating that a horse is being held by Animal Control. The latter two proposals present certain problems, how- ever, because of the difficulty in properly describing animals impounded and because of the increased cost of redemptions which would be involved. The department head will furnish recommendations on this matter in a proposed revised ordinance which is now being developed. r M DIAS E. A. LINSCHEID perv' or, Distri II Supervisor, District V 00`174 �l AN And the Board adjourns to most on April 21, 1976 at 9:p0 aorlo , in the Board Chambers, Room 1071, Administration Building, Martinez, California. Chairman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK e3`' 'i..lfi:.z'..`tJ,...::i 3^ .,T'. APprQved pe rsonn-a , actions fC" Auditor-Data Frof'assi lg, Clork, Baal h Dopt. , :::llimil. Med-ical Sere i c a.,5. Probs:icon, anc :;l:t`L,•i:.vis l^ .. . .. _ 5::hool:l. t , . �4L4 tl?.,f , a { 4r,�.,: m '",fl �,' v! ��i s'k 7pi'P 'ai a b i'Fa.,I III �i II I,j I� �,l tya , vim.',a7i ;, ., �k x ryy .x ` ,�". }`��' R"i��8�,� �I?(o��k 114'�� 1. " #t a} , in '! + i irysvAl � s' il�31I�i Y "}y► l MJF ' pt1t'i� /�}a�nS y��}� i", , /�'��(►A �.3 �a �g,g ' sE��!s'; a �. F +; a ^,t > ilAr�f'QF V�IA�*#.�iA•`Lw.fA �V}VIER//i��� .? - ��sr i a x 2, ) t> .}`4 "5ri1 , �,:.T* '� ' �' x: A `� .' fFIF♦ 'V ru'cry11rt< p.5e�-a� t 1-1 " Y; ,x 6r lmowfI'llr"'/i'�L.y►'y� jam- �y� /�� y/1�. {}fig' '�! s E ," tL."`g 3 tS'�� ^i may{^s F `' *74 v ,"2 x'^,�ynk 1. Y 1�il,^'R!W ..1 W.:{'» d� 61ZIzfil'+� d a '`.� `t�" $"( a`' ' �t �. �g � µ F R t` T, �' A Y 1 .{ d ¢ q �' 'rtM1 '"z`A'.I'�J � Nf XY �F ,, #' ft i``ts 7 ' u x,w-'7ti F.,{ - > .. .4 uf'" - �L�'"qs" _' r � PPro�red rsa�nx oqz t .ops i±or AsaBss0±+I: �' FQo�� - 'C3Px a1_1- s3�' to , .,k 1JI ;, sIttk atriYll?o ?IarS l,%'3�eCtion=Ad111mita, "QS E» _ " �sv3,a�aso1Q � < c �totcs11� sdutszt�^a Sl�l �a ,11 - 2�.vv u.,. o-°x 'b. �# �?.' y z . ', y,-' �yF` # �+! .o-sM s"io-.r�''s s� �x,.4'S°� iP o�colx8�lgrQpt' L QA adjust a s " { lsry Fire:, t-I �a�3ustso ac� 8�t4ta1 dor Pazb3Sc mks,' Dis'tAGt At..o�x*rrsgfba� c y,4� s sce� 4,, s aa,, 03.9l�0�.0-,,4r, Shst ��' gw,,gpor,,,If sii�l^Sera caa,; ;Nora Furs F 4 at 6 y, YCQn Ort. 3f 14rr}, `G ►j �� t� callQ�t• r r' 1. .�� '` "z.fi ^ `i` ks.z.'#;'ms' t. Y 1. r, a.a. a r r f . �^ t '_,7a C.. ^:#re r ,_,, :,r �f 'e, '' `"11 *�', ?" �!►utb+Qr o 3 Eub ct+ar to d+ atroy cortai»d dex CO r�,c ds � �,-!" ,� ^+t^5.,� -1- t a ' +' h `k'+i ,i ."'' _ 8 ! } "Y r `'a' 4 '�`,'.�"'-r^3`,+' k „„".,i,M,�„at "y- 'y",g '�S '"y." x hx .ac L �' li'* ,t111,11-11, �: �' - �k a�`w' ,. a i oa. a -` '.;z r� .k s '` ,. ' 'Z t�: �° r Au iol �Pd p C�I 11int Qr de panda tM c i 2d :4� Ls-Ir court At:�131iQY`al1tL7 ,1,� 1 , - t a 5 -�. ♦ r. * r„.�: § �1 7.. C ' x ,.n # rfi "r �Ct `,r +Jr,dpp ;. Ili `i tA11SStOX� i 114�, 1�i1' }�3,1�♦ xl Z1Q "�j .2'��ly..$�4pR�►1�'�iIFy� �!«�3R��isgtit�'i(}y}� IfC!$7�2.Q♦ `7"�t , f'O? �`Q f "Y:r fl'a�s�vww. Q r{..`'y > 1 s� 'u"IT rtoi� =dt,1+b+i , -��AI�Li ♦If` "�"+^,. Z", _ At`� W M#♦4 .. ,s. ,ti' ' �' #t ; N ,,atl��+j.,,!k ':.e i.G R'�`447fi 4+Zt, ' .. a3"v,1.. h. l .. ,> &r k; " >+(a Rh r.. ; 3 x a.ry ✓ trc 7 S a Ack ig �.,ot,ged r lot—,Qf fet or 1'rom� .;ad11�ri;sing.',tr at ac of ttere tQ� t kii, - I�,Ps�."Ou -, a a�ix►3t �GarI ah pro eat.tzar a� aster is d11 � ' is K •,- i a x i '+�¢ ty ;' t` "I .1,`�,,'R` x 71 R t�c,x, , _ �"'" a "� �� r"�z" .t `C S a N q E ,Ta ° �aX.1_ „�-_ -0 - n - ,*," f H. : z t Aut3% r ser ,pa u» Q L. : ac n dor p a asl p1`oJ sct 4�sc-� �. ," - ,�. +� a . i"" a`r r; .. t ,t-,' v Tyr�}.�,a �'. `"'',1 ^ r t.. �� Auti�ori�p+�yrs]3 psi' Qi' cash sbartagct'in as coumos o*k t,� i 3 c�a1 Df,, " z ',i.,'�i,%i ?5 *eI'll, a+ r +� z. s r 1-1 + v �" adv i}QX.. _ - :� 3 :/��-y. ,, Y '�!'�. ;�.y /,;�yy �/�a_ :.QQ, t" 3, s s : a Y fr, r: 1x#'i F ::x21' �„""i,2 '+ �X�.°`�. e,f :., -Au 4r s I'd eps as :i�4$t101 QYX�VMa� ♦ >^k LSd 4 Y f.1.f� � 4*" i�^ 7St'# W 11 •? '144, :!�• a � d W�aidszsld, i Serca, tRifct7E„1@� "�on �c , izP ,, a .,wApa �t ..5-ice, ;fito �3guss, k►a °� ?.Iunura�r .: Mi,' Council, : S Xa itj� Act 4n �rQ r e Con cwoq ,, LQ!z: a ac ,�A � tb33�F t'Q ' repres+ �ve to Sao JQaq 1i l+�j� T, �eprra�an_ Thea#�na a F og „ a..IJ„�4 ^k' a {q XC. '',,k "n.. i°' .- S V" Y�i,y.. W `�. h i°'"ih __ ��t #y�QsQ ,� ' 4 tl ;` TIt r 1 _ e S.7'y :r>r'k !�,.'. `�"�p3Fjl Fb,. _ +�7,s s 'l t`ti� i t rt r ..+", 5 wo.f« 4 it v "?d'..':.,, r. 4" t ,. 1"r ,� � *' �r � . A -j�� , s,cs iti oPt om ko a t�yu�d ls*se���i t; Alpo?hay Zntas�prfis+aa `for uses°o� g�����r� � � ��. � 83f1danestQP cteSrsx321a , +FDstcGu.Ft3�sd3a� gcz11 Sr �' " x = 3x3c3usibi4 ` n Count t+y Flao as;'roco�anc ed by.Dirre tc�r$o Pc son ��> " ¢rth` '"`? S fl_� ,� � i ..raFt""c - 11 Q� Q aye ,: -t '� 4 is;('r;�.� ,(ra rmy.„� ; d . 3 VXt .r xssarora�aduA,s o�t.,Gau:t b G u�sa aI ri , J 4 Y ,i'x4ti► d1 ►csaa sd�ri 11,agQQgistrtQF' CQ 11 Q11� �a., # sail s that Iwai e�3 s t_C is are ron ,, I � � ` r4 � at�.�e A+at -Qx�r Pro�+'' fi „ ,. t xS f y7ua wv-k#k� .� d '�# k Xfv'�;�-. a a -:n'' h- 1st ., :' ,I ,a ,...' e ..! ,r h=. ,* d Y x x�t r,n, o e:a z o I'll-a. 1:,Pg�.sre '' � � + _ zz ;�tru�cted�Di ect4r: Qf Plano3.sig, Acting Goun y► Buf2din#,' , , poct4rr(C"at ixtgt w g ziaer) k ndI-Pusb a T�orks.^,,D, rector to �w tti Suiad de oil $ � x�I ? Ill _ u 14,� >e . , z-dincuss �coasP 'aint a ac3epa3apma� pY sari sainor r ubdixisi4n�"«, � }� a- , ��re,3a111111 a+ a€� r-,,k c "? �3,ir -:;a<�, a 4c 'a, x," k'"' ¢,€,a 't ,�1,rA:. '�"'� 9 4 `�1 .fi .'� +a>�,� M1 oy,_pct ep#x �1..,"�i gmt11.11nn Qt �• Tho as as s GOs -,',. r o tYia wF ands , _ ' w'. .4e Qn.-Di si 11A 1 `5„3 .,,e, h ,,;, i 5 , s*i t r $ick s" �£ �v'l ?',r d` t #'� ".o' �' °.e SCM+« I'll Ack�111noWledged "!aCeipt QP CM 5nd-ar Rear $sport. rQI+ F 19"l� ? and�authcmi__,_-od �i . $n �'eLoaae*of�9sm o to, ispw Public• j1 - Ac3a�Oxle dged ' 1�}!- iAt 1 >Co itj ^Servs " Admi nisi Gi. � , " ate; �� rr 11 `�', - logon '44 a-,t e C 7 ^and Mu�tri.tion P wwg7�s and �auta4r7 -ed, stu�rpai"ss -,z � a� Gomaaun3.ty Sei��t�ices AdAlin3S,t , i.on,., 11� ', wax, ' z �� � � + ' '�ry?ye 5 a• a n - .., .5 �� N :`: 'Y�.sxs ApPrpuad 7ConLra Costaw County;Ca�pliancn„ P.ra�aduree dta- they F Sere rt Iy ~~ i;o�Stba 'ls�4d easter Protectan Act of 193 relating Vic! Hati4naZ Flood,l�xtsceerance , ft `� ,y�+T,l"Vgra ♦ A` 'S_4 y w # 1. V 3 #. I'- tri fix. z -t 5 , o-k_11-s c"z __s Wb ".' ``s+. { �n} ,4, a.S 7. .;k, 3,x ^wa v' ,'}t ,„Sf".-.:.,H z fvi''a, x'� z ' 'i w*Y2".; e� MINa• r �F,,,Approved, rsqu+sst o,f:.f�bg�.neor:of i�lo,c►l� tt tbe�' cI'll4ntractor� 9�led . ��'` � ,.; _ tez►aaaat �, �r_,= ma bi3.,,, SQr aertsi u 3r ixi A$aesaunsn Aiata,_11 ]!� 73 y -- a # +k k t n sv� � z 1�. 7 r x y, �- < ,¢:f.r> „ryk .x 'ads - -` „"` ,�y' D 5 9 x. y Nx.Jxy.a -'e g r ,gym wf d vv xi s � r ,kr. ar � �k�" c is r a a ti a � zS , .1 �. ,m_= iR �.'�tVLr':�R "}`�eq?Y k. _3 . a', .. ,.>... ate °',+','. m.,w't^ n..... v rt_Ym -`«i,i7" I'll +.�.. ry' .. - Y April 209 1976 Summary, continued Page 2 Authorised Public forks Director to execute the following!: Arreoment with P. Carlson for rental of County-owned property at 2565 Oak Road, Valnut Creek; Agreenent with B. McDonald for occupancy of County-owned pronerty at 981 Castle 'Rook Road, V.alnut Creek; Architectural services Ameement with A. Soot sru for ttoten's llinimam Security Facility, Richsond; As ex officio the Covernlnr. Board of the Contra Costa County Mire Protection District, Consulting services A1xeerent with J. Wilson for Architectural Program for Apparatus Shop Expansion• Authorised Chairman to execute the following: PreapPiication Fora rcqueatinr U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and tfeifare funds for Public Service Proseots; Fonthly rental ag-reement with D. Knowles, et at, for w(e of promises at 960 Salt Street, Pittsburg, by Cooperative Extension Service; Contract with Corwmunity %ad Coalition of Contra Costa County, Inc., for protein food aurchase0, 1krreesent with Interactive Resources Inc. extendinr. completion date for consulting services in connection with Contra Costa County Resources Study; Consent to aQsement between State Dent. of Parka and Recreation and Ssst Bay Regional Park District for disbursement of certain funds for acquisition and develop- ment or portion of Lafarette-ftraga Regional ':rail. Approved arendoents to Alaredn-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency Joint Powers Ar;ree:•ent with respect to powers of Governing 9owrd and alternate vIOb rs of Governing 1Aody. Adopted the following; nu--eyed resolutions: 7f/320, anarovinr -an and subdivision amvexnt for Sub. 11604, Orinda area; 79/321, fixing !-4,y 13 at 11 a.m. to receive bids for Diablo *load Reconstruction Prosect, Danville area; 76/322, acceptio;; as corolete Irprove^ents in Sub. 4599, Walnut Creek area, and accentinn randela Court ar eoantr road; 76/323. avaroving rat+ and subdivision ag,reerent for Sub. 4721, San Raton area; 76/324, approvinc renlacerent subdiviai-n arree-ent for sub. 38441, San Raoon area; 76/325. aporovinr -1a and subdielsinn arromwnt for Sub. 4527, 7n Rason area; TA/3?6, arProving -ar vnd vubdIvIsion arreement for Sub. 4761, yan Rason area; 76/32?. V/37R, and 'f/329, au%ho-!atnr ch•+nres !r. the aaaesgnent roll; 79/329. reacindlnr *vs. :±7. Tel?6n relstinr to transfer of tax lien to 1975-76 unsecured roll; 76/331. fixing Pay 1A at 11 a.m. to receive bids for Amherst Avenue Reconstruction Project, Kensington area; 79/332. avoroving arendrent to the County general Pian for .the Nartines area concernlar land use devalcrrent in the Howe fiord apes; 79/333, endorainr. :S 12*1 which Proposes IN re:iedy to social service Program funding rrablers for rY 1976-77; 76/334. aoprovinr social 4ecurity coverup for employees or the Riverview /ire Protection District; 79/335. corrAmpatinr 'liver Jubilee of grdtnation of The Reverend 0. Myer; 76/336. Proclairing week of way 9-15, 1976 as "Health Care Weak% 76/337. reallocatinr class of Fconorelc ^rportunity Program Director on Basic @clary schedule to Level 497 (SIFT' - 32419); 76/33P, arendlar Res. No. 7VS23 to add Methods Youth Development Center, Cartiehaei, to arnroved list of child a+.we !natitut!ons; 76/339, urclur. thlt stnte ororide apples to allow a uniform cost or living, increase for all !'ental lferlth Services rronnvaa; 7€/3411`, reeueatis:T Inv Area vivid Transit Dlrtrict 3oseWit i or Directors to continue direct service between Riebrand and man Francisco; 76/341, authorizing Chiu—n to execute quitclaim deed of conveyance to Bast Bay Nerional Park District for certain more-te in Lafayette; 76/344. aorrovU% proposed Sub. 4416 Annexation (Ciavton area) to CSA 1 .14 without, hearing or election; 76/345. fixing June i at 10:30 a.=, for bearing on proposed Sub. 4698 Annexation (E1 eobrante area) to CsA 6-41 76/347. subordinatinr lien aralust B. and R. a!orrison. (M.)477 .! April 20, 1976 Sur..-ary, continued Parm 3 Acknowledged receipt of letter fron The Orinda Downs Eiopseowners Association supporting. any restrictions he±nr enasidered to curtail operation of off-road vehicles In open maces in vicinity of residential areas, and referred same to Sheriff. Awarded contract to Caldwell *hoofing Co., Inc., for reroofinr Veterans' Femorial Building, Pittsburg area. Awarded contract to Ronrks Roof!nr Co. for reroofing various buildings at the Contra Costa County Hoarltal, Wartinez area. Appointed following persons to the Contra Costa County Fannower Planning Council as representatives in the caterories ind!csted: D. Willits, Veterans; A. Aiello, Cities; and R. Beyer, Econonte Develorrent Corporation. Appointed E. DeFalco, Town of Poraga, and Y. Aoki, Japanese-American, to the Overall Economic Development Prorrar Co.-r+ittee. Authorized Parents' Croup at Seorge Filler :.'eat to hold 3prinE Bazaar at said facility on June 18-19. Approved request of coneultirr firr of Daniel, "ann, Johnson and Mendenhall for deferment of action on any new le3::es rt Buchanan *Meld until Facility Requirement Element of the Airport *raster Plan has been cornleted. Awarded contract to Goulden-Randall Associates for rerodel of receiving cell at County Wain Jail, Martinez. Denied cla n for darares filed by J. warlss: and applicstion for leave to file late clam filed by C. Kennedy, 3. veunn, T. Zennedy and D. Young. Apnrnved reconstruction of Port Chicago Hirintsf Bridge, Clyde area. Acknowledged receipt of Envirnn-ental Impact Report for reconstruction of eortion of Livorna Road, Alaro area. Approved Traffic Resolution ft. 2103. Approved Subdivision Arree-eat Extension with L%rVin-Northern California, Inc., for construction of Inorover:ents in Dub. 3x45, San *&ran area. Awarded contract to Independent Construction for Blum Road reconstruction, Pacheco area. Awarded contract to Grahar Contr?ctors, ?ne., for slurry seal project within Rollingwood Subdivision, San Pablo area. Appointed firm of Sokoloff-Hamilton-Bennett, AIA, as Project Architect for Therapeutic Swimninr Pool to be constructed at Qeorre Miller Jr. Femorial Center-Kest, Richmond, and directed public Forks Director to orevare an architectural services agreement in connection therewith. Authorized Public Works Director, as ex officio Street Superintendent, to file with the Clerk of the Board amended aasessrents in connection with Assessment District 1964-3, Arador Valley Fater Syster.+, Sen Aaron arra. Approved proposed a-end:-eat to the County nrdl.nance Code aertaininP to regulations of recreational facilities and activities in residential districts. .4prroved nrorosed a-endrent to the Cersnty nrdimnee Code nertainina, to reyulatiors for land irproverent contractor's yards. Approved request of Public Works Director for extension of time to April 27 to report on State Dent. of Yater Resources reetinr, on "Petlew of Delta Alternatives." Approved Safe Drivinr, Awards vrork- for personnel of the Sheriff's Office, and directed County Counsel to prepare an anrropri•te ordinance in connection therewith; and adopted Resolution No. 74/346 allowing retiring Deputy Sheriff to retain County-issued service revolvers. 00478 April 20, 1976 Swm+ary, continued Page 4 Acknowledged recelrt of remarandu•2 !'ro:� County Adzedaistrator transmitting request for clarification of Board Policy on two jails and directed Contra Costa County Detention Facility Advisory Committee to snake recor:*endatlons on one detention facility; and not interpret these instructions to preclude two or more buildings at one location. Approved recortnendations of the Administration and Pinance Committee (Supervisor . Kenny, servinn for Supervisor Boggess, and Supe-visor Korlarty) on self-insurance public liability risks; adopted Resolution Mos. 7F/342, authorizing County Administrator to settle clairs aminst the County if the a.-aunt does not exceed $5,000, and 76/343, establlshinit pre-funded system to provide for potential claims so funds will be budgeted for period that liability exposure exists and accidents occur; and directed County depatrtrent and agency heads to devote attention to identification and minimization of risks to reduce damages and costs to taxpayers, record costs of losses, and report seri-annually to the Board. Acknowledged receipt of Court of Apneal's decision to uphold Judgement of Superior Court rendering invalid initiative petition to reduce Supervisors' salaries. Accepted Grant Deed fror• J. Stith required as condition of approval of LOP 2144-74 and 2205-75, San Ramon area. Approved recorrendations of Co•:er`Ment Operations Co:mittee (Supervisors Dian and Linscheld) with rgspect to appointment of Tenant Poaitlans on the Hoard of Commissioners of the Houalm. Authority of Contra Costa County. Acknowledged receipt of report of rotierncent Operations Committee on allegation or L. Lister that Aniral Control had I.-pounded and cold her horse within required five- day holding period. Approved surety tax bonds for Sub. 47x!4, Partlnez area, and Sub. 4817, Walnut Creek area. Approved recerrendations of Govern=-•ent Operations Corrittee on proposed policies , and Procedures developed to InpleWent the Housing -Pnd Cormuntty Development Program. referred to: "ublic Yorks Director enrrunication frog R. Catlin, Bethel Island, alleging that Stone Road is still too narrow to remit two vehicles to oess at the same tire, in vette of speed lirit P!rns ind barricades installed by the County, and indicating nosslble offer of dedient±on in exehnnre for reallmrent of said road; Goverment nPerationq Cor.-ittee requests for addition of members to the Contra Costa County Detention Qacillty Advisory Co-vittee who would be more representative of the corrunity; County Administrator and sublie Works Director communlcatlon from M. Goatley, et ux. , re renuirenent for ratirent of drainage fee prior to obtaining building permit for remodeling; Rdministration and r±nance Cr rittee for report on Fav 4 matter of theft of several vehicles fror+ rat::irr_ lot adiacent to Rich-ond County Buildings Complex; Director, Human Fesou-ces srercy, co--r-unications received from Senator J. Nejedly in response to Res. No. 7i/131 supporting legislation on licensing for children's day care facilities; County Shlerifr-Coroner and County Ad-inistrintor request of Contra Costa Chapter of the National Orr.anization for Woz-en thit the 1'oa*d preclude use of federal funds for construction or wren's Viniru- Security Pacility until Probation Dept. study of needs of weren Prisoners Sia coroleted; County Counsel notificatior. frorV. Smith of his intention to file a claim against the County; Director, Hunan 'Resou-ce" A"nev, nr!d County Art-inIntrator for review in preparation of 1979-77 Proposed count:• buiret renuest of M-Nett Corooration that consideration be given to alecholier. P.roble-s of Gener+l Rss!stance recipients; County Adrinistrator miternati:•e rr-cosals !AB 3745 and A9 3506) afrectinq the finaneinr of Hu Area Rnrld "rsns!t District oneratinns; Publication entitled "Operational Guide to Revonue Shnrinr Cali'ornlm Counties" received from CSAC; and letter from senator A. rreror!o urr►inr support of a proposed 210 million augmentatlon to the Governor's 197fi-77 alcoholisr+ budget. 0947'9 April 20, 1476 Surrarg, continued Page 5 Referred to: Cavernv+ent Operations Corrittee and Counter Administrator letter from Sconoeia Opportunity Council trarusnittina coax of 1975 evaluation report of Countp's Commuruity Action Promram; Public Vorkp Director letter fror .d. Pree concerning traffic situation at inter- section of Rudfear Road and San r1ruel Drive, Valnut Creek; Public Forks Director (Peal Property Division) request of Tessajara Fire Protection District for assistance +n expeditlnr acquisition of certain land for use as future fire station site. Deterred to June 2P at 11 a.m. (or earlier, subject to proper notifleatIM decision on appeal of A. Bards, et al, from Board of Appeals approval with conditions of tentative rap for R'S 73-75, El Sobrante area. Approved requests of E. Srasafield and 0. Anderson for refunds of park dedication fees, as recommended by Director of Planning. Directed Planninr Departrent and County Counsel to withhold legal action to effect removal of a certain ov!ary in a a+nfle far3ly renidential dictrtet until oublic hearings can be held to deterrine whether revtsion, of Ordinance Code to nonronriate, and instructed Plannlnr staff to submit rrorreas revert within AS days. 6s recom.ended by the CaTern•-ent Ocerations Cornittee: Referred to Chief and Boe-d of Corgi±ssinners of Cont" Costa County Fire Protection District and County !d^inistr•tor prorosed forratinn of special fire nrotection sone within said district to enus14=P hvd:-art rent2l costs; Approved reaueat For nrp!edr luncheon vftl: rereMd to Safety ProP,ram for Plood Control and road rzinteennee crews of Qnblic Vorkr Depart-ent; Established monition fr. sunrort of 33 474, which would 1:-^*t initial extension of HART service to within counties of Alareda, San 4rancinco and Contra Costa. - �� % Continued to Aoril 21 at o a.m. hearing on Social 4ervice funding problem. Adjourned reetina in urepory of Err. Dale R. Roden and qtr. Jones V. Diraw1o, Sr. The preceding documents consist of 480 pages.