Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 05271975 - R 75E IN 1
1975 MAYJ lit) TU SDAY i ........... THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.M. , TUESDAY, MAY 27, 1975 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Vice chairman J. P. Kenny, Presiding; Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for,Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator and Public Works Director. F y K J '.fit-rt ta,a L JAMES P. KENNY.RICHMOND CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WARREN N.BOGGESS IST DISTRICT CHAIRMAN ALFRED M.DIAS."Id PAULO JAMES P. KENNY 2ND DISTRICT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY VICC CHAIRMAN\ JAMES E. MORIARTY. LAFAYETTL JAMES R.OLSSON.COUNTY CLERK ]RD DISTRICT AND FOR AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF TH"OARD WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONCORD SPECIAL. DISTRICTS GOVERNEn BY THF. BOARD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT CHILF CLERK `\ EDMUND A. LINSCHEID. PITTssuRO BOARD CHAMBERS.ROOM 107.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING PHONE 228.7000 STH DISTRICT EXTENSION 2371 P.O. BOX 911 MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY MAY 27, 1975 The Board will neet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.432. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Presentation of resolution proclaiming the week of June 8 through June 15, 1975 as "Adoptions Week." 9:00 A.N. Consider recor^mendations of the Public Works Director. 9:10 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:30 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:30 A.M. Consider reconmendations and requests of Board r.!embers. 9:45 A.V. Consider reco;mendations of Board Cornittees including Intergovernnental Relations CoMr^ittee (Supervisors J. P. Kenny and E. A. Linscheid) on Cor:prehensive Employment and Training Act, Title I, ianpower Plan for Fiscal Year 1975-1976. 10:00 A.M. Executive Session (Governrent Code Section 54957.6) as required. 10:00 A.M. Recess. 10:30 A.M. ConsurLmate purchase of real property at 1029 Court Street, Martinez, for County Civic Center in the amount of $20,000. 10:30 A.M. Supervisors J. P. Kenny and A. i'. Dias (as a special Board Committee) will report on their study of municipal courts in Brest county. 11:00 A.M. Receive bids for construction of Sans Crainte Drainage Area Line B from San Miguel Drive to 14irka Lane, and Line G from Line B to Rudgear Road, Walnut Creek area. 11:00 A.M. Hearing on recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to request of Coleman & Isakson (1887-RZ) to rezone land in the Danville area. 11:10 A.M. Presentation by representatives of Fit. Diablo Regional Group Sierra Club with respect to removal of sand from a part of the Antioch sand dunes being proposed as a potential park. 11:30 A.M. hearing on request of Reclamation District No. 2025 to temporarily close Holland Tract Road; continued from I-lay 20, 1975. 11 :45 A.M. Mr. Warren Smith call request that the existing storm drain in the vicinity of 11Q0 Bailey Road, Pittsburg, be increased in sine. Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued Nay 27, 1975 ITEI::S SUBIPTITTED TO THE BOARD Iters 1 - 6: CONSENT 1. FIX June 24 , 1975 at the tires indicated for hearings on the recarnmendations of the Planning Commission with respect to the following rezoning requests: . 10:30 a.m. - Oleroy D. Hytholt (1897-RZ) , Pacheco area, fro; Single Far+ily Residential District-7 (P.-7) to Multiple Family Residential District-4 (M-4) ; 10:30 a.m. - Joyce Turner (1900-RZ) , Martinez area, from Light Agricultural District (A-1) to Limited Office District (0-1) ; 10:30 a.n. . - !%'alter J. Hardcastle (1892-RZ) , Pacheco area, fron Multiple Fanily Residential District (F'-2) and Single Family Residential District-7 (F.-7) to Retail "Business District (R-B) ; and 10:45 a.m. - Raymond Vail & Associates (1838-RZ) , Antioch area, from Light industrial District (L-I) to Single Family Residential-40 (F-40) . 2. EXONERATE bond deposited as surety for taxes in connection with A Subdivision 45-i7, '.Walnut Creek area. 3. RESCI.ID Board's Order dated T'arch 25, 1975 relating to transfer of tax lien to the unsecured roll. 4. AUTHORIZE cancellation of tax liens on property acquired by public agencies ; cancellation of certain delinquent penalties and fees on second installments on 1974-1973 secured assessment roll; and correction of erroneous tax cancellation eursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 4832 and 4836.5. 5. DENY the following claims: a. Mahmoud Abouzeid, Jr. , 52,641.85 for general damages; b. Patricia Ann Boeckner, $25,000.00 for personal injuries; c. David Christopher Thuleen, $25,000.00 for personal injuries ; d. Frank Stephenson, Jr. , $25,000.00 for false arrest; e. Aaron Charles Cloud, $25,000.00 for personal injuries; f. Harvey A. Srith, 51,137.42 for general damages; and g. 'Myrtle N. Brooks, a54,136.h9 for general damages. -y 6. AUTHORIZE provision of legal defense for M. D. Farr, Deputy County Counsel, H. T. Gonsalves , Deputy County Counsel, D. Corbin, Juvenile Referee, and Social Service Department in connection with Superior Court Action No. 152,292. Items 7 - 26: DETEWIINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item. ) 7. LETTER from President, East Contra Costa Historical Society, requesting that a reFresentati ve from said Society be appointed as a rerber of the John Marsh hone Restoration Committee. CONSIDER APPROVAL 00(0, Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 27, 1975 8. IiE!VORA'N ' fro:-i, Count.- Administrator ;,n response to Board DUN: �. : referral) recommending that after July 1., 1975 the Board consider adoption of a resolution changing the name of River Fire Protection District to Riverview Fire Protection District effective September 1, 1975. FIX TINE TO CONSIDER 9. LETTER fron Mr. G. Williams complaining about littering; and pollution of Redrock Marina, and requesting correction of same. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PLANING FOR REPORT 10. LETTER, from.: District Attorney supporting the budget request of the County Probation Departrent to include the cost of the court referral nroEram operated by said Department in conjunction with the Volunteer= r8ureau of Contra Costa County. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT 11. LETTEF, from Deputy Associate Regional Manpower Administrator, U. S. Department of Labor, advising that the county has missed a due date for having a complete grant applicaticn under CETA regulations, but that every effort will be made to fund the grant in a timely manner. REFER VO DIRECTOR, HUTMAIN RESOURCES AGENCY 12. LETTER, from.: Chairman, Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory* Council, transmitting the Council's recommendations , for citizens participation during the 1975-1976 Community Development prograr.; year, reconirending that said Council participate in review of progress under the first year program.., and further recom.*rerding that all activity proposals for the second year program be reviewed by it for recor-rienda- tion to the Board. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT AND APPROVE RECOMI EINDATIONS 13. LETTER from certain residents of the Alano area requesting that the Public I:orks Department be authorized to study and prepare a plan to alleviate storm drainage problems. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR REPORT 1i . LETTER from Assistant Regional Director for Manpower, U. S. Department of Labor, summarizing annual assessment of the county's efforts in implementing the Comprehensive Employment and Training, Act progran for the 1974-1975 fiscal year and advising that on the basis of evaluation, full consideration will be given to continued funding. ?ZFER TO DIRECTOR, HUVAN RESOURCES AGENCY ' 15. LETTER from Executive Officer, State Air Resources Board, inviting county participation in an initial meeting to form a joint State/Local task force to develop the first phase of an air quality maintenance plan for the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT AND ADVISE THAT COUNTY Rr.PRESE:'NTATIVES WILL A'I'TEAND 16. LETTER from Air. D. A. Ebert, Rodeo, complaining about lack of copies of proposals for CETA sub-grant funding at a recent meeting of the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council, and commenting on the quality and competence of the chair- manship and membership of said Council; and LETTER from Ms. Helen (Mackintosh, Pittsburg, complaining that at a meeting of the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council held for the purpose of considering a report of the Proposal Sub-Committee concerning expenditure of CETA funds for the 1975-1976 Fiscal year, interested citizens were not provided a copy of said report nor were they allowed to speak on the proposals. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMA.J RESOURCES AGENCY, AMD CHAIRMA +, CO::TRA COSTA COU=NTY N!ANPOj:ER. ADVISORY COUINCIL 001M , Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 27 , 1975 17. LETTER from Field Services Administrator, Child Development Programs Support Unit, State Department of Education, advising that a proposed carpership program is within the confines of the Standard Agreement project signed by-the Board Chairman on July 19, 1974. REFER TO COUNTY COUNSEL 18. LETTER from General Manager-Chief Engineer, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, requesting that a condition of approval of the Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization require that annexa- tions be subject to all the terns, conditions, and requirements of the Sanitary District Code and its supplemental specifica- tions. REFER TO COUNTY COUNSEL AND LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 19. LETTER from Branch ?'anager and Supervisor of Food Program, Cooperative Center Federal Credit Union, Berkeley, requesting that the fee schedule under provisions of a contract between the county and said Credit Union for issuance of Food Stamp Coupons be increased from t.85 to "1.00 per transaction. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY, AND COUNTY AUDITOR-CO`:TROLLEF 20. LETTER fron Senator G. N. Zenovich, Fourteenth District., advising that he is in the process of preparing legislation to assist taxsayers and requesting information with respect to county oronerty that is exempt from taxation. REFER. TO COUNTY AD'V;1NISTRATOR 21. LETTER from ''resident , Coloma-Lotus Boosters Club, inviting county participation in the Grand Parade as part of its Gold Discovery Days Celebration to be held January 23-2�, 1975. R.:F£R TO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION 22. LETTER from President, California Association of Health Facilities , Sacramento, stating that the 1875-1875 State Budget for Nursing Hove Funding under the ?-Tedi-Cal program is inadequate, and advising that Board action urging the Governor and Legislature to provide a necessary budget increase for said facilities would be helpful. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HU'iAN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR REPORT 23. LETTER fron. Co*?missioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission., and Chairman, Parking Management Steering Committee, inviting county participation in developing guidelines for local parking management plans, an alternative to Environmental Protection Agency parking facility regulations. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR REPORT 24 . LETTER from Secretary-Treasurer, Richmond Bar Association, advising that its membership voted unanimously to support AB 434, which would prevent closing or moving of the Department of the Superior Court located in Richmond, prior to a proposed amendrent providing for an alternate site location within a five-mile radius. REFER TO COUNTY AD14INISTRATOR 25. , LETTER from Mr. Thomas Bidowski, Martinez, complaining about the ?canner in which a recent auction for the sale of county equipment was conducted. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR REPORT 26. 1•:E:MORANDU'? from Director of Planning ;n response to request of Diablo Bowmen for grant of an open space easement, recommending that the Board inplem..ent the Open Space Easement Program (which could include, the Bownen application) , and suggesting certain policy and administrative considerations in connection therewith. REF?:^ TO GOVER11 ENT OPiERATIO.IS CO PITTEE AND COUNTY A7''INISTRATOR Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 27, 1975 I teems 27 - '31: IN G:',!",ATC:: .'Copies of cormunications listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties.) 27. LETTER from General Superintendent, Golden Cate "rational _ Recreation Area/Point Reye National Seashore, National Park Service, U. S. Department of the Interior, requesting space for its exhibit at the Contra Costa County annual fair. 28. PETITION from county residents opposing plans. for ofSnstruetion of the naw county jail. 29. LETTER from Vice President, Contra Costa County Genealogical :society, opposing the Board's opposition to SB 683 which would prohibit charging fees for searchii_g or copying any public documents. 30. LETTER from San Francisco Area Director, U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, advising that a Community Development Equal Opportunity training session for representatives of communities participating in Community Development Block Grant funding will be held June 12, 1975 in Oakland. 31. MEMORANDUM from Legal Counsel, County Sl°�ervisors Association of California, seeking assistance in obtaining information with respect to proposed legislation which could have financial impact on counties. Persons addressing the Board should complete the form.. :provided on the rostrum and furnish the Clerk. with a written coy of their Dresentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5 P.M. CONSENT (SUPPLE':`EEN T AL) 32. INTRODUCE ordinance *raking certain county ordinances applicable to the River Fire Protection District effective July 1, 1975; waive reading and fix June 3, 1975 for adoption of same. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions May 27, 1975 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Authorize appointment of Charles Wilson, M.D. to the position of Clinical Physician I, osition number 02, at the fifth step $2,626 per month) of Salary Level 580 $22160-$2,626), effective May '27, 1975, as requested by W. R. Downey, Chief, Medical Administrative Services. 2. Authorize re-employment of Ms. Nora Hendrix in the class of Intermediateist Clerk at the third step ($701 per month) Salary Level 179 ($636-$773), effective May 12, 1975, as requested by the County Assessor and recommended by the Civil Service Commission. II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS Name and Destination 3. Department and Date Meeting Mercedes Anderson Las Vegas, Nev. UC San Diego, Norma Gibson, June 4, 1975 to Course on Special Senior PHN June 7, 1975 Care of Newborn and Health Department Premature Infants D. J. Ludwig, Chicago, Ill. Group Health Foundation PHP Administrator June 22, 1975 to Institute County Medical June 26, 1975 Services Judge Richard E. Montreal, Canada Annual Meeting of Arnason and August 5, 1975 American Bar Judge Betsy F. to Association Rahn August 12, 1975 III. APPROPRIATIONS ADJUS114MS 4. Planning,Department. Add $4,360 for preparation of environmental impact report. Funds have been advanced by the developer to cover the cost. 5. Sheriff (Special Projects). Add $12,000 for continuation ot the strike Force project for the remainder of fiscal year 1974-1975. This project extension is financed by a grant of $8,472 from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning and $3,525 of County funds. 6. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. Add §1,9ZO from district funds for equipment. To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5/27/75 Page 2. III. APPROPRIATIONS ADJUSTMENTS . 7. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for the following accounts: County Medical Services, Health Department, Planning Department, Public Works, Social Service, County Service Area LIB-11 (Oakley). IV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS None V. BOARD AND CARE PLACEMENTS/RATES 8. Authorize placement of an emotionally. disturbed dependent child of the court at Fred Finch Youth Center, Oakland, California at a rate of $1,687-per month effective May 28, 1975 as Tecommended by the Director, Human Resources Agency. 9. Authorize placement of a ward of the Juvenile Court at Arnold Homes for Children, 4455 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Sacramento, California at a monthly rate of $1,472, as recommended by the County Probation Officer. 10. Amend Board Order dated April 22, 1975 which authorized placement of an emotionally disturbed dependent child of the court at Homewood Terrace, San Francisco at a rate of $1, 125 per month to correct rate to $1,165 . per month, the rate established by Resolution No. 75/56. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 11. Approve and authorize Director, Human Resources Agency, to sign on behalf of the Board, contracts with a fee for service physician and dentist used by County Medical Services. 12. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreement between the County of Contra Costa and the Regents of the University of California, under the terms of which the Social Service Department will continue to provide field instruction to students enrolled in the School of Social Welfare during the period May 1, 1975 through June 30, 1979. 13. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute amendment to contract with the State Department of Health for the County Alcoholism Program Information and Evaluation System Project, extending the expiration date from July 1, 1975 to December 31, 1975 with no increase in funding. To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5/27/75 Page 3. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 14. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreement between the County of Contra Costa and the State of California, Department of Health, to provide supplementary educational instruction and support services for 20 handicapped children at the George Miller Memorial Centers, during the period May 15, 1975 through June 30, 1975 at a total. cost not to exceed $18,536 funded entirely. with Federal ESEA Title I funds. 15. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute extension agreement between the County of Contra Costa (Probation Department) and the University of California at Berkeley for the conduct of the College Work-Study Program during the period July 1, 1975 through June 30, 1976 with the County bearing 30 per cent of the cost of the program, estimated to be $2,500, to be deposited with the University of California, and the Federal Government and the University to provide 70 per cent of program costs. 16. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreement between the County of Contra Costa and the State of California, Department of Health, for Family Planning Services provided by the County Health - Department during the fiscal year 1975-1976, as recommended by the Director, Human Resources Agency. The maximum amount payable to the County under the agreement is $85,000 funded entirely with State appropriated funds. 17. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute amendment to agreement between the County of Contra Costa and the State of California, Department of Health, for the conduct of a Geriatric Screening Project by the County Health Department to extend the duration of the project four months until December 31, 1975; all other provisions of the agreement remain unchanged. 18. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreement between the County of Contra Costa and Creative Communications and Research, Berkeley, California, for research_ and evaluation of the Probation Department Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project during the period May 28, 1975 through June 30, 1975 at a cost not to exceed $2,772 funded with project grant funds. To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5/27/75 Page 4. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 19. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors to execute Contract Amendment Agreement (#15 with the Pittsburg Unified School District for an additional $5,000 in CETA funds to cover the cost of additional training approved by the Manpower Advisory Council. 20. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Notice of Intent to Aply to. the U. S. Department of Labor for 378,000 in� . CETA-Title III funds for a Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (SPEDY). 21. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Contract for Purchase of Services (#20-023) with Ramps for Kids, Inc., for $34,200 in State and Federal funds to operate a campership program for low income youth during the period .June 1, 1975 to August 31, 1975. VII. LEGISLATION None VIII. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 22. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute month to month rental agreement with Kaiser Aetna for premises at 150 Buchanan Circle, Pacheco for use by the Mt. Diablo Municipal Court for storage of records. 23. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute lease between the County of Contra Costa and John Bessolo for the use of property in Rodeo, California by the UPSPROUT Community Garden Project during the period May 20, 1975 through May 19, 1976. 24. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute five year lease between the County of Contra Costa and George Curtis, et al, for premises at 215 G Street, Antioch for occupancy by the Probation Department. 25. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute amendment to lease between the County of Contra Costa and George Curtis, et al, dated September 19, 1972 for premises at 213 G Street, Antioch which extends term for two years and eight months to August 31,, 1980 so as to coincide with additional lease for contiguous space. 26. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Memorandum of Lease for recording purposes for lease dated April 8, 1975 between the County of Contra Costa and Peter J. Frumenti, et ux, for premises at 1957-G Parkside Drive, Concord for occupancy by the Family Support Division of the Office of the District Attorney. i To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5/27/75 Page 5, VIII. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS . 27. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to ! execute Memorandum of Lease which establishes May 16, 1975 as the commencement date for lease dated May 7, 1974 between the County of Contra Costa and Peter J. Frumenti, et ux, for premises at 1957 Parkside Drive, Concord, for occupancy by the District Attorney and the Public Defender. { 28. Authorize Real Property Divisiom, Public Works Department, to negotiate for lease of space in Antioch for Family Support Division of District Attorney's Office. 29. Authorize V. L. Cline, Chief' Deputy Public Works Director, to execute rental agreement dated May 13, 1975 between the County of Contra Costa and Mr. Lawrence K. Dostal for a County-owned single family residence at 25 North Lane, Orinda, California at the rate of $200.00 per month. 30. Authorize Real Property Division, Public Works Department, to work with Director, Human Resources Agency, to negotiate extension of lease for Oakley Health Clinic. _ F IX. OTHER ACTIONS 31. Authorize refund of $500 to Pedro Martins "`'• and Sons, Inc. , as recommended by the Director of Planning. Money was paid to the' County for preparation of an environmental ` impact report; subsequent arrangements were made by the applicant for preparation of the report by a consultant. 32. Refer to Board Committee for review, recom- mendation of Economic Opportunity Council on" use of $30,100 in carry-over Federal CAP funds. 33. Acknowledge receipt of Justice Automation Advisory Committee (JAAC) ACTION PLAN for implementing electronic data processing projects into an integrated Criminal Justice Information System and authorize submittal of the JAAC ACTION PLAN to the Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County as a County-sponsored application for Federal funding or other funding which may be available. NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Wednesday, 5:00 P.M. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California May 27, 1975 E X T R A B U S I N E S S SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 1. SUBDIVISION 4599 - MAP APPROVAL - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors:' 1. Approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4599. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Subdivision Agreement and any appropriate extension thereto on behalf of Contra Costa County. 3. Accept a $10,815.00 cash contribution (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 126241, dated May 23, 1975) in lieu of the widening of Walnut Boulevard required of the Subdivision. The widening work cannot be done at this time due to the conflict between the current and future alignments of Walnut Boulevard. Owner: Gavin W. Tefs, 1615 North. Broadway, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Location: Subdivision 4599 is located on the south side of Walnut Boulevard, west of Mt. View Boulevard. (LD) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page I ot 1 May 27, 1975 01012 , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California May 27, 1975 ' AGENDA. REPORTS . • i None SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 1. SAN MIGUEL DRIVE - APPROVE ROAD CLOSURE - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the closing of San Miguel Road (County Road 4041) near Rudgear Road for a three-day period sometime during May 21, 1975 and May 301 1975 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. . The East Bay Municipal Utility District has 'requested permission to close this road for the purposeoflowering their water line below the proposed County storm drain line. Traffic will be detoured over existing neighborhood streets. (LD) Item 2. CAbaNO PABLO - ACCEPT RENTAL AGREEMENT - Orinda Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Rental Agreement dated May 13,1975 for a single family residence at 25 North Lane, Orinda, and authorize Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, to sign the Agreement. The rental is on an "As Is" basis at a rate of $200.00, per month, effective as of May 1, 1975. The renter is Mr. Lawrence K. Dostal. CRP) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 10 May 27, 1975 II .. Item 3. SAN MIGUEL DRIVE - DEDICATION ACCEPTANCE - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept portions of drainage easements shown and offered for dedication for public use on the map of Subdivision 2113 filed April 7, 1955 in Book 57 of Maps at page 34. The Public Works Department has prepared plans and spec- ifications for the construction of a storm drainage system in the Sans Crainte Drainage Area with construction scheduled during the summer of 1975. Permanent drainage structures will be constructed within drainage easements which have been previously offered for dedication to the County. Portions of these drainage.easements need to be accepted so that future maintenance may be performed on the structures. - Descriptions and maps of those portions of the drainage easements which are to be accepted are on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. (RE: Sans, Crainte Drainage Project No. 8505) (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Send copy of Board Resolution to Real Property Division.) (LD) Item 4. ACCEPTANCE OF INSTRUMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: A. Accept the following instruments: No. Instrument Date Grantor Reference 1. Relinquishment 3-19-75 Lawrence A. . Harper, M.S.36-74 of Abutters et al. Rights 2. Grant Deed 3-19-75 Lawrence A. Harper, M.S.36-74 et al. B. Accept the following instruments for recording only: 1. Offer of Dedication 3-19-75 Lawrence A. Harper, M.S.36-74 et al. 2. Offer of 10-26-74 Michael Frank M.S.36-74 Dedication Hallenberger, et al. (LD) Item 5. NORTH GATE ROPE - DEED ACCEPTANCE - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed and Right of Way Contract, both dated May 15, 1975, from Bruce A. Iversen, et ux, and authorize Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director to sign the contract on behalf of the County. (Continued on next page) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 2 of 10 May 27, 1975 • . o0a4 Item 5 Continued: It is further recommended that the Board authorize. the County Auditor to draw a warrant in the amount of $300.00 payable to Western Title Guaranty Company, ". Escrow No. M307728 and deliver to the Supervising Real Property Agent for payment. - (RE: Project No. 4461-4561-72) (R') Item 6. TREAT BOULEVARD - ISSUE PURCHASE ORDER - Walnut Creek Area Three bids were received and opened in the office of the Public,Works Director on May 21, 1975, for the installation of interconnect conduit on Treat Boulevard' between Bancroft Road and Cherry Lane. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the plans -and specifications and authorize the Public Works Director to issue a purchase order in the amount of $8,506.00 to the low bidder, Steiny and Company Inc. (RE: Work Order 4240) " (TO) Item 7. BANCROFT ROAD - ISSUE WORK PURCEASE ORDER - Walnut Creek Area Three bids were received and opened in the office of the Public Works Director on May 21, 1975, for the installation of vehicle detector loops at the intersection of Bancroft Road and Treat Boulevard. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Public Works Director to issue a purchase order in the amount of $2,423.75 to the low bidder, Continental Electric Co. (RE: Work Order 4255) (TO) Item 8. SCHOOL STREET - EASEMENT DEDICATION - Moraga Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept for recordation an Offer of Dedication dated May 13, 1975, for a storm drain easement from Russell J. Bruzzone, Inc. The offer is being made as a condition of approval of Land Use Permit 2002-75M. - (RE: Work Order 8200-FC file 92 01 443 73) (R') A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 3 0-f 10 May 27, 1975 {; SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV Item 9. CAr1INO ANDRES - DEED ACCEPTANCE - West Pittsburg Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the Quitclaim Deed dated April 23, 1975 from the United States of America (Bureau of Reclamation Canal property) pursuant to the Contract dated February 8, 1974, between the County and the Federal Government. (RE: Project No. -5385A-4593-73) (RP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 10. SUBDIVISION 4464 - SUBDIVISION. ACCEPTANCE - Danville• Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: (a) Issue •an Order stating that the construction of improvements (widening of El Pintado) in Subdivision 4464 has been completed; (b) Accept the improvements which were done within right of way previously granted to the County. (Book 5189 of Official Records at page 38 and Book.5217 of'Official Records at page 345.) The $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement, evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail No. 112712 dated November 20, 1973, is to be retained for one year in accordance with Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. Subdivision Agreement dated November 26, 1973. Subdivider: Francis Mastri, % Jackson & •Company 3717 Mt. Diablo Boulevard Lafayette, California Location: Subdivision 4464 is located at the intersection of E1 Pintado and E1 Cerro Boulevard. (LD) Item 11. RYAN INDUSTRIAL COURT - STREET LIGATING - San Ramon Area At the request of local citizens and in conformance with the policy on street lighting, Resolution No. 72/341, it Is recommended that the Board authorize the Pacific Gas and Electric Company to energize five 7500 lumen, mercury vapor street lights on Ryan Industrial Court and Old Crow Canyon Road. The lights shall be energized in conformance with the drawing entitled "County Service Area L-45, Ryan Industrial Court," dated February 24, 1975, which is on file in the Traffic Operations Division of the Public Works Department. The lights have been installed by the Developer under previous agreements and shall not be billed to County Service Area L-45 until July 1, 1975. (TO) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 10 May 27, 1975 00016 Item 12. ESTHER LANE - STREET LIGHTING - Danville Area At the request of local citizens and in conformance with the policy on street lighting, Resolution No. 72/341, it is recommended that the Board authorize the Pacific Gas and Electric Company to install six 7500 lumen, mercury vapor street lights on Esther Lane and Quinnterra Lane. The lights shall be installed in conformance with the drawing entitled "County Service Area L-45, Esther Lane Area," dated February 18, 1975, which is on. file in the Traffic Operations Division of the Public Works Department. The lights shall not be billed to County Service Area L-45 until July 1, 1975. (TO) Item 13. SUBDIVISION 3653 - DEPOSIT REFUND - Byron Area The one-year satisfactory performance period after accept- ance of the streets for •maintenance has been successfully • completed. It is therefore recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the street and drainage improvements have successfully completed the one-year satisfactory performance period and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to U.S. Plywood Corp.-Bixland Corp. , 1450 Doolittle Drive, San Leandro, California, the $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail No. 67861 dated August 13, 1968. Streets were accepted for maintenance on September 25, 1973. Subdivider: Discovery Bay Corp. , P.O. Box 85, Byron, CA 94514 Location: Subdivision 3653 is located on Discovery Bay Boulevard north of State Highway 4. (LD) * Item 14. SAN RA-ION CREEK - EROSION REPAIR - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, approve' Work Order 8121 in the amount of $3,000 and authorize the Public Works Director to repair erosion of San Ramon Creek Channel near Drop Structure No. 11- upstream of Paraiso Drive. The work will be done bya combination of hired equipment and county forces. This maintenance work is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption from environmental impact report requirements. (RE: Work Order 8121) (M) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 5 of 10 May 27, 1975 0001 Item 15. SUBDIVISION IS 114-73 - MAP APPROVAL - Alamo Area . It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors': 1. Approve the Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision MS 114-73, ! 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Subdivision Agreement and any appropriate extension thereto on behalf of Contra Costa County. Owner: Frani: G. Bolla and Paul Bolla 3158 Miranda Avenue Alamo, CA 94507 Location: Subdivision MS 114-73 is located on the south side 'qf Alamo Way west of "Danville Boulevard. (LD) Item 16. COUNTY SERVICE AREA 14-6 - AWARD CONTRACT - Danville Area The following bid was received in the office of the Public Works Director on April 30, 1975 for the maintenance of median and border landscaping for County Service Area M-6. Sycamore Homes Association $8,136.00 P.O. Box 157 Danville, CA It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors•approve the plans and specifications and award the contract to Sycamore Homes Association. The contract is for the period July 1, 1975 to June 30, 19 76. This maintenance work is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption from environmental impact report requirements. Board Order Required. (M) Item 17. SUBDIVISION 4077 - DEPOSIT REFUND - Byron Area The one-year satisfactory performance period after"accept- ance of the streets for maintenance has been successfully completed. It is therefore recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the street and drainage improvements have successfully completed the one-year satisfactory performance period and that any deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Jorgen V. Lunding, 1545 Palos Verdes Mall, Walnut Creek, California 94596, the $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail No. 88260 dated February 16, 1971. Streets were accepted for maintenance on September 18, 1973. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 6 of 10 May 27, 1975 00.018 Item 17 Continued: Subdivider: Discovery Bay Corporation P.O. Box 85 Byron, CA 94514 Location: Subdivision 4077 is located on Discovery Point north of State Highway 4. (LD) Item 18. GREEN VALLEY CREEK PROJECT - EXCESS PROPERTY SALE - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex-officio the: Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa Count]? Flood Control District, approve the Notice to Bidders and Terms and -Conditions of Sale at public auction, one single family house located at 875 Diablo Road, Danville. The sale is to be conducted by the County Real Property Agent on the premises at 11:00 a.m. , June 24, 1975. Removal of the improvements from County owned property is required to clear the right of way for subject project. (RE: Work Order 8462) ' (RP) Item 19. WILLOW PASS ROAD OVERLAY - APPROVE PLANS AND ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - Pittsburg Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve plans and specifications for the Willow Pass Road asphalt concrete overlay and advertise for bids to be received in three weeks, and opened at 11:00 a.m: on June 17, 1975. The Engineer's estimated construction cost is $160,000. The project is located on Willow Pass Road between Port Chicago Highway and the Pittsburg City limits (400 feet east of Loftus Road) and will consist of an asphalt concrete overlay combined with the placement of a pavement reinforcing fabric. This project is considered exempt from environmental impact report requirements as -a Class 1 Categorical Exemption. (RE: Project No. 5181-4247-75) (RD) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page-7 of 10 May 27, 1975 0,00"; Item 20. CAMINO DIABLO - DEED ACCEPTANCE - Byron Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed from A. Steffensen, dated May 19, 1975, conveying additional right of way along Camino Diablo Road as a condition of Land Use Permit 341-73 and 2146-74. (RE: Road No. 7941, Work Order 4805) (RP) Item 21. LONE TREE WAY - DEED ACCEPTANCE - Antioch Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed and Right of Way Contract, both dated May 20, 1975, from Joseph A. White,- Jr. , et al. , and : authofize Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, to execute the contract on behalf of the County. It is further recommended that County Auditor be authorized to draw warrants as follows: Payable to Amount Joseph A. , Jr. and Lois M. White $60.00 Frank A. and Mary V. Siino $60.00 Said warrants to be delivered to the County Real Property Division for payment. (RE: Project No. 6971-4143-74) (RP) 'Item 22. SAN RAMON VALLEY BOULEVARD - TRAFFIC LANE •MARRINGS - Danville Area On March 31, 1975, the Board of Supervisors approved Work Order No. 6075, in the amount of $4,500.00 'and authorized the Public Works Director to arrange to repaint traffic lanes, paint a new two-way left turn lane and bicycle lanes on the portion of San Ramon Valley Boulevard between Sycamore Valley Road and Railroad Avenue in Danville. At the request of local businessmen, the Department agreed to change the limits of the project and to make minor modifications to the original striping plan. As a result, .the final cost of the work is $6,700.00,. or $2,200.00 above the original estimate. It is recommended that the Board approve Supplement No. 1 to Work Order No. 6075 in the amount of $2,200.00 to cover the increase in cost of the work. (RE: Work Order 6075) (TO) A_ G E N_ D A Public Works Department Page 8 of 10 May 27, 1975 Item 23. LONE TREE WAY = EXECUTE RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION — Antioch Area Itisrecommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to execute a Right of flay Certification to the State Department of Transportation that the County has acquired all right Of way required for the Lone Tree Way'curve reconsrruction project. A Negative Declaration pertaining to this project was posted with no protests received. The project has been determined to conform with the General Plan. (RE: Project No. 6971-4193-74) (R,) CALENDAR OF WATER MEETINGS TIME ATTENDANCE DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE REMARKS Recommended Authorizati- - June 6 Fri. California Muter 9:00 A.M. Regular Meeting Staff Commission South Lake Tahoe June 10 Tues. Bureau of 9:00 A.M. Central Valley Staff Reclamation Contra Costa Nater Study County Nater District, Concord June 11 Wed, Department of 9:00 California Water Port Nater Resources Sheraton Inn Plan Conference San Francisco Airport June 17 Tues. California Water 9:00 A.M. Public Hearing Staff Commission Resources Bldg. San Joaquin Valley Sacramento Drain June 18 Wed. Bureau of 9:30 Tour of Wastewater Staff Reclamation Suisun Farms Reclamation and Gun Club, Reuse Facilities Suisun Marsh June 26 Thurs. Bureau of 9:00 A.M.. Central Valley . .Staff Reclamation U.S.B.R. Water Study Sacramento A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 9 of 10 May 27, 1975 GENERAL Item 24. COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY COlII4ITTEE EXPENSES The Board of Supervisors appropriated $125,000 -in the FY 1974-75 Budget for the preparation of a countywide solid waste management plan and associated expenses (estimated at $5,000) of the Solid Waste Management Policy Committee. These monies were appropriated from revenue sharing funds. It is recommended that the Board authorize the establishment of a Work Order in the amount of $3,200 to which Policy Committee expenses can be charged. (RE: Work Order 5250) (EC) Item 25. WORK FURLOUGH CENTER - AMENDMENT TO ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - Richmond It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the First Amendment to Agreement for Architectural Services for the Work Furlough Center and authorize its Chairman to execute the Amendment. This Amendment.reduces the architectural fee by approximately $7,000.00 and relieves the architect from responsibility for field supervision during the construction phase. (RE: Work Order 5346) . (B&G) Item 26. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING REMODEL - PHASE II - INSPECTION CONTRACT - Martinez It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a contract for inspection services, effective May 1, 1975, for the Administration Building Remodel (12 Story) , Phase II, with Robert G. Grady, and authorize its Chairman to execute the contract. The agreement provides for payment for these services in accordance with the standard rates, as indicated in the contract. (RE: Work Order 5205) (B&G) Item 27. HIGHWAY USERS TAX APPORTIONMENT The Controller of the State of California advises that the May 1975 apportionment of highway users taxes to Counties has been completed and that a warrant in the amount of $348,185.83 has been mailed to Contra Costa County as its share of these taxes. This is $36,530.90 more than the May 1974 apportionment and $22,134.05 more in total fiscal year-to-date apportionment in comparison with the same time period last fiscal year. (B&S) Item 28. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider attached "Calendar of Water Meetings." No action required. (EC) NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 10 of 10 May 27, 1975 QWI 2 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 In the Matter of Ordinance Introduced. The ordinance indicated having been introduced, the Board by unanimous vote of the members present waives full reading thereof and fixes June 3, 1975 as the time for adoption of same. Subject Making certain County Ordinances relating to the Counzy Civil Service System applicable to the River Fire Protection District effective''-July 1. 1975• PASSED by the Board on May27, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this)7th day of Ygy , 19 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. A Deputy Clerk H 24 72174 - 15-M M Penningt 00023= *A� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Tias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sea[ of:the Board of Supervisors h axed this 27t day of May , 19 75 ffi J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy.Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M DorothyC na ld 00024, I I CONTRA•COST/ 'COUNTY APPROPRUTION ADJUSTMENT J 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT / RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE �`QK/1/4 Cord Special fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Increase Code Quonti ) BudoetUnit Object Sub.Acct. !CR X IN 66) Q! 1003 357-2310 Professional and personal services $4360 I I 99v-9970 Reserve for contingencies $4360 9?0-9970 Appropriable new revenues 4360 Contra COSia Cou"W RECEIVED office of County AC!mirlistrclicr PROOF Comp.—_ K.P._ _ _VER.— 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY This money has been received from a land developer. Dote Description (receipt #G381794) and deposited in a trust account pending the completion of the environmental impact report. A contract has been let and the EIR is in preparation. APPROVED: SIGN RES DATE AUDITOR— Y 19 CONTROLLER: COUNTY shahs ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OtOER YES: Supen'isors Iierny. D ss, N orlamy. cxGd-cla: W. N. Boggess MAY 2 : 1975 on J. R. OLSSON CLERK An on h esus , Dir Dely by t Pl or of annin , 5/14/7- otftiCI / Signmu a Tide _/ Dote Approp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) See Instructions on Reverse Side Journal No. 000 t M Ii, Rev. 2/6o) •See Instructions on Reverse Side �V 25x CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT 257 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CON TROLLER•S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' D crease Increase Code Quontit ) Fund BudoetUnit Oaiect Sub_Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies $12,000 O) 10Q3 257-2310 Professional & Personal $10,000 01 1003 257-2472 Criminal Investigation 2,000 PROOF Ca_mp.__ _K_P_ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitol outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL The County Wide Strike Force, an Office of Criminal Justice ENTRY Planning funded project, has its first year contract Date Description terminate May 31, 1975. Request for second year funding has been approved by the Board of Supervisors and the local Criminal Justice Agency; however, it is presently being processed at the Office of Criminal Justice Planning. Therefore, to insure continuing operations of the project in anticipation of second year grant funds, this request is made. Although $12,000 is requested, approximately APPROVED: SIGN ES DATE $25,757 will he expended. The difference is the result AUDITOR£— ) /?.2h! of surplus monies in Cost Center 257 due to the delayed CONTROLLER- / initiations of other COUNTY grant projects. Of the $25,757 t0 be 23 expended, the County will be reimbursed by $22,229. ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supenisors Tierr.v. rian. mortany. �i, I:t�citeid. SOyrCjeSS . MAY 2' 7 1975 NO%'f1.6 Gt-- on J. R: OESSON i7 Admin. Services Officer 5-20-75 CLERK by " 0 lop, , [? ; :�: �hr Signoture1. Title i Dote 0{ �26� Approp.Adl. { M 129 Rev. 2166) •See Instructions on Reverse Side Journal No. ' in 21 Approp.Aal. i ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) •See Instructions on Reverse Side`)Ou4b Journal No. • s CONTR,$ COSTA COUNTY ROPmATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT 2025 RESERVED FOR AUDI TOR-CON TROLL ER'SUSE Contra Costa Fire Protection District CoTd Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • increase Code Quantity Fund Bad et Unit Object Sub.Acct. Decrease (CR X IN 66) 61 2025 2025 7710 418 for water heater 172. Ol 2025 2025 7750 524 water heater 172, 01 2025 2025 7753 492 standard sedan 4095• 01 2025 2025 7753 494 car red sedan 38�5. 01 2025 2025 9970 for cars 7920. 01 2025 2025 7752 476 exec chair 189. 01 2025 2025 7752 468 desk 177• 01 2025 2025 7710 404 for desk r; chair 366. Contra Costa County RECEIVED MAY 1 9 '675 Office of County Administrator PROOF _C-77 t_K_K _ _VER.— 3. EXPLANATION OF RECIUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL 5k dome deleted at Station 14 (water heater replaced) Sky dome added red car for Training School , added standard sedan Date Description for Administration. APPROVED: ATURES JUE AUDITOR— 'CONTROLL COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: SupmIsors Kern}•. nlwt. morla:ty Ph k n 2 f 1975 J. R. OLSSON CLERK �= �� 1 by s. �F r6 C h I-e f , Clair Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. S �e " Journal No t M 129 Rev. 2/"66) •See Instructions on Reverse Side 06027 bY. 1. .ut c•, y -.�c. v(Jct�rit,(, �F i"6 6 h i e f 5 15-i 5 rrCI '.'iy Cleric Signature ApproTitle Date ( M 129 Rev. 2/66) � Journal No �f�a •See Instructions on Reverse Side 06M _ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY •-; APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MDICAL SERVICES RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increcse Code Quantic ) Fund SudoetUnit Object Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) %y3.00 01 1003 540-7750 013 badder 143.0o Ol 1003 540-7754 012 Microscope p $3.E} �c 3oS,oa Ol 1003 540-T750 030 Refrigerator 3oS.a 0 01 1003 54O-T754 020 Bed Scale 295-199 01 1003 540-TT51 042 Microfiche Readers 68.00 01 ) 1003 54O-T754 016 Bubble Top/Crib 68.00 01 1003 540-7754 038 Rectal Set 1].4.00 01 1003 540-TT54 026 Incubator 114.00 01 1003 540-7751 046 Shelf File 63.00 01 1003 540-7754 002 Centrifuge 63.00 PROOF _Co_mp._ _ _K_?: VER.— 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Apororxiation AdJustment necessary due to rise Date Description in prices. APPROVED: S1 RES DATE AUDITO — Y 9- 175 CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: 1 1 7J BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kcnnr. A[orlarty, �r I.insclleid. _ YV, N. Boggess ' i 19-15 y . V Chief, Medical J. R. OLSSON CLER ,� 'nistrative Services 5/20 b;�-�jI Depv, Cecrk 0 1 SignatureW. R. Title Date Downey II Approp.Adi. ( M 129 Rev. 2165) +Journal No. •See Instructions on Reverse Side ,00028 . CONTRA COSTA =COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT , r 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MEDICAL SERVICES + RES"-RVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLERS USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quanta ) Fund Bud etUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 661 Sf6- 77.x"! oy/g 01 1003 7759.048 Addressograph Machine $265.00 ,5V.0-776' t Ol 1003 q454-996 Miscellaneous Equipment $265.00 PROOF K.P_ VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - -- - — ENTRY Price increase has spiraled from $551 to $816 for Madel Date Descrfp:ion 200 Addressograph Machine. APPROVED: SGN RES DATE AUDI TO g CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: 46-zzS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supen isari Kenny, Dias. Moriarty. jj� Linschel& QjwAt: A N. Boggess MAY 2' 7 19 5 • « • I�dhmif, Medical J. R. OLSSON CLERK a. . nistrative Services!j-1 c? b De ty Clerk Signmure W. R. Downey II Apprap�lAd). J�� Dote ( M 129 Rev. 2i"68) jtijji AV hto. 7` •See larstrrctiaas an Reverse Side �J�jl! . . CONTRA' COSTA- couNTr t APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Co. I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNI ~v`��Of�Ty' RESERVED FOR AUDI TOP-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEIA• ` - urease Code Quontit ) Fund BudaetUnrtOb'ect Sub.Acct. DeaeKsC"J,� (CR'XIN 66) G� 01 1 1003 450 7750 001 Projector ! -0- Contra Costa CO TIW PECENE oilice Of County AdMinistrator PROOFComp. K.P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ---- - -- - Health Education through audio-visual equipment has been ENTRY utilized effectively in Family Planning and P. D. Clinics Dale Descrtption While patients are Waiting for services. Recent emphasis on child and adult screening services and resultant additional clinics has increased the demand for the projector. Through purchase of manufacturer demonstration models, still under Warranty, we are able to purchase four (4) APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE Projectors for a price less than the $1070 appropriated for three (3) projector in the 1974-75 Budget. One CONTROLLER: AUDITOR- 444 19 ?5 additional projectors with no increased expenditures COUNTY is requested. ADMINISTRATOR: S BOARD OSuSpUnisors Kenny.loartq, YES: ri Jk#WW Linseheld. A►Adl,& , W. N. Boggess It!AY ? 7 1975 NOk on J. R. OLSSON CLERK ^ CCAdministrative Services Asst. bt- S. Ddpu.4-/ C'e , Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. i M 129 Rev. 68) Journal No. !o • See Instructions on Ret erse Sia 00 OW cownU cOsu couNTY ` APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE �"��R�� Card Special ACCOUNT 2. DEJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Decrease Increase Code Quontit 1 Fund BudaetUn/t Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) of Cjo3 3S7-7750 006 Camera/projector (1) $ t 357-7750 007 Taboret (1) 12S 3 357-7750 old Drafting Machine (3) $810 2 357-7751 002 Microfiche Reader (3) 600 357-7751 004Microfiche file (1) 30 -357 :775 + .{ 357-7752 00S Desk, 60 x 30 (S) 21 357-7752 009 'bes k, i yp t s-t It jis1:2179 oTN SPEe- DEPT EIP 717 Contra Cosia County RECEIVED Qifice of Ccunty Adm.inistrGtor PROOF _Comp._ -X,.P_ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cast of each} TOTAL - ENTRY Change in priorities of need for capital items, inflation of prices. Date Description APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR- Y 19 75 CONTROLLER: COUNTY wh , ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supenisors Nennr, VIaa, �iorinriy. Limchcid. •' Vti. N. D—gass MAY -9 7 1975 ' NO%��.�� on ..-.--•--- c � f J. R. OLSSON CLERK rt of P.la 511. 1.'ZS by a. Anth A Deh ,i, S19.0 we Title Date. Approp. Journal N. M 129 Rev. 2166) •See Instructions on Reverse Side Journal No. - ( M 129 Rev. 2168) *See Instructions on Reverse Side (� a CONTRA' COSTA• COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM!• Increase Fund Decrease {CR X!N b67 Cade Quantity) BudaetUmt Obiect Sub..Acct. STORM DRAINAGE DISTRICT ZONE 13 01 2593 2 93-7712 332 1. Dan BI C-1-2 fm DOI 25301. 031 1. Dan BI C-I to 1}02 2500 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7A 2365 2365-7712 017 2. Outfall Fm 001 23001 301 2. Pit Expan to 017 2300 EQUIPMENT GARAGES 1333 362-7751 039 3. Micro Fich Vi267 7754 033 3. Sma I 1 too Is = -~-~-` 267 PROOF -K.P. VER. 3. EXPLAUNATiON OF REQUEST(if capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - - - ENTRY 1. 4.0. 8520 Preliminary Engineering for storm drain Date Description between Eaurenit�Way & Entrada Verde. 2. W.Q. 5437 Preliminary Engineering for emergency outfall at Shore Acres Treatment Plant. 3. Provide money for micro Eich viewer to replace subscription on Ford Motor Co. parts books. P. APPROVED 0AT AUDITOR- CONTROLLER- _. UDITOR-CONTROLLER: -- COUNTY kD ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD 0jt�UgfRVI0 R *.:orlsety. YES: 4"Opm. L:•ts:::d3 W. N. Boggess an J. R.OLSSON CLERK �.- �� Deputy Public Works Direct rector 5121 by Signature Title Date Deputy Cletk Approp.Ad1. ` Auma{No. {M 129 Rev. ?.`68) • See Instructions on Reverse Side tV#ii`+; ( M 129 Rev. 1.66) Reverse n as no. • See /rstractioas or Rerrse Side {{♦� I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public 'Forks RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease Code Quontit ) Bud etUnrt Ob ect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) SELECT ROAD CONSTRUCTION I 10 3 6 1-7600 234 1 . San Pablo Ave. 30,00 528 2. L i vorna Road 5000 589 3. Norris Canyon Rd 11105 535 3. Bethel Is(Rd 11105 208 4. San Pablo Dam Rd 32300 995 2. Design Eng 5WO )99 1. Landscaping 3000 MINOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION 665-76DD 230 5. Avenida Martinez 1000 ROAD MAINTENANCE 671-2319 4 b 5 Contracts S-208,M-230 33300 i PROOF _Comp.,_ K.P._ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 1 . W.O. 4256 Preliminary Engineering for median land- Date Description scap i ng between Tara Hills Dr. b Del Monte Dr. 2. W.O. 4257 Preliminary Engineering for reconstruction from 1-6&0 to Trotter Way. 3. W.O. 4227 Transfer funds to cover new railroad crossing at SP RR Xing BO 58.4 4. W.O. 5819 Reconstruct culvert and ditch at Sta. 301 (contract awarded 5/20/75) APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE 5. W.O. 5835 Preliminary Engineering for slide investigatic AUDITOR W 21 400 t s/o May Rd. CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Super% sons Kenny. r`fsr• .*,torlarty. ijgnpoft I bscheA L W. N. Boggess M AY 2 7 1975 on ---7 J. R. OLSSON CLERK /� Eeputy Pub 1 i s WorKs D i rector 5/21/75 by �\ S- i DeVuiy C:vrkj�5 Signature Title ��Date Approp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2i66) • See Instructions or Reverse Side Journal No. O3©A ={W3 ( M 129 Rev. 2/66) • See Instructions on Reverse Side O��U CONTRK COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT � DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT � • RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE ^re 3 Card Special ACCOUNT :. OBJECT 6ii X ENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Fund ` Code Quantity) BadaetUfw Obiea &.:b.Acct. 40 (CR X IN 66) 01 8 1003 500 - 7752 008 Desk (Typist) 2,000 01 4 1003 502 - 7755. 007 Desk (60 x 30) 2,000 PROOF _�O 'p _ _ _XIP_ VER._ 3. EXPLAt#ATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 1. To cancel four typist desks and add four double Dote Dest muton pedestal desks. 2. To cancel four typist desks budgeted for outstation clerical positions that were not cleared for hiring. APPROVED- erUsJDATEAUDITOR-CONTROLLER•COUNTY aDr!INISTRA.OR. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors ]Zenny. r1al. "inti-rty. Linscac:,a.. fel AY w 7 1975 NO% ��4-�.C� on J. R. OLSSONC, LERKor R. E. Jornlin. Director Signature Title Dote Joprop.na No: OST 7/ { M 129 Rev. 2:08) e.• InstructionsOOC- urnat Na Instructions on Reverse Side i M 129 Rev. , e8; 1 eq. 111SIrgCltOrrs ort ket erse SideOO^r journal No. o.1 _ CONT9A COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I DEPARTMENT OR BUDGE f U141T SERVICE AREA LIB-11 RESERVED FOR AUDIT O bIL PJOLLER'S USE Card SP�.� ACCOUNT 1 OaJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code 03Ayl Fane Redo`t t Ob ecr Sub_Art. CR X IN 66) 01 2711 2711-7710 00/ Construction $3,077 01 2711 2711-2170 -U-5 --- $3,077 Contra Costa County RECEIVED d MAY + 91975 Office of County Administrator PROOF - --Camp.- K_P:_I—VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - - ENTRY Transfer funds for cost of remodel to Administration - Dote Description (County) Building for Oakley Library. APPROVED: IG,*IA TE AUDI TO R-1 CONTRO -� COUNT ADMINISTRATOR: ` BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kenny. Dbm ASorl rtn -$oMompr, l inschdd NGS .' W. N. &cygef Y 2 1 1975 `7Z ,^ , Administrative Services Asst J.J. R. OLSSON, CLERK 6y . uty► Chef Signature Title Date ADproP.Adj. / (M 129 REV. 2/75) Joumol No. •Ser lustructini.� ort Reverse Side (M 129 REV. 2/6) •Ser laslrncltor.� on Ret;erne Nae IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS e OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the Map of Subdivision 4599, ) Walnut Creek Area. ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/x.12 WHEREAS a map entitled Subdivision 4599, property located in the Walnut Creek area, having been presented to this Board for approval, said map having been certified by the proper officials, and being accompanied by: Letter from the County Tax Collector stating.that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1974-1975 tax lien has been paid in full and the 1975-1976 tax lien which became a lien on the first day of March. 1975 is estimated' to be $3,000; and Security to guarantee the completion of road` and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a) Surety Bond No. 2452593 issued by Safeco Insurance Companies with Albert D. Seeno Construction Company as principal, in the amount of $37,600 for Faithful Performance and $38,100 for Labor and Materials; and b) Surety Bond No. 2452590 issued by Safeco Insurance Company of America with Albert D. Seeno Construction Company as principal, in the amount of $3,000 guaranteeing the payment of estimated 1975-1976 tax; and c) Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 126241, dated May 23, 1975), in the amount of $500, and Subdivision agreement between Albert D. Seeno Construction Company subdivider, and the County of Contra Costa, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete road and street improvements, etc., in said subdivision within one year from the date of said agreement; Cash contribution (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 126241, dated May 23, 1975), in the amount of $10,815 for the widening of Walnut Boulevard, which cannot be improved at this time due to the future realignment of Walnut Boulevard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said bonds and the amounts thereof be and the same are hereby APPROVED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement be and the same is hereby APPROVED and the Chief Deputy Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said agreement and appropriate extensions thereto. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said map be and the same is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 27., 1975• cc: Public 1-7orks Director Counts Auditor-Controller Subdivider Miner RESOLUTION N0. 75/412 00036`. z t� r SUT Ib I iLON, GRT , ENT (§2) Sube. 4599 _ (B. v P. Code S=11011-12) 01) Suhdiviier- Albert D. Seeno- Construction Company (3'1) ;fec.ti:re (sate:Wy 1975 (§1) Comrietion Period: one year (§4) Deposits: A. (Cash) $500 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (fait-tft l nerforc:ance F 1=aintei:a,-lce) $37,600.00 2. (labor K materials)$ 38,100.00 1. PARTIES %I: DATE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, califor-nia, hereinafter caller "County", and the abaveu:!zed Suldivider, r..utually promise and agree as follows conce:•rir_o this subdivision: 2. I:IPROVEAFENiS. Sub&jvider shall constrict, install and complete road and street jvpro`:ements, tract dr?.ill:toC, street signs, fire h)-drafts, and all improver-tents as requLred by the County Ordi race Cede, especially Title 9, and irc'udirg future :,mend-mcn;:s, and all 4 provement require; in the approved improt-eme=.t pian of this subdivision on. rile in the County's Public E*orks Departrent. . Subdivider shall complete this :fork and inprovezents (hereinafter called "work") within the above co:.p.e_ion period from date hereof as required by the California Subdivision Map Act (Pusine ss & Professicns Code §§11500 and fol low i.g), in a good work- manlUe ri=n:::ler, in accorGaltce with zcze:ted construction i Pctice a_*:d in a manner equal or superler to the requirements of the Ce:;nty Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; � and where there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter require.,-,eats shall govern. 3. GUARXTEE & i?AI\1-E.k!1.%rE. Sublivider guarantees t;.---t the work is and will be frev from defects =d will perfern- ss:i_fac:orily in accordance Lh Article 94-4.4 of the County- Ordinance Code; and he shall maintain it for one year after its completion and accr:utance against any dcfective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performaiice. 4. I,'•SPR0VE`1E.N7 SECURITY: -DEPOSIT & BONDS. Upon executing this Agreemartt, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business LIS Professions Code §11512, deposit as security :pith the County: A. Cash: $500 cash; arid.. . . B. Bond;, etc. : (I - faithful perfozmance € maintenance) additional security- for at least the above-specified amount, which is the total estir:ated cost of the :orl: 'Less $500, in the fol« of a cast: deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful perforzance of this agree:mcnt and ?Maintenance of the uork for one rear after completion tnd acceptance thereof against any defective worlmanshir or >»;terials or any unsatisfactory perforrar-ce; plus (2- labor F nateri.ls) another such additional security in at least the above-specified amount, whi 61 is the ful l amount or said estinated cost - securing pay=ent to the contractor, to bis subcontractors, and to persons rentir_, equipment or furnishing labor or materials to then or to the Subdivider. S. LARRANTY. Subdivider warrants that said improserent plan_ is adequate to accomplish this ::ori: as promised in Section 2; and if, at any ti=e before the County's resolution, of completion for the subdivision., the imvrovenent plan proves to he inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall rake changes necessary to accompli sa the work as promised. - l - 00037 6. -U t:AIVER BY COUN7Y. Inspection of the York and/or materials, or approval of lio_'k and/or materials inspected, or stat.2-ze t by any of=i.C:•, agent or arployee of the Cvzz lty inuicating the work or any part lther-z�of cv:^plies Y:iu: t e re=1::_C'.^ents of this Agrcenent, or acceptance of the whole or r::..- j?art of said work a_nd/or nate_ials, or payments, therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the Co::r:ty be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to`cowply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. I.NDD-WITY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The inder-anitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claire for damage of any ind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined ' below, and including personal injury, death, property dar:.age, inverse monde=natio;i, or any combination of these, and regardless of u ether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the irpro:-e,ent plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), actions) or other proceeding(s) concerning these. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or ron-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or core of them. D. Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is rot conditioned or dependent on vhether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or "hat the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay c:her.- due, all the costs of .he work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey wontz..:ents in accordance with the filed map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Co=issioner-Surveyor. 10. \0\PERFOR__a.NCE V.•D COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the tire specified in this agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete then by contract or other:.ise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges therefor i:_ediately uaon derard. If County sues to co=yer performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other experses o-_ litigation incurred by County in connection therewit1j. 11. aSSIGNME\T. If before County accepts these inpro:•emerts, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. _ 2 _ litiM V , 12. RECORD MAP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to file and record the Final Map or Parcel Map for said Subdivision.- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) VICTOR W. S R, Public Wor s ector ALBERT D. SEENO CONSTRUCTION 'COMPANY, : . :.l a limited partnership BY: Albert D. Seeno' Construction Compan; I e. ora on, ner Chief Deputy Public lYork erector By - &�t (D n e ial capacity "n the business) FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel Note to Subdivider: •(1) Execute acknowledgment form below; and (2) If a corporation, affix corporate seal. Bye' u-�c Deputy (CORPORATE SEAL) State of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership County of ) ss' or Individual) On the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individual and officer or partner as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me r-;f that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. (NOTARIAL SEAL) Notary Public for said County and State (Subdiv. Agrmt. CCC Std. Form) LD-9 (Rev. 5/74) �1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SS COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA On this __-22IM day of , 14-4-5 before me _SI1WE__ CHELM , a Notary Public in and for said county and state, personally appeared ALBERT D. SEENO, JR., known to me to be the Vice President of the corporation- that executed the within instrument on behalf of said corporation, said corporation being known to me to be one of the partners of ALBERT D. - - - SEENO CONSTRUCTION CO., the partnership that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as such partner and t such panne ip executed the same. Notary Public SUE ROCHELLE I BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 In the Matter of Resolution ) for Condemnation of Real Property ) 4 for. County Road Purposes, ) CONDEMNATION Subdivision No. 4578, Walnut Creek ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/413 5 61 71The Board off' Supervihors of Contra Costa County, California, by 8 �vote of two-thirds or more of all its members, RESOLVES THAT: 9 It finds and determines and hereby declares that the 10 public interest and necessity 'require: 11 The improvement by the County of Contra Costa of a 12 public road; and in connection therewith and necessary therefor,' 13 the acquisition of a temporary construction easement in the real 14 property described in Appendix A attached hereto, the easement 15 to terminate on July 30, 1975 or on completion of the improvement, 16 whichever first occurs; 17 Said proposed public improvement is planned and located 18 in the manner which will be most compatible with the greatest 19 public good, and the least private injury; 20 This Board shall acquire in the name of the County of 21 Contra Costa, the said easement by donation, purchase, or by 22 condemnation in accordance with the provisions for eminent domain 23 in the Code of Civil Procedure; 24 The County Counsel of this County is hereby authorized 25 and empowered: 26 To acquire in the County's name, by condemnation, the 27 easement and right of way hereinafter described in the said real 28 property in accordance with the provisions for eminent domain in 29 the Code of Civil Procedure and the Constitution of California 301for County road purposes ; 31 To prepare and prosecute in the County's name such pro- -321ceedings in the proper couras are necessary for such 00040 I acquisition; and 2 To apply to said court for an order fixing the amount 3 and nature of such security as it may direct, and to deposit such 4 security as so directed, and for an order permitting the County 5 to take immediate possession and use of said easement for said 6 public uses and purposes; 7 The said easement in real property is •more particularly 8 described in Appendix A attached hereto and ,by this reference 9 made a part hereof to the same extent as .if herein fully set 10 forth in words and figures. 11 PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 27, 1975, by the following vote: 12 AYES: Supervisors James P. Kenny, Alfred M. Dias, James E. 13 Moriarty, and Edmond A. Linscheid NOES: None 14 ABSENT: Supervisor Warren N. Boggess 15 16 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 17 and regularly introduced, passed and adopted by the vote of 18 two-thirds or more of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa 19 County, California, at a meeting of said Board on the date 20 indicated. 21 Dated: May 27, 1975• 22 County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board of 23 Supervisors of Contra Costa 24 County, California 25 By . 04� Deputy 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 - 2 - 00011. . r. s That parcel of land in the unincorporated area of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: Portion of the Rancho San Miguel, described as follows: Commencing on the east line of the tract of land designated on the map of Sans Crainte Unit No. 3, filed April 17, 1945, Map Book 27, page 47, Contra Costa County records, at the center line of Stewart Avenue, as designated on said map; thence from said point of commencement along the center line of a 50 feet in width road, south 650 41' east, 51.87 feet, south 760 41' 58" east,',444..70 feet, and south 700 52' 53" east;. 301.72 feet; thence' north 190 '071 o7"- east to the north line 'of said Stewart Avenue and the actual point of begin ning of the herein described parcel of land; thence from said point .of' beginning north 190 071 07" east, 20 feet;..,thence .south• 70° 521 53" east, parallel to said Stewart Avenue, to*,the' east . lirie of the parcel of land described in .the deed to Willard R. Johnson, et ux,, recorded October 14, 1968 in Book 5729 of Official Records at page 377; thence south 80 39' 35" west along said east line to the north line of Stewart , Avenue; thence north 70° 52' 53" west, 40 feet to the point ofbeginning.,, APPENDIX A AGREEMENT (Subdivision No. 4578, Walnut Creek) 1. Parties. Effective on May 23, 1975, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY herelnaafter called the "County" and Paul C. Petersen, Builder- Developer, an individual, hereinafter called the "Developer" agree as follows: 2. Purpose. Developer is developing the property within the Countyan(T-the City of Walnut Creek designated as Subdivision No. 4578, and in connection therewith is required and proposes to construct and install public road improvements therein pursuant to plans and specifications which have been approved by the County. The construction of the aforesaid off-site road improvements necessitates the acquisition of a certain temporary construction easement in private property within the unincorporated area of the County owned by private parties. A legal description of the pro- posed easement in real property is set forth in Appendix A which is attached hereto and by such reference made a part hereof. The County agrees to institute condemnation proceedings as may be required to acquire whatever easements and rights of way are necessary to construct and install the aforesaid road improvements, and the Developer agrees to pay all the costs and expenses incurred by the County in connection with the condemnation. 3. Costs. Developer will pay all costs of acquiring the necessary. property including the purchase of easements and rights of way necessary to accomplish this work, all condemnation suit costs to be incurred in acquiring said easements and rights of way, the award of the Court to the property owners, court costs, attorney's fees, title company charges, engineering fees and fees of appraisers approved by the County. Developer covenants to hold the County absolutely free, clear and harmless from any costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of said property interests, whether by negotiation or condemnation, and from all liability arising from the proposed work including abandonment costs if incurred. 4. Legal Services. The Office of the County Counsel of Contra Costa County shall have supervision of the said condemnation action,- but Developer's attorneys, Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, shall perform all legal services required for said condemnation action, such as making all legal appearances required, conducting the trial of said matter and handling any post trial proceedings required, including appeals. The County shall not in any manner be liable or responsible to said Developer's attorneys for legal services rendered for the condemnation action. The County retains the right at any time at its sole discretion to direct that legal services for said condemnation action be exclusively provided by the Office of the County Counsel thereafter with all costs thereof to be borne by the Developer as provided herein. By this agreement, the County hereby associates Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges and Nancy E. Smith, Attorneys at Law, San Francisco, California, as Special Counsel for the County to provide the legal services specified in this agreement. 5. Reimbursement . In connection with the reimbursement of the County for al costs set forth in Section 3 above, Developer agrees as follows: 00043 4 (a) To Deposit in Court any amount ordered by the Court for security in connection with any order for immediate possession obtained in such condemnation action after appraisal by an appraiser approved by the County. Said deposit, if not withdrawn, shall be ' returned to Developer upon the dismissal of said condemnation action; (b) Developer will upon demand post with the County a bond guaranteeing to the County full payment of all judgments awarded in said condemnation, all costs therein including appraisers' fees, attorneys' fees, including those of the County Counsel if incurred as provided herein by County, and all others, and including costs, plus fees and costs on appeal, if any appeal is taken, said bond f to be in the sum of twice the amount of the deposit for immediate possession ordered by the Court. Developer may deposit cash in a like amount with the County in lieu of the aforesaid bond. Said bond or cash in lieu thereof-if requested shall be submitted to the County before the order for immediate possession is obtained from the Court; (c) Developer covenants to pay reasonable attorneys' fees and costs involved in any suit by or on behalf of the County on said bond or to recover for the County the costs, fees and other items of expense covered by this agreement; (d) It is understood that the County will maintain appropriate records reflecting its legal and other expenses, including the time devoted by the County Counsel's Office, and that the services rendered by attorneys in the County Counsel's Office will be based upon the hourly rate of $25.00 per hour for the time of the Deputy County Counsels. 6. Acquisition Time. It is understood that the property interests which are the subject of the said condemnation action shall be acquired within the one-year period following the issuance of the orders of immediate possession, either by negotiation or formal condemnation, and that the Developer and his attorney will take all reasonable actions necessary to effect said acquisition within one year. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEVELOPER � By h firman of t o o pervisors ATTEST: County Clerk By �:. ,�/�tie�, GAJ,�� �� Deputy RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Note to Developer: Execute acknowledgment form on page 3. By FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By - Deputy - 2 - 00044 I 4 f State of California ss. County' of San Mateo The person signing above as Developers known to me in individual r and business capacity as stated, personally appeared before me, today and acknowledged that he executed It. -, Dated. May 27 1975 (SEAL) �� KH�i '6:HOOPS WTARY PitBltC - CALiF0iW1A SAN UMcovin r FORM APPROVED: J. B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, By Deputy 3 yY: _ i That parcel of land in the unincorporated area of the County' of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: Portion of the Rancho .San Miguel, described- as follows: Commencing on the east line of the tract of land designated on the map of Sans Crainte Unit No. 3, filed April 17, 194530. Map Book 27, page 47, Contra Costa County records, at the center line ' of Stewart Avenue, as designated on said map; thence from said point,. of commencement along the center line of a 50 feet in width. road,; ' south' 65o 41' east, 51.87 feet, south 760 41' 58" east, 444,70 feet, . ,. and south 700 52' 53" east, 301.72 feet; thence north l9` 071-.0 " east: to the north line of said Stewart Avenue and the-actual point of begin- ning of the herein described 'parcel of land; thence from said; point af' beginning north 190 07' 07" east, 20 feet; thence south 70° 52' S3" ` . east, parallel to said Stewart Avenue, to the east' line of the parcel. .- of land described in the deed to Willard R. Johnson, et ux, 'record e& October 14, 1968 in Book 5729 of Official Records at page 377';. thence- south 8° 39' 35" west along said east line to the north 'line of Stewart Avenue; thence north 700 52' 53" west, 40 feet to the point of beginning. APPENDIX A r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Completion ) of Improvements in Subdivi- ) RESOLUTION NO. ?5/414 sion 4464, Danville Area. ) WHEREAS the Public Works Director having notified this Board that the construction of improvements (widening of El Pintado) in Subdivision 4464, Danville area, has been completed, as provided in the agreement heretofore executed by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in Subdivision 4464, Danville area, have been completed for the purpose f of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under the subdivision agreement dated November 26, 1973 (bondsman United Pacific Insurance Company, Bond No. U 75 98 92) • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the improvements which were done within right of way previously granted to the County (Book 5189 of Official Records at page 38 and Book 5217 of Official Records at a page 345) are ACCEPTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 112712 dated November 20,: 1973) be RETAINED for one year in accordance with Section, 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on May 27, 1975. cc: Recorder Subdivider Public Works Director RESOLUTION NO. 75/414 r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUATY FLOOD CONTROL A:1D WATER CONSERVXfION DISTRICT In the Matter of the Resolution ) and Notice of Intention to Sell ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/415 Flood Control District Property. ) (House located at 875 Diablo Rd. , ) (Gov. C. 25363) Danville, W. 0. 8462) j The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: The County Public Works Director informs this Board that the improvements located on land acquired for the Green Valley Creek Project and described in the Notice to Bidders, attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein, must be removed, and recommends that they be sold for removal at public auction to the highest bidder. This Board finds and determines that these improvements are no conger needed for any Flood Control District purpose and hereby directs the County Real Property Agent to sell them for removal at public auction to the highest bidder, in accordance with terms and conditions of sale prepared by him :which are hereby approved. This Board hereby sets June 24, 1975, at 11:00 a.m. on the premises as indicated in the Notice To Bidders, as the time and place where bids shall be publicly received until the property - is sold. The successful bidder must immediately deposit 25% of the bid price in cash and must pay the balance in cash within 10 days. The Clerk of this Board is directed to publish the attached Notice To Bidders for five days prior to said sale in a ne:-rspaper published in the County or post in three public places in the County for that period. PASSED on May 27, 11075, ty at least a four-fifths vote of the full Board. I certify that the foregoing is a full and correct copy of actiom duly taken by this Board on the above date. J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. By SrI:bti, Deputy Clerk cc: Administrator Auditor County Counsel Building Inspector Planning Dept. Right of Way (3) Public Works Flood Control RESOLUTION. NO. 75/415 00048 VEi.V.sv, NOTICE TO BIDDERS The County Real Property Agent will sell at public auction to the highest responsible bidder, the building hereinafter described to be removed from Flood Control District property: Located at 875 Diablo Road, Danville, California, a wood frame, single-family residence on concrete slab, containing approximately 1700 square feet; 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, living and dining area, kitchen, shop, and attached carport. The auction will be held on the premises, Tuesday, June 24, 1975, at 11:00 a.m. Terms and Conditions of Sale are available at the office of the County Real Property Agent, 5th Floor, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California. The Flood Control District reserves the right to reject any and all bids received. May 27, 1975 By Order of the Board of Supervisors, As Ex-Officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By Deputy Clerk IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving Plans ) and Specifications for overlay of ) Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg Area, ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/416. Project No. 5181 -14247-75. - WHEREAS ,Plani and�Specifications for an asphalt concrete overlay combined with the placement of a pavement reinforcing fabric on 1••JILLO:,T PASS ROAD between Port Chicago Highway. and the Pittsburg City limits (400 feet east of Loftus Road) . have been filed with 'the Board this day by the -Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and . WHEREAS said project is considered exempt from. Environ- mental Impact Requirements as a Class 1c Categorical Exemption,- IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Specifica- tions are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on June 17, 1975 at 11 _OO A- N-, and the Clerk of _ this Board is directed to pu lish Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law, inviting bids for said work, said Notice to be published in the ROSSMOOR WWR - PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on May 27, 1975 • cc: Public Works Director County Auditor County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 75/416 00050 r • WILLOW PASS ROAD : PROJECT -NO. 5181-4247-75 BIDS DUE JUNE 17#1975 AT 11 O'CLOCK AoMw R0014 1039 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING+ 651 PINE STREET: MARTINEZ+ CALIFORNIA 94553 TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ♦ CALIFORNIA P R O P O S A L F O R WILLOW PASS ROAD OVERLAY NAME OF BIDDER ----��- ------------------------- BUSINESS ADDRESS --------------------- PLACE OF RESIDENCE TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THE UNDERSI NED9 AS BIDDERS DECLARES THAT THE ONLY PERSONS OR PARTIES INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE THOSE NAMED HEREIN- THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS MADE WITHOUT COLLUSION WITH ANY OTHER PERSONP FIRM OR CORPORATION- THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE LOCATION OF THE PRO- POSED WORK+ PLANS A14D SPECIFICATIONS- AND HE PROPOSES AND AGREES+ IF THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED. THAT HE WILL CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MACHINERY, TOOLS• APPARATUS AND OTHER MEANS OF CONSTRUCTIONS AND TO DO ALL THE WORK AND FURNISH ALL THE MATERIALS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACTS IN THE MANNER AND TIME PRESCRIBEDt AND ACCORD- ING TO THE REQUIRE=MENTS OF THE ENGINEER AS THEREIN SET FORTH+ AND THAT HE WILL TAKE IN FULL PAY=MENT THEREFOR AN AMOUNT BASED ON THE UNIT PRICES SPECIFIED HEREINBELOW FOR THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORKS THE TOTAL VALUE OF SAID WORK AS ESTIMATED HEREIN BEING S ----------------- ( INSERT TOTAL) AND THE FOLLOWING BEING THE UNIT PRICES BID# TO WIT- 00cUl P - 1 PROPOSAL (CONT. ) (PRICE NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) DECIMALS) ITEM TOTAL ITEM ESTI MATED UNIT OF PRICE ( I: ( IN N0. QUANTITY MEASURE ITEM FIGURES) FIGURES) 1 1 LS SIGNING AND TRAFFIC CvNTROL 2 19 EA ADJUST MANHOLE 3 23 EA ADJUST SURVEY M�ON'U..Es;T COVER ---------------------------------------------------------- ---- 4 289000 SQYD PAVESiCNT REINF02CISNG FABRIC ------------------------------------------------------------- ------ -------- 5 6.800 TON ASPHALT CONCRETE (TYPE B) 6 1 EA DRAIN INLET TOP ADJUSTMENT ------------------------------------...------------------------------- --------- 7 275 EA TYPE D PAVEMENT MARKER 8 10+000 S SURFACE PREPARATION AND SHOULDER 10.000.00 MAINTENANCE(FAY AS EARNED) ------------------------------------------------------------ ------ -------- NOTE—PLEASE SHOW TOTAL ON PAGE P-1 TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 00052 ----------0 052 P — 2 T r � PROPOSAL (CONT . ) ---------------- IMS CASE OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UNIT PRICES AND TOTALS# THE UNIT PRICES SHALL PREVAIL. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE QUANTITIES OF WORK UNDER EACH ITEM, ARE APPROXIViATE ONLY• BEING GIVEN FOR A BASIS of COMfPARISUN OF PROPOSALS AND THE RIGHT IS RESERVED TO THE COUNTY TO INCREASE OR DE- CREASE THE APSCUNT OF WORK UNDER ANY ITEM AS MAY BE REQUIRED+ IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MONEY SET FORTH FCR EACH ITEM OF WORK OR AS THE TOTAL AMOUNT BIC FOR THE PROJECT* DOES NOT COX STITUTE AN AGREEMENT TO PAY A LUMP SUM FOR THE WORK UNLESS IT SPECIFICALLY SO STATES. IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE UNDERSIGNED, AS BIDDER, SHALL FURNISH A LAEOR AND MATERIALS BOND IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF TME TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS PROP:;SAL AND A FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND TO BE ONE HUNDRED PERCEPT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS PROPOSALt TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AND AT NO EXPENSE TO SAID COUNTY• EXECUTED BY A RESPONS- IBLE SURETY ACCEPTABLE TO SAID COUNTY* I.N THE EVENT THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED BY SAID COUNTY CF CONTRA COSTA* IF THIS PROPOSAL SHALL HE ACCEPTED AND THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL FAIL TO CONTRACT AS AFORESAID AND TO GIVE THE TWO BONDS IN THE SUNS TO BE DETERMINED AS AFORESAID• WITH SURETY SATISFACTORY TO THE -BOARD OF SUPERVISORS+ WITHIN SEVEN ( 7 ) DAYSs NOT INCLUDING SUNDAYS+ AFTER THE BIDDER HAS RECEIVED ?NOTICE FRO:; THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THAT THE CON- TRACT IS READY FOR SIGNATURE• THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY. AT ITS OPTION+ DETERMINE THAT THE BIDDER HAS ABA.DONED THE CONTRACT+ AND THEREUPON THIS PROPOSAL AND THE ACCEPTANCE THEREOF SHALL BE NULL AND VOID AND THE FORFEITURE OF SUCH SECURITY ACCOMPANYING THIS PROPOSAL SHALL OPERATE AND THE SAME SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. SUBCONTRACTS THE CONTRACTOR AGREES. BY SUBMISSION OF THIS PROPOSAL TO CON- FORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS CF SECTION 41CO THROUGH 4113 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE PERTAINING TO SUBCONTRACTORS* THE SAME AS IF INCORPORATED HEREIN. A COMPLETE LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS IS REQUIRED• AND THE BIDDER WILL BE EXPECTED TO PERFORy WITH HIS OWN FORCES* ASL ITEMS OF WORK FOR WHICH NO SUBCONTRACTOR IS LISTED. THE FOLLOWING IS A COMPLETE LIST OF ITEMS OF WORK TO BE SUB- CONTRACTED ON THIS PROJECT. IF A PORTION OF ANY ITEM. OF WORK IS DONE BY A SUBCONTRACTOR• THE VALUE OF THE WORK SUBCONTRACTED WILL BE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED COST OF SUCH PORTION OF THE CONTRACT ITEM., DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. THE UNDERSIGNED• AS BIDDER# DECLARES THAT HE HAS NUT ACCEPTED ANY BID FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN THROUGH ANY BID DEPOSITORYO THE BY LAWS• RULES OR REGULATIONS OF WHICH PROHIBIT OR PREVENT THE CON- TRACTOR FROM CONSIDERING ANY BID FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN, WHICH IS NOT PROCESSED THROUGH SAID BID DEPOSITORY* OR WHICH PREVENT ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN FROM BIDDING TO ANY CONTRACTOR WHO DOES NOT USE THE FACILITIES OF OR ACCEPT BIDS FROM OR THROUGH SUCH BID DEPOSITORY. P - 3 00000 PROPOSAL (CONT. ) ; ---------------- N09 ITEM SUBCONTRACTOR ADDRESS ---- ------------------------ ---------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ACCOMPANYING TFi1S PROPOSAL IS A PROPOSAL GUARANTY I g7HEA1. : : : AMOUNT OF TEN (10) PERCENT OF A."0%1UNT B I D (CASHIER'S CHECK. CERTIFIED CHECK OR BIDDER'S BOND ACCEPTABLE) THE t:A`:ES OF ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE FOREGOING PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE AS FOLLOWS— IMPORTANT NOTICE - ------------- IF ------------ IF THE BIDDER OR OTHER INTERESTED PERSON I5 A CORPORATIONS STATE LEGAL NAME OF CORPORATIUN. ALSO NAMES OF PRESIDENT% SECRETARY% TREASURER, AND MANAGER THEREOF• IF A COPARTNERSHIP% STATE TRUE ,NAME OF FIRM* IF BIDDER OR OTHER INTERESTED PERSON IS AN INDIVIDUAL. STATE FIRST AND LAST NAME 1N FULL. ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- LICENSED TO DO C: SUBCONTRACT ALL CLASSES OF WORK INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT. Its ACCORDANCE *W I Tti AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE REGI STRA- 7 1 ON OF CONTRACTORS% LICENSE NO. (CLASS— 1 • ---------------- ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- (SIGNATURE OF BIDDER) _ BUSINESS ADDRESS PLACE OF RESIDENCE DATE 19 ----------------------------- -- 00054 P — 4 --- DATE 19 ----------------------------- -- 005 . P — 4 Willow Pass Road Overlay Project No. 5181 -4247-75 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON COUNTY HIGHWAY WILLOW PASS ROAD OVERLAY County Road No. 5181 VICTOR W. SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA May 27, 1975 0005) ,1 Willow Pass Road Overlay Project No. 5181-4247-75 I N D E X SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PAGE i . Location A-1- 2. Description of Work A-1 3. Contract Documents A-1 4. Beginning of Work, Time of Completion & Liquidated Damages A-1 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . Definitions and Terms B-1 2. General B-1 3. Proposal (Bid ) Requirements and Conditions B-1 4. Award and Execution of the Contract B-3` 5. Scope of Mork B-3 6. Control of Work B-4 7. Control of Materials B-4 8. Legal Relations and Responsibility B-5 9. Prosecution and Progress B-8 10. Measurement and Payment B-10 SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL I . Definition C-1 2. Labor C-1 3. Equipment Rental C-1 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS i . Materials D-1 2. Public Convenience, Public Safety and Signing D-1 3. Cooperation D-3 4. Obstructions 0-3 5. Clean-up 0-3 6. Pavement Fabric D-4 7. Asphalt Concrete D-5 8. Adjusting Inlet Top D-8 9. Adjusting Survey Monuments 0-9 10. Surface Preparation and Shoulder Maintenance D-10 11 . Pavement Markers - Type "D" ATTACHMENTS CC 3050 Figure 5-8 Standard Barricades _ . . . 4 SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT I . LOCATION The project is located on Willow Pass Road between Port Chicago Highway and Loftus Road in the Pittsburg area. 2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work consists of surface preparation, placement of a pavement fabric, asphalt concrete overlay, placement of pavement markers and such other items or details, not mentioned above, that are required by the Plans, Standard Specifications, or these special.` provisions to be perforined, placed, constructed or installed. 3. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The work embraced herein shall conform to the Plans entitled, "WILLOW PASS ROAD OVERLAY", the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, dated January, 1975, insofar as the same may apply, these special provisions, the Notice to Contractors, the Proposal , the Contract or Agreement, the two contract bonds required herein, any supplemental agreements amending or extending the work, working drawings or sketches clarifying or enlarging upon the work specified herein, and to pertinent portions of other documents included by reference thereto in these special provisions. 4. BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION E LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 8-1 .03, "Beginning of Work, " Section 8-1 .06, "Time of Completion," and Section 8-1 . 07, "Liquidated Damages, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The Contractor shall commence work upon receipt of directions:: to proceed as stated in the "Notice to Proceed" issued by the Public Works Department and shall complete the work within the allotted time of : 25 WORKING DAYS counting from and including the day stated as the starting date in the "Notice to Proceed ." A - I 00057 V.`vM7� y SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 4. BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION b LIQUIDATED DAMAGES (Contd) The Contractor shall pay to the County of Contra Costa the sum of $75.00 per day for each and every CALENDAR DAY of delay in finishing the work in excess of the number of working days prescribed above, and authorized extension thereof. A - 2 00058" U9VvC�� REVISED 2-14-75 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . DEFINITIONS AND TERMS As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires , . the following terms have the following meanings : a. AGENCY means the legal entity for which the work is being performed as indicated on the Notice to Contractors , Proposal and Special Provisions. b. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS means the governing body of the Agency. c. ENGINEER means the Contra Costa County Public Works Director (Road Commissioner-Surveyor; ex officio Chief Engineer) , or his authorized agent acting within the scope of his authority, who is the Agency ' s representative for administration of this contract. d. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (S.S. ) means the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation , (hereinafter sometimes referred to as S.S. ) , dated January, 1975. Any reference therein to the State of California or a State agency, office or officer shall be inter- preted to refer to the Agency , or its corresponding agency, office or officer acting under this contract. e. EQ.UIPfIENT RENTAL RATES A11D GENERAL PREVAILIPfG IJAGE RATES means the latest edition of the Equipment Rental Rates and General Prevailing Mage Rates of the State of California, Business . and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation , adopted annually by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, and on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . f. OTHER PERTINENT DEFINITIONS - See S.S. Section 1 . 2. GENERAL a. State Contract Act. Unless otherwise specified in Section A of these special provisions , or elsewhere by special order, the provisions of the State Contract Act (Government Code Section 14250 et seq. ) shall not apply to this contract, and reference thereto in S.S. Sec. 1-1 .40 is hereby waived. b . Standard Specifications. The Standard Specifications (S.S . ) referred to above are by reference fully incorporated herein except to the extent that they are modified herein. 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS The provisions of S.S. Sec. 2 shall apply except as modified herein. B - 1 00059 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS (Cont. ) a. Examination of Plans , Specifications , Contract and Site of work (S.S . 2-1 .03) Records of the Department referred to in the second paragraph of S.S . Sec. 2-1 .03 may be inspected in the office of the Public Works Director for the County of Contra Costa , Martinez, California . b. Proposal (Bid) Forms (S.S. 2-1 .05) ( 1 ) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 concerning the pre-qualification of bidders as a condition to the furnishing of a proposal form by the department shall not apply. (2) All proposals (bids) shall be made on forms to be obtained from the office of the Public Works Director, at the address indicated on the Special Provisions ; no others will be accepted. ( 3) The requirements of the second paragraph in S .S. Sec. 2-1 .05 are superseded by the following: All proposals (bids) shall set forth for each item of work, in clearly legible figures , an item price and a total for the item in the respective spaces provided, and shall be signed by the bidder, who shall fill out all blanks in the proposal (bid) form as therein required. (4) The requirements of the last two paragraphs of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 shall not apply. C. Proposal (Bid) Guaranty (S.S. 2-1 .07) The requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .07 are superseded by .the following : (1 ) All proposals (bids) shall be presented under sealed cover. (2) Each proposal (bid) must be accompanied by a Proposal Guaranty in an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the amount bid. Guaranty may be in the form of cash , certified check, cashier 's check , or bidder 's bond payable to the specific Agency. d. Competency of Bidders (S.S. 2-1 . 11 ) The requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 . 11 shall not apply. Attention is directed to S.S. Sec. 7-1 .01E and the requirements of law referred to therein relating to the licensing of Contractors . B - 2 00060 ..-I M,...-a..,...r4 m.r-,>nRx: .m ar•A.._,..:.:.., •,.`a;r+...:=an* w.ns..4..._. .. ,. ... ._ ,-. T,. - :criia.,'.i:I m..,u SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. PROPOSAL (BID) RE UIRE14ENTS AND CONDITIONS (Cont. ) ompetency of Bidders - (Cont. All bidders must be contractors holding a valid license to perform the required work as provided by the Business and Professions Code, and may be required to submit evidence to the Agency as to their ability , financial responsibility , and experience, in order to be eligible for consideration of their proposal . 4. AWARD AND EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT (S.S. 3) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 3 shall apply except as modified herein. a. Award of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .01 ) As used in S.S. Sec. 3-1 .01 "Director of Public Works" means the Board of Supervisors . b. Contract Bonds (S.S. 3-1 .02) The successful bidder shall furnish a Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of the total bid and a Labor and Materials Bond in an amount of at least fifty percent (50%) of the total bid, each in the form approved by the Agency. c. Execution of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .03) Within seven (7) days after its submission to him, the successful bidder shall sign the contract and return it, to- gether with (1 ) the contract bonds , and either (2-a) a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations , or (2-b) a certificate of Workmen 's Compensation Insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (2-c) an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director or the insurer. A sample copy of the Agreement (Contract) to be executed by the Contractor can be obtained from the County Public Works Department, at the address indicated on the Special Provisions . d. The Guaranty of the successful bidder will be returned within fifteen (15) days after the contract is finally executed and approved, and Guaranties of other bidders will be returned promptly after the execution of the contract. 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S.S. 4) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 4 shall apply except as modified herein. In lieu of the provisions in the third paragraph in Section 4-1 .038 , "Increased or Decreased Quantities," of the Standard Specifications , the following shall apply : B - 3 ,` 00061 SECTION 8 - GENERAL PROVISIONS 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S .S. 4) (Cont. ) If the total pay quantity of any major item of war'' ronimir d unci r th rnntr-rt 1•- i k vU LI-U UJ Lit- Contractor can be obtained from the County Public Works Department, . at the address indicated on the Special Provisions . d. The Guaranty of the successful bidder will be returned within fifteen (15) days after the contract is finally executed and approved, and Guaranties of other bidders wi.11 be returned promptly after the execution of the contract. 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S.S. 4) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 4 shall apply except as modified herein. In lieu of the provisions in the third paragraph in Section 4-1 .036, "Increased or Decreased Quantities," of the Standard Specifications , the following shall apply: B - 3 000 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S.S. 4) (Cont. ) If the total pay quantity of any major item of work required under the contract varies from the quantity shown on the Proposal by more than 25 percent, in the absence of an executed contract change order specifying the compensation to be paid, the compensation payable to the Contractor will be determined in accordance with Sections 4-1 .03B(1 ) , 4-1 .03B(2) , or 4-1 .038(3) , as the case may be. A major item of work shall be construed to be any item, the total cost of which is equal to or greater than 10 percent of the total contract amount, computed on the basis of the Proposal quantity and the contract unit price. 6. CONTROL OF WORK (S.S. 5) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 5 shall apply. 7. CONTROL OF MATERIALS (S.S. 6) The provisions of S.S. Seca 6 shall apply . 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S.7) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 7, except as modified by. , the agreement ( Contract) or these special provisions, apply to this project. a. Insurance (1 ) The Contractor, before performing any work under the agreement, shall , at no expense to the Agency obtain and maintain in force the following insurance: (a) With respect to the Contractor's operations: B - 4 OUVI ' V4v�J�r I SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) a. Insurance (Cont. ) ( i ) regular Contractor's Public Liabilit Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars $250 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of any one person , and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; and ( ii ) regular Contractor's Property Damage Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence and, subject to that limit per accident or occurrence, a total (or ag regate) coverage of at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars ( 100,000}g for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property during the policy period; and (b) With respect to Subcontractors' operations , Contractor shall procure or cause to be procured in their own behalf: ( i ) regular Contractor's Protection Public Liab-ili-tY Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars 250 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of any one person , and for at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or deaths of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; and (ii ) regular Contractor's Protective Property Damage Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars 50 ,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence, and, subject to that limit per accident or occurrence, a total (or aggregate) coverage of at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars (5100 ,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property during the policy period; and ( c) Without limitation as to generality of the foregoing subdivisions (a) and (b) , a policy or policies of Public Liabilit and Property Damage Insurance in amounts not less than $250,000/H500 ,000 Public Liability and $50 ,000 Property Damage Insurance, insuring the contractual liability of Contractor under the provisions of this Section as hereinafter stated. THE POLICY OR POLICIES, OR RIDER ATTACHED THERETO , SHALL NAME THE SPECIFIC AGENCY AS A NAMED INSURED. B - 5 MOM 0OW s SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) a. Insurance (Cont. ) (2) Form, Term, Certificates (a) The insurance hereinabove specified shall be in form and placed with an insurance company or companies satis- factory to the County, and shall be kept in full force and effect until completion to the satisfaction of and acceptance by Agency of all work to be performed by Contractor under the agreement. (b) The Contractor shall furnish., or cause to be furnished, to the Agency certificate(s) of insurance or certified copies of the policies of insurance hereinbefore specified. Said certificate(s ) shall provide for notice of cancellation to the Agency at least ten ( 10) days prior to cancellation of the policy. b. Public Safety The provisions of S.S . Sec. 7-1 .09 shall apply except as modified under Section D - "Public Convenience, Public Safety and Signing" of these special provisions. Maintenance of all project signing, portable de- lineators , flashing lights , and other safety devices , shall be the responsibility of the Contractor at all times . The Contractor shall respond promptly, when contacted by the Engineer, or other public agencies , to correct improper conditions or inoperative devices . Failure to frequently inspect and maintain lights and barricades in proper operating condition when in use on the roadway, or failure to respond promptly to notification of im- properly operating equipment, will be sufficient cause for suspension of the contract until such defects are corrected. All expenses incurred by the Agency because of emergency "call -outs ," for correcting improper conditions or for resetting or supplementing the Contractor's barricades or warning devices , will be charged to the Contractor and may be deducted _ from any monies due him. c. Preservation of Property The provisions of Section 7-1 .11 of the Standard Specifications shall apply to all improvements , facilities , trees or shrubbery within or adjacent to the construction area that are not to be removed. B - 4 00064 .. q SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) c. Preservation of Property (Cont. ) The last two sentences of paragraph 2 of Section 7-1 . 11 of the Standard Specifications are superseded by the following: If the Contractor fails to make the necessary repairs to damaged drainage or highway facilities in the vicinity of the construction area or to other damaged facilities or property within the rights- of-way or easements shown on the plans , the Engineer may make or cause to be made such repairs as are necessary to restore the damaged facilities or property to a condition as good as when the Contractor entered on the work. The cost of such repairs shall be borne by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due the Contractor under the Contract. d. Rights-of-May and Easements The rights-of-way , easements , rights-of-entry, fill permits and other permits acquired by or on behalf of the Agency are, as far as can be determined, adequate for the perfor- mance of the work under this contract. Any additional rights-of- way , easements , or permits which the Contractor determines are necessary or convenient for the performance of the work shall be obtained by the Contractor at his expense. e. Access to Construction Site The Contractor shall make his own investigation of the conditions of existing public and private roads and of clearances ,_, ` permits required, restrictions , road and bridge load limits , and other limitations affecting transportation and ingress and egress to the job site. The unavailability of access routes or limitations thereon shall not become the basis for claims against the Agency or extensions of time for completion of the work. f. Responsibility for Damage The provisions of the sixth , seventh , and eighth paragraphs of S.S. Sec. 7-1 . 12, regarding retention of money due the Contractor shall not apply. B - 7 Woo UUGIbj JECTION 8 - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) g. Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal Wave or Earthquake Subparagraphs A, C, E and F of Section 7-1 . 165, "Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal Wave or Earthquake, " of• the Standard Specifications are amended to read: 1 . Occurrence--"Occurrence" shall include tidal waves , earthquakes in excess of a magnitude of 3. 5 on the Richter Scale, and storms and floods as to which the Governor has proclaimed a state of emergency when the damaged work is located within the territorial limits to which such proclamation is applicable or, which were, in the opinion of the Engineer, of a magnitude at the site of the the work sufficient to have caused such a proclamation had they occurred in a populated area or in an area in which such a proclamation was not already in effect. 2. Protecting the Work from Damage--Nothing in this section shall be construed to relieve the Contractor of his responsibility to protect the work from damage. The Contractor shall bear the entire cost of repairing damage to the work caused by the occurrence which the Engineer determines was due to the failure of the Contractor to comply with the requirements of the Plans and Specifica- tions , take reasonable and adequate measures to protect the work or exercise sound engineering and construction practices in the conduct of the work, and such repair costs shall be excluded from consideration under the provisions of this section. 3. Determination of Costs--Unless otherwise agreed between the Engineer and the Contractor, the cost of the work performed pursuant to this Section 7-1 . 165 will be determined in accordance with the provisions in Section 9-1 .03, "Force Account Payment, " except that there shall be no markup allowance pursuant to Section 9-1 .03A, "Work Performed by Contractor, " unless the Occurrence that caused the damage was a tidal wave or earthquake. The cost of emergency work, which the Engineer determines would have been part of the repair work if it had not previously been performed, will be determined in the same manner as the authorized repair work. The cost of repairing damaged work which was not in compliance with the require- ments of the plans and specifications shall be borne solely by the Contractor, and such costs shall not be considered in determining the cost of repair under this Subsection E. B - 8 00066 t SECTIGN B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AHO RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7)'(Cont.) 4. Payment for Repair Work--When- the Occurrence that caused the damage was a tidal wave or earthquake, the County will pay the cost of repair,, determined as provided in Subsection E, that exceeds 5 per cent of the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes . When the Occurrence that caused the damage. was a storm or flood, the County will participate inthe cost of the repair determined as provided in Subsection E in accordance with the following: (a) On projects for whish the amount of. the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes is $2 ,000,000 or less , the County will pay 90 per cent of the cost of repair that exceeds 5 per cent of the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes . (b) On projects for which the Contractor's bid for bid comparison z* p purposes is greaten. than ' 52,000,000, the County will pay 90 percent of the cost of repair that exceeds $100,000. 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS The provisions of S.S. Sec. 8 shall apply except as, modified herein . r, B - 9 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS (Cont. ) a. Subcontracting (S.S. 8-1 .01 ) The items of work in the Engineer's Estimate preceded by the letters (S) or (S-F) are designated as "Specialty Items. " b. Assignment (S.S. 8-1 .02) Neither the contract, nor any monies due or to become due under the contract, may be assigned by the Contractor without the prior consent and approval of the Board of Supervisors , nor in any event without the consent of the Contractor's surety or sureties , unless such surety or sureties have waived their right to notice of assignment. c. Beginning of Work (S.S. 8-1 .03) In lieu of the provisions of S.S. Sec. 8-1 .03, the Contractor will be issued a "Notice to Proceed" by the Engineer within five (5) working days of the date the contract is approved by the Agency and the working days charged against the contract shall be counted from the day stated as the starting date in the "Notice to Proceed. " The Contractor shall not start work prior to the date stated in the "Notice to Proceed" unless a change to an earlier date is authorized in writing by the Engineer. d. Progress Schedule (S.S. 8-1 .04) The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer a practicable progress schedule before starting any work on the project and, if requested by the Engineer, supplementary progress schedules shall be submitted within five (5) working days of the Engineer's written request. e. Time of Completion (S.S. -8-1 .06) The following days are designated as legal holidays : January 1 , February 12, 3rd Monday in February, last Monday in May, July 4, 1st Monday in September, September 9, 2nd Monday in October, November 11 , 4th Thursday in 'Jovember, December 25, Statewide election days , hours from 12:00 noon to 3:00 p.m. on Good Friday, and any other day established as a general legal holiday by proclamation of the Governor of California or the President of the United States . B - 10 00000 I I, vVVW SECTION B - GENERAL PROYISIOnS 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS (Cont. ) e. Time of Completion (S.S . 8-1 .06) (Cont. ) If any of the foregoing holidays fails on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be considered to be a holiday. 10. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (S.S. 9) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9 shall apply, except as modified herein. a. Determination of Rights (S.S. 9-1 .045) The provisions of S.S . Sec. 9-1 .045 shall not apply. b. Partial Payments (S.S. 9-1 .06) In lieu of conflicting provisions of the third paragraph of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .06 and the fourth paragraph of S.S. Sec 11 -1 .02 , the Agency will withhold 10 percent from any estimated amount due the Contractor. c. Payment of Withheld Funds (S.S. 9-1 .065) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .065 shall not apply. d. Final Payment (S.S. Sec. 9-1 .07) ( 1 ) Upon satisfactory completion of the entire work , the Engineer shall recommend the acceptance of the work to the Board of Supervisors. If the Board accepts the completed work, it shall cause a Notice of Completion to be recorded with the County Recorder. (2) Thirty-five (35) days after the filing of the Notice of Completion , the Contractor shall be entitled to the balance due for the completion and acceptance of the work, if he certifies by a sworn written statement that all claims for labor and materials have been paid, and that no claims have been filed with the Agency based upon acts or omissions of the Contractor, and that no liens or withhold notices have been filed against said work or the property on which the work was done. Payment of the balance due will be made on the day following the regular day for payment of County bills by the County Auditor. e. Adjustment of Overhead Costs (S .S. Sec. 9-1 .08) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .08 shall not apply. B - 11 00!�i).7 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 10. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (S.S. 9) (Cont. ) f. Clerical Errors (S .S. Sec. 9-1 .09) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .09 shall not apply. g. All prior partial estimates and payments shall be subject to correction in the final estimate and payment. B - 12 0007 SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL (S.S. 9-1 .03) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 shall apply except as modified herein. 1 . DEFINITION. As used here, "force account" means the method of calculating—payment for labor, equipment and/or materials based on actual cost plus specified percentages to cover overhead and profit for work not included as a bid item in the contract. When extra work is to be paid for on a force account basis , compensation will be determined in accordance with the provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 as modified herein. 2. LABOR. z. The actual wages to be paid, as defined in S. S. Sec. 9-1 .03A( la) , will be considered to be the prevailing rates in effect at the time the labor is performed, and no revision of payment for labor already performed will be made for any retroactive increases or decreases in such rates. b. Premium wage rates will not be paid for any labor employed on force account work unless such rates have been approved, in writing, by the Engineer. The labor surcharge percentage to be a plied to the actual wages paid as provided in Section 9-1 .03A(lb� of the Standard Specifications will be 18 percent for all work, except that for the following types of work said labor surcharge will be as shown below: Type of Work Performed Labor Surcharge Percent Cleaninq and painting metal bridge - - - - - 30 Concrete construction - bridge - - - - - - - 25 Erection of structural metal for metal bridge, excluding sign bridge - - - - - - - 30 Piledriving, not including cast-in- drilled hole piles - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 3. EQUIPMENT RENTAL The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03A(3) shall apply except as modified herein. a . No payment will be made for idle time due to breakdown , lack of operator, weather conditions prohibiting work, or other circumstances beyond the control of the Agency. b. Equipment shall be delivered to the extra work site equipped as ordered. C. Idle time waiting for the arrival of trans- porting equipment to move the rented equipment will not be paid for. C - 1 00071 .r SECTION 0 - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . MATERIALS Attention is directed to Section 6, "Control of Materials," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. In accordance with the provisions in Section 6-1 .07, "Certificates of Compliance, " certificates of compliance will be re- quired for pavement fabric, pavement markers, and epoxy. The asphalt concrete mix design shall be designated by the Contractor subject to the approval of the Engineer. The Contractor shall provide the Engineer a minimum mix design review period of four working days for a design from an "approved" commercial plant and five continuous working days for a design from a "non-approved" commercial plant. For "non-approved" plants the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary aggregate samples. Refer to Section "Asphalt Concrete" of these Special Provisions. 2. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING Construction operations shall be performed in such a manner that there will be at least one 12-foot-wide traffic lane open to public traffic at all times. At the end of the day's work and when construction operations are notin progress, a passageway shall be maintained through the work of sufficient width to provide for two 12-foot-wide paved traffic lanes for public traffic. In lieu of the conflicting provisions in Section 7-1 .08, "Public Convenience, " and 7-1 .09, "Public Safety, " of the Standard Specifications, the Contractor shall bear the entire cost of furnishing _ flagmen and of furnishing, (except those items shown on the plans to be County furnished ) installing, maintaining and removing all signs ( including County furnished signs) , lights, flares, barricades and other warning and safety devices. Signs shown on the plans to be furnished by the County.. together with 4" x 4" wood posts, galvanized carriage bolts and brackets for assembly shall be picked up by theContractor at the County Maintenance Yard Sign Shop on Shell Avenue between Marina Vista- and Pacheco Boulevard in Martinez . The Contractor shall notify the Engineer at least one ( 1 ) working day in advance of the time he proposes to pick up the signs, posts and fasteners. Signs shall be erected and covered with burlap prior to commencing any other work on the contract. Covering shall be removed immediately preceding the start of work when directed by the Engineer. D - I 000n 00m: 4 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 2. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING (Contd ) Wood posts shall be securely set a minimum of 2' - 6" in the ground and shall be located so that the attached sign is at least two feet clear of the edge of pavement. Signs shall be placed on the post to provide a five-foot clearance between the sign and the pavement or ground surface, except that when signs are located in sidewalk areas, or where there are pedestrians, the clearance shall be seven feet. Exceptions to the location provisions of this paragraph- shall only be on the written approval of the Engineer. Upon completion of the project and at a time directed by, , the Engineer, the signs, barricades and lights shall be taken down and dismantled; and the County furnished signs and posts shall be delivered to the County Maintenance Yard Sign Shop on Shell Avenue. Lane closure shall conform to the provisions in Section 7-1 . 092, "Lane Closure," of the Standard Specifications except that ; the taper length for each lane width of closure shall be determined by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer prior to its use. The Contractor shall also provide and station competent f-#agmen in advance - of the closure. The sole duty of the flagmen shalI be: to direct -traffic ., around the work. Temporary pavement striping ("cat tracking" of the center- line stripe) shall be done by the Contractor at the end of each days work to provide for the safe and convenient passage .of traffic. Full compensation for the "cat tracking" shall be considered as included in the contract lump sum price paid for Signing and Traffic Control , and rir jd�jitional compensation will be allowed therefor. Full compensation for conforming to the provisions in Section 7 of the Standard Specfiications and these special provisions, including full compensation for furnishing all Labor ( including flagmen, ); materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and for installing, maintaining and removing all signs, lights and barricades as shown on the plans, as specified herein, and as directed by the Engineer, in- cluding picking up, hauling and returning County-furnished signs, and posts, shall be considered as included in the contract lump sum price paid for Signing and Traffic Control , and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. The replacement cost of all County-furnished material lost or damaged between the time it is removed from and returned to the Shell Avenue Maintenance Yard Sign Shop shall be borne by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due to the Contractor under the contract. D - 2 00073 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3. COOPERATION The following work by other forces will be under way within and adjacent to the limits of the work specified, as follows: Utility adjustments by Pacific Telephone and Telegraph and Bay Water Service (3145 Willow Pass Road. ) In lieu of the compensation provisions in Section 7, "Legal Relations and Responsibility, " and Section 8, "Prosecution and Progress," of the Standard Specifications, full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this special provision shall be considered included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work, and no separate payment will be made for delay or inconvenience '' to the Contractor' s operations by reason of his conformance with this special provision. 4. OBSTRUCTIONS Attention is directed to the presence of water, sewer, and gas pipe lines, telephone conduits and overhead utilities in the construction area. The Contractor shall give the utility companies two (Z) working days advance notice before work may start. The work specified shall be so conducted as to permit the utility companies, the water district and the sewer district to maintain their services without interruption. Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this special provision , not otherwise provided for, shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work, and no separate payment will be made therefor. 5. CLEAN-UP All construction debris, materials, and equipment in the - area of construction and any adjacent areas used by the Contractor, shalt ''-, be removed and disposed of outside of the construction area in- accordance with the provisions in Section 7-1 . 13, "Disposal of Material Outside the Highway Right of Way, of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Full compensation for clean-up shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work ` requiring clean-up, and no separate payment will be made therefor. D - 3 00074' D - 3 0007 . SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 6. PAVEMENT FABRIC The pavement fabric shall be placed where shown on the plans and at locations designated by the Engineer. The fabric shall be a non-woven polypropylene material conforming to the following requirements: Tensile strength, either direction, minimum per inch of width - 50 pounds Elongation, warp direction, 20 pounds, maximum - 0.5 in-. Elongation, fill direction, 50 pounds, maximum - 1 . 1 in. Weight, oz. /sq. yd. (fused two sides) - 3.8 to 4.5 Color - Black The fabric shall be placed on top of the bottom course of the asphalt concrete overlay. The surface area to receive the, fabric shall be sprayed with stream-refined paving asphalt , Type AR 4000, at a rate of 0.22 to 0.25 gallons per square yard. The Contractors attention is directed to Section 42-1 .04 "Applying" of the Standard Specifications. The minimum width of asphalt application shall be the fabric width plus ten inches. The fabric shall be unrolled in increments of 30 feet, stretched, aligned, placed and each edge of fabric shall be nailed to the pavement at 15 foot intervals. The fabric shall overlap six inches at all joints. Transverse joints shall be shingled to prevent pickup by the paver. Asphaltic emulsion binder shall be applied to all joints. The fabric shall be carefully placed to avoid wrinkles and broomed or squeeged to remove any bubbles. Should wrinkles occur which are large enough to cause laps, the fabric shall be cuff and laid out flat with a fabric patch placed over the cut twelve inches in width and sealed with RS-l . At each utility cover which would be covered with fabric, the fabric shall be neatly cut around the cover to allow for raising of the cover to finish grade. Turning of the paving machine or other vehicles should be gradual and shall be kept to a minimum to avoid damage to the membrane., Should equipment tires tend to stick To the fabric during paving operations, small quantities of asphalt concrete shall be broadcast ahead to prevent sticking. D - 4 00075 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 6. PAVEMENT FABRIC (Continued) Two areas, approximately 4 feet by 100 feet will be designated by the Engineer as "test areas. " Within the test area, the distressed pavement will be repaired as directed by the Engineer. The application of pavement fabric will not be required. All of the repair work will be paid for as extra work under item "Surface Preparation and Shoulder Maintenance." The pavement fabric is available from the following: Phillips Petroleum Company 66 Bovet Road San Mateo, CA 94402 The Phillips Petroleum Company has advised the County that if it is selected by the Contractor to supply the pavement fabric it will make available a laying/placement vehicle with driver and technical assistance. Quantities of pavement reinforcing fabric placed as shown on the plans or directed by the Engineer will be determined from measurements taken of the area covered by the reinforcing fabric, with no allowance for taps. The contract price paid per square yard for pavement reinforcing fabric shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, ( including paving asphalt and asphaltic emulsion) , tools, equipment and incidentals and for doing all the work involved in furnishing and placing pavement reinforcing fabric complete in place, as shown on the plans, as required by these special provisions, and as directed by the Engineer. 7. ASPHALT CONCRETE Asphalt concrete shall be Type B conforming to the pro- visions in Section 39, "Asphalt Concrete," of the Standard Specifications. and these special provisions. Unless otherwise directed by the Engineer, asphalt binder to be mixed with the mineral aggregate shall be steam-refined paving: asphalt having a viscosity grade of AR 4000. Aggregate shalt conform to the grading specified in Section 39-2.02, "Aggregate, " of the Standard Specifications for one-half inch ( I /211 ) maximum, medium grading. Paint binder sha ; l be asphaltic emulsion, RS-1 , and shall be applied at a rate of 0. 07 gallons per square yard prior to placement of the bottom overlay course. D - 5 00076. I ; I ` SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 7. ASPHALT CONCRETE (Contd) The Contractor's attention is directed to Section 94-1 .06, "Applying, " and Section 93-1 . 03, "Mixing and Applying, " of the Standard Specifications. Prior to applying any asphaltic emulsion, the existing pavement shall be cleaned. Pavement cracks shall be repaired in accordance with Section "Surface Preparation and Shoulder Maintenance" of these Special Provisions. No traffic shall be allowed on the asphaltic emulsion with the exception of vehicles unloading asphalt concrete. All vehicles involved with the Contractor' s operations shall turn around only at public street intersections; driveways and other private property shall not be used without prior written consent of the involved property owner, a dated copy of which shall be delivered to the Engineer prior to the use thereof. Paint binder shall be applied no farther in advance of the overlay than that distance which the Contractor can maintain free of traffic. The Contractor shall furnish and use canvas tarpaulins to cover all loads of asphalt concrete from the time that the mixture is loaded at the plant until it is discharged from the delivery vehicle. Areas where a surface course mixture designated to be spread to level irregularities shall be designated by the Engineer and paid for as "Surface Preparation and Shoulder Maintenance." Spreading and compaction of asphalt concrete in areas to be leveled shall be completed prior to beginning the bottom course of the overlay. The asphalt concrete overlay shall be spread in two layers. The bottom course shall be 0. 15 feet in thickness and the surface course 0. 10 feet in thickness. The pavement fabric shall be placed subsequent to placement of the bottom course overlay and prior to the surface course overlay. Conforms between existing pavement and newly constructed overlay pavement shall be made by tapering the new pavement in accordance with the plans. In addition to the requirements of Section 39-6.02, "Spreading'; of the Standard Specifications, all transverse joints shall be made by paving against a board of the same thickness as the paving layer to provide a straight vertical face. After the compaction of the newly paved layer, the board shall be removed and paper shall be laid against D - 000'77 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 7. ASPHALT CONCRETE (Contd) the vertical face and along the existing road surface that is to receive the subsequent layers. Asphalt concrete shall be spread over the paper in sufficient width and length as directed by the Engineer to provide a safe, smooth temporary riding ramp. Full compensation for constructing the transverse joint as specified above and constructing and removing the temporary ramp, shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per ton for asphalt concrete, and no separate payment will be made therefor. Conforming work, driveways, entrances and road connections to connect with the pavement overlay shall be paved as shown on the - plans or as directed by the Engineer. Full compensation for placing asphalt concrete in these areas shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per ton for asphalt concrete, and no separate payment will be made therefor. In lieu of the provisions in Section 4- 1 .036, " Increased or Decreased Quantities," of the Standard Specifications, adjustment of compensation will not be made if the total pay quantity of asphalt concrete varies by more than 25 percent from the amount shown in the Proposal . The contract price paid for "Asphalt Concrete" shall include full compensation for the following: (a) cleaning of existing pavement; (b) furnishing and applying asphaltic emulsion; (c) furnishing and placing asphalt concrete overlays as shown on the typical section and detail A/4; (d ) construction and removal of temporary transitions; (e) construction of driveways, entrances and road connections. B. ADJUSTING INLET TOP Where shown on the plans the existing storm water grated inlet shall be adjusted to conform to the overlay grade in accordance with Section 15-2.05 of the S.S. The existing grate shall be salvaged and reused. The contract price paid for "Drain Inlet Adjustment" shall include full compensation for doing all the work necessary to make the adjustment. D - 00078 ODU t SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 8. ADJUSTING MANHOLE COVERS Where shown on the plans or directed by the Engineer, existing manhole covers shall be adjusted to grade after final paving, in accordance with the provisions in Section 15-2.05, "Reconstruction" of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Covers shall be so adjusted that there will not be any perceptible difference in elevation between the finished pavement surface and the cover. The Engineer shall be the sole judge of the smoothness and riding quality over the adjusted covers. During sealing or paving operations, all surface structures shall be protected from being covered by paving; and no adhesive material shall be permitted to seal or fill the joint between the frame and cover of any existing utility structure. Single cast iron extension rings manufactured to fit the manhole covers shall be used for adjustments. Cast iron extension rings shall be attached only to frames, housings, castings and rings which have been securely fixed in the proper position. The contract price paid per each for "Manhole Adjustment" shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials tools and equipment and doing all the work involved in adjusting the facility complete in place, as shown on the plans, as specified herein and as directed by the Engineer. 9. ADJUSTING SURVEY MONUMENTS At locations shown on the plans, or where directed by the Engineer, survey monument covers shall be adjusted to finish pavement elevation by reconstruction of the monument casting at a new elevation in accordance with the details shown on the Plans. Extreme care shall be exercised during the adjustment of survey monument covers to prevent any movement of the survey monument. The existing monument shall not be disturbed until the Engineer has arranged for establishment of reference points to preserve the location of the monument. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer one full working day in advance of commencing the work. The Engineer will re-establish the location of the monument and the Contractor shall coordinate his work with that of the survey party. D - 000 79 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 9. ADJUSTING SURVEY MONUMENTS (Contd) The contract price paid per each for "Monument Adjustment" shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools and equipment and doing all the work involved in adjusting the facility complete in place, as shown on the pians, as specified herein and as directed by the Engineer. 10. SURFACE PREPARATION AND SHOULDER MAINTENANCE SURFACE PREPARATION Where shown on the plans and as designated by the Engineer , the following items of work shall be accomplished; (a) leveling of pavement irregularities in advance of the bottom overlay course; (b) at the locations shown on the plans where pavement deformation and cracking has occurred theareashall be blown clean of all dirt, treated with SS-I , and skin patched; (c) at locations where the pavement has cracked but deformation has not occurred (not shown on the plans) the area shall be blown clean of all dirt and treated with SS-I . SHOULDER I4A 1 NTENANCE In general , the area between the outer edge of the "overlay", and the right of way line will require a "maintenance" treatment. The - type of treatment and areas to be treated shall be designated by the Engineer. Treatments may include any of the following: (a ) "Choking" shoulders with aggregate material as shown on detail B-4 and C-4 of the Plans, (b) sweeping; (c) chuckhole patching; (d) skin patching; (e) fog sealing. Equipment, labor ( including flagmen) and materials used in the performance of "Surface Preparation and Shoulder Maintenance" will be paid for as extra work in accordance with Section 9-1 .03 of the Standard Specifications. D - -IT 9' 00080- SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 11 . PAVEMENT MARKERS - Type "D" Pavement markers shall conform to the provisions in Section 85, "Pavement Markers, " of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The adhesive shall be the Rapid Set Type conforming to Section 95-2. 04 , of the Standard Specifications. The provisions of Section 85-1 . 03, "Sampling, Tolerances and Packaging, " shall not apply, however a Certificate of Compliance shall be required for the markers and the rapid set epoxy. Pavement markers shall not be placed until the traffic centerline stripe has been painted by "County Forces. " This traffic stripe shall be used by the Contractor as the control line for the installation of the markers. Markers shall be placed according to Contra Costa County Standard Plan CC 3050. All additional work necessary to establish satisfactory lines for markers shall be performed by the Contractor, including correction of minor irregularities in the line established by the traffic stripe. The contract unit price for pavement markers shall include full compensation for furnishing Rapid Set Adhesive, and no additional payment shall be made therefor. D - IQ �t1U'V:1 y: } S ; ; !' r i �z ` � � ! � •.iii � ^y o � .. i � - � S r F� s, �• �i, a i • .i r ,� � � a� r +c� PCZ ki" cn e # • tt ` t ' i 1 i 19 0 tits( 1 � t _S. a a • o , n �• , O x f `j t• •-t L f}--1 ' Lo it ,A+i� � � �•• d �"' _ � {[ I !t � � i � i:i� 1. a —0- 44--1 � .. f Ua I. ��.� e i• _ i .._ \. z �;.,►iai•.'�� _.ri.7: .,ww= i �i TTSy G" ojw •'�.,_-.L�a � t it � ^ 'n - 2j' s� �:a `=� T = �t�► .s."' .tin - � �} :r paie • rc � F • �gYi M )); �w j �3 �X o f nf;w o> >i73to ua c-� _ i y 00082 00082 { i TRAP IC CONTROLS Barricade and Portable Flasher Support Characteristics TYPE I 11 Ill Portable Flasher Support Top — 8" to 12" Width of Rail tt' — tom" 8" — 12" 8" — 12'. Bottom— 4" rain. Length of Rail 2' min 32" — 4' 3' min. 31" max. Width of Stripe 6" 6" 6" 4" or 6" Height 3' min. 3' min. 5' min. 30" min. Number of Rail 2 4 3 it facing traffic in 2 it top rail 12"wide. Faces Reflectonzed one direction. 4 it top rail less 6 it facing traffic in than 12" wide. two directions. Type of France Cemountable or Light "A" Frame Post or Skids Light "A.. Frame Heavy "A" Fr.vvR *NOTE A, Il top board of a portable hasher support is less than 12" wide. bottom board shalt be 8" wide. striped, and ieliectoia-ed. NOTE B: 4" stripes may be used a length of rail -s 3' or less NOTE C= All diin:nsions are nominal lumber dimensions. Figure 5_8 STANDARD BARRICADES 4 or 6� E in r3 C E s O n See Note A PORTABLE FLASHER SUPPORT TYPE 111 6 4 Ci E irf . c t — TYPE 1 TYPE It 20. 00083 MONO" BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA: , Resolution Authorizing Certification- ) No. 2 of Right of Way in Connection ) - with Lone Tree Way reconstruction, ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/417 Project #6971-4193-74 (FAS No. IV- ) CC-804-CR, RS-804(3)) , The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: In order to obtain Federal and-State aid assistance from,the State- of California in connection with Lone Tree Way reconstruction, Project #6971-4193-74 (FAS #IV-CC-804-CR2 RS-804(3)) ,' and for the State Department of Transportation to approve the project for awarding, it is necessary that the County of Contra Costa certify . to the State Department of Transportation that the rights-of-way necessary for the proper execution of the Project have been acquired; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Certification of Right of Way, Certification No. 2, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, is hereby approved by the Board of Supervisors: of the County of Contra Costa, and the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized and ordered to execute the same for and on behalf of the County of Contra Costa. PASSED on May 27, 1975 unanimously by Supervisors present: ' z. f w SM/j cc: Public Works (2) Real Property (6) County Administrator County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 75/417 u WPM .1-1r. T. R. Lammers IV-CC-804-CR District Director RS-804 (3) r State Department of Transportation Lone Tree Way P. O. Box 7885, Rincon Annex San Francisco, CA 94120 CERTIFICATION OF RIGHT OF WAY Certification No. 2 The County of Contra Costa hereby certifies in connection with the right of way for the proposed Lone Tree Way curve Reconstruction, FAS Project No. IV-CC-804-CR, RS-804 (3) that: All required right of way for construction of this project has been acquired as set forth in detail below: 1. STATUS OF RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION: a. Total number of parcels required 2 b. Parcels acquired outright 2 2. STATUS OF AFFECTED RAILROAD FACILITIES: None 3. DESIGNATED MATERIAL SITES: None 4. DESIGNATED DISPOSAL AREAS: None 5. STATUS OF UTILITY RELOCATIONS: Power poles to be relocated by utility► companies by October 6, 1975. 6. SCHEDULE FOR REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS: Fences on Prewett and Siino properties to be relocated as part of contract. 7. UNAUTHORIZED ENCROACHMENTS: None 8. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY: All right of way has been acquired in accordance with Title III of the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and all applicable current FHWA directives covering the acquisition . of real property. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH RELOCATION ADVISORY ASSISTANCE AND PAYMENTS PROVISION OF FEDERAL AND STATE LAW: Comoliance with the provisions of PPM 81-1 was not required for this project. -1- 0003 i OOC83 - The County of Contra Costa agrees to hold the State of California harmless from any liability which may result in the event the right of way is not clear as certified. If the State is named in a damage' suit, as a result of the right of way not being clear as certified, the County of Contra Costa agrees that, at the request of the State, it will assume full responsibility for the conduct of the defense or provide such assistance as the State may require and will pay any judgments issued against the State and all costs in connection= with the defense. This project may now be certified as conforming to Statement No. 2 of Paragraph 5c of PPM 21-12. COU414TY OF CONTRA COSTA ByA�MAYLW-- Chairman, Board o Sup isors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Dated: 91 J7 By Deputy Reccy mended for Ce ication V '38 n E7 Cline Chief Deputy Public Works Director George 1. Derana Supervising Real Property Agent Approved as to form: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel Bir Deputy 00C.801 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Consummate Purchase and ) Accept Deed of Crow ) RESOLUTION .NO. 75/418 Property in Iiartinez ) Civic Center ) (Gov. C. §25350) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County -RESOLVES THAT: This Board on April 22, 1575 passed Resolution of Intention No. 75/315, and notice fixing May 27, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. , in its Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place when it would meet to consummate purchase of the real property described therein from Elmo Crow, et ux, said property being required for the County Civic Center; and said resolution was duly published in the "Morning clews Gazette". The Board hereby consummates said purchase. The County Auditor is hereby directed to drag a warrant in favor of Escrow zto. W-355765-2, Western Title Guaranty Company, Iiartinez, California, in the sure or $20,000.00 for said property. for payment to Elmo Crow, et ux, upon their conveying to the County a grant deed therefor; Said deed is hereby accepter: and the Clerk of this Board is ordered to have it recorded, toget: er with a certified copy of this resolution. PASSED on May �7 1975 unanimously by the Supervisors present. cc: Recorder c/o R/W Administrator Auditor Public Works (2) F,ESOLUTION IIO. 75/418 0��8� S IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Approval of Agreement for ) Construction of Public ) Improvements in Minor ) Subdivision- 114-73, 1 RESOLUTION NO. 75/419 Alamo area., ) WHEREAS an agreement with Frank G. Bolla and Paul Bolla, 3158 Miranda Avenue, Alamo, CA 94507, for the installation and completion of Public Improvements in Minor Subdivision 114-73, Aiamo area, has been presented to .this Board, and being accompanied by: 1. Security to guarantee the completion,of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance. Code, as follows: a. Surety Bonds No. 2 007724 issued by SAFECO.Insurance Company with Frank G. Bolla and Paul Bolla as principal, in the amount of $2,000 for Faithful performance and $2,000 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 126064, dated May 16, 1975), in the amount of $500. 2. Subdivision agreement between Frank G. Bolla and Paul Bolla, subdivider, and the County of Contra Costa, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete road and street improvements etc., in said subdivision within one year from the date of said agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said bond and the amount thereof be and the same is hereby APPROVED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said minor subdivision agreement be and the same is hereby APPROVED and the Chief Deputy Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said agreement and appropriate extensions thereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 27, 1975 RESOLUTION NO. 75/419 OQO8 0008� ' . ,.._,. w..0.. , a. MINOR SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (§1) Minor Subdivision: 114-73 (§1) Subdivider: Frank G. Bolla (Government Code §5 66463) Paul Bolla (§1) Effective Date: (§I) Completion Period: I year (§4) Deposits: A. (cash) $500 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (faithful performance & maintenance) $2,000.00 2. (labor & materials) $2.000.00 1. PARTIES & DATE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the above-named Subdivider, mutually promise and agree as follows concerning this minor subdivision. 2. IMPROVDiEWS. Subdivider shall construct, install and complete road and street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9, and including future amendments, and all improvements required in the approved parcel map improvement plan of this minor subdivision on file in the County's Public Works Department. Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work"), within the above completion period from date hereof as required by the County Ordinance Code, in a good workmanlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. - 3. IMPROVU1&\T SECURITY: DEPOSIT $ BONDS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to County Ordinance Code, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $500 cash; together with B. Bonds, etc. : (1 - faithful performance & maintenance) additional security for at least the ave-specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of the work less $500, in the fora of a cash depusit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this Agreement; plus (2 - labor & materials) another such additional security in at least the above- specified amount, which is the full amount of said estimated cost, securing payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Subdivider. 4. WARRANTY. Subdivider warrants that said parcel map improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any time before the County's resolution of completion for the minor subdivision, the parcel map improve- ment plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make changes necessary to accomplish the work as promised. S. NO 1►AIXTR BY COUNTY. Inspection of the work and;or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 1 — OOC89 6. INDDINITY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section. A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because. of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the improvement plan or .accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these. ' C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them. D. Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not ccnditi0ned or dependent on wrethcr or not any Inde.-nitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or minor subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any indemnitee. 7. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including inspection thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. B. SURX-TYS. ' Subdivider shall set and establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed parcel asap and to the satisfaction of the County Road Comissioner-Surveyor. 9. NONPERFOMANCE %- D COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the time specified in this agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges therefor immediately upon.demand. If County sues to corpel performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Subdivider-shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, cost of suit, and all other expenses "of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. - 10. ASSIGnF.%T. If before County accepts these improvements, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this, Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. _ 2 - 03090 . - i - UJUJV 11. RECORD MP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to• file and record the parcel map for said minor subdivision. • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY VICTOR VM ER,. Public Director SUBDIVIDER- (see note below) • B �t Chis eputy Public Directo f aj� t-� ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk 4 ex officio Clerk of the Board Paul Bolla Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknowledgment By form below; an 2) If .a corporation, affix Deputy corporate seal. FORA APPROVED: JOEN B. CLAUSEN County Co el By (CORPORATE SEAL) Depu y State of California ) ss. (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership County of t!nrtra ('ngtA ) or Individual) On -may 14, 1975 the person(s) whose name(s)mis/are signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individuals stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me - thattheyexecuted it VOTARIAL SEAL) . o Notar.V Public -for said County and State (LD_34A 3/74) OFFICIAL WW1s_x^L •�? BETTY J. Kt93UERA �• M6TAM• PU6&J=-CAUF0JQM&^ ' CONTRA C^SrA COUNW - 3 - - O0091 3 - - .00091 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RE: In the :latter of the Cancellation of ) Tax Liens On and Transfer to Unsecured ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/420 Roll of Property Acquired by Public ) Agencies. ) (Rev. & Tax C. S4986(b) �) and 2921.S) Auditor's demo: Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 4986(b) and 2921.S, I recommend cancellation of a portion of the following tax liens and the transfer to the unsecured roll of the remainder of taxes verified and taxes prorated accordingly. I Consent H. DONALD FUNK, County Auditor-Controller JOHN . CLAUS , unty Counsel By: dkvif�,rpeputy By: Deputy # * * # � tir t 3 : ! * t it * * f ! : * ,� t t * ! ! * * t * ! t # ! #, t ! i► ! !r * #.. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the above authority and reco=endation, the County Auditor shall cancel a portion of these tax liens and transfer the remaining taxes to the 1974 - 75, unsecured roll. Tax Date of Transfer Remaining.. Rate Parcel Acquiring Allocation Amount taxes to be. : Area Dumber Agency of taxes to unsecured Cancelled 11024 417-140-Ml-5 SAN PAHLo REDEVEWPHW $ 26.48 $ 14-51 AGENCY (all) 7-1-74 to 4-25-75 PASSED AND ADOPTED ON May 27, 1975. County Auditor 1 by unanimous vote of the County Tax Collector 3 Supervisors present (Secured) (Redemption) (Unsecured) RESOLUTION W. 75/420 000 T 3. it IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS • OF .CONTRA COSTA COUNTZ, STATE OF CALIFORNIA t _ . • s In the Matter of Cancellation of ) Tax Liens on Property Acquired ) RESOLUTION NO, 75/421 by 'Public Agencies ) WHEREAS, the County Auditor pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4986(b) recommends cancellation of a portion of the following tax. liens on properties acquired by public agencies; said acquisitions having been verified and taxes prorated accordingly. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to the above authority and recommendations, the County Auditor cancel these tax liens for year of 197h-75 RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 538-152-012-0 8011 All EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 573-050-020-3 8110 All 573-050-022-9 8110 All 573-050-023-7 8110 All 573-120-005-0 8111 All 573-120-015-9 8111 All 573-120-028-2 8111 All 573-120-032h 8111 All ADOPTED by the Board on May 27, 1975. R. DOtl FUNK, County Auditor-Controller By: ..J (Tax Cancel - Order) (R&T S4986(b) ) County Auditor 1 County Tax Collector 2' (Redemption) (Secured) RESOLUTION 110. 75/421 03493 V�l1ll vV y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORZFIA Re: Cancel Delinquent Penalties and ) Costs on Second Installments on ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/hZ?, 1974-75 Secured Assessment Roll. ) TAX COLLECTOR'S NMI-0: 1. Due to clerical error, penalties and costs have attached to the second installments of the below listed parcels. Having received and processed payment of the second installments, including delinquent charges and costs, I now request cancellation of the penalties and costs and refund be made pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 5096 (b) and 4986(1)(b). Assessee: Bartlett, Alan V. & Natalie E. 152 Bay View Drive Belvedere, CA 94920 Parcel No.: 208-4D43-008-1 Tax Amount: $279.12 Penalty: 16.74 Cost: 3.00 Parcel No.: 208-043-009-9 Tax Amount: W4.60 Penalty: 24.87 Cost: 3.00 Dated: may 16, 1975 EDWARD W. LEAL, Tax Collector I consent to this cancellation. JOHN AIIS , Crnmty Counsel BY:e , Asst. By: _ Deputy x x x �c-x-x-x BOARD'S ORDER: Pursuant to the above statutes, the Auditor is hereby ORDERED to CA110EL and REFUND the 6% delinquent penalties and costs. PASSED ON May 27 1975, by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. APL:jam cc: County Auditor County Taut Collector RESOLUTION N0. 75/422 -.. . ._ N BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COMA COSTA COUPITY, CALIFORNIA r. Re: Cancel Delinquent Penalties, Costs, } Redemption Penalties, and Redemption } RESOLUTION NO. 75i h?3 Fees on Second Installments on the } 1974-75 Secured Assessment Roll. ) TAX COLLECTOR'S M-M: 1. I have established by satisfactory proof that remittances to cover payments of the second installments of taxes on the below listed parcels were deposited in the United States mail, properly addressed with postage prepaid, but were not timely received, resulting in delin- quent penalties and costs being charged thereto. Having received payments, I now request cancellation of the 6% delinquent penalties, costs, redemption penalties and redemption fees heretofore or hereafter, accrued after the remittances were mailed, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 2512 and 4985. 129-231-014-9 196-171-019-9 195-240-028-9 i96-171-mi-5 185-242-005-6 197-230-014-7 196 171-015-7 237-072-002-7- 196-171-016-5 118-111-046-3 196-171-017-3 1418-112-064-5 196-171-018-1 2. Due to clerical error which resulted in failure to comply with a request for an applicable tax ball, penalty and cost have attached to parcel 257-411-032-2. Having received payment, I now request cancellation of the 6% penalty, cost, redemption penalty and redemption fee heretofore or hereafter accrued, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 4986 (1)(b) and 4785. Dated: May 20, 1975 EDIMM If. LEAL, Tax Collector I consent to these cancellations. JOHN B CLAUSEN, Coun Counsel Asst. By: , Deputy x x-x-x-x-x-x x x x-x x x x-x-xx x-x-x x-x-x-x-x x x x x x x x x x-x-x-xx x-x-x-x BOP.RD'S ORDM: Pursuant to the above statutes, and to the above satisfactory proof and showing that these uncollected delinquent penalties and costs attached because of error, the Auditor is ORDERED to CANCEL them. PASSED ON May 27 , 1975, by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. APL:jam cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector RESOLUTION 110. 75/4Q— _11L;J;bu� IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 75/424 RE: Rescind Board's Order Dated ) 'larch 25, 197S Relating to ) Parcel OSS-056-001 in Code ) Area 702S. ) Upon application of the County Auditor for rescission of Board's Order relating to transfer of tax lien to the unsecured roll, the Board of Supervisors finds as follows: 1. The Board's Order Dated March 25, 1975 where tax lien for 1974-75 on Parcel No. 035-OS6-001 was cancelled and transferred to the Unsecured roll was improper because Board's Resolution 75/34 allowing a homeowner's property tax exemption resulted in net assessed value of $-0-. 2. Since this parcel is fully tax exempt, there are no outstanding taxes due for 1974-75. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: Board's Order dated March 2S, 1975 relating to transfer of tax lien to the 1974-7S unsecured- roll on Parcel No. OBS-056-001 in Code Area 702S amounting to $29.00 he rescinded. I hereby request the above action: I hereby consent to the above amendment JOHN 1, C COUNSEL ADONA'5 BY Deputy NK COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Adopted by the Board this 27th day of 14ay 19 79; - cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector (2) County Administrator County 6ounsel RESOD ION 110. 75/424 00096 . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Kay 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Request of Coleman & Isakson ( 18$7-RZ) to Rezone Lana in the Danville area. Liahona Christensen, Owner. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to the request of Coleman & Isakson to rezone land in the Danville area, and no one having. appeared in opposition; and The Board certifies that the final Environmental Impact Report as received from the Planning Commission has been com- pleted in compliance with CEQA and the state guidelines and further certifies that the Board as lead agency and decision- making body has reviewed, considered and evaluated the information contained in said final Environmental Impact Report; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Coleman & Isakson to rezone approximately 9.43 acres located on both sides and at the southerly terminus of logan Lane, a private road, east of El Pintado Road in the Danville area, from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District-40 (R-40) is APPROVED as recommended by the Planning Commission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and the County Counsel prepare an ordinance, amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County, giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner as required by law in "The Valles Pioneer." PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Suppeeryisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Coleman & Isakson Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of PlanningSupervisors County Counsel affixed this 27th day of May 1975 a , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY.�► 1.��,1 , v Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 • 15-M Shoni Leks e 000197 0�0�7 CD I • l a) .: .}.1 %.j �%"i";`l��l�l� � ,'� f! ��"/ v ±'s.ems i. - •'•� •�.�L� � ..�f�� (1 f' 1 .VASM-1012.. ': ''r7`'f _..t�/� .• °�� \' ,'.`y..i--oC =A- �; ,�S t _ i . =;,' -. tiJ%=��••%+` �.,- �/� _ Eirimpris 1 �+;"• ��- •i� I. � 4 \"-�� ��: °: I I •`1 f/'�.• i{r � —ter _- �'_._- -.' IV' vr-'.!•/!///{•`-_ i'^ ..�, ``i.1 '` .'�•���� .'fi, '.fs ��'- \ ice- �I:�, -':i> Z. vis -t ,r'� ` 'YI�.. •^ ...� •.2. =� \\ -: ��� r :t7� 1•''' ay %. _ 36 j � i--•� t !-i.�1v�F_\`.. ����-^ \�1. _-�,• aI't �„•V iJ - ���r�'•'iTi�a�. v •�' L�''�\"1�` ^! ,o•. =17 �• ` fir• -•a ,`. ♦ ,�.! —1.J1 y .,p'�'�• ^ �i"�"' -'� ,del {gyp. •� - ` %C ? `,,_ -j-' IL Cl �' ' _; 1_ `• aiaimo.Oaky./ a�:�. .; = •••• _.cam =•tti' Ui ••le�•�"`'' it ♦ '!\� � ` •�j•. �• -- - - t-• � 4�� -. .�:I="!'::.v. - � .. o IIJ J. XJ -G:rets��,;cr�.'� �• � � r-C,•••� •. i 1 J f•'• • _. .�- -!"• •..,�•�'� ►�v ��. ��iii"• l.' .\ r i � '• \a`"•1. 71=�.;� +•�.�... ��••1�-- _ -T ``� .�. �,`/ :� �1 •..��� 4 '�:. '�• ��• �! ..'� .�''��� -`'' 1 - .. �. t..�.•Sri A2a`__.. r M,7I-r=A-Er-'?ML IMPACT IREPORT 0098 1897-FL: Cols3ri S Za':,oA.Inc. . i i° - j saisL'x 49Ar if __ s�tRe,..arra B 0 MARTINEZ .�♦:•• PTTTSBVRG •� +� r~ ANTIOCH PocAsco • COVCCRD , PLEASANT Y.:LL CLAYTON WALNUT CREEK LAFAYf TTE j In i i ♦ 1 -Sew Raege 1... 0 8000 16000 cectwa CENTRAL POMON ANTIOCN +.cess:..•• ..,.. AMene ..•»ceue„i•a „ts e,u r.r i„rai,e » •., ce+na CONTRA COSTA CCJNTy ...._... ... -„e. ea.e, :.,+a .�..., ........ .......... CALIFORNIA .____ -.we. ,a..t .-. .•...,. ae_....,i♦..e+ .w...».....,.».. .�».Jat. •». „r ,et, N„e •i,•.Mi eai„er:axa sr,il�ri•r,rite t s 90099 R sown 15. / R—2b" A-2 /s' r / '/ •/ �" # E D. ' A000 oll R-40of -20 1 !0-15 ti 1 A PORTION OF I _.` .' "� •' .w•T ._" .` ': SAT OIABLO OIViS10N•SECTOR 4 •iI/••IC T] • :•;tea♦'( •7: :\: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA !1+•\5 t• iK\ )a_t.aa..C!7\TQ Y O+'i\a\t[Iso )K aS avttiC�fi• :+'�a�'E �] h+s,•wCY .S t.•G__•\: :+:♦ati:E 4[fCOflli CO)f��C.Y•-:ra'E t!s.�:•�i � `� -��.�,;�� �., j 4 '7 ,r.,•..- .�,.,.r-fir•+• ..��`•`._ ...-. _ ..�. .. _ � _ .. - - - ..-•.,...:-,.- '.1--+.�•- «v+_. TO SHEET NC SEE `'\\ —_. ___--• fad -�"�� its �.`��� s- �_.• 1� 35 42 7-A 1 ./wy1 '/�• �t \moi _ .. ^r _ _�•. - `c \TR s • \ � --yt—i— � - .� t s e •.• _` .rte ® ti 327, >:; \, °•. ..� --•--- S Q - _`�°x.40 ._ ®� f .L. • ` ) F•• d ••• is fto 31 _ `\ ♦` • � ��� wry.-�./ ,t sae� _ - �� — r„_-it . �• 2'00 . / • \ ,^�S••,�_�—..— '�� \.,• .-`� _ •�rsi os�s4 mas a ear:•�ea�ss e•Gfr7.®s•s aSs.�.vri.W,Sea - .- 2100 ' 22 - i RA,.4 tly .Cc • 0/fa.'..fin • mG1i•rua'e r.5i� eFC '_ c•ixa.6 etwo••crr npn.- J��. WA ' \ �•' , �`�• ( e�'`'4- `` 'til r�`� tr� -" \ter �� `\ �RQ� �•1� ��,, • Yom~~•, 1 .1• ?.. � - - • b0 J7:/ `• • ..�.. � � o G�.i ��f�,yam•. 1 w • 314 w':�1��' � �� � .mss-• C cm 00102. f. 1. Project Description Under rezoning application 1867, the appiicant, Coleman & Isakson Inc., and the caner, Liahona Christensen, request rezoning of 8.30 acres from (A-2) general agricultural district, =4nimum lot size 5 acres, to (R-40) single family residential district, minimum lot size 40,000 square feet. The rezoning would provide ;he basis for 8 lots on the site. The project site is located at the end of a dedicated 52' wide strip of land on which a curbed 32' wide street is being constructed as a condition of approval of M.S. 178-71 and M.S. 69-73. This dedicated strip lies east of El Pintado Road, 550 eet south of Spring Lane in the Alamo area. The parcel can be further identified by assessment numbers 196-140-06, 21 & 22 and lies within Census .Tract 3462. a. Historical Perspective The project site is composed of Parcels 2 and 3 of Minor Subdiv- ision 237-64 whi..h was approved in 1965. This original action divided 16.2 acres into 4 parcels o_ a_._oximately 4 acres each. This action followed the denial of an ecclication• to rezone the 16.2 acres tc (R-15) residential disr_-ict, minimum lot size 15,000 square feet. The original tentative map also sho•.;ed suture divisions of the 4 acre lots into one to two acre parcels. It was obviously the intention of the original applica= to subdivide the site to maximize tue number of lots (figure 1) . Minor Subdivision 178-71 further divi=de:: Parcel 1 of M.c;. 237-64 into•4 one acre lots. Minor Subdivis_= 69--3 was approved divid- ing the western portion of the present project site, Parcel 3 of M.S. 237-64, into 3 parcels. The applicant's intent is to fellow the conditions under M.S. 69-73 and M.S. 178-71 for road access construction: The re- zoning to accommodate 40,000 square =cot lots has been necessi- tated by the recent ordinance a=enc-_, t requiring 5 acre mini- mum lot sizes in (A-2) districts. 2. General Regional Environmental Inventory The project site lies in the San Ramon Valley between Alamo Ridge and Interstate 680, which cuts through the ce=er of the Valley. - Physio- graphically, it is more precisely defined as lying on the low western • hillsides of t:ie Dido Range. The site is aLost directly east of Alamo and north of Danville. 00103 • �' ..• ••� - yvo tri► .(FS. - '` O C ,J � � _ - �C1=. + inti• �' C C�' - / a':.:acv v.- • - Zj wg 1 won ,. r j Development in the San Ramon Valley has been rapid the past decade_ However, the majority has taken place in the flatter lo-.;lands, leav- ing pockets similar to the project area to develop at a slcver rate at a very low density. There has been considerable development to the north and east of the site in Stone Valley and Green Valley respec- tively, and to the south and west in San Ramon Valley proper. Elevations range to above 550 feet along Alamo Ridge_ Slope steep- ness varies from 101 to over 301. Average annual rainfall approaches 20 inches, however, the majority falls between November and April. 3. Specific Environmental Inventory and Potential Project Impact a. Physical Description Physically, the site is dominated by a knoll at an elevation of 550 feet. Below this knoll, the land fans out on the site with slopes predominately between 201 and 301. There are no creeks or defined swales located on the site. Project Impacts Development of the parcel would modify portions of the natural landform for building pads and road and drainage improvements. The access road, which would serve the ultimate subdivision of the site, is under construction at this time. Eight building pads and driveways would also be graded. Mitigation Measures Although not an mitigatior measure, the major engineering pro- ' posal accompany=ng this _roject, the access road development, is already underway. The cut and fill grading required for this roadway has physically had the most profound effect on the site. b. Existing Use and Surrounding Area The site was recently used as grazing land for horses. The sur- rounding area is characterized by low density residential develop menu with many owners also keeping horses. -3- OV1VCz r Specifically, the develop ment north and west is on one acre to live acre lots, and the development to the south is on lots"ranging from one acre down to one-half acre. Project Impacts Approval of the project would allow 8 additional one acre homesites similar to the surrounding development. c. Utilities and Community Facil. ties The project lies within the district boundaries of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and the East Bay lRunicipal Util- ities District. Water and sewer mains exist' in El P`_ntado Road at the site. Schools, churches and shopping.facilities are a short distance away in the Danville core area. Project Imoacts Eight additional residential units would have an incremental impact on existing facilities and capacities. d. Circulation Presently E1 Pintado is a lightly traveled, narrow, winding road with approximately 20 feet of pavement. On January 3, 1974, the Public Works Department conducted traffic counts on E1 Pintado. These counts showed a two way flow of 658 vehicles per day on the western portion of E1 Pintado 100 feet north of Dolphin Dr_ve and 195 vehicles on the eastern por- tion of E1 Pintado 100 feet north of El Pinto. These counts may have been effected by the State closing of the overpass and free- way ramp (southerly direction) at E1 Pintado and interstate 680 near E1 Pinto. Information supplied by the Public Works Department regarding- accidents shows that there were 8 accidents on EI Pintado, in 1972 and 1973 combined. Three of these accidents resulted in personal injury. -4- 00106 s�. t f I Project Impacts if the proposed project is develoeed, the traffic generated by 8 new residences could approach 80 trip ends per day. 'Because thire are only 658 trip ends per day now on this section of E2 Pintado, the project hruld cause a substantial percentage increase in traffic on the roadway, although the absolute figure of 80 trip ends is small e. Legal, Policy and Institutional Constraints . The Contra Costa General Plan for Planning Area A8, the Alamo Danville area, designates the project site for low density sin- gle family residential. The maximum allowable density under this desig:ation is 2.32 units/acre or (ic-15) zoning if site topo- graphy permits. The rugged terrain on this site suggests a lower density such as that proposed. Project Impacts Development of the project would essentially implement the Gen- eral Plan because R--40 is an acceptable zone within an area planned for low densi y single-family residential uses. l f. Soils and Geology The best available geologic map of the project area was prepared by the U.S. Geolortical Survey (Brabb, et al., 1971). This map indicates, that the site is underlain by rocks of the Orinda Formation. within the Diablo Range, the Orinda Formation consists predominantly of fine-grained clastics (fine-grained clayey sandstone, siltstone and mudstone). Available information on geologic structure suggest that the bedding is inclined to the northeast- at approximately, 60 degrees. No faults are known to bisect the project area, and the nearest bounlary of the Special Study zone which encompasses the Calaveras fault is more than a mile south of the site. The soils which occur on the project area are assigned to the Alo Series by the Soil Conservation Service. (Soil Survey of Contra Costa County, 1973) . Soils on the westernmost portion of the site have been mapped as AaE, which designates Alo clay V01VII on slopes of 15 to 30 -percent_ The remainder of the site is maims as Aa£, which designates areas underlain by Alo clay on slopes of 30 to 50 percent. According to the description of this series by the Soil Conser- vation Service, the soil ranges from 2 to 371 feet in thickness. Runoff is medium and erosion hazard is considered moderate in slopes of 15 to 30 percent, and severe in slopes of 30 to 50 per- cent. The shrink-swell potential is considred high in all areas underlain by soils of the Alo series. Project Impacts The major geologic problems on the site are likely to be related to slope stability and the high shrink-swell potential of the clayey soils. With regard to slope stability, it should be noted that there are no known landslides on or adjacent to the parcel (see Nilsen, 1971) . However, it should be recognized that man's activities, which steepen natural slopes, remove stabilizing veget:`.ion, and ffect that water table, are capable or trigger- ing landslide; and marginally stable hillsides. g. Hydrology and Water Quality Since there are no defined drainage passages on the site, runoff ` moves overland as sheet flow. The basic drainage pattern would not be altered by the project, primarily because of tae hilly terrain. The roadway, which is presently under construction, will be drained by storm system consisting of a Type "A" inlet and 200 feet of 18" RCP. The outfall of the 18" RCP will be at an. e}::sting drainage swale west of the property near E1 Pintado Road_ Project Impacts Implementation of the project and ultimate development of 8 lots along with the completion of the access road would increase the area of impervious surfaces and runoff from =Ae site. If rains occur prior to stabilization of the graded surface, erosion and siltation could be serious problems_ The addition- al runoff would add to peak flow levels in San Fon Creek. Typical pollutants found in suburban areas (crease, oil and insecticides) would be carried to Susuin Bair b_r San Ranon Creek. r -� V OJLUV r ' h. Vegetation and Wildlife It is unlikely that any unusual or rare biotic communities exist on the site due to the prox.I.Mity of suburban development. The land has been subject to grazing for many years. Numerous bur- rowing animals and birds are likely inhabitants. Four large oak • trees sit on the eastern portion of the site. The grassland covering most of the site provides a habitat for many insect spe- cies and a foraging area for small nocturnal animals. Prot Impacts The landform modifications and vegetation removal would reduce the available habitat for many animal species. Mitigation Measures The developer does not intend to disturb the large oaks. The manicured landscaped homes will provide•a home for many adapt- able species following project co=letion. It is unfortunate that these adaptable species are often pests (house mice, rats, flies and other insects) . 4. Any Adverse Environmental Effects ttni.ch Cannot Be Avoided If T•nis Proposal Is Implerzented All cf man's activities have effects on the environment. Many of these effects are adverse and cannot be avoided when projects are implemented. The following adverse relatively minor environmental effects would accom- pany this project. The increase in impervious surface area would increase runoff from the site and add to pea: flow levels in San Ramon Creek. A slight increase in traffic would occur on E1 Pintado. Landfc.rm modifications and removal of vegetation cover would reduce the habitat and foraging area of some animal species. The future residences would be in an area of high seismic risk. 5. Alternatives to the Proposed Action No project. The land could remain zoned (A-2) . Since the site has already been subdivided via the minor subdivision process, 4 resi- dences could be constructed without a rezoning. 00109 The rezoning application could be modified to request (R-65) single family residential district, minimum lot size 65,004 square fejt. This imuld allow 6 lots versus 8 lots under (R-40) zoning. 6. The Relationship Between Local Short-term Uses of Man's Environment and the :Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-term Productivity Past and present development trends and the County General Plan in- dicate low density residential development for the site and the area. Therefore, the proposed use fortifies the development trend and implements the General Plan. 7. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes Mich Would be Involved in the Proposed Action Should it be Implemented The conversion of open land to residential use can be coi.zidered essentially irreversible. Although mc•st of the project's impacts are relatively minor, several of them, such as increased traffic and runoff, can be considered irreversible. ' Habitation of the units would increase demand on resources, many of which are non-renewable. S. The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action A considerable portion of the surrounding area is already developed. This action would be essentially an infilling action. It should also be recognized that although the zoning request would allow 8 lots, 4 lots already exist. 9. Organi-ations end Persons Consulted: :+ea....—nnts TT 41IT-4 During the nre=axation of Envit-on ental i----act :e: ts, written - . and oral core=unicati.ons ta-kf place between the Pla :::g De:a-trent and other Corr.ty denarrents- The General P=a, and its va:ioas elements are also scrutinized :ega_C g the pro_cued a..%._^n. Ir - additional consultations, contacts o= cc�seet-ence and dQct=e:sts were ,used they are reverenced below: 10. . 2ualirication of E.I.R. PreDaration Acencr This Emiron:.ental IT-pact P.eport c:as prep red by the Contra Co_ta County Planning Cepa=t=ent. :'ne majo_i tv of. the reports are prepared b r the Enviroxtentcl i=_-act personnel of the Advance Planning Division 2^d the County Punning Geologist where z_Dlicable. Cther Planning Depart Tent and other Co=ntl• personnel we_e •.:ti'_izLc here .necessary. Ordinarily, the person direct-1v cro_'::in a._:g and s:r.t::.y tre _e ort is listed as it e contact person in the 1:otice of Completion (last page) or Melvin S_ Ecbier, Planner III, can be contacted. -8- 001110 ' EIR Team. Helvin J. EObier, B.S. Bus. 1d., H.C.' .Cita Planting,' Dennis Fransen, B.A. Emno: cs, M. U.P., Grp Planning Marie r ereditn, 3.n. Enviro r_-_e.-j -I Studies Dazu,in Myers, B.S. Hatht., B.S. Geology, Ph.D. Geo'_oS-v Dale Sa.�de:-s, B.S. Biole y, Ph.D Entoco Oy'Y Now DF:j ar 5/7/74 s FyR -9- 00 f L COYTJL� -.OSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPART1tfE( NOTICE OF CaMPLETION OF EAVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Contra Costa Countv Planning Responsible Agency - Division 1887--RZ Project Title - County Administration Bldg. North Wing, 4th Floor Martinez Contra Costa 94553 Address City County zip Dennis Fransen 415 228-3000 2024 - Contact Person Area Code Phone Ext. PROJECT DESCRIPTION OR ,'MATURE, PURPOSE, AND BENEFICIARIES Under rezoning application 1887, the applicant, Colemar & IsaY.son Inc., and the ow-mer, Liahone Christensen, recriest rezonina of 8.30 acres from (A-2) general agricultural district, mini-=; lot size 5 acres, to (R-40) ` single family residential district, mini— lot size 40,000 square feet. The project would allow 8 lots averaging close to 40,000 square feet each. The project site is located at the end of a dedicated 52' wide strip of land on which a curbed 32' wide street is being constructed as a condition of approval of I.I.S. 178-71 and M.S. 69-73. This dedicated strip lies east of E1 Pintado Road, 550 feet south of Spring Lz -ie in the Alga area- The parcel can be further identified by assessment numbers 196-140-06, 21 & 22 and lies within Census Tract 3462. Alamo Contra Costa Project Location City Project Location County, 15 days Time Period Provided for Review same as above Address. Vhere Copy of Draft EIR Is Available Date posted. Signed by pfa"rt�~.^nt��aynninDc �, Representative 4 - yi EAST BAY wATER { EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT2130 AO£l•N£ STR££r. OAKLAIVO. GA 0462.3 -(Aa) 035-3000 1 WM'J.STEPH£N5 June 14, 1974 _ .carar•+►ct+c+• r•r.cc. t Mr. Melvin J. Bobier, Planner III Contra Costa County Planning Department P. 0. Box 951 Martinez CA 94553 Dear Air. Bobier: Thank you for the opportunity to review your draft Environmental Impact Report entitled "1887-RZ - Coleman & Isakson, Inc." The District has the following specific comments on water supply; 1. Page 4, under c. Utilities and Community Facilities. The District can provide water service tote proposed pro- ject, under applicable District rules and regulations, by main extension from El Pintado Road within the nominal eleva tions of 450 to 650 feet. 2. Page 4, under c. Utilities and Community Facilities. "Mitigation Measures" - The District is most concerned that all developments consider and make use of water conserva- tion measures, thus assuring that water conservation is built into the project; i.e. , water saving appliances, low water requirement landscaping, etc. EBMUD strongly recom- mends water conservation and would gladly work closely with any developer in this regard. Please do not hesitate to call on us if you have any questions, or if the District can be of further service. Ve truly rs ai a Envi en Committee IVJS:eh y-►a ` Z' � eoAwo OI'o•R£CrORs o£wlrr w.Kwv£Gea.rwflaoff+r.RORCWr T.MAMAS.Wcf/048104fNr.A.C.CAXW/RGrOAK.G.MOwAso wosrNXOV.CHARua J,wRIG-- • •• •. .. _. _.O. ..A....d._, , art G lIOWwPO/00/NSON.GMwRLLS J Wpl6MT 0011 h In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Mav 27 . 19 ,35 In the Matter of Approving and Executing Agreement AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING for Abatement Services in _BODY OF THE EL SOBRANTE FIRE El Sobrante Fire Protection PROTECTION DISTRICT •OF District CONTRA COSTA COUNTY This Board as the Governing Board of the E1 Sobrante Fire Protection District on May 22 1975, having accepted the bid of Spray Corporation for fire hazard corrections and abatement wort in the El Sobrante Fire Protection District; and The contract having now been prepared and submitted to this Board together with the required bonds and certificates of insurance (;:hich the County Counsel has reviewed and approved as to form) ; hereby approves said contract. IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Vincent Mirante, Chairman of the E1 Sobrante Fire Protection District Commission is authorized to execute the aforesaid contract. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that bonds posted by other bidders are EXONERATED. The foregoing order was passed by a unanimous vote of the Board members present on May 27, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Contractor Supervisors Fire District affixed this 27th day of Mav , 19 75. County Auditor-Controller ^ J. R_ OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By � �- Deputy Clerk _ A. Josey M 24 si74 -12.500REX;me 00114 any.:.:. { . .. .. ... .. n. . ... ...:. .:.a. '. .. ABATEMENT CONTRACT (Agreement) 1. SPECIAL TERMS. These special teens are incorporated below by reference. (§§2,3) Parties: (Public Agency) E1 Sobrante Fire Protection District (Contractor) J Spray Corporation 2710 Monument Court Concord, California (§2) Effective Date: MAY 2 '•' 4975 (see for starting date.): (§3) The Work: The Contractor will at its own cost and''expense, •in a workmanlike manner, faithfully and fully do all the work and furnish all the equipment and materials necessary to complete, in accordance with the Abatement Specifications and related contract documents hereinafter mentioned, to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief of the Public Agency, the correction and abatement of fire hazards from the properties set forth by the Public Agency. (§4) Completion Time: The work shall be completed as set forth by the Public Agency in Orders to be issued. ' (§5) Public Agency's Agent: Fire Chief of the Public Agency. (§6) Contract Price: $ 5 690.00 (for unit price contracts; more or less, in accordance with finished quantities at unit bid prices.) 2. SIGNATURES & Agi� . Public Agency. By: (President, Chairman or Other Designated Representative) t :a h,_ G;_4_4 (Secretary) Contractor, hereby also acknowledging awareness of and_- compliance s with Labor Code §1861 concerning Workmen', Compensation Law. By: (Corporate ( signate offi ial cai3acity in the ,. 'Seal) business) By: Designate official capacity in the business) Note to Contractor (1) Execute acknowledgment form below, and (2) if 'a corporation, affix Corporate Seal. ,State of California ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT (by Corporation, County of ,.nyrrrA rnrra ) ss• Partnership, or Individual) r The person(s)• signing above for Contractor, known to me in individual and business Capacity as stated, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. _ Dated: 5/22/75 " aku,tsi L1 , i:�_•�t-'mss;J� NOTARIAL SEAL NOTARY PUB C al A FFICIAL SEAL FORM APPROVED: J. B. CLAUSEN RILYN I DAVIDSON County Counsel By* aar PUBLIC• CALIFORMA rr CWWSd=Ewa Mew 7. IWSS Wil-i 3. WORK CONTRACT, CHANGES. (a) By their signatures in Section 2, effective on the above ate, these parties promise and agree as set forth in this contract, incorporating by these references the material ("special terms") in Sec. 1. (b) Contractor shall, at his own cost and expense, and in a workmanlike manner, fully and faithfully perform and complete the work; and will furnish all_. materials, labor, services and transportation necessary, convenient and proper in order fairly to perform the requirements of this contract, all strictly in accordance with the Public Agency's Notice To Contractors, Proposal, Orders, and Abatement Specifications. (c) The work can be changed only with Public Agency's prior written order specifying such change and its cost agreed to by the parties; and the Public Agency shall never have to pay more than specified in Sec. 7 without such an order. 4. TIME: NOTICE TO PROCEED. Contractor shall start this work as directed in the Orders and shall complete it as specified in Sec. 1. 5. INTEGRATED DOCUMENTS. The Notice To Contractors, Proposal, Orders and Abatement Specifications or special provisions of, the Public Agency's call for bids, and Contractor's accepted bid for this work are hereby incorporated into this contract, and they are intended to co-operate, so that anything exhibited in the Notice To Contractors, Proposal, and Orders not mentioned in the Abatement Specifications or special provisions, or vice versa, is to be executed as if exhibited, mentioned and set forth in both, to the true intent and meaning thereof when taken all together; and differences of opinion concerning these shall be finally determined by Public Agency's Agent specified in Sec. 1. 6. PAYMENT. For his strict and literal fulfillment of these promises and conditions, and as full compensation for all this work, the Public Agency shall pay the Contractor the sum specified in Sec. 1, except that in this unit price contract, the payment shall be for finished quantities (parcels) at unit bid prices. 7. PAYMENTS WITHHELD. (a) The Public Agency or its agent may withhold any payment, or because of later discovered evidence nullify all or any certificate for payment, to such extent and period of time only as may be necessary to protect the Public Agency from loss because of: (1) Defective work not remedied, or uncompleted work, or (2) Claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing, or (3) Failure to properly pay subcontractors or for material or labor, or (4) Reasonable doubt that the work can be completed for the balance then unpaid, or (5) Damage to another contractor, or (6) Damage to the Public Agency, other than damage due to delay. (b) The Public Agency shall use reasonalbe diligence to discover and report to the Contractor, as the work progresses, the materials and labor which are not satisfactory to it, so as to avoid unnecessary trouble or cost to the Contractor in making good any defective work or parts. (c) 35 calendar days after the Public Agency files its notice of completion of the entire work, it shall issue a certificate to the Contractor and pay the balance of the contract price after deducting all amounts withheld under this contract, provided the Contractor shows that all claims for labor and materials have been paid, no -2- 00116 claims have been presented to the Public Agency based on acts or omissions of the Contractor, and no liens or withhold notices have been filed against the work or site, and provided there are not reasonable indications of defective or missing work or of late- recorded notices of liens or claims against Contractor;' but in no case shall this be done prior to December 31, of the year in which the work has been completed. 8. INSURANCE. (Labor Code §§1860-61) On signing this contract, contractor must give Public Agency (1) a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or (2) a certificate of Workmen's Compensation Insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (3) an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director orthe insurer. Contractor is aware of and complies with Labor Code Sec. 3700 and the Workmen's Compensation Law. 9. BONDS. On Signing this contract, Contractor shall deliver to Publa.c Agency for approval good and sufficient bonds with sureties, in amount(s) specified in the specifications or special provisions, guaranteeing his faithful performance of. this contract and his payment for all labor and materials hereunder.* 10, FAILURE TO PERFORM. If the Contractor at any time refuses or neglects, without fault •of the Public Agency or its agent(s) , to supply sufficient materials or workmen to complete this agreement and work as provided herein, for a period of 10 days or more after written notice thereof by the Public Agency, the Public Agency may furnish same and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof from the contract price. The Public Agency may terminate this contract by registered mail where the Contractor fails to provide sufficient workmen and equipment as previously ordered. The Public Agency's determination shall be final and conclusive as to sufficiency of workmen and equipment. 11. LAWS APPLY. General. Both parties recognize the applicability of various federal, state and local laws and regulations, especially Chapter 1 or Part 7 of the California Labor Code (beginning with Sec. 1720, and including Secs. 1735, 1777.51 & 1777.6 for bidding discrimination) and intend that this contract complies therewith. The parties specifically stipulate that the relevant penalties and forfeitures provided in the Labor Code, especially in Secs. 1775 & 1813, concerning prevailing wages and hours, shall apply to this contract as though fully stipulated herein. 12. SUBCONTRACTORS. Government Code §94100-4113 are incorporated erein. 13. WAGE RATES. (a) Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1773, the governing body of Me__Pulglic Agency has ascertained the general prevailing rates of wages per diem, and for holiday and overtime work, in the locality in which this work is to be performed, for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract, and said rates are as specified in the call for bids for this work and are on file with the Public Agency, and are hereby incorporated herein. (b) This schedule of wages is based on a working day of 8 hours unless otherwise specified; and the daily rate is the hourly rate multiplied by the number of hours constituting the working day. When less than that number of hours are worked, the daily wage rate is _ proportionately reduced, but the hourly rate remains as stated. -3- 0011'7 gnomon 4 v (c) The Contractor, and all his subcontractors, must pay at least these rates to all persons on this work, including all travel, subsistence, and fringe benefit payments provided for by applicable collective bargaining agreements. All skilled labor .not.listed above must be paid at least the wage scale established by collective bargaining agreement for such labor in the locality where such work is being performed. If it becomes necessary for the Contractor or any subcontractor to employ any person in a craft, classification or type of work (except executive, supervisory,. administrative, clerical or other nonmanual workers as such) for which no minimum wage rate is specified, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Public Agency which shall promptly determine the prevailing wage rate therefor and furnish the Contractor with the minimum rate .based thereon, which shall apply from the time of the initial employment of the person affected and during the continuance of such employment. 14. HOURS OF LABOR. Eight hours of labor in one calendar day constitutes a legal day's Work, and no workman employed at any time on this work by the Contractor or by any subcontractor shall be required or permitted to work longer thereon except as provided in Labor Code Secs. 1810-1815. 15. APPRENTICES. Properly indentured- apprentices may be employed on this work in accordance with Labor Code Secs. 1777.5 and 1777.6, forbidding discrimination. 16. PREFERENCE FOR MATERIALS. The Public Agency desires to promote the .industries and economy of Contra Costa County, and the Contractor therefore promises to use the products, workmen, laborers and mechanics of this County in every case where the price, fitness and quality are equal. 17. ASSIGNMENT. This agreement binds the heirs, successors, assigns, and representatives of the Contractor; but he cannot assign it in whole or in part, nor any monies due or to become due under it, without the prior written consent of the Public Agency and the Contractor's surety or sureties, unless they have waived notice of assignment. 18. NO WAIVER BY PUBLIC AGENCY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the Public Agency indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefore, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the Public Agency be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 19. HOLD HARMLESS & INDEMNITY. (a) Contractor promises to and shall hold harmless and indemnify from the liabilities as defined in this section. (b) The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the Public Agency and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. (c) The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, including personal injury, death, -4- 100118 property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, regardless or whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the Public Agency approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and' including the defense of any suit(s) or action(s) at -law or =equity, concerning these. (d) The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with, the matters covered by this contract and attributable to the contractor, subcontractor(s) ,. or any officer(s) , agent(s) or employee(s) of one or more of thein. ,, (e) Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not con ta.one or ependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) , drawing;(s) ,; specifications(s) or special provision(s) in connection with- this work, has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these, matters or that the alleged damage resulted partly from' any •negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. X + 001. J;v A STOCK COMPANY — ESTABLISHED 1890 0 HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BKL-TIM0RE Bond No. 88 70505 r Faithful Perfere■aeee Bond ` e Public Work ` ('The premium charged on this bond is S-------28-_______-►being at , 5 ' the rate of S____________________per thousand of the contract pFice) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: TswT, WmmEA-% the----------------EL_SOBRANTE_FIRE_DISTRICT ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State of California,entered into a contract dated--------------------------------------19------- with J-SPRAY CORPORATION --------------------------------------------------------hereinafter designated as the "Principal," for the work-described as follows:Weed_abateent_for period 6 -1-75/6-30_75 _----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------; and W ERE&s,the said Principal is required under the terms of said contract to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said contract Now,THEREFORE,We. the Principal,and FIDELITY A.-.,D DEPOSIT C6xPA.*tX OF MAxyLjLiD,a corpora- tion organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland,and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California,as Surety,are held and firmly bound unto---------------------- EL SOBRANTE FIRE DISTRICT ----- ar ------- o a�-Sii3r-Hundreded-Ninety_--------------5 --- ,690.00 in the penal sum of -- -- ------- - ---Dollars (S--- -----------), lawful money of the United States,for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made,we bind our- selves,our heirs,executors,administrators,and suers,jointly and severally,firmly by these presents. TsE Co:\-DrrioN OF Txis OBucATION Is Suss, That, if the above bounden Principal, his or its heirs, executors,administrators,successors or assigns,shall in all things stand to and abide by,and well and truly keep and perform the covenants,conditions and agreements in the said contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided,on his or their part,to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified,and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning,and shall indemnify and save harmless ' the-----------------------------EL----SOBRANTE-------------FIRE-------DISTRICT------------------------------------- - its officers and agents,as therein stipulated,then this obligation shall become null and void;otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and virtue. And the said Surety, for value received;hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the Rork to be performed thereunder or the specifica- tions accompanying the same shall in any wise affect its obligations on this bond,and it does hereby waive aotice of any such change,extension of time.alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work ar to the specifications. IN WITLESS WHEREOF. We have hereunto set our hands and seals this____22nd__________________ jay of------ May-------------------19 75--- J-SPRAY CORPORATION Principal FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND -i By-- ice �--- -'� --------------- PaId2 G. Attorney-in-Fact CAi3173r-1\s,7-73 193407 00120 BOND NO. 88 70 505 Fidelity and D,+% sit Company HONE OFFICE OF IVIARYLAND BAL?1A1Or?E, d1D. 21103 i PAYMENT BOND (Section 3247, Civil Code) (Premium included in faithful performance bond} IMOW ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Whereas EL SOBRANTE FIRE DISTRICT _ has awarded to J-SPRAY CORPORATION as Contractor, a contract for the work described as follows: weed abatement for period 6-1-75/6-30-75 AND WHEREAS, Said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in connection with said contract, to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, materialmen, and other persons as provided by law; NOW, THEERE ORE, We the undersigned Contractor and Surety are held and firmly bound unto the EL SOBRANTE FIRE DISTRICT in the amount _ regsirea by law, the sura or- FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED NINETY AND NO/100---------------------------------------- o ars 52690.00 ) , mor which payment well and truly to a made we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors . and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these-presents. Tis CO]IMITION OF THIS OBLIGATION- IS SUCH, That if said Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, admin- istrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall fail to pay any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 3181, or accounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to work or .labor performed by any such claimant, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Franchise Tax Board from the wages of- employees of the Principal and his sub- contractors pursuant ..to Section 18806 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, with respect to- such work and labor that the surety or sureties herein will pay for the same in the amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In case suit is brought upon this bond, the said surety will pay a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the court. This bond shall insure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Civil Code Section 3181 as to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. In Witness Whereof, We have hereunto set our hands and sews ' this 22nd day of May , 19 75. J-SPRAY CORPORATION FIDELITY AND DEP94IT COMPANY OF MARYZ(1��:`TDs1 By: :11'i1^ . sJ, ' �;.. .. � N•..•N ..�n►r:.}L,♦ l: Y . I•�yrQSy L, CP E V a A c = � a 0 o O y 04 mo 1 2. D =0 Vf -v 0 3 '� o !; 'o v 3 n m N 2 m r: a vs o e v o A N R D �• 5 -0 t o —-1 O ti p c o. p c c r-3 o. O v. W w r, r o � s -�.� o (t o Q..S O w v o n 3 =o a , Ir 0 = -4 'O K CID o m D .c 10 o -0. E.« ! V 43 OO v t r 3 0 0 -C .q. L -II' CL J-4 K Wrl o � O O :!.T O O Ls p � K O 0.0 v . O C C) n L7 m 0 -6.A T t=f t l CL T D D A D V ONO � v v v 9. �.rrx o K n O w W Wcr Cf A•C III O e rt cr m o 0 0 0 { I 0•n o R Q o Oh R I� mH O t CL 0o K3 N3 �, If D A O rn a. b• o� a� v z Z�; �. m mNo; 3 '" m n Z 'd n ! Crr co ii O a ! Z 1 s up ..� D O v �1 m `° m :< o m O D Ail. N -• ; �'� N o r* r A N N N O O 11 CL rr 9 w R N A O O O f111 a (D N n O 0 -D o 0 4 r N �` CJ7 Z O O WOrra :;o O Ccvm N o 'fl o s o o w ; = z�M .� . o _N of O v < O O r m l O ai K C 7 �• Om CCD m 'A D - o CD o cni t ►f co ` .� .• Z ►trilli 3" x D t; 0_ m m m m m m m C z y' b-d ��o0o 0 0 0 0 ! m O m I e-VL' w A D A D D O 0 Cl Ph 0 r O `r O p`. Z � Co �Co N CCp C CA cn !D_ O m m m m m m f t z Tom" J r� :^n�2 CJ7 Cl I A C1. p1 A yOAO !ppn i( O t CT in i C)D (Z !N O C -G -C •{ -•C �-C ii-C 1 #� `O -6.9 3 ' --- ---- - I 0 . 00-4'3C3 • In the Board of Supervisors of . Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Request for Coordinated Program to Counteract Arguments of Proponents of Peripheral Canal Project. Senator John A. Nejedly having appeared this day'and - urged that the county take advantage of the one year delay in construction of the Peripheral Canal Project by the- State Depart ment of Water Resources to coordinate an effective program to counteract arguments of the proponents of said project; and Senator Nejedly having suggested that material be pre- pared to educate the public and the state and federal legislators on the damaging effects the proposed canal would have in the Delta counties; and Mr. Jack Port, Assistant Public Works Director, Environ- mental Control Division, having commented that the position of the state on the Peripheral Canal Project was not clear at this time; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having stated that there should be a public relations program to explain the county's views on the proposal; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having expressed the opinion that action should be taken to influence the state's decision with respect to the project; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Senator Nejedly for a coordinated program is REFERRED to the Intergovernmental Relations Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny and Supervisor Linscheid) for study and recommendation to the full Board. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Senator Nejedly Supervisors Board Committee affixed this 27th day of May , 19 Y-5 Public Works Director Environmental Control J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Vera Nelson County Administrator 061123 vU13 In the Board of Supervisors of- Contra Costa County, State of California Mag 27 , 19 UL In the Matter of California State Budget for Nursing Home Funding. L The Board having received a May 9, 1975 letter from Mr. John Williams, President, California Association of Health Facilities, stating that the 1975-1976 State Budget for Nursing Home Funding under the Medi—Cal program is inadequate and advis ing that Board action urging the Governor and Legislature to provide a necessary budget increase for said facilities would be helpful; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. hereby certify that the foregoing b a true and correct copy of an order entered on the • minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seo[ of the Board of cc: Director, HumanSuper4iiso'+ rs - Resources Agency w/ booizlet a affixed this 27th day of May 19 County Administrator t J. R. OLSSON, Clerk-- Deputy Clerk Helen C. Mar 00124: In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization A letter having been received from Mr. G. A. Horstkotte, Jr. , General Manager-Chief Engineer, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, requesting that a condition of approval of the Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization require that annexations be subject to-a11 the terms, conditions, and requirements of the Sanitary District Code and its supplemental specifications; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid request is referred to County Counsel and Local Agency Formation Commission. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board.of; cc: Mr. G. A. Horstkotte, Jr. Supervisors County Counsel Executive Officer, Local affixed this 27th day of May 19 75 Agency Formation Commission J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Planning Director By . Deputy Clerk H sa ,2,7,aPu &ic Works Director County Administrator D. Harkness 00125 f CENTRAL ..OR.ITRA COSTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS SANITARY DISTRICT G.A.HORSTKOTTE.JR.. PARKE L BONEYSTEELE.Presldeat General MAniger—Chief Engineer DON L. ALLAN 1250 SPR/NGBROOK ROAD ERNEST IC.DAVIS CHARLES J.GIBBS MAILING ADDRESS. P.O. BOX 5266 Secretary RICHARD J.MITCHELL WALNUT CREEK. CALIFORNIA 94596 TEL.934.6727 AREA CODE 41S GEORGE A. RUSTIOWN May 14, 1975 RECEIVED 14AY /Z 1975 J. R, 00=1 CLERK BOARD OF SUMVWO A Co. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Gentlemen: With reference to the Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission on May 7, 1975, and scheduled for hearing before your Board, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District requests that a condition of approval be that standard terms for all annexations to this District be applied to this procedure pursuant to Government Code Section 56275. In essence, these terms are that the property shall be subject to all the terms, conditions, and requirements of the Sanitary District Code and its sup- plemental specifications. Due to existing and pending State and Federal regulations relating to air-quality with this County and governing sewer services, the Board of Directors of CCCSD can make no guarantee of full service to this development or others in the future. The additional sewage generated within this development will - together with other current and future developments involving conversion of open land or densification of land uses in the general area - require expansion of the sewage treatment facilities of this District and the attendant greater use of energy within our critical air basin. Availability of energy for sewage treatment and atmospheric discharges from treatment plant operations serving this development are subject to future but undefined limitations which may restrict this development area because of the critical shortages of certain fuels and the critical nature of the air basin. Yours very truly, CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT T2 _ G. Horstkotte, Jr'.:� General eager-Chief Engineer GRH:,v WCD l Recycled Paper cc: Mr. J. Connery, LAFCO I / 'crofilmed with board ordelr �32a t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 ' 19. In the Matter of Assembly Bill 434. The Board having received a May 16, 1975 letter from Air. John Morey Allen, Secretary—Treasurer, Richmond Bar Associa— tion, advising that its membership had voted unanimously to support Assembly Bill 434 (which would prevent closing or moving , of the single department of the Superior Court located in Richmond) prior to amendment; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communi- cation is REFERRED to the County Administrator. s� PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. w 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Mr. J. M. Allen Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of P.O. Box 23258 Supervisors Pleasant Hill, Ca. affixed this 27th day of May . 19 75 94523 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator B �:EI.LA,.J� ������ . De Clerk H 24 r�Coaqty Counsel y Helen C. Mars P� AW127 In the Board of Supervisors of _ Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 19 TL In the Matter of Standard Agreement with State Department of Education for child care services. The Board having received a May 15, 1975 letter from- Ms. Dorothy H. Snyder, Field Services Administrator, Child Development Programs Support Unit; State Department of Education, regarding the legality of purchasing child care services under the auspices of the Standard Agreement project dated July 9, 1974, advising that a proposed campership program is within the confines of said agreement and that an amendment to same is not necessary; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to County Counsel. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. c c• Ms. D. S. Snyder Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of State Education Bldg. Supe 721 Capitol Mall affixed this 27th day of Mav . 1975 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel B j��V��� O Clerk Director, Human Resources y Deputy H 24 12174 ,. ifficy Helen C. Marshall County Administrator _ 00128 I 00128 mill' 11111111, 11 110i"000011" _r WIIHILES - RECEIVED Suyeriabadeatof a Puhl4e Iastnaclioa ..-.. and Director of Education 1 ' MAY A�1975- 1. R CX%0H STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD Or- SUPMISORS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION �� �• Dewity STATE EDUCATION HUB.DING.721 CUML MALL.SACRAMERM 93814 May 15, 19T5 Mr. Warren Boggess, Chairman Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Mr. Boggess: The County Counsel of Contra Costa has raised questions regarding the legality of purchasing child care services under the auspices of the Standard Agreement project signed by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors on July 19, 19T4. The Department of Education considers the proposed campership program within the confines of the required educational component for both the vendor pay- ment and family day care home arrangement provided in the Standard Agreement contract pursuant to Chapter 1 Division 12.5 of the Education Code. The child develop=ent program is less than .24 hours. We acknowledge that a child may be physically located in a camp program for a total of 24 hours in one day; how- ever, the proposed purchase of child development services constitutes only a portion less than A hours and therefore not in conflict with Section 16T09. It is the opinion of the Department that an amendment to the Standard Agree- ment is not necessary inasmuch as the Agreement does not specifically limit the method of child care service delivery provided by a county, but does author- ize the utilization of a maximum sum of funds for claim. Sincerely, Dorothy KISyder RECEIVED 1� Field Services Administrator Child Development Programs Support Unit MAY 15 1975 (916) 445-9903 or 322-2341+ J. R.�OSWUPURVLSORS D :dra BOARDO. Miaofilmej witha ori OQ� I J1 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 In the Matter of Executive Session. At 10:00 a.m. the Board RECESSED to meet in Executive Session in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, California pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, to consult with its representatives in connection with discussions of salary matters. PASSED by the Board on May 279 1975. At 11:05 a.m. the Board reconvened in its Chambers and proceeded with its regular agenda. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on-the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Director of Personnel Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board.of. County Administrator Supervisors affixed this _day of_May 19 I&L . J. R. OtSSON, Clerk: �} By A41 aAz( . Deputy Clerk H 24 IW74 - ,s-M Helen C. Marshall r 0€;130: f tl� It f l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 . 19 2_� In the Matter of Appointment of Commissioners to the E1 Sobrante Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County. Supervisor A. M. Dias advised the Board that he had received appropriate City of San Pablo nominations for com- missioners to serve on the Board of Commissioners of the El Sobrante Fire Protection District subsequent to the merging of the San Pablo Fire Protection District with the El Sobrante Fire Protection District effective June 30, 1975, as follows: Mr. William H. Mitchell lir. Manuel A. Mello 1144 - 20th Street 14000 San Pablo Avenue San Pablo, California 94806 San Pablo, California 94806 It was noted that two of the present commissioners of the El Sobrante Fire Protection District would continue to serve until the expiration of their current terms, as follows: Commissioner term ending Mr. Melvin 0. Sprague December 31, 1976 Mr. Robert H. Myers December 31, 1977 On the recommendation of Supervisor Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mxr. William H. Mitchell and Mr. Manuel A. Mello are appointed to the Board of Commissioners of the El Sobrante Fire Protection District, and Mr. Vincent Mirante is reappointed to the aforesaid Board for four-year terms ending December 31, 1978. IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that Certificates of Appreciation be issued to each commissioner now serving these two districts who will no longer be serving after the merger becomes effective June 30, 1975. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the • minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Board of Commissioners Supervisors of El Sobrante Fire affixed this 27th day of May 19 -15Protection District County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY,��+s�. -� Deputy Clerk H 23 12/74 - ,s-M Shoni Le cse OC 31 I i i IN HE BOARD OF. SU?ERVrS0P S Or CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE 0? CALIVORNIA In the Matter of Fixing ) Hearing on Proposed ) Consolidation of Municipal ) Va.„v 27, 2975 Courts of the Richmond ) Judicial District and the ) !Nest Judicial District. ) The Board on January 7, 1975 having appointed Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. P. Kenny as a special Board committee to study the status of the Richmond and !:est Funieipal Courts, and this being the time to consider the report of said committee; and Supervisor Kenny having; suggested that the Board members review the County Administrator's May 12, 1075 report to the connittee recomrending, consolidation of the municipal courts of the Pichrond and West judicial districts and having moved that June 17 , 1975 at 11:30 a.r. be nixed for a hearing on the proposed consolidation; and Sunervisor Dias having agreed on the need for a public hearing but having expressed the opinion that the June 17 date was too soon, pointing; out that a majority of the cities and Juris- dictions involved were opposed to the recommendations of the County Administrator and were unable to reach agreement on an alternate proposal; and Sunervisor J. E. Moriarty having expressed concern that the June 17 date would not allow sufficient time to study the report of the County Administrator and other facets of the matter; and Sunervisor F. A. Linscheid having commented that this matter has been before the Board for a considerable period of time and therefore does not require protracted study and hearing, having noted the possibility of conflicts with vacation schedules and with other scheduled hearings should there be further delay, and having seconded the notion of Superviscr Kenny, the vote was as follows: AWES: Su^ervisors J. P. :fenny, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: Supervisors F. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty. ABSENT: Supervisor N. Boggess. Thereupon Supervisor Voriarty having moved that July 22, 1975 at 2:00 p.r::. be Fixed as the time for the hearing; and Supervisor Linscheid having suggested that the motion include an amendment to recuest that the parties involved submit to the Board in writinc prior to the hearinS their specific recommendations on 'Che matter: and r :Supervisor.. 7'oriarty and Dias having agreed to the amended motion, the sage passed by the f ollocv:ing vote: AYES: Supervisors A. V. Dias, J. Moriarty, A. Linscheid. iTri?-S: Su^ervisor J. P. aenny. A3SB�ti^: ou—nervi sor T, . Boggess. <-A, I HEREBY CE.Rl.1FY that the .foregoing is a true and correct. copy of a resolution entered on the minutes of said Board of Saner= visors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the -Board of Supervisors affixed this 7th day of jaay 197 J. R. OISSONS CIL-RK . By ra Penn Deputy Clerk cc : City of El Cerrito City of Richmond City of San Pablo City of Pinole Hon. David !:. Calfee, presiding Judge of the Richmond Judicial District Hon. Robert J. Duggan, Presiding Judge of the Nest Judicial District County Counsel County Administrator Supervisor W. N. Boggess Supervisor A. M. Dias O(MR) i RECEIVED ' i OFFICE" OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR «�� i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MAY 2 71975 J. ;L OLSiON AJmiaistratioa (3 RD Or SUPEstvWgS Martinez, California '9 TA O l To: Supervisor A. M. Dias Date: May 12, 1975. upePG. li' e n A th Subreu: West County Courts ' County Administrator On January 7, 1975 the Board of Supervisors officially designated you as a Special Committee to review the status of the West County courts and provide a recommendation to alleviate the problems of said courts. M The problems of the West County courts are primarily related to the West Judicial District and fall into the general areas of court facilities and workload ,management. i ' At the request of your Special Committee, my office developed a number of alternative proposals for dealing with both the facilities and workload problems. The proposals were presented to you in the attached report dated January 20, 1975. Upon receipt of said report, your connittee scheduled a meeting with representatives of the various entities of interest to discuss the organization and facilities of. the West County courts and to receive coy report on the various alternative proposals for dealing with the West Judicial District problems. As a result of the presentation of my report and the ensuing general, disauss ion, Supervisor Dias appointed a committee comprised of the County Administrator as Chairman, the Presiding Judge of + each of the two courts, a City Councilman and a City Manager from � . each of the west County Cities. The committee was directed to ! . develop recommendations for presentation to the Special Board Committee. On February 14, 1975 the gest County Courts Committee met and discussed various aspects of my report. The E1 Cerrito representa- tives to the committee .uggested that'a possible alternate solution ! would be to annex the El Cerrito-Kensington area to the Richmond Judicial District, thereby reducing the total workload in the West Court, i 2. The West County Courts Committee met again on March 17, 1975. ► It was determined that. my recon-mendation for consolidation was supported by 'the City of Richmond and that the Cities of San Pablo and Pinole were in support of the El Cerrito policy state- went which proposed that E1 Cerrito and Kensington and possibly other areas such as East Richmond Heights be annexed to the Richmond Judicial District. The El Cerrito policy statement also proposed that in the event of a consolidation all of the Courts i in the consolidated district, as well as related County depart- ments, be placed in the Richmond Building by moving all non-court occupants to other quarters. f In view of the fact that there was disagreement among the members of the Committee, it was agreed that my_office would meet jwith the City Managers to discuss the El Cerrito proposal in detail and hopefully to develop a concerted recommendation for your Committee. i Subsequent to the `larch 17, 1975 meeting, we met with the " City Managers of E1 Cerrito, San Pablo and Pinole, the Court Organization Committee of the E1 Cerrito City Council, comprised of Councilmen Richard Bartke and Kenn Berndt and finally with: the full E1 Cerrito City Council in a study session. On all three occasions we presented our position regarding the E1 Cerrito - proposal as follows: 1 1. Based on cur-rent projections there is not a workload imbalance between the two ,judicial districts even considering return of felony cases from Richmond to the West District. 2. The problems of the San Pablo facility are not caused so much by the amount of judicial work but rather by the mix of workload. Thus a shift .of a portion of the total workload to Richmond would not, in our opinion, alleviate 1 the problem (this statement is subject to the t verification of the West Judges). j 3. Judge Curtin presently resides in E1 Cerrito. i Therefore, under the E1 Cerrito proposal Judge Curtin would eventually be required to move into the West Judicial District. i - lot' t i 3. ! 4. If the problem could be solved simply by shifting some of the work from West to I Richmond, such a solution would only be a . temporary one and further shifts would be € required in the future to maintain the balance between the two courts. ' After thoroughly discussing EI Cerrito's proposal we discussed E1 Cerrito's objections to our consolidation proposal. El Cerrito ► primarily objects to the proposed move of the Superior Court from J Richmond to El Cerrito. Tae City Council believes that the ' Superior Court should remain in Richmond, that the El Cerrito 1 facility is not large enough for the Superior Court operation and that such a move might preclude the eventual acquisition of the El Cerrito facility by the City of E1 Cerrito. In response to the E1 Cerrito concerns regarding the Superior Court move, we suggested that the move should be considered a short term solution to the problem and that it would be our intention to i make provision for the Superior Court in the Richmond building within two or three years. However, the City Council indicated that it could not support consolidation unless the County was prepared to make provision for the consolidated court in the Richmond building. On May 9, 1975 we net rrith Judge Duggan and Judge Curtin of the West Judicial District to provide th6-n with a status report of the West County Courts Cou'dnittee review of the court situation. on the same date I also met with the City Councilmen, City Managers, and other representatives of the Cities of EI Cerrito, 1 Riclunond, San Pablo, and Pinole 'to review the status of the court reorganization study. Arnile it was still apparent that the ! committee was split over the two alternatives, i.e., my consoli- dation recommendation and the:EI Cerrito proposals,. there was ► some interest expressed in the possibility of consolidating the Marshal functions and the Clerk Administrator functions of the two districts into a combined Marshal and a combined Clerk +" Administrator. Regardless of what action One Board of Supervisors 1 may take in this matter, it is my recommendation that we investi- gate the possibilities of consolidating the Marshal and/or Clerk Administrator. In :;wm inary, the recoii:mcndation of your committee should solve both the problems of pa}►sical facilities as well as the management of the case load. No one alternative is completely satisfactory. however, all things considered, the recommendation contained in my report to you of January 20, 1975 provides solutions on a long term basis for most of the problems. it provides specifically a short term solution on the maLter. of facilities. . i t. 4! ti E 4. i i j All of the Cities which have participated in these discussions, as well as the Judges of the two court districts, should be commended for the time spent and particularly should be recognized I for their dedication to provision of a workable solution. Unfortunately, all of the alternatives to my recommendation advanced in these discussions are either very costly or are temporary solutions and would require that we address these same • problems at least on an annual basis. Consolidation with the establishment of election zones and the distribution of courts into the facilities as set forth in ray report of January 20, 1975 ' still appears to answer most of the questions raised in this , discussion. iRecommendation It is my recommendation that the West and Richmond Judicial Districts be consolidated either in the convential manner or with the establishment of election zones and that the consolidated court be housed by maintaining one department in the San Pablo facility and four departments in the Richmond Building by moving the Richmond Superior Court.to the El Cerrito court -facility. Of all of the aforementioned alternatives, this proposal is the most feasible in terms of cost and timeliness. Additionally, this plan provides the most worimble arrangement for a branch court operation. Inasmuch as many of the problems of` the ` San Pablo facility are aggravated by court activities involving large crowds, e.g., traffic filings; or criminal defendants, it is my suggestion that, with the exception of the civilandsmall claim filings of the consolidated court, all cases be filed and i heard in the Richmond facility. The combined civil and small claim filings of the two courts could then be filed and heard in t the one San Pablo department. TJMcG/aa i encl. 'p i F OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Supervisor J. P. Kenny Date: January 20, 1975 Supervisor A. M. Dias From: Arthur G. Will, Subject: West County" Courts County Administrator Presented below is a summarization of the various alter- natives for dealing with the facility problems of the west County courts. The alternatives were originally discussed in greater detail in my memoranda dated November 19 and November 25, 1974: I. Consolidation A. Construct New Facility $3,750,000 B. Expand Richmond Medical Building $7,750,000 C.. Use Exai sting Facilities 1. Refurbish San Pablo Facility $352000 to $75,000 2. Vacate San Pablo Facility a. Relocate Richmond Superior Court $60,000 plus $9,600 per year • b. Reopen Rodeo facility $5,000 plus $12,000 per year c. Provide two courtrooms in Richmond Building $250,000 plus $48,000 per year- 3. Move Superior Court to E1 Cerrito and refurbish part of San Pablo facility $20,000 to $40,000 II. No Consolidation A. Refurbish San Pablo Facility $35,000 to $75,000 B. Construct New San Pablo Facility . $1,000,000 or $150,000 per year Recommendation It is my recommendation that the West and Richmond Judicial Districts be consolidated either in the conventional manner or with the establishment of election zones and that- the consolidated court be housed by maintaining one department in the San Pablo facility and four departments in the Richmond Building by moving the Richmond Superior Court to the E1 Cerrito court facility. qQ - Z. Of all of the aforementioned alternatives,_ this proposal is the most feasible in terms of cost and timeliness. Additiona�ay, this plan provides the most workable arrangement for a branch court operation. Inasmuch as many of the problems of the San Pablo facility are aggravated -by court activities involving ' large crowds, e.g., traffic filings, or criminal -defendants,, it is my suggestion that, with the exception of the civil and small claim filings of the consolidated court, all cases be filed. and heard in the Richmond facility. The combined civil and small claim filings of the two courts could then be filed and heard in • the one San Pablo department, TJMcG/aa _ .fit _ _ .. .... ..... OF Fir_ OF COUNTY 0"11415TR,ATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California 7o: Supervisor James P. Kenny Date: November 25, 104 Supervisor Alfred M. Dias From: Arthur G. Will, Subject: West County Courts County Administrator Attached hereto is a report on the west county court situation which presents various alternatives for dealing with the facility problems. In addition to the alternatives presented in the attached report there is a sixth suggestion for providing court space if the Richmond and West courts are consolidated. _ The entire operation of the consolidated court could be shifted to the Richmond Building by moving some of the present non-court occupants to other quarters. The cost to remodel the building to provide two additional courtrooms and clerical space would be approximately $250,000. It is estimated that the net-cost to provide office space for the people displaced by the court would be around $2,000 per month. . The above costs related to housing the consolidated court in the Richmond Building could be reduced by approximately fifty per cent if the Richmond branch of the Superior Court could be moved to the El Cerrito court facility. TJ)icG/aa encl. r OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOP. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Arthur G. Will pate: November 19, 1974 From: Terrence J. McGraw Subject: West County Courts The consolidation of the Richmond and West Judicial Districts has been discussed and proposed over the years to equalize workload, reduce personnel costs, e.g., eliminate one Marshal, one Clerk-Administrator, and one or more Deputy 2iarshal position, prolong the need to add judges to either districts, improve utilization of manpower, eliminate confusing judicial district boundaries, and standardize operating procedures. Recently a new incentive for consolidation has been added, that of dealing with the facility problems of the West Municipal Court. If the two courts were consolidated they could be merged in total or the existing districts could be maintained within the consolidated district for purposes of qualification and election of judges and the selection of jurors. Tinder a limited consoli- dation arrangement such as in San Bernardino County, the presently existing judicial districts would become divisions within the consolidated district subsequent to the consolidation. The judges of the Richmond division of 'the consolidated court would continue to be elected by the voters of the Richmond Judicial District as it exists today, and similarly this situation would apply to the judges and voters of the existing West Judicial District. * Consolidation with the establishment of election zones is advantageous for the judges inasmuch as they are not' requi=ed to run for election in a larger "new"' area as in a conventional consolidation. However, if the benefits of consolidation are to be realized, particularly equalization of judicial u-&rkload, the judges must be Milling to view their responsibi?ities as transcend ing the boundaries of their original districts. Assuming a consolidation plan can be worked out to the satisfaction of all parties concerned, the County would be faced with the problem of housing the consolidated court. Presented below are some alternative proposals for dealing with the facility question: - - wnin r :__taur G. i•:iI %. - r:ovember la, 19�7_ I. Consolidation . A. Construct New Facility $327502000 Build a new facility in the west part of the County ' with six developed courtrooms with a potential to develop three or four more courtrooms if and when the need arises. The building should also provide space for District Attorney, Public Defender, and Probation personnel. It is estimated that the cost of such a complex would be approximately $3,500,000. In addition to the cost of purchasing land and constructing a new building there would also be a cost of approximately $250,000 to remodel the court space of the Richmond Building for general office purposes. B. Expand Richmond Health and Medical Center Building $7,7507000 Add six additional floors to the existing Richmond Health and Medical Center as originally planned and for which the building was constructed to accommodate. The six additional floors would provide 150,000 square feet of space which would accommodate court needs as well as provide administrative space for other county departments 'thereby eliminating the need- for a considerable amount of leased space in the Richmond area. Placement of West County Courts in the Ricin-mond County complex would eliminate the requirement to obtain space for the relocation of Probation, District Attorney, and Public Defender staff in the future and would centralize courts in a readily identifiable, easily accessible location in the West County. A rough estimate of the cost to provide the added space of 150,000 square feet is approximately $7.5 million. C. Use Existing Facilities $35,000-$757000 1. Continue the use of the San Pablo facility. The problems of the San Pablo facility appear to be related to either the inherent limitations of the building layout, i.e., the location of the two courtrooms, in relation to the holding cell, or certain maintenance problems which are the responsibility of the City of San Pablo. The problems of the layout of the building could be minimized by the selective assignment of workload to the Richmond court or the El Cerrito facility. For example, by continuing the assignment of the felony caseload to Richmond the ... r fJ ! Arthur G. November 14, 197- problems related to the holding cell and in-custody defendants can be reduced. By assigning the traffic cases to either Richmond or E1 Cerrito the problems related to the crowding of the corridors can be substantially reduced. The problems .9 associated with the amenities and maintenance of the San Pablo building should be studied to determine what is practical and necessary in improvements and/or alterations. Attached hereto is the list of complaints lodged by Judge Duggan with my comments in answer to each item, 2. Vacate the San Pablo City Hall (a) If it is determined that the San Pablo City Hall cannot be made into a suitable court facility the entire oDeration of the consolidated court could be shifted to El Cerrito and the Richmond Building by moving the Richmond Superior Court to Martinez or other quarters in the Richmond area. (b) If it is not possible to move the Superior Court out of the Richmond Building, the space needs of the consolidated court could be met by maintaining the three depart- ments in the Richmond Building, one department in the El Cerrito city building and reopening the Rodeo facility. However., if this alternate should be chosen it would most likely be necessary to obtain additional office space near one or more of the aforesaid court locations to accormodate the clerical staff of the consoli- dated court. In addition to a one time cost of about $5,000 to convert the facility for court use it is estimated that the space yea. -r. the clerical staff would be approximately $12,000 per ye . If the consolidation of the West and Richmond Judicial Districts cannot be effected it will be because of the request and action of the City of San Pablo. Therefore, the following alternatives for dealing with the excessive workload and the San Pablo facility problems of the West Court should assume that the City trill be willing to play a major role in financing the solution of the facility problem: II. No Consolidation A. Continue occupying the San Pablo City Hall and deal with the problems of the building as stated in I. C. 1 above. B. Build a new facility in San Pablo. A three court complex would cost about $1,000,000 or on a lease basis $140,000 to $150,000 per year. The costs would be approximately double if space is provided for District Attorney, Public Defender and Probation staff. T.IT;cG/aa encl. 0043 List of co:,nlaints with answers regarding the San Pablo City• Hall. _ g (a) Roof leaks: The roof was repaired in January, 1974. See the attached November 4, 1974 letter from the City of San Pablo. (b) Lights and heat go off repeatedly: Electrical failures have been caused by overloading of circuits by the use of non-authorized electrical appliances throughout the building and interruptions in the main lines. The heat- ing is adequate; however, there have been occasional breakdoums of the heating system beyond the control of the City. See letter from the City of San Pablo. (c) Rotten window frames: Some frames need replacement; however, according to the letter from the City of San Pablo the frames in Judge Dug gan's office and court are operational. (d) Urinals overflow: The San Pablo letter states that the urinals do not overflow but that in the past the valves have become clogged with silt from the water main which caused them to run constantly. The condition has been repaired. _ (e) Judges have to be escorted to the restroom: There are other non-public restrooms available for the use of the judges. See the November 4, 1974 letter from the City of San Pablo. (f) The main corridor becomes heavily congested at times: The assignment of selected types of cases, e.g., felonies and traffic, to the Richmond court should substantially alleviate this problem., (g) Children make 'obscene gestures through the windows at the judge on the bench: The windows could be covered vdth venetian blinds or the clear glass could be replaced with translucent glass. (h) The holding cell is extremely substandard: This problem could be alleviated by shifting cases involving in-custody defendants to the Richmond court. Another solution to the problem would be the use of the San Pablo City Jail .facilities as proposed in the letter from the City of San Pablo. (i) Jurors cannot hear because of noise level: Install loudspeaker equipment. 0044 " . J (j) Jurors cannot be kept separated from the general public.- The ublic.The City Hall facilities include a jury room. (k) Witnesses cannot be sequestered and mingle, naturally, with the jurors: This question needs clarification. (1) Attorneys have to interview clients throu h the window of the holding cell: See the answers to (f) and (h) above. (m) The courtrooms are unbearably hot in the summer: The San Pablo letter states that -there are very few hot days • in the San Pablo area. However, an air conditioning system for the courts could be installed at a cost of approximately $16,000. (n) The Marshal's office is several blocks away: The Marshal's office was moved at the request of the couit. The location of the Marshal's office is not critical to the security question inasmuch as" the deputy marshals are either at the court acting as bailiffs or are away from the office serving papers. According to the letter from the City- of San Pablo the court could rely on the San Pablo City Police Department in an emergency situation by installing a buzzer system between the courts and the Police Department. (o) The location of the building is in the high crime area in an out of the way, little known and difficult to locate portion of the judicial district: The only part of this statement that has any validity is the comm=nt regarding the high crime area which is probably an accurate statement with respect to the San Pablo area in general. Pq ,;d f 14EST COUNTY COURTS - FACT SHEET Judicial Workload: Old Standards Required - Present Weighted Filings Judicial Positions Number of Actual jec—tea Actual Projected Court Judges 1973-1974 1974-1975 1973-1974 1974-1975 Richmond 3 134,189 140,174 2.2442 2.3452 West 2 132,035 99,950 2.261 1.710 Combined 5 266,224 240,124 4.4401) 4.00(l) New Standards(3) Required Present Weighted MIRas Judicial Positions Number of Actual Frojected Actual Frojecteff– Court Judges 1973-1974 1374-1975 1973-1974 1974-1975 Richmond 3 156,044 1602398 2.6052 2.672 West 2 159,506 118,274 2.72` 2.02 Combined 5 315,550 278,672 5.25(l) 4.64(1) (1)Based on 60,000 units per judicial position. (2)Based on 58,500 units per judicial position. (3)Adopted by the Judicial Council in November, 1974. 2. 1 Population: Cities April. 1, 1970(4) January 1, 1974(5) ' Richmond 79,043 75,800 San Pablo 21,461 21,150 El Cerrito 25,190 24,050 Pinole 13,266 14,850 Hercules 252 120 Judicial Districts Richmond 81,895 79,000 West - Total 105,700 106,000 El Cerrito 31,513 30,100 San Pablo - Total 51,481 523,200 North Richmond 3,177 3,200 Carquinez 22,706 23,700 (4)Source: U. S. Bureau of Census, 1970. (5)Source: California State Department of Finance Contra Costa County Planning Department Court Facility Occupancy Data: Richmond Building - 1955 - 11,312 square feet plus Superior Court 1,833 square feet. San Pablo City Hall - December, 1954 -- Second courtroom added late 1972.- 5,000 square feet. E1 Cerrito Public Safety Building - June, 1961 1,840 square feet. Rodeo - April, 1968 - converted to office space early 1973 2,570 square feet. 0047 x; 3. r Civil and Small Claims: Old Standards s Judicial Judicial Actual Projected Positions Positions Court 1973-1974 1974-1975 1973-1974 1974-1975 Richmond 38,514 35,005 West 19,176 19,985 Combined 57,690 54,990 .98 .94 New Standards Judicial Judicial Actual Projected Positions Positions Court 1973-1974 1974-1975 1973-1974 1974-1975 Richmond 332651 30,337 West 16,744 17,410 Combined 50,395 47,787 .86 .81 Weighted Workload Breakdown of Components of West Court: Old Standards Judicial Judicial- Actual udicialActual Projected Positions Positions Court 1973-1974 1974-1975 1973-1974 1974-1975 West 132,035 99,950 2.26 1.71 San Pablo /1�g S3,-97.3 .97 E1 Cerrito 33,009 24,988 - .56 .43 Carquinez 27,727 20,989 48 .36 Total -13T-U- 15 99—.19-)u = New Standards Judicial Judicial Actual Projected Positions Positions Court 1973-1974 1974-1975 1973-1974 1974-1975 West 159,506 118,274 2.72 2.02 San Pablo bb,1.3.3 0- 1-.47 fly E1 Cerrito 39,877 29,569 .68 .51 Carquinez 33,496 24,837 .57 .42 Total yjub 116,2/4 L!� -Based on 1970-1971 workload as follows: San Pablo 547., El Cerrito 25%, and Carquinez 21%. 401481. . J :F. 6Pj ictijl ono r r cA.4jociation P.O. BOX 243,STATIO-N A x'' (Vz-- RICH.tOND,CALIFORNIA 94808 April 17, 1975 Chairman and Members of the Board of.Supervisors RL-CEIVED Contra Costa County Administration Building APR -V1375 Martinez, California 9-4553 Re: San Pablo Court Facility CORK CCAR3 CI luffitY13m om� ,� � Gentlemen: We would like to take this opportunity to advise you of the inadequate facilities for the San Pablo B,ra:+ch of the Nest Municipal Court District_ Each day that we as practitio=ars see litigants, witnesses, jurors, judges, lawyers and other citizens encounter the very difficult conditions under which justice is dispensed in the San Pablo Court, we hope for a rapid change. So many factors make the court facility inadequate, very dangerous and simply an inappropriate place for people to come in contact with our system of justice. We have previously resolved that consolidation of the district with Richmond, only a short distance away, would relieve the problems now existing. We would now like to present" Ito you some additional reasons why we believe that maintaining the court facility at San Pablo would be an in- appropriate solution to the problem. 1. An extensive investment into the City facility is necessary to eliminate the problems. 2. The investment would be ultimately an improvement which would benefit the City of San Pablo, if the court was consolidated_ 3. The investment wo=uld have to be used for a long period of time in order to give the county taxpayers their money's worth and at the same time be a :ac_o: Chat would tend to prevent consolidation. Whether the cour-ts are conso-dated or not, we should rapidly proceed to remedy the San Pablo Court. -facility before the reflections of it reach unbearable and even tragic proportions. f- i Respectfully submitted, ;Thomas M. Powers Vice President �� to":ab 00149 M.. . 1 OFFICE OF 1 � i THE CITY MANAGER ci ty �j �.L�?��o CALIFORNIA April 17, 1975 Contra Cosies County RECEIVED'i °' APR Mr. A. Will, County Administrator Office of Contra Costa County County Administrator Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Dear Art: The City Council at a recent meeting carefully considered the proposal of the City of El Cerrito on court consolidation. The Council determined that there are financial benefits in supporting your recom- mendation and, therefore, reiterated its support of your original recommendation contained in your memo- randum of January 20, 1975• Very truly yours, J David W. Higgins Assistant City Manager DWH:mc cc: Supervisor A. M• Dias Supervisor K• P. Kenny G. A_ MacLaren, Mayor, El Cerrito W_ H. Mitchell, Mayor, San Pablo 9 N Qw 50 vv.L16 TOWN i 1 J?icklpenoad cit 0 CALIFORNIA r April 17, 1975 The Eonorable G_ S. IsacLaren, mayor City of 31 Cerrito city Hall S1 Cerrito, California 94530 Dear Mayor Rac-Laren: . The City Council at its meeting of March 31, considered carefully the City of Sl Cerrito's recosmenda- tide on the court consolidation questioa currently being considered by Supervisors Keer.ny and Was. while recog- nizing considerable merit in the suggestions voiced by your Co=cil, our Council felt that there are still sub- stantial questions inherent in your suggestions which cannot be answered at this time and, therefore, reiterated its original recd=andatioa to' su?,ort the recommendatioa of the County Administrator. in addition to the substantive legal groble=3, it was felt that the long-range interests of the community would better be served by Mr.' *.gill's recommendation and that there was significant financial savings to be ac- crued in his recommendation. Very truly yours, David W. Higgins Assistant City Nianager -M CH me cc: Supervisor A. ,Dins Super i.sor J. Renny I--@ayor R. A. S ha.dley, Pinole County Ad=inistrator 00151 e -:t . a•��' CITY OF SAN PABLO 22021 MART {ET ,AVE. ` SAN PA B L O Contra Costa County r CALIFORNIA 948005 RECEIVED i OFFICE OF City Man ager � �i/�R �'� l�?� March 27, 2975 Office of County Administrator Supervisor Alfred Vt. Dias 4 300 Garden Road El Sobrante, California 94803 Dear Al: " At the regular adjourned meeting of March 24, 1975 the City. Council voted unanimously to support the proposal of `the City. o.f El Cerrito regarding the reorganization of municipal courts In West Contra Costa County. Sincerely., Louis Shepard City Manager LS:mry cc: County Administrator City Manager - El Cerrito - Pinole - Richmond_ t 2:6= ~� 1:;Z30 «.'f aP;SLO �?f_"�t c, LI C T"�2IT0, G4 S4530 (415) 3;-?3?3 , February201 4 , 97S Contrci Coster Cou xy CITY COUNCI1 tMIM A. cax F,Eg:21 i975 . r:TDR Mt E.ft4zV % Office of "�! `' TO: Court Consolidation dati on Comm ttee - 'CO .. tttTriisfrtrfar: Esa$v~Lidx�x: ,= FROM: Gregory A. Cook, Mayor, City of E1 Cerrito _ CITY Mk AGER SUBJECT: El Cerrito City Council Policy Statement on 14est Contra Costa Lower Courts » Attached is the above-referenced policy statement adopted by the E1 Cerrito City Council at its meeting on_February 18, 1975. flay• I suggest that you peruse the statement prior to the next committee meeting. ,J Ll'Ilbc n r February 20, i973 t EL CERRI TO CITY COUNCIL POLICY STATEMEUT ON TEST CO TPA COSTA LOWER COURTS It has long been the desire of the citizens of El Cerrito to maintain a lower court within the E1 Cerrito City limits, for the ease and convenience of E1 Cerrito citizens who might be witnesses, jurors, or litigants, as well as for the economies involved in servicing the court system by the E1 Cerrito Police Department. The public officials on Contra Costa County have made firm commitments to guarantee the continuance of a local lower court within El Cerrito. . It is now apparent to all that the recent creation of the West Judicial District . (Kensington, El Cerrito, San Pablo, Pinole, El Sobrante, etc.) is not success- ful . Administration of justice is severely hampered for at least the following reasons: - Unequal judicial caseloads in Western Contra Costa County has required the shifting of many cases, including all felonies, to the Richmond Municipal Court - - Facilities at the San Pablo location are.=inadequate. The present_buiIding is an old school which has been converted into a City Hall and then into a court. It is impossible to continue the use of the present facility as a general-purpose court. In view of the above, E1 Cerrito officials may find it necessary to retreat from their former position of insisting �on a court located in E1 Cerrito, in favor of- a larger goal' - the efficient administration of justice for the citizens of E1 Cerrito and for all of Western Contra Costa. To date, the following jurisdictions have made known their desires before the study groups: Kensington - insists on continuing to use the E1 Cerrito jail. Richmond - accepts the County Administrator's recommendation. San Pablo - will not agree to total consolidation and favors a court within or near their City. Pinole - does-not favor total consolidation and prefers a court closer to their City, (perhaps the Rodeo Court which was recently abandoned.) In response to the above, El Cerrito has made tentative inquiries into a plan that could satisfy all os the above airs, plus the additional goal of lowest possible expenditure of County funds. THE EL CERRITO PROPOSAL I. That the jurisdictional boundaries of the Richmond Municipal Court and the West Municipal Court be redrawn to approximate the present supervisorial district boundaries. (i.e., E1 Cerrito, Kensington and Richmond in the Richmond Court, and San Pablo and north iff the Kest Court. "Swing"areas .. such as East Rich=mond Heights, and North Richmond are available to even up the caseloads between the proposed districts.) 00154 .. FIRM EL CEP?i •;�.• CITF 1C' S76ATE'r=t;T QIN WEST COUTP.A COSTA MWEP. COURTS i Pane two February 20, 1975 ADVANTAGES: 1. Can be undertaken rapidly by the Board of Supervisors without State legislative appro,,al . 2. Kensington can continue to use El Cerrito's jail. 3. There would be no costs in the Richmond District. 4. A savings would be available if the E1 Cerrito courtroom is phased out. The El Cerrito Police and Fire Departments, who now share the Court building, may be interested in negotiating with the County to acquire that space. 5. There would be no change in Richmond Judges. 6. The Richmond Marshal is already serving El Cerrit6 and Kensington. 7. E1 Cerrito and Kensington felonies are now handled in Richmond. - 8. El Cerrito's and Kensington's courts would be geographically closer and more accessible to the people to be served. 9. It would satisfy the aversion to a general consolidation voiced by San ' Pablo and Pinole. 10. The cost of facilities in the West District are the lowest of those pro- posed, i .e. , $30,000 to 570,000 for remodeling. 11. There would be no built-in reason why the West Court could not operate. a branch in Rodeo to aid Pinole, if population continues to grow in that area. 12; The Superior Court would stay in its central location in Richmond.' DISADVANTAGES: 1 . Judoe Curtin, who moved from the Lafayette area to San Pablo to become blest Court Judge, has recently moved to El Cerrito, so he would be out of his District in the above plan. Could he be appointed a Richmond Judge on permanent loan to West District? (Then, in case of a vacancy in P.ichmond, he could fill the vacancy.) 2. There is some question whether even $70,000 would be sufficient to convert the San Pablo building into a proper Court facility. However, the City of San Pablo will be moving its City offices out of the building within the next two years which will allow more space that could be converted to court use. Or, perhaps San Pablo could provide facilities for court use in their now City Hall complex now in the drawing boards. '00155 ,. ,.-^„r.-..,,. ., ..T.,..-. .. rig •__ „i i:•it M EL CCRrITO CITY COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT ON WEST CONTRA COSTA LOWER COURTS Page three February 20, 1975 II. If a general consolidation of all Fest County courts is to be. considered' now:,or in the foreseeable future; the earliest and. least-eXpensive seems to be to move all other tenents out of the County building, and turn 'it: �nto' a full _legal center.. Two courtrooms. could be added.downstairs and office space provided for<_the.Public .Defender and Probation officers whose, offices.` are now scattered in other` Wild ngs,.many�,uf which are rented. ADOPTED unanimously by the El Cerrito_City Council on Tuesday,-February 18, 1975. f: 00', {5�� . s Y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Open Space Easement Program. A memorandum report having been received from Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, in response to a March 18, 1975 Board referral of a request for an open space easement on property owned by the, Diablo Bowmen on the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo; and Mr. Dehaesus having stated that it would appear that the Bowmen property is an example of what the Legislature had in mind when the Open Space Easement program was adopted and that in his opinion it would be desirable that the Board further sanction the Open Space Easement program beyond the recognition already given through its adoption on August 18, 1973 of the County Open Space-Conservation Plan, and having suggested certain additional policy and administrative considerations ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is referred to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and: J. E. Moriarty) and the County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: M r. W. G. Broderick Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Board Committee Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 27th day of May , 19 75 County Counsel — County Administrator / J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By CIx ,. a:„ Deputy Clerk. H sa 12/74 - 1541 Robbie Gil ierrez . 00157, 1'y RECET_VED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT J. rL olL=N LcIC eo:,ao o. suiERVISon 1M a CO- 7d&BD.Puly TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: May 19, 1975 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus SUBJECT: Open Space Director of Plannin Easement Program On March 10, 1975, the Bold of Supervisors referred to me and County Counsel a letter from Mr. William G. Broderick, attorney for the Diablo Bowmen, requesting an open space easement. The origins of the request of Diablo Bowmen appear to stem from Contra Costa County's Open Space-Conservation Plan, adopted by the Board of'Supervisors on August 18, 1973. The state law which directed the preparation of this plan also required the inclusion of an Action Program, a portion of which recommended the use of open space easements (previously "Scenic Easements") as one means of im- plementing this plan. INTENT OF THE PROGRAM The Legislature, in establishing the Open Space Easement program, felt that rapid growth and spread of urban development was encroaching upon or eliminating open space lands which are important to the State. The Open Space Easement'program is one of the growing number of tools available to local government to provide some measure of tax relief to property owners whose interest coincides with that of the public in that they wish to keep their lands in open space use of one form or another. The scenic easement program had been law for numerous years but was utilized sparingly by local government. In the 1973-74 Regular Session, the Legislature changed the program considerably and renamed scenic easements to open space easements. The Legislature made the program similar to that of the William- son Act: Like the Williamson Act program, open space easements are established (at a mini- mum) for annually renewing 10-year periods. Both are tax shift programs, in that they reduce the assessed valuation (and thus the property taxes) on any given land . in exchange for a promise not to develop that land. SMkJARY COMPARISON Williamson Act Open Space Easement Use Commercial Agriculture Same Minimum Preserve 100 Contiguous Acres* To Be Determined Minimum Parcel Size 20 Acres To Be Determined Term of Contract 10 Yrs., Renewable Annually Same Withdrawal Deferred Taxes Due Same Appropriate Zoning A-4 Nof Ye, Determined *35 Acres in East Contra Costa and Byron-Bethany Irrigation Districts 0€ 158 kv- Board of Supervisors -2- flay 19, 1975 D I AB LO BO 14iEN-S REQUEST It would appear that the Diablo Bowmen property is the type of situation that the Legislature had in mind when it adopted the Open Space Easement program. The land lies within the boundaries of what the State Department of Parks and Recreation hopes will be the ultimate boundaries of Mt. Diablo State Park. The high property taxes on the land may force Diablo Bowmen to subdivide and sell off the land. They do not want to be forced to sell; they wish to hold and uti- lize the land for recreation until such time as the State wishes to purchase the land. This is an example of where an infinitesimal reduction in the county-wide assessed valuation could hold the land until the State has the resources to acquire the land. Mr. Broderick's letter states that his client would like the County to proceed im- mediately with an open space easement on his parcel. While this could be done, any tax benefit that would accrue from this action would not take effect until the 1976- 1977 tax year in any case. I would prefer to obtain direction from the Board of Supervisors regarding its intent to implement open space easements; this application could then be treated as part of that program and handled in a timely manner to insure inclusion in the 1976-1977 fiscal year. RECOMENDATION It would be desirable for the Board of Supervisors to further sanction the Open Space Easement program beyond the recognition already given through the adoption of the Open Space-Conservation Plan. I feel that this program has merit and should be utilized by the County; it would provide a meaningful supplement to other Board programs to preserve open space. I wish to suggest certain additional policy and administrative considerations: 1. The program should parallel the way we currently handle Williamson Act (Agdcultural Preserves) applications, including possible use of a re- view committee to facilitate administration and provide adequate controls on the use of the land; that is, easement acceptance should be coupled with rezoning requests. 2. k'hen a parcel is eligible for either agricultural preserve status or open space easement status, Board policy should be to place the land in agri- cultural preserve status. The state currently partially reimburses Contra Costa County for lost taxes through the Open Space Subvention Act, while Open Space Easements currently receive no subvention. 3. Because of the differences in state subventions, a broad interpretation of the Williamson Act should be utilized by the County (this may require some modification to the existing agricultural preserve policies and program). This would maximize the subventions received by the state. i 0 oo G:u1Jal_` Board of Supervisors -3- May 19, 1975 i 4. The Planning Department, in conjunction with the County Counsel's Office and other affected departments, should be directed to prepare the necessary ordinance, policies and procedures to bring the County into the program in a- timely fashion to meet the deadlines for fiscal 1976-1977. This should,be done soon, to give the County Planning Commission and the Board°adequate', time to review the proposed procedures and standards. This memorandum has been reviewed with County Counsel and has his general con- currence as to any statements of law contained herein. AAD:EMA cc - Mr. W. G. Broderick County Counsel County Administrator Mr. Arthur L. Seeley UQV �= . .... -------------- i f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Proposed Sand Dunes Waterfront Park, Antioch Area. ?�.. Thonas A. Torlakson, Chairman, Mt. Diablo Regional Group Sierra Club, having appeared to discuss the sand quarrying operation in the area of the Antioch sand dunes which is proposed to be developed as a recreational area; and Mr. Torlakson having expressed concern that the aforesaid operation would have a detrimental impact on the ecology of the area and having requested that an investigation be made as to whether the quarrying is being done with appropriate land use permits; and Other interested persons having commented on various aspects of the quarry operation and the proposed park development; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having noted that he had a copy of a letter from Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, to Mr. Gerald A. Sperry, Antioch City Attorney, advising that the fact that sand has been removed from the property prior to the existence of a controlling ordinance would establish legal nonconforming use; and Supervisor Linscheid having recommended that the matter be referred to County Counsel and the Director of Planning for con— sultation with interested parties and for a final determination as to whether the quarrying is being done in violation of the County Ordinance Code; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Linscheid is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Mr. T. A. Torlakson Super Mr. G. A. Sperry affixed this 27th day of May 197 County Counsel Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15•b1 .ary Penn gton .00�s i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 14 75 In the Matter of Meeting of Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council. A letter having been received from Ms. Helen Mackintosh, Pittsburg, complaining about the April 30, 1975 meeting held by the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council for the purpose of considering a report of the Proposal Sub-Committee concerning expenditure of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act funds for the 1975-1976 fiscal year, in that copies of said report were not available to interested citizens nor were they allowed to speak on the proposals; and The Board having also received a letter from Mr. Daniel A. Ebert, Rodeo, complaining that copies of the proposals for the aforesaid funding were not available to non-voting members of the Council nor to interested parties attending the meeting of the Man- power Planning Council held in Pleasant Hill on May 15, 1975 and commenting on the quality and competence of the chairmanship and membership of the Council; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that this matter is REFERRED to, the Director, Human Resources Agency, and the Chairman of the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Ms. H. Mackintosh Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Box 230 Supervisors Pittsburg, CA 94565 this d of 1�(a 19 Mr. D. A. Ebert 27th ay y Zi. 912 Mahoney Street J. R. OLSSON, Cla* Rodeo CA 9457 .�r � 2 By . /li�G . `f � Deputy. Clerk H za &.rep�pr, Human I~eaxine M. -Neuf eld Resources Agency Chairman, Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council County Administrator oin i k { f � RE El May l,3, x975. 111A /% 1975 �' it OLSS( +, Contra Costa County Bid of Supervisors ATTN: Warren Boggess, Chairman- 65Z Pine Street Martinez, Calif. 94553 Dear W. Boggess: X hope that this is not the first letter you have received about the ill conceived meeting of the Manpower Advisory Council, on April 30th! But in case it is the first, let me briefly telt you what happen to arouse my in- dignation. The main agenda item was the consideration of a report of the ProposaZ Sub- Committee concerning the expenditure of CETA funds for the next fiscal year. The report was in wriitirg, and it was available gnb L to those who had sub- mitted proposals -- and to the Council, of course. Why didn't someone think about the interested citizens who help to pay the bills, therefore, has some rights? This is not my only complaint. The spokesman for the Su"v-Conmrittee read the recommendations and the Council accepted the recommendations as they were presented; no one who had a propo- saZ before the Council, and no one who was an interested citizen, could speak on the question. What kind of business is this? Has everyone on the Council and its sub-committees so soon forgotten how agitated the public was over irresponsible political behavior as edified in Watergate? I trust you can do something to prevent a re-oecurence of such fZagr=t disrespect for the democratic process. Conflict of interest is an additioi=Z concern I have, and it cones from the activities of yet' another Suis--Committee, "The Evaluation Sub-Committee." I am told that a currently funded program: Operator Who had submitted a proposal and was recoraaended for re-funding by the Proposal Sub-C=-M*ttee, actually assisted in the evaluation of on-going progrars of other sub--contractors. How can anyone defend this practice? I trust that you 5G; do something to prevent this, too, from ever happening again. . 00163 I r' Page 2 I did not hear the name of a member of the Board of Supervisors mentioned:-as a member of the Manpower Advisory Council. Dont you think it is about time. the public had a representative of its interests? , Sincerely, Ms. Helm Mackintosh cc: Contra Costa Times Martzj Nichols Arthur Wills Robert dornlin Etlm ind A. binscheid Wally Bram Tony Donato -- - �� 912 Mahoney Street _ Rodeo, Califo � ,EIVED_ 16 May 1975 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors MAY iy 1975 Admini s t ration Building Martinez, California 95814 c J. L Wrvv A Sirs: I am a recently discharged Military Intelligence Officer who has worked as a CETA PSE to aid in reorienting myself to the civilian environment. I feel well served by this program and shall terminate 30 May 1975 rather than complete the nine month program due to the highly effective and helpful per- sonnel with whom I have been associated. Yesterday, I was offered the opportunity to attend the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council's meeting in Pleasant Hill. The purpose of the meeting was to listen to the protestations of those agencies which had submitted proposals for which Council recommendations had been made to not fund. Before proceeding, I shall re-emphasize that I went to this meeting on my own, to observe the process by which my County's funding of CETA sub-grants is approved. In no way am I corresponding by the suggestion of another, to include staff of the organization with which I am associated. Your attention is invited to review the tapes of the meeting to confirm that which is herein related. First, no personal copies of the proposals were made available to the non- voting members of the Council. For them, Ms. Van Huffel stated, only her office copy was available. It appeared she had convenient access to the actual proposals, and I ask if she is a voting member? If not, shewas privi to infor- mation not so readily available to other non-voting members. If she is a voting member, is this not irregular considering her position as a member of the Manpower staff? 1 firmly believe that personal copies of all proposals should have been distributed to every Council Member, voting or non-voting, well in advance of the meeting to maximize the opportunity of each member to study them sufficiently to ask appropriate questions of the proposing entities. It would seem to me to be more effective to distribute copies of all pro- posals after the submission deadline to all interested parties. In this case, a bidder could more effectively argue the merits of his proposal over those of similar, competing proposals when making his oral presentation. It might also cause the inferior bidder to withdraw his proposal and thereby eliminate the time consumed by the Council listening to the presentation of that proposal. Second, and of more immediate importance, is the quality of chairmanship 7 17S. 161 �=. WLADZE�X" 1 00 s v and membership. For five years I have served on councils and boards in various capacities, but never have I seen a chairperson inferior to Mr. Harr or a more inconsiderate and discourteous member than Ms. Van Huffel. With the initial speaker, these tura persons displayed behavior which would cause Mr. Roberts to roll over in his grave. Throughout the twenty minutes of presentation offered by Ms. Braud,of EDD, these two persons carried on approximately nine minutes of private , conversation, totally ignoring many significant arguments offered. .. displaying a complete lack of concern for the right of the speaker to their undivided attention in a meeting specifically designed for that and other speakers' pre- sentations. Such behavior on any of the many councils and boards on which I have served would have precipitated written reprimand and immediate removal. I find it difficult to accept such behavior from supposed public servants. Had Ms. Brown of the Neighborhood House not risen to chastise them, I do not doubt that such behavior would have prevailed. Surely the chairperson should not need to be reprimanded for his behavior by a member of the Council which he is sup.- posed to chair ! For the remainder of the meeting, every speaker was condemned to the brooding, dispassionate stare of Ms. Van Huffei. The chairperson, Mr. Harr, displayed a knack for total contradiction by stating that five minutes would be allowed for each presentation and an addition- al ten minutes would be allowed for questioning by the Council; then he allowed excessive time in all instances for presentations. The quality of concern offered by Council members was evidenced by the limited number of persons who asked questions and the small number of questions asked. The competence of this Council, as exemplified above, overwhelms me... as do dead skunks t 1 ! G �L /DANIEL A. EBERT OVJLV d r it In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 --* 19 5 In the Matter of Fee Schedule for Issuance of Food Stamp Coupons. The Board having received a May 14, 1975 letter from Mr. Robert K. March, Branch Manager and Supervisor of Food Program, Cooperative Center Federal Credit Union, Berkeley, requesting that the tee schedule under provisions of a contract between the County and the Credit Union for issuance of Food Stamp Coupons be increased from 5.85 to $1.00 per transaction; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said request is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency, and the County Auditor—Controller. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Mr. R. K. March Witness my hand and the Sea! of the Board of Director, Human Supervisors Resources Agency affixed this 27th day ofd 19 ya County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator � � By l plc!�' , Deputy Clerk H 24 12173 - 1s-M Helen C. Marshall 001, 87- -- r f . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 . 197-1- In 197In the Matter of Communication from the United States Department of Labor with respect to Contra Costa County CETA Program for Fiscal Year 1974-1975. A communication dated May 20, 1975 having been received from Mr. William J. Haltigen, Assistant Regional Director, for. Manpower, United States Department of Labor, Manpower Administration, Region IX, su®mariziag the annual assessment of this county's efforts in implementing the Comprehensive Employment and Tralming Act program for fiscal. year 1974-19'T5, and advising that on the basisof evalu- ation. full consideration will be given to continued funding; and- IT ndIT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid communication is REFERRED to the Director, human Resources Agency. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the, minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Resources Agency Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 27th d of May 19 75 Acting Director of �' — Personnel � � J. R. OlSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M L. runcald out : i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 . 197 In the Matter of Letter from U. S. Department of Labor with respect to CETA Title I Grant Application. A letter dated May 16, 1975 having been received from Mr. Jesus Ramos, Deputy Associate Regional Manpower Administrator,' U. S. Department of Labor, Manpower Administration, Region IX, advising that this county has missed a due date relative to a complete grant application for Comprehensive Epployment. and Training Act, Title 2, for fiscal year 1976, but that every effort will be made to fund the grant in a timely manner; and IT IS BY THS BOARD ORMW that aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency. Passed by the Board on May 270, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board:of cc: Director, Human Supers Resources Agency affixed this 27th day of May , 19.75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 - 15-M L. Kincaid 00169- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 . 5 In the Matter of Property Exempt from Taxation. The Board having received a May 13, 1975 letter from Senator George N. Zenovich, Fourteenth District, advising that he is in the process of preparing legislation to assist property taxpayers and requesting information with respect to property within Contra Costa County that is exempt from taxation, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDS that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the County Administrator. PASSED on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Senator G. N. Zenovieh Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors County Assessor affixed this 27th day of May , 19 Director of Planninga��a J. R. OLSSON, Clerk L � 4cr/l l�r./��. Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Helen C. Marshall In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Condition of Redrock Marina, Richmond Area. The Board having received a May 12, 1975 letter from Mr. G. Williams complaining of littering and pollution at Redrock Marina, Richmond area and requesting that attention be given to correcting the problem; and IT-:IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Director of Planning for report. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. r." I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid c c• Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of.the Board;of Public Works Supervisors Environmental Control affixed this 27th day of Mav 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting County Health ByC il Deputy Clerk. H sa 12174 #sU ce r ' Rob ie Gu errez 001-71, w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Gold Discovery Days, Coloma, California. The Board having received a May 10, 1975 letter from Mr. Andrew M. McKeown, President, Coloma-Lotus Boosters Club;, Coloma, California inviting the county's participation in the, Grand Parade as part of its Gold Discovery Days Celebration to be held January 23, 1976 through January 25, 1976; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid invitation is REFERRED to the Contra Costa County Development Association. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered.on:the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Contra Costa County Supervisors Development Association affixed this 27th day of May 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 . 15-M Robbie GtgierreiO 00132, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 1975 In the Matter of Guidelines for Local Parking Management Plans. A letter having been received from Mr. Richard La Pointe, Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and Chairman, Parking Management Steering Committee, inviting participation in the development of guidelines for local parking management plans, which the Environmental Protection Agency has indicated may-be substituted for its parking facility regulations; and Mr. La Pointe having advised that Alan M. Voorhees and Associates has been contracted as the consultant to develop the guidelines and having enclosed copies of the consultant's scope of work and a brief description of what the study will entail, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is referred to the Public Works Director for report. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sea! of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors Planning Director this 27th d of Mav 19 75 Acting County Health Offic ay County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY, AxA'06"') , Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M D. Harkness Y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California ?-lay 27 , 1975 In the Matter of Complaint Regarding Manner in which Recent Auction was Conducted. The Board having received a letter from Mr. Thomas Bidowski, 54 Morello Road, Martinez, California 94553 complain— ing about the manner in which a recent auction for the sale of County equipment was conducted; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid complaint is REFERRED to the Public Works Director for report. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• `v J� I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on-the., minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c c: Mr. Thomas Bidowski Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 27th day of MaY 19-'75 County Counsel County AdministratorL ,, J. R. usso , Clerk By�/•C�F�t�/ t LLQ tel,"_ Deputy Clerk H si 12174 - ,s-a Mildred 0. Ballard 4L11��� a_ A In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 1975 In the Matter of Recuest of Mr. Marren L. Smith irith Respect to Bailey Road Drainage Facility. fir. {iarren L. Smith, 1100 Bailey Road, Pittsburg, California 91565 having appeared this day to request the Board to require,, the Flood Control Division of the Public dorks Department to replace an existing 36—inch diameter storm drain with a 6—foot diameter drain under Bailey Road near his property; and The Board having considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Public Idorks Director for report on June 10, 1975- PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the: minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness c c: ;sir. LtiTarren L. Smith my hand and the Seat of the Board of Public 11orks Director Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 27th day of May . 1975 County Administrator J. R. OLSSONI, Clerk i By �� Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M 'ne M. Neufeld 00 .75: In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 Z. In the Matter of Request for Drainage Study, Alamo Area. The Board having received a letter dated April 17, 1975 from Mr. Jerry Belcher and others, residents of the Alamo area, requesting that the Public Works Department be instructed to undertake a drainage study and prepare a plan for the solution of storm drainage problems in the vicinity of Easy Street,, Miranda Avenue, Acacia Lane, Erselia Trail, and Livorna Road. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said request be REFERRED to the Public Works Director for report. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote oforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: Mr. Jerry Belcher Supers 136 Erselia Trail Alamo, California 94507 affixed this 27th day of May . 1975 Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Flood Control By. Deputy Clerk za �v7ar�'iSs+T. Burlingame County Administrator N. sham » F p /�..„J K".?`.,4.. t/_.... i'.'Lfi4.Y s.......w, RYA^-4• -X......� 001'76 FRE-cEIVED Apri117, 1975AYE ?-J 1975 136 Ersel i a Tra i l J. Z cts:or, Alamo, Ca (94507) mc 30AO OF SUPERVISORS yS ��ptdiRq + CO. Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County ' Administration Building Martinez, California Gentlemen: We .the undersigned desire that you instruct the Department of Public Works to"undertake a drainage study and prepare a plan for the solution of storm drainage problems for the area indicated on the attached map. Questions or information concerning this matter may be directed to Mr. Jerry Belcher at the above address. Your consideration of this request is appreciated greatly. cc: Victor W. Sauer T. E. Burlingame Attachments Name Address Date all 7 �. � ✓ � y�7�ir PL, xi b3 4.e r C/ AV i (2.C. �f Requesting studies and preparation of a pian to alleviate drainage problems in t.�e Alamo area (Easy Street, Miranda Avenue, Acacia Lane, Erselia Trail , Livorna Road): Name Address Date "Y-2 31- S A 6ca"I I /`7 234 4c.9cP4 1 dE . 00178 „ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Correction of Erroneous ) Tax Cancellation per Rev. ) BOARD ORDER F, Tax Code gJ 4832 and ) 4836.5 ) AUDITOR'S MUM.-* , Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code §§4832 and 4836.5, I recommend correction of the following erroneous tax cancellation. N. DONALD FUNK, Auditor I consent JO USEN, Aunty Counsel By ,e Deputy By Deputy BOARD'S ORDER: Pursuant to the above authority and recommendation, the County Auditor is ordered to correct the roll as follows: For the Fiscal Year 1974-7S, in Tax Rate Area 79038, Parcel No. 133-092-007, assessed to Juanita Chandler, was erroneously cancelled. Under instructionsof the Tax Collector $613.38 Tax was cancelled instead of $11.42. Tax in the amount of S601.96 should be reinstated on the 1974-75 tax roll. Assessee has been notified of this correction. CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a full, true”is correct copy of the orlonai document which is on file in my office, and that it teas lmvwd & adont�d by the Board of Superriaors of Ccun.a Ccwta County, California;,op the date shown. ATTEST: J. P.. OIkSSON, County Clerk& ex-of(Wo Clerk of said`Bcard of Supervisors' by ty Clerk. MAY 2-7, 1975 s PASSED ON AY 2 7 1975 by unanimous vote of the Supervisors present (BOARD ORDER CORRECTING ERRONEOUS TAX CAA'CELLATION) Auditor County Counsel .Tax Collector r 00-1.7 X In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27' , 19_Y5 In the Matter of Formation of Policy Task Force for Air Quality T-1aintenance Plan. The Board having received a letter from Mr. William Simmons, Executive Officer, State Air Resources Board, inviting county participation in an initial meeting on June 5, 1975 (hosted by Association of Bay Area Governments, Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Bay Area Air Pollution Control District) to form a joint State/Local task force to develop the first phase of an air quality maintenance plan for the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin; IT IS BY TIM BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said invitation is ACKNOWLEDGED and the County Administrator is REQUESTED to advise ABAG that county representatives will attend the meeting. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• F 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. William Simmons Supervisors Public Works affixed this 27th day of___MM 19 Y5 Environmental Control ay J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of Planning Acting County Health Offic�q Deputy Clerk H 24 1v&o u*W Administrator M y Pennin on 00180 -------- . . F 00180 WNWa , • . - �r51 SLATE OF r'.AUFORNL4—iRESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor AIR RESOURCES BOARD 1709—11th STREET SACRAMENTO 91814 RECEIVED May 16, 1975 91975 LSSOH Warren N. Bogges, Chairman SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County Board ev of Supervisors Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Supervisor Bogges: Subject: Formation of San Francisco Bay Area State/Local Policy Task Force for Air Quality Maintenance Planning The Air Resources Board intends to form a joint State/Local task force to develop the first phase of an air quality maintenance plan (AQMP) for the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin. Federal Regulations (CFR Section 51_12, 51.18) require that an air quality maintenance plan be developed in areas where attainment or main- tenance of the standards by 1977 is not predicted and/or where growth and development in the 10 year period 1975-1985 may interfere with either attainment or maintenance of the standards once achieved. ' In the Spring of 1974, the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin was identified as an air quality maintenance area by the California Air Resources Board. The development of air programs has impacted on local government very often in a disorderly manner. Local government needs to be involved in the conceptualization of air quality maintenance plans. Such plans will affect the lives of all the people and governmental organizations in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin. We believe citizen groups and local jurisdictions should participate in approving methodologies, techniques, and strategies on a comprehensive basis in order to assure the people in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin that health degrading air quality will be eliminated in the long term and that growth and development can proceed as expedi- tiously as possible to meet the economic and social needs of society. 00181 -2- We invite you as a representative of Contra Costa County to parti- cipate in an initial meeting to determine the people and resources, available to carry out Phase I of this process by December 1975. Association of Bay Area Governments, Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Bay Area Air Pollution Control District have agreed to host this initial meeting on June 5, 9:00 a.m. at the Claremont Hotel. Please respond to ABAG on the attached form if you or a representative plan to attend. We anticipate that the San Francisco Bay Area AQMP Policy Task Force will be formed at this meeting and initial participants in the process will be identified. ARB staff will provide liaison with the task force as well as work with designated local staff from participating agencies in carrying, out program work elements. Phase I will identify the resources and agencies as well as programs. that can be utilized to implement the process. If you need more information, contact ARB staff at (916) 322-6076. Sincerely, i William Simmon Executive Officer Attachments t Oux.82 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 In the Matter of Report of the Planning Commission on the Request of Raymond Vail & Associates, 1838-RZ, to Rezone Land in the Antioch Area. Mr. William Alexander, Owner. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the above request; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, June 24 , 1975 at 10:45 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez.- California, artinez.California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the "Antioch Ledger." PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the fonnpft is a true and correct copy of an order entered;on,the, minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid VAtness my hand and thr Seal of the Board of cc: Raymond Vail & Associates Super c/o Mr. Dan Bevis affixed this 27th of May i9 75 101 Railroad Avenue dcY Antioch, California 94509 - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Mr. William Alexander By Deputy Clerk H sa ,2,74c/9,Zed Carpet Realty Miry Penningt 100 East 18th Street Antioch, California 94509 Director of Planning 0fttjc ll In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 14 U In the Matter of Report of the Planning Commission on the Request of Falter J. and Dorothy M. Hardcastle, Applicants and Owners (1892-R2) to Rezone Land in the Pacheco Area. The Director of Planning having notified this Board .that. the Planning Cormission recommends approval of the above. request; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, June 24, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 107; Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the "Morning News-Gazette.' PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered onthe minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. & Mrs. W. J. Hardeast1tSupervisars 4949 Pacheco Boulevard Martinez, California 9455 '" this day, ofMMay 1975- Pacheco Town Council J. R. OLSSON, Clerk 110 Center Street H '24 ,2174ftysh+eco, California 94553 -' Deputy Clerk- Director of Planning R Penning on In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 __119 75 In the Matter of Report of the Planning Commission on the Request of Joyce Turner, Applicant and Owner (1900-RZ) to Rezone Land in the Martinez Area. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the above request; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, June 24, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the "Morning News-Gazette." PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc• Ms. Joyce Turner Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • 2984 Hannan Drive Supervisors Pleasant Hill, California affixed this 27th day of May , 19 75. City of Martinez Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Department By -ex/� Deputy Clerk H 24 12/7a5�-14f'enrietta Street Martinez, California 94553 Ma PenningXOn Maurice E. Huguet, Jr. Attorney P. 0. Box 110 Martinez, California 94553 Director of Planning 00185. t } In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 . 19 75 In the Matter of Report of the Planning Commission on the Request of Oleroy D. Hytholt, Applicant and Owner (1$97-RZ) , to Rezone Land in the Pacheco Area. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the above request; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, June 24, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 1072 Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the "Morning News-Gazette." PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Oleroy D. Hytholt Supervisors 4931 Pacheco Boulevard affixed this 7th day of May , 197 Pacheco, California 94553 City of Martinez Planning , J. . OtSSON, Clerk Department gy y'i Deputy Clerk H ?a ,z15i2'5+spnrietta Street Pennin on Martinez, California 94553 "ector of-' :1 nnni ri._ i 0U180 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Request for permission to close Holland Tract Road, Reclamation District 2025. The Board having heretofore continued to this date the hearing on the request of Reclamation District 2025 for permission. to temporarily close the Holland Tract Levee Road in order to make certain repairs to the levee; and Mir. Mark Kermit, Deputy Public Works Director, having stated that he had received a telephone call from Attorney Richard Rockwell, Secretary of said District, advising that he had been unable to meet with Mr. Max Mortensen to discuss the proposed closure and requesting the Board to continue the hear- ing; and Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid hearing is CONTINUED to June 3, 1975 at 11:00 A.M. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: i'Ir. Richard Rockwell Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of< Mr. Dante J. Nomelli.ni Supervisor Director, Public Works affixed this 27th day of tna�_, 19 5 Department J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B sail Deputy Clerk H za ,zna - 15-M MaxAe M. Ne el 0Ul� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Letter from District Attorney with respect to Court -11-eferral Program of Volunteer ;bureau of Contra Costa County. The Board having received a letter from Mr. William A ' O'Malley, District Attorney, advising that he supports the budget request of the County Probation Department to include some of the cost of running the court referral program operated by said Department in conjunction with the Volunteer Bureau of Contra Costa County; and IT IS By Tn BOARD ORDERED, that receipt of the afore- said communication is ACKNO'.YMGED. PASSED by the Board May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the forogoinp is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc; Volunteer Bureau of Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Contra Costa County Supervisors County Probation Officer affixed this 27th ems, of May : 14 75 District Attorney I R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By Deputy Clerk 21 12/71 15 M Helen C, marehaii 40 . 8 . In the Board of Supervisors of . Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 i 9 75 In the Matter of Recommendations for Citizens Participation Plan for 1975- 1976 Community Development Program Year. The Board having received a May 7, 1975 letter from Mr. Nick Rodriquez, Chairman, Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council, transmitting the Council's recom- mendations for citizens participation during the 1975-1976 Community Development Program year and suggesting that activity proposals for said program be reviewed by the Advisory Council for recommendation to the Board; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the afore- said letter is ACKNOWLEDGED and the recommendations for the Citizens Participation Plan are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: CCC Community Development Witness my hand and the Sean of the Board of Advisory Council Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 27th day of Paay . ig 75 Director, human Resources Agency J. R. OLSSON, Clerk �, Acting County Building By Gr=- �.. icr . Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 - hs-M Inspector Vera Nelson Economic Opportunity Program Director County Counsel County Administrator 001:89 vv1� f:1 CONTRA COSTA COUA7Yrj • CO,XAIUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL RE v�+��� EAg 2 1 1975 I L OLS50N CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PLAN CLER1� �� St1P-Mvi5oR5 MPA A CO.FOR 1975-76 PROGRAM YEAR The Citizens Participation Plan outlined below was prepared and adopted by the Community Development Advisory Council on May 7, 1975. It is intended to ensure that citizens of Contra Costa County are provided with information on the Community Development legislation, application and program and with an opportunity to participate in the assessment of needs, development of the program, and preparation of the application for funds. 1. Preparation of an updated publication summarizing the basic provisions of HCDA of 1974, indicating the requirements for the County's partici- pation in the Program, the amount of funds to be available, and the range of activities which may be undertaken. Consideration of a more popular supplementary brochure. The publications to be made available in August 1975 in public places such as county and city offices, libraries, churches, possibly union halls, industries, etc. They will be available at public forums and other CD meetings. Copies will be distributed to the news media (newspapers, radio, television, etc.). Copies for internal distri- bution will be made available to active community organizations in the County, upon request. 2. Newsmedia will be kept informed on the application process, proposals contained in the Second Year Program, so that news stories will keep the citizens appraised of the County's proposals for Community Develop- ment. 3. The Community Development Advisory Council, appointed to represent the citizens of the County in the preparation of the Application and to make recommendations on the same to the Board of Supervisors, con- sists of 10 members appointed by the Board and of 1 additional member appointed by each participating city or up to 21 members in all. In addition, participating cities may appoint their own committees to obtain citizen input. All meetings of the Advisory Council are open to the public, and citizens are encouraged to attend and participate in the public discussion time set aside at the end of the business meeting. 4. A series of public forums will be held at different locations and times in three or more locations in the County in September 1975 to inform the public on provisions of the law, HUD guidelines and the 0010A f current program, and to obtain public suggestions and other input for preparation of new proposals. More than 300 organizations and a sub- stantial additional number of individuals are expected to receive mailed notices of these meetings. Dews media will also be informed so that publicity would be available. S. A mailing inviting suggestions 'for activities to be undertaken will be sent to more than 300 community organizations in August 1975. 6. Public hearings will be held both by the Advisory Council and the Board of Supervisors before a Second Year Program is finally approved and submission of the Application is authorized. The hearings will be duly advertised and noticed, and substantial news coverage and advance publicity is expected again this year. Under provisions of the Act (the County) must certify that it has complied with the citizens participation requirements in the preparation and adoption of the Application. The County in turn, when accepting the portions of the program proposed by the cities, will look to the cities to certify that they also have giver citizens full opportunity to participate in the development of their proposals. Further, to avoid difficulties during the review of the Performance Repor: required by HUD at the end of each year, the County will - continue to document citizens participation to the greatest extent feasible. To this end the file containing samples of all informational publications handed out, a list of meetings together with their notices and attendance sheets, mailing lists utilized and samples of mailing, newspaper clippings discussing the program and meetings, phone logs, and logs of personal con- tacts and meetings on program information and program proposals will be updated and should be supplemented i,; similar information collected and provided by the sponsors of program suggestions. It is therefore requested that all sponsors tzintinue to collect the following for inclusion in the County's file documenting citizens participation: - Samples of informational material handed or mailed out, with mailing list. - List of public organization meetings, together with attendance sheets and copies of notices or newspaper items relating there,`.o. - Phone logs and visit logs or other evidence of providing information to the public or obtaining suggestions from the same. AAD:hf 001 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 5 In the Matter of Bids for Construction of Sans Crainte Drainage Area Line B from San Miguel Drive to Mirko Lane and Line G from Line B to Rudgear Road, Walnut Creek Area, Work Order 8505. This being the time fixed for the Board to receive bids for the construction of Sans Crainte Drainage Area Line B from San Miguel Drive to Mirko Lane and Line G from Line B to Rudgear Road, Walnut Creek area; bids were received from the following and read by the Clerk: MGM Construction Co., Concord McGuire & nester, Oakland Silva's Pipeline, Inc., Hayward Spartan Construction Co., San Jose Peter Cole Jensen, Inc., Danville Ernest E. Pestana, Inc., San Jose IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said bids are REFERRED to the Public Works Director for review and recommendation. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller '�r"5Ors - County Administrator affixed this :27th day of May 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY � . Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard 0a1�2: 'S In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of CETA Title I Manpower Plan for Fiscal Year 1975-1976. The Board on May 13, 1975 having referred to its Intergovernmental Relations Comtuittee (Supervisors J. P. Kenny and E. A. Linscheid) for report this day the Compre- hensiEmployment and Training Act, Title I, Manpower Plan for fiscal year 1975-1976; and Supervisor Kenny having advised that the Committee would meet with interested persons on May 29, 1975 at 8:30 a.m. in Room. 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, California and having recommended that the Com- mittee report be deferred to June 3, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Denny is approved. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. MI� cc: Director* Human Resources n my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisorsency Attn: Ms. J. Miller affixed this 27th day of May 1975 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By rd�t1,le� , Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 15-M D. Harkness F In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 Z5- In the Matter of Exoneration or Surety Tax Bond on Tract No. 4577, City of Walnut Creek, The County Tau Collector having advised that the county, taxes on property included in Tract No. 4577, City of Walnut Creek; have been paid in full; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Surety Tax Bond. No. 19,804#6- issued 9,804 6-issued by the Pacific Insurance Company is hereby EXONERATED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• L hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of;the Board of cc: Tau Collector Supervisors affixed this, —2!zth day of May 1975— J. R. OL.SSON, Clerk gy _ Deputy Clerk 14 24 12174 - Isaa Penningt In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 In the Matter of Appointment to the Board of Commissioners of the Orinda Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having advised the Board that Mr. James H. Benney has submitted his resignation from the Board of Commissioners of the Orinda Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County; and Supervisor Moriarty having further advised that he had received a letter from Mr. C. L. Blue, President of said district, recommending that Mr. Lloyd MacDonald be appointed for the unexpired term of Mr. Benney ending December 31, 1976; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appreciation be issued to Mr. Benney in acknowledgment of his years of service to the Orinda Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid cc: Orinda Fire Protection DistricVrdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor—Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this ?7th day of May 1975— J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By V Deputy Clerk ++ 24 12174 - 15-M Penning Zn 0€3155 i I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California) May 27 , 19-LL In the Matter of Proposed Name Change of River Fire Protection District. Mr. Arthur G. VIM, County Administrator, in a May 20, 1975 memorandum, having recommended that the Board consider adopting a resolution changing the name of the River Fire Protection District to Riverview Fire Protection District effec- tive September 1, 1975, said Dane change having been requested by the Committee of Commissioners of the District; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDS that the recommendation of the County Administrator is APPROVED and August 5, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. is FIXED as time to consider same. PASSED by the Board May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Cte. of Commissioners, Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of River Fire Prot. Dist. Supervisors County Administrator affixed this M:U day of_„ j a , 1975— County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 . 15-M Helen C. Marsh _ . 00196w 'i 00196 w OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors '` fie' May 20, 1975 From: C OurG. Will, k Subject` Antioch-Pittsburg Area County Administrator Fire Protection District on May 6, 1975 your board referred to this office for report a request from the Chairman, Committee of Commissioners of subject district, Mel Whatley, to change the name of the district from the River Fire Protection District to the Riverview Fire Protection District. The committee, upon organization, requested public input as to a permanent name. The Riverview Fire Protection District was chosen. Health and Safety Code, Section 13878.5 states, in part: "The change in the name of the district shall be effective upon the adoption by the Board of Supervisors of a resolution approving. the change in the name of the district. " - It is recommended that your board, after July 1, 1975, consider the adoption of an appropriate resolution changing the district name as requested, effective September 1, 1975. The reason for the delay in the district renaming is to attempt to keep down the confusion of a district name change at about the same time (July 1, 1975) that the district will come into existence_ JSC:sc • RECEIVED MAY 2 1975 I R. assoN na �. 00197 Mivofilmecl with FOOR orlelr.- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 M In the Matter of Authorizing Provision of Legal Defense. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County shall provide legal defense for M. D. Farr, Deputy County Counsel, H. T. Gonsalves, Deputy County Counsel, D. T. Corbin, Juvenile Referee, and Social Service Department, named in Superior Court Action No. 152292, Eva Aranda et al, Plaintiff, reserving all of the rights of the county in accordance with provisions of California Government Code Sections 825 and 995. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c c: Mr. IA. D. Parr Supervisors Mr. H. T. Gonsalves affixed this 27th day 19 � W. D. T. Corbin Director, Human Resources J. R. OtSSON, Clerk Agency By Deputy.Clerk H 24 lvViDuft Counsel County Administrator ry Penni7gton 001997' U`Jlw� IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MAY 27 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Myrtle M. Brooks. 2151 Pine Street. Martinez. California 94553 by and through her attorney. Larry Lockshin, Law Offices of Joe R. Magray, Attorney at Law. 228 McAllister Street. Suite 206. San Francisco. California having filed with this Board on May 9 19,x,, claim for damages in the amount of S 54 .136.49 (approximately) ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May , 197 �. J. R. OLSSON CLERK By y Iggry Penni on Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch Countv Counsel County Administrator 00199 ' IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Max 27 = , 19 75 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Mr. Harvey A. Smith, Rt. 1 , Box 1094, Antioch , California 94509 by and through his attorney David S. Thomas, 2211 "A" Street, Antioch , California 94509 having filed with this Board on May 15 , 19 75, claim for damages in the amount of S 1 ,137.42 ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the- Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None . ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess . I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed - this 27th day of May , 197 5 . J. R. OLS SON, CLERK By / Robbie GTerre Deput Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator 00200 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA- CCSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATay 28 , 19 75 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) tlr. Aaron Charles Cloud, c/o Law Firm of Gerald J. Tiernan. P-0- Rnv 92n- Can VranNi or%0. r3l4 fo"n4—!94"-Q"- having 94�Q"-having filed with this Board on _ t T i+, 19 , claim for damages in xces�s of S 25,000 NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A _ M_ lliaa , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES:. None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28tb day of 197 s J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By ��� Helen C. Marshall. Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator • OU201 - (AM01 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 27 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Mr. Frank Stephenson , Jr. , 1307 Kelsey, Richmond, California by and through his attorney Elliott M. Pisor, 11 Embarcadero West, Oakland, California 94607 having filed with this Board on May 19 , 19 75, claim for damages in the amount of S 25,000.00 NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty , E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. M. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May , 19? 5 . J. R. OISSON, CLERK ByR,l�,�, 6r y4 bie GAtierreid Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant T Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator 00202 s r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORi3IA May 27 1979 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Mr. David Christopher Thuleen , 14 Stock Bridae, Concord, California 94520 having filed with this Board on May 19 , 19 75, claim for damages in the amount of 525,000.00 • NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J-- E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the — Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid., J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor H. N. Boggess. f I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May 197 5 . J. R. OLSSOR, CLERK By Robbie G ierrez Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Vx. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator 0U4VV IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 27 , 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) L Ms . Patricia Ann Boeckner, 249 F Boardwalk Avenue , San Bruno , California 94066 having filed with this Board on May t9 , 19_71, claim for damages in the amount of $25 ,000.00 - NOW, THEREFORE, on notion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess . I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May , 197 5 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK ByJU ., R ie GVtierrezd Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel County Administrator 4 UQ204`- f IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 27 , 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) 1jahmnud AbnuzeidJr_ by and through his attorney. Jerome G. klahlert, 156 Montgamp_ry S,treet� Suite 401+ San Francisco, California o 41 n4 having filed with this Board on May 16 , 19jr claim for damages in the amount of 5 29641 _at; ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this :)Ttth _day of _mv , 197 �. J. R. OLSSON BQH, CLERK By M enning o eputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3 ) Attn: Mr. Broatch Countv Counsel Countv Administrator OQ 05 r � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California r May 27 , 19 71; In the Matter of Proclaiming Week of June 2, 1975 as Youth Employment Week in Contra Costa County. WEERE.AS The Youth of Western Contra Costa County is a valuable community asset; and WHEREAS The Youth of Western Contra Costa County is interested in obtaining meaningful summer emplo�mnt and have joined together to locate summer youth jobs; and 14HEREAS The Cities of Western Contra Costa County are cooperating with the Youth Summer Employment Project; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, does hereby PROCLAIM the week of June 2, 1975 to be YOUTH EMPLOM ENT 1MK in Contra Costa County and urges all citizens to give special recognition to this vital program. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. bcc: 12 copies to Supervisor Dias Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this27__day of I•'[ay 19 7�L J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - I5-M Shoni Lekse s 00206, 00206 In the Board of Supervisors of i Contra Costa County, State of California `May �7 . 1975 In the Matter of Authorizing the Human Resources Director to Sign Contracts For Services with Fee-For-Service Physicians, Dentists Optome- trists and Podiatrists pphil- ized by the edicaltSerrvicesmant In connection with the rates ofscompensation for fee-for- service physicians, .dentists, optometrists and"podiatrists utilized by County Medical Services and the ;County Health Department, this Board on July 23, 1974 adopted Resolution No. 74/636A setting the rate for said physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists; and This Board today received contracts with those fee-for- service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podJatrists whose names are listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full, implementing Resolution No. 74/636A; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said contracts are hereby approved; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. R. E. Jornlin, Director, Human Resources Agency, is authorized to sign the contracts on behalf of Phis Board. PASSED by the Board iiay 27. 1975 • • s t 1 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Sea{ of the Board of Agency Supervisors Mr. W. Downey, Chief, affixed this 27th day of May , 19 ?5 Medical Administrative J. R. OLSSON, Cleik Services 'f4/4&Q4g!gL, Deputy Cleric Actin Director of Personne.. H 24 IV74 - 1 �:axine M. Neufel County Auditor-Controller County Administrator 0020'7 A _ • f EXHIBIT A Medical Services _ Name Number Rate per hour Effective Date William Eldridge, D.D.S. 126-704 $1+1.10 April 14, 1975 Arnold Josselson, M-D. #26-703 $17.00 Ji y. 1, 1974 0097 1.14600 August 1974 ' AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) P1WRER 26 - 704 _ . ----- I . Parties. The -County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) William W. Eldridge, D.D.S. (address) 110 Fiesta Circle, Orinda, CA 94563 Phone 3T6-0445 (b) [ ] Physician Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [ ] Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment [ Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. - Scheduled Hours 10.00 Per week Rate: $ 14.10 Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week in accordance with established schedule. (includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: $ Per Week r ] ..Mon i h I y Pa veli.;:z%z : Can t:actor paid fcr seryi ces renuared during a month in accordance with established schedule. ( Includes payment for on-caii services iT so indicaied in 2. (0.) (d) On-Call Availability: [ ] Yes No (e) Effective Date April 14, 19T5 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum-Yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered undei- the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specialty trained, experienced and competent to perform special • professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and i therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b) , pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451 . 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officcr. The afcrena—_A shall proviyin, Contractor with a schedule of professionuI services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Ufficer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent. or by either darty, by niv'=in 30 days eivance written notice thereof to the: o1 her. 6. Modification anti_Fxtonslon. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of 1 he board, sccop I ud i n wr I t i nq by ttic Contractor. The' Contrac for and 'the Counly agreo that each sub::equant contract will IV--present the result of all 00209 nenoiiations betwoen the Contractor, County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written Invoice on the form prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. If the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each Invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated In Section 2. (c) or pro- rate amount for said aYY:^r:•ed Period. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel Involvina the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly ow"demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. 'Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. It. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. 12. Insurance. County stidli keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, including professional malpractice liability with total limits of not less than 55,006,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNTY �/:� �� CONTRACTOR Y — ���J�i'9��AI/SPT William Eldridge, D.D. ' Director, Human Resources Agency ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON, County Clerk and officio C k the Board dy , Deputy RECOnJiENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACIQXMILEDGED: R E. Jorrlin Zt&� Direci-or, numoti ReSuu1 vt:s L , Gcorpe Def:'.':a iD. Medical Director or Health Officer d 00210 { t•14600 August 194 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) 26 - 703 I. Parties. The .County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) Arnold Josselson, M.D. (address) 1446 Phoenix Drive, Fairfield, CA 94533 Phone (b) [JDA Physician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [ ] Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment [7O] Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours 40.00 Per week Rate: S 17,00 Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week in accordance with established schedule. ( Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Week . [ ] ..Month I y Pa i l. Co.;rs;.t: Ccztr actor paid for services rendered dur!ng a month in accoraance wiTn esTaDiished -schedule. ( Inciudes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) (d) On-Call Availability: Yes [ ] No (e) Effective Date July 1, 1974 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under- the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training In medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normaiiy dud custcs.x;rily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor 4ith a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d). ) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent. or by eiVn-r (tarty, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof +o thu other. 6. Modification and Fxtension. This contract may be m. dlfled and/or extended by written order of thu Hoard. acceprod In writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the County aoren that each subsequent contract will r)opresent the result of all 00211 negotiations between the Contractor, County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written Invoice on the form prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. if the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor arc not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: W if hourly paid, at the rate Indicated in Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated In Section 2. (c) or pro- rata amount for said approved neriod. 8. Mileane Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. 'Status. Contractor functions as self-employed; Independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. II. Privileaes. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. 12, insurance. County snail keep in effect a poiicy or pol ;cies of iiabiii-Fy insurance, including professional malpractice liability with total limits of not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNTY L `� i - CONTRACTOR Y Arnold Jos el on, M.D. Director, Human Resources Agency ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON, County Clerk and fficio Clerk of the Board • Deputy t - RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACIOXXILEDGED: R. E. Jornlin Director, Human Resources 6§ency George Dernan M.D. - Medical Director or Health Officer 00212 q mare z. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Rental agreement with Kaiser Aetna. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman: is AUTHORIZED to execute a month-to-month rental agreement with Kaiser Aetna for premises at 150 Buchanan Circle, Pacheco for use by the Mt. Diablo Municipal Court for storage of records. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board:of Real Property Supervisors Lessor via VP affixed this 27th day of May 19 75 Buildings & Grounds — County Auditor–Controller J. R. OLSSON- Clerk County Administrator gy� - Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Mt. Diablo 1~11unicipa . Court R a • (Month-to-,Month Tenancy) THIS AGREEMEYr rs made and entered into Inns 27th day qt ('�Y .1975 by and between Kaiser Aetna doing business as LOCKANAY SELF STCR-'GF•hereinafter referred tr as-Lessor-,and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ,hereinafter referred to as-tenon;".lessor does hereby rent t3 Tenant thew certain;remrrs descr�d as SPACE NUMBER G-13 10 x 30 located at 150 Buchanan Circle.Pachem Cahforn,a,hereinafter referretd to as-premises",commenciaz an June 1 .19]j and continuing thereafter from monthdo•mbath. 1. RENT: Rent shalt be the sum of S 60.00 per mian.0%payable in advance upon the 1st day et each and every caiendar month to trier or to lessor's designated agenL in the event Plat rent is not paid ort,"five(5)days at' the due date.or in the event of a dishonored bank check from Tenant to Lessor, because actual damages for said l3Pe payments gad dishonored bar::checks are extremely drtticuft to ascertain, Tenant agrees to pay 55.00 as liquidated damages for said late payment and 55.00 as liquidated damages for said disronored bank check as additional rent. 2, DEPOSITS: Tenant shall pay in advance a security,cleaning and damage deposit of s 25.00 to be held by Lessor for the faithful performance of the terms at this Agreement and for cleaning and marr of the premises alp surrender of the same by Tenant The deposit shalt be refunded to the Tenant within two Mees after Tenant vacates the premises, less all charges fee cleaning, repairing replacement of any missing items, or other amounts due under this Agreement when necessary:o compensate Lessor for loss or damage caused by the breach of Tenant including any amounts necessary to compensate Lessor for delinquent rent owed by Tenant At the termination of this tenancy,it shat be Tenants responsibility to rehrrn the premises in the same condition as they were in when rented to TenaoL 3. USE AND OCCUPANCY: The premises are to be used orgy for sutras?of personal property and household goods coned by TenanL Tenant further agrees that the premises will not be used for operation of any business or for human or animal occupancy.Trash or other material shalt not be allaxed outside the teased premise& 4. CCMPLiABCE WiTH LAIN: The stora,e of welding, at itarnmable.expl„,rce or other Liliventfy dangerous material is.prohibited.Vehicles or other similar fuel-drivers equipment may be stored only it We fuel tanks are empty.Lessee shall not store in Ofe premises any items which shalt be in violation of any order or require- ment imposed by any Board of Health, Sanitary Department,Poke Department at other government or governmental agency or in violation of any other legal require- ment or do any act or cause to be done any act which urates or may create a nuisance in or upon or connected with the premises. 5. SiGNS: No painted or other signs shall be placed on the leased prennes 6, RULES: Tenant agrees to abide by all LOCYAWAY rules and policies that are posted and arena*in effector that maybe put into effect from time to tirnr Lessor agrees M supply written copies of said rules to Tenant adopted in the future. 7, CONDITION AND ALTERATION OF PREMISES: Tenant has examined the premises and hereby accepts them as being in good order,candition and repair_ Tenant agrees to immediately rsotily Owner of any defects,dilapidations or danserous conddions.Tenant 2grees to keep 01!premises in goad order and condition and to pay Lessor promptly for any repairs of the premises, caused by Tenants negligence or misuse or the negtigence or misuse of Tenants invitees,licensees and guests Tenant shall male no alterations or improvements of the premum we-out the prior written consent of Lessor. Should Tenant damage at depreciate the premises or, make alterations or improvements,or do painting or redecorating.ithaut the prior wntlen consent of Lessor,then all casts necessary to restore the premises to its prior condition shalt be borne by TenanL- : 8. INSPECTION: Tenant agrees that Lessor or his atoms may at any reasonable time enter to inspect the`premises or maser repairs.It notice of termination of this tenancy has been given by either party, Tenant further agtm that Lessor at his agent may show the premises to prospective Tenants during the 304ay period prior to termination or to prospective purchasers of the property or to lending institutions or their representatives at any reasonable time. 9, TERMINATION: The truancy under this Agreement may be terminated by Lessor or Tenant by Use giving by one of written notice to the other of his into.-.tion to terminate the tenancy at least 30 days prior to the date of termrnahom Rent is payable by Tenant to Lessor for said 30-day period and it Tenant vacates prior to the end of said 30-day period,Tenant must nevertheless pay rent for said 30 days as hereinabove provided.As conditions for such termination,and prior to the return of any deposiL Tenant shall do the following Complete;y vacate the premises in good and clean condition. reasanabte wear and tear excepted:leave toruarding address.-and allow lessor to inspect the premises in Tenant's aresen:e W verify the final conft'On of the premises and its contents. 10, ABANDONMENT: Tenant sha. not abandon etre premises at any time during the term of this Agreement It Tenant shaft abandon-said premises or Isa dispossessed by process of lax,or otherwise,then Lessor or its agent sha'l have the right to take immediate possession of and reenter said premises. Lessor and Tenant agree that in the event a notice to terminate the truancy has been given by Lessor to Tenant and Tenant has not occupied the premises for the 30 days covered by said notice of terminator and has not paid in full the rent due tin said period,then the premises may be deemed abandoned by LessrX and Lessor may reenter and take immediate possession of said premises,consider the tenancy terminated and react said premise& . In the event said robce ih terminate has be-%given,and. in the event the rent for said period has Pat been paid by Tenant to Lessor,and in the event any of Tenant's personal property remains on the premises.Tenant hereby Grants to Lessor a security interest in said personal property at the expiration of 30 days.Upon taking possession of said personal property.Lessor shall mat to TenanL at the address of Tenant provided in this Agreement mfice that Lew has taken possession of the premises and has taker possession of all Tenants personal property and has stored said personal property. It is presumed that any personal property left by Tenant, does not exceed$100 in value.At the expiration of said 30 days,Lessor may br public sate.dispose of the personal property. 11. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLETTING: Tenant sha- r4t sublet or assign an or any portion of the premises or Tenanrs interest thatein without the print vnillrm consent of Lessor. 12. ATTORNEYS'FEES: It legal action stall be bavest by lessor fu unlawful detainer, to recover any sums due under this Agreement,or for the breach of any other covenant or condition contained in this AgreemenL Tvmt shag pay to Lessor an costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys fees incurred by Tenant in the aforesaid action, 13. LIABILITIES: Tenant shall hold Lessor and his agents harmless tram all claims of toss or damage to property and of injury ter or death of p____ _ caused by the intentional acts or negligence of TenanL his guests,ficensees,or invitem or occurring on the premises rented for Tenants exclusive use.Tenant here'1_ expressly releases Lessor from any and all liability or foss or damage to Tenant's property or effects arising out of water feakagD brraking pipes of theft or other 1 causes beyond the reasonable control of Lessor. Teiunt*s pusseziors wrthrc the building are so placed at Tenant's sole risk and Leiwr shalt have no liability for loss or damage caused to said possessions whatsoever. 14. RECOURSE:. In consideration of the benefits accruing hereunder. Tenant and all successers and assigns covenant and agree that in the event of actual or asle£ed failure,breath or default hereunder by Kaiser Aetnx (1)The sale and exclusive remedy Shan be against the partnership Kaiser Aetna and its pa t^._ ship assets: (2) no partner of Nasser Aetna shall be suM or named as a party in any suit or action (except as may be necessary to secure jurisdiction of the Y,_-- Aetna partnership).(3) no sF+vict of process shall be made against any partner of Kaiser Aetna (except as may be necessary to secure jurisdiction of the Kaiser). partnership):(.)no partner of Kaiser Aetna shall be required to ansaer or ct'nerxise plead to airy service of process(5)no judgment will be taken against any p_ t of Kamer Aetna.(6)any judgment taken against any partner of Kaiser Aetna may be vacated and set aside at any time nurse pro tuns"(1)no writ of execution w,i.r_ be levied against the assets of any partner of Kaiser Aetna:(81 these covenants and agreements are enforceable by both Kaiser Aetna and also by any partner of Aetna. 15 RECEIPT: Lessor hereby acknorlc9¢es receipt of S as advance real payment for the period of tr and receipt of Sas advance rent payment for the month startial ,19 Lesson Ierther,clirewl-dg-s r!ce+pt o -f S __as will ter s-crntity,rtranrmt and damage deposit as defined herein. Readent manage. has made no other representations to tenant other than as are contained in this rental agreement and tenant airees that he has net rete on any st3lement other than as are contained herein. This Agreement has been executed on the day and year tint above wnden. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political LOCKAWAY SELF STORAGE U v'sion of th State of California By - Chairman, Bo rd of ervisors I By: Deputy RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: > l_q Buchanan Curie PteheCo.California 94553 + T&Vhon._(415)793.1122 i B BUSINESS ACORESS i BUS."NE 228-3000, extension 2134 F031I APPROVED BAKE CHECXS PAYABLE 10 LOC)WAY SELF STORAGE JOHN IL CLAUS- , xty Conn I oo9l A __�__ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Ma 27 . 1979 In the Matter of Recommendations of Economic Opportunity Council on Allocation of Federal CAP Funds. Mr. Arthur G. Will, County Administrator, having submitted to the Board a memorandum dated May 21, 1975 which he received from Mr. George Johnson, Economic Opportunity Program Director, containing recommendations of the Economic Opportunity Council on the appropriation of $30,100 of Carry- Over-Balance of Federal CAP grant funds; and Mr. Will having suggested that aforesaid recommenda- tions be referred to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Kenny) for review; and IT IS BY THE BOARD SO ORDERED. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on.the minutes of said Hoard of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Board Committee Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of. Economic Opportunity Supervisors Program Director (2) affixed this 27th day of May , 1975 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON,_Clerk County Auditor-Controller ey19Pe l Deputy Clerk H za 12174 - 15-M L. Kincaid 00215, 00215 i RECEIVED OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY- v 2 1 f � X75 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Office of MEMORANDUM County Administrator TO : Arthur Will, County Administrator DATE: ►lay 21, 1975 FRoM : George Johnson, Director L _ SUBJECT: Allocation of COB The EOC has taken action to appropriate $30,100_of Carry-Over-Balance (COB) of Federal CAP grant funds. The recommendation of the.EOC to- the Board of Supervisors is as follows: 1. Damps for kids -(County-wide) $12,000 (Stiuplation: no more than $5,000 for operating costs; RECEIVED ������ $7,000 for Campership slots to be divided equally among the 8 area councils; that an Advisory Board of area council members be established; that 3 low income persons (non-EOC members) be selected to I,�AYa�1975 the board; that there be an option for either residential or day camps; and that Central J. oisSM Administration monitor and assure compliance) CLERK � 2. Neighborhood Youth Corps - (County-wide) $ 5,800 (Stipulation: Funds are to be equally divided among eligible area councils - 7 area councils (including No. Richmond) with 3 slots each) 3. Welfare Rights Organization (NR/IT, SS, SP/PV) $ -1,500 (Stipulation: Funds to be used over 6 month period of July-Dec., 1975 - $250 x 6 months. No. Richmond Neighborhood House is to continue as fiscal agent or another acceptable one must be obtained) 4. Carquinez Coalition (Rodeo/Crockett) $ 1,800 5. United Council of Spanish Speaking Org. (Pftz 5 $ 3,600 Cent. County) (Stipulation: If CETA position (Title II - or VI) is obtained for July-Dec. 1975, this money is to be turned back to the EOC) ' 6. Pittsburg Community Drug Program (Pittsburg) $ 1,800 7. Concerted Services Project (Mtz or E. County) $ 3,600 (Stipulation: Person assigned to E. County must be bilingual; if CETA position (Title II or VI is obtained for July-Dec, 1975, this money is to be turned back to the ECC) $ 30,100 Microfilmed with board order, OEO 37 {rev.21691 _ _ 00216 w • It is necessary that the Board of Supervisors review and take action regarding the recommendation of the EOC. The action of the Board of Supervisors, to the , extent that the request of the EOC is approved, then goes to Regional CSA/OE0 for notification, and in case of new Delegate Agencies for approval. Regional CSA does not need to approve actions on COB of less than 10% of total Federal Grant ($954,000) but it must approve changes in work program priorities and new Delegate Agencies. � IL - Request: It is requested that tfie County Board of Supervisors review and .take action on the recomaendation of the EOC for use of• $30,100 of Federal-COB. (Note: The County Auditor has reported COB in excess of $100,000) . 1 l GWJ:11 t 00217 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 M In the Matter of Extension Agreement with the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED. to execute an amendment to the agreement dated October 1,, 1973 between the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley, and the County (Probation Department) extending the term of the College Work—Study Program through June 30, 1976. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: University of California Supervisors County Probation Department Attn: Mr. W. Donavan affixed this 27th day of Mav , 19 U County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administratorgy Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 - I5-a N. In wham 00218 y UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERI:ELEY• D.-.%u • IRVINE•LOS ANCELES-RI%TRSWE•SA.�DIEGO-SA%FRA-\cISCo 'r o? Sw%Tw BARBARA•SANTA CRUZ OFFICE OF FI\A%CIAL Ata A.\DDE C U CALiFOMIA W1720STUDENT E.%IPLOYIIE%'r SERVICE LL''�� ttL��� .I1 SPROUL APR 3 0 1975 coNTRA COSTA COUNTY PROBATION DEPT. Reference is rude to the agreement between the Contra Costa County Probation Department and the Regents of the University of California, relative to the College Work-Studv Program atreement dated October 1. 1973 tie wish to extend this agreement for one additional year Voicb would establish a termination date of June 30, 1976 The Federal share of student comnensatfon paid in the Colleee [,ori:-Studv Program is 701 for the 1975-76 year (the Organization's share of student wages is 3M. Tf this extension is agreeable to you, T would appreicate it if you would sign the original of this letter and return it to John 1. Danielson, Director of Financial Aid and Student Employment Services. Sincerely yours, i,G C 1 Patricia Ahlgren Mork-Study Coordinator Jo n I. Danielson, Director n fice of Financial Aid and udent Emvlovment Services Fountyof man, Boar pervisors FOP- T APPR01rZD Contr osta �� n. ..i. � y Coluoel 00219 (3/75) i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 19 75 In the Matter of Agreement with the Regents of the University of California. (Agreement No. 20-012) . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED > to execute an agreement with the Regents of the University of California, under the terms of which the Social Service Department will continue to provide field instruction to students enrolled in the School of Social Welfare during the period May 1, 1975 through June 30, 1979. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Director of Human Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • Resources Agency S' Attn: Contracts Adm. affixed this 27th day of May , 19 75 Contractor J. R. OLSSON Clerk County Auditor-Controller D Clerk unty Administrator y H 24 12/74 - N. In&aham f . x 00220 AGREEHF-NT FOR STUDENT FIELD PLACEVOIT PROGRAH (Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency) 1. Agreement Identification: HUMBER 9- 0 - 012 . Department: Social Service Subject: Student education and training for staff development 2. Parties: The County of Contra Costa California, ("County") for its Department named above, and the following named Educational Institution ("Institution") for its School Now or Department specified below, mutually agree and promise as, follows: Institution: The Regents of the University of California School or Deaartment: School of Social Welfare Address: University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 3. Term: The effective date of this Agreement is May 1, 1975 and it expires June 30, 1979 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either party, at its sole discre- tion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. S. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified or amended by a written document executed by the institution and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. 6. Payment Limit: County shall make no payments to the Institution under this Agreement. 7. Counter's Oblisations: County shall provide those services for the Institution described in the "Field Placement Plan" attached 'hereto which is incorporated 'herein by reference, subject to all terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Institution's Obligations: Institution shat provide those services and carry out that work described in the "Field Placement Plan" attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 9. Legal Authority: This Agreement is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: 45 CFR Part 205, Section 205.202 California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 10616 10. Signatures: These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CPWIFORti'IA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION _ By By hairman, BoArd o" upervisors I,``_,� 1�AN SCiIUG4 c)f Sc3<.i�}L CO-Cl/wt, Attest: County Cler J. R OISSON (Designate official capacity in Institution) I, the person signing above, do by that By r •. signature hereby certify that I am author Deputy ized by the above named Institution to execute this Agreement and that I am Recommended by Human Resources Agency acting for the Institution in signing this Agreement pursuant to its bylaws, a resolu- tion of its governing body, and/or any By other pertinent authority required by the Designee .nsti.ution. I declare =.der ^eralt o. perjury that the foregoing is true and Form Approved: County Counsel correct and that this declaration was executed on S /5/ , 197 5--, at By ELG� -1- (4 A-L t rog Aj i A- Deputy �? WITNESS: (S' nnfature) (Title) DATE: //yZ73-- 00221. • M FIELD PLACEMENT ?Lr",Of NumBER. 20 = 012 1. Institution's Oblizations. The Institution shall establish and conduct a student field placement program in cooperation with County's Department. In conducting this program, the Instituticn shall: a. Assign a staff member from its School or Department to represent the Institution and act as a liaison with County's Department in all matters relating to this Agreement: b. Cooperate with County's Department in establishing assignment schedules consist- ing of specific dates for the placement of a specific number of students with the County for field instruction, which shall be established by mutual agreement of the respective representatives of the County and Institution. c. Assign for such field instruction only those students who are prepared therefor to a degree considered adequate by mutual agreement of the County and Institution. d. Assign a field placement supervisor from its School or Department to supervise each student and to be responsible for the student's field placement program. e. Make all necessary arrangements with such students, so that each will: (1) Have completed or be in good standing for all the necessary courses required by the Institution as preparation for placement in field instruction. (2) Have transportation to and from County's field placement site, (3) Refer educational problems to the appropriate instructor(s) in the Institu- tion's School or Department. (4) Promptly report all illnesses and absences from duty at County's field placement site to County's appropriate field placement supervisor. (5) Comply with the standards of conduct and regulations governing professional personnel at County's field placement site. f. Be responsible for the educational program of students assigned to field instruction with the County; for the selection, evaluation, and assignment of students in accordance with agreed upon schedules; and for the proper conduct of its students and staff in the student field placement program. g. Withdraw from the program any student whose performance is unfit or whose conduct prevents constructive relationships at the field placement site, upon the written and suitably documented request from County's Department. h. Provide satisfactory assurance or evidence of acceptable health levels of assigned students who shall also be provided appropriate medical care by the Institution's student health service. i. Arrange all necessary transportation required for students in connection with their field placement duties. j. Require each student who contemplates the use of his private automobile while completing his assigned field placement duties to carry motor vehicle liability insurance as required by State law and in amounts not less than: (1) $15,000 for personal injury to, or death of, one person; (2) $30,000 for injury to, or death of, two or more persons, per occurrence, and (3) $5,000 for property damage. k. Defend, save harmless and indemnify the County, its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation any consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising :ram or connected with the operations or the services of the institution under this Agreement, whether or not result- ing from the negligence or the Institution, its agents, employees, or students. Initials:?/�, yI Foo Institution County Department -�- 00222 FIELD PL ACEME2 i PLAN HUMBER 2 0 - 012 •1. Ensure that the Institution, its staff, and students participating in activities under this Agreement will comply with any additional requirements as may be set forth in "Special Conditions" (if any) attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference. 2. County's Obligations. County shall participate in the Institution's student field placement program in cooperation with the Institution's School or Department. In par- ticipating in this program, County shall: a. Assign a staff member from its Department to represent the County and act as a liaison with the Institution's School or Department in all matters relating to this Agreement. b. Accept the placement of such students in field instruction as may be assigned by the Institution in assignment schedules and for a placement period not to exceed one academic semester or quarter at a time, as shall be established by mutual agreement of the respective representatives of the County and Institution. c. Provide each student with supervised field instruction consisting of learning experiences and professional duties needed to accomplish the educational objec- tives of the Institution's student field placement program consistent with the operational responsibilities and professional activities of County's Department and the specific field placement related thereto. d. Assign a staff person to provide direct supervision for each student in connection with the student's field placement duties. e. Provide office facilities, equipment, supplies, and clerical assistance as needed for each student's field placement at no cost to the Institution, including properly authorized use of County cars. f. Reimburse students for automobile travel expenses in connection with field placement duties as may be authorized in advance for each student by County's field placement supervisor and Department. g. Not'pay students compensation for services rendered in the performance of their field placement duties. 3. Joint Obligations. County and Institution shall jointly: _ a. Plan a student field placement program and student assignment schedule so as to. provide a sound and effective educational program. b. Review the program at the end of each placement period in order to evaluate out- come and establish mutual agreement for the next consecutive placement period. 4. Independent Contractor Status. This Agreement is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. S. Program Liability. The Institution understands and agrees that it is responsible for the actions of its officers, employees, and students while they are engaged in activities related to this student field placement program which is under the direction of the authorities of its School or Departument. 5. Student Volunteer worker Status. Any student placed with the County by the Institution under this Agreement is to be a "volunteer worker", that is, a special employee of the County, subject to all of the requirements and regulations pertaining to County's volun- teer workers, including the filing of a volunteer Application. The County's liability to such student for any injury he might sustain while performing activities under this Agreement is limited to workmen's compensation benefits. The Institution hereby agrees that it shall inform all such students of this provision and that it shall place with the County no student who does not agree with this provision. Initials: f. r Institution County Department -2- 0OIZ23 'art^•M F ,. ;. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 1975 In the Matter of Contract No. 20-023 with Kamps for Kids, Inc. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a contract with Kamps for Kids, Inc. for provision of services in connection with operation of a camp- ership program for lour income youth during the period from June 1, 1975 to August 31, 1975. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered:on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Kamps for Kids, Inc. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director, Hunan Resources Supfrvisors Agency affixed this 27th day of May 19 75 Attn: Contracts Admin. — County Auditor–Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By �, Deputy Clerk H sa 12n4 • 15-M Ftaxine M. Neuf Ad -s I 0022 CCC Standard Form May 1974 CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES (Contra Costa County Human Resources AgencyL O - 023 O2 1. Contract Identification Number `�)+ Department: Social Service Subject: Child Care through camperships for former, current or potential AFDC youngsters--Summer 1975 2. Parties: The County of Contra Costa California, (County) for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Name: Kamps for Kids, Inc. Capacity: Non-profit corporation Address: 1045 Detroit Avenue, Concord, California 94520 3. Term: The effective date of this Contract is June 1, 1975 and it terminates August 31, 1975 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit: County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $34,200 5. County's Obligations: County shall make those payments to the Contractor described in the "Payment Provisions" attached 'hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all teras and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions: This Contract is subject to the General Conditions attached hereto and to the Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incor- porated herein by reverence. 7. Contractor's Obligaticns: Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the "Service Plan" attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or *incorporated herein. 8. Project: This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: State Department of Education Child Development Program, Project No. 07-00000-3282-5-01, Contract #20-408 9. Legal Authority: This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following. legal authorities: Title !V-A Social Security Act of 1967 (PL 90-248); California Education Code, Section 16700 et. seq. 10. Signatures: These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR J17By By Chairman, Zoa_ ' Supervisors Attest: Countv Clerk (Designate official capacity in business and affix corporation seal) By Deputy State of California ) County of Contra Costa ) ss. Reco=nended by Human Resources Agency ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and By D'esignee business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ they signed it and that the corporation Form Approved: County Counsel or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. By ,.� '�,'L,�" / ft �A ' �Denuty Dated: 0022 rublic' 45 4 I •� .� i s i Ot8 j Public` , _ j' •-y(�e''y �_�e`c"�. ;' I PAYMENT PROVISIONS Interim Payment Adjusted to Cost Number Z_- c� -d— 1. Interim Amount and Payment. County shall advance the sum of $30,780 to Contractor on or before June 25, 1975 on an interim basis for Contractor's use in purchasing child care camperships. 2. Cost of Services. Payment to the Contractor for services provided under the provisions of this contract shall be on the basis of the actual cost of services, but County. shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the maximum specified Payment Limit of this contract. Actual cost shall not include remodeling (except with prior State approval) and/or equipment purchases as to any item which has a useful life in excess of two years and a value in excess of $100, except that part of such costs that can reasonably be charged to depreciation. 3. Cost Basis. Contractor's allowable actual costs for reimbursable expenditures will be subject to determination in accordance with United States Bureau of the Budget Circular No. A-87, which shall be implemented by such of the following described documents as are applicable to the services provided under this contract: a. 11OASC-5 A Guide for Non-Profit Institutions: Cost Principles and Procedures for Establishing Indirect Cost Rates for Grants and Contracts with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare." b. "OASC-8 A Guide for Local Government Agencies: Establishing Cost Allocation Plans and Indirect Cost Proposals for Grants and Contracts with the Federal Government." c. Other State of California or Federal guide for establishing indirect cost allocations, as may be required to meet the special needs of a contract program. 4. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor, without recourse, when in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Con- tractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed , or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s). 5. Cost Report and Settlement. Contractor shall keep records of all child care campership procurements and child care campership placements made on behalf of County-referred children in the manner prescribed by County and in accordance with standard accounting principles and procedures to include the following: a. Paid receipts for all purchased child care camperships. b. Total expenditure for all purchased and donated child care camperships obtained by Contractor. c. An accounting of each County-referred child placed for child care through campership service including: The child's name and address. The parents' names Dates of attendance Name of camp attended The cost of each child's care The number of hours of child care. No later than thirty (30) days following the termination of this contract, Contractor shall submit to the County a Cost Report in the form required by the County showing the actual allowable cost of services. If the Cost Report shows that the actual allowable cost of services for the term exceeds. the interim payment of $30,780, County will remit the difference to Contractor subject to the maximum specified in the Payment Limit. if the Cost Report shows that the interSm payment exceeds the actual allowable cost of services far the term, the Contractor shall refund the difference to the County. Initial::: � A_J G Contractor Department -1- 00226. t PAYMENT PROVISIONS Interim Payment Adjusted to Cast 22 Number"' O 6. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by State or County in addition to any certified audit required by the Service Plan. If the audit(s) show a difference between the actual cost of services and the interim payments made (including adjustments made pursuant to the Cost Report and Settlement provisions contained 'herein) then the procedure contained in the Cost Report and Settlement provisions to adjust payments to costs shall be followed. 7. Audit Exceptions, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions to the extent they are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this contract. Initials: ly Contractor Department -2- 00227" J CCC Standard Form May 1974 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES General Conditions 20 - 000 NUMBER ...............».. ...........:�s 1. Compliance with Law: Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection: Contractor's performance, place of business and records are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records: Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the United States General Accounting Office, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records as may be required by the county. 4. Retention of Records: The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the termination of the Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this contract. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to county, state or federal personnel. 5. Termination: a. Written Notice: This Contract may be terminated by either party,, at their sole discretion, upon thrity-day written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform: The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may pro- ceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract, as the case may be. c. Cessation of Funding: In the event that funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement: This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures: Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract including but not limited to monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in :mitten "Informal Agreements" entered between the Contractor and the Count;. Such "Informal Agreements" when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarity that which is already required hereunder. Further, any "Informal Agreement" entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract including any sums o: money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. "Informal Agreements" may be approved for, and executed on behalf of the County by the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. i Initials: iZ'/�-�_ 7- ontractor Department 20 - 023 . NUMBER ......_......� 8. Modifications and Amendments: This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. 9. Disputes: Dispgreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final deter- mination in writing by the Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. 10. Law Governing Contract: This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance With Federal and State Regulations: Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County: Subject to the disputes provision contained herein, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original-Contract: The original copy of this Contract and of any amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment: The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work con- templated under this Contract without .first obtaining written approval from the County. Such approval shall be attached and made a part of this Contract. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status: This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of Interest: Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing Board of Directors (or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of Board of Directors as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a coraoration. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any Board of Directors of the Contractor shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Initials: t-/ Contractor Department - 2 - 00229 S. x NUMBER _...'�'Q 023 17. Confidentiality: Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employess to comply with the provisions of Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and any other State or Federal statute or regulation respecting confidentiality to assure that: a. All applications and records concerning any inc'.ividual made or kept by any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of any pro- vision of the Welfare and Institutions Code relating to any form of public social. services will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose- not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be pub- lished or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally violating Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is guilty of a misdemeanor. 18. Nondiscriminatory Services: Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification: The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County, its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with its operations or its services hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance: During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as co-insured with limit of at least $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with satisfactory evidence of Insurance including a provision for thirty days written notice to County before cancellation or material change, evidencing the above- specified coverage. The Contractor also shall provide the County with a certi- ficate of insurance evidencing workmen's compensation insurance coverage for its employees. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance, as to the County, the State and Federal governments, its officers, agents, and employees, so that any other policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under said insurance. 21. Notices: All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the Director of the Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. Initials: w�'� Y..L^# Contractor Department - 3 - Uw?30 IL i er SPECIAL CONDITIONS Number s 1. Prior to entering on g up performance of this. Contract, ,the Contractor. shall.: have in effect a blanket fidelity bond and shall submit a:copy of said bond'ta the F County for approval, in the amount of $30,780, covering all officials,.emAoyees, and agents handling or having access to funds received or disbursed by:the Contractor , under this contract, or who are authorized to sign or cotmtersign checks`. Contractor shall maintain such bonding in effect throughout the effective" period of this Contract. 2. Contractor shall insure compliance with Federal Interagency Day, Care requirements pursuant to Section 522 (D) of the Economic Opportunity Act. 00, Initials: Contractor Departwnt, • _ 4 V� '; 4 ti: i SERVICE PLAN 20 - 023- Number Contractor shall purchase a minimum of 330 campership slots to provide a minimum of 32,500 hours of child care at fourteen (14) hours per day per child for. use by AFDC (Aid for Families with Dependent Children) children during the school vacation period of the summer of 1975. The Contractor shall maximize the number of child care camperships to be purchased through the interim payment received from County, by soliciting cash donations from private contributors and by requesting a proportion of free child care camperships from the camp organizations from whom such camperships will be purchased. The Contractor shall provide, at no cost to the County, overall administration and incidental expenses of the child care campership program. The County's total payments to the Contractor shall be expended solely to purchase child care camper- ships of one week or a maximum of two weeks, in summer camps capable of looking after the physical, nutritional, emotional, educational and social needs of the youngsters in their care and mindful of the child's safety, well-being and potential for development in the above-stated areas. Contractor's contracts for the purchase of child care camperships shall be subject to the prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. All payments by Contractor to camp operators for child care camperships shall be based on the operator's full casts in the provision of the child care campership services, shall not exceed amounts reasonable and necessary to assure quality of service, but in no case shall the cost exceed $1.05 per child care hour. Such costs may include cost of transportation as one component of child care campership services, as referenced in paragraph below. The children who shall receive child care camperships through the terms .of this Contract shall: be referred by the Contra Costa County Social Service Depart- ment to the Contractor. After receipt of a referral, the Contractor shall diligently attempt to place the child in a suitable child care camp program. The Contractor shall have direct contact with the parent or guardian or County representative as necessary to ensure that this is accomplished and that the parent shall be involved, as appropriate, to help achieve the goals of child development and parent education. The Contractor shall attempt to fill child care camperships as equally as possible. ` throughout all geographic areas of the County. The Contractor shall assume responsibility for providing transportation to and from a central pick-up location for each child placed in a summer camp program for whom this transportation is needed. In connection with Paragraph 6, Audits in Payment Provisions, Contractor- shall provide County with a Certification (prepared by a Certified Public Accountant) of its Cost Report and Settlement required under this Contract. Initials: /C/- Contractor Department 00232 O In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 19 75 AS In the Matter of Lease with John Bessolo. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a lease with Yx. John Bessolo for the use of property in Rodeo, California by the UPSPROUT Community Garden. Project during the period Pay 20, 1975 through May 19, 1976. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order_entered on the; minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. cc: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board o Attn: Alan Pfeiffer Office of Economic Supervisors Opportunity affixed this 27th day of May 19 , County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator / Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Mr. John Bessolo Maxine M. Neufeld 0023 LEASE (Contra Costa Community Gardens Project) 1. Lease Identification. Department: Contra Costa County Office of Economic Opportunity Subject: UPSPROUT Community Gardens 2. Parties, The County of Contra Costa County, California, (Lessee) for its-5epsrtment named above, and the following named Lessor rratually agree and promise as follows : Name : John F. Bessolo Address : 113 Parker Avenue Rodeo, Calif. 3. Term. The effective date of this Lease is May 19, 1915 and terminates Mev 18, 1976 unless sooner termi.na-6d as provided herein. 4. Lessee's Obligation. In consideration for this Lease, Lessee shall pay the sum or One Dollar (61.00) to Lessor for the entire term of the Lease. 5. Lessor's Obligations. Except for the improvement described in section b of this ease, essor shall let the vacant land described as follows : Parcel # 357-052-002-7 500 block of 3rd St. Between Gibbs and Son's furniture store and 512 3rd St. Rodeo, Ca. 6. Improvements. Improvements consisting of the following are located upon the leased land and are not included in the Lease : None 7. Su ersadi Ri hts. The land leased hereunder is leased subject to the to owing superseding easements and rights: None 8. Utilities. Water necessary for the irrigation of the crops to be grown on ES76 premises shall be available during the term of this Lease from the facilities of the None a. Pro * ct. This Lease implements in .Whole or in part the follow- ing desc-rued Project: The Contra Costa County Office of Economic Opportunity has assigned personnel to the establishment of commuuity vegetable gardens under the Federal Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1974. These gardens are operated on a non-profit basis in order to provide food and gardening experience for low- income families and groups. The operation by which this purpose will be earri�-d out has been labeled IIUPSPROUT Community Gardens" 10. General Conditions. This contract is subject to the General Conditions attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 11. Legal Authority. This contract is entered into, under and subject to the following legal authority: Government Code 26227 _ 12. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hersto. LESS R LESSN Con 3 Costa County oz Print Nara& C,h Man,. soar o Su a isors ATTEST: J.R. OLSSO: County Clerk and ex officio Cle* of the-)Board 00234 Ull A LEA:;E (Contra Costa Community Gardens Project) General Conditions 1. Occupation. Lessee shall be given ir.madiate possession of the demised premises. 2. Termination. This contract -gay be terminated by either party, at their soie cretien, upon thirty-day written notice thereof to the other. 3. Use. The real property herein leased shall be used for the planting, cultivating, irrigating, growing, tending, fertilizing, and harvesting of vegetable crops, including application of herbi- cides, pesticides, and fugicides and composting. A. Toolbox. Lessee may erect a toolbox for storage of shovels, rakes, hoes, cultivators, hoses an other tools normally used in connection with the activities mentioned in section 3. 5. Waste. Lessee shall not commit, or permit others to cam-.It, on the premises, waste, or a nuisance, or any other act that could disturb the quiet enjoyment of Lessor on reserved or adjacent property- 6. Hold Harmless. Lessee agrees to save, indemnify and hold harmless Lessor from all liability and claims for damages arising from or connected with Lessee's use, maintenance, or operation of the leased premises hereunder. 7. Insurance. Lessee agrees to take out and keep in force during the terra of tis Lease at its own expense public liability insurance covering and insuring all parties hereto, including the naming of the Lessor as an additional insured, against any accidents or injuries to person or property arising or occuring in or about the dein;sed premises in the miri.=um sum of 6250,OUG for any one person injured, $500,OUO for any one accident, and $100,000 for property damage. 8. Assignment and Sublease. Lessee agrees not to assign this Lease or sublease the premises without first obtaining the written consent of the Lessor. 9. Successors. This Lease shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, ana assigns of Lessor. 10. notices. All notices desired or required to be given shall be given in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the Lessee shall..be addressed to Contra Costa County, Office of Economic Opportunity, 1157 Thompson Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Lessor shall be addressed to the Lessor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. -2- 0035 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , i9'75 In the Matter of Memorandum of Lease with Peter J. Frumenti, et ux. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a Memorandum of Lease establishing April 1, 1975 as the commencement date for a Lease dated April 8, 1975 with Peter J. Frumenti and Virginia L. Frumenti, for premises at 1957-G Parkside Drive, Concord, California for occupancy by the Family Support Division of the Office of the District Attorney. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975- I hereby certify that the fcn nr*v is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Supervisors Lessor via R/P affixed this 27th day of May . 1975 Recorder via R/P J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Buildings and Grounds By Deputy Clerk ►+ 2a �2/7a otty Administrator N. In aham County Auditor-Controller District Attorney I G After Recording Return to: LQNTRA COSTA COUNTY • Contra Costa County Public Works Department Real Property Division 5th Floor, Administration Bldg. Martinez, California 94553 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE This Memorandum of Lease made and entered into this 27th day of May, 1975, by and between PETER J. FRUMENTI and VIRGINIA L. FRUMENTI, hereinafter called "LESSOR" and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "LESSEE"; WITNESSETH: LESSOR, for a valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and in consideration of the terms and provisions of that certain lease between Peter J. Frumenti and Virginia L. Frumenti, as LESSOR, and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA as LESSEE, dated April 8, 1975, does hereby lease, let and demise unto Lessee the real property hereinafter described for the purpose of conducting various office functions of Lessee. All of the ground floor area containing approximately 3,275 square feet of office space situated in that certain 3 story frame and stucco office building commonly known and desig- nated as 1957G Parkside Drive, Concord and more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached to the lease dated April 8, 1975 by and between the parties hereto. The term of this lease is for 5 years commencing April 1, 1975, and ending March 31, 1980. This Memorandum of Lease is made upon the terms, covenants, conditions of that certain lease dated April 8, 1975 described hereinabove which lease is by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof and which is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, California. The provision hereof are binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executor, administrators, successors and assigns. -1- 0023E IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed tris Memorandum of Lease as of the day and year first hereinabove written. LESSEE: LESSOR: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California to . Fru en i By Ch i an, Board of Puperyi rs V V6ia L. Fr enti ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By r Deputy RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: ey County'Admfnistfator By ea Property Agen By �• -� Dep ty Public Workt birfctbr Buildings and Grounds Division APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By Deputy County C unset -2- 00238" . ,:. G" In the Board of Supervisors of :. Contra Costa County, State_ of California May 27 , 197-2- In 97In the Matter of Contract Amendment No. 1 with Pittsburg Unified School District (No. 28-412). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to ' execute an Amendment No. l to contract with the Pittsburg Unified School District providing for $5,000 in Comprehensive Employment and Training Act, Title I, funds to cover the cost of additional training approved by the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council. PASSED by the Board on clay 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on:the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Attn: Contracts Adm. Contractor P wvisom County Auditor—Controller affixed this 27th day of May 19 75. County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk"; By96d W- Deputy,Clerk H za 12/74 . 15-M Maxine M. Ne eld Own." CONTRACT AME1JDME1JT AGREEMENT M) (Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency) 1. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Number 28 412 Department: Human Resources Agency Manpower Project Subject: Administration and staff services for a Classroom Training Program in fielding Skills serving CETA eligible adults residing in the Pittsburg area of Contra Costa County. Effective Date: September 10, 1974 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County) for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Name: Pittsburg Unified School District Capacity: Public Agency Address: 2000 Railroad Avenue, Pittsburg, California 94565 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of this Contract Amendment Agreement is 4. Amendment Specifications. The Contract identified above is hereby amended as set forth in the "Amendment Specifications" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Legal Authority. This Contract Amendment Agreement is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 31000 and 53703 Federal Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (CETA) (P.L. 93-203,87 Stat. 839); California Education Code Sec. 554 6. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR BY airman, Bo of u• rvisors Z L PZ4"7 _ Desi ate of.ficial capacity in business Attest: County Cleee and affix corporation seal) r J State of California ) By County of Contra Costa ) Deputy ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recommended by Human Resources Agency known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared liefore me today and acknowledged that By ha/they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Forth Approved: County Counsel _ Dated: sir /97) /1 Deputy _ 1,;- /Deputy. County Clerk ROBERT I Pf;XTOR DEPUTY COLVIrf CLF.•.•^,i; Contra Costa County, Q.4,forn; V'' AMENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS ''//,, i� Number 4 1 !.r ' WHEREAS, Contractor agrees to hire and employ an additional, half-time classroom instructor .for the purpose of providing additional services as described in the Service Plan hereunder, and WHEREAS, County,' in consideration thereof, agrees to increase the amounts payable to the Contractor under the Contract Payment Limit and the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures, NOW THEREFORE, the Contract identified herein is amended as specified below, while all other parts of said Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect: 1. Paragraph 4. (Payment Limit) of the Contract For Purchase of Services is hereby amended by increasing the amount of the Contract Payment Limit from $50,813 to $55,813. 2. Paragraph 1. of Section C. (Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures) of the Service Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: "1. Contractor shall provide services in accordance with the following budget of allowable expenditures: a. Administration 10 Month Contract Period Salaries $ 6,413 Travel 350 Utilities 29450 Rent 5,000 Equipment Related Costs 2,500 $16,713 b. Training Salaries and fringe benefits $27,821 Equipment Repair 700 Books 275 Instructional Supplies 8,770 37,566 c. Services Part-time Job Counselor: Salaries and fringe benefits 1,534 TOTAL CONTRACT BUDGET (Payment Limit) $55,813 d. Allowances (paid to participants by County) $28,643 e. Equipment (to be purchased by County) 3,670 TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET $88,126" �.Initials: Contractor County Dept. 0024111 Z - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California. May �7 , 1975 In the Matter of Memorandum of Lease with Peter J. Frumenti, et ux. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a Memorandum of Lease establishing May 16; 19?5 as the commencement date for a Lease dated May 7, 1974 with Peter J. Frumenti and Virginia L. Frumenti, for premises at 1957 Parkside Drive, Concord, California for occupancy by branch offices of the District Attorney and the Public Defender. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc- Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • Real Property Supervisors Lessor via R/P affixed this 27th day of May 1975 Recorder via R/P J. R. OLSSON; Clerk Buildings and Grounds County Administrator By - Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15 AA N. IngVaham County Auditor—Controller District Attorney Public Defender 00242 C Recorded at the request of CONTRA COSTA COUNTY After recording return to: Contra Costa County Public Works Department Real Property Division 5th Floor, Administration Bldg. Martinez, California 94553 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE This MEMORANDUM OF LEASE made and entered into this 27th day of May, 1975, by and between PETER J. FRUMENTI and VIRGINIA L. FRUMENTI, hereinafter called "LESSOR" and CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "LESSEE"; WITNESSETH: LESSOR, for a valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and in consideration of the terms and conditions of that certain lease dated May 7, 1974, does hereby lease, let, and demise unto LESSEE the real property hereinafter described for the purpose of conducting various office functions of LESSEE. All of the 2nd and 3rd floor area containing approximately 13,690 square feet of office space situated in that certain 3 story frame and stucco office building commonly known and designated as 1957 Parkside Drive, Concord and more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached to the lease dated May 7, 1974 by and between the parties hereto. The term of this lease is for 10 years commencing on May 16, 1975 and ending May 15, 1985. This Memorandum of Lease is made upon the terms, covenants and conditions of that certain lease dated May 7, 1974 described hereinabove, whichlease is by reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof and which is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, California. The provisions hereof are binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. -1- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Lease as of the day and year first hereinabove written. LESSEE: LESSOR: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California rumenti Bye *- n. oa o rvisors Virctffiii L. Fr6m`enti ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By r Deputy RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By County MminTstfItnt, By County Real Propertyent B Y Deputy Public Norc r Buildings and Grounds Division APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel B I� Y -Deputy-County Counsel -2- 00944 M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75, In the Matter of Letter and Preapplication in connection with Comprehensive Employment and Training Act, Title III, Funds. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Vice Chairman is AUTHORIZED to sign a letter to Mr. William J. Haltigan, Assistant Regional Director of Manpower, U. S. Department of Labor, declaring county's intent to apply for $378,000 in Comprehensive Employment and Training Act, Title III, funds for a Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (SPEDY); and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Vice Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a preapplication for said funds in connection therewith. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• U. S. Department of Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Labor Supervisors Association of Bay affixed this 27th day of May 19 75 Area Governments J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Office of the Governor B p�•© c 7�s�� , De Clerk y putt' N za 'y ti)Vctor,County Administrator Human L. Kincaid Resources Agency County Auditor-Controller Ms. J. Miller, Projects Administrator, HRA Ms. N. Van Huffel, Manpower Project, HRA 00245 i THE BOARD OR SUPERVISORS JAMES P. KENNY,mcHMoNo WARREN N.6000ESS oar OttT11iCT CHAIRMAN ALFRED M.DIAS.SAN N►aw CONTRA COSTA COVTTV JAMES P. KENNY 2ND owitocr Yic[CHAIRMAN JAMES E. MORIARTY.LAP^vgT t ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGROOM f08 JAMES R.OLSSON,COUNTY cL[RIC , 31to DISTRICT AND[%O//ICtO CLGIK 0/.THC IOARo WARREN N.BOGGESS.coNCoRo P.O. BOX 911 MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL ATH OISTRIcr CNIR!Cumic EDMUND A. UNSCHEID, •RTSau*0 !MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 ►Nome 2sa.3000 0TH DISTRICT [7IT[NSION 2371 t May 23, 1975 - ..t MR. WILLIAM J. HALTIGAN Assistant Regional Director for Manpower 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Dear Mr. Haltigan: �— Contra Costa County intends to apply for $378,000 in CETA Title III funds for a Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (SPEDY) . We.plan to provide a program of work experience to serve 1200 youths ages 14 to 21 in the entire County, excluding the City of Richmond. We estimate that the population of this area is approximately 505,000. The County of Contra Costa has general governmental authority, which includes the power to levy taxes and expend funds as well as general corporate and police powers. We also certify that the development of the program will be in compliance with the directions specified in the Act and regulations. ' Yours very truly, CONTRA CaS A COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS fl�� A- James P. Kenny, Vice cc: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator R. E. Jornlin, Director, Human Resources Agency Judy Ann Miller, Projects Administrator Nancy Tran Huffel, Manpower Project Director 1 Association of Bay Area Governments Office of the Governor 00246 li 024b Ftt:acanent A: 2I.PC21t. J PREAPPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE PART 1 2. Ae.:a w.i•A..:.e was.w 3. FNwel Lramw Agw.ey A. Appl.eaet 0"~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CONTRA COSTA' COUNTY Orga:aw:enal U..t G..wt..e.e Orq.wt MANPOWER ADMINISTRATION 651 PINE STREET Ae..w.trw...011.c. St..w Adi.e.e—P.O.bee` 450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE MARTINEZ CONTRA COSTA Ste...Add.esa_P.O.Boa C+ty CovmT SAN FRANCISCO CALIF. 94102 CALIFORNIA 94553 City Some Zap Cad0 lease zip cads S. D.scr:Pt:.e"wee of th.Poets, III ' EMLOYKENTTRAINING ACT 1973 6. F.ene1 Cat«eg/s. 7. F.dwel Fer.d:.g►ie.ded S 378,000 li. G.am..7yp. S.w., X Cetrt.y. City, otlwlSe.cilyl 10. T yP.el Ass:stawce G.awt, Lawn. Ots.w 1S.eci/yl 1r►.papAa.:en O:..ctly l.o..tl..P.ot.et 12.L"lh el P.oj.et 3600 I Cotress:owel D:all ice 17.B.g:n..:.g Dwo d L. 14 Date al Appl:ce6e. County-wide May 27 1975 iS The apPUcent cea:G.s that>o ibe bast al his L.e.l.dg.ed►el:.F,sloe dote:.dtia p•oappl:ceti«we$me wed correct,and the filing of the p..applicaiew leas b..n duly a..thor:a.d by else ye...a:eg body et tt..apo:cawt. Z 1 1 1 ! T yp.d na—e - ; Tide Ui P. KentL•/' CE[�/ BOARD of T.1epl.e.t•Nun.bw SUPERVISORS Asea CODE ett..sen a:T. S:pnmweKo,dlw•:+.drelre.cntol:.e MAY Z Z 1115 415 228-3000 2221 FW F.d..el Us.only 00247 r I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Nay 27 19 79 In the Matter of Proposed Health Service Area Designation. On the recommendation of the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is Ai3THOR= to sign a letter for transmittal to the Honorable Edmund G. Brown, Jr..; Governor, State of California, expressing Contra Costa County's disagreement with the May 19, 1975 recommendations of the State Department of Health on Health Services Area boundaries; the manner in which the recommendations were issued; and the short notice which was given on hearings in connection therewith. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board-of • Director, Human Supervisors Resources Agency affixed this 27th day of may , 197i k_4t._C1.,*e� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Yp�YB C De Clerk H sa 12/74 - I5 tN L. Kincaid 00248"', THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P. KENNY,RACHNOND WARREN N.BOGGESS AST DISTRICT CHAIRMAN ACI•RED M.DIAS,SAN PAOLO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAMES P. KENNY 2%10 DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN JAMES E. MORIARTY, LAFATLTTE JAMES R.OLSSON,couNTV CGXRIc ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROOM 109 ]RO DISTRICT AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N. BOGGESS. CONCORD P.O. BOX 911 MRS. GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRACT CHIEF CLERK EDMUND A. LINSCHEID, PIrTsouRc MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 PHONE 338.3000 5TH DISTRICT EXTENSION 3371 May 23, 1975 The Hon. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Governor of California State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Governor Brown: Contra Costa County expresses its disagreement with the Department of Health's May 19, 1975 recommendations on Health Services Area boundaries, and also expresses its concern with the manner in which the recommendations were issued and the hearings conducted on short notice. . The work of the Advisory Health Council and its Ad Hoc Committee and their public hearing process regarding Health Service Areas were exemplary. Even though the Council's recommendations do not reflect Contra Costa's position, the hearing process was open and thorough and provided the Council with a wealth of information upon which to base their recommenda- tions. It appears that the Department of Health has summarily rejected this whole public process and the deliberations of the Council and substituted instead its own arbitrary recommendations. We also object to the short time permitted for review of the new recommendations and the superficial and cursory manner in which those recent public hearings were conducted by the Department. Contra Costa County reiterates its position that the nine Bay Area counties, the area now covered by the Bay Area Comprehensive Health Planning Association and other regional agencies, is the most desirable Health Services Area designation for effective comprehensive health planning. As an alternative, this Board continues to feel that any other area designation be the largest possible, but not less than the five counties of Contra Costa, Alameda, San Francisco, San Mateo and Marin. The area boundaries proposed in the Department of Health's recommendations with respect to the Bay Area and Northern California do not in any way reflect a realistic or feasible approach to effective planning. We strongly urge rejection of these recommendations, and request that further consideration be given to the establishment of Health Service Areas more closely resembling the configurations recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee. Sincerely, JAMES P. KENN Chairman, Board o Supervisors JPK :cjg 00249 R EY+ .L ..' The Hon. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. May 23, 1975 Page 2 cc: State Department of Health r Attention Dr. Jerome Lackner Mr. Yoshi Honkawa, Chairman Advisory Health Council t. Assemblyman John Knox Senator John Nejedly Assemblyman Daniel Boatwright U. S. Representative George Miller, III Comprehensive Health Planning Association Attention Mr. Joe Hafey ©o2 a, a. In th R--vrA of coir ..•i r. ,.' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May �7 19 75 In the Matter of Refund to Pedro Martins and Sons, Inc. On recommendation of the Director of Planning,, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is. AUTHORIZED to refund $500 to Pedro Martins and Sons, Inc., for an anticipated. Environmental Impact Report to be prepared by the County, and for which arrangements were subsequently made by the applicant for preparation of same by a consultant (Thomas Reid Associates). ' Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc• Pedro Martins Whew my hand and the Seal of the Board of • and Sons, Inc. Supervisors c/o Planning affixed this 27th day,of May jQ 75 Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator BY Deputy Clerk sa12174 's"" N. In sham nn <; s 1' CONTRA COSTA COUNT ` ! 'r PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 1 I TO: Arthur G. Will DATE: May 19, 197S County Administrator t Attn: Frank Fernandez 1 t FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus SUBJECT: EIR Fee Refund Director of Planning � By: James F. Beiden Please obtain Board of Supervisor's approval to refund $500 to Pedro Martins and, Sons, Inc. The $500 was collected in anticipation that the County would prepare the Environmental Impact Report, but a later-decision resulted in the use of a consultant and the firm sent in the consultant's fee. Since the County will not be preparing the E.I.R.*, the refund of $500 is in order. Attached is a letter from Mr. Martins requesting the refund. I i i ^ JFB:bp I - - ' Attachment i s i i s S 1 Z 1� 1 . 0,02524- f r t PEDRO MARTINS & SONS, INC. ' . rY ED V P.G. Box bb BETHEL ISLAND, CALIN.94511 MAY 14 19 ptiaes�•e:s � � tIts hfay 12, 1975 Planning Commission Contra Costa County Administration Bldg. Miartinez, CA 94553 Subject= Pedro Martins Property -' Bethel Island Director of Planning= This is in reference to $500.00 advance fee paid -by me to your office for anticipated E.I.R. study to be done by your office. I am requesting a check for $ 00.00, as I havepaid Thomas Reid Associates for this work as recommended by you. Sincerely, Tc Y. . 00253 00253 _. t . t 4 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 . 197-1- In 97In the Matter of Justice Automation Advisory Committee (JAAC) ACTION PLAN. On the recommendation of the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt is ACKNOWLEDGED of the.- Justice Automation Advisory Committee ACTION PLAN for implemen- tation of electronic data processing projects into an integrated Criminal Justice Information System; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that submittal of the aforesaid plan to the Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County is AUTHORIZED as a county-sponsored application for federal: funding or other funding which may be available. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Criminal Justice Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of. of Contra Costa County Supervisors County Administrators thisday of_�gy 197 District Attorney County Sheriff-Coroner J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 15 M L. Kincaid 00254 RECEIVED MAYaf 1975 a ' R. aoaS J U S T I C E A U T O M A T I O N A D V I S O R Y C O M M I T T E E ACTI0N PLAN FOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY May 1975 This report was prepared under the direction of the Justice Automation Advisory Committee of Contra Costa County, by staff of the Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County under the grant from the Lary Enforcement Assistance Administration/Office of Criminal Justice Planning, for a Criminal Judicial Process Study. 1055 m ._u_ �._ JUSTICE AUTOMATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (JAAC) CHAIRPERSON ALTERNATES Thomas S. Welch Arthur Laib Supervising Management Management Analyst Analyst County Administrator's County Administrator's Office Office COMMITTEE MEMBERS Donald P. Burke Chief of Police Walnut Creek Public Safety Department Roy Chiesa Donnell Nelson Clark-Administrator Chief Deputy Clerk Walnut Creek-Danville Walnut Creek-DanviZZe Municipal Court Municipal Court John A. Davis Tim Ward Probation Officer Administrative Analyst Probation Department Emil A. Gysin Marilyn Eck Clerk-Administrator Chief Deput ' Mt. Diablo Municipal Mt. Diablo Municipal Court Court Patrick R. Murphy Bruce M. Weiss Public Defender Acting Chief Deputy Public Defender James Olsson Willard Ballenger Thomas FaZce County Clerk Assistant County Clerk Administrative Analyst Superior Court Clerk-Recorder William A. O'Malley Gary E. Strarkman James L. Miller District Attorney Assistant-in-Charge Administrative Services Westerx Area Operations Assistant District Attorney District Attorney Wilfred O'Neill Thomas Betts Court Administrator Assistant to Jury Superior Court Commissioner Barry D. Ramsay John Quartarolo Sheriff-Coroner Administrative Services Assistant IIF Sheriff-Coroner Arthur T. Sturgess L. Douglas Cervantes Supervisor, SrUsteme Project Director Division Auditor-Controller Auditor-Controller Glen C. Taylor James Clark Data Processing Programmer-Analyst Manager Data Processing Auditor-Controller 00256 A.f } J As Gy" F 7c t STAFF L. Douglas Cervantes, Project Director, Auditor-ControZter's Office, Contra Costa County, rt J. Michael Harcourt, Court Specialist r Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County'; " Shirley. K. Johnson, Secretary. Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County. SUPPORTING STAFF Thomas F. Falce, Administrative Analyst` Clerk-Recorder's Office, Contra Costa= County "s j. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Exhibits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii I. INTRODUCTION A. What is JAAC? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B. Purpose of JAAC . . . . . . . . . . . 1 C. JAAC Goals and Objectives . . . . . . . . . . 2 D. Purpose of this Report . . . . . . . . . 3 E. JAAC Staff Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 II. RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 III. THE COURTS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES A. Superior Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 B. Municipal Courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 C. District Attorney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 D. Public Defender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 E. Probation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 F. Sheriff . . . . . . . . . 19 G. Other Law Enforcement Agencies 22 IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Recommendation 1 (Register of Actions) . 24 Recommendation 2 (Master Indexing) . . . . . 25 Recommendation 3 (Calendaring) . . . . . . . . 27 Recommendation 4 (Traffic Citation) . . . . 30 Recommendation 5 (Parking Citation) . . . . . 33 Recommendation 6 (Case File Maintenance) 33 Recommendation 7 (Case Management) . . . . . . 35 Recommendation 8 (Case Following) . . . . 37 Recommendation 9 (Prisoner ID & Record Maint.) . 37 Recommendati n 10 (Booking) . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Recommendation 11 (Case Management) . . . . 38 Recommendation 12 (Crime Geo-Coding Reporting) 39 V. WORK PLAN A. Five-Year Plan - Standards and Goals. . . . . 40 B. Time Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 00258 I TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Title Page A Out-of-County Survey Trips . . . . . . . 4 B Locations of Municipal and Superior Courts . . . 7 C-1 Court-Related Yearly Filings, County Clerk (Graph) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 C-2 Court-Related Yearly Filings, County Clerk (Chart) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 D Clerical Personnel Survey . . . . . . . 14 E Cost Benefit Analysis, Register of Actions . . . 26 F Cost Benefit Analysis, Indexing. . . . . . . 28 G Cost Benefit Analysis, Calendaring (Countywide) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 H Filings per Municipal Court . . . . . . 31 I Cost Benefit Analysis, Traffic Citation . . 32 J Cost Benefit Analysis, Parking Citation . . . . 34 K Cost Benefit Analysis, Case File Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 L Time Estimate, Register of Actions . . . . 42 M Time Estimate, Indexing . . . . . . 43 N Time Estimate, Calendaring . . . . 44 O Time Estimate, Traffic 45 P Time Estimate, Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Q Time Estimate, Case File Maintenance . . . . 47 i 0025a 00 . PREFACE This Action Plan is the result of an intense study conducted by the Justice Automation Advisory Committee. The Committee began its study in August of 2974 with the main thrust aimed at creating a more efficient judicial system within Contra Costa County. The Committee and supporting staff have reviewed the many application areas involved and have reviewed potential solutions. incorporated within this Plan are the recommended priorities of systems applications within Contra Costa County. ii /( [[''�� 00400 UM60 I. INTRODUCTION A. What is JAAC? The Justice Automation Advisory Committee (JAAC) is a selected group of agency heads and administrators* who, collectively, represent the entire justice process in Contra Costa County. Specifically, the following entities are represented: 1. Courts: - Municipal - Superior 2. County: - Administrator - Auditor-Controller - Data Processing - Systems - Clerk-Recorder - District Attorney - Probation - Public Defender - Sheriff 3. Cities: - Police Chiefs' Association The selection of the Justice Automation Advisory Committee was encouraged as a result of an LEAA grant for a "Criminal Judicial Process Study" which has been conducted through the Contra Costa County Criminal Justice Agency. This grant terminated as of March 1, 1975, and is now continued under a new LEAA grant, "Automated Calendaring." The current grant provides for the continuation of staff set- vices to JAAC through June 1976. B. Purpose of JAAC In August 1974 the Justice Automation Advisory Com- mittee was formed to review and discuss existing justice information systems presently used in Contra Costa County and other selected counties within the state. * See list of Committee members. -1- 00251 The immediate purpose of JAAC has been to define policies and set guidelines for the development of an integrated and uniform justice information system, a system that can provide accurate and accessible information to the courts and all justice-related agencies on a "need-to-know" basis. Currently, the courts and criminal justice agencies involved in the litigation of a criminal case each maintain an independent, manually operated informa- tion system that provides only limited amounts of information useful only to that agency. Each agency maintains its own records, thus creating multiple levels of duplication. The scheduling error of one agency throws the schedules of all the others askew. The prime purpose of JAAC is to bridge the informa- tion gaps that exist between the justice agencies and the courts with an efficient criminal justice information system. This committee has recognized, from its inception, that to be effective in obtaining its objectives it must consider the individual and common requirements of the courts and justice-related agencies and it must set clearly understandable priorities and guidelines that illuminate and limit the extent of any systems undertaking. C. JAAC Goals and Objectives The goals and objectives of the Justice Automation Advisory Committee are as follows: 1. Identify systems problems within the judicial process network and describe the root causes. 2. Determine the feasibility and the desirability of transferring systems technology employed in other counties to Contra Costa County. 3. Outline action programs necessary to improve identified problem areas within the judicial process system and outline the economic feasi- bility for implementing such programs. 4. Prioritize identified problems and programs into a one- to five-year implementation plan. 5. Successfully implement identified systems in order of priority over the next five years. -2- t 00262 �l 6. Research and pursue all potential alternative funding sources. I D. Purpose of this Report 1. To provide background information on the opera- tion and intent of JAAC. It is specifically intended that this report will answer the questions of the varied agencies within this county from which support and endorsement is needed, as well as the questions of agencies outside the county which may provide either support or funding. 2. To briefly describe each county agency partici- pating on JAAC. 3. To clearly set forth the work and progress of JAAC to date. 4. To propose an Action Plan outlining basic future events necessary to accomplish the stated goals and objectives of the Justice Automation Advisory Committee. E. JAAC Staff Activities Messrs. Cervantes and Harcourt have provided the primary staff input to JAAC. They have worked closely with the JAAC Chairman, Mr. Welch, in developing objectives, target dates, agendas, and presentations for review by the Committee at its monthly meetings. Much of staff's time has been spent individually with justice agency administra- tors and their support staff in order to identify. systems requirements, either currently in use or in need of implementation. They have met with JAAC subcommittees for the purpose of documenting current systems and defining priorities on a department-by- department basis (i.e. , courts and justice-related agencies) . They have traveled to selected counties in California to observe criminal justice data systems and to talk with the designers and users of these systems. See Exhibit A for a list of persons and locations visited. -3- OOP-63 EXHIBIT A OUT-OF-COUNTY SURVEY, TRIPS Alameda County George Dickey, Clerk of the Oakland-Piedmont Municipal Court (CORPUS from the point of view of the largest municipal court in the system) Bill Callaway, Clerk of the San Leandro Municipal Court (Automated Traffic Citation Processing) Lowell Jensen and staff, District Attorney (Automated Case Following for the District Attorney--DALITE) Fresno County Ed Deis, Chief Deputy Clerk, Traffic Division (Automated Traffic Citation Processing) Orange County John C. Lewis, Assistant County Clerk (Criminal Justice Information Systems) Sacramento County Russ Waltrip, Systems Division (Court Information Systems) San Diego County Bud James, Director of the Law and Justice Agency (Criminal Justice Information Systems) Jessie Asuna, County Clerk (Case Scheduling/Calendaring for the Superior Court) San Joaquin County Mike Kurey, Clerk of the San Joaquin Municipal Court (Automated Traffic Citation Processing) Al Flor, Assistant County Clerk, Program Director (Case File Maintenance, Sheriff's Information System) San Francisco County Dick Delaplain, Director of Justice Information Systems (Court Information Systems) Santa Clara County Thomas Condron, Assistant Supervising Programming Analyst (The CJIC System) -4- 002�4 II. RECOMMENDATIONS Following are the systems applications recommended by the Justice Automation Advisory Committee, unanimously adopted on March 26, 1975: 1. We recommend the automation of the Register of Actions for the use of the courts and related agencies. 2. We recommend the automation of a Master Indexing system for use by the courts and related agencies. 3. We recommend the automation of a Calendaring system for use by the courts and related agencies. 4. We recommend the automation of the Traffic Citation process for use by all five municipal courts. 5. We recommend the automation of the Parking Citation process for use by all five municipal courts. 6. We recommend the automation of a Case File Maintenance system for use by the courts. 7. We recommend an automated Case Management system for the Probation Department. 8. We recommend an automated Case Following system for the District AttorneyjPublic Defender. 8. We recommend automating a County Prisoner Identifi- cation and Record Maintenance system. 10. We recommend an automated Booking system for use by the county 's law enforcement agencies. 11. We recommend the automation of a Case Management system for the Sheriff. 12. We recommend the automation of a Crime Geo-Coding Reporting system for use by all county law enforce- ment agencies. -5- 0005 III. THE COURTS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES A. Superior Court The highest court in the .county is the Superior Court (see Exhibit B) . It provides the justice system with a final disposition (barring further appeal to the State or Federal courts) . The Contra Costa County Superior Court consists of 11 depart- ments. The superior court system also provides two juvenile courts and court referees. The administrative and clerical functions of the Superior Court are served by two offices: 1. Court Administrator/Jury Commissioner. The Superior Court Administrator oZ Contra Costa County heads an office consisting of an assis- tant, two jury clerks and three civil clerks. The Administrator and his staff provide the court with the varied clerical needs not speci- fically covered within the County Clerk's Office. The Court Administrator has two specific areas of responsibility: a. He manages the courts' master calendar of contested cases, which involves the mainte- nance of both an active and a closed index of civil cases. b. He manages the random selection of prospec- tive jurors from the voters' registration file and maintains panels of jurors quali- fied for selection by the court for trial in both civil and criminal cases within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. Upon completion of jury duty the Court Adminis- trator initiates a voucher resulting in the payment of the juror. Currently the Superior Court Administrator's Office receives data processing support in the random annual selection of prospective jurors from the voters' registration file. The office further receives, at its request, computer- generated weekly jury panels which are, again, randomly selected from the annual list of prospective jurors. Juror summons are auto- matically generated, ready for mailing to each jury panelist. The system assures that a juror, once he has served or has appeared four times without being selected, will not be called again during the current or the following year. A -6- VWDO ie.ryv".LF„Pd =z..,r:...:q•,s.,,. _-:....,e-TMWMW.W"Mom .. __ ..8 -. _-.-... .-ar--pass.mn-r r ..aM .t;. r£.i `Y •r VV266 r EXHIBIT B .tllr�o� 7VNfDYoI NK 14 7 O O O U � U .-,t a o 4.) 0 ¢, o .� ,f 01.. 14 0 o ocn Ute. w .-4 w $4 O to O i O •C 'Q W 14 u u u : .c o 0 54 0' lam+ i to co tYl E to tn � it IC It II >r .o a� .r, a T Z � o x so v° cn ci t— ;saA ts vL O c ui O 0- z Z OQ 4� ,rz VQ 1_ —1 � a CC � a v v F o �O � o cn ct z rc U U 002 separate subsystem of the automated jury system provides for the manual calculation of jury reimbursement for time and mileage. The County's Data Processing Department is presently working on an expansion of the automated juror system that will automatically provide payment to the juror upon completion of his service. This will greatly aid in alleviating a bottleneck result- ing in unwanted delays in paying the juror.* In the area of civil calendaring, records and indices are maintained on a strictly manual basis. The greatest area of service offered by our Court Administrator is the maintaining and managing of the civil caseload calendar. In current years calendar management techniques have received much attention. Many judges and court administrators have pointed out that by the adoption of sound prescreening techniques and policies related to settling cases prior to trial, the caseload backlog can be dramatically reduced. A court information system in which the presiding judge and court administrator were permitted to classify cases by major and minor categories would enable them to make better management decisions concerning the assignment of cases to judges as well as to give better information concerning the probability of a given case being settled outside of court. Contra Costa County, according to a recent cal- endaring study conducted by the California Judicial Council, is experiencing an 18- to 20- month delay from the at-issue memo to disposi- tion of civil cases that go to trial. (Only 13% of the cases filed go to trial.) Recommendation We recommend the automation of a Calen- daring system for use by the courts and related agencies. 2. County Clerk. The Contra Costa County Clerk's Office maintains a clerical staff of 50 people who devote their time to court-related activi- ties. There are 12 court clerks, 10 legal clerks, 13 intermediates, 4 clerk-typists, * Jury selection for the municipal courts is automated through step one (random annual selection of prospective jurors) . All other phases are manually performed. -8- 00268. meow 5 microfilm technicians, and 4 administrative personnel. The generalized duties of the County Clerk are enumerated in the Government Code Sections 69841 through 69847. They provide that the County Clerk perform, in brief, the following functions: S69841 - Attend each session of the Superior Court 569842 - Maintain indexes S69843 - Issue processes and notices S69844 - Take minutes, keep records, enter judgments, etc. S69845 - Maintain register of actions S69846 - Maintain file of papers and records associated with cases S69847 - Maintain naturalization records In addition to the functions specified by the statute, the Contra Costa County Clerk maintains the following uncontested calendars (lasting no longer than 20 minutes) : 1. Law and motion (Martinez and Richmond) 2. Criminal arraignment 3. Uncontested (Martinez and Richmond) 4. Domestic relations 5. Probate (Martinez and Richmond) 6. Juvenile (Martinez and Richmond) The workload of the County Clerk can be directly related to the number of filings. In 1974 the Clerk's Office was responsible for maintaining the records and actions involving some 16,500 filings. During the nine-year period of 1966 through 1974, filings increased at 39% (see Exhibits C-1 and C-2) per annum. The Clerk maintains a yearly average of 14,053 case files, with an average increase of 574 new filings per year. A recent survey taken in the Clerk's Office shows the number of documents filed each month ranges from 16,000 to 18,000. Each of the documents, when filed, requires the Clerk to identify, review for completeness, enter to appropriate Register of Action, and set an appropriate calendar date. Typical of documents filed are: petitions, reports, orders, transfers, warrants, notices, subpoenas, transmittals, informations, transcripts, minute orders, face sheets, -9- 0026 7 YNaiw{a..lfpp,�ww./ /i ;Ina■p�.laYA�/M�f�wi,arY.now".iii.,.,,r�,rMf,now""a"Susan 1..,,' • .aaMMN.rfiw.OwM;A�M�.IM.AMWGS .Rarf. .'�'fia.'M'..■.itr,aiNr�asr,faa.N • 1 r,wura.,..ww.a ,,.r..,■a.,aawa..ra..i,r.Na",..r,.,s.a.,a,..,■. ■r wrYa■iiY.wawwwr,r.rs ,wS,t - sign" rill,wg., Mru • iwawa i.a.iar.w N.,sa*wwuaarw,.ra�rsiii.,1arwwrr��urii ,rfiaYi r.-iif� saSa■aa..aa.S�mga N.MM Ml.fna i 'M"w�'.'� iOa�"MY'/a'i'.'ari'_.a_Napp.'t��M'fs''s■s�,'fNiuwaY'asii"" s, i �uiseu Mai 'r•{l/i,iaii.auiiisii arli�wawi. --- .aa■/ srul/r1,...N „ VtlNaa • Sangamon BEIM ■a. /m .r■ mmuuw Yaw wrwun igwrw,iS,saawia.gwr.raSmw ,.algaOrllaug.NN /tw■f �aaM,■iru��uga.gy�.aaiiarg.11 mw■w, __ • 1iw...aAw, aWrr/r■tiR7rMisamassess emu • U�U�d►,M��q •lla�ras.ls7i.s /w+r�sa:aasi,�'Ya'a',anasa"ess.aauua'.aaaa i■.•\a anouuman .c..; uo'aaaa= aaas.'aasbases rw -- Ss,a,waairrar.raisi Ysrrrurlrgrr. 'who .aw�r,N.�\.fw.a.aamaS.asasS..gfl,nag.,n c '� 11 aa'"aiAl tisYsurgairas Yii,arar g1,ga■ isr�'awaas,SSarm.i../o/af..rogagrr anwaa..S.SawnppaSw.aws.�..a,gimn.grlma.tggagg■ aial.gaw..walYaa..g g1/N/..1r11e1rlg..S/ ,may./ rrr,a.r.rlaraurrau ' f aawni. u wa', �b'Iinr'.{ w"mMulmassa"uaaniiiiiiiiiiiisissiis •aili.a a■ a�rr.'sla,i'iwtfMialtri' aiaSNiai+mess":Aaa" eaam se egos MEN goes MU!"Us"UHH: t pal ;)i lip aman il,m 1.111//.gllfl Nffglaf,! .gen N,gl.,aa,.rgmn Gorgeous uuaur,ar.ria ...wa N.uN.a /1r. ur.i.grgr rslra 11r�1aa___._ swSY 1.r1a..Yf 1,1.s"CUN: wiiw aig,ra.awwi.ars.tigaia 9"0 so�a rvs •a rwwwi_ : i'�m�saaSSaan x asxsonse ♦ ew, �� IMawwSSo ::Num"oum ..rr„ gw1,w .arra+�E80 usi'ii'aiai'ra6Nsipusaxi • �� lk au"uamsS cam- s,saraai■r .was.s,' asa'aa'�iiiu�a`S'aa:Nsai sales 'olm"Umg 411:11 Mal auloss"t ' • .Sia. =�=W" stuman n"'i 'gaairai'09" mea YW pmffw M nwiri d.maa.■ oMae wn r irk /ff • f ♦ ,a.ai a.M. Ism\ ss aau'a !,f • M� C,aSo, awr„>i,wiEMU ,a,., pf„fS.ef nates � r f aroll"ao"am " • aalnanalanlf4 �� .L'a�:�is" as EXHIBIT C-2 O n r- M ri r- r- 0 0 V� M Mo O r M O cis t .z cm r, M H ri to m z .-1 H .W� cu \0 - 41 co ri v1 -- ri to 0 .O .O cv a 0UtLO m ° : JHO ° e U c co 4-3 Q ~ O Rt ri U1 O w w a H a� o c ri UN s rn a z N r- r- r v. t 1 rl CI- r- d i. W -y' UN O n r- O O ri z .-I 0 to O .0 n e-1 r♦ n ft C.t Cit C� Cil cry ct. C H ►-� C3 ,� f=] H r• to a F m -o %0 zy a H N r- cvUN - a� .o r a• �. a y E pdq ch M lr- .HD N U'% y to N M ` 0 d O O s-i ri 7-1 .-i ri .-4 ,-1 ri ri H M •-+ tit 0. o x o Lr\ ~ a i Fc>~ Q H ri -sO O .-i O r-i F O C, Cil O r r- to cv O to O O ri O -.t - CT V r/ rf rt ri ri F ri ; n1 a v .4 as o z V-4 CI--4 o .moi %0 ai N -o ° --4 W .o m o c 0 - u, .o ra 0 t- 1Oi EH-+ Chi M v. M M M ^7 L, U U CV %O cn an ct. CVCT CT ri E Sr C to _7 ri r tO .7 to u'% W-4 to r1 ri \0 NO .O M i3. U 0 U M M M M M M M M r„) S,y 4.r W CL d! .a M r r ri ri Q• .� - .-i r4 0 d ri CS• TO c+. cc U\ CA CI. o cs F as CT C*% O r- to C3% M cn s> O f-i C14 N - ff. - m UN O s~ C F '-1 ri ri ri ri H s-i ,-i H v -1 � -.i ac w bD c a .o r• m rn o 0-1 cu M -t cS cs sn d .O a %0 1%o Tse C% 0% (7� CJ- LT O• Gr m U Q1 S. a. H H H ri r-4 H r-i ri r+ > > > Q7 -11- 00271 dispositions, articles, etc. The sheer volume and the requirement that all information relating to a filing 'be easily accessible has placed an increasing, amount of pressure on this office to look toward automa- tion. Through the proper utilization of` automation the level of service currently_ offered by the Clerk's Office can be :signifi.- cantly improved while maintaining; or. even lower- ing the future costs of such services. < Recommendation We recommend the automation of the "Register- of Actions for the use of the courts and related agencies. Recommendation We recommend the automation of a Master Indexing System for use by the courts and related agencies. B. Municipal Courts The county is served by five municipal courts jsee Exhibit B, page T) which collectively encompass 13 departments No. of Court Departments Delta Municipal Court, Pittsburg 2 Brentwood Branch Court Mt. Diablo Municipal Court, Concord 3 Martinez Branch Court Richmond Municipal Court, Richmond 3 Walnut Creek Municipal Court, 3 Walnut Creek West Municipal Court, San Pablo 2 £1 Cerrito Branch Court The administration of each of the courts is directed by a clerk-administrator and an assistant. -12- 00272' According to a recent personnel survey, a total of 94 clerical personnel are employed by the five municipal courts (see Exhibit D) . The prime func- tions of the municipal courts are: - Traffic infractions - Parking and other infractions - Small claims and civil actions under $5,000 - Misdemeanors - Preliminary hearings of all felonies - Juvenile hearings (traffic) The municipal courts of Contra Ccsta County process over 215,000 moving and parking traffic citations annually, ranking tenth among 58 counties in the state in such filings. This workload consumes approximately 9 of 13 judge positions and 44 of the 94 clerical positions in the municipal courts of Contra Costa County. Clerk, prosecutor and bailiff time add considerably to the total effort expended by the criminal justice agencies in Contra Costa County. All traffic citations are currently pro- cessed by all municipal courts in the county by a uniform manual system, in much the same manner as they have been since 1958. A severe backlog accumu- lation of traffic cases is being experienced by several municipal courts; for example, Walnut Creek- Danville Municipal Court's backlog of untried court trials increased from 80 on February 1, 1973, to 283 on November 1, 1973, of which approximately 95% were traffic cases. While the population has increased from 558,400 in 1970 to approximately 605,000 in mid 1974 (8% growth) , the total traffic and parking citation filings grew from 180,096 to 198,068 during the same period (10% growth) . The rate of increase in population and traffic citations is anticipated. to accelerate as the impact of the completion of the Bay Area Rapid Transit System is fully experienced. Reasons for this include the BART-generated increase in population as well as BART's addition as a new parking citation issuing agency within its parking facilities. For the above reasons it becomes clear that the design and implementation of an automated traffic citation system will potentially provide the greatest impact on the municipal courts in terms of serving the judiciary and reducing the clerical burden. This in turn will free time and resources for criminal and civil matters, improving the whole system. -13- 00273 EmUBIT D CLERICAL PERSONNEL SURVEY COURT AGENCY CRL%LVJM CIVIL T FIC PARKING OTHER Delta 4 3 3 1 Mt. Diablo 6 1/2 5 1/2 14 2 R.ichmDad 2 1/2 4 1/2 9 1 - Walnut Creek 3 3/4 4 1/4 13 3 West 4 1/2 3 1/2 5 1 Subtotal: 21 1/4 20 3/4 44 8 - Juvenile) County Clerk 3 9 - - 6. (Jury) Court/Administrators - 3 2 District Attorney Superior) (Family - - Subpoena) 4 Support) Z (Muni) 2 8 Public Defender 9 - - - Probation 2 - - - Sheriff 1 - TOTAL: 49 1/4 34 3/4 44 8 10 *Includes small claims, jury services, accounting operations, administrative and personnel services. MH:sj 1/29/75 -14- ............... Recommendation Me recommend the automation of the Traffic Citation process for use by all five municipal courts. Recommendation Me recommend the automation of the Parking Citation process for use by all five municipal courts. In addition to the requirements imposed by traffic and parking citations, the municipal courts must maintain accurate and accessible information relating to the arraignment of felonies and the processing, through final disposition, of misdemeanor and civil cases. Case-related data is currently restricted to the one-page docket/Register of Actions. The municipal courts are looked to by all other criminal justice agencies as the prime source of information concerning the status and disposition of all criminal cases. Over the years the municipal courts have tried to be responsive to the particular needs of each agency. They have, however, now come to the point where, because of volume and cost, they are having to review and reevaluate the services they are providing to outside agencies. Such items as specialized disposition reporting, trial notices to defendants, and the filling out of specialized forms for the convenience of other criminal justice agencies, are currently being modi- fied or discontinued. The courts realize this will place a larger workload upon the using agencies but feel they have no alternatives short of developing automated systems. While recognizing that Contra Costa County's munici- pal courts are autonomous, it is noteworthy that the administrators meet regularly to discuss and adopt solutions to common problems. Many of the systems, procedures and forms used within the courts have been standardized as a result of these informal administrators' meetings. The fact that this frame- work of cooperation exists promises to be very valuable when the work of designing and implementing specific court systems actually is begun. -15- VV r� i C. District Attorney The Contra Costa County District Attorney presently operates from three principal offices. The Richmond office handles prosecution in the west county area and the Martinez office covers the central-eastern portion of the county. A new office in Concord has recently been opened to serve the central-southern area. The District Attorney is responsible for prosecuting all crimes under State law occurring within the county as well as county ordinance violations. Through the Family Support Division the District Attorney is responsible for the collection of family support payments from absent fathers who fail to provide for their minor children. In 1971, the Consumer Fraud Division of the District Attorney's Office was created to handle the prosecution of pollution, consumer fraud and related cases. Since 1968 the District Attorney has been assigned the responsibilities of the Public Administrator- Public Guardian. In this role the District Attorney probates estates of residents of the county who die without leaving a will. In the past eight years (1967 - 1974) the combined total of misdemeanors and felonies has grown nearly 100% or at an average rate of 12 1/2% per annum. The average workload per deputy has grown 14.1% despite the hiring of some 16 additional deputies. Correspondingly, the workload increase has had an impact upon the clerical staff working within the District Attorney's Office. Of major importance to the District Attorney and his legal staff, as it is also with the courts, is the tracking of cases in process. Information relating to the status and scheduling of case-related events must be easily accessible and accurate. Facts relat- ing to the filing of the complaint, submission of discoveries and the issuing of subpoenas and trial notices must be captured and made available to the appropriate deputy or other parties upon request. Automatically, upon the receipt of a criminal com- plaint the District Attorney checks to see if the person in question has been filed on before or if there are any current actions being taken against the suspect. This is done by a clerk who manually reviews a Flexo-strip index file which tags names to case numbers. The County's Data Processing Depart- ment is currently undertaking the design and -16- 002'7S implementation of a new indexing system as the size of the existing index and the volume of checking have become too great for the present system. The District Attorney is increasingly experiencing the need to know more about the nature of the cases his office is involved with. He must know and have control of workload assignments to his deputies. He must know whether the cases upon which his office is filing are being successfully prosecuted in the courts. Inasmuch as his agency must coor- dinate nearly all of its activities with the courts, there is a need for an easy exchange of information between his office and the courts. Recommendation We recommend an automated Case Following system for the District Attorney. D. Public Defender The Contra Costa County Public Defender currently maintains its home office in Martinez with branch offices in Pittsburg and Richmond. A third branch office, now under construction, will soon be located in Concord. Duties; The Public Defender is responsible, 17-77 upon request of the defendant in question or upon order of the court, to defend, counsel and advise such defendant if the latter is financially unable to employ private counsel. . . ."* The 1973-74 personnel makeup of this office consis- ted of 56 people of which 40 were professional and 16 clerical. During the fiscal year 1973-1974 the Public Defen- der's office opened a total of 11,225 new case files. Hundreds of those cases were referred to private counsel either because of conflicts or because they represented an excessive workload In his letter of transmittal covering the 1973-1974 Annual Report of the Public Defender, the Public Defender, William R. Higham, stated that "The major problem facing our office in 1973-1974 was that of * Annual Report, Public Defender, Contra Costa County, California, 1973-1974 -17- 00277 -17- 00277 r M excessive workload. . . . He stated there was an immediate need to " . . . professionally and manager- ially assess the situation and do all that we can, properly and ethically, to make resources stretch. . . .' He further stated that " . . . all aspects of manage- ment of our office are mutually Mpactive of one another; for example, unless management data systems are upgraded personnel administration will suffer. . . . the county would do well to develop a sophisticated 'systems approach' to its criminal justice planning; attempting to level the stool by uncoordinated length- ening of legs has not worked and never will." The Public Defender maintains an absolute minimum of case statistics for use by management. A recent attempt to maintain a card index file for yielding immediate statistics on open and closed cases was found to be too burdensome and therefore discontinued. The need for a case following system which reflects events on a timely and accurate basis is, as with the courts and the District Attorney, a critically needed element to a coherent scheme of management. Because of the similarities of data currently being collected by this office and the courts, the facts strongly suggest that a cooperative and coordinated effort will make sense in designing and implementing an effective information system. Recommendation We recommend an automated Case Following system for the Public Defender. E. Probation In the criminal justice system, the Probation Depart- ment provides investigative, advisory and counselling services for the courts. The department has two divisions to provide these services: an adult division and a juvenile division. The adult division primarily makes written reports and recommendations on adult offenders found guilty of criminal offenses. They also supervise those adults placed on probation by the courts as an alternative to confinement. Since 1970, the activity of the adult division (court investigation, reports and probationers supervision) has increased approximately 70%. Part of this increase is a result of a change in the law which now requires 18-year-olds to be certified as adults, that second-offender drunk drivers be referred for pre-sentence investigation and certain -18- 002'78 first-time drug offenders be referred for investiga- tion and possible diversion to a drug program. The juvenile division conducts informal hearings and investigations of delinquency cases under the juris- diction of the juvenile court. They file petitions, provide temporary detention and make written reports and recommendations. They must also supervise those juveniles declared wards of the court. The County's Data Processing Department is currently in the pro- cess of implementing a Juvenile Register of Actions, including referral information and dispositions. Also included will be a Deputy Caseload Report. Since 1973, the activity of the juvenile division has decreased by approximately 28%. This decrease is due to the changes in the law and the shift of responsibility for dependent children to the Social Service Department. It appears that the trend of juvenile crimes is now starting to increase and the activity of the juvenile division is expected to start picking up again. In addition to this, the Probation Department is also responsible for providing written reports and recommendations in dissolution and custody cases and in cases of step-parent adoptions. Like some of the other departments involved in the criminal justice system, workload patterns depend on population and environmental conditions as well as changes in the law. This department, like others, must maintain an accu- rate case management system on each individual. The accuracy involved will go a long way in affecting any future decisions that will in turn affect the individual and society. Recommendation We recommend an automated Case Management system , for the Probation Department. F. Sheriff The Department of Sheriff-Coroner has the prime responsibility for crime prevention and detection in Contra Costa County. While the Sheriff has legal jurisdiction over the entire county, police services are provided only to the unincorporated areas and to cities which contract -19- r 002 `a7 WON . w with the Department. The incorporated cities main- tain their own police force; however, if for some reason these cities need help, the Sheriff's Depart- ment will provide the necessary assistance. This Department also provides other services to the county: assigns bailiffs for the superior court, serves writs and processes, maintains custody of prisoners at the county jail and rehabilitation center, and provides coroner services. To provide these services, the Department is organ- ized into nine divisions: administrative, patrol, investigation, detention, communications, coroner, service, inspection and control, and criminalistics laboratory. The increase in criminal activity fluctuates with the population and with the environmental conditions. This increase affects all aspects and all areas of the criminal justice system. This is particularly so for the Sheriff's Department where the justice process begins. Accuracy of prisoner/offender processing, identification and records trailing throughout the entire criminal justice system, there- fore, becomes even more important. Recommendation We recommend the automation of a ease Management system for the Sheriff. A case management system only partially solves the problem of crime prevention. The ability to deter- mine and predict possible areas of crime and report- ing these predictions will provide the Sheriff with another tool that can be used for crime prevention and detection. Since 1970, arrests have increased approximately 52%. The number of investigations increased 19%; the num- ber of warrants received and processed increased 40% and the number of requests for criminalistics examinations increased by 22%. The potential for mishandling and mismanagement at this point because of overloading the capabilities of the present system can create problems throughout the entire justice system. -20- 00280 Recommendation We recommend the automation of a Crime Geo-Coding Reporting system for use by all county law enforcement agencies. Bookings: The current procedure for booking prison- ers results in duplication of effort by municipal police departments and the County Sheriff's Depart- ment. The booking procedure generally involves searching the prisoner, cataloging his property, fingerprint- ing, taking mug shots, completing an information sheet, and sending fingerprint information to the FBI and CII. In 1971 police agencies in Contra Costa County booked 30,533 prisoners. Of that total, it is estimated that 4,475 (15%) were booked more than once for the same offense (once by the arresting agency and then again by the Sheriff's Department) . The estimated cost of rebooking the 4,475 persons amounted to about $37,000. This duplication of effort continues throughout the booking system adding more costs and chance for error. Additional time and cost are also involved in book- ing the same person at different times during the year arrested for different offenses. It is a legal requirement to follow the same general procedure for each booking whether or not the individual has been booked before. The degree of detail can be reduced for repeat offenders. In reducing the detail care must be given to protect the civil rights of the individuals involved. It is estimated that an additional $10,534 was spent in 1971 by police agencies because each person rebooked required a complete fingerprinting. Recommendation We recommend an automated Booking system for use by the county 's law enforcement agencies. The detaining of prisoners includes only Cie time spent by police agencies in handling and attending prisoners from their arrest to their initial court appearance. It does not include the post-arraignment and post-sentencing detention responsibility of the County Sheriff's Department. -21- 00282 { UU4U1 On the average, police agencies detain prisoners for about 12 hours from the time of arrest to arraign- ment. This involves providing at least two meals, regular inspection, and special handling for attorney visits, telephone calls, etc. Specific problems associated with handling prisoners during the time from arrest to arraignment are summarized below: 1. Most agencies maintain their own detention facilities which take up needed space in the department. 2. When detention facilities are occupied, the attendance of at least one officer -is required at all times to inspect and attend the prisoners. Recommendation We recommend automating a County Prisoner ..identification and Record Maintenance system. G. Other Law Enforcement Agencies Inclusive of the Sheriff's Department, Contra Costa County has 17 law enforcement agencies operating within the county, 13 of which are city .police departments: City Police Departments: Antioch Pinole Brentwood Pittsburg Clayton Pleasant Hill Concord Richmond El Cerrito San Pablo Kensington Walnut Creek Martinez Contra Costa County Sheriff East Bay Regional Park District California State Highway Patrol Bay Area Rapid Transit Police Services The East Bay Regional Park District supports a ranger force to provide police protection to 25 parks, some 30,000 acres both in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. The California State Highway Patrol provides traffic control on the state highways in Contra Costa County. -22- 00282 -22- 00282 Strength: The Contra Costa County law enforcement personnel (sworn) total 799, with the following breakdown: Field patrol . . . . . . 425 Criminal investigation . . . . . 97 Support services . . . . . . . . 277 To assist law enforcement personnel in handling their tasks, 355 police vehicles were utilized; 160 were marked and equipped patrol cars; 100 were used by investigative personnel; the remaining 95 vehicles (wagons, vans, motorcycles, motor scooters and boats) were used as needed. Service Area: The Contra Costa County law enforce- ment agencies serviced 784,4 square miles and 3,371.7 linear street miles. The average number of calls for service handled by each officer during 1971 ranged from a low of 225 in Brentwood to a high of 850 in Richmond. On the average, field patrol officers handled 534 calls each during 1971. On a daily basis the average number of calls for ser- vice handled by each officer ranged from a low of .92 in Brentwood to a high of 3.82 in Richmond The number of calls for service handled daily by officers available each day for field patrol averaged 2.35 throughout the county. By comparing the total time spent by officers responding to calls to the total time available to field patrol officers, it is possible to determine a measure of uncommitted patrol time. On the average, police agencies in the county spent about 43% of their time responding to calls for service. The amount of "uncommitted" patrol time (time not actively involved in servicing or reporting to a call for service) ranged from a high of 79% in Clayton to a low of 30% in Richmond. Recommendation We recommend the automation of a Crime Geo-Coding Reporting system for use by a1Z county Zaw enforcement agencies. -23- 00283 IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS In developing this Action Plan we have divided the Contra Costa County Justice Automation System into a series of modules. We have specifically chosen this methodology in order to aid in the successful completion and opera- tion of the system. Each module has specific, limited goals, goals that are logical and necessary in the operation. The goals in summation will produce a more efficient, informative system that will be responsive to the community needs. The first modules within the system directly involve the courts within the county. The Justice Automation Advisory Committee and its staff feel strongly that this is where the need is greatest and therefore adopted Recommendations 1 through 6 unanimously. Recommendation 1 We recommend the automation of the Register of Actions for the use of the courts and related agencies. This system will contain the base data needed for a court-oriented, case following system. From it the Automated Calendaring and Indexing systems will be generated. It will provide the using agencies (District Attorney, Probation, Public Defender, and Sheriff) and the general public with the knowledge of where a case is, at what stage it is in, who the principles involved are and what has happened to it. Based on guidelines provided the system, it will inform the agencies and courts of necessary action that is due and aid greatly in the court management of cases. The respective court clerk/administrators will be responsible for the data and flow of information within this module. Input - Essentially the system will receive each formal action that takes place on a case, including but not limited to: A. The defendants, plaintiffs, and attorneys names, - addresses, and other pertinent I.D. B. The case number, lower court number, charge filed C. The formal action taken by the court Output - The design of this system is extremely critical. It becomes a data base for future needs of the courts and therefore it is necessary that well-thought-out codes, methods of input and storage be structured. -24- 009R4 The automated Register of Actions will one day tie into an automated Booking system (Recommendation 10) and the District Attorney's Case Following system (Recommenda- tion 8) so that much of its input will eventually come automatically from other modules. It must be capable of operating on its own; therefore, the design for input- ting must be flexible. The automated Register of Actions will provide: A. Notices to the parties involved of pending actions and/or actions taken by the court. B. Information to pertinent parties, when possible, as to actions required of them by the courts. C. Inventory and control of warrants, as a subsystem of this main system. The output will also involve providing data to most of the other systems recommended. As new modules are added, adjustments to the method of output flow will be made. Management Data - As a byproduct of the systems opera- the clerk/administrators will receive sta- tistical reports, which will be designed to satisfy their management needs and the state and court adminis- trators' statistical requirements. Control reports will provide the court clerk/administrators the account- ability necessary to manage the input. Among these will be input counts, document inventories, and edit reports. A cost analysis of the system is provided in Exhibit E. You will note we expect a high amount of savings to be provided by the system in terms of clerical work. As noted above, the benefits will be great. Recommendation 2 We recommend the automation of a Master Indexing system for use by the courts and related agencies. The Index system will be designed to extract name data from the Register of Actions system and generate an alphabetic file of all plaintiffs and defendants within a case. The Index will incorporate, progressively, the booking, file or docket numbers assigned by the arrest- ing agency, District Attorney, courts, and Public Defender. A witness and attorney file will also be explored to go beyond the legal requirements. -25- IN0285 e , EXHIBIT E COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS REGISTER OF ACTIONS* Municipal and Superior Courts A. Operation Cost of Existing System Personnel: Head count . . . . . . 59 Dollar cost: S850/mo x 12 + 201 . . . . . . .$722,160 Supervision overhead cost, 751 of $150,000 . . . . . . . . 112,230 Outside services cost . . . . . . . 3,440 Materials cost, 59,000 filings x .SO . . . . . . . . . 29,500 Space requirements, 5900 sq ft x .50 x 12 . . . . . . 35,400: TOTAL OPERATION COST OF MaSTZNG SYSTEM...................5902,730 Proposed operation Cost o`_ New System Personnel: Head count46 Dollar cost: 5850/mo x*12 + 201 .5563,040 Supervision overhead cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,501 Outside services cost % . . . . . . . . . . . 72,000- Materials cost, 59.000 filings x .SO . . . . . . . . . . . 29,500 Hardware cost, CRT's - Encoders53,800 Space requirements, 4600 sq ft x .SO x 12� 27,600` TOTAL PROPOSED OPERATION COST OF NEW SYSTEM...............$833,441 NETSAVINGS............................................... $ 69,289 B. Proposed System Implementation Costs Programmer/Analyst, S2S/hr x 1430 hours ...5 35,750 Programming and Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,'S00 Hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,250" Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,600 Miscellaneous (mileage, etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,350 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116,450 User Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,280 Subtotal . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133,730 TOTAL PROPOSED SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION COSTS (ROUNDED TO $134,000 + 204)................................5160,800 Cost Benefit Analysis does not reflect the probable savings directly relating to some 26 clerical personnel located within the offices of the District Attorney. Probation, Public Defender and Sheriff. Assuming average salary to be 5850/mo + 201 fringe, the total cost of 26 clerical positions currently is $318,240. MH:sj 3/19/75 —26- 00286 The Index will be updated continually via teleprocess- ing, microfilm or some other automatic method. Copies can be provided to all the agencies involved, giving them better access to court activities. Names can be cross-checked across court lines to prevent conflict in scheduling or conflict of interest. A cost benefit analysis of the Indexing system is provided in Exhibit F. Recommendation 3 We recommend the automation of a Calendaring system for use by the courts and related agencies. One of the major problems today in the court system is the lack of utilization and management of all the assets within the system. More specifically, empty courtrooms, unscheduled judges' hours or misscheduled hours, conflicts in witnesses and attorneys schedules are all causes of problems for the courts in terms of backup, poor deliverance of justice and mistrust of people. We believe the automated Calendaring system will go a long way in alleviating this problem. The system will receive input from the automated Register of Actions. Guidelines and limitations will have been built into the computer system. Involved in these guidelines are number of cases per court, judges schedule, and witnesses schedule. The computer will provide optimum times to the court clerk/administrators. The limit can be overridden if necessary, giving the clerk/administrator full control. Output will include: A. Calendar listings by court and by litigants B. Notices to litigants and pertinent agencies where concerned C. Exception reporting for further investigations D. Management and statistical reporting for adjustment and management of guidelines and conflicts A cost benefit analysis of the automated Calendaring system is provided in Exhibit G. -27- VV 7 3 EXHIBIT F COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS INDEXING Municipal &-0W-Superior Courts A. Operation Cost of Existing System Personnel: Head count . . . . . . 6 Dollar cost: S850/mo x 12 + 201 . . . . .$ 73,440 Supervision overhead cost, 81 of $150,000 . . . . . 11,392 Outside services cost - $8,125 - muni . . . . . . . 12,800 Space requirements, 600 sq ft x .50 x 12 . . . . . . 3,600 TOTAL OPERATION COST OF EXISTING SYSTEM...................$101,232 Proposed Operation Cost of New System Personnel: Head count . . 4 Dollar cost: •S850/mo�x.12 + 20% . . . . . . .$ 48,960- Supervision overhead cost . . . . . . 7,595 Outside services cost . . . . . . . . 11,000 Hardware cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,300 Space requirements. 400.sq ftx .50x12 . . . . . . 2,400 TOTAL PROPOSED OPERATION COST OF NEW SYSTEM...............$ 75,255 NETSAVINGS............................................... S 25,977 B. Proposed System Implementation Costs Programmer/Analyst, $25/hr x 200 hrs . . . . . . . . . . .$ 50,000 Programming and Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,600 Hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,500 Material . . . . - . . . . . . . . . 920 Miscellaneous (mileage, etc.) . . . . . . . . . . 500 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 16,520 Project Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,920 Subtotal . . . . . . . . 18,440 TOTAL PROPOSED SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION COSTS (ROUNDED TO $18,000 + 201)................................$ 21,600 MH:sj 3/19/75 -28- 00288 EXHIBIT G'. COST BENEFIT ANA:.YSIS CALENDARrNG (COUNTYWIDE)# Municipal and Superior Courts A. Operation Cost of Existing System Personnel: Head countx . . . . . . 14 Dollar cost: $850/mo x 12 + 201 . . . . . . .$171,360- Supervision overhead cost, 241 of $150,000 . . . . . . 35,593 - Materials cost . . . . . . 9,000 Space requirements. 1400 sqft x .50 x 12 . . . . . . 8,400 TOTAL OPERATION COST OF EXISTING SYSTEM...................$224,353 Proposed Operation Cost of New System Personnel: Head count . Il Dollar cost: x$850/mo x12 + 20f .5134,640 Supervision overhead cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,965 Outside services cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,000 Materials cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W . . . . 91000 Hardware cost . • . . . . . . . . . 20,700 Space requirements, 1100 sq ft x .50 x 12 6,600 TOTAL PROPOSED OPERATION COST OF NEW SYSTEM...............$226,905 NETLOSS....w...............................w............. (S 2,552) B. Proposed System Implementation Costs Programmer/Analyst, S25/hr x 550 hrs . . . . . . . . .$ 13,750 Programming, $20/hr x 650 hrs + testing . . . . . . . . 21,000 Hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,250 Material . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,600' Miscellaneous (mileage, etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,250 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 44,850 Project Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,680 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 52,530 TOTAL PROPOSED SYSTEM IMPLEMMMATION COSTS (ROUNDED TO $53,000 + 201)................................S 63,600 Cost Benefit Analysis does not reflect the probable savings directly relating to some 26 clerical personnel located within the offices of. the District Attorney, Probation, Public Defender and Sheriff. MH:sj 3/19/75 -29- 0089 -29- 00989 Recommendation 4 We recommend the automation of the Traffic Citation Process for use by all five municipal courts. The traffic system when fully automated will aid the lower courts in their caseload considerably. The current system, though efficient, does not provide the judges with all the data necessary in a timely fashion. A heavy amount of clerical time is spent typing, filing, retrieving and coding the citations and dockets. The load has jumped dramatically over the past year as shown in Exhibit H. The caseload in Richmond and Mt. Diablo will increase further due to the Office of Public Safety's program. This program has dumped a heavy load of new citations on the courts (Richmond doubled its load in January and February of 1975 vs. 1974) . The new system will automate the flow considerably. Input will start with the citation, which will be key- punched or encoded upon receipt and entered into the system. From that point on, the inventory and control possibilities of the computer will be available. The bails will be automatically calculated, with bail calculations based on priors available to the judges. Mandatory appearances can be better controlled. Dockets, notices to appear, and courtesy bail notices will all be a part of the system. Warrant warnings and warrant control will be automatic with ties to DMV and the PIN system. Disposition notices to DMV and follow-ups to Traffic School or other areas will be controlled more efficiently. The system will tie directly to the cash registers for dollar inputting. Accounting, balancing and distribu tion of receipts will be aided greatly via the use of the computer. Statistical reporting for the Judicial Council and the administrator's office will be byprod- ucts of the system. Certain reports, statistics and controls can be added, with further analysis, to aid the cities in their needs. Citation control, citation analysis, and revenue analysis can all be expanded via the use of the computer. Overall the Traffic Citation system has the highest priority of the municipal courts of Contra Costa County and is expected to produce a great savings in cost (see Exhibit I) . This cost savings is in addition to the vast increase in benefits expected and a potential increase in revenue. -30- 00990 V V V EXHIBIT H FILINGS PER MUNICIPAL COURT Tota Mt. Walnut All Delta Diablo Richmond Creek West Courts Felonies 1972-73 294 559 422 250 310 1,835 1973-74 301 487 - 422 269 370 1,849 Gain or (Loss) 7 (7y) 0 19 60 14 Selected Traffic 1972-73 884 2,190 771 1,490 875 6,210 1973-74 11.#10033 1,949 1,045 1,789 1,346 7,232 Gain or (Loss) 119 ---(2 ) 274 299 ^'471 x,022 Traffic 1972-73 10,697 28,438 9,991 23,885 13,868 86,879 1973-74 12,979 26,906 11,393 27,145 14,069 92,492 Gain or (Loss) 2,282 ,532) 1,402 3,266 201 5,6T3 Misdemeanors and Intoxication 1972-73 11816 3,554 3,018 1,539 2,815 12,742 1973-74 2,579 4 61.,553,227 2,347 3,530 16,298- Gain or (Loss) 763 1,061 2-O5 968 �15 3,556 Parking 1972-73 4,735 28,823 12,224 43,432 12,065 101,279 1973-74 3,028 28,962 13,246 42,094 12,000 99,330 Gain or (Loss) (1,70) -'- 139 TM Z1,359 (95 mow) Small Claims 1972-73 1,984 3,104 3,392 2,537 1,310 12,327 1973-74 2,2199 3,354 3,047 20,791 1x44866 12,897 Gain or (Loss) 235 250 X45) � 176 570 Other Civil 1972-73 672 1;527 1,687 1,187 922 5,995 - 1973-74 872 1c.6�.�5.�5 1,686 1,211 859 6,283 Gain or (Loss) ---76-0129 U 24 "`" (6`3 98 Total Filings 1972-73 21,082 68,195 31,505 74,320 32,165 227,267 1973-74 23,081 67,928 34,066 77,646 33,660 236,381 Gain or (Loss) 11999 (267) 2,561 3,326 1,495 9,114 -31- W291 EXHIBIT I COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC CITATION SYSTEM 2wnacipa Co A. Operation Cost of Existing System Personnel; Head count . . 44 Dollar cost: $850/mo x 12�+�201* .$538,560 Supervision overhead cost, 461 of $200,000 . . . . . . 92,000 Outside services cost.-Indexing 6 Computing . . . . . 18,475 Materials cost . . . . 28,000 Space requirements,�4400 sq�ft x .50 x 12' 26,400 TOTAL OPERATION COST OF EXISTING SYSTEM...................5723,435 Proposed Operation Cost of New System Personnel: Head count • . . . . . . 25 Dollar cost: $850/mo x12 + 201 . . . . . . .$306,000 Supervision overhead cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,000 outside services cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195,000 Materials cost . . . . . 28,000 Space requirements, 2500 sq ft x .50 x 12' 15,000 TOTAL PROPOSED OPERATION COST OF NEW SYSTEM...............$598,000` NETSAVINGS............................................... $105,435 B. Proposed System Implementation Costs Prograsxaer/Analyst. $25/hr x 1050 hrs. . . . . . .$ 26,250 Programming and Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,500 Hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,000 Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,500 miscellaneous (mileage. etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . 11000 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,250,- _ User Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,160 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$111,410 TOTAL PROPOSED SYSTEM 3MPLEMENTATION COSTS (ROUNDED TO $111,000 + 201)...............................$133,200 MH:sj 3/19/75 —32— t 00292 Recommendation 5 We recommend the automation of the Parking Citation process for use by all five municipal courts. Along with the Traffic Citation problem, the Parking Citation problem has grown tremendously as the cities have grown. The municipal courts of Contra Costa County process 101,280 parking citations annually (1972-73) . This is compared with 82,636 parking citations in 1971-72. With the full operation of BART and the additional vigilance by the city police the volume in this area continues to grow. In the analysis stage of the parking system, some basic policy decisions will have to be answered. They involve responsibility of tasks between the court and the cities and will involve the design of the system. Basically the system will utilize a structure similar to that of the Traffic Citation system. The citation will initiate the bail calculation. Revenue will be calcu- lated and spread via cash register to computer. After nonpayment and the decision to pursue is reached it will enter the normal warrant structure, including a DMV registration search. The anticipated system is expected to generate a big savings in clerical time and effort. It will generate added revenues and unclog the administration of the courts in the process. A cost benefit analysis of the automated Parking Citation process is provided in Exhibit J. Recommendation 6 We recommend the automation of a Case File Maintenance system for use by the courts. The Case File Maintenance system covers a broad area of responsibility in the courts. It involves the recording and filing of all documents into case-related files (physical or automatic) . These files must be available to the courts and court users. During the course of a case multiple parties need access to the file, and its integrity is critical. A model system is being designed for San Joaquin County. The system has tremendous potential and could be the prime answer to the problem. It combines the use of microfilm and teleprocessing for retrieval. -33- W293 n r EXHIBIT J i COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS PARKING CITATION municipal�nrtsco A. Operation Cost of Existing System Personnel: Head count • .. . 8 Dollar cost: $850/mo x 12 + 201 . . . . . 97,92.0 Supervision overhead cost, 8.51 of $200,000 . . 17,000 Materials cost, .10 per citation . . . . . . . . . . ". 12,000 Space requirements, 800 sq ft x .50x12 . . . . . . . 4,800 TOTAL OPERATION COST OF EXISTING SYSTEM...................$131,720 Proposed Operation Cost of New System Personnel: Head count5 Dollar cost: x$850/m0*x'12 + 20i 4 61,200 Supervision overhead cost . . . . . . . . . . . 10,000; Outside services cost . . . . . . . . . . 25,708 Materials cost . . . . . 12,000 . Hardware cost, Data Action Encoder . � . . . . . . 1,800- Space requirements, 500 sq ft x .50x12 . . . 3,000 TOTAL PROPOSED OPERATION COST OF NEW SYSTEM...............$113,708 NETSAVINGS............................................... $ 18,012 B. Proposed System Implementation Costs Programmer/Analyst, $25/hr x 240 hrs . . . . . . . . . .$ 6,000 Programming, $20/hr x 600 hrs + testing . . . . . . . . 17,000 Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,400 Miscellaneous (mileage, etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25#700:, Project Coordinator (2 months) . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,840: Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . .$ 29,540 TOTAL PROPOSED SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION COSTS (ROUNDED TO $30,000 + 201)................................$ 36,000 MH:sj 3/19/75 -34- 0-3294' ' 09294 The automated Case F ile Maintenance system will be used in conjunction with the Register of Actions, which when fully developed will take much of the load of look- ups to the Case File. The system will protect the files from loss or misfiling and give access to many more people. A cost benefit analysis of the automated Case File Maintenance system is provided in Exhibit K. The remaining six recommendations all affect the user agencies of the courts. The first six recommendations basically involved the recordkeeping function of the courts themselves. It was unanimously agreed by the JAAC committee that the greatest need for automation is in the court area. The data base that will be built by the courts' recordkeeping functions will be the key- stone to each of the user departments' systems at the base from which to build. Recommendation 7 We recommend an automated Case Management system for the Probation Department. The Probation Department has a large caseload of clients which it services. In order to alleviate some of this load and the clerical tasks that accompany it, an automated system of tracking clients would aid the Department greatly. Such a system would: A. Increase the accuracy of the data B. Make the data more available to the Department C. Provide security measures for controlling the data usage D. Enhance communication within the Department and across the county E. Receive data automatically from the courts for action by Probation F. Provide statistical recordkeeping for department administration The system would provide time savings in the area of background checks, court and case scheduling, and follow- up reporting on probationers. -35- 0029 i t; .; VlJ�.►vv� EXHIBIT K I COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS CASE FILE MAINTENANCEt Superior Court A. Operation Cost of Existing System Personnel: Head Count . _ _ _ _ . . _ 7 Dollar Cost: $850/mo X 12 + 201 .$ 85,680, Supervision overhead cost, 81 of S150,000 12,000 Materials cost . . . . 4,000 Space requirements, 3400 sq ft X .50 X 12 . . . . . .. 20,400 TOTAL OPERATION COST OF EXISTING SYSTEM...................$122,080 Proposed Operation Cost of New System Personnel: Head count . . . . . . . . . 5 Dollar cost: $850/moX12 + 201 . . . . . 61,200 Supervision overhead cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,500 Materials cost Hardware cost (lease of�mini-computer and*software)' 37,800 Space requirements, 11,500 sq ft X .50 X 12 9,000. TOTAL PROPOSED OPERATION COST OF NEW SYSTEM...............$120,500 NETSAVINGS............................................... $ 1,580 B. Proposed System Implementation Costs Programmer/Analyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 10,000 Programming and Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,000' Hardware (2 work stations) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000 Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,000 Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,000 User Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,250 Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,250 TOTAL PROPOSED SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION COSTS (+201)......... 62,700, 1. The proposed system provides maximum security of original documents (currently they are not secure). 2. The system will enhance the Register of Actions module. 3. The mini-computer has the potential for further expansion and use in the judicial system. -36- 0029S Recommendation 8 We recommend an automated Case Foltowing system for the District Attorney/Public Defender. The Public Defender and District Attorney have a similar problem in most criminal cases. Much of the data is the same for the two departments. Case identifiers, name, social security number, etc. , are necessary data for both offices. Communication with the courts is a necessary step for both offices, when and where and for what reason their professionals are needed. This area can be automated simultaneously, giving them equal information and access to the information. This would aid them in the management of their professional staffs. The system can inform the professional staff of the status of cases both in the court system and within the department. Caseloads can be regularly reviewed and statistics via automation will greatly aid the manage- ment. Special data required individually by each department can and will be provided for in a secure method assuring privacy. Recommendation 9 We recommend automating a County Prisoner Identification and Record Maintenance system. The County Jail is a fair-sized city in terms of its population over a given year. The population comes and goes rapidly, sometimes within hours. But it is critical that the Sheriff keep an accurate accounting as to: A. Who is in the Jail - or who has been in the Jail B. Where that prisoner is in the Jail C. When the prisoner was received D. What the prisoner's next step is in the process E. 14hat the prisoner brought in with him F. Miscellaneous connecting data, as to case identi-. fiers, identification numbers, etc. -3T- 002W . r. This system would enable the Sheriff to keep more accu- rate records of prisoner population, a very critical function. It would give him statistical data for management reports and future planning. Recommendation 10 We recommend an automated Booking system for use by the county 's lav enforcement agencies. A uniform system of booking suspects should exist within Contra Costa County. With the use of automation, the savings in workload and the accuracy of recordkeeping would more than offset the uniqueness required by any one law enforcement agency. Currently, many suspects are actually booked several times, causing a large duplication of effort. The large manually kept filing systems become very .cumbersome and often documents are misfiled or lost. The automation of this problem area would move the law enforcement agencies of the county toward close cooperation and allow the passage of accurate informa- tion in a much better fashion. Recommendation 11 We recommend the automation of a Case Management system for tate Sheriff. The Sheriff's Department has a third recordkeeping function that automation would aid greatly. The inves- tigation arm of the Sheriff's office is involved heavily in recordkeeping and information recall on cases, identifications of suspects and other follow-ups. All policing agencies in the county are involved in record- keeping of this sort. For example, they may know the automobile involved in a crime by description. Often they have knowledge of its ownership via another contact. Being able to find this data becomes a horrendous job for the Department. Automation can limit the search to a much shorter time span. This cross-indexing of I.D. 's and M.O. 's and accessi- bility of case histories all enhances the investigatory abilities of the departments involved. -38- 00998 Recommendation 22 We recommend the automation of a Crime Geo-Coding Reporting system for use by all county law enforcement agencies. The utilization of the Sheriff's Department's seen and materials is a constant problem. . Our many rural areas make the deployment of such resources 'criitical. The deployment would be greatly enhanced usinga system of tying the physical property identifiers to the'automated. system. Used properly, high crime areas could"be easily Identified. At its highest development, deployment could be a semi-automatic function of matching crime priority and resource to reach the most critical mixture. -39- 002,99 V. WORK PLAN A. Five-Year Plan - Standards and Goals The Justice Automation Advisory Committee intends that the twelve recommendations discussed in this report (see Section II) be scheduled for design and implementation over a five-year period. The first six priorities will be given immediate attention, but not necessarily in numerical order. The major determinate of which and how many of the first six recommendations we begin with will relate directly to the source and level of funding that becomes available. -� The goals set forth in this Action Plan are consis- tent with those discussed in the National Advisory Commission's report on Standards and Goals for the Courts (11.1 and 11.2) . These goals are also described in the National Symposium on Criminal Justice Information as sponsored by Project Search. The ultimate goal in completing the twelve recommen- dations is to provide a comprehensive information system which will serve two functions: 1) provide useful and necessary information to aid parties (arresting agency, prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, and judge) involved in criminal cases. This is accomplished by supplying them with current data pertaining to the status of a case, purpose, time and place of next appearance, or historical reference sources as to what transpired in the course of adjudication; 2) provide a reservoir of data which will be useful to research projects aimed at the study and/or evaluation of our judicial process system. Implicit in these—unctions is the objective of improving not only the current opera- tions of the courts and justice-related agencies, but also the quality of the service provided to the public. The JAAC approach and style for accomplishing its stated goals has been one which involves defining systems objectives in clear, definitive and simple language and then employing proven methods to obtain desired results. The Committee's intention is that of providing systems capable of growing, both in relation to volume and content. In the sense that very little has been done for our courts and justice-related agencies in the way of automating systems, there is a feeling of urgency on behalf of many people that something be done. In -40- 0030a noun the sense that we observe thehave had an opportunity Preceded us Successes and failUy to i mation n implementing auto those who systems, wtunat e are for mated e justice znfor- to be beginning but also thw yti„ public. for accon►Plishing its and style involves defining The JAAC approachbeen one which Ve and simple stated goals has clear, definimethods to obtain systems objectives in loving provenis and then employing sintentiontI i that languagere systems The C rowing, bo desired capable of g Providing systems t- °f p volume and Conten relation to done for our very little has bee ne way of sense that a encies in of urgency on in the usti.ce-related g feeling courts and 3 there is a thing be done. In automating systems. a that some behalf of many PeOpl -40- r.= the sense that we have had an opportunity to observe the successes and failures of those who preceded us in implementing automatedjustice infor- mation systems, we are fortunate to be beginning B. Time Requirements The following charts (see Exhibits L through Q) represent time estimates for the design and implementation of the first six recommendations. These estimates were predicated on a permanent staff of three analysts. Data Processing estimates were based on the assumption that outside contract programming would be used and the contractor would commit whatever resources he has available to meet the dates required. -41- { ` 00301 EXHIBIT L - ,or v N w O .s Ei x . O , X m � H H Z O V Q � N to Q N N H tr ts7 W N y ui H N O z o x m m ri o X N N< H• 0°�GN �H � L? NZ x n. ta m v �cZ �' rpt to M t6 N am as h w m tJ H is H a < toe a E+ to a. 0 a o t6 o to a v < E• a4 o m a a•m s to cc in a to o fn to a to< tq G to 040 0. [r p t-. co c► .+ —42- 04202 EXHIBIT."'.r4 cla a M O T. co .y E x O H E W W F{ 04 Z H E N I 06 fn O ' AG o z O> 7C x z x E O} OC N O 9G O M H AtoNO �gHH cn E.i 0H E- ms EZ3C O f < 14.i . Sm am C ta ctoo .. OCA. E co.c art a E.. ti N N n W 0► �+. v v v v v v v v v v -43- 00303 EXHIBIT N w d N .�s N 32 P E4 N E-4 Q W � W W _! 64 qu 64L1 I+ d. N O H O E+ C} tj x Q H aH E4ca E4'14 ca �� A '� coif c�3 to-C �A Doti C .o a M a Y N 0 y. H al Go w cav M W 4 w 1K- H H E+ d N D 916 fA x a z DCM O x Mp H < H CHz - H H H F4 4Z t3 t+�•i a1 t6 H-3 w HH Aw 0M a E{ < a)< .2 E1 WM, oCa oh. g to Es al m V as< al 4 w 0.0 a. E• fi q .. a m oo o� v v v v v v v v v v —45— EXHIBIT P •e ca N' O x x N W Q to W C H E a E+ v O z o z C.CD N Q O? x �x x < H xH Q z No M Ey < N x H a<H &4zG EN+ C N H V !m; x ca Com. E4.2 U3 W Wm Ems4H t 1-4 OH N .3 c� < m< ..7.E+ CDC. _ .. HC4 V2 in co C34 a• H A .-� .-� i► n n r► n n � O v v v v v v v v v v -46- 00 3 uufjiju► y� EXHIBIT Q i i a N .r O O z w z W z ~ 94 H � � N NO H W H M 4. E w H Q � V co O z 0 z 0.1tf H O pto> z z z x < N zH O z HO H (4 .0 DG H E+EdEq < o vz -H H gH E a1-4 w9-3om H M;g U) 0. a. wa >.w sw C--w C w 0 0 to to w< toA 0 6.Q 04 E .a N t7 v v v v v v v v v v -47- 003 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Contract with Creative Communications and Research of Berkeley, CA for research and evaluation of the Pittsburg— Antioch Diversion Project. The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with CREATIVE COMMUNICATIONS AND RESEARCH of Berkeley, California for research and evaluation of the Pittsburg—Antioch Diversion Project from May 28, 1975 to June 30, 1975, at a cost not to exceed 52,772. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975- 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: County Probation Officer Witness my hand and the Seal of:the Board of Attn: V.allace C. Donavan Supervisors Contractor affixed this 27th day of May : 19 75 c/o Probation Officer County Auditor—Controller �' J. *R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 - 15-M Maxine M. Neu_f'eld 00348 V u Vuv I I _ W e Number 35018-316-728-2310 1. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION: Department: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT E Subject: RESEARCH AND EVALUATION OF THE PiTTSBURG-ANTiOCH DIVERSION PROJECT { 2. PARTIES: The County of Contra Costa, a Political Subdivision of• the State of California, hereinafter referred to as COUM, and the following named CONTRAC- TOR, mutually agree and promise as follows Name of Contractor: CREATIVE COMMUNICATIONS AND RESEARCH Address: GiNI SCOTT, PRESIDENT, 2837 Regent Street, Berkeley, CA 94705 (if a Corporation, established under the Legal Authority of the State of Cali- fornia, see item 16 under ".Special Conditions" on Page 2 of this contract.) 3. PURPOSE: The County requires, and the Contractor is especially trained, exper- ienced and competent to perform and furnish professional services, advice, edu- cation or training in Probation Department activities. Specifically, these activities are covered onde"r!"Service Plan", Page 3 'of this contract. 4. PAYMENT: This contract is for 396 hours @ $7.00 per hour and includes a`1 contractor related costs; the>total amount of this contract shall not exceed the sum of $ 2772.00 ' . Contractor shall submit to the Probation Department not less than monthly, a proparly executed and completed County Demand {Form D-15} indicating in detail the date and hours during which services under this contract were performed. 5. TERN: The effective date of this contract is May 28. 1975 , and it term- inates on June 30. 1975 , unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 6. STATUS: The Contractor is an independent Contractor and is not to be considered an employee of the County. COUNTY CONTRACTOR B 1�•�ci Sy �r Y . CHURMAN, 'BOW-00 SUPERQ ISORS ATTEST:. James �R: Giss , County C1'erk4ecorder an`d'iix officio of Itate Hoard of Su ervi' ors Designate official capacity in busi- ness and/or affix corporation seal) By ' `.DEP TY ,' The person signing above for Contractor ' personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they signed it and RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: that the official capacity is as shown t gy Dated `221e -.211 /0 COUN PR08 T N 0 ICER � - NOTARYU L DEPUTYCOU EM By r COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN f/CL��AUUSEH, COUN cou�s By DEPUTY r . k "t it 4GV909 0OU09 E "SPECIAL CONDITIONS" Page 2 I 1 . Entire Contract: This Contract contains all the terns and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otheeviise, regarding the subject matter of ;his Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 2. Comp Ilance with Law: Contractor shall be subject to and conply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including, but not limited to, licensing ; employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and con- ditions of employment. 3. Modifications and Aiendments: This Contract may be modified or; gmended by a written document executed*by the Contractor and the County. 4. Disputes: Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or perfomance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the County. 5. Independent Contractor Status: This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partner- ship, joint venture or association. 6. Conflicts of Interest: Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted by-laws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governin: Board of Directors (or Trustees) and to timely .update said by-laws or'the •Irst of .Board of Directors as changes in such governance occur,. if Contractor is a corporation. Con- tractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any Board of Directors of the Con- tractor shall avoid any actual or potential conflict of interest: 7. Failure to Perform: If the Contractor, without fault of the County or its agent, 'at any time fails, refuses or neglects to perform any of its duties under this Contract for a period of 10 days after written notice thereof by the County, it shall constitute a breach of the entire Contract and the County may terminate this Contract as provided in the Termination pro- vision, complete the Contractor's required performance in any reasonable-manner It chooses, and hold the Contractor liable for any damages or loss occasioned thereby. 8. Termination: Upon 3 days prior written notice to the Contractor, the County may terminate this Con- tract whether or not the Contractor is in default. Upon termination without default of the Contractor, the County shall pay, without duplication, for all services performed and expenses incurred to date of teurination. In consideration of this payment, the Contractor waives a) i right to any further payment or damages, and shall turn over to the County everything pertaining to its services hereunder, possessed by the Contrac- tor or under its control at the time of termination. 9. Inspection and Audit: The County or its agent shall have access, for purpose of audit and inspection, to any books, documents, papers and records of the Contractor which may relate to this Contract Initials s-5- l 'Contractor Department 4. t e 00910- "SPECIAL CONDITIONS" - (Continued) Page 2A 10. Indennification: The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims .for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation all consequential da-ages, iron any cause whatsoever arising from or connnected with its operations or its services hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of.the Contractor, its agents or employees. I1. Notices: All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the Probation Department, 10th Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, CA 94553. Notices to' the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. s 12. Confidentiality: , Contractor agrees to comply and to. require his employees to comply with the provisions of Section 10850 of the Welfare and institutions Code and any other State or Federal statute or regulation respecting confidentiality to assure that: a. All applications and records concerning any Individual made or kept by any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of any provision of the Welfare and Institutions Code relating to any form of public social services will be confidential, and wi•11 not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published • or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services. Contractor•agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions,, and that any person know- ingly and intentionally violating Section 10850 of the Welfare and institutions -Code is guilty of a misdemeanor. 13. Nondiscriminatory Services: Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 14. Contract Provisions: Exhibit A is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement. initials Contractor Department 0021 "SERVICE PIAN" Page 3 During the contract period, commencing May 28, 1975 and ending June 30, 1975 the Contractor will provide the following services: Creative Communications S Research will do a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion Project and develop an evaluation design to be used for the duration of the project. Quantitative measures will be used to assess project impact by comparing the project experimental group to the control group. The Contractor will collect and analyze . data to compare the two groups as to: (1) subsequent police contacts, (2) number of days of detention in Juvenile Hall , (3) rate of petition filing, and use other quan- titative measures as indicated. - The major thrust of the evaluation effort will be to develop an explanatory scheme that (1) links project- efforts to project outcome measures, (2) accounts for signi- ficant differences in project experience in the East County setting- as, compared to the experience of the piversion Odits in Richmond and Concord, (3) describes project experience in terms of the community and organizational setting in which it operates. The primary mode of data collection will be the open-ended interview. Interviews of project staff and key personnel in the Probation Department, police departments, and other youth-serving agencies in the service area will be.conducted. Observations of project operations will be used as supplementary data for analysis.: The specific products to be delivered within the contract period are to include: 1. Submit a work plan within 21 days, finalizing the evaluation plan. • 2. Prepare monthly progress reports. 3. Collect project, Probation Department, and police contacts data for project and control group clients. - 4. Prepare first year evaluation. 5. As part of the evaluation report, present-a detailed evaluation design- for the second year of the project, to include actual data collection instruments. The parties understand that the aforementioned services are not required to be completed by June 30, 1975, and agree that the term of this contract may be extended to August 31 , 1975, provided that the funding balance for the contract - is available after June 30, 1975- The hourly rate includes all incidental expenses incurred by the Contractor during the course of this contract, and the use of equipment and supplies. The Contractor shall render these services at the times and places specified by the Probation Department. Initials: ,,� CONTP.ACTOR DEPARTMEM t �7. , � � p =. OF�TCE OF CRI;1INA.L JUSTICE PLANNING = EXHIBIT A STANDARD THIRD PARTY CONTRACT PROVISIONS 1 . Conpliance with Grant ;ward. Contra Costa County, hereafter referred to as Subgrantee, and the Office of Criminal Justice Planning, hereafter re erred to as OCJP, entered into a grant award, No. A 1954-1-74, dated 6-10-7. , hereafter referred to as "grant award". Said grant award is incorporated in the within Agreement. It is expressly understood and agreed that Subgrantee will retain ultimate control and responsibility for the grant award project and the Contractor agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of said grant award applicable to Subgrantee in the conduct o,' the project. 2. Cemoliance with Fiscal Reauirements. The Contractor agrees to perform under this Agreement in accordance with all terms and conditions contained in the OCJP Fiscal Affairs Manual and the financial guidelines prescribed by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (hereafter referred to as LEA;) and the OCJP. 3. Assion-,ent or Subcontracting. No performance of this Agreement or any portion tnereof may be assigned or subcontracted by the Contractor with- out the express written consent of Subgrantee and any attempt by the Contractor to assion or subcontract any performance of the terms of this Acreement without the express written consent of Subgrantee shall be null and void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. Whenever the Contractor is authorized to subcontract or assign, he will include all . the terms of this Agreement in each such subcontract or assignment. -4. Assurance of Compliance with Civil Riahts Laws. The Contractor hereby assures that it will comply with Tit e VI of the Civil Rights Act of . 1964 and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to regulations of the Depart-ent of Justice and the L=EAA issued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person shall , on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under this Acrer.ert or under any project, program, or activity supported by this Agreement. The Contractor will comply with Justice Department Equal Employ, nt Regulations in federally-assisted programs (28 CFR Part 42, Subpart D) to the end that er:alo ;._nt discrimination in such programs on the crounds of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin shall be eliminated. The Contractor recognizes the right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement of the forecoing convenants against discrimination. If this Agreement- provides for payment to the Contractor in excess of $10,000, the Contractor shall comply with Executive Order No. 112469 entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity", as supplemented. The Contractor shall be required to have an affirmative action plan which declares that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and ace and which specifies goals and target dates A. to assure the implementation of equal employment. OU12313 2 4b w f 5. i:ain=enerce and Insoection c` ion_r_ctual Records. `sae Contractor agrees tnat the Subgrantee, the :n a LEAA, the Comptroller General of the United Sates, or any of u._ir duly authorized representatives shall have access to and the ri- to audit, excerpt and transcribe any ' direc_li pertinent b33ks, e._;; :_s, papers and records of the Contractor, involving tra;sactiors to this Agreement. Such material must. be kepi and maintained for a p_riad of three years after termination of tr.e -rant award or until an audit is completed by CUP and LEAA and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, whichever is sooner. The - Contrac_or agrees to keep zrd .naintain all records required by the Fiscal Affairs Manual, the financial Guidelines prescribed by LEAH, and any other records that may be r_=;:i1red by other laws or regulations. of Federal, state or local governmental snits. 6. Cooyrichts and Richts in Da adhere activities supported by this Agree- ment produce original cor;:5_er programs, writing, sound recordings, pic- torial reproductions, drawings or other graphical representation and works of any similar nature (t.ie term computer programs includes execu- table ccnmputer progrars and supporting data in any form), the OCJP, the LEAA, and Subgrantee reserve the right to use, duplicate and disclose.- in isclose;in wrote or in part, in any manner for any purpose whatsoever, and to authorize others to do so. If the material is subject to copyright, ' the Subgrantee reserves tt:e right to copyright such and the Contractor agrees :tot to copyright such material . If the material is copyrighted, the OCJP and the LEAA reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, -and irre- vocabie license to reproduce, piblish, and use such materials, in the whole or in part, and to authariz_ ctners to do so. 7. Publications. 33th the N—J _gid the Subgrantee reserve the right to recti i re tree Contractor cct :; ;:;b i i sh, and the Contractor thereupon shall retrain fro, ruolis yin: original books, manuals, films or other cop;richtable material prod----ed by activities supported by this Agreement, whetner copyrighted or rct, :her- may be designated by the OCJP or the Subgrantee. Such rignt shall be exercised by addressing written notice to that effect to ne Co._r_c_or. Before publishing any materials produced by activities supported by :his Agreerpnt, the Contractor shall notify Subgrantee and OCJP sixty d_..s in advance of any such- publication. If the Sutcrentee and OCJ? fail to ex=_rcise the right to prohibit publication as set forth above within sixty days of the receipt of the notice of intent to p-:bl ish, the Contractor .:af publish said material . The Contractor shall furnish twenty copies of t�_ •:aterials so published-to Subgrant6e and OCJ?. Any such publication ty the Contractor shall include on the title page the following standard disclaimer: "The preparation of these materials was financially aided through a Federal grant from :he Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and the Office of Crinir._1 Justice Planning under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe S_ree=_s :t of 19'03, as amended. The opinions, findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the author and are rot necessarily znose of the Law Enforcement Assistance ht-iinistration or the %Nice o: Criminal Justice Planning." -2- OC314: Vvv.L ... r:serves a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, pjbl ish and use these materials, and to authorize others to do so." 8. Patents- If any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course o` or as a result of ork performed under this agreement, the Contractor shall refer the discovery or invention to Subgrantee and CUP. The Contractor hereby aSrees that determinations of rights to inventions or discoveries ride under this Agreement shall be made by LEAA, or its duly authorized representative, who shall have the -sole and exclusive powers to determine whether or not and where a patent application should be filed and to determine the disposition of all rights in such inventions or discoveries, including title to and license rights under any patent application or patent which may issue thereGn. The determination of LEAA, or its duly authorized representa- tive, shall be accepted as final . The Contractor agrees and otherwise - recognizes that LEAH, GCJP, and Subgrantee shall acquire at least an irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to practice and have practiced throughout the world for governr►ental purposes any invention made in the course of or under this Agreement. 5. Contactor Work hours and Safety Standards. If this Agreement provides . for payment in excess of $2,500 2,000 or construction contracts) and involves the a .pioyment of mechanics or laborers, the Contractor agrees: a) That each mechanic or laborer will have wages. computed on the .iasis of a standard work day of eight hours and a standard work week of f,rty h:urs. ::ork in excess of. the standard work week or day is per- rissole provided that the worker is compensated at the rate .of not less Iran one and one-half tires the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of eight hours in any calendar day or forty hours in the work .:eek; b) That no laborer or r-echanic shall be required to work in sur- roundi;.ss or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to his health and safety as determined under construction safely and health standards promulgated by the Secretary of Labor by regulation (29 CFR 1518). T;iese requirements do not apply to the pur- chases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open rartet, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. 10. Clear Air Act. If this Agreement provides for payment in excess of $100,000, the Conzractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or reculations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970. Violations shall be reported to OCJP and the regional office of the Environmental. Protection agency. 11. Public rvai labi l i tv of Inf or,:ation. The Contractor shall comply with the rEcuir;•-ants of Sections 6253 tnrough 6260 of the Government Code of the State of California and the LEAA Guide for Comprehensive La:, Enforcement Pianning and :.c-tion Grants relating to the availability to the public of iden_3:iaole records or other documents that are pertinent to the receipt or experditare of LEAA funds. 12. Security and Privacy. (a) Tne Contractor agrees that, except as provided by federal law QV�P''�S otr,er than the Crime Control Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. Sections 3701 et seG.), none of its officers or employees shall use or reveal oi.c-er Lhan she LriMe Control Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. Sections 3701 1�'�ty1J et sea.), none of its officers or employees shall use or reveal - ~ any research or statistical information furnished by any person and identifiable to any-specific private person for any purpose t oher V"an the purpose for which it was obtained. Copies of such inion.-ation shall be it-mune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent, of the person furnishing such infor- ra tion, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial or administrative proceedings. (b) Criminal history in:or„2tion: (1) The term "cri.miral history information" includes records and related data, cw.piled by law enforcement agencies for purposes of idea-ifying criminal offenders and alleged • offenders and maintaining as to such persons surmaries of arrest, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confine.-int, rehabilitation and release. (2) If the Contractor utilizes "criminal history information%, the Contractor shall comely with the following: All criminal histcry information collected, stored, or disseminated shall contain, to the maximwn extent feasible, _ disposition as well as arrest data where arrest data is included therein. The collection, storage, and dissemina- tion of such in-FOMatioa shall take place under procedures reasonably designed to insure that all such information is kept current therein, the Contractor shall assure that the security and privafy cf all .information is adequately provided for and sucn information shall only be used for lap enrorceiment and cri irai justice and other lawful purposes. In addition, an individual who believes that criminal history . info .mation concerning rim contained in an automated system is inaccurate, inc,,-.:.?fete, or maintained in violation o► the Crime Control ;"ct of 1973, shall , upon satisfactory veri- fication of his identity, be entitled to review such infor- mation to obtain a copy of it for the purpose of challenge or correction. (c) Any person violating the Security and Privacy provisions of, this Contract or of the Crime Control Act of 1973 [42 U.S.C. Section 3771(c)] or any rule, regulations, or order issued thereunder., shall be fired not to exceed 510,000 in addition to any other -penalty imposed by lase. (d) The contractor assures that Oe foregoing provisions of the Security and Privacy clause shall be incorporated into all of its su ;coni:racts. • A O{./11 . 13. "Adie uat�e Competition. All procurement transactions regardless of whether egotiated or advertised and without regard to dollar value - shall be conducted in a manner so as to provide maximum open and, free competition. The grantee should be alert to organizational conflicts of' interest or noncompetitive practices among contractors�'wfiich may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade. Contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work and/ or RFPs for a proposed procurement shall be excluded from bidding:or submitting a proposal to compete for the award of such procurement," In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May �7 , 19 75 In the Matter of Amendment of Lease for premises at 213 G Street, Antioch. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an amendment to a lease with Mr. George Curtis, et al, for premises at 213 G Street, Antioch, Cali— fornia which extends the term for two years and eight months to August 31, 1980 so as to coincide with additional lease for contiguous space. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public Works Department yyness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Lessor via R/P Supervisors Real Property Buildings and Grounds affixed this 27th day of 14ay . 1975 Probation J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor—Controller By J Deputy Clerk H 24 12173 - 15-M ?Maxine PM. Neuf 1G d� County Admin].strator n Amendment to lease 213 G Street Antioch, California 94509 PROBATION DEPARTMENT 1. Effective Date and Parties Effective on MAY 2 71975 1975, George Curtis, Faye C. Curtis, Thomas Broderick, Phyllis Broderick, Enrico E. Cinquini and Rose Cinquini, hereinafter called. Lessor and County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, here- inafter called County, mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Purpose The parties desire to amend that certain lease entered into between George Curtis, et al and County dated September 19, 1972, for approximately 3,700 square feet of office space at 213 G Street, Antioch, California. 3. Amendments A. Paragraph 6, Term is amended by adding the following thereto: The term of this lease is hereby extended for two years and -eight months from February 1, 1978 to August 31, 1980. B. Paragraph 7, Extension is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: This lease may, at the option of the County, be extended for five (5) years commencing September 1, 1980 and ending August 31, 1985 on the same terms and conditions as contained herein except the rental during the entire option period shall be One Thousand One Hundred Eighty Five and No/100 Dollars ($1,185.00) per month. C. Paragraph 8, Holding Over shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced by the following: Any holding over after the term or extension of the lease as provided- hereinabove rovidedhereinabove shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month subject to the terms of this lease so far as applicable. D. Paragraph 10, Utility Systems is hereby amended by adding the following thereto: Commencing February 1, 1978, County will maintain any and all interior electrical , interior water and interior plumbing systems, except the County 00319 i shall not be responsible for major repair or replacement of said systems. County shall provide routine maintenance and minor repair to the heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, such as periodic inspection, lubrication, replacement of filters, belts and fuses. Major repairs, such as replacement of motors, compressors or other major components shall be the responsibility of Lessor. E. Paragraph 12, Maintenance and Repairs is hereby amended as follows: Commencing February 1, 1978 sub-paragraph A shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: Lessor shall keep the exterior of the building in good order, condition and repair except for exterior doors and their fixtures, closures, and hinges, which shall be maintained by the County. County shall maintain all locks and key systems used in the demised premises. Commencing February 1, 1978 sub-paragraph C shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: County shall replace any glass windows broken in the demised premises. 4. Effect Except for the amendments agreed to herein, the lease of September 19, 1972 remains in full forceand effect. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this amendment to lease as of the day and year first written hereinabove. COUNTY COUNTY; OF CONTRA 'COSTA, a Ful i ti cal Subdi vi si en; of the LESSOR: Stat of California e By v Led L firman, Boal,of S ervisors George C itis ATTEST: J. R. OLSS , Clerk Jote__ " Faye C. Curti s Of B _ c/ 1 puty Th s Brod' 'ck twf �, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Phyis Brode�ic / Enrico E. Cin uini By Real Property Agen5�!� Llc�t 4'.1z -10 Rose Cinquini By , , APPROVED AS TO ORM: County iimiL- or� J. B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel puty lic W rks Di ctor By Buildings and Grounds ivision Deputy -2- s 00 0� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May -27 19 75 In the Matter of Lease for premises at 215 G Street, Antioch. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a five—year lease with Mr. George Curtis, et al, for premises at 215 G Street, Antioch, California for occupancy by the Probation Department. PASSED by the Board on May 279 1975- 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Su rvisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public Works De Witness ness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Lessor via VF Suers Real Property Buildings & Grounds affixed this22:Lday of Maw , 19 Probation Department J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor—Controller Count Administrator By �"-- Deputy Clerk H sa 12/74 - ,s-� Maxine M. Neufel lJirt�:�`Fr1 L vey�•+l ............. LEASE 215 G Street Antioch, California 94509 Probation Department 1. Parties: Effective on MAY 2 7 19n,' 1975, GEORGE CURTIS, FAYE C. CURTIS, THOMAS BRODERICK, PHYLLIS BRODERICK, ENRICO E. CINQUINI, and ROSE CINQUINI, herein- after called "LESSOR" and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision. of the State-of California, hereinafter called "COUNTY", mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Lease of Premises: Lessor, for and in consideration of the rents, hereby leases to County, and County accepts and takes those certain premises situated on the northeast corner of 3rd. and G Streets, Antioch, California, consisting of the southerly portion of a one story concrete block building containing approximately 3,080 square feet of office space, commonly known and designated as 215 G Street, Antioch, California. 3. Rental : County shall pay to Lessor as rent and use of said premises a monthly rental of One Thousand Two Hundred Ninety and No/100 Dollars ($1,290.00) on the tenth day of each month, during the term of this lease. Rental shall be paid to George Curtis, et al, P. 0. Box 546, Antioch, California 94509. 4. Term: The term of this agreement shall be for five (5) years commencing September 1, 1975 and ending August 31 , 1980. 5. Extension: This lease may, at the option of the County, be extended for five (5) years commenc ing September 1, 1980 and ending August 31 , 1985 on the same terms and conditions as contained herein except the rental during the entire option period shall be reduced to Nine Hundred Eighty Five and No/100 Dollars ($985.00) per month. 6. Holding Over: Any holding over after the term or extension of this lease as provided herein- above shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month subject to the terms of this lease so far as applicable. OQ�22 V 7. Use of Premises: The premises shall be used during the term and extension hereof for purposes of conducting various office functions of County. 8. Maintenance and Repairs: a. County will maintain any and all interior electrical, interior water and interior plumbing systems, except County shall not be responsible for major repair or replacement of said systems. County will replace any and all electrical lamps and ballasts in the lighting system after total original tamping by Lessor. b. County shall provide routine maintenance and minor repair to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems, such as periodic inspection, lubrication, replacement of filters, belts and fuses. Major repairs, such as replacement of motors, compressors, or other major components shall be responsibility of Lessor. c. Lessor shall keep the exterior of the building in good order, condition and repair except for exterior doors and their fixtures, closures, and hinges, which shall be maintained by the County. County shall maintain all locks and key systems used in the demised premises. d. County shall keep and maintain the interior of the premises in good order, condition and repair, but Lessor shall repair damage to the interior caused by failure to maintain the exterior in good repair including damage to the interior caused by roof leaks and/or interior and exterior wall leaks. e. County shall replace any glass windows broken in the demised premises. f. Lessor shall provide and install at the direction of the Fire Marshal the necessary number of A-6-C fire extinguishers for the premises at no cost to County. County shall thereafter maintain, repair and replace said extinguishers. g. County shall not suffer any waste thereon or thereto the demised premises. Ii. County shall not be held liable or responsible for any repair and/or replace- ment of any part of any system under warranty. Lessor shall furnish County with three (3) copies of warranties, parts lists, and operating instructions for all mechanical systems maintained by County. - 2 - 0o?23 i. Lessor shall be responsible for the correction of any code violations which may exist in the leased premises; provided that Lessor shall not be liable for correction of Code Violations or CAL/OSHA violations which arise out of and are directly related to a change in the. County's occupancy . or use of said premises. 9. Utilities and Janitorial : County shall pay for all water, gas, electric and refuse collection services provided to the leased premises and shall provide its own janitorial service. 10. Accomplishment of Improvements: a. Lessor shall construct improvements per plans and specifications labeled Exhibits "A" and "6" which are attached hereto and made a part hereof. Final plans and two (2) copies of the final specifications of materials and equipment to be installed, will be submitted to County and shall be approved by County before any construction work is commenced. After approval by County, Lessor shall not make or cause to be made any changes in said plans or specifications without the prior written consent of County. County hereby reserves the right to inspect during construction of improvements as specified herein but will not interfere with Lessor's work and will notify Lessor of any requests, recommendations or discrepancies. Lessor shall commence remodeling within fifteen days of the effective date of this lease and said improvements shall be complete, including final inspections and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, by September 1 , 1975. If actual remodeling has not commenced within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this lease, County may, upon written notice to Lessor, cancel this lease without cost or obligation to County. b. In the event Lessor cannot deliver premises on or before September 1 , 1975,; as provided hereinabove, rent-shall be prorated from the date premises are. completed and accepted by the County. However, if the premises are not com- pleted by October 1 , 1975, County may, at its sole option, terminate the lease by giving Lessor written notice, with no further cost or obligation on the part of County; or County may elect not to cancel this lease but may assess Lessor, as liquidated damages, the amount of One Hundred and No/100 Dollars - 3 - 00e)24 ($100.00 for each working day of delay which shall extend beyond October 1 , 1975. 11. County Property: As part of the consideration for this lease, Lessor shall install Mills "Mainliner" partitions and conference room folding doors as specified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. These items shall remain the property of County and may be removed at any time during the term of this lease or extension thereof. If County electsfo remove any fixtures, it shall be done in a workmanlike manner calculated to preserve the demised premises. County, at its sole option, shall repair or compensate Lessor for any unreasonable damage to the premises resulting from the removal of fixtures. 12. Prior Possession: Commencing on August 1, 1975, County shall have the right to install fixtures, telephones, and other items required to prepare space for County's occupancy and to store furniture, supplies and equipment where such work or storage can be affected without unduly interfering with Lessor's completion of the building and improvements. 13. Alterations, Fixtures and Signs: County may make any lawful and proper minor alterations, attach fixtures and signs in or upon the premises which shall remain County property and may be removed therefrom by County prior to the termination of this lease, all signs to meet with existing Code requirements and Lessor's approval. Any such alterations, signs, or fixtures shall be at County's sole cost and expense. 14. Hold Harmless: It is understood and agreed that Lessor shall not in any way be responsible for damages to persons or property in and upon said premises and shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone whom- soever while in or upon said leased premises during said term and County hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Lessor from any liability or charges of any kind or character by reason of such injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising therefrom in, around, or upon said leased premises, except in the case of any structural, mechanical , or other failure of equipment or building owned by Lessor which results in damage to any person or property, Lessor will be held liable. Lessor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold County completely harmless from damages to persons or property and County shall not be held liable for any liability, claim, or suit for damages to the persons or property when and if said persons or property are invited or brought into the demised premises by Lessor. I 15. Destruction: a. In the event of damage causing a partial destruction of the premises during the term of this lease from any cause, and repairs can be made within sixty (60) days from the date of the damage under the applicable laws and regu- lations of governmental authorities, Lessor shall repair said damage promptly and within a reasonable time, but such partial destruction shall in nowise void this lease except that County shall be entitled to a proportionate reduction of rent while such repairs are being made, such proportionate reduction to be based upon the extent to which the portion of the premises usable by County bears to the total area of the premises. b. If such repairs cannot be made in sixty (60) days, Lessor may, at his option, make the same within a reasonable time, this lease continuing in full force and effect and the rent to be proportionately rebated as provided in the previous paragraph. In the event Lessor does not so elect to make such repairs- which cannot be made in sixty (60) days, or such repairs cannot be made under such laws and regulations, this lease may be terminated at the option of either party. c. A total destruction of the premises or the building in which the premises are located shall terminate this lease. 16. Quiet Enjoyment: Lessor covenants that County shall at all times during the said term peaceably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the demised premises without suit, trouble, or hindrance from or on account of Lessor as long as County fully performs hereunder. 17. Defaults: In the event of County breach of any of the covenants or conditions herein, including rent payment, Lessor may reenter and repossess the premises and remove all persons and property therefrom. In the event of such a breach by Lessor, County may quit the premises without further cost or obligation or may proceed to repair the building or correct the problem resulting from the breach and deduct the cost thereof from rental payments due to Lessor, provided that County has given Lessor three days written notice of said breach and provided that Lessor has not made a substantive effort to correct said breach. 18. Surrender of Premises: On the last day of the said term, or sooner termination of this lease, County will peaceably and quietly, leave and surrender to Lessor these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures (except signs and fixtures referred to hereinabove) - 5 - .-.. .'. k. in good order, condition and repair, reasonable use and wear thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by act of God, or by circumstances over which County has no control excepted. County shall not be liable for painting the interior of the demised premises upon termination of this lease. 19. Taxes: County shall pay to Lessor within thirty (30) days after being requested to do so by said Lessor, as additional rental , a sum equal to thirty five percent (35%) of the increment, if any, in City and/or County taxes levied against the Assessor's Parcel 66-053-005 in any year during the term of this lease or extension thereof which may exceed the taxes for the fiscal year 1975-1976 which are Should taxes decrease, the rental shall decrease in accordance with said tax decrease. 20. Inspection• Lessor may enter the premises between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., . Monday through Friday, and may employ proper representatives to ensure that the property is being properly cared for, that no waste is being made, and that all things are done in the manner best calculated to preserve the property and in full compliance with the terms and conditions hereof. 21. Successors: The terms and provisions of this lease shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties hereto, jointly and severally. 22. Recording: A Memorandum of Lease shall be executed and recorded by the parties hereto. This will be in lieu of recording the entire instrument. 23. TIME IS THE ESSENCE of each and all of the terms and provisions of this lease. COUNTY LESSOR COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political —Z.441 subdiv• on of. 4the Stat of California George rtes By 0 � - �r f- irman, Boars f Sup isors Faye C. Curtis ATT J. R. SS Jerk El 4h;oxm�as Broderic De ty 7f' - RECOMMENDED F A ROU &=C=� Ph ; lis Bro ri By f � ` Count rato �1tc', GL. Enric E: Cinquini By - eputy Pu is Works Dir or Buiidi gs a Rose Cinquini By APPROVED AS TO FORM: —Feal Property Ag J. B. C U EN, County CouseI By Deputy -6- 0av2`� By �� � ;ftia4.c By. - 00U027 EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS LEASED BUILDING COUNTY REQUIREMENTS LOCAL CODES: 1 . Building and its components to meet all applicable codes and the County to be provided a "Certificate of Occupancy" from the local jurisdiction at the cost and responsibility of Lessor. 2. Building facilities to comply with CAL OSHA standards (CAC Title 8). 3. Furnish and install facilities for handicapped persons per State law. 4. "Exit" signs as required by code and fire marshal. 5. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS Fire extinguishers and F.E. signs as required by fire marshal are to be furnished by Lessor. ABC size as required by fire marshal. 6. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Existing Buildings: Lessor to furnish two copies of floor plan(s) (min. 1/8" = 1 '-0") of premises. New Buildings or Remodel: Plans, specifications, "As Builts," maintenance manuals to be furnished by Lessor. 7. ELECTRICAL a. Lighting Fixtures: 2'x4' surface or recessed with two, three or four tubes to meet required performance. b. Fluorescent lighting fixtures with acrylic lens similar to Wellmade 102 HFA, adequate to deliver 80-100 foot candles at desk level in all areas within clerical and office spaces. c. 50-60 foot candles in non-clerical areas. d. Ballasts shall be free from hum or vibration objectionable to staff and employees. Ballasts to be "A" rated protected fuse link. e. Telephone System: Conform to telephone company requirements for space, conduit, power, panels, ventilation and dust control . f e f 7. ELECTRICAL (con't.) f. Convenience electrical outlets in balanced circuits. g. Night and exit lights to code, rechargeable dry cell battery emergency lights as required by fire marshal , local agencies, or as shown on plans. h. All light switching to be by wall switches or contactors, no switching from breakers. i. All bus bars to be copper in all panels. j. All wiring to be copper. 8. HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, EXHAUST Roof top or conventional equipment shall have gas fired furnaces (NO HEAT PUMPS) with circulating blower. (NO ELECTRIC HEAT) a. Design temperature indoor 72° at five-foot level above floor for heating. b. Design temperature outdoor 35°F. for heating. c. Distribution of supply air shall be through quality (Krueger Mfg. - or equal) adjustable registers with opposed blade/dampers located to deliver quiet, draft-free air movements, also to affect cold air currents from exterior walls. All totally enclosed offices to have supply and return registers. d. Zone areas with separate furnaces and/or re-heat duct furnaces with separate thermostats. e. Thirty percent (30%) fresh air makeup with separate thermostats/or at each supply air blower unit. f. Exhaust or economizer features with auto-adjustable damper to thirty percent (30b) CFM of unit. g. Blower operation shall be continuous and scheduled by a spring-wound w/overide time clock (seven day). Time clock to be located inside building. h. Thermostats shall be ductstats in return air system. i. Operation of blower - air noises through registers and vibration shall be at an acceptable level for occupants, not to exceed NC35. j. Install extractors for all branches and turning vanes in ducts. k. Air changes shall be a minimum of 1-1/4 CFM per sq. ft. of floor area. -2- 00329 8. HEATING, COOLING, VENTILATION, EXHAUST (con't.) 1. Refrigerated, air cooled condensing units: Roof top or conventional equipment. Design temperature indoor 75* DB at fivefeetabove floor. Design temperature outdoor 95* DB and 67 F - WB. Distribution, etc., quality and performance shall be same as heating. Balance of all supply, return and exhaust registers and submit performance sheet. (After two months' occupancy, by County.) If multi-occupancy, upon complete occupancy of building, the building to. be rebalanced at no expense to County. > ✓ Noise emission from blowers, ducts, and other mechanical equipment tol occupied areas shall be below NC35. 9. FLOOR COVERING a. Carpet in areas indicated on plan - Antron Il Nylon, 22-oz. minimum face weight, direct glue-down per manufacturer's instructions. No pad. Carpet to have antistatic semi-conductor back, man-made fabric, similar to that made by Burke Rubber Co. Rubber topset cove base to be installed over carpet. Pile Yarn: 100% Antron II Continuous Filament Nylon (2450 Denier,. 2-ply rated) with Burke Static Control System with Brunslon. Face Weight: 22 oz. Number Series 32100 Style: 5/64 Stitches per Inch: 11 Pile Height: 1/8 Primary Back: Polypropylene Weight Density Factor 139,392 Density: 6336 SECONDARY BACKS AVAILABLE: LOKTUFT BACK CARPET Secondary Back - Loktuft 5.3 oz. b. Smooth Floor: Installation 1/8" minimum thickness, 12"xl2" vinyl asbestos with 4" topset rubber base. Contra Costa County Building. Maintenance Department approval for pattern and quality. c. All toilet rooms to have sheet vinyl floors, wainscote to code on walls ` of toilet rooms up 4' from floor. 10. PAINTING Paint interior a light color, white ceilings, trim semi-gloss enamel . Color selected by County. a. Toilet Room Areas - one coat prime sealer and one coat stipple enamel. b. Office Room Areas - one coat latex to satisfactory coverage. c. Doors and Frames - frames, two coats paint; interior doors, natural finish, one coat sealer; exterior doors, to match existing finish. d. Public and Waiting Rooms - vinyl walls of material approved by Contra Costa County. 11 . TOILET ROOMS a. Women's toilet room with good light (fluorescent fixtures), ventilation, heat and sanitary floors. See list for County recommended fixtures and fittings. Walls to meet local codes. Not and cold water. b. Men's toilet room with good light (fluorescent fixtures), ventilation and sanitary floors. Hot and cold water. c. Women's lounge room to CAC Title 8 code with incandescent lights controlled by dimmer switch. Provide electric wall heat with thermostatic control. d. Toilet Partitions - standard metal partitions with one unit in each toilet room prepared for handicapped persons. 12. TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES Furnished and installed by County, except door bumper, coat hooks on T.R. partitions and grab bars for handicapped persons. 13. JANITOR'S ROOM Supply storage space, service sink with hot and cold water supply, electrical outlets, floor drain, ventilation. Janitor's room to have no electric or telephone panels. 14. CASEWORK Staff room - wall hung and base cabinet with formica top. Men's and women's toilets - lavatory counters with formica top, if applicable). 00231 p i r 15. COUNTER TOPS Pre-formed formica cover with 6" backsplash in toilet rooms and staff room. Formica covered in clerical offices to be self edged. 16. CEILINGS Acoustical tile with tee bar hangers. Tile - Armstrong "Minaboard" mineral fiber panels with fissured design. Size - 24"x48"x5/8". Flag spread class 25, Federal Spec. SS-S-118a. NRC- .60 - .70. Light reflectance - over 75%. Tile Suspension System - Exposed grid, white finish. If recessed, light fixtures are used, one hanger wire at each corner of fixture. Hanger wire to be 12 ga. and no more than 48" o.c. in each direction. 17. ELECTRIC WATER COOLER Haw's HWTA-6 Wall Mount. 18. LOCKS a. Door lock to be Sargent - Lock Series Magna 8 line w/FED 161 cutout. Schedule available. Confer with Contra Costa County Public Works, Buildings and Grounds Department for details. NOTE: Any leased building with joint tenants and common areas not to have Sargent locks. 19. DOOR HARDWARE Panic hardware on doors as per fire marshal 's requirements. Aluminum doors to be wide stile w/automatic astragal. 20. Area security lights at exterior doors. 21 . Good house cleaning of windows, walls, floors, plumbing fixtures, light fixtures, ready for occupancy. 22. Meter services: separate for water, gas, electricity and sewer. 23. CLOCKS Provided by County. Clock outlets by Lessor. 24. DRYWALL Walls other than Ultrawall system to have vinyl covering similar in weight and pattern to Genon vinyl wall covering. Pattern - Interplay Type I Weight - 19 oz./53/54-inch width Fabric Type - Scrim Color selection by County. -5- 032 -5- UU �� ------------------ 25. INSULATION Sound insulation as indicated on drawing. "Sound Transmission Class" through full height walls shall be a minimum SFC 43. Excessive noise areas to be as specified on individual plans. 26. XEROX ROOM Provide an exhaust fan in Xerox Room - 400 CFM on separate switch. Receptacle by Xerox Corporation. Switch to have pilot light. 27. STAFF ROOM Provide an exhaust fan in Staff Room to provide a minimum of four changes per hour. 28. PARTITIONS Floor to Ceiling: Ultrawall movable partition system. Finish to be vinyl - U.S.G. Textone Group II Flax 07665. Partitions to be installed to manufacturer's specifications. Contractor to submit shop drawings to Contra Costa County Building Maintenance Department for review and approval before proceeding with installation. Walls to be installed with non-progressive stud system. Floor to Ceilings: Wood or metal studs w/5/8" gypboard. Finish - Tape - Texture and paint as described in Section 10 PAINTING Movable or Demountable Partitions Mills "Mainliner" 68" high w/6" open base steel or steel and glass panels to plan. Maximum Panel width 48". Contractor to submit shop drawings to Contra Costa County Building Maintenance Shop for approval . 29. PLUMBING FIXTURES, TRIM AND ACCESSORIES SPECIFIED FOR LEASED AND RENTED BUILDINGS: WATER CLOSETS Tank Type - American Standard F2109.056 (less seat) "Cadet" toilet combination. (a) American Standard Church 5320.114, elongated bowl, open front, no cover, white. Flushometer - F2222.016 (less seat) Madera, with Church seat 5320.114; Sloan Royal 112YV Flushometer. LAVATORY American Standard P-4869.020, 20"x18" - "Regalyn" C.I. white enameled lavatory with- (a) 4" center set Delta #500 and perforated P/0 plug. (b) 1-1/2 x 1-1/4 C/P P trap. (c) C/P Speedway stop and supplies. Countertop - Circlyn 3201.035, same fittings w/SS Hudee rim. 00333 -6- Q 29. PLUMBING FIXTURES, TRIM AND ACCESSORIES SPECIFIED FOR LEASED AND RENTED BUILDINGS: cont. SINK 'American Standard P-7013.014, 25"x2l" C.I. white enamel A.R. "Custom Line" sink with - (a) R-4505 perforated grid strainer. (No removable strainer) (b) 1-1/4 x 1-1/2 C/P P trap. (c) Speedway stops and supplies. (d) N-100 Delta deck type w/swing spout, less aerator. SERVICE SINK American Standard 24x20 Akron service sinks u7695.018 with rim guard and trap stand 2" or 3" size. (a) Double faucet with vacuum breaker and bucket hook, w/stops in shanks #8341.075. FLOOR SINK Floorwell 7740.020 w/7593.148 faucet (ceramic tile wainscot). URINAL American Standard Wallbrook 6540.017 with Sloan"Royal" 180YV C/P Flushometer. Install floor drains 2" minimum size directly under urinal or urinals. -7- 00334. a *z J " J .�._��rk 'a d,^• n�.✓- ala. . p a Y"k IV 2R' ol In LT s b41IF%ttl fy.•.i` _ f v v* 34:x 34. 1'0 '8'.7i1."t�l.'iKL"T 'W��Jw►Ql��A;',- .` x� � •" r rr► YQ Gvsa�. Fr— '- .N Z a t i ± ' 'u r� "rte 1 ee f • # t; A aj r k ; rxtr Y .. A .T N fir. r may. { Ilk rr i', A Y R., r +{fat;Im 'rr. ..> ++g• -N.rt.t.�x� '.�K's' •aX+�f:'«c�;4a':'" L �#x:. � ✓� � �,h'.3 h'.aR fiq 'Y�4 s'.+S t�'lyp �L�r���1}C q 3f� �S MAY } y< x �^� *9 r #1-11 Iaa °' #�s tip x.. Y ""tgi� d"4 k : a d"' xy rz, < .�^ '!'' fi . 'M '1!'-+f a,+. ^7 c �,'". " s +"nx� � K, 11 "' r x oY �S ex cwt w:« f ,j. e ''f Y 7 Y" '�' ^$1 r � 7 • U' i. �.. a 'y'.7- '-`F � z s ,z t ° ! d r T: 7 xt F J X* ,� &'x J �7 h *dam � � " Rl �7 + zI " cx e in -,,,, ; .��" :. ___,. et^t y �.. ,a� II _..__ 3. d ,; °"� �",# '. T*" to-. 4 >' L { �' Rr Y. f ._. r K '„'ti`� �,rw't Via° ate.,,_,. .11 " „ - i~ - c� ° ',Via tii 4' ,,x $" ' -� ," ; � .. em , - _ - rrxf x N 11 F* -I 11 '- 'rte x.ry a. 7 * rX ri=J A " _� 11 , r t �'- `'� ..+� ' "� �:Sy' "tom ,wy i ..`. f2mf J.r .y� .ti .. :'x -.2 r+`d" 1' ay. 4I'llv'' 'vii' % t _. - _' �% " ,,// _ t'} .�.. i i+ i +. 1• `�'' �, .a a*.4 9W�yZ,3,'Y Ey' gyp. t��.�} .. f tS �` y-"-#" -:A d. .`I-.F '..' "'L k1 '�.�"'� Kw. .-a .. Y 1' _ 01 VY P Y": t. .Maw _ s f� n , e } o-fi rj",,,p f �se-yri .a p..w ; �t.i. _ - :.� ,I ^*a ass. ,' *z..a, „y^e % 1 N ` Yc s11 r.A— a.r ,• • F C 3 $f JF?{�R Iy{ ,TF _ z r .,Hp _See . W Y. t. _ $ rt, _t yy _ R r x c i.nW Y ...a..R, .- -,r _ - -4 .µ o f ' ' .1. u $ `� r#. P tl mfoe,AW ZY 2" ( , ''`+ v,+ H,y, '$ r , 11 A r,. .T"�:V,'7'I n4`rIry _f "' _ � xyy� - _ f+ y t o, k'i^/f�'sip�,'S" !}x'll „', Y 4- 1_111I kM*'.vr'� Sc .�....,.:.. f - . J 4 N , F "Po-,rp"r"f XaR vin� .- .x x , ` t a.' x ° ;”" a .-�,1 �F. * 4 �X k- . %H .d - 2 � Y " 11 -"" r f x 7vr - I .€. ..t . . t, .`.� i °,y K f xa�''�7,0-'{"w.�.,'+at' "�. p , :. `=F y",. k 'Y,r y. s „pip. 1i -1 M'h f.,:li ..._. � �t ,,L = St, , Y v r ; r e�� , i'�: o-h� �p,�, M A _ yam:•. +.l+il _ , Ni 11 r � r � ..y "� y az.9' .f 3' r.r2 ._ ,: :�. - , ' "'i a 9rn•t'qs",;P r"' ,Y. r P tr - t ,• °i _ - .. t ` atS •tC t "i"72" F „' `.s.'' '�tom.z"4+' _._.- f c' �, Y, Ys� Y. .rt��x, .. y$ . 1 "C 4� .+`- "° fs�< kmSf-.y.N..!��£ .r.ZST.� + Ft .,. R is.' - :. " _ .t; '+ / ..l !n yy' Gam,..._ .,. _ ..-,._. , - A S � .we - ` i -,fit � --,"n r?- .. ,,,r -.¢�f,w*^ C.. i ....�,..w. f �� XYt Y „ .. ..,�"".....r- 117 �: i Z k f tw, ry^ s Y, 1 e a�w ,•`' 'C'x .,Ln .ar•, "' "p- j r,r t., - ^.. .s `' T .� ^: `�' M ,i 'I'x' "f'k�s"� „ f ;uij*_r- P xr''�, . - r Ye+' Y +P -' +. Ph ., y*�r"b.pyo,j*� :i- S Mu�'rY`SY af&.' 7 I" k11 `-..'. :,.,tom :' `.. - s„ i trig-i,`i"'xyw ..� is � ,. M -'- ` °'�If ,,.,,g K a� .. v 7 .r°„+.. '.ate r'` TE$* h su x z r #:y� sh m. f'l" +o- �t YAC - .y.�.........._..._ 0�7 �,��,� � _ , : ' S ,— Mgt. .�� �r ,— , . • ^ "".i ti - Y "G _ . xII S+ : °` c e ' t r r ya. . .yix Y ! ss e Ax 'Yr rte" _ k ` ,4 " qf "+`'k'sy ,. { .'±4, :y,..in W, .tom. 1111 � U' k ,i 4 Y � � w. 's.r w , Y• 'Y s fix' r t ,: * �X �. 1 aK t? ■� mv �4:4 � 2l '^' t Sg 5R " wx;.'�'t-s..i"4 w.`tpti' s�h` aj' "r''i- � .,a,i rA�'Q'3< :�W`L "IC Yzi w Yea i u + n az (^"Y�, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 1975 In the Matter of Amendment to an Agreement No. 74-50639 (A-1) with the State of California, (Department of Health. No�z9-2es3urces Agency ol IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an amendment to an existing agreement with the State of California, Department of Health, for the conduct of a Geriatric Screening Project by the County Health Department to extend the duration of the project four months through December 31, 1975, all other provisions of the agreement to remain unchanged. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Resources Witness nay hand and the Seal of the Board of Agency Supe Attn: Contracts Adm. affixed this 27th day of May , 1975 State Department of Health J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting County Health Officer County Auditor-ControlleOff. Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 • 15-M N. In aham County Administrator Will STANeARD AGREEMENT--ATTORNEY QaE STATE AGENCy ?A'iH OF CALIFORNIA DE>•f.OF GM 9Q. STD 2 (IICV.Io1T21 CONTROLLER THIS AGREE\TENT,made and entered into this tenth day of Apri 1 , 1975 0 � In the State of California, by and between State of California, through its duly elected or appointed, 0 qualified and acting 0 TITLE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE Chief, AGENCY NUMBER Fin nci 1 Management Br nch Department of Health hereafter called the State,and , Contra Costa County ^ rraQ-a0/ hereafter caUed the Contractor. WITNESSETH: That the Contractor for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements,'and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the State services and materials, as follows: (Set forth service to be rendenod by Contractor,amomt to be paid Contractor,time for performance or completion,ard'attaeTi plant and SPW*adoRr,if any.) 1 . In that certain agreement between this Department and Contra Costa County, dated September 1 , 1974, -and approved-on December 9,."-1974 by the State Department of General Services: Paragraph 2-is `amenefed to read as follows: The period of this contract shall be September 1 , 1974 through December 31 , 1975. 2. All other terms and provisions of said contract shall remain in°full force and effect. JOHN ir. cuUsEri, CM*Couase! The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement By o:rw.y IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the date first above STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR- AGENCY CONTRACTOR(IF OTNSA TNM[AN INDIVIDUAL,.STAT[MNMNQ A CDIIPDSAT(ON. 1ARrida""I►.ETC.) Department of Health Contra Costa .County BY (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) BY OR/ZED SIGN�RyR[ ► M AY 2 7 1975 TITLE James U. Boyd, i e T EAchni m strati o bui I d 651 Fj ne ree Financial Management Branch Martinez, Californ' 94553 JO- ADDRESS (CONTINUED ON JO-SHEETS. EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR) DO HM Wr"is This SMA AMOUNT OF THIS ESTIMATE APPROPRIATION FUND s -0- Local Assistance General UNENCUMBERED BALANCL ITEM CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL Y:AR s 299 (j) 1375 1974 1974-75 ADJ. INCREASING MCU"_ FUNCTION SRAHGE Office Expense and Equipment ADJ. DECREASING ENCUM. UNE ITEM ALLOTMENT SRANCE 810-145-44-05 I hereby certify upon my otrn personal knowledge that budgeted funds T.B.A-NO- B.R.NO. are ar ' :bk for pertOd end purpose of the tapenditum Stated above. SIGNATURE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICER DATE I hereby certify that eL conditioru for ezemptson set forth in State Admin�Manual Seton 1201,13 have been complied Irith and thu document is ezempt from review by the Department of Finance. SIGNATURE OF OFFICER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE AGENCY DATE ► 00257 o>� i Ut7cw t ------------- T. .. a r I. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers,a is .gen and employees from any and all claimi and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, iLnd any other person, firm or corporation furnishing-or supplying work,service§,materials or supplies in connection with the performance of this'contractl and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by the Contractor in the perfonriiiice of this contract: 2 The Contractor, and the agents-and employees oE:'Contractor, m'the-performance of_this agreement, shaW act in an independent capacity and not,as oTwe s.or_employees o;agents of State of California - _ .:n 3. The State may terminate this amt and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to Contractor should Contractor fail to perform the-covenants herein contained.at the-tame and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination the State may proceed-sv_ith-the work in any manner deemed proper by the State. The cost to the State shall he deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this agreement, and the balances if any, shall be paid the- Contractor upon demand. 4. Without the written consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part S. Time is the essence of this agreement 6,-No alteration or variation of the teras_of this contrast shall be valid unless made im writing. _ and signed by the parties hereto,and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated Herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 7. The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in_compensation for all of Contractors expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel and per diem, unless otherwise'expressly so provided. 00CM8 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 1975' In the Matter of Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. ALC-072-74 with the State Department of Health. (Human Resources Agency No. 28-076) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Amendment No. 1 to an existing contract with the State Department of Health for the County Alcoholism Program Information and Evaluation System Project, extending the expiration date from July 1, 1975 to December 31, 1975 with no increase in funding. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Adm. Supervisors State Department of Healtkdfuced this 27th day of May . 197-5— Acting 97-Acting County Health Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator BY - Deputy Clerk. H 24 12"4 - 15-M N. In aham STANDARD AGREEMENT— AP crtOv'mm Ga STAT[AGENCY HE Q co"Tlu"t°R STATE-SF CALIFORNIA STO 2 mgv.tomw ❑ DEPT.OF GID/,sm. THIS AGI EEMENT,made and entered into this ?4 - ❑ � � day of March , lg 75 ❑ in the State of California, by and between State of California, through its duly elected or appointed, ❑ qualified and acting TITLE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE Chief, AGENCY Hu"NER — 74 Financial Management Services Department of Health Amendment #1 hereafter caUed the State,mod Contra Costa County 2 .8 - 076 hereafter called the Contractor. - WITNESSETH: Tliat the Contractor for and in eorisideratioa of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the State services and materials, as follows: (Set forth sen:ice to be rendered by Conhatxor,amount to be paid Contractor,time for performance or completion,and attach plass and oslr,if airy) 1. In that certain agreement between this department and Contra Costa County dated June 3, 1974, and approved on October 16; 1974 by-the I; .partment•of '- General Services: Paragraph 2 is amended to read as follows: t12. The period of this agreement shall be from July 1, 1974 to December'31, 1975.1, 2. All other terms and provisions of said contract shall remain in full force. ' and effect. The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a hart of this agreement tr - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties•hereto, upon the,date.Ent.ab've wntten. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR AGENCY CONTRACTOR(li OTNtR TITAN AN INOIYIONAL-tTAT9 NNWna A CORPORATION. PARTMQfMiR<TQI Department of Health Contra Costa.'Couat4 BY (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) IIY l ORIZED SIGNATURE 01- ► - V MAY 2 7 1975 TITLE Loyd H. Forrest, Chief nairmao, Board or Supe stirs Firnnni-1 Manawamart Sorviroc (CONTINUED ON D_SNEETS.EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR) ADDRESS P.O. Box 911 Martiucz- Calif nia c)4 Do Not WRtR in Th;S SpB AMOUNT OF THIS ESTIMATE APPROPRIATION FUND S Support General UNENCUMBERED BALANCE )TEM CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR S 290 375 1974 1974/75 ADJ. INCREASING ENCUM- FUNCTION BRANCE S 0 ADJ. DECREASING ENCUM. LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT S RANCE 8o4-71 o-44—co 1 hereby certify upon my a—personal knowledge that budgeted funds T.H.A.No. H.R.No. are available for the period and purpose of the espenditum stated above. SIGNATURE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICER DAT[ so _T - 1 1 hereby certify that all conditions for exemption set forth in State Administrative Afanual Section 1201.13 have been complied kith and this document is exempt from review by the Department of Finance. SIGNATURE OF OFFICER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THC AGENCY DATE 00340 �- 0 340 f-The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting.to any and aIf contractors,. subcontractors, materiaimen, laborers and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or _ supplying work,services,materials or supplies in connection with the performance of this contract, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person„ fine or corporation who may be injured or damaged by the Contractor in the performance of this contract: - -r 2 The Contractor, and the agents and employee's of Contractor, in the performance of this agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees gr agents of = _ State of California. & The State may terminate this agreement and be relieved of the payment of any consideration , to Contractor should Contractor fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the time apd-: t' in the manner herein provided In the event of such termination the State may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by the Stag The cost to the State shall be deducted from; any sum due the Contractor under this agreement, and the balance, if any, shall be paid the Contractor upon demand 4. Without the written consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part 5. Time is the essence of this agreement 6. No alteration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid unless made in writing . and signed by the parties hereto,and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 7, The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of Contractors expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel and per diem, unless otherwise'expressly so provided 00"41 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 i 19 '7..t In the Matter of Agreement No. 75-53011_with " the State of California, Department of Health. (Human Resources Agency No. 29-202) On recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the State of California, Department of Health, for Family Planning Services provided by the County Health Department during the fiscal year 1975-1976, the maximum amount payable to the County under said agreement is $85,000 funded entirely with State appropriated funds. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Human Resources Agency supervison Attn: Contracts Adm. State Department of affixad this 27th day of Mav 1975 Health J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting County Health ►+ sa M74 , t 'ficer By ����.•!� '' Deputy Clerk . County .Auditor-Controller N. Ingraham County Administrator 009 +may U CONTRACTOR STANDARD AGREEMENT— A " NEY GENERAL C] STATE 11G[NCY STATE OF CALIFORNIA . U DEPT.OF GEN. SER. STI. 2 iRLV. 10.72. 0 CONTROLLER THIS A(.HEE\LENT, made and entered into this 13t _day of-_-Lu _ _ 1975 11 in the State of California, by and bet%veen State of California, through its duly elected or appointed, F7 gualiried and acting M TITLE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE AGENCY —•--•— _ - - -- — —__—_�NUMBER -- —_— iief, Financial Management Serv: s Department of Health 75-53011 hereafter the State,and ( For its ) Contra Costa County(Health Department) 'aq_Z0,z caUed the Contractor. NVITNESSETH: That the Contractor for and inconsideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the State services and materials, as follows: (Set forth sert:ice to be rendered by Contractor,amount to be paid Conftetor,amc for performance or completion;and attach plans and speciAadons,if aw) 1. The Contractor shall provide family planning services to-persons who request such services and are determined eligible for such.services by the State Department of Health. Family planning services shall be provided in accordance .with the July 1, 1974 "Program Standards for Family Planning Services" published by the State Department of Health, a copy of which has been provided to the Contractor. Mese services shall be provided in coordination with the County Welfare Department. 2. The period of this contract shall be from July 1, 1975 through June 30, 1976. -3. the attached Exhibit IIAII(F) entitled, "Additional Provisions" is mads a part hereof by this reference. '1. In consideration of the above services performed in a manner acceptable to the State, the State shall reimburse the Contractor not more frequently than monthly, in arrears, upon sub- mission of a claim in format prescribed by the State, stating the time period covered, at rates not in excess of those published in the "State Department of Health Schedule of Maximum Allowances for Medical and Related Services in Family Planning Programs". The maximum amount The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement FOR11 APPROVED IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the date first STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR e •°"ty AGENCY CONTRACTOR t11 OTMfR IMAM AM IMMV/DUAL STAT=VINSTMR A COIt/ORATIOM. Department of Health ��"Contr•`T`I Co tra Coats County •BY (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) BY I T ORtZED SIGN�rU ) so- MAY 2 7 1975 TITLE L Chief, Financial Management Services Chairatan. _Board• _pervisors A11REss - 651 Pine Street (CONTINUED ON /SHEETS. EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR) u—_t1�L•� 945_3_3_ �O 'Wry in TWO Sp_ AMOUNT OF THIS ESTIMATE APPRGPRIArIC/r7 FUND $ 85,000 Local I General UNENCUMBERED BALANCE ITEM "V CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR s _ 28o(f) 1975 11975-76 ADJ NCIREASING ENCU". FUNCTION "RANCE $ Operating Expense g Equipment ADJ OECREAiING ENCUM LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT $RANGE 810-230-4Q.00 1^ 2� '-(� ^A /l -why r.r1ij `1 • 1 7 1. 'Thu• Ctit/trre-ter agro-e% ics iuelc•tiusik, ill-h-IN! :1134%.1 V'- Itaosselr•LS Ile 'tit:tll-, i1�l�f(ir r•r�, :1{,nt♦ and r u►pluycY%fro//1 any and all rlaisn%and luau-s ar+•rainy;fir re%soltint; fp;usy:11►el :11f t-fsntr clor%. %ul)a►ntrlctom. matetialtneu. l:Jwrrrs and any sillier Iterx1a, firm or i-s)rlx,rltion furnOtioi.g c,r %upplriu&work,sercicel.material.s or suppli(-%in coijucctiun with the-Ix•rfons►ance i)f this runtrss:t. wed front :enty and all claims and la%u-% accruing fir resulting is :111} Ix-moss, fine or rary>,►rltiuu wlso may l>.-injured or damaged by the Contractor ctor in the Ixrforspance of this mutrart. 2. 77he Contractor, and the agents and employees of Contrtctur, its tic Ix•rfornustice of thio agraY:ment, shall act in an independent aulracity and toot aS oflicen or employees or agents of State-of California. 3. Tltc•Stat- may termiu:ctc• this agr•c•lat-nt .11141 Ist- relieved tit the•Isaytaet/t of any c•rn►sider lkal to Ointrtctor %hould Contractor fail to lx•rfurtn list- etivenrtrts herr-in r oatainr d at tis•• time :uset in the-)Wanner herein protidc-d- In the %•%cent ul sowh tenni aliato the Staff- nw_v.pros t-ed with thc- work iu any manner deetne d pnslx r by the State. 110- "Ast to tilt- State slwell be deehredecl front au%• sum due the Contractor ureter this agreeme--nt, and the baktnee. if any, shall he paid the Contractor upon dernand_ 4. Without the written.-cxonwitt of the State, this agreennent is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part. b• Time is the essence of this agreernrnt. 6. No alteration or ),striation of the term of this contract shall Ix-valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto,and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated hereat), shall Ix-binding on any of the parties hereto. 7. The consideration to be paid Contrtctor, as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of Contractors expense% incurred in the performance hereyd- including travel and per diem, unk•.%otherwise expressly;so pro iderd :- 009AA .... ...... f - Pis 70b 7`: Page 2 Contra Costa County Health Department Contract Number 75-530II payable hereunder shall not exceed $ 85,000 . 5. hinds paid under this program must"be used to further and augment the family planning program of the Contractor, and must be used in addition to funds received from other sources of support for this purpose and not as a substitute for them: Agencies shall be required to show that programs or caseloads have been appropriately expanded. 6. Charges of over S75 for any individual, exclusive of facilitating services, in a 12-month period will not be reimbursed unless prior written authorization has been: requested and received from the Office of Family Planning. 7. Billing for reimbursement for services provided under this contract shall be submitted to the State Department of Health within three months of the date services- are provided. 8. if either party finds it undesireable to continue this Agreement, said Agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days Written notice to the other party. 9. The attached Exhibit "B" is made a part hereof by this reference. UL;M n-. ... • � � Exhibit A (F) STATE OF CAUFORNM DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ( 1) The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.-The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or natio:ai origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to:the fojlowing: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment,- notices to be provided by the Contracting Officer setting forth the provisions of the.Equal Opportunity clause. ( 2) The Contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employement without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. ( 3) The Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice, to be provided by the agency Contracting Officer, advertising the labor union or workers' representative of the Contractor's commitments under this Equal Opportunity clause and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. ( 4) The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations and relevent orders of the Secretary of Labor. ( 5) The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records and'accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders. ( 6) For work or services performed under this contract, no individual shall be paid wages or salary by contractor either (1) in excess of$18.75 per hour during any 24-hour period, or (2) more than $150.00 for any 24-hour period, out of funds payable by State to Contractor hereunder. Any reimbursement for necessary traveling expenses and per diems for food and lodging shall be at rates not to exceed those applicable to regular State employees under State Board of Control rules. No travel outside the State of California shall be reimbursed unless prior written authorization is obtained from the State. ( 7) All equipment, material, supplies, or property of any kind purchased from funds advanced or reimbursed under the terms of this agreement and not fully consumed in the work described herein shall be the property of the State. At the time of purchase of equipment under the terms hereof the Contractor shall submit a list of such equipment in accordance with the instructions and format contained in the attached Exhibit A-1. Contractor shall at the request of the State, submit an inventory of equipment purchased under the terms of this contract or any predecessor contract for the same purpose_ Such inventory will be required not more frequently than annually. At the close of the project covered by this agreement the Contractor shall provide a final inventory to the State and shall at that time query the State as to the disposition of said equipment. Final disposition of such equipment shall be in accordance with instructions from the State to be issued immediately after receipt of the final inventory and request for disposition instructions. O NAs 1197(6/741 �.J � �f - ( S) Prior authorization in writing by the State will be required before the Contractor will be reimbursed for any purchase order or subcontract exceeding $1,000 for any articles, supplies, equipment or services. The Contractor must provide in its request for authorization all particulars necessary for evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such, cost and as to the reasonableness of the price or cost. For purchase of any item exceeding.such minimum dollar amount, three competitive quotations must be submitted•with the request, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified. ( 9) All personnel employed; py the Contractor under this contract shall meet the standards of training anis experience required for comparable positions in State employment, as determined by the State. If the Contractor maintains a Iocal merit or civil service-system, then the personnel employed under the budget shall be subject.thereto, providing such local system is generally comparable to standards with the State civil service system.as:determined by the State. (10) The Contractor shall account for funds provided hereunder in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, including documents to support accounting record entries. Such records shall be maintained for a period of five years after termination of this contract and shall be available for inspection or audit, at reasonable times, by personnel authorized therefore by the State. (11) A final invoice and, if required by this contract, a final report,shaU be submitted by the contractor within 45 days after the termination date hereof except as may be otherwise specified herein. If a final report is required by this contract final payment hereon shall be withheld until after receipt by the State of an acceptable report. (12) Any inventions made in the course of or under this contract shall be promptly and fully reported to the Chief Deputy Director, California State Department of Health. Patent applications shall not be filed on such inventions without the prior written consent of the aforementioned individual. VVegy'Z1 1 U064 .. .. •� T.. _ Exhibit& IsB" Contract Number 75-53011 Contra Costa County Health Department (1) It is mutually agreed between parties that this contract has been written and executed prior to July 1, 1975 for the mutual benefit of both parties in order to avoid program and fiscal delays which would. incur if the contract were processed after July 1, 1975. .L (2) This contract is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available by the Budget Act of 1975, or any other appropriation, for the fiscal year 1975-76 for purposes of this contract. In addition, this contract is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations or conditions enacted by the Legislature and contained in the Budget Bill or any statute enacted by the Legislature which may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this contract in any manner. (3) It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of 1975 or�other appropriations do not appropriate sufficient funds to pay the maximum amount of this contract, this contract shall be invalid and of no further force and effect and the State shall have no liability to pay any funds.whatsoever to the contractor, or to furnish any other considerations under this contract and the contractor shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this contract. ll0z2v 418 I .. FROMM i h In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Nay 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Agreement No. 74-51181 with the' State of California, - Department of Health. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the State of California, Department of Health, to provide supplementary education instruction and support services for 20 handicapped children at the George Miller, Jr.- Memorial Centers East and West during the period May 15 1975 through June 30, 1975 at a cost not to exceed $18,536 funded entirely with Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Title I funds. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of. cc: Director, Human Resources Supervisors Agency Attn: Contracts Adm. this 27th day of May 19 75 State Department of Health J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting County Health OffisfrAZ�2e , r Deputy Clerk H sa 1.74CgjWty Auditor-Controller N. InEVaham County Administrator 0011249 STANCAf.'7 AGREEMENT— AFpr.Ovxm BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CT.'?_I:CE CK!'•%a:NtA yy�...*-<.-y..-.:,_ Q STATEAGL,;Cy J 2 06_T!40,721 a ,. ❑ DEPT.OF GEN.SER_ ❑ CONTROLLER T'"S' AGREE_�fE**T. made and entered into this 15th_ y of I! 19_Z5; ❑ ?:s &— St ate of t:::l.fornia, by and between State of Ca!iforn , thrcugh its duly elected or appointed, � (::a_i3 En Wd and acting TIT-LE 07 OFF:cER ACTIN.".FOR STAT£ManSger JIGENCY h yam -- Financial Management Branch Department-of Heaa �aZlth $ h erre;:,-r raWd the Stcte,end Contra Costa County 1.rr ealfrr carte the Ccntraetor. WITNESSETH: That Lie Contractor for and in considesrtion of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State he:cinafter expressed, dues hereby agree to fuiaish io the State services and materials,.as foHows: fSc:f et::t semLx to be rertL-rectby Contre=or.emourt to be pcid CoWrcctor,time for perfonr.once or cotnplenar.,crad'attach pansand spicifcetia 1. The contractor shall: A. Provide supplementary educational instruction and/or support services to 20 handicapped pre-identified project participants in the language and/or reading anal multi-cult6ral studies component. areas. . (1) Contractor Eo provide in-service training for staff to enhance their teaching skills in one or more of the identified com?onent areas. (2) Contractor agrees to pre and post test all project participants in each instructional component area as well as staff in in-service component areas as required by E S.E A Title I (P.L. 89-313). (3) Contractor agrees to provide test data to Department of Health, The rra'%4zions on the tevcrse side he.cof constitute a pad of this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEhEOr, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the date first ab3ve %vrittm STATE OF CALIFORI IA CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR.(IF CrKCA THAN AN IFDIVIDr.AL.STATC V#IgCy[L t A COPlCRATIO%. PAXIWJEfMH/r.CTC- Department of Health Contra Costa County VY (AUTHORIZED 51Lr:ATUR£) (AUTHJRIZfxbl/SIIGNA UR ) � l � Y TITLE James D. Boyd ' IT E t:anaper, Financial Management Branch Chairinan, r f Supervisors 1 ADDRESS (CONTINUED ON SHEETS. _^cH REARING NAme OF camrRACTOR) 651 Pine Street, Martinez, Ca. 94553 Do::tM Ylirite in this SpC:f AKOU\T OF TH.S Es-Su TE .Af 01"IATION FUND $18,536.00 Sec. 109 U.S. Code .Clic Health Federal YENCUMBERE7 UALANCE :TEW ,CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR ADJ. ,NCnEu11G ENCUI!- FUNCTION S RANCE it AOL .^._CESAS.NG C:KCL:U- LIN=ITEM ALLOTMcKT BRA.•tCZ < 4 _ 809-844-Various See Exhibit 713" her:'•y^i r efy ern M.,ars persotle.►'r.ax.-dre that b:;&,erod Rind! T•S.A.NO. S.R. NO. are CL :c�.'; !or the PtTe'd wa run tfst aj!i7e.-ot"Ailitw-t:.sS:>+ed aba:_. SICNATURE OF ACCCUre);N:OFF:CER DATE 1 l,r,t I c4r:ijy t;a t ti:t Cry j,arx ft r =c TG;tort JrT fort!;i s J'tt», .yC.T.JI.Itl1t tC:1t r✓x I$fGio: 1209= ,t f•:.•S:t: lig':n t.t'Y swad AU d.. C MS 19:is tempt fr-pt rcCL!-w iwj the 1 S-GuA—„LA-M CF CFFIC=A 1"W 11Gr: +HALF q THC AG£::CY DATE _"`__ __': _��- =G_.��=�a`r' '-� - tea- •'n-rnZ , WNW 5=� O�e.-�� !.f1.77J 1•:I,t2r Gly y , 1. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers,agents. :' and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, materialnien, laborers and any other person, firm or corporation-furnishing, or supplying norl:,services.materials or,supplies in connection with the performance of this contract; and frorq any and all Elaims slid I" accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation. who may be injured or damaged I}v the Contractor in the performance of this contract. o The Contractor, and the agents and employees of"Contractor, in4t - performance of this agreement. shall act in an independent capacity,and not as officers for'employees or agents of State of California. . 3. Tlie State may terminate this agreement and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to Contractor should Contractor fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the time and in the manner herein provided In the event of such termination the State may proceed u-ith the work in any manner deemed proper by the Statim The cost to the State shall be deducted•from anv sum due the Contractor under this agreement, and the balance, if any, shall be paid-the Contractor upon demand. 4. Without the written consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in.whole or in part. 5. Time is the essence of this agreement. 6. No alteration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid unless made in %vritinc and signed by the parties hereto,and no oral understanding or agreement rwt incorporated.hereu4 shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 7. 17he consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of Contractors expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel and per diem, unless otherwise expressly so prodded. 0©951 Contra Costa CGunty -2- 74-51131 B. Implement, conduct, and execute all agreezents herein recd all associated program ctivitics in a wanner cstablishad by the project applications and public documents specifically indicated in the zttac ed niLit "A". entitled '!Schedule of ProYcct Applications, ane Puhtic 3octmerts", incorporated herein and made a parE hereof by�this reference. 2. ;.he attac!t�.t Exhibit "A(F)", entitled "Addi. icn31 Provisions" is incorporated herein and made a part-hereof•by this-reference. 4 3. The atteched Exhibit "B". entitled "3udget" is incorporatLd herein and made a part hereof by this revision. 4. The period of this contract shall be from May 15, 1975 through June 30, 1975.. 5. In consideration of the above services, perforaed in a -manner acceptable to the State, tha Stat-_ shall rei»•-aurse the contractor monthly, in arrears, upon submission of an invoice and supporting touchers ir. triplicate, st?tin- the time period cevered, and stating the contract number for actual expenses in accordance with the budget attached 'hereto; provided ho-=ver, that the contractor shall not cxccad b1 2A or ;1,030, whichever is less, any individual item in tha budget; that the contractor submit an explanation of the need for such excess with the claim for reimbursement to: Deparraant of Realth, Compensatory Education, .744 P. Street, Sacramento, California, 95814. 6. The total a.:.ount of this contract shall not exceed $18,536.00. 7. This agrees-_nt may be terminated by either party upon 30 written notice to the other party. 8. Effective May 15, 1975, this contract supersedes contract # 74-- 50618 made and entered into between the State and Contra Costa County on July 1, 1974, and approved by the Department of General Services on February 26, 1975. �0 52 • EMBIT "A" SCHMULE OF ?RbJ£CT APPLICA'TiOINS AND PUBLIC DOMMENTS 1. PROJECT APPLICATION A. F.Y. School Comprehensive Prograp Plan, Form A 127ES (revi' ed 1Z-74).x B. F.Y. Contolidated Application for Funds for Education Programs, Form A127D (revised 2-75)•.* 2. PUBLIC DO.^.UIIMS A. Administrative Iyanual_ Public Lax 59-313, Amendmen s toa ElementnEx and Secondary Education Act, published by the U.S. DepartmenC ; of health, Education, and Welfare. B. Compensatory Education Guidelines, The Elementary-and Secondary Education Act of 1955, Title I - Public L:.•, E9-10, published by the California State Department of Education. , C. ISanr_gemnt Information and Requirements for Programs Fun-led Through The Consolidated Arplicrtio:e, published by' the California State Department of Education. x Both the State and Contractor are in possession of copies published by State of California Departmant of Education. a -95 ry r Exhibit A (F) STATE OF CAUFORNM ' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ( 1) The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee- or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion. sex or national origin—The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to thew race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shalt include, but not be limited to:the ii.11owing: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment,- notices to be provided by the Contracting Officer setting forth the provisions of the.Equal Opportunity clause. ( 2) The Contractor will, in all solicitations or adverdsements'for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employement without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. ( 3) The Contractor wi11 send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice, to be provided by the agency Contracting Officer, advertising the labor union or workers' representative of the Contractor's commitments under this Equal Opportunity clause and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. ( 4) The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the cotes, regulations and relevent orders of the Secretary of Labor. ( 5) The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, record's and,accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders. ( 6) For work or services performed under this contract, no individual shall be paid wages or salary by contractor either (1) in excess of$18.75 per hour during any 24-hour period, or (2) more than $150.00 for any 24-hour period, out of funds payable by State to Contractor hereunder. Any reimbursement for necessary traveling expenses and per diems for food and lodging shall be at rates not to exceed those applicable to regular State employees under State Board of Control rules. No travel outside the State of California shall be reimbursed unless prior written authorization is obtained from the State. ' ( 7) All equipment, material, supplies, or property of any kind purchased from funds advanced or reimbursed under the terms of this agreement and not fully consumed in the work described herein shall be the property of the State. At the time of purchase of equipment under the terms hereof the Contractor shall submit a list of such equipment in accordance with the instructions and format contained in the attached Exhibit A-1. Contractor shall at the request of the State, submit an inventory of equipment purchased under the terms of this contract or any predecessor contract for the same purpose. Such inventory will be required not more frequently than annually. At the close of the project covered by this agreement the Contractor shall provide a final inventory to the State and shall at that time query the State as to the disposition of said equipment. Final disposition of such equipment shall be in accordance with instructions from the State to be issued immediately after receipt of the final inventory and request for disposition instructions. HAS 1197(6I74) 00254 * ( 8) Prior authorization in writing by the State will be required before the Contractor will be reimbursed for any purchase order or subcontract exceeding $1,000 for any articles, supplies, equipment or services. The Contractor must provide in its request for authorization all particulars necessary for evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such cost and as to the reasonableness of the price or cost. For purchase of any item exceeding such minimum dollar amount, three competitive quotations must be submittedwith the request, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified. ' ( 9) All personnel employedby the Contractor under this. contract'shall meet the standards of training anti experiences required for comparable positions in State employment,-as determined-by the State. If the Contractor maintains a local merit or civil`service system,then the personnel employed under the budget shall be subject thereto,providing such local system is generally comparable to standards with the State civil service-system asdetermined by the State. (10) The Contractor shall account for funds provided hereunder in accordance with' generally accepted accounting principles, including documents to support accounting; record entries. Such records shall be maintained for a period of five years after termination of this contract and shall be available for inspection or audit, at reasonable times, by personnel authorized therefore by the State. (11) A final invoice and, if required by this contract, a final report shall be submitted by the contractor within 45 days after the termination date hereof except-as may be otherwise specified herein. If a final report is required by this contract final payment hereon shall be withheld until after receipt by the State of an acceptable report:. (12) Any inventions made in the course of or under this contract shall be promptly and fuliv reported to the Chief Deputy Director, California State Department of Health. Patent applications shall not be filed on such inventions without the prior written consent of the aforementioned individual 00955 7 CONA fi-,k COSTA, COUh-TY (GEORGE M rLLER CEN R) ` Budget April 1, 1975 - Juna 30, 1975 EXHIBIT "S" Monthly Salary D.O.H. Range or • PERSONAL SERVICES CODING M.Y. Hourly Rate Amount Teacher(s) 12-00 1.0 $8.00 per hr. $ 9,268 Instructional Aides 18-130 41-0 $2.50 - $5.00 hr. X00 17 268 Total Salaries and .'ages Total Personal Services $I7,268 OPERATING EXPENSES AND EQUIPMENT Supplies 30-00 $ 536 Travel, Conference, Other Expenses 2 Reimbursed (Instate) 33-00 1,268 Total Operating Expenses and Equipment TOT*%L BUDGET - $18,536 MINI is In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California> May 27 . 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing negotiation of lease extension. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Real Property Division, Public :forks Department, is AUTHORIZED to work with the Director, Human Resources Agency, to negotiate an extension of lease for the Oakley Health Clinic. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of. Real Property Supers County Administrator affixed this __271h_day of Mav , 19 75 Director, Human Resources J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, Agency By Deputy Clerk H 24 rzna - IS-M Maxine M. Neu eld 0, In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costo County, State of California May: 27 , 19 In the Matter of Authorizing Real Property Division to Negotiate for l ' Lease of Office Space. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Real Property Division, Public ',forks Department, is AUTHORIZED to negotiate for lease of space in Antioch for the Family Support Division of the District Attorney's Office. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered.on.;the:_ minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seo[ of the Board of Real Property Supers County Administrator aRixed this 27th day of May 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk , A eYfDeputy Clerk H 24 12n4 - 15-#1 a M. Ne eld nn F In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 19 75 In the Matter of Amending Board Order of April 22, 1975 Authorizing Placement of Youth. The Board on April 22, 1975 having authorized placement of an emotionally disturbed dependent child of the court at Homewood Terrace, San Francisco, California at a monthly rate of $1 ,125; and Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid order is AMENDED to correct the monthly rate from $1,125 per month to $1,165 per month. x PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. : f 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seol of the Board of Agency Supervisors Social Service, Concord affixed this d o#_ Mav 19 75 Attn: L. Jacobs ay County Auditor-Controller ,7 X: R. Ol.SSON, clerk County Administrator By r ;� Deputy Cleric H 24 12/74 - 15-M Robbie Gu40errezO In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May, 27 19 75- In the Matter of Authorizing Placement of a Juvenile Court ward. On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources. Agency, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that authorization is GRANTED for the placement of an emotionally disturbed dependent child of the., court, Court Number 45126, at Fred Finch Youth Centers Oakland, Ca1ifor.nia: `; at a monthly cost not to exceed $1 ,687 effective May 28, 1975. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. i r yt 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid c c: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of:the Board of , Director, Human Resources Supervisors Agency affixed this 22±h_day of19 County Auditor-Controller ay Max_Mair ?5 Social Service, Concord J. R: OLSSON, Clerk Attn: L. Jacobs By Deputy Clerk ►+ 24 12174 - 15aA Robbie Gutierre f I N In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing Placement of a Juvenile Court Ward .. On the recommendation of the County Probation Officer, IT 15 BY THE BOARD ORDERED that authorization is GRANTED for the placement of an emotionally disturbed ward of the court, Court Number 41363, at the Arnold Hones for Children, 4455 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Sacramento, CA at a monthly cost not to exceed $1472.00 effective May 28, 1975. Passed by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on-the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Probation Officer Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 27th day of May 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By •' t. Deputy Clerk' N za rzna - Is:, Robbie 'Gutierrez j 4 : In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , Ig 75' In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance ' at Meetings. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following persons are AUTHORIZED to attend meetings as indicated. NAME MEETING DATE Ms. Mercedes Anderson University of California, June 4, 1975 to and Ms . Norma Gibson, San Diego Course on June 7, 1975 Senior Public Health Special Care of Newborn Nurses , Health and Premature Infants , Department Las Vegas, Nevada (at County expense) Mr. Donald J. Ludwig, Group Health Foundation June 22, 1975 to Prepaid Health Plan Institute, Chicago, June 26, 1975 Administrator, County Illinois Medical Services (at County expense) Judge Richard E. Annual Meeting of August 5, 1975 to Arnason and American Bar Association, August 12, 1975 Judge Betsy -F. Montreal , Canada Rahn (at County expense) PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Acting County Health Witness my hand and the Seai of the Board of Officer Supervisors County Medical Services affixed this 27th day of May . ig 75 Judge R. E. Arnason r J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Judge Betsy F. Rahn y l} t j .► p ,x a ,,� 1 Deputy Clerk H za ,ufotgAy► Auditor-Controller Robbie Gutierrez/1 County Administrator Director, Human Resources Agency w s s 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 19 75' In the Matter of Personnel Action. The Board hereby AUTHORIZES re-employment of Ms. Nora Hendrix in the class of Intermediate Typist Clerk at the third step ($701 per month) of Salary Level 179 ($636-$773) , effective May 12, 1975, as requested by the County Assessor, and recommended by the Civil Service Commission. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975_ 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: County Assessor Witness my hand and the Seal of the Boardof " Acting Director of Supervisors Personnel affixed this 27th day of May 1975 County Auditor-Controller — County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By A ...t`.G� r Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - ISASRobbie "tierrez) 1 t "Ix In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California r^ May 27 19 75f In the Matter of Personnel Action. f. The Board hereby AUTHORIZES appointment of Charles Wilson, M:.D. ` to the position of Clinical Physician I, position number. 02, at the: fifth step ($2;626 per month) of Salary Level 586 ($2,160-$2;626), effective May 27, 1975, as requested by W. R. Downey, Chief,' MedicaT, Administrative Services. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. z I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Chief, Medical Administrative Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board oU Services supe Acting Director of �,xed this 27th d of May . 19 75 Personnel aY -� County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSOR Clerk County Administrator gy ' ��,, Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15a►, Robbie 6u ierrez�l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 5 .. .. In the Matter of Approval of First Amendment to Architectural Services Agreement, Work Furlough Center, Richmond Area, Work Order 53 .6. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED. to execute the First Amendment to Agreement for Architectural Services for the Work Furlough Center, which will reduce the. architecural fee by approximately $7,000 and relieve the Architect from responsibility for field supervision during construction. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the- minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of. County-Auditor—Controller S'pe^"SOrs County Administrator affixed this 27th day of fty 1975 R. OLSSON, Cterk Deputy. Clerk _. H 24 12/74 - 15-M Constance J. Davies oo5 11t�t�J FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR 14ORK FURLOUGH CENTER - RIOWOND I. Effective Date and Parties. Effective on May 27 , 1975.. , Cometta and Ciaafichi (herein called "Contractor"), and the County of Contra Costa, (herein called "County', a political subdivision of the State of California, mutually agree as follows: II. Purpose: The parties desire to amend that contract they entered into, effective April 29, 1974, entitled "Agreement for Architectural Services". This Agreement was for architectural services for the Work Furlough Center located at 847 Brookside Drive, Richmond, California. III. Amendments. The Agreement for Architectural Services is hereby amended as follows: 1. Article III, E.2, Page 6 and 7: Delete in its entir=ty and replace with the following: "2. Contract administration will be provided by the County with the Architect assisting .in the general administration as follows: "a. Advise the County in writing as to the true intent of the contract documents when so re- quested by the County. "b. Review and approve and transmit to the County all shop drawings, submittals, operating in- structions, equipment lists, maintenance manuals, etc. "c. Complete the selection of materials and colors for all finishes within twenty (20) days after receiving necessary information from the Con- tractor and/or the County. "d. When requested by the County, provide technical direction. (Such requests will be kept to a minimum by the County.) "e. The Architect and each consultant approved by the County shall make one visit to the site at the completion of the work under their disci- pline or as invited by the County. "f. The Architect and/or his consultant, when in- vited by the County shall perform additional assistance to the County in the administration of the construction contract over and above those services spelled out herein, and such "extra" services, 0030 T,.f. 00 by errors or omissions in the contract documents, shall be paid for in accordance with Article VI, B., Page 14." 2. Article III, F.3.a., Page 8: Delete in its entirety and replace with the following: "a. The County will make the "As-Built" corrections: to the plans and specifications. Upon request the Architect shall deliver to the County the original tracings." 3. Article IV, A., 7.. Page 10: Delete in its entirety. 4. Article V., A., Page 11: Change the total fee from seven percent (7x) to six and 3/10 percent (6.37.). 5. Article V., C., Page 12: Delete in its entirety and re- place with the following: "c. The Architect shall reimburse the County for the cost of construction work which is unneces- sary and non-beneficial to the County , which is the result of gross errors and/or ommissions in the contract documents." 6. Article VI., A., Page 13: Payment #5; Delete the percentage amount and replace with: "Cumulative total fee due is ninety percent (90%) of the total fee for services (6.3% of the construction contract amo nh cha ng Payment#5 to 25% . Payment #7; delete. Payment #8; change percentage amount due to 2YX.. Payment #9; change percentage amount due to 2�%11. 7. Article VIII., B., Page 18: Subparagraph 4; delete the second sentence. Subparagraph 10; add the following: "10. The County will prepare all Change Orders." -2- 00367 S. Article XI., A., Page 21: Add the following supplemental conditions: "A. Architect will be responsible. for the information contained in the contract documents prepared by him or his consultants. Architect will not be responsible for the acts by the County or the Contractor over which he has no control. "B. County will contact Architect prior to making . significant changes to the contract documents and Architect's response, if received, will be duly considered by the County." CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ARCHITECT - - BY .. By C ��'.z-f`- Partner ;Na ATTEST: - By Partner J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Name and TitIe By 1 = , al�.u�l� Deputy Uerk dha Cometta and Cianfichi RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE BOARD OF CUPER - RS N CO COUNTY . G. WILL, County Administrator r i r ' Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEN County Counsel , 44 BY ,Y f Deputy -3- Qnn V36S In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California. May 27 19T5 In the Matter of Establishment of Work Order 5250 for Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Policy Committee Expenses. The Board having heretofore appropriated $125,000 from revenue sharing funds in the Fiscal Year 1974-1975 Budget for the, preparation of a countywide solid waste management plan and asso- ciated expenses (estimated at $5,000) of the County Solid Waste Management Policy Committee; On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS , BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the establishment of a Work Order in the. amount of $3,200 to which said committee expenses can be charged, is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Committee Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors County Auditor—Controller affixed this 27th day of 19 75 County Administrator d. R. OLSSON, Clerk By3c.� �Lia�L Deputy Clerk H sa 12n4 . Iwai Kildred 0. Ballard 443�9r f ct IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving Plans ) and Specifications and Awarding ) May 27, 1975 Contract for Maintenance of Median ) and Border Landscaping, County ) Service Area M-6, Danville Area. ) WHEREAS plans and specifications for maintenance of median and border landscaping in County Service Area M-6, Danville area, have been filed with this Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and WHEREAS the Public Works Director reports that said maintenance work is considered a Class 1 Categorical Exemption from environmental impact report requirements; and WHEREAS the Public Works Director further reports that in con- vection with said project informal bids were received on April 30, 1975 from the following: Bidder Total Amount Sycamore Homes Association $8,136 P. 0. Box 157 Danville, California 94526 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said plans and specifications are APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid, and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the. contract and returned it together with any required certificates of insurance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975 cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller County Administrator CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a Ertl, true & correct copy o!` the original en,,w7ient n•h3eh is on file in my office. and that it ^aG«ed adopted by the Board of Supervi:or7 r: c:cs:trn :'o:ta County. California, on the date shw�•n. ATTF:'T: J. ft. OLSSON, County Clerk a ex-officto Clerk of said Board of Supervisors, by Deputy Clerk. � .a CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA County Service Area M-6 Danville Area Landscape Maintenance March 31 1975 REQUEST FOR BID A Bid is requested for the following described work proposed to be constructed as noted herein: LOCATION: Danville County Service Area M-6 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Maintain landscaping in various areas in the Sycamore Valley area. Work is to be done in accordance with Specifications enclosed herewith. Proposals are to be delivered to: VICTOR W. SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 2505 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 ATTENTION: ROAD OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE SECTION before 4 p.m. on April 25, 1975. Bids will be opened by the Public Works Director who will recommend to the Board of Supervisors as to the award of the contract to the lowest responsi- ble bidder, except that the Public Works Director reserves the right to, re- ject any or all bids for cause, to request new Proposals, or to cancel the project. Failure by the Contractor to perform the necessary work for one month shall be considered cause for the County to cancel the contract andto use the monthly cash payment due to insure the proper maintenance of the area defaulted by the Contractor. ATTACHMENTS: Proposal Special Provisions P-1 00377,1 . f � - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY -County Service. Area M-6 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Danville Area 255 GLACIER DRIVE Landscape Maintenance MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 March 31 , 1975 P R O P O S A L County Service Area M-6 Landscape Maintenance The undersigned, being a duly licensed Contractor in the State of Cali- fornia, hereby offers to furnish all labor, equipment and material required, and to do the work necessary to perform the work as described in the.REQUEST FOR BID in accordance with Plans and Specifications therefor for the following lump sum prices: Landscape Maintenance A. Entrance of Old Orchard Drive from Sycamore Valley Road and median in Old Orchard Drive. $ B. Entrance of Old Orchard Drive from Tassajara Road. $ C. Medians in Sycamore Valley Road from approxi- mately 5001+ west of Old Orchard Drive to approximately 200'+ east of Tunbridge Road. $ D. Median in Greenbrook Drive at the Sycamore Valley Road Junction. $ Total annual cost for the above area: Dollars $ And, further, the undersigned agrees to enter into contract with the County to do the work as provided above and to furnish the prescribed insurance. Company Authorized Date Signature Title Address California Contractor's (Signature to be notarized) License No. P-2 O03'72- • .. -.. County Service Area..H-6: Danville Area. , Landscape Maintenance 1975-1976 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-6 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY VICTOR W. SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA MARCH 31, 1975 4; ;4 t ........... PAINTENANCE OF PLANTED AREAS COUNTY SERVICE AREA M- A. SCOPE OF SERVICE The Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials and equipment required to satisfactorily perform the landscape maintenance required by the County in the streets or areas as designated in the attached drawing and these special provisions. Maintenance of the various areas shall include, but not be limited- to, weed removal , spading, plowing or loosening of the soil , fertilizing, watering, removal and disposal at a commercial garbage disposal site of debris, trash and detritus collected. Where sprinkler systems and water spigots are installed and available, the County will furnish the water at no expense to the Contractor. In all other areas to be maintained, the Contractor shall furnish the water as included in the contract price bid. During, and at the end of the maintenance period, all plant material .shail - be in a healthy, growing condition. B. INSPECTION The County may inspect each area. In the event the Public Works Director or his representative finds any area unsatisfactory, the Contractor will rework the area immediately. If the Contractor fails to rework the area as directed, the County will have the unsatisfactory work corrected by others and the cost thereof will be deducted from the monthly cash payment due. After the correction work, the County will reinspect the work. Fifty dollars ($50.00) will be de- ducted from the amount due the Contractor for each reinspection required in each service area. C. PAYMENT On a monthly basis, the Contractor will furnish the Public Works Director with an invoice for work done during the previous month, giving dates and service area name and number. Payment shall be made on receipt of said invoices at the contract Lump Sum price divided by 12. Invoices are to be directed to: Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Sixth Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, California 94553, Attention: Accounting Division. D. INSURANCE Prior to performing any work under this contract, the Contractor shall furnish to the Public Works Director, evidence that he carries the following insurance coverage: • 1 . Contractor's Public Liability Insurance providing for a limit of not less than Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of any one person, and a. total a limit of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence. -1- 003774; D. INSURANCE (Cont.) ' 2. Contractor's Property Damage Liability (nsurance providing for a limit of not less than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence. E. TERM OF SERVICE The term of the contract will be from July 1, 1975 to June 30, 1976, The County may cancel the contract or any portion thereof at any time during the term of service, and such cancellations shall be effective upon giving of written notice. The Contractor shall furnish to the Public Works Director within 15 days after approval of the Contract by the Board of Supervisors a work schedule showing the proposed dates and times of work for each of the locations shown on the Proposal. The Contractor may change the schedule of work by submitting a revised work schedule at least 30 days prior to the date when the revised schedule is planned to become effective. F. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DETAILS 1. Weed, Insect and Disease Control All planting and rock surface areas shall be kept weed free. A program for control of weeds, insects and disease shall be developed by the contractor and submitted with supporting manufacturers' data for written approval by the Public Works Director before the start of the maintenance period.' Application of weed, insect and disease control chemicals shall be within the season(s) best suited to the insects, diseases and vegetation in ques- tion. Any new or existing plants or soil which in the opinion of the Public Works Director have been damaged by applying control chemicals shall be replaced: by the Contractor at his expense. Weed oils and granular or pelleted weed control chemicals will not be allowed. 2. Staking and Guying Trees or shrubs susceptible to wind damage shall be kept adequately staked or guyed. Ties shall be loosened periodically to prevent girdling. 3. Irrigation All planted areas shall be watered as necessary to promote normal growth and insure the health of the vegetation therein. -2- �J3'75 . ......... r 4. Plant Replacement The Contractor shall replace all vegetation lost through lack of care as describes: in Items I through 5_ Unusual occurrences or those beyond the control of the Contractor may be excepted from this provision by the Public -Works Director provided he is advised promptly by the Contractor. 5. FerLiIizer Commercial fertilizer shall conform to the provisions of Section 20-2.02 of the Standard Specifications of the State of California and shall .have a guaranteed analysis of Min. Max. Nitrogen 11% 14% Phosphoric Acid 8% 14% Water Soluble Potash 4% 7% and shall be applied at the rate of 6 lbs. per 1000 square feet. Fertilizer shall be applied to turf areas five (5) times during growing season between March and October (i.e. , every six weeks) . Fertilizer shall be applied to all other planting areas three (3) times during growing season between March and October (i.e. , every nine weeks)`. A11 areas shall be well watered within the 24-hour period prior to ferti 1 ization. 6. Pruning and Mowing All trees and shrubs shall be kept pruned for health, shape and public safety. Turf shall be maintained at a height of 1-1/2" to 2-1/21' at all times. H. LOCATION OF WORK A. Entrance of Old Orchard Drive from Sycamore Valley Road and median in Old Orchard Drive. B. Entrance of Old Orchard Drive from Tassajara Road. C. Medians in Sycamore Valley Road from approximately 500`+ west of Old Orchard Drive to approximately 200'+ east of Tunbridge Road. D. Median in Greenbrook Drive at the Sycamore Valley Road Junction. Show cost breakdown for above items on Proposal . -3- 003-76, s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Approval of Contract for Inspection Services with Mr. Robert G. Grady, County Adminiatration Building Remodel, Phase II, Martinez Area, Work Order 5205 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDEM that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a contract with Mr. Robert G. Grady, 64 Collins`Drive# Pleasant Hill, California 94523, for inspection services in connection with the County Administration Building Remodel, Phase II. PASSED by the Board on May 270 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the` minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand-and the Seal of the Board:of: cc: Mr. Robert G. Grady Supervisors Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller armed this 27th day of May , 19'75 '.' 9 75 ' R; OLSSON, Clerk B ------- 1 Deputy. Clerk H 24 12174 . ,5-M Constance J v es Wall N[; V'Ja► �_ t y ------------------ !n the Board of Supervisors of r Contra Costa County, State of California Kay 27 , 19 75, In the Matter of s Authorizing Acceptance of 4. Instrwnents for Recording Only. IT IS BY T BOARD ORDMW that the following offers of dedication are ACCEPTBl for recording onlyt Date Graanto�r. Reference f lay 13s 1975 Russell J. Brnzzone, Inc. Work Order 8200- PC file 92 01, - 7 (The offer is being made as a condition of approval of Land Use Permit 2002-704 PASSED by the Board on bay 27, 1975* I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid oat Recorder (via P.w.) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public works Director Supervisors Director of Planniagaffixed this 27th day of` 19 75' County Assessor County Administrator R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 • 15-M Constance J, Ifavies 00 '78 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 ..19 75. r In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of instruments for Recording Only. a 1� IT IS BY THE H•3A:iD ORDERED that the followitzg offers of dedication are ACCEPT for recording only: D= Grantor Reference 14arch 19, 1975 Lawrence A. Harper, at al 24.s.36-74. October 26, 1974 Hichael Frank NS-36-74 Hal3.enbergers at al PASSED by the Board on lay 27, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Recorder (via P.W. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 27th day of rTAY i9 75 County Assessor J. R. OLSSOt1i; Clerk County Administrator By /s 'Z-0 Deluty Cleric H 24 12J74 - 15-M Constance JO/Davies 10,0379. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 119 75' In the Matter of AuthorisiM Aoaeptanae of Instrwments. IT IS BY TM BOARD NFEERET1 that the following 14atr=sntg are ACCEPTED: Instrument Date Grantor Reference Relinquish went March 199 1975 Lawrence A. Harper„ No S*3 -? of Abutters at al Rights Grant Deed Farah 190 1975 LexreRae A. Harpers- M.3.36-74 at al_ PAssED by the Board on May 27, 19750 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on tha minutes of said Board of supervisors on the dab aforesaid. aa: Pnblia Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board,of County Admirdstrator Super affixed this 27th day of May- i9 75 J. R. OLSSON Clerk B� Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Constance Je Davies t1l�f:��V .. I i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorising Acceptance of Deed, Camino Andrea, West Pittsburg Area, Project No. 5385A-4593-73. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Quitclaim Deed dated April 23, 1975 from the United States of America (Bureau.. of Reclamation Canal property) in accepted pursuant to the Contract dated February 89 1974, between the County and the Federal Govermnent. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the, minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County A:Ainistrator Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May . 1975 . R.,OLSSON, Clerk B Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 • 15-M Constance J./Davies ` 0030 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California fay 27 , 19 75. In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Deed for Road Purposes. IT IS BY ME BOARD ORDERED that the folloxing deedalbe' accepted, and this Board directs the Clerk to certify to said acceptance on said deed: Grantor_ Deed Date Road Name and Number A. Steffensen fay 190 1975 CARO. DIABLO Road No. 794 Mork order !{ 45 (conveying additional right of xay along Camino Diablo Road as a condition of Land Use PerAlt. 341-73 and 2146-74) PASM by the Board on Hay 27v 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid oa: Pablic Works Director Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Cotutty Administrator Supervisor affixed this 27th day of ?lag , 19 , ,f. ' R. OLSSON, Clerk Y 4 B Clerk Ds!�Y H 24 12»4 . ,sM Constance J. Davies In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT May 27 14 1 In the Matter of Erosion Repair of San Ramon Creek, Danville Area, Work Order 8121. The Public Works Director having requested. authorization to repair erosion of San Ramon Creek Channel near Drop Structure No.' ll - upstream of Paraiso Drive, Danville area, stating that said project is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption from environmental impact report requirements, and advising that said work will be done by a combination of hired equipment and county forces; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is APPROVED. PASSED by the hoard on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors affixed this 27th day of MaY 14 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard 00 383 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 79 U In the Matter of Authorizing Issuance of Purchase Order for Installation of Vehicle Detector Loops., Walnut Creek Area, Work Order 4255. The Public Works Director having reported that three bids were received and opened on May 21, 1975 for the installation of - vehicle detector loops at the intersection of Bancroft Road and Treat Boulevard, Walnut Creek area; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERE'b that plans and specifications for said project are APPROVED and the Public Works Director is , AUTHORIZED to issue a purchase order in the amount of $2,423-T5 to the low bidder, Continental Electric Company. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on=the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Public Works Director Wi'h1°u my hand and the Seal of the Board'of County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 27th day of MaY , i9 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By L Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 1S-M Mildred 0. Ballard { 038 . i 00,384 Bancroft Road -; Detector Loops Road No. 40616 W. 0. No. 4240 REQUEST FOR BID A Bid Is requested for the following described work .proposed to be constructed as noted herein: LOCATION: At the intersection of Bancroft Road and Treat Boulevard. DESCRIPTION OF WORK.: Furnish and install vehicle detector loops at the intersection of Treat Boulevard and Bancroft Road, in accordance with the plans entitled "Treat Boulevard-Vehicle Detector Loops." Work is to be done in accordance with the Plans and Specifi- cations enclosed herewith. Proposals are to be delivered to: VICTOR W. SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SIXTH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 before 4 p.m. on May 21 , 1975. Bids will be opened by the Public Works Director who will arrange for issuance of the purchase order to the lowest responsible bidder, except that the Public Works Director reserves the right to reject any or all bids for cause, and to do work with County forces, to request new proposals, or to cancel the project. ATTACHMENTS: Proposal Plans Specifications Bancroft Road - Detector Loops Road No. 40618 W. 0. No. 4240. P R O P O S A L The undersigned, being a duly licensed Contractor in the State of California, hereby offers to furnish all labor, equipment, and material required, and to do the work necessary to complete the project as described in the Request for Bid in accordance with plans and specifications therefor for the following lump sum prices Dollars (S ). Work is to be done pursuant to Specifications attached hereto. And, further, the undersigned agrees to accept a purchase order to do the work as provided above and to furnish the prescribed Insurance. Company Authorized Date Signature Address Title California Contractor's (SIGNATURE TO BE NOTARIZED) License No. - 2 - 0V43OU Treat Boulevard - Detector Loops Road No. 4861 • W. 0.' No. 4240 I SPECIFICATIONS SECTION A - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . Reference is made to the provisions in the current edition of the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Highway Transportation Agency, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways, which Specifications shall be applicable to this project and which are incorporated herein by reference thereto. 2. The Contractor shall complete the project within the allotted time of ten ( 10) working days, counting from and including . the date of Notice to Proceed from the Public Works Director. 3. The Contractor shall pay to the County of Contra Costa the sum of $75. 00 per day for each and every CALENDAR DAY'S delay In finishing the work in excess of the number of working days prescribed above; and, in addition, the direct costs sustained by the County of Contra Costa as a result of the Contractor's delay In -finishing the work, including but not limited to the actual cost of engineering, inspection, superintendence and other overhead expenses. 4. The Contractor shalt comply with all local , State, and Federal regulations applicable to labor, wage rates, hours of work, apprentices, and subcontractors. 5. Wages paid shall be not less than the current list of prevailing wages on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 6. Neither a Faithful Performance Bond (surety bond) nor a ' Labor and Materials bond (surety bond) is required for work done under this purchase order. 7. The work shall be performed under the general supervision of the Public Works Director, or his authorized representative, who shall have the authority to approve or reject any portion of the work, or to order the suspension of the work for cause. 8. Payment (or credit) required to compensate for authorized changes in the scope of work or quantity of work required by the County shall be made in accordance with provisions of a supplemental written order for the change, except that In no case shall the cost of work to be done pursuant to the purchase order, plus any authorized supplements thereto, exceed 510,000.00. A - 0038'7 S SECTION A - GENERAL PROVISIONS (Continued) i 9. Force Account: As used here, "force account" means the method of calculating payment for labor, equipment and/or- materials based on actual cost plus specified percentages to cover overhead and profit for work not included as a bid item In the contract. When extra work is to be paid for on a force account basis, compensation will be determined in accordance with the provisions in Section 9- 1 .03 of the Standard Specifications (S. S. ) as modified herein. A. Labor: The actual wages to be paid, as defined in S. S. Section 9-1 .03A( la) , will be considered to be the pre- vailing wage rates in effect at the time the labor is performed, and no revision of payment for labor already performed will be made for any retroactive increases or decreases in such wage rates. Premium wage rates will not be paid for any labor employed on force account work unless such rates have been approved, in writing, by the Engineer. The percentage (S. S. Section 9-1 .O3A( lb) ) to be applied to the actual wages paid (S.S. Section 9-1 .03A ( la) ) will be 16 percent. B. Equipment: The equipment rental rates to be paid for each classification of equipment shall be the prevailing rates approved by the Board of Supervisors for rental of equipment to Contra Costa County, which are in effect at the time the equipment Is used. The rental rate list is available at the Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Business and Services Division. No payment will be made for idle time due to break- down, lack of operator, weather conditions prohibiting work, or other circumstances beyond the control of the County. The provisions In S. S. Section 9-1 .O3A(3a) shall apply with these modifications: ( 1 ) Equipment shall be delivered to the ,job equipped as ordered; (2) idle time, or time to complete rigging of the equipment as ordered or to prepare it for move-off, will not be paid for; (3) idle time waiting for .the arrival of transporting equipment to move the rented equipment will not be paid for. 10. Before any work is commenced pursuant to the purchase order, the Contractor shall furnish to the Public Works Director: (a) Evidence of adequate Workmens' Compensation Insurance. (b)* Certificate of Public Liability ($250,000/$500,000) and Property Damage Insurance ($100,000) . A - 2 00388 � e SECTION A - GENERAL PROVISIONS (Continued) \ If . By acceptance of the purchase order, the Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Contra, Costa, or its representatives, from all liabilities Imposed by law by reason' of Injury or of death to any person or persons or damage to property which may arise out of the work performed pursuant to the purchase. order and does agree to defend the County In any claim or action .assertcnd.- such liability. r 12. PERNITS Electrical : It shall be the responsibility `of the Contractor to pay the necessary fee and obtain from the County` Bul1ding; Inspector the necessary permit covering .the electrical installations and to: . comply with the requirements thereof. A - 3 00389 SECTiON .P - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . DETECTORS Detectors shall conform to the provisions in Section 86-4.05, "Vehicle Detectors," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Loop detectors in the left turn lanes shall not detect any vehicle in adjacent lanes. During the installation of any conduit or other facilities within thelandscaped median, If any ground cover is removed it need not be replaced. If any shrubs or trees are damaged they shall be replaced with an identical shrub or tree of the same size. Any decorative concrete removed shall be replaced, and shall match the existing decorative concrete and rock, Concrete shall be three (3) sack mix. Attention is directed to the presence of irrigation facilities within the area of work within the landscaped median. Contractor may at his convenience review the "AS BUILT" plans for these Irrigation facilities at the County Administration Building, 5th floor, Traffic Division, Martinez, CA. Any irrigation facilities damaged by Contractor operations shall be repaired tike r-aw to the satisfaction of the engineer, at Contractors expense. Contractor is required to install the detector loops and install the conductor leads to the nearest pullbox. Approximately 10 feet of slack shall be left in each detector lead-in. Slack shad be coiled and placed in the bottom of pullbox. At the 0 Al detector loops a new pullbox will have to be installed within the median, over the existing interconnect conduit and the conduit brought into the pullbox. 2_ WORK COORDINATION All work done in the area of the Treat Boulevard and Bancroft Road intersection shall be coordinated with Steiney & Co. of Vallejo. Steiney is the electrical contractor performing inter- section signal modifications and therefore all work should be coordinated with their operations. B - I Q039Q In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Kay 27 , 1975 In the Matter of Authorising Issuance of Purchase Order for Installation of Interconnect Conduit on Treat Boulevard, Walnut Creek Area, Work Order 4240. The Public Works Director having reported that three bids were received and opened on May 21, 1975 for the installation of interconnect conduit on Treat Boulevard between Bancroft Road and Cherry Lane, Walnut Creek area; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that plans and specifications for said project are APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to issue a purchase order in the amount of $$,506 to the low bidder, Steiny and Company, Inc. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the- minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 27th day of May . 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk �itll� By� _ �' - Deputy Clerk H sa uno • ,saa Mildred 0. Ballard 4391 �` ass 2: Treat Boulevard Interconnect Conduit Road No. 4861 W. 0. No. 4240 REQUEST FOR BID ' A Bid Is requested for the following described work proposed to be constructed as noted herein: LOCATION: On Treat Boulevard between Bancroft Road and Cherry Lane. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Furnish and install Interconnect conduit and cable on Treat Boulevard, between Bancroft Road and Cherry Lane, In accordance with, the plans entitled "Treat Boulevard Interconnect Conduit. " Work Is to be done in accordance with the plans and Specifi— cations enclosed herewith. Proposals are to be delivered to: VICTOR W. SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SIXTH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA- 94553 before 4 p.m. on May 21 , 1975. Bids will be opened by the Public Works Director who will arrange for issuance of the purchase order to the lowest responsible bidder, except that the Public Works Director reserves the right to reject any or all bids for cause, and to do work with County forces, to request new proposals, or to cancel the project. ATTACHMENTS: Proposal Plans Specifications . © 1392 Treat Boulevard Interconnect Conduit Road No.•4861 W. 0. No. 4240 PROPOSAL The undersigned, being a duly licensed Contractor in the State of California, hereby offers to furnish all labor, equipment,, and material required, and to do the work necessary to complete the project as described in the Request for Bid in accordance with pians and specifications therefor for the following lump sum price: Dollars (S ) . Work is to be done pursuant to Specifications attached hereto. . - And,- further, the undersigned agrees to accept a purchase order to do the work as provided above and to furnish the prescribed Insurance. Company Authorized Date Signature ' Address Title California Contractor' s (SIGNATURE TO BE NOTARIZED) license �b 2 - - 00393 V Treat Boulevard Interconnect Conduit Road No. 4861 : W. 0. No. 4240 . SPECIFICATIONS SECTION A - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . Reference is made to the provisions in the current addition of the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Highway Transportation Agency, . Department of Public Works, Division of Highways, which Specifications shall be applicable to this project and which are incorporated herein by reference thereto. 2. The Contractor shall complete the project within the allotted time of Fifteen ( 15) working days, counting from and including the date of Notice to Proceed from the Public Yorks Director. 3. The Contractor shall pay to the County of Contra Costa the sum of $75.00 per day for each and every CALENDAR DAY'S delay in finishing the work in excess of the number of working days prescribed above; and, in addition, the direct costs sustained by the County of Contra Costa as a result of the Contractor's delay in finishing the work, including but not limited to the actual cost of engineering, inspection, superintendence and other overhead expenses. 4. The Contractor shall comply with all local , State, and Federal regulations applicable to labor, wage rates, hours of work, apprentices, and subcontractors. 5. Wages paid shall be not less than the current list of prevailing wages on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 6. Neither a Faithful Performance Bond (surety bond) nor a Labor and Materials Bond (surety bond) is required for work done under this purchase order wherein the bid proposal total is less than $10,000. If the bid proposal total is $10,000 or greater, the successful bidder shall furnish a Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of the total bid and a Labor and Materials Bond In an amount of at least fifty percent (50%) of the total bid, each in the form approved by the County. . 7. The work shall be performed under the general supervision of the Public Works Director, or his authorized representative, who shall have the authority to approve or reject any portion of the work, or to order the suspension of the work for cause. A - I -00394 e. 01394 w_ � I SECTION A - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. Payment (or credit) required to compensate for authorized changes in the scope of work or quantity of work required by the County shall be made in accordance with provisions of a supplemental written order for the change, except that in no case shall the co5-t of work to be done pursuant to the purchase order, plus any authorized supplements thereto, exceed $10,000. 00. 9. Force Account: As used here, "force account" means the method of calculating payment for labor, equipment and/or materials based on actual cost plus specified percentages to cover overhead and profit for work not included as a bid item in the contract. When extra work is to be paid for on a force account basis, compensation will be determined in accordance with the provisions in Section 9-1 .03 of the Standard Specifications (S.S. ) as modified 'herein. A. Labor: The actual wages to be paid, as defined in S.S. .Section 9-1 .03A( la) , will be considered to be the prevailing wage rates in effect at the time the labor is performed, and no revision of payment for labor already performed will be made for any retroactive increases or decreases in such wage rates. Premium wage rates will not be paid for any labor employed on force account work unless such rates have been approved, in writing, by the Engineer. The percentage (S.S. Section 9-1 .03A( ib) ). to be . applied to the actual wages paid (S. S. Section 9-1 .03A ( la) ) will be 16 percent. B. Equipment: The equipment rental rates to be paid for each classification of equipment shall be the prevailing rates approved by the •Board of Supervisors for rental of equipment to Contra Costa County, which are in effect at the time the equipment is used. The rental rate list is available at the Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Business and Services Division. No payment will be made for Idle time due to break- down, lack of operator, weather conditions prohibiting work, or other circumstances beyond the control of the County. The provisions In S. S. Section 9-1 .03A(3a) shall apply with these modifications: ( 1 ) Equipment shall be delivered to the job equipped as ordered; (2) idle time, or time to complete rigging of the equipment as ordered or to prepare it for move-off, will not be paid for; (3) idle time waiting for the arrival of transporting equipment to move the rented equipment will not be paid for. A - 2 00395 i SECTION A - GENERAL PROVISIONS i 10. Before any work Is commenced pursuant to the purchase order, the Contractor shall furnish to the Public Works Director: (a) Evidence of adequate Horkmens' Compensation Insurance. . (b) Certificate of Public Liability ($250,000/5500,000) and Property Damage Insurance ($100,000) . 11 . By acceptance of the purchase order, the Contractor agrees to save, Indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Contra Costa, or Its representatives, from all liabilities imposed by taw by reason of Injury or of death to any person or persons or damage to property which may arise out of the work performed pursuant to the purchase order and does agreee to defend the County in any claim or action asserting such liability. 12. PERMITS Electrical : It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to pay the necessary fee and obtain from the County Building Inspector the necessary permit covering the electrical installations and to comply with the requirements thereof. A - 3 DU39S SECTION B - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . MAINTAINING EXISTING AND TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS Maintaining existing and temporary electrical systems shall conform to the provisions in Section 86-1 .05, "Maintaining Existing and Temporary Electrical Systems, " of the Standard Specifications and .these special provisions. Traffic signal system shutdowns shall be limited to periods between the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. The Contractor may use temporary portable traffic signals, subject to the approval of the Engineer, to keep the existing traffic signals in operation while roadwork or signal work is being done. This special provision is provided should It be necessary to remove all conductors from existing conduit runs in order to install the new interconnect cable at any of the existing traffic signal systems. 2. CONDUIT Conduit shall conform to the provisions in Section 86-2.05, "Conduit," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. All conduit to be installed entirely underground shall be rl.gid, non-metallic type, installed by the trenching method . RI g i d non-meta I l i c conduit shall be schedule 40. After conductors have been instal led, the ends of conduits terminating in pull boxes and controller cabinets shall be sealed with an approved type of sealing compound. 3. CONDUCTORS AND WIRING Conductors and wiring shall conform to the provisions in Section 86-2.08, "Conductors," and Section 86-2.09, "Wiring" of tfie Standard Specifications and these special provisions. At least six feet of slack shall be left for each cable In each pulibox and twelve feet of slack in each controller cabinet. Controller cabinet at Treat and Caudellero shall have twenty feet of slack in each cable. • Contractor shall be responsible fer installing cables in existing conduit runs as shown on the plans, and shall terminate each cable run in the controller cabinets by coiling the slack cable and laying it on the bottom of the cabinet. B - 1 0039'7 a • 0004 t r SECTION B - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3. CONDUCTORS AND MIRING (Continued) Interconnect cable shall consist of a. -8 a. Controller interconnect to "Master" - Beldon 8729 (2-twisted pairs) or approved equal , and b. Interconnect Cable for detector information Beldon 8457 ( 12 conductor) or approved equal . Splices will be permitted in the interconnect cables only in the puilboxes. No splices will be allowed' in the conduits. Conductors shall not be pulled Into conduit• until pull boxes .are set to grade, crushed rock sumps are installed and conduit is bonded and grounded. No conductors shall be pulled into conduit excepfi" In the presence of the Engineer,, 4. TRENCHING OPERATIONS All conduit shall be installed by the trenching method as shown on the contract plans. No lane closures will be permitted before 9:00 a.m. or after 4:00 p.m. on any day. After conduit has been installed, the trench shall be back- filled and compacted. All dirt and rocks shall be removed from the traffic lane at the end of the day to insure no obstructions remain for the vehicles using the street. Any dirt residue left by the trenching operation shall be removed from the street surface to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Contractors attention is directed to the presence of Irrigatior facilities in the area of work. Typical installation of these facilities is shown on the contract plans. Contractor may at his convenience review the "AS BUILT" plans for these irrigation facilities at the County Administration Bldg., 5th Floor, Traffic Division, Martinez, CA. , B - 2 0398 I SECTION B - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 4. TRENCHING OPERATIONS (Continued) Any irrigation facilities damaged by Contractors operations shall be repaired like new to the satisfaction of the engineer, at Contractors expense. Conduit installed near location as shown on the plans will require removing 75 feet of existing concrete and decorative rock. Existing rocks removed shall be stockpiled and reinstalled. 5. EXISTING LANDSCAPING - A 1 I .existing groundcover remoyed during the trenching operation need not be replaced . Any existing shrubs or trees damaged during the contractors work in the area shall be replaced with an identical shrub or tree of the same size. Any decorative concrete removed shalt be replaced and shall match the remaining decorative concrete and rock. Concrete shall be three (3) sack mix. Salvaged rocks shall be reused. 6. WORK COORDINATION All work done in the area of the Treat Boulevard and Bancroft Road Intersection shall be coordinated with Steiney- and .Company of Vallejo. Steiney is the electrical contractor performing Intersection signal modifications and therefore all work should be coordinated with their operations. B - 3 ' U399; II In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 U_ In the Matter of Supplement No. 1 to Work Order 6075. w The Board on March 31, 1975 having authorized the Public Works Director to arrange to repaint traffic lanes, paint a new two-way left turn lane and bicycle lanes on the portion of San Ramon Valley Boulevard between Sycamore Valley Road and Railroad Avenue, Danville area; and The Public Works Director having reported that, at the request of local businessmen, the Department agreed to change the limits of the project and to maize minor modifications to the orig— inal striping plan, resulting in a cost of $2,200 above the original estimate; On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supplement No. 1 to Work Order 6075, in the amount of $2,200 to cover the increase in cost of the work, is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• { 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors offuced this 27th day of May , 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By *,,('-€u. 1,E,,e__ Deputy Clerk H za 12:74 - Is-M Mildred 0. Ballard Q. z i 00400 I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Kay 27 19 75 In the Matter of Approving ) and Authorizing Payment for ) Property Acquisition s . ) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement a- and Right of Way Contract s are APPROVED and Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public 'Works Director, is AUTHORIZED to execute said contract on behalf of the County: Contract Payee and Reference Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount North Gate Road Bruce A. lVersea, May 158, 1975 Western Title $300 Project No. at ux Guaranty 4.61- 4561-72 Company Walaut Creek Area Escrow No. M307728 Lene Tree Way Joseph A. White, May 20, 1975 Joseph A. $ 60 Project No. Jr., at al Jr. aad� 69714143-74 Lois N. White Antioch Area Frank A,:',and.,s $ 60 Mary V. Siino The County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to draw warrant a in the Amount s specified to be delivered to the County Supervising Reals Property Agent. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed s from above-named grantor a for the County of Contra Costa. The foregoing order Was passed Nay 27, 1975 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seel of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of Nay , 19 cc: Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, CLERK County Auditor-Controller ,..-� _ County Administrator B� `^ Form #20.4 004041 75-2-200 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 In the Matter of Supplement No. 1 to Work Order 6075. The Board on March 31, 1975 having authorized the Public Works Director to arrange to repaint traffic lanes, paint a new two-way left turn lane- and bicycle lanes on the portion of San Ramon Valley Boulevard between Sycamore Valley Road and: Railroad Avenue, Danville area; and The Public Works Director having reported that, at the request of local businessmen, the Department agreed to change the limits of the project and to make minor modifications to the orig- inal striping plan, resulting in a cost of $2,200 above the original estimate; On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supplement No. 1 to Work Order 6075, in the amount of $2,200 to cover the increase in cost of the work, is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By i Deputy Clerk H za 12J74 - ,sau Mildred 0. Ballard 00400 �J IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Nay 27 19 75 In the Matter of Approving ) and Authorizing Payment for ) Property Acquisition a . I IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement 8: and Right of Way Contract a are APPROVED and Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, is AUTHORIZED to execute said contract on behalf of the County: Contract Payee and Reference Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount North Gate Road Bruce A. Iversen, Nay 15s 1975 Western Tole ow. Project No* at ua Guaranty 461 41561-72 Walnut Creek Area $80row No. X307728 Latta Tree Way Joseph A. White, Nay 24S 19% Joseph A. Project Ro* i'r., at al .1`ro and sw 6971-043-74 Lois N. White Antioch Area . A arida ,j 6if- P : Siix�a r The County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to draw warrant s in the amount a specified to be delivered to the County Supervising Real Property Agert. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed s from above-named grantor a for the County of Contra Costa. The foregoing order was passed Nay 27, 1975 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this, 27th d ay of NASA 19` 75. cc: Public Works Director S. R. OLSSON, CLERK County Auditor-Controller County Administrator By Constance J. De es Deputy Clerk. Form #20.4 0V4U►nn 75-2-200 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 27 197 5 In the Matter of Releasing ) Subdivision Deposit ) Subdivision: 4077 Byron Area ) Deposit: $500 ) Auditor's Permit No. 88260 ) Dated February 16, 1971 ) Refund to: ) Jor n V, Landing ) Palos Verdes Mal-1 ) wainut Creek, cs u ornia 94596 ) On September 18, 1973 this Board resolved that the improvements in the above-named Subdivision were completed for the purpose of establishing a beginning date for filing liens in case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been main- talned (for one year after completion and acceptance) against defective work and/or labor done or defective materials furnished in performing the Subdivision Agreement, and that all deficiencies (if any) developing during this period have been corrected; and Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 8429(b) and the Sub- division Agreement, the Director is authorized to refund the deposit as indicated above. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 9975, I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of th $pard of Supery-issors affixed this yday of May 197 5 d. Re OLSSON, CLERK cc : Public Works (2) Subdivider Discovery py �Corp. ByaDeputy Clerk P, 0• Boa Constance Davies Byi+on, California 94514 00402 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 15L In the Matter of Granting Permission to Close San Miguel Drive (Road No. 4041) , Walnut Creek Area, for a Three-Day Period. On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that permission is GRANTED East Bay Municipal Utility District to close San Miguel Drive near Rudgear Road for a three-day period sometime between May 21, 1975 and May 30, 1975- from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., for the purpose of lowering its water line below the proposed County storm drain line. PASSED by the Board on may 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witnesscc: Public Works Director Witnessnmy hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May l9 u J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H za 12!74 - 15-ru Mildred 0. Ballard 0€ 403 . IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 27 1975_ In the Matter of Releasing ) Subdivision Deposit ) Subdivision: 3653, Byron Area ) Deposit: $500 ) Auditor's Permit No. 67861 ) Dated August 13, 1968 ) Refund to: ) II. S. Plywood Corporation - B3 Land''Corporation ) 1450 Doolittle Derive ) San Leandro, California 94577 ) On September 18, 1973 this Beard resolved that the improvements in the above-named Subdivision were completed for the purpose of establishing a beginning date for filing liens in case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been main- tained (for one year after completion and acceptance) against defective Work and/or labor done or defective materials furnished in performing the Subdivision Agreement, and that all deficiencies (if any) developing during this period have been corrected; and Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section $429(b) and the Sub- division Agreement, the Director is authorized to refund the deposit as indicated above. PASSED by the Board on May 27s 1975, I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid_ Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of May 1975 J. R. OLSSO$, CLERK cc : Public Works (2) Subdivider Disooveury Ba Corp. By ` Deputy Clerk P. 0, Boa 85y Constanee X. Davies Byron, California 9451 4 004-04 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Accepting Portion of Drainage Easement, Sans Crainte Drainage Area, Project No. 8505, Walnut Creek Area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a portion of the offer of dedication for a drainage easement which is shown and offered - for dedication for public use on the map of Subdivision 2113 filed April 7, 1955 in Book 57 of Maps at Page 34, and which is more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, is ACCEPTED. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 27th day of May , 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By u_.L- Z".�.MZL , Deputy Clerk. H 24 12/74 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard 00405 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL ONE (708A.1) A portion of that parcel noted as "Drainage Easement" adjoining San Miguel Drive as shown on the map entitled "TRACT 2113" filed April 7, 1955, in. Book 57 of Maps at page 34 in the office of the Recorder of Contra Costa County, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of said parcel , thence from said point of beginning along the westerly line of said parcel the following two courses, South 380 30' 16" West 9.07 feet (record South 38° 30' 16" West) and-thence southwesterly along the arc of a tangent curve, concave .to the southeast with a radius of 121.23 feet through a central angle of 8° 40' 51", a* distance of 18.37 feet; thence, leaving said westerly line, South-68° 21 ' 00" East 2.94 feet; thence easterly along the arc of a tangent curve, concave to the North with a radius of 193 feet through a central angle of 80 37' 28", a distance of 29.05 feet to a point on the southerly line of said parcel ("Drainage Easement"), a radial line to said point bears South 130 10' 32" West; thence, along said southerly line, South 820 18' 52" East 22.37 feet; thence, leaving said southerly Tine, North 6° 22' 16" East 1.21 feet. radially to the point of beginning of the hereinafter described curve; thence easterly along the arc of a curve, concave to the North with a radius of 191 feet through a central angle of 3° 10' 59", a distance of 10.61 feet; thence, radially to the end of said curve, South 3° 11' 17" West 1 .76 feet to a point on the said southerly line of said parcel ("Drainage Easement"); thence South 820 18' 52" East 2.85 feet along the said southerly line; thence leaving said southerly line easterly along the arc of a non- tangent curve (a radial line to the point of beginning of said curve bears South 2° 20' 45" West), concave to the North with a radius of 193 feet through a central angle of 8° 59' 28", a distance of 30.29 feet to a point on the easterly line of said parcel ("Drainage Easement"), a radial line to said point bears South 60 38' 43" West; thence North 8" 52' 55" West 16.35 feet along said easterly line to the north- easterly corner of said parcel; thence North 750 53' 02" West 80.22 feet along the northerly line of said parcel to the most northerly corner thereof, the point of beginning. PARCEL TWO (710A) A portion of Lot 2 as said lot is shown on the map entitled "TRACT 2113" which was filed April 7, 1955, in Book 57 of Maps at page 34 in the office of the Recorder of Contra Costa County, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Lot 2, thence from said point of beginning South 8' 52' 55" East 16.35 feet along the westerly line of said Lot 2; thence leaving said westerly line easterly along the arc of a non-tangent curve (a radial line to the point of beginning of said curve bears South 6' 38' 43" East), concave to the North with a radius of 193 feet through a central angle of P 27' 17" a distance of 15.01 feet to a point of reverse curve, a radial line to said point bears South ll* 06' 00" East; thence easterly along the arc of a curve, concave to the South with a radius of 167 feet through a central angle of 8' 53' 25", a distance of 25.91 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 2; thence North 75* 53' 02" West 44.40 feet along the northerly line of said Lot 2 to the most northerly corner thereof, the point of beginning. 00406 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California may 27 , 19 LCL In the Matter of Authorising Execution of a Rental Agreement. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Mr. Lawrence K. Dostal for rental of a single family residence at 25 North Lane, Orinda, on a month-to-month "as is" basis at $200 per month commencing May 1, 1975. PASSED by the Board on May 27, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors Real Property Division �� this d of May 14 County Auditor-Controller ---2th�day County Administrator J. R. OLBSON, Clerk By, t(' Deputy Clerk H za 12J74 - 1" Mildred 0. Ballard 00407 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County.. State of California &Y 27 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorising Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Energize and Install Street Lights. On the recommendation of the Pahl ie Turks Director IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Pacific Gas and Electric Company is authorized to: RAergize five 7500 leo no mez4=7 vapor street 11*ts in contbrsa.nee with theentitled "County Service A Ryan Ihtduafrfal Court," dated February 248 1975, which is on file In the Traffic Operations Division of the Public Works Department; Ihaten aft-g7500 l=ens mereuay vapor street lights in conformance with the drawing entitled "County Service Area I-V-K9;8 Bather Lane !fres," dated February lag 19758 which is ott file in the Traffic Operations Division of the Public Works Depart- meat; IT is FM ORDERED that charges for all of the aftresaid .street lighting shall not be billed to Ga maty Service Area L-1,5 until July is 1975. PASSED by the Baird on Nay 278 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. cc: P.G.&H.s Concord Waness my hand and the seal of the Board of Paella WbrkaMzeotor supervison County AUditaor.Controner affixed this 27th day of N&Y 19 75 County AdministratorR. OLSSON, Clerk B e•�� �- Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 . tsar Coastance J,"/ftvi.e$ 0V" s .,FA . • sa t0 meet OA AndadOurris. the Board � � �ABministration the Board Chambers, ROOM 10?� x If at % v ' in : Buildings Martinez, California• 4 '.T• P. $e11t1�, iC@- ZRRSYI, ATTEST: t= �. R. OLSSON, CIXRK tea, rx? o r r Ip w:F ka f� r r rrnR THr pn&pn - �, SU2A9ARY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, MAY 27, 1975, PREPARED BY J. R. CLSSON, COUNTY CLERK A?:D EX.-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Authorized appointment of C. Wilson, M. D., to positio: of Clinical Physician I, Medical Services. Authorized re-employment of N. Hendrix in Intermediate Typist Clerk class, Assessor's Office. Approved appropriation adjustments for Planning, Sheriff (Special Projects), Contra Costa County Fire Protection District; and internal adjustments not affecting the totals for Medical Services, Health, Planning, Public :.orks, Social Service, and Service Area LIB-11 (Oak-ley). Authorized attendance at meetings as follows: M. Anderson and P+. Gibson, Senior Public Health Nurses, Health Department - University of California, San Diego,Course on Special Care of Newborn and Premature. Infants, June 4-7, Las Vegas; D. Lud:,dr, Prepaid Health Plan Administrator, .!edical Services - Group Health Foundation. Institute, June 22-26, Chicago; Judges B. Rahn and R. Arnason - Annual ieeting of American Bar Association, August 5-12, r4ontreal. Authorized placement of one youth at Arnold Homes for Children, Sacramento and one at Fred Finch Youth Center, Oakland; and amended Board Order dated April 22, 1975 authorizing placement of youth at Home: ood Terrace, San Francisco to correct the Mc;ithly rate from 31,125 to 31,165• Authorized Director, Human Resources Agency, to sign fee-for-service contracts with certain physicians utilized by County Medical Services. Proclaimed June 2-8 as YOUTH EagWY161ENT WEEK in Contra Costa County. Authorized energization of street lights in County Service Area L-45, Danville and San Ramon areas. Denied claim for damages filed by M. Abouzeid, Jr., P. Boeckner, D. Thuleen, F. Stephenson, Jr., A. Cloud, H. Smith, and M. Brooks. Authorized provision of legal defense for M. Farr, Deputy County Counsel, et a1, in connection with Superior Court Action No. 152292. Waived reading and fixed June 3 as time for adoption of proposed ordinance making certain County Ordinances relating to the County Civil Service System applic- able to River Fire Protection District effective July 1, 1975. Fixed August 5 at 10:30 a.m. as tide to consider adopting a resolution changing the name of the River Fire Protection District to Riverview Fire Protection District. Appointed L. MacDonald for the unexpired term of J. Benney ending Dec. 31, 1976 on the Board of Commissioners of the Orinda Fire Protection District and issued a . Certificate of Appreciation to Ar. Benney for services rendered. Exonerated surety tax bond on Tract No. 4577, City of Walnut Creek. Deferred to June 3 Intergovernmental Relations Committee (Supervisors Kenny and Linscheid) report on CETA, Title I, Y.anpoeer Plan for FY 1975-76. Ackno:,ledged receipt of communication from District Attorney supporting budget request of Probation Department for inclusion of certain costs relative to Court Referral Program of Volunteer Bureau of Contra Costa County. Continued to June 3 at 11 a.m. herring on request of Reclamation District 2025 for permission to temporarily close Holland Tract Road for certain repairs. O 10 ;..,. ro zssr 7T4) May 27, 1975 Summary, continued Page 2'` Authorized Real Property Division, Public Works Department, to negotiate for lease of.space in the Antioch area for District Attorney Family Support Division,. and for extension of lease for the Oakley Health Clinic. Authorized Chief Deputy Public Works Director to execute agreement with L. Dostal for rental of county-o:•ned residence, Orinda. Accented portion of drainage easement, Sans Crainte Drainage Area, Walnut Greek. Granted permission to East Bay Mun cipal Utility District to close portion of San Kiguel Drive, ::'alnut Creek area, fol- 3-day period between May 21-30. Determined that improvements have been maintained for one year in Subdivisions ' 3653 and .077, Byron area, and authorized refund of surety deposits to U. S. Plywood;. Corporation and J. Lunding, respectively. Authorized payments for property acquisitions to B. Iversen, et ux, for North Gate Road, Y:alnut Creek area, and J. ?'White, et al, for Lone Tree Way, Antioch area. Approved Supplement No. 1 to ::'ork Order 6075 in the amount of $2,200 for certain: repair work on portion of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, Danville area. Approved clans and specifications for installation of vehicle detector loops, at intersection of Bancroft Road and Treat Boulevard, and installation of conduit on portion of Treat Boulevard, 11alnut Creek area; and authorized issuance of purchase orders in connection. therewith. Referred to Public "orks Director for recommendation bids received for con- struction of Sans Crainte Drainage Area Lines B and G. As £x-Officio :he Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and j:`ater Conservation District, approved request of Public Works Director for authoriza-, tion to repair erosion on portion of San Ramon Creek, Danville area. Accented deed for road purposes from A. Steffensen conveying additional :ight of spay along Canino Diablo Ro?d, Byron area. Accepted Quitclaim Deed from United States of America in connection with Camino Andres, lest Pittsburg area. Accepted instruments from L. Harper, et al, re M.S. 36-74; and instruments for recordiriF only from the aforesaid and M. Hallenberger, et al, re M.S. 36-74 and Russell J. Bruzzone, Inc.,as condition of approval of LUP 2002-75M. Approved plans and specifications and awarded contract to Sycamore Homes Association for maintenance work and landscaping, County Service Area M-6, Danville. Approved recommendations of Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council for citizens participation plan for 1975-76 Community Development Program year. Authorized Chairman to execute the following: Contract with R. Grady for inspection services, County Administration Building. Remodel, Phase II, Martinez; Agreements with State Department of Health for certain services to handicapped children at George Miller, Jr. Memorial Centers East and Test; and for Family Plan ring Services for FY 1975-76; Amendments to contracts with State Department of Health for County Alcoholism Program Information. and :valuation S_rstcm Project and Geriatric Screening Project extending services through December 31, 1975; Lease with G. Curtis, et al, for premises at 215 G Street, Antioch for use by Probation Department; and amendment to lease with G. Curtis, et al, for premises at' 213 G Street, Antioch extending term to August 31, 1930 so as to coincide with additional lease for contiguous space; Contract with Creative Communications and Research of Berkeley for services in. connection with Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion Project conducted by Probation Depart_ ment; , WM May 27, 1975 Summary, continued a tPage 3 Pay 27, 1975 Summary, continued � Cage 3 Agreement with Regents, University of California, Berkeley, whereby Social Service Department will continue to pro:ride student field instruction; and amendment to arreemert with University extending to June 3C, 1976 the teres of a trainee employed by the Probation Department under a :.ork-Study Program; Contract with Kamps for Kids, Inc. for operation or campership program for low-income youth; Lease with J. Bessolo for property in Rodeo for use by OEO UPSPROUT Community Carden Projec,.; Amendment to contract with Pittsburg Unified School District providing for 35,000 in CETA, Title I, funds for additional training; Rental agreement with Kaiser Aetna for premises at 150 Buchanan Circle, Pacheco, for use by .it. Diablo MuniciDal Court for storage purposes; b,e.moranda of Leases with P. Frumenti, et ux, for premises at 1957 Parkside - Drive, Concord, for occupancy by District Attorney and Public Defender, establishing lease commencement dates as April 1 and May 16, 1975, respectively; Amendment to agreement for architectural services in connection with :ork Furlough Center, Richmond, to reduce fee by approximately 37,000; Letter and preapplication to U. S. Department of Labor declaring county's intent to apply for S378,CCO in CEiA, Title III, funds for Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (SP£DY); Letter to Governor expressing county's disagreement with May 19, 1975 recom- mendations of State Department of Health relative to Health Services Area boundaries. Approved recorLmendation of Planning Commission on request of Coleman & Isakson (1887-RZ) to rezone certain land in Danville area to Single Family Residential District-40 ( -40) Authorized establishment of ::or1 Order 5250 in amount of 1,3:200 for Count-,r Solid 1:aste Management Policy Committee expenses, as recommended by Public :forks Director. Fixed Jwic 21: at times i::dicated for hearings on recommendations of Planning Commission on follo,:irc rezoni^r requests: 10:30 a.m. - C. Hytholt (1547—u:), Pacheco area, from Single Family Residential District-7 (R-7) to i.ultiple Fa.Mily Residential District-4 (11-4); 10:30 a.m. - J. Turner (190C-RZ), Nartinez area, from Light Agricultural District A-141 to Limited Office District (C-1); 10:30 a.m. - W. Hardcastle (1892-RZ), Pacheco area, from ►'ultiple Family _esidentia District (U-2) and Single Family Residential District-7 (R-7) to Retail Business District (R-B); and l 10:45 a.m. - Raymond Lail & Associates (1818-RZ), Antioch area, from Light industrial District (L-I) to Single ramily Residential-4C (R-40) . Authorized Auditor to refund 35CO to Pedro b:artins and Sons, Inc. in connection tivith proposed preparation of an EIR. Acknowledged receipt of Justice Automation ".dvisor- Co=ittee ACTION PLAN for implementation of electronic data processing projects into an integrated Criminal Justice Information System, and authorized submission of same to Criminal Justice Agency as a county-sponsored application for Funding. Requested County Administrator to advise Association of Bay Area Governments that county renresentativestitill attend June 5 meeting re formation of San Francisco Bay Area State%Local policy task force for air quality maintenance plan. Ado ted the folloi,:ing numbered resolutions: 7512, approving snap of Subdivision 4599, dalnut Creek area; 75/413, authorizing County Counsel to initiate condemnation action to acquire real property required for county road purposes Subdivision 4578, :falnut Creek area, and authorized Chairman to execute agreement with 11hitecliff Homes, Inc. in connection therewith; 75/414, accepting as complete construction of improvements in Subdivision 4464, Danville area, and retaining for one year surety cash deposit; V V412- May 27, 1975 Summary, continued 'I' .Page 4 75/415, as Ex-Officio the Board of Supervisors of the Flood Control District, fixing June 24 at 11 a.m. as time to sell at public auction county residential property located at 875 Diablo Road, Danville area; 75/416 approving plans for specifications for overlay of Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg area, and fixing June 17 at 11 a.m. as time to receive bids thereon; 75X17, authorizing Chairman to execute Right of day Certification to State Department of Transportation in connection with Lone Tree '.ay, Antioch area; 75/418, consummating purchase of property from E. Crow, et ux, for premises at 1029 Court Street, Martinez, required for County Civic Center purposes; 75A19, approving agreement with F. and P. Bolla for construction of improve- ments in M.S. 114-73, Alamo area; 75A210 through 75/"23, authorizing cancellation of tax liens on and transfer to unsecured roll of property acquired by public agencies; cancellation of delinquent penalties and costs on second installments on 1974-75 secured assessment roll; 75/424, rescinding Board Order dated IMarch 25, 1975 relating to transfer of tax liens to unsecured roll (Parcel C85-056--001, Code Area 7025)• Authorized correction of certain erroneous tax cancellation per Revenue and Taxation Code. Referred to: Public Works Director letter from Alamo residents requesting that drainage study be undertaken and pian preparcd for solution of certain storm drainage problems in area; request of i'.'. Smith, Pittsburg, for replacement of storm drain under Bailey Road (for report June 10); complaint from Xartinez resident re manner in which recent count* auction was conducted; an invitation for county participation in development of guidelines for local parking management plans which the Environ- mental Protection Agency has indicated may be substituted for its parking facility regulations; Contra Costa County Development Association letter from Coloma-Lotus Boosters Club inviting county participation in its Gold Discovery Days Celebration, January 23-25, 1976; Director of Planning for report complaint from G. Williams re condition of ;bedrock Marina, Richmond area; County Administrator letter from Senator Zenovich re legislation oL tax exempted property; letter rrom Richmond Bar Association supporting AB 434 which v,ould prevent closing or roving of the Department of the Superior Court located in Richmond prior to amendment; Director, Human Resources Agency, letcer from U. S. Department of Labor re CL'TA Title I grant application for FY 1976, and letter summarizing annual assess- ment of this county's efforts in implementing the CETA program for FY 1974-75; Director, Hunan Resources Agency, and County County- Auditor-Controller letter from Cooperative Center Federal Credit Union, Berkeley, requesting increase in fee schedule for issuance of Food Sta--p Coupons; Director, Human Resources Agency, and Chairman, Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council letters from county residents complaining about the way in which meetings viere conducted by said Council re expenditure of CETA funds for 197576; County Counsel and Director of Planning matter of proposed Sand Dunes tlater- front Park, Antioch area; Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors Linscheid and Kenny) recommendation of Economic Opportunity Council on appropriation of 530,100 of Carry-Over-Balance of Federal CAP grant funds; County Counsel letter from State Department of Education advising that a pro- posed campership program is ;%ithin the confines of the Standard Agreement project signed by the Board Chairman on July 9, 1974; County Counsel and Local Agency Formation Commission request of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District that a condition of approval of the Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization require that annexation be subject to certain conditions; County Government operations Committee (Supervisors Dias and 74oriarty) and County Administrator memorandum from the Director of Planning relative to request of Diablo Bostirmen for grant of Open Space Easement; Director, Human Resources Agency, letter from California Association of Health Facilities advising that the 1975-76 State Budget for Nursing Home Fundin&. under the ?fedi-Cal program is inadequate and requesting Board to urge Governor and Legislature to provide necessary budget increase for same. 00413: Ys May 27, 1975 Summary, continued Page 5 Fixed July 22 at 2 p.m. for hearing on proposed consolidation of municipal courts of the Richmond Judicial District and the West Judicial District, and - requested parties involved to submit to the Board in writing prior to said hearing their specific recommendations on the matter. Appointed W. Mitchell and M. Mello to the Board of Commissioners, El Sobrante Fire Protection District, and reappointed V. Yirante to the aforesaid district for 4—year terms ending December 31, 1973; and authorized issuance of Certificates of Appreciation to each commissioner now serving the aforesaid'district and the San Pablo Fire Protection District who rill no longer be serving after the merger of the two districts becomes effective June 30, 1975- As Ex—Officio the Governing Board of El Sobrante Fire Protection District, approved weed abatement contract with J Spray Corporation pending review and clearance by Office of County Counsel. Recessed into Executive Session to consult with representatives in connection with salary matters. Referred to Intergovernmental Relations Committee proposal of Senator Nejedly that this county establish a coordinated program to educate and enlist the public's assistance in influencing legislators to abandon plans for the Peripheral Canal. 0OAi4 i The Preceding documents consist of 414 pages. r e k