Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05131975 - R 75D IN 5 i 3Y c h S t #M 5 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 21.E-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSIONAT 9:00 A.M. , TUESDAY, MAY 13, 1975 IN POOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Vice Chairman J. P. Kenny, Presiding; Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: Supervisor W. H. Boggess. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell; Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator, and Public Works Director. ) 0 C 01 4 JAMES P.KENNY.RtcHMOHa CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVJSORS WARREN N.BOGGESS IST DISTRICT CJIAiR/1AN: ALFRED M.DIAJAMES P. KENNY S.SAH►ARLO :Ho DISTRICT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - V&CC CHAIRMAN JAMES E.MORIARTY.LAFAYETTE JAMES R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERIC SRO DISTRICT AND FOR - AM 9X OFF1C10 CLERK OVINL 150A11D.' VPARREN N.SOCGESS,Co.ICD+D SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVEP1VED BY TFE_ LIOARD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT CHIW CLIJIK EDMUND A. LINSCHEID. PITTSSuns BOARD CHAMBERS.ROOM 107.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING rHow 220.3000 STH DISTRICT E=MSION..t371 P.O. BOX 911 MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY MAY 133 1975 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.Y. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Presentation of resolution proclaiming May 13, 1975 as "Retired Senior Volunteer Day." 9:00 A.M. Presentation of resolution proclaiming the week of May 18 'through May 24, 1975 as "Action for Poster Children Week" in Contra Costa County. 9:00 A.M. Consider recomr.+endations of the Public Works Director. 9:10 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:30 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:45 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees including Intergovernmental Relattons Com. ittee. (Supervisors, J., P Kenny and E. A. Linscheid) on disposition of Fire Suppression and Prevention Unit II representation petition.` filed by United Professional Fire Fighters, Local 1230.. 10:00 A.M. Executive Session (Government Code Section 54957.6) as required. 10:00 A.M. Recess. 10:45 A.M. Presentation by the County Rood Coalition (comprised primarily of church-sponsored "food pantries") pertaining to rood distribution activities of private agencies. 11:00 A.M. As Ex Officio Governing Body of Contra Costa County Storm Drainage District, receive bids for construction: of Danville Boulevard Ston" Drain (Storm Drainage District Zone 13, Line C-1) , Alaro area. 11:30 A.M. Hearing on protests filed with respect to Assessment District No. 1975-1, San Ramon Sewerage Improvements, and consider Engineer's Report in connection therewith. 2:00 P.M. Hearing on request of City of Pittsburg for consent to include unincorporated lands in the Pittsburg Southeast Assessment District 111o. 1974-1 and for .jurisdicti6n to form said district; continued from March 18, 1975. (See Iter 8 on the Board calendar. ) 000Uk' Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 13, 1975 ITw'"S SU3?1IT TED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 7: CONSENT 1. AUTHORIZE Chairman to execute agreement with M.G.M. Construction Company for work in connection with Assessment District No. 1973-3, San Ramon area (Bishop Ranch). 2. AUTHORIZE execution of agreements for construction of private improvements in Minor Subdivision 35-74, Orinda area, and Minor Subdivision 118-743, Walnut Creek area. 3. EXONERATE bond deposited as surety for taxes in connection with Subdivision 4537, Moraga area. 4. AUTHORIZE County Auditor-to refund erroneously collected charge for Vendor's Permit No. 3034. 5. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll; cancellation of- delinquent penalties and costs on second installments on the 1974-1975 secured assessment roll; and cancellation of uncollected penalty and interest on assessment reduced by Assessment Appeals Board/Officer. 6. DENY the following claims a. Patricia Ann Brooks, approximately $5,000 for general damages; b. Jewel Haynes, $20,000 for general damages; c. Larry Oates, 125,000 for personal injuries; d. Lee A. Valley for personal injuries; and e. Kevin Caldwell, $25,000 for general damages. 7. ADOPT Ordinance No. 75-22 (introduced May 6, 1975) rezoning land located in the San Ramon area to Planned Unit District (P-1) zoning classification; Leadership Homes of Northern California, applicant (1911-RZ) ; waive reading and order publication. Items 8 - 17 : DETEFrTINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item.) 8. LETTER from Chairman, Contra Costa County Land Conservation Committee, recommending that the Board agree to cancellation of the land conservation contract covering the 113-acre Buchanan property if consent to establishment of Southeast Assessment District No. 1974-1 is granted and if the Buchanan property is included within such assessment district; and MEVORAIMU'M from Director of Planning advising that the Planning Commission recommends that the land conservation agreement on the Buchanan property be cancelled and if the Board con- curs with said recormendation, the Planning Commission will proceed with rezoning hearings. CONSIDER IN CONNECTION WITH HEARING ON SOUTHEAST ASSESSf EIJT DISTRICT NO. 1974-1 SCHEDULED` FOR 2:00 P.M. THIS DAY 9. CONSIDER report from. Director of Planning (in response to Board referral) pertaining to amendment to the County General Plan in the Vine Hill-Pacheco Boulevard Corridor area. 10. MEMORANDUM, from Director of Planning (in response to Board referral) advising that the Planning Commission reafirms its previous recovirendation for extension of Roundhill Road, Alamo area, and - reco^mends denial of abandonment of roads in the Round Hill Estates development. ACKNOWLEDGE ?RECEIPT AND CONSIDER FIXItIG DATE FOR HEARING THEREON 00003 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 13, 1975 11. MEMORANDUM report from County Administrator (in response to Board referral of complaint regarding county purchasing practices) advising that an investigation revealed that a proposal submitted by Sherwood Medical Industries was rejected_ because of material deviation from the quotation request, and further advising that the action taken was in accordance with Ordinance Code provisions and proper purchasing practices. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT 12. REPORT from County Sheriff-Coroner (in response to Board. referral of letter from fr. Lenord Smith with respect to transferring cardroom licenses) advising that each transaction has been. investigated and no violation of the County Ordinance Code has been identified. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT 13. LETTER from District 'Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, advising that a permit application has been submitted by the Richmond Sanitary Service for the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill Project and enclosing a Draft Environmental Statement in connection therewith. REFER TO ACTING COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR (ENVIRONN.ENTAL COUTROL) FOR REPORT 14. LETTER from Executive Director, Concerted Services Project, Pittsburg, requesting a parade permit for May 26, 1975 (tentatively) to celebrate existing and proposed community projects. PEFEP TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ACID COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER FOR RECO:1PIENDATION 15. MEMORANDUM report from Director of Planning, in response to Board referral of letter from Bay Area Archaeological Cooperative which states that an archaeological site in the Danville area has been danaged by a construction project; Director of Planning advises that the preparation of the Environmental Impact "Reports and their processing_ have been • in accordance with adopted procedures and guidelines, and that the property owners have retained an archaeological- consultant who will submit a special report prior to -July 1, 1975 and that the parties involved are working toward a positive and constructive resolution of the matter. ACKNOT-MEDGE RECEIPT 16. MEMORANDU:4 from Director of Planning recommending that 75% of the cash deposit of $10,000 required to guarantee implementa- tion of an approved landscape and irrigation plan in connection with Land Use perr3.t No. 362-71 be returned to Mr. John Barron and that 25'7 be retained pending further review of the project. AUTHORIZE $7,500 REFUND TO MR. BARRON 17. LETTER from San Francisco Area Director, U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, forwarding for county response letters from Mr. Arthur Schroeder and Mrs. Hazel Shirley of the E1 Cerrito Committee on Aging regarding the County's Housing Assistance Plan which includes the City of El Cerrito. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PLANNING A11D CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPH'+ENT ADVISORY COUNCIL Items 18 - 22: I11FORMATION (Copies of cor:nunications listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties.) 18. LETTER from Mrs. Virginia Nolen, Walnut Creek, urging financial support for the Blind Adolescent Life Skills Center in San Pablo. 00004 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued May 13, 1975 19. LETTER from Mr. N. P. Gaerttner, Danv;lle, objecting to a- recent cable television rate increase and quality of- servfce provided -` + by Cable-Vision. 20. LETTER from. Kammy L. Buss, Richmond student, urging continued financial support for the ?urine Ecology Research project 'at Point Malote Marine Laboratory. 21. LETTER from Supervisor R. L. Kopp, San Francisco Board of` Super- visors, transmitting copy of resolution commending Governor E. G. Brown, Jr. , for his efforts to resolve the farm labor, issue and suggesting that the county adopt a similar resolution -: 22. MEMORANDUM report submitted by the County Administrator on` the status of county sponsored legislative measures in the 1975 a session of the California State Legislation. Persons addressing the Board should complete the fore Drovided on the rostrurl and furnish the Clerk with a written cony of their presentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEVS: WEDNESDAY, 5 P.M. i j, T. L. w O000511, f. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR t CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: `Recommended Actions,, May ':13, 1975 y From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Medical 540 One Discovery House None-: Services Director-Project 309 ($945-$1,149) Medical 540 Six Discovery House None Services Aide-Project (149 ($580-$705) II. GIFTS AND DONATIONS 2. Accept gifts and donations to the County Library system during the month of April, 1975 III. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS 3. Name and Meeting and = Classification Location Period Floyd I. Marchus, National P.T.A. May 31, 'I975 Supt. of Schools Convention, to June 4,, 1975 Atlantic City, N.J. Gerald H. Evans, American Society of 'June. 1, 2975:' Asst. Materials Civil Engineers to June =4; 1975 Testing Engineer Conference, Atlanta, Georgia Oliver T. Smith, ICMA-EPA Seminar on _ May 19, 1975 Environmental Resource Recovery May, 23,. 1975 Control Engineer Management, ' Boston, Mass. 4. Authorize attendance of Mr.Daniel Yee,- Vice Chairman, ry' County Solid haste Management Policy Committee, and Mr. Gregory Cook, Mayors Conference representative on said committee aCt international City Management . Association Resource Recovery Seminar during the period ?-:ay 20 through May 23, 1975 in Boston, 1-lass. r IV. APPROPRIATIONS ADJUSTMENTS f l 5. County Department of Agriculture. Add $13,440 for increased operating costs of the Animal Control Division and $6,200 for additional cost of County A . eauip.ment for the Department of Agriculture. 00 To: j/Board of Supervisors From. County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 5/13/75 Page 2. IV. APPROPRIATIONS ADJUSTMENTS .p. 6. County Auditor-Controller (Various Courts) . Add $400,000 to provide for the increased cost of private attorney fees for public ' defense. 7. County Auditor-Controller -(Various Departments) f` Add $2,127 from the Reserve for Prior Year Liabilities to cover increased cost of 'fixed. {: assets. 8. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for the following accounts: County. Auditor-Controller (Data Processing) , Building .. Inspector, Planning, Public Works, Superior Court, Veterans Service Office. r V. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS 9. Authorize write-off of delinquent accounts receivable in the amount of $602.41, as recommended by the County Auditor-Controller. 10. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Satisfaction of Lien taken to guarantee repayment of the cost of services rendered by the County to Joan Funkhouser, who has made- repayment aderepayment in full. VI. BOARD AND CARE PLACE_HENTS/RATES .None VII. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 11. Authorize submission of application to the State. j Department of Health for continuation of the . 7 Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children for fiscal year 1475-1976 total program costs are Federally funded r. ($570,000) . 12. Authorize County Planning Director to modify.,_ agreements with certain Census Supervisors designated by the State of California, Department of Finance, to conduct the 1975 Special Census to extend the duration through May 30, 1975 and increase the maximum payment from $3,500 to $5,000 per agreement. 13. Approve and authorize Director, Euman .Resources'Agency, a;r' to sign on behalf of the Board, contracts with certain fee for service physicians used by the County Medical Services. 14. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute grant signature sheet for CETA Title I funding for fiscal year 1975-1976 in the amount of $1,968,570. Ain Wo To: Board of Suoervisors From: County Administrator { ` Re: Recommended Actions 5/13/75 Page 3_ VII_ CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 15. Authorize the following actions regarding the CETA Title I manpower plan for fiscal, year 197.5-1976: (a) Referral of the fiscal year 1975--1976 manpower plan recommended by the County Manpower Advisory Council to the Intergovernmental Relations Committee for review and report on May 27, 1975 with the understanding that said committee will hear appeals from those h: agencies whose proposals were not recommended by the Manpower Advisory r Council. (b) Issuance of a notification of when the committee will hear appeals and iridicating that agencies wishing to be heard should inform the Office of the County Administrator in writing by May 16, 1975. 16. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreement between the County of Contra Costa and the County of Alameda for the holding of Contra Costa County convicted female prisoners in Alameda County detention facilities or at the Alameda County work furlough facility, as appropriate, subject to the conditions more particularly described in the . agreement, and subject to payment by Contra Costa _ y County of the following rates: Santa. Rita h Rehabilitation Center, $17.50 per inmate per-;day; - Alameda County work furlough facility, $32.84 per inmate per day. 17. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreement between the County of Contra Costa and Thomas Reid Associates for consulting services in connection with preparation of the environmental impact report with respect to proposed development of Subdivision 4727, Bethel Island. The cost of services in the amount of $4,360 has been advanced j by the developer. 18. Authorize Director of Planning to submit application - to the State Office of Planning and Research for a "701" planning grant to conduct an energy r resource and conservation study estimated to cost $50,000_ The study will be -financed by the requested grant of $25,000 and $25,000 of County in-kind services. %III_ LEGISLATION 19. Establish County position on measures pending before the 1975 session of the California State Legislature as follows: �a Bill Number Subject Position, AS 1130 Operation of Work Furlough Support Programs r` TOS mak. r y. , ..� •:.. .- gym. ':i .•';.:tF r�7,., To: Board of Supervisors ' From: County Administrator ' Re: Recommended Actions 5/13/75 Page 4. IX. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 20. Authorize County Administrator to execute monthly rental agreement between the County of 'Contra Costa and Roy Ray for occupancy of County-owned property at 1125 Mellus St. , Unit No. 7, Martinez, California_ X. OTHER ACTIONS 21. Amend Board Order dated July 29, 1974 authorizing County Auditor-Controller to pay the cost of utilities (gas and electric) in an amount not to exceed $4,500 for fiscal year 1974-1975 for Concerted Services Project, Inc. , Pittsburg, California, so as to increase maximum allowable payments to $5,750. 22. Approve submittal of data on the public assistance programs to the appropriate State authorities, pursuant to Section 10800.1 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code. 23. Refer to Administration and Finance Committee memorandum report of the County Administrator on judgeship requirements of the fit_ Diablo Municipal Court and on Municipal Court staffing and salaries. 24. Authorize R. E. Jornlin, Director, Human Resources Agency, to submit recommendations with respect to proposed Department of Health, Education and Welfare regulations to implement Title XX of the Social Security Act of 1974. 25. Authorize County Administrator, in conjunction with City and Special District representatives, to explore use of a consulting firm to develop the Final Emergency Telephone System (9-1-1) Plari and potential sources of funding to cover cost of Final Plan preparation. y 26_ Adopt resolution fixing estimated annual unit cost of Sheriff's Department contract personnel and estimated annual total cost of providing police. services to Lafavette and Moraga under a combined city police services agreement. NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested- citizens nterestedcitizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes. lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: Wednesday, 5:00 P.M. 0000 v i�£F CONTRA COSTA, COUNTY, PUBLIC WORKS' DEPARTMENT % Martinez,. California `Ys^, May 13, ' 1975 E X T R A B_U S I N E- S S SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III ;fr Item 1. SAH MIGUEL DRIVE - ROAD CLOSURE - Walnut Creek Area , yFt Tom Bristol, Sewer Contractor, requests permission, y: to close San Miguel Drive (County Road '4041)'.. near Rud ear Road for a three-day y period. sometime .between . r May 12, 1975 and May 23, 1975, between 8:00 a.m. and r- 4:30 p.m. The closure of the. road will allow for theJ installation of a manhole and longitudinal; pipe.'. Traffic will be detoured over existing neighborhood. =f" streets. : } Approval of this request is recommended with the- following conditions: 1. All signing be in accordance with State of Calif— ornia alifornia Manuel of Warning Signs, Lights -and Devices yam: dated 1971 and the County Manual of Warning Signs, fly. Lights and Devices; and s J�F 2. The Contractor shall comply with requirements of the Ordinance Code of California. The Public Works Department recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the road closure. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 2. SUBDIVISION 4566 - MAP APPROVAL - Byron Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Approve the map for Subdivision 4566. Owner: Discovery Bay Corp. , P.O. Box 85, Byron, CA 9,4514 ' Location: Subdivision 4566 is located west of Discovery xz: Bay Boulevard and north of State Highway 4. (LD) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 1 May 13, 1975 ' : CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez,, California May 13, 1975 AGENDA REPORTS Report A. LILAC DRIVE - PARKING RESTRICTION - Walnut Creek Area The Board of Supervisors, through its Order of May 6, 1975, referred to the Public Works Director for report, ` an item submitted by Supervisor Moriarty on behalf of Mr. David F. Leary, 1750 Lilac Drive, Walnut Creek.. Mr. Leary is requesting that the Board temporarily suspend the existing parking restriction on Lilac Drive.' in the vicinity of his home, to permit building con- struction vehicles to park while his home is being remodeled. On March 6, 1973, the Board of Supervisorsadopted Traffic Resolution No. 1874. This action resulted in the prohibition of parking, between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on the entire north side of Lilac Drive, a distance of approximately 1500 feet. Mr. Leary's home has only approximately 100 feet of frontage and . it is within the 1500 foot restriction, therefore, the only possible way that the existing parking restriction could be suspended in front of Mr. Lear y. home would be for the Board to temporarily-'suspend _the parking restriction on the entire north side of Lilac . Drive. it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution lifting the parking restriction from May 13 through June 15, 1975. (TO) (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Suggested text of Resolution- - has been prepared in cooperation with County Counsel and furnished to the Clerk.) Report B. ABANDONED EXCAVATION'- AUTHORIZE ABATEMENT -_Ori.nda Area On March 18 the Public Works Department prepared a report to the Board of Supervisors regarding an "Old Miners Cave". This was initially brought to the Board of Supervisors attention by a letter from Mrs. Bunn., The Public Works Department requested the Board's authorization to contact the owner for abatement prior to County abatement under Government Code - Article 9 (Section 50230-50256) . . The Public Works Department was successful in contacting. Mr. Johnson who was believed to be the owner and with n- (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 8 May 13, 1975 Report B Continued: the improvement of weather made an inspection of the - site with Mr. Johnson. As a result of this inspection, - it was determined that the cave was not -on--Mr.; Johnson's property. t It is recommended that the Board authorize the Public Works Director to contact owners of the adjacent properties to determine ownership and arrange for closing of the cave. (FCA) (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please send copy of this report and the Board action to Mrs. Dunn and the Orinda Fire Department.) Report C. SAN RAMON VALLEY BOULEVARD - ROAD MARKINGS - Danville Area The Board of Supervisors, through its Order of May 6, 1975s, referred to the Public Works Director.for report, a request by Supervisor Linscheid to investigate reports that the new road striping and bicycle lane markings are unclear and are causing confusion on that portion of San Ramon Valley Boulevard between Sycamore Valley Road and Railroad Avenue in Danville. The Public Works Department has reviewed the bicycle lane markings and found them to be clearly marked and marked in accordance with standards adopted by the State of California and many other local agencies. The Department was unable' to substantiate any claim of a problem involving confusion pertaining to the bicycle lane markings. The Department is aware of possible problem involving the markings for the two-way left turn lane in the. vicinity of the Bank of America building. The problem involves two factors (1) the location of the existing.. driveways to the Bank and (2) the design of the two-way, left turn lane. The Public Works Department will make immediate revisions to the lane markings to improve this situation, however, the problem may require the Bank of America to consider the relocation of one of their driveways so their patrons would have a more convenient access to the Bank's facilities. (No action by the Board is necessary at this time.) (TO) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 1. ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD - APPROVE PLANS - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve plans and specifications for the Alhambra Valley Road (Continued on next- page) AGENDA Public Works Department Page 2 of 8 May 13, 1975 o-0 - i Item 1 Continued: Slide Repair project, 1.1 miles west of Reliez Valley Road; and advertise for .bids to be received-in 4 weeks, and opened at •11 a.m. on Tuesday, June 10, 19.75. . The Engineer's estimated construction cost is $22,000. The project consists of the installation of an under- drain pipe along a portion of Alhambra Valley Road and the construction of slope protection to reduce underground seepage which is the primary cause of the existing slide problem. A one day closure of Alhambra Valley Road to through- traffic (with the exception of emergency vehicles) will be required for the installation of the underdrain pipe crossing. This project is considered exeinpt from Environmental Impact Report Requirements as a Class lc Categorical Exemption. (RE: Project No. 1481-5830-75) (RD) Item 2. CHRISTIE ROAD - AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT - Pinole Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Provenzano. and Associates for a Soils Investigation to repair a slide in Christie Road near Franklin Canyon Road in the Pinole area. The Agreement provides for a maximum payment of $6,000 which cannot be exceeded without prior written approval of the Public Works Department. (RE: Project No. 2383-5833-75) (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please forward two copies of the Board Order to the Public Works Department.) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 3. NORTH GATE ROAD AND TRAILS END DRIVE - STREET LIGHTING Walnut Creek Area At the request of local citizens and in conformance with the policy on street .lighting, Resolution No. 72/341, it is recommended that the Board authorize the Pacific Gas and Electric Company to energize eleven (11) 7,500 lumen, mercury vapor street lights in Subdivision No. 4127. The lights shall be energized in conformance with the drawing entitled "County Service Area L-45; Subdivision No. 4127," dated May 5, 1975, which is on file in'the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Depart- ment. The lights have been installed by the Developer under previous agreements and should now be billed to County Service Area L-45. (TO) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page-376f 8 May 131 1975 09013 Item 4. HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD - APPROVE TRAFFIC REGULATION - Orinda Area At the request of local.citizens and upon the basis 'of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolution No. 2099 be approved as follows: TRAFFIC RESOLUTION -NO. 2099 Pursuant to Section 21101(b) of the California Vehicle Code, the intersection of HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD (Road 12845C) and the State Highway 24 on-ramp, Orinda, is hereby declared to be a - stop intersection and all vehicles traveling north on Hidden Valley Road, shall stop before' entering said intersection. - (TO) Item 5. SANS CRAINTE DRAINAGE AREA - DEED ACCEPTANCE - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the following Grant of Easements and Right of Way Con- tracts and authorize Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, to sign said contracts on behalf of the County. - It is further recommended that the County Auditor be authorized to draw the following warrants payable to Transamerica Title Insurance Company and deliver said warrants to the Supervising Real Property Agent for distribution. Contract & Escrow Grantor Deed Signed Payment . No. 1. Pierre H. Sice, et ux 5-3-1975 $800.00 220643B 2. Harold O.- Stewart,et ux 5-2-1975 390.00 220642B 3. Robert J. Fromm, et ux 4-30-1975 1,660.00 220638E 4. Lee E. Stanley, et ux 5-6-1975 85.00 220690 5. Lee J. Katsikas, et ux 5-7-1975 750.00 220644' (RE: Work Order 8505) (RP) Item 6. MUTH DRIVE - AWARD CONTRACT - Orinda Area Informal bids were received and opened in the office of the Public Works Director on Wednesday, May 7, 1975, for the replacement of 670 lineal feet of concrete curb on. Muth Drive in the Orinda area. The proposed work is necessary to correct `, a drainage problem in this area. The lowest of the seven bids_`;' received was $8,990.00 and was submitted by L & F Paving of � Livermore. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Works Director to arrange for the issuance of a purchase order to L a F Paving, 1001 Murrieta, Livermore, CA 94550. (RE: Project No. 2745-4200-74) - (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV No Items A_ G E N D A Public Works Department `, Page 9 of 8 May 13, 1975 04014. SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 7. BOLLINGER CANYON ROAD STREET LIGHTING - San Ramon Area - - At- the request of local citizens and in- conformance with.- - -- the ith.- -the policy on street lighting, Resolution No. 72/341, it is recommended that the Board authorize the Pacific Gas and Electric Company to energize sixteen (16) 11,000 lumen, mercury vapor street lights and nine .(9). 7,500 lumen mercury vapor street lights in Subdivision No. 4121. The -lights shall be energized in conformance with the drawing entitled "County Service Area L-45, Subdivision No. 4121," dated May 5, 1975, which is on file in the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Depart- ment. The lights have been installed by the Developer under previous agreements and should now be billed to County Service Area L-45. ' (TO). ' Item 8. SUBDIVISION 3888 - REFUND DEPOSIT - Morgan Territory Area The one-year satisfactory performance period after accep-- tance of the streets for maintenance has been successfully completed. It is therefore recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the street and drainage improvements have successfully completed the one-year satisfactory performance period and that all deficiencies develop- ing during this period have been corrected. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Founders Title Company, P. O. Box 324, Concord, CA 94522, the $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit- Permit Detail Number 96622 dated February 2, 1972. Streets were accepted for maintenance on May 22, 1973.. Subdivider: Cal-Land Real Estate, 2222 Salvio Street, Concord, CA 94520 Location: Subdivision 3888 is located east. of Morgan Territory Road, approximately 1.4 miles south of Marsh Creek Road.- (LD) Item 9. EL CERRO BOULEVARD - APPROVE REGULATION - Danville Area At the request of local citizens and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolution No. 2098 be approved as follows: TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2098 Pursuant to Section 22358 of the California Vehicle Code, no vehicle shall travel in excess of 30 miles per hour on that portion of EL CERRO BOULEVARD (Road #4621) , Danville, beginning at the intersection of La Gonda Way and extending easterly to the inter- section of Diablo Road. (Continued on' next page) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 5 of 8 May 13, 1975 0�01�i Item 9, Continued: (Resolution #1596 pertaining to the existing 35 miles per hour speed limit on El Cerro Boulevard is hereby rescinded.) (TO) Item 10. SUBDIVISION 4410 - AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT EXTENSION - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Subdivision Agreement Extension for Subdivision 4410 and authorize its Chairman to execute it. This Agreement grants an extension of time through November 7, 1975. Subdivision 4410 is located east of Interstate 680 and north of Greenbrook Drive. It is the opinion of the Public Works .Department that the size of this subdivision and the work required for completion justifies granting this extension. (LD) Item 11• COACHMAN PLACE STREET LIGHTING - Clayton Area At the request of local citizens and in conformance with the policy on street lighting, Resolution No. 72/341, it is recommended that the Board authorize the Pacific Gas and Electric Company to energize two (2) 7,500 lumen, mercury vapor street lights in Sub- division No. 3977, as follows: 1. On the west side of Coachman Place, three poles north of Diablo Downs Drive; and 2. At the north end of Coachman Place four poles north of Diablo Downs Drive. The lights have been installed by the Developer under previous agreements and should now be billed to County Service Area L-45. - (TO) Item 12. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1973-3 - AMEND AGREEMENT - San Ramon Area On September 4, 1973, per Board Resolution No. 73/689, * the Board of Supervisors approved an agreement with Coleman, Selmi. & Simpkins, Consulting Engineers, for Engineer of Work services for Assessment District 1973-3 (San Ramon) . The Agreement provides for various services at specified hourly rates. In the intervening time, var- ious wage scales have risen and the Engineer of Work, by letter dated April 11, 1975, has requested that the Agree- ment be amended to provide for new hourly rates effective March 1, 1975. All payments to the Engineer of Work are ' made from Assessment District funds at no cost to the County, and sufficient funds are available. (Continued on next page) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 6- of 8 May 13, 1975 00als= Item 12. Continued: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors amend the September 4, 1973 Agreement to provide the follow- ing hourly rates in Section 3: Principal 135.00/hour (no change) Engineering Manager 30.00/hour (no change) Assistant Engineer 22.00/hour - Junior Engineer 20.00/hour Computer Draftsman 18.00/hour (no change) Senior Draftsman 18.00/hour Draftsman 16.00/hour Junior. Draftsman 14.00/hour Field Supervisor 30.00/hour Party Chief 28.00/hour Chairman 23.85/hour. (LD) Item 13. SUBDIVISION 4218 - REFUND DEPOSIT - Danville Area On August 28, 1972, by Resolution; No. 72/554, the Board., of -Supervisors authorized the acceptance of ,a $2,000.00.' ' cash bond to guarantee the completion of a 72-inch storm drain in Subdivision 4218. This work has been satis factorily completed. it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize,,.. the Public Wotks Director to refund to Duffel Financial and Construction Company, 1882 Diamond Boulevard, Concord, , CA 94520, said $2,000.00 cash deposit as evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail Number 101703, dated August 25,1972. Subdivider: Duffel Financial and Construction Company,, 1882 Diamond Boulevard, Concord, CA 94520 Subdivision 4218 is located along the east side of Camino Ramon, north of Paraiso Drive. (LD) GENERAL Item 14. SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 - APPLICATION FOR CLEAN WATER GRANT It is recommended that the Board .of Supervisors'.as ex officio Governing Board of County Sanitation Dis trict No. 5 authorize the Public Works Director, as ex officio Engineer, to file an Application for-Pederal Assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control. Act -' and an Application for State Grant under the Clean Water -Bond Law for construction of wastewater treatment works:. It is further recommended that the Board authorize the, Public Works Director to sign all official papers and documents necessary for procurement of said Grants (EC) A G E N_ D A Public Works .Department Page 7 of 8 May 13, 1975 Item 15. HOSPITAL ELECTRICAL DEFICIENCIES - COMPLETION OF CONTRACT - Martinez y .It .is recommended..that the Board of Supervisors accegt,. �.. . as complete, as of May 13, 1975, the construction contract with Weirick and Zimmerman of Danville for the Hospital Electrical Deficiences at the County.Hospital and direst:, the Clerk to file the appropriate Notice of Completion.. It is also recommended that the Board of Supervisors extend the contract time 213 days to the date of acceptance inasmuch as the Contractor was delayed for a variety of reasons over which he had no control such. . . as the late delivery of manufactured items. This item was inadvertently placed on last week's agenda, but was deleted by .the Clerk of the Board as' the work could not be accepted in advance. (B G) Item 16. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY, It is requested that the Board of-Supervisors-consider attached "Calendar of Water Meetings." No action required. (EC) � CALENDAR OF WATER MEETINGS . r TIME DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE AITENDANCE r REMARKS Recommended Authorizat o May 1S Thurs. Bureau of 7:30 P.M: Four-County Study Staff Reclamation Napa (Solan Napa, h Lake &.Yol) June 6 Fri. California Water 9:00 A.M. Regular Meeting Staff Commission South Lake - • Tahoe June 10 Tues. Bureau of 9:00 A.M. Central Valley Staff Reclamation Contra Costa Water Study r- Cmmty Water District, Concord June 26 Thurs. Bureau of 9:00 A.M. Central Valley Staff Reclamation U.S.B.R. Water Study Sacramento AGENDA Public- Works. Department.;:'' Page 8 of 8 May. 13, 1975 aaass. 9 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Zoning Ordinances Passed Date: MM=3� 1975 This beinngg the date fixed to consider adoption of- the . 'following ordinances) rezoning property as indicated, which was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board orders that this (these) ordinances) is (,are) passed, and the Clerk- shall have it (them) published as indicated: below: .j Ordinance Application Number - Applicant Number Area Newspaper 75-22 Leadership Homes of 1911-RZ San Ramon The Valley" Northern California Pioneer • a:x r PASSED on May 13, 1975 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E.. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. :4r NOES: None. ABS: Supervisor H. H. Boggess I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct; racord and copy of action duly taken by this Board on the above- date. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board: on May 14, 1975. By: A. T sep cc: County Administrator 000.'f' 9 ' >`7 In the Board -of Supervisors a t� of Contra Costa County; State of California: May 13, , 1Re 7 1 L In the Matter of f „ Approving Personnel Adjustments. r r � As recommended by the County Administrator, ITIS SY THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto-',r- and ereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. ;ties PASSED by the Board on Hay 13, 1975- tt { ray, r a n1 l IN u 5 Xh ,hF r r t 1 c § ¢ s `gip I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy ofan order entered'on the minutes of said Board of Supervisorsanthe date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the SeaFof the,t3oard'of r Supervison affixed thislath of May 75 ; f doy. J R. OLSSON, Ct6rk By Deputy Clerk n r zE H 24 12/74 - 15-M Dorot MR Mona " Y 3 r�P 3r f (skf. �F f a!' F !"fir.•: !a 4� POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Coro. Kedical-Serv4-ces8udget Unit 540 Date 3/11/75 Action Requested: Acid six (_6) D; overr HGuse Aides - Project Positions Proposed effective date:as soon as • possible i Explain why adjustment is needed: T,, staff the new Mscoverry House being established M th reprep of Counter Hospital K-Ward- 'Contrd Cosia County Estimated cost of adjustment: ► ELD Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: P i -; -- �$ 2. Fixed Assets: ( At ite=6 and coat/ ��` " :fit 3',� v ,- Office of r of low AdministAtot WMA.t,3Er,';!V?C-_S AGENCY I Estimated total � � �` $. 4 Dote �.,,, Signature WJIU= R. Pfftwr& TI Chief W-Admin-ftes, Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: County M t a r Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: May 1, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify (6) Discovery House Aide-Project. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Discovery House Aide--Project. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the ad- dition of (6) Discovery House Aide-Project positions, Salary Level 149 (580-705). Personn i rector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: _ May 12, 1975 Add six (6) Discovery House Aide-Project positions, Salary Level 149 ($580-$705) , effective May 14, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED (L)!9!1M1lMl�liiil3) on MAY 13 MS !. R. OL.SSON, County Clerk Date: MAY 13 1975 By: ��—�;"19:--10,-A�-�,_. Deputy Clerk APPROVAL aS hiss adjubbment cone#.itutee an Apptoptiati.on Adju6b+ment and Pwonnet Ruotution Amendment. � �w M POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department crrn. Mpdiepl RorvirAg Budget Unit el&_ Date 4,9f 5 Action Requested: Add one (1) position of Discovery House Director - Project; and revise the job specification for this class Proposed effective date: as soon as posHM e Explain why adjustment is needed: To staff the new ih scovery House being established With renrogrammina of Countv Aosnital ?J.Ward Costa osta Coup Estimated cost of adjustment: Cont`/ Amount: R` DIVED 1 . Salaries and wages: $ 2 Fixed.. sets-, .( �.i te=6 and coat) P Ca• crnin:strator Cf I -AGE Estimated total $ ., Da. �� Signature 764 710 0 He Svcs, Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: == County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: May 7, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Discovery House Director-Project. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Discovery House Director-Project. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Discovery House Director-Project, Salary Level 309 (945-1149). , Personn Director 11 - 12, 1975 Recommendation of County Administrato Date: May Add one (1) Discovery House Director-Project, Salary Level 309 ($945-$1,149) , effective May 14, 1975. County Ad 'm s rator Action of the Board of Supervisors MAY 1 3 1975 Adjustment APPROVED ( e) on Date: MAY 13 1975 By R. OLSSOM, County Clerk . Deputy MA APPROVAL of thio adjuatment eonati tutea an App&opkiati.on Adjuattwxt and Penao"22 Reaotuti.on Amendment. In the Board of Supervisors of r Contra Costa County, State of -California g r 9 75_ — wz M, 3 i r t In the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. K On motion of Supervisor E. A. _Linsaheid, seconded by. Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERS that the t , appropriationadjustments attached hereto. and by reYerence' k� incorporated herein, are APPROVED. f PASSED by the .Board on May 13, 1475. v„r f f ;aft s h r x n 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy;of an,order entered;on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the'Seol of the.Board'df Suf affixed this 13th day:of May 19 7 } 1_Ri OLSSON;.:Clerk- f),A Clerk Deputy.Clerk H 24 12/74 - 154A DorotbyMireDonald J. Q { .` -A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT � RESERV FO"LlTtO CONTROLLER'S USE Cord ", �'n�tiACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase; T`� Fond, Decrease Code Quandt tUnit Object b.Acet. CR X IN"66) aup�` F•y~ 4 l 1 003 335-2302 Use of County Equipment $6200; Unappropriated Reserve $6200 PROOF Comp.- K.P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL — ENTRY Use of Count E ui lent: The Public Works Date Description Department underestimated the use of county equipment for the fiscal year 1974-75- 0 97475• 0 APPROVED: St ES DATE AImI T - R 3 0 73 CONTROLLER- COUNTY ONTROLLER:C+SI fNTY ` AC)MINISTRATOR: Z?LQ T — HOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 5upenisots iienny. Dias. Moriarty. I,laechtid. w. ri, uv-yyzs5 Agri cultural C ommr. No:. MAY 3_ 3 1975 31r. of Weights & an Measures 4/29/75 K \ *� K by ���� K OLSSVIM +hcPiJtY Getk Signature �' �'�� Titic Date J. v Approp.Adi. (M 129 Rev. 2/68) larmd No. •See Instructions on Reverse Side r . 1 CONTRA-COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT w 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Co. Dept. of Agriculture - RESERVED`FOR AUDM R-W� ALLER'S USE Animal Control Division — 366 Card Special ,ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code Quan , and :Bud unit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 „` 003 366-1014 Overtime $3540 366-2170 Household Expense 2200 366-2302 Use of County Equipment 5000 366-2310 Professional & Personal Svcs. 2700 940-qq70 Unappropriated Reserve $139,440 366-7752 005 Storage Cabinet 14 366-7750 002 Animal Cages 14 PROOFComp.- K_P_ VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cast of each) TOTAL ---- -F J--- - Overtime: The Fair Labor Standards Act now ENTRY requires paid overtime (leave home and return home: Date Description for call back on days off, including clerical, and also for officers required to appear in court. Household Expense: Custodial costs increased greatly and window washing and lamp replacement are now charged to this account (formerly 22$1). Use of Count E ui ment: The Public Works Depart— ment underestimated the use of county equipment APPROVED: St GN RES DATE for the fiscal year -1974-75. AUDITO - /, ,/ S Professional & Personal Svcs: The number of CONTROLLER: 7 injured animals picked up s increased and the COUNTY -� charges for veterinarian services have also ADMINISTRATOR.: � �l'r1'•l1c�t� , J � increased. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: Storage Cabinet: Storage cabinet cost more than YES: sulxr.a_ur_ - ilus. the amount originally budgeted. L1nwhtU Cj[.,t t : Wt N. Boggess, lr1,�Y 13 '1975 No:. `! L{: a Agricultural Commr. v �a•tti�.r �- �!� Sir. of Wts. & Meas. 4/29/75 M�SMMMf, C ERK by s J. Rr OLSSO Deputy Clerk CT.9nature Title Dote Instructions000-2-3o1urnal No. Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/66) •See Instructions on Reverse Side 0�17 • • • ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Various Outside Attorney Fees RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2_ OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMIncrease Fund Decrease Code Quantity) Bud etUnit Object Sub.Acct_ CR X IN 66), 01 1003 200-2313 Superior Court 127,000:- r 210-2313 Mt. Diablo Muni Court 18S,0001 .. ' 212-2313 Richmond Muni Court 3S,000 1 213-2313 West Muni Court 17,000 ? 214-2313 Walnut Creek-Danville Muni Court 23,000 21S-2313 Delta Muni Court 13,000 01 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies 400,000 (General Fund) PROOFComp.- K_P_ VER.- I EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ---- - - - — ENTRY To appropriate for Outside Attorney Fees which are projected to be over budget as indicated above. D°'° Description The original appropriations for this object were from the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR- CONTROLLER -f 4-16-75 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Super%lmrs Renvy. Dias, A[orlarty, RoSSaiw. Linscheid. RbseNf W. N. Boggess NO%A(,D 'r MAYS � J. R. OLSSON CLERK bY ` , ` . C9.L d Budget Analyst 4-16-75 '00epijiy age SiynomreA Title C. D. THOMPSON Agprop.Adj.Journal No. � M 129 Rev. 2068) See $ls$ See Instructions on Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Auditor-Controller 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Fixed Asset Carry-forward RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. DEJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET fTEM Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantity) Sud et Unit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 03S-7751 705 lg 03S-7751 712 26 043-7750 707 1:786 056-7758 705 12 062-77S4 702 16 062-7754 704 201 062-7754 705 78 062-7754 714 42 062-7754 723 2 062-7754 726 127 063-7756 726 22 214-7751 70S 2 214-7752 704 60 214-7752 707 2 242-7752 723 22 242-7752 724 64 2SS-7754 743 402 3321-7751 738 6 321-7751 739 2 321-7751 740 4 324-7751 701 32 324-7751 702 2 355-7751 706 11 357-7752 703 38 450-7751 703 29 451-7754 703 16 , 4S1-7754 713 Cl�"y 18 S40-7752 745 ` CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease. (CRX IN bb�.� � Cade Quontitrl Budget Unit Object Sub.Acct. 01 1003 540-7754 712 2 S86-7752 705 15 S89-7751 701 2 S89-7751 744 14 1102 367-77S8 701 15 1102 367-2479 15 01 1003 995-9971 Reserve for Contingencies Pr Yr ,127 PROOF Ca"'Q__ X_f'._ WER.— 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL } ENTRY To adjust prior year fixed assets to reflect actual Dare Description expenditures, and to take the balance from the reserve for prior year contingencies. F1A_ Carry-forward adjustments APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— CONTROLLER: r—./7 1.7.ri._ COUNTY t �-� �� ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supenlmrs Kenny, Dias, Motisrty. Linschad. Aha r•` W- N. Boggess J. R. OLSSON CLERK �r Budget Analyst 5/7/7 5 J. by 6 � I:t d Title: Date.; Gt Sig" to pp Deputy Clerk C. D. Thompson }V�r(7r Jou Appal.No. z 543T ( M 129 Rev. 2168) •See Instmclions on Reverse Side coNTw► cosTw COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Auditor-Data Processing Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase':, Fund Decrease- CR X!N:661 Code Quonti ) BudoetUnit Ob'ect b.Acct. 01 1003 011-7751 008 Electric Typewriter 69.00 01 1003 011-2310 - Professional Services 69.00 PROOF �'"p _ K_P_ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF R TOTAL EQUEST(it capital outloY, fist Items and cost Of each) ---- - - — ENTRY IBM Sel ectri c typewriter - cast increase because Date Description of need for 13" carriage. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR- Y L 7S CONTROLLER: �/ COUNTY - Jl/1I7 ADMINISTRATOW BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supertdsors Kenny. Pins. A'oriatty, .&jggemw unscheLL RGsctiy: W. N. Boggess f NO:. NOAFL t Y 3 11175 J. R.OLSSON CLEPJc vw a Data ProcTeisticsin M 4_9Dat-7a -�4� s 1'byPa Approp.Adj. �? (M 129 Rev. 2/68) Of Journal No. •See Instructions ox.Reverse Side f, . • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Building Inspection RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2_ OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM" Decrease Increase '' Code 'Quantity) Fund Bud etUni►Object b.Acct. CR KIN661':- `-2;4' 01 1 1003 340-7752 003 Desk 45 x 30 160 01 1 1003 340-7752 011 Desk Typist 160 OO tv r<<6 "� Contra COSTO County RECEIVED APR 2 9 11975 Office of County Administrator PROOF VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST i if capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - - - -- ENTRY To transfer single pedestal desk appropriation to a typist desk as needed. Internal adjustment not affecting. Date Description department total. APPROVED: St04QRES DATE AUDITO CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Superttsora Kenny. Dias, Moriarty. IiWgaat. LAnscheld. 17b5,p4rf- W. N. Boggess NO:. /JDN MAY 1 3 197 J. R. OLSSON CLERKby GZ1 _ �Z97 6 W- Signature OQ 'c`�0 Title Dote ekpufy Clerk U Approp.Adj. {M 129 Rev, 2/68) Journal No. See Iastructions an Reverse Side f OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECEIVED' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MAYIJ 195 Administration Building t OLSSON Martinez, California aaK win of sWEUvwa A Co To: rd f Supervisors Date: May 12, 1975 s F hur G. i 1, Subject: Outside Attorney Fees County Administrator As previously indicated to your Board by this office, a $500,000 budget deficiency was projected in the various courts for expenditures made for outside attorney fees. The actual adjustment has been delayed pending further expenditure experience to ascertain the fiscal effect of efforts made by Mr. P. R. Murphy, Public Defender, to reduce use of outside attorneys. The attached statement indicates that although the upward trend appears now to have been reversed, a deficit of at least $400,000 will occur. The over-expenditure in this account has . now utilized available budgets of the courts so an appropriation adjustment is necessary. As you know, Mr. Murphy has implemented administrative. procedures to eliminate use of outside legal counsel for those cases which staff previously did not defend due to excessive workload. Although this action will substantially reduce expenditures for outside counsel, it will be a rather prolonged period before the results become evident as it will take. a considerable period before previously assigned casesare closed. ' For your information, a -total of 2,661 separate payments were made in the first three quarters of this fiscal year in a total amount of $742,722, an average of about $279 per payment. The Public Defender and staff of this office will devote continued study and attention to the use of private legal counsel for the provision of legal defense in order to restrict County expenditures to the minimum necessary. FF/aa encl. 000311" y �f yr w rn (D A) (D Y• (•t W (D K 1-9 o 0 G G '0 rr o o r ['3 C6 c7' ti Y '= (D a 1 d � - K t r F" a ,a .0 -cn %D.t* U7 O W N N to V tD (nY� V N Y to Q► 1. Ln 1 (D W Ln N Co M 4- V v(D aD U1 V OD N ON O R- t> to In W V O V N N to l/1 H(D O O O O O O O V O Cl O O Cl O O Ln - � o r N Y w co N o w W V In In V co CAC:. O O O O O O Q O Co O O O O O (D tD to H O O 0 o O O O v O' c-r YH' �n -tn tD O CZ .r.- to •D a% f= Z.C O O to tD O O P.t Crl';c1 O A Co � -P- a1 N (D M- rj3 O O O O O O O c-r-(D ►s� O O o O O O JJ^^ llRR cn y 1J J . N r m ' W Y r N Ul Nrr tD V V N O 9 O - aD M w O m tD V CT Y Y Y w o Ln l^j Qt N Y a� r C)D Y Ln Y r r Y V N V Y m O V w w (D OD O r V to w ON rr 0= W V V O K - -00 -CO CL (D N Y K co Y r Y N V o to w Y co m 0 v - v v - +• Ic O N OD W w In N rr (IN r to Y V (n rt ' W W W w N tD CO • 41 m CT tD tD tD V N N to !-+• V ,. g In r w tD w to CT m N w N O � Y at K rr V Oo V O 0 r N (D co �A •(J> [sJ � In 11 L-- tD a% H fT o O to %D O (DL a !�-�- v v v (T.� Co O Co O O O 0 1"'M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D a 00032 t CONTRA COSTA COUNTY At'PROPRlAT10ft ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT r RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USED Cotd Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' {itcreose Decrease Code Quantity) Fund BudaetUnit Object b.Acct. CR"X IN 66) DI 1003 358 1013 Temporary salaries $40,000 358 2100 Office expense 9,000 3S8 2102 Books and periodicals 1,500 3S8 2473 Specialized printing 1,500 358 2120 Utilities $t;Q 3S8 2170 Household expense 2,F1a0 3S8 2190 Publication of notices - 400 3S8 2250 Rent of Equipment 4a0111 3S8 2260 Rent of Real Property 3S8 2310 Professional and personal services 35,E 3Sg Gi 10 C 01%M'Jb-J Ca'f t oy s e#S+OU M a Contra Coda County -- RECEIVED WAY ;91 a Office of County Administrator PROOF Cfl'"p_ K;P_ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capital outlay, list Items and cast of eatlt) TOTAL - - - - _ cellaneous adjustments to accommodate census project ENTRY xpenditures. Date Description APPROVED: SI TURE DATE AUDI TO CONTROLLER: --- ---=- COUNTY . 11 ADMINISTRATOR: ` BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kenny. Dias. 'Aod"ty, Ltnschei& ghse,f�: W. N. Boggess ��y7 NO- AIOAfe—. MAo�—.L�.t—i:i�a— J. R. OLSSON CLERK ha Wye gr of PlInnning,' M )'�r'�4 L V to Title Dari `.cpUry Clerk n i tNo. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) •See Insimctions on Reverse Sid/ J� �' • COIRTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUST)11EltT 1. DEPARTMENT 00 BUDGET UNIT Pub 1 is Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Decrease Code Ouantit ) Fd Bud et Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66f,`.' SELECT ROAD CONSTRUCTION 01 (003 661-7600 575 1. San Ramon Vly Blvd 1,500. I 214 3. Sar, Pablo Dam Rd 2,000, 583 4. Camino Tassa jara 10,000, 997 1. Frontage Imp 1,500 373 5. Oak Rd to 330 14,000 488 5. Waterfront Rd to 330 8,000 558 5. E 18th St to 330 13,000 MINOR ROAD BETTERMENT 666- 990 2. Min Rd Betterment 2,500 MINOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION 665- 229 2. Midhill Rd 2,500 ROAD MAINTENANCE 671-2319 3. & 4. Contracts to S-214083 12,000 COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 330-2282 5. Cow Crk Fm 661 35,000 r/, cc o Wil, CG'G> PROOF C°'"p•_ K_P_ VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL --- - - —- ENTRY I . W.O. 4253 Preliminary Engineering for paving at Heddings Lumber Company. Date Description 2. W.O. 4254 Preliminary Eng i neer i ng for road reconstruct io' east of Morello Avenue. 3. W.O. 5818 Preliminary Engineering for slide repair between Orinda and EI Sobrante. 4. W.O. 5834 Preliminary Engineering for slide investigatio; between Lemitas Road and Molitas Road. _ APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE 5• W.O. 4701 Cover estimated cost to replace concrete AUDITOR- Y 8 .5 channel lining south of Harlan Drive. CONTROLLER: COUNTY . j7, ADMINISTRATOR: f--�J BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDEF� Super YES: ism Ketuly. Dias. tortarty. LAnschcdd. t f/l Ern W. N. Soggy NO:. ,t rcAfE.. MAY J. R. OLSSON CLERK Deputy Public Works Director 5/7/75; b a De Clerk Signature TitleApp ,��j/�/(�/ Date ( M 129 Rev. 2/'68) ;34 Journal No. Sl 00 See instructions on Reverie Si e CONTRA COSTA COt1NTY APPROPRIATfON ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT ` L RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET lT Decrease Iricrease , Code Quanti j Fund Budget Unit Object b.Acct. CR X IN b6I 01 1003 200-7752 JUDICIAL CHAIR 540.00. 01 1003 99G-99-70 R 540.00 2ec; - !v t 3 %P1•r„�+'�*�� s�ttbtri¢S PROOFComp.M K,P_ VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - - - - — ENTRY ITEM RQUESTED ON 74-75 BUDGET - DENIED Date Description ITEK AGAIN REQUESTED ON 75-76 BUDGET DEPT. 9 (JUDGE Mr-BRIDE INSISTS ON DMMIATE' DELIVERY) APPROVED: SIGNATU S DATE AUDITOR- MAY $ CONTROLLER: COUNTY I -7 ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kenny. Dias. Moriarty. 4166840R Ltuadi & 11,b.4&,f- W. N. Boggess . MAY 13 1975 NO:. AIOAJ�_ on AAK w.y.r **CH, CLERK by LI 3 i J. R, a�O {{" c�}_ Tile ,/rf Dote Deputy Clerk �� V' .ipI` � 3 (024 Rev. 2168) oumol No. 'Sec Jast"ctiatrs Dior Reverse Sonde - .,fir✓ .a, y' F CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Y xP , �t�•�: 1. DEPARTMW Veterans Service ' f RESERVED FRR l�tglYbR ° " -CONTROLLERI3 USE OR COST CENTER 0579 C CAR SPEC IA .� ouNt Q. NATE 4HJECT OF EXPENSE 1NCRtAst COD (�r FUND `�t�'•1 lm O1IJECT SUl.ACC (StE INSTRUCTIONS ON REYtRSE) DECKERS[ (CR.,X lNait�y� C G oyQ� Cri of 1003 574-2100 Office expense (2100) 60.00 f 01 1003 671?-7 752 001 Capital Outlay (7752) (for desk) rr t'f r r, { tR00F •-4OK�•- -�.r._. .vis _ I EMANATION Of REQUEST (if capital:outlay;li st Item and cost of,ear�t� n 70TAL ENTRYiation for a desk was inadeDescriptionccipt(oa �r �� ('$160).-: So' Date O about ..h0 is needed: to cover�cost of=60 x�30 desk,, '- pleas an additional $20 towards shipping costs. The wooden desk we are replacing in,Richmond has 'fallen apart APPROVED: 518 ES DATET AUD ITOR 8 .� CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR• / ? BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: B Ts xeany. i)1:s eld. 43s'jt• W. N. Boggy No: Mo v6, MAY 13 1975 Mi7mMIMM, CLERK by 0. 7rvy Vets.Ser.Officer 5�? Z i. R. OMON peps, Cleric S WTUIE TITLE Approp.',Adf. TE" daurnal NO. s� (kilts 10-42) x IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving Plans ) " and Specifications for Underdrain ) Installation, Alhambra Valley Road, ) RESOLIITION N0. 75/364 Martinez Area, Project No. 1481 -5830-75. } WHEREAS Plans and Specifications for the installation of an underdrain on Alhambra Valley Road, 1 .1 miles gest of Reliez Valley Road, Martinez area, have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and I0ME:AS said project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report Requirements as a Class 1c Categorical Mcemption; IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Specifica— tions are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on Jvirgi- IQ a at 11 :00 A. M. , and the Clerk of this o Board- is directed to pu - h Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law, inviting bids for said work, said_ Notice to be published in the MORAGA SUN PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on Mnv 1 - . 1 w c; cc: Public storks Director County Auditor County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 75/30'k ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD PROJECT NO. 1481-5830-75 BIDS DUE JUNE 10r: 1975 AT 11 O'CLOCK A.N. ROOM 1039- COUNTY ADM INISTRATIOA BUILDING% 651 PINE. STREET*_` MARTINEZ% CALIFORNIA 94553 ., TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ% CALIFORNIA P R O P O S A L F O R ll ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD UNDERDRAIN INSTALLATION NAME OF BIDDER« -_N-_-Mrl----_--rNN--N--rrrN-- BUSINESS ADDRESS ------------- PLACE OF RESIDENCE ------------------------r�rr-_rr- TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THE UNDERSIGNED% AS BIDDER% DECLARES THAT THE ONLY PERSONS OR PARTIES INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE THOSE NAMED HEREIN- THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS MADE WITHOUT COLLUSION WITH ANY OTHER PERSON% FIRt4 OR CORPORATION- THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE LOCATION OF THE ,PRO- POSED WORK• PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS- AND HE PROPOSES AND AGREES# IF,'THIS, ; PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED% THAT HE WILL CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MACHINERY9 TOOLS+ APPARATUS AND OTHER MEANS`,: OF CONSTRUCTION* AND TO DO ALL THE WORK AND FURNISH ALL THE MATERIALS: . SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT, IN THE MANNER AND TIME PRESCRIBED 9 AND=ACCORD. ING TO THE REOUIREKENTS CF THE ENGINEER AS THEREIN SET FORTH% AND` THAT fi WILL TAKE IN FULL PAYMENT THEREFOR AN AMOUNT EASED ON THE UNIT PRICES SPECIFIED HEREINBELOW FUR THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORKS THE TOTAL VALUE OE SAID 'WORK AS ESTIMATED HEREIN BEING 5 ( INSERT TOTAL AND THE FOLLOWING BEING THE UNIT PRICES BID% TO WIT- S I L 14AY 3 :1975 J. PL 0=N' CLM BQAm St! 15085 CONI i 0 P - I O PROPOSAL (CONT. ) (PRICE NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) DECIMALS) ----------------------------------------------------------- --------- ------ ITEM TOTAL TOTAL ITEM ES7IMATED UNIT OF PRICE( IN ( IN N0. QUANTITY MEASURE ITEM FIGURES) FIGURES) -•------------------------------------------------------------- ------- --------- 1 LS S I GN I;:G AIND TRAFFIC CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------ ------ -------- 2 425 CY STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (F) -------------------------------------------------------------- 3 -----------------------------------------------------------3 170 CY STRUCTURE BACKFILL (F) ---------------------------------------------------------- ----- 4 LS SHORING AND PROTECTION ------------------------------------------------------------- ------ 5 194-15 SOFT PAVEMEziT SECTION -----------------------------------------------~---------- ---- G 375 LF 611 PERFLRATED STEEL PIPE UNDERDRAIN ( *064' ' THICK) ------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------- 7 44 LF 60 ' NON—PERFORATED STEEL PIPE UNGERORAIN t .O64" THICK) ------------------------------------------------------------ ------ ---- --- 8 1 EA TERMINAL RISER t s(364" THICK) ------------------------------------------------------------ ------ ------- 9 1 EA RISER ( *064" THICK) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- 10 105 LF ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE (0.50' ) - ------------------------------------------------------------ ------- ---....r��. I1 18 CY SACKED C0114CRETE SLOPE PROTECTION IF ) ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- -------- 12 415 TON CLASS 1 PERMEABLE MATERIAL -.--.----------------------•-------.--r-.-- ------------- 13 -- -.----.---13 1 +000 3 SUPPLE;AENTAL WORK—rFLAGGING $1#000.00 (COUNTY'S SHARE ONLY)—PAID AS EARNED -------------------------------------------------------------- --- ------ NOTE—PLEASE SH%.W TOTAL ON PAGE P-1 TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------ - -------------------------------------------------------- -----------M-N-------.. OCC3g PROPOSAL (COM.T. 3 IN CASE OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UNIT PRICES AND TOTALS* THE UNIT PRICES SHALL PREVAIL• IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE QUANTITIES OF WORK UNDER EACH ITEM ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY* BEING GIVEN FOR A BASIS OF COMPARISON. OF PROPOSAL* AND THE RIGHT IS RESERVED TO THE COUNTY TO INCREASE OR DE- CREASE THE AMOUNT OF WORK UNDER ANY ITEM AS MAY BE REQUIRED* IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT of MONEY SET FORTH FUR EACH ITEM OF WORK OR AS THE TOTAL AMOUNT BID FOR THE PROJECT* DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AGREEMENT TO PAY A LUMP SUM FOR THE WORK UNLESS IT SPECIFICALLY SO STATES. IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE UNDERSIGNED* AS BIDDER* SHALL FURNISH A LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS PROPOSAL AND A FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND TO BE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS PROPOSALS TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AND AT NO EXPENSE TO SAID COUNTY. EXECUTED BY A RESPONS- IBLE SURETY ACCEPTABLE TO SAID COUNTY: IN THE EVENT THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED BY SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. IF THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED AND THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL FAIL TO CONTRACT AS AFORESAID AND TO GIVE THE TWO BONDS IN THE SUMS TO BE DETERMINED AS AFORESAID. WITH SURETY SATISFACTORY TO THE BOARD OF SUPER VISORS* WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS* NOT INCLUDING SUNDAYS* AFTER THE BIDDER HAS RECEIVED 1%'QTICE FROM THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THAT THE CON- TRACT I5 READY FOR SIGNATURE* THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY* AT ITS OPTIUN% DETERMINE THAT THE BIDDER HAS ABANDONED THE CONTRACT* AND THEREUPON THIS PRUPUSAL AND THE ACCEPTANCE THEREOF SHALL BE NULL AND VOID AND THE FORFEITURE OF SUCH SECURITY ACCOMPANYING THIS PROPOSAL SHALL OPERATE AND THE SAME SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA*. SUB-CONTRACTS ------------ THE CONTRACTOR AGREES* BY SUBMISSION OF THIS PROPOSAL TO CON- FORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 4100 THROUGH 4113 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE PERTAINING TO SUBCONTRACTORS* THE SAME AS IF INCORPORATED HEREIN. A COMPLETE LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS IS REQUIRED* AND THE BIDDER WILL BE EXPECTED TO PERFORM WITH HIS OWN FORCES* ALL ITEMS OF WORK FOR WHICH NO SUBCONTRACTOR IS LISTED. THE FOLLOWING IS A COMPLETE LIST OF ITEMS OF WORK TO BE SUB- CONTRACTED ON THIS PROJECTS IF A PORTION OF ANY ITEM OF WORK IS DONE BY A SUBCONTRACTOR* THE VALUE OF THE WORK SUBCONTRACTED WILL BE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED COST OF SUCH PORTION OF THE CONTRACT ITEM* DETERMINED FROM INFOR+lATION SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR* SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. THE UNDERSIGNED• AS BIDDER* DECLARES THAT HE HAS NOT ACCEPTED ANY BID FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR M4ATERIALMAN THROUGH ANY BID DEPOSITORY* THE BY LAWS* RULES OR REGULATIONS OF WHICH PROHIBIT OR PREVENT THE CON- TRACTOR FROM CONSIDERING ANY BIC FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN9 WHICH IS NOT PROCESSED THROUGH SAID BID DEPOSITORY* OR WHICH PREVENT ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN FROM BIDDING TO ANY CONTRACTOR WHO DOES NOT USE THE FACILITIES OF OR ACCEPT BIDS FROM OR THROUGH SUCH BID DEPOSITORY., 00040 P - 3 PROPOSAL (CONT. ) N0. ITEM SUBCONTRACTOR ADDRESS --- ------------------------ ---------------------- --------------------- ---- -------- ---- ACCOMPANY I;;G THIS PROPOSAL IS A PROPOSAL GUARANTY IN THE AMOUNT OF TEN ( 10) PERCENT OF AMOUNT B I D (CASHIER'S CHECK. CERTIFIED CHECK OR BIDDER'S BOND ACCEPTABLE) THE NAMES OF ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE FOREGOING PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE AS FOLLOWS- IMPORTANT NOTICE IF THE BIDDER OR OTHER INTERESTED PERSON IS A CORPORATIONP STATE LEGAL NAME OF CORPORATION, ALSO NAMES OF PRESIDENT, SECRETARY9 TREASURERS AND MANAGER THEREOF. IF A COPARTNERSHIP• STATE TRUE NAME OF FIRM• IF BIDDER OR OTHER INTERESTED PERSON IS AN INDIVIDUAL, STATE FIRST AND LAST NAME IN FULL. ------------------------------------------------ LICENSED TO DO OR SUBCONTRACT ALL CLASSES OF ;CORK INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT* IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE REGISTRA- TION OF CONTRACTORS+ LICENSE NO* (CLASS- ---------------- ---------------------- ------- CLASS-------------------------------- ---- -------------------------------------- ----------------- -------------------------------------- (SIGNATURE OF BIDDER) BUSINESS ADDRESS --------------- ------ PLACE OF RESIDENCE DATE 19 -------------- P - 4 00041 ALHAMBRr VALLEY:' RUAVAW UNOERDRA I N I NSTALLAWri V Proj . No . 1431 -5830775 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON COUNTY HIGHWAY ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD UNDERDRAIN INSTALLATION M Ay, 1975 J. 5L.01550P1 CLERIC BOARD Or SU COP RA COUNTY ROAD NO . 1431 VICTOR W. SAUER , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MARTINEZ , CALIFORNIA May 13 , 1975 r ALHA14BRA VALLEY' ROAD 3 UNDERDRAIN INSTALLATIOtd Proj . No, 1481 -5830-75 N D E X SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF WORK PAGE 1 . Location A-1 2. Description of Work A-1 3 . Contract Documents 4 . Beginning of work, Time of Completion E Liquidated Damages A-I 5 . Permits A-1; SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . Definitions and Terms B-i 2. General B-1 3 . Proposal (Bid) Requirements and Conditions B-1 4 . Award and Execution of the Contract B-3 5 . Scope of Work B-3 - 6. Control of Work B-4 . 7. Control of Materials 3-4. ' 8 . Legal Relations and Responsibility B.-5. ` 9. Prosectuion and Progress B, 8 r ;r 10. Measurement and Payment B-l'0 SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1 . Definition C-1- 2. Labor C-1-- '� 3 . Equipment Rental C-1 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . Lines b Grades D-i f 2. Materials D-1 w - 3 . Public Convenience , Public Safety b Signing D-2 r 4. Obstructions D-4, 5. Measurement and Payment D'- 6. 6. Watering D. 4 7 . Earthwork D-5' 8 . Aggregate Base D-b '' 9. Asphalt Concrete D-6 " 10. Asphalt Concrete Dikes D-7 ' 11 . Underdrains D-7 12 . Sacked Concrete Slope Protection D-8 CC 302 B- 103 1` State D37-B .4 SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1 . LOCATION q e. t � The project is located on Alhambra Valle,y 'Road 1" 1 miles .rest of Reliez ValleyRoad southwest of: Cit ' , y ;o_f`.Mart f nez gyp : 2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK $< The work consists of the construction of 'an' un.d.er, ter; drainage system, pavement replacement , slope protection� and ,`such other items or details , not mentioned above , that are required b,y the Plans, Standard Specifications , or these speciat provisions. to be performed , placed , constructed or installed. 3 . CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The wort: embraced herein shalt conform to . the P1ans.. : : entitled , "ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD .UNDERDRAIN iNS:TALLATION" rJ the Standard Specifications of the State of California , _Busi"ness : , f and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, dated January, 1975 , insofar as the same may apply , these spec iaY °pro ' visions , the Notice to Contractors, the Proposal , the Contract, two contract bonds required herein, any supplemental agreements.. .::` amending or extending the work, working drawings or'..sketche.s ctarfy ing or enlarging upon the work specified herein , and to pertunent y portions of other documents included by reference thereto' in• these >} ;zr, special provisions. 4 . BEGiNNIUG OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION LIQUIDATED ' F DAMAGES Attention is directed to the 'provisions im Sect: on - = 8- 1 .03 , "Beginning of Work," Section 8-1 .06, "Time of Comp,letron ;" and Section 8- 1 ,07 , "Liquidated Damages ," of the Standard Sp;ecifi' x cations and these special provisions . r3 The Contractor shall commence. work upon rece-vpt. 'of x ^ry directions to proceed as stated in the "Notice to, Proceed" i`ssu'ed by the Public Works Department and shall complete the work within' x e the allotted time of : 25 WORKING DAYS counting from and' inCludi'n`g . the day stated as the starting date in the "Notice -to' Proceed' '.-_. The Contractor- shall pay to ;the County of Contra ;Co,s,ta � the sum of $75 per day For each and every CALENDAR DAY of 'de:lay in finishing the work in excess of the number of working days pre scribed above , and authorized extension thereof , 5. PERMITS Attention is directed to Section 7-1 .04, "Permits ,and, pry. Licenses ," of the Standard Specifications and these special' ty . provisions . r Y ;x SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Cont. ) y Grading - The Contractor shall comply with the appIi cable provisions in the County Grading Ordinances (Title: 7- Division 716 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code)._ i.n the process of disposing of the excess material as fill on pri,vat,e f, property within the County. ' f Full compensation for conforming to , Permit require men is shall be considered as included in the pr i`ce- pa,i d. for_.tEe item in which the permit is required_ A - 2 :c 0Q_ - - - _ - - �._. — per.?^*`• q•�, REVISED 2-14-75 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . DEFINITIONS AND TERMS As used herein , unless the context otherwise requires , the following terms have the following meanings : a_ AGENCY means the legal entity for which the work is being performed as in icated on the Notice to Contractors , Proposal and Special Provisions . b. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS means the governing body of the Agency. C. ENGINEER means the Contra Costa County Public Works. Director (Road Commissioner-Surveyor; ex officio Chief Engineer) , or his authorized agent acting within the scope of his authority, r, who is the Agency 's representative for administration of this contract d. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (S.S. ) means the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and Transportation _ Agency , Department of Transportation , (hereinafter sometimes referred to as S. S. ) , dated January, 1975. Any reference therein to the State- of California or a State agency , office or officer shall be inter- preted to refer to the Agency , or its corresponding agency., office or officer acting under this contract. e. EQUIPMEUT RENTAL RATES AND GENERAL PREVAILING !MAGE RATES means the latest edition of the Equipment Rental Rates and General Prevailing Mage Rates of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation , adopted ' annually by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County , and on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . f. OTHER PERTINENT DEFINITIONS - See S. S. Section_I . 2. GENERAL a. State Contract Act. Unless otherwise specified in Section A of these special provisions , or elsewhere by special order-, ' the provisions of the State Contract Act (Government Code Section 14250 et seq. ) shall not apply to this contract, and reference thereto in S .S. Sec. 1 -1 .40 is hereby waived. b . Standard Specifications . The Standard Specifications , (S. S . ) referred to a ove are by reference fully incorporated herein except to the extent that they are modified herein. 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS The provisions of S . S . Sec. 2 shall apply except as modified herein. B - 1 004 YL 7 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS (Cont.} a. Examination of Plans , Specifications , Contract and Site of Work (S.S 2-1 .03) Records of the Department referred to in the second paragraph of S.S . Sec. 2-1 .03 may be inspected in the office of the Public Works Director for the County of Contra. Costa , Martinez, California. b. Proposal (Bid) Forms (S.S. 2-1_05) (1 ) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 concerning the pre-qualification of bidders as a condition to the furnishing. of a proposal form by the department shall not apply. (2) All proposals (bids) shall be made on forms:- to be obtained from the office of the Public Works Director, at, the address indicated on the Special Provisions; no others will be accepted. (3) The requirements of the second paragraph in , S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 are superseded by the following: All proposals (bids) shall set forth for eaci� item of work, in clearly legible figures , an item price and , a total. = n° F4 �' for the item in the respective spaces provided, and shall be signed by the bidder, who shall fill out all blanks in the proposal (bid). form as therein required_ r. (4) The requirements of the last two paragraphs j ` of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 shall not apply. C. Proposal (Bid) Guaranty (S.S. 2-1 .07) The requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .07 are superseded r by .the following ;r (1 ) All proposals (bids) shall be presented under ' " sealed cover. f ' (2) Each proposal (bid) must be accompanied by `a Proposal Guaranty in an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the amount bid. Guaranty may be in the form of cash certified check cashier's check, or bidder's bond payable to the specific Agency. ' d. Competency of Bidders (S.S. 2-1 . 11 ) The requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .11 sha11 not apply.' { Attention is directed to S.S. Sec. 7-1 .01E and the requirements of law referred to therein relating to the Iicensing .of Contractors . r �X B - 2 00047 s `j` t gT 2 SECTIOPI B - GENERAL PROVISIONS r' 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS (Cont. d.Competency of Bidoers 2-1 .11 (Cont.,. )- All bidders must be contractors holding a val:ld - license to perform the required work as. provided by; the Business". and Professions Code, and may be required to submit evidence to, the Agency as to their ability, financial responsibility, and_ experience, in order to be eligible for consideration of'their t� proposal . t 4. AWARD AND EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT (S.S. 3) � f The provisions of S.S. Sec. 3 shall apply except as " 3Z; modified herein. { ,u a. Award of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .01 ) As used in S.S. Sec. 3-1 .01 "Director of Public Works" means the Board of Supervisors . r t b. Contract Bonds (S.S, 3-1 .02) 8 ; The successful bidder shall furnish a Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of the total bid and, a Labor and Materials Bond in an amount of at least fifty percent (50%) of• the total bid, each in the form approved by the Agency.. c. Execution of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .03) ' Within seven (7) days after its submission to him, the successful bidder shall sign the contract and return it, .to=,. : gether with ( 1 ) the contract bonds , and either (2-a) a certificateo of consent to self-insure issued by tie Director of Industrial Relations , or (2-b) a certificate of Workmen's Compensation Insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (2=c) an- exact..copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director or the insurer. A: r sample copy of the Agreement (Contract) to be; executed: by. the' Contractor can be obtained from the County Public Works Department, L: at the address indicated on the Special Provisions. d. The Guaranty of the successful bidderwill- be returned within fifteen (15) days after the contract is fi nal'ly, executed and approved, and Guaranties of other bidders will be returned promptly after the execution of the contract. 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S .S. 4) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 4 shall apply except as modified herein. In lieu of the provisions in the third paragraph in Section 4-1 .03B , "Increased or Decreased Quantities, " of the Standard Specifications , the following shall apply; , Y f -ti B 3 � u,r s - p 9 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S.S . 4) (Cont. ) If the total pay quantity of any major item of work required under the contract varies from the quantity shown on the Proposal by more than 25' percent, in the absence of an executed contract change order specifying the compensation to be paid, the compensation payable to the Contractor will be `.' determined in accordance with Sections 4-1 .0313(1 ) , 4-1 .03B(2) , or 4-1 .038(3) , as the case may be. A major item of work shall be construed to be any item, the total cost of which is equal to or greater than 1`0 percent of the total contract amount, computed on the hasis. of_:. „ the Proposal quantity and the contract unit price. ti. 6. CONTROL OF WORK (S.S. 5) r" The provisions of S .S. Sec. 5 shall apply. ; 7. CONTROL OF MATERIALS (S. S. 6) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 6 shall apply . ,a 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S�:S.7) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 7, except as modified by the agreement { Contract) or these special provisions , apply to this project. a. Insurance (1 ) The Contractor, before performing any work ' under the agreement, shall , at no expense to the Agency obtain and maintain in force the following insurance: (a) With respect to the Contractor's operations : r4 : t 1i B - 4 ; r ,y SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL. RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7)(Cont.}- a. Insurance (Cont. ) (i ) regular Contractor's Public ; Liabilit Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand x Dollars $250,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries s to or death of any one person, and at least Five Hundred Thousand �y Dollars ($500,000) for all damages arising out of bodily , injuries {» to or death of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; { and (i i) regular Contractor's Pro ert . Damage-' ',,,- t Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars. for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property , in any one accident or occurrence and, subject to that imit. per - Y :til accident or occurrence, a total (or aggregate) coverage of at. leastfi One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for all damages arising .out ;� Y`. of injury to or destruction of property during the policy period; and (b) With respect to Subcontractors' operations , Contractor shall procure or cause to 55 procured .in ; : ``' their own behalf: (i ) regularContractor's Protection Public Liability Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars $Z50 ,000) for all damages arising_ out, of bodily injuries. to or death of any one person , and for at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or deaths of two or more persons in any` one .acci`dent._ or occurrence; and (ii ) regular Contractor's Protective3 Progerty Damage Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars 50 ,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or' destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence, and, subject to that limit per accident or occurrence, a total (or f aggregate) coverage of at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction ri.. of property during the policy period; and a (c} Without limitation as to generality of the foregoing subdivisions (a) and (b) , a policy or policies of Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance in amounts not less . than 250 ,000/StOO ,000 Public Liability and $50 ,000 Property Damage Insurance, insuring the contractual liability of , Contractor under the provisions of this Section as hereinafter . stated. THE POLICY OR POLICIES, OR RIDER ATTACHED THERETO, SHALL NAME THE SPECIFIC AGENCY AS A NAMED INSURED. a 00050 s W i SECTION 8 - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) a. Insurance (Cont. ) (2) Form, Term, Certificates (a) The insurance hereinabove specified shall be in form and placed with an insurance company or companies satis.- factory to the County, and shall be kept in full force and effect.; ; until completion to the satisfaction of and acceptance by Agency of all work to be performed by Contractor under the agreement. (b) The Contractor shall furnish, or cause to be furnished, to the Agency certificate(s) of insurance or cert fi e'd copies of the policies of insurance hereinbefore specified. Said . ; certificate(s) shall provide for notice of cancellation to the :Agen' cy at least ten ( 10) days prior to cancellation o'f 'the policy. b, Public Safety The provisions of S.S. Sec. 1 .09 shall apply , except as modified under Section D - "Public Convenience, Public Safety and Signing" of these special provisions. Maintenance of all project signing, portable de f lineators , flashing lights , and other safety devices , shall be: the: responsibility of the Contractor at all times. The Contractor shall respond promptly, when contacted by the Engineer, or other public agencies , to correct improper conditions or inoperative devices . Failure to frequently inspect and maintain lights and barricades in proper operating condition when in .use on the roadway, or failure to respond promptly to notification of im- properly operating equipment, will be sufficient cause for suspension of the contract until such defects are corrected. s` All expenses incurred by the Agencybecause of emergency "call -outs ," for correcting improper conditions ,ar fo,r resetting or supplementing the Contractor's barricades or warning. .:' ` aF devices , will be charged to the Contractor and may be deducted .. . ' from any monies due him. c. Preservation of Property The provisions of Section 7-1 .11 of the Standard F Specifications shall apply to all improvements, facilities , trees . or shrubbery within or adjacent to the construction area that_ are — not to be removed. ,7 Kfi 0005 r B _ SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S . 7) (Cont. ) c. Preservation of Property (Cont.) The last two sentences of paragraph 2 of Section 7- ; : : 1 of the Standard Specifications are superseded by the following: If the Contractor fails to make the necessary repairs to damaged drainage or highway facilities in the vicinity of the construction area or to other damaged facilities or property within the rights- of-way or easements shown on the plans , the Engineer may make or cause to be made such repairs as are necessary to restore the damaged facilities or property to a condition as good as when the Contractor entered on the work. The cost of such repairs shall be borne by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due the Contractor under the Contract. d, Rights-of-stay and Easements The rights-of-way , easements , rights-of-entry , fill permits and other permits acquired by or on behalf of the Agency are, as far as can be determined, adequate for the perfor"- , mance of the work under this contract. Any additional rights-of- way , easements , or permits which the Contractor determines are necessary or convenient for the performance of the work shall be obtained by the Contractor at his expense. e. Access to Construction Site The Contractor shall make his own investigation of the conditions of existing public and private roads and of clearances permits required, restrictions , road and bridge load limits , and other limitations affecting transportation and ingress and egress to the job site. The unavailability of access routes or limitations thereon shall not become the basis for claims against the Agencyor extensions of time for completion of the work. f. Responsibility for Damage The provisions of the sixth , seventh , and eighth paragraphs of S .S. Sec. 7-1 . 12 , regarding retention of money due the Contractor shall not apply. 8 - 7 rt fs SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS -8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) g. Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal Wave or'Earth'quake Subparagraphs A, C, E and F of Section 7-1 .165, "Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal gave or Earthquake, " . of:.the Standard Specifications are amended to read: 1 . Occurrence--"Occurrence" shall include tidal waves , earthquakes in excess of a magnitude. of 3. 5 on the Richter Scale, and storms and floods as to which the Governor has proclaimed a state of emergency when the damaged work is located within the territorial limits, to which such proclamation is applicable or, which were,. in the opinion of the Engineer, of a magnitude at the site of the the work sufficient to have caused such a proclamation had they occurred in a populated area or in an area in. which such a proclamation was not already in effect. ' 2. Protecting the Work from Damage--Nothing in; this section shall be construed to relieve the -Contracto.r of his responsibility to protect the work from damage: . The Contractor shall bear the entire cost of repairing; ' :x damage to the work caused by the occurrence which the Engineer determines was due to the failure of the Contractor to comply with the requirements of the 'Plans and Specifi"ca-_ tions , take reasonable and adequate measures to protect th'e s: ri Bork or exercise sound engineering and construction practices in the conduct of the work, and such repair costsshall- be. , excluded from consideration under the provisions of this section. 3. Determination of Costs--Unless otherwise r agreed between the Engineer and the Contractor, the cost fir of the work performed pursuant to this Section. 7-1 . 165 w will be determined in accordance with the ` provi s%ons in Section 9-1 .03, "Force Account Payment, except that there;. shall be no markup allowance pursuant to Section 9-1,.03A," a "Work Performed by Contractor," unless the Occurrence, that": r` caused the damage was a tidal wave 'or- earthquake. ' The r cost of emergency work, which the Engineer determines would have been part of the repair work if it had not y ti previously been performed.,, will be determined i'n the same '. manner as the authorized repair work.' The cost of repairing damaged work which was not in compliance with.' the-' require- ments of the plans and specifications shall be borne solely _x by the Contractor, and such costs shall not be considered in determining the cost of repair under this Subsection E. , 3 x 1 B - 8 SECTIGN a - GENERAL PROVISIONS a.. 8. LEGAL RELATIOUS AND RESP04SIBILITY (S-S_ 7) (Cont ) 4. Payment for Repair Work--When the Occurrence- that ccurrence that caused the damage was a tidal wave or earthquake, the County will pay the cost of repair, determined as s, provided in Subsection E, that exceeds 5 per cent of the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison ; purposes . When the Occurrence that caused the damage was a : storm or flood, the County will participate in the cost: of the repair determined as provided in Subsection°`E in accordance with the following-.- (a) ollowing:(a) On projects for which the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes is S2 ,+000,000 or less , the County will pay 90 per, cent of the cost of repair that exceeds 5 per cent of the amount of the Contractor's bidfor. , bid comparison purposes . (b) On projects for which the Contractor's. . �- bid for bid comparison purposes is greater than ;2 ,000,000, the County will pay 90 per cent of' the cost of repair that exceeds $100,000: 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS The provisions of S.S. Sec. 8 shall apply except as modified herein . t; ,y ♦ i T~ y ti B - 9 000. SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIOINS 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS ( Cont. ) a. Subcontracting (S.S. 8-1 -01 ) The items of work in the Engineer 's. Estimate ' f preceded by the letters (S) or (S-F) are designated as "Specialty. Items . " b. Assignment (S.S. 8-1 .02) Neither the contract, nor any monies due or to become due under the contract, may be assigned by the Contractor. without the prior consent and approval of the Board of Supervisors , ' nor in any event without the consent of the Contractor's surety' or sureties , unless such surety or sureties have waived their right to notice of assignment. c. Beginning of Work (S.S . 8-1 .03) In lieu of the provisions of S .S . Sec. 8-1 .03, 'the . Contractor will be issued a "Notice to Proceed" by the Engineer y within five (5) working days of the date the contract is approved by the Agency and the working days charged against the contract ; shall be counted from the day stated as the starting date in the "Notice to Proceed. " The Contractor shall not start work prior to the date stated in the "Notice to Proceed" unless_a change to an earlier date is authorized in writing by the Engineer. d. Progress Schedule (S .S. 8-1 .04) The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer a practicable progress schedule before starting any work on the project and, if requested by the Engineer, supplementary progress schedules shall be submitted within five (5) working days af , the Engineer' s written request. e. Time of Completion (S. S. _8-1 .06) - _ µ. The following days are designated as legal holidays : January 1 , February 12, 3rd mon- day in February, last Monday in May, July 4, lst Monday in September, September 9 , 2nd Monday -in October, November 11 , '4th Thursday in 1ovember, December 25, Statewide election days , hours from 12:00 noon to 3:00 p.m. on Good Friday, and any other day established as a general legal holiday by proclamation of the Governor of California or the President of the United States . fr< B - 10 a005 - J� S02t..: SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIOnS k 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS (Cont. ) e. Time of Completion (S.S . 8-1 .06) -('Cont. ) If any of the foregoing holidays falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be considered to be a holiday. 10. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (S.S. 9) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9 shall apply, except as f modified herein. s a. Determination of Rights (S.S. 9-1 .045);' r The provisions of S.S. Sec. 4-1 .045 shall n-at apply b. Partial Payments (S.S, 9-1 .06). > f . r In lieu of conflicting provisions of the third , r paragraph of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .06 and the fourth paragraph of S.S . Sec 11-1 .02, the Agency will withhold .10 percent from any estimated amount due the Contractor. c. Payment of Withheld Funds (S;S, 9-1 .065) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .065 shall not apply`. d. Final Payment (S.S. Seca 9-1 .07) (1 ) Upon satisfactory completion of the entire -, 4 work, the Engineer shall recommend the acceptance of the:.-work. ,: to the Board of Supervisors. If the Board accepts the completed Yom' work, it shall cause a Notice of Completion to be recorded -with ' 4r the County Recorder. " (2) Thirty-five (35) days after the fiIinig, of � = the Notice of Completion , the Contractor shall be entitled to the balance due for the completion and acceptance of the worts, if, he' certifies by a sworn written statementthatall claims for labor. and materials have been paid, and that no claims have been filed with the Agency based upon acts or omissions of. the. Contractor,. rw and that no liens or withhold notices have been fi.1ed. against; y, said work or the property on which the wort: was done. Payment of the balance due will be rade on the day following the regular day for payment of County bills by the County . Auditor. e. Adjustment of Overhead Costs (S.S. Sec. 9-1 -08), The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .08 shall not apply " s Mt B - 11 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 10. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (S.S. 9) (Cont.)_ f. Clerical Errors (S.S. Sec. The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9--1-.09 shall ,not .appl:r 9. All prior partial estimates and, payments shall be. subject to correction in the final estimate- and payment: ' j t. B - 12 t: SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL (S.S. 9-1 .03) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 shall apply-except as modified herein. ;fhb 1 . DEFINITION. As used here, "force account" means— the eans -the method of calculating—payment gpayment for labor, equipment and/or r materials based on actual cost plus specified percentages to cover overhead and profit for work not included as a_ bid " item Jn ;the contract. When extra work is to be pard for on a force account basis , compensation will be determined in accordance with the provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 as modified herein. 2. LABOR. a. The actual wages to be paid, as deffned to S. S. Sec. 9-1 .03A(la) , will be considered to be the prevail-jng, 5 rates in effect at the time the labor isperformed, and no. revision of payment for labor already performed wial be made for " any retroactive increases or decreases in such rates,. - ; b. Premium wage rates will not be paid for any labor employed on force account work unless such rates have been r approved, in writing , by the Engineer. ; The labor surcharge percentage to be a plied to the actual wages paid as provided in Section 9-1 .03A(lb of the Standard Specifications will be 18 percent for all work except that for the following types of work said labor surcharge will be as shown below: Type of Work Performed Labor Surcharge Percent. } Cleaning and painting metal bridge Concrete construction - bridge - - - - 25 Erection of structural metal for metal bridge, excluding sign bridge - - - - - 30 Piledriving , not including cast-in- drilled hole piles - - - - - - - - - - - 23 3. EQUIPMENT RENTAL t`= The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03A(3)' shall apply except as modified herein. �j a . No payment will be made for idle time due to breakdown, lack of operator, weather conditions prohibiting work, or other circumstances beyond the control of the Agency. b. Equipment shall be delivered to the extra ` work site equipped as ordered. , c. Idle time waiting for the arrival of trans- ..... h; porting equipment to move the rented equipment will not be paid for. C 1 0005 �1 Xs SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . LINES E GRADES One complete set of stakes for each of the following . items will be set by the Engineer after notification by the Con- tractor as specified in Section 5-1 .07: (a) Limit lines for sacked concrete slope protection . (b) Underdrain and underdrain outlet. The Engineer shall be the sole judge of the adequacy and sufficiency of the stakes and marks for the purpose for which they are set. If the Contractor requests additional stakes, hubs, lines , grades or marks other than those set by the Engineer, the cost of labor, equipment and materials required to comply with the Contractor ' s request shall be deducted from any monies due or to- become o become due the Contractor. ;. The cost of labor, equipment and materials involved, in resetting stakes destroyed or displaced because of the following reasons , will be deducted from any monies due. or to become due the Contractor: (a) Negligence in use of construction equipment. (b) Stakes ordered by the Contractor that are not used for a long period of time and are lost in the interim. (c) Poor planning of sequence of operations by the Contractor. 2. MATERIALS "= Certificates of Compliance will be required for perfor ated steel pipe and non-perforated steel -pipe. The asphalt concrete mix design shall be designated, by the Contractor subject to the approval of the Engineer. The Contractor shall provide the Engineer a minimum mix design review period of four working days for a design from an "approved" com- . mercial plant and five continuous working days for a design from. a "non-approved" commercial plant. For "non-approved" plants, the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary aggregate samples . The Contractor shall give the Engineer not less than 4 working days advance notice to permit adequate testing and plant' rr� inspections of materials for asphalt concrete and aggregate base, w from recognized commercial plants. The relative compaction will be determined by comparison r> with the maximum density as determined by Test Method No. Calif. 216. The field density may be determined by Test Method No. Calif. 216 or by nuclear density gage determination (Test Method. No. , Calif. 231 . ) r P- r SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ` 3. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING All signing , barricades , and traffic control shall con- ;r form to the "Manual of Warning Signs , Lights , and Devices for use , µms: in performance of work upon County Highways" (RevisedMarch 1974, ,, Contra Costa County) . GAa The Contractor will be allowed to close-Alhambra .Valley . Road to through traffic for one calendar day for the construction of: r< the underdrain outlet , but shall not include any Saturday, Sunday, or` legal holiday. The closure period may begin at 9:00 a.m. and. sha-11 . continue until construction of the underdrain outlet is completed-, - ru but no later than midnight of that day. Passage of emergency yehici"es `' shall be provided for at all times . <` The Contractor shall secure the approval of the time and date of road closure from the Engineer at least 72 hours ahead ' - of the proposed closure. The Contractor shall post road closure signs as directed by the Engineer at the locations shown on the plans 48 hours in advance of road closure and shall remove these signs at the end of the closure. Road closure shall- be permitted only in the presence of the Engineer. In order that all unnecessary delay to the traveling ' public may be avoided , the road closure. shall not be placed into effect until all labor, materials, and equipment necessary to pro- secute the work without delay are at the jobsite. Other construction operations shall be performed i'n such a manner that there will be at least one i6-foot-wide traffic lane open to public traffic at all times. At the end of the d'ay ' s . work and when construction operations are not in progress , a passageway shall be maintained through the work of sufficient . width to provide for two 10-foot-wide paved traffic lanes for public traffic. The Contractor shall bear the entire cost of furnishing, . (except those signs shown on the plans to be County furnished) installing , maintaining and removing all signs (including County: furnished signs) , lights , barricades and other warning and safety- devices . afety devices . Signs shown on the plans to be furnished by the County, ' together with 4" x 4" wood posts , galvanized carriage bolts and brackets for assembly shall be picked up by the Contractor at the County Maintenance Yard Sign Shop on Shell Avenue between Marina Vista and Pacheco Boulevard in Martinez. The Contractorshall notify the Engineer at least one ( 1) working day in advance of the time he proposes to pick up the signs , posts and fasteners . D - 2 00, SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3 . PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING (Cont.) Signs shall be erected and covered with burlap prior. to commencing any other work on the contract. Covering shali`;be .,',, removed immediately preceding the start of work when directed by t the Engineer. Wood posts shall be securely set a minimum of Z' - 611 : in the ground and shall be located so that the attached sign is. at least two feet clear of the edge of pavement. Signs shall be placed on the post to provide a five-foot clearance between the , sign and the pavement or ground surface. Exceptions to the location provisions of this paragraph shall only be on the written approval. of the Engineer. Upon completion of the project and at a time directed by the Engineer, the signs , barricades and lights shall be taken down , dismantled; and the County furnished signs and posts sha'ii k` be delivered to the County Maintenance Yard Sign Shop on Shell Avenue. Lane closure shall conform to the provisions in Section. 7-1 .092, "Lane Closure," of the Standard Specifications except that the taper length for each lane width of closure' shal:l be : l > determined by the Contractor and approved by the Engineer prior to its use. The Contractor shall also provide and station competent flagmen in advance of the closure. The sole duty of the flagmen shall be to direct traffic around the work. Attention is directed` to Section 7-1 .095 "Flagging Costs." Full compensation for conforming to the provisions in, Section 7 of the Standard Specifications and these special pro visions for furnishing ail labor, including one-half of fiagg.ing � { costs , materials , tools , equipment , and incidentals; and for. installing, maintaining and removing all signs ,: lights,'.and `barrix 'fr cades as shown on the plans , as specified herein ,. and as .directed ,_' by the Engineer , including picking up, hauiing and. return`ing County-furnished signs , and posts , shall be considered as included>- in the contract lump sun: price paid for Signing and Traffic Control , and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. The replacement cost of all County-furnished material, . lost or damaged between the time it is removed from and returned to the Shell Avenue Naintenance Yard Sign Shop shall be borne" by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due to the Contractor under the contract. Payment shall be made in increments of the contract lump sum price for Signing and Traffic Control in the following manner: D - 3 0QG SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SiGNING'(Cont.) Initial Increment - 50 percent of the lump sum price upon satisfactory completion of installat►on of construction signs and barr'ic"ades. }w Final Increment - Balance of the lump sum price upon satisfactory completion of removal > r and dismantling of all signs; lights, ` = = barricades , posts and f.raming ,. and delivery of County-.furnished materials to the Shell Avenue Maintenance .Yard' Sign Shop. 4. OBSTRUCTIONS Attention is directed to the presence of overhead utilities in the construction area . The Contractor shall give the utility companies two (2) working days advance notice before work may start . The work specified shall be so conducted as to permit the utility companies to maintain their services without) nterruption Abandoned pipe lines , conduits , culverts and foundations , if encountered , shall be removed and disposed of off the job site, in accordance with the provisions in Section 7-1 . 13 , "Disposai: of ' Materials Outside the Highway Right of Way," of the Standard Specifications. 1 Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this special provision, not otherwise provided for, shall be considered; {, r_- as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work, and no separate payment will be made therefor. z= ` 5. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ry :,,.. Attention is directed to Section 9-1 .0.15, "Final Pay �4 Quantities ," of the Standard Specifications , the provisions of 'which` are applicable to three bid items on this contract . 6. WATERING Full compensation for developing water supply and applying water , including water used to control dust resulting, from contractor ' s performance of the work and for the purpose of controlling dust caused by public traffic, shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involving the use of water, and no separate payment will be. made therefor. D - 4 oq� r SECTION 0 - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 7 . EARTHWORK The provisions in Section 19-2.02, "Unsuitable Material ., of the Standard Specifications , providing for payment for removal and disposal of unsuitable material as extra work shall not apply.. ,The: . removal and disposal of all unsuitable material will be paid for 'at the contract price per cubic yard for the ciass of material. for the .,- quantity involved. At the option of the Contractor , backfill materiae con- forming to the requirements for Class 2 aggregate base may .be used for structure backfill in lieu of excavated material as shown on` the r - plans. Class 2 aggregate base shall be used for structure back fill beneath the pavement section placed across the roadway (Profile Underdrain Outlet) . Full compensation for furnishing and placing Class 2 aggregate base as structure backfill shall be considered . r° as included in the contract price paid per cubic yard; for "Structure wY Backfill" and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. Excavated material may be used for structure backfill, where shown on the pians. Pay limits for structure excavation and backfill shall be as shown on the plans. Reiative compaction shall not be less than 90 percents. It is anticipated that there will be an. excess of about 245 .cubic yards of material from structure excavation which shall' be disposed of by the Contractor off the job site , in accordance with the provisions in Section 7-1 . 13 , "Disposal of Material Outside : z> the Highway Right of Way," of the Standard . Specifications. � r Pieces of pavement over six inches in greatest dimension; ' remaining exposed or loose after compaction , shall beiremoved and; = FA disposed of as directed by the Engineer. "z Full compensation for scarifying , recompacting , and removing and disposing of oversize material shall be considered .as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of 'work, and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. `L The Contractor and his Engineer shall retain the respon sibility for the correctness and adequacy of the design and the , implementation of the "Trench Excavation Safety Plans," (SS Section ; 5-1 .02A) during the course of the construction work. The review of the plan by the County Public Works Department will not `relieve the Contractor and his Engineer of the above responsibility. D - 5 A .ti: s- SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Y ' 7. EARTHWORK (Cont. ) Full compensation for preparing the plan , constructing-1: .° ' the planned shoring or protection and removing the planned, shoring or protection shall be considered as included in the contract lump sum price for "Shoring and Protection," and no additional compensation, ­-­,­,.­ will ompensation ,will be allowed therefor . F: Full compensation for furnishing and placing concrete for the Class C concrete block at the trench junction (Detail E/3 . of ""z '_ the plans) shall be considered as included in the contract price; ; paid per cubic yard for "Structure Backfill ". and no additional " compensation will be allowed therefor. 8. AGGREGATE BASE Aggregate base shall conform to the provisions in- Section. 1 a` 25 of the Standard Specifications and these speciai .provisi'ons . x Aggregate base shall be Class 2 and shall conform to. ; the grading for the 1 -1/2 inch maximum or 3/4 inch maximum grading. x The aggregate base provided must comply wholly with the speci-ficatioFt for 1 -1/2 inch maximum or 3/4 inch maximum. A`combination of "the.' v two separate specifications will not be permitted. Full compensation for furnishing and applying all water. after the material has been delivered to the roadbed, shall be considered as included in the contract price paid per square .foot for "Pavement Section ," and no separate payment will be made'.`therefor. ` ' F X;y 9. ASPHALT CONCRETE �r .nn Asphalt concrete shall be Type B conforming to .the pro visions in Section 39, "Asphalt Concrete," of the Standard -Specifi x` cations and these special provisions . Unless otherwise directed by the Engineer, asphalt binder to be mixed with the mineral aggregate shall be steam- refined paving asphalt having a viscosity grade of AR 4000 ._ _ Aggregate shall conform to the grading specified. i.n , Section 39-2.02, "Aggregate," of the Standard Specifications for. `.; one-half-inch maximum, medium- grading. Paint binder shall be asphaltic emulsion , Type RSI . The asphalt concrete shall be spread in two layers each of 0. 15-foot thickness. The Contractor shall furnish and use canvas tarpaulins to cover all loads of asphalt concrete from the time that the mixture is loaded until it is discharged from the delivery vehicle: Yk. o — b 00 M. atl k. �r u; SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 9- ASPHALT CONCRETE (Cont.) ;f Conforms between existing pavement and newly constructed . ` ' pavement shall be made by cutting the existing pavement to a neat, , . smooth line at the conform line and constructing a `vertical'-face' butt joint, r`:<`'r The contract price paid per square foot for, "Pavement, <c`t Section" shalt include full compensation for the following.- (a) ollowing:(a) Furnishing and placing asphalt concrete and aggregate base (detail 8/2 of the plans) <_ (b) Construction and removal of temporary trench pa.ving `; (c) Cutting existing pavement for all conform work (d) Furnishing and applying asphaltic emulsion (e) Excavation and construction of asphalt concrete- apron oncrete apron 10. ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKES Asphalt concrete dikes shall conform to the provisions. in Section 39, "Asphalt Concrete," of the Standard Specificationsa and these special provisions . aY, Fog seal coat conforming to the provisions -in Section 37 , "Bituminous Seals ," of the Standard Specifications, shall be, app] ied to the completed dikes. Xw" Full compensation for fog seal coat , shaping of dikes at the tapered inlet as shown on the plans, and for furnishing asphalt concrete placed as dikes , shall be considered as ' included r in the contract price paid per linear foot for "Asphalt. Concrete: Dike" and no separate payment will be made therefor. a 11 . UNDERDRAINS Underdrains shall conform to the provisions. . in Section 68- 1 , "Underdrains ," of the Standard Specifications and these:" special provisions. N. Underdrain pipe shall be fabricated of perforated 'r steel pipe and the Underdrain outlet shall be nonperforated- steelz pipe- The use of slip joint couplers will be allowed. t D - 7 r SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS H . UNDERDRAINS (Cont . ) Permeable material shall conform to the provisions in Section 68- 1 .025 for Class 1 , Type A. The Contractor shall exercise care when placing permeable material around and over underdrains so that dirt and other foreign L` matter shall not be mixed in with the material . All permeable material that has become mixed with foreign material to such an extent as , in the judgment of the Engineer, to impair the quality of the permeable material , shall be rejected . No payment - - will be made to the Contractor for rejected permeable material . The contract unit price paid per each for "Terminal Riser" and for "Riser" shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor , materials , tools , equipment , and incidentals and for doing all the work involved in installing the risers to the under - drain pipe , complete in place, as shown on the plans , as specified. in the Standard Specifications and -these special provisions, and- as directed by the Engineer. The underdrain system shall ' be flushed after construction < f< The cost of flushing shall be considered as included -in the various items of work. and no additional compensation will be made therefor 12. SACKED CONCRETE SLOPE PROTECTION Sacked concrete slope protection shall conform to the provisions in Section 72, "Slope Protection ," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions . The contract price paid per cubic yard for "Sacked Concrete Slope Protection" shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor , materials , tools , equipment , and incidentals , and for doing all work involved in excavating for and constructing the sacked concrete slope protection and installing weepholes , r complete in place , as shown on the plans , as specified in the Standard Specifications and these special provisions , and as directed by the Engineer. D - 8 00 ' -.--fitw r V »x At y� n Xao s VJ� mu 3 • It < V.1swoo.1 s41 L♦ iryt �- ? O so 49 to it 10 oc lit + � Of# ® rxPIZ jr !s 40 +� b � w�ei•=�. r u - •�i+yYt M Will �w t;YS � ,� � � �•O aq-ii e,w r r S K « i Y t v in "� 1_�t# ; 4� •q 4 e Y $ ii! '' •+ � � `'u'�:1 > t1�'�� 'fig s r o `*�` +- i.A O P.�.'d �""� ,<,R ,,,Ii.r � - is w w E*«'�� r' ��k .�'.b' �, Q �!"'�yliY47R•i=tY4 i �Y:�a �4�« '—`...:1.. -oa ut 'Z1 = ` yob • •S 7 4+ Z '(( (S(t` a Trv zF= tc F�� d t ice• if* j Cy g 3.0 i ♦ _ Y •%A ",- �< « J �s♦i"'+ is Z OOs # of-�#_• { «. .. a 00 .. �! � �� •z,e� �Y a$w .rw• i,,�S 4 i n Q i .�` d b • 4 0 �4 f i»I o0 Eli sofa°a' � S �8 y w�' dD• ((� Sri �� u! � t � M 00 off► fi 00 Sgrid 4tZ V fOQ Q Z u z sos Y tt t- t-� d1yAsk � . ,. U E► � At '� 2 3 r ��. i� a�A ci ds Sid� CIO Ile Z .�L A 4� z ;to ti o Cl 3 � Najd n r., u aft tiytY! z t- Z b F ILI� to ani -10 ct t' ¢ pitVi a � �o rp i„ S ` 0.•-^78"" 4 ct L 1. � i• R O 6(w1 'gas t bF `""aZ 4 It rw 3'"• b t �."'r .rG�'°''6 S+.a+J'x+h W'ai'�...-�-.�«� R o " o•r• watt } c`. + =♦ 3 1 �: it •`a t b 7. � •� ' � c • 4� ab /� Z tj r t i NR4 tlA�Y rj� J ,Ot r� rp. 3 cr y i 4's i!Q i•_ J cr r Al.f .....-.` �3,���,,•t� "'� �`s fit" 4 s Jc i» .R.J"Yi6'O c �t r 1•r a o� N "a"•ti Q 1 { : t L i 4yai r A d S pmt Z ut on d 5 i 26 5 e T ng f '�Y z�l� I< , All i CL 5 on • 4 1 t � � .s� '� sr w1_ ry � ..� �p ..� Cc 65 r y,. r s IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the Map of Subdivision 4566, ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/365 Byron Area. ) WHEREAS a nap entitled Subdivision 4566, property located in tjie Byron area, having been presented to this Board for approval, said map having been certified by the proper officials, and being accompanied by: . 1. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no - unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1974-1975 tax lien has been paid in full and the 1975-1976 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day r j of March 1975, is estimated to be $20,000; r a. Certificate of Deposit No. '6585-023013 issued by Wells:'Fargo Bank, payable to Contra Costa County, in theamountof $20,000 guaranteeing the payment of estimated 1975-1976 tax; Certificate of deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 125905, dated May 12, 1975), in the amount of $20,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Certificate of Deposit and the amount thereof be and the same are hereby APPROVED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said map be and the same is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 13, 1975. i! cc: Public Works Director Planning Director Discovery Bay Corporation P. 0. Box 85 Byron, California 9 .514 RESOLUTION NO. 75/365 00d 1-JUEN RECORDED, RE-LURN RECORDED AT REQUEST OF OY A.&& TO CLERK BOARD OF at o'clock M. SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County Records J. R. OLSSON, County Recorder. Fee . S Official BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COU111TY, CALIFOPaTIA _ In the Matter of Accepting and Giving RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE Notice of Completion of Contract with 3 dnd NOTICE OF COMPLETION Weiri k & Zimmerman (Ballding (C.C. §§3086, -3093) Maintenance Job #1456) . RESOLUTION 110. Z�j66 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: r: The County of Contra Costa on March 12, 1974 contracted vrith Weirick & Zimmerman, P. 0. Box 716, Danville, California 94526 Name and Address of Contractor) for construction of the electrical system at the County Hospital_ Mprtinpm_ ra11form p with The Ohio CasuaZtv Insuranceo as surety,. Name of Bonding Company for work to be performed on the grounds of the County; and The Public: )forks Director reports that said work has been inspected and complies with the approved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of May 13, 1975 Therefore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the Cov.aty Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract. Contract time is extended 213 days inasmuch as the contractor was delayed for a variety of reasons over which he had no control. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON May 13, 1975 ' CERTIFICATI021" and VERIFICATIOi! I certify that the forego tig is a true and correct copy of a. resolu- tion and acceptaance duly adopted and entered on the minutes of tihis Board's meeting on the above date. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foreoofng is t--:e and correct. Dated: May 13, 1975 J. R. OLSSO?:, County Clerk &: at :•.artineZ, California ex officio Clerk of the Board By Mildred 0. Ballard .Daputy Clerk cc: Recore re turn Contractor Auditor Public -ork s Administrator RESOLJTIOZI 1;0. 75/366 Form ;F9. 000" 1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONt`RA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r Re: Erroneously Gollected $15.00 ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/367 Charge for Vendor's Permit #3034. ) TAX COLLECTOR'S HERO: On April 21, 1975, Dewy A. Upton, nt. 1, Box 382, Vierra Avenue, Antioch,, California 94509, came into this office and applied for a Vendor's Permit. Mr. Upton was charged $15.00 for the first quarter of his permit. Under Article 56-4,406 veterans are exempted from fees and Hr. Upton, being a veteran, should not have been charged. Therefore, I now request a refund in the amount of $15.00 to be issued to Dewy A. Upton. DATIM: May 5, 1975 r MWARD k'. LEAL, Tax Collector I consent to the above refund- ' JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County;Counsel x x x x x-x-x-x-x-x x x BOARD'S ORDER: Pursuant to Article 56-4.406, the Auditor is ORDERED to REMID. , PASSED ON May 13, 1975, by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. EWI/j M cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector RESOLUT?OU NO. 75/ 367 _0001& O V V fes' +bv IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF -- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/368 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1974-75 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and .what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on theroll should be corrected; and, FURTHER, in accordance with Section 4985 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee, heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled if it is impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to delinquency date, upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date cor- rection is entered on the roll or abstract record; and, FURTHER, in accordance with Section 4986 (a) (2) the County Auditor should be directed to cancel all or any portion of any tax, penalty, or interest on that portion in error as if it had been levied errone- ously. For the fiscal years 1973-74 and 1974-75, in Tax Rate Area 02002, Parcel No. 105-163-012-5, assessed to John E. F Mary A. Doyle, has been erroneously assessed with land value of $1,810 and Improvement value of $5,900, due to this parcel's not having been picked up by the computer at the time the area in which this prop- erty is located was reappraised. Therefore, this assessment should be corrected to read as follows: Land $3,200; Improvements $6,300;. . less the existing Homeowner's .Exemption of $1,750; making a net taxable assessed value of $7,750. Assessee has been notified. R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copies to: Assessor (Airs. Kettle) Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 75/368 Page I of 2 OCC l3 r ,r In Tax Rate Area 66009, Parcel No. 207-.330-00170, assessed to Morrison Homes Corporation, has been erroneously assessed with land value of $3,250 and Improvement value :of- $3,375, - due-to-,,via, uelr' being based on incorrect percentage of completion of .the-property° 1. Therefore, this assessment should be corrected to .read as, follows '," Land $2,750; Improvements $375; making a total assessed value of $3,125. I hereby.; consent to- .the above changes and/or'`corrections:;? J0 ;;County, Counsely' r Assistant Assessor tS/2/7S By J e PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975., it sr J k RESOLUTION NO. 75/368 page 2 of 2 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CO?iTRA COSTA COM.Tr CALIFQR21IA Re: Cancel Delinquent Penalties and ) Costs on Second Installments on MESMUTION NO. 75/369 the 1974-75 Secured Assessment ) Roll. ) TAI COL.ZCTOR'S HERO: 1. On the parcel numbers listed below, penalties sad costs have attached.' to the second installments due to inability to complete valid procedures prior, to the delingrient date. Having received payments, I now request cancellation. of the 6% penalties and costs pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4985.- 033-070-003-0 189-160-004-9-01 088-387-009-9 233-060-01.8-5 115-131-013-1 520-132-0l4_5-o1 129-432-014-6 538-151-006-3 2. On parcel number 271-291-005-4-01 payment was not applied.to. the applicable tax bill due to clerical error which resulted in penalty and cost attaching. I now request cancellation of the penalty and cost pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 4986 (1)(b) and 4985• 3. Also, on parcel numbers 110-120-030-9 and 262-192-002-0-01 the penalties and costs have attached to the second installments due to inability.. to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date. I now request cancellation of these penalties and costs pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4985 and payment may be wade within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll. Dated: May 1, 1975 ' EMARD W. ZEAL, Tax Collector I consent to these cancellations- JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By: • , Asst. By: Deputy BOARD'S ORDER: Pursuant to the above statutes and showing that these uncollected penalties and costs attached due to inability to complete valid procedures and clerical error, the Auditor is ORDERED to CANCEL them. PASSED Q.1 May 13, 19750 by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. A-FL:jam cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 75/369 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORidIA Re: Cancel Delinquent Penalties and 370 Costs on Second Installments an RESOLUTION NO. 75/ the 1971 -75 Secured Assessment Roll. ) TAX COLLECTOR'S HERO: ` 1. On the parcel numbers listed below 6% penalties and costs have attached to the second installments due to inability to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date. Having received payments, I now request cancellation of the penalties and costs pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11985. 149-061-012-6 187-090-005-5 187-090-006-3 187-090-007-1 187-090-008-9 271-020-018-5 Dated May 51 1975 EIh:ARD N. LEAL, Taos Collector I consent to the above cancellations. JOHMBEK , County Counsel eL. Ctlt� 1)4utyl- X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X XYx-]CX X-xxXxxYX-JCxXxJ - -7lxK- - - - BOARD'S ORDER: Pursuant to the above statute and shoving that these uncollected delinquent penalties and costs attached because of inability to complete valid procedures prior to the delinquent date, the Auditor is ORDERED to CANCEL them: PASSED ON May 1 3, 1975, by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. i ; 0.,M:jam } cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector soLu�ox uo. 75/ 370 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the ?fatter of the Cancellation of ' Uncollected Penalty & Interest On ) , RESOLUTION r0. 75[371 Assessment Reduced by Assessment ) • Appeals Board/Officer. ) (Rev. &- Tax C. 1§2922.5, 41985) Auditor's '4emo: Pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code Secs. 2922.5 and-498S,_I recommend cancellation from the following assessments on the unsecured roll, -of" , penalties and interest which have attached erroneously because such-assessments' were reduced by the Assessment Appeals Board or the Assessment Appeals Hearing Officer. I consent to this cancellation. H. DONNLD FUNK, JOHN B. CLAUSE4, County Counsel County Auditor-Controller By: 7" 7�Puty By: Deputy . The Contra Costa County Boardoof Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the- above authority and recommendation, the County Auditor shall cancel penalties and interest on the following unsecured assessments: For Year 1974-75 85127-2031 8001-8019 14002-2119 y rr y Ti. PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 13 ., 1975 by unanimous vote of the Supervisors present County Auditor 1 County Tax Collector 2 (Secured) ' (Redemption) RESOLUTION M. T5/371 NOW i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1n the Matter of ) Temporary suspension of ) RESOLUTION No. 75/ 374 no parking regulations ) Walnut Creek area. ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to Mr. David F. Leary's 4-23-75 request this Board hereby temporarily suspends the "no parking" regulation in force along that northerly portion of Lilac Drive between Newell Avenue and extending easterly to the Walnut Creek City Limits for the period from May 13, through June 15, 1975. The "no parking" traffic, regulation which is temporarily suspended is Traffic Resolution No. 1874, and after such temporary suspension they shall otherwise remain in full force and effect. The County's Public Works Department is hereby directed, for the period of this temporary suspension, to cover all existing "no parking signs" along the section of Lilac Dr;ve- ` upon which parking will be temporarily allowed. PASSED on May 13, 1975 1975 unanimously by Supervisors present. y rc: Public rdorks Director County Counsel County Administrator 14r. D. F. Leary RESOLUTION No. 75/ 374 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AND ORDER APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING THE ACQUISITIONS TO BE MADE AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1975-1, SAN RAMON SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, on the 8th day of April, 1975, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of Cali- fornia, adopted its Resolution of Intention in Assessment District No. 1975-1, San Ramon Sewerage Improvements, Contra . Costa County, California, for the acquisitions to be made in said assessment district and referred said proposed acquisi- tions to CREEGAN D'ANGELO, Engineer of Work for said assess- ment district; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of April, 1975, the said Engineer of Work filed an Engineer's Report, Assessment and Assessment Diagram in accordance with said Resolution, and said Engineer's Report was presented to the Board of Supervi- sors of the County of Contra Costa for consideration; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of April, 1975, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa preliminarily adopted said Engineer's Report and fixed Tuesday, the 13th day of May, 1975, at the hour of 11:30 o'clock A.M. of said day, at the meeting place of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, located in the Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing pro- tests with relation to said proposed acquisitions; and -1- RESOLUTION NO. 75/375 , m - WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution hereinabove mentioned a Notice of Improvement was duly published, posted and mailed, giving notice of the time and place of hearing on said Report; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1975, said hearing was held; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that this Board does hereby find, determine and order as follows: 1. That the district benefited by said acquisitions, and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, - is more particularly described in the Resolution of Inten- tion hereinabove referred to and made .a part hereof by refer- ence thereto. Said Resolution of Intention also excepts from the district to be benefited the area of all public streets, avenues, lanes, roads, drives, courts, places, public parks, and all easements and rights-of-way therein contained belong- ing to the public, and also all property owned by the County of Contra Costa, the State of California or the United States of America, contained therein, now in use in the performance of a public function. 2. That the Estimate of Cost of the itemized and total estimated cost and expenses of the acquisitions, and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, which said Estimate of Cost is on file with the County Clerk of the CLunty of Contra Costa, be, and it is hereby, finally adopted and approved as the Engineer's total and detailed -2- RESOLUTION NO. 75/375 estimate of the costs and expenses of said acquisitions. 3. That the acquisitions to be made, as described in the Resolution of Intention, and the Engineer's Report on file with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa, are hereby approved, and all of the matters contained in said Engineer's Report are approved and confirmed. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa further finds that the public convenience and interest require, and hereby orders the acquisitions to be made as described in and in accord-. ance with said Resolution of Intention and said Engineer's Report. Reference to both the Resolution of Intention and the Engineer's-Report is hereby made for a more particular description of the acquisitions herein approved, confirmed and ordered. 4. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa does hereby levy and apportion upon each and every lot, piece and parcel of land within the boundaries of the assess- ment district the amount by which each of said lots, pieces or parcels of land is benefited by the acquisitions. The amount of the assessment which is levied and apportioned upon each and every lot, piece and parcel of land within the bound- aries of the assessment district is as shown on the assess- ment attached to and made a part of the Engineer's Report adopted by this Resolution. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa hereby finds and determines that each of said lots, pieces or parcels of land within the boundaries of said district is benefited in the amount and in the -3- RESOLUTION NO. 75/375 000K proportion of the total cost of the acquisitions, plus inci- dental expenses, which each of said lots, pieces or parcels of land has been assessed in said Engineer's Report. S. Collections of assessments. shall be made by the County Treasurer of the County of Contra Costa. 6. In the event any surplus remains in the Improve- ment Fund after the completion of the improvements and the payment of all claims from the Improvement Fund, said surplus shall be distributed in accordance with Section 10427 of the Streets and Highways Code. -4- RESOLUTION NO. 75/375 � ��' ,n l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13: , 19 75 In the Metter of Police Cost for Contracting RESOLUTION MEMBER 754377• With Other Jurisdictions. WHEREAS the county has indicated its willingness to supply certain requested services to local public jurisdictions' at cost; and- WHEREAS the county has entered into contractural service arrangements with several jurisdictions; and WHEREAS the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement-Police Protection Services requires a city to notify the county annually as to the desired level of law enforcement for the forthcoming fiscal year, and this the cities of Lafayette and Moraga have done; and WHEREAS the county is then required to fix, by resolution, the estimated annual unit cost and estimated annual total cost of police services as requested for each fiscal year; and WHEREAS the Office of the County Auditor-Controller has computed estimated annual unit costs for fiscal year 1975-1976 per patrolman ( ,767) , patrol vehicle ($20,209) and investigative personnel (W,408) ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that for the level of service requested by the cities of Lafayette and Moraga for fiscal year 1975-1976 (16 patrolmen, 4.5 patrol vehicles, and 2.75 investi gative personnel) the total estimated annual cost will be $725,834, said total cost to be paid by the cities at a ratio to be decided by the two cities. = PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975 cc: City Clerk, Cities of Lafayette and Moraga County Sheriff-Coroner County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director H 24 12ngg4gLy Administrator RESOLUTION MiMR 75/377 I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 In the Matter of Authorizing the ) Filing of Application for Federal ) and State Grants for Publicly ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/378 Owned Wastewater Treatment Works ) and Providing Certain Assurances. ) ) BE IT BY TEE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLVED that i-fr. Victor W. Sauer, Engineer Rx Officio, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of the Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 5, an Application for Federal Assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 at seq) and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and receive a grant under said act and a state grant under the Clean 'dater Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974 for construction of wastewater treatment works. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if grants for its project are .made pursuant to the aforementioned federal and state statutes, . it will comply with all applicable state and federal statuatory and regulatory requirements, including but not limited to the Assurances contained in the Federal Grant Application and the State Grant Contract, The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended relating to the right of the public to obtain informa- tion and records, The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, U.S.C. 470 at seq, as amended, relating to thereservation of historic landmarks, The Copeland (Anti-Kickback Act, 18 U.S.C. 874, 40 U.S.C. 276c and the regulations issued thereunder, 29 CFR 3.1 at seq, and The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 327 at seq, and the regulations issued thereunder. PASSED AND ADOPTED on May 13, 1975. cc: County Counsel County Auditor-Controller County Administrator Haalth Dspartmant .Public Norks Director Environmental Control RESOLUTION NO . 75/378 1 _ IN T6T BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Satisfaction } of Lien(s), Termination of ) t2ESOLUTION NO. 75/379 Reimbursement Agreement(s). } 1:HSREAS instrument(s) dated May 13 , 1975 wbich 'provide4 s)% that for valuable consideration(s) bad _MW recelved Wme County -of. Contra Costa, any and all liens created by virtue of reimbursement agreement(s) and notice (io), of lien(s) executed by the following person(s) or granting of aid and assistance to said person(s) is (are) hereby satisfied, and all real and personal property .of -said person(s) is (are) released from the said lien(s) and said referred-to reim- bursement agreement(s) is (are) canceled and the agency created is hereby terminated, are presented to this Board, to wit: Name Date Executed Joan Funkhouser August 11 , 1960 NOL', THEREFORE, IT IS BY TEE BOARD RESOLVED that said instrument(s) be and the same is (are) hereby APPROVED and the: Chair man of the Board is AUTHORIZED to execute said instruments) on behalf of the County of Contra Costa. PASSED and ADOPTED this 13th day of May cc: County Auditor-Controller Central Collections County Counsel County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 75/379 y �n TEXIMaTION OF REEMBMEMENr t4REEMENT s The REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT and NOTICE OF LIEN executed on Aurctst 11, 2960 by Joan FWNWUmes -, and recorded in the official records in the office- of.the County Recorder of this County on Arsggtst 12, 1960 in Volume _ 36M at page 578 is hereby released. F Dated; May 13, 1975 By order of the Board of Supervisors. j / �. {V/ OF THE BOARD O VIS, ;a ""Contra Costa Coun STATE OF CALIFORNIA s County of Contra Costa On (date) May 13, 1975 before. me, 'Fi Robbie 6utiE a deputy county clerk of this, county, personally appeared James P• Kenny ; known to me to be the person who subscribed this instrument'and to , the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of this County and.'acknow ledged that he executed it. J. R. OtSSON I ►��� County Clerk s —J Twr Duty C ty Cle ;, �f rta': RESOLUTION NO. 75/380 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT�BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AND M.G.M. CONSTRUCTION CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM, AND APPROVING BONDS, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1973-3,; SAN RAMON, , K;`p CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SA' BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of M Contra Costa, State of California, that contract dated the 29th ; tj day of April, 1975, by and between the County of Contra Costa and M.G.M. Construction Company, a corporation, for -the construe *' tion of the water supply system in Assessment District. No: 1973-3, ` t ; San Ramon, Contra Costa County, California, is hereby approved—and. `- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of nt Supervisors be authorized to sign, and the County Clerk thereof be authorized to attest, said agreement; and a BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Labor and Material Bond.' = r; and the Faithful Performance Bond to secure the performance of" said contract and to secure payment.of labor-and material claims" be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa. in F said matter, which said Labor and Material Bond_ 'and said Faithful Performance Bond are hereby approved. PASSEL AND ADOPTED on May 13, 1975. _ {J RESOLUTION NO. 75/380 h� g 00047 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 29th day of April, 1975, by and between M. G. M. CONSTRUCTION CO., a corporation of the State of California, First Party, and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, Second Party, under and by virtue of the authority granted to it by an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" and amendments thereto, which said Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 is now embodied in the* Streets . and Highways Code of the State of California; - W I T N E S S E T H That, whereas, First Party (as will more fully appear by . reference to the proceedings of the Board of Supervisors of the - County of Contra Costa on the 8th day of April, 1975) has been awarded the contract for the water supply system to be constructed in Assessment District No. 1973-3, San Ramon, Contra Costa County, Calif- ornia, and described in the Resolution of Intention, as amended, for the doing of said work, which Resolution of T_ntention, as amended, was passed by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa on the 4th day of September, 1973, and as described in the Second Amended Engineer's Report, and the plans and specifications for said water water supply system; and NOW, THEREFORE, -these presents witnesseth that for and in consideration of the full and complete performance of the covenants _ herein mutually agreed to be performed, the parties hereto do coven- ant and agree as follows: Said First Party promises and agrees to do or perform or cause to be performed in a good and workmanlike manner under the in-. spection of the officials of the County of Contra Costa, and in accord- ance with the plans and specifications for the water supply system the work described in the Resolution of Intention, as amended, of FILE � .�_ �A T� 14AYENDTi, 5975 15. WSW / - cupc eoAao or- uvemsoas Micro [ w�tli 6oara ori _ 001)00 _ said Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. The contract entered into by the acceptance of the bid of .t the First Party and the signing of this agreement consists of the following documents, all of which are a component part of this con- tract and as fully a part hereof as if herein set out in full and, if not attached, as if hereto attached; 3. This Agreement. 2. Plans and Specifications for water supply system. 3. Resolution of Intention, as amended. 4. Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for water supply system. 5. Bid. All of the documents hereinabove referred to as -being a part of this contract are on file in the office of the County -Clerk of the.. County of Contra Costa. -Said First Party shall furnish all necessary tools, equip— ment, labor and materials required for the performance and completion of said work and improvement, and all materials used shall comply with the said specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the County of Contra Costa. Time for commencement and completion of the work is fixed in the specifications. First and Second Parties agree that the actual work of con- struction completed shall be paid for by Second Party to First Party, based upon the following unit and/or lump sum prices: Item No. 1. 7,990 lin.ft. 12" ML and CS Pipe and appurtenances @ Nineteen Dollars and five cents ($19.05) per lin.ft. $ 152,209.50: 2. 8,940 lin.ft. 16- ML and CS Pipe and appurtenances @ Twenty-five Dollars and Ninety-five cents ($25.95) per lin.ft. 231,993.00 3. 7,920 lin.ft. 24" ML and ECS Pipe and appurtenances @ Thirty-Nine Dollars and Ninety cents ($39_90) per lin.ft_ 316,008.00 4. 6 Ea. Fire Hydrants @ Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) ea. 3,000.00 $ '703,210.50 -2- . Payments will be made to the Contractor in cash by •said Second Party but only from the proceeds of assessments levied and bonds which have been sold to represent unpaid assessments, or from any funds- provided to the Second Party and placed into the 'same fund, which said fund is the fund mentioned and described in Section 10424 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said payments will be made to the contractor based upon the provisions of said specifications for payment and based upon the conditions therein specified. The contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees in accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 .of, the Labor Code .of the State of California and all amendments thereto, as required by Labor Code Section 1860. And it is further agreed and expressly understood by the' parties to this contract, and notice thereof is hereby given, that in no case except where it is otherwise provided by law will said Second Party or any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any portion of the expenses of the work aforesaid or for any delinquency of persons or property assessed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the First Party has hereunto subscribed . its name by its officers thereunto duly authorized, and the Second Party has hereunto signed its name by the Chairman of -the Board-of Supervisors, attested by its County Clerk, the day and year in this . agreement first above written. M.G.M. ONSTau CTI CO., a co ration By f V SEF,;, ; : By. "First Party" COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdi-- vi of the S ape of California ATTEST: BY / l airman, B and b Supervisors JAMES R. OLSSON, County Clerk BY— "Second Party" " -3- '- ' i1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALISORAIA In the .'flatter of ProcZairmng ) .lay 18, 1975 through May 24, J 1975 as "Vational Insurance J RESOLUTION NO. 75/361 ;.T Yomen's Meek" in Contra Costa ) County ) MHEREAS the Insurance Momen 's -Association of East Contra Costa County, a branch of the National Association of Insurance Homan, was organized fourteen years ago; and SSR WHEREAS the primary purposes of said organization are to interest its members in educating themselves so that t they will be an asset to the public which they serve and to create feZZowship among those whose interests, because of their :. occupations, are the same; SOU, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THIS BOARD RESOLVED that L said Insurance Women 's Association of East Contra Costa County is congratulated on its aims and interests;: and IT IS BY THIS BOARD FURTHER RESOLVED that-May' 18.1 1975 through May 24, 1975 is hereby PROCLAIMED as "National *>; Insurance Women 's Meek" in Contra Costa County_ PASSED and ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 1975. a=- ff ,P. ..� ^ q In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costa County, State of California My 13 In the Matter of CETA Title I Manpower Plan for Fiscal Year 1975-1976. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following actions are- APPROVED in connection with the Comprehensive Employment .and: - Tra'�g Act, Title I, Manpower Plan for fiscal year 1975-1976:- a) Referral of the aforesaid plan recommended by the Contra. Costa County Manpower Advisory Council to the Intergovernmental Relations Committee (Supervisors J. P. Kenny and E. A. Linscheid) for review and report on May 27, 1975, with the understanding, that the committee will hear appeals from those agencies whose proposals were not recommended by the Council; and b) Issuance by the Office of the County Administrator of a notification of when the committee will hear appeals and indicating that agencies wishing to be heard should inform said office in writing by May 16, 1975. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Agency Supervisors Attn: Ms. J. Miller affixed this _17 of 19?� County Administrator --� Board Committee J. R. QL�SSON Clerk, Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M L. Kincaid - F .. i G��x The format followed in submitting these tentative recommendations to the Manpower - • T Advisory Council was as follows: j rF h I. The Planning Subcommittee ' a. Formulated the basic service priorities, b. Developed area allocation recommendations, a suggested service delivery system, and alternative models for preparing non-job ready enrollees for permanent placement. C. Reviewed the existing Manpower/training programs in the County in an attempt.; to integrate traditional training institutions into the CETA philosophy and goals. II. Evaluation Subcommittee a. Establish objective evaluation criteria. b. Reviewed all written evaluations. C. Requested those agencies who appeared to have unfavorable evaluations to .personally appear before the subcommittee. d. Met with: 1. EDD - Richmond 2. EDD - Pleasant Hill 3. EDD - Pittsburg 4. National Alliance of Businessmen S. North Richmond Neighborhood House b. SER-Jobs for Progress e. Conducted follow-up of CETA trainees who-bad gone through various CETA programs. f. Did Labor Market surveys. g. Wrote recommendations for each subcontractor. III. The Proposal Subcommittee a. Reviewed recommendations made by the Planning Subcommittee. They initially recommended program operators they felt most completely and efficientlymet the program goals and priorities as determined by the Planning Subcommittee. .' b. Established criteria for the differentiation of proposals. 000% C. Reviewed recommendations from the Evaluation Subcommittee. d. A selection process was established to include a comprehensive proposal. format for both present and potential program operators, part o£ which involved a three day period of interviewing all of the agencies; juris- diction and institutions which had submitted proposals for Fiscal Year '75 - '7b. e. Oa May 19, 1975, final recommendations concerning these proposals wi11 be made by, the Council. f. Made tentative recommendations to the Manpower Advisory Council (April 30, 1975),;. g. Reviewed all complaints from agencies that were not recommended for funding (May 7, 1975). h. Scheduled all subcontractor to appear before the entire Manpower Advisory, Council (May 15, 1975). i. Final recommendation to the Board of Supervisors (May 19, 1975). Manpower Project (nQQ NVH/aw 5/7J75 oOkIIJ� TO: :h'-hers, 1;c.r=jer A;hisory Council F C14: Proposal Su: -C . ..Litter bob Corrigan, Chairperson SUBJECT: G--neral ^ tions In presenting its recammerx1ations to the Manpower Advisory Council, the Proposal Sub-Cannittee feels it is irmortant for members to be aware of the extensive process followed in order to assure tact (1) interested bidders had an adequate onportunity to learn about the proposal submission process and (2) a fair opportunity to present their proposals to the sub-c=nittee. The procedure followed in the proposal process included: (1) announcement_ of tha opportunity to bid was presented in all local news media; (2) a proposal format was mailed or given to all interested bidders; (3) each bidder was alloviel at least 15 minutes to explain his proposal to the proposal Sub-Caani.ttee; (4) the Proposal Sub-Committee met to listen to and ask questions about proposals :: for the major part of three days; and (5) surveys were conducted by the CETA Central staff to validate i*iformation put forth in proposals as well as to assist the Proposal Sub-Co ittee in its deliberatiols. ging the sub-committee meetings which were concerned with making decisions on individuals proposals only those members of the sub-canmi.ttee were involved who were not involved withagencies which were prospective program operators. General recommendations of the Proposal Sub-Ccmrnittee are as follows: 1. During the conduct of t.'his Mann er Advisory Council meeting (April 30) no MAC member who represents a potential sub-contractor should be allowed; to spea): on the merits of his/her agency's proposal or that of any other potential sub-contractor. (This reccmendation represents an action taken by the Proposal Sub-Committee in its April 25 meeting.) 2. Any potential sub-contractor wbo is dissatisfied with the Proposal Sub- Cammittee's or the MAC's action on his/her proposal will have the opportunity to express the dissatisfaction in writi*x_7 and transmit it to the Proposal Sub-Coarumttee at the CEA Citral Office no later than 5:00 P.M. on Tuesday„ Say 6. Mia Proposal Sub-C=ittee uril.l meet later that week to oamine t-he complaints and lake further recamvenxiations to the MAC to the extent it feels such recce mendations are warranted. 3. As a result of its review of Assessment/Orientation and Job Finding W rkshop proposals,Tm Proposal Sub-Ca:mittee recxc.mea-rls that wit= a given CE'M. geographical area, these programs should be undertaken by a single (one) sub-contractor. 4. To the extent feasible a trade-off of slots between CEA geographical areas should be developed (subsequent to this meeting) to facilitate effective use of information gained about a client's interests/ne-e3s as a result of hisPher involvement in the A,/O workshop. 5. During the time an enrollee is participating in the A/0 Workshop or Job Finding workshop, he/she should be reimbursed for travel costs incurred and legitimate child care costs but not paid Allowances. 6. All potential sub-contractors vho intend to conduct CETA training programs must be able to document the results of their efforts to obtain ADA ("average daily attendance" assistance) before their proposals vill be considered for funding. 7. All work Experience slots authorized in the 1975-1976 funding proposal should be assigned to and utilized by CETA Title Z sub-contractors. Of the Work Experience slots allocated, three individuals will be assigned to each of the HDD Offices in order to keep =A Z sub-contractors doing job develouaent/place=ent aware of job openings as soon as this information becomes available. Six (6) slots vill also be assigned to the CETA Central Office to help enable that office to conduct its program responsibilities. w .00,095 ACE: =S WdO APPLIED FOP. FUNDING FOP. 'i S - 176 JOB ASSESS4E.NT/ FINDING JOE REA INTAKE ORIEN7AIION WORKSHOP DEVELOP.MN'T TRAILING Richmond/ *UCSSO *UCSSO *UCSSO *UCSSO Linton -Clerical`. ' Rodeo * NYC *Southside *Southside *Southside NRNff -- Clerical - * EDD *NYC *Westcom *EDD- Southside-Pte-Voc, . Carginez -*IDD **Carquinez *Urban Southside--GED Coalition Westcom Coalition League City San—'Pablo—Work *Co. VSD *Co. VSD **NYC Carquinez.Coalition- People Child Care " Pledge Concord/ *UCSSO *UCSSO *UCSSO *UCSSO Mt. Diablo-Autood- rtinez *NYC *NYC **NYC *IDD Polly Priest-Cleric *EDD *CSP *IDD *Southside Apollon-Ind. Tech'.:- *Co. VSD *IDD *Southside *CSP *Co. VSD *CSP *Urban *Westcom DVC League *Southside *Westcom LILAC Pittsburgy *CSP *UCSSO *UCSSO *UCSSO CSP - Clerical. Antioch Filo-Amer. *EDD *IDD *IDD SER ESL *UCSSO *Co. VSD *CSP *CSP Pittsburg-Vector *EDD *CSP *Southside *Southside " - Water/Sewer- *Co. VSD City/Pitts. City/Pitts. City/Pitts: PUSD —Welding *Southside **Urban . Pitts.-Intern Progr Aztlan Develop League Pre-School Coordina Fil-Amer. Council-DayCare-" Aztlan Dev. Oakley/ UCSSO UCSSO UCSSO ' UCSSO Brentwood * Multi-Component Proposal ** Partial services County/ Human Development Associates - Motivational Training vide United Truck - Truck Driving Training IDD - in service training for vocational counselors Programs East Bay Skills Center - Multi Occupations Youth Business Management - Self business OJT: NABS, GAUL, DAS, Sheriff's Department Manpower Project NVH/aw 4/30/75 0009; 1) EDD - based on ov ,11 ineffective services provi. the agency as indicated in their evaluation. 2) WESTCOM INDUSTRIES a. Work Assessment Program (West and Central County) - General consensus "No"; previous efforts of agency mainly with State Voc. Rehabilitation; general feeling program would not relate effectively to CETA clients nor be readily integrated into CETA structure. b. Job Interview and Job Placement Program (West and reatral County) - General consensus "No"; for above reasons. Also, no verification of employment sta- tistics. 3) NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF BUSINESSMEN OJT Placements (County wide) - General "consensus "No"; performance to date does not warrant continuation as stated by Evaluation Subcommittee. 4) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY VOCATIONAL SERVICES DIVISION Intake/Assessment (County wide) - General consensus "No" for funding for FY 75-75; reasons: 1) cost for services is excessively high; 2) 14 counselors - - all white; 3) Administrative costs 35.3 Z; 4) Social Services' staff not viewed with con fidence and trust by many in client community. 5) STATE DIVISION OF APPRENTICESHIP STANDARDS OJT (County wide) - General consensus "No" for FY- '75-'76; DAS unwilling to offer any assurances regarding permanent job placement; cost also high. 6) EDD-EDUCATIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM Labor Market Assistance to Educational Institution (County wide) - General consen- sus "No"; proposal is one which should be funded by State IDD and Department of Education (or individual school districts), not CETA. 7) YOUTH BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TRAILING PROGRAM Recommendation - That this proposal NOT be funded; funding for this type of pro- gram should come from another source, for example the Chamber of Commerce, OEO, etc. Csot excessively high, ability of group to function in County as a whole marketability of goods which would be produced, etc. 8) CONTRA COSTA COU?�?Y SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT a. Trainees in: (1) Statistical Analysis; (2) Food Services; (3) Communications Dispatching - (County wide) - General consensus - this proposal should be dir- ected to the CETA Title II or Title VI program for funding; it is not really a CETA Title I program. b. 10 Dositions in Criminal Lab Training - (County wide) - General consensus; also a-proposal which belongs under CETA Titles II of VI. 9) AZTLAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Consensus of Subcommittee that two proposal offered by this group not be funded; U.C.S.S.O. performing public service placement function and also services to Spanish Speaking elderly._ REC0MMENDATIONS OF MANPOWER PROPOSALS- BY AREA: AREA: RICHMOND/RODEO Intake: *NYC - recommendation to fund based primarily on present year's record of effective service within the area. Within contract for FY 75 - 76 a clause to be included will call for a bi-lingual staff member to ensure propoer representation of the Chicano population within the area. CARQUINEZ COALITION - recommendation not to fund is based primarily because of adminis- trative costs. However, the recommendation is made to provide two work-experience slot to do intake within the Rodeo/Crockett area which would be the direct responsibility of the agency. Assessment/Orientation: , *SOUTHSIDE C0.)OMITY CENTER - recommendation to fund based primarily on the present year's record of effective service in their Pre-Vocational training in the Richmond area. t. 1 • , .r NYC - recommendation not to fund based primarily 15 the fact that another organization currently providing the service in the area has been found to be doing a commendable OOP97 • RICWIOND/RODEO RECOI?MENDATIONS - CONTINUED Job-Finding Workshop: *SOUTHSIDE COK4UNITY CENTER - recommendation to fund based on present year's commendable record in administering this service within the area. In addition, it was detei3ained to be economically wise to have one organization provide the service of A/O and a Job-Find- Ing Workshop. CARQUINEZ COALITION - recommendation not to find based primarily on lack of experience in providin this service. PEOPLE PLEDGED FOR COMMUNITY PROGRESS. -INC. Job Readiness Workshop - General consensus "No"; idea for program not carefully enough conceived; is only an idea in mind of director; actual implementation would-not-be as�_ sured. Job Development: BAY AREA URBAN LEAGUE - recommendation to fund based upon the fact that the component of on-the-job training as included in the proposal is a beneficial addition to the ,program. In addition, B.A.U.L. has a proven record of effective job development. SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER - recommendation not to fund based in part upon the unsub- stantiated and thus questionable placement statistics offered by the agency. Multi-Services: U.C.S.S.O. (Intake; A/0; JFW; JD) recommendation not .to fund based primarily on the fact that the agency has not performed CETA services in this area and that the existing - provider of the service is doing a commendable job. However, a recommendation for a bi-ligual staff doing intake was accepted. Training Programs: CM OF SAN PABLO - That the City of San Pablo be granted three work experience posi- tions, but no contract as such; recommendation that one intern be black, one (1) Chicano.- and one (1) white and that the City of San Pablo provide and ethnic breakdown on the work-experience people eventually hired. LINTON BUSINESS COLLEGE Secretarial/Clerical Training - General consensus, if Linton services are used, it should be as individual referrals through Voc. Ed. monies. NORTH RICHMOND NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE Clerical Training Class - That no decision be made on this proposal pending a further - information of this program. The schedule for the class must be changed so that it is more convenient for enrollees, If the program is to be funded; investigation is needed to determine whether the class could be funded under ROP individual referrals;. infor- oration is also needed to determine the Contra Costa College could provide basic educa- tion and the typing lab through ADA funds. Training Programs Not Recommended: CARQUINEZ COALITION Child Care Training for Rodeo/Crockett Area - General rejection of this proposal; too costly; could be done by school district or community college. SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER Pre-Vocational - General rejection based on the fact it is a combination of AN and JFW. GID b PROPOSAL ` That this proposal not be funded; it is a good program and Southside Community Center shouldbe encouraged to work with the local school districts and/or community college- ---tire ollege- 1't♦ire 1[♦ 00098 CONCORD/MARTINEZ AREA Intake: *NYC - recommendation to fund based primarily on agency's present record of providing the service in a commendable fashion. Assessment/Orientation: *NYC - recommendation to fund based primarily on effectiveness of present year's pro- gram in Central County. At least one bi-ligual staff to be employed. *LILAC - recommendation to fund as a work-experience slot based upon low cost of pro- gram to'number served and favorable experience with the agency in the past. In addition, the agency's target population is one of particular concern (female head-of-household): and need within Central County. Job-Finding Workshop: *NYC - recommendation to fund because of cost absorption possible through the combin ation of the services of A/0 and a Job-Finding Workshop. In addition, agency has pro- vided commendable services in related areas within Central County. DVC - recommendation not to fund as a Job-Finding Workshop because of high costs involved. Instead, it is suggested to consider to fund it- as a training component. However, in. regard to this, additional evaluation is necessary and further persual of cost absorption; through ADA. Job Development:_ BAY AREA URBAN LEAGUE - recommendation to fund based on proven track record in delivery of the service. In addition, the on-the-job training component as offered by B.A.U.L. should prove to provide even more effective services in this area. Multi-Services: CONCERTED SERVICES PROJECT (Intake; A/O; JFW; JD) - General consensus "No" for FY '75- '76; budget excessive. Director present and a participant on CETA Management Team when new CETA process developed, yet he was unable to explain how activities under this pro- posal related to this new CETA process. U.C.S_S.O. (Intake; A/0; JFW; JD) - recommendation not to fund because of inexperience in administering this service in Central County, and doubt as to whether substantial :' Mexican-American CETA eligible population exist in the area. However, their recommenda-; tion for a bi-ligual staff person was accepted. SOUTHSIDE COMMITY CENTER (A/O; JFW; JD) recommendation not to fund based on agency's inexperience in providing this service in the area and the existence of an agency cur- rently providing the service -commendably. Training Programs: POLLY PRIEST BUSINESS COLLEGE Clerical/Secretarial Training - General consensus, should be funded under individual referrals for FY '75 - '76 through Voc. Ed. monies. APOLLON RESEARCH, INC. -(County-wide training in Elec./Chem/ Technology and Machine Shop Trademan) - recommendation that this proposal be tabled for the present pending the results of a labor market survey. MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Body Fender Class) - recommendation that this pro- " posal be tabled pending a labor market survey and the determination as to whether Mt.' Diablo Unfied School District is eligible to receive ADA reimburement for instructor.'s costs_ 00099 PITTSBURC/ANTIOCH Intake: ` *U.C.S.S.0. - recommendation to fund one intake worker and provide for one work- experiene slot based upon present record of commendable service in the delivery of this component within the East County. - *CSP - recommendation to fund one'intake worker and provide for a work-experience slot based on present record of commendable provision of said service. FILIPINO-AMERICAN COUNCIL - That they not be funded because of administrative costs; the bi-ligual Fil-American be represented in United Council's Services to the Fili pino-American community; to the extent time permits CETA be asked to give the Fil- ` American Council help in getting foundation funding. Assessment/Orientation: *CITY OF PITTSBURG - recommendation to fund based on present year's commendable service in the Manpower Program and tha apparent economic advantage in the agency's access to high cost equipment and in-kind administrative cost. In addition, the agency has pr__ ability in utilization of existing resources in the Pittsburg area. Job-Finding Workshops: *CITY OF PITSBURG - recommendation to fund based on cost absorption possible through tF combination of the services of A/0 and a Job-Finding Workshop under one agency. In addition, the agency has performed commendably in other areas of the delivery system. Job Development: *CITY OF PITTSBURG - recommended because of their experience in job development this year through their training programs. FILIPINO-ANMCAN COUNCIL - no experience in Job Development. BAY AREA URBAN LEAGUE - Subcommittee decided since this is a new subcontractor in the County, that their services should not be county-wide. Multi-Services: SOUTHSIDE C0101UNITY CENTER (A/0; JFW; JD) - recommendation not to fund because of inexperience in delivery of this service in the East County area-and the fact that other agencies are providing adequate services. CSP (A/0; Jnl; JD) - recommendation not to fund because of excessive budget and incon- sistancy of proposed program with new CETA delivery process. U.C.S.S.O. (A/0; JFW; JD) a) member of staff indicated that the proposal did not seem realistic in terms of services they would have to perform; b) Ethnic breakdown of staff is not representative of the Pittsburg area; c) all equipment must be rented or purchased through the County. Training Programs: CSP Clerical Training - General consensus - program should be funded for FY '75 - '76 effort should be made by CETA/CSP to get Pittsburg Unified School District to pick up , instructor and other costs; question whether program should be divided by beginners. and intermediate clients; question whether thirth (30) trainees per class is too many. PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT - Welding Class - That CETA staff explore the possibility of the funding of the instruc tar by ROP or through ADA that CETA staff also do a follow-up on the palcement of gers who have complete the Welding Class and have been placed on jobs to determine whether' they are still on the Welding Jobs they may have obtained. 00100 _ _ y PITTSBURG/ANTIOCH RECO"O XION'S CONTINUED Training Programs - (continued) CITY OF PITTSBURG ' a. Waste Water Treatment Class - recommendation that this proposal be funded; City of Pittsburg has indicated it will try to get the instructor paid through the community .. college, and this should be investigated before final approval. b. Vector Control Class - Labor Harket Survey supported need for training, however, City needs to investigate available monies through ADA for instructora c. Student Intern Program - Cost too high for CETA. Subcommittee recommended five work-experience slots instead for this purpose. Training Programs Not Recommended: SER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS English as a Second Language - Program is high cost when measured against projected ben- efits; goal of "750 vocational and job related words in English" appears too low; pro- gram for ESL is a duplication of similar programs offered by Pittsburg Unified School District and Los Medanos College. In addition, the Evaluation subcommittee reported that: at least 75Z of the students interviewed were dissatisfied with the class. Finally a report by the Manpower Office indicated that the placements reported by SER were either work-experience of jobs that the trainees* found on their own. PRE-SCHOOL COORDINATING COUNCIL, INC. Day Care Training for Instructors and Clerical Employees - General consensus "No" for FY '75 - '76; Training for instructors can be obtained from Pittsburg Unified School`' District or community college (Los Medanos College); Little of no assurance of avail- able decent-paying jobs for persons trained. Cost very high. BRENTWOOD/OAMM AREA: *U.C.S.S.O. - recommended for intake; individual counseling; referral to training programs and job development. COUNTY-WIDE TRAINING PROGR_4MS UNITED TRUCK DRIVING SCHOOL (Truck Driver Training) - General consensus "Yes" for FY '75-'76 because program has been successful thus far; •should"be used of individual. re- ferrals through Voc. Ed. monies. EAST BAY SKILLS CENTER (Training for 17 Occupations) - Appears to duplicate training; _ availble in some of County's ROP programs; should compare EDSC's offerings with projected offering of County ROP; if EBSC is used at all, it should probably be through individual ' training referrals-through Voc. Ed. monies. HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES (Portia Shapiro) - Management Motivation Training. No recommendation on this proposal; staff person to do follow-up on CETA program previously. conducted by VDA. General feeling that funding should be added to any clerical program funded. 'Work Experience: *NYC - recommendation to fund based primarily on agency's commendable job as evidenced by this year's program and evident need for such a service. Supportive Services: COWRA COSTA LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION (Client Legal Assistance) - General consensus "Yes" for FY '75-'75; program needs to be more thoroughly promoted during orientation for FY '75-'76 and then thorough records kept of actual- use of services. U.C.S.S.O. (Interpreter Services) - General Subcommittee feeling that consideration shoul be given the funding of one (1) General Interpreter who would have no intake responsibil- ities; recognition that possibility exists that OEO and/or VBAC funds may be available " for this service. In addition, one (1) work-experience slot was also recommended. R . r " IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Recommendations of County Administrator on Judgeship Requirements of Mt. Diablo Municipal .May 13, 1975 Court District and Municipal Court Staffing and Salaries. Mr. Arthur G. Will, County Administrator, having submitted a memorandum dated May 12, 1975 containing the following recom- mendations with respect to judgeship requirements of the ' Mt. Diablo Municipal Court District and municipal court staffing and salaries: 1. " Additional Judge for Mt. Diablo Municipal Court. District. The report of the Judicial Council re erred to this office on April 22, 1975 indl cates that a fourth Judge.will be required to ' carry the projected workload through 1976. My office has examined the statistical data involved and concurs in the recommendation of the Judicial Council. 2. " Court Reporters Salary. Court Reporters have requested a five per cent "catch up" salary adjustment (because all legislation pertaining to salaries was held up by the Legislature in 1973) plus a tie-in, to provide automatic adjustment of Court Reporter salaries, to an appropriate County classification. ' The latter approach has some merit but no fully satis- factory tie-in arrangement has yet been identified, and a formula arrangement may present problems at a future time. Accord- ingly, a straight salary adjustment is recom- mended at this time while this matter continues under review. " To cover the increased cost certain filing fees should be increased by $1.00 from its existing $14.00 level to help offset the increased cost. 3. " Municipal Court Marshals. Provision should be made for the class of Supervising Process Clerk together with provision for the class of Process Clerk at the Deputy Clerk III level. Allocation of the class of Supervising Process Clerk to Level 291 ($895-$1088) is recommended. 4. " Municipal Court Clerk. A different classifi- cation or salary differential for Deputy Clerk IV positions assigned as division chiefs or branch court managers has been requested, but the matter requires more detailed classification review. Recommendation is proposed to be with- held until the next court bill is submitted in 1976. Meantime, salary differential such as that applicable to Chief Deputy Clerk will also be further examined."; and 001,0211, ti Mr. Will having pointed out that as part of the, county legislative program for the 1975-1976 calendar year, this r Board authorized submittal of a bill covering municipal court- staffing and salaries, and having advised that it is, necessary at this point in time to proceed with amendment to the bill to assure that required changes are made during tb.e current ,. legislative session; and Mr. Will having suggested that aforesaid recommendations be referred to the Administration and Finance Committee - (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Kenny) for review and report on May 20, 1975) NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD SO ORDERED. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. - � CERTIFIED COPY I ceztft that this is a fan, true do correet cow of the orisinai document wWcii is on me in my office✓ and jhat it=was ptsscd ;: ad_^rtcd by.We Board of Supervisors ct Conua Coota Coant r, Calitorula..on tho date shoum-ATTRST: J R oI.,SSo xF, Coauty Clerk&ex-OMCIo Ciertof said Ildard of Superru'rM. by DeputyyCCiedL _ cc: Board Committee - �"'' � `'e-1 f �� 5 County Administrator County Counsel Hon. J. D. Hatzenbuhler, Presiding Judge of Mt. Judicial District Director of Personnel h .'x 71 r' y.. �I ^p 00If 0/ � r; In the Board of Supervisors • of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 ..i9 75 In the Matter of • Authorizing the Human Resources Director to Sign Contracts For , Services with Fee-For-Service Physicians, Dentists Optome- trists and Podiatrists Utilized by the County Health Department and County Medical Services. In connection with the rates of compensation for •fee-for service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists utilized by County Medical Services and the County Health Department,,-this Board on July 23, 1974 adopted Resolution No. 74/636A setting,the. rate for said physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists; and This Board today received contracts with those fee-Por- service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists whose;. names are listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and Incorporated herein as if set forth in full, implementing Resolution 'No. 74/636A; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said contracts are hereby approved; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED -that Mr. R. E. Jornlin, Director, Human Resources Agency, is authorized to sign the contracts on behalf of this Board. PASSED by the Board may 13, 1975 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct cc"of an order entered on.the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board: Agency Supervisor Mr. W. Downey, Chief, aR'ixed this 13th dolt of May i975 Medical AdministrativeJ. R. OtSWN, Clerk Services _ ActinDirector of Personne$Y Deputy Clerk. H 24 12n4 - 15-M H . In&aham County Auditor-Controller County Administrator 001- EXHIBIT A Medical Services Name Number Rate Effective Date Richard Brenner, H.D. 026-696 $17.00 per hour April 14, 1975 Michael Cohen, H.D. 926-697 $17,00 per hour .July 1, 1974 Gilbert Elian, H.D. 026-698 $17.00 per hour March 251, 1975 John Rostkouski, H.D. #26-699 $17.00 per hour July 1, 1974 Nils Parson, H.D. $26-647 $17.00 per hour December 17, 1974, !h CCC Standard Form 144600 August 1974 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) I . Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) Richard W. Brenner, M.D. (address) 45 Wiltshire St., Larkspur, CA 94939 Phone 924-7681 (b) [ ] Physician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [XI Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment �] Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours 15.00 Per week Rate: S 17.00 Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Week [ ] Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a month in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) (d) On-Call Availability: [ ] Yes [XI No (e) Effective Date April 14, 1975 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Hoard Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement .of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent, or by either party, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof to the other. 6. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended 'by written order of the Board, accepted in writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the e County agree that each subsequent contract will rlepresent the result of all 001(% negotiations between the Contractor, County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written invoice on the form prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. if the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated In Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) or pro rata amount for said approved period. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for rthe operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing promo essionai services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to, the County for collection or administration. 11. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. 12. Insurance. County shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance including professional malpractice liability with total limits of not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13.. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNTY/ CONTRACTOR ►�,�tl►�ri,ctr i��i�,�w�rr��r� Director, Human Resources Agency Richard W. Brenner, M.D. ATTEST: J.R. -OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board By Deputy RE=tIENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACKNOWLEDGED: R. E. Jornlin Director, Human Re urces Lnq(cyy''` u George Degnan. M.D. W. Medical Director or Health Officer CCC Standard Form 144600 August 1974 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) 26- 69799P.0 C — 6 9 7 NUMBER - .�.V 7 f. 1 . Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) Michael Cohen M La Casa Via, Walnut Creek,,CA 94596 (address) , CIL 9r;598 Phone 939-3000 Fxt- 364 (b) QIX] Physician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist C ] Psychiatrist [ ] orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment Cq Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours 10.00 Per week Rate: S 17.00 Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Week [ ] Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a month in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) . (d) On-Call Availability: [ ] Yes gX] No (e) Effective Date July 1, 19T4 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board.Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as cart of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special . professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or-where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent, or by either party, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof to the other. 6. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Board, accepted in writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the County aqree that each subsequent contract will depresent the result of al•l 00108 negotiations between the Contractor, County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written Invoice on the form prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. if the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each Invoice and apprnval by the County Medical DIrector or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) if weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) or pro- rata amount for said approved period. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures forte operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing pro essional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. ll. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate arofessional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies ` and non-profit medical corporations. 12. Insurance. County shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, Including professional malpractice liability with total limits of not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNTY ' 1� OONTRACTOR 8y ri�� L/Hadt lad/B �et:i is Michael Cohen, M.D. 1 Director, Hunan Resources Agency ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board By Deputy RE=t.IENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACKNOWLEDGED: Director, Human Re u rce�s I}gency ,D George Degnan, M.D. Medical Director or Health Officer 00109"'. CCC Standard Form M4600 August 1974 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) I . Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) Gilbert Elias, M.D. (address) + �a U:� .YG�l.'�lt.v 5 � t�!'i iM— Phone—,00111085 -2,FY JL62 (b) [X3 Physician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [ ] Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment [XJ Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Z Scheduled Hours 15.00 Per week Rate: S 17.00 Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week in accordance with established schedule. (includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Week [ ] Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a month in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) (d) On-Call Availability: [ ] Yes No (e) Effective Date March 25, 19T5 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board- Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. in cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent, or by either party, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof to the other. 6. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Board, accepted in writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the County aqree that each subsequent contract will depresent the result of all 00110 , negotiations between the Contractor, County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written invoice on the form prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. if the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each Invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated In Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) or pro rata amount for said approved period. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel Involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Re ulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures or the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, Independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. 11. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. 12. Insurance. County shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, Including professional maloractice liability with total limits of not less than $5,000,000 coverinq both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. 007" 1 1 CONTRACT hP rr,cir�ila�i�p�lir�� r¢i Gilbe F1ian, M.D. Director, Human Resources Agency ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex offlcio Clerk of the Board By Deputy RECOI•tlENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACICMLEDGED: R. E. Joralin D rector, Human sources;.ggeenncyy George Degnan, M.D. Medical Director or Health Officer 0OI11 CCC Standard Form 144600 Aucust 1974 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) NUMBER ... 2 66,919". 1. Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) John Rostkovski, M.D. (address) 1150 West Arlington Way, Martinez, CA 94553 Phone F g 4 (b) "ysician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [ Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment [ Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours 10.00 Per week Rate: S 17.00 Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week In accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated In 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Week [ ] Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a month in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so Indicated in 2. (d).) (d) On-Call Avaiiabil'ity: [ ] Yes No (e) Effective Date July 1, 1974 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Hoard Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special . professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including,all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. in cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent, or by either party, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Board, accepted In writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the, County agree that each subsequent contract will depresent theall 4 negotiations between the Contractor, County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written invoice on the form. prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. if the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each invoice and apprmval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) If hourly paid, at the rate indicated In Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) or pro- rata amount for said approved period. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. 11. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. 12. Insurance. County shall keep In effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, Including professional malpractice liability with total limits of not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this anreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUN i fj r CONTRACTOR 8y j _: t `�- 0-7 5050011000"1011 ►+00rijsort John Rostkovski, M.D. Director, Human Resources Agency ATTEST: J:.R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board By Deputy REMt.IENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACKNOWLEDGED: R. E. Joralin � / Director, Human Resources Agency Y George Degnan, M.D. Medical Director or Health Officer • 00113 { CCC Standard Form 144600. Auaust 1974 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES �+ (Contract Paid Physicians) 47 1. Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-namedContractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (R) Contractor (name) Nils Parson, M.D. (address) 2415 Highschool Ave., Concord, CA 94520 Phone 689-2250 (b) ] Physician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [ ] Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment [XI Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours 20.00 Per week Rate: S 317•00 Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week In accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Week [ ] Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered durina a month in accordance with established schedule. (includes payment for on-call services if so Indicated in 2. (d).) (d) On-Cali Availability: [ ] Yes No (e) Effective Date December 1T, 19T4 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board. Order currently In effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent, or by either party, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof to the other. 6. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Board, accepted in writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the, County agree that each subsequent contract will depresent the result of all 00114 nenotiations between the Contractor, County and any organization representinq the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written Invoice on the form prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. If the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) or pro- rata amount for said approved period. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Re u�lati_ons. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. 11. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. 12. insurance. County shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability Insurance, Including professional malpractice liability with total limits of not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. !0)UNTY CONTRACTOR II�,iI`l+ �LltA� 1A�1$a�¢1J�4/ Hils Parson, M.D. Director; Human Resources Agency ATTEST: J.R-. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board By Deputy RECC*t-IENDED FOR APPROVAL: AC10JOWLEDGED: R. E. Jornlin D rector, Human Resources Agency Tn George Degnan, . .D. Medical D'rector or Health Officer 00115 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Mav l� 3 19 In the Matter of County Food Coalition. Mr. G. X. Schrock, Chairman, Steering Committee of. the County Food Coalition representing voluntary groups (mostly church sponsored) which maintain food pantries for needy families, appeared before the Board and advised that emergency food reouests have tripled during the past year and supplies are nearly exhausted. Mr. Schrock explained that many of the Coalition referrals are received from the Human Resources Agency through its social workers, and requested that the County aid the Coalition by- provid ing: a truck to move surplus resources to a location wherethere isl , basic need; interim storage space at appropriate locations in the :, County; and a full-time social worker with back-up office assistance" . and supplies. Mr. R. E. Johnlin indicated that the Social Service Department had worked informally with church groups on provision of food to the needy for a number of years and that this request... , therefore, reaffirms authorization and provides for specialization in such assistance, and that his recommendation is for continued' authorization to work with those involved and for report back to the Board-at a future time. It was suggested that the Human Resources Agency,, in cooperation with. County Counsel, explore the feasibility of a con— tractural arrangement with respect thereto. Board members otherwise discussed and commented on the matter and, being generally in agreement with the suggestion of the Director, Human Resources Agency, Supervisor J. P. Kenny, Acting . Chairman, stated that to be the action of the Board. THIS IS A MATTER OF RECORD I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy►of iMwed ecc on t a minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid CC: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of, SupwVhom affixed this 13th00i► of_ MZaav 19 _. J. R. OLSSON, Cie-& BY. ly�'�CLLc•JDeputy Clerk H 24 12174 . 15-M liel en V• 3 } In the Board of Supervisors of fi Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Agreement with the County ~' of Alameda. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the County of Alameda for the holding of Contra Costa County convicted female prisoners in Alameda County detention facilities or at the Alameda County work furlough facility, as appropriate, subject to the conditions more particularly described in the agreement, and subject to payment by Contra Costa County;'of the following rates: 4i Per Inmate Per Day Santa Rita Rehabilitation Center $17.50 Alameda County work furlough facility $32.$4 Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the, minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board,of >` cc: Alameda County Supervisors County Administrator Attn: Mr. Arthur Laib a this 13th day of May 1975 County Sheriff—Coroner J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor—Controller gy Deputy Clerk H 24 12rgQ y Administrator N. In wham 0OU-7� A G R E E M E N T This Agreement , made and entered into this 13th day of May 1975, by and between the COUNTY OY ALAMEDA and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, both political subdivisions of the State of California, is made with reference to the following facts: A. The Sheriff of the County of Contra Costa is the defendant in a pending case in the United States District Court entitled -Phelps V. Ramsay, et al. , wherein plaintiffs allege that the County of Contra Costa's facilities for the care of sentenced women prisoners are inadequate. B. The County of Alameda has adequate facilities for the care of "sentenced women prisoners and from time to time has sufficient capacity in those facilities to house some of the County of Contra Costa's women prisoners_ C. Penal Code §4115.5 provides in relevant part that: The board of supervisors of a county where adequate facilities are not available for prisoners who viould oth-eniise be confined in its county adult detention facilities ray enter into an agreement with the board or boards of supervisors of one or more nearby counties Whose county adult detention facilities are adequate and are readily accessible f xm the first county . . . . Such agreement must male provision for support of a person so committed or transferred by the county from which he is comms-ted. . . _ .Support of any such person shall be a charge upon the county from which he is coamitted. Accordingly, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. The jail facilities owned and maintained by the County of Alameda are hereby made available by the County of Alameda to the County of Contra Costa, and will be furnished by the County of Alameda, for ho?ding the County of Contra Costa's convicted female misdemeanants and convicted female persons required to serve a term of imprisonment in the Contra Costa County adult detention facilities as a condition ofo, p-robation, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement_ 0118- 2. Such prisoners may be housed either in the County of Alameda facilities at Sana Rita Rehabilitation Center or at the County of Alameda's work furlough facility, .as appropriate. 3. For each such prisoner at the work furlough facility, the County of Contra Costa will cause the prisoner to furnish at her expense all necessary clothing. To the. extent that any clothing is furnished to work furloughees by the County of Alameda, then the County of Contra Costa will promptly upon receiving a statement therefor reimburse the County of Alameda for all costs in connection therewith. 4 . The County of Alameda will provide all medical treatment necessary or appropriate for each such prisoner in the custody of the Sheriff of the County of Alameda. All costs of such medical care, including but not limited to hospitalization, surgical care, drugs, therapy, and dental care, will be paid promptly by the County o: Contra Costa upon receipt of a statement therefor from the County of Alameda. 5. The County of Alameda shall provide, for each prisoner, all necessary food, linens, toilet articles, and housing. The County of Alameda shall also provide clothing for each prisoner at Santa Rita. The County of Contra Costa will pay the County of Alameda for all such Stens at the rate of $17.50 per day (or any fraction thereof) , for each such prisoner who is housed at the Santa Rita Rehabilitation Center, and at the rate of $32.84 per day (or any fraction thereof) , for each such prisoner housed at County of Alameda's work furlough facilities . The normal amount charged to and paid by Alameda County inmates of the work furlough facility shall be charged to and paid by Contra Costa County inmates of the work furlough facilities. 6. The County of Contra Costa shall indemnify the County of Alameda, and its officers and employees, against any and all liability for in-ury or damage caused by any act or o.^tission of any of the County of Contra Costa's employees or volunteers in the performance of this contract ,- or by any of the prisoners, and the County o, Contra Costa -2- 00 shall hold the County of Alameda harmless from any and all loss incurred by it in the performance of, or otherwise arising, out of, this contract. 7. The County of Alameda shall provide at 1 ast monthly to the County of Contra Costa a statement setting forth all sums which may be due County of Alameda pursuant to this contract, and shall submit- such statement to the County of Contra Costa. Such statement shall promptly be paid by the County of Contra Costa. 8. No employee of the County of Contra Costa shall by virtue of this contract be deemed an employee of the County of Alameda for any purpose whatsoever, nor shall any such employee be entitled to any of the rights, privileges, or benefits of the County of Alameda's employees. - The County of Contra Costa assumes exclusively the responsibility for the acts of its employees or volunteers as they relate to the services to be provided hereunder during the course and scope of their employment. . 9. . The County of Contra Costa shall provide -all transportation of the prisoners to and from the County of Alameda's facilities, and none of the costs of such transportation shall be borne by the County of Alameda. 10. This Agreement of the County of Alameda to house the County of Contra Costa's prisoners is conditioned upon the availability of space in the County of Alameda's facilities. Should the County of Alameda- at any time lack space to house such prisoners, the County of Alameda shall promptly notify the County of Contra Costa of that fact, and the County of Contra Costa :ill not transport any more prisoners to the County of Alameda facilities until notified that space has again become available. In addition, the County of Contra Costa will, upon demand by the County of Alaneda, remove prisoners as may be necessary to make space available for the County of Alameda's prisoners. 11. The County of Alameda may reject any prisoner deemed by it to b-- unsuitable for acceptance or for continued custody. In such event, . the County of Alaneda shall promptly notify the County of Contra Costa of such unsuitability, and the prisoner shall either not be accepted. into the Countly o Alaneda facilities, or shall promptly be removed therefrom by the County of Contra Costa, as the case may be. `3` 00 , 7 7. This Hgreei'c''I?t v ay be ur,04 i tried by the parties hereto b- a, . written i ns tru-ment executed by the parties. This A_V,'ree:alio P iy' - be tern!ira-ed b3 either parity at any time :tithout cause, upon giving; thirty d-iyswritten notice to the other party. - 13. For the purposes of this Agreement, the respectIve sheriffs ` n of the parties are designated as the persons to Five and receive notices. 14 . The performance of Agreement is conditioned upon the agreeman- by the County of Contra Costa And by the plaintiffs in the above-mentioned.' litigation that the facilities of the County of Alameda are adequate_ t Before any prisoners are delivered to the County of Alameda the County. of Contra Costa shall obtain a stipulation to that effect from said ' plaintiffs, and furnish a copy of the stipulation to the County of Alameda for its approval. Should there be any alteration, modification . or cancellation of said stipulation, the County of Contra.Costa shall promptly notify the County of Alameda of that fact, and any such action shall entitle the County of Alameda to terminate this Agreement forthwith 15. The following signatures witness the parties' agreement hereto COTN OF CONTRA C STA ATTEST: J. R. OLSSOY, County Clerk , and ea officio Clerk, Board.,of By� )fid MAS 131975 Supervisors, Contra Costa County C 'sman o thr Boar of California ' : S ervisors, Count of Contra costa By � Dep Clerk COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ATTEST: JACK K. POOL,' Clerk. of the Board of Supervisors of the, By County of Alameda, State of California Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the County of By Alameda, State of California Deputy Clerk Approved as to form: Approved as to form: County Counsel County Counsel Co_ n4L;y of Contra Costa County of Alameda; Jhn!j In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Agreement with Thomas Reid Associates for Consulting Services. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Thomas Reid Associates for consulting, services in connection with preparation of the environmental. impact report with respect to the proposed development of Subdivision 4727, Bethel Island, at a cost not to exceed $ 1,360, under terms and conditions as set forth in said agreement. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. - I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on'the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Boardof cc: Thomas Reid Associates Supervisors Director of Planning this 1 th d of May 1975 County Auditor-Controller — av County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 • 15-AA N. In sham 0V k r; • Ai � t 1. Special Conditions. These special conditions are incorporated M1f below by reference: , 3 (a) Consultant's Narte Address: Thomas Reid Associates, 931 Cowper F; Street, Palo Alto, California (b) I3ffective Date: April 14, 1975 to June 9, 1975 f` (c) Prosect 'lane, Number, & Location: Marinade la Playa, Subdivision 4727,'., Bethel Island (d) Pa-v. ont Linit: $4,360.00 2. Siluiatures. Thnse signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto COUNTY n? 117011TRA COSTA CON StILTAt 14m A 3AL By Mzkok3u( qh4rnnn, I3o rd Designate officio 1 c� acity in business) per visors ATTI,ST: J. R. t nso.I, [t;t7t PORATI. SEAL] County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of State of California ) ss the Board. Contra Costa County ) ACKIICWLEDMIENT BY The person(s) signing above for Consul Deputy, tont, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally- .: lie cortn .ded banneared before me today, and acf;nocilecIf;ed that he/they signed it and that the ' orporation or partnership named above it A. .e..z:es:::, executed it. Dire foroY Planning; Porn nate: APR 3 0 197 John B. Clausen County Counsel � .:r . � t P 1.=s:4µE By VIC i CI? J. WESTMAN pr;nci^,st o:s� Deput`: [ISI 1 .AL•n]cont:a rmia' oq&M,t • �fc610,147T _ 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra an t e above-naned Consultant nutually agree and promiseasfollows: 4 . Eranlo;!rtert. County hereby enploy, Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment to perforn the professional services described herein, upon the terns and in consideration of the payments statedr. herein. 5. Scone or service. Scone of Service shall be an described in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.._,' 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to the County., furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to the County of (a) public liability insurance of at least a250,000.00 for all damages arisinf; out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and. at least X500,000.00 for ti:o or pore persons in one accident or occurrence ; and (b) property danage liability insurance providing; for a limit of not less than x50,000.00. Thirt*v days' notice to County of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Par-ment. The Coi:nt :.hall nay Consultant the fr�P shourn in l(d) ai,ove for professional snrvices perforr.:r.d, payable in installments as fo1loi-:s -1- OV120 . (a) The first installment, in an anount to he determined by the Director of Planning of not more than 50% nor less than Sap of the fee, shall be paid after receipt by the County of the 'worldng draft" - s' r report . (b) ^he second installrzent, constituting the remainder of the fee, Shall be paid after the Director of Planning receives and finds acceptable the "final Consultant draft." (c) The fee specified in Section 1(d) includes all overhead'and' incidental expenses for which no additional compensation shall .be allowed. In no event shall the total arlount paid to the Consultant'-,' - • , ": exceed the fee limit specified in Section l(d) without the prior written approval of the County. 8. Termination. At its option, County may terminate this agreement at any tine- by :•.ritten notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default, upon such ternin3`ion Con ultant ac;rees to deliver to the County evervthing- pertainingto the wort: in the, possession of Consultant or under its control at that tine-, and will ,'. be paid, except as provided below, without duplication, all* amounts _ due or thereafter becoming due for services rendered to the date of- ' termination. If the Consultant is in default at the time of termin . ation, County may complete the wort (scope of service) and deduct, the reasonable e::nense^ thereof from the fee and from any funds othert•:ise due and payable to ttte Consultant. 9. Status . The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not to be . considered an employee of the County. 10. 1:xclusive Services. Consultant agrees to restrict its firm and. its subcontractors from any enploynent, other, than for the County, in- any way pertaining to tete subject of this employment or to the proposed project which this report will review, for a period of two years. after the effective date of this agreement without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such employment. Consultant further agrees to insert this condition into all contracts or work agreements with its subcontractors. 11. Status of Product. It is understood that tate final Consultant draft accepted by the County ::ill he utilized as background or source material by the Planning Departnent for its exclusive use, all or. in part, as it sees fit. The Consultant arrees riot to release, disclose or otherwise nake available conies of its smitten documents,_ their contents, any vie.:s or opinions contained therein, or any outer :mitten or oral material, data, views , opinions or 'other information in any way arisingout of or connected with the subject. of this enploynent to other than the Planning Department without first obtaining t-be prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such disclosure. ".IJ 13:b Attachments : Appendix A —2— O Y 121. i APPENDIX "A" Consultant shall prenare a report .anzlvzing environmental impact in accordance with the Cal;Cornia Environmental duality Act' and County guidelines and as more particularly described in the - attached he -attached proposal which is incorporated herein by reference. The report shall be prepared in the format specified by the Countv. it small be sin[7,le spaced and suitable for duplication by either offset or office cooler methods. The Consultant uhall prepare the report in a "working draft" ford initially and su1Nm t 3 conies for Planning Department review. After Planninj; Denartment reviewr S and coixnents on the draft, the Consultant shall ravine the worl.inf, draft report in accordance with such co:-ments ar.d suhnit one copy of a "final Consultant draft" for review and acceptance by the Planning Department. Assistance of County :staff required by the Consultant in the --atherinE of data to conplete this report shall be limited to the supplyinr, of source documents on County premises. No compiling of data will be done by County staff. All other County staff support effort i.ill be limited to that specifically eriumerated be lore In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Appendi "A" and the attached Consultant'; proposal relative to County staff effort in the completion of this report, the provisions of the appendix shall prevail. MJB:bt: , APPENDIX B SUBDIVISION 4727 TENTATIVE MAP jsf MARINA de la PLAYA SUBDIVISION a BETHEL ISLAND The scope of this investigation and report shall. be to investigate; assess and prepare a report describing the Environmental :Impact ofthe .. . r proposed land development, County File SUB 4727, as.outlined- in.the Thomas Reid Associates proposal of March 20, 1975, a copy of which-"is herein attached. (Agreement and Appendix A and B take:precedence over possible minor descrepancies of proposal.) The reportshall, be prepared:: in accordance with, and satisfy the requirements of the.Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code §21000 et. seq.) and-Contra Costa County's "Policies for the Review of Public Projects and Environ- ' mental Impact Reports." Contractor shall assist the Planning Staff in preparation of the public written responses to the Environmental Impact Report or final t? report if necessary. (Three principal man days.) The contractor shall assign Mr. Thomas Reid to direct this project unless substitute persons are approved by the Director of Planning. _ The contract is to run eight weeks for delivery of the draft Environmental Impact Report. The working draft to be received-by the County for review and changes one week earlier. ,. a • ' •THOMAS REID - :.a)4�►t31f'.' :'Elf:!;'.;� ASSOCIATES (415) 327-0429 March 20;-1975 ' -3 N Mr. Anthony A. Dehaesus J., Director of Planning Contra Costa County, Planning Department County Administration Building P. 0. Box 957 17- Martinez, California 94553 Re: E.I.R. Proposal -- Subdivision 4727 Attention: Melvin J. Bobier, Planner III Dear Mr. Dehaesus: We are pleased to submit a proposal for the preparation of ,a draft environmental impact report for the Subdivision 4727 tentative map. This project is called Marina de la Playa Subdivision and it proposes 168 lots bordering Piper Slough on Bethel Island in Contra Costa County. We have had an opportunity to review background material from our own files in addition to those supplied to us by the County Planning Department and accompany— ing the request for proposal. On the basis of this, we outline briefly below our` . view of the problem, our approach and our proposed services. We would,. however, welcome an opportunity to discuss the scope of services for this project with you . further if this were desirable. Were we to be selected for this E.I.R. preparation,' we would expect to communicate frequently with the staff of the Contra Costa County Planning Department in order to insure that our work effort mould be useful to you ..:.' The Problem The project proposes the creation of 168 lots along the levee perimeter of, Bethel Island. These lots will have access both by proposed roadway and by the; waterway of Piper Slough. The project does, not entail construction of specific structure types, but the medium to high value of the land to be.offered under the subdivision will be suitable for either first homes or recreational, or;second ,htOes: The location of this project in the Delta Area of Contra Costa County raises several;' sensitive issues. One major concern is the suitability of the project site for the proposed Ian&. use. This includes engineering considerations, such as levee stability, seismic hazards, and flood safety, as well as social considerations, such as proper access and availability of utilities, particularly waste water treatment. 'r Box 872 Palo Alto,CA 94302 (651 Hamilton Avenue) , s�zF • E.I.R. Proposal Subdivision 4727 -2- March 20, 1375 The second major concern is the impact of the proposed use on the environ- ' ment of the Delta Region. The Sacramento River Delta is an important environ- mental resource -- important as an element in the region's ecology-and important for man's use. Ecologically, the river/delta system is important as the principal source of fresh water for the San Francisco Bay, as an integral part of the. Pacific- Flyway for migratory waterfowl and as a water resource of general value to the California Ccastai Ranee. than makes use of this resource for recreation, for its aesthetic value, for fisheries, for cotramerce and as a water supply for both muni- cipal and industrial use. Historical patterns of land use within the Delta Recion have primarily involved agriculture and water-oriented recreation. The structure: of services, . such as transportation networks, utilities, and commercial faciiities within the Delta are adequate for crly a small population. Increased population' accompanying a land use change, such as the proposed project, creates an additional demand for transportation, utilities and facilities, and increases the impact of man's use of the wet lands resources. Subdivisien 4727 represents a ccntinuetion of changing land use patterns cn Bethel Island. Over the previous decade: two-thirds of the 60,G00 foot perimeter cf this Delta Area has been subdivided fer the ccrstruction of water-oriented ' recreation and first home rousing. Of the remaining 10,000 feet of water frontage on Bethel Island, the proposec project will subdivide slightly over half. Subsequent.;, home construction and the incremental poFuiatien cf some EGO persons represents a continuation of the island's trend towards the urbarizaticn of its perimeter. -Since-* the principal value of land in this area is due to water-oriented recreation, the interior cf Bethel Island has net received the sane dtvelcpment pressure as the perimeter. Future intensive t,se of the interior will comprise access readw-ays, sone ccnr:erciel fac;litie:s, inter1r: wastr mater trema sent facilities; residential dr►�etrp- meet will Le 'im,iteCL withcut tither viater•ways pro f-cts, increasing water frcr.t:are of the island or the development of some non water-oriented recreational facility The proposed subdivision, then, represents a continuation and a near completion of an existing land use trend on Bethel Island. Because of the Delta's importance as an environmental resource and because :of its sensitivity to land use change, population development of this region has been the subject of long study by the Planning Department of Contra Costa County. .. For this reason, we believe that the major purpose of the proposed E.I.R. will beto- assess the project's anticipated environmental impact in the context of long term planning for environmental quality. Our Approach In the interest of comprehensiveness, we .intend to follow the County 1,.I.R. outline, and that docuamnt is included in this proposal by reference. That outline covers the major points of possible project impact and is designed to meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The discussion of many, potential impact areas for this project is essentially straightforward. There,am, however, several topics for which vie intend particularly careful examination. 1 E.I.R. Proposal -- Subdivision 4727 -3- March 20, 1975 As'noted above, this includes an assessment of the suitability of the project site. and engineering for the seismic and flood safety of future homes. The project is located on the north shore of Bethel Island, along Pipe Slough. An area designated in the Delta Recreation. Plan as a restricted waterway. "Restricted",. in -this instance, means that it is considered suitable for the construction of private docks for waterway access. The configuration of proposed lots along the Slough must be'studied with respect to the feasibility of intensive waterfront use. Water quality is one of the principal areas of environmental concern in the Delta Region, and the project must be examined for both short-term impacts during construction and conger-term impacts from recreational use and from waste water generated by project inhabitants. In addition, the areas of traffic with concomitant air quality impacts, community: facilities, and recreational capacity of the waterway gust be assessed. Overall, we intend to stress the relationship of this project to long-term planning for the:,, Delta Region and to interpret the proposed project in the context of the economics of changing land use. Services The object of our study will be to prepare an E.I.R. to meet the County guidelines , in accordance with the C.E.Q.A. As requested, vie will prepare an interim draft for review by the County Planning Department within six weeks after the date of contract approval. One week after we receive changes for the interim draft from the County; Planning Department, we will provide a draft suitable for public review. We propose to perform the work of the first phase, the preparation of the public review draft for tir,3e and material. We anticipate a time requirement for principal staff of fifteen man days. This will include coordination with the County Planning Department, administration and environmental impact analysis. We anticipate a requirement for eight man days of research staff time for data gathering and report production. Time will be charged at Two Hundred Dollars($200.00) per day for principal staff and One hundred and Twenty Dollars($120.00) per day for research staff. Materials include travel time at Twelve Dollars($12.00) per hour and Twelve Cents($.12) per mile and any special studies, such as archaeology. We do not.ixpect materials costs to exceed Foun Hundred Dollars($400.00) for the public review .draft' phase.of the work. On the basis of this time estimate, we suggest that you authorize an upper limit of Four Thousand Three Hundred Sixtv Dollars($4.36f).00) for thA orena a ". tion of this E.I.R. This will include three days of principal staff time in preparation of response to comments required ,for,lVie r' final draft E.I.R. Should additional work be required for the preparation7of Ole final draft, we will perform such work as required at the rate of Twenty Five 161ol. ."iS ($25.00) per hour of contact tir:,e, with travel and mileage as above. Report repro duction beyond five copies of the interim draft for Planning Department review' and beyond one copy plus camera copy of the public review draft will be charged at cost: Enclosed is a background description of key personnel who will participate in this study of Subdivision 4727. Our firm has a long familiarity with Contra Costa. County and with land use issues of major importance to government there. Specifically, we have participated in fourteen projects in the unincorporated portions of the County.. . ",. 29W E.I.R. Proposal -- Subdivision 4727 -4- !March 20, 1975 " These include full E. I. R. preparation for residential development, ecological . > reconnaissances and our present participation_ in:the E.I.R. for- the ,East/'Centralj Waste ldater Management Program. The latter provides a 'tremendous background'_to us on the area of the proposed subdivision. We-feel- that this background combined . �; with our sensitivity to the problem; of growth and environmental quality in 1 " Contra Costa County will insure that our report will- be-comprehensive'. Very truly yours, THOMAS REID ASSOCIATES Imas S. Reid TSR:jw encl: Requested materials will be sent under separate cover. ti x r j iC- T H 0 M A 5 , l �.a—...���, e i11t11, li: •��e�(�E���f.Tf�� 4t�.:���r���- _ M, ..: REI D ski- .s it 111;4if•:� , y "t. ASSOCIATES F."atlilF'!`, (415)327-0423 SCOPE OF SEXiv'Ir; Thous Reid Associates is a group of consulting professionals organized to provide services in environmental s impact analysis, ecological studies and open space planning. Team members are drawn from diverse back- grounds. yet each one retains the overview of other specialties necessary for a complete project analysts, Past wort; includes residential and structural projects. During the last two years;this has tr4ant studies 'f of over 20 private sector residential develeprents totalling more than 20,000 prcposed dwelling units.-' Ye assumed full EIR responsibility for the majority of these projects. and provided special services such as ecological. socioeconcmic or air quality studies for the remainder. An example of the latter is the Harbor Bay Isle project wmere we analyzed ecology, air and water quality iMacts as part of the Arthur D._Little, lnc. study for Ute City of Alameda. Structural projects studied range from water related-projects such as .reserwofrs, dredging, tidal drainage and bay fill to bridge,. sanitary landfill, golf Cotmes, a dfmS abase c-:rster. a calle;e Campos, and a tree farm. An example of a study perfors-ed in the public sector is the growth and air quality analysis of the Palley Cc--,unity Services District Livermore-Faador Valley sewage treatzent plant expansion. - Throughout these studies of the co=mity's housing. structures and services, we have developed'an approach to land use and papulation dynamics that can place technical Infrmaztion in a broader, social context and that can provide useful environmental analysis to government decision makers. Peter C. Hall Nr. Hall received his BA in biology and environmental studies from Alfred University. i:ew York with advanced study at the State University College of New York (Geneseo) and at Hcpkins i!arine Station (Pacific Grove). He has field experience in marine biology on both Atlantic and Pacific coasts. .Peter E. Pollaczek Nr. Pollaczek received his BA in ecor•-onics from the University of California,at Santa Barbara, his LLD from 5oait Hall. University of California at Berkeley, and is a member of the California Far, hr. Pollaczek specializes in land use policy and fiscal impact of growth. He has principal responsibility in socioeconcru c studies. Thomas S. Reid 4r. Reid received a BS degree in chemistry from Yale University. Advanced study in biology at Stenford University includes theoretical work en both animal and plant ecology. He scecializes in the application of boar theory and techniques such as computer capping and aerial infrared photography to problem of land ase and regional planning. As principal consultant. with three years experience coordinating environmental impact analyses. ;'r. Reid has participated in all of the .firm's studies. Benjamin Roberts Mr. Roberts reteived his BS from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his MS from Stanford in civil engineering. Xr. Roberts specializes in the hydrology and quality of surface and ground Haters with particular reference to pollutant dynamics in streams and estuaries. This pefs;.act{ve is important in n�stS,i;.=, mood Use d:a,ge= Hhere subtly oitt:rat:Jrs In Lha hydrologic cycle - can affect a variety of enviro-m-nidl factors. W. Paul Weatherly Fr. keatherly received his 5S from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in engineering and has co.:pleted advance'<' study in biology at Yale University. He is involved in.traffic and transportation analysis and in land use evaluation from the viewpoint of ecological and coaarunity ' needs. Karen S. Weissman Dr. i:eisse.:n received her BA in zoology from the University of California at Los Angeles and her Ma in population biologi and ecolc+ly from Stanford. In addition to continuing ecological work. Lr, lveissran t+as resaansitility for aro;ysing and interrelating air quality. dermography, aesthetic and coz:•rJnity impacts. :Working with Pr. Reid for over a year, she has been project principal for a dozen. major residential and structural studies. In addition to the capabilities within the group itself. Thomas Reid Associates maintains contact with professionals providing expertise in specific areas such as geology and archeology that is needed for a complete study. Boz 872 Palo Alto, CA 94302 (651 Hamilton Avenue) �. * rr In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19:711 In the Matter of =: Application to the United States Department of Labor for Comprehensive Employ- ment and Training Act, Title I, Funding for Fiscal Year 1975-1976. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is. AUTHORIZED to execute an application and Grant Signature Sheet for Comprehen- sive Employment and Training Act, Title I, funding for the fiscal year 1975-1976 in the amount of $1,968,570. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. err I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered-ort the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Agency Superv,son Attn: Ms. J. Miller affixed this 13th day of May 1475 Office of the Governor J. R. OLSSON, Clerk U.S. Department of Labor Association of Bay Area By. - Deputy Clerk ' H 24 1 V7 - 15-m Governments N. In aham County Administrator County Auditor-Controller 00132 r L.S. DR►ARTrRMT OF LA10R • xrpos"r Ad=IWUMI.8 GRANT NWIaER GRANTNATURE SHEET COMrRrAZ"SJV= &W ZNT Axa TZAtxDIG VVIDGA t MODIFICATION MWIRER 503 GRANTOR GRANT[E U.S. Department of Labor Board of Supervisors Manpower Administration County Of Contra Costa 450 Golden Gate Avenue 651 Pine Street San Francisco, California 94102 Martinez, California 94553 This grant is entered into by the United States of America,-Department of labor. Manpower AF1taioistratioe. hereinafter referred to as Grantor and pyo of A1we SPONW)$QAX5LS&, pe visors Contra Costa County hereinafter referred to as Grantee- The Grantee agnts to operate a Compmhen m Empkmoest and Tubmg Program in a=ordanae with the proe MU of this agnemeat. 9WhA o9 the CaotprebUIEW Manpvwit rhe and such qmw al and sp=4 ris=e=as an Bodo" balm A.GRANT PERIOD This Grant agmaaent cotes the paiod Jun) h m 7-1-75 to 6-30-76 B.OBLIGATION Thi: action a8 inmum ❑dea� ❑ don not dMP the federal obUgation for this grant by (ala.ee y S to fwne b.d/ 1 13 968,570 C.TITLE AND FISCAL YEAR TITLE FISCAL YEAR TOTAL 1975 TME I Base 1,968,570 1,968,570 Iaeeati.� a TILE a n.>a D:�aaiona� TITLE m Indians M*Wt OIb , TYLE vI Dbaetknwy TOTAL 1.968,570 8,570 APPROVED FOR THE GRANTOR BY ArrROVED FOR THE GRANTEL BY NAME NAME U.S. Department of Labor Board of Supervisors Manpower Administration Contra Costa County TITLE TITLE James P. Kenny Chairperson SIGNATURE DATE SIGNA UAE / DATE ✓' AY Z 3 197 MN. 19" 0133 Circular go. A-102 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 75020339 (NONCONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS) •..4«�,•n..u.M,.. ]. F.a.»1 Cwe~frees, a. APPWw.None Department of Labor Board of Supervisors U.S. De P Contra Costa Countv G,.M.«4...1 Uew aw.a.+04.4e4r+ Manpower Administration 651 Pine Street ' g Alwiwi.w«i.e 0144.. Srew A/d.eee-PA.Us 450 Golden Gate Avenue Martinez Contra Costa swe"w/M..s_r.0.nee crr CO—, San Francisco California 94102 California 94553 CNi sum 2b Cw& seaft - Z1►ca" Title I of Comprehensive Employment b Training Act 1973 s. F0Ie.e1 Ce6siq 4+u. F. iebrd FwAiy jueem" s s..... c c» o..« r 9. Iir.w1 Awb.ewew•4104.+00 X of•.Ne6e.w. �Gee. Leet 04..(Se..r.4 4 L r.pdwme 06-mai8 Mw,4Hi"1..-N..Peps. U.Le p%a►.eis" 3600 12 months IL ce-...d..a 04«461 M,a..:.i0 0.e - 7, 8, 9 7-1-75 ►- County-wide LU Dom of*0~020 3-13-75 43.I4-..e1N...s.wMies.YW N.&.4..6.1 4w►..s.4e *e./4..4:.4 Me d..e F Nis epoftai a we 6.w eN esr..te.ww4 Nr he w4q eeweir -411.elm wft hed dw~e.w.e i4 4.6.90 4 Nie pw.. I"......' TWO Chairperson Wobw James P. Kenny Board of Supervisors tali Sl�.w... s•.N..N.ei R bei MAY 13 1975 415 228-3000 2221 r re.Fe/rei 41..Ort, 00 ,'.. =a 1 .. .CPN 1 v a./a CONTRA C 0 S T A C O U N T Y. C 0HP RE`HENS IV- E '. 'MANPOWER P.LAH u A N D TITLE I APPLIC'ATIO'N ,.` r FISCAL Y E A R 2 9 7 6, i j RAJ db 1 t o•t• v C ..! ! ! ! Irl i[o `Abr C6 39 0 z CA W 10 on r to z > i a, o n • a o _ �Mtttt to O Zt 1 r •s: _ Mrwr A 0 + M O 4 G CMM tt• cam 10 w Wo p !r p rftes. T tr N ^• r t t• r� I ttAr♦rtttM wT O C O ptA o 0 0 4 •1 .� .40 10 n WDO Sm Ic Q . N o v „t •per �> }�¢ ! qE -'„ 3fi e, 0 0 o >.o AI6 0 vw � OM � p tr +1 IJ 2 C_•O c7� �C. [ I A - o, Zitoto t�Zcl C 3 9 !Lilla _= C w s I w 95 o b ir2 C y � p � ? � O • 's � G •• n It �o t.2 - ,� ! �,� El . =.. V x o n o o o z1 a ro / �• o ,� ,� to a _ � w 3 g ►,•. -4 -410 o µ �T s�► 4r — N 4 v a ;• t r It- J.r �' { j i 1 Ina i �+ a 1 ,• 1 r w tz {J#tA -T-4 vr i i { rl } t^ c4o t r t Rev. 0 _ o ^` 1 3 St. 9 .o �' o DIK 31 C r c y,r Ra)ctt .4 Q 0 .91 = -o n NurnOe. w to O Ln to fAA { Min W aY C) M O A " COnt0. Q .. C [] at F f 'fit { vi Mantes m a D ^ pry 0 < p Yrar n •„� N N � N P [) toAL ir– tT >• V Y P V a, {J C, M {t —W u N 4 e N D ►� R m r "^ Cl c -r Cti tri o y m ra '4 '�`•I tx! 2 _ N '- C 'T1 -a c O X 3 Q 1 z a Q ,r Q '` � G' Q "'" N7 .. .1N ! N I N 0 A Q n � � ? _ co a io D n a -moi - � b Zi i - w ci z „ -mac 1 t_A r A`* # N � ♦ V Y Id {L+�1 ►`t X I n b y Q o E.—. TA ! N 0 t r � p `•1"'_"'.ra ,a` O �y - ra Irt: A �'' C p � D al m ... .a 7 N a ;;rn cc d Z uW A s _ N j {6� w W C w F !3 t1 n n 1 ,N _ �- C �,, ,�t w [+ yt 00137 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF TITLE I GRANT ApMCATTON UNDER THE r COMPREHENSIVE F.mjwmau AND TRAINING ACTOF 2973 CON-M COSTA COUNTY ma, 1975 T A B L E Q C O N T E N T S y-f 1_ GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I ACTIVITIES A. Objectives and Needs for this Assistance " 1. Policy Statement 2. Analysis of Needs B. Results and Benefits Expected C. Approach 1. Planning System 2. Program Activities and Services r^ 3. Management and Administrative Plan 4. CETA Cost Plan ;, 3 ✓t F I. General Requirements for Title I Activities A. Objectives and heeds for this Assistance 1. Policv Statement The purpose of the Contra Costa County Manpower Program for FY 175 - '76 will be to serve the unemployed, underemployed and economically disadvan- taged residents of the County. This service will include programs aimed at particular segments of the disadvantaged population, i.e., English as a Second language, counseling, remedial education and others besides skill.- training oriented programs._She envisioned result of this service is the placement of as many of these residents as possible into permanent, full- time unsubsidized employment. This purpose will be best achievedthrough. ; the equitable distribution of resources throughout the County (excluding the City of Richmond) as determined by the relative need within specific geographical areas. Decisions related to the achievement of this purpose are made by the Man- power Advisory Council and its subcommittee - subject to the approval of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. Because the Council is com- posed of representatives of community agencies, the client community, educational/training institutions, business and labor, and state and municipal organizations, this decision-making process is directly account- able to the desires and needs of the community at large. Included in this program will be activities which will be aimed at serving the youth of Contra Costa County. The goal of the program will be the maintenance of youth-presently enrolled in school and the return of those who are not. Implementation of classroom activities coupled with work experience activities will be coordinated to prepare youth for maximum participation in the labor force. The Manpower Program will utilize, where feasible, existing Federal Programs> in the area and accommodate any and all reasonable requests made by said programs. Ideally, the situation will be one of free exchange ofideasand: information with related goals of service. 2. Analysis of heeds a. Economic Conditions of Area General Description of County Contra Costa County, with an estimated population of 585,900 persons, encompasses 802 square miles bounded on the north by the-Sacrimento River and Suisun Bay, on the west by the San Francisco and San Pablo, Bays, and San Joaquin and Alameda counties on the east and south_re spectively. (See map below). 1, t SOL AND SARIN - _ - CONTRA CONTRA COSTA COSTA-, COU PITY SAN FRANCIS ALAMEDA SAN MATED \ SANTA CLARA Contra Costa County's labor market can be best understood by.dividing the County into two areas -- east and west ---- the dividing line be ing a range of mountains which run in a southeasterly direction,from Richmond, behind Berkeley and Oakland, to the Contra Costa-County line The most eastern fifth of the County is primarily agricultural,. the . ' central portion of the County is a combination of older small towns. plus: a tremendous suburban residential increase in the valley and foothills The western portion comprises cities along the Bay with Richmond- as the` industrial ceater_ -2- 00140 Population Cnange Population Per- Jurisdictions 1960 1970 Numeric centace Antioch 17,305 28,060 9,888 57_1 Brena►ood 2,186 2,649 463 21_2 Clayton 530u 1,385 855 161.3 Concord 36,208 85,164 48,956 135.2 E1 Cerrito 25,437 25,190 -247 -1.0 Hercules 310 252 -58 -18.7 Lafayette 16,SSOu 20,484 3,934 23.8 Maxi-inez 9,604 16,506 6,902 71_9 Pinole 6,064 13,266 7,202 118_8 Pittsburg 19,062 20,651 1,589 8.3 Pleasant Hill 19,170u 24,610 5,440 28.4 Rir!hmond 71,854 79,043 7,189 9.1 San Pablo 19,687 21,461 1,774 9.0 Walnut Creek 9,903 39,844 29,941 302_3 Total Incorp.. . 217,620 378,565 160,945 74_0 Dnincorp. Area 191,410 177,240 -14,170 -7.4 Total County 409,030 555,805 146,775 35.9 *NOTE - Data obtained from Northers California ED & R (March 18, 1975) estimates total Contra Costa County population as of July 1, 1974 at 585,900 persons. r , -3- 00141 For purposes of distributing CETA services the prize sponsor area. will be made up of four seperate districts. (See map below.) DISTRICT ONE: El Cerrito DISTRICT THREE: West Pittsburg San Pablo El Pueblo Pinole Northeast Pittsburg Unincorporated Richmond County Antioch El Sobrante West Rodeo County Hercules Crockett Unincorporated County in that general area DISTRICT TWO: Martinez DISTRICT FOUR s Brentwood Pleasant Hill Oakley Pacheco Fast Unincorporated East Concord County County Central Walnut Creek County Lafayette Orinda Danville Clayton Unincorporated County in that general area Croccett\ Cl+scoga 4Moc� .c Morta►ez f,_ F S- Concord 6rsnf.000 . Pleasant Hitt -.% IMLDiabia Richmond If E1.3819 �1 wolnul Creet Cr toyette T1i c 'r r„to _Oruoso ' Danville 00,1 The Brentwood--Oaklev Area The Brentwood-Oakley area is located at the northern and eastern edge of the County which is bounded by the Sacramento River and Suisun Bay. : ` Primarily a farming area, there is currently some evidence of increas- ing urbanization and some growing -tourist and recreation business on the river. In the 1970 census, the incorporated town of Brentwood had; a population of 2,649 persons. The total of the two census tracts en- compassing Brentwood was 5,632: Census tract 3031 had 3,495 persons and 3032 had 2,137 and the Post Office Zip Code area reported 5,884. Oakley is an unincorporated area with 4,670 persons in Census Tract 3020 (and 5,058 persons in the Oakley Post Office Zip Code area). In the City of Brentwood, there was a 75.1 percent participation rate among males 16 years and over compared to a County rate of 78.9, percent, ` and 90.5 of workers who were working in Contra Costa County. The median. family income was $10,232 compared to $12,423 for the County and 9.1' percent of the families were below the poverty level. The Contra Costa County Planning Department made an extensive study of'. the 5 census tracts in the most northeasterly portion of the County. . Called the East County Planning Area and including both Brentwood: and . Oakley, this study has provided much information used is planning Man- power programs. The East County Planning Area had a median-family income of $9,312 per year compared• to $12,243 for the whole County. Spanish speaking families constituted 22 percent of families in the East County area and had a median family income of $6,663 per year. . The North-Eastern Portion The north-eastern portion of the County is more varied than the Eastern. portion. Pittsburg, West Pittsburg and Antioch are,-areas which have been settled for a long time. Antioch is a growing community, caught in the increasing urbanization which characterizes this County. In Antioch, there were 28,060 persons in 1970. There was a civilian labor , force participation rate of 80.4 percent and 85.3 percent of workers who worked in Contra Costa County_ Antioch is characterized by new sub-divisions and a large new shopping center. Residents primarily work in the industries on the northern waterfront edge of the County. Median family income was $10,971. Pittsburg was the residential and industrial location of persons who came to work in war related employment during World War II. As these- industries and military installations reduced activities, Pittsburg fell into economic decline. The City has an ongoing urban renewal program and has been the recipient of Model Cities funds for the past five (5) years. 0,x143. -s- r The Central Counts Area The Central County area includes the co=nmities east of the Richmond hills and west of Mount Diablo. Martinez, on the north, is the County Seat. It contains a high-income professional community as well as pockets of poverty. For example, one census tract has 9.6 percent Spanish speaking residents and a 13.2 percent unemployment rate. The median income in 1970 however, was a comfortable $12,013. South of Martinez are the cities of Concord, Pleasant H411, and Walnut Creek. communities,comunities, along with Martinez, contain the great majority of CETA eligible residents. In terms of economic growth, this part of the county represents the principle source of opportunity. Major ac- tivity is in assembly line production, electronics, retailing, banking and finance and, until the current economic slump, a booming construc- tion industry. Also located in Central County are the suburban communities of Lafayette,' Orinda, Alamo, Alamo Oaks, Danville, Diablo, Clayton and San Ramon, with .< relatively small incidences of poverty. As a whole, however, Central County contains the highest number of CETA eligible residents. The West Countv Area The West County area, beginning with Crockett in the North and including Rodeo, Pinole, San Pablo, El Cerrito and the unincorporated areas of North Richmond, are area of the County which were settled long ago and have not been growing as rapidly as the rest of the County. The western shore of the County, which is San Pablo Bay, has been the site of oil and chemical refineries and munitions manufactire, all related to the waterfront location. Unfortunately, for the unemployed , these in- dustries are not increasing in employment. Primarily they are capital intensive and not labor intensive industries. Crockett is unincorporated with 3,725 persons reported in the Post Office Sip Code area. Crockett is characterized by older residential struc- tures. There is one very large industry there and it is viewed as a "company" town. It has not grown very much and has the lowest mobility rate of any area in the County with only 34.6 percent of housing units with new residents in the past five years (as reported in the 1970 census). This County has rapid turnover in housing and many areas have. 60-80% new residents in the past six years. The median income of fam ilies in Crockett was $11,028. Rodeo is also an unincorporated area reporting 5,064 persons in-the Post Office Zip Code area. Rodeo has a small downtown area surrounded. by older homes and since 1970, there have been new homes constructed'` in sub-divisions. These are related to the freeway rather than the town and are planned to house commuters. The median income of families- was $9,178. L014� -6- The City of Pinole has fewer minorities, fewer families on public assistance, and a higher median income, but was included because of its , unemployment rate of 6.8 percent. The median income was $12,947. There are two unincorporated areas, West Pittsburg and E1 Pueblo which are very depressed residential areas. They are indistinguishable:from:, .' the rest of Pittsburg to the eye, but are not within the City, limits By most- indicators, these areas exhibit a higher rate of social and . economic decline than the City itself. Pittsburg had a labor force participation rate of 69.8 percent, and. had 86.7 percent of workers working in the County. The median family income was $9,224 compared with $12,423 for the entire County and 13.8 percent of families were below the poverty level. West Pittsburg-.had 71.0 percent participation rate of males over 16 and 84.5 percent of workers working in the County. The median family income was $8,088 and there were 16.3 percent of families below the poverty level. County Table I refers to Contra Costa County only. The latest figures- for the County are available only to March 1974. S.M.S.A. Table I covers the Principal Economic Activities and shows growth and declining activity on an S.M.S.A. basis updated to March 1975. In the San Francisco - Oakland S.M.S.A., between March 1974 and March 197I 5, ; there was an increase in the civilian labor force of 41,700; an increase in.. employment of 10,700; an increase in unemployment of 31,000; and an adjuste&. unemployment rate of 9.8 percent. The increase in the labor force of 41,700 reflected small seasonal: gains in most industry groups in the private sector. Retail trade payrolls received a large boost with the opening of discount department stores. Employment in durable goods manufacturing fell to its lowest level in two. "` years during the period of February to March 1975. This was precipitated;! by a major truck manufacturer's decision to close its East.Bay assembly plant. Governmeut services are on the rise as result of the influx of emergency federal funds. Employment is expected to show seasonal increase in the latter part of 1975' as tourist-oriented and agriculture rise with the end of the rainy season. -7- >> 0 M cn "1 -a ^a �I %V •r} m rr. W rt O A w K 1 C O r O m o O V it M m K "" C K O G O a 0 7 rr X K V to C. o' n n Fr tD A < O C- 7 C m o m O M, _ R K C ►+ A KK F► .Zf 0 tD G m V% R K N Cr O o" TS to C K r_ ' A tD A R"O ID n m ). 3 to R H Aa I+ C H+ 2 8 A ca 0 r• O A c I-+ o m M R co > K R R R O 0 CS I-+• N K R A M+ N F+ 0 a 1+ R G R to < .b O b M + K I R {„- 1.1 R m K I- X I+ tD H O .. 'O H N O 1-400 R@ eD ly a 0 K I+ %* D to ,-, %D n K to c m 0 00 m m t► o c.. K n V I+• ►+ R K 0 A O N 3 = ta rw c m a m w o to tD A N A O O O �O @ N D K O K rn 2 Im-+ G. 3 K c: c. :sa is Cr m to R A a R o 90 t 0 H m m to mcr r A M _ es 0 ? N ai aoD 9 N Im+- r* O O 1-6 H to 0% N O is .~ 0 %A La N m o c. � H H N V to Cis tD b 0 A h+N N N N N w cT N N a CI m 00 > �O N M r M w w V %01.- tT w O N n0 c 02 0 r %0Inmw %A V ZOOw w O O W m O 1 W d 00000 00 000 Cl Co O O K 010 < y aOooO 0 C Ooo 0 o a o m mQ w a c 0 %4 i; -cl n m W an 00 ao <n rt o+li LrJ N O O 0 W + $ 7d N w N r to O t7 O N N v O co A IT at %A LnCD n _ + l9 N In Vi O d+ :2 m d N V to O 1- O co 0%%0 A N co co R n U tANOmCh V %0 O►coN w O. Cl N O » t!3 O O O O O O Cl Co Co O O O Co o O 0 9 O O O Cl O O O O O O O0 Cl O Co cr Z *! K O 0 C > O N K t� tb to I-J C* W %D H V r4 Ln O VT 0 O N N N w N V+ W N V N O V to N V to N w w�O to LO w N N G m • • • • r + + • N I.+ m r C%C%O N N m N w I-- O O O N W m O O O O O Cl O Cl O O O O O O V. R n oO000 0O oOo a o Cl o r I�- 0 0 r� C6 n R to N o0 N 9 + 7 %0 Za A O' m N o► N rt tD ao w w m a. N w r to w mm ►+. N N N W N - Lrt Q1 V W to rt N V cc N %A w %D tT tD 0% W 0 N @ O W r N �O W 10 M r aO N O O O N O aOooa CD C> 000 o Cl o Cl rn Ln 0000a Oa Ooo Co Cl Co o m >f * a~ >F * * * >t >♦ >r w N ` lV O O O O O h+ O o 0 H r-3 H H O W rr to > > > %a > I-.• m to > > > > V + r+ P4 r-i to .I` ZO t-• t-0wN wr N r r m o > w r a+ O a o% to > to > to 0 Cil C[S• ► Lsy + CO + rl r" a-an A t-r-+ N Q+w t o 0 r N C� Mm %AOo 00 00o rel Cl rn o . oao 00 000 0 o a. >F aoz�s . f • S.M.S.A. TABLE Z Nonagricultural. Wags and Salary and l6s'f4-a1LQral]�1ot�,eat San FYanciNotstmalitaa Area (tlaweda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San bate* Cb=ties) 1975 1974 rArch February January MarcIN PrelirtinaT7) Nonagrica],tural %age and sal=7 worksic0000..*. *........r.. 1'3169300 2,3110900 1,317,70y01.,298,000 Mineral lx�tlon ...w...rr.. 1,500 10500 1,500 1,600 construction ................. 57,9Q0 56ADO 58,900 63,000 :Mamttacturing ................ 187,5�00� 1�8L8,9�[0�0� 190,VLW 192,900 Durable goods -�...._...*.rs. ry94,6 0 96otJurW �9+7�,9000�� 98MO primary metals .*..a.._... l2v500 l2v4OO 12,400 23,310 Fabricated metals -------- 19,500 19,800 19,1900 20,300 Wonelactri.cal machinery .. 18,400 180500 18,600 18,000 F�a1�.jecctria,��.j+./�r_achi nerq 0 0 0 0* 1..7,000/0 l6 v70O 17220D 17s7QO motor Vehicles 0..00.000.0 5,700 7,300 8,000 7,400 Shipbuilding and repair .* 3,900 4,100 4,000 3,400 Other durable goods ..•._. 17,600 17,700 17,804 18,600 Nondurable goods 00..000.*.. 92,900 92,400 92,500 94.,20D Food canxdmg and preserving 3,5GO 5,400 5,100 6,000 other good processing .... 22,000 �2^1,^'5�0y0� 21,600 �2+208W Ipparei ..ww.....••.s.•... 11,200 11,100 11,100 11,400 printing ----------------- 190200 19,300 19,300 289700 Other nondurable goods ... 35,C00 35,100 35,400 35,300 Transportation, c==,nication ^ft1t� �� �yy� �yy� O and utilities ..•.••..__.•._w 122,200 122,000 123,LLD 124,300 Trade286,300 2850000 289000028270 'Wholesale 67, 00 87,1000 87,400 87,600 Re'ai1 .w............w...... 19$,900 197,900 2010600 195,100 Finance, insurance, and real 111,v500 n ,10 1U,1oO 109,300 Servicea�y.._._._i.....___w.*_. 263,L��00� 294,,000 281y600 2662,2'0/0'► �2(5�8y,700 Gover=.e:nt .....*.w w*wr•_•_.. 286,000 284,101 2&1,600 265,500 Agriculture ........... 5.6 5.3 5.4 5*� E--p2rRr�sztt reported by place of-work. Does ndt include persons in4olved in labor rs.nagemrnnt trade disputes. .reFared by: Northern CaliSoz sties E lagmnt Data and Research., 745 Franklin Street, San Francisco, California 94102 -_ Phone: (415) 557-3052 VU141 -9- - 3) Economic Outlook Economic, and therefore, employment growth in the Bay Area during 2975 is expected to be only slightly above the July 1, 1974 civilian employment total of 213,200 persons.l Using this employment base znd accepting ED:bR`s employment outlook estimates, the seasonally adjusted unemployment;rate will reach 10.5 percent (22,386 persons) by June 1975. This rate is ex- pected to continue to rise until the fourth quarter of the year. It should then level off and fall to a rate of 10.2 percent (21,747 persons) by June 1976.'- Taxable retail sales for the County for 1974 were $1,399,015,000.3 No estimates are available for projected retail sales for 1975 or the first half of 1976. Similarly, figures are also unavailable on project lay-offs for the same period. The data gathered has shown that there will be a logical projection of approximately 2,500 new jobs in Contra Costa County between 1975 and 1976. These jobs are broken down into 12 categories. They are: 1. Agriculture, including forrestry and fishing. 2. Mining, basic metal, oil and gas, and minerals. 3. New Technology Manufacturing or Manufacturing 1. 4. Central Urban Manufacturing or Manufacturing 2. a. Textiles. b. Printing. c. Rubber and Plastic. d. Leather and leather goods. 5. Decentralized Urban or Manufacturing 3. a. Food products. b. 'Wood products. c. Furniture and fixtures. d. Paper products. e. Clay, sand, and glass products. 6. Metal and Machinery Manufacturing or Manufacturing 4. a. Metal fabrication and machinery. b. Transportation equipment. 7. Petrochemical and Primary Metals or Manufacturing 5. a. Chemical products. b. Petroleum and coal products. 8. Long Distance Transportation. a. Rail, truck, water, air, pipe-line. b. Warebousing. 9. Wholesale Trade. 10. Finance and Insurance. 11. Institutional Services. a. Business services. b. Educational services. 12. Federal and State Services Non-educational. 2 Contra Costa County Universe of Need, FY 1975 - 1976 ED SSR, March 18, 1975. ' Employment Outlook and Manpower Planning Project Report, FY 1975 - 1976, ED SSR March 1975. 3 California State Department of Finance. O 'W- -1 n- ' Of these 12 groups only one is expected to have no growth in 1976 and the next five years. That is in the mining category. Of the remaining 11 categories, those with the most new job potential appear to be: NEW PERCENTAGE ENTRY LEVEL JOB CATEGORIES POSITIONS OF TOTAL POSITIONS Institutional Services 496 20Z 50 - 100 Metal and Machinery Manufacturing 490 19Z 49 - 98 Petrochemical and Primary Metals 415 16I 41 - 82 Central Urban Manufacturing 336 13Z 33 - 66 Wholesale Trade 325 13Z 32 - 64 Federal and State Government 232 9X 23 - 46 New Technology 224 9X 22 - 44 Decentralized Urban Manufacturing 172 6X 17 - 34 Long Distance Transportation 114 4Z 11 - 22 Agriculture 24 1% 2 - 5 Finance and Insurance 22 lz 2 - 5 Of the 2,500 new jobs we have projected for 1975 - 1976 approximately 10 to 20 per cent should be entry level positions. SOURCES OF DATA:GRONORTH STUDY ENTRY LEVEL EMPLOYEE PROJECTION Conducted by ABAG/MTC. PG b E, PT & T, and EBMUD CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS U. S. Bureau of the Census 00149 1 TABLE Z CIVILIAN EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY INDUSTRY PERCENTAGE CHANGE'-" 1970 1974 1975 70-74 74-75 Total, All Industry 131,400 146,700 +11.642 r Agriculture 2,500 800 -68 X '' Mining 200 300 +50 % Construction 9,800 8,600 12.24X' Manufacturing 26,600 26,500 + .372 Transportation, Communications, Utilities. 8,900 10,100 +13.48X fi Wholesale and Retail Sales 28,700 36,400 +26.82X Finance, Insurance, Real Estate. 4,600 6,400 +39.13X r< Service Industries 20,600 24,500 +18.93% Government 29,500 33,100 +36 x Source: ED &K, San Francisco-Oakland S.H.S.A. Employment Outlook, Manpower Planning Report Fiscal Year 175 - '76. Date of Data: Larch 1975. :r f, 40150 =` :r r . TABLE II ECONOMIC INDICATORS CONTRA COSTA AREA Indicator 1970 1974 1975 Percentage (Sample of Indicators that can be used, others may be _ Change appropriate for particular 1970-1974 areas) Population 555,805 585,9001 N/A + 5.28% Total Non-Agricultural Employment 128,900 145,9002 N/A +13.13% Agricultural Employment 2,500 8002 N/A -68 Z: Unemployment Rate 5.6Z 82 11.27 2.4 Z Personal Income Retail Sales Taxable 9.1$,130,000 1,644,650,0003 N/A +42.952 Value Added by (1967) (1972) Manufacture 602.1M 639.3�6- N/A + 6.172 Number of Housing Permits 6,650 6,637 N/A .19% (June 1970) (June 1973)4 Bank Deposits 801,408,000 1,217,079,000 N/A +51.86Z ' Taxes Collected Sales 60,973,450 106,902,25 N/A +75.312 Property 197,417,770 253,378,367 N/A +28.34Z- TOTAL 258,396,220 360,280,617 1 Contra Costa Planning-Department. 2 ED &R San Francisco-Oakland S.M.S.A. Employment Outlook, Manpower Planning Report ' Fiscal Year '75 - '76. 3 State Department of Finance 4 State Banking Department --- San Francisco 5 Contra Costa County Assesor's Office 6 Census Manufacture Department of Commerce 04151, -13- .: ...:.... LABL 1 - COU:..-Y ESTIMATED PER:E►•'TAGE OF WORKERS IN NDN-AGR 1 CULTURAL ESTABL t SFMENTS, BY t 14DUSTRY SAI: FRAM iSCG - OAKLAND PA=-TPD AREF Areb March I N D U S T R Y 1970 1971 1972 11973 1974 1975 (Mineral Extraction . 15 . 15 .15 . 12 .12- .11 Construction 4.93 - 4.87 4.85 4.83 1+.85 4.39' Manui acturi nc 16.05 15.27 14.81 14.90 14-87 14.25 transportation and Utilities 10.61 10.36 10.01 9.69 9.58 9.29:- i t ra ae 21 . 16 21 .43 21 .67 21 .83 21-79 21.76 ( Finance, insurance and Real Estate 7.70 7.84 8.04 8. 18 8.42 8-47-, ( Services 17.73 - 18.01 18.58 19.23 19.93 20.01 Government 21 .67 22.07 21 .89 21 .22 20.45 21-72 100.00 100.00 100.00 100-00 100.OD 100.00 Wage and Salary Workers Vage and Salam Roriers In Non-agricultural establishments In Bon-agricultural establishments By Industry San Francisco-Oakland-Metres p olitan Area San Francisco-Oalstend-Metropolitan Area Part A: 1966-1973 San 1}ancisco-Oakland Labor Market, Bull, California Emp 1 oyment Development Department California Employment Developement Depar W152 -14- � � x b. Characteristics of the Labor Force (1) Employment Status by Sex and Ethnic Group Racial/Ethnic Groups According to Population and Sex According to the 1970 Census, the population of the Prime Sponsor Area (Contra Costa County - excluding the City of Richmond) was 479,346 and had the following, racial and ethnic breakouts: Racial/Ethnic Group Total Percentage of Population White, Non-Spanish-American 455,043 94.932 Black- 12,921 2.69% American Indian 1,460 .32% Oriental Asian 8,623 1.79% Other 2,243 7.49% Spanish-American 43,907 9.16% The 'Oriental-Asian" group may be further broken down by the following subgroup within it: 2 of Oriental/Asian 2 of total Subgrouping Total Population Population Japanese 3,417 39.622 .71% Chinese 2,651 30.74% .55% Filipino 2,372 - 27.51% .49% Korean 183 2.13% .042 8,623 100% 1.79% The Prime Sponsor Area's population is composed of approximately 49% males and 51% females. A further breakdown of sex by ethnic group follows: Racial/Ethnic Group Male % Female % White, Non-Spanish American 224,337 (49.3%) 230,706 (50.72) Black 6,277 (48.93%) 6,553 (51.072) Oriental Asian 4,247 (49.25%) 4,376 (50.75%) American Indian 71.1 (48.7%) 749 (51.3%) Other 1,146 (51.12) 1,097 (48.9 Spanish American 22,179 (50.51%) 21,728 (49.49%) 236,535 242,811 Again, the "Oriental-Asian" group may be further broken down by the following subgroup: Subgrouping Male 2 Female % Japanese 1,562 45.7% 1,855 54.32 Chinese 1,328 50.12 1,323 • 49.9% Filipino 1,293 54.52 1,079 45.5% Korean 67 -36.6% 116 63.4% tin Vi � :F i 61 Racial/Ethnic/Sex Breakout of Labor The Civilian Labor Force in the prime Sponsor Area numbered 210,760 in March of 1975. Table III details the racial/ethnic composition of the labor force. The male participation rate in the labor force is 81.1% and the female parti- cipation rate is 39.4%. The overall labor force participation rate for the Prime Sponsor Area was 59.732 per the 1970 Ceaeus, while the Civilian labor, force totaled 191,231. As of March, 1975, the Civilian Labor force grew to 210,760 - an increase of 19,529 or 10.22. A cross breakdown of the labor force by racial/ethnic group and by sex is as follows (based on 1970 Census Data): White, non-Spanish Spanish American American Black Other Males (125,745) 100,093 (52.34%) 10,394 (5.43X) 2,467 (1.29X) 2,766 (1.45%) Females 69,938 (13.66%) 4,957 (2.59X) 1,897 (.99X) 1,572 (.82X) (65,501) Racial/Ethnic/Sex Breakout of Unemplovment As of the April, 1970 Census, 10,019 individuals or 5.24% of our Civilian labor force were unemployed. Among the different racial/ethnic groups, the Spanish- Americans and the Blacks suffered higher unemployment rates than did whites and "other" races. April, 1970 Unemployment Rates Male Female Total White, Non-Spanish American 4.5% 6.5% 5.2Z Spanish-Americans 5.84% 9.6Z 7.092 Blacks 12.892 13.70% 13.242 Other races 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% The economy, and therefore, the unemployment rates have changed dramatically since the 1970 Census. The overall unemployment rate for the Prime Sponsor Area was 8_9% in March, 1975. The number of persons unemployed totaled 18,812 - an increase .: of 8,793. The forecast on economic upturn is slow. Assuming, however, that an upward trend` begins, it will not do so until late 1975. By that time, employment growth. in 1975 will probably not be sufficient to absorb the large numbers of people who have become unemployed in the past year. Although total employment is .expected, to reach a level above the last two years, the growth will not be sufficient to absorb the large numbers of entrants and re-entrants into the labor market, many of whom will have little or no skills or experience., as a result, a high rate of unemployment can be -.xpected through 1975 and 1976. 00154- f .,ter t1� C^ O RDQ� or CIO (D - �+ co O � n r► w Ili iM n - coO-Z 01. O r r Oto 9D r � Q '"'► ac { OO W C O O ,.. •� Cb eta En t'7 ,r .moo z " w r cP.i+ r w - o c r N to N a, w � � to a a a > iv v o co is w Z s� w co co o, v w t«+ to cr+ � O � Gn _ A ty !b VIP CD V N � Cl %D Q co r V w tT w re O+ aQ ?! v v v CIP r. C) ell r C Cu t+ ti *"� Z Z Z Z 1� tNr► ► � Ct'C A a > a 9 > r ow+ w coo i woo CL � ri r•� r. r. � n � • � Ol..; F-' A tJs C: Q f�" •�+ Q !'I �M � Q• ✓ ?t N i� t3s. v+ v P-i POT to �✓ a•! At }a1 -.,: ='O 0 tj .a rZ O 17! X N r.. K X I - K m !--• 01 0% N Go tT m n Oo to =' 1 2 = Z t- _ w vu r p r -• { o O'C K tD a a �► a -5 6iC m a to tU A tb v v 1Q+ t-+ ID A o O =ay • {7t t31 Ct C3� N N C16 *r �00 Co w N R tD iD ry %a to %0 %0 W %D t7 N r w Vs r• 1+ A K rt O ate zG m i+ N ttt N N tx► ?4 i14 N, n n, to OO r co r t,n CI Oo K Z Z Z Z Oo n O V N co co t3 w aL1 o o a O K Q v 9 t+ A C• ~C+ t~i+ to n v m w occc o C7 oo avo sw+ r !O p, .t O vcl to is O � � � O 40155 (2) Population Groups In Table IC, are special population groups or target groups most in need of Man- power services in the Prime Sponsor Area. The economically disadvantaged are our main concern in the County. These persons are composed mainly of the unemployed and underemployed. ID b R - San Francisco estimates the 'Universe of Need for Manpower Services for- Fiscal Year 1976 as 97,500. This represents 16.64% of County population as-of' July 1, 1974. Of this total, 16,800 are "poor" and 80,700 are "aoa-poor" (composed. of 19,300 in "near poverty" group and 61,400 listed as "all other non-poor". Of the economically disadvantaged in the Prime Sponsor Area, there are specific subgroups that have a crucial need for Manpower services. Target % of Total Population Population Group Group below Poverty Level Black 25.552 Spani.sh-American 9.43% Female Heads of Households 29.46% Public Assistance Recipients 100% Based on '70 Census. It should be noted that the 1970 Census indicated there were 4,381 families within; the Prime Sponsor Area that were on Public Assistance. The Quarterly report of the Contra Costa County- Social Services Department indicates there 'vere 6,963 families on public assistance as of 12/31/74 and an increase of 2,582 families. (3) Age Breakdown The division of age groupings within the Prime Sponsor Area can be seen in Table V. fill -18- 1 lablt It Lnaracteristscs c: int Laoor i orc_ Population Grouts ' Total Percent Minority Percent otai Population 479,346 1002 - 56,737 •(11.84X) Total # of Families 129,450 100% 13,370 (10.33X) I'lubl is hssistance-ARIC ) + 4,381 3.382 970 ( .75X) -ublie Assistance-Other ) Fcononrically Disadvantaged 49381 3.382 970 ( .75X) Bel ow Poverty Level - 6,930 5.357 1,739 (1.34X) • Limited English Speaking N/A N/A - N/A N/A Ability - - Migrant Farm Worker ) '� 1,262 .26% 332 ( .06X) Seasonal Farm porker ) - Veterans N/A N/A N/A N/A Special Veterans N/A - N/A N/A N/A (tandi capped N/A N/A N/A N/A Ex-VI N/A N/A N/A - N/A Female Head of Household 2,839 2.19% 1,699 (1.31X) clear -Poor 1252 of Poverty _ 2,589 2% 177 families ( .17%) 4 Forner r;anpower Participants N/A N/A' N/A N/A U. 1. txhaustees N/A N/A N/A N/A Uneiigl oyed more than 15 weeks N/A N/A N/A N/A Not Eligible for U. I. N/A - N/A N/A N/A _ (except those lacking work experience) Sources: U. S. CENSUS NOTE: Figures are for Prime Sponsor area (Contra- " Costa County - excluding the City of Date of Data: 1970 Richmbnd) - -19- 0015, M. raft ■ M WAMW bow •. r ru•a tabtr Cnare�tertst�c: c`. tnf. tecta AGE ?ota't Percent Female Percent Unemployment kt otal Population - 479,346 (1000 242,811 (50.652) 4.52 / March 1.75;.;8:. Civilian Labor For 191,231 (39.890 " 65,486 (13.66X) ander 1& 165,102 (34.442) 81,256 (16.95X) Only following 6 through 20 37,526 (7.83X)+ 20,813 • (4.342) Age breakouts z6~ through 20 15,698 (3.272) 6,817 (1.42.X) Available: ` tot in School Bales: 16 --- Dues (4:53%) !I through 34 87,041 (18.16x) 45,097 - (9.40%) 36 through 44 62,450 (13.03%) 31,902 (6.66%) Female. 16 - over, 16 through 54 100,339 (20.935) 50,304 - (10.49X) (6.58X) 35 and over 32,655 (6.815)' 18,690 (3.90X) Source. U. S. CENSUS NOTE; Figures are for Prime Sponsor Area {Contra Custa County -- excluding City of Xicbmon Date of Data: 1970 * Source - ED & 8 - San Francisco A better understanding of the Labor Force Characteristics is found by 9 the individual CEM Districts. In addition to the narrative descriptions, two tables are included grapbically. presenting CETA district information. DISTRICT I - NEST COUNTY The population of West Coun-ly wits be discussed together, although the sub-areas Dear little statistical relation to each other. The reason for discussing these areas together is because they show the same labor market, which is the Richmond/Oakland area. Rodeo and San Pablo-have Spanisb-speaking populations of higner porcrnracfr than me :.ovn:y*� o4eraf1 perces- Cage, which 1s 9.3 percent. ;ioaea nag 20.0 ncrcenr and San Pablo 14. 1 percenT. The percenTaoe of blacks .rias 4.1 percent for Rodeo and 2.5 percent for San Pablo. North Richmond -it; an unincorporated area and all statis- tics were oa#hered from census tract data. These figures. show 92.4 -percent black and 0.4 percent Spanish speaking with an overall unemployment rate of 18.0 percent and 20.0 percent for blacks. The unemployment rate for Rodeo was 8.1 percent overall and 13.0 percent for Spanish speaking. in San Pablo, the overall unemployment rate was 6.8 percent with 8.0 percent for blacks and 6.7 for Spanish speaking. Percen- tage of youth from 16 - 21 years of age who were not in school , unemployed or not in labor force was 24 percent in Rodeo and 32 percent in San Pablo. DISTRICT 2 - CENTRAL COUNTY In the Central portion of the County is the largest job market (excluding Richmond) . Central County has some- what better transportation, for instance, BART to down- town Oakland, and more extensive training opportunities through high schools and college districts. The unernoloy- went rate for the Ci•!y of Concord va- 5.0 percent in 1970 and for Martinez was 5.2 percent. The percent of blacks in Central County is less than 2 percent. Spanish speaking represented 7.1 percent in Concord ,and 9.4 Percent in !farti nez. 00159,11-'. a 22 '. , DISTRICT 3 - SOF31LEAST In the City of Antioctl, 15.9 perCent of residents were Spanish speakinc. 7ne unemploymeni -rate for the City was 5.b percent and 7.0 vercent among Spanish speaking. Twenty-two percent of Youth (16-21 years of age) were not in school , were unemployed or not in the labor torte. Pittsburg and West Pittsburg exhibit higher concentra- tions of minorities than Antioch. Pittsburg had 22. 1 percent black and 24.6 percent Spanish speaking. West Pittsburg had 12.6 percent black and 16.2 percent Spanish speaking. The unemployment rare was 11 .6 percent in Pittsburg and 11 .8 percent in West Pittsburg. Minorities had higher rates of unemployment with 19.4 percent of blacks in Pittsburg unemployed and 11.4 percent of Spanish Speakinc. In West Pittsburg, blacks had 13.8 percent unemployment rate and Spanish speaking had 12.1 percent. In Pittsburg, 29 percent of youth (16-21 years of ace) were not in school or were unemployed or not in the labor force. This not only indicares that there were numbers of youth looking for work, but also because many did not stay in school , their skills training as well as their basic education was and is often less than youth from other areas. DISTRICT 4 - EAST COUNTY The population of the East County area is less than five percent of the County's total population. There was fess than 1 percent black population and 28.0 percent Spanish speaking in Oakley and 29.8 percent Spanish speaking in Brentwood. The unemployment rate in Brentwood was 10.2 percent and alm6st double that for Spanish speaking whose rate was 22.2 percent. In Oakley, the rate was 8.3 percent and among Spanish speaking was I1 .0 percent. In Oakley, 15.5 percent of youth (16-19 years of ace) were not in school , compared to 8.7 countywide. The median income in Oakley was the lowest in the 5 counties of the East County Planning area and 43.7 percent of families were on public assistance. Spanlsn apezasng adults (25 year, ena ostwr) ne3 attained a lower educational level znan the area at. a whole. For example, in the-Oakley area only 25_5 percent of Spanish surname persons had comoleted a high school education, compared to 42.8 percent for the East County Planning area. 00160- � I � ` TABLE II - COMM- FAMILY INCOME AND PERCENT BELOW PDVERTY LEVEL } FAMILIES ONrA ENT ON 12/31/74 1 TOTAL PUBLIC IC PEF_'ENT BELOW FAMILIES ON AREAS FAMILIES ASSISTANuE 57ANCE 6?OYERTY LEVEL PUBLIC ASSIST: '4f) Fast Countv 3.831 514 13A 1 .2 832, Brentwood 1 ,580 281, 13.4 14.9 374 Oakley 1 ,389 210 _ 15.1 12.7 33 North-East County 16,0hh 2,065 22.8 , Z 10.1+ 4,369 Antioch 7,991 653 8.2 - 6.5 1,56T Pittsburg 14.2 West Pittsburg 8,208** 1424** 17.3** 16.3 I 2,802 70 Central County - 69,97 3239 1+•6' 3.7 5,623 Concord 21 ,291 1213 5.7 3.0 2,527 Martinez 4,232 423 10.0 i " 7.5 970 634 ). Hest County 34,056 3109 9.1 6.6 � 1+ 382 Rodeo �` 1 ,364 231 16.9 11 .7 :38 Pinole 3,506 158 4.5 2.3 2666 1,361 San Pablo 5,647 694 12.3 8, 1 North Richmond 1 ,098_j 360 35_7 _ 11 .2 551 * Estimated from census tract data United States Bureau of the Census * includes West Pittsburg and .Pittsburg Census of Population-Housing: ** Median Income of Spanish-Speaking 1970 Census -Tracts -- families 56,663 Final Report PHC (1 )-189 SF-OAK SMSA social Service D--,oartment I Quarterly Stat 12/33171+ -24- • rft TABLE Z11 - CDM-rY POPULATION AND UNEMPLOWENT- IROVLOWEN'T '16- YERPS.AND•OLDSC-. TOTAL PERCENT SPANISHARU POPULATION BLACK SPEAKING TOTAL IRATE--ISLACKI. RATE -. AKI f=1 sk i:: sst County 1 ,899 0.1 24.7 h08 8.2' N/A. ., 8/A .. :";.IF 4L.:' �8ff 3rentwood 2,649 0.0 29.6 104 10.2 . -0- 4,670 0.1 28.9 138 8.3 ,err 3rth-East •"x 61,22 9.6 1 .TSun 1896 8.1 8/.A a/A .:_tioch 28,060 0.1 15.9 641 5.8 10: .71.:a. 'ittsburg 20,651 22.1 24.6 855 11'.06 309 , 1.91'4: 8b.:= ;t l< 4: Pittsburg 5.969 12.6 16.2 248 _ 11.8 .35. 13.8: .42>'' aunty 286,000 0.3 h.6 479T 3.6 N/Aa/a oncord 85,164 0.4 7.1 722 5.0 -0-'. ,tines 16.506 1.9 9'.4 339 5:2 -0- 0-'. 'tet County 1259951 9.8 T-3 3091 . 6-3 I/a' a/�► . . ..a1 :ark. 5,064 4.1 20.0 169 8:1 -0l -o- 53. :. '. i� Q' 3i ncl a 7,297 .3 8.4 221 6.8 -0- :gin Pablo 21,461 2.5 14.1 597 6.8. 20 8:0. 70 . 3rth Richmond " 3.177 92.4 0.4 140' 18.0 129 .'20.0 :-0= .incdrporated areas. data estimated United States Bureau by census tract Census.of Population-Nous'hig Numbers lo small, data suppressed 1970 Census. Tracts.`` F1nol Report PFC 't 1)-L89.SF-CM. wY c. Assessment of Skills Shortaaes Professional , Technical , and Managerial Almost one out of ten persons employed in the San Francisco Oakland Bay Area is in a management position. The number of persons working in management positions will continue to grow but at a slower pace than that of other white collar workers. According to Employment Data and Research of the Employment Development Department, the majority of new management positions will be in the fields of Trade, Services,and Finance, and Insurance and Real Estate. - Since approximately two thirds of the openings in the professional , Technical, and Managerial positions are simple replacement as a result of death or retirement, the projected rate of 18,200 new jobs in this category in the San Francisco-Oakland Metropolitan Area, should not be as affected by the current economic downturn as some of the major labor projections have been. At the present time there seems to be an adequate supply of sufficiently educated persons to take care of the labor market for Professional, Technical and Managerial positions. Sales Opportunity for sales positions should be better in Contra Costa County or the Prime Sponsor Area than in most of the rest of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area because there are two shopping centers planned for the central county and a regional shopping centerplanned West County in the Richmond, San Pablo, E1 Sobrante area. In the fields of outside sales and wholesale trade there is a heavy dependence-on the general state of the economy. There are positive projections by the Employment Data and Research Department that the major increases in wholesale trade will be in firms supplying various types of machinery and equipment. Understandably, sales of some products or categories of products fall when the economy is in a downturn. New car sales are down further than any time in the last twenty years and people are not purchasing high cost items such as pianos organs, or other items which represent non-essential purchases. Clerical The largest growth in new jobs will be the clerical groups. One out of four new jobs in new businesses will be in the clerical group. More than 60 per cent of all new clerical jobs will be in the occupational groups of Services, Trade and Finance, and Insurance and Real Estate. There is a ,portage in supoly of highly qualified clerical persons. This shortage is mainly in the following fields. 1. Secretary 3. Stenographer 2. Bookkeepers 4. Accountant Lower skill level clerical positions are plentiful but so is the number of persons ready to fill these positions. In addition to a large labor force that is available to fill entry level clerical positions, lower skill level positions are being eliminated by new technology and automation. UV -26- 27 The employment outlook for the highly sUlled is a=ng the best of joc opportunities in the Bay Area. For the marginally skilled, however, there are more people looking than there are jobs to be filled. Craftsmen This group of ogcupations is affected by movements in the general economy of the nation. As in other fields of work, if someone is "really, good" in his/her field, he/she has an excellent chance of finding work. host of the craft unions are phasing out their apprenticeship programs because the economy is currently unreceptive and many of the craft unions have persons on job-waiting list. in attempt to gauge the rate of employment and the employment potential of various craft positions, the Prime Sponsor conducted a labor market survey. The results of that Labor Harket Survey follow the discussion of occupational groups. Overatives The operative, or semiskilled worker group of occupations accounts for about 13 percent of total employment statewide. This category of workers is relatively smaller in the Bay Area, comprising less than 11 percent of the total jobs locally. Except for the employment of farmers and farm workers, which will decline from 1972 through 1975, job gains in the oper- ative occupations results, in part, from the heavy concentration of these semiskilled workers in the manufacturing industry division, which plays a less important role in the Bay Area economy than it does in the State as a whole. The.employment level of operatives in the manufacturing industries will follow most closely trends in transportation equipment, electical and nonelectrical machinery and fabricated metal products man- ufacturing. Growth in the trade division, which employs one out of five- local semiskilled workers, will provide a slight employment boost in the operative occupations. The fastest job gains for operatives will occur in : the transportation idustrg as trucking and warehousing activity continues to expand rapidly through 1975. Trolaymmt in Ya;ar OpeY'ative O cupaticros 1972 1975 Oom-etives 143,924 146,716 Operatives, except Transpertatim EmAment Operatives 98,764 100,224 -lied ed Metal Wca -kers 10,951 11,085 Grinding, Lathe E Milling P"achine Operatives 1,633 1,806 Ruch E Stamping Press Operatives 1,088 1,121 Welders and Flamm Ox-&-tens 5,940 5,647 Sem-:ski :ed Pah ng E Inspecting k��cers 15,274 15,506 Other Opemtives, except M arspm t Egi:ipmesct Opezaxives 72,334 73,427 Assemblers 8,708 9,552 Battling and Canning motives 1,647 1,698 Garege Markers E Gasoline Station Attendants 8,224 8,137 L mnxny 8 Dry Cleaning Operatives 3,247 2,965 Semis and Stitchers 7,203 7,371 M�cel]�ns Turbine motives 12,481 12,499 Transport Eaui=x!nt Ope.ratives 45,160 46,492 Bus Drivers 4,146 3,97 �s Delivery and Routemen 11,300 11,52NIC Fork Lit E Tow Pbtur Oiler eves 53,078 5,064 auck Driver 19,299 20,254 A i Within Contra Costa County many of the firms that hire a large number of semi-skilled operators have gone into what they refer to as an "em- ployment freeze". They are trying not to do any new hiring at the oper- ator level, even in the event of death or retirement. One of the better employment prospects in the operators field is truck driving. In the Bay Area there is an expected increase of approximately 580 jobs for truck drivers with a substantial amount being centered near the new postal distribution center in Richmond. Service Workers Presently approximately 195,000 persons work in services in the Sana Franciso - Oakland Bay Area. Approximately 12,000 more will be needed in 1975-1976. The largest number of persons will be needed in the Food services. The Fast Food Industry is one of the healthiest industries in Contra Costa County. Thrre is a high turnover in the lower skill levels because many of the jobs are filled by students who are keeping the job until school is completed or something better comes along. In the positions of janitorial or upkeep and routine maintenance, the job .` outlook is not positive. The services industry will grow at a slower rate than the general economy of the area. This applies to the fields of cleaning service workers, chambermaids, cleaners and charpersons and bartenders. One of the more positive opprotunities in services is again in the food industry. There- is an expected shortage of qualified cooks. There is also a positive ' projection for vocations in the health services. Laborers - Non-Farm The demand for Non-Farm Laborers is smaller than the supple and will con tinue to be smaller in the comming years. Integrated. systems of pack- aging and handling and processing industrial materials, along with auto- matic conveyors, and similar technological improvements will restrict future expansion in the employment of Non-Farm Laborers. Farmers and Farm Workers In Contra Costa County there is a marked downtrend in Farming and the employment of Farm Laborers. It is expected to continue. According; to one Labor Market Survey conducted by the CETA Staff, there is some opportunity in farm work-for persons skilled in the proper use of° pest- icides and Pest Control. -28- �as, TELEPHONE SURM A telephone survey was conducted of businesses in Contra Costa County. The survey was a' search for entry level positions at present and for the next 12 months in test general categories. 1. Clerical 5. Small Business Hachine Rpr. 2. Fast Foods Services 7. Track Driving 3. VAter Ireatment 8. 'Welding 4. Metal b Machinery Mfg. 9. Sales 5. Petrochemical 10. Computer Maintenance TRE14DS ESTABLISHED BY SURVEY RESPONSES Public Utilities: Eiiring Freeze except for new facilities. 1. CLERICAL: Majority of jobs in the nest 12 months appear to be people with exceptional clerical abilities. Typing - 50 wpm Short Hand - 90-100 wpm Dictation Transcription 2. FASI FOODS SERVICES: There is a constant need for new people in fast foods. The turnover rate is high in the waitress and bus-, boy categories. There is better pay and a more permanent situation with food preparers and cooks. 3. k'AT£R TREATMEKr FACILITY: Except for a EBIM plant going. up in Oak- land there does not seem to be many openings in water treatment. There will be a force of twenty trainees needed when the EBHUD plant opens next year in Oakland. Five to ten employees will probably be hired by Central Valles Sani- tation anitation District with the expansion of the waste water treat- went facility in Martinez. Trainees for Assistant Operator positions must obtain -29- oo1s� a Grade Four Uperator's Certificate issued by the Calif orula Water Pollution Control Association z-ithia one yea: of employment. 4. MEM AND MACINERY 14FG: Heavy layoffs, Businesses in holding patterns or closing up through sale of company or bankruptcy. S. PETRDLIMaCAL: Generally plants are trying to avoid lay-offs. Pros- pects for new jobs are poor except for professional skills such as instrument repairmen and electricians. 6. SMALL BUSINESS MACHINE REPAIR: There appears to be good job market for the highly skilled. People in the business now say that the graduates of the training schools are grossly undertrained for small busineas.nachine repair. The general consensus is that if a person is going to be trained, he should be trained to repair one type of machine in a six month period and go:out to work for someone who handles only that equip- went. The.preference of employers Is that trainees should have a combination of classroom training and on-the-job training. 7. TRUCK DRIVING: i►'ith larger union outfits the job situation is poor. With non-union firms it is the opposite. There are many jobs for beginning truck drivers_ United Truck Drivers School in Hayward has an 82X placement rating for CETA enrollees. The job out-look for the next twelve months is good. 8. krELDING: Steamfitters Union say they have 25 journeymen welders waiting :o be called to work. They are, for the time being, doing away with their apprenticeship program. 9. SALES: Most sales positions revuire previous experience or training. Outlook for jobs for salespeople is good.-Jobs run to sales clerks working across the counter to outside sales of tang -30- 00167 • 0 ibir ant 2nta=;ibie goow_ 10. CO'.iPUTER MA1'YrE 'Eh'Cr: People caning out of coaputer ati.ntenente schools are not being adequately trained. If a person has proper. training there is a substantial job uarket in tc n=zr asaiatenence. RESULTS OF SURVEY 3-17 THROUGH 3-27 ENTRT LEVEL POSITIONS NOW. 23 Clerical 3 Scall Business Mar_hine Repair 0 Fast Foods Services 8 Trucking 1 Water Treatmenm 3 Welding 0 ?fetal & Machinery Mfg. 0 Sales 8 Petrochemical 0 Computer Maintenence 0 ENTRY LEVEL. POSITIONS NEXT TWELVE MKM 121+ Clerical 47 Trucking constantly increasing Fast .Foods Services 30 WElding 0 Water Treatment 22 Sales 11 Metal & Machinery Mfg. 0 Computer Mainte 0 Petrochemical 0 Small Business Machine Repair - no exact ` number, but a good job market for well trained PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS N= TWELVE MONTHS: 88 . Water Treatment Facility 83 Fast Foods Services 3 0010° -31- st::.- RD-IM-n St 1;;: . v-=-, L ZI:1-21 'srSI.' �:!"1LiiTJ.. ate' [�TIt�•.t._ 1AL1 rD LAPU or. sem. It y - ss: laTalrnn. t27rST, tw.lats,w-yc*,rya :lams.' 1.:. lx. F9► basic )...arra► Gt.+p ) - tawsst.ress� ' "Colawrt. amesIn ad kukaa; aS lsssr47 bwlbor.c...:..c. .. O) ATr a"ISaaral ,wvarc%%G& 07 Irraaaalsaarav aen►acrt at ars.f► c�si*.ressw cutrax..*. al ►.trstvl 27 irrscsw a..or c.wsncss3a Os l UMC C tw.a)ssiw-lret+rs.t hrs}et J ttlRlt� basic IwarstrT taoep ) lanae..1taa�.�.M.sara. La..rawrtra�rw 30 bmaa =ana*r - End llLibsa!> 13 Ca sae rim tst=actaoc .42 li+ra3 SAID :..ter.MIS I!rasaeIOr" 34 Oootsallsc aaarcraLlr - its�srt 47 2sans7.rs,ta.a ac:+aees b�tsie ).aeuettr► Ww0 3 - 42: 4�.vasratss- ' ilt� 44 " Eac==C. gas. -A a-asap se..1eet,oloP+ st,.aa:aezeaaaj acrrleea y 24 taroe�nce auto accissoraea JL l:acctsacai aauxvm at am avpnlar. 3t tasts.nrasta areo scuaee proouCas 1lrML Tip - _- }owlassa..Ses+rswl;ls�ttt7 3- lrct,il hair Clam=I basic la.onsX" [.roup • Lctriralaara!Lrraatz at.:aasa�raur3n; 54 sage ssatr- 22 la=dle grill pr9oouct~ SS a�eaaoota.rt icalera aa� aetvacr Zl Ityoanel ago ots+cr testale yraoucta stasaara 27 l zaaasns acro VLAlasaarq Sb Mti*c) .u4 acus:.* ssrs 30 k Boer and paastse prooue7s. h S7 kurnaswe aed rt tueaaanan 31 irataier and lcAwmere ?a= ss.nss SL htam 9"driskmor Places nrZII.']T basic lydetstay Lsont� S - S9 thscs2lsness :st=ab state=s 1=cca'►sallree .tvaalnctYsaei 1= Tip-, 1+fapalsis.n-Sertas= lodiaa+v 20 j and km3c.cc QroouCz> Fsaaaa�ce� Iustsap+cc. avd 1wi':"'' 749 lacac: and.tied arerouCis Fsisu 210 insastwc and lastures Unkmi 26 lwapet Jmd a212et1 proonCis 61 Lseaat arrncies otkez T�.w 32 On. saw. a%6 216a3s p00&=x st 2as:asawcr, 39- lltseellauw%wm tbrx4aetusanr sorrier rrstis' Drolc:s atiL . 65 .Real bstatc lse�a ; a Basic Indmrr r 6iomp 6 - Metal .bb Combined restestate..imnsar 'Ir labacamum and ttadaracry esc. 3j Iabracatea;a.ttsl prodzxm 3s llochancrp. cmqq= eleetzieal 37 Ia-%'.ycrts:am cq=p = Sesriera i7�, }� Us= -ln&=:ry 6rssi.z - 7D lraacls;srd W--I= 3.d=strz ylaues irtrac3+e^.ita2s vid fu=ry F*%&U 72 AMo Twp sca+acss a 2E - Cxascau w d allied '. 7S ssao Tcprc'ss serrica ave Fasar6; ' 76 ssgss scs.aces Zo 1ettolears sad cool Frocxas 74 hocaaaa pieaarom. 33 I'zsariry --al PX-M=s 79 Iusaaot and reCnotion-se7WMW 1 D TRWi hsie 2estkatr+ G:varp i - lam bas— go Iic&ta3 area alba btalTls sesrari lrarrt+ortaua� El I&-r" scr+rsce- tt+ Aaiitw0 trz-ss0artataam abi sanczs'ri s__> k.�asf1 D eszr -- 42 lTmk w aro aaacncsi lni ib Frssatc LoRaet»liu it Later IrTa-mporataor► 4S zsrat+ortatiw bM gar ILC ca. Poj.lTati,�.-ScsYiu4 inasssrT a 46 Pipc 2aa.c =russporaztim 93 1o1Ma1 . k�L TT�3 lssie IT%&atry Cacwp 9 - Trase - - - SD = >t-ralev3e t=ide _ S s**+lr�+r catcrsals and la== N-1 FIN, IIS Usic :r.ductrr Groep 20 - ?btiorwd l3n:are we lu%%=anet 62 See==mly, co=mmda:y brol= wwd sCYtticcs 63 67 Roldan= gird other "wesvacnt La:�rLa CS Um IS= Ivuc Ini-Isstty Grouj► 22 - Scr+nccl 73 riaxe222mcm a bush esa, serViees 32 L&araiaoaal acrrlccs SA taaaessra. l%L--zaital. i1+0302ic4 jar�icsts - - 19 YascC22AS caa acr.races S2Lurt) S:aie taa3ieres aural L`sis syties (�nn ��QQ I.S cam: kiaie lnduntr► Group II Fe�lcrs'1 and TABLE V1 SKILL SHORTAGE OCCUPATIONS Analysis of Demand and Supply in Area Projected for Period 75-80 SUPPLY SPECIFIC DEMAND -QUALIFIED OCCUPATIONS J UNEMPLOYED NET DEMAND ESTIMATED NEW JOB TOTAL. -COMPLETING FOR PREVAILING REPLACEHM OPENINGS DEMAND TRAINING OCCUPATIONS WAGE -NEW ENTRANTS Local Services 3650 1570 5220 N/A N/A N/A Retail 2510 . 75Q 3260 N/A N/A N/A Training Local 1840 550 2390 N/A NIA N/A. rzovernment Construction 1640 500 2140 N/A N/A N/A Metal 954 286 1240 N/A N/A N/A Machine Instructional 854 256 1110 N/A N/A N/A Service Wholesale 554 166 720 N/A N/A N/A Trade L TR, OM, U 523 157 680 N/A N/A N/A LOC FIRE 508 152 660 N/A N/A N/A NEW TECH 114 456 570 N/A N/A N/A FEDERAL S STATE 246 74 320 N/A N/A N/A Government CENT URB 231 69 300 N/A N/A N/A Source: ABAG/MTC/DOH EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS SERIES C.2: TAR 00170 -32- TABLE VII Classroom Training Provided by CETA For FY 75 Occupation Number Number Number Wages Enrolled Completed Placed in Received Employment Water Treat- 20 11 8 N/A ment Plant Pump Operator Vector Control 18 No completions to date. Clerical 53 2? 1q 556? per month Cluster ( average) Weldinq 28 18 3 $ 335 per month ( average Body & 24 6 3 N/A Fender Truck Driver 7 7 7 N/A Source: Computer-Process Manpower Monthly Report Training orngrams funded by Reqional Occupation Program are not included. Figures quoted in the table are for results throunh March 1975. A large number of enrollees in the training classes are still undergoing training. 00171- -33- r d. Population Groups in deed of Service (1) and (2) Groups/Significant Segments and flow Determined. The population groups to be served are youth, female heads of households, who are welfare recipients, minority heads of households and Veterans. The goals for the Contra Costa County Manpower Project for the coming year are as follows: 1) Reduce unemployment rate for youth; 2) Reduce unemployment Tate for disadvantaged minority groups especi- ally heads of households; 3) Provide better employment opportunities for female heads of house- holds, who are receiving public assistance; 4) Work with Veterans, especially Vietnam-era Veterans. These goals were recommended by the Manpower Advisory Council in planning meetings and are in accord with the National priorities as the population groups most in need of service. i i t z. Results and benefits Eraected 1. Occupations to be given aricriTy Occupations which will be given priority are those for Which a need has been validated through the Area Manpower Review for Fiscal Year 1975- .1976 975 1976 published by EDL or through CETA local market surveys. In addition, use Will be made of openings in ROP classes for which a validation of training need will have been conducted. (See attached schedule of ROP programs approved for the 1975 Fall Semester.) Those occupations found to have the most potential for entry-level trainees are listed below. Welder - Demand fer this occu"?ation in the bay Area, aecerding to the JL-ea i.anpower Review, is moderate and linited to certified journeymen Welders with specialized experience. Industrial plant expansion in the Pittsburg area however, offers some assurance of strong job prospects for a limited number of entry level positions. Waste Hater/Sewaee Treatment Operators - (See results of CETA local mar}:et survey to validate the job opportunities for this occupation.) Vector Control - (See results of Pest Control Survey conducted by CLTA Central Office and attached.) i i Automotive Body Fepaimr - An intense follow-up of the job acquisition success of e-u-ollees who completed a CETA-funded Auto Body and Fender Repair class is being conducted at this time. Should the findings indicate justi- fication for continuing the class, it will be continued. 00172 -34- Clerical/Secretarial E=lovee - As the Area I:annower Review indicates, opportunities in this occupation continue to exist for the person who is highly competent. CETA job placement records to date show that enrollees with high level skills in typing and shorthand are able to find jobs. Industrial Technician - This job category represents a new category for CETA consideration. A local survey was conducted by CETA staff to determine the job opportunities for a new training program which has not been offered by other institutions. Within two days 12 companies stated they could utilize the services of individuals trained in the Industrial Technical field. The survey disclosed that there were jobs available because individuals have not previously been trained to do this kind o: work. All persons contacted about employing Industrial Technicians showed interest and enthusiasm for interviewing graduates of the proposed Industrial Technical program. Truck. D=iving - Follow-up conducted of CETA enrollees who have completed a CETA-funded truck driving training program provides justification for continuing this program. 2. Statement of Specific Goals a. Kinds of Occupations for Which Enrollees will be Trained or Placed The aim of the CETA Title I program is: (1) To provide the quality of client assessment, education/work-ex- perience training, and job development/placement assistance to maximize the number of clients who can be served with the CETA Title I funds available. Section C-3-a of this proposal des- cribes the structure/process that will be used during 1975 - 1976 to achieve this goal. A principle objective of this struc- ture is to assist enrollees to identify their skills/interests and vocational goals. A second objective is to enable enrollees to obtain the educational/vocational training that will result in or enhance significantly their job aequisitiou-prospects. The kinds of occupations for which individuals will be trained cannot be identified more specifically than what has been indi- cated in item B-1 above. While Prime Sponsor recognizes the necessity of providing education and training directed toward occupations where employment propects are positive, it also is concerned that enrollees are prepared for positions which utilize their interests and skills. This is paralleled by a concern that enrollees are not just "fitted into slots" but play a key roll in the job selection process. As-a result, training programs will be established by CETA which reflect widespread enrollee interest and positive jol, markets. At the same time, through the ROP Program and Individual Vocational Referrals, pro- gram flexability will be developed in order to furnish enrollees with a variety of training choices. 00173 b. Removal of Artificial Barriers Should artificial barriers to employment exist, it will be the task for those responsible for job development/placement to arrange for their removal. Should these barriers pose a legal problem, repre- sentatives of the Legal Services Foundation who are CETA-funded will be called upon for assistance. Additional assistance will be pro- vided through the CETA EEO Staff person who should be employed on or near July 1, 1975. C. Kinds and Amounts of Services (Kinds and amounts of services are described under section C-2-b-(8) of this proposal:) 3. Placement and Follow-up a. Brief Discussion of Placement Goals Placement goals as indicated on the POP reflect the ultimate prime sponsor objective of securing unsubsidized employment for CETA enrollees. Partly on the basis of the FY 174 - '75 program results, and partly on the basis of subcontractor projections for FY '75 - '76, the indirect placement goal was calculated as 60% of all participants who complete a classroom training program or job-finding workshop. Plans call for the enrollment of 1600 clients in these activities, and the "graduation" of 80%, or 1280. (Thus the net placement goal is 60Z of 1280, or 768). This number constitutes almost all of the placements expected and recorded on the POP ("Total Entering Employment"). A small number of direct placements (30) will be made by counselors before the enrollee enters any training program; and a small number rf self-placements (50) will also be made. Thus, the total employment goal for FY '75-176 is (768) + (30) + (50) - 848. b. Fallow-up Procedures Follow-up of all placements (direct and indirect) will be conducted by Manpower Staff, for the following purposes: (1) To verify subcontractors' reports of the number of placements made. (2) To obtain detailed information about the placement (e.g., relevance of the training, satisfaction with the placement, etc.). (3) To monitor the duration of the job placement. Placement follow--up will be carried out for every client who enters employment and will be done at two (2) points after the placement date: one month and three months to six months. Information will be derived from telephone interviews of clients conducted by Manpower evaluation monitoring staff. If any doubt remains about the clients' current status,; staff will -pursue the follow-up with the clients' apparent employer, or most recent employer. A second type of follow-up program will be implemented by Manpower Staff. This will involve the collection of information on clients who leave CETA for other than employment reason_-: The follow-up interview will focus on factors possibly involved in the decision to leave the program (e.g., grievances, personal goals and values, time constraints, etc.). This non-placement follow-up will take place as soon as possible after the date of separation from CETA. I -36- 001-74 ro C. Approach 1. Planning_ System a. Membership of Manpower Planning Council CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ' MANPOWER ADVISORY COUNCIL Sebe Hill Carquinez Coalition Community Agency Bill Smith Citizens for Jobs Community Agency; Lucy Brown Nort1i 'Richmond Neighborhood Community Agency. House Al Perez United Council of Spanish Community Agency. Speaking Organizations Augustin Ramirez Client Community LeRoy Sheff Client Commoi3nity, Lula Washington Client Community Charles Mason Client Community John Christensen Pittsburg Unified School Educational/Training District Ray Dondero Junior College District Educational/Training Inst. ; Wilfred McKendry Vocational and Adult Ed. Educational/Training Inst;;, County School District Norman Naas Secondary Education Educational/Training Inst.:: Mt. Diablo Unified School District Duane Davis U. S. Steel Business Robert Corrigan Montgomery Ward Business Roscoe Hunter Local Union 324, AFL--CIO Unions H.H. Bud Harr Central Labor Council Unions Merle Hauser City of Concord Cities Nancy Thacker City of San Pablo Cities Fran David City of Pittsburg Cities Louie Sousa Agriculture Business Bernadine Braud &aployment Development " F Paul Hughey Contra Costa:County Development. Assn. George Chaffey Contra Costa Legal Citizen's Advocate Grouup',. Services Foundation SUBCOMMITTEES EVALUATION SUBCOMMITTEE Lula Washington Client Community George Chaffey Contra Costa Legal Citizens.-Advocate Group Services Foundation Lucy Brown North Richmond Neighborhood Community Agency. House Ray Dondero Junior College District Educational/Training Inst:: Duane Davis D. S. Steel Business LeRoy Sheff Client Community i GRIEVANCE SUBCOMMITTEE Abraham Amador Baited Council of Spanish Community Agency Speaking Organizations Bob Corrigan Montgomery Ward Business Charles Mason Client Community Sebe Hill Carquinez Coalition Community Agency PLANNING SUBCOMMITTEE Bill Smith Citizens for Jobs Community Agency Wilfred Mckendry County School District Educational/Training Inst. Lucy Brown North Richmond Neighborhood Community Agency House Bernadine Braud Employment Development Dept . Merle Hauser City of Concord Cities John Christensen Pittsburg Unified School Educational/Training Inst. District PROPOSAL SUBCOMMMITTEE George Chaffey Contra Costa Legal Citizens Advocate Group Set vices Foundation Sebe Hill Carquinez Coalition Community Agency Abraham Amador United Council of Spanish Community Agency Speaking Organizations Bob Corrigan Montgomery Ward Business Charles Mason Client Community NOTE: The Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of the Manpower Advisory Council -seLrveon the above subcmittees as ex-officio members. b. Role of Planning Council The format in submitting these recommendations was as follows: The Planning Subcommittee (names listed previously) was responsible for surveying the Labor Market, gathering employment related statistics, and formulating the basic service priorities for Fiscal Year '75 - 176. With this information to draw from, the subcommittee developed area allocation recommendations, a suggested service delivery system, and alternative models for preparing non-job ready enrollees for permanent placement. From this basic foundation, the Contra Costa County Manpower Plan for '75 - '76 was developed. In addition to these duties, the Planning Subcommittee reviewed the exist- ing CETA Title I program operators, as well as any other'Manpower/training programs in the County. The aim of the review was to integrate, whenever possible, traditional training institutions - such as school districts and the Junior College system - into the CETA philosophy and goals. The result was a wider use of non-CETA funded training slots while still retaining the community-oriented approach legislated by the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 and endorsed by the Contra Costa County Manpower Advisory Council. The Proposal Subcommittee (names listed previously) was responsible for the implementation of the recommaendarions made by the Planning SubcommmitteeJ As such, they selected an array of suggested program operators they felt most completely and efficiently met the program goals and priorities as determined by the Planning Subcommittee. 001 to -38- This selection process included a Comprehensive Proposal Format for both present and potential program operators, part of which involved a three day period of interviewing all of the agencies, jurisdictions and institutions which had submitted proposals for Fiscal Year '75- 76. Along with the interview component, the Proposal Subcommittee established , criteria for the differentation of proposals and developed a mechanism which incorporated existing evaluation data on present program operators into the proposal evaluation process. Upon the completion of these tasks and others related to such a process, the funding recommendations were submitted to the full c6uncil on April 30, 1975. The "evaluation data" alluded to in the previous paragraph, was that submitted to the Proposal Subcommittee by the Evaluation Subcommittee. The evaluation system devised by this subcommittee enabled the CETA County Staff to conduct on-site evaluations of program operators. Re- lated to this task, the subcommittee devised new evaluation forms and redesigned the contract format. Results of the on-site evaluations were reviewed by the Evaluation Sub- committee for each CETA subcontractor and recommendations were made, where applicable, regarding problems that required corrections or adjust- ments. The subcommittee also had the responsibility of recommending contract terminations for any program operator who consistently fell below his contract performance standards, or failed to provide quality service to CETA enrollees as specified in the County Plan. These recommendations were then submitted to the Proposal Subcommittee. The final step of the process involved the submission of tentative rec- ommendations by the Proposal Subcommittee to the entire Manpower Advisory :- Council. Accompanying these recommendations were brief presentations of the reasoning behind them. Questions were entertained and all information; ';`' relating to the recommendations were made available to members of the Council and all prospective subcontractors. Those agencies which had been recommended not to be funded were given the opportunity to voice their reactions in writing to the Council. . These written reactions were reviewed by the Proposal Subcommittee and .sub witted with Proposal Subcommittee input to the Manpower Advisory Council on May 15, 1975. At this meeting, verbal presentation of dissatisfaction with the recommen- dations will be made by prospective subcontractors. Final recommendations ';: will be made by the Proposal Subcommittee following this meeting and submittedto the Advisory Council for approval on May 19th. It should be stressed that at no time during the Proposal recommendation- process were prospective subcontractors who held a seat on the Advisory Council allowed a voting or decision-making role. This practice was. included to eliminate the obvious potential for bias in the recommendation- '. process. -39- 001717 x. r The Manpower Advisory Council holds its meetings in intervals of one (I) month. The various subcommittees also meet at least once a month (with the exception of the Grievance Subcommittee, which meets only when formal complaints against specific contractors are filed) and more often as needed. The locations of the meeting places vary with the availability of space. All Manpower Advisory Council meetings are open to the public and were publicized originally through the area publica- tions and presently by way of a mailing list. This list consists of anyone expressing the desire, to the Central Manpower Office, to be informed of these meeting dates and locations. Minutes of all Council and Subcommittee meetings are kept and distributed for approval of the committee's membership. C. Description of Staff Support of the Council The County Manpower Staff's support of the Advisory Council can best be described as an information resource pool. As such, the lion's share of data gathering relative to each of the subcommittees' tasks was carried out by the Central Staff. To elaborate: labor surveys and market studies as required by the Planning Subcommittee were undertaken by CETA Central Staff and provided for the committees' review. In addition, alternative delivery systems were suggested and researched by the CETA staff and present subcontractors. The data on which the Planning Subcommittee based its area allocations, was compiled by CETA Staff and in part consisted of a wide range of statistics dealing with the population characteristics of Contra Costa County. The potential cost absorption possible through ADA was pursued by the Manpower-Staff. Evaluations of existing subcontractors, as men- tioned previously, were conducted by staff members. In addition to these duties, the regular "housekeeping" chores of keeping minutes and providing copies of available data to members of the Council, were provided by the, Manpower Staff. Finally, members of the CETA Central Staff attended all Manpower Advisory Council meetings in addition to those of the. Evaluation, Proposal and Planning Subcommittees. d. Participation of Community-Based Groups At present, eight of the twenty-three members of the Manpower Advisory Council are representatives of Community-based groups. Their names and the agencies they represent are given in the section under "Approach" dealing with the Planning System. This number accounts for over 33% of the voting power of the Council. In addition to this, the Manpower Management Team, consisting of all present subcontractors - the large majority of which are community agencies - meets monthly in a discussion format where community demands and needs are the predominant issue. 2. a. Activities and Services to be Provided, Reasons Selected and Enrollment Levels Centra Costa County's Manpower Delivery Plan will include the following activities and services: Classroom Training 300 Individuals Served On-the-Job Training 40 Individuals Served Work Experience 43 Individuals Served Youth Programs 140 Individuals Served -40- 00178 Participant Services 2000 Individuals Served -- including Intake 2000 Assessment/Orientation 1120 Individuals Served Job-Finding Workshop 1540 Individuals Served Job Development 1400 Individuals Served Supportive Services 1500 Individuals Served The need for skill-learning programs by CETA eligible clients, is as accepted premise. A vide variety of these types of programs allows for greater adaptability by CETA operators to individual clients with different kinds of training needs. To allow for this degree of vari- ability, the four (4) different training programs listed above will be. part of the activities to be provided. A related, yet perhaps less obvious, need of CETA eligible clients is for quality, job acquisition-oriented services. For example, even if a client has a marketable skill, he may be unable to "sell" this skill to a prospective employer. In another instance, a client may have al skill` and know how to approach an employer, but find himself without- an-.employer to approach. For these simplified reasons and many others of a pore specific and intricate nature, the components of a Job Finding Workshop and Job Development will be included again this year within the.Manpower Delivery System. Finally, to enroll and acquaint the CETA client with the components,of the program, the services of Intake and Assessment/Orientationare to be., provided. To insure that the CETA client will not have to endure finan- cial or other type hardships as a result of enrollment in one of the programs, Supportive Services (to cover such things as transportation. . costs and child care) will also be a component of the Manpower Delivery System. The locations where provision of these services will take place varies with the type of service and activity to be provided. The components of Intake, Assessment/Orientation, and Job-Finding Work- shop will be provided in centrally located sites within each of the four (4) Contra Costa County areas (West,Central, East and Northeast County). Job Development offices will also be located centrally within Central, East, and West County - Job Development for Northeast County will be conducted through the East County agency. Training Programs, including classroom, on-the-job and work experience will be located at a variety of sites throughout the County. 00 .'79 -41- itl b. Description of Each Activity and Service to be Provided. (1) Classroom Training, Prime Sponsor This program activity includes any training conducted in an insti- tutional setting designed to provide individuals with the technical skills and information required to perform a specific job or group of jobs. The principal occupational areas to be served in Contra Costa County tentatively include: Welding, Waste Nater/Sewage Treat- ment, Vector Control, Auto/Body Repair, Clerical/Secretarial and Industrial Technical. Prime Sponsor Classroom Training Programs will be used in conjunction with that offered through Vocational Education. and ROP Training as a skill-learning pool from which CETA clients can select that most pertinent to their employment goals and needs. Associated with this training will be that offered through the Regional Occupation Program (ROP). This too, will be done on an individual' referral basis with CETA funds being used for participant's allowances. The occupational training available includes: Test Equipment Repair Insurance Clerk Distributive Industries Data Processing (Clerical Cluster) People Care Services Automotive Specialist Security Systems Graphic Communications Legal, Medical, Insurance Typist Small Gasoline Engine Repair Health Centers Public Services Auto Specialization Clerical Cluster Construction Technology Pipe Welding Television Occupations Plastics Occupations- Office Occupations Nursing Assistant Engine Construction and Analysis Meat Cutting and Processing Environmental Landscaping General Office Clerk Food Services Career Communications Training Radio Communications Auto Tune-up Retail Merchandising Child Care Graphic Communications Medical Receptionist Service Station Specialist Community Service Agency Office Stimulation Training Commercial Art Occupations Commercial Photography Electronics Occupations Advanced Machine Shop Plastics/Metals Occupations Legal Careers (2) Classroom Training, Vocational Education At this time, allocations to specific training programs and services to be provided by the State Vocational Education Board and financed through CETA funds granted to the Governor have yet to be determined. When'the non-financial agreement is prepared, a description of these services will be included. Tentative occupational skills available through Vocational Education monies will include Truck-Driving, Clerical/Secretarial, Weld- ing, Engineering Aide, Keypunch, Data Entry, Cable TV Technician and LVN. Agencies contracted to provide these services will do so on an individual referral basis rather than on a determined number of slots. 00,80 -42:- 0 (3) On-the-Job Training On-the-job training (OJT) program provides for the hiring of CETA eli- gible persons residing in Contra Costa County(excluding the City of Richmond). The contractor (employer) is paid for the provision of skill training and associated services for the CETA participants for a pre- scribed training period while an the job. The end goal is the continua- tion of employment beyond the specified date of contract termination. The procedure in the establishment of training time and reimbursements extraordinary training costs varies from one employer to another. As such, the agency which is subcontracted to provide OJT slots deals on an individual basis with each contractor (employer) in setting up dura- tion of training and reimbursements. Whenever possible, employers, who have been favorably involved in past OJT Programs, are contracted for OJT slots. When such is not the case, quality controls are built into the contract which exclude prospective contractors who do not provide indiscriminatory service, practice equal opportunity, or who do not follow an affirmative action plan. In addition to this, there is a clause within the contract which ensures the pros- pective contractor's financial soundness. Quality control in context of selecting occupations under OJT is based on available market surveys and labor research data. Methods of monitoring and assessment will include monthly reports from the contractor on the status of his OJT Trainee, on-the-site evaluations and inspection of contractor's records. For further information on monitoring and assessment, refer ahead to Management and Administration Plan, b3, "Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures". It is expected that 32 or 80% of program participants will complete the program. Of this number, it is anticipated that 70% will be retained beyond the training period. (4) Work Experience There will be three (3) basic types of work-experience programs within Contra Costa County. They are: In-School, Out-of-School, and Adult Work Experience. The In-School/Out-of-School programs are more com- pletely dealt with in the section under Youth Programs. The Adult Work Experience Program will be instituted to serve the CETA eligible client over twenty (20) years of age. The participants for Adult Work Experience will include the chronically unemployed, the retired, recently discharged military individuals, the handicapped, institutional residents and others who have not been working for extended periods of time. The duration of the employment will be of a short te*--n nature and include both full and part-time work. The Work Experience person will be employed by a public or private, non- profit agency. In many cases, the work experience slots will be provided within subcontracting agencies. In this way, costs will be absorbed allowing for better use of the Manpower dollar and at the same time providing a worthwhile learning position. The design of the work experience program will be to enhance the future employability of youth and to aid adults in attaining a planned occupa- tional goal. Contrary to the situation present in many classroom train- ing programs, the enrollee gains practical, applied know �I skills related to his goals. -414- C7j ■ While somewhat related, the work experience program varies substantially from Public Service Employment (PSE). The areas of difference are length of program, expected result of employment. and availability of training assistance. Work Experience slots are of a shorter'duration than PSE. Upon completion of the PSE program, the anticipated result is the retention of the en- rollee by the agency. In work experience, this is often not the case. Instead, the work experience enrollee, upon completion of the program, is a "free agent" with acquired skills which enable him to successfully compete in the labor market. Finally, the work experience slots will be placed in situations where assistance and training will be readily avail- able. Thus, work experience allows for greater variability in terms of work sites, duration and type (full or part-time) of employment. As such,, it can serve a wider range of individual client needs. (5) Limited English-Speaking Ability In accordance with section 301 (b) of the Manpower Training Act, the segment of the Contra Costa County population which is of limited English speaking ability will be served through existing programs aimed at this group's language deficiencies. Two agencies, which_ presently have such programs, are the Pittsburg Unified School Dis- trict Adult Edugation and Los Medanos Junior College. However, as tentatively recommended, no specific subcontractors will be funded as prime sponsors to provide this service. (6) Youth Programs An in-school program will be provided which will serve 125 CEPA eli- gible youth, age 14 through termination of regular high school, .who are enrolled in junior or senior high school and residing in Contra Costa County (excluding the City of Richmond). Services to be avail- able through this program will include: Program orientation, Guidance and Counseling, allocation of Work Experience slots for youth to member , agencies; development of individualized work experience and training placements for eligible youth in non-profit community agencies; arrange- ment of educational experiences, including field trips and speakers from various career fields and provision of tutoring in subject area in which participating youth are deficient. In addition to this, an out-of-school program will function to provide service to 10/20 CETA eligible youth, age 14 through 20, who have been out of regular school for at least three months and are residing in Contra Costa County (excluding the City of Richmond). Services to be provided in the out-of-school program will include: assessment of the individual and orientation to the program; pre-vocational and career counseling; referral of participants to remedial or higher education activities, as appropriate; placement of youth in classroom training or individualized work experience activ3ries, as available; and referral of youth through County's established CETA Units to on-the-job training or job development services. VvI8 i • CONM CosTA COMIMY MANPOWER EELIVERY SYSTEM: Fr '75 — '76 INTAKE Determine.Eligibility,, GII�ERAL Frovide Inforaation. V OEATION On CETA Including Supportive Services Refer to Component A,B or C' SUPPORTIVE SERVICES I LEGAL SERVICES (A) (B) tASSESSMrOT JOB FINDING C) ORIMATION I WOFOMOP OTHER AGEN Transportation Transportation If people are not Child Care Child Care Legal Services Services interested in Bal Assessment Orientation and,Job , Finding Workshop Bo Allowance refer them to e.g:_ Paid in Either EDD, Dept. -of Component Vocational Rehab.,' Social: Services CLASSROOM TRA3FI2QG PLAMEENT Transportation Services ftunished for 30 da►s Child Care After Placement Legal Services Transportation Auto Repair Child Care Health Care Union Dues Emergency Aide Tools Books Clothing Clothing _ Legal Services Health Care - 5- 00 :83 : (8) Service to Participants The CETA Program will address certain common service needs of its participants. Manpower Services are designed to bring individuals into the pro- gram, to assess their.employability needs, interests and capabil- ities and to develop and implement a plan of action to achieving their employment goals. This program activity is designed to provide supportive Manpower services which are needed to enable individuals to obtain or retain. employment or to participate in other Manpower program activities leading to their eventual placement in unsubsidized employment. Such services include, but are not limited to the following: (a) Intake; (b) Assessment/Orientation; (c) Job Finding Workshop; (d) Job Placement, (e) wining classes. These services include Health and Medical Services, child care, Legal Services necessary, job related items (union dues, uniforms, tools, etc.), transportation, and services of an interpreter. The above will be provided to participants through subcontractors with, community agencies as service providers. The CETA Program will address certain common service needs of its participants regardless of the activities they become involved in Describe the types of Manpower and Supportive Services available to Participants Supportive Services is to provide assistance to individuals enrolled in CETA training programs, and will be provided to enrollees in overcoming personal handicaps which inhibit ,their employability. Supportive Services provided by CETA will vary depending on the type of participants served and the conditions of the localarea.<-, Participants' need for Supportive Services tends to be individual7 istic and requires attention on a case-by-case is order. to- be effective. New needs may arise at any time during program; participation. An A/0 Counselor will explore vocational opportunities with the participant. If indicated, the Job Counselor wili arrange for aptitude and vocational interest testing to' determine.appli. ;'. cant's best field. The counselor will assist eligible participants to arrange for needed Supportive Servicr:--Iz A/O. * 00 -46- �V;* S i What is Suyvartive Services: Supportive Services is money set &aide by CETA in a special ' budget for the specific purpose of paying for services. to enrollees to meet their needs in areas of: I. Transportation 6. Volunteer Drivers 2. Child Care 7. Bealth 3. Clothing 8. Miscellaneous (union dues,' books, 4. Car Repair and tutors) 5. Tools. 9. Emergency Aid What method vill be used to determine which participants receive which service? To ensure supportive services for enrollees, a priority was set' .' by the Hianpower Advisory Council as follows: Priorities Act2V2 rr Time 1. Non-Welfare Recipient .lob/or I month Iimitatiou bead of Household 037 2_ veliare Recipient Slot 1 month limitation 3. Sincle Individual 1 montb limitation L_ ?Mon-Veli ar a hecipi ent _ CE?A Classroom During Trainin& S_ Velfare kecipient Training 6. Sintle Individual to Non-Wr-Uare Recipient Otber Activities As needed b. Vel:are Recipient e.g_, ROP; 9 Sintle Individual Adult Education " BUDGET AMDUNT ALLOCATED TO EACH PROGRAM SERVICE: Assessment/Orientation $40,000.00 Job Finding Workshop 40,000.00 Classroom Training 49,500.00 Placement 49,500.00 $179,000.00 We expect 1200 people to go out through Assessment/Orientation components. Twenty participants in each area, for a total of 60 participants every three of four weeks. There are three areas, West=County, Central and East County. Job Finding Workshop: 1540 participants will go through Job Finding Workshop. -' 00185 k How will services be integrated with program activities? Supportive Services will be integrated as a part of Msapower Services up through the certification of a participant's eligibility as a CETA enrollee. Again, the chart on Sup- portive Services show the method of operation that deter- mines how the CETA Supportive Services will be integrated into the Manpower Delivery System. c. Selection and Recruitment Contra Costa County CETA programs will have more than one intake agency among them. Some programs will do their own intake, recruitment, assess- ment, and counseling, while other programs will have trainees seat to them through a separate CETA intake facility. In either case, eligibility determinations will be made at the intake agency, based on guidelines set by the Department of Labor and the Jocal y:Y Prime Sponsor. The majority of the special service programs, because of the nature of their specific target groups, will do their own intake and assessment. Recruitment will be done County-wide. Some of the prospective program operators will recruit with particular emphasis on a certain section of the County, due to affirmative action goals or the lack of adequate trans- portation for trainees to other sections of the County. Other programs will establish out-reach offices in various sections of the Counts attempting to reach those most in need of service. The availability of training positions and Manpower services under, the Comprehensive Employment S Training Act will be made known to the..Board, the Manpower Advisory Council, and the subcommittees. These groups and, especially the program operators, will use various media to inform poten- tial trainees of various CETA programs. Newspaper articles and pamphlets will be used to transmit information. Some programs will speak to various community groups and outreach agencies for recruitment purposes. -'Coor- dination with other government agencies, as explained in Section C.2.e. (3), also helps recruit target group clients for programs. Examples of - such government agencies are the WIN office and the County Department of Social Services. Selection of trainees from those who are recruited is also an activity of the intake agencies. Selection criteria has been determined by the Department of Labor, that is, a person must be unemployed, underemployed, or economically disadvantaged to be eligible for CETA. 011�8 -48- d. Continued Funding of Existing Programs One of the guidelines recommended by the Planning Subcommittee and adopted by the Advisory Council was that if the existing subcontractor was meeting performance standards, they would receive primary consideration for funding in Fiscal Year '75 - '76. The determination of which subcontractors were providing effective services was made by the Evaluation Subcommittee based on a system which included, but was not limited to, the components of on-site evaluation, quarterly program assessment, and follow-up studies. Those sub- contractors which were cited for effective services were: Contra Costa County Superintendent of Schools, Comprehensive Employment Training Program, Neighborhood Youth Corps (NYC): The recommendation to continue funding was based on the perceived need for such a service and the lack of alternate programs to provide like goals. Citv of San Pablo: (Intern, City Management; Work Experience Program) . The recommendation was made not to continue funding the program in the manner which it had been in FY '74 - '75. Instead of directly funding the City of San Pablo as a subcontractor, it was decided to be most efficient to provide work experience slots through- NYC. City of Pittsburg: (Student Intern Program; Work Experience and Community Development) The program was not selected for continued funding per se. It was recommended that five (5) work experience slots be allotted through NYC for the use of this agency. The project was determined to be too expensive to fund in its entirety - yet too valuable not to fund in any form. Waste Water/Sewage Treatment Class - the selection for continued funding was based . on the apparent job-availability in this field, in addition to the desira- bility of such a program by CETA clients as evidenced by the present class waiting list. Vector Control Class - Selection for continued funding pending the results of a labor market study to determine job availability in this field. United Council of Spanish Speaking Organizations: (Intake, Assessment/Orien- tation and Interpreter Services) - Selection for continued funding based on agency's effective service in the present year in addition to its ability to represent the large minority population of East County. The interpreter ser- vices will be a—ended for FY '75 - '76 in that only one (1) interpreter will be funded opposed to last year's three (3) . Concerted Services Project: (Intake, Clerical Training) - Selection for con- tinued funding was based on both programs'demonstrated effectiveness. In addition, the job market indicates a constant demand for people with clerical/ secretarial skills. Southside Community Center: (Pre-Vocational Training Class)- The program was not selected for continued funding in the form it was for FY '75 - '76. It was determined that to fit into the new Manpower Delivery System, the program would have to be amended. This resulted in a less-extensive program of shorter duration which-contained the components of a Job-Finding Workshop. In this form, the program was selected for continued funding. Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation: (Supportive Services - Legal Aide) The program was selected for continued funding because of the need for such services by CETA clients in Contra Costa County and the lack of organizations attempting to fill this need. 00187 -49_ f Pittsburg Unified School District: Gelding Class) Selection for continued funding pending the results of a labor market study to determine job availability in this field. Mt. Diablo Unified School District: (Auto/Body Repair Class) Selection for continued funding pending the results of a labor market study to determine job availability in this field. Polly Priest Business College: (Clerical/Secretarial Training) Human Development Associates: (Administrative Clerical Training) United Truck Driving School: -.(Truck Driving Training) These three organizations were selected for funding on an individual referral basis through Vocational Education monies. The decision to do so was founded on the present availability of jobs in each of the specific areas and the success of the agencies in placing the clients that they have trained. NOTE: The recommendations for continuation or non-continuation of funding are tentative. When the finalized delivery system and subcontractors are determined, this information will be updated and ammended. a. Delivery Agents and Facilities As mentioned previously, selection of specific delivery agents is at the tentative recommendation stage. Thus, the section dealing with listing of Delivery agents and services will be provided later. In addition, because the specifics are not yet finalized descriptions dealing with utilization or non-utilization of existing services will have to be general in nature. s. (1) Extent of Which Existing Service Facilities are Utilized Those existing Manpower training facilities and services agencies in Contra Costa County will be utilized as the need arises. As mentioned ' in the section dealing with descriptions of activities and services to be provided (C2b) various state vocational education programs, local educational agencies, post secondary training and educational institu- L�y tions and community action agencies will be used in the Manpower 'Delivery: System. Specifically, tentative recommendations call for implementation of training classes through the Pittsburg Unified School District and Mt. Diablo Unified School District. The Junior Colleges in the area are being contacted to see what classes can be offered through ADA to CETA eligible clients. ROP Programs (listed previously) will be used on.an individual referral basis. Numerous community action agencies are tentatively recommended to serve as prime sponsors for the gamut of Manpower activities. (2) Existiug-Agencies not Utilized: At this point, the Employment Development Department offices in Contra Costa County and Program SER-Jobs for Progress, Inc. (English as a Second Language) are tentatively recommended not to be funded. CETA requirements for due consideration of effectiveness were more than ade quately met in each case since the agencies in question were funded for FY 174 - '75 to provide Manpower services. ON -50- As far as specific comparative data used in making these tentative recommendations is concerned, the criteria of cost rates and types of services were not ultimately involved. In both cases, the element in question was the responsiveness of services. Follow-up work and evalua- tion data showed client dissatisfaction with the agencies, non-completion of specified duties, and inadequate provision of services. In short, the agents' capabilities had proven to be short of the program's objectives. EDD's unique position in terms of information concerning job availability will not be overlooked. _ Tentative recommendations include the provision of a work experience slot in each of the three State IDD offices in Contra Costa County. Through this measure, access to these job listings would be provided. In addition, the provision (301b) of the Manpower Act dealing with persons of limited English-Speaking ability will not be ignored. While SER-Jobs for Progress has proved to be ineffective in serving this segment of the population, alternative programs of the same type are available through _ State and municipal educational institutions. Thus, the segment of the population that is of limited English-speaking ability will be more effectively served and the Manpower dollar in Contra Costa County will be more efficiently spent. (3) Coordination of non-CETA funded Manpower Services Non-CETA Funded Deliveries of Manpower will be provided by the Employment Development Department, a State run institution. (a) What relationship will CETA establish with non-CETA funded organizations? CETA will provide coordination and recruit- ment from non-CETA funded organizations for participants who meet the economic criteria of CETA Title I requirements. CETA will send all available information on CETA training programs, job workshops, orientation and assessments, and contact EDD for job leads. (b) Is there Supportive Services provided by non-CETA funded programs? Yes. WIN provides Suuportive Service to all Welfare recipients who are certified as WIN eligible, in the form of Child Care and Transportation. Regional Oc- cupation Training Programs provide a 6% a day for transpor- tation money for high school students enrolled in ROP classes. (c) _ Coordination Between Title I and Title III Programs: Title I will coordinate with Title III thru, recruitment, Job Development, Vocational Training and Job Placement efforts. Title I will cooperate with Title III in identifying Migrant Farm Workers and just plain disadvantaged people, who do not qualify for Title I'and could receive the benefits of CETA Title I. The same procedures will apply for the Indian Population of Contra Costa County. -51- V V The Prime Sponsor will also receive many free services which should be considered "in-kind" contributions. Contra Costa County conducts all personnel transactions, payroll trans- actions, purchasing, finance services, and administrative direction for the prime sponsor staff. 3. Management and Administrative Plan a. Organizational Structure and Administration The Prime Sponsor, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, will administer the program through the Manpower Administration, an office of the Human Resources Agency. Program planning and operation will be under. the direction of the Manpower Advisory Council, with final authority re served for the Board of Supervisors. Manpower Staff will operate through four (4) units: Planning; Evaluation Monitoring; Fiscal; and Supportive Services. The Manpower Director; %.-ill be responsible for the activities of all units. Manpower Staff will receive consulting services from other County offices, including' Fiscal Management, Contract Development, and Data Processing. An organization chart of program administration and a functional chart follow. b. Administrative controls (1) Accounting - Who acts as the Auditor/Comptroller? The Auditor/Controller (H. Donald Funk) and his staff performs these duties. - Who approves the budget, purchases and contracts? The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors reserve the right and authority to approve all budgets, purchases and contracts entered into by the County. - Who is the depositor of revenues? The Contra Costa County Treasury Department deposits all revenues for the County. - What property records are kept? The County Accounting Divi- sion maintains property records on all capital equipment owned by the County in the "Equipment and Fixed Assets" section. These items of equipment must cost $100 or more. - Is there a petty cash account? In the Administration by the County of the CETA Project, there is no petty cash fund maintained. - khat financial records are kept? The Auditor/Controller's Department maintains master spread sheets and financial records on all revenues and expenditures for the CEFA Project. They maintain a constant auditing and monitoring process which incorporates an adequate system of checks and balancas. - Who keeps property records? The County Accounting Division's Equipment and Fixed Assets section. _ ,_ 00,91052 CHAR-. ! INDICATES ADVISOR': Oh CONSULTANT F.0L INDICATES WORK-E)T'ER.IENCE POSITION : MANPOWER BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -i_-- ADVISORY COtT11CII. f. DIRECTOR, HUNAN RESOURCES AGENCY --- - -- ; DIRECTOR, MANPOWER ADMINISTRATION MANPOWER PLANNER ' PLANNING ASSISTANT " CONTRACT CONSULTANT ! " AUDITOR-CONTROLLER COUNTY DATA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT PROCESSING CONSULTANT � OPPORTUNITY OFFICER * ` Y Mh2ti'POt,'ER ANALYST (FISCAL) MANPOWER ANALYST (OPERATIONS) PROGRAM fPVALUAT( w LYST ASSISTA7-T (w.e.)114.1.S. ?Y3 SIOR FISCAL CLERK: FISCAL CLERK q SECRETARY ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE CLERK TYPIST *This position is being negotiated (� ({�� 001(41 = -53- page SL CW- AI3t I S£' L3. *rv'', •:; :�:� PRI":.` SFO'.. Or PRO.- A.": OPT," 4 y BOARD OF y'r� 3iA1QY0NFR ADVISOR'! COUNCIL CLIENT :7C0102WIT' SUPERviSORS SMAN RESOURCES AGENCY Y,IANPOitER STUTI.ON .,...�._....',.-._...._. INTAKE AMCY . -..} A,DMINZ i 4 — ASSESS)WgT/ORZEMN COUNSELING _ iC - 3OB-FINDING CIASSR � WORK-k P'£ CE 0.J.T. t1ORRSHOP TRA`TNEhG SUPPOR UPPORTI E S SERV� UPPOR IVE coq t t t - F s •_ _ - - 368 DE:iTEIAPHEPI7 NON-?OSITI i UBSIS►IZEA pSUBS�CE TENT OT R: ST TMMNXTION ,ACEM TERMIIZATION J. s` SCUP *rrrte�- !'' t •i■ ,� i a (2) Reporting (MIS) Cumulative reports of fiscal activities will be prepared monthly for each subcontractor by the fiscal unit of the Manpower.Office. Cumulative reports of service activities will be prepared monthly by the evaluation-monitoring unit, utilizing a computerized data storage and compilation system. This automated Management Infor— mation System (MIS) will electronically store and summarize: infor- mation reported by-the subcontractors on three sources documents (Client Record Formsj: (a) Intake Form (b) Activity Form (attachments) (c) Termination Form The Intake Form will be completed by the intake worker when a client is enrolled into CETA. It calls for client identification information, eligibility data, a listing of the. client's general characteristics (corresponding to DOL breakdowns), and a listing of special characteristics (e.g., offender, handicapped,.. fuU-time . student, etc.). The form will contain a record of the date of intake, and a code for the agency and staff worker responsible for the intake. The Activity Form will be completed each time a CETA function IS performed for an enrollee after intake, e.g., Counseling; OJT assignment; enrollment, graduation or termination from a classroom training program; placement; a supportive service, etc. The form will be filled out by the subcontractor's staff worker who performed' the activity. It will include identification information, the.date of the activity, and a code for the enact activity performed. . Again, a code for the agency and the staff worker will be recorded. The Termination Form will be completed 30 days after an enrollee has left CETA. It will be completed by the subcontractor's staff'' worker who executed the termination. Items will include an agency staff code, client identification information, the terminationdate, and the reason for termination. Items for the one-month"placement follow-up will also be provided. A physical file will be opened for each new client enrolled into CETA and all of his/her records will be stored together. Complete HIS client files for all enrollees will be maintained by the Manpower Office; complete files for all enrollees in a given County region will be maintained by the local intake agency. Activity files for all enrollees in a particular subcontractor's programwillbe main- tained by the subcontractor. An electronically stored filed will be initiated for each new enrol- lee. The computer will store all information contained on the Client Record Forms and will update client files monthly. The computer will provide monthly cumulative summaries of intakes, activities, and terminations processed by each subcontractor; the summaries will be further broken down by client characteristics. 001 -55- These computer processed reports will guide internal management control for both the prime sponsor and the various subcontractors. Client Record Forms will be submitted to the Manpower Office by subcontractors on a weekly basis, and will be continually reviewed for completeness by evaluation-monitoring staff. On-site audits of the accuracy of recording will be conducted quarterly for each subcontractor. The physical files maintained by the intake agencies, the files of the Manpower Office, and the Monthly reports based on; the computer files will be cross-validated on a spot-check basis each month. (3) Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures The evaluation and monitoring plan calls for the utilization of seven primary information sources: (a) The MIS computer-processed reports, (b) Follow-up of placed clients, (c) Follow-up of nonplacement terminated clients, (d) On-site visits and interviews with subcontractor's staff (quarterly), (e) Structured telephone interviews with active participants (quarterly), (f) Continual auditing of fiscal practices (including the fiscal unit monthly report); and (g) Contir"l review of MIS Client Record Fors. In addition to these sources generated by the Manpower Office, evaluation-monitoring staff will consider narrative reports of self- evalutions by subcontractors on a monthly basis, and will also con- sider any reports submitted by the agency contracted to process client grievances against CETA programs. Fiscal evaluation and monitoring will be continual. The fiscal unit of the Manpower Office will pre-audit all demands for expenditures ( except those from school districts and city governments, which will conduct regular self-auditing). A general audit of fiscal practices will be conducted once during the year for each subcontractor by the Auditor-Comptrollers office of the Human Resources Agency. Findings of all such audits will be considered by the evaluation-monitoring staff in preparing subcontractor performance reports. Performance reports will be issued by the Manpower Office on a quarterly basis for all subcontractors. The reports will focus on the following areas: (a) Progress toward attaining contractual performance standards, (b) Compliance with HIS requirements, (c) Compliance with CM guidelines, (d) Fiscal responsibility; and -- (e) Client satisfaction. 91 -56- The first three quarterly reports will be formative rather than summative; they will emphasize action plans action plans for improvement rather than the policy implications of deficiencies in the program. The reports will be released to and discussed with the subcontractors and the Evaluation Subcommittee of the Manpower Advisory Council. The subcontractors will be given the opportunity to challenge the staff report before the Advisory Council. The Evaluation Subcommittee will approve the quarterly and end-of-year performance reports on each subcontractor. 4. Personnel Staff employed by the Prime Sponsor, Contra Costa County, will occupy project positions. Project positions do not require a written civil service examin- ation, and they lack the permanence of traditional Civil Service positions.. They are established to exist for the duration of the project for which they were created. Applicants for project positions are ranked, and the top 10- 12 candidates are interviewed. The department head or appropriate department- al official then selects a candidate from among the top three applicants. Em- ployees who occupy project positions enjoy normal civil service rights other than permanency of empfoyment and transferability. In early 1975, the Manpower Advisory Council established a Grievance Sub- Committee for CETA enrollees. Assisted by a Grievance and Complaint staff person from the County Social Service Department, the Grievance Subcommittee developed a grievance procedure which follows the dictates of sound Admin- istrative Law. At present, the grievance procedure is awaiting final approval by the entire Manpower Advisory Council, and formal adoption is expected in June. As developed, the grievance procedure consists of a three-step process., First, an aggrieced CETA client must document an effort to reconcile his differences — with the program operator (subcontractor) in question. Second, if he/she is unable to settle the matter at the first level, he/she must make a written request to the Grievance Subcommittee. JIf the grievance procedure is adopted,: the Grievance Subcommittee will be granted the right to resolve grievances at this level by the Manpower Advisory Council.) A Hearing Officer (Grievance. and Complaints Staff person) will be granted the right to resolve grievances at this level by the Manpower Advisory Council.) A Hearing Officer (Grievance; and Complaints staff person) will be assigned by the Social Services Department as in-kind service, to conduct these hearings. Decisions will be rendered in writing by a Grievance Committee which shall consist of at least five members, none of whom shall be subcontractors with a vested interest in the grievance being resolved. Third, should a grievance not be resolved at the second step, either of the parties involved may appeal the matter to the Regional Department of Labor in San Francisco. �0�9J -57- Two reasons exist for the recommendation of a three-step grievance procedure. First, when there are more than three steps, parties are often inhibited from settling at lower levels because they feel they can hold out for a resolution in their favor at the final step. Second, as few as three steps encourages. the parties to more concertedly attempt to resolve their situation at step one, the most ideal place. Third, experience with grievance procedures has shown that where more than three-steps exist the time required for a final resolution runs contrary to the objective of prompt grievance resolution. The grievance procedure for employees of the Prime Sponsor is as follows: (1) attempt to resolve the grievance at a supervisorial level; (2) right of appeal, to the department head; (3) appeal to the Board of Supervisors. The Director of the Prime Sponsor's staff, the County Manpower Project, possesses the right to hire and fire her own staff. Subcontractors are required to submit written Personnel Policies and Procedures for approval of the CETA Manpower Office and the Manpower Advisory Council. The Subcontractors are expected to include an accept- able grievance procedure in their Personnel Policies and Procedures, and it is recommended that the right to hire and fire rest with the agency director or official administering the CETA project of that agency. C. Allowance Pavment (1) Allowance Pavments System Explain who will make the allowance payments - Upon completion of the Certification for Correctness and the processing of the paperwork by counselors, the allowance demands, for all classroom participants, are forwarded to the Manpower Office for review and then sent to the Auditor/Controller's Accounts Payable section' and mailed to the individuals. (a) The Entitlement/Certification Process, - Upon entering the CETA program via the Intake Mechanism, the individual is referred to an Assessment/Orientation Activity. If in this process, the individual desires to attend a training activity, the counselor will complete an allowance entitlement form which . " explains what payments he/she is entitled to. The original and first' copy will be forwarded to the County CETA Fiscal Staff; the second copy will be sent to the training facility clerk or the instructor for their records; the third copy to the individual for his/her records; and, the fourth copy for the records of the counselor. The County Fiscal Staff, upon receipt of the original and first copy of the entitlement forms, sends a list of names, social:- security numbers and dates of birth of these new training parti- cipants to the County Social Service Department for certification whether any AFDC cash grants are being received by these indi- viduals. After certification by Social Service, they return 'i the list indicating those who are in fact receiving aid in the fora of cash. -58- Vtfsl A list also is sent to the State Employment Development Depart- ment for certification of those receiving any unemployment insurance. The same process is performed and returned to the Fiscal Staff. Upon receipt of both lists, the fiscal staff determines the final allowance amounts entitled and sets up the file for the individuals. Any change in status of individuals are reported to the fiscal staff when necessary and action is taken to update the records. (b) Notice of Participation/Attendance Records - For the fiscal staff's purposes, the entitlement form will suffice in lieu of the "Notice of Participation" form suggested by DOL. The entitlement form will serve to indicate participationinthe allowance program. If after five consecutive days, the indi- vidual fails to attend the classroom and these absences are unexcused, the•instructor will notify the fiscal staff of this fact and termination procedures will be undertaken. If an. individual continuously fails to attend the classes for 15 days,. the instructor will notify the fiscal staff and this individual will be terminated. The Training Facility Clerk at the training site will certify attendance on the County's demand. After processing the certifdcation of attendance, the training facility clerk will place his/her initial at the top right hand corner of the attendance boxes (on the face of the allowance demand) and sign and date the demand in the spaces provided. This initial/ signature combination will validate the demand as well ascertify, its correctness to the fiscal staff. The absence of these two items will cause the demand to be returned and the participant not to be paid until the subsequent pay day. A record of those - persons authorized to sign-off on demands will be kept on file for reference and comparison. (c) Request for allowance procedures - Upon request from any authorized person or party, representing the County Adminis- trator of the Department of Labor, our allowance procedures and records are open for examination and review. In any event, the classroom participants and instructors will receive a summary of our allowance payment procedures for their edifices- tion and reference. (d) Payment Authorization/Delivery of Checks - Upon completing the auditing process and certification for correctness, the Fiscal Analyst and his staff shall reserve the right of authority to approve or reject payment of any and all demands submitted to them for payment, subject to any declination of. that authority by the Director of Human Resources Agency, and/or his designates. Upon payment of allowance demands, County warrants (checks) will be processed by Accounts Payable for those demands that were . approved for payment by the Fiscal Staff, and mailed to the hone address of the classroom participants. -59- OO1ZJ r (e) Advances of Allowances (Recovery of Advances) - There will be no provisions for the advancement of allowance per se. Only in cases of extreme emergency will an individual be granted an "Over-the-Counter" warrant. Each situation will be evaluated on the basis of the "Urgency" of the need for the monies and the degree of relief afforded the individual by receipt of the monies. Upon the determination of an actual emergency, the Fiscal Analyst will secure the signature of approval from the Manpower Project Director and forward to Auditor/Controller's Department for over-the-counter processing. If the Fiscal Staff deems that the circumstances do not warrant an emergency payment, a letter explaining the reasons for re- jection will be sent to the individual enrollee with a copy to his/her instructor, the Auditor/Controller and a copy placed in the files in the Fiscal Office. If it is determined later, that the individual had falsified the information pointing to an emergency, and was given the monies, then recovery of the monies will be secured from future allowance: payments. (f) Overpayments -- Recovery of overpayments Upon determination that an overpayment of allowances has been made as a result of a processing error, the individual- enrollee. will be apprised of same via a letter, and the overpayment _wi11 be recovered in future allowance payments if not waived by the Fiscal Staff. If other than a processing error is involved, and recovery is not waived, then a "Notice of Determination=.' will be issued, setting forth the reason(s) for the determina- tion. In any case, the authority to waive or pursue over- payments will be vested in the CETA Manpower Project Director, or his/her designates. (g) Loss or Theft of Checks - Reissue - If it is discovered that a warrant has been lost, stolen or otherwise not received, the" individual must wait 10 working days to cover possible receipt. After this grace period, he/she must sign and file,an affidavit of non-receipt by the Auditor/Controller, a stop-payment Will be issued for the lost/stolen warrant and a new one issued over- the-counter. (h) Internal Controls - (1) Amount of claims against maximum authorized training- No individual will receive any allowance payments if termin- ated or otherwise dropped from the training activity. Individuals will receive allowances in accordance with Section 105 (a)(4) and Section III of the Act, only if they are present and actively participating inthe class- room activity, unless the absence is specifically%excused by the instructor. -60- �� . (2) Advance balance not exceeding authorized -- with regards to a projected total cost in terms of an allowance total for an individual over the term of his/her training period, no individual will be given an advance balance in allowances. Allowances will only be paid for the days actually, spent is class and/or excused. (3) Basic and dependent's allowance not paid to welfare recip- lents -- In adherence with Section III of the Act, our internal controls will not allow an individuals) to receive any monieg above and beyond the "Incentive Allowance" amount of $30 per week if it is determined that he/she is receiving public assistance (AFDC - Cash Grant) . (4) Dependents counted for one participant- Specified. weekly.: allowances will only be paid to participants of the._training activity and not dependents. Dependents will not be included ,,'; in the physical count of participants nor as participants' receiving weekly allowance payments. (2) Allowances - Type and amounts paid (a) The type and amount of allowances to be paid - Payment of allowances will be for classroom training and some work experience. Work experience people will be entitled to $2.10 per hour (It will change to $2.30 per hour on January 1, 1976). Allowances for 30 hours of classroom training shall. be: - Welfare Recipient (AFDC-Cash Grant) $30 week` Institutionalized Persons - Heads of Households $60 week - Each dependent up to four (after the $5 week' first two - includes self and spouse or self and first dependent) - Single individuals not heads of households$45 week All individuals above will be apprised as to the allowance amounts they are entitled to via allowance entitlement form. (b) Method for verifying Unemployment Insurance Payments,should be explained - Reference should be made to C (1)(a) The entitle- ment/certification process above. (3) Waivers and Reductions (a) What waivers will be requested and reasons for the waiver Waivers may be requested for the recovery of emergency payments and overpayments due to: (1) Demand processing error, (2) Fault of the participant, and (3) Genuine need or emergency. Nita (b) Reductions for unexcused absences and part-time enrollment should be explained showing what constituted uneacused absences and part-time training. Also, the method for computing reduc tions - Enrollees will be paid allowances for those days actually ,:, in the classroom. A reduction in the weekly allowance amount • will be assessed upon the individual if he shows days, of unex cased absences. The amounts will be prorated as follows: Head of Household: $60.00 per week or $12.00 per day for 6 hours or $2.00 per hour. Welfare Recipient: $30.00 per week or $6.00 per day or (AFDC-Cash Grant) $1.00 per hour. Single Individual not $45.00 per week or $9.00 per day or Head of Household: $1.50 per hour. Dependent Allowance: $5.00 per week or $1.00.per hour. Unexcused absences will be determined by the instructor. i There will be uo provision for part-time training for allowances. Allowances will be based on 30 hours per week in the classroom setting. (4) Explain the review procedures for Participants who Dispute a Reduction or Disallowance of an Allowance The enrollee may formally file a complaint to dispute any reduc- tion or disallowance of allowances within five working days after receipt of his/her warrant. —� The review will include an opportunity for an informal hearing, if requested by the participant. The hearing will be conducted by the Management Team Grievance Committee. Decisions will be based on the guidelines established by the prime sponsor for allowances. The final disposition of the matter will be furnished to the party concerned within five working days sfter the final determination. (5) Explanation of Proposed Periodic Cost of Living Increase and "additional allowances" The Prime Sponsor intends to align its payment system with the local cost of living index to rise when appropriate. A periodic raise in the hourly rate per hour will begin on January 1, 1976 from $2.10 per hour to $2.30 per hour. The rate will continue to be adjusted as the minimum hourly rate increases. Additional seasonal allowances will be provided to participants in any program activity for meals, travel, transportation, subsistance, emergency and other expenses. These payments are intended to compensate participants in any program activity for costs related to their participation. Such payments will be made on a basis that will, as nearly as possible, equal the out-of-pocket costs experienced by the participants. e. Equal Employment Opportunities (1) Statement of Policy of Affirmative Action for CETA and Subcontractors The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California, as Grantee under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) of 1973, commits the Manpower Project and all persons and agencies who are subcontractors of the Project to a policy of non-discrimination and equal opportunity to all people regardless of race, ethnic background, age or gender, in employment, in participation on the Manpower Advisory Council or in the enjoyment of all benefits rendered by its programs. 00200 -62- (2) Eaual Employment Opportunities Under Section 98.21 of the Federal Regulations regarding CETA, the Prime Sponsor is charged with the responsibility of assuring the Secretary of Labor that no discrimination will exist and further, that an affirmative action program will ensure equal opportunity for all persons. (a) The County Manpower Project will designate an Equal Employment Opportunity Officer on its staff and this person will be responsible for developing an Affirmative Action Plan for subcontractors that the County Manpower staff will be working With. (b) The County Manpower Project will make sure that the information concerning the Affirmative Actian Plan will. reach all ethnic, sex and age groups through the following actions: - Distribute copies of its Affirmative Action Plan to all subcontractors, businesses, public agencies and others who may benefit by the activities and services. - Maintain a similar list for appropriate public and private organizations, including churches. - Develop an information campaign concerning the training programs in cooperating with news media. (c) Equal Employment Opportunity Officer will monitor all subcon- tractors for adherence to the priority groups which were specified to receive services and for provisions of equal opportunities to all participants. (d) The aforementioned monitoring for equal opportunity further applies to providers of vocational education classes, to OJT contractors, Work Experience sponsors, and others who may benefit from the activities and services. (e) The prime sponsor will work with prospective CETA participants . to insure that job requirements are reasonably related to job performance and that personnel practices are applied impartially in the evaluation and selection of candidates. CETA funded and non-CETA funded services and facilities. The booklet ' has been developed that will give not only the services of the various agencies, but also the eligibility requirements, if any.,- in ny,in order to receive the services. CETA participants will not be referred without assistance and follow-up, in order to assure that services were actually avail- able and provided. 002x1 4. CETA COST PLAN a. Determination of Administrative Costs At the time proposals were requested, all prospective program operators, were informed of the 20 percent maximum for administrative costs. In one case where classroom training was available from the school district and did not show as a program cost-, the administrative costs were over 20 per cent. However, when combined with other programs having little administrative costs, the total was under 20 per cent. The Prime Sponsor's administrative costs represent approximately 7-10% of the annual CETA budget. " b. Allocation of Costs by Program Activity The population groups that are intended to be served by the Prime Sponsor are youth, female heads of households, who are welfare recipients, minor- ity heads of households and Veterans. In order to effectively serve the above populations, the prime sponsor has had to set the following goals which are essentially the same as last year's goals but are much more magnified due to the increased inflation and the status of the unemployed sectors of the County that seem to be worsening as the economic situation unfolds. (1) Reduce the unemployment rate of youth to the extent practicable. (2) Reduce the unemployment rate for the disadvantaged minority groups, especially heads of households. (3) Assist in providing better employment opportunities for female heads of households who are receiving public assistance (AFDC-Cash Grants). (4) Assist Veterans, especially Vietnam-era Veterans. In order to achieve these goals, the prime sponsor has had to keep in mind the priority groups and project the monies needed in each area of the County that would best serve their needs. In evaluating our '74 - '75 funding year and program developments, it was determined that quality counseling was not being given to our participants. Since this was a critical shortcoming and an important adjunct to our Proposed Operating Plan, we have provided for increased staffing in our CETA Units to accommodate this need. C. Non-CETA Funds As it was elaborated in C.2.e. (1), Extent of Which Existing Service Facilities are Utilized, state ROP programs, local school districts and junior colleges in the area are to be used on a referral basis to provide classroom training to CETA eligible clients. The funds received through this grant will not be used to replace these services, but to supplement them by providing allowances and supportive services to the clients participating in these programs. 002V4 -64- BY- LAWS MANPOWER PLANNING COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (Final Draft for Approval Including Changes Designated at 10/15/74 Meeting) ARTICLE I - NAME _ The name of this organization shall be the Manpower Planning Council of Contra Costa County. ARTICLE II - OBJECT As set forth in Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 and in the Contra Costa County Board..-if Supervisor Resolution dated May 14 1974, the purposes of this Council are: a) To submit recommendations regarding the program plans and basic goals, policies and procedures from employment and training programs; b) To monitor and provide for objective evaluations of Manpower U; program conducted in a prime sponsorship area; C) To provide for continuing analysis of need for employment, training and related services in such area; , d) To seek Federal, State and private funds for Manpower, employability and economic development program having manpower potential to benefit the residents of Contra Costa County. vu203 } N i ARTICLE III - M.EMBERSHiP A. Members of the Council shall be appointed by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and shall not exceed twenty-three (23) members. B. The membership of the Council shall include community agencies, the client community, educational .institutions, agriculture, business, Employment Development Department of the State of California,, unions, citizen advocates and cities. C. Programa operators shall not constihte more than eight (8) out of the. •- twenty-three (23) members of the Council. D. Members other than ex-officio members shall serve for a term of two years except that one-half (2) shall be appointed initially for a one year term. Initial one year terms shall be decided by drawing lots within each of the major membership categories mentioned in B above. E. All members of the Council shall appoint designated alternates who may vote on their behalf. F. The members of the Council shall be reimbursed at $10. 00 per meeting (not to exceed $30. 00 per month) except those representatives who serve, -by virtue of their job and/or who receive expense reimbursement from another source. Alternates may be reimbursed a maximum of $10. 00 per month unless they are attending in place of the regular representative. 00204, G. Absence from three (3) consecutive regular meetings of the Manpower Planning Council or four (4) regular meetings within a six (6) months period by any individual representative without an excuse deemed valid by the Council and so recorded by the Council will be construed as a resignation from the Council by that agency, organization or group. After two (2) consecutive absences of their representatives, the member agency, organization or .group will be notified in writing. ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS AND DUTIES A. Officers shall be a chairperson and a vice-chairperson. B. The chairperson shall preside at all Manpower Planning Council meetings, represent the Council whenever the occasion demands, appoint all committees and call a special meeting at any time necessary. C. The vice-chairperson shall assist the chairperson as directed by the latter and assume all the obligations and authority of the chairperson in the absence of the latter. ARTICLE V - ELECTIONS A. Selection of officers shall be held. each June with the terms of the officers beginning July 1 of each year and appointments by the Board of Supervisors:':'_.., made by the last official meeting in June. B. Officers shall be recommended to the Board of Supervisors by a majority vote of the Council- 4 C. Officers shall serve for one year terms and may succeed themselves once. 2 D. An officer appointed by the Board of Supervisors may be removed by the Board of Supervisors whenever, in its judgement, the best interest of the Manpower Planning Council will be served thereby. If the office of any officer shall become vacant for any reason, the vacancy shall be filled by the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation by. a. majority vote of the Council. ARTICLE VI - VOTING A. ' 51% of the eligible voting merw.bers and 51% of the non-voting regular members of the Manpower Planning Council will constitute a quorum for the transaction of all -regular business of the Manpower Planning Council. 51% of the members of the Manpower Planning Council shall constitute a quorum on all other issues unless otherwise voted by the Council. The quorum for special meetings will be one fourth (—�) of the eligible voting members and one fourth of the non-voting regular members of the Manpower Planning Council. If a quorum (as defined above) is not present at any regular or special meeting of the Council, the meeting shall be adjourned one-half (i) hour after the designated starting time and cannot be reconvened until the entire Manpower Planning Council has been given proper notice as stated in these•By-laws. At any such adjourned meeting, no business shall Tie transacted. 0021W B. All members of the Council shall formally appoint in writing desig- nated alternates to their regular representatives. In the event both the regular representative aad the alternate are present -at the meeting, only the regular representative may vote on 'issues. C. If program operators are members of the Council, they must refrain from voting on all financial matters pertaining to the allocation of CETA TITLE I funds. D. Each representative, or their alternate shall have one vote when present and no proxys or absentee votes shall be permitted. ARTICLE VII - COMMITTEES A. Committees of the Council may function on behalf of the Council proper in gathering information, hearing testimony or drafting recommendations for action; but all official action shall be taken by the membership of the Council proper unless the Council shall have delegated authority.for such action to a committee of the CounciL B. Membership on all committes shall be representative of the Council membership as a whole and shall attempt to minimize conflict of interest situations. Committee members will be appointed by the Chairperson from nominations made 'at a regular meeting of the Manpower Planning Council. 00207 6 _ C. There shall be four (4) standing committees of the Manpower Planning Council. 1. Planning Committee: To plan for a long range over-all perspective of manpower problems, and to establish program >=' needs and planning priorities on an on-going basis. 2. Evaluation Committee: To look at on-going and past performance of presently funded programs for manpower purposes and to- recommend o-recommend action on each. ' E. 3. Proposal Committee: To examine manpower proposals and, based on information provided by the planning and -evaluation= committee, develop funding recommendations. 4. General Grievance Committee: To listen to and to evaluate. any complaints from CETA clients concerning CETA programs.. D. Adboc - The Council may from time to time establish such other committees with such functions, powers, duties and tenure as the Council shall determine. ARTICLE VIII - RULE OF PROCEDURE s' a A. All meetings of the Council and its committees shall be governed by the current edition of Roberts Rules of Order. # - : _ ARTICLE IX - MEETINGS AND MEETING NOTICES A. Meetings of the Manpower Planning Council of Contra Costa County may be held anywhere within the County as determined monthly by the officers and staff of the Council. B. Regular meetings of the Council Will be held monthly on a regular meeting day as determined at the first meeting of the Council in July of each year. C. Notice of- regular meetings of the Manpower Planning Council--shall be given to each representative by zaail at least five (5) days prior to the i, day named for such meeting. The mailing shall include at a minimum the agenda for the up coming meeting and the minutes of the past meeting. D. Special meetings may be called by the chairperson providing at least forty-eight (48) hours can be given to each members' representative. E. Emergency situations will be handled by the staff and the officers in conjunction with a poll of the "Committee as a Whole". ARTICLE X - MANPOWER PLANNING STAFF The County Manpower Planning staff will provide all necessary professional, - technical and clerical staff to serve the Council. This will in no way be in-. terpreted that the Manpower Planning Staff is employed by the Manpower Plan- ning Council of Contra Costa County. VV2019 ■ ARTICLE XI - AMENDMENTS These By-laws may be altered, amended or repealed at any regular meeting of the Manpower Planning Council by a vote of two-thirds (2/3) of_ the members' representatives appointed at that time, provided notice of the proposed change shall have been mailed to each representative not less than seven: (7) days, , prior to such meeting. z Y�+ 0021 21 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 In the Matter of Report of Director, Human Resources Agency, relative to PL 93-647. Social Security Amendments of 1974, Title XX. Mr. R. E. Jornlin, Director, Human Resources Agency, having submitted a report dated May 9, 1975 pertaining to proposed U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare regulations to implement Title XX (PL 93-647) of the Social Security Act of 1974, which report contains recommended changes in the proposed regulations; and The Board having considered the matter; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Jornlin is AUTHORIZED to submit aforesaid recommended changes to the Adainistrator'. Social and Rehabilitation Services, U. S. Department of Health Education and Welfare. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Resources Agency Supervisor County Administrator affixedthis 13th day of May 19 75 R. OLSSON, Clerk By � �c�c De Clerk PWY H 2a i21�a - �s-td L. 0021-1 Human Resources Agency Date May 9, 1975 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY R CEI VE To '7Director MAY/J 19/5 Frons R. Carnl f 2 0UwM aanc WAM a XOMMMM Subj PL 93-647, SOCIAL SECURITY A`E]OMEIWS OF 1974, TITLE xx The following material is to provide on the anticipated i umoact of Title xx. The social security AmendmQnts of 1974, PL 93-647, added Title xx - Grants to states for Services. Primarily, Title Xx is a social. service reform measure that repeals Titles VI and IVA, thereby combining adult, fam- ily and chUdrenIs services in the new Title 1X. It takes effect on Octo- ber 1, 1975. The purpose of Title XC is to deal with problems d in social ser- vice delivery since the 1960's. These have included the massive growth in the editure of federal funds for the sponsorship of social programs, oarQlicatnd categofrical programs that fragmented services at the local level, oar ' ' and un,claar federal policies, and a prevailing lack of coordinated resource allocation, p1annim, and most a lark of ao�ty to the public. The intent of PL 93-647 is tothe social service program of federal financial assistance arra to encourage states and local oomiznn!ties, Frith citi- zen participation, to pian and deliver Locally relevant social services with minimum federal intervention. TIS Social Security Amenclont of 1974 shifts the nsihil. for pram Planning, service delivery, and evaluation onto localoommmities, with strong federal emphasis placed Won the requirement to report client impact and cost for social programs administered by state and local governments. Federal emphasis is clearly upon program and fiscal aeoount ability in contrast to the previous emphasis on mwidating specific social pro- grams with little or no foamsfor actability related to pro- gram effectiveness and cost efficiency. _ Title ?CX is not a special revenue sharing picogram. Although federal funds are distributed on a population basis for each state, tin federal government reaui,res local financial sharing of costs. A 25 percent match is required for federal f;nan-;al participation in all services ement family pLmuif'tg. The federal adaziixLi.stration have made statements proposing the reduction of the federal financial participation in social,, services aoc n to 50 percent by 1977. This will require re at-*Ament to the Social Sectwity Act. Title xx defines five client impact goals that must be addressed by the social service program developed by any state or local gmmr m ennt. Mese are: 1. Achieving or maintainin3 econ=&c self: ort to prevent, reduce, or eliminate dependency. ' 00212 Hoard of Supervisors 2- May 9, 1975 2.• Achieving or mai nta ng self-sufficienczy, including reduction or dependency. 3. Preventing or remedying neglect, abuse, or exploitation of children and adults unable to protect their own interests; or preservingu ng or reuniting fam1lie 4. Preventing or reducing institutional. care by prowidiM for community-based care, bome;6 sed care, or other fo®s of less intensive care. S. Seawing referral or acini ssi on for institutional care when other foams of care are not apg>:opr Late, or providing g services-to individuals in inti tutus. States and local eniments are required to set forth measurable objectives and to develop programs intended to impact on these. There must be at least one service directed at each of the fire national goals with other.services such as family plaruniigr ;fi,a11y mandated. At Lmus east three services t be directed to Supplem�tal Security Income (SSI) recipients. Mutation and health programs and the of buildings cannot be funded tars the provisions of this law. Migibility for services is liberalized to eneaaQass families with incomes up to 115 percent of a state's median income. In Cali- fornia, aliforni a, this is $16,995 annually for a family of four. Although 50 percent of federal funds under Title XIX must be spent on services to recipients of public ash MMC, Medi-Cal, and SSI) , or those who are eligible for these pro- grams, the remainder may be spent for services to clients with incomes up to US percent of state median income. The option of spending more Ulan 50 per- cent on- recipients or the limitation of slier b;l;ty basad upon income status lies with the state. Within the general framework of the law, local goveninents are provided with m37�im]til f3 exi hi 1;t y in service program design, delivery, and aclztrini motion. The primary constraint affecting Caifornia`s ability to plan and utilize the fle2d hi 1 i ty available in the law is the siuple fact that California currently is expending its total federal allocatiocu of social service funds. Title l0; does not affect the closed-ended allocation of social services funds as enac- ted in Title III of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972.. Fur- thermore, there is no provision in Title XX to al.l w reallocation of funds unspent by other states. At the present time, appmctimately nine to eleven states have reached their federal ceiling on funds; others, such as the state of Arizona, expend only $7 million 1 i on of their $23 million i tm allocation. Without real location,serviees cannot be expanded in California. A reallocation nvu-m= in the U. S. Congress is essential for Cali foniia to implement the intent of Title XX. The impact on Contra Costa is similar. Tdith a limited amount of Social Rehab- ilitation Service revenue, and with little prospect of additional allocations, it is difficult to engage in a meaningful planning process with citizens and professionals who expect ez process to yield program ftexihi 1 ity, expand elii gibil;ty, and have greater impact on the decision making process for social service programs. It is irnortant to reali?e that the first year of Title XX iarpleateitation will be governed by the State of California through its 00213 Board of SqDervisors -3- May 9; 1975 existing lavas and regulations. It is doubtful that major service program changes will be implemented during the first year or that eI i a;hi I i ty will be expanded. Title XX provides Contra Costa with certain flibi1 hies heretofore unavailable. fir, the dilemma of urmet meds and limited resources rema ns. A possible answer to the dileam is a caunty supported planning press that Would evaluate the total financial resources available LQ]dE'r CEM, CDA, and ort--i?.r g ants-ix-aid to m3Xlmize the efficient ut1liZd tion of Mese funds. Coordinated planning would eliminate costly duplication in separate program planning, inforeatinn gathering, management, and ser- vice delivery. Uniform and 1nicoup�1?cnted eligibility standards, clear cut program objectives, and —1uplicated administration would net the county more funds for direct service delivery. The human service agencies in Contra Costa and projects such as AIL-Led Services nave dencrostrated the fens' ility of such rehe*+sive and integrated planning. Proposed Title XX regulation were issued in the Federal Register of Monday, , April 14, 1975, Volume 40, Number 72, Part II. I am requesting-your approval of the attached coaments and reoommendat on for change in the proposed regu lations and your authorization to forward these comments under the signature of the Chaisrman, County Board of Supervisors. To be properly considered, these cm ments must be forwarded to the AcIi ni motor of Social and Rehaai.Ii tation Services, DH+T, by May 14, 1975. RW:gg At t2ici rmnt-a cc: Qouaty Acimi ni t ator G. Fussell 00214 COtVENTS AND RECOVWNDAIIONS ON PROPOSED RULES AND REGULATIONS. OHEW, 45CFR, PART 228, AS ISSUED IN - FEDERAL REGISTER, MONDAY, APRIL 24, 1975, VOL. 40, NO. 72, PART II - PART 228, SOCIAL SERVICES PROGRAMS FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES: TITLE XX OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT Subpart A - Scope and Definition No comment. Subpart 8 - State Plan Requirements, Reports, Maintenance of Effort, Compliance The fourteen subsections of this part are requirements for state planning and program_administration of social services. These subsections by and large are currently covered by California law and will be so declared.- el eclared:.- - Section 228.10, Safeguarding Information The county recommends greater specificity in the language of the section to show the objectives for which information is safeguarded. Section 228.19, Noncompliance The county recommends that no action be taken upon the Secretary's authority to suspend funds on a full or partial basis until FY77-78 or at least one fiscal year after the implementation date of October 1, 1975. Subpart. 0 - Comprehensive Annual Service Proqram Plan Section 228.23, Program Goals and Objectives The county applacrds the federal effort providing for service plans stated in measurable terms and for goals directed at client impact, and for the flexibility in service programming that is permitted as well as acknowledgement of the value . of preventative services. We caution that over-emphasis.on the goal of self-support will prove detrimental to the large population served by social service agencies where the client's maximum level of functioning is self-sufficiency or self-care and where economic self-support is not a realistic expectation. Simplistic 0021 application of the economic self-support coal as if based upon individual failings, neglects to take into account the broader social and economic factors that contribut to this social condition. Section 228.29, Program Coordination and Utilization; Section 228.31 , Needs Assessment; Section 228.32, Plannino, Evaluation and Reporting The county concurs with the federal requirement for sound program and fiscal planning to coordinate jand maximize services to clients. It is obvious that the. first program year under Title XX will not comply fully with these requirements because of the serious time constraints. The major detractor in these sections . is the administrative cost of implementing these procedures. The cost of establishing needs assessments, planning, monitoring and evaluation systems reduces the amount of limited funds available for direct services. It is therefore recommended that special funds, at the federal level, be earmarked.specifically for these planning activities. Section 228.33, Proposed Services Plan; Section 228.35, Amendments to Final Servic.— Plan We concur in principle with the requirement for public presentation and participati, in development by the state of comprehensive plans for social services and for the' publicireview process about results. The administrative expenses related to the broad public information distribution required, reduces the funds available for direct client impact services. Therefore, we recommend: a. That the Administrator, Social Rehabilitation Services, set aside discretionary funds or other monies available to his office for special grants to states in which projected expenditures forthe fiscal year require use of all SRS funds allocated to the state under the standard formula whenever such special grants are properly justified for this purpose, and b. That federal legislation be requested to permit reallocation of unexpended 00216 -3- .social services funds from states underutilizing standard formula SRS allocations to those states which demonstrate a need and capacity to utilize additional funding. Subpart D - Limitations -' Services Section 228.40, Medical and Remedial Care The additional flexibility allowed under Section 228.40 is welcomed; however, because of California's, particular pattern of full service fund utilization, this section will not allow implementation. Under subpoint (4)-the county recommends the addition of language that would indicate the requirement of investigation of other health care resources such as the crippled children's program prior to utilization of social service funds for medical or remedial care. Section 228.41 , Room or Board The terminology in this section should be clarified to encompass room and/or board situations. Also this section should exempt specific programs: such as Child Day Care Centers from the restrictions of federal financial participation being available for only six consecutive months because many Child Day Care Centers provide year-round (12 months) services to eligible participants. Child Care services cannot be time limited; the nutritional component of this care may cost more than 20 percent of the total amount. Section 228.42, Child Care Standards (2)(ii)A We recommend the elimination of this section which would remove the requirement for. educational services as a component of child care. Elimination of the educational . , 00217 component would allow "warehousing" of chiidren. (2)(ii)B and 2(ii)D We recommend the following staffing standards for day care centers and group . day care homes: Age Standard 0 - 2 yrs. 1 staff for 3 children 2 - 3 yrs. I staff for 4 children 3 - 4 yrs. i staff for 5 children 4 - 6 yrs. 1 staff for 7 children 6 - 14 yrs. 1 staff for 10 children While we recognize that family day care may be preferrable to group care or institu- tional care for infants,-such care is not always available. In. Caiifornia, there are group care facilities which provide excellent care for- infants.- We -believe the staffi_. standards for older children proposed in the regulations are too low and will not allow for strong programs. (2)(ii)C We recommend the following substitution: A family day care home shall care for no more than six children. The numbers, ages and sex of the children who may be accepted by the home shall be determined on the bases of the application review which will take into consideration the following: 1) Personal characteristics, physical energy and skills of the licensee. 2) Family life experiences and attitudes of the licensee toward children. 3) Other household members including children and adults and their individual needs. 4) Physical features of the home and its safety and suitability for children. 00218 -5- No more than two infants including the children of the family day care parent shall be provided care unless there is a plan for additional household help and child care which has been approved by the licensing agency. Section 228.44, Services'to Individuals living in Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Intermediate Care Facilities (Including Any Such Hospitals or Facilities for Mental Diseases or For the Mentally Retarded)-, or Prisons. There are many effective "therapeutic community" programs, particularly in the fields of drug and alcohol abuse and the mentally disordered or disabled, that would be seriously handicapped if the provisions of this section were to be applied to them. Habilitation and group and indimidual counseling activities are specific services which can be used to assist such individual attain the goals of attaining self-support, achieving self-sufficiency, and preventing inappropriate institutional care. Purchase of service agreements which include the above services provided by the facility should receive FFP since they are integral to the milieu therapy and should not be fragmented. Section 228.45, Services Provided by-Foster-Family Homes or Foster Care Institutions -":: The county•is pleased with the provision allowing FFP for services provided by a foster family home. This has- been a concern to professional staff as well as foster parents who have provided special care and services without remuneration. Section 228.46, Emergency Shelter We agree with the intent of this section which makes federal financial participation available for emergency shelter as part of a protective services plan for children. We recommend that federal financial participation for emergency shelter for adults as part-of a protective services plan also be made available with the same or similar constraints as described in this section. 00219 i -6- _ Subpart E - Limitations - Financial • Section 228.52, Allotments to States We strongly recommend and actively support changes in legislation to provide for reallocations by the federal agency of SRS funds among and between states within aggregate ceiling amounts; so that, the Administrator SRS may during the fiscal year reallocate monies projected to be unexpended by any state to other states which certify the specific need for and capacity to use federal funds in an amount greater than the standard formula allotment based on population ratios. Subpart F - Limitations - Individuals Served, Eligibility and Fees 'Section 228.60, Person's Eligibility; Section 228.61 , Determination of Eligibility The proposed responsibility of the state agency for'contineiing determinations of eligibility of individuals for services sets forth an eligibility determination process which is inefficient, costly to implement, and unnecessarily difficult to administer. We endorse the principle of determining eligibility for social services primarily by applicant's -declaration about relevant eligibility factors, subject to supportive documentation when the applicant's statements appear ques- tionable or inconsistent. If applicant declaration is unacceptable, it is imperative that certain categories be exempted from- this requirement where loss of confidentiality would be a deterrent to use of the service; e.g. , the sexually active adolescent living with parents seek:__, family planning services or a spouse seeking help with a personal problem that cannot be shares with other spouse. Section 228.61 , Determination of Eligibility, as written, would require that the state and county re-determine eligibility with' documentation each time a service is provided to avoid a risk of federal audit exception. Eligibility should be re-determined at prescribed intervals (such as every six months) with eligibility 00220 presumed and federal financial participation available for services rendered-during this period unless the eligibility determining agency failed to act upon information • to the contrary in the individual case. Section 228.52, Fees for Service No fee should be required for Information and Referral Services or for Protective Services for Children or Adults regardless of income level since such fees would be a deterrent to utilization of these services. States should be permitted the option of developing a fee schedule for services provided on a continuing basis to chronically disabled persons different from fees for services provided in acute or crisis situations. For example, a severely dis- abled child or adult requiring lifetime maintenance and habilitation services should not be charged with fees similar to those provided on a short--term basis. Subpart G - Purchase of Service Section 228.70, Written Contract (a)(12) This section is vague; it is not clear as to what standards or guidelines are to be used for contracts and monitoring; it is not clear as to whether they are to be. determined by the state or federal agency. Subpart H - Training an¢ Retraining Section 228.80, General;Section 228.81, Who May Be Trained; Section 228.82, Grants to Educational Institutions; Section 228.83, Financial Assistance to Students,..;' Section 228.84, Activities and Costs Matchable as Training Expenditures; Section 228.85, Activities and Costs Not Matchable As Training Expenditures 002'21 .......... The direction taken in the regulations to prohibit the use of Staff Development funds for attendance at meetings or conferences of professional organizations (228.85(d)) would cause a serious constraint in making use of such conferences as a major learning tool for-the development of staff in public social service settings. It is unrealistic, in view of the many demands on the closed-end services money, to expect such budgets to include provision for attendance at professional con- ferences. Therefore, the resource of such meetings will no longer be available for the important learning content they provide. The barrier to attend such meet- ings that are devoted primarily to public welfare needs is especially unrealistic. For example, the programs of the American Public Welfare Association and the National Conference of Social Welfare are devoted exclusively to public social ' service needs. Cutting funding for attendance at these meetings will serve to make them unavailable. ' In addition to such conferences, there are conferences such as those offered regionally by the Child Welfare League of America, the content of which makes a significant contribution to improving methods and practice in the delivery of ser- vices. As a result of attendance at these meetings, staff attending always obtain significant information that contributes to program enhancement and improved ad- ministrative practices. Subpart I - General Administrative Provisions No Comment • 00222 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 4 May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Administration and Finance Committee Report on Grant Application for an Energy Resource and Conservation Study. The Board this day having considered the recommendation of the County Administrator that the Director of Planning be author- ized to submit an application to the State Office of Planning and Research for a "701" planning grant to conduct an energy resource and conservation study estimated to cost $50,000, said study to be financed by the requested grant of $25,000 and $25,000 of county in-kind services; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having expressed concern with the number of various studies being conducted by the county, and having recommended that aforesaid request be referred to the Administration and Finance Committee ( Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Kenny) for review and report to the Board; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommen- dation of Supervisor Moriarty is APPROVED; and Later in the day Supervisor Linscheid having orally re- ported that the committee concurs with the recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the report of the Admin- istration and Finance Committee is APPROVED and the Director of Planning is AUTHORIZED to submit said grant application. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness cc : County Administrator my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 13th day of Eay , 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Cleric By OP A tc c -- , Oeputy Cleric H 24 12!74 - 15-M L. Kinc ai d 00223 j IN 111E BOARD 01= SUPERVISORS OF COMA COSTA COUYFY, 5rATE OF CALIFORNIA In the katter of 1 Au0102-i ation to File AhpliCalion ) For HUD Grant for an lincrgy Resource RESOLUTION NO. 75/376 and Conservation Study. ) h'1i1:MI►S, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County recognizes the problems and issues related to energy utilization and conservation in the County, and desires to undertake a planning study as outlined in the Application for Comprehensive Planning Assistance to contribute to-improved understandin- of the subject matter and the possible resolution of these issues; and 1:11E-REAS, the County of Contra Costa has dcvclolx-O an Overall Program Design and recottnendcd the development of an organizational structure as outlined in the Application to deal with these development problem_; and issues; and, the California Council on Intergovernmental Relations, under authority of the Government Code of the State of California (Section 34200), acting through the California State Office of Planning and Research, may pro- vide planning assistance for such a program and receive financial assistance from the U. S. Department of [lousing and Urban Development, as authorized by Section 701 of the housing Act of 1954, as amended; NOW T1lEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa hereby requests the Council on Intergovernmental Rela- tions, acting through the Office of Planning and Research, to provide planning assistance wider authority of the Government Code of the State of California, with such financial assistance as may be provided by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, under authority of Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended. Such planning assistance is more particularly des- cribed in a project description, a copy of-which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board and by reference incorporated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, .subject to approval of such planning assistance by the State and Federal authorities, hereby authorizes the use of personnel of the Contra Costa County Planning 13cpa rtment for services and/or other expenditures "of funds toward the accomplishment of this project which-will have a net esti- mated cost to the County of Contra Costa of $S0,000. BE IT FURT11ER RESOLVED that the Director of Planning of the County of Contra Costa be, and lie is hereby, authorized and empowered to execute in the name of Contra Costa County all necessary applications, contracts, and alreerents and amendments hereto to implement and carry out the purposes spe- cified in this resolution. '17ue foregoing resolution was passed by the Board of Supervisors of the Cuway of Contra Costa this 13th day of May 1975_ cc: State % Director of Planning Director of Planning Co. Administrator Co. Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 75/376 W)224 bFR-2 (6/74) FINAL APPLICATION - COMA REHE;:SLVE PLAN.:ING ASSISTANCE i SCH 75012772 j Name of applicant Planning Program - Short Title s CONTRA COSTA COUNT PLANvIING DEPARTti1ENT ENERGY RESOURCE AND CONSERVATION STUDY Planning Area Population Census Date Months required to 600,000 estimate 1975 Complete Program 12 ,tos. OPR Use,: Size of Planning :area in Square Miles 735 a) Federal Grant $25,000 ' Project Director Titte Requested t� James W. Cutler Planner IV �= ! $ t�b Address ) l.oc.�l C:zslz he Contributed ' 1 P. 0. Bot 951 1 Martinez, California 94553 c) Value In-Kind $25000 Services to be Provided Phone 228-3000, - Total Casts of Program $50,000 (415) Ext. 2035 (a + b + c) 1 , List enclosures which are a part Of this application package: (See Sectiun II.B.) A. Board of Supervisors Resolution Authorizing Grant Request. B. Final Application (Form OPR-23). C. Overall Program Design. I D. Work Program. ! I E. Monitoring and Evaluation Program (OPR-34). F. Statement of Grant Review by the Association of Bay Area Governments. !I ' G. Statement of Assurance. 1 # 1. Board of Supervisors Resolution. 2. Affirmative Action Plan17 jI I - rr i Lhc�rlrc.cl r}! f cc c:�1 :gn:�turc D. _Anthony_A_-Dehaesus -- -- . ----- � _ 2 . 222_ 1 i t 1 e Director..of_Planuiag- __�� -- - -- -� - /E�/75 „ ' - - 5,. w • i'Y' re it { F ry "ERGY RESOURCE AND CONSERVATIO,'i STUDY Introduction and Analysis � r Program Design Work Program �.L ,� sz Contra Costa County, California , Planning Department y" 1975 r KEY I SSUE'S Energy is rapidly becoming the important conservation issue of the 1970's. A flurry of acts by both the state and federal governments testify to this need. D1ost of these efforts look at energy from a system-wide perspective. Some, such as the State of California Energy Resources Act (AB 1575) , emphasize developing information which can be utilized by engineers and architects to minimize energy loss through design criteria. Those studies provide only part of what is needed on energy conservation; lacking is an approach which will help local govern- ments make decisions on energy issues. It is the purpose of this study to demonstrate how this need can be filled. The key issues which are most relevant to planning agency function are: 1. flow should energy considerations modify the land use plan? 2. Should predominantly single family housing developments give way to clusters, apartments, and high-rise construction because of a higher potential for energy conservation': 3. glow can local government adequately measure the energy consump- tion effects of its administrative actions? 4. What is the range of actions that local government could imple- ment to conserve energy both for itself and for new development projects? S. What effect do appurtenant facilities (i.e., swimming pools, advertising signs) have on the County's energy consumption? G. Does energy usage correspond to user's income level? 7. Do rural homes use less (or more) energy than urban homes? S. How can government conserve more energy without reducing; its present (or anticipated) service levels? In an effort to barn insights into these and other energy related issues, the County situation will be utilized as a test case. Products will be Generated which will explore these issues and yield insights into specific County problems, which include the following: 1 . Ways to diminish the rapidly increasing commitment of County financial resources to purchase energy. 2. 11oi; to provide more complete energy analysis as an input into the County's EIR process. 3. Ways of relating L.UCO sphere of influence decisions to energy conservation measures. O02- f F R d. Impetus to the development of a County energy conservation e1craent of the General Plan. S. Correlating the energy-costs findings with the results a- the " Cowty's previous cost-effectiveness study. ORG,'►RATIONS Due to the broad scope of the study, most agencies operating within the County might be affected either directly or marginally by this stt:dy: In addition to Federal, State and regional agencies the following local .�=5 agencies could be affected. COUNTY AGENCIES Department of Public ttorks ' Health Department ' e3 Local Agency f=ormation Commission T Building Inspection Department Sheriff's Ucpatwent r Flood Control and hater Conservation District Airport Land Use Commission Count;: Library Svstem - = Education Department CITIES Antioch Brentwood Clayton Concord �ftl Xzr.. El Cerrito Hercules — Lafayette Martinez =r Moraga u" Pinole , Pittsburg Pleasant dill Richmond San Pablo Walnut Creel: fry DISTRICTS AANO SERVICE- AREAS Loral School Districts (18) Contra Costa County Junior College District Local Fisc Protection District (18) Local Reclamation Districts (11) Kunicipal Improvement District (2) Sanitary Districts (17) Vater Districts (19) r ;rr r 111MM1 GROUPS Pacifica li Gas and Electric�riC Company The Associated building Industries of Northern California Bay Light and Power Company PREVIOUS PLAN\I::G EFFORTS Contra Costa County has maintained a planning agency for almost forty years. During that time, a General Plan has been prepared for the County, the area has been zoned, and development has been regulated by ordinances which are among the more thorough and up to date in the nation. In recent years planning accomplishments included the following: 1. The preparation of a planning data base as part of the Contra Costa County Land Use and Transportation Study (partially 11701" financed) . ' This program is nearing completion. 2. Preparatioa of Environmental Impact Report Processing Procedures (drafted spring, 19721 and creation of specialist EIR review team. 3. Institution of "mandatory referral" review procedures for public and related projects under Section 65402 of the California Planning Law. 4. Preparation of the Forth Richmond-San Pablo Cay Study (partially "701" funded) which resulted in an adopted Area General Plan and physical improvements justification for this minority-group community. - -S. Development of a local General Plan updating and zoning review system on a "planning; region" sequence, under which the review areas,are structured on Local Agency Formation Commission "spheres of influence" for cities. 6. Adoption or a General Plan Recreation Element, parkland dedica tion ordinance, and park dedication fund distribution program, which has lead to a County Parks Program (through County Service Areas) . 7. Adoption of a (joint) Open Space-Conservation Program. S. Adoption of a Scenic Routes Element. 9. institution of an Agricultural Preserve Program. 10. Institution of a Certified Population Estimation Program. 11. Preparation of a countywide proposal for the State's 1974 park bond proposal. oa229�;, j f a 1 12. Preparation of several unincorporated community "Urea" components of the County Gcneral Plan. 13. Preparation of the County's Housing Community Development program in conjunction with 12 cities within the County. Work in progress includes: 1. Adoption of the Seismic Safety Element. 2. Adoption of the Safety Element. 3. Completion of the Noise Element. .3. Completion of the ,'Airport Site Selection Study (partially funded by FINA) . S. E=stablishment of a Scenic Easement program in the County. Work in progress especially pertinent to the energy resource and conserves- tion study includes: 1. The East County Cost-Effectiveness Study (partially financed by „701" funds) . 2. The use of work experience students on the collection of energy. related information in conjunction with the University of California, Berk-elev. HOUSING Contra Costa County adopted a General Plan Preliminary dousing Element in 1970 (which report also served as the basis for several city elements) which identified the follo:.ing housing issues: 1 . A general shortage of housing exists. 2_ Housing costs for both new and used units, already very high, are rising beyond the reach of an increasing proportion of the County's residents. a. Choice of Dousing by type, price, and location is narrowing for most of the Countv's residents. 2. Families and individuals with low incomes arc being hurt most of all by the combined effects of the shortage, high costs (both purchase and rental) and narrowing choice of housing in the County. S. General (let alone the special) housing needs of a growing number of elderly citizens are being met adequately. 00230 0. Neither the private market nor the various public programs as ,presently constituted seer: capable of dealing effectively with the housing needs of low-income families and individuals. 7. A poor balance in the supply of housing seems to exist in several areas in the County. S. An initial !lousing .Needs study was drafted in 1971, and 1972 and 1973 additional population and housing data was obtained. A revised housing Clement, including a more complete housing Deeds analysis, has been prepared and is presently awaiting revision. 9. "i'i,o special Iiousir:g studies have been prepared as part of the general plan rcti,ision for the San Ramon Valley and the East County Planning :areas. Two reports containing essential planning background information were completed in March and November, 1974. 10. Further housing needs data was prepared as part of the County's recent liousiag and Community Development Block Grant application. The Housing Assistance Plan, a part of this application, quantified the need for additional housing for lox-income households, the elderly and other special groups requiring housing assistance. OTHER BASE DATA Certain portions of the Energy Resource and Conservation Study arc currently underway. The Contra Costa County Planning Department. is participating in the Internship Program of the Conservation of Natural- Resources Field Major for the University of California at Berkeley. A student enrolled in this major field of study is working in the Depart- ment during this spring quarter on a full time basis. The student is doing an analysis of energy consumption and conservation of residential land uses in this County. This analysis is performed under the guidance of Dr. John Holdren of the University of California, in coordination with the Planning staff. The project includes a climatic analysis of the County and its relationship to residential consumption of energy. The land use analysis will be broken down by residential type (various single family and multiple family categories) . This analysis will be overlain by an evaluation of the various energy conserva- tion ncasures which can be applied to each climatic and residential area and will be utilized in the proposed Energy Study. FULF I LI-NIENT OF OF ASSURANCE The County complies with federal requirements pursuant to the Civil Riloiits tact of 1964. In an effort to set up a program to insure that the goals of the Civil Rights Act are attained, the County has instituted an affirmative action plan. The provisions of this plan are attached to this report. 00231 s I PROGRX-1 DESIGN PROGILIt i CATEGORIES The program activities of the Contra Costa County Planning Department may be categorized under the following headings: A. Ordinance Administration B. General Plan Preparation C. Project Review D_ Government Support GOALS The Planning; Department activities'arc based upon a program developed over the past several years, which laid the foundation of a comprehensive data base, analytical studies, General Plan element preparation and up- date, and the establishment of routines for coordinating activities of the County and other public agencies. Mucic of the future effort of the department will be devoted not only to maintenance and improvement of the many planning tools acquired, but to cooperative efforts with other public agencies to promote full use of a more complete arsenal of public policies and activities to coordinate and improve both public and private development. This goal can be detailed through the following objectives: 1 . Development of closer working relationships with regional agencies and special districts, and continued emphasis on city-county efforts. 2. Preparation of large-scale Area General Plans for "regions" of the County, including considerations of development phasing, the provi- sion of public facilities and services, and public transportation systems. 3. Accomplishment of more comprehensive reviews of development proie-et applications, including greater attention to environmental and design considerations. 4. Improvement of informational services to county government and other agencies operating in Contra Costa County. a. Increased Planning Department involvement in County capital improvements projects and social programs, jointly with other agencies, as part of the grousing and Community Development Program. 4-1232. as A. G11WiX'AXCE A MINISM-NTION 1SSUi:S, Pft0i;1.LMS A;:U OPPORTUNITIE'S The Contra Costa County Planning Department has long been noted for its thorough reviews of development applications, and this function will not onir account for the singie largest block of staff time but will be t= reinforced in the course of the next few years. Increased ecaphasis will be given during the next three years, to relating development application reviews raore c.loselti to Gencral Plan development policies. - This is important because the public no longer views developments as isolated building projects, but as aggregates which affect the quality of the environment, taxes, and the costs of services. The public demands closer scrutiny of proposed projects, and with more develo ment. in areas with difficult topography, more attention will be given to the review of rer.onings, subdivisions, and planned unit develop- ments. To the existing ordinances will be supplemented with regulations dealing with .lope density, tree protection, and historical preseriation, as will as provisions extending design review of structures and developments. In addition, it is expected that further open space regulations will be devclopcu, scismic safety provisions strengthened, flood plain hazard provisions adopted, and rural residential zoning categories developed, all in accordance with General Plan policies now being formulated. A recent departiaental reorganization placed the EIR function for private development projects in the current planning division, to ensure carry- through of environmental concerns and staff recommendations. Fl!6' ' YliAR'S PROGRAM The objectives of the first year's program arc: 1. To develop additional land use controls dealing with open space lands, specifically the Open Space Easement program. 2. To provide ordinance measures which deal with flood hazard problems as required by the National Flood Hazard Act. To enhance public safety by giving greater attention to land stability and seismic safety in ordinance provisions. I. To develop a scenic routes ordinance providing greater aesthetic controls in designated corridors. The Current Planning function in the department covers all private land development; the following table covers the overall staff assigned to these functions. ' i tom, f QRommNCr AL).k lNIsrRAT oN Man-months Costs Staff 425 560,000 Other public agencies 0 0 Consultants — - Totals 425 560,000 Source o: Funds ' Noxi-federal - 560,000 701- federal Other-federal - 0 4 SECOND XND THIRD YENR'S PROGR.I Although no detailed program has been developed, it is felt that the second and third year's programs will include: 1. Rewriting of the ordinances (for greater clarity and coordination) . 2. The revision of the ordinances to reflect the results of .Energy Resource and Conservation Study. 'ER.AL PL.k.\ PREP.�l:.MON* B. GE ISSUES, PROBLEMS, t"ND OPPORTUNITIES Contra Costa Countv's General Plan program is one of Ion-:standing and is based on studies developed over several years (largely under the Contra Costa County land Use and Transportation Study), which produced-a planning data brise, analysis systems, and a spec lined staff. Mandated- countywide elements in Seismic Safety, Safety, a Noise are presently entering their public hearing phase. 'a *The adopted Count- Gcneral Plan includes elements dealing with the following subjects: Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Open Space, Con- sensation, Recreation, and Scenic Routes. `s Y� r f , ;r r ix x In addition to Uke Countywide elements, two major area General Plan. ws efforts are nearing completion of their citizen. pgrticipation phase: µ , These are the 1S 4 square mile Bast County Piatining Area Flan and the: square mile San Ramon Valley Study. In both cases, the 1studies will U enter the presentation phase during; the coming'.fiscal year: An important contribution to all these area plans is the systematic and _ � + aggregated methodology of evaluati.ng,public costs and revenues asso&idtedr # with different levels of development, being supplied by the East County Delta Cost Effectiveness Study. This evaluation system is: especially useful in a time of increasing facilities costs and declining resources I il'a'T YEAR'S PRUGMI The objectives of the first year's program are: ' 1. Complete two or more major comprehensive Area General Plan pro ,? grams. 2. Continue the program of localized General Plan reviews, including � completion of the general Plan-zoning conformance program. 3. Preparing the Energy Resource and Conservation Study. 4. Refine the County Recreation Element, including a small craft z� harbors section. S. Prepare a County Community Facilities Element. Sub-category 1., Comprehensive Area General Plans 1 ' r� In an effort to develop updated General Plans for each of the Counir, �x 9 planning regions, the program for San Raman Valley and East County be completed. Now area plan studies for El Sobrante (in conjunction rx With the City of Riclimond) and another Northwest County area, gillfbe' initiated. ,r. Man-months Costs s Staff 34 60.000 Other public 2 4,00 agencies 2 4000- Consultants - w Totals 36 Er1,000, Source of Funds ;ion-federal 64,004 *' ?01-federal - - Other-federal - Jo w� � y Sub-category .2, Localized Genernl Plan Reviews 'i'he recently-instituted program to have the Planning Commission review' the County General Plan as it applies to each of the planning regions in terms of General Plan-toning compliance and requests for General. Plan changes on a semi-annual basis is expected-to result in several- small- scale amendments. t Stan-months Costs ti Staff 48 54,000 Other public -_ agencies 3 5,004 Consultants - Totals 51 89,000 Source of Funds Lion-federal 89,000 701-federal - Other-federal - - Sub-category 3, Perform the Energy Resource and Conservation Study, This study is designed to take the entire fiscal year and is described elsetdhere in this report. Man-months Costs Staff 20 35;000 Other public ,;° agencies - © r Consultants S 15,000 Totals Source of Funds :ion-federal 25,QdQ 701-federal 25,000 Other-federal 0 r ,r fr c zx. Y �b Sub-catc:,ory .1, Refine the County Recreation Element The Recreation Element will. be updated and revised based on data no-w being etiera.ted i)y a recreation facilities survey and concurrent Arca General Plan reviews. The "Small Craft Harbors Plan" will also be updated as part of the Recreation Element_ _ <a Key elements of the Recreation Element refinement will be the detailed, review of earl: standards and criteria, and assessment of the Countys, role in recreation. :,an-months Costs Staff 26 45,000 Other public ;ic'.cnczes 1 2,000 Co&isa l t:ut t c. - - Totals 27 47,000 source of `;o;i-fcdci:;I 47,000 lilt-fulcra 1 L�tl:C2'-te�icral - •- Sub-category S, Prepare a Community Facilities Element The Department intends to develop a Community Facilities element. This effort will be an outgrowth of the energy study, and will also fill the needs of the Housing and Community Development Program administered by this department. Ian-months Costs Staff so 57,000 �. Other public agencies !I 7,000 '= Consultants - - Totals S4 94,000 Source of Funds Non-federal 91,000 701-federal - y Other-federal r C SECOND AND Trim) Yi:mv s PROGRms Distinctions between the second and third year's programs cannot be made at this time. The following, however, are expected to be the major program components: 1. Updating of the County General Plan on a planning area and. planning region basis. �. Developing appropriate responses to regional planning efforts now underway. 3. Developing studies, as needed, for background to EIR preparation: ` •1. Developing Parkin- Management Plans (this might begin in fiscal year 1976-7, depending on Federal programs and regional agency guidance) . S. Developing specific plans and urban design studies for certain unincorporated problem areas. C. P:;OJ ECT REV I IEW ISSUES, PROSLE::4S, AND OPPORTUNITIES Project Review has been given mapor new pokers through a new instrument, the Environmental Impact Report. The EIR, in- turn, has reactivated the "mandator)- referral" powers long provided in Section 65402 of the California Planning Iaw. The EIR, required of private projects since the California Supreme Court's 197-1 decision in Friends of Mammoth vs. County of Mond, has altered the consideration of development projects by subjecting them to "full disclosure" evaluations on their on-site and off-site impacts. Not incidentail% , the review requirement has given citizens nese oppor- tunities to both hear and challenge proposals, and has interjected new personnel and new points of view into planning agency staffs checking project applications. Similarly, "mandatory referral" requirements have had the effect of forcing closer coordination between agency staffs and requiring planning commissions to give consideration to public projects ::'."rich bear directly on the feasibility of the private projects they are- accustomed to review. [loth Environmental Impact Reports and "mandatory referrals" require a jurisdiction to rely heavier on the adopted policies of theGeneral Plan as a basis for decision making;. Project review activities of the Contra Costa County Planning Department, now entail the full time services of a special team (4 professionals) and considerable supporting effort from other staff. Recently the EIR team was transferred from the Advance Planning Division to the Current Planning Division, to effect closer operating ties to the development review process. j.t r-, :<7ai One, growing type of services to government is demographic service. Several years ago, it was anticipated that the demand for such services Would orow as the Department's store of data expanded, but. the adminis- trative need for such information brought about by subvention programs, "S-B. 90" and revenue-sharing, and social justice requirements could. nto be forecast adequately. Traditionally, the Department has been responsible.for census activities; and it recently packagedthe purchase of "unpublished" 1970.ccnsus. data by several cities and agencies. Further, the County in conjunction:caith the State Department of Finance and the cities is conducting a Spring - Countywide census. '4> F I i:ST YEAR'S PROLiWI =- 1. To analyze census results for planning and other programs. 2. To prepare new series projections based on 1975 Spring census results. 3. Provide demographic information to the increasing number of special purpose BR's for unique geographic areas. rT Man-months costs Staff G 10,000 Other public 1 agencies - Consultants Totals b 10,000 yy. H Source of Funds y G 10,000 :ion-federal 701-federal f Other-federal SECOND AND THIRD YEMS' PROGRV-1 1. To prepare for the 1950 census, as required. 2. To extend population projection capability to sub-county areas_ :- 3. To develop population estimates as needed. _ �f'^ J f St1i: tf Ytw d ,2` i r. Alan-months Costs Staff 10 15,000 OtIler Public agencies 0 D Consultants 0 0 Totals 10 15,O00 Source of Funds Noir-federal 1S,O00 701-federal ~ Other-federal SECOND ,LND THIRD MkRS' PROGFLVILIS Since project reviews :are: "routine" activities largely in response to the building and development activities of the private sphere of the economy and public agencies, the second and third years' programs will be essentially replications of the first year. D. SERVICES TO GOVEPUNMENT ISSUES, PROBLLMS, XAD OPPORTUNITIES The Contra Costa County Planning Department supplies services to other units of government in the following ways including the following: 1. Demographic and other data services, largely to its parent government. 2. Participation in studies of other units of government, j Time to be devoted to the l-tter during the next three fiscal years cannot be determined. The Department has suggested to the staffs of the ` Association of Bay Area Governments and the Metropolitan Transportation. Comwaission that it share in their grants through the performance of certain technical work pertaining to the County (e.g., land use and caplo)-hent inventories). Thus far,, only the Department's services,,to ABAG's Public Technical Advisory Committee are "counted" as part of the County's support of that regional body. On a more local level, a_sub- stantial staff effort is "contributed" to city programs, some funded by grants, which also can not be predetermined. The County presently contracts with cities, or provides free specialized planning services the most notable is use of the Department's Planning Geologist for implementation of the Alquist-Priolo Act (seismic hazards) . Y. fi F� W_v + S The ";mandatory referral" operations and clearinghouse reviews are con- ducted as part of the Advance Planning Division's routine. This coordi hating function is becoming increasingly important as the County General. Plan addresses itself more directly to public improvements and utilities. � r rlRS3 YEARIS PRGGIL�.'-1 The objectives of the first year's program are: 1. To prepare or manage the preparation of Environmental. Impact Reports for development applications submitted to the County, allowing longer periods for public review and increasing the range of subject coverage in response to requests by the public and organizations. 2. To process all "mandatory referrals" and clearinghouse requests, giving increased attention to making theca more effective General Pian implementation instruments through increased inter-agency contaet'and more thoroughly analyzing their justifications relative to the County General Plan. Sub-category 1, E:R Activity Products of this activity are 300 to 500 Environmental Impact Reports r plus :u; undeter7ninCd number of Negative Declarations. t= Man-months Costs r Staff 65 125,000 Other public agencies - - Consultants 65 100,000 Totals 65 225,000 Source of f=unds Kon-federal - 225,000 701-federal - - Other-federal - - *Consultant-prepared EIR materials reimbursed by developer. Sub-category 2, Other Project Reviews _ Products or this activity are 70 or more review docwnents, many considered at public hearing by the Planning Commission. Most staff time, however, is expended in contacts with other departments and agencies. { 4i v c" 19 U3 w �- Cf O F r co O � 1 ! w cs > r. o ^ in x o r r ' Cd of Cd r +d A 0 t1 {u 4-1 tn U riEE U V j r=re. Q O S; O O U ►i 41 U O U �2 � r t:`ORt� PSZOGIU'��I _ 7hs Bork Prol;rarn proposes an outline of work steps that would. carry out, the Contra Costa County Energy Resource and Conservation Study. STEPS SPEP 0: Pre-I'roiCCt Actitiity This phase of the study is to be carried out prior to the final approval. of this project, and will be carried out with respect to recent changes to the KIR guidelines. Some of the work has already been established.- A. stablished.A. Preparations 1. Prepare Application and Wort: Program 2. Review Existing Methodologies � F4„ B. Background Data 1. Acquire letters of agreement with participating agencies. 2. Review existing methodologies .i. (lire consultant assistance 4. Establish Advisory Group STEP 1: itevieh Energy Expenditures = A. Review literature on energy expenditures ftr oaring types"of, development and by physical environment criteria B. Develop energy vse by type, density, and construction quality of development C. Review County energy expenditures J SIl'P 2: Review Proposed Methodologies For More Efficient Energy Use ya: A. Examine recommendations to County Energy Committee that existed during the "gas shortage" + B. Review technic-al literature and suggestions through press; etc'. C. Analyze energy consumption material to be prepared by PG&E � D. Review County ordinances for existing controls (primary or secondary) on energy usages ; E. Review proposed model energy ordinances; i.e., Cities of Davis and Indio. .;.- r; L'J fr! l I,y� fi STEP 3: Preyare Energy Consumntiom Estimates For Sample Now Developments . A. Separate un-site expenditures from transmission losses B. Rcvie:a alternatives as indirect energy expenditures. such as sewage and water transmission C. Project alternative designs for modifications in energy consumption E=xamples: street and home layout relative to maximum utilization of solar energy D. Review proposed landscaping plans of examples for relation- ship to housing climate control and energy use STEP 4: Evaluate Potential Energy Conservation Measures Analyze conservation techniques for existing data sources and discuss their feasibility of implementation (i.e., Iow flush toilets, flourescent lighting, improved insulation, dwelling orientation, A, Review "lie literature B. Receive iwput from our technical consultants and technical advisory coal-Aittee of the feasibility of utilization of each energy source. C_ Relate energy saved by each alternative to what effect it would have on an "average home" S1EP S: Evaluate the Relationship Between Energy Coasumption and Urbanization Relate energy problems to the functions of' LACCO and their state mandate to control sprawl and the County general plan A. Review of cumulative energy consumption based on adopted LAFCO` sphere of influence lines and open space plan B. ,analysis will be made of energy impacts associated with develop ment C. Analysis will be made of the continued energy necessary to service this development, including maintenance costs, and on- going costs, and committment of energy resources STEP G: l:i7t'.rgy Consumption Analysis for Individual Projects Develop procedures and formula for looking at individual con- sumption measures A. Isolate energy consumption problems B. Develop formula and methodology for measuring anticipated energy usage 0023 f C. Attempt to verify this relationship with wherever feasible S'fEP ?: Ue:,eloLi A Akarix Of Energy Conservation '- A� Prepare matrix 13. provide analysis of trade-offs which may modify the =itrix approach C. Relate this matrix to the methodology for examining energy usage and conservation measures. STEP S: Analysis ])of Future Ener Consumption After Primary Use is Established~: Examine appurtenant urban energy consumption for policies and , Unanticipated additional energy costs (i.e., swimming pools added over time to single family residential areas) A. identify these energy uses S. Evaluate the individual and potential cumulative impact beyond that normally associated with that land use C. Prepare potential policies relative to these functions STEP 9: Constraints zlnalysis Examine the practical and political constraints that would effect the implementation of energy conservation measures which were identified in the previous steps. Identify the unit o)= govern- went overn sent that would be most capable of implementing these procedures STEP 10: Develop Finial Products 11e program will. lead to several basic products all equally , important but geared to different audiences. The first and most comprehensive product will be a project .j summary report. It will review the procedures and work under- : taken as part of the study. Discussion will include techniques of analvscs which were found to be successful, as well as those ; . which were not. Hopefully, this demonstration will prevent others from making abortive analyses. One portion of this report will, be a "cook book" of energy relationships found useful in the planning process. r The second major- product .ill be a set of specific policy and planning recommendations to variDus agencies within the . County; i.e. , the County Planning Agency, LAFCO, and the 'f Board of Supervisors (and all of the functions they represent).- Lastly, e resent)Lastly, specific guidance will be provided to EIR writers to assist in the review of both on and off-site design in terms of energy efficiencies. During certain phases of the program a consulting firm will be hired" to evaluate energy conservation measures. The purpose of' this evaluation' will be to sift through the multitude of measures and to recommend..those which have practical application. In other words, the consultant will- help the County decide which energy conservation measures have practical .-,r potential. This consultation with engineers, architects and energy s planners is necessary because the County does not currently have technical staff expertise in this field. The Planning Department Budget is-"allowing, , up to $15,000 for this work during the next fiscal year (1375-1976) . r a : t p _ s f_ m f t OPP.=34. r------ �� -- - - --- --.. (6-/74) -17 LLA U } ( f � t l r i C, 1 I _ al ✓ C D � r f � � '• �n •.� E of � r U f i.l } o J - ✓ O .-. C O G cJ n O U O G. C"Jo c1 U� ff O I > % •r. S;} c3 -•a _ ..•, ._, % O N rn 1 U { �;( '•'+ ::7 G 0 RS N V d O j-+ c3 •ri Y.4-1 -4 c,'` 1 c1 1" U c: i. O O U 00 d [ a. ! ++ 0 :r n Sti Sr a+ C U i.•r1 O •-+ c3 C r O a.+ V, U i+ =It" a. --i 41 as •.1 .-t O O n ++ i•+ d H O "O c3 1J It L_3 G ' r. } U o _ O to co +-) 0 " U C •-4 U z r n :.1 O[ U n C M N LLL -+ > O n U �+ o a, 5. c3 N O > O > U O O O Q 41 0 t vs 3 U U j \i •:J U '� .:I O ^• ^ N .s=-.-/ f0 7 :+ [� L'.'C J •-, •� n :+ CO.' c Q1 O v .1 O U 0 i CI•.� 51..> � 0 U CL. L= 44 R. :+ i'+.��JM��� ,� �� l'• r t� ' d .:Z.l n r-+ U LJ iJ 4a 4-V r to to to us to in I-a .�•Lt� �� 41(lli. rr2 133. P, C', 4 Dote:Gjatc:n:». - Berkeley,Gahfornia94705 (415)841-0730 April 9, 197t) S11hC1'1'1SU1' l:::rl'i:11 �i. 1:"�t;4;Ctiti - v'>i Clt:tin::�n Contra C�os } t.-i Comic CONTRA CESTA COUNT DOM-(] 04' 'stmcrz�:t wr_. �lf;it?l�Isa BE�ARTIVSENT _ y; 651 fine St: Martinez, Cn li fnrni a 9,1553 I.e, i:ticr"Y Re-source and Consenlation Stud}• -. Deur Supervisor Ik1,-;ess: ; + In accord utcc with yo it request received on Jwivary 22 1075, the Association has con-Ju--ted a revicv; of the County's application to the Co,lncil on lntetroverlmental Relations for assisUaice under the Co:rllreltc nsive Ilannil1„ Assistance (701) Program of the Departtncnt f of (lousing and Urban DeveloMment. fi Dicloswxl is t.h^ staff report. which %as reviewed and accepted, by the AI:AG Executi-ve Poard at its regularly sche%luled ineeting on March 20, 1975. 'F11cri:. being no conflict bctween the County's application and renional planning objectives, approval of this application is recar7c.•lcicd. Silicer4of 1 , l✓� .+ Pe-vanA F_ Tranter Eecut- •e Director enclo- res: 1) staff report 2) Fonn CA-1S9 cc: Jim Wtlt:r, Contra Costa County Planning Dept. Bill L,-v ttcr, OPR r T J j± F �C Rzepresenting City and County Go ernmcnL,in the San Francisco Bay-Area � vr i Grant File No : 6-75 exec . Cowan i ttee • 3-20-751 :155(',CII;TIOf1 OF BAY AREA GO'IERNitici'TS EXECUTIVE BOARD REPORT -> GRANT APPLICATION SllMIMARY AND RECOMMENDATION PROJECT 13EN T I F I CAT I0;1 _ Applicant: Contra Costa County Program: Comprehensive Planning Assistance (701 ) Department of Housing and urban Development Project: Energf Resource and Conservation Study Received : January 22 , 1475 Costs : Total Funds 550, 000 Grant Request 525 ,000 Local Funds 525 ,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION' The County :;ill focus its revie:•r on energy resources utili =zed by local governments and subsequently recommend energy-saving techniques . The study trill also consider energy conservation concerning innovative housing programs as they relate to the construc- tion industry . Finally , the Courity intends to develop a process for the preparation and evaluation of energy information in the review, of envirorcn`ntal documents . STAFF COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION In the initial stages of this study , the County ;rift under- take an anaiysis 017 existing and future producers and consumers of energy; and conservation techniques . In addi - tion , a review of planning tools and the feasibility of their implementation by local governments will be studied . The County planning staff will work closely with the LAFCO , Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the County Public �Wort;s Department aloric .ri th a Technical Advisory Committee com- posed of public and private industry representatives Eventually, specific policy and planning recommendations would be forwarded to various County agencies and departments . At the ABAG General Assembly in February , 1974 , a discussion 0 1 ; 002OV, Y, 1 Continued Page 2 paper entitled Energy heeds - A New Criterion for.-Plannirt was presented . Discussion Paper Three considered possible regional assistance in energy planning . 1n general., 'the ,.,. paper explored possible changes in planning concepts --such as revisions in building codes to require additional insulation; in-house commercial facilities for empToyees at their working place; and more self-containedcommercial . services in residential , especially high density, '.developments . The paper supports efforts by local governments. to design and manage energy-efficient communities There being no confiict between the County 's application and regional objectives approval of this application- is ;fix recommended . r <:, lir: _ r �f 1 J�• 00 7YV Y - .. - - _ -. .. ' . - .. .. .tf" ... .r..;"'r'."'i^>..,x°ley:_.xr✓ - Yt. • #ate of ��xlif�r�t't7 W.— Y �<GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 95814 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. � March"6, 1975 HXx� . Mr. James Cutler fury P.O. Box 951 Martinez, CA 94553 SN M �I SUBJECT: SCH 75012772_ ENERGY RESOURCE AND CONSERVATION STUIY ah r Dear Mr. Cutler: ^ , The above listed project was submitted by the State }F Clearinghouse to numerous State agencies for revie�r.' The rel►iew 3;aa been completed, and there were no. Comments ,on ` thta {pro iect. .: This letter verifies your compliance with preapp�.ication s rk review requirements. Please attach it to your, formai : x; application. We request that you use the State,,Clearin9 house number assigned to your project on the. cover page, of your application and on all subsequent references .to _ � this application, since it will be used by the funding agency when. the State Clearinghouse is notified' of the at-:arding of your grant, 'Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, William G Kirkham ' r Management; Sy►s.tems of€i.cer.. ..` r State :learinghouse' mY, ,r "a O ' CPR 11--A ,. ( :--tt.- n ( (eo not type to the left of dotted I)ne. : ,COVER SHEET for FEDERAL GRANT APPLICATIOW/AWARD NOTIFICATION 1 APPLICATIONDATE 1'and-other Project Reviews-STATE OF CALIFORNIA yr MCI ` day' �ITELAS 1.31 TU BE COMPLLIED BY APPLICANT 79 -_1_ 17' A ,LICANT`-Organizational Unit 4.ADDRESS-Street or P.O.Box 2 FEDERAL EMPLOYER 10 N0. ! Contra Costa County Planning Department P. 0. Box 951 xS '' 5.CITY b.COUNTY 7.STATE 8.ZIP CODE 9.PROG TIT O.(Catat of Fed 0 ie Assistance) 1 Martinez Contra Costa CA 94553 14.203 uPIM�I , 10.TY Erry�O�F ACTION TjYPE OF CHANGE ICompiete at/Il2*0 b or 10c was checked) '34-001h 3 14.EXISTING FED GRANT 10 is L•:1 New c ❑ Modiliwion A ❑Increased Dolton a Increased Duration a ❑Other Scope =' �I LJ Continuation b DO. . eed Ooltara b❑Deceased Duration b❑Cancellation CPA t170111 yr mo 19.APPLICANT TYPEEnter 75 D7 Letter FUNDASREOUESTED/ForCheoprsShow OnyAmcaf)nc(�lorDeFF). 15.RESIUESTED FUND START 19� A.State F. School District Dt ?a FEDERAL ( f S ; ,25.000, 00 16.FUNDS DURATION I2 1Months) B, Interstate G. Community Action Agancv 2r.STATE ( is .00 yr mo C. Sub Sute Dat H.Sponsored Organisation 22.LOCAL ( /S 25,000 ,00, 17.EST,PROJECT START 151,75 4 7 O. County 1. Indian 73.OTHER ( is 00 18.EST.PROJECT DURATION 1? (Monthsl E. City J. Other(Specify in Remark Iall2e.TOTAL(20.2t.2Z 231 ( )$ 50.000'-00 25,BRIEF TITLE OF APPLICANT S PROJECT Energy Resource and Conservation Study 26,DEPCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS PROJECT(Purpose) r t� � 4kiw•Study iwaposes to examine possibilities for energy conservation in Contra Costa County, an urban developing, county. The products will be a textual and graphical cussion of energy use in the County, recommendations for implementation of"conservation technology, and a methodology on how to measure and evaluate energy consumption ,and alternatives available, mss-part-vf-the"EIR"pwcess:► 27.AR€AOF PROJECT IMPACT(Indicate City.County,State,etc,) r WI STATE- WIt�E COU MULTI- P.Costa County Q F 26,CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 29.Environmental Assessment Required 30.CLEARINGHOUSEtSI TO WHICH SUBMITTED Of Applicant Districts Impacted By Project By SLtdFederd Agency? Y. 14 j C ®No a KISate b ®Area Wide coNone 31,a t*MElTITLE OF CONTACT PERSON b ADDRESS-Street of P_O.Boxc TELEPHONE NO. James Cutler - Senior Planner P. 0. Box 951, Martinez CA 94553 415'),72018 3000.; 31,d It ENV(($$ONMENTAL DOCUMENT RE VIEtY REQUIRED YES❑ NO CY If Will the project require h It project is physics In nature or requiresan if Yes Ll Environmental Imoact Statement(Report)Attached 120 copies) relocation environmental document,list the U.S. ❑ Oraft>=1R ❑ FirtatE)R Y N GeologicSurveyOuadrangtemapinwtuchth- ' Negative Decimation Attached(20 copes) t Does your a9enL'y have a project is located. tsve None attached-Document wilt Be Forwarded On aunt rights.alfand plan?action p0 and ptan7 r Approximately YES rA NO Mon Day Year g is ggo i covered by If No ® Federal Program Does Not Require An Environmental Docu�sterut A�35 f't IVT Project Exempt Under State Categorical Exemption,Class 6 1f YDS NO r_3YIsES ❑q ?ANO 0 ? ITE*AS 32-38 TO BE C0161PLETED BY CLEARINGHOUSE !-� 32.CLEARINGHQUSE ID �v U MULTIPLE CLEARINGHOUSE 0 33,a CT10N BASED ON 33,b ACTION TAKEN gV AEVIEW OF STATE APPLICATION? ( 5 ai otifitation a ❑ly Comment c ved' ❑Wai34' IDENTIFIER tsAt) i C A { � 90Applicatican b C-4ithout Comment o 0 Unfavorable State Number STATE WIDE County/ City Countv/ City County/ City County/ City County/ City County/ City " 35.CL€ARINGHOUSE t�7 tutr-� Ping Area Ping Area Ping Area Ping Area Ping Area Ping Area T IMPACT CODE ` ,Yes r I No10-7 ( f !1 t 36.SThTE PLAN REQUIRED 3t.RECEIVING OATS �ioT i}++) 3B,a$I ATUR O CHO I L AT CLEARINGHOUSE is ��� Yes No 38.FINAL CH ACTION DATE ITLMS 31J 42 TU nE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT BEFORE SENDING FORM TO FEDERAL AGENCY U The applicant tortrfies Mat to the best of his knowledge and belief the above data are true and N 39.CEfiiTIFICA7IQN - correct and till f this form has been duly authorized by the Check a is if acheclearinghouse,_ '� N rtq o governing DOdy of the applicant. response i4 attached. 1_.) 40.a NAME(Print or Type! b 717 LE c SIGNATURE of Authorized Representative d TELEPHONE NUMBER A 41.DATE MAILED TO FEDERALiSTATE AGENCY yr mo day 42.NAME OF FEDERAL / STATE AGENCY TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED ITEMS 43-54 TO BE CO%IPLETLO BY FEDERAL OFrICE EVALUATING AND RECOMMENDING ACTION Oct T11E APPLICATION 43.GfjANT APPLICATION 10 52. AOpt•eation Recd. 53.a E.O.Action nate 53.1) Ret. to Applicant ;(Assigned by Federal Agency! yr mo day yr mu day Always Complete '+r con div 19 19 53.ORb 1J 44,G•ANTOR AGENCY --- - --- - �. ; R Amended Applic. R Rev.Expected 54.Exp.Action R Subs¢tluent Ret.r I ; E E Received Action Oete Aes iOt E AOpI cant A 45,OI)GANIZATIONAL UNIT If V V V T" 1 yr mo day 1 yr rnu day yr mo day ) yr Nno der 1 S S I S � 19 1 19 19 1 19 A 46,A'MINISTERING OFFICE '-- - -- ` - -'--' `t • N 19_�- - 0 t9_ � t9_ � � [4T_A DRESS-Street or P,O.Bo+ 448.CITY49.STATE 50.ZIP CODE 51.TELEPHONE NUMBER . i _ t ilf:S 95uS iii tit" COMPtt.TE0By Trill FEDFFIAL OFFICE APPROVING THE GRANT APPLICATION FIN-AL ACTION FINAL DATES yr **w day FUNDSAPPROVED[ForChanges Show OnlyAmr.olln.l+tar Dec N.l 55.a ,1.J Awarded b Relectcd a '.tvitndrawn 19 -- -- 60.FEDERAL AMOUNT(F Y funds) ( !S w A 56.FtjNOSAVAILABLE 19--- 61.STATE SHARE f 1S 00 57,ENOING DATE 19 - 62.LOCAL SHARE T 58. FtOERAL GRANT ID 63.OTHER ( JS .00 1 64.TOTAL(60.61,62.63) ( )S DO 5 59.FgOERAL FUND wCCOUNT NUMBER 65.MULTIPLE PROGRAM-LINK 0(1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Natter of } r Adopting Policy on ) Affirmative Action ) RESOLUTION NO. 72/434 Plan for Equal ) Employment Opportunity. ) WHEREAS since establishment of the merit system in Contra Costa County, the Board of Supervisors has required that appointment to and promotion within the County service be based upon merit and fitness, that discrimination in employment because of race, color, national origin or religious belief is forbidden, and that discrimination on considerations of sex or age` is - proS-cribed except as laws or obvious employment conditions require otherwise; and WHEREAS the United States Government has taken action through the United States Civil Service Commission to have Affirmative Action Programs established in all State and local governments; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLVED . that it hereby ESTABLISHES an Affirmative Action Policy to identify and remove artificial barriers to employment and promotion, of minority groups and disadvantaged persons; and that consistent with the merit system, aggressive ef_ ort shall be made to attract and assist minority and disadvantaged candidates to qualify for employment and promotion; that the Office of the CountyAdministrator., `. the Civil Service Department, and all departments of county govern- ment shall act affirmatively to make equal employment opportunity a reality throughout the Contra Costa County work force; and BE IT BY THE BOARD FURTHER RESOLVED that within the aforesaid policy an Affirmative Action Program will be initiated under the direction of the County Administrator and the 'Director of Personnel which will require the active support of all department heads, said affirmative action to be initiated within current staffing and funding considerations with the understanding the County Administrator will recommend additional staffing and funding as specific needs are identified for consideration by this Board, said program to include but not be limited to the following steps with the goal of providing full employment opportunity and encouragement of a broader participation of minority and disadvantaged persons: 1. Review existing personnel programs and procedures to identify and remove artificial barriers to arployment and promotion of minority disadvantaged candidates; 2. Expand recruitment efforts in the minority and disadvantaged community; RESOLUTION NO. 72/434 _ s_ c' „r 2s 'W 1 a°sM. ; • t 3. Conduct surveys of County work force. to identify situations which require special effort in the promotion of this Affirmative Action-.Policy; 4. Identify needs for bi-lingual staff. " s F� 5. Review existing career ladders ,to- dete .gine if there is need to establish additional entry and promotional opportunities for disadvantaged persons; 5. Evaluate training needs and assure that traininb opportunities are available to all, employees, _ ployees regardless~ of race, religion *sex or national origin; F u: 7. Instruct department heads in the intent of the F Affirmative Action Program and require their_ support and compliance with the program; 8. Periodically evaluate the results of -the: Affirmative Action Program and make.necessary, adjustments, within r ' Board policy to assure the vitality of the program; and: BE IT BY THE BOARD FURTHER RESOLVED that aforesaid Affirmative Action Program is APPROVED with the underst'andin that . : 'k`' the Board will consider amendments to same within the next 'two: months. PASSED and ADOPTED this 26th day of June, 1972 by the ` ,. following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, , ( J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. .Linscheid. > NOES: None. A ABSENT: None. CERTIFIED .COPY x l I certify that this is a"full,true,-&,correct copy oL f the original document w:ilch s an file"in.my office. and that:t was pa :cc.� :s,adopts"1 by the Board ot. supervLmrs of Contra G._t4 Cucm:y. t:allforaia. on the Date sianra. P.'l't ' tY,'% l:11:_crl, carroty` clerk&ex-affiJu cleric of zAid L taru of supervisors;.,xN by deputy cleric. 'olt d { u RESOLUTION NO. 72/43 ■ THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN The County Administrator and Personnel Director are jointly responsible for the administration and implementation of the County Affirmative Action policy. It is understood that insofar as practical this plan will be implemented within current fiscal limitations. Additional fiscal requirements to further the program will be subject to the recommendation of the County Administrator and approval of the Board of Supervisors. The plan includes affirmative action programs sponsored by other levels of government in which the County and its departments participate, such as the Emergency Employment Act. The County Administrator will appoint a member of the Central management Staff to act as coordinator of the Affirmative Action Program. The board will be requested to provide for appropriate staff support to initiate the program. I. DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT A. The County Administrator and Personnel Director will meet with the Heads of Operating Departments to obtain their active support and participation in implementing Affirmative Action within their Departments. B. Each Department Head will appoint a member from within the top management of his department to coordinate Affirmative Action. C. Operating Departments will be responsible for submitting written reports on the specific steps they are taking and progress being made to, effectuate this Affirmative Action plan within their Departments. II. DATA GATHERING AND EVALUATION The County and Operating Departments will focus their efforts on specific areas which need attention after a survey of the disadvantaged composition of the County population and the County work force are completed. A. The term "disadvantaged" refers to certain persons who because of race,' sea, handicaps or economic situations are subject to special employment obstacles. B. The County population survey will be developed by the Office of the County, Administrator, with the assistance of the County Planning and Social Service- Departments. It will identify, insofar as the information is available; the numbers of minority and disadvantaged persons in the County on both a- county-wide and regional basis. C. The County work force data will be gathered by the Operating Departments under the direction of the Civil Service Department assisted by Data Processing. It will identify, insofar as it is obtainable, the numbers of minority and disadvantaged persons by category, department, classifica- tion and work location. D. Initial and periodic reports on the findings will be issued. Evaluation of the data will consider the representation and utilization of minority and disadvantaged persons at various levels in the work force on a county- wide and on a county regional basis relative to their representation in the population 0a253� tai III. PERSONNEL RULES, POLICIES AND PRACTICES The County Administrator, the County Personnel Director, the Civil Service Commission, and Operating Departments will review their rules, regulations, policies and practices and propose such changes within merit principles as will assist in achieving the goals of affirmative action. A. Recruitment The Civil Service Department with the assistance of Operating Departments is responsible for recruitment of minority and disadvantaged persons into appropriate job opportunities. 1. The distribution of job announcements to community organizations and advertisement of job opportunities in publications which reach disadvantaged persons will be increased. Recruitment literature will be designed to encourage the disadvantaged to apply for employment. 2. Employees from disadvantaged backgrounds and community representatives will be utilized in recruitment efforts. B. Selection The Civil Service Department has the primary responsibility for implementing selection procedures which are consistent with the goals of affirmative action. Operating Departments will contribute staff and. resources as required. 1. Statistical data on the numbers of minority and disadvantaged persons participating in the various steps in the examination process will be.< compiled to identify barriers which are unrelated to employment. 2. Qualified minority and disadvantaged persons will be sought for, participation in qualifications appraisal boards (oral interview panels) . 3. Written tests and other selection devices will be reviewed to eliminate material that may not be job related. 4. The use of the practice test to familiarize disadvantaged persons with." written test procedures will be expanded. C. Appointment, Placement and Promotion 1. Operating Departments will instruct supervisory personnel with author ity to make appointments in the goals and commitments of affirmative action. 2. Operating Departments will place disadvantaged persons appointed to trainee positions in initial assignments which are commensurate with their abilities and increase their utilization within their classifi- cations as their skills develop. 3. Operating Departments will take reasonable measures to notify employees of promotional opportunities through the posting and distribution of job announcements. 4. Operating Departments will submit periodic reports on the number of vacancies filledpenand promotional--including the number of minor- ity and disadvantaged persons interviewed, hired and promo -2- D. Classification Implementation of the following classification proposals requires the cooperation of Operating Departments, Civil Service Depart- ment, Office of the County Administrator and Civil Service Commission. 1. Operating Departments will review their work programs, and where affirmative action needs are identified initiate classification proposals within current staffing allocations through job restructuring. Where staff additions are proposed the recommendation of the County Admin- istrator and the approval of the Board of Supervisors is required. 2. Class specifications at all levels will be reviewed to eliminate quali- fication requirements which may not be related to employment. 3. The need for bi-lingual staff in public service programs will be identified. 4. Additional entry level trainee classes for economically disadvantaged" persons will be considered. Trainee classifications for clerical, community services, and technical areas and internships for professional fields should be explored. 5. Career ladders and lattices which provide for advancement and lateral movement from trainee- positions will be considered in the classification plan. As trainees achieve experience and educational requirements,: ' advancement opportunities will be provided through merit system processes. E. Training Training activities will be coordinated through the Employee Development Division of the Personnel Department, however, the assistance of Operating Departments is also required. 1. Training opportunities will be expanded for departmental management, supervisors and employees, to help improve the skills and attitudes necessary For achieving Affirmative Action goals. Training opportun- ities will be publicized. Departments will schedule their employees to attend such training when it does not adversely affect departmental' productivity. 2. Departments will develop on-the-job training programs to assist individual disadvantaged trainees develop their capacities. 3. Training Courses will be developed, which relate to trainee,classifi- cations. These courses shall be coordinated with state and federal training programs and utilize outside resources. 4. The disadvantaged will be encouraged to take career improvement courses which will help them evaluate their potential. 5. Where possible, instructors from minority and other disadvantaged groups will be used in providing County training. County departments are expected to make their employees available to serve as consultants and trainers. IV. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Consistent with the Equal Employment Opportunity Policy of the Board of Supervisors it is the goal of the Affirmative Action Plan to achieve a County work force composition representative of the population inclusive of its minority -3- • s - • and disadvantaged groups. It is recognized that the County regional population differences may cause similar differences in County workforce distributions. A. Data gathered will be a guide in achieving and evaluating progress toward the goal; therefore, it will be the first objective of the plan and .rill,. receive top priority. B. Many of the steps outlined in the previous sections of this plan havebeen initiated and it is expected that persons responsible for these activities_" will take immediate measures to increase their effectiveness. C. Departments will submit written reports to Central Management on the immediate measures to be taken and plans for effectuating this program within their respective departments. D. Those aspects of department plans which require changes in.County-wide. policies, significant job restructuring, or the establishment of- :train; Ing positions and training programs will be reviewed by,Central Management for approval and appropriate action consistent with County-wide goals. V. PROGRAn EVALUATION A. Departmental Evaluations Operating departments will establish and"main- tain an internal Affirmative Action Program evaluation plan. Each depart-. meat's plan should include but not be limited to: 1. Reviewing work force and population data surveys and records of new, appointments and promotions. 2. Periodically submitting plans and written progress reports on program. effectiveness and reco=endations for any changes needed in the.pro- gram to Central Management. B. Countv-wide Evaluations The County Administrator and the Personnel Director will provide for the establishment and maintenance of a. County- wide Affirmative Action Program evaluation plan. This plan will include but not be limited to: 1. Reviewing work force and population data surveys and departmental. reports on new appointments and promotions. f 2. Reviewing Operating department plans and progress reports on program . effectiveness, and evaluating them jointly with departments. 3. Reporting periodically on plans and progress toward achievement of County-wide Affirmative Action goals and objectives including recom- mendations for any changes which may be needed in the program. F -40021*7 - 1 +r _ 4 "� ► APPENDIX The term "disadvantaged persons" may refer, but is not limited to, the following . categories: A. Minorities 1. Black 2. Oriental (including Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Indonesians, Filipinos,,', Hawaiians, Polynesians, Malayans, Eskimos). 3. Spanish Surnamed (including Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Latin/ Central/South Americans of Spanish origin or ancestry). 4_ American Indian. Pys B. Persons Who May be Subject to Special Obstacles in Employment 1. Persons under 22 first entering labor market 2. Persons over 45 3. Handicapped—physically or-mentally 4. Women 5. Persons receiving public assistance 6. Persons whose incomes meet Department of Labor poverty standards ,a 6/21/72 -5 W o_ - AK9D IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Authorizing Attendance ) May -13, 1975 at Meetings. ) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following persons are AUTHORIZED to attend meetings as indicated: NAME MEETING DATE Mr. Floyd I. Marchus, National Parent-Teacher May 312-1975 Superintendent of Association Convention, to Schools Atlantic City, New Jersey June-.4, 1975 (at County expense) . Mr. Gerald H. Evans, American Soci-ety of Civil June 1 , 1975 Assistant Materials Engineers Conference , to Testing Engineer Atlanta, Georgia June 4 , 1975 (at County expense) .Mr. Oliver T. Smith, International City Manage- May 19 ,_ 1975 Environmental Control ment Association-Environ- to Engineer mental Protection Agency May 23 , 1975 Seminar on Resource Recovery Management, Boston, Massachusetts (at County expense) Mr. Daniel Yee, International City Manage- May 20 , 1975 Vice Chairman , County ment Association Resource through - Solid Waste Management Recovery Seminar, May 23, 1975 Policy Committee, and Boston, Massachusetts Mr. Gregory Cook, Mayors Conference representative on said committee (at County expense) PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct'` copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors,- -.- on the date aforesaid. a . cc : County Superintendent Witness my hand and the Seal of of Schools the Board of Supervisors affixed this Public Works Director 13th day of May, 1975. Mr. D. Yee Mr. G. Cook J . R. OLSSON , CLERK County Auditor- Controller County Administrator gy L/ „ Deputy Clerk Ro,b ie GuVerrez In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 1975 r In the Matter of Modifying Agreements with Certain Census Supervisors. The Board on March 5, 1975 having entered into agreements with certain Census Supervisors designated by the State of California, Department of Finance, to conduct the 1975 Special Census; and IT IS BY THE BOARD QED that the Director of Planning is AUTHORIZED to execute modifications to aforesaid agreements to extend the duration through May 30, 1975 and to increase the maxilr mum payment from $3,500 to $5,000 for each Supervisor. Passed by the Board on HaY 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the: minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid cc: Director of Planning Witness mfr hand and the Seal of the Board.of .. County Auditor-Controller w rs County Administrator affixed this 13th day 19 15 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey Q Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 - 1sN+ L n J. Beitler 00261 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 j In the Matter of Supporting AB 1130 Pertaining to Operation of Work Furlough Programs. The Board this day considered the recommendation of the County Administrator that it support AB 1130 pertaining to opera- tion of work furlough programs for the reason that expansion of the authority of the Work Furlough Administrator to release instates for periods of up to 72 hours for specified reasons would provide greater flexibility in the operation of the work furlough program and enhance the rehabilitative aspects of the program. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a County position in SUPPORT of said measure is hereby established. PASSED by the Board on May 13 , 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Senate Judiciary Committee Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Legislative Supervisors Delegation affixed this 13th "day of May 19 County SupervisorsJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk Association of California B IU C_rl Deputy Clerk H 24 lledUdty Sheriff-Coroner Robbie &ut4rrez County Administrator County Counsel 002M, 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California iKav 13 , 19 79 In the Matter of Authorizing Write-Off of Delinquent General Accounts Receivable. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor- Controller is AUTHORIZED to write off delinquent General Accounts Receivable totalling $602.41 as set forth on data processing listing dated May 1, 1975. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• County Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 13th day of--May 19 751- J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Byn Deputy Clerk " ss izna ' ' " Lynn J. Beitler NMI I I O zID, r? + N �! � N m DDr -1 O �. N v >10 '- 031 m `sSC7 �7: C h 20X! G m00D m { Tr^4nGmm+ 0 Tmrr ._ tmmm! �+< -4 ,0 m Z ;m^ % 'n ;D-'t OI Z �:1- --4 0 T ff Ia -1 0f r Imo -r-1 ~ p >i Mor +1 �--IwhlOO -1mh emir -1wm N [-4 a ( O � -4 7QI C S S b. = 3a to S3CD _ tea 7; tl1y 7C•- .� a O Z .. 0 . m --r E37� SGZminC 0 z m m C7 :mt a #CJZm � > mC) 3:13 mZ � � CO) 'mm ;s mm o mm Imm * ` >> Cr'-1 r .c •..'..� I O ;-0 a C) a G v v h h -1 t'1 -i N C7' 70 .� l� ,7D «•• 7D ..� 1;10►+ r O D N! O.rr4 t_ r a z j-4 D s � Z -1, it7 zo S .7 S l^ ( OD m;< ,w mCa 7J -mM Irn ' ImG G F < d ,- c� 1 � 4 r ;-t r t z z 02). i -e x d T r. - I N to m 7C I'1 i t %n W tA r- yy i w x- tp > m -C rn rtz i m m 0; m = h r.: h # h h to rn - v+ Z Z 2 r 2 Z {# L r r �. + lm m r m N I N co tv CD ! G i f �; •O ;t1f E i = 6 i ? t d I X Cl m 3, O - t ; m n i C7 X O b hr 70 O7 St N N <3{ -� v+ W m N Z m; O CO i co m O O O O :Z Ol -4Oa p m marl t i t ; LOtsN FILED r I i MAY 13 19751. MUM � 1 00; m I f I ; j y � j. ��. ✓aj`� 3 C= a r p i . j } ttt Vt CO of--t :Z f!t iJ wt fTt fii: Tit D > SNF ;on 4D-fa; z �r — C '-� i --4 r ., o%L m ct ;K i r m,..; e,f n r 4 ;a C-1 m ;amcpm -4:0O rn az ll)W � O !r r vzrnto GDf c. 10 -Z b mm (n rta vD ,rnm s b ;* V C3, m 17 Rifer 2 .� fm —1' m 7 jr o}N r 3 :0 3 I 3 V►; s m u� < �► 1 -i .rte. Z t/s I " C t LA t r 4 .-4 ICA# ! J -n o m z i m Ln ` rr, , a �s i C't O ; m On s C'7 ; !t rn r j z Z: C —1 t yf . In i Z E .Z� i v m= `i, i { R cc, CAh —1 f C1 00 g D , O O F O els C:lt ^ j I # e j tm mr Cl. O• CD O► F 3 N' ' • • • • • :mr Zi 30 Ul �- 1 r � 1 i 6 �^aayy In the Board of Supervisors r of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 19-15 In the Matter of Authorizing Submission of an Application to the State Department of Health. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Orlyn H. Wood, M.D. , Acting Health Officer, is AUTHORIZED to submit an application to the State Department of Health for Federal funds in the amount of $570,000 for continuation of the Special Supple- mental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children for the fiscal year 1975-1976- Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and torted copy of an order. entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: State Department of Health 1Arttness my hand and the Seal of the Board of C/o Acting Health moors Officer affixed this 13th day of May ,1975 Acting Health Officer J. R. OLSSON,' Clerk Director, Human Resources B De Clerk A ency y PAY H 24 12/74 - N. In aham County Auditor-Controller County Administrator 00.4 e APPLICATIO3 FORM SPECIAL SUPPLUIENTAL FOOD PROGRAM FOR UOPU, I IFANTS, CHILDREN (NIC PR2GRA14) - Ii: aegrd=ae with WIC Pr_ a---r. Re ulatior_ VtZe 7 - Chanter 11 - Part 246.6 1. Agency Nave, Address, Phone 2. Responsible Official for Agency. (Name, Title, Phone Contra Costa Health Department 1111 Ward St. , Orlyn Wood, M.D. Martinez, CA 94553 Acting Health Officer 228-3000, Extension 2501 .3. Rame of Sponsoring Agency or 4. ax Exempt Agency Type of Health Agency Contra Costa County Health Dept. too U Yes Attacivwnt incZuded ❑ Attachment included ❑ 5. Funding Sources 6. Length of UIC Funding Request Contra Costa County 7 2 75 6 30 76 Attachment included ❑ �� to ��f_ Date of Application 8. Participation Level Requested 3 / /75 Women 260 9. lotal Funds RequestedInfants 400 Administration $ 59,703 Children 1,340 Clinic 5—TO—,79T Food $480*00U Total 570,000 * 2,000 per month 10. Geograpnic Area to be served by 14IC (246.6 f) Contra Costa County excluding cities of Richmond, EI Cerrito and San Pablo 1 Attachment incZ_eded (Page 8) ll. List Congressional Districts included in 00 Congressional Districts 7, 14 and 44 Page 1 of- 27, 00267 l2: Po�ulation of Entire r;IC Project Area (246.6 g) 13. Percentage Population with ,low • income (246.6 h) stimated 475,000 for 1975-76 9.2% on assistance 14. ationale foraIC Program in this area (246.6 i) C i . . Attachment included 91 Page 14 15. Attach copy of eligiuility standards for free or part pay medical care and fee schedule for agency and each subcontracting source of medical care (246.6 e) Attachment included Page 15 16. Does project area also have Supplemental Food Program? No �c . Yes ❑ If yes, attach needed information (246.6 1) Attachment included Q 17. Attach description of otner activities being carried out which will complement the WIC Program (24G.6 m) Attachr-wnt included ® Page 17 18. Present Monthly Caseload of your health facility for health services Total nurser of patients seen monthly in clinics EST 600 _J Of this above figure, hair many are: Pregnant women 0 Infants under" 1 year 25n 71 How many of these are adolescents 0 Children 1 to 4 EST L 350 Lactating mothers EST 125 19. Requested Participation Total oy Partici ant by Racial/ctnnic Group infants Children Women Total (246.6 j) (A) (B) (C) (p} a. White 100 375 81 -556 b. Negro or :Black 140 576 98 814 C. Spanish Suniame 160 389 81 630 d. American Indian e. Oriental �- f. All others g. Totals 400 1,340 260 2,000 0 Page 2 of 27 0:*= Are you presently collecting for following data on all patients? (246.6 e) Women Infants Children Height ® ® Q Weight �C] ❑c �j Head Circumference (infants only) Hemoglobin ❑ ❑ ❑ FOematocri t Serum or Plasma Concentration for: Iron ❑ ❑ ❑ Albumin D ❑ D Vitamin A Q ❑ ❑ - Ascorbic Acid ❑ ❑ ❑ % saturation transferrin ❑ ❑ Q . Include other laboratory test or medical data routinely performed Attaehrwnt included ❑ -- 21. Narrative of prenatal and well-child services (246.6 Q Attaeh=nt -�neluded Page ;8-20 22. Narrative list of staffing of medical personnel (246.6 b) Attachment included Page 21-23 23. ti s t of clinics - Attachment included Page 24-27 24. Quarterly Projections 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Quarter Jul I-Se t. 30 Oct 1-Dec 30 Jan 1-March 31 Aoril 1-Jun 3 Infants 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Children 4,020 4,020 4,020 4,020 Women 780 780 780 780 _ Total 6,000 61000 6,000 6,000 ( i 2a. Staff 141C personnel: project director, fiscal manager, nutritionist/dietitian Orlyn H. Wood, M.D. , project director Attac;vnent included 0 Don Meyer, fiscal manager Helen Torbet, nutritionist/dUile Page 3 of'. 27.:' 26,.;; Budget Information Section' A - Budget Categories I Clinic Costs • Total Total Percent Monthly Quarterly Annual A. Personal Services Time Rate Costs Costs 1 P H Nurse 100 1049--1275 3,614 14,454 1 P H Nutritionis 50 1017-1236 1,816 70266 1 Program Aide 50 584-x710 --lx,0'44 4,176: . Fringe Benefits (17 %) 1,100 4.401 Total Clinic Costs 7,574 3 0 L 297 II Administrative Costs Total Total Percent Monthly Quarterly Annual A. Personal Services Time Rate Costs Costs 1 Program Clerk 100 687--773 1,746 6,982 3 Distribution Clerks 100 687773 61813 27,252 . 1 Account Clerk 50 734892 10"311 5,244 1 Supervising Clerk 100 721876 20,577 100308 Fringe Benefits 17 %) 10,154 40617 B. Operating Expenses Total Total Quarterly Annual Costs Costs 1. tion-recurring Travel 1,125 47500 2. Recurring Office Supplies 125 .500 Medical Supplies 75 -300 Total Administrative Costs 14.925-- 59,7Q3_ -o1 � s Total Budget Request 90000" ' ` Page 4,"of 27 - f?age 5 5 G�1Oil p - CA a d N C� 0% ty 0 Qy ' O O edh N N cn 0 o � s O i- V p - � • jell Q r r N ' rA C4 Cp a ' O d p Ln r-A i N O� 3 y d N +� O / t.J N to O d o to d o v 'c O M �` �� N • ASSURANCES The Applicant assures and certifies with respect to the WIC Program that: 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution, motion, or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant s governing body, authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application` ` and to provide such additional information as may be required. 2. It will corply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P/L/ 8e-352) and in accordance with Title VI of that Act, no person in the United States shall:, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take: any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. 3. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2OOOd) prohibiting employment discrimination where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to provide employment or (2) discriminatory employment practices will result in unequal treatment of persons who are or should be benefiting from'the grant-aided activity. 4. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P/L/ 91-646) which provides for fair and 0 equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally assisted programs- 5. rograms.5. - It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political. activity of employees. 6. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximun hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as they apply to hospital and educational institution employees of State and local governments. 7. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, ':` or other.ties. . 8. It will give the grantor agency or the Comptroller General through any authorized representative the access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. 9. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal grantor agency concerning _ special requirements of lazy, program requirements, and other administrative requirements, Approved in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular Ho. A-102. • 4 002'72 Page 6 o€' 27. • Assurance (Continued) 10. .' I certify that the information furnished in this, appli:cation is true and- accurate to the best of W knowledge. I acknowledge that I have-received and:read'the Standards Manual for the California WIC Program and will operate-the, program according to the directives therein. I will provide the State with: information'' f; on any changes in the data provided in this application. ignature Title Orlyn H. Wood, M.D. Name 'i'yped e S fined > 1 ,4( ?lw • .'f.,,�ry4_".Yip 7;= 002 �a ; Page 7 27 yam" 1:.,�""'"�• __i�`�`�"'-","`�'"�{��'= ^ �3 +oma v.-t/•»�: •r»•., 4 _. --- j c. .: ��J..+•''r V,,.�? j .^ ._,,.^!fir' :"'1 t... s y ` �� � ~ g � y f''4a '� 4.,,t . :� .�� _Y 1t1�} w`yy'�`�;;"+'-zs.i� :� w �✓, i.a,,.�-fit�-,r _•.. .t ++ .' y;,w..L �` �� ... w i nom' .i� 1 Y 't\ ♦: l-1-r t f sl'.s♦ ��T. 1 �T f � •� �.,' ,� ..• ".'`�� _ ♦ s. T'' ��• ..• '�,.,r„♦ ��' � �� w Ty x_a...r-..�,e^r�r+..a' i N:�j ` +a •_*`1.. '�-- C' ♦• � `• Xt �j ."•`Li�Y• s '� a 0]SM bli L „r •„zr �' � nJ �'`"'1 i Y +r �\- �y, � ({ j„i l.t,,>�w { w+•+3 ^r'r a�,yn at' r f, . ,.�_ \' 4 C �• tet. *' � A 2 + ` � `,fes_:r ` .,.•�--r ti* r„ f V � a'ec'` iz + .•r, ) � y/' ,.J"+i'� •Y �., Y Z �~!� wR Lp'• V.Olt. N ut .\ �� ��tt .�- +�/�/'_ r .+ai�3�- 1■■■ • .Z s^ •a'v M1w I��!t;Lni��' ,0. .J �� � � ,V R• ti LD . •. !'w1 Y•�!a i �w ii�1' •� �' y �� fff 1 ,f Y, r ` � � N ,... ,I:f � wt �`` ," ` �•' S• w• � �. `A =�'i'� � • `,+� �,Jya� Gy'` � � .'�i�..r"+ w ~^ _ �� Lir�sJh g ry� ` ,, ! ' G Xn...�'F'"'t..y '4� �� 'a«~ a•'�r'G •'w~ �;�{}. ��„„ ? .:ai".' p1� s,- ^� r G4K✓ ~''• � rrw.w /' Porn+�; C ,.^+ n �'.•, •� _ '' as 4{� % :� a ,r .s +• -'..:a't. `? � r ..,f '-•{y�yK j .� �`. 1�f`� qtr � _ j as` �� �t {� -.,. r�_�I n+ �//�/�^f j4 •� � ;�i ,`' .,i �� 4.= 1y�: x�+.�' •t 'fjt� � �,^•jj�iw� '.L'�.R J+ +��`\ ^f �f�i�' a.-^ t i S, ! � ��a�`. ♦ �',.a/�/ ''�. �/'/may 4 � �:"l 1 t //,,i'y J A t C �/ - is z �� v.�• .w "'.'f/� 1 .) '+,.'f `� �♦ 7i \� 'r / �.lt" } y ter' SI _ `�, '- -:}�� `�^+'•� ' 4'='`. _ _ .i o 1 �; s :1 - !} •d .� � �,fir f}-f(�'.tyi � �� `'\., �'� .+ ti��♦ dl .�'��/�`ri^L11 �•il?.=t .r r i r ;,•h,rr07 i CASES, PEPSONS ANO PROPORTION' OF POPMATIO11 RECEIYIRO PUBLIC ASSISTA.'.CE BY CENSUS TRACT PLACE 'TRACT POPULATIO►i C.%SES2j PERSMS RtECIP?E::TS RECEIVING ASSISTANCE (PERSa ;S)' PER 1,SCO . POPULATION Bethel Island 1 2,134 81 180 84 Oakl ey 2 4,670 335 814 174 • 4 Brentwood �5,632 374 921 16 Byron 4 1,453 41 100 - 69 Antioch 5 5,445 428 986 181 • Antioch 6 8,069 382 ' 796 99; Antioch 7 12,507 616 ),486 119 161tioch 8 30249 141 283 87 Pittsburg 9 3,575 , 455 . 946 265- . Pittsburg 10 3,475 274 576, 166' Pittsburg 11 39568 245 574 161 Pittsburg 12 1,937 265 598 309 Pittsburg 13 9,450 621 19554 164 Kest Pittsburg 14 10,870 942 2,240 206 Concord 15 1,483 12 26 18'. Martinez 16 1,357 109 224 165 Martinez 17 2,118 161 289 136 Martinez 18 3,287 112- 199 61 Martinez 19 6,454 • 314 704. 109 Martinez 20 5,317 274 632. 119 Martinez 21 10,451 259 491 47 Pleasant hill 22 5,900 65 141 24 Page 9. of 27 r CASES, PERSOUS AND PPOPORTIOU OF POPULATION RECEIVIIIG PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BY CEUSUS TRACT PLACEAJ TRACT POPULATION CASES PERSO-1S- RECIPIENTS (PERSONS) RECEIVING ASSISTMCE PER 1,000 POPULATiklit- •� Pleasant Hill -23 4,924 - 74 157 - 32 Concord 24 6,005 171 352 59: Pleasant Hill 25 6,690 317 486 73 Pleasant_ Hill 26 2,998 17 31 10 Concord 27 42246 178 413 ' 97 Concord 28 693 102 • 180 260 Concord 29 7,429 167 376 51 Concord 30 7,767 148 319 41 Concord 31 52951 189 369 62 Concord 32 8,519 120, - 279 33 . Concord 33 13,135 218 .512 - . 39 = r ' Concord 34 6,677 238 528 79; Concord 35 4,063 125 295 73 Concord 36 11,660 612 1,526 . 131 5` Concord 37 13,665 210 463 34 Concord 38 22,057 220 . 456 21 Walnut Creek 39 4,920 272 458 93 Pleasant Hill 40 10,623 193 369 35 = Lafayette 41 4,014 49 - 102 25 Walnut Creek 42 4,400 36 66 15 Walnut Creek 43 10,316 91 181 18 u -2- - r Qa2'7a Page IO of 2? •�---- -..air .,,-,;�,.'�,r.,r -r_ CASES, PERSONS A39 PPMPORTION OF POPULATION RECEIVItlG PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BY CENSUS TRACT P1 ACEAJ TRACT POPULATION- CASES-2J PERSORS RECIPIEt."TS (PERSO'16 • RECEIVING ASSISTANCE PER 1,000 POPJE AT10►1 Alamo-Danville 44 3,064 16 29 9 Alamo-Danville 45 148043 109 - 210 l5 Alamo-Danville 46 90665 . 68 131 14 Lafayette 47 39595 9 18 . 5 Lafayette 48 40679 19 - 34 7 Lafayette 49 6,191 64 107 17 Lafayette 50 4,314 47 84 19 Walnut Creek 51 11,168 19 3t - 3 Moraga 52 13,245 78 160 12 Lafayette- 53 7,691 31' 64 8 y` Lafayette 54 7,065 23 - 44 6 Antioch 55 9,314 85 185 20 Pinole 56 1,123 2 4 4 Crockett 57 3,698 147- 286 77 Rodeo 58 5,356 382 905 169 Hercules 59 12,641 298 697 S5 Pinole - 60 11,666 175 391 34 Richmond 61 3,277 108 225 69 Richnand 62 4,138 141 - 298 72 Richmond 63 59221 151 333 64 ;r -3= a 00277 Page 11 of 27 CASES PEP•SOUS AM PROPORTIOR OF POPULATIOit • RECEIVInG PUBLIC ASSISTANCE F BY CE11SUS TRACT Pi f PLACE4 TRACTT POPULATIO t CPSE PERSO1!S3J RECIPIVITS (PERS0 8' RECEIVING ASSISTWICE PER 1,000 POQULAMON Richmond 64 73,200 286 689 96 Richmond 65 6,050 13,040 2,209 • 365 =r: San Pablo 66 7,885 532 " 19257 159 Richmond 67 89852 414 968 109 San Pablo 68 69770 654 1,586 234 San Pablo 69 7,158 710 19327 185 Richmond 70 39151 74 162 51 Richmond 71 5,144 190 380 74 Richmond 72 - 60349 282 624 98 r- Richmond 73 2,889 209 478 165 Richmond 74 3,740 164 346 93 Richmond 75 2,859 359 811 284 Richmond 76 5,254 869 1,871 356 Richmond 77 5,511 926 19891 343 Richmond 78 2,733 199 382 140: Richmond 79 7,198 1,137 _ 2,496: 347- - Richnond 80 _ 2,967 ,589 1,443 486 Richmond 81 6,006 840 1,799 300 Richmond 82 6,507 827 11919 294 Richmond 83 5,093 192 409 80 '4'" - Unnv4ls�r-�pQ x;• s • page 12 .af 2'7 CASES, PERSONS XJM PROPORTIO11 OF POPULATION ' RECEIVING PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BY CEIISUS TRACT Aj PLACE TRACT POPULATIOt 1 CASES-2j -PERSORS3 RECIPIEIITS (PERS0;1S)`. RECEIVING ASSISTXICE PER 1,000 POPULATION El Cerrito 84 49447 = 54 109 25 E1 Cerrito 85 3,974 17 32 8 El Cerrito 86 2,409 - 136 281 117 El Cerrito 87 3,153 57 125 40 EI Cerrito 88 2,735 74 158 58: El Cerrito 89 3,501 148 304.. .x•. 871, El Cerrito .90 4,971 57 105 21 Kensington 91 28968 25 51 17 Kensington 92 2,855 31 54 19 TOTAL 554,636 23,318 - 51 ,180 - 92 1. U. S. Census: 1970 Population and Housing Units by Census Tract (1960 Tract designations). 2. Includes recipients of all categories of aid administered by Contra Costa County, including AFDC, General Assistance, Medical Assistance Only and tion-assistance, Food Stamps. SSI/SSP recipients are paid by the Social Security Administration' and have been excluded. This count does not include recipients who reside outside Contra Costa County. 3. Estimated, based on average numbers of persons per case in the various categories of assistance. - 4. Places are not based on city limits but include unincorporated areas adjacent to cities and towns. Census Tracts do not necessarily follow city limit lines. - 002 • Page I3. of ....-....+.-,.... _. ,,,.,�....., ... .. ,,.._.. .�...:,+ .�-..,.... ....,.•._. -+r r,V;«• , ..,w�....ti..,a:.g.a'Se . ! �`+.-a.T�q�GJpTq'�^.` s: 14. (Attachment) Rationale for WIC Program in this area. Contra Costa County is one of the San Francisco Bay Area counties extending from the bay on the west to the old river delta on the east; bounded on the north by the Sacramento river and Carquinez straits and contiguous with Alameda County on the south. The County is divided into three parts by mountain ranges; the West a densely populated industrial urban area with a high concentration of Blacks; Central County which consists of a .series of bedroom communities with a high concentration of young families and senior citizens, predominantly White; East County, largely agricultural, but with two industrial communities and a large .Mexican-American population. There are pockets of poverty throughout; more pronounced in West County than other areas. Physician coverage is adequate, however, because of transportation, financial and language barriers there are segments of the population who find it difficult to obtain preventive services. Many of the low income families receiving care from the Contra Costa Health .Department and Medical Services clinics are at nutritional risk as determined by assessments which reveal' inadequate nutrition knowledge and practice. she following are rates from our clinic patient load: a. Nutritional anemia 8% b. Rates of pregnancy - women aged 15-44: 11.9/1000 population c. Rate of teenage pregnancies 6,978 total live births; women under 20-983 live births d. Rate of premature births 6.1% e. Rate of low birthweight infants 6.1% f. Rate of infant mortality 13.5/1,000 g. Rate of miscarriage - not available h. -Statistics on Infant Mortality, sickness (if available) - Not available. OU.VV. Page. 14 of 27 .¢ 15. No charge is made to patients for services in the Health Department Child Health Conferences and Screening Clinics (including EPSDT, Mediscreen and PHP) . Only 3rd party payments are billed according to attached schedule. Eligibility requirements are as follows: A. For Child Health Conferences - Families residing in Contra Costa County who are unable to get well-child care on a private basis. 1. Priority is given to mothers who have a first child, a premature infant, newborns before older children, and those in the family with other medical problems. 2. Consideration is also given to helath problems of siblings of the infant under Child Health Conference supervision. 3. The. public health nurse makes a home visit for an interview= if the family is not already known to her. Criteria used for selection are: capacity of the mother to use assis- tance, inability to afford private physician service and availability of such resources. 4. Service in the Child Health Conference may be continued to school age if parents are in need of the help given in the conference. B. For EPSDT Clinics - Any person under 21 years of age residing in The Target Areas. 1. West County - Expanded Model Neighborhood Area 2. East County - Census Tracts 020, 031, 032, 040, 010 (Brentwood, Oakley, Byron, Bethel Island and Knightsen) . C. Mediscreen - Limited to Medi-Cal recipients. D. PHP - Limited to PHP Participants. A' 0028E Page 15 of 21 r SECTION VIII: RATES AND FEES f 0018. Proposed Schedule of Maximum Allowances* r,n Procedure Maximum Allowance SEHS $11.80 Phonocardioscan 1.60 Snellen Eye Test .80 rn MCT 2.00 « , r. Infant MCT 3.00 r Pure Tone Audiometry 2.20 Developmental Assessment (DDST) 3.20 Tuberculin Tine Test 1.40 .,y f Standardized P.P.D. 2.70 Urine Dipstick .90' Microhematocrit 2.00 Hemoglobin 2'.00 .rr. Sickle Cell Trait Screening 3.50 . Sickle Cell Electrophoresis 12.50 Blood Lead Screening 5.00 Yi. Tests for Syphilis (VDRL, RPR, ART) 3.00 * Based on December 27, 1973 standards `.:„ ;r- y f fi 1 f w'7 0282" . 16 of 27 Page r s z•- 17. (Attachment) Description of other activities being carried out which will complement the WIC Program. The nutritionist has not only provided essential service in obtaining nutrition assessments from new enrollees and- instructing- participants about the WIC program and the use of vouchers but: has also incorporated nutrition education into the above procedures.. Informational materials have been developed for the WIC clinics. We are also working cooperatively with the ENEP program to utilize f. their aides to enhance the nutrition education in our clinics. r r. RR�� y ' erg �W rax: Page 1,7of', � �• .. ..,., .... -. .,y_ .•r.:.... ... ... .._,..,""TP<..,�. :+.nrww ..71"+;'r.`?'}C' Iet ws�@ry+�Y111 SI /IIS • 21. (Attachment) Narrative of prenatal and well-child services. In Contra Costa County, health and medical care for many low income and indigent individuals is divided so that much of well-child care is provided by the Health Department and the sick care is provided by the Medical Services and private physicians. The Health Department offers well child services without charge to families who are unable to obtain such services- on a private or health plan basis. Each month we hold 39 Child Health Conferences and 42 £PSDT and other screening clinics. Patients are seen by appointment. Physicians, nurse examiners, Public Health Nurses and RN's and aides staff these clinics. History and physical examinations including a visual oral examination are done by the physicians and nurse examiners. Denver Developmental tests, screen- ing hearing and vision tests and blood and urine tests are obtained' as indicated. A number of indigent families receive pediatric care from the Contra Costa County Medical Services as Medi-Cal and Prepaid Health Plan participants. Others are charged according to a fixed fee schedule. A Full range of medical, dental and laboratory services is available. The patients are seen by appointment and/or on drop-in basis by staff physicians. We have obtained a letter of agreement from Dr. Arnold Gilbert, Director of Pediatrics, to refer eligible infants and children to the Health Department WIC program. Dr. Gilbert has agreed to provide ongoing medical care, measurements and tests as required by the WIC regulations. (See letter of agreement, page 19) The Health Department provides prenatal education classes for high risk mothers, but does not provide prenatal medical care. For this reason, we have obtained a letter of agreement from Dr. Thomas Brewer, Director of Prenatal Services, at the Contra Costa County Medical Services to refer eligible women to the Health Department WIC program The patients are seen by appointment by staff physicians. A full range of medical, dental and laboratory services are available. Dr. Brewer has agreed to provide ongoing medical care, measurements and tests as required by the WIC regulations. (See letter of agreement, page 20) W�V Page 18 of, 27: 1 MCH MAR 11 1975 e �sc� X4 - CONTRA COSTA ORLYN H. WOOD, MD., Acting Health Officer z � HEALTH DEPARTMENT Mme„ DEPAl"Uff CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Fast Office fioz 871, Wur4 cahb=94553 tem 21&3000 February 25, 1975 Re: Agreement for Certification of Pediatric patients from Cotmaty Medical Services Pediatric clinic for CCHD WIC Project Orlyn H. Wood, M.D. VIC Project Director Contra Costa County Health Dept, P.O. Boot 871 Martinez, California 9b553 Dear Dr. Wood, I agree to certify individuals potentially eligible for the Contra Costa Health Dept. WIC Project who are: 1. Receiving pediatric care at the County Medical Services Pediatric Clinics. 2. Considered to be at nutritional risk. 3. Residents of target areas of the Health Dept. WIC Project: Contra Costa County excluding Richmond, San Pablo, and El Cerrito. I also agree to provide the measurements, blood tests, and medical history at the intervals designated by the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and 'Children (WIC) guidelines for each child referred to the. Health Dept. WIC Froject. I understand all referral is voluntary on the part of the participant. Arno Gilbert, H.D. County Medical Services Chief of Pediatrics i 't OHW:ESB:sh OQ28-5 ' Page -19 of 2T- CONTRA COSTA ORLYN H. WOOD, M.D., Aaiag Health Officer v Z 0 0 HEALTH DEPARTMENT NUMI o �VENTaMEW z � v CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Post Offxz hoz 871.Uattir eL CahWria 94553 Tekphvw 228.3000 February 24, 1975 Orlyn H Wood, K.D. WIC Project Director Contra Costa Health Dept. P.O. Box 871 Martina, California 9 553 Re: Agreement for Certification of Prenatal patients for CC11D WIC Project Doar Dr. Wood, I agree to certify individuals potentially eligible for the Contra Costa Health Dept. WIC Project who are: 1. Receiving prenatal care from the County Medical Services Prenatal Clinics 2. Considered to be at nutritional risk 3. -Residents of Contra Costa County excluding Richmond, San Pablo, and E1 Cerrito. 4. And not enrolled in any other WIC Project I also agree to provide the measurements.. blood tests and medical history at the intervals designated by the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) guidelines for each woman referred to Health Dept. VJIC Project. I understand all referral is voluntary on the part of the participant. Thomas Breuer, R.D. Chief, Prenatal Services 0151:ESB:sh 0028D Page 20 of 27 22. Attachment Narrative list of staffing of medical personnel HEALTH DEPARTMENT Child Health Conferences Name $ Time Salary Source Deon Patten, M.D. 33 hr/mo $17/hr County H.D. Linda Schultz, M.D. 48 hr/mo " Miriam Budinger, M.D. 6 hr/mo Butonne Currier, M.D. 21 hr/mo Sophie Casson, M.D. 3 hr/mo Toshiko Iwata, M.D. 3 hr/mo Screening Programs (See attached schedules) EPSDT Mediscreen Name $ Time Salary ' Source Miriam Budinger, M.D. 3 1/2 hr/mo $17/hr County H.D. Sophie Casson, M.D. 4 hr/mo Deon Patten, M.D. 24 hr/mo Arther Schlosser, M.D. 4 1/2 + 16 hr/mo" " Sue Chan, M.D. 16 hr/mo " Butonne Currier 16 hr/mo Linda Schultz 16 hr/mo Arnold Gilbert (24 hr/mo) s :9 00287 Page 21. of 27 f_ - 22. Attachment Narrative list of staffing of medical personnel (b) COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES Pediatric Clinics Name $ Time Salary Source Joseph Montenegro, M.D. 4 hr/mo $17/hr County Med. Services Lewis Meyer, M.D. 4 hr/mo " Sarah Malin, M.D. 8 hr/mo Richard Oken, M.D. 20 hr/mo " p Joan Hart, M.D. 4 hr/mo John Nackley, M.D. 40-50_ " Arnold Gilbert, M.D. 40-50 " A Miriam Budinger, M.D. 12 hr/mo " Toshiko Iwata, M.D. 12 hr/mo COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES Prenatal Clinic Name % Time Sam Source Thomas Brewer, M.D. 12 hr/mo $17/hr County Med. Serv. Phyllis Taylor, M.D. 4 hr/mo " Laurence Dorcy, M.D. 2 hr/mo Ed Carlson, M.D. .8 hr/mo 0028 Page 22- of 27� 23. Attachment List of clinics used in above mentioned prenatal and well-child services. Names of persons responsible for Health Department clinics: CHC's - Dr. Elsie S. Baukol, 1111 Ward St. , Martinez, CA Screening Clinics - Dr. Jogi Khanna, 1111 Ward St. , Martinez, CA Names of persons responsible for County Medical Services Clinics Pediatric - Dr. Arnold Gilbert Prenatal - Dr. Thomas Brewer Locations of Clinics 1) County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Ave. , Martinez, CA 2) Richmond Health Center, 38th and Bissell Ave. , Richmond, CA 3) Richmond Neighborhood Center, 240 - 8th St. , Richmond, CA 4) Pittsburg Outpatient Clinic, 45 Civic -Ave. , Pittsburg, CA 5) East County Medical Services, P.O. Box 606, Oakley, CA 00289 Page 23 of 2? M ;r + * a�a►a+a► at b a►a►a►Ch y cn c►at(A O :06O, Ln(A DN O -40►N�1 iLOrN O 0 OW W W W V WOa1 Q1a1AN N s m n rrrar r w rrljF- O NO r rNrr ONrw (D r A a►N to �I I co ds W 0% f -I CO to N E I tr til r-w 0 O rrK O < wwww wwww H- too rc a m KonK a 0000 K K to ct m (D O tr 0 ct 0 0 M l< rt ct m O a Q::ry v(nr a 00 0 0 0 0 O K a'OKKIb < w :3 :3 w w aaaa a Z Or mma � a rt 'v 'Lf K Ci h1 0O ct m ct ct b ct rt 0 O-ct o' noon AW • (Dmlb O 1--001- a 0. 000 m m N33N:1 ct � ct w 0 K !b to .t. tD m O O w bi m tO W ttl ct t9- 0 a � -j rt, K l�rrA rrW&< p N woo VI C.wQ G IQ to l 0 as W W (D A K H w0 ct ct O rr rrr� p1 ` Aft NOON 000' rr b 0 1-307V Of o O I-+ O FO+- tL K K 'KG O l l NO m (D O CD :'a' M (n.1 v ca v V.1-f 1 tom+- cOt ? ct ct m ct a'�cit -r CA) � Q+ NIH-+ O m lAlh� fn(aractt ct to to t✓ K rt rt K It rt ct a• O b b r r O 0 pi 3y w Ea (a cwt ►C Tt 7c' K K o lu 0 fit! lbCD 000 ;cf A� • tQ W o a wwa www• gs Sb r lip, to O 0 .. � CD rt p w C�2 m 0 v NrWr N SW NN I-+ANS d amftm :3 rtK � a m a y MMM* 3H 3 EX14 xftlX 0 rift :'? O ftmIDK KOK (D th 9; lbmm lb Inmmtb 0lbNm O LIC K .<.< c a %DtD%Dr r 1D�D10�D rrr�D H IST I I I 1 1 1 l 1 ! •• Fa I-A H.P. a rrrr ,c+w�o.r p. - NNN NNNN •+ O•• N O w i W N .. N W r OLn f n G In w 1, •• sti lb Do r C < ftrtItct (A rtcrMct wEll Hn 0 wmcD (D n mtn0m nnEw E !nava ? Oaa'0 SU (D 0 w 00290 1F-A m K : r . rt � ctct a Pages 24--of 27;, chrnrnsrn rnc►Olt y at M(h cri MMMMMMMMMO t N0M0%tnvt 1-•Lntn % 0000 0w1-4aw0orwr 0%00CD-1 LnC% %o al--•�N q -J LnwtndscowMwa Cl) 'wwwww WWw -t WwWW 01 NNNNNNNNNNO i N N H t-I l-• O O t-• F+1-+Cl 0 N"W OD�J W N 01 1 %D Cl t0 N 1 01 1-+!!t 4t 1]D fJi W 01 N b - 4b 21 rornnn > > nowo x HrnNb rr � e� t� � ►vr � H a . ' rt0 O O trtr ow O 10-•G < I nR rt 4 NrGtratK ~�K fKD carte-•� w rat ct ti " " no o z a lb w w?cr0 z3a w ctm mmGG000 C5rt o 00100 timmcr00 & trm K f1+ tr :3002M � rn0 0t< G A C A n vK K 0 0 t< K elm C C Ywwm m M w0 x m K m 0• a 0crrt. nrt O a N KArtrt wKrt m a r0r K alxvommomaMl< t W K&< 16< EnEnC m'< H r r a N GaaO OKAiro ;U N m AAmO ma r wtrw to mI✓L4Cwnoto wL< mtri m N IA o 0 Al a o O r o'er• a t✓!✓ t m• m_ 00 KPC K oomrom 0 a • to CC Oto a .t., WPM00E CD a rt* rt0 anKK0 auto o a rt-•til-� wnm m 5 wtsiw G - cHwS'0 A :r01- '• 0 ct ct- - ct. • t11Iz. woo m m wK 0 G 0'0•C =I:3 Z - a R w ct to w rt K K G & K M www ana to n rt0taA000 " (a0co M 00Nrh] K ?ro n on nN a w O'tht-h0'A G•vt rtm m 0tnLn 0 2)OG rrw CPC C � "C :r no �?O n M t O 0aK < nrtr0 • w KM K - 0 C nO'O•n' G rhw 0'm m EEONaO• 0 A H0 m t14 O K K O NK m t, G K K wwI- - 0, ? 0'cn a C A G H-wG NA Qw K • N N o 0 to 0, n- o K ct 0•K ((s m tt N 0'O < Z A :. I-j i K N Ln K ? 0'- rt rt ct rr - a m w 0•W W O O 3 . O -N K-In- - b m -. ft . Czj.. - 4- O' - - • F-•r E �- o n cn_?Ul a K cn o e► H N a 0 KsaDOOto Ec� Nro e� 0 x� v rn �Obwv r`wa I-h WPJa ww N• A a a (A m tfict NrWrN-ct FA-nWW F~-•tai(Ga v wo " m roOi wwr-w r • MIHH wm 0 coVco GL<� rrAl� a 0 &< wa wK K w rt. t✓> tr rt crb as a a a O m a< art - AOoa a < G o'st+ o•o - A aaa • • M0 • K rt >• cc 0K 'c1 aa- - tra- to w �• a3wwX :0PAW r + >F e•- - G - > so 0 a aatmaa• m roro K to 0 K O A H - K ctrtK • - was 3n IPC- -wcwt (wt `° wcwt II•-mct rt :rI- to of Al aA 0 0:. a rt rt rt rt rt rt o - O ct C row• w K3 • Al an KctrtwM rt. A A mmnnnIDM rt- N tn tha a tr tr m Cr fib ? n a N 00 N 0 a n F+ tr Cr" GK cot m 0 OO GtaO � Zw K KW�R KW w m x O O t-• xn tw+ ww W W W h' N aGr + m wK ?w o' a rr at. Or AWWis.A. NNi--•N AwWw NNis.DNNt--•Nri O ?a rtK K ct ct 0 W M 0 KKK (A 0 rtctO Ut M O G (a a o ff xaa=:r am & aaa rra=:rarrrraarrl< O ca '=i ►siKiEE EEE HEH3 3 'zJHHHHH333 0 040wwwaa aaaw CamO 0tr-Cmmmm000 KAt aaa00 OOOa Kowa aaKMatm (naaa 3 m0 aaamm comma tnmaa aatnaaaaaa0; o aa _ L<►<L< m to m m to K a m a'< ►<l< a a a a a A<l<l< O H a s a a a a aL< a t<'<'<►< & m G r• %DHkot-•to rr%0ao t-•%otos-j got-��c��o� wr�ot H m 1 1 1 1 1 I l l •• I I I I I t l l t t l t l t N' ct E✓� t-•H.D H N N 1-•t✓ F-•<n t-to w N N N N O N to N N N N N N N m O I O O b .. K w O 0 tr onnrr > now t+ rrn t4 t. nIV GaG • • OGCG G • 0 $0 tu • a w� � K m K G K K L' K rt ct R ct cr. K w K rn rn mK K w rn to rn K M ct rt ct M rr M cr M M w0wAA Mw1--O AAAw AmmmAmAmAA m O m 0'O' 0 m to 0'0'0•m O'0 0 0 0.0 O.0 :7:31 0 K K00 KKm GGGK G C C CG J291, ] QQ { rt rt rt rt rt rt rr rt N N N N N N N N N N N N Pace 25- of -2-IL` ',• Lpo p,L nO as 0. N �.+.• + to t 11 m ft CD 110 .- cn 1-1. 0 C) cr �+ cr iL is. { FSA m %A V1 K ��S � G0t r 03 p H. � $ cai •. � � r03 of CA rt, � (A$ a �ro (Dct,W ! Y• 'DmOK (A t� ci It • nL r 00 - 0 cf; K to Lri r. P-S-j m L pr�v Cn m l U� $ NK m � ROr W ~ Y• c,fm Q 8 O 92.O C 0 caCA C2 } F�@CS K g (n too ��csa°.a `D ' O x K p 0 K x K �- x � o d rte+ to :s M K 0 d o *C Q" *D U b b ny 0 m +- - time m ca. rmc. m CrQ CD 1 CD A3 r f-( WV1W"I�'-J IV t N % o i -� ry rn W N • m • Af NO W U . to •d 1 � � tt• 00292 . v+ Page 26 of. 27 i - O Y " cl r. 0yy V z n N G t�D co trot, o q > a a : a a ( � y I O En Fes+ cc Q n a n (n C.0 t +- d ON ct f2, CD O m O O O O 0A En N cA CDCD cam+ m cK+ m cC+ m cc+ ca 0 • n :r p- > ►s ►s a- x v ° po°, n x a cn a cn av, a v, Q z � � Q � G Q � � G m G d `` C+ a FJ %0 vt ~ � d res �s � c t:2: C+ o� r cd r co r cd r ►;� ►o . :r 0 0 � • �s c • cn CL a t� cn n to 0 cn a v, cn CD W o sr o C a G o C n m c7 O "1 5' '2 a' "i �' K �' to C ? N C 1 W f0+ F+ H F'• H c+ 0 W "1 V1 'Y N 'i N K N K N N O '1 F'- N tr m 1 'mi r F{ ►s t co z W 1 N 1 1•' t Vi CT`Cb N ip 1� Ngr-m`'r`" o n d m e d d H t� o� ao \o °0 1 0 cn a to > C/3 to p . M z . y [cam, Q µ C� Q t7 Z H 03 23 > t t CH7 CD cam+ cc+' ct, OQ 93 s _ Page 27 of 27 R i t f: In the Board of Supervisors • of Contra Costa County, State of California LK : May 13 In the Matter of Final Emergency Telephone System (9-1-1) Plan. j. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator . is AUTHORIZED to explore, in conjunction with City and Public : . Protection Agency representatives, the use of a consulting firm to develop the Final Emergency Telephone System (9-1-1) Plan and: potential sources of funding to cover the cost of the Final Plan preparation. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975• ;t 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enla -an the. minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board'of cc: County Administrator (50) Supervisors Emergency Telephone � � 13th d of 19 75" System Committee Members - - °y c/o County Administrator • J. R. OLMN Clerk _ By Deputy-Clerk H so 12n4 - 15-M N. In'Wraham 002.1. , OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECEIVE � • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY j D W. N. Boggess Administration Building HAY !3 1975 J. P. Kenny Martinez, California J. Rt A. M. Dias a momaF PAUbV=, To: J. E. Moriarty Data: May 7, 197 E. A. Linscheid From-. Arthur G. Will, Su5ied: Emergency Telephone SySterw County Administrator Plan (9-1-1) Your Board established an Emergency Telephone System Planning Committee on June 18, 1974' naming representatives from the County,_ Cities, special districts and other agencies operating in Contra Costa County that are involved in emergency telephone communications. The Emergency Telephone System (9-1-1) Committee has contin- ued its activities for preparation of a 9-1-1 Final Plan to be submitted to the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and to the Communications Division of the State Department of General Services by January 31, 1977, as required by State law. The 9-1-1 Final Plan project will closely follow concepts included in the 9-1-1 Tentative Plan approved by your Board on January. 21, 1975, endorsed by all public safety agencies in the County and filed with the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and the Communications Division of the State Department of General Services in the manner prescribed in Government Code sections 53100 through 53120. Emergency Telephone System (9-1-1) Committee discussions have resulted in a consensus to investigate possible selection of an outside consulting firm to perform the 9-1-1 Final Plan project. it has been indicated that Federal Grant Funds may be available to defray cost of the proposed 9-1-1 study to local agencies in the County. Enclosed herewith is a proposed "Emergency Communications Services, 9-1-1 Scope of work" outline prepared by the committee to provide a basis for possible selection of an outside consulting firm. It is understood that the Contra Costa County City Managers` Group, Police Chiefs' Association and Fire Chiefs' Association have previously endorsed the concepts contained in the 9-1-1 Scope of Work outline, including use of an outside consulting firm to study alternatives for a Countyu;ide comprehensive com- munications system. 00295 2. At the May 1, 1975 meeting of the Contra Costa County. Mayors r Conference a report was approved to endorse the- concepts, contaived,' in the Scope of Work outline and to suggest that the respective City staffs further pursue this matter. This matter will be placed before your Board on May 13,1975",' to consider authorizing the County Administrator to explore with Cities and Special Districts in the County sources of fund-ing. and development of a suitable contract with an outside consulting: fii`m to assist in completing the Emergency Telephone System (9-1-1) _ Final Plan as required by State law_ JEH:eb 00290 . r r DRAFT FOR MM- TTEE CONSIDERALT-70.1 Scope of Work for Emergency Communications Services/9-1-1 Following is a suggested scope of work for a study to be ' performed by contract of Emergency Service Communications iu- Contra Costa County to be integrated with 9-1-1. At a joint meeting with the Contra Costa County Managers, Association and the Contra Costa County Police Chiefs' Association, it was indicated that LEAA• funds may be available to a maximum of 90% of the total cost of such a study with.10% coming from-local agencies. It is probable that in order to qualify for the, Federal , funds, the primary thrust of the study would have to be towards police communications with the fire and 9-1-1 aspects being inte- grated as essential secondary conditions. 9-1-1 Scope of Mork I. Degree of Consolidation A. Alternatives 1. One regional center (a) Police, fire and emergency medical direct dispatch. (b) Police direct dispatch transfer to fire and emergency medical. (c) Fire direct dispatch only transfer to police and emergency medical. (d) Transfer to police, fixe a-id emergency medical. r f to 0025 '. 4 a. T a 2• . zr r5 2. Two regional centers " 4 �k h (a) Police, fire and emergency - a medical direct dispatch. (b) Police direct dispatch transfer to fire and emergency , medical. { (c) Fire direct dispatch-transfer Y'E to police and emergency medical. (d) Transfer to police, fire and emergency medical. 3. Three regional centers (a) Police, fire and emergency medical direct dispatch. (b) Police direct dispatch transfer . r. to fire and emergency medical. (c) Fire direct .dispatch transfer to police and emergency medical.. (d) Transfer to police, fire and ,7 emergency medical. fir' 1. 4. Four regional centers (a) Police, fire and emergency 4 medical direct dispatch. (b) Police direct dispatch, transfer to fire and emergency medical. 0.0298: • - 3. f - - x (c) Fire direct dispatch, transfer` to police and emergency medical. (d) Transfer to police, fire and emergency medical. S. Decentralized dispatch/transfer bar . individual centers 6. Selective routing B. Cost of Each II. Technical Capabilities of 9-1-1 A. Analyze the several optional features of 'a ; "Sophisticated 9-1-1 System." xr B. Costs III. Institutional Structure (policy making and administra tion) A. Options r B. Costs IV. Locations and Physical Facilities Y • A , . Options r B. Costs V. Equipment (including communications equipment and " •f f ' r office furniture) A. Options F B. Costs M y 1 { t.f f -r rw 0029 x F x ��1 _ tc wM1Ar't�'f`! • - Cti .a' . r _ 4. �z VI. Financing � r A. Alternatives B. Analysis VII. Personnel Requirements A. Options B. Costs a _r VIII. Costs/Savings for Individual Cities. ` f A. Alternatives . B. Analysis r w . . ---------------- f { 4 ' J In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of a Rental Agreement. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Arthur G. Will , County Administrator, is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Mr. Roy Ray for rental of a residence at 1125 Mellus Street, Apt. 7, Martinez, on a month-to-month basis at $70.00 per month commencing April 25, 1975. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real PropertySupervisors ' County Auditor-Controller M 19 75 County Administrator - - -- -- ay J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By i Deputy Clerk N2stti" 15'" R ie Gui0errezi 0030,11r J i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 .75 In the Matter of Submission of Data on Public Assistance Programs. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administratdr: is AUTHORIZED to submit data on the public assistance programs. o the appropriate State authorities, pursuant to Section 10800.1 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. r I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of, Director, Human Resources Supervisors Agency affixed this 13th day ofHay . 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk " 24 ,zna ' 's'" Robbie 6u rrez nab r �VU-0 f. In the Board of Supervisors �--' of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 _ , 19 75 In the Matter of Utilities for Concerted Services Project, Inc. , Pittsburg. , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its July 29, 1974 order authorizing the County Auditor-Controller to pay the cost of utilities (gas and electric) in an amount not to exceed $4f500 for fiscal year 1974-1975 for Concerted Services Project, Inc. , Pittsburg, California, is AMENDED so as to increase the maximum _ allowable payments to $5,750. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and eorrsd copy of an ardor entered on the . minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Concerted Services Wt m my hand and the Saul of the Board of Project, Inc. Supsrvims Office of Economic affixed this 13th dale of May , 19 75 Opportunity J. R. OLSSON, Chrk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator By D"ty Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M N. Ir&aham OWN • rzr, In the Board of Supervisors ;h of y Contra Costa County, State of California f May 13 , t9 75- k In the Matter of r Accepting Gifts and Donations 4 . made to the County Library System. r . The Countg Librarian having reported to the Hoard on., r: gifts and donations made to the County Library System during tfie month of April, 1975, and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said gifts and donations are ACCEPTED on behalf of the County. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1475• { l t s-{ I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on,the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• County Librarian Wiitneu my hand and the Seat of the I3ocrd of, County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 13th day of May 1975 J. R. OLSSON ,,Cl", _� By h,.Y.� Q_`,�io.tGP4f ..Deputy: Ctertc: H 24 12/74 - 15-M Lynn XP Beitler 00304 OFFICE OF COUNTY LIBRARIAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 1750 Oak Park Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 DATE: May 1 , 1975 TO: A. G. Will County Administrator Contra Costa County FROM: C. Iters, County Librarian RECEIVED SUBJECT: Gift Acknowledgments MAY -271975 Office of Attached are copies of acknowledgments sent for the following gifts received during the month of April: 782 Books 343 Paperbacks 22 Record Albums 2 Tapes 2 Coat Racks 20 vols. Disney World of Knowledge 2 multi-volumed sets Messages & Papers of the Presidents World Book Encyclopedia 13 year National Geographics Track & Field News Issues from 1954-1969 CRW:mg R E CEI V ED. MAY 131975 J' 2 OMON CLM WAW OF U) CSSOBS A 003w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Amending Agreement with Engineer of Work, Assessment District 1973-3 (Bishop Ranch) San Ramon Area. The Board on September 4, 1973 adopted Resolution No. 73/689 approving an agreement with Coleman, Selmi & Simpkins, raigineer of Work for Assessment District 1973-3, San Ramon area, said agreement providing for various services at specified hourly rates; On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED thats effective March 1 , 1975, the aforesaid agreement is AMENDED to provide the following hourly rates in Section 3: Principal $35.00/hour (no change ) &gineering Manager 30.00/hour (no change) Assistant Engineer 22.00/hour Junior Engineer 20.00/hour Computer Draftsman 18.00/hour (no change) Senior Draftsman 18.00/hour Draftsman 16.00/hour Junior Draftsman 14.00/hour Field Supervisor 30.00/hour Party Chief 28.00/hour Chainman 23.85/hour PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Coleman, Selmi & Simpkins Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 13th day of May 19 75 County Administrator R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H 24 12»4 - 15-M Constance J. Davies Q 03VU i y � f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California may 13 19 31 in the Matter of Acceptance of Documents, Sans Crainte Drainage Area, Walnut Creek .Area, Work Order 8505. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following Grant of Easements and Right of Way Contracts are ACCEPTED and Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the County: Grantor Date Payment Escraw No. Pierre H. Sice at ux May 3, 1975 800 220643 B Harold 0. Stewart at ux May 2, 1975 390 220642 B Robert J. Fromm at ux April 30, 1975 1 ,660 220638. B Lee E. Stanley at ux May 6, 1975 85 22069C, Lee J. Katsikas at ux May 7, 1975 750 2206-44 IT I3 FURTHER ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is- AUTHORIZED to draw warrants in the amounts specified payable to Transamerica Title Insurance Company to be delivered to the Super- vising Real Property Agent of the County. The foregoing order was passed on May 13, 1975• I hereby wtifp that !be foregoing is a trw and corred copy► of an order entered an the minutes of said Soord of Supervisors on the dale oforewkL cc: Public Works Director Witness my bond sed Ow Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 13th day of a , 19 75 .. aoma, ca" 11Y D"X+y r-64 Constance J. Davies H 2412n4-I&M 0030 L, IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA M May 13 197 5 In the Matter of Releasing ) Subdivision Deposit ) } Subdivision: 3888, TasaaJara Area ) Deposit: $500 ) Auditor's Permit No. 96622 ) Dated February 2, 1972 ) Refund to: ) Pounders Title Company ) P. 0. Box 324 } Concord, California 94522 ) ) 1 On May 22, 1973 this Board resolved that the improvements in the above-named Subdivision were completed for, the purpose of establishing a beginning date-for filing liens inl' case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been main-,'' tained (for one year after completion and acceptance) against-._ defective work and/or labor done or defective materials Furnished , in performing the Subdivision Agreement, and that all deficiencies . ` (if any) developing during this period have been corrected; and'. Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 8429(b) and the Sub division Agreement, the Director is authorized to refund the deposit as indicated above. ADOPTED by the Board on May 13, 1975• I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is, a true and . correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. ; Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed = this 13th day of May , 197 S W. T. PAASCH, CLERK cc : Public Works (2) S �bldivider _ -Land Real Bata% Deputy Clerk 2222 Salvio Street Constance J. Davies Concord, CA. 94520 Founders Title Company 00308 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 195 Matter Awarding Contract for Replacement of Concrete Curb on Muth Drive, Orinda Area, Project No. 2745-4200-74. Bidder Total Amount L & F Paving, Inc. $U31990 P. 0. Box 731 Livermore, California 911550 Hess Concrete Construction Company, Ince, 11apa Kike Morgan Paving and Grading, Walnut Creek R. R. Jones Construction, Concord Martin Brothers, Inc., Concord 0. C. Jones & Sons, Berkeley &%xgene G. Alves Construction Company, Inc., Pittsburg The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received by the Public Works Director; and The Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring , and so finding; IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder,- 'a the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract therefor.. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it with any required certificates of insur- ance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to , form, the Public Works Director is authorised to sign the contract for this Board. PASSM? by the Board on May 13, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public Works Director W'h'y my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 13th day of May , 19 75 Contractor R. OLSSON, Clerk By •�� Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Constance J./Davies 003 In the Board of Supervisors r of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 795�: In the Matter of Granting Permission to Close San Miguel Drive, walnut Creek Area, for a Three-Day Period. On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Tom Bristol, sewer contractor, is GRANTED permission to close San Miguel Drive (Road No. 4041) near Rudgear Road, Walnut Creek area, for a three-day period between May 12, 1975 and May 23, 1975 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. , for the purpose of installing a manhole and longitudinal pipe, subfect .to the following conditions: 1. All signing be in accordance with State of California Manuel of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices dated 1971 and the County Manuel of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices; and 2. The contractor shall comply with requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra:'Costa County. The foregoing order was passed on May 13, 1975. ,Y 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order, entered on the: minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of 1 cc: Public Works Director Supe affixed this 13th day of May 19 75 J. R.r OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19-75 In the Matter of Proposed Closure of an "Old Miners ' Cave" in the Orinda Area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to contact the owners of the properties adjacent. to an "old miners' cave," Orinda area, to determine ownership of said cave and arrange for closing of same. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid c c: Mrs. I. B. Dunn Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board',of. Crinda Fire Protection DisUpervisars Public Works Director 13th of may pig 75 Acting County Health Of Pic � M -- County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk. Byf c. �i�� . Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard 003 F 4", +' Y J j �4 In the Board of Supervisors r f o f rs f Contra Costa County, State. of-Califomict- yt May 13 , 19 Z .; f: A In the Matter of d4� Agreement for Soils Investigatio x: In Connection with Slide Repair in Christie Road, Pinole Area, Project No. 2383-5$33-75• N FJ IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the . Public Works.Director. � is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Provenzano.and: L Associates for a soils investigation in connection`with< the, repair of a slide in Christie Road near Franklin-Canyon.Road,; $ }« F 6FF� Pinole area, said agreement providing for a.maximum:,,payment. oP $6,000 not to be exceeded without prior trrritten approval'of the ^ 4 Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975xf ' f p is yamy' % y j r. ji ;r' z r s$ F H.. Fes. 7 I hereby certify that the foregoing 8 a true and correct copy.of an order entered minutes of said Board of Supervisors on thedoteaforesaid. Witness my hand and the-Seal of.,fhe Board oft cc: Provenzano and Associates Supervisors (via P.W.) Public Works Director offbod this 13th day,°f Y 19 75 County Auditor-Controller J. ft.. OLSSON; Clerk. ' County Administrator g 'jJ�,� , H za 12115-Ma - �sy . Deputy Ctertc.' Mildred 0. Ball s; t t i. '.. .ti •. _ , ...• .•r r ,• 1.' :>;_•c:i�i1 U. Conuit•ionsr '!•he:;L Sl�cc:i::: Cond:it.ion< 3l:carssorat�:q :�dlr� by �•:•1 t•1.�:tre:. (at) Public Agertc;;:` COUNTY OF CONTRA- COSTA (b) Cann; t:•~Til:':. I:ir.:c Addre:s: Provenzano S Associates 1303 Stanford Avenue, Emeryville, CA—M0 (c) L•'freective, Date:_ May 13, 1975 ` (d) I'i•oject l:arle� :I�::::�cr, Loc�iL'iatt: Christie Road Sl ide Inv' ti gaEioti`apprc:s: i, mile south highway 4, 12383-5833-75 (e) Not to exceed $6,000.00 2. Sl;-natures. These s1;;I11L Cs attest the parties' ai r'ecricrit here%o: . (Desi tc officiail capejety in business) StaLc of California , JJ Contra Costs; County . ) ACI:H07JLI:DG!.%-;11'i' (CC F11)0.1) The person si;;ning a:?ove for Conau1L•ant, knomm to cm in those inuividual and busine ns capacities, personally appeared. before VII, today and ac;:no:•:lcdl;ed that lie siCncd it and that the cc)rporat o:t: or partnership nand above executed the within -imtrii-ment to its by-lags or a resolution of its Board o Or rtCIAtr. t3.E/l4' Date _'--, YlRGlNtA�1.:C1QY�� _ .i.;r NOTAMY,nJ04C•C�LttONN1A' (Seal s' CONTRA COST^-COUNT ... 1 Ct a2•y Y ul�'I i C /// �r ca,rimoat 4:sus P1ILLIC AG}:;lCi F0101 APPROIrEil Victor/W. Sauer . John B. Clausen, Count x. Counsel"` : P ub l e% Works 6r- B Iiy: e � ! - , Deputy SY= // . 3�f,< , l7eauGy. 3. Parties. Efferive on the above date, the above-nand Public. Agency ,;: and Cousultant mutually agree and pro:lise as follows: 4. L•'tauloymcW-. Public ACericy Hereby employs Consultant., and, Consultant accents such et ployment, to perform the professional services descrilfea: herein, upon the terra: and in consideration of the paytaents stated here :.: ;:• . 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service s:iall be as describes: in. Appendix. A. attac:led hereto. G. Insura:ice. The CotlsultwiL shall, at no -expense to. Public Are:icy, furninsh certificates or oLiwr evidence acceptable to Public Agency of: (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all dar:ta ger arising: of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,009: for or mo:c personG in one acoiclent or occurrence; and (b) property dagat c 'Iiab;.lity insu:auce providing for a Iimlt of not le:;s than $50,000. days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is requiraci. Payment. Public h;,'.'!lC;i Sltaill pay. CO:15u1tatlL for professiollal SairV1;CL'S; , performed at the rates shoran in Appcndix B attached hereto, which include ;n- ail overi:ead and incidental expenses, for which no additional corllsensstiorn shall be allowed. -In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the paynent limit specified in Seca 1(e) without- written ithout itiritten approval of the Contra Costa CowiL•y Public :loris Director. Collsuli:•:nt's statement of cil:iri;e:, shall be submitted at convenient-.intervsls Payt.:wnt will be made wit-hin th r•%.: (30) days after receipt of each; stat"emeriE 8. '.'.'CS:'i'::llclliolL. AL ii.:; OPL'on, Public hf;micy t::iL'•j to rdinate: e`h!G arrt�e ::_!!t LL wny t:i:1•u by written riotic .• to the Consultant, vfnet;her or tilt this. Cora;ult.anls: 13 in del"atulL. G;ioit such tern-trlation, Conn.ulta nt aeras.. ovor to Public A,-�enc.y punetainisis to the uo;•:: nos:essed hy: os• urtc:t:t• tris co:ti.t•ul at. L.t-:t Lir:•,:, and will be paid, without dtihlicltio:t,: . ;. all. :;;,.ou::Ls due or ti;eroalt'Lili• t,um-.0n.; clue on account of 3arv:i.cea I'.andd-red=:'.::; to tiio ti to or terninal.l on. 9. :+.:t1.l :;. it:t: t:t?:t:u1.i.::►7+. :i: an in-le.)entletit conte utor, and. is not, to 'b., COIi:.i.t:e:l•::e:l all e:Ixi of etc UPu..?iC {►;;1?1ir'f. 1+J. !.tt+:t•?tlttt'1C11..i.ctt. 'ii�' t:o:1-,u1L--.nt: ahall deCerid, m. Jct, irm'.mirtit'y,.: ar.d. 1101 }i:l.'..iJ.�.;:+ t�llul 1 C t ; •tl::; am! Z l:; Vi!lt:t'M, and enp1qye•:u from any and all 1'or' ii::•1 111•!Ur-1 Ot- d L:-Kt,-;C:, ilt•l:i'•�n fro;.-1 or cr nliected fit¢t v:i:S . Zero l ce1:i p!•OV.Ld.-:(i t'e+rf:Ltltl,er. ILL :!(:'::'•::::t:, ' t:i,.,w wi l.v. A 00313 . PRC?VENZANO 8e A' MATES SOILS ANO FOUNDATION ENGINEERS 1303 STANFORD AVf-- UE CM[RYVILLC"LIFORNIA.,pieOR, • to/31 834•3709 P&A-8769-1 April. 17, 1975 Victor 11. Sauer, Public Iforks Director Contra Costa County Public Works Department Sixth Floor, Administration Building s( ' Martinez, Ca. 94553 Attn: Mr. Maurice Chew Subject: Existing Slide along Christie Rd. approx. 1 Mile So. Highway 4 Contra Costa County, California k; PROPOSAL FOR SLIDE INVESTIGATION Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we are submitting our proposal for-conduct— ing orconducting a slide investigation at the above site. The proposal is based on our ' site inspection and field discussion with you on 4/16/7S. Christie Road in the vicinity of the slide consists of a one laved paved roadway running along the top of a 40 foot high embankment slope on the west. Rodeo Creek runs along the toe of this embankment. There is an ac- tive railroad line located parallel to and approximately 25 -feet east of the roadway. 'Fite slide is situated on the west side of the roadway in the, embankment . slope. The slide scarp is approximately 400 to 500 feet long and is. S to i8 feet high. A portion of the scarp has presently undermined 2 to 3 feet of the roadway pavement. the toe of the slide consists of two '(2) compound hulges. One (1) broad bulge, approximately 300 feet long, is located 35. to, 30 feet below the roadway. A secondary bulge approximately -100 feet long toes out at the base of the creek approximately 40 feet below the roadway. The embankment slide is situated opposite the toe of a natural Swale locat- ed on the cast and uphi11 side of the railroad tracks. '17he;re• is evidence of ponded water alum., they toe of this natural Swale. It anticars that the -z1 idt. e.ati te•igge;red by a buildup of sett.::urCurc seopage 11:'essures :elolig the tee: of the scale. It is our opinion that if not corrected this slide can completely undermines roadway and portions of the: railroad tracks during the coming 197S-1976 rainy season. ' -1- 0031.4: Page 2 of Append:cx A One obvious recommendation is to install a deep intercept subdrain parallel to and uphill of the roadway. Horizontal drains will be required to tap. the subdrain. A number of possible repair solutions for the slide are. (a) a caission supported retaining wall along the top of embankment slope; (b) a conven- tional earthwork solution starting with a buttress key below, the creek .bed . or a box culvert buttress fill across the creek or (c) •a midslope repair utilizing steepened slopes with chemically stabilized soils or a bin wall and fill section. It is our preliminary opinion that approach (c) will prove to be the most suitable. The following are two (2) work-cost breakdowns indicating minimum and maxi- mum estimated costs for our investigation. Field Work Minimum Maximum Preliminary site reconaissanc:e 2 firs @$30.00/hr. • 60.00 60.00 Approximately 8 Borings 6 8 Probes Portable Drill Rig f Crew 16 hrs @$40.00/hr. 640.nO, Engineering Supervision 16 hrs 0$25.00/hr. 400.00 Portable Drill Rig 6 Crew 24 hrs 0$40.00/hr. 960.00 Engineering Supervision 24 hrs @$25.00/hr. 600.00 Field Mapping 2 Tech 6 hrs ea QS1S.On/fir. 12 hrs @$18.00/hr. 216.00 216.00 Ground water Readings Senior Engr 8 hrs @S25.00/hr. 200.00 Senior Engr 10 hrs @$2S.00/hr. 250`.00 Laboratory Investigation Moisture Contents 40 @$4.00/ea. 160.00 4' 60 @$4.00/ea. 240.00 Densities 10 0$2.50/ea. 25.00 la 0$2.50/ea. 37.50 Triaxial Compression Tests 2 tests Undisturbed 6 pts @$35.00 210-00 210.011 I Test Remolded 3 pts 0$45.00 135.00 2 Tests Remolded 6 pts OS4S.00 270.00 Lime-Cement Stabilization Study 60 Tech hrs A$I8.00/1ir. 1030.00 Engineering Analysis and Report Drafting 24 hrs 0518.00/hr. 432.00 432.00 Senior Engineer 16 hrs @525.00/hr. 401!.00 400.00 Principal Engineer 30 firs @$30.00/hr. 900.00 40 hrs. 0$30.00/hr. 1200.013 Total Estimated Cost- Min$3778.00 Max$5955.50 A:tual costs, c:i i l Ly bayed on our 1,975 lee Schedule, a copy of which is en- closed. Investigations extending for periods in excess of one: month will. he progress billed at 30 day intervals for work completed at that time. , t fe3F. 1 We will require your support in providing approximate survey data consist- " r ing of a plan and profile of the slide and uphill scale area. Results of our analysis and recommendations will be prepared in a. short design data report form. lfowever, we plan on consulting with your design staff on our preliminary findings� as soon as they are available and, prior to issuance of the report. The above cost estimate includes required consultation with you and -your- . Engineers during design but does .nor include field inspections and consul tation during actual construction. The costs of engineering field control are directly dependent on construction conditions, and are therefore diffz cult to estimate accurately. Actual construction inspection costs, if're- r quired, will as above be based on,.our standard fee schedule_ Very truly yours, PROVENZANO & ASSOCI ES /201 ep) 1. Provenzano, P r C.E. 3562 JMP/sas Enc: 1975 Fee Schedule L= lµ_ y±: 'G t i c� ,� 1'►t1►11�. u PROVENZANO & AziJOCIATES 8011.8 AND F•OUNOATION ENOIN£ERS - 1303 STANFORD AVEttUE LNLRYVILLE.CALIFORHtA 94609 - (Af31 66t-3700 FEE SCHEDULE 1975 Technical Personnel Principal Engincer ---------------------------------------------- $30_00/hr_ Principal Geologist ------------------------------------------- 30.00/hr. Senior Engineer ----------------------------------------------- 25.00jhr. Design Draftsman ------------------------------------------- -- 18.00/hr_ Field/Laboratory Technician ------------------ ----------------- 18.00/hr_ Court Appearance Minimum Charge ----------------------- $200.00/half day; $400.00/full day Consultation and preparation for court-Principal Engineer ----- $40.00/hr. Subsurface Exploration Equipment (Incl. Sampling Equipment) Truck Mounted: 6" Auger Drill w/Crew Portal to Portal (8 hrs. minimum and/or 4 hrs. minimum) ---- $52.00/hr. Overtime Rate ---------------------------------------------- 70.00/hr. One (1) Inch Plug Sanpler w/Crew ------------------------------ •10.00/hr. Bucket Rig w/Crew ----------------------------- Rental: Cost times (x) 1.I5 Grading Equipment for Site Access ------------- Mental Cost tines-s (x) I-IS Laboratory Tests Moisture Content Determination -------------------------------- S 4.00/.test Density Determination ----------------------------------------- 2.50/test Atterberg Limits ---------------------------------------------- 35.00/test Shrinkage Limit ----=------------------------------------------ 30.00/te5t Sieve Analysis w/200 gash '5.00/test Sieve Analysis (Dry) ------------------------------------------ 20-00/test Wash on 200 Sieve --------------------------------------------- 10.00/test Hydrometer Analysis ------------------------------------------- •10_00/test Specific Gravity ---------------------------------------------- 2S.00/test Unconfined Compression on Undisturbed Sample ------------------ 25.00/test" Unconfined Compression on Remolded Sample -------------------- 30_00/test Triaxial Compression (Quick) on Undisturbed Sample ------------ - 35.00/point Triaxial Compression (Quick) on Remolded Sample --------------- 45-00/paint Consolidation per Load Increment ------------------------------ 2S.00/point Permeability -------------------------------------------------- 20:0(1/hr. E xp ausion (Shell vs. Pressure) -------------------------------- 51.00/ttsr Mols:ure Den<it�,• 3:clarionship (Compaction- 'rest) --------------- 1, --------------1 Oil ---- -------------------------- ----- .'.t•ti! "R" Value Uetrtiainatiou u/Lime-Cement Additives -------------- - lUE)_Utl/[L•`=r Special or standard tests not listed -------------------------- on request Field Dtnisi tv Te,ts (4 hrs. minimum) - Sand Cotic "erho,I ----- - -- -------------------------------------- a_'N_rIt)'br. ;duclear f=ield bcnsity Test Metilnd --------------------------- -- 25.Mi/h r. • IM31'7 In the Board of Supervisors of 4 Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 1975 In the Matter of Refunding Deposit for Subdivision 4218 , Danville Area. The Board of Supervisors on August 28, 1972, adopted Resolution No. 72/554 accepting a $2,000.00 cash bond guaran- teeing the completion of a 72-inch storm drain in Subdivision 11218, which Work has now been satisfactorily completed; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to refund to Duffel- Financial and Construction Company, 1882 Diamond Boulevard, Concord, California 94520 said $2,000.00 cash deposit, as evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail Number 101703, dated August 25, 1972. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of. County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 13thday of May , 19 75, Duffel Financial do Const. Co J. R. OLSSON; Clerk B GL Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 - 15-M Constance J.Pbavies V V t�.1V" In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California may 13 19 7. In the Moner of Extension of Agreement, Subdivision 4410, Danville Area. IT IS BY THS BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AIITHORIZED to execute an agreement with Say Building Company,; 880 Hinckley Road, Burlingame, California 94010, extending its agreement with the County for construction of certain, improve- ments in Subdivision 4410, Danville area, through November 7, 1975.' The foregoing order was PASSED on May 13, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enWed on the minutes of said bard of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: Subdivider Witness my had and the Sed of the,Board'of Public Works Director Supervisors Planning Director affixed this 13th dap of May . 19 75 Y n R. OLS90N, Uerk Deputy CIS& . Contance J. D vies H 2412/74-15-M SUBDI IISIO'r AGR=--STT EXTE MSY9r Contra Costa 4ibc�? on Number 4410 Subdivider Kay Building Company (o=i,ginnal) Agreement Date November 7, - X19 73 Slwetv N: e Argonaut Insurance Company Bond Ito. 083M Amount :$ 88,224.13 Date June 14., s, 73 �aenszea New TerriLnatien Date November 7, sy9 75 This Subd;vider and his Surety desire that this z bdiFisicn a-eement be c uerded thxcugh the above date; and Contra Co;;ta Coi--+,7 sr-,? the S-a ety hereby agree thereto and acknowledge swie. - i , Dated: February 10, 1975 • ;•} CO'URA .COSTA CC►rJ�I:•�' V f,�ar ••r By ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY Ch�irr:�_n, Boardl of S risors Si^aL?r BY: Fp?:? APP.VFD: JO M P. WOOTERS, ATTO -IN-FACT County Cn=sel - - MITES?-' J.R. OLSMI, Court; & ex of:icie C?eek the Board Jenutt - (rrcTL: SUT3DIz7_TD t'S tii,D SUUTt'S SIG'..'iIiU TO ET :iti^L7_L7_ ) LD--10 (!,..tr- 11/73) OQM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: ) Pursuant to Section 21101(b) of the} TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO 2099-STP CO., declaring a stop intersection) on HIDDMI VALLEY RD. (Rd. #2845 ) Date: MAY 13 1975 and State Highway 24, Danville - area (Supv. Dist. III Orinda }: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors .RESOLVES THAT.- On HAT.On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommenda- tions thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken as indicated) : Pursuant to Section 21101(b) of the California Vehicle Code, the intersection of HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD (Rd. #28450) and the State Highway 24 on-rasp, Orinda, is hereby declared to be _ a stop intersection and all vehicles traveling north on Hidden Valley Road, shall stop before entering said intersection. Aa`opted:Dy the Boarc! ♦ 4 cc County Administrator Sheriff California Highway Patrol T-14 3¢: D03Z -y'- l BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: ) Pursuant to Section 22358 of the ) TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. ?_098-SPD CYC, declaring a speeding zone on ) EL MM BODDEYMD (Rd. #4621) 1 Date: MAY 131975 Danville area (Supv. Dist. V - Danville ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: f On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommends- tions thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46_2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken as indicated) : Pursuant to Section 22356 of the California Vehicle Code, no vehicle shall travel in excess of 30 Hailes per hour on that portion of EL CERRO BOULEVARD (Rd. 94621), Danvi.Ue, . beginning at the intersection of La Gonda ,fay and extending easterly to the intersection of Dialalo'Road. (Resolution #1596 pertaining to the existing 35 mph speed limit on E1 Cerro' Boulevard is hereby rescinded) `... .! %� Adopted by the Board cc County Administrator Sheriff California Highway Patrol T-14 . /M� W3Fr,�G may- , , 1 In the Board of SupAfvtion Of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 ' 1975 in the#A~ of Authorizing Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Energize Street Lights. On the recommendation of the Public Works Director IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDEFM that Pacific Gas and Electric Company is AUMORIZED to energize two 7,500 lumen, mercury vapor street lights in Subdivision No. 3977, as follows: 1 . On the west side of Coachman Place, three poles north of Diablo Downs Drive; and 2. At the north and of Coachman Place four poles north of Diablo Dome Drive; and IT IS FUR3'HKR ORDMM that charges for the aforesaid street lighting be billed to County Service Area L-45• The forepping order was passed on May 13, 1975- T hweby cwtfy that *a foregoing is a true and corred copy of an ardw MM.rtd on*w minutes of said bard of Supwv6acs on the dole aforesaid. c c: P.t3.do B., Concord Witney mfr mond and the Sea!of the ioord of Public Works Director Supervisors County Auditor-Controller , } this 13th , Hay , 19 75 County Administrator'. J. R. OLUM, Clwk BY( _ ,C� D.pwY ^ctwfg Constance J.fDavies H 24 12/74-I" 00323 'I .._. .... .. .._ .. ..: �: .. of^ •'� -. • ..., .:y _'SfrrY iy qw! W lip AR • _.... s�c +��":ss�r •, - rw�rmrj�rwli!�!!?!*!. . �.`�uF��k ���.�ilr�. fix?' �G�•��.5 ' J!�3��� ���•••� _ �: • .a.:�....:�:�..A 't -� +• ; w+' •.•.. „► ...:�•�T�e• •�• •wrr•r:.•�r,•:.."!ar�..+...�ni r..+����•`f,';,_:'r a,-.'.. • s !.. f _• • ••„�i 'tib• � ;};.:.�.;.''..>. 16 41 ' .• �R'7^ •I'll •'x ti'�►• f'^ * � �� _,�•• i• •K iii' 'i'•s,:L�. 1� •�•:Y l:;•,i,•'r!tYz lit'3 •' �f i"• �.ti�+Kb if.lydl�,.Raf i�•�. ~ � ,v r :' .�.Yk',•A.'a`• 1&•,�y .w�# : ��.'� +s;'1• •'•r J. . .,i, .x i ti:.••' '?�",`-ji1a's,.,i• a- s ~.tom 16 � sem' t• •�•7•t',A. 2.y.��-�4�i� � .�� ` � i.�+~ 4����!'�"����':!\//R•"dill�'G��M,�f'Fi,''r:r '-/ �$ ' .. , '•fI.•/ 5.: 417`" ' ... . • ' •• .' .. _ � ... .� .'i'�h'.�..•.M�':'�%S•;i.:.i';r�.a;u:.;fi��s',S'.""=f`I:`:.':'i:}i»i"�ati.:l.�:`'f;'T:a In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California may 13 1975 In the Matter of Authorising Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Energize Street Lights. On the recommendation of the Public Works Director IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Pacific Gas and Electric Company is authorized to: Energize eleven 7,500 lumen, mercury vapor street li§hts in conformance with the drawing entitled County Service Area L-45, Sub- division No. 4127," dated May 5, 1975, which is on file in the Traffic Engineering Divi- sion of the Public Works Department; Energize sixteen 11 ,000 lumen, mercury vapor street lights and nine 7,500 lumen mercury vapor street lights in conformance with the drawing entitled "County Service Area L-45, Subdivision No. 4121 ," dated May 5, 1975, which is on file in the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department; and IT IS FQRTHSR ORDERED that charges for the aforesaid street lighting be billed to County Service Area L-45. The foregoing order was passed on May 13, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing a a true and correct copy of on order entered an the minutes of said bard of Supervisors on the dolt oforesold. c c: P.G.do E., Concord Wt ess my hand and the Std of the bard of Public Works Director S"per'"sors County Auditor-Controller affixedthis 13 doy ofy , 19 75 County Administrator ."R. OLSSON, Clerk By�e-><. .� � Deputy Ctrl Constance J. Divies H 24 12171-154A MM5 INN `• K•i ! f '• ' •� MY '� •rte• ••f ~ ¢r•`. OL 4'w fir,• : CIS .. � r� �rtti, �.- :"''-'t'= "'- lir + ' :r.=�. t'�e;. •'� • •/y ,:X .' y� ik It ,, =t •Y'a. .w /Y.L'�+•y :. ' !+ '•'may' ��.:- '•'+.;u •• � Asp lowr Y *fir ♦.' _ I! •, ... r•• w vim,, `r. ti * • 4�•: • i : is•. .a^'r-• r o 17o ly t .: •7 .�' j, '•rte•(, .w R:• lf .� w _ ♦4:. •y, sa5Ct�Y/ •.,+; may.,�;!p��., «� aw OL fit;: • w•.' - ••_•�.!•rw.: r� j. 1 .. - itis' '•',.�^ri'•-w3: is V j Ali- 40 .A'•'.�'r.• �"+ A• 1 /!�. "` � .•�••" s,`•'.'Fo.XI r•'Yom••s!N. . ,•.'oma. 'e, tx Yom,•-'' .,r' tr• at US ,,r.Y• 4 ... '^�i � � �•. •�(• > .:'t fit. �isf' Y.•yy,,��J'�• _ •i itr ` r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 Z5- In the Matter of Request of Mr. W. E. Buchanan et al for Cancellation of Land Conservation Agreement 1305—RZ, Pittsburg Area. The Board on March 18, 1975 having referred to the Planning Commission for recommendation the request of Mr. W. E. Buchanan et al for cancellation of Land Conservation Agreement 1305-RZ, Pittsburg area; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having reported in behalf of said Commission that it unanimously recom- mends that the aforesaid contract be cancelled as requested; and The Board having received a communication from Mr. A. L. Seeley, Chairman, Contra Costa County Land Conservation Committee, advising that at a special meeting it was unanimously recommended by the members of said Committee that if the Board of Supervisors consents to the establishment of the proposed Pittsburg Southeast Assessment District 1974-1 and if the subject Buchanan propertyis, included within such an assessment district the preserve eontraat covering such propzrty be cancelled; and The Board having this day heard testimony related to the aforesaid assessment district, closed the hearing and fixed May 20, 1975 at 2:00 p.m. as the time for decision on same; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the reports of the Planning Commission and the Contra Costa County Land Conservation Committee is ACKNOWLEDGED and consideration of the recommendations is also DEFERRED to Nay 20, 1975 at 2:00 p.m. IT IS F[JRTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Government Code Section 51284 June 10, 1975 at 10:115 a.m. is FIXED as the date for hearing on the request of Mr. W. E. Buchanan et al for cancellation of Land Conservation Agreement 1305-RZ. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director of Planning Supervisors County Assessor affixed this 13th day of NU 197 County Counsel Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 • 154A Na Penningt W 41 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 • 19 Zr�L In the Matter of Procedure for Filling Vacancy on the Board of Trustees of the Contra Costa Mosquito Abatement District No. 1. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having noted that the term' of Mr. William V. Cardinale, the Board appointee as Trustee-. of Contra Costa Mosquito Abatement District No. 1 (from the District at large) had expired on January 2, 1975 and that Mr. Cardinale did not wish to be reappointed; and Y Supervisor Linscheid having called to the attention of the Board a letter he had received from Mrs. Freda Ericksen, 791 Cumberland Drive, Pleasant hill, California 94565 requesting that she be considered for said appointment; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter of replacement action is REFERRED to County Counsel and the County Administrator for advice as to the appropriate procedure. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. r: r 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy.of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. Witness my hand and"Seal of the Board:,of cc: Mrs. Freda Ericksen Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 1 th day of May ,1975-. County Administrator J. R. OLSSON I Clerk 'A, . Deputy Clerk. H se 12/73 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard fir`, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Superior Court Personnel Requirements. On the recommendation of the County Administrator, the Board on April 28, 1975, having referred to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Kenny) certain personnel requests submitted by the Superior Court, including establishment of the position of Family Law Commissioner; and Supervisor Linscheid having this day reported that said . committee has determined that an adjustment in. court staffing is. warranted , based on weighted caseload filings, and that the alter- native of designation of a Family Law Commissioner as contrasted` to an additional Judge has advantages in terms of specialization and in circumventing the need for a standard courtroom; and Supervisor Linscheid having noted that implementation of the aforesaid position requires legislative action, and having recommended that the Board approve said position and refer the matter to County Counsel to prepare the appropriate legislation; and Supervisor Linscheid having further recommended that the request of the Superior Court for the positions of Juvenile Court Referee and Probate File Examiner be considered in the 1975-1976 budget review process. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Me aforesaid recom- mendations of the Administration and Finance Committee are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enured on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: Board Committee Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Presiding Judge Supervisors Jackson Davis affixed this 13th day of May , 19 75 County Counsel 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting Director of g Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 personnel y R bbie , tierr 0033 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES I KENNY.RICNNOND WARREN N.BOGGESS IST DISTRICTWARREN ALFRED M.DIAS.SAN PAMW CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAMES P:XMMY 2ND DISTRICT 11C[CiL1leRJtA7t ... JAMES E. MORIDISTRICT 7Y,LwiwriTT DI ]RD DISTRICT [ ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. ROOM 103 JAMES R:OLSSON,coumy cLxxx. AND CX OFFICIO CLERx or TN[tDASOL WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONCOIID P.O. BOX 91! MRS.GERALD{NE'RUSSEt,L 4TH DISTRICT CNIEI CLERK. EDMUND A. LINSCHEID, ►lrMsURa MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 E sra aISTRICT May 13, 1975i�J" MAY X31975 REPORT soil mow OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMM ON SUPERIOR COURT PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS •-r On April 28, 1975 the Board referred to the Administration and Finance Committee the recommendations of the County Adminis- trator on establishment of the position of Family Law Commissioner and certain other Superior Court personnel requirements. The Committee has reviewed these requests and determined that an adjustment in staffing is warranted, taking into account weighted caseload filings, and the alternative of designation of a Family -Law Commissioner as contrasted to an additional Judge has advantages in terms of specialization and in circumventing the need for a standard courtroom. Implementation of this position . will require a legislative change and, accordingly, the. Committee recommends that Board sanction be granted for inclusion of the position in the County's legislative program, and the matter referred to County Counsel for development of appropriate enabling legislation. Budgetary provision for the position and its supporting staff will be required effective January 1, 1976. The Committee recommends that other Superior Court personnel requests be reviewed in the 1975-1976 budget in the regular fashion. The Presiding Judge has advised that if approval of this proposal is granted no judgeship requests' will be made at this- point in time. /44 E. A. LINSCHEID J. P. BENNY� Supervisor, District V Supervisor District II 00030 C In the Board of Supervisory Of Contra Costa County, State of California a May 13 , 19., In the Matter of Letters regarding the County,s Housing Assistance Plan. Y The Board having received an April 28, 1975 letterr from Mr. James H. Price, Area Director, U.S. Department of Housing and . Urban Development, San Francisco Area Office, Yorwardingletters from Mr. Arthur Schroeder and Mrs. Hazel Shirley of the El Cerrito Committee on Aging regarding the County's Housing Assistance Plan which includes the City of rte. Cerrito, andrequest= ing that the County respond to said letters; IT IS BY THE BOABD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is , REFERRED to the Director of Planning and the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid ce: ?fir. A. B. Schroeder Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Me. Hazel Shirley Supwvbors Director of Planning offi,ed this 13th dor of May . 19`75 CCC Community Development J. R. OL$$ON, Clerk Advisory Council, Mr. Nick Rodriquez, Chairman tgy, ��L. dlc-�� � . Oeputy Clerk Director, Hunan Resources Helen C. Marshall Agency Economic Opportunity Programs Director County Administrator 00 � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 In the Matter of Draft Environmental Statement on West Contra Costa County Sanitary Landfill Project. The Board having received a communication from Colonel H. A. Flertzheim, Jr. , District Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District, advising that the District is reviewing a permit application submitted by the Richmond Sanitary Service with respect to the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill Project, enclosing a Draft Environmental Statement in connection therewith, and soliciting comments and views on the draft statement; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Acting County Health Officer, Director of Planning, and Public Works Director (Environmental Control) for report. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of said report are to be submitted to the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Policy Committee for its information prior to action by the Board. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Acting County Health witness my bond and the SeW of the Board of Officer Supervisors Director of Plante affixed this 13th day of May 19 Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Environmental Control ' CCC Solid Waste ManagementBy �- ���� Deputy Clerk H 24 'z'°PdJJCy Cte. Helen C. Marshall County Administrator In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Bay Area Sewage services - Agency Proposed 1975-1976 Fiscal Year Budget. Supervisor E. A. T-Inacbeld having called attention to a letter received from Mr. Paul C. Soltow, Jr. , Cenesal. Manager, - Bay Area Sewage Services Agency, advising that the Contra Costa County share of the Agency's $580,000 total 1975-1976 fiscal year preliminary budget is $70,244 and that there will be a public hearing on the proposed budget on June 4, 1975 at 7t30 p.m. at. the Hotel Claremont, Berkeley; and Mr. SoltoK having enclosed a copy of the proposed budget and copies of the Agency's Regional Services program which discusses in greater detail the regional services spending mentioned in the budget= IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the proposed budget is referred to the Public hocks Director, Planning Director, County Auditor-Controller and County ]fainistrator for repor with the request that it be compared with the 1974-1975 budget. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public hocks Director Wtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of isors Planning Director supwV County Auditor-Controlleraffixed this 13th day of LM . t975 County Administrator J. R. OLSSONI, Clerk ByDeputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M D. Harkness UU603. � 1 BAY AREA SEWAGE SERVICES AGENCY HOTEL CLAREMONT BERKELEY.CALIFORNIA 94705 44151 545.7600 - - RECEIVED e: 1123.02:`:- May 8, 1975 MAY 9 1975 I. OLS50ri «ERK 60AW OF S, Honorable Board of Supervisors cc. County of Contra Costa - Post Office Box 911 Martinez California 94553 Subject: Apportionment of Costs and Expense.3 (Section 16804 et seq., Water Code) Gentlemen: This is to advise that the Bay Area Sewage Services Agency has prepared a preliminary budget and county apportionments pursuant to Section 16804, et seq., California Water Code. The Code provides. for BASSA to divide the amount of the Agency budget among the nine Bay Area counties in the proportion that the population of each county bears to the total population within the Agency. The preliminary apportionment of your county's share of BASSA's total $580,000 preliminary budget is $70,244. This information is provided for the convenience of your county staff in. budget preparation. The Agency Board has called for a public hearing on the proposed budget for fiscal year 1975-76 for June 4, 1975, pursuant to Section 16802 of the Water Code. Upon conclusion of the budget hearing and no later than June 10, the Agency Board will approve the budget and- county apportionments. I am enclosing a copy of the proposed Bay Area Sewage Services Agency.budget for fiscal year 1975-76 for your review. Also enclosed are copies of the Agency's Regional Services Program, which discusses in greater detail the regional services spending mentioned in the budget, and a notice of. the . Agency Board public hearing on the proposed budget to be held June 4, 1975, ' . 7:30 PM at the Hotel Claremont, Berkeley, California. Please feel free to. contact me if there are any questions regarding the proposed budget or the programs of the Agency. Sincerely yours, j PAUL C. SOLTOW, Jr. General Manager Enclosures cc: J. P. McBriea, County Administrator Arthur Harris, Agency Attorney Mark DiDuca, Chairman, Finance Committee �.:. ichibit A to Ramolntioa No. 75-16 RMCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held in the Alameda Room, Hotel Claremont, Ashby and Domingo Avenue, Berkeley, California, at 7:30 PH on Wednesday, June.4, 1975 by the Agency Board of the Bay Area Sewage Services Agency to consider the budget estimate of the Agency for fiscal year 1975-76 in accordance with the provisions of Section 16800 et seq. of the California Water Code. Agencies, organizations or individuals having an interest or concern in the Agency's budget for fiscal year 1975-76 are invited to attend and present testimony. All persons are advised that, under the lav, upon- conclusion of the hearing and not later than June 10, 1975, the Agency Board must approve the budget estimate as subadtted or as revised by the Board and thereupon the same shall constitute the final budget for the eIIsuing fiscal. year_ Information copies of the proposed Agency budget are on file in the Agency Office at Hotel Claremont, Ashby Avenue and Domingo Avenue, Berkaley, California and in the Office of the County Cleric of each County within the Agency. y. KA lC. Clerh of the Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Sewage Services Agency Berkeley, California Oi35 ..r In the Board of Supervises of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 19-7 5 In 9 75In the Matter of Funding for Project MER. The Board having received an April 21, 1975 Letter from Ms. Kammy L. Buss, a student in a Richmond Union High School Biology class participating in the Marine Ecology Research project at the Point Molate Marine Laboratory in Richmond, urging con- tinued financial support for said project; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having commented that he was : of the opinion that such a request for funding an educational program should have been directed to the County Superintendent of Schools; and On the recommendation of Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY-, THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communication is REFERRED to the County Administrator for reply to Ns.:.BussI,with a� c.op to. be, - 11 transmitted to the County Superintendent of Schools and those divi= sions of the Department of Education associated with said project: Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing B a trw and correct copy of on order snowed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dam aforMoid. `v, rely hand and the Sea of tilt soord 4, cc: Ms. Kammy L. Buss Witness County Administrator superwhols aRixed this 13th day of May . 197 J. R. OLUM,, C"` Sy G.pwy clerk H za 12/74 - 15-M N. Irk7graham In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Cable Vision Service CnarFes. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having advised the Board that he had received a letter from Mrs. Orville Jennings, Orinda, inquiring as to whether the new owners of Cable Vision in Moraga can legally charge for an FM service which she states was provided free-of-charge by the original owners; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator- is REQUESTED to respond to Mfrs. Jennings. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mrs. Orville Jennings Supervisors 21 Los Arros Orinda, California 94563affixed this -13th—day of Nam_, 19 M County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 15-M 41ry Penning4on 003 .i In the Board of Supervisors of {. Contra Costa County, State of California Ma.Wr 13 19 a5 In the Manor of Complaint with Respect to Flood Damage, Walnut Creek } Area. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having brought to the attention: '. # r}i of the Board a letter he had received from Mrs. William E. Bingman,, r Walnut Creek, advising of a flood proplem on her property; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator. is REQUESTED to review the matter and respond to Mrs. Hingman with. respect to same. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1475• f., ti is w° dr. s f-i yam. ++kw S } it f^i hereby certify than the foregoing b a true and correct copy of an order,entered on he minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dads aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mrs. William E. Bingman Supervisors " 1283 Rudgear Road Walnut Creek, California a this lith day of Mss Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Cl" y _ Flood Control By ePuty Clerk. H 2e ivfouay Administrator Mary enningto t 's. 00=1'11 .wr 4f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California :r .Maw -, 19 r: —d In the Matter of Acceptance of Resignation from Contra Costa County Community Development .Advisory Council. Supervisor E. A. I,inscheid having brought, to the 7 attention of the Board a March 24, 1975 letter from Mr. Manfred Lindner, 32 Corte Nogal, Danville, California. 94526 resigning from the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council as a representative of Supervisorial Diatr ct It IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said resignation. is hereby ACC.. MD. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter of the vacancy is REFERRED to the Director of Planning F Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. F f :f. n i W f; I herebycert] that the ,. certify forepoine k a true and corrsct copy of an order entered onahe minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. M. Lindner Witness my hand and tine Seal of the Board,of CCC Community Develop. Supervisors Advisory Council . Director of Planning aAixad tha-1- .--day of B[a�_ 19; Director, Human �''1�1 J. R OtSSON; Clerk Resources AgencyBy f -e 1 G �%A,44� . Deputy, Clerk. " 24 1W74 - 15-M Helen C. Marshall Economic Opportunity Program Director County Administrator F r V Jr M{�■ 1 R 3 ..,. 339` ,Jf 3V4 I t[l a In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 197 1n the Matter of Proposed Extension of Round Hill Road, Alamo area, and Proposed Abandonment of Roads in the Round Hill Estates Development. The Board having received a memorandum from the Director of Planning (in response to Board referral) advising that the Planning Commission reaffirms its previous recommendation for "extension of Round Hill Road, Alamo area, and recommends denial of abandonment of roads in the Round Hill Estates development; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid memorandum is hereby ACKNOWLEDGED. The foregoing order was passed on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the: minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the.Board of c c: Director of Planning Supervisors Public Works Director this d of May 19 75 County Administrator _13th °�' — J. R. OLSSON Clerk By � �� . Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard i. 00144 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Proposed Amendment of the ) Circulation Element of the ) RESOLUTION NO_ 75/373 General Plan and Abandonment ) of County Roads, Round Hill ) Resolution & Notice of Intention Estates, Alamo area ) to Consider the Amendment of the General Plan and the Abandonment of County Roads (Gov. C. 565355 and S.&H. C. 5595682 958) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the Government and the Streets and Highways Codes, it declares its intention to consider the amendment of the. Maior Roads Plan (a part of the Circulation Element of the County General Plan) and to abandon the County roads described in Exhibit "A"- a-tached hereto. The proposed General Plan amendment provides for the designation of Roundhill Road for its full extent between Miranda Avenue and Stone Valley Road as an arterial road. The Planning Commission by its Resolution No. 47-1975 has reported to this Board on the proposed General Plan amendment and road abandonment. It fixes Tuesday, June 17, 1975, at 2 p.m. (or as continued) in its Chambers, Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez-, California, as the time and place for hearing evidence offered bkl . any interested party as to whether these roads are unnecessary, for present or prospective public use and to hold a public hearing on . the proposed General Plan amendment. The County Clerk shall have notice of this natter (1) published in "The valley Pioneer", a newspaper of general circulation published:• in this County which is designated as the newspaper. most likely to give notice to persons interested in the proposed General Plan amendment and abandonment, for at least two successive ,weeks before the hearing, and (2) pdsted conspicuously along the line of these` roads at least two weeks before the hearing. PASSED on May 13, 1975 unanimously by Supervisors present. cc: Round Hill Property O-omers Association, Inc Public Works Director Planning .Commission Draftsman County Administrator Newspaper Purchasing C.C.C. Water District Stege Sanitary District of C.C.C. E.B.M.U.D. Oakley County Water RESOLUTION NO. 75/373 District - 5rr EXHIBIT A Roundhill Road Road No. 4437 ROAD ABANDONMENT - Portion of Roundhill Road and all other roads dedicated for public'use-as shown on the maps filed with the County of Contra Costa, California, lying; in=the' +` Rancho San Ramon, described as follows: Subdivision Date Filed Book-of Maps- and-"Page 2630 12-29-59 76 2794 5-23-62 97 - 3551 73551 3-29-67 11430 4030 9-30-70 133 - S 4041 .11-25-70 134 1 4092 4-13-72 145_ 2S s 4142 9-29-72 151` ttr +r is r-- J _ W.� r f In the Board of Supervisors s. of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 . 19 75 In the Matter of City of Pittsburg Proposed Southeast Assessment District No, 1974-1 . The Board on March 18, 1975 having continued to this date the hearing on the request of the City of Pittsburg for consent to include certain unincorporated lands in the proposed Pittsburg Southeast Assessment District No. 1974-1 and for jurisdiction to form said District; and Mr. Robert Brunsell , Bond Counsel for the City of Pittsburg, having called attention to a May 8, 1975 letter from Attorney Gordon Turner advising that Mr. William E. Buchanan et al , owners of lands proposed to be included in said Assessment District had withdrawn their protest to such inclusion; and Mr. Brunsell having further advised that Mr. Buchanan had requested inclusion of a small parcel adjacent to that described in the original request; and Mr. Gerald Sperry, Antioch City Attorney, having advised that the City was protesting the inclusion of unincorporated terri- tory which is currently within the City of Antioch `s Local Agency. " Formation Commission-adopted sphere of influence (easterly portion ,of' Standard Oil Company property) , and property (the-Baker 5 Property) currently under litigation and awaiting an Appellate Court decision as to its incorporated status; and Mr. Brunsell having recommended that the boundaries of the proposed district be changed and drawn back to reflect the line" approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO); and The Board having discussed the matter and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having recommended that the hearing on the aforesaid pro- posal be closed and decision to be made May 20, 1975 at 2:00, p.m. ­ IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommenda- tion is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Mr. Gordon Turner Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. Robert Brunsell , Supervisors Bond Counsel affixed this 13thday of May . T9 75 City of Pittsburg City of Antioch J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director By I #IA Deputy Clerk H2 'tirMor of Planning Robbie Gut rrez Q County Administrator 0U343 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 . 19 In the Matter of Disposition of Fire Suppression and Prevention Unit II Representation Petition Filed on September 30, 1971. The Board on May- 6, 1975 having referred to its Inter- governmental ntergovernmental Relations Committee (Supervisors J.-P. Kenny and ` E. A. Linscheid) for report this day the matter of the disposi- tion of the Fire Suppression and Prevention.Unit II representa- tion petition filed on September 30, 1971 by United Professional Fire Fighters, Local .1230; and Supervisor Linscheid having submitted as the report of the Committee a memorandum from Mr. C. J. Leonard, Acting Director of Personnel, dated Clay 12, 1975, recommending that aforesaid petition be terminated as proposed by the County Administrator in. his memorandum to the Board dated April 29, 1975, thereby removing the 1971 Petition and permitting Local 1230 to immediately file a new petition demonstrating their current interest in representing management classifications in the fire service; and Mr. Ben Wright having stated that Mr. William Cullen, Secretary, Local 1230, was unable to be present at this time and would like to meet further with the Board Committee; and Supervisor Kenny having suggested that receipt of the. Committee reoort be acknowledged and that action on the petition be deferred to May 20, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the suggestion of Super- visor Kenny is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board or. May 13, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of cc: United Professional Supervisors Firefighters, Local 1230 County Counsel affixed this 13th day of May . 19 75 Acting Director of Personnel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Count Administrator �� County By .. . .�� ��, ,' . Deputy Clerk H 24 tsna - tstit Lynn J. Beitler 00344 I _ RECEIVED • . � =�:j1 +.-�.,�-, ��_ � :�. -�� ,� ��. Mar � t MAY/,f 975 J Administration Building OrAOF Martinez, California you Date: May 12, 1975 TO: Intergovernmental Relations Committee J. P. Kenny, Chairman and E. A. Linscheid FROM: Charles J. Leonard, Acting Director of Personn SUBJECT: Request of Local 1230 to utilize petition to establish Fire %juppres3lon and Prevention Unit 11 filed Septembj-r 30, 1071 This issue presently before the Committee.pivots around the very critical point of who is going to represent Fire Service management employees in the establish- ment of their salaries, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment. Both the Myers-Milias-Brown Act and the County's Employee Relations Ordinance permit employees, management or otherwise, to decide whether they wish to join employee organizations and whether they wish to have these organizations repre- sent them in the meet and confer process with the County. In this case a petition to establish a representation unit was filed in 1971 by Local 1230. Since that time there has been a significant change in both the number of employees covered by that petition (more than 75% were removed when the arbitrator placed the Fire Captain in the No. 1 Unit) and the general direction of labor-management relations in this County. During the last four years the overwhelming majority of management employees in. Contra Costa County has chosen to let the County represent them in the salary and benefits area. This is not to say that the management classifications in the Fire Service should thereby be denied the right to establish a management unit. That is not what is suggested. What is suggested is that since the Board of Supervisors is faced with a four year old petition which has been significantly changed, this important decision should be based upon current information. j Evidence gathered: by the staff upon the request of the Intergovernmental Relations Cornmi.ttee shows that only 26.09x6 of those currently filled positions represented by the 1971 petition are members of Local 1230. Therefore, technically this petition would not qualify on the basis of not representing 3076 of the classifications listed in the petition. However, I do not believe that this alone should be a basis for discharging the petition since it still fails to consider the most important factor and that is that the.petition does not represent current classifications nor the current labor management relations :atmosphere. I believe that the management employees of the Fire Service of Contra Costa County should be given the opportunity of expressing themselves as to whether e, / `' AK63 - Microfilmed with board order p Intergovernmental Relations - Committee -2- May 12, 1975 or not they wish to be represented by Local 1230 or by anyone else. The only way of assuring that this decision is made on a current basis would be to adopt the report of the Employee Relations Officer dated April 29, 1975. This remove the 1971 petition and permit Local 1230 to.immediately file a new. petition demonstrating their current interest m' representing,management class ifications in the Fire Service. If such a petition is filed there is only a;miairnal possibility of a jurisdictional issue with another employee organization. .In.view of this minimal possibility I believe it would be appropriate for the Board to.,. waive the 21 day intervention period and thereby permit our staff to immediately r sit down with Local 1230 representatives and meet and confer over the content of the new petition, ,as required by the Ordinance. f I have attached a report dated May 9, 1975 from Robert Palmer which includes some statistics and several documents showing the recent sign-up of new members: and the cancellation of dues deduction from existing members. This reportservesf to reenforce my position that we should proceed on the basis of current inforacia tion rather than utilizing facts developed four years.ago. CJL:mg Attach. uo 1 i�A P. Kenny, a E. A. Linc ei , M er ;'Intergovernment Relations Intergovernmental Relations Committee Committee `Y r MM Administration Building Martinez, California Date: Flay 9, 1975 TO: Charles J. Leonard, Acting Director o Personnel FROM: Robert Palmer, Personnel Analyst SUBJECT: Verification Request of the Intergovernmental Relations Corimittee As you are wward, the Intergovernmental Relations Cosnnittee (Supervisors J. Kenny E. Linscheid) met the afternoon of flay a, 1975 to discuss the Board's referral of. Fire Suppression & Prevention Unit II petition. A memorandum from the Employee Relations Officer advised that the Fire Suppression A Prevention Unit II Detition filers Septe►'rber 30, 1971 by Local 021230, was no longer viable because,of subsequent ' modification petitions and arbitrator's Meyers' decision; 'and recommended forml termination of saw to allow for the filing of a new petition by Local 71230. Curing the course of that meeting a question was raised by Supervisor Linscheid as to the number and percentage of current Local V1230 members in relation to classes originally petitioned in September 1971. The question was generated out of the issue in Section 34-12.002 wherein petitions for forral recognition must shoe enployee approval of at least 30% of the eaployees in the proposed unit. n research of our files shores that the initial petition contained the following classes: Mkrofil med with board order AK53 ■((�Y�/��. Verification Request as of ay 6, 1975 Currently Filled Union Membership' Title (as of Hay 6, 1975) (as of 3/31I75) Fire Chief Group I l Q Fire Chief Group II 3 p Fire Chief Group III -abandoned classification Assistant Fire Chief Group I 4 p Assistant Fire Chief Group II 6 1 Ass;stant Fire Chief Group III -abandoned classification 63ttalion Chief 7 Fire Marshal Group Ii 1 Q Fire Training Instructor -placed in Suppression Unit by Arbitrator Fire District Communication Supervisor 1 Q Fire Captain -placed in Suppression Unit by Arbitrator- Total: 23 6: 26.09% Membership of currently filled positions. Additional classifications proposed in the tiay 6, 1975 Memorandum from local 01230 to the Intergovernmental Operation Committee: Currently FilledUnion Hembershi p. Title (as of May 6, 1975) (as of 3/31/75) ti Fire Training Supervisor 1 1 Fire Apparatus Foreman 1 Q. The !Management Supervisory Unit modification proposed by local 11230: Currently Filled Union Membership Title (as of Hay 6, 1975) (as of 3/31/75). Fire marshal Group II 1 0 Fire Training Supervisor 1 1. Battalion Chief 7 5 Fire apparatus Foreman 1 Q Fire Coo=nication Supervisor 1 0 Total: i 1 6 54.55w Membership of currently filled, positions -2 ;;71 r r Verification Request as of Pay 6, 1975 � r= G" iiay 3, 1915, tliliiam Cullen, Secretary for Local =1Z3U brought to Civil °} ; Service No applications for membership for Local z1Z30 recently signed. by incu:rbents in the positions of Fire Apparatus Foremn and Fire Can 6ication_ Supervisor. If the InterSovernmentai Operation Co:mnittee wishes to 'cons-ider;' these recent enrollments, the percentages are as follows: Currently Filled Union,Merbershi F;4 Initial petition filed 23 7 30..4 f Hanagemnt Supervisory Unit Modification 11 8 72.73% RP:pr cc: William Cullen, United Professional Firefighters, Local #1230 ry':C �F rj r "3' .rhk' V'V Y 34"Fe >7 4'uv✓ 4 n J L� �--. y ." • .z ,. AAPLSC AT1ON FOR !AM$taSHt° in International Assaciction of tire fighters L the undenignsd a4 Apply for membership in the abort union and agree to abide by ils Cowtiiw tion and Sydaws; b. Hereby tender payment of 14ifiv#04 1"; , ma.P. coofe is ad.,., C. ;f►utharia the union to be my exclusive h=q=!nina ageett, CL1kulh,arca monthly payroll dedudion for Unica-Dues. Signed �?%•- -r-r�:G-�• t.cDL s-�n�ure �tfc Std , SFu-r' Nome Addrm Stats zip... Is Tebphone Nott~ For Your tacd Um;m R.mg&only. p " APFLKATION FOR MEMBERSHIP to - lsttematiortcl Association of Fire Figttiatz 1.the undersigned: a. Apply for memberAip in the above union and agree-to abida by its GonsfiW rico and Ey-Laws; L Husby f80; ? .... .. t mi. P" saji- in edrencs a Authorize the union to be my*X&Sive bargaiging agent fi d Aulharizr hiy for Union Dues, FIRE DIVI. . Signed COi� „�tl'Sttt FC DAY ,... SigaatRae Rankstation Shit' ' 2940..L3is�_3?� C.t3i�CJMD .........DALL�`.......9 $2$........ Mom Address Gty Slate Trp 6 9.=99119 AaY--.7- -19-75- Telephone 19-75Telephone Data DOH 10/12/40 Non;Fer Yam haat shims Rftords Changes in Union Membership As Of May 12, 1975 Original Petition Classifications: May 12, 1975 May 12, 1975 . Title Currently Filled Union Membership Fire Chief Group I 1- 0 II 3 0 III ----- abandoned --------- Assistant Fire Chief Group I 4 0 II b i III ----- abandoned --=------ Battalion Chief 7 2 Fire Marshal Group II 1 Q Fire Training Instructor ---- in Suppression Unit - Fire District Communications Supervisor 1 1 Fire Captain ---- in Suppression Unit - Totals: 23 4_ 17.39% Proposed Local 11230 "Management Supervisory Unit": Fire Marshal Group II 1' Q Fire Training Supervisor 1 0 Battalion Chief 7 2 Fire Apparatus Foreman 1 1 Fire Communications Supervisor 1 i Totals: 11 4 36.36% 00351 �y= 17=� Last Name U�__ kE ' _ - �il,il:L}�.J.Ir4��`.CCi7 ti'Q \itY+.1►Cr-•- ..I t/L+r.. M .r10J ee 110.'. �•` ' 3 -hereby- request tba t Stich deeductioasas _ / Ca.3ifn are bziag from - salary: for j'3ia Physics _ 4 ;iap Health p?.arte b8 Lr2i1C'. t� effecti-re !!• •i•: Date - • LQ'W�'.• 1.`. _ - � - •; � R •"•.r. �,,; tiff's. M : . -CAM --s-. -; =-.. '.�.�j 2,�»;,y'.L,t' =sr+:.•. ` ,•". �� .�.5:`y cV '•�: .a,':a :r.w.�3' .�.• ^,e:�.i.6!S:� „r,,�:�:-�:r*Y'•�'L�.•�:' w i� t�`' '�����j'� IV 't'est' '^ •a.• ... ,L,,. —. , • .. ti r. .s-R�♦. • •.+,~: .+� •;'�' \+�""' �!' r+ '�• is wa. `�`:....�R�. ;,"f`::.C.``•w.� ,. -�.:"�.,-.t. 1�..�•�_ -� .�.' -�4..��-i.� -• :r,•�;4.rr.•„y-' •t»...` ..`..`�•.""•�"t- ^' ".i� �"`s -r.+�►i.".' `: �.1• �.y"Y.: �-' ''':'• � .ti�,•+4'•••�,;••�?`i,;:;.,�.:?..�..+k�"Y"',q+.~"; .. �•- 4. r .It. M'`Y `+•;i-m• !H+w'. '� •y.. '-s:. � ^t' ,,;.��..�"' "�� iw.~. r.{'jw_�F...F s.• L ♦. ef♦ t. :� r _ +i}•.���� w. \. _ rVr"`t r' � " �V r.+i4-11�:r4�A a�.✓ F 4-. 4 . � -X t.. • .; .Me+►,'� rr' ` '... s.'l ,. .�''+ � :z„_•r•�•� r.•^'mow• +.•. 'i`��..' ��.:+ �*slr:.�!•^r�i.�.wr�S�.-+^X,%,+�'�ri � w¢!.�14 �. HORIZATIC4 TO CANCEL O=DUCTION ,f 'na:-_J :rg.:cst tan: s,Cc reductions cs cc-- being mcie from ray sekry for f-7 CaW*ornia K-',sicians Servicr K=-Isrr Foundc:icn eelth Nen . /? LJe ^�L@i:3G ttY-[SING --�`/ — 7S _ .. r (92;0- 11-'62'1 • t ►io. . - AtJ T HORIZA T ION TO CANC=L'p_DUc ICN rtr9loyia 1 herAy rrglest that such deductions es cre bring acda from my selury for Cclitaralc Physicians' Servlet Kciser Foundatio i };-miff Plcn / Other- cU i ( Owe ( Siyr cst;rs j t M2'—:3 1! _62 f i- r-m Lost Neme hmp oy" O er- J1tJT}tOQlUTtOti TO GLHCcL DEDUCTION I h-:-by request that suc_% deductions as err Ding mcda frm-n my salcry for Californic Physici cns' Servic= Y Kaiser Founcetiaa Heel'-'n Plan Other s�-rr►' i o�'-`� a v�f'� ^-.0".P�!=�k� C b-cc.-,celled etfxtive tr - t . I x'75 _ Signa�Ujr (M230 11-62) w, � 2,'q _ 5-S 1"rrYs es L� t yY � v '-:r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Sherwood Medical Industries Complaint Regarding County Purchasing Practices. A iaesnorandum report having been received from the County Administrator in response to an April 8, 1975 Board referral of a complaint from Sherwood Medical Industries With respect to County purchasing practices; and The County Administrator having advised that in an effort to obtain the best proposal the Purchasing Division of the Office of the County Auditor-Controller requested quotations for 12 items, that Sherwood Medical Industries could not supply 3 of the items, that the remaining proposal submitted met the total requirements, and that therefore the quotation submitted by Sherwood Medical Industries was rejected; and The County Administrator having further advised that the action taken by the Purchasing Division was in accordance With County Ordinance Code provisions and proper purchasing practices; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of aforesaid repast is acknowledged. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Robert E. Stickney Sherwood Medical Indnstri% is 13th day of IL& , 19 75 County Administrator -- County Purchasing Agent J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By d26 4,o aut , Deputy Clerk H sa 21f*QxVW Counsel D. Harkness �4�55 OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Date: May 5, 1975 r Arthur G. .Will, Sherwood Medical Industries From: County Administr t Subject: Complaint Regarding by F. Fernandez Purchasing Practices The subject complaint made by Mr. Robert E. Stickney to your, Board was referred to this office for review and report. Investigaltion discloses that the Purchasing Division of the Office of County Auditor-Controller, in an effort to obtain the best proposal, requested quotations foraackage of nine (9) different types of blood collecting tubes (Vacutainers),. two (2)- types of needles, and one (1) Vacutainer and holder combination'. Sherwood Medical Industries could not supply three of the items included in the package, whereas the other proposal submitted met the County's total requirements; therefore, because: of the material deviation from the request the quotation submitted by Sherwood Medical Industries was rejected. The Purchasing Division follows the practice of requesting quotations in order to encourage competition and secure the. best buy for the County. The action taken was in accordance with County Ordinance Code provisions and proper purchasing practices. It is hoped that when quotations are again solicited for these items Sherwood Medical Industries will be in a position to submit a proposal which fully and completely meets County needs. . FF/aa RECEIVED cc. Mr. Robert E. Stickney H. D. Funk W. A. Schmidt MAY 6 1975 I R. OESSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVWW RA O_ Miuofilmed with bocid order 000.55 I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Meeting with Contra Costa County Employees ' Retirement .Association Bo.^rd Special Committee on Actuarial Report. The Board on May 6, 1975 having designated the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) as the Board of Supervisors committee to meet with a committee of the Contra Costa County Employees ' Retirement Association Board on the Qctu^sial report recently received; and Supervisor Dias this day having presented a written report (copy of which is on file with the Clerk) prepared after the meeting with tho Retirement Board committee indicating the pro- posals tentatively agreed on and recommending that County Counsel prepare an opinion on the legality of use of retirement surplus._ as cited therein; and Mr. C. A. 3ammond, Assistant County Administrator, 'hairing advised that the Board of Supervisors actin, other than the request for County Counsel's opinion, should consist of acknowl- edging the report inasmuch as the Retirement Board is presently meeting on said matter; and Supervisor Horia_rty having stated that the issue of applying *650,"?7)Q of surplt;s to help cover increased county costs is the major issue requirin!; legal opinion; and Iii. J. B. Clauson, County Counsel, having advised that his office would carefully review the retirement law and render its best judgment on said issue; and Supervisor Dias having called attention to the need for County Counsel's opinion at an early date and in any case by July 1, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORD= that receipt of the report of the County Govornmment Operations Committee is ACEN(7ILEDGED and County Counsol is DIRECTED to prepare an opinion on the use of retirement system surplus for the purposes cited in said report. PAS ::,D by the Board on May 13, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered_ on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Counsel Supervisors Retirement association County Administrator affixed this 13th day of May 197 Board Committee Members J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By e- nn� , Deputy Clerk H sa 12/74 - ,sem Lynn J: Beitler 04357 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P. wEN1�Y,RIa+MONa WARREN N_BOGGESS 1iT.^ISTRtCT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CHAIRMAN ALFRED M.DIAS.SAN►AaLo JAMES IR KENNY2ND DISTRICT - JAMES E. NORIARTY, LAFAT[TTE V/CS CHAIRMAN. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. ROOM 103 JAMES R.O!_SSOlY,cotrxtr CLERK ARD DISTRICT AND E%OFFICIO CLERK OF THS SOAI12 arN DtsrRlcT . WARREN N.BOGGESS,CDNCDRo P.O. BOX all MRS. GERALDINE RUSSELL MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 CHIEF CLMK EDMUND A. LINSCHEID, ►iTTS1tlRc ►NONE 250-3000` STM DISTRICT R N 5371 May 13, 1975 CELS D. MAY 1Y 1975 . REPOFORT O COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE ON MEETING WITH SPECIAL RETIREMENT BOARD COMMITTEE The County Government Operations Committee met on Monday, May 12, 1975 with a special committee of the Retirement Board comprised of Treasurer E. W. Leal, employee member James Orr, and public member R. E. Sponenbergh on the actuarial report on the County retirement system and decisions which must be made by the respective Boards based thereon. Agreement was reached on the issue of applying a 5-3/4% interest assumption and making required adjustments in member and County contribution rates and certain related facets such as mortality tables. Considerable discussion was held around the additional issues of the use of surplus as against additional benefits or application to the County contribution, possible expansions of benefits, and cost sharing under the cost of living feature of the system. Agreement was reached on submittal of a package plan as follows subject to a County Counsel opinion on use of surplus as proposed. 1. Adjust retirement allowances for pre-July 1, 1972 retirees on basis of highest year's earnings to be financed from retirement surplus. The estimated cost for one time funding from surplus is $1,500,000. 2. Apply retirement surplus to cover the additional County contribution to funding of the retirement system required in conjunction with the 5-3/4% interest assumption. Estimated cost is $650,000_ •m r _ CC �v C 2. 3. Use retirement surplus to pay the increase in funding of the 3% cost of living feature from .64% of payroll to 1.48% of payroll as required - by the 5-3/4% interest assumption. This will avoid requiring an employee contribution rate of .74% of earnings which would otherwise be required. Estimated cost is $630,000. 4. Provide health plan coverage for pre-1962 retirees from retirement surplus: Estimated cost is $25,000. 5. Provide retirement coverage for parttime employees utilizing surplus to fund the prior County liability. Estimated one time funding is $116,000. Provision has already been made for a special 2% adjustment in the retirement allowances of retirees at a cost of approximately $103,000. if this plan is accepted by all parties concerned, commit= ments will be made of approximately $3,000,000 out of the surplus ' which on June 30, 1975 will approximate $6,000,000., The remainder is proposed to be held to provide additional protection against unrealized losses in the investment portfolio and/or to cover possible future "one time" adjustments in the allowances of retirees or other unanticipated, or agreed on, costs. The Committee recommends Board consideration of this plan.:_ and direction to County Counsel for preparation of an opinion 'on the use of surplus as cited above. 7� A. M. D S J. E. MORIARTY Su strict II Supervisor, District III :a 004359, t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 M In the Matter of Proposed Amendment of County General Plan for the Vine Hill- Pacheco Boulevard Area. The Board on April 28, 1975 having referred to the Planning Commission for review a suggested revision to the proposed amendment to the County General Plan for the Vine Hill Pacheco Boulevard Corridor area; and The Planning Commission in its Resolution No. 48-1975 adopted April 29, 1975 having found that the introduction of a small area of commercial land use designation on the south side of Pacheco Boulevard between Veale Avenue and Delacy Avenue will not materially change the concepts underlying the General Plan amendment, and that the change is so small that any alterations in the Environmental Impact Report data are negligible, and having concurred with said change as proposed by the Board of Supervisors; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said recommendation is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director of Planning Supervisor affixed this 13th day of May 1975- J. 97J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H za 12174 _ ,5-M Mar Penin n o03so ..y • BOARD OF SU? ERVISORS, COMMA COSTA COGIITY, CALIFORNIA in the Eatter o�' Pr000sed Amendment ) of County General Plan for the Vine ) RESOLUTION iYO. 75/ 372 I?ill-Pacheco Boulevard Area. ) (Gov. Code §rj65355 65-35-6) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Its Clem, on February 27, 1975 received_a cony of Resolution No. 36-10,75 adopted by the Planning Commission recommending an a.nendment to the County General Plan for land located in the Vine ?-fill-Pacheco Boulevard area as designated therein to change the Land Use Element designations for said lands to appropriate densities among the various single family and multiple family residential categories and to change certain non-residential land use designa- tions , all to achieve General Plan-Zoning ordinance consistency with existing development and to reflect the County policies on future development natterns. On Tuesday, April 8, 1975, pursuant to the Planning Commission 's Resolution No. 36-19752 this Board held a hearing on the proposed amendment to the County General Plan in the Vine Ifill-Pacheco Boulevard area. notice of said hearing was duly given in the manner required by lair. The Board at the said hearing heard the testimony of all interested persons for and against the proposed amendment. The Board members having discussed the amendment determined that the south side of Pacheco Boulevard essentially between Veale Avenue and Delacey Avenue should be designated for commercial use, and . instructed County Counsel and the Director of Planning to revise the proposed amendment accordingly . At the conclusion of the presenta- tion by the staff and Board discussion, the hearing was. closed on April 8, 1975- The modification of the amendment made by the Board was brought before and discussed by the Planning Commission or. April 29, 1975, and the Planning Commission reported concurrence with the Board actions by the Planning Commission Resolution No. 118-1975, a copy - of opy -of which is on file with the Clerk of this Board. This Board hereby certifies that the Environmental Impact Report (with all sunDlements and attachments thereto) submitted to it by the Planning Commission concerning the proposed General Plan amend- ment has been completed in compliance with the 'California Environ- mental Quality Act and that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Environmental Impact Report . Further, this Board hereby determines that the Vine (fill-Pacheco Boulevard portion of the County's General Plan should be changed as recommended in the Planning Commission Resolution Nos . ' 36-1975 _ and 48-1975. The County Planning Department is- hereby directed to nrenare a plan man and text as necessary to reflect this proposed amendment. ?finally , this hoar:? further directs the County Planning Department to Incornorate this nr000sed amendment into a combined amendment to the General Plan w::ich this Roard will consider for adontion durin? the 1°75 calendar year as one of the three oermitted amend- ments to the Land Use Elemrnnt of the County General Plan. �ASFED o.^_ tray 1', 10,7 j , unanimously by 'Supervisors present . RESOD'^?OF '•.'0. 75/ X72 (� Cc , Mr. A. F. Bray (2) 009)61 Director of Planning •- - !• -Y 6J i ...�. `" 71r bey a. c r t,i IL 7. if ENVIRDNIMINTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERALPLAN M END6IT VINE HILL-PACHECO BOULEVARD AREA:, x»: y t • J , Contra;-'Costa' County, ' Plann�pg_Aegartment _ Octbber I T4 1 �w� rt 'u r a A r y z { TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4 A. Introductory Discussion 3 1. Project Objectives 3 a. ' Location 3 . b. Objectives 3 { c. Proposed General Plan Amendment 4 2. Environmental Inventory of Region 4 a. Physical Description and Existing Land Use 4 b. Existing Circulation 10 c. Legal, Policy and Institutional Constraints 13 f d, Zoning and Conformance with General Plan I5 - e. Community Facilities and Utilities 16 Schools 17 (tater Service 17 Sewerage Service 17 Gas and Electricity 17 Fire Protection 19 f. Geology 19 g. Soils 19 h. Hydrology 24 i. Climate and Air Quality 24 j. Noise 25 B. Environmental Impact Analysis 27 1. Environmental Impact of Proposed Action 27 a.- Land Use Impact "27 b. Population and Housing Impact 29 c. Circulation Impact 30 i d. Community Facilities and Utilities Impact -32. - r Schools 32 Utilities Service 32 V e. Soils and Landslide Impact 33 �- f. Hydrologic Impact 33 g. Air Quality Impact 34 h. Noise Impact 34 r • - - • <` ! .SIJ F Xf'hj1 � F t Page a' 2. Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot he Avoided if this Proposal is Implemented 34 3. Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact • 35 :r. a. Secondary Impact Measures 35 b. Further Governmental Process Measures 35 c. Land Development Measures 35 ti _ d. Transportation Measures 36 e. Seismicity Measures 36 4. Alternatives to the Proposed Action 36- a. No Amendment 36- b. Adopt the General Plan of the City of Martinez for this Portion of the City's Sphere of<-Influence 36 c. Modifications of the Proposed Amendment - 37 r S. ' The Relationship, Between Local Short-term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance of Long-term Productivity 37 6. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would r be Involved in the Proposed Action Should it be Imp?cmcatcd 7. The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action 38 S. Organizations and Persons Consulted; Documents Utilized 38 9. Qualifications of the EIR Preparation Agency - 4- Y. LIST OF EIR EXHIBITS Location Flap 1 r s Amendment Area Map 2 Proposed General Plan Amendment Map z✓+r Land Use by Sub-areas Table 6 - t.-- Amendment Sub-areas Map 8 a�+Y " Traffic Volumes Map 12 Martinez Unified School District Enrollment Table 18 Soil Hydrologic Groups Map Soil Shrink-Swell Potential Map 22 Landslide Deposits Map 23 ; Highway Noise Level clap 26 Comparison of Residential Types Table 27 New Areas Planned for Employment Use Table 28 Estimated Vehicular Tripends Table 30 , Future Traffic Volumes Map 31 �a v4 v { yy h� r r -• x t cis .r rfi�l:" 1 � M A 11 V x StJJStJa1 Air � ,y�� ��+ AMENMASNT West PrtKQ+aa AR MARTIN � r FIT SOURS • ••• ANTIOCN � r Pocf„so r t Jl CONCORD 1 PLEASANT t4LL v- CLAYTON i'r`nl►tU7 CREEK LAFAYETTf Mt Oie010 � s• A1o.a ��• • uwago Damao -•rte ` �• d 3 t r; .\ S _ .sea Rer.aw 0 8000 16000 LOCATION MAP CENTRAL PORTION 4N710CN •r•••••••r•a ••'-• Aiet•a ar..to••or•„• ••••♦ uur•r r[tr•[ta n-rw tett.• - ••••-••• ••'• r•re• [a•ea esp. [e11r1, rt•...ra CONTRA COSTA COUNTY .Ir•[rrt., ^ .,.ea •a•a• •r• v.ur[ u..r.,n•no»,reg•n.a..�n [� ..►,i•rv,.r.,r CALIFORNIAf ..»...a •ra ..r. .w. r...►,. [.p...... 1 003 # ` 1 PIZ mow'=•�.•...w•i�-���.;'�,•..y,�/� � 1_- t. •� _� •-.; 2/ • 4 S �.....r- JJ"_'1 t. •i' ! a i • Jam•4t. �;�}i�•�-f„1 �a. . i,{ -.""♦c l�•`a i moi^. •'` �f .Y '/ ',j / r)'. �� + ,�.4'.�'�.t J ,o.. ` . ♦e••• IL.'�--' ••c -•• �•.� .< ^c../`�- w'C�f � 'fir` 77 a- w i' ,•, .,,' .+ �:S,-_ .-' ,.,, _�co,`� 1 .Y: j5�,1 v.a�ea y�,j ..-. •'" / _, - ; , .._ t �„�� .,--., �;^ ---t .•+ c - _��,� r tea; �� :. c s �•--+_•� Lam. i ��. 3'�rwr^s. �•� I;} y."-.:.'�a.a •.. %E' •f r;" ..` z2' a.. � -- •.(r'�•� ..�, �.6�•:i I .• �S- 4� ar� s;'1 ` 'Sa�$Yi•., :[ •+r•�'`� 1�, .; '1 becO `�F �� `+qty',I i•,.-�� L`� ,{-•�r� _��t �,�'' y ` w---' ��_ �,~ - "'"'1:,'t ac ''`'����t' r•� p•�: 2 _ ; ems_•- .,,. ` ��'"��as'p v.'.'..:-•.. •r +* IN- ;,�Lr.•�`1� �:, -��.i' .��'�"��- /'� �y � -^_ ��-,1``:: .� tai.,' '"-';': !�: a ir A. Introductory Discussion 1. Project Description Contra Costa County maintains-a continuing program of General Plan review to locate and eliminate inconsistenciesbetween the County General Plan and the County's Zoning Ordinance pursuant to California" State Planning Law (Section 65860 of the Government Code which re- quires consistency between the General Plan and the-Zonirig*Ordinance)- . As part of this continuing program, the Planning Commission, on March 19, 1974, reviewed a Staff Report which pointed out the, number of General Plan-Zoning inconsistencies in the line Hill-Pacheco Bou levard Corridor area. Tae Commission directed that the staff pre pare a more detailed General Plan review for the study area, to ascertain hole consistency between the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance could best be achieved. Findings of this General Plan retriew and recommendations, if ,any, for amendment of the General Plan may have an impact on future zoning in the area and, therefore, action on a number of rezoning applica tions was deferred until this General Plan review is completed The objective of the General Plan amendment, which'is the "project" discussed in this Environmental Iz?act Report, is therefore to amend " the land use element of the Contra Costa County General Plan to rew. duce the number of General Plan-Zoning inconsistencies which exist. Subsequently, recomaendations regarding changes in the Zoning Ordi N nance will be prepared to eliminate the remainder of the inconsistencies. through rezoning procedures. a. Location The amendment area is comprised of approximately,2,625"acres and is bounded on the nest by the City of Martinez, on the south"by `; 1. Highway 4, extends east of Interstate 680 from about 1/4 to- 3/4, of a mile, and north of Pacheco Boulevard by roughly the same distance. Within the area there are 44 separate instances of nonconformance covering a total of 420; acres. The most common inconsistency is the presence of a variety of zoning-districts, ' .including light -and hear} industry and commercial uses in.,`areas' planned for residential use. b. Objectives The "project" is a proposed amendment to the Contra Costa County General Plan. The present General Plan is very general in the delineation of proposed land uses in the area, resulting in some ambiguity in the development policy. The primary objectives of 3 V0t�l�6. 8 " t r the proposed amendment arc to provide sufficient detail for guiding laid use development and to eliminate the conflicts between the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. Land use recommendations not directly related to the conformance issue have also been made where appropriate. These include: reducing the conflict between residential and commercial or industrial uses with better buffering of the residential areas centered around Arthur and Blum Roads east of Interstate 6S0 by changing the industry classification (which allows H-I zoning) to light industry and controlled industry; refining the limits of the open space designation to the crest •and eastern slopes of Vine hill Ridge reflectspolicies to limit development of ridge- lines and hazardous slopes; and to provide more detail in the single family residential densities in the area south of the railroad in order that they more accurately correspond to topo- graphy. c. Proposed General Plan Amendment A summary of the results of the amendment proposals are shown on Map 3, and Table 1 designates the acreages allotted for each type. of land use and compares them with the current County General. Plan. The proposed amendment will reduce'the amount of residential land use within the study area. It also would alloy: for a greate. variety of housing types and densities than the present General Plan. The major change in this area is that the amendment desig nates areas of multiple family residential use which the currf;nt plan does not. An increase in the area planned for industrial and commercial uses is also proposed by the amendment. The concept of confining these uses to intensive development centers and corridors with clustering of similar uses is utilized in order to-prevent unintegrated strip development. The amendment recognizes that the trend of scattered commercial uses has already begun in the area and attempts to con- trol it. 2. Environmental Inventory of Region a. Physical Description and Existing Land Use- the amendment area lies within the Briones Hills physiographic region at the eastern botnidary where it adjoins the northern end of the Diablo Valley. The terrain is varied, generally being level to rolling in the central and northern parts of the amend- sent area, rising to low hills in the west and to the steeply sloped fine Hill Ridge (maximum elevation 266 feet). East and 4 a0600 u o ti R O • R D A j• to n t t� y v ` 94 v t+ V t Q .� V y v 45 Z, 0'- �" t ,J _ N A. U) 9.07 N c ca In 104 1,4 &1 a v fin•. a w o A c a wNN }' r N:e i � .. .•t Tib.. •: �� •, .•� , } s w • �ti t /`� fi { (+.! ♦.'0:[�i r f.�/.i. .ilrl�r � Eft { —+• f 1,....•/r ; ,'.rY .�.3.i �'•_.>� � ,t .;flys si ..«. •..:::.::::::::.::::.:::.' i} x R ,�-. t fit•, CC=i:C:� -. J ---•--� Vie.'.?..��.� �, f, � {�! jJ);r ---------------- 00, z. ' ` s 06 • �� ~mac - -\ �-- �`1 , MLs I m ago asp IM Z iT w y •t o .a Q C> .-• •. h .9t tnNoh �D in • , NC; tel , e . Man .qrNtohpt rf ci cs ov U O M IV •-4 N t'S Q N "O 1 O h .-r O O O O i- O O M :O . to . ( O to NT .-4 Cl O N 4J U to M t0 1-0 �p . N Cy cd t= 00 O ON OO O%0 17 co %D O - M I FU G1 to M M to 0 ^. 00 0 00 OOOOOM O O M; i.► y o st N tD r is G CG .fl � + C) Ln OO tlltlpOOOO M 'O S O N U 0. S= n. o tnh Oo 0o000o a .-. M. O > t4 O 0 tz }� C7 .--t o ' • 0. tb m 00 to h to OC N 000 N O AD .oi V to Cl .tC ` O tK 0. 0. O 0 0 0 0 00 O O �D Cl � C7 •-+ fa U � 0 y G O O O O co O r1 O N tq M V c5 U QO N .-t h to CO to w 4J ti .i Ln O V � n Cd 0. O O v 00 00 t- OOtn O O aD o� ri to co lz ` tl1 'ti 10-t d C)i 0 0 N C) Cit O ►n O by 0 %0 Ln .n-• O bC -rt M .-i to v � , to 4j tU-r at fl. 00 O 00 00000-t O O t` b C9 14 to to � 41 ,O N U -4 0. 'O 4j -.-t U -C v ;4 .- ~ C) i -.4 ?� E � -.-1 C.to � a O E a C:M 4J-1 11 W y • 4 ca -14 U y -4 to C O L" [0 'C7 Y U ul r 4J U. y a m V y C: O U) -rt C', U � � M to t." G E) .-+ U E 'a Uk F OO G G 0 � �3 fJC] �. Uk k 4 U to W u 10 .+ G •.t O O aj--t U s+ a.+ n -4 ..] D t.] •-+ -.� s+ .., .. b H to (QQ• y C to tt. E +j c LA C 0 to 0 •0a-.' 0 U ..1 v►-� ts. O EO.. , north of the ridge are several elongated hills lying in a north- West-southeast direction and somewhat separated by narrow valleys.. One of these, Fine Hill, 2S2 feet high, is the highest point. The amendment area has been divided into five sub-areas to facilitate analysis (see Hap 4). (1) Pit. View Sub-Area: f s' This area is predominantly developed in single family resi- dential uses south of Pacheco Boulevard (:pith densitiesup to S units per net acre due to the small lot sizes). Much of the housing is of pre-World i�ar lI construction and some of the older dwellings are in need of repairs or rehabilita- tion. At the southern end of the sub-area some vacant l"and. : remains, and some newer single family development has occur- red at 5 to 6 units per net acre. North of Pacheco Boulevard the dominant use is the Shell Oil Refinery. Other uses include the Martinez filtration plant, a P. G. and E. steam plant, and the County garage. Around, the intersection of Shell Avenue and Pacheco Boulevard there are several cormercial establishments such as a tire store, gas station, and auto repair shop. Along Howe Road a mix of uses including single family homes- Oft apartments, construction yards, light industry, and retail businesses exists. Approximately 50 to 60 percent of the land along Horse Road is vacant. (2) Las Juntas Sub-Area: Within this sub-area there is a mix of intensive uses all along Pacheco Boulevard. Light industrial and heavy commer- cial uses are found concentrated around the corridor area between Las Juntas School and the railroad, while similar uses are more scattered in the corridor area just east of Howe Road. A combination of small retail businesses and some single family homes are located in the corridor area between Morello Avenue and the old Vine Hill School (now used by the 'Martinez School District for administrative and storage purposes). Between this retail district and the heavier commercial uses to the east and west are several small (up to 14 units) apartment complexes. The Shell Oil Refinery occupies the northwestern portion of the sub-area. The area south and northeast of the Pacheco Boulevard corridor is extensively devoted to single family residential use, most- ly at high densities (5 to 7 units per net acre), with an area '. .;,�� •� �i^�tt�,',lr�;c'��r'_l /��-�' t'1��``• kl Vt �, � LU ( r ALU CS it 'ia h•' :!\C� '�. 1 '� lit- � i:� J•- 1. � 1?� ' � � -- � {----�-� �... � � . t ''jam' � x'14 �•..� , -` � 4� � 1 t .• ? �•;—;Ir it�r � �i 'L"•�:�:.1 t t �z � �l 1 � ,.�: j�}- `rte �,1( r-• �'� f �:,,;�?r Y! !••^� J r^1� � [�= �•t+t Lam-, �/ ..� C ,.h is f11 �;�•(ryl _ _��_ 4t }.:;.� ��1 J�,�� !� s! J r a tq _ R ' f L� 8 009 73 �7 of medium density development (3 to 5 units per net acre); in the western portion. The-Martinez Reservoir is"located . in the western end of the study area and the.land south of r it is vacant. (3) South Pacheco Corridor Sub-Area: A mix of commercial uses, single family and multiple.:family residential uses are located at the southern end of this sub -` area, centered around the freeway interchange. At the north ern end of the sub-area are several duplexes, a small (4"unit)1 r " apartment building, and a contractor's yard (a, legal non-' conforming use since it existed before zoning was established)`: Scattered single family homes occupy the central portion,:"of+, the area. (4) Vine Hill Sub-Area: Single family residences and agriculture, are,the mayor land uses in the Vine Hill area. Residential development, -at`both ;.1 medium and high densities -(from 3 to 7 units ,per net acre) ° = are mainly located along or just off of the major, roads ; n F the sub-area. Housing becomes scattered in the-less- access ible areas, where homes are sited on large parcels (usually from one-half acre to several acres). Some •of,these parcels could be considered in "light agricultural" use--sdme 'fruit or nut trees on the property, but definitely at only a sup plementary level. The principal agricultural activity in the•Vine Hill area,_,,,­."._ rea `= is the 101 acre Viano-:;organ agricultural prosexve. These. = { properties are mainly involved in wine grape production and grazing. There are only a few business uses within the sub-area: .,Three are located near the intersection of Arnold. Drive and.riorello 4s Avenue: a chiropractor's office, a,cabinet°shop, and a decou page business. The Viano Winery is located. on Morello just south of the railroad. Within the area�incorporated' in '._ the city of Martinez in the southern part of -the sub-areae the =' use pattern is quite similar with:two!exceptions. The most ' important one is the Holiday Hills. development.`east-of; Fig Tree Lane, which has ok-ner-occupied townhouses at 10 per net acre ( a total of 87 units). The other exception is the existence of two light industrial activities in the south west portion of the sub-area, just north of Arnold Drive: a. camper manufacturer and a gardening tool distributor. { 9 a (5) Eastern Sub-Area: There are two high density single family residential neighbor- hoods cast of Interstate 680, one located around Blum Road south of the railroad and one centered around fathur Road north of the railroad. This latter area has been somewhat blighted along Arthur Road, largely due to the presence of heavy truck traffic en route to the garbage dump located to the northeast. There is a small area of multiple family residential use (17 units) on Blum Road-near the freeway. On the southeast side of Blum Road is a cemetery and the location of the proposed County corporation yard. North of the Arthur Road residential area is the Acme dump, a sanitary land fill solid waste disposal site. Portions of the hills east of the residential area are presently being quarried for fill use in the dump. At the extreme eastern. end of the sub-area, near the Pacheco Creek Channel is'the Industrial Tank Company, which is involved with re-processing petroleum wastes. At the northern end of the sub-area.is a small fiber-glass products manufacturer. The land between the two residential areas is either vacant or in extensive agricultural use. (6) Surrounding Area: To the west of the amendment area is the city of Martinez. The area immediately adjacent is primarily in high density, single family residential use, with some scattered commer- cial development along Pacheco Boulevard. The downtown area of Martinez contains considerable retail development and also is the location of the County offices. North of the amendment area is a continuation of industrial use and vacant land. Southeast of the area is the Central Contra Costa County Sanitary District's treatment plant. Other industrial and vacant lands are located east of the amendment area. The area immediately south of amendment area is within the . city of Martinez and is mostly developed in medium and high density single family homes. In this area are the Veteran's Y Administration Hospital and County offices and facilities (e.g. Disaster Office, juvenile hall) . b. Existing Circulation The amendment area is heavily dependent on the automobile for transportation, as are most areas in the central County area. The present street network serves a developing urban environment now composed •primarily of single family residential housing, r.: xfr 10till Y UU375� �u �M1 y. together with mixed commercial, industrial and multi-family - residential uses found along Pacheco Boulevard and Howe' Road: ` k The major streets serving the planning area are: 1) Pacheco Boulevard (2-way/2-lane) an arterial street linking xs the Martinez and Concord-Pleasant Hill areas. Present average daily traffic (ADT) along Pacheco ranges from 7,700 just- noith of Highway 4, to 16,000 near Mrello Road, present design capacity< �w is 6,000-10,000 ADT. 2) Bowe Road (2-way/2-lane) a collector street linking Pacheco Boulevard with Highway 4 to the south. ADT counts range from � . 2,509 (1970) near Pacheco Boulevard, to, 3,289 near<Highway ,4. Design capacity is presently for 6,000 to. 8,©00 ADT. ; 3) Morello Avenue (2-way/2-lane) is a collector street, linking , y Pacheco Boulevard and Highway 4, located east of Howe Road. ADT, counts range from 1,561 (1971) near Highway 4 to 1,913-northbound- j only (1974) near Pacheco Boulevard. A doubling of the northbound count at the Pacheco Boulevard location, an estimated 3,800. ADT can be assumed. The present design capacity of this street is. 4,000-6,000 ADT. ` 4) Arthur Road (2-way/2-lane) is a collector road linking Pacheco' Boulevard and Interstate 680 and the surrounding residential area and the Acme Dump. ADT counts range from 1,022 (1970) near the- - dump entrance, to 3,782 (1965) where Arthur Road crosses under, ..,, Interstate 680. Design capacity ranges from 4,000.6,000 -ADT. '= However, the high ratio of truck and other traffic travelling; to the dump minimizes the suitability, of.this'.road.for,its;;in� tended use, a residential street. y= { It is estimated (utilizing 1965-1975 traffic counts) that 86,000 ADT's are currently attracted and/or generatedwithzn the planning- area. Specific traffic volumes are shown on Map S. The present : t street netirork is generally adequate to the traffic flow, with the_; exception of portions of Pacheco Boulevard, where peak hour, volumes cause some congestion and difficulty crossing or. entering Pacheco t Boulevard traffic. iz The County's Circulation Element, including the subject area, was .' last updated in the course of adopting the 1%a Roads Plan::Adman 5 istration Map in 1971. The adopted road system is..characterized. by a principal arterial (Pacheco Boulevard), running through -the study area in roughly a southeast-northeast direction with `two general thoroughfares (collector roads) Howe Road and Morello Avenue connecting Pacheco Boulevard with Highway 4. The proposed. extension of Pine Street to Howe Road near the freeway interchange is planned to function as an arterial from the Martinez downtown 11 s M F 1 f f S•'' mss,a ( ;,;; }t `i tttj ��.r. ti• �t�� �•'.ti•1. f P r,.•�...>,j f ;'t•-'^r>.� a� �"jt l�Fr�I' 1 .1 4:f �, �-,«,� ._.1•r a syr t-a, y s T _.t i �i'',,���.1,,��� * � -'.,+-. y ,,'}�-•'t 6��" y�,r'i 1' ice'= a '•i�11V �,ljjS'�1.. ` r�a.}°it-1� sir 4 �=�4--;1{ :��.YM�' '�� '♦`' rV 40 Cl i"1'��'1'..�t* a1St*tit,-�Laj;jy•• f ""�� .♦s. ,�l� of Ull .� • �1 is a t t Al i-I • t ` iu..r, f ^` ;!}S { _•1k a�l a � t11 ...-.�':� ��..� � N,•j7 r,:J 14. ♦ R �:�•f n �T,.` . �. .�"j ��i•-�: 4 ;Oji 1 °��"' ...:p .. •l' •�ti"� . ;..�..:�; ;w .>�'' t ���+ .�! ~ irk:{ €•t t � �•':;, 1�.. '�',,,�\,rs��, • j �jfa a � i`1< �t,S^`":i2"'� ` �,� trc r`i\- ✓ /� - • 'tai +l�P;jt�; ,1« -,1`,,;..4%.�>�t � t t ��.r r� ts\ s•: �, `f'✓ t \• i sw{ 1.-1� fa'.�.� ! ^� ♦ N!`� 1 h ;..4 ,rr�,1 �j � P.:4 t/� aYw'� I � t t • ! a�ti1t�\`� � .`i:'i��. •` � 6 ,�•�y �ti;�....,ritt$��{.1,,,tj�l. �� ��•` ,.. ♦1 2a - a •�la'G 4�.4� .�- :' r�.� �y East (n 1•r a•..a.:)L, r�.�:.- 1 1 S `` a`,i '- ` t st ,. �. ..: c..=.A'-- ;Stn 1• .♦ iN4 Awk arca to Highway d. Blum and Arthur Roads are designated as collectors leading to the residential communities east of Inter- state 680. Other collector streets include Shell Avenue, Mid- hill Road, rtilano I0ay, Central Avenue and the northern portion of Arthur Road. Proposed additions to the system of collector streets are Palms and Arnold Drives. The County's Major Roads Plan Administration map indicates most of Pacheco Boulevard ti.ill eventually be improved to 100 foot right-of-way, SO foot pavement standards; Howe Road and Aforello Avenue, to 81/64. foot standards; and the southerly portion of Arthur Road to 84/64 foot standards with the remainder to be a 60/40 foot standard. Local Transit A local mass transit agency is proposed for much of the central county area, which agency would provide service to the Martinez area. The proposed district, if approved, would be operated by A-C Transit, and may start initial service as early as the first part of 1975 in selected areas. As currently proposed, the Martinez area would re- ceive two basic types of service. Fixed route service would include the "L" route--Lafayette/,Martinez (all-day service) routed as follows: Lafayette: BART Station, Deer hill Road, Pleasant Hill Road (alternate: �l Taylor. Boulevard) , Alhambra Avenue, Bro:.m Way, Pine Street, looping the County Center area and at modified schedules extending to Ilowe Road via Pin-- Street and ?acheco Boulevard. In addition, BART bus service would travel Marina Vista, Alhambra Avenue, Highway 4 frontage road, Center Avenue to Contra Costa Boulevard and commute hour BART e-press bus service would travel Acarina Vista, Interstate 680, Concord Avenue and Concord BART station. Secondly, Dial-a-Ride service which consists of a fleet of small buses and combines the ride sharing aspects of conventional buses with the radio dispatched convenience of a taxi cab is proposed for the Martinez area, including most of the planning area. The L-route service could commence approximately the spring of 1977, and Dial-a-Ride operations in kartinez, approximately the winter of 1975-76. c. Legal , Policy and Institutional Constraints : The constraints affecting an amendment pertain to State lair, the elements of the Contra Costa County General Plan, zoning ordinance, and the General Plan of the City of Martinez. (1) State Lai. and County Policy Concerning Conformance: Section 6SS60 of the Government Code has mandated that California cities and counties bring their general plans and zoning ordi- nance in conformance by January 1, 1974. This action followrs the principle that implementing regulations (e.g. zoning) are meant to carry out adopted policies (e.g. the general plan). 13 00 !C� The Contra Costa County Planning Commission adopted as an amend- ment to the General Plan in January 1974 a policy statement* articulating assumptions and practices on conformance that have been followed by the Board, - the Planning Commission and the Planning Department collectively. This document states that zoning should be changed when an inconsistency occurs, except "where the General Plan is obsolete and zoning provides for the appropriate use (sometimes the existing use) ; in such in- stances a General Plan study is in order before an amendment is processed," The statement also declares that the General Plan should not contain "excessive detail" and that some flexi- bility is intended for "interpreting the General Plan in bound- ary line situations." (2) Relevant Provisions of County General Plan Elements: The Land Use Element of the County General Plan designates four land use classifications for the Vine Hili-Pacheco Boulevard Corridor amendment area:. single family residential- medium density (3-S units per net acre) , single family resi- dential-high density (S-7 units per net acre), commerce, and industry. The conformance policy statement previously mention- ed states which zoning districts are compatible with these planned land use categories. The Open Space-Conservation Plan which was adopted in June 197; designates the amendment area as completely within the Urban Gro-eeth Area and the Piano-Nbrgan agricultural preserve as open space within the Urban Growth Area. Open space within the Urban Growth Area is intended for the "protection of life . and property from excessive risks of slope failure and flood- ing, and preservation of major ridges for visual quality." Tho of the policies of the Open Space-Conservation Plan which apply to the issues and problems of the study area are: *Design hillside and ridge top properties so that they do not excessively disrupt the visual quality of the land- scape, *Design and landscape industrial, residential, and other properties to provide needed visual buffers between in- compatible land uses. *"Interpretative Policies on General Plan-Development Ordinance Conformance." • f f�. 1lY 14 Vtl( n x= t��+7Ri �.1s The recreation Element of the General Plan proposes four neighbour. ood parks within the study area. The Parks and Recreation Plan defines neighborhood parks as: "small ureas of landscaped oxen space and have a service radius of one-half raffle. Their service areas are generally equi- valent to that of elementary schools. Neighborhood parks should be developed in domination with play-grouncs and some playfield activity. Joint development with thea local elementary school could allow for joint use of playground facilities." It also states that "care must also be taken to insure that facilities are provided for the elderly. Separate areas of benches and tables should be provided as places where the elderly can relax and deet with each other." The stzndard for neighborhood parks is 2.5 acres per 1000 population. The plan also points out that the study area "lying to the east of Interstate 680 will need its own small park and play area because it is effectively isolated from the rest of the area by the freeway." The Bicycic Paths Plan, a part of the Recreation Element designates Primary Bicycle Paths along Pacheco Boulevard and Morello Avenue in the study area. A Primary Bicycle Path is intended to acco=cdate high volun;es of bine traffic and are ultimately to be physically separated from vehicular traffic and other trails. (3) Martinez General Plan: The present Martinez General Plan designates much of the study area south of the Santa Fe Railroad as a Holding Zone and recom nerds no further development until the fro-atage service road to Highway d in the area is completed. In the interim the city planning staff is in the process of formulating a plan for this area to present to the Martinez- Planning Commission. The Martinez General Plan is in general agreenent with the proposed amendment in most basic concepts,, but does differ on several points. For example the city plan indicates the equivalent of multiple family densities in areas designated. for lower concentrations in the amendment, and vice-versa. d. Zoning and Conformance with General Plan: There are a variety of zoning districts within the amendment area allowing for various industrial, commercial, single and multiple family residential and agricultural uses: is 1 11-1, Hcaiy Industrial District- W-3, Controlled Hca%y Industrial District L-I, Light Industrial District C, General Co-=ercial District R-B; Retail ,Business•District N-B, Neighborhood Business District M-1, Multiple Family Residential District M--', Multiple Farily. Residential District ti-3, Multiple Family Residential District M-4, Multiple Family Residential District R-6, Single Family Residential District f R-7, Single Family Residential District R-10, Single Family Residential District A-1, Light Agricultural District A-2, General Agricultural District A-4, Agricultural Preserve District All of the multiple family residential zones arc not in conformance; with the General Plan a; they are in areas planned for single- family residential and commerce use. A brief analysis of the other incon- sistencies by sub-area is given below: °Mt. View: L-I, C, and R-B districts in single family residential-high density. °Las Juntas: L-I, C. R-B, and N-B districts in single family residential-high density; R-6 in industry. *South Pacheco Boulevard Corridor: C and R-B in single family residential-high and tedium density; R-7 in industr, . °Vine Hill: R-7 in single family residential-tedium density. *Eastern Sub-Area: H-I, L-1, and R-B in single family residential- high density; R-7 in industry. e. Community Facilities and Utilities -Community facilities and utilities are provided to the planning area by various local units of government or.special districts. Because the area is essentially developed, it is presentiy pro- vided by a full compliment of services. The community facilities impacted by the land use modifications are discussed below. The General Plan serves to alert service agencies of the potential changes in area development and the need for public facilities. f , 16 Schools • s . The planning area is served by the John INfuir, Las Juntas, Mt. View, and Vine Hill elementary schools, and the Martinez Junior High and Alhambra High School in the Martinez Unified School District. Table 2 shows the enrollment for all schools in the district for 1973 and for 1968. The overall enrollment in the district declined by 420-students` (8.3%) during the five year period. Of the schools serving the Planning . Area, only John Muir and Fine Hill Elementary Schools had increased en- rollment during the comparative period. The school district "is prepared" for additional growth in the area. Plans exist for development of a new high school/junior high -school facility on 62 acres in the eine Hill sub-area (already owned by the district). Morello School is planned to develop to full size (current enrollment is about 100 students) as the need arises. There are also plans for additions to Las Juntas School. Water Service The Contra Costa County hater District provides domestic water service to the planning area. T"ne district delivery system consists of the 47.7 mile Contra Costa Canal, the 4.8 mile Clayton, and the 5.2 mile .Ygnacio relift canals. Water is taken into the system through a four mile unlined intake from Rock Slough in the Delta area. The Contra Costa Canal passes through the planning area to the Martinez Reservoir. A filtration plant is located on Pacheco Boulevard near Howe Road. The present water system is adequate to serve the current and proposed development in the area. Sewerage Service The Mountain View Sanitary District provides sewerage service to most of the planning area. This is a small district surrounded by the large Central Sanitary District. The District provides both primary and secondary treatment through its facilities, and according to the County Health Department, is effectively meeting Regional Eater Quality Control Board requirements for treatment standards. The present system is deemed adequate to meet anticipated growth in the area. Gas and Electricity Gas and electric service is provided by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Present service is deemed adequate to serve the planning area in the future. No public expenditures will be required for improvements within the planning area, 17 7y TABLE 2 MlARTINEZ UNIF1ED SCHDOL DISTRICT ENROLUIENT 1968 and 1973 ENROLLFlEI�'T Oct. Oct. SCHOOL 1465 1973". Change John Muir * 403 459 +S6 John Swett 432 265 167 Las Juntas 543 S10 Martinez 610 645 +3S,,: Mfontccito 337 362 +251, Morello 96 - Aft. View 186 156 Vine !till * 100 208 +108 Martinez Junior }sigh * 817 705 -112 .Alhambra high School * 1,559 1,353 206 5,083 4,663 420:'. - Schools Serving the Planning Area Source: Contra Costa .County Superintendent-of Schools`Office } 18 . 003 - � r Fire Protection The Contra Costa Countv Consolidated Fire District provides fire protection for the planning area. Stations servicing the area are:. Station Number 12 at the corner of Shell Avenue and Martinez Avenue in the study area and Station Number 9 at Center Avenue and Aspen Drive in Pacheco. Station Number '12, however, is planned to be relocated to Concord Avenue, just gest of the Sheraton Inn, result- ing in about an additional two minutes to the response time for the southeastern part of the study area. f. Geology The geologic formations within the study area range in age from the Upper Cretaceous to the Upper Miocene epoch with the rocks of the early Tertiary dominating. The amendment area reflects the rolling, topography of the Pacheco Syncline. The formations encountered are of the Great Valley, Martinez, Markley, San Ramon, Monterey, and Briones types, These formations contain various shales and-sand- stones with some siltstone. Shales and sandstones are clastic sediments and generally have gide variations in their engineering. and physical properties. Generally clastic sediments tend to be highly susceptible to all weathering processes. In general the folding and faulting of the rocks in the amendment area has ex- posed them to erosion and weakened them. Penetration of water and wind is thus promoted, deepening the zone of weathering. {lie orien- tation and engineering significance of structural elements such as bedding, jointing and shearing must await more detailed site studies for specific projects. There are no known active faults in the area. The Concord Fault is approximately 3/1 of a mile to the east; the Calaveras Fault System is approximately two to three miles :est of the study area. There are a number of cross-faults in the area. These are short in length and are not known to be active. However, they appear to be cross- faults which are mechanically linked to the Calaveras Fault. The Calaveras Fault is perhaps the most active fault in the Bay Area today. In the ?Martinez Area this activity is not in recent evidence; however, this could possibly mean that the seismic pressure in the local area is building and suggests that the potential for a strong earthquake along the Calaveras is increasing. Through detailed site studies it is possible to identify hazardous conditions which can either be mitigated by appropriate site preparation methods or haz- ardous areas can be identified and avoided during construction (e.g. left in some form of open space land use). g. Soils Soils in the study area are mostly loams with some loamy sand soils . along Vine Hill Ridge and silty clay soils around the eastern edge of the amendment area. 19 002184 '17ic Soil Conscrl-ation Service has -interpreted the Properties of soil types (or upping units) for engineering uses. All of the soil types in the amendment area exhibit "severe" limitations for throe rated uses: septic tans: filter fields, road location, and dwellings without basements. A limitation rating of 10severe" ricans soil properties are "so unfavorable and difficult to correct or overcome as to require Major soil reclamation, special designs or intensive A:zintenance". Properties affecting suitablility of soil for septic tan;: absorption fields ore permeability, depth' to water tahle or rock, susceptibility to flooding, and slope. The soil limitations for dwellings refer to structures not wore than three stories high and supported by foundation footings placed in undisturbed soil. Properties affecting the suitability of soil to support dwellings and resist settlement under load are wetness, susceptibility to flooding, density, plasticity, texture and shrink-swell potential. also considered are factors affecting case of excavation such as slope, depth to bedrock and content of stones and rocks. Soil factors most important in determining soil suitabliity for road location are the stability of subgrade (affected by wetness and flooding) lead supporting capacity and case of excavation and amount of cut and fill required to obtain an even grade. Soils can be classified into our hydrologic soil groups based on csti:otcs of crater intakle during the last part of a long storm (after soil is wet and has had an opportunity to swell) , without the protective corer. Such classification can help to esti-Mate the amount of runoff expected. In ;roup "A" are soils with the fastest infiltration rates and lowest rtmoff potential while soils in group "D" have the slowest infiltration rate and the highest runoff po- tential. Groups "B" and "C' are intermediate in infiltra`ion and, runoff. Most of the soils in the study area belong in group "D" with the remainder in hydrologic group "C" (Map 6) . The extent to which a soil shrinks as it dries out or expands when it gets %;ct is known as its shrink-swell potential. Shrinking and shelling of soils causes considerable damage to building foundations, roads and other structures. Development on such soils can appreciably add to construction costs. 'tap 7 shows the location of soils with low, moderate or high shrink-swell potentials. A "high" shrink-swell potential indicates "a hazard to maintenance of structures built in, on, or with material having this rating". Photo-interpretive studies conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (1972) indicating areas of probable and possible landslide deposits are reproduced in Clap S. Except for the eastern slopes of Vine Hill Ridge there are only a few relatively small areas of landslide de- posits in the amendment area. lSoil Conservation Service, Cor-tra Costa Soil Survey (Preliminary Draft), Contra Costa Resource Conservation District 1973. 20 0085 �. sr ¢,�='utr4r.aal++tnJ..w'•+ z..`.e.'�yrr,,,•.7y ,{. V� . r ACMt f �#a �..t ......... • • .............. ..........- Z�•��:•f �' }�.4 :mow.+�1': :'":'•:: .t. •• � ♦ i ; ^ •'•♦ u :z:• r... '�,1�.«:::.•.�`:. h. .tir. 4': v •'d: C.S. s" L: .:Z ,y s :-t.r "J 1 �t 11 1 ' .��.' f: R•+o. r r o" _:'�•' :l:»...♦ :yr .z- i j'T qtr.= ; j a:�'.�1• :.t,! :•` 1 ' Lz ° r t" t ..... r. l.. •;ti k :i. :C• r: s :r i i? •y •:Zr. w r:• ����+�•�� ♦. or.. r 'K "zirr~: a f•i' T. " !+^: t4i: w i C f •s �a 43, ''J� r rr 431 •"w- <f•: V (` 1 R t r•T j+ `r- (( J w�y V i•+ r „I / .Y. } T / VI Jr (•�rM) VV t I - rE L _ 5': ✓•t �.... ..I a^: c1c mar* .:Y .�r�y`0ta+f 21 RlV+u4.7�` NP3 ems-off'^„•�•a ,� � : ��yy�•• ��}, /►` , « tM.�.f ,.......•_ ••..w .•lam-^ Nt (�G`' I' ::�~•t. ':•:• fit'' i YY ..... ._ . •r ct .............:. �f'I,,P¢��° - _ r• �» �� :_ 3* t:::::'.:::::::: ria+ '_... .`•.... `,•J(�'i .J�k"•'•":•.3.i ' t.............. .. 4.3 _ •� rn Zi. O f ,.� :jj.. 43 i� '•±'-:.t; r"•ssr•_J�:' ';-'" `.�+'+.�Ll o F`�FY :•.I.:•:'.'�-Iluw"• C� ca !� r: a- � +f :A'i��•�• {'. 'r `'' rnra tl O H to ::..ti: •. `i2J �i0.7 Fi r Ht t,i ,: 1q .� �M`�y �, J;•, �ry }o ♦anti r;:��:; •`' .•Y.•:.:: t�AA Id :'•:.::��� J. 'v�.� fa t rpt• awas��a• s • i! ti's.. ''4'', !.• '• ' F.. a *"a.t��O 22 r- r • - IMMJ// �j .•'•'� ;�S r Vj / tr�.•,�` V.. �Al f � . Q Orf"/• w4,r •r rs•. Nt ', Nj L A T4,+,,, ..�� �•--..� '/ L� �� i�J .-'��'-'r,M �� •vim �•„ V rq,{A A+ £"t•:'? _ `',�r� )R� �,7�h ''��:"�� ,.l .,r i': ir. �y+. FQ [(� �' - Y.} t j/) 7• f r,r,/-. .} - r �y 4,/"�. �' * Y; tA' 'S7 f `,r. >1 � t fr.� .• j; M,rF f '"s � �^ lots. �l r t t :j.r s A r ..w. Gr s7.1r 'i > ��a S'� t ell ��fir' jj� � .��,�r: ^� .� i.. 't , �:.' , � i r f ,f. "/ ii"'.. ter• ` S '/� } j ri {j'''1 �f ,.r°J r i ` �kt � �i`� �s•.i. •+..`",'+....,. s'',� � r s�' ,• f•`. �1,�s "•-� �� t� y.. �. J�.+ lr 1,Zr t " ?at �` Yf t� .� f I r•_i.i'- '}a i7► •,..err d 1 t f - •f; ` ' ;• ;'r}i�•x.. 'yfi ��✓� lj. S ~��. 1 % ( t � Ca` „"''a-•� �°_ `� � vi f �••��\ ['}' 't•f `V �,, �s j 1`'"'• r 1'f% "°i. � � � � ��," 00 ,� �c ��� � r `� � 'i ,'e• �f ! 4 R t S'. �'' t � � W V YJ 1 s ..i C+� s s {. .'' "„ •�s� �,������r�'Si.`fr" /.` `s ). �11��' r ,•t .G a1 ..,•� �;.�'' \�q°.� .1 ��� i� ,l - �, � ` •\~:�� r/is 't .�� ` _,� ..-�', •:�,, �• �v ram !� •ice•'•••1 V��r` � w {!(J/. '� f . r - The soils info rsation in this report, however, docs not eliminate need for further investigations at sites selected for engineering works, especially works that involve heavy loads or that require excavation to depths generally greater than 6 feet. Also, inspec- tion of sites, especially the small ones, is needed because many delineated areas of a given soil mapping unit may contain small areas of other lands of soil that have strongly contrasting prop- erties and different suitabliities or limitations for soil engi- neering. h. Hydrology The amendment area is mostly within the Vine hill drainage basin,. with portions of the eastern and southeastern parts of the study area being in the Grayson Creek drainage basin. The Vine Hill basin drains roughly five to seven square miles of generally low rolling landscape. .The intermittent stream system is poorly defined and riparian vegetation is not well developed. The depth of seasonal high water is shallots through parts of the watershed; artesian springs are abundant, reflecting the relative height of the stater table. Mean rainfall in the study area is less than 12 inches, the lowest in the Martinez environs. i. Climate and Air Quality The grneral climate in the !•ttriinez environs is characterizeu by warm, dry siurm ers and mild, tet canters; the growing season is about 270 days. -The study area c>periences less marine influence and comes u:.der increasing influence of the inland air mass, Hill- tops and valley floors tend to have cold :inters. The mid-slope areas of hills are affected by thermal belts c.hich reduce the cold winter tendency. In the stormier the micro-climate of the amendment area tends to be drier and hotter than areas to the west or north. Winds tend to be westerly and southwesterly. 71ie pollution potential of the Vine Ilill-Pacheco Boulevard corrider area is very high. The hills and mountains surrounding the Diablo Valley and the typical summertime inversion layer cause pollutants to quickly reach high levels during periods of low wind speed. Abundant sunshine and warm temperatures in summer are conducive to the formation of photo chemical oxidant. Considering the potential for air pollution nuisances within the amendment area and to the north and cast, the local wind pattern is highly fortunate. Areas southwest and west of these emission sources tend to be generally protected by the prevailing winds. Occasionally periods during early fall and winter, especially when associated with cold fronts, northerly, northeasterly and easterly winds will push emissions into the amendment area. 24 OQLB9 Air quality data for the station nearest the planting area ('1 Concord - indicate that oxidant levels exceeded the air quality standards' one to eleven days per month during the April-October period in 1975. Suspended particulates levels were exceeded two days each in May, June, and July; and one day each in September, October, and November, 1973. Carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide ' standard levels were not exceeded at the monitoring station during_ s 1973. J. Noise i Ambient noise levels vary greatly throughout the amendment area, depending upon tine of day and specific location within-the area. Detailed information on levels of noise within. the amendment area (with the exception of highway noise) is not available. The area, contains or is near a number of significant "fixed-point" noise sources, particularl; heavy industrial activities such as the Shell oil refinery. Important. transportation noise sources are r Interstate 680 and Highway 4, local arterials accommodating through, js=: traffic such as Pacheco Boulevard and Hoge Road (where a' large share of the traffic is trucks), and the traffic activity gen- crated by commercial development. Due to the extreme variability of environmental noise,, levels of noise are normally described statistically. , The noise environment is often described by the Llo level, which represents the noise level in A-weighted decibels' (dbA), which was 'exceeded 10% of the time. The L10 is a measure of the "average peak" noise level, and provides inforcation on the severity of maximum noise levels'. Map 9 approximates the L1O level for 65 dBA along Highway 4 and Interstate 680 in the amendment area. A level of 65 dBA is com- parable to that found inside a large store (more than five clerks). . The primary criteria of the 1973 Federal Highway Administration Noise Standards are that L10 for noise levels inside people-occupied spaces shall not exceed 55 dB, or for sensitive outdoor spaces' "..;,in which serenity and quiet are of extrordinary- significance....", 60- dB. : Shielding barriers that block the line-of-sight from the observer to. the highway are an "observer" factor affecting highway ,noise propaga tion. These include natural features.such as hills or other changes in ground elevation, and vegetation, including trees. Man-made shielding elements include houses or other structures,, walls, `earth< berms, etc. The acoustical effectiveness of the shielding depends upon the extent to which it blocks the line-of-sight to the highway,, as well as upon the characteristics of the barrier itself. If the view of highway vehicles is completely shielded, the A-level atten- uation by a solid barrier may vary from SdB for lour barriers to a- maximum of about 24 dB for very large barriers. A single row of houses may reduce highway noise about SdB; multiple rows of houses " will provide a reduction of up to 10 dB. Trees, -if densely planted, and at least 15 ft. tall, provide a reduction of about 5 dBper 100' ft. of woods depth, approaching a maxims of 10 dB. 'Standard for oxidant is 0.08 ppm (1 hour average); carbon zonoxide 9 ppm (3 hour average); suspended particulates loo g/m (24 hour average). Taken fro BAAPCD Technical Services Division Contaminant and Heather Suk=Ty.' 7 ' v `*•.✓:�r,'r'%'"'-+� ,--� � „rel , • J pp a as 44 I ice! f r' .Z+�i` • ..M#t. s, j"R •� O Ol r, t # sae+' ��C4nt`,♦ �+mac a e `�'. r4 �•� .••t Cpr • .s SJ J�.• .- 1 �f'"x �i••sj•rsx i'`.e•f+• 4�i1��..•�,� t r� U S-► • •Y • •y '~ 16 1� a � 7 rr�`� .•��� is '`�,.'�?��J' � �. �.'► t�_e♦ :)• O� j°�.;wZ �i is 1• ' •.! 'S : 'Y ,l is Old 00 0 It to vv j �r�• � .,,,,�t'�sytD"�': ! : � �• x���1`� �1+�* �41 Qom"' ,t1 • E' 3 -•`�% �;���;�"�• � was J • •! �..R'���r'T �'�P Imo• �rlr '..���. i� t '. • •�: � 1 .•i1� * r .. , • • •• r B. Enviroamental Impact Analysis 1. Environmental Impact of Proposei :Action The General Plan is the County's basic long-term policy for guiding public and private development Lid providing public services. The proposed amendment, if adopted, would revise the' Land Use Element of Contra Costa County's General Plan. a. Land Use Impact (1) Planned Residential Use A major impact of the proposed amendment on the long-range development of the area would be to decrease the amount of land intended for residential use in the General Pian by approximately 51 percent (595{ acres). Also, the amend- ment proposes a greater variety of residential densities than does the current plan. Table 3 compares the different general plan residential categories proposed by the amendment and the existing General Plan for various parts of the amendment area together with the number and percent of the total esti- mated- allowable population for these residential use pro- TABLE 3: COMPARISON OF RESIDE.MAL TYPES 1` XIM I ESTIMATED POPULATION* GENERAL PLAN RESIDENTIAL Existing General Plan Amendment USE CLASSIFICATION Kumber Percent Ntunber Percent Single Family Res.-Low Density 0 0 910 3 Single Family Res.-Medium Density 8,390 23 3,330 12 Single Family Res.-lligh Density 26,;:0 77 17,805 65 Multiple Fan. Res.-Lok Density 0 0 900 3 Multiule Fa.n. D.nsity 0 0 4,620 17 "TOTAL 35,130 100 27,570 100 *Rounded to the nearest 10's In the fine Hill sub-area where much of the now development is expected, the amendment proposes a different distribu- tion of Single Family Residential uses than that of the existing plan. The proposals of the amendment correspond more closely with the topography of the area, designatinglw high density development in the flat to rolling central area where access to tumor roads is good, and lower den- sities where the terrain is more varied. One effect of 27 W-392 this land use proposal would be to reduce development costs and the hazards of residential development on hillsides, as greater lot areas would allow greater opportunity for site planning with environmental considerations-in, mind. (2) Planned Commercial and Industrial Uses Associated with the change in area planned for residential use is an increase in the amount of area designated for comaaercial and industrial uses over that shown by the current General Plan. The amendment also specifies in greater detail r:hat types of uses are to be established in a particular part of the amendment area. Based on the factors of 10 employees per acre for commercial' uses and 4 employees per acre for industrial uses, the proposed amendment could provide roughly 1,050 more local jobs than provided for in the current General Plan. Table 4 indicates the additional acreage proposed for cmplo}zn--nt uses above that included in the current General Plan. TAL'Id: 4: NEW AIT..ASl PL.MNED FOR EMPLOYMENT USE of UlND USE ACRES STUDY AREA Co=crcc-- 21 1$ Industry 211 S% TOTAL 248 9% 1Areas not shown for ci:ployment use in 1963" Land Use Element and either vacant or in residential or other non-intensive use. 2Includes Linited Office, Retail Shopping and Cormercia2 Service (General) - 'Includes Light Industry, Controlled Industry and Industry (General). As proposed by the amendment, 15 percent of the increase in employment areas is for commercial uses, mostly retail shop- - ping. The amount of land which would allow Heavy Industrial (1I-1) zoning--the Controlled Industry and Industry (General)- is reduced in the amendment proposals by 6 percent from that of the area's present general plan. It is recommended, how- ever, that the areas designated for Controlled Industrial use be zoned 11-3, Controlled heavy Industrial Zoning District, Which provides for a 250-foot buffer strip where adjacent 28 40393 to non-industrial districts. Generally the amendment pro- vides for better buffering of residential areas than the current general plan by designating Light Industry or Con- trolled Industry near residential developments in areas which the General Plan now shows for Industry. In the corridors and crossroad areas proposed for commercial and light industrial use by the amendment, there are already scattered intensive uses existing. The General Plan amend- ment could act to restrict further uncoordinated develop- ment of the area's major arterials and minimize the possibility of unsightly "strip" appearance by clustering similar uses together into unified centers. These clusters could also be more efficient in attracting business by combining their "draw- ing power". h1iile the location of these intensive uses on principal circulation corridors and intersections makes them more accessible, more traffic congestion could occur in these areas. (3) Open Space The refining of the open space boundary as proposed by the amendment could add approximately 127± acres along the crest and eastern slopes of bine Hill Ridge into the Open Space category within the Urban_ Growth Area category as described in the County's Open Space-Conservation Plan. The designation, of that area as open space would restrict development from the unstable parts of the east side of the ridge, reducing erosion potential and preserves an aesthetically pleasing ridgeline. b. Populution and Housing Impact The proposed reduction of the area to be devoted to residential use, coupled with the more detailed allocation of residential densities mould lower the number of allowable dwelling units by approximately 14 percent (1,300± units), and the estimated maximum population by 26 percent. The decrease in estimated population is greater than that fon- the dwelling units because of the typically smaller family. size for multiple residential inhabitants. The proposed greater variety of residential units could have a social impact on the amendment area as different housing types trend to attract or are available to varying segments of the population. For instance, the apartment units which typify the Multiple Family Resi- dential-High Density category- are particularly utilized by single people, young and old, as well as young couples with limited incomes. As housing prices rise, more and more people are purchasing condo- miniums and to►;nhouses such as might be developed in the areas pro- posed for Multiple Family Residential-Loan Density use. Differing - segments of the population utilize and require different services. The more heterogenous a community is, the greater the demand for a 29 00394 variety of services. As the existing plan only designates ,a limited scope of residential types, .the proposed amendment can be seen to generate a need for more types of public and private facilities than otherwise might be expected.-, however, because of the reduction of the maximum number of dti.elling units and population resulting from the land use proposals :of the amend- ment, the level of° services demand ,ill most likely be -less than. :: would be expected from the current plan." This could have an; environmental effect in reduced construction-and maintenance " y x,% costs of community facilities. r c. Circulation Impact The land use proposals of the amendment will generate and/or ` attract approximately 177,400 vehicular trip,ends on the circulation network (see Map 10). With or without the-amend- ment to the General Plan, the area is prone to increased F, traffic and general growth as the Central County area conti- nues to develop. The amendment, however, is expected to generate about 1S percent more vehicular trips than the cur a' rent General Plan due to the increa_sed`amount:of-land area proposed for commercial and industrial uses, as such uses, ,' ' . �e typically generate more traffic than residential uses. Table 5 compares the estimated ADT's that could be generated 4V by the current General Plan and the amendment. a x TABLE 5:. ESTIMATED VEHICULAR TRIPENDS CURRENT PROPOSED . PERCERIT LAND USE GENERAL P"I AMENDMENT DIFFEREIICE Single Family Residential 92,500 58,600 Multiple Family Residential 0 13,300 - Sub-total 3,300 Sub-total 92,500 71,900 22.3, Industry 40,200 59,900 Neighborhood Commercial 12,800 29,300 , t. Community Commercial Q 16,3W ,t i Industry/Commercial Sub-total 53,000 10S,500 49.8 Total Trip Ends Generated 145,500 177,400 18.0 �q. In reality, the higher figure attributed to industrial and commercial development is on the high side as some of this type of development has already taken place at variance with the General Plan and is not reflected in the current General . Plan figures. With the proposed additions and improvements to the circula- tion as shown on the Major Roads Plan Administration Map and. described in part in an earlier section of this report, the 30, •03� / Y vtS qac «v •. `• { f ' r r' i �✓, i f t• t tl e�TO'� x, • f� r r, r lss�,� �{ t �� yi� Fl j•'- ��Iw";�y�'ll.��T. 1 •s, ±� ,'1_" ..�� 'f f4� t�,?��wr sf"ti�_ • . �7 '• ft'",�a 1�'"+.�`�t •'�";w ` J.' r . e �+- �fi..M..r{'� w �. X1.1 K MAP Af CAA ' . . zt� t ' sRt • Oft . ��'� �'--"-'"`�;.-sus• �~`�� t-� tS - , "'� L-'►c r ��� f i-x � r��#�, 1, .+lt� �'I.:.'•.�" '.� r�•'• �' �+`r 7f � �!t•-.,,,.. , t•^►• t,•.� t 's}'",�i'' t �. ('� �V'.�r yr ♦f�! J`:'+,.1-2.4 \�f� 4 'tT..-.i�. circulation system will be adequate to handle the anticipated traffic volumes_ The 100-foot right-of--may/80-foot pavement standard proposed for Pacheco Boulevard could typically include four 12-foot traffic lanes, two 8-foot parking lanes, and a 16-foot median with left turn pockets at major inter- sections. The 84/64-foot standard proposed for Howe Road, Morello Avenue, and part of Arthur Road could include four 12-foot traffic lanes and two S-foot parking lanes. In addi- tion, the development of a freeway frontage road in conjunc- tion with the current llight:ay 4 improvements will effectively serve as an cast-hest collector road in the.southern portion of the Planning Area and is expected to handle approximately S,000 ADT's. f It is estimated that daily riderships on the proposed "L Route" serving the Martinez area would be about 73i: and another 4001 would utilize Dial-a-Ride, removing roughly 1,:'10 vehicle trips from the local road network per day. While this is a relatively insignificant amount, the greater impacts lie with the potential use of less fuel and the "greater accessibility to transportation for the aged and the poor. d. Community Facilities and Utilities Impact The impact of land use modifications on community facilities and utilities are in most cases not major since the area is already sufficiently built-in with services which will be adequate for additional growth. Effects to some types of com- munity facilities by the amendment are not discussed here due to minimal impact. Potential impacts of the amendment are generally less than could be anticipated through the current General Plan due to the lower allowable population. Schools Using current pupil-resident ratios, there are approximately 2,100 students (K-12th grade) residing within the amendment area, based on these same ratios, the proposed amendment could generate as many as 6,000± students and the current General Flan 8,900±, However, the trend of diminishing family size could result in substantially less future enrollment totals. Nevertheless, it should be anticipated that addi- tional school facilities will be necessary to ultimately serve the arca. Utilities Service {tater, sewerage, gas and electric service will necessarily need to be expanded to serve a population of approximately, 27,500 in thc. amendment area as compared to the present popu- lation of 5,230, When compared with the current General Plan, residential service would be less and commercial and resi- dential service would be greater under the amendment. In 32 OOU� _ general terms, this means that the potential residential usage could be reduced from the current General Plan proposals by 3 million± gallons of rater per day and 760,000± gallons of sewage per day. However, this residential reduction could be more than offset with the replacement of commercial and indus- trial uses %;i►ich are typically higher uses. It is difficult to estimate %that this latter usage might be as the consump- tion rates differ greatly according to specific users. e. Soils and Landslide Impact The apparent inability of soils within the amendment area to support septic tank sewage disposal can affect development plans, particularly for remote sites. In areas where other constraints prevent the installation of sewer lines, even very low residential densities could prove untenable because of soil unsuitability for on-site waste discharge. Although practical engineering solutions are available, develop- ment on soils with high shrink-swell properties will add appreciably to construction costs by requiring employment of special foundation techniques to offset these effects. Such measures may include foundations. which extend below the zone of seasonal moisture change (such as drilled piers), continuous footings (grade beams) chamfered on the bottom edge, and special si')-bases for paved surfaces which will reduce the transmittal of surface changes. The existing General Plan designates the entire eastern slope of Vine Hill Ridge for single family residential development, mostly at medium density. Although the identification is termed "uncertain", U. S. Gc,ological Survey preliminary photo interpretive map shows 55± acres of landslide deposits in the area now planned for residential development. Thus, the amendment prop-)sal of designation of this land for open space use has a positive environmental impact by reducing the possi- bility of life and/or property loss should there be a slope failure in the area. f. Hydrologic Impact Basically, significant hydrologic issues are not .evident. Over drafting of graundwater or the extension of impermeable surfaces through extensive development could cause a lowering of the water table which, if significant, could lead to land subsidence. However, it is more likely that extensive residential development will actually serve to increase the groundwater level through importations brought by lawn irrigation. Parts of the the amendment area have a high erosion hazard be- cause of the steep slope, slight vegetation, and low permeabi- lity soils. The watercourses can be expected to carry larger 33 Q awl nts of nater and silt because.of more impervious surfaces, cut slopes and exposed soils. Storii drains can be expected to carry more and more water as development continues. Erosion and run-off will be increased due to the grading and the paving associated with development of the area. The U, S., Geo- logical Survey states that in a I square mile area, complete storm severing and paving of 60 percent of the surface--com- parable to dense residential housing--can iricIZease- the- average annual peak flow by a factor of more than four. g. Air Quality ImEnct The plan proposals would allow additional residents and traffic in the area. However, the major factor relative to air quality in the amendment area are the presence of I-680, Highway 4, and existing nearby industrial activities. The impact of develop' hent within the amendment area, as proposed by the plan, is minimal compared to that of outside sources. New air pollution control regulations should go into effect in 1975 for all nev: cars, which ultimately will significantly reduce pollutants discharged from individual cars. h. Noise Inpact The detailed noise levels to be expected in future development pursuant to this General Plan are dependent upon specifics of development and cannot be assessed at this time. The more intense development along Pacheco Boulevard and Howe Road;can be assumed to increase noise levels. An increased noise level could discourage future residential development or be harmful to the resale values of existing hones in areas adjacent to commercial and/or industrial areas. However,:,Inoise level changes due to implementation of the amendment proposals are expected to be small. As with air pollution, the most adverse impacts from noise are expected to emanate from Highway I-680 as well as exist- ing and currently planned industrial use in and around the area 2. Adverse Environmental Effects which Cannot be Avoided if this proposal is lmplemcnted Ile can classify environmental impacts of development in general under major categories: biological impacts, utility and community facility impacts, circulation impacts and socio-economic impacts. It is not anticipated that the adoption of the proposed amendment would accele- rate development or transition of land uses within the Planning Area. Development can result in additional people, traffic, noise, and demands on utilities and other municipal services. It should be noted that the proposed amendment would in general have a lesser impact than the existing General Plan. 34 f F k 4m 44 The biological impacts of development will be adverse and essentially unavoidable. Habitat areas will be reduced-or destroyed, and much, natural vegetation may be removed. In addition, increased automobile traffic will lower ambient air quality. However, the area has already changed to an urban area of relatively high ,density without strong existing biological values. £' Improvements in the ciruclation system as proposed in the County's '= Major Roads Plan Administration Map .ill be necessary as- the addi- tional traffic to be generated by development will push the average' daily traffic counts far above the existing counts. Although development of the area will cause significant g 1 increases in` demand for municipal and utility services, the agencies involved indicate that their planned capabilities will be able to meet the anticipated demand without unreasonable expansions. The socio-economic impact of the continued development of the area will be primarily positive. Additional revenues jobs, and'duelling units will become available to governmental agencies and individuals' 3. Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact a. Secondary Impact Measures The action of amending the County General Plan in itself would not have a direct environmental impact on the area but rather, provides a development policy under which subsequent development projects could occur. Detailed mitigating measures c;n be re quire3 at the time these specific projects, are proposed.- b. Further Governmental ProcessMeasures Due process of the law will be followed in the adoption of the ` General Plan amendment, application of "imple,aentirg ordinances, and projects approved in conformance. All project-proposaTs will have to meet codes and conditions of the various county 'departments in receiving site pian approval..' These plans' should;r be sensitive to the preservation of existing environmental assets, such as trees, vegetation, and the enhancement of stable neigh- ; borhoods. = c. Land Development Measures Applicants for development projects, particularly along Pacheco Boulevard, could be encouraged to assembles larger parcels, where feasible, to optimize design and circulation access flexibility, aesthetics and project quality. N° The easterly slope of the Vine Hill Ridge exhibits evidence. of unstable soils. The anendncnt. proposes the steeper portions of the slope be retained in its natural state, thereby eliminating. ; OV40O', 35 y �'1 T7ce biological impacts of development will be adverse and essentially wiavoidable. Habitat areas will be reduced or destroyed, and much natural vegetation may be removed. In addition, increased automobile traffic will lowcr ambient air quality. However, the area has already changed to an urban area of relatively high density without strong existing biological values. Improvements in the ciruclation system as proposed in the County's ' Major Roads Plan Administration Map will be necessary as the addi_- tional traffic to be generated by development will push the average daily traffic counts far above the existing counts. Although development of the area will cause significant increases in demand for m:uiicipal and utility services, the agencies involved indicate that their planned capabilities will be able to meet the anticipated demand without unreasonable expansions. The socio-economic impact of the continued development of the area will be primarily positive. Additional revenues, jobs, and dc+relling units will become available to governmental agencies and individuals. 3. gating Measures Proposed to fiinimize the Imoact a. Secondary Impact Measures The action of amending the County General Plan in itself would not have a direct environmental impact on the area but rather provides a development policy under which subsequent development projects could occur. Detailed mitigating measures can be re- quired at the time these specific projects are proposed, b. Further Governmental Process Measures Due process of the lac; will be followedin the adoption of the General Plan amendment, application of impleaenting ordinances, and projects approved in conformance. All project proposals will have to meet codes and conditions of the various county departments in receiving site plan approval. These plans should be sensitive to the preservation of existing environmental assets such as trees, vegetation, and the enhancement of stable neigh- borhoods. c. Land Development ?Measures Applicants for development projects, particularly along Pacheco Boulevard, could be encouraged to assertible larger parcels, where feasible, to optimize design and circulation access flexibility, aesthetics and project quality. The easterly slope of the fine Hill Ridge exhibits evidence of unstable soils. The amendment proposes the steeper portions of the slope be retained in its natural state, thereby eliminating 35 0V40"AU. the placement of structures in areas of high geologic risk dnd the need for massive grading. Regulation of development on the westerly side of brine Hill Ridge, which has fairly steep areas yet is more buildable than the eastern side, could be accom- plished by slope density ordinance provisions similar to those being considered by the County for a countywide ordinance. d. Transportation ?Measures Implement proposed circulation improvements as recommended in the Major Roads Plan. These improvements are necessary with or without the General Plan amendment. Establish organization, funding and programs for local bus routes and Dial-a-Ride. Efficient mass transit would promote.- area autonomy, independence from the automobile, lower trip generation within the area, and increase efficient utilization of energy resources. e. Seismicity.?Measures The San F=rancisco Bay region has repeatedly demonstrated that structures on sites near the edge of valleys sustain damage out of proportion to their distance from the epicenter of the earthquake. With respect to the design standards for buildings, recent engineering geology studies in this portion of the Cour--ty have recommended that commercial or high-occupancy structures be designed to accommodate accelerations of .2 to .3g. This appears to be a very realistic approach which takes into account the geologic and seismic setting of the Martinez area. 4. Alzernatives to the Proposed Action a. No Amendment No change in the General Plan would mean the retention of the County General flan as adopted in 1963 and amended by the Circu- lation Plan in 1971 and the Open Space-Conservation Plan in 1973 as the General Plan policy document for the area. This alterna- tive would leave numerous general plan/zoning inconsistencies. To rezone these properties to conform with the present General Plan would create a multitude of legal non-conforming uses through- out the Planning Area. This action would also potentially allow for more population and housing than the proposed amendment. b. Adopt the Gencral Plan of the City of ;Martinez for this Portion of the City's Sphere of Influence This action uvuld not measurably change the overall impacts from the proposed amendment in the long run and would not address or correct some of the inconsistencies between the general plan and 36 00402 4 zoning; found in the area. Much of the area is placed in a "holding zone" classification on the City's plan pending further study, thereby delaying the placement of development policies on those areas through this amendment. ' c. Modifications of the Proposed Amendment The amendment proposals are the product of the consideration in the planning process of existing development, development trends, and existing zoning and their relationship to sur- roundings. Consideration was given to more or less of a par- ticular land use in the area, a different land use, and, in some instances, a combination of these. The overall effects of modified land use proposals or their combinations within the Planning Area would not likely have significantly differing impacts on the environment. S. The Relationship Between Local Short-term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance of Long-tern Productivity The proposed general plan amendment provides the framework in which short-teiia uses are detailed and can work toward the long-term development pattern appropriate to the area. The proposed amendment would bring the General Plan and Zoning Ordi- nance _ntu conformance, and would also bring the County General Plan. into substantial agreement with the City of Martinez' plan, thereby providing a more cohesive and coordinative development policy to the area. hgien compared with the existing- General Plan, the proposed amendment will decrease the allowable population, increase open space, provide a greater mix of housing types and densities, could increase local employment through greater areas being devoted to commercial and industrial uses, and, in general, could increase traffic. The demand on resources in both the short and long-term are increased through area development; however, the relative differences between the exist- ing General Plan and proposed amendment is difficult to assess. Short-run economic benefits include employment in project construction. Short-ran detriments include the noise and dust during construction. The proposed amendment, when implemented by proper zoning and develop- ment, will effectively remove the subject land from future considera- tion for other uses. The land in the planning phase is suitable and available for a wide range of alternative uses with diverse probable impacts on the environment. Once the amendment is passed, it is still necessary to monitor various zoning controls, such as site plan review, to insure proper urban development. If proper precautions are taken, the long-terra productivity should be maintained and enhanced, 37 O9- 403-- 6. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes lihich Would be Involved in the Proposed Action Should it be Implemented The area has already been substantially developed in various land uses. Alternative forms of urban development to the proposed plan would have essentially the same irreversible effect when the plan is effectuated through actual construction. The iumtcdiate results from a general plan amendment are easily reversible. However, when this is refined by ordinances and project approvals are given, this ordinarily requires alterations of exist- ing land fors within and adjacent to the site. The act of covering land with a structure is in itself a form of irreversibility because commitment of substantial resources makes removal or non-use unlikely for a considerable time in the future. The visual, social, economic and ecological setting will be altered. The environmental changes from the standpoint of each of these factors could benefit from the action. Permanent resource commitments result from any construction proposal, although such resources may differ in regard to their relative rarity." Of course, during the construction of the structures, wood, steel, concrete, and other construction non-renewable materials would be used. During the operational phase there will be continued dependency on gas and electric resources. Any additional residences will put further burden on public utilities and their abilities to provide services. Such demands will increase the irreversible use of non- renewable resources such a-s fossil fuels or atomic fuel elements to provide gas or electric power. 7. The Grosnh-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action It is not anticipated that the proposed action would induce growth and its attendant impacts at a faster rate or to a greater degree than the existing :Jeneral Plan. The amendment could result in approxi- mate net decrease of 26 percent in population, 14 percent in housing units, 376± more acres of commercial and industrial development than shoum in the present General Plan. It should be noted here, however, that some of the latter type of development already exists, but at variance with the current General Plan. The indirect ramifications of the amendment on population, traffic, and community facilities are analyzed in earlier sections. The amendment would channel new growth into more defined land use patterns than does the current plan.. S. Organizations and Persons Consulted; Documents Utilized During the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports for general plan amendments, written and oral communications take place between the Planning Department and other county departments and appropriate cities' staff. The general plan and various ordinance codes for the County and cities are also scrutinized regarding the proposed action. If additional consultations, contacts of consequence, and documents were used, the), arc referenced below. 38 004114_ rt"T r r, 9. Qualifications of the EIR Preparation Agency ` This Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the: Contra. Costa . . County Planning Department. The majority, of the' ' general plans or general plan amendments are prepared. by ihe_COM rt�r munity Planning Section personnel of the Advance-Planning Division. Other planning departments and other county personnel, are.:uti I ized- ` _. incerc necessary. y, This General Plan EIR was prepared by the following: t Edward D Stout, Project Planner ` Steve Burkey, Planner r, :.t rwr. c 5 39 rr � s l M• BOARD OF APPEALS - FEBRUARY 11, 1975 HARRIS REALTY CO. (Applicant) - HARRY H. $ JERONIE MAGEE (Owners) (R-20) (1154-74) The applicant requests approval to have an average lot width,variance of. f' 77' . Subject property is described as follows: A descriptive parcel fronting:. - 109' on the east side of La Gonda Way at the southeast corner of Freeway, 680 underpass and La Gonda Way, in_the Danville area. BACKGROUND This variance application was heard by the Zoning Administrator on. January, y` 20, '1975. This application was discussed at that meeting by both the applcant. and "`~ those immediate neighbors who were opposed tothevariance. The primary reason for the opposition to the request is that the"applicant intends to move an older, small home to the site and renovate the house." ♦, elk After some deliberation, the Zoning Administrator approved the variance request, based on the following reasons: 'r 1. The only consideration before the Zoning Administrator under applica tion 1154-74 was whether or not the lot width modification was justi-. fiable. 2. The question of architectural compatibility of any proposed home on the.. site could not be considered part of the application, since that could by the subject of the building moving permit. , 3. The Zoning Administrator found that a definite hardship did exist and, therefore, granted the variance request. On January 22, 1975, the immediately adjacent neighbor to the subject prop- erty, Lloyd G. Stark, appealed the decision of the Zoning Administrator to the Board of Appeals. Mr. Stark based his appeal on the following Conten- tions: 1. An infringement would be made on his privacy with the granting of the variance. The purchase of his property was based on the assumption that Z-oning regulations would prohibit a house on. the adjoining prop- erty. 2. The purchase of the subject property by the applicant was speculative. 00406, f a Farris Realty Co. -2- Board of Appeals #1154-74 February 11, 1975 3. The size of the variance granted is too great in deviation. STAFF CONSIDERATIONS The subject parcel was created through the sale of excess freeway right- of-way in 1969. The properties immediately south of the site were already established lots through a minor subdivision in 1966.. Mr. Magee acquired the property and, upon offering it for sale to Harris Realty Company, discovered that the lot did not meet the required minimum width for the R-20 District. Although the lot has 109' frontage on La Gonda Way, when the formula for computing average width is applied, it averages approximately 771 , due to the depth and unusual configuration of the parcel. Staff considers the variance request justifiable for the following reasons: 1. Variances similar to this request have been granted in the immediate vicinity through approval of Minor Subdivisions 8-65 and 145-66, at which time average lot width and average lot depths were modified. 2. To deny the variance would render the lot unbuildable and would impose an unreasonable hardship on the applicant. 3. Although the request is for an average width of 77' , the actual front- age dimension is 109' . The applicant would still meet all setback and sideyard requirements. 4, Any home, if moved to the site, will be subject to architectural review by the County Building Inspection Department. Any structure found to be incompatible with surrounding homes would not be allowed to be moved onto the property. REMMENDAT IONS Staff recommends that the decision of the Zoning Administrator be. uphel'd' and the appeal be denied. 004077. EIR ADDENDUM VIDE HILL-PACHE-CO CORRIDOR AREA AMEND?SENT The geology section of the EIR (Page 19) should make reference-to the fault zone which abuts the northwest boundary of the amendment area. This fault zone is identified as one of the unnamed fault zones by the State Geologist (Alquist-Priolo Act/SB 520). Future studies of these zone traces may show these to be more potentially dangerous than they presently appear. ,t C.C.C.P.D. 11/26/74 C p Q} t) n3 o to (? 0-OVA, Vag (n ca sra . N +� N t1 N C Q � 2 m caw Q 4) CS (ti t!t W t 2 t �" 3 C w = C} 0 }SS 0 W .0 0 cu +ice. ,r Q C} 'L7 '"` u3 tV LIi. Q to > 4? —"(U E ,@ C 0 j� � ° 3 � � tai ty ... A E � t. ._ co — ,�•�,,�, 6 .a 0 .0 3 N i .� cly 0) cm / C ~�- O i V Q I; , O p 7. :3N Q cfS o ° o m a ro OL ; 4 QUjQS • 3 rltjt , {} qi tC! t3 N > n.. Q — to C* p m tori t L C " N (SS }� C O Q x M r Q �` w o _ u-�`z 14 L 3� r t1i Z7 t1 Q > C q� �v rr. } < tp `� > 3 > .ate; cai •` ' it; ��. '' :_ (a Q C ,.. as o ca to VIP .0 t�►t rtl � ti' u� 1- oz C .0 Ll. (� ► G t ;: r i �S 2 �H2 � i wj! 1�P • t ":�2"`Y F^. � 4 ir�„�h �G4:1".,�' `,��{l s 1 • �ti+'�(• * r! (� sy iI ;T2'uiL'#rts . t = r R � 4 tic . � • I ,.,.-l' r ,.,� � . "i AN i`i t��° jl�s't>� a4t.i�1T ems" t�x`�. >�}`��''• t' 1 '� I t t • y4a wb � ".•.�% F �� ta• l4r t �1��`s��# ti i � r;rti�r tx Fy K:{ / +� �L+�' r c +�- �} 2 5; PLANNING CONWSZ40"WKWIMS AKTHOKY A_ OEHAESUS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY aU►[GT07� PLANNING DONALD E. ANDERSON, MOwwcw - ALBERT R. .HILDE LIA. ►.,w ALPO PLANNING DUARTN+MW RICHARD D. NILDEeRAND, �rwu+ut CKZR RICHARD J. JENA. [L SOURAMM - WILLIAM L MILAN0,Prrrpuwo COLIN" wp041HISTRATION OUILWN6, HQ*TH WIKO JACK STDDOARD, wlcMrOMO ANDREW H. YOUNG. AL&MO P.O.so:961 r"Cote 22A-30W RESPONSES TO COMM-NTS ON 71iE DRAFT EIR FOR THE PROPOSED UAa�D�E-'vir TO THE GENERAL PLAN FOR TiiE t'INE III LL-PACIIECO BOULEVARD CORRIDOR AREA To Concerned Parties: This document is the Contra Costa County Planning Department response to verbal and written testimony received by the County Planning Commission hearings on the draft EIR for the General Plan Amendment for the Vine IEill Pacheco Boulevard Corridor area. The final EIR will consist of this docu- ment and the draft EIR. 2 The proposed amendment to the County General Plan, is for an area comprised _ of approximately 2,62S acres and is bounded on the gest by the City of Martinez, on the south by Highway 4, extends cast of Interstate 680 from about 1/4 to 3/4 of a mile, and north of Pacheco Boulevard by roughly the . same distance. f1 Y�2 "r RESPONSES TO C0NZ1EtiCS ON T11E DRIFT EIR FOR ME PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN IN THE VINE HILL-PACHECO CORRIDOR AREA Introduction With the enactment of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and its subsequent guidelines, local agencies were given the responsi- bility for the preparation of EIRs (Environmental Impact REports) for public projects. In March of 1973, the County of Contra Costa adopted guidelines for the "Processing Procedures of Environmental Impact Reports on Public Projects". In accordance with these guidelines, an EIR was prepared for the proposed area general plan and a notice of completion was posted on October 28, 1974. This EIR was circulated to agencies and the public. A hearing on the EIR was held by the Planning Commission in the County Supervisors, Chambers on November 26, 1974. At this hearing, verbal testimony and written comments were received pertaining to the contents of the draft EIR, with the time to receive written comments on the EIR extended to November 15th. The draft EIR, together with this response to comments received on the draft EIR, will comprise a final EIR which is described as follows by the adopted County guidelines: Final EIR means an EIR containing the information specified in the draft EIR plus a section for comments received in the consultation process, and the response of the Responsible Agency to the comments received_ The policy of the County has been to handle these responses in one of two manners. The draft EIR may be revised to incorporate such comments and the lead agency (Contra Costa County) responses or the responses may be added to the draft EIR. Because of the length and complexity of the draft EIR, the Planning Department staff has chosen the second method. It was often difficult to distinguish between comments directed at the draft EIR and comments directed at the plan itself. The Planning staff attempted to make this distinction by carefully reading all the testimony and written materials to discover their intent. Many of the comments received related to the plan itself. These comments are not appropriate to the EIR response and will be dealt with separately. None of the testimony taken at the first public hearing was directed toward the adequacy of the EIR, but rather toward the plan itself. Two letters have been received which are directed toward the EIR and are discussed here. 00411. Eater Service The EIR discusses water service to the Planning Area on page 17. The following comments on the EIR, as it pertains to water service wer received from the Contra Costa hater District and should be considered e in conjunction with the material already nrnyid q in T., ents ..uu Wii..4_11 maLeiial� Lu ui�wV J- u,.C1, l,n,e„ta . Many O� the COAIJAopri received related to the plan itself. These es eseparately.comments re not appropriate to the EIR response and will be dem None o£ the testimony taken at the first public hearing ward the wasidirectedTwo toward the adequacy of the EIR, but rather letters have been receivto ed which are directed toward the EIR and are discussed here. pa4�1. ;later Service The EIR discusses water service to the Planning Area on page 17. The following comments on the EIR, as it pertains to water service, were received from the Contra Costa Mater District and should be considered in conjunction with the material already provided in the EIR. .I . Regarding water Service, the Contra Costa County Water District provides raw, or untreated, water to the planning area. Untreated water is provided by the Contra Costa Canal System to the City of Martinez, which provides domestic water to approximately 40 percent of the area. The Contra Costa Canal receives water from the Sacramento . River Delta via Rock Slough near Oakley. Domestic Nater is provided the remaining 60 percent (approximately) of the area by the Treated Water Division (TWD) of the Water 1 District. The TWD receives its water from the Contra Costa Canal and directly from the Sacramento River near Pittsburg via pipeline. 2. The Contra Costa Canal passes through the planning area to the Martinez Reservoir. Martinez Reservoir is a part of the Canal System and is the terminal reservoir for the Canal. The City of !iartinez Filtration Plant is located on Pacheco Boulevard near Howe Road_ Contra Costa County hater District plans the orderly development-of its facilities to accommodate normal growth_ The amendment to the General Plan is anticipated to place greater - Zona-term demand for water on the District--both the Contra Costa Canal System and the facilities of the Treated Water Division. A greater demand on the District's source of water, the Sacramento Rover, must be assumed. This would have a long-term effect on the net outflow of the Sacramento River. The population densities, as proposed, would require the expansion and extension of TND facilities to serve the area. Back-up facilities (treatment, pumping and storage) are required to, accommodate any new development. The long-term effect is expansion of treatment facilities, with increased demands for energy and chemicals; expansion of pumping facilities, with increased demands for energy and possible noise pollution; and expansion of reservoirs, with possible aesthetic effects, as reservoirs must be constructed on readily visible elevated parcels of land. Noise effects from operating pimps can be partially or totally mitigated. by burying or enclosing pumping stations. Aesthetic concerns regarding reservoirs can be partially or totally mitigated by burying the reservoir. 00412 r . ------------ These comments relate to changes from existing conditions. No appreciable increase in water consumption from the 1963 General Plan is caused by the proposed amendment. Drainage The EIR discusses hydrology in the amendment area on pages 24 and 33. The following comments on the EIR, as it pertains to drainage, were received from the Flood Control Planning Division of the County Public Works Department. 1. At the present time, the area has deficient existing drainage improvements and natural waterways which do not have the capacity to convey the existing and proposed runoff within and from the subject area. 2. The impact of reducing the amount of residential land use for multiple family residential and commercial uses will increase the amount of impervious surfaces and result in increased runoff. This increased runoff will further overburden the existing storm drain systems and natural waterways and increase the possibility of flooding. 3. The report does not describe the specific drainage problems. The existing drainage facilities in the area are largely inadequate and in some areas nonexistent. To fully analyze the drainage situation would require an extensive drainage study. Because of the wide latitude for development and specific land uses permitted by various general plan land use categories, it is difficult to assess specific impacts of the proposed amendment on the area drainage. In general, it can be stated that decreasing the area devoted to residential uses and increasing areas devoted to commercial and industrial uses could increase the impervious surfaces, creating additional runoff. It should be noted, however, that much of the "proposed" commercial and industrial areas are already substantially developed. As shown on the following map, the amendment area is within portions of four drainage zones as established by the Flood Control District. The upper portion of Drainage Zone 88 lies north of Highway 4 and within the amendment area. The drainage zone drains under Contra Costa Boulevard via a 48 inch line into Grayson Creek. This area has had a history of flooding south of Highway 4, outside the Amendment Area, in the Temple Drive area in Pacheco. Runoff from the amendment area can be expected to increase with the development of the portions of drainage _one area north of Highway 4. However, the potential for runoff should be considerably less under the proposed amendment than under the current. General Plan, due to a general lowering of densities and designation of much of the area for open space. Q0413 r - - _ • - �. _ ' '- i' �. . y3�� .4 i Wit. _- 11.11 U1..111i1g - -Ulle✓ U!� U)r Lll'- ,-IUUU LUM.&Vl UiJL1.1t.L. The upper portion of Drainage Zone 88 lies north of Highway 4 and within the amendment area. The drainage zone drains under Contra Costa Boulevard via a 48 inch line into Grayson Creek. This area has had a history of flooding south of Highway 4, outside the Amendment Area, in the Temple Drive area in Pacheco. Runoff from the amendment area can be ; expected to increase with the development of the portions of drainage zone area north of Highway 4. However, the potential for runoff should be considerably less under the proposed amendment than under the current' General Plan, due to a general lowering of densities and designation of much of the area for open space. i .Aj. �,I.V 41 r' t j _ter t w.a '' "� _� _ "--_1 , .i ` �`'' { Y • '� .••O�r •� 1 6 ue,n.., ��:.•. . ' �' � �_ - / - -. Asp`-� 1 •'�� i �''''g.,-,,,. "' P •. t •� r� H • — , • �' , '. •�•� YM Gw,,,i+•, '-�;� �[- 4�,. tip; . •i.rte` -� �-.• 3 w • • Y •.�• .'� 1 `ri.�1,i� ` '. { �,tr i,• r •i i'� �- r '. '� � z2. ' -�. ,1.. ,•� ,.,fes+�*� �, �' , E e}�p` •!E DRAINAGE • �:-., (�' `' "fes ,_' `�J7 '',-r► p��p�A(�C� P ac le / ` !- `tet•\- � ' l 1 ��./ 1"`_- �..� �.-.�,. � .� Ll` ��7 }•. t..+ .• ♦ , � l^� . •�''`� `1 �.Z'o %7jG�`'1 � R.,ro=+C 1 r e t\� ^l 1 _�• '►w 1 --"tib�/•.-��✓��i.•r / �'� �.••�"�- � .: r _•r4 ''.�'{//;� f. i•' l„ f(� ,� �.- �•�,� ��i •+•rs•r..caa•.•--y/r♦ ...•�1'.--...Grt-.�.' J t • t-. ..,-f •l'i `-� +J.'` , „•J jr-�r-�_ r 'V ', t� as..nu(�;: „i ••z t!,. [ . r_": .".\ it M.7�'`{ i ; ,4-.•.�L �� •• ..rS_ -.N �� ! .'� /4t,_I,.��`f u•j�[r� Y 1 t+ `- •.�o- i 1 ~\ ,,r �c \•- t L `♦ G-'2 ti f s .•R. . t -G' DRAINAGE ZONES VINE HILL- P4ICHECO 00 Drainage Zone 57 drains northerly, under I-680 north of Arthur Road, into the low-lying area east of I-680 and south of Waterfront Road. In the eastern protion of the area, periodic flooding or ponding occurs just south of the Atchison-Topeka-Santa Fe Railroad trestle on Pacheco Boulevard due to the inability of the 24 inch culvert under the tracks to handle excessive runoff. This flooding has resulted in the closure of Pacheco Boulevard from time to time. Both the eastern and western portions of the zone will require improved drainage systems as development occurs. Without improvements, the flooding condition will worsen and could result in more frequent closure of Pacheco Boulevard. Substantial land fill will probably be necessary for any development in the low lying areas located in the northerly portion of the zone. Increased multiple family development along Pacheco Boulevard around Las Juntas School could cause flooding in the Arthur Road area and could require County improvements to the canal ditch in that vicinity. Flooding occurs periodically in the Midhill-Morrello Roads area. Additional development could result in increased ponding and flooding. Drainage Zone 40 centers around the Mountain View area. At present, this zone drains to the north via a 36 inch culvert under Pacheco Boule- vard east of Howe Road. Increased multiple family, commercial and light industrial development along Howe Road could result in flooding in the area southeast of Pacheco Boulevard and Howe Road. In general, existing drainage facilities are inadequate in the amendment area. Funds are not available, nor is there a mechanism at present to finance the necessary improvements. With the continued development of the area two things are happening: runoff is increased through develop- went of more impervious surfaces; and people are placed in areas where ponding and flooding occur. An overall drainage plan should be developed for the area to indicate appropriate drainage problem solutions, and the County should consider the enactment of ordnance(s) to form an assessment district or the levy of an ad velorem tax to finance the necessary drainage facilities. In the interim, additional development of flood prone areas should be controlled and made subject to flood protection measures. 00425 F 4, _ 06 iV)DE10101 TO Wit. LIR ON 't1fE GENERAL I'LNN 1WENMIEKI' VINE= RILL-PACIifiCO WULEVARD CORRIDOR AREA A proposed modification of the proposed amendment would establish a neigh- borhood shopping center and an adjoining cluster of multiple family resi dential uses north of Highway 4 at Morello Avenue. 1; The addition of a commercial center in this location is based upon further review of development trends; the area south of Highway 4 has experienced substantial residential development in recent years. The area to the north has recently developed in new residential tracts and has the greatest potential for future residential, growth in the amendment area. In. addition" ,. the reconstruction of Ifighway 4 and the development of Arnold Drive-as a frontage road will open up now areas for development both north and south of the highway, making the, more accessible and funneling additional traf- fic into Morello Avenue. 11iese factors combine to increase the future demand for commercial services in the immediate area. If indeed a comorcial center is designated, adjoining lands should also",. be designated for higher intensity uses. It is proposed that a cluster. of higher density residential uses be established on'. vacant lands both north and east of the commercial center. This designation Would provide"" ,' X, both a desirable transition of intensities of use anti furtherreinforce the primary trading; area of the commercial facility. LWD USE The proposed modification to the amendment would place approximately 10 acres of neighborhood commercial and 40 acres of multiple family residen- tial in the amendment area. It would reduce the area proposed for single family residential by approximately 50 acres. The data compiled in'TablerI, Page 6 of the LIR would be modified to show approximately 53 acres for Retail Shopping, 40 acres of Multiple Family Residentinl-Aledium,Density, and approximately 5710 acres and 200 acres of Single Family-High and' Medium densities, respectively. IMPACTS The environmental impacts from this amendment modification do not .differ- n greatly from those previously discussed in the EIR. However, several points should be noted. The modification would reduce the number of single family homes by approxi- mately 296, and the estimated population by 1,000 persons.. It would add . approximately 500 multiple family units and approximately 1,200 persons.- In ersons.In general, the proposed modification would not change the population total substantially, since a smaller family size is usually associated with multiple family housing. Traffic ,generation attributable to area residents would be slightly less (approximately 3,500 ADT for single family and 3,000 ADT for multiple family uses; however the commercial development could attract approxi- mately 1,000 daily trips per net acre of neighborhood shopping center. 004161- ONO Y 41 kms. rw"Z Since Morello Avenue, as shown on the County's Major Roads Plan, is pro- posed as a four-lane facility between Pachec nstructed, Ecoiucculation faeiand lities4 and Arnold Drive has just been reco should be advanced to handle the traffic movements generated by the pro should development. greatly from those previously, discussed in the EIR. However, severalteT Points should be noted. The modification would reduce the number of single family homes by approxi- mately 296, and the estimated population by 1,000 persons. It would add approximately 500 multiple family units and approximately 1,200 persons. In general, the proposed modification would not change the population total substantially since a smaller family size is usually associated with multiple family housing. Traffic generation attributable to area residents would be slightly less (approximately 3,500 ADT for single family and 3,000 ADT for multiple family uses; ho:ievOr the commercial development could attract approxi- mately 1,000 daily trips per net acre of neighborhood shopping center. 00416 Since Morello Avenue, as shown on the County's Major Roads Plan, is pro- posed as a four-lane facility between Pacheco Boulevard and Highway 4 and Arnold Drive has just been reconstructed, circulation facilities should be advanced to handle the traffic movements generated by the pro- posed development. Commercial and multiple family development will create additional imper- vious surfaces, which could result in greater storm water runoff. As discussed earlier in this report, drainage in the Morello-Midhill Avenue area is poor and will require new drainage facilities depending on the r; type of new development in the area. :Y In general, commercial development will require more extensive grading than single family residential development. This may also apply to multiple family uses, though the latter could be clustered to preserve existing topography. This impact can be more appropriately addressed during the preparation of an EIR for a specific development plan. Theplacement of additional neighborhood commercial services in the vicinity of Morello Road and Arnold Drive could result in a reduction of vehicular miles traveled by residents for shopping, thereby conser- ving some enerbey resources. C.C.C.P.D. 1/31/7S 001,17 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, SiATZ 61 CALIFORNIA AS IDC OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BODY OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STORM DRAINAGE DISTRICT In the Matter of Awarding Contract for Construction of Danville May 13, 1975 Boulevard Storm Drain, Alamo Area, } Zone 13, hind 0-1 . (Work Order 8508) ' Bidder Total Amount Bond Amounts Dalton. Construction Company $53,800.00 350 Cutter Street Labor & Mats. $26 900.00 . Foster City, California 94114 Faith. Perf.. $53'�800.00 Peter Cole Jensen, Inc. , Danville - William anville -William A. Smith, San Ramon Harry F. Cleverdon, Lafayette Bay Cities Paving and Grading, Inc. , Richmond Ernest E. Pestanw, Inc. , San Jose The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director, recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; - IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor, and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said 1-id; and that said contractor shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract tf :refor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together with bonds as noted above and any, required certificates of insurance, and the Ccunty Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract fo-• this Board. IT IS FURT'IER OP.DERED that, upon signature of the .contract by the Public Works Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are .to be exonerated and any checks submitted for security shall be returned. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. S. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Benny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. CL•'RTIFILD COPY t2:atIrur. .c voirr"t copyOi them nrtginat ilrm-umrnt u hG•tt 1.4 on Illw to rayoftlae i and that it wan na,.r11 y adnptrd by the wmrd,6 Ftifw'rr:Ktin+ of vorstra vfb to nxinty. callromino oq cc: Public Works Director the 11414' 018own. ATTMM: J. R. Ol SSON, Cattnty;,; County Counsel Cicrk&rx•offieto Clerk of amid hoard of,supervlsorx;., Deputy Clerk. County Auditor Contractor 00418 �. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Approval of Surety Tax Bond for Tract No. 4705, City of Richmond. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that surety tax bond in the amount of $7,000.00 for Tract No. 4705 located within the city limits of Richmond is APPROVED. Passed by the Board on Nay 13, 1975. - I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered.on,the: minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Tax Collector Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of , (with copy of bond) Supervisors affixed this 13th day of May 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M N. Ingr%ham. `r W11 e. x hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Tax Collector Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of (with copy of bond) Supervisors affixed this 13th day of May . 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M N. In am 711-1 t E ARD K.LEAL ALFRED P.LOHELI ?:.linty Treasurer-Ta:Collector Assistant County,Treasurer TAX COLLECTOR'S OFFICE Tax Collect First Installment of Taxes CONTRA COSTA COUNTY First Installment of Taxes Due and Payable Delinquent on the First Day of November on the Tenth Day of December ------------- MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA ------------- Second _ ____Second Installment of Tams Phone 228-3000.Est.2385 Second InstaUtnent of Taxes Due and Payable li Denqueat on the First Day of February April 28, 1pry7 r 5 an the Tenth Day of April IF THIS M. CT IS NOT FILED BY OCTOBER 31, 19 75 , THIS 12TTErR IS VOID This will certify that I have examined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled= t TRACT N0. 4705 and have determined from the official al tax records that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map. The current 1974-75 tax lien has been paid in frill. Our estimate of the 1975-76 tax lien which became a lien on the first day of Larch, ig7S is $7,000.(30 E NAND W. Tax Calle FIREMAN"i ..«.,....: .J•.�..._t.«...�CtoY..•.. Bond No- SC 6280370 T•.(•YC«•C.e.•tisc►.`•tt COY:.\• FUND ( AMERICAN .:S9G..i10 ir.00YV•t♦COw••O•t.f•W. .Y(w1C1N.YIOYOf•..L.dstTw.r.CCCO�I.A• INSURANCE C U?I!'A\1!S twYc on.cc sar cN...csco.uLerow...+ F I L E D• MAY/3 1975 SUBDIVISION TAX Bo;'Z i• Otst aSnc BOARD of SUPERVISORS CPNTRA CMATA CO. KNOW ALL . LN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, PAUL C. PETERSEN, BUILDER DEVELOPER As Princip_1, and FIRLiAN'S FUND INSURANCE COKPANY , a corporation, as Surety are held and firmly bound unto the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA State of California, in the penal sum of SEVEN THOUSAND AND No/1 ($ 7,000.00 ) Dollars for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and assigns, Jointly and severally by these presents: THE CONDITION of the above obligation is such that Whereas, PAUL C. PETERSEN BUILDER DEVELOPER , the Owner(s) of a tract of land representing a certain subdivision of real estate, to—wit: TRACT No. 4705 in the City of Richmond intend to file a `tap thereof with the Recorder of COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA � and MIEREAS, the provisions of the State Law require that this bond be filed with the Board of Supervisors of said County. NOW THEREFORE, If the said Principal shall pay, or cause to be paid, when due, all taxes and all special assessments collected like taxes which at the time of filing said `tan, are a lien against such subdivision, or any part thereof, but not yet payable, then this obligation- shall cease and be void, otherwise shall remain in fall force and effect. t - NOTARIAL ACKNOWL[D"ItNT-ATTOM&Y IN FAR STATE OF CALIFORIqu 3� day of APRIL of 75 On this_.._.. ,before: CITY AND County of�S.S. Inc. ALICIA :g 3Tft:122r�— a Notary Public in and for. SAN FRANCISCO )r said.______ C17Y AND_..._Comply,State aforesaid,residing therein,duly colnlnis- _.__._....___ sioned and swam.personally appeared-_ LOUIS A. LLUZZI — known to me to he the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the attorney in fact of FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COIiPANY thereto as principal,and his own as attorney in fact. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and a& ed NCISCO sem' at my office In the said the day and year in this certificate first above written. �'• _ _ -.!� . ice'_:/: -. __ .... yp�•wc-v�ti^.�•+� t R '` '`""^^ NotaryPublic in and for the__ __.__ CITY AND. Countko 'i._` "f C:SCa State of California. 9Iy commission expires..._._.. 04,2 "1-360042-5-65 360042-5-65 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 1975 In the Matter of Exoneration of Surety Tax Bond on Tract 4537, Town of Moraga. The County Tax Collector having advised that the county taxes on property included in Tract No. 4537, Moraga area (currently Town of Moraga) , have been paid in full ; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Surety Tax Bond No. 14024 issued by American Bonding Company, is hereby EXONERATED. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the fonn;oing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid c c: Transamerica Title Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Insurance Company Supervisors Messrs. G.T. McCartney, Jr this ��tt, day of May 19 and J. R. Lynn difixed American Bonding Company n J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Tax Collector By ,/ , Deputy Clerk " Za 12/74 - 15-M Rob ie i erre 00422 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 197 In the Matter of Approval of Agreement for Private Improvements in Minor Subdivision 118-74, Lalnut Creek Area. WHEREAS an agreement with Ms. Ruth M. MacVean, 1720 Orchard bane, Walnut Creek, California 94595 for the installation and completion of private improvements in Minor Subdivision 118-74, Walnut Creek area, has been presented to this Board; and WIEREAS said agreement has been secured by a $2,100 cash deposit (Building Inspection Department Receipt No. 113190 dated April 21, 1975) for the full amount of the costs for completion of the improvements required by the Board of AdSustment in approving said minor subdivision; NCW, THEREFORE, on the recommendation of the County Building Inspector, IT IS BY THE BOA1D ORDERED that said agreement is APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the County. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an ander entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Applicant Wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Building Inspector Supervisors Grading Engineer affixed this _day of ALV 19 _71� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ldG , Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 . 1SAI Helen C. Marshall 4OL123. i MI??OR SUBDIVISION AGRF 'rNENT (§1) Minor Subdivision: M.S. 118-74 (§1) Subdivider: Ruth 14. fmac Vean (Private Improvements) 1720 Orchard Lane, Walnut Creek (§1) Effective Date: L-2-2-7 9; (§2) Completion Period: One Year (§3) Deposit: (faithful pert.))$_2,i00.00 ('-1-11 TIP ICZj+ RPr.ai=t. MQ_ 111190 1. Parties & Date. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the above- named Subdivider, mutually promise •and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct, • install and co.:�plete private road and street ir.:provements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Coda, especially Title 9 and including future amendments, and all imorovements required in the approved parcel map improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the County's Building Inspection Department. Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work." within the above completion period from date hereof as required by Section 922-4.808 of the County Ordinance Code, in a good workmanlike :canner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance. Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a con- flict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. Improvement Security. Upon executing this agreement, Subdivider shall, in accordance with Section 922-4.604 (3) of the County Ordi- nance Code, deposit as security with the - County at least the above- specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of the work, in the form of a cash deposit, a- certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful perfor- mance of this agreement. 4. Indemnity. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A - The inderanitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees; B - The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below ,. and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the parcel map improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these; C - The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negli- gent or non-ne-ligent) in connection with the matters covered by this . agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontrac- tor, or any officer; agent or employee of one or more of them; D - Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indermification covering, any of these ratters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of _ any Indemnitee. 5. Costs. Subdivider shall pay when due all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 6. Nonperfornance and Costs. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improveiaents t:ithin the time specified in this afreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them act -1_ Microfilmed VA Sock 69W or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges there— for ir. ediately upon demand. If County sues to connel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. 7. Assignment._ If before these improvements are completed this minor subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. 8. Warranty. Subdivider warrants that the said improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any tire before the County's acceptance of the improvements as complete, the i=rover..ent plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall malce changes necessary to accomplish the work as Dromised. 9. No Waiver by County. 'Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval o: wort: and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies :ash the requirei.,ients of this agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of .said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any of - the terms and conditions hereof. 10. Record Map. In consideration hereof, County shall accept said parcel map for filing with the County Recorder. C "Y OF CONTRAICOSTA SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) BZ11 P, (Yirman, o d of upervisors J. R. OLS 1, County Clerk B 6- ATTEST: � & ex officio CI of the Board Designate offici 1 capacity ih the business) (� BY-0 G 4tle L t l Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute Deputy acknowledgment form below; and (2) If a corporation, attach a certified copy of (a) the by—laws FOR`.'I APPROiI&D or (b) the resolution of the JOHN B-CuwS Ccmly ] Board of Directors, authorizing execution of this contract and 87 Dw.*` �- ' ='��`"` of the bonds required hereby. State of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, County of Contra Costa ) ss' Partnership or Individual) On April 29, 1975 , the person(s) whose .name(s) is/am signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individ— ual and officer or part::er as stated above who signed this instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. SEAL SANDRA A. McGRATH .; ��C NO Y PUBLIC Cail' ait+L Sandra A. McGrath ti coNr,1A COSTA corn Notary Public for said County and State y My C—i =E.4iaz Je1,13.1915 l.VL1:'�1ti'til'LYLSZVti'LK1ZY'�1111.'L 'ti (CCC Std. Form; Rev. 1274) ZIJB:bw —2- 004Z Z In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 7�_ in the Matter of Approval of Agreement for Private Improvements in Minor Subdivision 36-74, Orinda Area. ,AMREAS an agreement with Mr. Lawrence A. Harper, 52 Oakwood Road, Orinda, California for the installation and completion of private improvements in Minor Subdivision 36-74, Orinda area, has been presented to this Board; and WHEREAS said agreement has been secured by a $4,155 cash deposit (Building Inspection Department Receipt No. 113782 dated May 5, 1975) for the full amount of the costs for comple- tion of the improvements required by the Board of Adjustment in approving said minor subdivision; NOW, THEREFORE, on the recommendation of the County Building Inspector, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said agree- ment is APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the County. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Applicant Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Building Inspector Super Grading Engineer affixed this 13th day of__Iiay 19 _U J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By I G.' I,�LL2� . Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Helen C. Marshall 00/196 MINOR SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (§l) Minor Subdivision: 36-74 (51) Subdivider: 11 A. Harper (Private Improver:.ents) SZ OAK000-D P.CAD 02ta0A 01) Effective Date: ) (S2) coripriction—Feriod: One year (§3) Deposit: (faithful pert. )$ Cash Deposit $4155.00 8rxw' .-rept. 2ecamvt 0- 113 7 eb2_ . 1. Parties & Date. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, Californ_a, hereinafter called "Count ", and the above nam-d Subdivider, mutually promise -and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct, install and complete private road and street improvements, tract drainage , street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9 and including future amendments, and all improvements required in the approved parcel man improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the County's Building Inspection Department. Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work" within the above completion period from date hereof as required by Section 922-4.808 of the County Ordinance Code, in a good workmanlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a con- flict between the improvement plan and the County- Ordinance Code, the stricter .requirements shall govern. 3. Improvement Security. Upon executing this agreement, Subdivider shall, in accordance with Section 922-4.604 (3) of the County Ordi- nance Code, deposit as security. with the County at least the above- specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of the work, in the forms of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check., or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful perfor-- mance of this agreement. 4. Indemnity. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A - The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees; B - The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below . and including personal inJury, death., property damage, inverse condemnations or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the parcel map improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these; C - The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negli- gent or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontrac- tor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them; D - Non-Conditicns: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these natters, or that the alleged damage -resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of - any Indemnitee. - 5. Costs: Subdivider shah pay when due- all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 6. Nonperformance and Costs. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and i.%provc;::eist;s ::ithin the ti=c specified in this agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract -1- 0042 t "Crofiimed with BOA on �x_. - c � I • or otherwise, and Subdivider shall par the costs and- charges there— for im. -ediately upon demand. If County sues to compel perfor-ince of this aCreement or recover the cost of completing the inprove:xerts,- Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connecoion therewith. 7. Assirnment. If before these i^aroverments are completed this minor subdivision is annexed to a city, t::e County may assign to that city the County's rights under this agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them... 8. Warranty. Subdivider .:yarrants that- the said improvement plan is adequate to accomml;sh this ::orl: as p:orised in Section 2; and ifs at any time before the County's acceptance of the irmroverients as- complete, the improvement plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make changes necessary to accomplish the wort,: as promised. - 9. No ?•.giver by County. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or appro�Tg; o. ::o..: and/or materials ;:aspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the cork or any part thereof complies with the recs__awents of this _agreerent, or acceptance of the (:hole or any part of said work. and/or- mater{a?s, or - payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligat=cz to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be -L^ereby estopped from bringing any action for da=ages arising fro= the failure to cormly with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 10. Record Idap. In consideration ereo=, County shall accept said parcel map for filing . ith the County 'Recorder. COUI _ OR CONTRA OS^A SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) J By Zed C airman, BoardXouDervisors A EST: J. R. OLSA. County Clerk By & ex officio Clerk. of the Board (Designate official caaaci,,y in the business) Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute Deputy ac .:o::ledg=ent fora Belo::; and (2) If a corporation, attach a cert.f{ed copy of (a) t^e 1-..y—laws or (b) the resolution o: the Board of Directors, auto_ix'_ng execution of .this contrac1. and of the bonds required hereby. _ Cr=FICIAL S-AL STATE OF CALIFORNIA " rtr Fa rs.': �L Q-. - �M�rttt Contra GOS�a MaRA�ctx:TA cru:rrY county of CI. . -r.......►hWo. Gly Commission EYpe'rn S pterrb�r 11. 1973 o„ '?av 5 . 1975 14 bejontne. S e as anri WrU..r r7v.now*of notary a Alsov►Public,in andfo:*41*0 County and State,personalty appeared 1ja*tirenCe A Hamer and Anna -MIcCune Harner known to me to be the person S whow name—L-are subscribed to the within insimment•and acknowledged tome drat_heY_esecuted the same. ••1/notary is commissioned in another County In.Warta.to+hpurrra syr..r od"Mena of..bry strike"sail"and name County. NotaryPublic H e 1 da L. iann (Individual) 00428 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 19 75' In the Matter of Archaeological Site in - the Danville Area. A memorandum report having been received from the Director of Planning in response to a March 18, 1975 Board referral of a ` letter from Bay Area Archaeological Cooperative concerning possible archaeological finds in the Danville area on the site of a general retail business complex proposed by the'Bank of Contra Costa; and The Director of Planning having advised that environmental impact reports were prepared and processed in accordance with adopted state and local guidelines and procedures, that a meeting was held and the archaeologists in attendance were in agreement that the site has considerable archaeological value, that the property owners have agreed to retain a consultant to prepare a special report on the matter, and that it is expected that the report will be submitted prior to July 1, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the report of the Director of Planning is acknowledged. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the fonnping is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Dr. M. J. Aioratta Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. Gary Berg �Pervisors County Counsel affixed this 7-i -h day of t� . 197 Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Sheriff-Coroner By�A. k� , Deputy Clerk H 24 ,2,,°-U&V Administrator D. Harkness 00429, ■ FECEIVIED I Z3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MAY 7 197 PLANNING DEPARTMENT J. IL OLSM dw BoAW O SU LWRA A TTSM TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: May 6, 1975 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus . SUBJECT: Bay Area Archaeological Director of Plann' Cooperative Letter On March 18, 1975, the Board of Supervisors referred to me a March 4th letter from the Bay Area Archaeological Cooperative signed by M. J. Moratto, Ph.D. This letter concerns itself with possible archaeological finds on a 4.67 acre parcel fronting approximately 700 feet on the south side of Diablo Road just east of San Ramon Creek. This 4.67 acre parcel was the subject of recent general plan amendment and rezoning hearings. On August 21, 1973, the Bank of Contra Costa filed a rezoning application (1833-RZ) to rezone the subject site from Multiple Family Residentail Dis- trict (M-2) and Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20) to a Retail Business District (R-B) for the purpose of establishing a general retail business complex including a bank. Because this rezoning request was not in compliance with the General Plan, the applicant then (on January 24, 1975) asked that the Planning Commission initiate public hearings to consider amending the General Plan to allow the requested zoning to be considered. On March 19, 1974 the Planning Commission agreed to this. The General Plan amendment was considered and approved by the Planning Commission on June 18, 1974_ This recommendation was forwarded to the Board of Supervisors who approved the Planning Commission's recommendation on October 15, 1974. Following this, the Planning Commission then con- sidered the rezoning request which gained their approval which was also approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 10, 1974. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the general plan amendment (completed in May, 1974) and another was prepared for the rezoning appli- cation (completed in January, 1974). Both of these EIR's were certified as being adequate and were processed in accordance with the adopted State and local guidelines and procedures. Prior to the hearings, the EIR's were circulated for comment and general input. No comment nor input was received concerning possible archaeological finds on the subject site. The subject site is in downtown Danville. There were three homes on the site. These homes were razed since the completion of the EIR's, for this Microfilmed with board ordeE Board of Supervisors -2- May 6, 1975 project. At the time the EIR's were written, there was no indication of special archaeological importance on the site. It is particularly diffi: cult in developed areas (three homes existed on the site) to make such re- views. No public nor privately available information gave any indications as to any archaeological findings on the subject site. Noticed public hearings on the draft EIR's and the rezoning and general pian change were extended over most of 1974 with final actions taken in December. No testimony was presented at these public hearings as to any archaeological resources on the site. Again, I say that the preparation of the EIR's and their processing have all been in accord with adopted procedures and guidelines. We had provided Mr. Moratto with USGS maps so that he could mark them with information identifying possible or probable sites having archaeo- logical value. He placed a qualifier as to the use of this information on the maps. This qualifier has been met and maintained by the staff members of my department. What basis Mr. Moratto has for his statements in regard to the use of these maps and information, I am not aware, nor are members of my staff aware. However, in accordance with his request, the maps have been returned to him. As I understand, the basis for Mr. Moratto's claim as to the archaeological value of the site is founded on same digging that took place on the site within the past several months. Since receipt of Mr. Moratto's letter, our office called him several times to arrange a meeting to discuss the matter. Mr. Moratto has not returned _ any of our phone calls. On April 7th, we arranged a meeting on the site with George Rodgers, archaeologist with Hayward State-University; Gary Berg, archaeologist for the Society for California Archaeology; William Seidel, archaeologist with Historical Preservation Division of the State Depart- went Parks & Recreation, and Louise Renne with the Attorney General's office.. Mr. Moratto was invited and was expected but did not attend. Dennis Fransen and Dale Sanders of our office attended. The archaeologists at this on-site meeting were in agreement that the sub- ject site has considerable archaeological value. As a result, we have pro- ceeded to discuss the matter with the property owners' representatives. The property owners, through their representative, have agreed to retain an archaeological consultant to prepare a special report in the matter. It is expected that this report will be submitted prior to July Ist. In making these arrangements, we have been working closely with representatives (through Mr. Berg) of the Society for California Archaeology and the Bay Area Archaeological Cooperative in addition to the property owner. s, Board of Supervisors -3- May S, 2975 Mr. Berg, Mr. Rodgers and Corporation (proMar. Seidel and the 25 .0 Perty Owner) have been American Capital toward developing a most helpful and coo , Positive and constructive rative resolution ofd . this matter. County Counsel has reviewed this report ,and cones, The archaeolog"' " ical value. As a l�- �' `'' ject site has considerable archaeological owners$ representatives_ have agreed to retain ceeded to discuss thewh their rep a eentative. a matter. The property owners, g e a special report in an archaeological consul t , to prepay submitted prior to July lst- cted that this report will be subsai closely with representatives It is expected ts, we have been working and the Bay making these arrangof Society for California Archaeology (through Mr- Berg) of the the property owner. Area Archaeological Cooperative in addition to 4 1 Board of Supervisors -3- May 6, 1975 Mr- Berg, Mr. Rodgers and Mr. Seidel and the Triad American Capital Corporation (property owner) have been most helpful and cooperative toward developing a positive and constructive resolution of this matter. County Counsel has reviewed this report and concurs. AAD:EMA cc - Supervisor Linscheid Arthur G. Will, County Administrator John Clausen, County Counsel Harry Ramsay, sheriff-Coroner Gary Berg Michael J. Moratto, Ph.D. Harry Perry William C. Seidel Victor W. Sauer, Public Works Director ", In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 19 In the Matter of Authorization of Refund in connection with landscape and Irrigation Plan, Land Use Permit No. 352-71. 'f1he Board on January 28, 1974 having executed an agreement with Mr. John Barron setting forth terms and condi- tions under which a cash deposit of $10,000 required to guarantee implementation of approved revised landscape and irrigation plan in connection with band Use Permit No. 362-71, will be returned or utilized; and The Board having received a May 5, 1975 memorandum from Fir. Anthony A. Dehaesus, Birector of Planning, advising that Mr. Barron has requested that 95 per cent of the $10,000 deposit be returned to him; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that, as recommended by Mr. Dehaesus, the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to refund $7,500 to Mr. Barron; the $2,500 to be retained pending Further review of the project. Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing k a true and correct copy of as order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mir. John Barron Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c/o Planning Director of Planning supervims County Auditor-Controller affixed this 13th day of-------Mav . 19 _U County Administrator r J. R. OLSSON, Cleck By �V�' ✓� �2�f.[ A Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 1S-M Helen C. Flarshall 00'11v3e. V M L.U.P. 362-71 ! DISPOSITION OF CASH DEPOSIT REQUIRED FOR LAUDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PLAN 1 2 ! - On November 24, 1971, John Barron received a conditional land use 3 permit (No. 362-71) from the Board of Adjustment; and i 4 +; On October 4, 1973, John Barron entered into a contract with Robert 5 ! M. Babcock & Associates to prepare a revised landscape plan and to supervise , s fits implementation; and 7 This revised landscape plan was made necessary as a result of g altered placement of air conditioning units which was not provided for in the g ; approval of the conditional use permit; and 10 On October 25, 1973, John Barron submitted to the County a $10,000 11 jcash deposit to insure implementation of the approved revised landscape and 12 ( irrigation plan dated November 19, 1973; and 13 On November 19, 1973, Robert M. Babcock & Associates submitted a ; li ` revised landscape and irrigation plan consisting of three sheets (L-1, L-2, L-3) "' . 1 15 iuhich was approved by the County Zoning Administrator on December 3, 1973 with 1v j exceptions as indicated hereafter; and now therefore i 17 IT IS AGREED that the gate and fencing indicated at the end of Orinda 16 flay, the fencing indicated on the northerly side of the site along the pathway t 1� ' leading to the BARTO Station be deleted; and 20 IT IS FURTHER AGREED that the building be painted in a color approved. 21 ' by the Zoning Administrator; and i 22 IT IS FURTHER AGREED that John Barron is to begin implementation of, 1 23 ? the plan as soon as approval is given and shall be completed within ninety days. 24 ? An extension of this time may be given by the Zoning Administrator for good 25 ' reason therefore, such as inclE +ent weather; and 26 IT IS FURTHER AGREED that if John Barron does not fully and properly, i 27 ; implement the approved landscape and irrigation plan within the time provided 28 ' in the preceding paragraph, the County may and shall use the cash deposit, or. 29 necessary portion thereof to properly complete the: work while i-t being 0 I' the ' understcod that I.-his rcn?dy is in addition to all re-mcdies provided by law for al ' failure to cof-Ply .:i ii the terms of the lard use perpit; and � :;ti 3E IT = ;r.i:i- R, ..:s "cO that °wher, john Barron has fully and properly E I. i i� Miuofilmed with hoard c order 00434 - 1 ; implemented the approved landscape and irrigation plan, the County Zoning 2 Administrator shall so certify and the County shall return to John Barron ` 3 eighty per cent of the $10,000 cash deposit or the balance remaining after 4 any amounts expended by the County to insure implementation, provided that t 5 a $2,000 balance shall be retained; and 3 s BE IT FURTHER AGREED that the balance of the deposit retained by. 7 the County shall be used for the purpose of insuring that the plantings are 8 properly maintained; and that should any plantings fail to survive, John Barron 9 shall replace them; and should he fail to do so, the County shall replace such 10 plantings using necessary portions of the balance of the cash deposit to do, so; i 11 and 12 BE IT FURTHER AGREED that on determining that the plantings have,been r 13 properly maintained and any non-surviving plants replaced, the County_ hall 14 at the end of. each successive three calendar month period following 'certificall- 15 tion of the completion of the work, refund equal portions of the balance' of'the j 1G I Deposit, so that all of the remainder of the Deposit (less amounts expended :as 27 described above) shall have been returned at the end of one year fol Iowing cer i 18 tification; and 19 BE IT FURTHER AGREED that the decisions of the County Zotd ng Admints ._ r f 20 trator concerning satisfactory completion of the-work according to the approved 21 landscape and irrigation plan, satisfactory maintenance of the plantings accord 22 i ing to this agreement, and use of the deposit to fulfill. this agreement shall 23 be final. 24 Dated t 25 - i �~ 2a i John Barron 27 { Contra Costa County By: J. E. MORIARTY, CHAIRMAN 28 ... t' N, Iauthorized per =d o fSup ervi ors ReEolution dated January 28, 19711 30 i3_ is 32 , i• - 0041 , l� IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA F In the Matter of Recommendations ) i for Emergency Medical Services in ) May 13, 1975 Contra Costa County. ) '� The Board on March 18, 1975 having referred to its Adminis- tration and Finance Committee (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and ! J. P. Kenny) for review r-ith the County Administrator the report submitted by the Emergency Medical Care Committee of Contra Costa County containing recommendations for emergency medical care services in this county; and Supervisor Linscheid on behalf of the Administration and Finance Committee having submitted a report this day recommending.- 1. ecommending:1. "That the Board endorse the proposed Association of Bay Area Governments regional grant appli- cation for emergency medical services with the understanding that there is no concomitant County financed commitment at this time. If this appli- cation is approved, some $50,000 will be available to the County for intensification and coordination of emergency medical services. Endorsement is recommended with the understanding that organi- zational arrangements applicable to the proposed Emergency Medical Services Director (Coordinator) position and its classification and pay will be continued under review, particularly in relation to the functions of the County Health Department_ 2. "That the Board endorse participation in the proposed Bay Area Regional Emergency Medical Services Council and that in conjunction therewith the County Health Officer and the Emergency Medical Care Committee be requested to recommend nominees for Board consideration for the two County members. 3. "That the remaining portions of the report of the Emergency Medical Clare Committee be reviewed in conjunction with compilation for the budget for the 1975-1976 fiscal year, a procedure which will fully allow for public input without the necessity of a special public hearing."; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations of the Administration and Finance Committee are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975- cc: Director, Human Resources Agency CERTIFIED COPY Emer ency ?iedical Care Committee I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of C/o County Hospital the original document tirh[eh is on file is my office and that It was passed F adopted by the Board of Acting County Health Officer Supervisors of Contra Ca=ta County. Califoraa, on Comprehensive Health Planning Assn. the date shown. Arr�-�r: J. lt_ ol.Ssov, County Clerk-&ex-officio Clerk of said Board of Supervisors, Attn: Mr. Bob Eisenman by Deputy Clerk. Medical Director � Mr. Donn Court, Grand Jury ✓:'/�� 0a4:_l.'� Board Committee Members Contra Costa County Fire Chiefs Association County Administrator oo413s _ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Reappointment of Mr. Jamas D. Graham as Member of Contra Costa County Assessment Appeals Board. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having recommended that Mr. James D. Graham, P. O. Box 1022, Danville, California 94596 be reappointed as a member of the Contra Costa County Assesment Appeals Board for a terra of three years commenc- ing the first Monday in June, 1975; IT IS By THE BOARD oRDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Linscheid is approved. PASSED by the Board on Kay 13, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Appeals Board Members (5) Witness my hand and the Sea[ of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors County Assessor affixed this 13th day of May 19 75 County Auditor County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 - 15-M D. Har)mess 00 TJ a In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California MaY19 Z!i- In the Matter of Reappointing Mr. Moses Coleman as Commissioner of the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having noted that the term of Mr. Moses Coleman as Commissioner of the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa will expire on May 26, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Moses Coleman, 658 Carpino Avenue, Pittsburg, California is REAPPOINTED as Commissioner of the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa for a term of four years ending May 26, 1979- Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Moses Coleman Supervisors Authority (6) �� this 13th of May 1975is County Auditor—Controller County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 1V74 - 15-M N. In aham Woo I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Max 13 , 147 , In the Matter of Resignation from Board of Trustees of Alamo-Lafayette Cemetery District. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having advised the Board the Mr. Andrew A. Neumann has submitted his resignation from the Board of Trustees of the Alamo-Lafayette Cemetery District effective immediately; and Supervisor Moriarty having recommended that the resignation be accepted and a Certificate of Appreciation be issued to Mr. Neumann; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recom- mendations are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Alamo-Lafayette Cemetery Supervisors affixed this d of , 19 County Auditor-Controller i3th ay -may - County Administrator (� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. 7" Deputy Clerk H sa 12/74 . 15-M Penningten 0OG'39 R,= l -; t,n ---------------- IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ` COA'TRA COSTA COUNTY, STATEOF CALIFORNIA- - May 13 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Mr. Kevin Caldwell, 808 Galvin Drive, E1 Cerrito, California, by and through his attorneys, Ryan & Tabor, 680 Beach, Suite 324, San Francisco, California 94109 having filed with this Board on May 1 , 19 75 , claim for damages in the amount of S 25,000.00 ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIM. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. - ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal n of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 13th day of May , 197 5 . J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By = _ Q -`&;oLhn . T.'t� e T�e P yff cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator W44011 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF �1T*'s' I� COSTA COUb-TY, STATE OF" ;;AI.�RNIA r F By puty eerkr cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn= Mr. Broatch County Counsel County Administrator IM40 i Jrcy`u c" S IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 13 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) } Mr. Lee A. Valley, 35 - 7th Street, Richmond, California by and through his attorney, Richard H. Bartke, Attorney at Lau,, The Law Building, 207 - 37th Street, Richmond, California 94805 having filed with this Board on April 28 , 1975 , claim for damages in the amount of ::Unknown -at this time ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A._M; Dias seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED; _...� that said claim is hereby DEFIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. *Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. DOES:_ None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this lath day of MFLT�.. 1975 J. R. OLSSOh, CLERK By - � Lynn C. Beitler Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator 4 tr t .�T t- IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May_13 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Mr. Larry Oates, 2081 Celeste Avenue, Walnut Creek, California,; by and through his attorney, Law Offices of Gerald J. Tiernan, Post Office Box 670, San Francisco, California 94101 having filed with this Board on April 25 , 19 5, claim for damages, in the amount of VC indefinite but in excess of$240000.00 NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the, Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. DOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors : on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this lith day of May , 197 5 . J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By LJBe'tl r YTe pu.tt' 861i� cc: Claimant Public Works (3) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel County Administrator } IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 13 19 75 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Jewel Haynes. 437 South 20th Street, Richmond, California by and through her attorney. Fred F. Cooper_ Tribune Tower, Suite 800, 13th and Franklin Streets, Oakland, California 94612 having filed with this Board on April 28 , 19JI claim for damages in the amount of S 20.000 ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Benny. DOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 13th day of 1975ON CLERK Helen C. Marshall Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3 ) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator 0'03 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA By t 1,� �,�.��� HelenD Mar aelrl k. cc: Claimant rks (3 ) Public o Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel Countv Administrator OgLm ion i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 13 � 1975 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Patricia Ann Brooks, 665 S. 26th Street. Richmond, California 84804 b, and through her attorney, haw Offices of Eskanos & Kleinman, 32�2 - 18th Strom, Oakland. California 94612 having filed with this Board on May 1 19_M, claim for damages in the amount of 5 .000 (approximate) ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors A. H. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 13th day of May , 197 5 J.,R. OISSON CLERK By �bj%CEJ G Helen C. Marshall Deputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3 ) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel County Administrator fill t , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California -- i May 13 , 19 75 In the Matter of Complaint with Respect to Card Room Licenses. A report having been received from the County Sheriff Coroner, in response to an April 28, 1975 Board referral of a complaint from Mr. Lenord Smith, owner of Smith Club, Pittsburg, with respect to transferring card roma licenses; and The County Sheriff--Coroner having advised that transactions involving transference of card roam licenses have been investiga- ted and no violations of the County Ordinance Code have been identified; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of aforesaid report is acknowledged. PASSED by the Board on May 13, 1975. - I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date ofoei�isaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: Mr. L. Smith Su County Sheriff-Coroner affixed this 13th day of Mev 1975 County Counsel — County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. , Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 . 15-M D. Harkness lJ MV HARRY D.RAJtsAY H.s.HOSOXV r' s,e May 5, 1975 ,nM�u,.asawus.onncae Warren N. Boggess, Chairman Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 RE: April 15, 1975, Letter. to the Board from Mr. Lenord Smith Smith's Club, 2328 .Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565.: Dear Chairman Boggess and Members of the Board: On April 28, 1975, the Board referred the subject letter of complaint with respect to transferring cardroom licenses to this office for report. In 1972 a license was issued to Mr. Francis L. Brown to operate a cardroom at the Corner Club, 780 A Port Chicago " Highway, Pittsburg. The Corner Club has since changed hands` twice, but Mr. Brown has retained the license. A cardroom manager employed by Mr. Brown in 1972 has continued in his employ since that time. At the time Mr. Lenord Smith purchased his establish- ment there was an existant cardroosm license on the premises . issued to Mr. Gene Sweat. Mr. Sweat continued to operate the caxdroom until he and Mr. Smith apparently had some type of business disagreement and Mr. Sweat withdrew his license . from the premises. Mr. Smith then applied for a license in his own name but was refused when a moratorium was imposed on issuance of new licenses by the Board. . r E ELVER t�AY ? 1975 J. L OMIM +nso curc Maofilmed with board order f: 3 } Warren N. Boggess Page 2 May 5, 1975 t` } f� Each transaction involving the Corner Club was investigated at the time of occurrence. We have not determined that any violation of the County Ordinance is involved. Our file on Mr. Brown' s license is available for review if desired. L truly yours, D. AY, Sheri f-C roner HDR:HEH:lm cc: Mr. L. Smith County Counsel County Administrator YL -y i Y 0,147 y' r._ Krs r• IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA C OU21Ty, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Y I ry. IN THE BOARD 01.7 SUPERvISORS OF C OTVM4 COSTA C 0121TY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proposed ) - Assessment Districts. } Hay 13, 1975 The Board on May 6, 1975 having referred to its Adminis- tration and Finance Comm?ttee (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Kenny) the report of the Assessment District Screening Committee with respect to proposals to form Assessment Districts for construction of public improvements within Tract 4508 (Orinda. Downs) , Orinda area, and for improvement of Appian Way (Assessment District 1975-3) , El Sobrante area; and 1. "Tract 4508 (Orinda Downs) - This proposed district conforms to Board policy in that public improvements will be financed through use of 1911 Act bonds. It is recommended that the Board authorize establishment of this proposed local improvement district. 2. "Appian Way (E1 Sobrante Area) - This proposed district does qualify for 1915 Act financing as the work proposed is essential for improvement of a developed area. The following actions are necessary to begin this project (a) Fix the boundaries of the proposed district to include Zones A and B as defined by the Public Works Deoartment. (b) Refer the proposed undergrounding of utilities utilizing Rule 20-A funds to the County Underground Utilities Advisory Committee for review and recommendation. (c) Inasmuch as there is a County commitment of road funds of about _ $700,000 required to finance components of public improvements included in the proposal, the Board should not take action to initiate the assessment district until it has had an opportunity to review the budget for the 1975-1976 fiscal year as it pertains to County road programs. (d) Assessment districts for construction of improvements in developed areas usually meet with some objections and this proposal is no exception. Assuming that the actions in (b) and (c) above are approved and the project proves feasible, the Board should hold a public hearing to deter- mine support of the property owners .for the assessment district prior to determining whether to proceed to expend monies for engineering the work. "; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recom— mendations of the Administration and Finance Committee are APPROVED: ` :fy Passed by the Board on May 13, 1975- CERTIFIED COPY I ceetuy that this is a foil, true & correct-Cow of the original document which is on file in my office, and that it was mased & adopted by the Board:of. Supervisors of Contra.Costa County. Californis,,on the date shown.ATTEST: J.-R. OLSSON. County j Clerk E ex-QMcl0 Clerk of said Board of Supervisor, . by Do"Clerk. MAY 131975 cc: Administration and Finance Committee Underground Utilities Advisory Committee Mrs. 0. V. Mills, Chairman Appian Way Study Committee Public Works Director Director of Planning County Administrator :1C I' t 11 .Y j I And the Board adjourns to meet, on. at f 4+r� /�} i , in the Board Chambers, Room 1017, Administration. Building, Martinez, California. -j • P. Kenny, _ ice_ firman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK i 1 i r i t S 041150 i SMIARY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUP:RVISOH—S OF CONTRA COSTA CCUUTY, MAY 13, 1975, P?.EFARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLE MK AND EX—OFFICIO CLE?E OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel actions f ov- .!Poi;r^l S rvi r I i 00 A.50 t ST141ARY OF PROCEEDIIiGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, MAY 13, 1975, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUIITY CLERK ANDEX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel actions for Medical Services. Approved appropriation adjustments for Department of Agriculture, Auditor- Controller (Various Courts and Various Departments); and internal adjustments not affecting the -orals for Auditor-Controller (Data Processing), Building 'Inspector, Planning, Public orks, Superior Court, and Veterans Service. Accepted gifts and donations made to County Library System during month of April, 1975• Authorized attendance at meetings as follows: Mr. F. Marchus, Superintendent of Schools - iational P.T.A. Convention, Yay 31-June 4, Atlantic City; G. Evans, Asst. Materials Testing Engineer — American Society Civil Engineers Conference, June 1-4, Atlanta; 0. Smith, Environmental Control Engineer - ICI.U.-EPA Seminar on Resource Recovery Management, May 19-23, Boston. Reappointed Mr. J. Graham as member of County Assessment Appeals Board for`3--yr.> term and M. Coleman, Commissioner of County Housing Authority for a 4-yr. term. Acknowledged receipt of report from Sheriff-Coroner in response to Board re- ferral concerning complaint u ith regard to transferring of card room licenses. Amended Board order to increase maximum allowable payments for utilities at Concerted Services Project, Inc., Pittsburg. Authorized County Administrator to submit data on public assistance programs to appropriate State authorities; to execute a rental agreement with R. Ray for occupancy of property in Martinez; and to explore the use of a consulting firm to develop the Final F..merbency Telephone System (9-1-1) Plan- and-potential-sources o funding to cover the cost of preparation of said plan. Authorized Acting Health Officer to submit application to State Department o Health for Federal funds for continuation of Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children (FY 1975-76). Authorized energiZatior_ of street lights in County Service Area L-45, Clayton, Walnut Creek and San Radon areas. Adopted Traffic ?resolutions Vos. 2098 and 2099 and rescinded No. 1596. Denied claims for damages by P. Brooks, J. Haynes, L. Oates, L. Valley, and ; K. Caldwell. Authorized Auditor-Controller to write off certain delinquent general accounts receivable. Accepted resignation of Mr. A. Keumann from Board of Trustees of Alamo Lafayette Cemetery District and authorized execution of Certificate of Appreciation for services rendered. Established county position in support of Assembly Bill 1130 pertaining to operation of :,ork furlough program. Authorized Director of Planning to execute modifyinng� agreements with certain Census Supervisors for continuation of services through:Iliay 30, 1975- Authorized D. Yee, Vice Chairman, and G. Cook, Mayors Conference representative, County Solid .haste Management Policy Committee, to attend International City Manage- ment Association Resource Recovery Seminar, May 20-23, Boston. 004-5 May 13, 1975 Summary, continued Page 2 Approved report of Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors Linscheid and Kenny) that Director of Planning be authorized to submit an application to the State Office of Planning and Research for a planning grant to conduct an energy resource and conservation study, and adopted Resolution No. 75/376 in connection therewith; and report of said committee on recon mendations submitted by the County Emergency Medical Care Committee regarding emergency medical care services in this county. Authorized Director, Human Resources Agency, to submit recommended changes to U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare relative to said department's proposed regulations to implement Title XX (PL 93-647) to the Social Security Act of 1974. Authorized Auditor to refund $7,500 to J. Barron in connection with landscape and irrigation plan, LUP 362-71. Approved certain actions in connection with CETA Title I Manpower Plan for FY 1975-3976, including referral of said plan to the Intergovernmental Relations Committee (Supervisors Kenny and Linscheid) for report May 27. Acknowledged receipt of report of Director of Planning relative to archaeological site, Danville area. Authorized Chairman to execute the following: Application and Grant Signature Sheet for CETA Title I funding for FY 1975-76; Agreement with Thomas Reid Associates for consulting services in connection with preparation of environmental impact report for proposed development of Subdivision 4727, Bethel Island; Agreement extension with Kay Building Company for construction of certain improvements in Subdivision 4430, Danville area; - Agreements with ter. Lawrence A. Harper for construction of private improve- ments in N.S. 36-74, Orinda area; and M.S. 118-74, Walnut Creek area, with Ms. Ruth M. MacVean; Agreement with Alameda County for holding Contra Costa County female prisoners in detention or work furlough facilities. , Authorized Director, Human Resources Agency, to sign contracts with certain fee-for-service physicians used by County Medical Services. Authorize Public Works Director to: Refund surety cash deposit to Duffel Financial and Construction Company Subdivision 4218, Danville area; execute agreement with Provenzano and Associates for soils investigation of slide in Christie Road, Pinole area; and to contact owners of properties adjacent to an "old miners' cave," Orinda area, to determine ownership of said cave and arrange for closing of same. Exonerated surety tax bond on Tract 4537, Town of Mforaga. Granted permission to Mr. T. Bristol, sewer contractor, to close San Miguel Drive (Road No. 4041) near Rudgear Road, 1alnut Creek area, between May 12 and May 23 for a 3-day period. Awarded contract to L & F Paving, Inc. for replacement of concrete curb on Muth Drive, Orinda area; and asEx-Officio the Governing Body of Contra Costa County Storm Drainage District, awarded contract to Dalton Construction Company for con- struction of Danville Boulevard Storm Drain, Alamo area (Zone 13, Line C-1). Approved surety tax bond for Tract No. 4705, Richmond. Accepted documents from certain parties in connection with SansCrainte Drainage Area, :,7alnut Creek. Declared that improvements have been maintained for one year in Subdivision 3888, Tassajara Area, and authorized refund of $500 deposit to Founders Title Co. in connection therewith. I May 13, 1975 Summary, continued - Page 3 Adopted following numbered resolutions: 75/364, approvinr plans and saeci`_'ications for underdrain installation, Alhambra Valley Road, .'•'.artinez area, and fixing June 10 at 11 a.m. as time to receive bids thereon; 75/ 65, approving map of Subdivision 4566, Syron area; 75 66, accepting as complete contract with :;eirick & Zimmerman for con— struction of electrical system, County Hospital, Martinez; 75/367, authorizing Auditor to refund to D. Upton an erroneously collected S15 charge for vendor's permit; 75/368 through 75/371, authorizing certain changes in assessment roll; cancellation or delinquent penalties and costs on second installments on 1974-75 secured assessment roll; and cancellation of uncollected penalty and interest on assessment reduced by Assessment ADaeals Board/Officer; 75/374, authorizing temporary suspension of "no parking" regulations on portion of Lilac Drive, .":alnut Creek area; 75/375, approving Engineer's Report, ordering certain acquisitions to be made, and confirming assessment ::ith respect to Assessment District 1975-1, San Ramon Sewerage Improvements; 75/377, determining the total estimated annual cost for contracting for police services requested by the cities of Lafayette and Moraga for FY 1975-76; 75/378, as Ex—Officio-the Governing Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 5, authorizing the filing of an application for Federal and State grants for publicly o-med vastewater treatment corks; 75/379, authorizing Chairman to execute Satisfaction of Lien filed against property of J. Fl:n'.khouser; 75/38C, authorizing Chairman to execute agreement with M.G.I . Construction Company for rater supply system to be constructed in Assessment District 1973-3, San Ramon area (Bishop �Ianch); 75/381, proclaiming May 18-24 as"national Insurance .:omen's ,reek" for the county. Approved recommendations of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to formation of assessment districts for construction of public improvements within Tract 4508, Orirda area, and or improvement of Appian ':lay, El Sobrante area. Acknowledged receipt of report of Government Operations Committee (Supervisors Dias and Moriarty) :ri:,h respect to its meeting with a committee of County Employees' Retirement Association Board on actuarial report, and in connection therewith directed County Counsel to prepare an opinion on the use of retirement system sur— plus for purposes cited in said report. Acknowledged receipt of report or Intergovernmental Relations Committee (Supervisors Kenny and Linscheid) on disposition of Fire Suppression and Prevention Unit II representation petition filed on September 30, 1971 by United Professional Fire Fighters, and deferred to Mlay 20 action thereon. Acknowledred receipt of report of County Administrator in response to Board referral of a complaint from Sherwood medical Industries with respect to county purchasing practices. Closed hearing and fixed May 20 at 2 p.m. for decision on request of City of Pittsburg for consent to include certain unincorporated lands in proposed Pittsburg Southeast Assessment District No. 1974-1 and for jurisdiction to form said district. Acknowledged receipt of Resolution No. 48-1975 adopted by the County Planning Commission re proposed amendment of County General Plan for Vine Hill—Pacheco Boulevard area, and adopted Resolution Ko. 75/372 in connection therewith. Acknowledged receipt of memorandum from Director of Planning advising that the Planning Commission reaffirms its previous recommendation for extension of Round Hill Road, Alamo area, and for denial of abandonment of roads in the Round Hill Estates development; and in connection therewith, adopted Resolution No. 75/373 fixing June 17 at 2 p.m. as time for hearing on proposed amendment of the circulation element of the County General Plan and Abandonment of County Roads. qr%3 I � T May 13, 1975 Summary, continued Page 4 Acknowledged receipt of report from Planning Commission and Contra Costa County Land Conservation Committee and deferred to May 20*at 2 p.m. consideration of their recommendations re request of W. E. Buchanan et al;for cancellation.'of-Land Conservation Agreement 1305-RZ, Pittsburg area, and fixed.June 10-;at 10:45 a.m. for hearing on said request. *(Decision on Southeast Assessment District No. 1974-1) : Waived reading and adopted Ordinance No. 75-22 rezoning certain land in San Ramon area, 1911—RIZ, Leadership Homes of Northern California. Amended Section 3 of agreement with Coleman, Selmi & Simpkins, Engineer of. Wdrk for Assessment District 1973-3, San Ramon area, to provide certain hourly rates. Referred to County Counsel and County Administrator forad*rice as to appropriate procedure for filling vacancy on Board of Trustees of Contra Costa' Mosquito Abate- ment District No. 1. Approved recommendations of Administration and Finance Committee that position of Family Law Commissioner be approved; that said matter be referred to County Counsel for preparation of appropriate legislation; and that request of Superior Court for positions of Juvenile Court Referee and Probate File Examiner be considered in the 1975-76 budget review process. Referred to: Acting County Health Officer, Director of Planning and Public Works Director (Environmental Control) communication from U. S. Army Corps of Engineers re permit application submitted by Richmond Sanitary Service with respect to'West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill Project, and enclosing draft environmental statement in connection therewith; Director of Planning and Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council communication from U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development forward ing two letters frog members of the El Cerrito Committee on Aging re the County's Housing Assistance Plan; Public `.Forks Director, Director of Planning, County Auditor—Controller-and County Administrate proposed 1975-76 budget and Regional Services Program of Bay Area Sewage Services Agency; County Administrator for reply letter from Ms. K. Buss, student at Richmond Union High School, urging financial support for the Marine Ecology Researchproject; inquiry from Mrs. 0. Jennings, Orinda, with respect Cable Vision service charges; and letter .from Firs. W. Birgman, Walnut Creek, re a flood problem on her property.- Director roperty;Director of Planning matter of vacancy (Supervisorial district V) on Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council (created by resignation of M. Lindner); Administration and Finance Committee for report recommendations of County Admin— istrator with respect to judgeship requirements of Mt. Diablo Municipal Court ' District and municipal court staffing and salaries. 0"x.54 •ir`> i V 1 f; i( l aft 9 The 3 Q C�O-y V g li 3' 4v9C$a �8$g8• COng1 9 of , a f F t r r<' t Tn