Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09092004 - 71-098 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In. the Matter of Changes j of the Assessment Rall } RESOLUTION NO. 71/98 of Contra Costa County j j WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by theCounsel,: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 19(/-70 10-71 It haat been ascertained from the assessment roll and ,from papers; in the Assessorfs office what was intended and what; should have been assessed; and` therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Cade, Section .831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected as stated below; In Cade Area. 3000, Pel 500-030-4010,,, Frank A,, Wirshup was erroneously allowed the 'veterants exemption due to clerical error in calculating thevalue of his-assets, Vett rants exemption of $1400 should be removed and homeownerts exemption of 750 should be allowed, In Code Area 5001,* Pcl 366-.163.»013, Sadles B Hunt Jr. was erroneously allowed the veteran' s exemption due to clerical. error In calculating the value of his assets. Veteran's exemption of 000 should be removed and homeownerts exemption of 4750 should be allowed* In Code Area. 140023, Pel. 233-060-009s, Hoped Steward was erroneously not allowed a veteran, t s exemption due to clerical error In not being sent to data. processing, Therefore, exemption in the amount of 1oaOshould be allowed„ 74 F. 0, 5EATON Assistant Assessor February 9, 1.973 Copy to: ,assessor - Erns Auditor Tac Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO- 71/98 In fade; Area # # , cl )*25�w0? -,oO:L6 ttrd 3 .e a errceaxxel albcd;the vetert eempt a due t eleri eel error '041+ x l ting thW value o h,�� aeeete.i Vetex� ►s e�em :tion Of Ott eha €ld be removed sed hamea .erts eemsto of 7' 3 should be allowed. To �a�e free S�t3��, Pei, 42�t 9Z,-006 Vie© w Is was erroneous $1l iii :the V Or #s +6 ti o due to a erg e 2 error a a c Sat u9 the Val cx�' � �e sate.l �'e�eran�s� e�empti€�� of �t £ hould'be removed and hemea�Srf e e z on , O should be allowed. In Code Area � 4 ( , Pel -� -. fl , Vitae erra�xeate2 not allayed a veteran a eace tin due to, le2erie€�1 ewer i� t to data zest' beingsuil prbaers ice. 'heref�sre, exemption in the amount of 1000 Should be a1: 10wed.Th ` cede Ar + 10:01P�1 074»��-O . , Hb H* Ca�phe�.l filed a'notarized tat t Pursue.t to SOct'i..on 166 of thg Revenu+sand 2xet csr Code, tts the 'affect he maIled IhiSveteran, � exam—tion zz c1€ m to the aaaeas�ri therefore, tris vetera�t� e�em�ati©n ©f l€i 3f3 ehQ zld h� Allew d,� In Code Area , F 1 I } , �ro_y i e Jz+ filed a nit .ried et teiext Urauant to a eticn l�6 ef' thet�Ere3'�ue 2d Taxation fade to the ef `eet he ma�.led hir ' eteran eecptts claim to the aer eeea t therefore,' the veteran:;e exemptlau o�' 1€3 #3 should be allOwe d. R. 0• �P1 Affe etisnt Assessor I ere + :#ext to tYe eerec.ti,a and ahes in the above rezolutiex� JOS B C MENI, C*Unty Counsel 14epi � Page 2of 71/ 91