HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09092004 - 71-004 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Rall } RESOLUTION NO. 71/4
of Contra Costa County }
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the County Counsel;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorizedto correct the following assessments':
For the Fiscal Year 1907-0. 196/21
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor' s office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and
Taxation Code, .Section 4331, the following defects in description
and/or farm and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should
be corrected as follows:
In Cade Area 2002, Pcl, No, 114-392-009, Joseph No & Louise
'fie Martini are erroneously entered as assessees on this parcel and
entered with Land $130, as such property should not have existed as a
separate parcel, This assessment should be deleted from the roll,
In Code Area 2002, Pcl, No. 114--.392.010, Kenneth D. & Bessie
N, Furlow are erroneously entered with property described as Alray
Estates Lot 21, due to mapping error., This description should be
corrected to read: A,lray Estates Lot 2 & Por Lot 1, with no change
in assessment,
R. O. SEATON
Assistant Assessor
Copies to: Assessor (Mrs, Kettle)
Auditor
Tax Collector
Page 1 of 2
in Cade Area 2008, P01. No. 133*%l00*-*07, Commonwealth
Properties Inc. , are erroneously assessed) with Improvements $4601, as
such improvements did not exist on lien date,. This assessment should
be`corrected to read: Lund. only >$3.913830.
In Code Area 2008, Pcl. No. 133-100-008,. Commonwealth
Properties Inc. , are erroneously assessed with improvements $29,780,
as such improvements did not exist on liens date. This assessment
.should be corrected to read-, Land only $19,0$4.
in Cade area 3040, Pei. No. 5€j-0 21..024, Myrtle ., .' Vi.e raj,
is erroneously assessed with Land $3082€3 and no Improverents, due to
erroneous description used by appraiser:. This assessment Should be
corrected to read: Land $3,93.5 and Improvements $455 'should be added
as `,escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531 of the Revenge and
Taxation Code. Assessee has been notified of this correction.'
I hereby; consent to the above
04, changes and/or corrections:
R. 0. SEAT .TQ3?I B. L� N s COUNTY CC74 L
Assistant Assessor Y
"s
Deputy
e4k
r
kdoptod 'hy the Board this dad' Of
1:9
Page 2 of 2