Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011997 - 97-573 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution on October 28, 1997, by the following vote: AYES' Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 97/573 SUBJECT: Tabulation of Mail-in Ballots, Confirmation of Diagram and Assessment and Levy of Street Light Charges for Minor Subdivision 3-96, County Service Area L-100, EI Sobrante area. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES: 1. On September 9, 1997,the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 97/481 directing the filing of the engineer's report for street light charges for County Service Area L-100. As directed by the Board, the Engineer of Work has filed the engineer's report. 2. On September 9, 1997, the Board adopted Resolution No. 97/481 declaring the Board's intention to levy and collect street light charges to operate and maintain facilities and services within CSA L-100 for fiscal year 1997-98 and setting a public hearing for October 28, 1997. Notice of the hearing was given in the time and manner required by law. 3. Resolution No. 97/481 directed the Engineer of work(Public Works Director) to cause to be mailed to property owners within CSA L-100 the notices and ballots required by Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). 4. The notices and ballots have been mailed to property owners and the returned ballots are ready to be tabulated. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board FINDS, DETERMINES and ORDERS that: 1. A public hearing was held before this Board on October 28, 1997 at 11:00 a.m. At the hearing, the Engineer of Work presented to the Board all ballots received from property owners within Minor Subdivision 3-96 a proposed tabulation of those ballots. The Board heard and considered all protests against the proposed assessments and tabulated the retffned ballots according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected properties. The Board also afforded to every interested person an opportunity to make a protest to the engineer's report, either in writing or orally, and the Board considered each protest. 2. A majority protest, as defined in section 4(e) of Article X111 D, does not exist. 3. The Board hereby confirms the diagram and assessment as set forth in the report of the Engineer of Work and hereby levies the street light charges set forth therein in Minor Subdivision 3-96 for fiscal year 1997-98. > a tw*eieeiy n ehN N•ew am wood gppy a .neo w+r ae.nas r On &ON irken rnd�arbnrd ons-*Nr f of("�Mti► waw t> r c Dl53 l / cas.a: .M-2253 IL BATCHELOR clerk of tho SWWVI* AM Uoa AdMW =C.—" RESOLUTION NO. 971573 iPuBLicWomDEPARTwNT CONTIRA COSTA COUNTY DATE: October 22, 1997 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: 1.Michael Welford,Public Warks Director SUBJECT: lilts ofthe Ballots Cast in the Proposed Annexation ofMS 3-%into CSA L-100 (APN#433-010-011) I, I Michael Watford,Public Works Director for the County of Contra Costa, State of California, having canvassed the return of all votes cast in the proposed annexation of MS 3-96 into County Service Area L-100 Lighting District held between September 9, 1997 and October 28, 1997 do hereby certify the following to be a full,true and correct Statement of Results of all votes cast on the following measure: County Service Area L-100 Lighting District Annexation and Annual Assessment for MS 3-% YES NO I further certify that the total number of ballots cast in the proposed annexation of MS 3-96 into County Service Area 1,100 Ligim4g District at said election was one(1)and attached hereto are the total ballots received for and against annexation and assessment. Dated the 28th day of October, 1997 LUC a�r.+tr.�rrnww+ t County Sergi Arca L-100 Lighting District Annexation Ballot Assessor's Parcel Nos.:433-010411 Annention of:Moor SubdMoks 3-96 Record Owner. Mark Sutter Address: 477 Pettis Avenue Mountain View,CA 94041 "Yu,I approve of the proposed annual assessor ent ofS14.94 on each of parcels ickotified in this ballot. No,I do not approve of the proposed annual assessnunt of S 14.94 on each of'these parcels. Sipature of Record Owner or Authonzed Represeetat'n a of the above idwkifiled paroalt. l hrr7 Dasa