Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011997 - 1997-552 TIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution on October 14 , 1997,by the following vote: AYES: Supervisor Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla and DeSaulnier NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO.97 /552 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE TENTATIVE REPORT, AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING A BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-29 (DOUGHERTY VALLEY), SAN RAMON AREA. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa FINDS THAT: 1. On May 21, 1996 the Board adopted Resolution No. 96/238 forming County Service Area M-29(Dougherty Valley), San Ramon Area("CSA M-29") 2. The property within CSA M-29 will receive a special benefit over and above that received by the general public in the form of the following types of extended services(the"Extended Services"): extended police services and construction,operation and maintenance of parks,trails, recreation areas,open space, special landscape areas, library,community center, senior center, corporation yard, flood control and storm drain facilities, internal road network(including bicycle Maths and park and ride lots),and other extended County facilities and services as prescribed in wernment Code sections 25210.4 et seq. These services, in particular,are set forth in the Plan for ,iding Services for this service area, which was considered with the formation of CSA M-29 and "le with the Local Agency Formation Commission of Contra Costa County("LAFCO"). Resolution No. 96/238 states that it is contemplated that CSA M-29 will be supported by essments. copy of the "Engineer's Report for the Contra Costa County Service Area M-29 'ley), San Ramon Area Benefit Assessment"(the"Engineer's Report"),prepared pursuant to Article XIII D of the California Constitution, is attached as Exhibit A. The Engineer's Report has been filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The Engineer's Report includes: (a)a description of the planned development in CSA M-29; (b)a description of the special benefits that will be conferred by the Extended Services separated from general benefits conferred on property located in the County at large;(c)a description of the specially benefited property(the property that will receive Extended Services);(d)the estimated total benefit assessment chargeable to the entire service area; (e)the benefit assessment for each parcel; (f)the methodology for calculating the assessment per parcel;(g)a statement/legal analysis explaining why the federally-owned Camp Parks will not be subject to the benefit assessment; and(h)an explanation that the Engineer's Report satisfies all the requirements of a tentative report under Article 1012-2.6 of the Contra Costa County Code and,therefore,constitutes the"Tentative Report for the Contra Costa County Service Area M-29(Dougherty Valley), San Ramon Area Benefit Assessment Service Charge Fiscal Year 1997-1998"(the"Tentative Report'). 5. Based on its review of the Engineer's Report: A. The Extended Services provided by the proposed benefit assessment will directly benefit the assessed parcels by increasing their value and habitability. B. The cost of the proposed benefit assessment on each parcel to be assessed is proportional to the special benefits that the Extended Services will confer on such parcel. C. The proposed benefit assessment is not applicable to the parcels in Camp Parks because the Engineer's Report provides clear and convincing evidence that the parcels that comprise Camp Parks will receive no special benefit from the Extended Service. Now,therefore,the Board of Supervisors ORDERS AND RESOLVES THAT: 1. The Board accepts the Tentative Report. 2. The Board will conduct a public hearing(the"Hearing") on Tuesday December 9 , 1996 at 2:00 P.m. in Room 107 of the Board of Supervisors' Chambers,651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. 3. The Board directs the Clerk of the Board to immediately provide the Public Works Director of Contra Costa County(the"Public Works Director")with a copy of this Resolution. 4. No later than October 17, 1997,the Public Works Director shall mail the written notice IP the Hearing(the"Notice")attached as Exhibit B to the record owners of the parcels identified in ,tion 4 of the Tentative Report. A ballot(the"Assessment Ballot") in the form of the ballot hed as Exhibit C and a copy of the Engineer's Report shall be attached to the Notice. 5. The Board directs the Clerk of the Board to give written notice of the Hearing pursuant ,mens Code section 6066. t the Hearing,the Board shall consider any objections or protests to the proposed lent. The Board will then tabulate the Assessment Ballots received from the record Is identified in Section 4 of the Engineer's Report. The Board shall not impose the 2 benefit assessment if there is a majority protest under Article XIII D of the California Constitution. If there is no majority protest,the Board will then adopt a resolution which confirms the Engineer's Report as the Tentative Report; assesses the benefit assessment in the Tentative Report; finds that the Director of the Contra Costa County Public Works Department, acting as the Designated Director, has concluded that the Tentative Report conforms to the official assessment roll for the year in which the benefit assessment will be collected and,therefore,constitutes the"Final Report for the CSA M-29 Benefit Assessment" (the"Final Report"); confirms the Final Report; and levies the benefit assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the Final Report. Orig.Dept.: Public Works Department(Special Districts) cc: Skip Epperly(510)313-2253 County Administrator County Counsel i hereby certify that this is a trueand conw0copyof Auditor-Controller Board action taken and on ered on the minutes of the Board of Su i the date own. County Assessor ATTESTED. Community Development Dept. PHIL MM, OR,Clerk qj'ttfe Board Christian Truebridge,Shapell Industries tum isaft a d County istratot Susan Collins,Windemere Stanch Partners J By ,Deputy 3 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-29 (DOUGHERTY VALLEY), SAN RAMON AREA BENEFIT ASSESSMENT The undersigned, acting on behalf of Contra Costa County, respectfi,ffly submits the enclosed Engineer's Report as directed by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, Dated: By: J. Michael Walford, P.E. Director of Public'Works RCE No. 16670 I BEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of ) 1997. Jeanne Maglio, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County, California By: I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the Board of Supervisors of contra Costa County, California on the day of , 1997. Jeanne Maglio, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County, California By: I BEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Contra Costa, on the day of ________.2l997. Jeanne Maglio, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County, California By: sAar4—*dirt\odobwN=wptcw ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-29 (DOUGHERTY VALLEY),SAN RAMON AREA BENEFIT ASSESSMENT October 9, 1997 Section 1. Introduction and Overview. .............................................................................................l Section 2. Background and Project Plans. ..................<.......,.............................................................l Section3. General Benefits and Special Benefits................................... .....................................2 Section4. Specially Benefited Parcels..............................................................................................2 Section5. Total Assessment. ............................................................................................................3 Section6. Assessment Per Parcel......................................................................................................4 Section 7. Methodology for Calculating the Assessment Per Parcel................................................6 Section 8. Statement/Legal Analysis Regarding Camp Parks...........................................................7 Section 9. Tentative Report under Contra Costa County Code Article 10122.6.............................7 i ENGINEER'S REPORT Section 1. Introduction and Overview. This Engineer's Report(the "Engineer's Report")provides the justification for the proposed benefit assessment(generally the "Assessment')for County Service Area M-29 (Dougherty Valley) ("CSA M-29'J. The Engineer's Report was prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California. The Engineer's Report complies with the requirements of the California Constitution Article XIII D ("Proposition 218"}; Government Code section 25210.77a; and Contra Costa County Code Article 1012-2.6. Section 2 describes the development approved for CSA M-29 and identifies the plans for providing various services and infrastructure to this area (the "Extended Services'). Section 3 identifies the special benefits as distinct from general benefits that will be conferred on parcels subject to the Assessment. Section 4 identifies the property that will be specially benefited. Section 5 identifies the Total Assessment(defined in Section 5). Section 6 identifies the Assessment Per Parcel (defined in Section 6). Section 7 describes the methodology used in calculating the Assessment Per Parcel. Section 8 provides an explanation of why the federally owned Camp Parks area is not subject to the assessment. Finally, Section 9 demonstrates that this Engineer's Report satisfies all of the requirements for a Tentative Report under Article 1012-2.6 of the Contra Costa County Code and, therefore, also constitutes the "Tentative Report for the County Service Area M-29 (Dougherty Valley), San Ramon Area Benefit Assessment) Service Charge Fiscal Year 1997-1998" (the "Tentative Report'j. Section 2. Background and Project Plans. The Dougherty Valley is located in the unincorporated area of Southern Contra Costa County (the "County"). In 1992, the Board of Supervisors approved development of 11,000 dwelling units and up to 680,000 square feet of retail and commercial space (the "Prnject'� in an approximately 5,080-acre portion of Dougherty Valley (the "Project ,Site"). As part of the overall plan for operating and maintaining infrastructure, a County Service Area was subsequently identified as the appropriate vehicle for funding operational services and for .providing ongoing municipal services to any unincorporated area developed as part of the Project. On May 21, 1996, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 96/238 forming County Service Area M-29 (Dougherty Valley), San Ramon Area ("CSA M-29"), The types of services to be funded and/or provided by CSA M-29, the Extended Services, include: extended police services and construction, operation and maintenance of parks, trails, recreation areas, open space, special landscape areas, library, community center, senior center, corporation yard, flood control and storm drain facilities, and internal road network(including bicycle paths and park and ride lots), and other extended County facilities and services as provided in Government Code sections 25210.4, et seri. Resolution No. 961238 states that it is contemplated that CSA M-29 will be supported by benefit assessments. The County and the Project developers Shapell Industries of Northern California("Shapely) and Windemere Ranch Partners ("Windemere'} (together the "Developers' intend to annex areas, final map by final map, into the City of San Ramon(the "City'. 1 Section 3. General Benefits and Special Benefits. Proposition 218 provides that"only special benefits are assessable." Cal. Const. Art.XIII D, Sec. 4. The Extended Services that will be provided within CSA M-29 pursuant to the Settlement Agreement are special benefits. These special benefits are over and above the benefits received by the general public (the general benefits.) Section 4. Specially Benefited Parcels. The following parcels describe the Project Site. The property described by these parcels will receive the Extended Services financed by the Assessment. Windemere Parcels Shapell Parcels APN #206-050-006 APN#206-230-001 APN#206-050-007 APN#217-060-004 APN#206-050-008 APN#217-060-005 APN#206-050-009 APN#217-060-025 APN #206-050-010 APN#206-240-003 APN#206-050-011 APN#206-240-004 APN#206-050-012 APN#206-240-005 APN#206-090-004 APN#206-240-008 APN#206-090-005 APN#206-240-009 APN#206-090-006 APN #206-240-010 APN#206-090-007 APN#206-240-011 APN#206-090-008 APN#206-250-003 APN#206-090-009 APN#206-050-004 APN#206-090-010 APN #206-050-008 APN #206-090-011 APN#206-120-001 APN#206-120-002 Total Parcels 15 APN #206-080-001 APN#206-04.0-002 APN#206-040-003 APN #206-040-004 Total Parcels 20 The above parcels will be subdivided under a series of Project approvals and agreements.' These subdivided parcels will be specially benefited by the Extended Services that will be financed I These approvals and agreements include but are not limited to the following. (1)that certain agreement titled "Development Agreement Between County Of Contra Costa And Shapell Industries, Inc. Relating To The Development Commonly Known As Country Club At Cale Ranch" entered into by and between Shapell and the County as .of January 11, 1995 and recorded February 17, 1995 at Contra Costa County Records, #95-027735, and any amendments thereto; (2)that certain agreement titled "Development Agreement Between County Of Contra Costa And Shapell Industries, Inc. Relating To The Development Commonly Known As The Gale Ranch" (Footnote continued on next page) 2 by the Assessment. The process for levying the Assessments on subdivided parcels is discussed in Section 6 of this Engineer's Report and Section 5 of the attached MOU. Section 5. Total Assessment. The total Assessment chargeable to all the parcels within CSA M-29 in each year is the "Total Assessment." The estimated Total Assessment in each year is equal to the total cost of providing the Extended Services to CSA M-29 in the identified fiscal year. The estimated Total Assessment is: Residential Tier A Residential Tier B Dion-Residential Cumulative Cumulative Building Cumulative year Building Permits Effmit, Squarclufm Assessment 1997 0 0 0 $0 1998 90 30 0 $88,497 1999 506 168 15,000 $501,660 2000 1,302 434 248,000 $1,362,084 2001 1,854 618 271,400 $1,912,252 3,666 units 2,750 917 366,400 $2,825,020 8,500 units 6,375 2,125 642,800 $6,481,577 11,000 units 8,250 3,7.50 1,170,000 $8,500,000 (Footnote continued from previous page) entered into by and between Shapell and the County as of April 8, 1996 and recorded April 25, 1996 at Contra Costa County Records, #96-75415, and any amendments thereto; (3)that certain agreement titled "Development Agreement By And Between The County Of Contra Costa And Windemere Ranch Partners" entered into by and between Windemere, Windemere Ranch Partners and the County as of January 18, 1996 and recorded January 11, 1996 at Contra Costa County Records, #96-0048-46, and any amendments thereto; (4)that certain agreement titled "Agreement to Settle Litigation Relating to the Dougherty Valley General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Report" entered into by and between the County, Developers, the City and the Town of Danville on May 11, 1994 to settle certain claims brought by the City and Danville as more fully described therein (the "Settlement Agreement-'I; (5)the "Dougherty Valley Specific Plan," adopted by the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Resolution 92/867, on December 22, 1992 and amended by the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Resolution 96/564 on November 19, 1996; (6)a Vesting Tentative Map, Preliminary Development Plan and Final Development Plan for Country Club at Gale Ranch approved by Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 94-79 on December 20, 1994; (7)a Vesting Tentative Map, Preliminary Development Plan and Final Development Plan for Windemere Ranch Partners Phase I approved by Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 96-44 on December 3, 1996; (8) a Vesting Tentative Map, Preliminary Development Plan and Final Development Plan for Shapell Industries, Inc. Gale Ranch Phase II approved by Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 96-45 on December 3, 1996; and (9)that certain agreement titled"Memorandum of Understanding Between Contra Costa County, the City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries and Windemere Ranch Partners Relating to the Development of Dougherty Valley" entered into between the County, the City, Shapell and Windemere as of October—, 1997(the WWI. 3 The assumptions and figures used to calculate the estimated Total Assessment are provided in the "Dougherty Valley County Service Area M-29 Annual Budget 1997-1998, Five-Year Budget 1997-98 through 2001-02" which is Exhibit "E" to the attached MOU. As further explained in Section 6 of this Engineer's Report, the Total Assessment may vary from these estimates depending upon the cumulative number of foundations poured on subdivided parcels, the land uses that will occur in such parcels and other factors. Section 6. Assessment Per Parcels Each of the parcels identified in Section 4 of this Engineer's Report will be further subdivided pursuant to the Project approvals and agreements identified therein. As explained below, the portion of the Total Assessment that will be chargeable to each of these subdivided parcels (the ".Assessment Per Parcel'} is based upon the Property Use Code Category and the Tax/Assessment Rate Multiplier that will be assigned to that parcel. As provided in Section 5.1(b)(2)(B) of the MOU, upon the approval of each new final map, all the parcels within that map will be assigned one of the "vacant" Property Use Code Categories identified in Exhibit C of the MOU (Use Code Categories 15, 16, 17, 18, 20 and 30.) When "a building foundation is poured" on a parcel, "the Property Use Code Category assigned to that parcel will be changed by the County Assessor to reflect the actual land use on that parcel." Id. Pursuant to Section 5(b) of the MOU, there are two "tiers" for the payment of the Assessment on residential parcels. Tier A is the tier Assessment that will generally be applied to higher density residential development. For fiscal year 1997-1998 the Tier A Assessment is $563 per unit. Tier is the tier'Assessment that will generally be applied to lower density residential development. For fiscal year 1997-1998 the Tier B Assessment is$795 per unit. Exhibit C of the MOU shows the current Use Codes for each tier. Tier A currently includes Use Code Categories 25, 26, 27 and 28. Tier B currently includes Use Code Categories 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 29. Use Code Category 31 is currently designated for commercial stores, not supermarkets. As further reflected in Exhibit C of the MOU, only apartment parcels will be automatically charged the Tier A Assessment. Other parcels will be eligible for the Tier A Assessment, if they meet the following qualifications: • The density shall be 15 du/acre or more. • Identical product types within each final map shall be the same tier Assessment. (i.e., all product that is 15 du/acre within .an identified parcel of a final map will have the same tier). • Identical building product in adjacent final maps shall be the same tier Assessment. • Tiers shall be approve prior to and may not be changed after the recording of the final map. • No more than 25% of each Developer's total units Project-wide shall be assigned the lower tier Assessment,Tier A. 4 Pursuant to Section 5.1(b)(2)(A) of the MOU, each subdivided parcel will also be assigned a multiplier(the "TaxlAssessment Rate Multipller'�to reflect the actual number of units approved for that single, subdivided parcel. The Assessment Per Parcel is based on the Property Use Code Category that will be assigned to that subdivided parcel and the applicable Tax/Assessment Rate Multiplier. Section 5.1(b)(2)(A) of the MOU provides an example: [T]he Annual . . .Assessment Per Parcel identified in Exhibit C [of the MOU] for apartments with 5-12 units is $4,785 or an average density of 8.5 units multiplied by the Tier A rate of $563. If 10 units were actually approved as part of the final map process, the Annual . . . . Assessment for that particular Assessor's Parcel should be $5,630, or 10 actual units charged at the Tier A rate of$563. The . . . Assessment Rate Multiplier for this example parcel would, therefore, be 1.18 (or 10/ 8.5). The Project will include non-residential as well as residential parcels. As provided in the "Dougherty Valley County Service Area M-29 Annual Budget 1997-1998, Five-Year Budget 1997-98 through 2001-02" which is Exhibit E of the attached MOU, the Assessment Per Parcel on non-residential parcels in the Project will be$0.33 for each square foot. The Assessment Per Parcel for both residential and non-residential parcels may be increased each subsequent year based on the Consumer Price Indexa and the Utility Rate Index3. Annual increases in the Assessment shall be calculated as follows: Tax/Assessment for Non- Consumer Price Index for the Utility related Costs x San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area for April of the immediately preceding fiscal year plus: Tax/Assessment for Utility Utility Rate Index based on Related Costs x the costs of utilities for the 2 "Consumer Price Index"shall mean that certain measure of the average change in prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods as reported by the United States Department of Labor Statistics for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area. The base year for the Consumer Price Index used in calculating the Tax/Assessment on parcels within the Dougherty Valley shall be the year in which this MOU is executed. 3 "Utility Rate Index" shall mean the index calculated by the following formula: 20 randomly selected parcels within the Project Site, which include both residential and non-residential parcels, shall be identified. The actual, total gas, water and electricity charges (including fees) for the preceding year (year 1) for all 20 of these parcels shall be added. This total shall be divided by the actual, total gas, water and electricity charges (including fees) for the same 20 parcels for the preceding year(year 0). The resulting ratio is the Utility Rate Index. 5 immediately preceding fiscal year In no event shall the Tax/Assessment per parcel for any fiscal year be less than the amount established for the first fiscal year.4 Section 7. Methodology for Calculating the Assessment Per Parcel. The three Assessment categories are Tier A (generally higher density multi-family residential), Tier B (generally single-family residential) and non-residential. The Tier A and Tier B Assessments are chargeable on a per unit basis. The non-residential are chargeable on a per square foot basis. Multi-family residential units generate less demand on public facilities than single-family residential units; therefore, they should pay a lower fee. They generate less demand for the following reasons: * The multi-family units may typically range in size of 900 square feet for apartments and 1,800 square feet for townhomes. The smaller size of these units as compared to the single family units, 3,000 square feet, generates a lower population of adults and school age children per household. This owner population per household generates less demand upon public facilities such as schools, parks,and libraries. • Multi-family units have a number of private amenities within each area. These generally consist of a recreation building, pool and spa, and trails and common open spaces and meeting rooms. These amenities are private and for the use of the residents of the multi-family units only, and do not compete for use with the single family population. This creates less demand by the multi-family residents upon parks, trails, recreation areas, open space and the community center. • Landscaping and road maintenance costs are higher for single family residents due to more street frontage per unit and lack of a home owner association to levy maintenance costs. Multi-family units will be charged a-home owners association fee or a portion of rent will be used to maintain the private roads and landscaping areas specific to each development. • Based on ITE trip generation factors, single family residential units generate 9.55 trips per day, condominiums/townhomes generate 5.86 trips per day, and low rise apartments generate 6.59 trips per day. Due to the lower trip generation factors for multi-family units, less impact may occur to the streets by multi-family residents. Based on the above justifications, demand for Extended Services is directly related to the average square footage of the two types of residential units. 4 Pursuant to Section 5.1 (b)(2)(B) of the MOU, if any legal challenge results in a prohibition against, or a substantial delay in the levy of, a Tier A Assessment on any parcel, the Tier B Assessment in effect at the time of such prohibition or delay shall be charged to such parcel and adjusted in subsequent years according to the formulas provided in Section 6 of this Engineer's Report. 6 Non-residential uses also generate demand for Extended Services. The demand is primarily on streets, flood control and storm drain facilities, and police services. There is less demand on schools, parks and libraries. The demand of non-residential property is also related to square footage. The methodology used to allocate costs to the three categories of Assessments is based on a square foot basis (MOU, Exhibit E, page B-7). The assessment assigned to each category is pro-rated based on its percentage of square footage compared to the total Project-wide square footage (MOU, Exhibit E, page A-5). The per unit Assessment for single-family units and multi-family units is the estimated Total Assessment for that respective category divided by the respective number of units (MOU, Exhibit E, page A-5). The square footage Assessment calculation was translated into two per parcel Assessments for residential parcels due to the relatively small range of square footage of the individual residential units and to simplify the Assessment collection procedures. The per unit Assessment for non-residential uses is the estimated Total Assessment divided by the non-residential square footage Project-wide (MOU, Exhibit E, page A-5). The estimated Total Assessment for non-residential parcels is apportioned by square footage because the total square footage of these units will vary widely. Section 8. Statement/Legal Analysis Regarding Camp Parks. Proposition 218 provides that: Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. Cal. Const. Art. XIII D, Sec.2. The southern end of CSA M-29 is home to the Camp Parks Reserve Forces Training Area. The 892-acre facility is owned by the United States Department of the Army. The area is policed by the U.S. Army and already has all of the services needed to perform its current mission. Camp Parks will not be subject to the Assessment because none of the Extended Services will be provided within its boundaries. Further, it is a federal facility which will not benefit either directly or indirectly from the Extended Services provided to other parcels in CSA M-29. Finally, under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, state and local governments may not directly tax the federal government or federal departments. Government Code section 25210.77x, which authorizes assessments for Extended Services in County Service Areas, also specifically provides that"The Board of Supervisors shall not impose a charge upon a federal or state governmental agency." Section 9. Tentative Report under Contra Costa County Code Article 1012-2.6. This Engineer's Report contains all of the information required to be in a tentative report under Contra Costa County Code Article 1012-2.6 and satisfies all of the requirements for a Tentative Report under that Article. This Engineer's Report, therefore, constitutes "The Tentative Report for the County Service Area M-29 (Dougherty Valley), San Ramon Area Benefit Assessment/Service Charge Fiscal Year 1998-1999" (the "Tentative Report"). The Assessment 7 constitutes a "service charge" as that term is used in County Code Chapter 1012-2. The Tentative Report includes the computation of service charge required by Contra Costa County Code section 1012-2.606. CA962300.044 Attachment A r Co • i •� t. �. . i r X x r t+ 1 r > r 0 r z m F/ RDr r ATTACHMENT B Legal Descriptions and Parcel Maps LEGAL, DESCRIPTION THE GUMPERT RANCH (WINDEMERE) ALTA tsar Pouey- N1�gl Schedule C SCHEDULE C The land rutwed to In"a p6ft b d+ewrtind foltowc REAL PROPERTY in an unincorporated area, County of Contra Costa, State of Callbrnla, descr1bed as follows: REAL PROPERTY in an rmincorporate+d area,CoLm of Contra Costa,Saes of Coffomi . as filo": PARCEL ONE: A parcel of land altuMed In ltha Rancho San Ramon.Contra Costa County, Callfomia, being all of tots 2L, 23, 24 and 25 of the Map of the of Elizabeth A. Dougherty as saki Map is recorded In Book C of Maps at Page 63, lying within the following Commencing at tate 1 1!2'�iron pipe%ft tag marked LS 4477 lad the southwest corner of said Lot 24 as shown on the Record of Si rosy recorded In Book 68 of Land Survey Maps at Page 2D, Oftial Records of Contra Costa County; 1henee North 22'flr W East along the west"6rw of Lot 24 as shown on said Record of Survey, 236.98 feet 10 the:point of beginning; thence +fig the westetty and rarttrty Bros d Lot 24 as shown on said Record of Survey the following courses and North 22' CTT 54' East 5813.48 feet; North 28- Or sol' East 39&08 feet; North 530 tom` 17' East 33ti'63 North 46* 36' Sr East %4{88 fleet~ North 20' SK'53" East 481X55 feert* South 88' Sr 69' East 3480.31 feel; Thence leaving said northef#y Sro of Lot 24 acrd along the fallowing courses and . South 19" 38' 15' Want 188ta.78 feet South Or 41'36' l=ast 809.16 few North 72. 40' 16" West 2.217.98 fest; North 88' 44'68' West 2106.57 team; To the point d beginning. i A.P.No.: 206-050.006 PARCEL. TWO: A parcel of land situated in the Rancho San Raman,Contra Costa county. California„ being all of tots 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 of the MaV of the Estate Of Elftbesr A.Dougherty as Bald Map is recorded In Book C of Maps at Page 63, lying within the foli whV desalbed boundary: Commencing ad the 1 1I2' kon pipe with tag marked LS 4477 S1 the southwsst can-or d said Lot 25 as f' shown on fire Record of Survey recorded In Book 68 of Land Suacvvey Maps at Page Zo, OfWW Aecords t F"Irst.lrrsrrirarr Title 1 i Commencing at the 2' iron pip+r with tag marked LS 3400 a4 the southeast GorrW at that parcel d land shown on the Record of Survey recorded In Book W of Land Survey Maps st Page 20, Oiftlal Records of Contra Costa County, ti fiance North 12'0C'35' East along the easterly title of said Parcel, 1136.95 feet to a 2- iron pipe; thence ico t ruing along the easterty line of said Parcel the iaH N*V courses and distances: North 04' 11' 52' West 1155.35 Met; North 01' 48' 08' East 404A8 feet. North 01' GAG` 24' East 146.47 feast To the paint of beginning; ihance continuing along said easterly line the following courses and di North 01' 52' 74' East 9WA3 fleet; North 41' 25'00" East 55181 feet; North 24' SW 12' East 141260 feet, North 47' 32' 09' Weet MW feet Thence leaving said easterly Ins and along the following courses and . South 86' 20' 31' West 17+47.134 fW South 14'00' 31` Waast 2M.87 feet South 76' 47' S8' East 1876.12 feet To the point of beginning. ' A.P.No.: 206-090-409 PARCEL TWELVE: A parcel of land situated in%the Rancho Sara Ramon,Contra Costa County, Caftmla, baling aI Of Lott 19, 20, 21 and 28 of#* Map of 1w Estate of Bubft A. Dougherty as Said Map 18 M=dW In Book C Of , Maps at Page 63, lying within the following descrbed boundary. Commencing at the 1 112' Iron pipe with tag marked LS 4477 at the northeast corner of said Lot 21 as ! shoom an the Record d Survey recorded in Bonk 68 of Land Survey Maps oat Page 20, OffkW of Contras,Costa County, that»along ft asastarty line of said Lot 21 as shown on said Record of Survey the following courses and dstances. South 48' 43' 31' East 330.00 Iset: South cit' 37' 48' West 438.24 feet ' South 38,, 29,4-r West 99.50 feet; To a 1 1/2' union pipe with tap marked LS 4477 and the paint of beginning, t woos acontEnuing along said eastsrty fine the following courses rind dislarxAw South 120 23' 49'West 151.33 fasts South 01' 32' 04' Went 94.112 foot~ South 06' 28' 47' West 653.74 feet South 40' 03' 04' Wast 1705.65 feet ; To a 1 1/2' iron pipe with tag marked LS 4477; "nee leaving said easterly line and aslong the following {courses and distances, i rhos American Me ' s r I 2 i f dd i To the easterly fine of said Parcel; thence aloN said easterly line the fallowing courses and i e f South 01` 52' 240 West 146.47 feet South 01' 48' 08' West 404.58 feet; South 04" 1 V S2` East 11 t6.35 feet; i South 124 W 35' West 1136.95 feet To the point of beginning. i I A.P.No.: 206-090-00$ PARCEL TEN: f A parcel of I"situated In rhe Rancho Nath Raman,Contra Costa County, California, being all of Lots 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 3d and 38 of the Map of the Estate d Eftaboth A DwjgtwrW as Wk Map is recordod In Book C of Mads of Pale 83, tying within the Mowing describecl boumdary: C,ommendng at the 1 1/2'iron pipe with Ug nw*ed LS 4477 of the ratmWerly corner of said Lot 21 ora shown on the Reoord of Survey recorded in Boot 65 of Ltutd Survey Mage at Page 20, O tt ial Records of Contra Costa County; thence North 18'41'02".East along the easterly lirt8 of Lot 22 of said Map of ft Estate of Qiz� A. Clougherty as shown on said Record d Survey, 2is.30%st Vwnntar Waves veld easterly Ikm end along the and dlstankees: ' i North Sr 84'O8' Wast 2647.58 feat; South 24. 13'46' West 3050.74 feet; f � To the point of beginning; thence along the following courses and&-tanoes: South 61` 04'SW East 1056.76 feet South 37' 2r 21' East 1271.07 kmat South 14' 00'31' West 2636.x87 kmt North IW 4l 58" Wait 1485.21 feet•, Nara 00' W S0' East 1753.26 feet North 10. 2r Or East 2017.48 feet To the point of beginning. AP.No.; 10 j t PARCEL ELEVEN; A parcel of land situated Wthe Rancho San Ramon, Contra Costa County, C*Momia, being at of Late 18, 19, 20, 28 and 29 of the Map of the Estate of Elizabeth A Dougherty as raid Map is mc=W in Scah C of Maps at Page 63, lying within the following describecl boundary. i i s i Fait American Tftls i To said westerly line d Lot 30; thence along sold westerly Ilne the following courses and distancer. North 36. 59' 4V West 481.74 feet~ North SO 32' 38'West 812.E feet; North 3r 00' e8" West 758.45 feet To the point of beginning. A.P.No.: 206—ora—coos f PARCEL EIGHT. A pwvW of lands itualod In the Rancho San Raman, Contra Costa County, Cdfdrnla, being all of Lata 18, ; 19, 28. 29 and 30 of the Nkp of the Estate d Elizabeth A Dougherty as saki Map Is recorded In Book C d Maps at Page 83, lying iAthln the following described boundary: s Commencing at the hub and laic at the southerly comer d that parcel of land shown at the Record of Survey recorded In Bonk 88 d Land Survey Maps at Page 20, Official Records of Contra Costa Couray; thence North 47"38'4W West song the southerly boundary thered, 1166.71 feet to the p*4 d begin kq, ! thence leaving said scut wrty be and along the fallowing courses and . North 14' 0031 a East 2901AI feet North 76` 47"slaw Wnt 1465.21 tweet; South 2r 02' 31' West 1874.24 feet To a 8' by W concrete movement with nail at an angle paint In said southerly One; them South 4T 38' 4V East along said southerly line, 2178.99 feet to the point of beginning. A.P.No.. 206-0004)07 PARCEL NINE j A parcel of land situated In the Rancho San Ramat, Contra Costa County, California, being all of!rots 17, r 18, 19, 28 and 29 of the Map of the Estate of ElIzabe h A Clougherty as sold Map Is. In Book C of Maps id Page 03, h+ing�Ithln the following descrlt*d bounder . Bunning at the 2'trtan pipi wwtthh tag marked LS 3400 at she southeast corner of that pawl d land shown en the Record d Survey recorded in Sods 68 of Land SwnW Maps at Page 20,Official Records d Corara Costa County thence North 76.2T 22` W4st along the southerty One thereof, 526.21 beet to a 1 Ur iron { OPO with tag marked LS 4477; theme continuing along said southerly ilne the following courses and r distances- South 62` 17' 26' West 886.61 fleet; South 76' 21`49'Went 202.39 feet , North Air 38`45' West 1165.71 foot; Thence leaving said southerly linee and along the following courses and . !I North 14• W 31' East 2881.81 fleet South 7B' 4T 58` East 1876.12 fit First American ?"rite 4 t i t i To the point of beginning. A.P.No.: 206-090-004 PARCEL SIX. A parcel of land situates! In the Rancho San Racoon, Contra Costa County, California, being as of Lots 27, 30. 37 and 38 of to Map of the Estate of Elizabeth A, Dougherty es said Map Is recorded In Book C of j Maps at Page 63, lying within the following described boundary: E Beginning at the 1 1/2"icon pipe with tag marked LS 4477 at the trarthwest com w of said Lot 37 as shown on the Record of Survey accorded In Book 68 of ULnd Survey Maps at Page 2D.C)l6dal A oortls of Contra Costa County, thence North 00' 1S 2V W+►st alotV to westerly llrw d Lot 27 as shown an sold Record of Survay, 396.17 feet: thorns leavkrg sW w9sterty 8ne and Wong the blowing courses end dateraw South 79' 30'S2" East 1389.27 feet; South 35' 27"W East 1606.89 feet South 5V ;3ti' 11' Wiest 3036.06 fact To the westerly line of said Lot 37 as shown on said Record of ,ttrewrwe along sold westerly line the following courses and distances: North 35' 30'4(' Weal 1744.38 feet; North 42. W Sr East 264.40 feet; North 88' 52' 12' East 562.01 feet; North 21* 58'30' East 1316.13 feet To the point of beginning. A.P.No.: -005 PARCEL SEVEN: � Ay[�pe�t of land situated In the Rancho San Ramon, Coma Nista County, a, being all of Lots 28, i 29, 30. 3T and 38 of the Map of the Estals of Elizabeth A. 'Dougherty as saki Map Is ne=%W in Book C of M" at Page 63, lying wtthln the following described boundary: Beginning at the 1 112' iron pipe at the westerty corner of said Lot 30 ars shown on the Record of Survey recorded in Book 68 of Laird .Survey Maps st Page 20. Official Records of C"a Costa CourA)r, ther" North 35' 30'44r west along the westerly line of NO Lot 30 as shown on said Record of St vey, 386.18 feet; thence leaving said westerly fine and along the following couraft and dMancew i North 65' S6' 11' East 3036.06 feet North 85' 3T 28, East 1900.54 fee South 00`SB'SW West 1753.26 fee South 27' OZ 31'West 187+4.24 fee North 89' t7' 29' West 2o1li.5.'S feet ! • S 1 • i Finn Amerkan Tale °+ 1 5 t i of Contra Cosh County; thence North 38"37'32" East along the wvstedy line of Lot 26 as shown an said � Record of Survey, 835.10 feet to the paint of beginning: Manes continuing Wong said westerly find the following courses and di . North 14" W 42' East 709166 feat; North 31. 62' 490 East 372x42 bet; North 22" Or 54" East 238,.36 Meet; Thence leaving said westetly fins and along the following courses and distances: South 88. 44'68* East 2106.57 feet; South 72" 40' 16" last 2217.98 feet 1 South Oer 41136* East 708.77 feet; South 24" 13'4W West 884.33 feet; l North 70* 38' 14' West 301.87 teat; North 79. Sr 30' Wast 871.37 treet To the point of beginning. A.P.No.: 2866-050-007 PARCEL THREE: A parcel of later situated in'the Rancho Sart Ram, Contra Costa county, Crrftmiaa, being all ! of Lots 21, 22, 25. 26 and 27 of Me Map of the Estate of Ebabft A. Dougherty as said Map Is recorded In Book C of Maps st Page 63 tying wfthln the following deserted boundary: Commencing at the 1 112'tvn pipe at the southwest comer of ald Lot 26 as shown on the Record of Survey lin Book as of Land Survey Maps at Page 2o, official Raeoor+ds of Contra Geta County: theme North i6. 4349* East ski the westerly fans of list 28 as shown on said Record of Survey, 278.22 fort to the point of beginning; them continuing along said wasterty Gree of i,.ot 26 and the wrist" fans of said Lot 25 as shown on sand Record of Survey the following cioucses and distances: North 160 43' 48" East 286:61 fdet: North 460 11'32" East 317:30 feet; North 35" or 42' East 81 o.38 foot: North 38.37'32' East 535:10 feet Thence leaving the westerly line of Lot 26 and along the following courses and d . i i South 79" Sr 30" East 871.37 feet; i South 76" 38' 14" Essen 3651.87 feat; South 24" 13' 46* West 1256.86 North 83' 32' 15" Wast$039.04 tadt; To the point of beginning. A.P.No.: -M i First Amerie" 2 tle 6 PAROL. POUR: � A weal of laird situated In'the Rancho San Rarteort, Ce oft Oosta County, Calftnia, beteg all of Lou 21, 26, 27,28,37 and 38 of the Map of the Estate of E tzabeth A Doughwty as said Map Is recorded In Book C of Maps at Pape 63 Ift within the bkmg described boundary. C;,oenme acing at the 1 1/2'+iron pipe *fttag marked LS 4477 at the souffrwst eaoe10'e5d aprld Lot 27 as shown on the Record of Survey recorded In Book 68 od I a nd Stm+'eay Maps at Page 20,Of5cW Records of Contra Costa County; thence North OU' IV 2ti'Wag along the westerly One d Lett 27 eas Shown an Said d Record of Survey, 396.17 het to the pant of beginning;thenar continuing among said One Of Lot 27 and along the westerly line of said Lot 26 as shown on said R000rd of Survey, the following courses and dstances: North 13' 13' S4' East 420.38 feet; North 18' 46'20` Wast 467.93 fetes . North 31' 12'SW East 'S9+#.T7 fest+ North 28'90'28' West= 'feert; North 13` 211'SW East 324.98 North 33. 12` 41' Ea$t 28f1.86 f9K. Nodh 16' 43'49' East 279.22 bet; Thenoe leaving the westaedy Ilne of Lot 26 and Wong to following courses andS.` South 83' 32' 15' West 6Q39,04 feet; South 24' 13' 46"West 1703.65 feet South 86' 40' 3r West 1863.13 fry South 61' S31310 West 1541.24 fest North 79' 304 62' West 1369.27 feed To the point of beginning. A.P.No.: 50-009 PARCEL FIVE: A parcel of land situated In,the llanrho Sart Ramon„Contra Costa County, Caitfo nia, betting 91 of tuts 21, 27. 28, 30, 37 and 38 of the Map of the Estate of Elizabeth A Dougherty as said Map b recorded in Book C of Mmes at Page 63, lying within the following desabod b Commencing at the 1 1/2-`bon pupa wins tag marked LS 4477 at the corner of add Lot 27 as shown an the Record of Sttrvsy recorded kr Boole W of Laud Survey Maps eat Paige 20, CMciad Records of Contra Costa County; thenerer North or 15'28'Wast along the weastearfy line of Lot 27 ave a hmm on said Record of Survey, 396,17 Meet: thence a South ?W 30' 52' East, 1=27 fest to to poo t of thence Wong the following courses and I North 61. 53' 31' East 1511.24 feet � North 86.40` 37' East 1883.13 feat, South 10' 2T 08` West 2017.48 feet i South SS' 37` 28' West 199.54 feet; North 35. 27' 02' West 7606.88 feet 'a i rust Ameenr= 7We _ ! 1 i South 86' 20' 31* West 1747.64 feet~ North 37` 27' 21* W4W 1271.07 feet North 49` 29' 420 EGO 2778.98 feet; S"h 78` 28' 34` East 525.18 feet r To the point of beginning. A.P.No.: 206-080-011 i PARCEL THIRTEEN: ' A parcel of land situated In that Rancho San Rarrron, Contra Costa Colony, Caftmkl being all of Lft 2D, i 21, 22, 25, 26, 27,28 and 38 of the Map of 1he Estate of Eftabsih A. Dougherty as said Map Is reowded j in book C of Maps at Page 63, lyitrg wtthin to fdowing described bowxW. Beginning at the i 112" Iron prpe with tag marked LS 4477 at ft ralmst csorner of said Lot 21 as shown on the PAxmrd of Survey recorded In Book as of Land Stmrey Maps st Page 20,Official Fkxxwds of Contra ' Costa County; thenee along the easterly fine of sold Lot 21 ere shown on said Reword of Sur*vy the *Mowing courses and costa=s: South 480 43' 310 East=00 feet � South 02` 37'48`West 438.24 trete South 38` 294r West $D$.i°�'t?feats t To a 1 1(20 iron pipe with In marited LS 4477;thence leaving salts rine and along the folowbg comes and d ! North 78` 28' 34" West 595.18 feet South 49` 29' 42` West 277$.98 teal; � North 61•tb4'6W West 1056.78 iset; North 24. 13' 4W East 3050.74 feet; 1 South 87` 54' 08' East 2647.98 feet To the easterly One of sold Lot 22 as shown on said Record of Scrrvej, thence South 18. 41'W West � along said easterly One, 219.30 feet to the point of beginning. e A.P.No.: 206-050-010 i PARCEL FOUR I N: A parcel of land situated in the Rancho San Ramon,Contra OWa County, +Caliitorrnia, being an d Lis 22, 23. 24, 25, and 26 of the Map of the Estate of Elizabeth A. Dough"as said Map M in sock C I of Maps at Page 63, tying within the following described boWKW. i! Commencing at the 1 112' iir+snm pipe with ag market! LS 4477 at the northeao comer of send Lot 23 as shown on the Record of Survey recorded In Book a8 of Lara Sunray Maps at Page 20, OMcW Records � of Contra Costa County; thence along the easterlyOne of said List 23 as shown on said Reco:ti3 or survey i the following courses and South OS` 4738* West 1186.$1; feet; i South 25° 36' 43' East 971.76 feet: t Fsrsst 14mrsfaa r 7 sue 1 ! 8 s i To a 1 1/2` Iran pipe with rep narked LS 4477 and the paint of beginr*V, them ooxh m*V akxV Bald easter*One of said Lot 23.and along the easterly WW of said Lot 2.2 as shown on said Record of Survey the following courses and tiisUuves: South 02' t3' 42' West 874.71 fee South 46.43' 405' West s08.29 feet South 54' 4r 12' west 228.41 feet; South 18` 41' 02' West 757.50 feet; 3 Thence leaving said easterty tine of said Leat 22 and along the fallowing courses and . I North Sr 54' 08' Wast 2647.88 feet; North 24° 13'46' East 884.33 feet; � North 060 41'364 West 708.77 feet; North 76' 12'02' East 277`8.88 feet; , South 83' iia' 08' East 481.83 feet i To the point of beginning. A P.N o.: 208-080--ta 11 e PARCEL FIFTEEN: i A partal of land situated in Ahe Rancho flan Ramon, Contra Cosh County, Cattornia. belrhp all of Lots 22. 23. 241 and 25 of the Map of the Estate d Ermabeth A. Dougherty as said Map is nx=ded in Book C of Maps at Pape 83. lying within the following dascrtbed boundary; BeS7i'nning at the 1 1/2'iron pipe with tag marked LS 4477 at the north ast coma„;of Said Lot 23 ua shown on the Record Of Survey recorded In Book+68 of Land Survey MaM at Page 20,Oftidti d Ca ft Coeta County; thence Siong the easter*fiche thereof the bllomft =mum and distanow. South 05` 47"38" West 1186.86 feet; South 25' 86' 43' East Q71.76 feet; t To a 1 112` iron pipe with tag marked LS 4477; thence Wa*V said easterly Cam and'along the fobwing courses and distances: { North 83' 15' 06' Weal 481.83 feet* South 7V 12' 02' West 2778.88 feet~ North 06.41'36' West 808.15 fest; North 19. 38' 15` East 1896.78 feet; t i i JR-0.rfkmencan 7-We ' 4 1 9 • � a a To the northerly #ne of said Lht 24 as shown on said Record of Survey, thence Scuadh SW S2" 590 East s along said northerly One, 104.88 feet to a 1 1/21 jrm pipe with tag marked LS 4477 at the northwest comer � of said Lot 23 as shown On said Record of Survey, ftr"Mouth 88` 18'36' (east along the rwrt mrly uric � of said Lot 23, 2261.97 feet to the polM of beginning. � A.P.No.: 206-050-012 i EXCEPTING FROM PARCELS ONE THROUGH FFTEEN: I i i The rights reserved in the Dead from Emll Gurnper%at of to Edest, N.V..a Netherlands A Oes corporation, ! recorder! March 28, 1980, as Instrument No. 80- SMO, as follows: "But any as to the arse lying mtxe than In hundred OM team below the land surface of the real property, s ars undivided one-half (1/2} Interest In and to all rights to, and on 4aff (1/2) of a8 oott, Bas, mkwrsis, 1 petrochemicals and other hydrocarbon subsUmcm in„tinder or produced and saved from,the rent . PARCEL SIXTEEN: i That portion of Parcel 'A` of MS 79•-74 recorded to Book 38 of Parcel Maps, at Page 29, Contra Co to 1 County Records and more particularly described as fo5ows: Beginning at to northeast corner of said Parcel •A` thence along the northerly, westerly and eoudmly boundaries of said Parch the following bemings and di e North Sr 22'54' West 3135.17 feet i South 041 14' 21` East 486.26 1"t i South 120 00' 4,9" West 1136.78 feet South Pr Zr 34' East 762.55 feet f North 00` 43' 180 West 126.01 Nots North 010 IV 24` West 436.67 feed North 28` 08' 11' East 387.32 feet South 54. 55' 434 East 254.19 feet South 82' 16' 49' East 254.42 feet s North 74. 04' 280 EaW 335.45 feet; ! South 76` 21' 60' East M.73 feet: _ ! South B5` 13' 05' East 248.92 feet i Mouth 4a` 08' 336 East 157.52 feet; South 74. 21' 24* East 287.59 feet; South 05' 41' 40* East 252.35 fret r South 50` 46' 28` West 302.50 feet; Thence continuing along the westerly boundary of said Parcel`A' South 14`49.'13`East. 60.14 feet to the westerly end of the r+swevised lot line dlvlding said Parcel'A` and Parcel `B' of MS 230•-71 as recorded in that certain Pascal Map recorded In Book 23 of Parcel Maps at Page 6of Contra Costa Courcy, ; California, thence North 86`48'S5`East along said realised hot fie,$39.51 fret to the northwesterly rouser + of said Parcel "B" as shown, on said MS 230--71; thence along the norterfy line of sold Parcel wg. North � 9W 3£t" 28` East. 223.20 test to the easterly One of Bald Parol*K, thence along the esaterly tine of wird Pareai `A` the following bearings and distances: w I • 1 Fust,Amerkan Taut a 10 1 r r North 14' 41' 00' West 259.60 feet; North 06' 24' 00* West 300.35 feet; ! North 03° 04' 00' West 301.21 feet ' North 01. 11' 18' West 802.54 feet; Thence continuing along Bald easterly Wo North 04' 18,290 East, 178.38 feet to the point of beginning, j A.P.No.: 206-110-009 r PARCEL SEVENTEEN: i Portion of the Rancho San Ramon, Amador Cram, being Lot 8, as said Lot in st►om on the Map endure d, 1 Map of ft Property of the Estate of Ozaboth A. Dougherty, deceased. Mod In the Office of the Rewrder d Contra Costa County, State of California, May 4, 1891, In Map Book 'C` at Page 63, described as y { flows: { i Beginning at a point on the boundary Ine of the Rancho San Ramon at the comer convnon to Lora 7 and ► 8, as said tarts are shown on the Map hereinabove referred to, 1henos,along the ons dividing wld Lots 7 and 8, North 55' 30' West 2230.80 `forst: thence North 70' West 924 feet; thence North SV IV West 1358.28 fest to the northwest caret`of said fart 8;lhence along said tot Line South 1• West 1661 feet; i tumce South 5• Fast SW,fest th the sourdwAW corner of trald Leet 8; ftwve along ft Lots ; 8 and 9 as shown on the Map hereinabove reterred to, South 88" Fast 4184.40 feet to the boundary fine a of said Rancho; thence along said boundary One North Cr 30' East 1094.29 Meet to the point of begkw*V. EXCEPTING FROM PARCEL SEVENTEEN: A portion of Parcel Map MS 207-78, filed July 14, 1980, in Book 87 of Parcel Maps, at Page 38. more particularly described as follows; ' Beginning at a point on the boundary One of the Rancho San Ramon at the corner omur ion b lots 7 and 8, as said Lots are shown on the Map hereinabove referred to: thence along the Oros dividing mid Leta 7 and 8, North 84.33'26'West, 148.05 feet(87 Parcel Maps, Page 38; North 85'30'000 West 848..05 fsefy to the contertine of Camino Tassalara,as shown on Parcel Map M.S. 20778 Mod Judy 14, IOW in Book r 87 of Parcel Maps. Page 38, Contra Costa County Records; thence along the Iast mentioned line South � V IS-28'West 1124.88 feet(87 Parcel Maps 38; South 3.21'52"Wast 1135.58"to the southern line of Bald Lot 8: thence along the last mentioned line South 87. 2Z 40' East IW8.42 fast (87 Patel Maps; 38: South 88' 00' Oil" East 100183 feet) to the eastern One of sold Loot 8;thenar along the last mert>loned fine North 1' 13' 00' East 1077.87 feet (87 Parcel Maps 38; North Cr 30' 00' East 10042A too 10 the i point of beginning, t` f A.P.No.: 206-110-007 j i r I Fir&AR1Crz= 7We ! fi 1 11 0oXy1eI7Y fir/ '� err ww, IWO tiwww rs ,w...- ��, r ♦ t �w e i•� S= w,rww ;1 '••a.^•"'w,w � `•r "may y w piN' r; a� `ry�+M PMS 'o+ti'e`w`¢ so✓ � \ r w-••w. r� •y ti.w. 1• ell 00 NOTICES THIS MAP MAY OR MAY NOTi BE A SURVEY OF THE LAND DEPICTED HEREON. IT IS NOT TO BE RELIED !:PON FOR ANY P'U'RPOSE OTHER:NA'� OFS'EiNI?i'.%` x. ONE'S SELF AS TO THE GENS AL LOICAT IDN OF ThE P;,RCEL OR PARCELS OF INTEnE't'. FIRST AMERICAN TILE COMPANY ASSUM,25 NO LIABILITY FOR LOSS ' OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM r'tELIANCETHEREON. � i , 12 P'r' i..� a 9 i J/ itJZ •hRr. ss�.t .> .a v r� 1.�C JO .wDAGLA, .a.A'O.A3t. J1&Ii* OAP Or ME Pq00%WM OF CLlZA9STN A. CSOOK C Or AAPS Ar AW Off { . COUW" COA=er&W CfW1. VVSAVM AMC +""•"�' +^r•-• j airs tocwir srr/tyr f •+.rrYr�.aw. tJ.rrr.�,...r.�.�.w r.sw..•..,r 1 � ��* O wv•Lr.r swr +rr+•v�ww r rw.w«- 1 �.�.rrrusaw rrrwr•w.a.rrww+ , -at��.- r.�,ulR.ri. a++rY'±+r �` � .w.r,.wrstrl.�.w '"` t f+w i+r sale r.v wVr �'!"*•+i.+..ns�+�w s•.w•,�.�...w+w.r��v ,..�'•.�rwr.Y � `a r d 0:'4 rrwrrr.w tis If swo. a,om Axmm rp _... yrs .... j� Lal u 107 � 4'�'� to-,cry —���.��,•, ,..r..s i � Lal tt ✓s' � 1.07 s � , e i 'o. vc IM C: •"fY �'W 39 Lai cn '11 e. � / ~may • �.y�rs, Low��"�A�r�w.,r„•, ,�r..�.� �.,,,} � G4� ��••!� ��: 'r°f�.i•+ 'µ'.�.... mss_ ,��..e i� }y Tyy s k it Um fill4 �� � v r arra •.ar.rr;rr '' ��' � 1 �C f •--w� •°�,; * � gyp! � �'a�+rryetr► „"...�."�.rr.rrxs � 1 W.AFAV of/+Wr9,•srVO .,,. 41 a qR *hit 'two 3t at U 04 41 1 r.;�. tom, � � r� `` i �� $ �v �'•'Y�3 �✓r.+• ter . �' �� x rrrt 1Cal sir` fS'r Irc-1 il>f3t4�'(;;i rtS k'. Ua� J.),M•,—oil 1 'em ((( { LIP 4f T� •e1r,••: .H,�•1:'��!i;'V4•?+:.R.-Wj"i f'f•rr`� bFJ1 Y.1rY' �.!• �VYr/Q+•�+Y Y'Y r•. ' 14 fill, 11t ;o � LI V$�1 1 . r "�,tl► W to tri t 1 t! •,,�^ „�# 4Y'®` � ti*,� �1 �� T, OIL �..i. � {W�LA ld-t �# +M!'s��+^�'"'�w� � t 1 Ali �� � '�T • Y£. �+ y t w►#�• W14 u tY+ twit N N t t �, 'tt• � t�r r 1C wt x r �7 rte t'rft ; ' { v � t t"3 t !! �w *� •1 r.t,. "' Lir �d S i 41c iIWO itta16kitx t{{{ a !. � !it Y.l� 1N�r�r,fwyYP.trr Y•"`s � O 'i ,tt1s`e ttgt .MfYw i. pyf `r 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION GALE RANCH {' .. (APPROX. 2,728 AC) TIM LAM M—raE TO HEM-24 15 STM M MM 5-,-A-t`E CF CALZFC IA, C=frY Cr CaMt?A CMTA, ALN-N=Fw 'fRAmM AREA AM IS CM=-t3= AS FOL+:DWS A Cif OF "111,E AMA= C'WM OF MM FMCa''r} SAN R*W, A PCEMM Cr Sa= 'tW IV&SE=P 2 SalrF., Rte. 1 LEST AND AOF SEL—..Xc N 6, moamtp 2 SCXm, M<Z I M .se""r, BM%JC; A r-aM'IC N OF U= 35, 36 AM 67 AND Au CUFF LCIS 39, 40, 41. 4z, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48. 49, 550, 51., 52, 53, 54, AND 53, As mvAN cN THE MAIC' et'T:L=. -mp CF Sw1SDNtSZQY OF PLIC r A CLF TRE L M="M "Y RANCH, AXAM= AND C ='FMA aMAaxmmm. MFORMA,", F= CN MAY 2, 1894, IN `THE C7l=.=- CF THE QTY Or SAM CM1'M CXR'A COUM':` L'`t SOM H OF ice, AT PAM air, LES "RMM AS FC7XZ=iS: ,B3GMV r3 C N � ZASM- r LIy E+CF'et'�THE� 791.8..x.'3 ,�tTF+.�rPMCM CF LtA�rr�i+D�SEs LAPART TO L.rVU;M w7" M. tuk.+X; " f 7i J,i AT {rr'4iaY73N i+�rY.iS+T:. � .1p°.n['4�I".T , fv.�iW�ca��J.i� �'�MnMW 25, 1891, Vf THEE SMEVIUM C=ttr OF THE ST`RTE CF CALF CW>, IN ANIS Fm am C xwy CF AtAMJEA, IN 'FIAT � AC 7Z V HPO 'THEMM , C«AI�r, m M. Dmi2maY, FTA=N-ZF- VS- ADA M. =JMWMw., ET AL. I1ZLT [..t11'`t,I:S, CM NO. 6479. A CMCMF t9 CM'Y OF WH= L '"'; W .Ill =PC Er MARMI 3, 2891, IN B= 59 C'F AT PACE 525, AT TIM M39TIMN LXsM OF . 35.46.3= AaM ?ARM OF LAND =Sat=M n4 THE p=4AL. .7tm►."onm REMMM =f 21., 1947, 8Y THE DZSTRl= Ca' Cr -_9E UNl'TEG SL'A'VS, IN Ate,? FM .,IM NCR HWW D SIP=. OF NCA, SOUMMRN ITVISICN, IN 'LSAT C=h3V ACT-_CN mm TMM, ENTZTI= Ute''.,.? STATES CF AM=. F"LaAnjrr�' VS. 396 A M Or LAM, A'[JMMh AND calm C=m C.'IfiTi'ISS, C AL4`FMM. AL'A C'...aimT, ET AL. 3:mmoSt m,_a N3. , A WITI—F'�C}� C ±" OF��*i MALI aMGV!,�T` Sr�sy � ��yl►9/10= 2, IS4 , :N I � Lii Lwt'Y.1 A.4F%M v7�/, M i�T► 4 �71'6M p0.V r C M=MG NORMM2 AND WESrM= == TIDE EIiTERIC'F`t L2,M CF 5A= 7928.73 AM P (5S D 5525) AS FOLLMS:7GIS: NORM 32* WW, 331 E'EI",T, 1 OR LESS M ANM,E p=c, NCS= 650301 i T 613.80M.": t4OR i 384 U� 7S9 FY : N=H 360.340' kESr 21= FEW. iii 4*301 EAST64 C+M MM 86* EXST 561 NCI- Z'-" EAST LU4. 2 FEET; NMM 1'15 WEA 396 FEE 1401M 14*151 EAST 429 Fr :r'i NaM 19`45' WE5T' 4M FEE."; NORM 30*15' MvSr 594 FEET: NORM 27*30* WEST 660 : NORTH 12*30" EAST 325.70 FES'; �,+yy gMg 32"15' 'rr"'"'�..s�"T'2^.x{9.50' tom- : NORTH 1'59 45" �E��564�.30 -r=r#. .N�C�j H,�y459 115t' �mm,, 316.80 .�"�r"+Sr,«i N�i 344 151 � SM. i�i sus• w4/*45, MkS / 5.60 pEE Y NOMM. 14* EAST 720.16 .' .; MORM 31* MM" 372.24 rmT: NMMj 22*15' EAST MS FES': NOM Z7015' EAST" 396 .2—M.": NCH !!2-30* MW 330 FEET: NMRTH 45"451 EAST 594 F=-.' NOFM 200 Eta' 481.80 Fes' :O THE NOFM W =aM CF SATJ SAN RMCN Rte: AX= SAM NC:RMMU L,�""M � X899**�45''�WEST 597.30 /F�'=,- L+Ekvry7�i�; 89'0451 jNa . WEST Maga .0** 5' EAST 2653-20}, ,y ��}���.wi r�N���.yi\.+�y,�89*15' � 23.05.70�F' - ���p M 89'0 45 1WES � 1707.40 F'L.iwt i +ySm�.� �/G�i{5 45* Tsi�SA +Gi�7/'6y 6.20 i s*yN+ M �1.,t4 15, mkS �1]c:js *E i�w�i,. SCUMy/+99-45, WEST r� �M��y�, d iJ�122.S�7V/+F .�T; -San M400 SAN 301 +��yi�G��r,S�+d�,J.7�i+.+_Jy�pFEET.-���N*,�y�;��w +�89#45, 4�+r7.L��+M.10 ri�.iGr+�fi 1�iy4�', +�.7iAy+1.�i,M S.R. 8 O � 2YY400 � iV'L'1.41, 1;7.11.7 Si�'0#7.cN sJR. 8 BEM'%G lr+�s ��i A�A.iw'Y�ii1 �./C' ' HE tt`,}��++��&.��.:.. CC��F�' M. CESaLrMM«�I�NwC'= " +yip FROM �t 1.r."�i�Iyr�1l�+�t,+?��CCWAANwY'�'�TO MW F. !*iT.i�I�M, E � . S&vTGMMR 28, 1922. Z4 428 C Lei �A � 52: THM4= L.EAMC THE L LLE OF SkM 7,91B.-,-'4 A=M FAQ (59 D 52.5) AL= ME EXXtnmw L-A-IE OF SAM Wlg t PAMM Nom! 89,0.1.51 725 F I' AND SWM 71*01 4� 1442.307 FSE-r TO .".tM WESTEM Lar SAM i w SAN RwCN. BEING A BCH OF TYE I:.Vr-g.r U:R L-.1,M OF SA= 7,918.73 " M PAR= ('3+q 0 =5),- TIMI= AUja G —CSA r„+ SC-4 21* r-ST '--554-28 Fes':” M. STATIM S.R. = OF SA= RhNaV SAN FIi4M +t, A"iD7I'IC 27* ' =,C.' FEET To T � t EMM CIF SAM 'PApCL i s' LAMMA''`E=- +S PAK aqE IN TiMCM =LL-,M yfM >GAFV To NlgaaW a4, 1 of 4 FXNIBIT B NOME IS HEREBY GIVEN that: On May 21, 1996,the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 96/238 forming County Service Area M-29 (Dougherty Valley), San Ramon Area("CSA M 29'J. The types of services to be funded and/or provided by the CSA(the "Extended Services") include: extended police services and construction,operation and maintenance of parks,trails,recreation areas,open space,special landscape areas, library,community center,senior center,corporation yard,flood control and storm drain facilities, and internal road network(including bicycle paths and park and ride lots),and other extended County facilities and services as provided in Government Code sections 25210.4, et seq. Resolution No. 96/238 states that it is contemplated that CSA M-29 will be supported by benefit assessments. On October 14, 1997,the Board of Supervisors adopted Resoiutior97 552 setting a public hearing to consider adopting a benefit assessment for CSA M-29. The benefit assessment will be used to finance the Extended Services. The estimated total amount chargeable to the entire district is provided in Section 5 of the"Engineer's Report for the Contra Costa County Service Area M-29 (Dougherty Valley), San Ramon Area Benefit Assessment , 1997" (the "Engineer's Report's attached to this notice as Exhibit A. The amount that will be chargeable to the individual parcels that will be subdivided from the existing parcels you own is provided in Section 6 of the Engineer's Report. The basis upon which the benefit assessment was calculated is provided in Sections 5, 6, and 7 of the Engineer's Report. The benefit assessment may continue to be levied in perpetuity. The benefit assessment shall be adjusted annually to reflect the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index and the Utility Rate Index as described in Section 5 of the Engineer's Report. The Board of Supervisors will conduct a public hearing(the"Hearing")on Tuesday, December 9, 1997 at2_:00p.m. in Room 107 of the Board of Supervisors' Chambers, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553 to tabulate ballots and hear any protests on the proposed benefit assessment. Procedures for retuming and tabulating the ballots: A ballot is attached to this notice. A copy of this notice,the ballot and the Engineer's Report have been sent to each of the owners of property that will be subject to the benefit assessment. The ballot may be completed and mailed to the Public Works Director of Contra Costa County(the "Public Works Director'), 255 Glacier Drive,Martinez, California 94553. The ballot must be received by the Public Works Director no later than 5:00 p.m. December 8, 1997 to be considered at the Hearing. At the Hearing,the Public Works Director will deliver the ballots it receives to the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors will then consider all protests and tabulate the ballots. The Board ofd rvisors will not impose the benefit assessment if the is s a m4joritypprotest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the Hearing,ballots submitted in opposition to the benefit assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the benefit assessment. In tabulating the ballots,the ballots will be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. Inquiries regarding the benefit assessment may be made to Mr. Epperly,Special Public Works Special Districts Coordinator of Contra Costa County,telephone(510)331-2253. CA962040.049 EXHIBIT C BALLOT Assessor's Parcel Noss Record Owners Address. Yes,I approve of the proposed annual benefit assessment described in the attached Notice on the property described by the parcel numbers identified in this ballot. No, I do not approve of the proposed annual benefit assessment described in the attached Notice on the property described by the parcel numbers identified in this ballot. Signature of Record Owner or Authorized Representative of the above-identified parcels. CA962040.049