HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011993 - 1993-082 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AS THE'GOVERNING BODY OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Adopted this Resolution on February 23, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Smith,_ Bishop, M Peak and Torlakson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Powers
ABSTAIN: Nome Resolution No. 93/8?
(West's Water Code App.
Ch. 13 Sec. 12.2 and 12:3)
. �rrr�Wu��rti�rr..i�rror�Miiinwerruii�nir.rrrrr Nur
SUBJECT: Repeal of Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21, and. the Adoption of a new
DrainageFee Ordinance for Drainage Area 29G, Antioch Area. Project No.
7568-6D8223.
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as the Governing Body of the Contra
Costa County Flood Control and Water'Conservation District, RESOLVES' THAT:
On January 12, 1993, this Board set a public hearing to consider the repeal of the existing
Drainage Fee Ordinance 83-21 and the adoption of a new drainage fee ordinance to
increase drainage fees in Drainage Area 29G.
On February 23, 1993,',pursuant to the Board's Resolution of January 12, 1993, this Board
held a hearing to consider the repeal of Drainage Fee Ordinance 83-21 and adoption of a
new drainage fee ordinance. At which time all written and oral objections presented
concerning these actions were considered.
This Board FINDS that any valid'written'protests filed do not represent more than one-half
of the assessed valuation of real property contained in Drainage Area 29G. This Board also
FINIS that no written petition for an election, signed by at least twenty-five percent of the
registered voters within Drainage Area 29G, has been filed.
It appears from the affidavits of publication on file with this Board that all notices required
to be given for such a hearing have been duly and regularly given and all procedures to be
followed have been followed, all in accordance with Sections 11 and 12.3 of the Contra
Costa County Flood Control and Water'Conservation District Act and in accordance with
the provisions of the Board's Resolution of January 12, 1992.
No resolution or ordinance protesting this action was received from the City of Antioch.
The purpose of the drainage fees described in this resolution' is to generate monies'to
finance drainage improvements in Drainage Area 29 . The fees will be used to finance the
drainage facilities listed in the drainage plan and described in the engineer's report. As
discussed in more detail in said report and in the Report of Impervious Surface Drainage
Ordinance Dated January, 1982, the types of development that are subject to the fees will
generate additional impervious surfaces and stormwater runoff within said drainage area and
watershed,thus creating a need to expand or improve ecisting drainage facilities and a need
to construct new drainage facilities. Use of the fees paid by each type of development will
provide necessary infrastructure to mitigate adverse drainage impacts that would otherwise
result from such development.
l Rotution 93/.82
Repeal Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21
Adoption of Drainage Fee Ordinance for Drainage Area 29C
February 23, 1993
PageTwo
This Board hereby FINDS that the repeal of Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21 and
adoption of a new drainage fee ordinance for Drainage Area 290 is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)'pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Act's
guidelines.:
This Board also;DIRECTS the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of
Exemption with the County Clerk.' This Board further ACJTHOAIZES the Chief Engineer
of the Contra Costa County Flood'Control and Water Conservation District to arrange for
payment of$25 to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption.
This Board hereby further FINDS that good cause exists for the adoption of a new drainage
fee ordinance for Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Drainage Area 29G, and this Berard hereby ENACTS Ordinance No. 93L19. This Board
hereby also REPEALS the existing Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21.
nete;)y tiorwy ,na,t;,tntlb is a'true ana(. rroct copy a
in'-action tak3n and ernfn d on the;minutes cA tt�e
30ard of Supervisors'on ithe date shown.
ATTI STM pertto" 2s 1923 w,
PHI! BATChfELOR,Clerk of the Board"
of SUPerAsors and C)oun Ad miniatre o
By ;' r
SC:kd
C:BO\BORES29.t11
Contact: P. Harrington, 313-2285
Originator: Public Works (FCE)
cc: County Administrator
Community Development
Building Inspection
County Counsel
County Assessor
County Treasurer - Tax Collector
County.Auditor - Controller
Chief Engineer
Flood Control Engineering
Accounting
Engineering Services
Building Industry Association
P.O. Box 51611
San Ramon, CA 94583
David Lennon
Hofman Company
P.O. Box 907
Concord, CA 94522
Dennis J. Razzari
Davidon Homes
1600 S. Main Street #1511
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
Richard. W. Jensen
Braddock & Logan Assoc;
41.55 Blackha k Plaza Circle #201
Danville CA 94526
ORDINANCE NO. 93/-1-9
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 83.21
OF THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND ENACTING '
A NEW DRAINAGEFEE ORDINANCE FOR THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOC CONTROL
AND
WATiER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
DRAINAGE AREA 29G'
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County as the Governing Body of this Contra
Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District does ordain as fellows:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 83-21 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District is hareby repealed,
SECTION.1. The Board hereby enacts the following as the Drainage Fee Ordinance for
Drainage Area 29G:
SECTION I. DRAINAGE PIAN. The drainage plan and map entitled"Drainage Area 29G,
Bound";Map and Drainage Plan", dated December, 1982, on file with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors,,is adopted as the drainage plan for the Contra Costa County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District Drainage Area 29G pursuant to Sections 12.2
and 12.3 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Fater Conservation District Act
(Chapter 63 of West's Appendix to the Water Code).
SECTION'11. FINDINGS. This Board finds and determines that said drainage,area has
inadequate drainage facilities;that future subdivision and development of property within
said drainage area wilt. have a significant adverse impact on existing and future
developments; that development of property within the drainage area, with its'resultant
increase in impervious surfaces,will require the construction of facilities described in the
drainage plan, that the feed herein provided to be charged are uniformly applied on a
square foot of Impervious surface basis and fairly,apportioned within said drainage area
on the basis of benefits conferred'on property upon which additional impervious surfaces
in said drainage area are constructed; that theestirraated total of all fees collectible
hereunder does not exceed the estimated total casts of all drainage facilities shown on
the drainage plan: or included in the Engineer's Report, and that the drainage facilities
planned `e in addition to existing drainage facilities already 'serving the drainage area
at the time of the adoption of the drainage plan.
IIA uolioaS ui taiaol las se eq 11e14s lunowe eel eyl -siseq lot lanpnipur
ue uo palelnolso eq {{sys suorslAlpgns aeylo lie .sol eel eyl 'eAoge pa;ou se lda0x3
'BUIPlAlpgns of joijd ezls 101 ayleq jlet4s jlun jed puel;lo lea} ejenbs„ eyl 6qultwelep ul
pasn azls lo{ayl pue {elluaplsea Allwell4nim se paleeg eR IIeUs teal ejenbs ppp'V ueyl ssal
$iol lenp!Alpur fiulleejo suolslnipgns edA Bulsnoy jaisnlo pue`wnlo wopuoo `asnoy umol
-dew pies to uollepiooel of Loud pang sl dew leoied jo leug a yolynn aol ilun lanp{Alpul
yoga uo ao uols.nlpgns pasodaad a gue eyl uo eel a6eule p all fed pet's aapwpgns
eul 'AI pue III suo toes .tapun palllwied se ld9ox3 'SNOISIAIC]BfiS "IA N011 3S
'IIA uolOas
sppun paalnbei lunowe eyi paeoxe of lou inq 'fool ejenbs aad Zb:`0$ to eels s of joefgns
actIleys aoel ns snoltuadwi ul eseaiou{ tau to lunowe'ayl 'sola soiled 'sal{enn `sAennaAl tp
of''pallw l lou jnq Bulpnloul 'aoepns snomiedwl ul aseejoul ue esneo let4i 41!oel Bu lslxa
ue of s#uaweoeldsl jo suoileol}Ipow 'uol nilsuoo ,teylo and {ood .gad 09E$ aq Ilet4s
eel eyl 'pled taaaq lou ssy aal e6eulip ay# yolynn sol slot uo stood Bultuwlnns le!lueplsej
/Cilwel efiuls and TAU014088ul'ylaol has se eq Ileys eel 91.4 uogonalsuoo lelilul and `Pled
uaaq set' eel eBeulejp pa inbei eyl Illun eeie aBeulsap ayl ulyllM uollon 4suoo jol llwjed
Butpllnq r(us enssl you {lays uogolpsl of Bulney lep!4o'Alp eyl .�o°Ajunoo elso0 eawo0
ay>r `AI Pus III uolioaS aapun pelllwied ss'ldeox3 'S11W2� d JN1o�lf1€1 'A' LAOIS 03S
-pled'sl eel eyi se awil yons illun eel paijelap to eaae pies jolsiosiAJodnS to pjeog
ayl of sjgBu luawdolaAap ayi 'ie1alelloo se''Bulluea6 sieunno Aliadoid e43 uo jeuolllpuoo
sl ''eel to luawialep eyl *luewdolanaP Bulpuad eyl< to ved paalnbei g jou st ieyi
seloe oral to ssaoxa ul lo{ eyl to uollaod aql uo eat eqj to luewAed e411eleP ueo Jeumo
Alaedoid eyl 'ezls ul seme oAq uetp aaleaaB slot u0 ` .N3Wa3d3t] 33d 'AI N01 OSS''
•AIsnolAa.rd'pled ({Int uaaq aAgy seal eBeuleap LP 14m aol
/4redoid jo lot Auy (t, jo eoueA8Auoo ayl to llnsea a se peleem leu sl ells jo lol Bulpling'
meu a ejegm aaunnn Aliadoid Bulunge ao 141lin o lgnd 'Mue ol{gnd `AouaBe luewwenoB'
g 'ol puel Aenuoo of (C '.tae; aienbs pp,t ueyl eaow Aq peseejoul jou st e5eJeA00
punoj6 to lunowe ayi poplAojd `saoe tns snawadu�l Kayla �+ sa�nlonals J !pow off,
{ 'einloruls leulsl.►o mg se eoepns snolAiedwl asal jo' 'ages ayl set' eanlon,4s luignsei
at.11 PaptAoad poJ to log aayla jo spurn'poog'aaii Aq pefiewep jo paAoilsep ejnlonjls s
soeldej'ol(Ir .Bulnnollol eqi jol peiinbei act lou Ileys eel'041 'SIS011dW3X3 '1!I N01103S;
OMI GBed
tZ-Es 'ON a0ueu!pJ0 6ut{eadaa soueuipio
Ordinance Repeating Ordinance No. 83-21
Page Three
SECTION VII. FEE SCHEDULE.'
J,Mve 62mgnt LWe Bullding P!grm t Subdivision
Commercial/industrial/t)owntown Office $1.7,270 bore $18,550 /acre
Offico (Medium) $14,800 /acre $16,540 /acre
Office (Light) $12,385 /acre $13,960 /acre
Multifamily Residential (Includes Mobile Horne Parks)
Less than 2,500 sq'. ft. of land per unit $13,610/tore $13,$10 /acre
2500 to 2999 sq'. ft. of land per unit $ 805/unit $ 805 /unit
3000 to 3999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 925]unit $ 925/unit
4000 to 4999 sq. ft.,of land per unit $ 1,075 /unit $ 1,075 /unit
5000 to 5999 sq, ft. of land per unit $ 1,230'/unit $ 1,230/unit
6000to 6999 sq ft, of land per unit $ 1,380 /unit $ 1,380/urfd
7000 to 7999 sq' ft. of land per unit $ 1,530 /unit $.1,$30 lunit
8000+ sq. ft. of land per unit $1,605/unit $ 1,605]unit
Develogment We Building Permit Subdiyision
Bingte Family Residential
40,00 to 4999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 1,130 /unit $ 1,810/unit
5000z to 5999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 1,180'/unit $ 1,885 /unit
6000 to 6999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 1,230/'unit $ 1,960/unit
7()00 to 7999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 1,280 /unit $ 2,035/unit
$000 to 9999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 1;355/unit $ 2,145 /unit
1 1)000#d 13999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 1;510/unit $ 2,355 /unit
14000 to 19999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 1,760/unit $ 2,720 /unit
20000 to 29999 sq ft. of land per unit $ 2,175 /unit 3,265 /unit
34000 tt
3M;sq. ft, of land per unit $ 2,700 /unit $ 3,9{3(3 /unit
40004+ sq. ft. of land per unit $ 3,240/unit $ 4,490/unit
Agricultural
Under 10% of lot impervious EXEMPT
#Acre than 10% of lot Impervious $16,465 /acre of developed portion
On single Pami r lots, urns and sheds In excess of 400 square feet and tennis and sports
courts shall ncot be considered asincidental residential facilities included in the above
schedule. The drainage fee for the portion of these facilities in excess of 400 square feet
TA uo!loeS aapun
elgehed seal; ayl isule6e pellpeao eq Ileys uol sanb ul ells luewdolanep
eq; aol pled eal .eyl jo junowe rellop eye 'eoueuipjo eel e5auleip
psldope us of luensind ueyl jaylo pled ueeq aney seal aBsulaip eaayM (o
•eeje aoelins snowedwr isuolllppe
Aue jol IIA uoll09S aapun_elgeAed eq lleys seal`jenemQH Ped seen eel eyl
yolynn jo; eeie eoepns snoimedwl 18101 041 Jo; IIA uolPaS spun paalnbej
aq jou lleys seal: `soepns snowedwl uoposeq eoueulpio eel e6 uleip
seyloue jo eoueulpio s yl ispun pled useq eney seal e6euleap eaagM (q
•uoislnlpgnsai
e to aseo eyl ul jdaoxe 'pled seen eel eyl yolynn aol saia lelol 9L4 to
l red Aus ao;IIA uolloaS.spun pajlnbei eq lou llegs seal'a6eajoe uo paseg
aoueulpao eel"e6euleip jewiole aapun pled ueaq!eney seal sBeuleap eJe4M (e
:smollol,se pa 1peao aq Ileys pled Alsnolnaad sael'e6eu ejl '1103bO :XI NO1103S
•este afieuisip eyl;o sseupelgepul popuoq hue to lseialui
ao ledpulid eyl eonpai of pesn jo eeis 96eule p eyl ulyllm sell!lloel eBeulejp pauueld
to 'lied ul ao eloynn ul 'awes eyl jol luawasingwlel ao `uoilsiedo pus aoueualulew
'a►edel 'uollellslulwpe 'Buljaaulfiva `uollon suoo'uolllslnboe puel aol Alelos papuedxa eq
lleys punt plea ul ssluoVi •eejo e6eule.ip eyl .poli paysilgelss punk sall!l oel 96euleip at,l
jo lun000e eUz of Ainseeil hlunoo eta ul pallsodep aq lleys japuneia4 paloolloo seel tib'
•ledlouud sly to lueolldds ayl Aq sallllloel sBeule p peuueld eta lo'ved a;o uotlorulsuoo
lenloe se yons uollejeplsuoo jaylo aseul6u3 lei4o s,piiisi e4l Aq pezPoylne uaynn `jo
`)loego jo yseo idaooe Aew uotlolpslinf WA84 I810140 eyl '1N3W kVd 33A TIA N011035
-jol eyl;uo aq of pasodod shun Builennp
jo jegwnu eql Aq zeal ejenbs ul ezts jol eta BulpIA!p;Aq poulelgo lualldnb 94l aq'lle4s
„Ilan ped puel la last ajenbs,, sol (shed auto4 allgow 6ulpnloul)' lellusplsej'AIlwezlllnW
job •llun Bulllemp auo Aluo Bululeluoo slol of Aidds IIsUs„lelluaplsetj A11 s�el6ulS,,iepun
slunowe eel eye. -jol a se dew leoied 10 leug ayl uo annoys puel leyl'`slo) uolslntpgns
nneu jol (Z) jo !jol a se Ilo1 luewssesse pezllenbe isalel eyl uo unnoys puel ls4l' 'slo}
6ugslxe jo; :eq lleys ezls jol `IA uo!paS of pefgns 'eoueulpao.slut to esod end eLa ao j
-slunowe ea; anoge e41,
of uolllpPs ul'eq IIB-4s 11 Pus 'A uolloeS ul es; loo; ejenbs syl fulsn palelnoleo eq.Ileys
moi 05ed
t3-M -ON GOueu,pJp Bulleede8 aoueuipio`
Ordinance Repealing Ordinance-No. 83-21
Page Five
SECTION X. EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 60 days after passage,
and within 15 days of;passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors
voting for and against it in the"Antioch Daily Ledger,"a newspaper published in this area.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON February '`23, ;,1.993 by the following vote: '
AYES: Supervisors Smith, Bishop, McPeak and 'Torlakson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Powers
Chair of the Board
ATTEST: PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and
County Administrator
rf
Biel • V r
Deputy
SC:kd
C:DAtDA29QA.ti'2