HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011981 - 1981-1057 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Decision on the }
Application of American Development}
Corporation (2468-RZ) to Rezone }
Land in the West Pittsburg Area } RESOLUTION NO. 81/1057
and Conditional Approval of }
Development Plan No. 3011-81, }
}
-. WHEREAS, the Board on September 8, 1981 closed the hearing
and deferred decision to this date on the recommendation of the County
Planning Commission with respect to the application of American
Development Corporation (2468-RZ) to rezone land in the West Pittsburg
area and conditional approval of Development Plan No. 3011-81; and
WHEREAS , A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, advised that
a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was filed for
this proposal; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors reviewed and considered
the County Planning Commission recommendation together with planning
staff analysis, environmental documentation, maps , site plans, and
other documents submitted therewith, and
WHEREAS , the Board received oral and written testimony on
the proposed development and the Board being fully informed about the
project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that rezoning
application 2468-RZ and Development Plan No. 3011-81 are APPROVED
subject to conditions (Exhibit A attached hereto and by reference
made a part hereof) and that Ordinance Number 81-72 giving effect to
the aforesaid rezoning is INTRODUCED, reading waived and September 29,
1981 is set for adoption of same.
IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER RESOLVED that in approving the
aforesaid applications it makes the following findings .
L Approval of this project will require a pro rata share of drainage improvement costs
to be paid toward the ultimate construction of drainage improvements in the West
Pittsurg area and will significantly contribute to alleviate problems in the area.
2. The Board recognizes that the Sheriff's Department beat areas are currently under
review to provide for Sheriff service areas regardless of the area of coverage
resulting in equal demand upon officers' time. Regular review and adjustment in
Sheriff beat areas, in response to changes in demand for police services, will provide
for an equal amount of coverage among all beat areas in the unincorporated area of
the County. The construction of this project will not have a significant affect on the
provision of police services in the West Pittsburg area due to the on-going review and
adjustment of Sheriff beat areas.
3. The variances outlined in exhibit "A"' to allow parking in the setback and sideyard
areas, to allow automobile overhang onto landscaped areas, to allow auto back-up
areas less than 28 feet, and to allow a carport in a sideyard area affect only a minor
portion of the total auto parking spaces, does not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and is
consistent with the limitations imposed by the County on other properties in the M-17
Zoning District. Due to special circumstances applicable to the subject property
because of its configuration and in consideration of the advantages of increasing
landscaping by reducing parking stall pavement area and allowing auto overhang onto
landscaped area, and in consideration of the additional landscaping provided between
carports and property lines in excess of Ordinance Code minimums, and in considera-
tion of the minor nature of the various parking variances. The intent and purpose of
the parking ordinance is substantially met in that the project will provide the
required number of parking spaces and covered parking spaces in a workable
configuratin and in a visually attractive manner.
F i /105-)
4. The density variance to allow a total of 72 units at a density of 19 du's per acre is
within the density range allowed by the County General Plan and is within the
building coverage limits of the M-17 zoning district. Due to special circumstances
applicable to the subject property, because of its location with good freeway access
and due to a project design which meets the building coverage requirements of the M-
17 zoning district and the density limits of the General Plan, granting of this variance
would not constitute a special priviledge inconsistent with limitations on other
properties in the vicinity or in the M-17 zoning district. In consideration of the
project .siesign features outlined herein the requested density variance substantially =
meets t*intent and purpose of the Ordinance Code.
S. The developer proposes to construct a recreation center for project tenants as an
additional project amenity above and beyond Ordinance Code requirements as
provided for in Exhibit A.
f. It is understood by the Board that the developer intends to provide social director
services to include a day care cooperative and crime prevention instruction.
7, It is understood by the Board that the developer intends to form a tenant's
association.
g. The Board recognizes that local preference in the occupancy of assisted housing
projects is a matter which has created a substantial amount of controversy at the
federal, state, and local levels. Local preference is desired by many communities
who are providing for assisted housing primarily because of the acknolwedged need
within their community. The local planning and review provess highlights and
emphasizes the local serving aspects of a project. The primary financing entities of
assisted projects-HUD at the federal level and CHFA at the state level, however,
have differing constituencies to serve, as well as explicit policies to implement
(expanding housing opportunities, spatial deconcentration, etc.).
Recognizing that communites will be less receptive to providing assisted housing if no
local preference accommodations are made, HUD and CHFA have implemented
policies on residential preference. The Willowbrook project in West Pittsburg, being a
HUD Section 8 development, is bound by HUD policy which basically states that local
preferences are allowed to the extent they are consistent with Affirmative Fair
Housing Marketing Plans. The Fair Housing Marketing Plans are developer/owner
produced and HUD approved plans for marketing units to minorities. The Fair
Housing Marketing Plans require owners to advertise the availability of units to
persons living in high minority or poverty areas, and to those expected to reside in
the area due to actual or planned employment. {ince the goals included in a Fair
Housing Marketing Plan are met (or all steps attempted), the developer is free to rent
up the units to others. Local residency preferences could be established at that
point. in no case are local residency requirements allowed.
The Board recognizes that typically, there is a high proportion of occupants of a new
assisted housing development come from the immediate area. This is more apparent
in development located in more moderate and middle income communities as opposed
to very affluent communities. The effect of local residency preference may be, if
the above holds for the Willowbrook development, somewhat academic. However, in
order to assure that some commitment is made by the developer to notify local
residents of the available units condition # 10 of Exhibit A i included in the project
approval.
9. The developer will be required to provide a project social director who will be
available and average of 2.5 days per week as required by condition ## 12 of Exhibit A.
10. HR 3982, among other things, established occupancy percentages for love income
(below 50% of median) and moderate income (50-80% of median) households in
federally assisted developments. The percentages apply on a national basis to various
housing programs, and are not intended to apply to each and every project. HUTS was
given discretion in implementing the requirements on a national basis. The Act
indicates that after October 1, 1981, no more than 5% of the occupants of Section 8
New Construction developments can have moderate incomes between 50% and 80% of
the median. A minimum of 95% would be of low income.
The Board recognizes that this particular provision is in keeping with the current
administration's philosophy of assiting only the "most needy" and that the ultimate
effect &r any one project is not determinable at this time due to lack of information
as to how HUD intends to implement the requirement, and due to the fact that the
Section S program has tended to "concentrate its benefits on (the) low income group,"
since its inception.*
*U.S. General Accounting Office. Evaluation of Alternatives for Financing Low and
Moderation Income Rental Housing. Sept., I9 0.
11. It is understood by the Board that the developer will implement
a strict selection policy to insure quality tenants and shall
take firm and forceful measures to evict problem tenants .
12. It is understood by the Board that the developer' s management
and selection policy will aim for a mix of income levels , hopefully
favoring tenants in the "working poor" category.
13. It is understood by the Board that the developer will involve the
Housing Alliance in the tenant selection process and will strive
to achieve the selection guidelines outlined in the American
Development Corporation' s letters dated September 4 and September 14,
1981 that have been submitted for public record.
14. It is understood by the Board that the developer intends , to the
extent possible, to hire local skilled laborers in the construction
of this project.
1981: PASSED by the following vote of the Board on September 15,
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson,
Powers .
NOES: None .
ABSENT: None .
Ctrt'MFIED COPY
T certifc that tt;ia 1, n tall- ir,Ie 9 enrre(A copy sr
the 01-19frialde<."•,-�;•. ."e 41" r5 y office.
acrd thn� iw r ! !hf, Roard of
3rrn�;v� or,
of a �'n.:t;� Cn i;cirnia, or
041 dare t;'o---r
I': J hLSSQ Count,
Clerk & ex-Oftic';o Clerk of said Bourd of sui)ervison
--4 Deputy CWk.
cc: American Development Corporation
Director of Planning
County Assessor
C. Lackey
C. Perry
CO`TITIONS OF VPROl,1L FOR DarELOPAENT PLAN #3011-81
1. The .development shall be as generally shown on plans dated
March 5, 1981 by the Planning Department and in accordance
with--materials submitted.
?. Provide a revised parking plan showing 137 parking spaces, a minimum of 69
which are to be covered.
3. Setback, parking stall dimensions and unit density variances are granted as
requested.
4. Submit complete elevations and examples of building materials and colors for
review and approval by the Director of Planning.
S. Provide an acoustical analysis for review and approval by the Director of
Planning with recommendations for attaining 45 dBA CNEL interior noise levels
in all units. Recommendations necessary for attacining the required interior
noise levels shall be incorporated into final plans.
6. Submit a landscape, irrigation and fencing plan for review and approval by the
Director of Planning. All trees shall be a minimum size of 15 gallons and all
shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gallons, except that fast growing shrubs may be
a minimum of 3 gallons. All landscaping shall be installed prior to occupancy.
7. A variance is granted to allow a total of 72 apartment units.
8. Comply with the requirements of the Riverview Fire District as follows:
A. Install three fire hydrants along the projects frontage to Bailey Road.
The hydrants shall be installed in accordance with Riverview Fire Dis-
trict standards. Uniform Fire Code, Section 13.301.
B. Install an automatic or manually operated fire alarm system in every
apartment house containing more than 15 apartments. The System shall
be installed in accordance with Section E-740-19, Part 3, T24, California
Administration Code. Title 25 California Administrative Code, Section 26.
C. Provide adequate turn-around space for fire apparatus at the end of the
two private dirveways providing interior access to buildings, or additional
fire protection systems will be required to mitigate lack of access. Un-
iform Fire Code, Section 13.208.
D. Submit plans and specifications of the proposed development to Riverview
Fire District Fire Prevention Bureau for review prior to construction.
Uniform Fire Code, Section 13.301 (e) .
E. Provide portable fire extinguishers in accordance with NFPA standard No.
10. Uniform Fire Code, Section 13.301.
i
t t
9. Comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department
as fallows
A. Submit an alignment for Mary Ann Lane, mutually acceptable to the
-property owner to the west, to the County Public Works Department, Land -
Development Division, for review.
B. Convey to the County, by offer of dedication, a 56 foot right of way for
Mary Ann Lane. Dedicate 20-foot radius right of way returns at the Bailey
Road intersection.
C. Construct curbs, four-foot six-inch sidewalks (width measured from curb
face), necessary longitudinal and transverse drainage and a 36 foot
pavement width on Mary Ann Lane. The face of curb shall be located ten
feet from the widened right of way line .
D. Comply with the requirements of Division 1006 (Road Dedication and
Setbacks) of the County Ordinance Code. This includes the following:
1. Construction of curb, six-foot six-inch sidewalk (width measured from
curb face), necessary longitudinal and transverse drainage and
pavement widening on Bailey Road. The face of curb shall be located
ten feet from the widened right of way line.
2. Relinquish abutter's rights of access along Bailey Road except for the
Mary Ann Lane intersection and the two 20-foot wide driveways shown
on the tentative map.
3. Construction of ultimate channelization on Bailey Road at the Mary
Ann Lane intersection.
E. Install street lights on Mary Ann Lane. The final number and location of the
lights will be determined by the Traffic Engineer.
F. In accordance with Section 92-2.014 of the County Ordinance Code, this
development shall conform to the requirements of Division 914, "Drainage,"
of the Subdivision Ordinance.' This may be satisfied by one of the following:
1. Collect and convey all storm waters entering or originating within the
subject property (without diversion of the watershed) to the nearest
adequate man-made drainage facility or natural watercourse.
2. Form an assessment district with other developments in the area to
construct the necessary drainage improvements.
3. Contribute a maximum of $700 per unit to a County Drainage
Deficiency Fund, The exact amount will be determined by the Public
Works Department, Flood Control Division, prior to lssurance of any
building permits.
G. Furnish proof to Public Works Department, Land Development Division, of
the acquisition of all necessary rights of entry, permits and/or easements
for the construction of off-site, temporary or permanent, road sewer and
drainage improvements.
�►�ras7
5 �����. rJ G
L����J� -�,� t}
H. Submit site grading and drainage plans to the Public Works Department,
Land Development Division, for review prier to the issuance of any building
permit or the construction of site improvements.
L Install all new utility distribution services underground.
J. Submit improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer to the
Public Works Department, Land Development Division, for review, pay the
inspection, plan review and applicable lighting fees. These plans shall
include any necessary traffic signing and striping plans for review by the
County Traffic Engineer. Plans for the County project, "Bailey Road
Widening," are available at the Public Works Department for use by the
applicant in the preparation of specific improvement plans. The improve-
ment plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Land
Development Division, prior to the issuance of any building permit. The
review of improvement plans and the payment of all fees shall be completed
x prior to the clearance of any building for occupancy by the Public Works
Department. If occupancy is requested prior to construction of improve-
ments, the applicant shall execute a road improvement agreement with
Contra Costa County and post the bonds required by the agreement to
guarantee completion of the work.
K. Obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department, Land
Development Division, for construction of driveways or other improvements
within the right of way of Bailey Road.
L. Construct Sanitary Sewer facilities in conformance with Contra Costa
County Sanitation District No.7A Ordinance and Requirements.
I
M. The main sewers serving the subject property shall become an integral part
of the districts collection system and shall be in:
1. Easements or fee title dedicated to the district, or
2. The County road right of way.
N. The applicant shall post with Sanitation District No.7A a Maintenance Bond
(cash or surety) in the amount of $1,000 prior to acceptance of the sewerage
system by the district.
O. Provide for maintenance of the portion of this property located south of
Mary Ann Lane.
10. To -the extant consistent with the Affirmative Fair Housing
Marketing Plan approved by the U. S. Department of Housing and
Urb n- Development, the applicant shall take all reasonable -
efforts to notify local residents of the availability of the
housing units ; and to the extent consistent with the Affirmative
Fair Housing Marketing Plan and prudent business practices shall
provide preference in the rental of the assisted units to local
residents .
11 . A commanity building for project residents shall be provided as
shown on plans dated 9-14-81 .
12. A social director shall be provided for the benifit of the
project residents for an average of 2.5 days per week minimun for
the entire tenth of time that this deveopment operates within
the confines of the HUD section 8 program.
13 . Comply with the park dedication ordinance.
14. The developer shall form a tenants association.