HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-889 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 69/889
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor hawing filed with this Board requests
#or correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1962 - 19V20
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor's offices what was intended and what should have
been assessed, and therefore, pursuant to the Revenues and Taxation
Code, Sections 4831,, the fallowing defects in description end/or form
and clerical error of the assessor on the roll should be corrected;
and, further, all or any portion of uncollected tax, penalty, or co>sts,
heretofore or hereafter levied erroneously or illegally due to such
error 'should be cancelled pursuant to Section 4986 (1) (b) and/or
4986 (1) (d) of the Revenue and Taxation Code:
In Code Area 2€ 02, Pel. leo. 126-041-007„ Robert L. & Alice R,
Baldwin, are erroneously assessed with Improvements $250, due to error
in assessing improvements which did not exist on lion date. This
assessment should be corrected to read: Land only $44500 and taxes
and/or penalties should be cancelled on that portion: in error.
In Code Area 100099 Pel. No. 018-230-0340 Henry A. Hanson,
is erroneously entered in the wrong code area, due to clerical error
in posting. The code area should be corrected to Code Area 58023.
Assessee has been notified of this correction.
R. 01. V
Assistant.A.ssea'sor
Copies to Assessor (Mfrs. Kettle)
Auditor
Tax Collector
Page 1 of
RESOLUTION No. 69/889
In Code Area 72005, Pel. bio. 020-130-080, H. R. Watehie �
Associates . lne., are erroneously assessed with Mineral Rights below
500 feet, due to misinterpretation of deed. Assessment should have
covered Mineral Rights above 500 feet, which are being included in
another assessment. This assessment should be deleted from the roll
and all taxes cancelled.
In Cade area 85114, Pel. No, 430_050_004, John E. & Joyce
A. McNickles, are erroneously assessed with Improvements $6,290, due
to clerical error its computation of area of building, resulting in
incorrectrovement value. This assessment should be corrected to
im
read, band 1,203 (no change), Improvements $5,720, with a Total
assessed value of $6,920.
FURTHER$ it has been ascertained by the assessor from an
audit of the assess,+ee i s backs of account or other papers that there
has been a defect or defects of description or clerical error of the
assesses in his property statement and/or in ether information or
records furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess
personal property at a substantially higher valuation than he would
have entered on the roll if the information had been correctly fur-
nished to the assessor; therefore, in accordance with Section 4831.5
of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following correction
should be made on the roll:
In Code ,Area 1.2012, Pel. No. 127-110-015, Skaggs Pay fess
Drug Stores, are erroneously assessed with Personal Property $1.12,960,
due to assesseers error in reporting personal property on property
statement. This assessment should be corrected to read: Land $ ,870
(no change), Improvements $18070 (no change), Personal Property
$111#550; Business Inventory Exemption $159383 (no change); a Not
assessed value of $160,007,
I hereby consent to the above
changes and/or corrections:
R. 0. SEATON JOHN B. CLAUSEN
Assistant Assessor COUNTY C
BY �,fy�s
eputy
Adonted by the Board this 30th day of December, 1969.
Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 69/889