HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-852 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .....................................................................................................
...... ................ .......... ........_ ............ ......... ....._... ..__...... ....._.... _.._..... .......... ....._...
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes )
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 69/852
of Contra Costa County )
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
io'r correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District .Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1962 - 19'4-70
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records in the Assessor'►s offices that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below
and$ therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section
4986 (1) (b), the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs here-
tofore or hereafter levied or charged:, should be cancelled in whole
or in part on the following assessments:
Code 2008 - Assessment No. €. boat CF 9782 AB is assessed.
to Gary Lo Burlison, assessed valu.s $50. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the boat was destroyed prior to the
lion date.
Code 8001. - .Assessment No. 12 0, boat CP 879 . AM is assessed
to 14ax Haas$ assessed value $180. This assessment was errone-
ously levied since the situs has been determined to he Alameda
County, where it has been assessed for 1969-70.
0* Seaton:
Assistant Assessor
cc: Assessor (G. Giese)
Auditor
Tax Collector
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 69/852
Cade 8024. - Assessment No. 35, boat CF 9 .37 CZ is assessed
to Daniel F. Cellucci, assessed value $70. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the boat was roved out of state prior to
the lien date.
Code 9007 - Assessment No. 16, beat OF 586 . CZ is assessed
to Thomas J. Shinault, assessed value $300. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the boat was moved out of state prior to
the lien date.
Cade 12012 - Assessment No. 32, beat OF 9530 AG is assessed
to Ira L. Smith, assessed value $130. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the brut was sold and moved out of state
prior to the lien date.
Code 72€309 Assessment No. 62, boat CF 557 . AK is assessed
to M. ,Green and Frank Dubose, assessed value $260. This assess-
ment was erroneously levied since the situs has been determined
to be ,Alameda County, where it has been assessed for 1969-70,
Code 79063 - Assessment No. 31; boat OF 7807 CH is assessed.
to Stanley L. Darlow, assessed value $160. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the boat was moved out of state prior
to the lien date.
Code 791.96 - Assessment No. A2132, aircraft 0 1724D is
assessed to George W. Galloway, assessed value $3A:60- This
assessment was erroneously levied since the aircraft was sold
prior to the lien date. An assessment is being added to the
new asjsessee on the 1969-70 roll.
Cade 82038 Assessment No. 12, boat CF 3739 AD is assessed
to jack C. Collins, assessed value k7G. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the boat was sold prier to the lien date
and the situs has been determined to be Stanislaus County, where
it has been assessed for 1969-70•
Cade 85097 - Assessment No. 5, boat CP 254.3 HC is assessed
to Dean P. Umbarger, assessed value $16€3. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the boat was sold prior to the lien date
and the situs has been determined to be Alameda County, where it
has been assessed for 1969-70.
-------------
R. Q. Seaton
Assistant Assessor
Page w2 of
RESOLUTION NO. 69/852
............................... .......... ....... ....................................................
Code 98002 Assessment No. 2h., boat OF 9716 AG is assessed
to W. D. Wisherd, assessed value *390- This assessment was
erroneously levied since the boat.was sold prior to the lien date
and the situs has been determined to be Sacramento County., where
it has been assessed for 196q-7C.
T hereby consent to the
corrections and changes in
the above resolutions.
JOB14 B. CLAU SEN
County Counsel
By
R. 0. Seaton Deputy
Assistant Assessor
Adopted by the Board this 16th day of December, 1969,
Page ...'t.wof �
RESOLUTION No. 69/852
.............
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STA'T'E OF. CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll j RESOLUTION NO. 69/853
of Contra Costa. County j
j
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction oferroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1969- - 19X-70
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll. and ;from
papers in the Assess€>r!s office ghat was intendedand what should
have been assessed* and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa-
tion Cade 48313, the following defects in descriptionand/or form
and clerical error of the assessor on the roll should be corrected:
to remove or allow exemption as shown below:
In Code ,Area 2402, Fel 110-216-007,t Billy W, Simpson filed
claim for veteran t s exemption in a timely manner, Additional inform-
ation to clarify his legal residence was requested, Svidenee has
been received whereas the veteran is eligible for the exemption,
therefore, the 'assessment should be corrected: to allow 410bo
exemption.
In Code Area 90000 Pcz 189•-054-100x, Roman Catholic Bishop
of Oakland (St. Anne 's Catholic Church) filed claim for church
exemption in a 'timely manner and has been erroneously, granted exemp .
tion of 057,80€3 du.e, to error in computation, This assessment 'should
be corrected to allow exemption of $60*700,
In Code Area 76051,; Pel' 380-202-025, Frederick E. Robinson
filed claim for 'veteran t s exemption in a timely manner. However, due
to a clerical error this information was not forwarded to data proc-
essing, therefore, exemption of $1440 should be allowed.
In Code Area 12018, Pcl 149-091-009, Ellen 0-1sen diad not
file a claim for veteran's exemption,, flue to clerical, error in
purging the exemption of 1000 has been incorrectly allowed as this
information was not forwarded to data processing.,, Therefore,
exetp ti on should be removed.
WAITANA,, + my Assessor Page
December 9s 1969 -L of,2,..,.
Copy to. Assessor' - Kris
Auditor
Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 69/853
In Code Area 30001, Pcl 501-181-017, Ebbie J. Marray filed
claim for veteran'f s exemption in a timely manner end was erroneously
allowed veteren t s exemption of $1400 due to clerical error in eal-
oulating the value of his assets. The assessee also filed claim for
hemeownerts exemption within the time prescribed by law. As his
total assetsexceed the limitation for veterans s exemption, the
assessment should be corrected to remove the veteran's exemption of
1000 and to allow the homeownert s exemption. of $754.
--0- 4 - W-4LOPA- .a,,
F. W : , County Assessor
Decembers 9, 1969
1 hereby consent to the
corrections and changes
In the above resolution,
JOHN B. CLAUSEN$ County Counsel
By
Deputy
Adopted 'by the Board this 16th day of December, 1969.
Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION No. 69/853