HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-79 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
in the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Rall } RESOLUTION No. 69/79
of Contra Costa County
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District ,Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196.6 - 1969
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and;what should have
been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation
Code, Section 4831., the following defects in description and/or farm and
clerical error of the assessor on the roll should be corrected AND, it
has been ascertained by audit of the assesee;s records that the assesse'e
omitted to report the cost of personal property accurately to the extent
that this omission caused the assessor net to assess the property or to
assess it at a lower valuation than he would. have entered upon; the roll
were the cost reported accurately; therefore, that portion of the prop-
erty as to which the cost was inaccurately reported should be entered on
the roll as escaped property in accordanee with Section 507 of the Cali-
fornia Revenue and Taxation 'Cade', together with interest on taxes in
accordance with Section 506.
In Code Area 7001, Pel.' No. 86-020--005, assessed to The Stanley
Works, should have entered the following ,escaed assessments,* For the
years 1:966-67 C/A7001 Personal Property $2,,794; for the years 1967-68
C/A 7001 Personal Property 6,090; for the years 1968-,69 C/A 7001 Per-
sona.l, Property $830. F RTE R, Improvement value for the year 1965-66 is
erroneous date to error in description of the property 'causing the assessor
to assess such property at a lower value than should have been entered on
the roll. Therefore, in accordance with Section x.831., there should be
entered a supplemental assessment of Improvements $8,000. Assesses has
waived equalization 'hearing on all iby Itho
tems.
I hereby consent to the above
changes and. corrections.
R. Q. SEATON
Assistant Assessor JOHN A. Y, District Attorney
b Deputy
Copy to: Assessor (Mrs. Kettle) Page i of i
Auditor
Tax Collector
R.v, CLIA `'ION rso. 69/79