HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-771 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERV15ORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Rall } RESOLUTION NO. 69/771
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1962 - I96/ 70
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and: from
papers' in the Assessor{ s office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and:, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and:
Taxation. Code, Section 4831., the following defects in description
and/orform and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should
be corrected as follows-.
In Cade Area 5001, Pel.. 'o- 378-040-001S 'hell oil Company
is erroneously) assessed' with Personal Property $1,712, 384 and Business<
Inventory Exemption $243.001h/701
and a Net assessed value of $8,987,256,
as corrected by 'Resolution on October 21,, 1969. This figure
is incorrect due to error in computing grease inventory values on
property statement. This assessment should, be corrected to reads
Land no change; Improvements no change, Personal, Property $1i374,200;
:dusiness Inventory 'Exemption $192,202, ming a new Net assessed
value of $8,699,378*
In Code Area 5005, Pel. o. 373-173-003,, Ralph G. 'Ruffman 3„
and. Ralph G. and Mabel liuf furan '!a were erroneously not assessed with,.
Personal Property of $16,260 and Business Inventory lxenption of $2,174,
due to clerical error in posting these values to the wrong parcel,
This assessment should. be corrected to read; .Land $3,370** Improvements
$13,630; Personal Property $16,260; Business Inventory Exemption . 2,174,
ma:ki.nS a Net assessed value of $31.,€186. Assessee has been notified
of this correction*
r,
o
A:ssistwat assessor
Copies to Assessor (Mrs. )kettle)
Auditor Page I of 3
Tai Collector
RESOLUTION No. 69,/771
In Code area 5005, Pol, No:, 373-173-007, Ralph Huffman. �*s
and RalDh Go and Mabel Huffman , are erroneously assessed with
Personal Property ; 16,260 and Business Inventory Exemption $2,174, due
to clerical error in posting to the wrong parcel. This assessment
should be corrected to remove all Personal, Property and Business
Tnvento:EV Exemption and show only Land $1,620, Improvements $6,490
with a Total assessed value of $8,110, as already entered.
In Code, area. 110317, Pcl, No. 411-204-033, William Ho and
Dorothy E. Mitchell are erroneously assessed with Improvements $4,7600
due to clerical error in computation. This assessment should be
corrected to read.: Land $530 (no than e)o Improvements $3,560, with
a Total assessed value of $4,110.
In. Cade Area 66014, Fol. No. 001 .011-023, Oliver Lonergan,
is erroneously assessed in the wrong cede area, due to clerical error
in posting. The cod.e area should be corrected to read: Cade Area
60014. This will result in a decrease in the amount of taxes.
In Cade area 66014,, Pcl. No. 001-011-024$ Samuel Armstrong,
is erroneously- assessed in the wrong code area, due to clerical error
in posting. The code area should be eorre;ted to read: Code Area
60011� .' This will result in a decrease in the amount of taxes.
in Code :area. 66030, Pol. leo. 199-110-025, Georgia B.
Andreasen, et al, are erroneously assessed with Land value of $1,160,
due to clerical error in incorrectly transferring computation value on
total property record. This assessment should be corrected to read:
Land $120.
In Code area 79026, Pel. No. 100-211-014, United: States of
America, is erroneously entered on the taxable roll, dine to clerical
error In not coding; this parcel nontaxable when title was transferred
November 20, 1968. This assessment should be corrected to read.
Nontaxable and should be coded US
In Code Area 82007, Poi.. No. 031-093 .436, Leo J. &; Ruth
Partington are erroneously assessed with Improvements of $1,010p due
to error in description as the improvement represented by this value
dial not exist on the lien date. This assessment should be corrected
to read: Land only $350.
r iC
t/K
R. 0. ;ATO
Assistant ,assessor
RESOLUTION No. 69/771
Page 2 of 3
FTJRTHFR, it has been ascertained from the assessment mall
and from papers in the Assessorts office that the following property
has been erroneously or illegally assessed and, thereforep in accord-
ance with Section 4986 (1) (b) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all
or any portion of uncollected tax., penalty, or costs, heretofore or
hereafter levied should be cancelled on the following:
In Cade area 12412, Pcl,. No. 149-270-025, Walter H. Ratcliff*
is erroneously assessed. with .Land value of $10,750, dins to error in
property's not being described as property being used exclusively
for public schools. Such property is exempt From: taxation in accord-
ance with Article Xlll, Section 1, of the California Constitution.
`herefore, this assessment should be coded, as Nontaxable SD and all
taxes and penalties thereon should be cancelled*
In Code ,area 60003, Pel. No. 003-030-060, Henry J. Croeker,
at al, are erroneously entered as assessees for mineral rights which
dial not exist as a separate parcel on, the lien date, as lease ,expired
May 13, 1968. This parcel should be deleted entirely from the roll
and all taxes should be cancelled.
... l hereby consent to the above
changes anal/or corrections:
R. 4% 3:t ib 4 JOHN B. CLAUSEN
Assistant Assessor County Co el
By A4 Deputy
Passed and adapted this 18Th day of November, 1969.
RESOLUTION NO. 69/771
Page 3 of 3