HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-658 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
In the Matter of Changes )
of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 69, 658
of Contra Costa County )
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
tor correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1969 - igs-70
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records in the Asssessorts office that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below;
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and `Taxation Cade, Section
x.986 (1) (a), the following uncollected tax,, penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be' cancelled in
whole or in part on the following assessments.-
Code
ssessments.Code 08092 - Assessment No. 2008, Frank Young is erroneously
assessed for personal property with a valuation of *130, less 14
business inventory exemption. This assessment should be cancelled
since it is a duplicate of assessment leo. 08092-2010.
Cade 83013 - Assessment No. 2038, Westinghouse Electric
Corporation, is erroneously assessed for personal property with a
valuation of `'630 plus 10% penalty of 63 for f sssi,lure to file
return within the time required by law. This assessment should be
cancelled since the equipment has also been assessed at another
location.
Code 98003 - Assessment No. 2041, Harold Ray aond is assessed
more than once for personal property with a valuation of 650 less
47 business inventory exemption. He has moved his business and, is
also being assessed at his new location.
R. C. Seaton., WasisEant Assessor-
October 7. 1969
co: Assessordito (G. Giese) Page 1 of
Tax Collector __._
RBSOLU1IO NO. 69/658
Ds FURTHER a, under 3e c tion 4986 (1) (b) :
Code02€ 02 - Assessment Nab. 2913, V- jai. and Ra and Yon.ce,
are erroneously assessed; for 'improvements with assessed valuation
of ?p since they were not the owners on the lien dates. An
assessment is being levied against the correct owner for the year
1969-70
Codes 02008 .. Assessment No. 8004s joe Kramas is erroneously
assessed for improvements with a valuation Of $280 since he was
not the owner of the property on the lien' date. An assessment is
being added' to the 1969-70 unsecured roll in the correct name.
Code 08001 - �ssessment No. 2696, Canners League of Cali-
fornia is assessed for possessory interest in land and improve-
ments with a valuation Of *56o. Tenant terminated residenoy
within, six months of the lion date.. on month-to rionth rental,
possessory interest is considered to be of no values if, aceupanoy
terminates less than six months after the lien date, or prior to
,august 31, '1969. Termination of occupane:y after assessment has
been made and within sic months of the lien date constitutes an
vp ni .0 of no value. Therefore, .`in accordance with assessor$s
polioyo this assessment ''should be cancelled.
Code 08001. - Assessment No. 3577, Hava Sna.k Food Services
Inc. is erroneously assessed' for personal' property with a valuation
of $300 plus 10% penalty of 30 for failure to file return within
the time required by law. This assessment should be cancelled'
since the business was closed before the lion date.
Cods 66035 - .Aasessmesb.t No. 2033: Vernon D. Flanigan is
erroneously assessed for personal property with an assessed valua-
tion of $200 lees $15 business Inventory Iexemption, since he had
gone out of business before the lien ;date.
Code 79096 - Assessment No. 20",* Ralph Trost is errone-
ously assessed for personal property''with, a valuation of $1.30 plus'
1 penalty of $13 for failure to file return, within the time re-
quired by law since assesseses had no eguipmout at this looation.
Equipment had been moved, and is beim assessed for the year 1969-70
at the new ''location.
Code 7911.9 -,Assessment No. 2005, Bruest Smith is errone-
ously assessed for personal _property with a valuation of 200 since
the property was in Alameda County on the lien date,,
J
ea 'on* AsMfani I MeMr
October 7s 1969
Pages 2 of 3
R SOLU`is101.1 1\70. 69/65
AND, TPIMT R, under> Section 4986 W (d)
Code 53004 - .assessment oto. ,2085, Manuel H. Gonsalves is
assessed for unsecured improvements that didnot exist on the
lion date since they had been removed before that time*
It has been ascertained from. the ,assessment roll and from
papers in that assessor t s office what was intended and what should:
nave been assessed; and, therefore, 'pursuant to Revenue and. Taxa-
tion Code ,4831, the following defects in description and./or fez
and clerical errors 6f`the assessor on the roll should be eor-
rected; and, pursuant to Section 4985, the assessor requests the
Board of Supervisors to order the auditor to cancel any uncollected
delinquent penalty,, cast,, redemption penalty, interest, or redemp-
tion fee which has attached heretofore or hereafter because of such
error and because of assessor's' inability to complete valid pro-
oodures initiated: prior to the 'delinquency date.
Code 14002 - Assessment No* 2077, George A. Tagney is
assessed .for personal property with a valuation of $290. The
assesses was granted a>business inventory exemption of and, a ;
veteran' s exemption of X2$7. The veteran's exemption should not
have been allowed since the assessment was based' on incomplete
information., subsequent information received r+evea.lin.g that the
assessee exceeds the limitations. Therefore., this assessment
should be corrected to 'show personal property with a valuation Of
$290 and a business inventory exemption of $3, Further,, any
penalty attached should be cancelled.
Code 83003 w Assessment _Wo. 2004, Gordan H. Bell., Inc. is
erroneously asseseed for personal property with a valuation of
$421,550. A.n. 'assessor's error has been made: in computation result-
ing In an overassesa meant; therefore s this assessment should be cor-
rected to show $176,470 assessed valuation. :further, any penalty
attached should be cancelled.
I hereby consent to the
corrections and changes in
the above resolutions
JOHN B. CIAUUN
County Counsel,
s3r r f
R. 0. ...oa:ton Deputy
Assistant assessor
October 7', 1969
> 'lti /
Pae of
PWOLUTIO No. 69/658