HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-629 IN TTS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ii qq COSTA
OF
y-s y �} 7t
C01CIRA C''.lSTA COU3,71L' s, STAT` O 4A=LIPO':NIA
In the Matter of Revised and }
Consolidated Policy on Allocation )
of Aid-to-City Funds for Projects E,50LUTIO NO. 69/629
on. the City-County Thoroughfare }
3ystera within Cities.
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Casts does
resolve as follows!
THAT the following A.
is hereby adopted as the policy on alloca-
tion of Aid--to-City Funds for projects on the City-County Thoroughfare
System within Cities; and supersedes Resolutions No. 183,5, 3907s 4843,
491 and other previous resolutions relating to this matter:
AID-TO-CITY ALLOCATIO,'NS POLICY
A. The total annual allocation for Aid-to-Cities shall. be *500sOOO
additional funds eaeb year,
B. One-half of said amount shall be allocated to projects in cities
in order of priority orn the approved priority list established by
the Board annually based on the recommendation of the City-County
Engineering Advisory Committee , the City-County Planners.. the
Mayors t Conference, and the County Highway Advisory Committee.
These funds shall be known as "Priority Funds."
C. tine-half of said amount shall be allocated to projects in these
cities whose total Thoroughfare allocations to the beginning of
the fiscal year are less than tlieir share based on the formula
described. in Section C herein. These funds shall be known as
"Balancing ;Funds."
D. Allocation of Aid-to-City funds budgeted by the County to a project
on the City-County Thoroughfare System shall be made only upon
receipt of a duly enacted Resolution from the Council. of the City
requesting such 'allocation.
E. Allocation of County funds, whey: approved b; the Board of Supervisors,
for anAid-to-City project shall be subject to the 'following
cond'ii ions
1. The County Auditor-Controller will rake payments to the
City of monies due upon receipt of invoices arid:/or progress
payments (properly an roved by the City and the County
Public Works Director) for work approved for participation.
by County. The total payment by 'the County shall not
exceed the amount allocated for the project.
2 County funds allocated to a project shall not be used for
payment of the following items (which items shall be considered
as non-participating work to be paid for by others ) :
a. Ana right of way or right of way acquisition costs.
b. Construction costs for longitudinal storm drains which
carry drainage originating ofd' sof the street.
c. Cost of construction, reconstruction, relocation or
extensions of utilities.
d. New frontage or property improvements such as;
curb, gutter, sidewalks, fence, walls, driveways.
e. Improvements on intersecting streets or other
areas outside the thorough are right of way.
f. Street lighting except safety ligh=ting.
g. Landscaping.
h. Engineering and Administrative: costs incurred
in con' unction with the project.
i. Reconstruction of an existing pavement section
for structural reasons where existing line and
grade are acceptable.
J. Local share of signal.i ation. costs. The costs
of traffic signal construction. shall be split
between jurisdictions according to the number
of street legs in the intersection.
3. All expenditure Made in connection with the work for which
the allocation is made , shall be subject to audit by the
Internal Audit Division of the County Auditor-Controller's
Department.
F. Policy a1221icable to Priority FundAllocations-:
1. When there is a balance remaining .from any approved project
allocation after the completion. of the work for which the
allocation was made, and alter the precise cash amount of
such balance of funds has been determined, the amount of
such balance may be use4, scab, ect to the concurrence of the
City-County Engineering Advisory Committee by April lst of
each year, for:
a. Supplemental allocations to budgeted Priority Fund
projects before advertisement;
b. Allocation to other projects ready for construction,
in order or priority on priority list for current
year.
2. 1 enever a City, having a project for wh_i.ch. Priority Funds
have been budgeted by the County, determines that it will
not be able to commit the project funds so budgeted and so
advises the County by Resolution, such. budgeted funds nay be
made available , pursuant to the above paragraph,, to ether
projects ready for construction in order to expedite con-
struction of the City-County Thoroughfare projects.
3. The maximum size of projects shall be limited to 250oOOO
of Priority Funds.
G. Policy on BalancinE Fund. Allocations .-
Balancing Fund allocations shall be used for City-County
Thoroughfare projects in each city receiving such allocations.
These balancing allocations may be accumulated until, sufficient
for the desired project. All data and computations shall be as
of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the balancing
determination is being mads;. Determination of Balancing Fund
shall be made as follows:
y <<.., 2-
1. The City-County Thoroughfare Fund of I-00,000 per
year, began? in 1.959-60 a 4nd all balancing and: priority
allocation computations shall be accumulative from
and including that year.
2. A theoretical formula distribution of Thoroughfare funds
shall be calculated each year on the basis of equal
weighing ,of Assessed Value, Population, and Maintained
Street Mileage . Each cityf s percentages of the total
assessed value , population, and street mileage for all
cities in the County shall be determined and the average
of these three percentages shall represent that city' s
percentage "share" by formula, of the total annual
`�.'horoughfare allocation.
These percentages shall be calculated to the nearest 0.1
percent. The assessed values will be as furnished by
the County Auditor. Populations will be as shown in the
"Annual peDort of the State Controller" and the Maintained
Street Mileage will be as furnished by the State Division
of Highways.
3. The accumulated total of such formula shares from 1959-60
to date shall be determined, for each city.
.. Each year, the total Thoroughfare funds received from
19159_60 to the beg-nning of the .fiscal year shall be
determined for each city. Where approved Thoroughfare
projects 'have been budgeted but for which. final costs
are not yet available , Lhxe bild ;eted amounts shall be used
to determine total funds received to date.
T1. The difference between the accumulated formula shares
(3 above ) and the actual total. of Thoroughfare funds
received to date (4, above ) shall be determined.
6. The ,250,000 annual Balancing Fund skull be credited to
the cities in the proportion that each. cityt s difference
bears to the total difference for all of the cities that
are behind: in allocations {as determined, in 5 above ) .
PASSED AND ADOPTED on. the 30th day of _September, 1969 by the
following vote of the Board:
.A' `S : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. Y. Dias, T. J. Coll,
E. A. Linsche .d, J. E. Moriarty.
NOES: 11.one.
ABSENT: None .
RESOLUTION NO. 69/629