Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-55 3 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll ? RESOLUTION NO. 69/55 of Contra Costa County } } WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the .District Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments. For the Fiscal Year 196$ - 1963 1t :has been as certained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Asses'sor'ts office whatwas intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore.. pursuant' to the Revenue and Taxation Code, section 4831, the following defects in description >and/or form and clerical error of the assessor on the roll should be corrected, and., further, in accordance with Sections 4985 and 4986(i) (a.) '& (b),, it is requested the; Board of Supervisors advise the auditor to cancel any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, 'interest, or redemption fee,, heretofore or hereafter attached because of such errors and/or because of the Assessor's inability to complete, valid: procedures before the delinquency date.- In ate.In Code Area 1000, Fel . No. 67-221-0020 Robert E. and Roberta M. Franz are erroneously assessed with Improvement value of $2',350 due to error in description of property. This assessment should be cor. reeted to read: Land $1,003 (no change) , Improvement value $1,650, making a, total 'assessed value of $2,650. In Code .area. 73005, Fel. No. 233-133-015 is erroneously assessed to W. W. and Violet I. Norton. This assessment should be deleted, from the roll as title to property described 'thereon was ac- quired by the State of California by instrument recorded in Book 5359, Page 331, on May 20 1967, and no longer exists as a separate property. R 0. S 1~OR Assistant Assessor Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Kettle) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO, 69/55 In Code Area 790112, 1968 Segregation No. 178--68 on. Parcel No. 96-041-005 is erroneous. That portion designated as 1969 Parcel No. 96-041-023 erroneously valued Improvements at $1850 due to in- complete information. This segregation should be corrected to read: (96. 041- 323) Improvements $2790, no change in Land value of $190, total assessed value $29801. Correction is requested on second install- ment of taxes. Assessee has signed waiver of rights of appeal. ALSO, that portion designated as remainder (96-041-005) is erroneously assessed with Improvement value of $4100 due to incomplete information, and this value should be corrected to read $29603, with no chime in :hand value of $560:3, making a total assessed value of $3520, and 2nd installment reflee In Code Area 79012, 1968 Segregation No. 240-68 on Parcel No. 96-041-005 is erroneous. That portion designated as 1969 Parcel No, 96..041-0122 shows erroneous Improvement value of $30360 due to error in previous segregation on trail property. This portion of the segregation should be corrected to show Improvement value of $1920.. with no change in Land value of $190, making a total assessed .value of $21101. That portion designated as 1969 Parcel No. 96-041-024 is correctly entered. Correction is requested on second installments. In Code Area 85028, Pel. No. 403-341. 009, Alfred J, and. Rozella M. Bearden are erroneously assessed with Improvement value of $4,330 due to error in computation. This assessment should be cor- rested to read: Land $10276 (no change), Improvements $3,330, Exemp- tion $10000 (no change) , making a total taxable value of $3,600. Cor- rection is requested: on the second installment of taxes. FUR`HER2 it has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of the assessee';s books of account or other papers that there has been a defect or defects of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement and/or ether information or records furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property at a substantially higher valuation: than he would have entered on the roll if the information had been correctly furnished to the assessor; there- fore, in accordance with Rection 4831.5 and 532 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following corrections 'should be entered on the roll In Cods Area 8001., Parcel No- .560-310-008, Bray 03il Company is erroneously assessed with Improvement value of $70,6303 due to a. portion of the improvements being reported on the property statement and also included in the on-'site appraisal.. This assessment should be corrected to read.: Land $41,6301 (no change); Improvements $61,860; Personal Property $40..670..670J (no change), total assessed valuation $144,1601. Correction is requested on second: installment of taxes. In Cade Area 9000, Pel. No. 178-172-0035, Kslprop Corporation is erroneously assessed with Personal Property value of $35s49€3. This assess- ment should be corrected to read' Personal Property $35,090, with no change in land or improvement value, making a total assessed value of $89,5903. Please correct on second installment of taxes. I hereby consent to the ' changes and corrections on the above resolution. R. 0. Beaton Assistant Assessor JOHN A. NEJEBLY District rn / By /fl..J�eputy Adopted by the Board this _ / J]t day of t/ 4,eLnr(4. — Page 1� , .., Page 2 of 2 RESO}LUTIOK NO. 69/55