HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-539 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 69/539
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196-9- 19*ZO
It has been ascertained from the assessment .roll and from
records in the assessor' s office that taxes have been levied or
chargederroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below,
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation. Code, Section
4986 (1 ) (b) , the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in
whole or in part on the following assessments
Code 02002 - Assessment No. 2110, Barlease Company and.
Starl.ite Room are erroneously assessed for personal property with
a valuation of x;1,350 since the equipment was removed before the
lien date.
Code 02026 - Assessment No. 2008, C. v. Haller is errone-
ously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $430 plus
10% penalty of 43 for failure to file return within the time re-
quired by law. lssessee is no longer in business and equipment
was sold before the lien date.
Code 07006 - Assessment No. 2056, H. D. Kn.aak and John Millis
are erroneously assessed for personal property- with s valuation of
2,120 since the' assessees included licensed equipment on their
property statement. Therefore, this assessment should be corrected
to show personal' property- with assessed valuation of >1,620.
N
R. C. fiIeaton., Assistant Assessor
August 19, 1969
cc Assessor (C. Giese
«u.ditor Page 1 of 2
Tax Collector
RESOLUTION NO. 69/539
Code 66028 -- Assessment No. 2115, 0. J Norgaard is errone-
ously assessed .for personal property with a valuation of *80 plus
10% penalty of 8 for failure to file return within the time required
by law. This oompany is no longer in business „ being dissolved
before the lien date'.
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the A ssessort s office what was intend Ied d what 'should
have been assessed; and, ,'therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa-
tion Cade 48,31, the following defects in description and/or form
and clerical errors of the assessor or the roll should be corrected::
Code 83018 - Assessment 11o* 2005, ;:s. L. V oore and fan Lucchesi
are erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuationof
u
�4,600. There has been an array of the assessor canoe deputy used
wrong factor it computing; the assessment; he should have used histori-
cal cost of 'equipment as shown per audit.` `:`herefore, assessed valua-
tion should be corrected >to $2,720.
It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of
the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been
a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his
property statement or in other in.formation, or 'records furnished' to
the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property''
which should: not have be€;n, assessed or to assess it at a substan-
tially higher valuation than he would have entered' on the roil If
the information had been correctly furnished; and,, therefore, pur-
suant to the Revenue and Taxation Code.. Section 4831.5: the assessor
certifies to the auditor that the following correction should be
made on the assessment roll
Code 66485 - Assessment No. 2020, Lennard B. & Shirley A.
Easley are erroneously assessed for personal property with `<a. valua-
tion of $420 and improvements of $400. From pagers subsequently
furnished the assessor it has been determined that' accountant
reported equipment located in a former place of business and not
moved to neva location. Therefore, the roll should' be corrected: to
ehow personal property with 9 valuation of $240 and improvements of
x$'2.30
hereby consent to the
corrections and changes in
the >above resolutions
JOH- 1 B. CIAUSEN
Acting District Attorney
R. 0 Seaton on Depu y
Assistant Assessor
August 19, 196
A do " d b;Y tll-lo Board this �� �` i►
RESOLUTION N4. 69/539
Mage- 2 of 2