Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-527 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the: Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 691.527 of Contra Costa County j WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests #or correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District Attorney, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1969- - IcAZO It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from records in the assessor's office that taxes have been levied or charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Cade, Section 4986 (1) (b), the following uncollected tax, penalty, or casts heretofore or hereafter levied, or charged, should be cancelled in whale or in part on the following assessments: Code 02008 - Assessment No. 2200, Wayne Skidmore is errone- ously assessed for improvements with a valuation of $280 since he had sold the business and leasehold improvements before the lien date. An assessment is being levied against the new owner. Code 08001 - Assessment No. 3603, James L. Evans is errone- ously assessed for improvements with a valuation of $660 since he sold the property before the lien. date. An assessment is being levied. -Za.inst the new owner. { � . Baton, 'sistaxt assessor August 12, 1969 cc< assessor (G, Giese) Auditor Page l of 2 Tax Collector RMOLUTION NO. 69/.527 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and;, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa- tion Code 4831, the following defects in description anal/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be cor- rected: Code 02002 - Assessment Yo. 2929, East Bay Newspapers, Ina, is erroneously assessed for ersonal ,property with a. valuation of $11,510 and improvements of X3,8©0. 'inhere has been a clerical error of the assessor since the deputy failed to take into consider- ation functional obsolescence and used the wrong factor in` comput- ing the assessment. Therefore, the roll should be corrected to show personal property with 'a valuation of $:11,510 and improvements of X20,000, leas business inventory exemption $12. It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of the assessee's books ofaccount or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property' which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substan- tially higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll if the information 'had been correctly furni shed; and theref ore, pur- suant to the ievenue and Taxation Code„ Section 4431. , the assessor certifies to the auditor that the following; cbrrectioa should be made on the assessment roll. Code 01000 - Assessment No. 2045p Darkenwald Construction Company, Inc. is erroneously assessed for personal property with a valua=tion. of $11,430 due to defect of description and insuffi- cient nsuff -cient information at the time of the assessment. From papers subsequently furnished the assessor and from equipment guide books,, it has been determined that this assessment should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of $9,250. 1 hereby consent to the corrections and changes in the above resolutions JM''' B. ,CIAUS , Acting District Attorney y r ✓, By R. 'd. Seaton Deputy Assistant Assessor august 12, 2969 Adopted IY the Board this/ d Y of Rw4LUTIAN wo. 69/527 Page 2 of 2