HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-510 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION N4. 69/510
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1962 - 19*30
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records in the Assessor's office that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below;
and., therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section
.986 (1,) (a) , the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in
whole or in part on the following assessments:
Code 98003 - Assessment No. 2121, Clifford' s Catering,, Inc.
is assessed farer*son:al property with a valuation of X3,450 and
improvements of x2,854 plus 10 penalt for failure to file return
within the time required by law, less 415 business inventory exemp-
tion. It has been determined from papers in the assessors office
and a review of the assesseers books, that a portion of the equip-
ment and fixtures is also included in a real property assessment.
Therefore, this assessment should be corrected to show personal
property with a valuation of $2,330 and improvements of $1 730 plus
10- penalty of $406, less business inventory exemption of 15.
AND, nRTFW, under Section 4986 (1) (b) :
Code 03€00 - Assessment No. 2 .43, Laura Paul is erroneously
assessed for personal property with a valuation of $240 and im-
provements of $600. The assessee had sold the business before the
lien, date,, the correct owner is being assessed.
F
« ea on, Assist0t Assessor
Aug. 5, 1969
cc: Assessor (C.. Giese)
Page 1 of
Auditor
Tax Collector
Fwt3L€TT2 N bm. 69/510
Cads 08022 - assessment No. 2013, Digitronics Corporation
is assessed for; personal property with a valuation of $6,150, plus
10 penalty for £ai.lure to file Within the time required by law.
Subsequent information has been filed that shows the equipment had
been removed before the lien date, therefore, assessment and penalty
should' be cancelled'.
Code 11003 - Assessment No, 2181, :Lambert M, O'Donnell is
erroneously assessed for greonal Property with a valuation of810 and improvements of ,330 plus 10% penalty far failure to
file within the time required by law. The assessee had sold the
business before the lien date and the correct owner is being
assessed.
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor's office what was intended' and what should
have been assessed; and therefore$ pursuant to Revenue and Taxa-
tion Cade 48312 the following defects in description, and/or fora
and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should beicor-
rested:
Cade 12014 - Assessment No. 2050, 'George Maddox is assessed
for personal property with a valuation, of $x:86 and. i.�prQvea�ents of
$1 .,580. There has been a clerical error of the assessor since an
.incorrect faster was used in computation, Therefore, the >roll
should 'be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of
*480 and improvements of $%P780.
It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of
the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been
a defect of description or clerical error of the asaessee in his
property statement or In other information or records furnished to
the assessor which caused the assessor to assess
personal 'property
which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substan-
tially higher
ubstan-tially 'higher valuation than he would have entered on the 'roll if
the information` had been correctly furnished; and, therefore,- pur-
suant to the Revenue and. Taxation Codoo section x:831.5, the asses-
sor certifies to the auditor that the fallowing corrections should'
be made on the 'assessment roll.
Cade 12014 Assessment No. 2049.. :,George Maddox and Bruns-
wick Corporation are assessed for improvement's with a valuation
of 45 0604.> This, coviputation was biased on prise of .new equipment.
Subsequently, assessee has furnished information showing he pur-
ehased rebuilt equipment; therefore,, assessed valuation should be
corrected to 330000-
f;
. Seaton., Assistant ass+siior
Aug. 5, 1969
Page 2 of
OLUTION NO. 69/510
There has been an error in the fallowing assessments due
to error of the assesses in his property- statement and information
furnished the >assessor* Taxpayer has submitted additional infor-
mation subsequent to filing to justify using a lower mark-up to
arrive at selling price. Assessments are adjusted to reflect use
of new xar -up' percentage.
Federal Sign & Signal Corp.
950' - 30th St.
Oakland, Calif.
Assessed valuation improvements only for year 1969.70..
Cade-: ssmt. # FROM TO
01000-2086 270, PO
02002»2071 6s320 5xC
03000-21 .3 580 53
05005-2018 600 500-2002 0 4
07006-20-34 1,5.50 91
08001-2435 ,5, 1.0 ,4,910
09000-2149 70Z72-0 6,914
11043-2044 2 s 574 2p3.30
1.2912-2019 3,494 3,170
66428-2031 2,144 1,953
66066-2002 240 22
6698&2093 494 450
77006-2035 6,570 5060
79063-2006 560 514
83024-2051 10384 10259
SND, FURTFM, under Sections 4831.5 and 4831, since there
was a clerical. error' .in the original computation tae follow-
ing assessment should be corrected:
Federal Sight & Signal Corp,
950' - 30th at.
Oakland$ Calif.
Assessed valuation » improvements'' only for year 1969-70,
Code-Asamt " FROM TO
14010-2080 i, .7a 1:75
NOTE: Assesses has been notified of the increase and his
rights of appeal.
1 hereby" consent to the;
carry c t i ons and changes in ,
the above resolutions
41410 B. CIAUS
Acting' District Attorney
Seat= Depa t
Assistant Assessor
Aug. 5'<. 1969
IVISMUTI TOR NO.µ 6915,E
Page of