HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-500 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 69/500
of Contra Costa County )
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1969 - 19*30
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
record's in the ;Assessor's office that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below,
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Coda, ,Section.
4986 (1) (a) , the 'fallowing_ uncollected tag, penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in
whole or in part on the following assessments.-
Code
ssessments:Code 08001 Assessment Wo. 3013, Clark Leasing Corporation
is assessed for personal property with a valuation of $1020. This
assessment has been levied more than once, since it is also in-
cluded in a secured assessment.
AND, FURTHER, under Section 4986 ('1) (b):
Codes 07001 - Assessment No, 2342, Ly7nden LaVere is errone-
ously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $250.
This equipment was disposed of before the lien. date.
Code 79119 - Assessment No. 2003, Robert foody is errone-
ously assessed for personal property with a ,valuation of 300 since
the property was moved out of the county before the lien date.
E. F. ana a, oun y ssessor
July 29, 1969
ce assessor (G. Giese)
Auditor Page 1 of 3
Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 69/500
Code 76051 Assessment o* 2019, Deal Maury, is erroneously
assessed for personal. property 's Valuation or 06 plus l
penalty for failure to 'filereturn within the tine ragaaired b
law, less $90 business inventory exemption« The ae:ss8ssee had
moved out of the oounty before the lien 'date and had noproperty
in this county.
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor's offiee' what was intended and', what should
have been asses sed; and, therefore, pursaa ant tc Revenue and T�a-�
tion Code 4631,s the following defeota ix! description 'aaWor form
and clerioal errors of the assessor on the: roll should be corrected:
Code 02002 - Assessment No. 2624, Bart. J. Kinna is assessed
for personal property with a valuation tion of $340 and improvements
of $870. The assesses >filed .for voteran;s exemption'within the
time required by law, but due to ol.arioal error of the Assessor
the exemption was not allowed. Therefore.# an exem tion of $1,60€x'
should be `allowed, leaving a net taxable value Of 4210,
It has been;, asoertained by the assessor from an audit of
the assesses e s bceo s + account' �r other papers that there has been
a defect of description or 'eler eal error of the aasaesset in his
property statement'' or in other information or records. fu nished to
the assessor which' caused the assessor to assess personal Property
which''' should not have been 'assessed' or to assess it at a sub tan-
tiallly hiker valuation than be would have entered on the roll if
the information had been corroet17 furnished; and, therefore, pur-
suent to the Revenue and, Taxation Code, ',Section 4,831.5. the assessor
certifies to the aauditolr that the following correeotions should be
made on the assessment roll..
Code 02002 - Assessment No. 3025, George ., 'ill amx, and,
Spires Lagusis are assessed for personal property with aIvaluation
of *3..850 plus 1001 penalty for failure to file return within the
time required by law. A p ysioal. inspection of papers and equip-
went discloses that assessee furnished ineorreet,' information on
his property statement causing assessor' to use wrong factor in
computation; therefore, the assessment should be' correeted to show
730 personal prcaperty, $1,,800 improvibr4entzo plus a 10penalty
of $2530 less business inventory exemption of 1. ..
Code 02008 - Assessment ent €o. ;2262, Oliver 'B. Pitman is
erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuation of
X7,230 plus 10 penalty for f allure to f ile within the time required
by lax. There has been a defe et of description and clerical error
of the assessev, in information, furnished the assessor since he in-
cluded equipment whi ah'had ;been disposed of before the lien date.
Therefore, this ae.ssessl meat 'should be eonraoted to show personal
property with a valuation of 2,200' plus 1 penalty of $220., less
business inventory' exemption of $72.
sena, ounty Astoss r
July 29' 1909
AMOLVII Olt NO* V
Page 2 of .
Code 02011 --' Assesmen.t o. 2024, Freya A. Hill is
assessed for personal property with a valuation of 6002 improve-
ments of $570, ,plus10% penalty for failure to file return within'
the time required by law. An it peotion> of the asses see's books
discloses that ;'them has been. a 'defect of description' and error
of the assessee since she included merchandise being serviced for
others. Therefore,, the roll should be ccrreeted to shag personal ,
property with a vsluatican. of *250# improvements of $250, plus 10
penalty of $50.
1 hereby consent' to the
corrections and changes in
the above resolution$.
JOHN B. OL&USEN
Acting District Attorney ;
By
`aha " , County Assessor Deputy
July 29, 1969
Adopted by the- Board ;hi ss -2� day Of
RASOLM-ONo* WOO
Page :,.. ._. of , ._