The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-480 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS or CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION No. 69/480 of Contra Costa County } } WHEREAS, the County Assessor hating filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District .Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessment's; For the Fiscal Year 1969 - 190610' 1't has been ascertained from the assessment roll and:from papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should have'' been assessed; and, therefore* pursuant to Revenue ' and 'Taxa- tion Code 4831, the following defeats in description, anal./or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll ,should be corrected: As the result of physical appraisal by the Valuation 'Divi;- cion, it has been determined that 'there has been a clericalerrors of the assessor, therefore, the following assessments should be corrected to show*. Fotoma.t Corp. $ 920 Kline St., La Jolla., Calif". Assessed valuation Code-Asamt.# Year FROX TO 02002-2763 196+9--70 0 240 persona. property 1 80 610 improvements TOTAL l,p 9 2 02002-276 . 1969-70 240, 240 personal property 1 7' 0 610 improvements' 1, 0' '5 TOTAL 02008-2179 1969-70 240 $ 240 personal property 1 890; 610 improvements TOTAL � > r Seaton, Assistant- Assessor July 22, 1969 -ESOLUTION No. 69/480 ee Assessor (G . Giese) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of Code-Assmt. Year FROM TO 11003-2150 1969-7th $ 500 5v® personal property 1*730 610 impr+ vemon.ts 1,11E TOTAL 77006-2119 1969-70 250 250 (personal property 2 610 Improvements f ; TECTAL Because of allerioe1 errors of the assessor, the ,following assessments were emitted from the 1.969_70 unstoured roll. These abould be o'orrected to show assessed 'valuation as follows Diamond Leasing Company P. 0. Box 14 $1 Oakland, Calif. - sessed valuation personal property Cods08001 -- Asamt. pro. 3598 1969-70 $110 +IQ% penalty ll* TOTAL Lonr is: Jobnson: Y. G. Cooper 22I Uhio Avenue Ricbmond Calif._ 4ase used valuation Code 08001-3599 personal property $180 plus 10% penalty Total wig Ted Johnson Dorothy Johnson dba Manhatten Club 167 - 2nd St. Richmond Calif. Assessed;;' valuation w Code'' 08001--3600 personal property $ 60 improvements 100 plus 1E penalty 16*; less 15% B.I. Ex. Total Artco Chomioal Company P. C Box 208 Oakland.. Calif« Assessedlval.uation Cade' 08001-3601 personal property 603 plus 14 penalty 6*' less 15% B.I. Ex. Total r4 *Psnas.ty .dor failure to file within> time required by law per Sec. 463 Reg. & Taxation Cods. NOTE: Asaessees have been notified of the increase and their rights of appeal,.. 9 14 « . ea tflII.,: AssNEEt issessor Page 2 of ..... ......... ......... ...._. ..... ............ ....._ ...... ......... ........ ........ Thomas D. Cook dba T &' D Used Parts 1720 Cutting Boulevard Ri cb ond, Calif. Assessed valuation Code 48001-3602 personal property $100 les. 1 B.I. Ex. 8 Total James L. Evans dba Richmond Spurt Fishing Ctr* 591 . N. Arlington Blvd, <San <Pablos Calif. Assessed valuation Code06001-3603 improvements only $660 Kern Foods, Inc. Attn: Mr. Sid Renfro 13000 Bast Temple Ave. City of Industry, Calif, Assessed valuation Code' 08001-3604 personal property $30760 less 15% B.I. :x. ; Total , GAP Corporation 140 West 51st St Now Fork, New York Assessed I valuation` Code 4$431-3645 personal property 8$554 less 15% B.I. :x. 8 Total , NOTE: Assaessees have been notified of the increase and their rights of appeal. ' Code 02020 - Assessment No. 21.7, Milens of California is erroneously assassed for personal property with a valuation of 08s764' axed' improvements' of $124#44 3. It has been determined that a portion of the improvements hag also been included in a real`' property assessment,' therefore, this assessment snou,7d be corrected to show' personal property with a valuation of *3$ 760 and improve- Code of$•6 91t}. Cade_ 08,001 -- Assessment No. 25910 Dataf ax Corporati.on is erroneously' assessed far' personal property with a 'valuation of> $lob o. Where has been a c lerioal error of the assessor since the assessment was based on incomp to infra tion; this assessment should be corrected to show personal property with a Valuation of lllp R• 4. Seaton, Anes stint Assessor 69 Page of Code 09000 - ,assessmentNo'. 2140s Clary Sale & 3UPPlY Corporation is erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $3,720. There has been a clerical error of the assessor since the assessment was based on incomplete information;, the roll should be correoted to show personal property with a valuation of $?-..300- Code 12012 - Assessment No, 21260 J. W. sting is erroneously assessed for personal. property with a' valuation of *850, plus 10% penalty for failure to file within the time required by law. 7t has been determined by physical inspection that equipment was over- assessedand should' be corrected to show'Personal property with a valuation of 1440 plus' 10% penalty of $q. , total' assessed value *484+ Code 1 010 - assessment No. 2069, Caudle enterprises.. et al is assessed 'for `personal, property with a valuation of $2,620. There has been, a Clerical error of the assessor in ccs utatloax therefore this asses�ent should be corrected to :show 260 assessed valuation Code, 79017 -' Assessment No, 2003, Datafax Corporation is erroneously; assessed for personal property with. a valuation ref $770. There has been a clerical error of the assessor since the assessment was based on incomplete information; this assessment should be corrected to show personal property"with a valuation of *480'+ It has been aseertatu d by the assessor from sn audit of the assesses'sbooks of 'a000 nt or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assesses in his property statement or in other information or records furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substan- tially higher valuation 'than> he Mould have enterer on ;,the roll if the information''had been correctly furnished; and, therefore, pur suant to the Revenue and' Taxation Code, Section 4$31.5, the assessor , certifies to the auditor' that the following corrections should' be made on the assessment roll Code 02002 - Assessment No. 2239, 'Jams Gran.zella is assessed for personal property with a valuation of 3,740 and improvements of $7,990.' There has been a clerical error of the assaseee in, his prow party statement' since he declared supplies and also included them with his inventory. Therefore, assessed 'valuation, should be corrected to show personal property of $2,$00 and improvements of *73*9901, X32 *183 Code 03000 - Assessment No. 2409, I-lira 'data Final Estate, Ina. is assessed for personal property with a valuation of 22210 and improvon- e.nts of ' 40. There<has been a clerical error of the assesses since he reported equipment and improvements than have boon moved to another location and are being assessed there. Therefore, the roll should be corrected to show personal property only with a valuation of $440* ea on AssIs ianE Asseasor Page' ,..4 of Code 08001 - Assessment Noo 32870 Mira 'Vista fealty, Inc. is assessed for ROW* rsonal prop+�rt with a. valuation of 0s,070improvements of There has been a ' clerical error of the . assessee since he omitted to >report equipment moved in from another location.. Therefore, this assessment should, be corrected to show personal property with avaluation of $4,6.50 and improvements of NOTE: Assessee has been notified of the 'increase and his rights of appeal. Code 11017 - Assessment No. 2159, Lee Cleamon.s is assessed for personal property with a 'valuation of *2,220« There has been a clerical error of the assesses in his property statement; there- fore this assessment should be corrected to show $783 assessed valuation, less 'business'` inventory exemption $30., 'Code 14010 - Assessment No. 20871 James Granzella is assessed for personal property with a Ivaluuation. of 1.,010 and improvements of $50. There has been a clerical error of the asses$ee in his property sta.tev-lent since he declared !supplies and also included them with his inventory. Therefore, assessed valuation should be correoted to show personal property of $810 and improvements of 00t t B ' Ex. �27• Code 83003 -- Assessment No. 2001s Elwood W. Bradley is assessed for personal property with a valuation of $3,750 less 15% business inventory exemption As the:result of a physical inspeo- tidn of the books, it has been determined that there has been a clerical error of the assessee in reporting cost of equipment and inventory. Therefore, this assessment should be corrected to show personal property with a' valuation of $2,020 less business ' inventory exemption of 94. It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from records in the Asses'sor' s office :'that'' taxes have boon levied or charged erroneously or illegally 'fear 'the reasonsas stated` below; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4986 (l) Cad, the fallowing uncollected tai;, penalty, or costs heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in whale or in part on the 'following assessments Code 11003 -- Assessment Ido« 216 , Franchise Investors is assessed for personal property with a' valuation of *14(3 less 15 business inventory exemption of $21. This assessment should be cancelled since it is also levied against another assessee. R. , Seatono Assistant sseiisnr' 6 Page of Code 86004 Assessment No. 2015, 'Diebold Compute�yr Leasing is assessed for personal property, with a valuation of $$R09,5%. This assessment'' should be cancelled since it has also been levied against another assessee. AND, 'FURTHER., under Section 4986 (1) (b) Code o2020 - .Assessment No. 2€54., Goldman;s of California Is erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $13:290 and improvements of 4;17ST80 less '15 business inventory exemption, it has been deta rmined that a portion of the improve- ments 1s net the property of this assess-ee and is being assessed to the correct owner. Therefore, the ro11 should be eorreeted to show personal property with a. valuation of $131290 and improve- Ments of $6,330 less business inventory exemption $11131. Cade 090:00 Assessment No. 2981, Atlas' Heating en Ventilating Campany,, Ltd*, is erroneouslg assessed for personal property with s valuation of $1,110 less '$150 business Inventory exempti o,u., plus 10% penalty for failure to files within the time required by last. It has been daterminIed that this equipment was moved out of the county before the lien date; therefore this assess- meant should be cancelled. Cads 12047 - Assessment No. 2004, Ron Gage is erroneously assessed, for personal property with s valuation of X50. This assessment should be cancelled sinusthe property was moved out of county'' before the lien date'. Code 14010 - Assessment Ido* 2480, Bdward D, Coleman is erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $790 plus 1 penalty for failure to Pile within the time required by law. This ssses'sment should be canoelled sine s the a.ssessee had moved his equipment out of eounty before the lien date, R . 'Seaton, ss s an ' Assessor 69 / 480 Page 6 of FUR 'S, for the 1968-� fisoal :year, under Section 986 {l b}: the f`ollor ing 'assessment should be eanaelled: Core 79172 -`' assessment No. 201.$, William C. C 113 I ant is; erroneously lassessed for 'personal<. property with a valuation of $470, since the rise see 'had 'sold the equipment before the lien date, I herebg 'cvnsnt to the corrections and charges in the above resolutions,, JOHNB. CIAUSM Acting Dist 1, .attorney B, R, a. soaton p Assistant Assessor Adopted by the Board this ��,�'�. day' 9f b /4UV age . .. of ,,.