HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-316 __ .._. .................................................................................................................................................................................
. ........... ._........... ..._._...... ........._.....__........ .......... ....._ ........... ........... ......... ........ ...........
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO, 69/316
of Contra Costa County )
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Beard requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196eL - 196-9
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records in the Assessor's office that taxes have been levied or
chargederroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below;
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section
4986 (1') (b), the following uncollected tax., penalty„ or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged., should be cancelled in
whole or in part on the following assessment:
Code 1000 - Assessment No. 175, boat C>~ 11. 6 AK is
assessed to Barrell D. Isom, assessed value $80. This assessment
was erroneously levied since the situs has been determined to
be Alameda County, where It has been assessed for 1968-69.
Code 3000 - Assessment No. 188, boat CP 737 . AC is
assessed to Eugene Mathis, assessed value $130. This assessment;
was erroneously levied since the situs has been determined to
be Alameda County, where it has been assessed for 1968-69.
R-. ,O. Seat6n, Assistant Assessor
RESOLUTION NO. 69/316
cc: Assesses (G. Giese)
Auditor
Tai Collector Page 1 of 4
Code 8001 - Assessment No. 928, boat OF 8841 AK is
assessed to David H. Chevez, assessed value $60. This assessment
was erroneously levied since the situs has been determined to
be Alameda Counnty, where it has been assessed for 1968-69.
Cade 8001 - Assessment No. 932, boat OF 9786 AT is
assessed to Jack Cline, assessed value $80. This assessment
was erroneously levied since the brut was mold and destroyed
prier to the lien date.
Code 9000 - Assessment No. 96, boat CF 6643 CS is
assessed to Robert K. Kunkel, assessed value $230. This
assessment was erroneously levied since the situs has been
determined to be Alameda County, where it has been assessed
for 1968-69.
Code 53009 - Assessment No. 110, brut OF 4496 Chi is
assessed to David Wigglesworth, assessed value $1000. This
assessment was erroneously levied since the boat was sold prior to
the lien date and the situs has been determined to be Marin
County, where it has been assessed for 1968-69.
Code 79€302 - Assessment No. 15, boat OF 8773 AL is
assessed to William Diekerson, assessed value $80. This
assessment was erroneously levied since the situs has been
determined to be San Joaquin County, where it has been assessed
for 1968»-69.
R. 0. Seaton,, Assistant Assessor
HEESOLUT!0 'F�o. 69/316
Page 2 of
FURTHER, for the 19§1-68 f iseal year:
Cade 1000 - Assessment No. 280, boat CF 1156 AK is
assessed to Darrell D. Isom, assessed value $90. This assessment
was erroneously levied since the situs has been determined to
be Alameda County, where it has been assessed for 1967-68.
Code 82034 -» .Assessment No. 1692, beat CF 5146 CE is
assessed to Peter Markusx assessed value $140. This assessment was
erroneously levied since the beat was sold prior to the lien
date.
w;
R. 0. Seaton, Assistant Assessor
USOL TION ISO. 69/316
Page .3- of 4
MTHER, for the 1906--7 fiscal year:
Code 1000 - Assessment No. 1032 boat CF 1156 AZA is
assessed to Darrell D. Isom, assessed value $100. This assessment
was erroneously levied since the situs has been determined to
be Alameda County, where it has been assessed for 1966-67.
I hereby consent to the
corrections and changes in
the above resolutions.
JOHN B. CLAUSZ
Acting District .Attorney
R. 0. Seaton Deputy
Assistant Assessor
AdapC'eu vy the Board this day of 7,
RESOLUTION NO. 69/316
Page ,4 0f