HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011969 - 69-187 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 69/187
of Contra Costa County )
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196 8 - 196,9
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessorts office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa-
tion. Code 4831, the following; defects in description and/or form
and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected
on the second installment of taxes:
In Cade Area 2010, Pel. No., 129-140-008, El Dorado Electronics
are erroneously assessed with. Improvement 'Value of 89s490 and Persobal.
Property value of $112s640, due to error in classification of propert
This assessment should be corrected to read: Land $26,600 (no change ;
Improvements $52,720„ Personal Property $11 .,150; making a Total
assessed value of $193,470.
In Code Area 021310, Pel. No. 129-152-013., Alvin T. and
Nancy R. McCarty are erroneously assessed with Improvement value of
3,940 due to error in description of improvements. This assessment
should be corrected as follows: hand $1,270 (no change); Improve-
ments $3,760,* Total assessed value $5,030.
f y :
Carl S. tMstl; -ss s anAssessor a ng
RESOLUTION No. 69/187
cc: Assessor (I. Kettle)
Auditor Page 1 of
Tax Collector
In Code Area 58004s Pei, No. 012-020-007 Juana R. Martinez
is erroneously assessed with Improvement value of $3,0,00 due to
clerical, error caused by entry of value on incorreat property record.
This assessment should be eorreeted to read: Land $1,270 (no change) ,
Improvements $870, Total assessed value of $2,>140.
In Code Area 66003, Pei. No. 206-020-036, Robert A. and.
Loretta C. Dias are erroneously assessed with;. Improvemen.t value of
$6,250 due to error of entry of value on the wrong roperty record.
This assessment should be corrected to read: Land x,150 (no change)
Improvements $6,710; making a total assessed value of $11,860.
Assessee has waived equalization hearing.
Pei. #206-020-0 ?
In Code> Area 66003,/'alter C. and athi F. Mosle have been
erroneously assessed with Improvement` value of $4,60 due to error of
posting; to the wrong, property record. This assessment' should be car'-
reefed to remove all Improvement values with no change' in the Land
Value of $4,920, and new Total value of $4,920.
In Code Area 73001, Pcl #237-230-004, assessed to Last Bay
Municipal Utility District, as corrected for the years 1967-68 and
1968-69 by Board Resolution 69/54, should' have entered thereon' an
assessed value of Land $380.
In Code Area 79172, Pel. No. 116-140-004s assessed to
L. W. Hames was erroneously segregated on seg. 491/68. Pei. A
(1969 Pel. #''216-140-0317) was erroneously valued with Land of t4o000,
Improvements $1,850, Total $5,850 due to entry on wrong arcel. This
should be corrected to read. Land $1.,000., Improvements ;1,850, Total
$2050. That portion designated as Pel. B (1969 Pei. #116-140-031)
was erroneously valued with Land $7,8413, Improvements no value,
Total $7,800. This portion should be corrected to read** Land '$100800;
Improvements no value, total $10,800. Assessee has waived equaliza-
tion hearing.
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor' s office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and
Taxation. Code, Section 4831, the following defects in description
and/or form and clerical error of the assessor on the roll' should'
be corrected; and, pursuant to geetion 531, escaped assessment due
to such error should be entered as follows
In Cade Area 03000, Pei. No. 501-500-1313, assessed to Hax
and Mary Frankel, has not had entered thereon'; the improvement value
due to error of omission of posting from the property record. This
assessment should be corrected to read: For the year 1.967-68
Escaped Assessment of Improvements 8,,030 For the year 1968-69
Escaped assessment of Improvements $8,030. Assessee has waived
equalization hearing.
URY7 5, Rush, Assistant Assessor
Page 2 of 4
RE-SOLUTION No. 69/187
In Code area 58004p Pel.#012-020-006, Irving D. and
Freida N. Martin, are erroneously assessed with land value only
due to entry of improvement 'value on wrong property record
Escaped assessment as follows should be entered: For the year
1968-69 - Improvements $2,130 (making a total assessed value of
$2,830). Further$ this assessment should be corrected to allow
veterants exemption in the amount of $1,000, >.making a net taxable
value of $1.1830, A ssessee has waived: equalization hearing.
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should
have been assessed, and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and
Taxation Code, Section 4831, the following def'ect's in description
and/or form and clerical error of the assessor on the roll should
be corrected; and, further, in accordance with Section 4986 (1) (b)',
it is requested the Board of Supervisors advise the auditor to cancel
all or any portion of any uncollected tax, penaltyO or costs, here-
tofore or hereafter levied on that portion in error.
In Code Area 09000, Pol. No. 178-1.71-022, Reuben B and
Mary L. Freitas have been erroneously assessed due to misinterpre-
tation of deed with Land value of $4000 as this parcel should not
have been described as a taxable parcel being part of Bonanza
Street in the City of Walnut Creek'. This assessment should be
deljeted from the assessment roll, in entirety ' and all or any portion
of any uncollected tax;, penalty, or costa, heretofore or hereafter
levied,, should be eancelled',
In Cade Area 85097, Pel. No, 419-102-004p assessed to
Kenneth W. and Joan F. Hall, is erroneous in. that Improvement value
of $950 entered for. the years 1967-68 and 1968-69 are for improve-
ments 'which did not exist on the lien date. This assessment should
be corrected to read; Land $680, Total, assessed value $680. Any
portion of any uncollected tax, penalty , or casts, heretofore or
hereafter levied on that portion in error should be cancelled.
Carl S. Rush, Asa stanE ssessor Rest
Page of RESOLUTION "''O. 69/1.8'
It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of
the assesses' s books of account or other .papers that there has been
a defect of description, or clerical error of the assesses in his
property statement or in other Information or records furnished, to
the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property
which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substan-
tially higher valuation than: he would have entered on the roll if
the information had been correctly .furnished; and, therefore, pur-
suant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4831.5, the assessor
certifies' to the auditor that the following corrections should be
made on the assessment roll.
In Code Area 030000 Pel. No. 503-01.0-003,- assessed to
F. F. Conwill, should be corrected to reduce personal property
value from $12,990 to $1100100 and, correction is requested on the
second installment of taxes,
In Code Area 09000, Pol. No>o 177-200-001, Ewen and Phyllis
Danielslon have been erroneously assessed with Personal Property
value of 2€0100 due to error on their property statement. This
assessment should be corrected to change Personal Property value
to $14.,320., making a new total value of $19s990.
I hereby consent to the
corrections and changes in.
the 'above resolutions.
JOHN A. K; SLY
District Attorney
Carl Ruth Deputy
Assistant Assessor (Acting)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ' 18th day of March,, 1969.
RESOLUTION NO, 69/187
Page of 4