HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011968 - 68-756 IIS THE BOARD CSE SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA> COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the 'utter of the Proposed }
Annexation of El Pueblo Area RESOLATIO NO. 68, 756
to County Service Area L-43, �
Pittsburg Area ) (Gov. Code 5631.3,, 56314,
5631.4.1, '56819.1)
RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING WITHOUT.. PREJUDICE
THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ORGANIZATION I TO, ANNEX
THE EL PtJEBLO <ARE TC COUNT Sgfffi. &F AREA L--4 3
The Beard. of Supervisors of Contra Costa Count; RESOLVE$ THAT:
On September 24, 1968, this Board adopted Respluti.on 'go. 68!662
initiating; proceedings for the annexation of the IEl Pueblo area. to
County Service' Area .L- , Pittsburs area, which is 1c rated in
Contra CostaCount r. 'phis annexation hid been prop ed by the
Housing Author .tri of Contra Costa County. Resolution of atpplteat ion
for the proposed change of 'organization was filed by the 'Rousing
Authority with the< Executive €lf `i cer of i the Local Agency Porati on
Commission on July 29 , 1.968. The reason for: the propo5red. annexa-
tion
nnexa._t on was to provide the saki territory with street lighting
service,
On September 4; 1968, the Local.' Agent* Formation Commission
approved the resolution. without condition, declared the !territory
proposed to be annexed, as Inhabited-, and assigned the proposal
desi.gnati on a's "El Pue} l.o Annexation to County service Area L-43".
Pursuant to Resolution No 68/1662, thi.s Beard held a public
hearing on the proposed annexatI-on at 1,11:00 >a*m.' on Tuesdk- ,
October 2.9, 168, notice of said hoarig was duly given ;b (1)
publication In. the "Pittsburg Post Dispatch'' , (2) poStin on ;the
Shard's bulletin board,,,, and (8) mailing notiloe to all person} and
counties , cities or districts which had theretofore filed a written
request for special notice withthe Clerk of the Board. At said
hearing this Board heard the determination of, the Local Agency
Formation Commission read aloud, and then called for evidence or
protests as provided for by Government Code Section 56814 . do
protests were made, either ;orally or in Iwrit'ing, by any person or
taxpayer of the public A recommendation of disapproval of the
proposed annexation was made by J . 8.. Connery, Executive Secretary
of the Local Agency Formation Commission, who stat that certain
problems would be created if the. annexation was approved at this
time.
RESOLUTION No 68/7 6
At the conclusion of said h ari F11 this Board DISAPPROVED
without prejudice the DrOPOSed annexati6wj ofthe KI Pueblo area
to County Service Area L-43-
PASSED
--43.PA SES AND ADOPTED on October 29, 1968, by this Board.
DE:p
RESOLUTION 90. 618/756