HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011968 - 68-714 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Proposed }
Abatement of the Property of RESOLUTION NO. 68/71
George F. & Lillis Collins �
}
WHEREAS, it appears from the records of this Board, that the Contra
Costa. Ciounty Building Inspector acting as the '"Enforcement Agency" pursuant to
the provisions of 'Sections 1701.E st seq., of Title VIII of the California Admin-
istrative Code, having determined that the building located at 33 j Ghesley�
N. Richmond � and more particularly described as
Lot 4 in Block 206, as delineated upon that certain map entitled "Wells
SecondAddition to the City of Richmond, filed March 4, 1912s, in Book 6 of
Mapst page 140 in the office of the County Recorder of Contra Costs County
is unfit for human habitation or occupancy, and is therefore a public nuisance,
and said Building< Inspector' having pasted said property with $ t ce, two A, hate,
Nuisance and having notified the owner {s} of said property that it is unfit for
human habitation or occupanoy, in the manner provided' by lax as appears more
particularly' from the declaration of the Building Inspector on file herein; and
WHEREAS', the: sari building has not been repaired or removed as re-
quired by said Notice to Abate Nuisance; and
WHEREAS said Building Inspector thereafter posted said property with
Notic bLUAWA, which Notice specified the time and place of the hear-
ing before this Board for tne'�owners sof said property to show cause why the
building thereon should not be condemned as a public nuisance, and the Build-
ing Inspector having notified the owners of said property= of said hearing in the
manner provided by lair, as appears more particularly from the declaration of the
#l4
2.`65;
(Third Notice) RESOLUTION NO. 681714
t
Building Inspector on file herein:; and
WHMMS', the ;matter having come on for hearing by this Board on
Tuesday., October 150 1968 &tM40 a.M. *v as provided in the
Notice hereinabove mentioned; and
WReasy the owner of said property haves appeared and having yrs-
guested a anal time within which to correct deficiencies of th aid
building and to a the nuisance thereof, and the Board considered
the muter and continued t earing to Tuesday, ,
at.., wA.M./P.
K.
WNERW* the owner of sa proper wing appeared and halving re-
quested additional time n which to correct der iencies of the said: build-
ing and to abate nuisance thereof, and the Board havionsidered the
matter continued the hearing to Tuesday
...,....,A.M./P.M
1EEKEAS the Board' having considered the evidence presented by said
Building Inspector and all other interested parties, the following appears and
this 'Board now finds that said building is unfit for human habitation or 0ew
cupancy by reason of the following deficiencies which are hereby found to
exist: flet ealsh 8 Inadequate seanitation, including
0. tam of proper mater closet, lovatorya bathtub or shower.
b. '' Lack of proper and sanitary kJ=h9n sink.
. £.' ragh C, Structural hazards, including
a. Detariorated and inadequate foundations
b. '' Flooring supports of insufficient eine to carry imposed loads
with safety.
arArpg. V Nuisance# including
a. An attractive nuisance as defined by the Uniform Dousing Cods.
LaIgMgh E Hazardous tiring, including
a. _ Wiring installed and maintained in an unapproved manner
-Parearaph IF Hazardous plumbing, including
6. Fixtures not vented
b. improper 'fittings <used in the drain lines.
p,. e,.gMe M' Faulty Weather Protection including
a. Ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, including
broken windows.
b. Lack of weather protection for exterior wall coverings,
including look of paint.
#14 c. Broken, ratted andsplit exterior wall covering.
2-65; 400 Parearsah L Inadequate maintenance.
(Third Notice)
2 68 /714
BE IT 1UMORE RESOLVED that said Wilding is unfit for hums habit&
tion or,'Occupancy'and is declaredto be a public nuisance and the owners there
of are hereby ordered to abate said nuisance within 30 days after a copy of
this Resolution along with Notice thereof has been posted to said property,
BE IT FURTHER RESORTED that it is the conclusion of this Board that
said building cannot be reconstructed or repaired in a Ulmer so as to comply
with the provisions of Article S Chapter 9 of Title VIII of the California.
Administrative Code or the Contra' Costa County Ordinance Code and therefore
said building tet, be rased or re m weed.
IT I'5 FURTHER ORD&= that the notices posted' to said property shat.
specify that if said nuisance is not abated within the tiger all* e►d, said
nuisance will be abated by the Building Inspector of this qty, and the ex-
pense thereof'' made,a lion upon the land upon which said building (a) are
located.
PASSED AND ADOPTED - Hct3be-. 1..8.�..�1.-9-68r . - -
.�..�..r by the following votes
AY&Ss Supervisors James P. Kenny, James E. Moriarty# Thomas J. Coli,
Edmund A. Linscha id, and Alfred M. pig
NOES'; Done
ABSENTS Cdons,
#14
-6 #0 4
(Third Notice) RESOLUTION NO. 68/714
68 /714