The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011968 - 68-670 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COS'T'A COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 68/670 of Contra. Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 196§. - 1962 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessorts office what was intended and what should have been assessed; 'and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 4831, the 'following, defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected, and, pursuant to Section 4833, the assessor requests the Board of Supervisors to order the auditor to cancel any uncollected delin- quent penalty, coat, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee which has attached heretofore or hereafter because of such error and because of essessorts inability to complete valid procedures initiated prier to the delinquency date.- Code ate.Cade 5001 - Assessment No. 2066, Victor Comptometer Corp. and Shell Oil Company are assessed for personal property with a valuation of $1,860, due to an error in computation, and should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation:. of $960. Code 06042 - Assessment No. 2057, Victor Comptometer Corp, and Doctors Hospital are assessed for personal property with a valuation of $1,410, due to an error in computation, and should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of *420- R. n. 'eaion, A'ss stent Assessor oe Assessor (G. Giese) Auditor Page 1 of Tax Collector RESOLUTION No. 68/670 Code 73028 Assessment No. 2207, Victor Comptometer Corp* and Custom Floor Coverings are assessed for personal property with a valuation of *400j, due to an error in computations and should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of $200. Code 83024 - Assessment No. 2106, Victor Comptometer Corp. and Ogdenso Inc. are assessed for personal property with a valua- tion of $400, due to an error in computations and should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of $210. It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from records in the Assessor's office that taxes bave been levied or charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below; and, therefores pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4986 (1) (a), the following uncollected tax., penalty, or costs heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in whole or in part on the following assesomenta*4 Code 09000 - Assessment No. 2805, Lois Jean Bell is erron- eously assessed with personal property with. a valuation of $1s530. It has been levied more than once, being a duplicate with Assess- ment No. 09000-2485. Code 83018 - Assessment No. 2002', Mrs. Clyde Alexander is assessed for improvements with a valuation of $210. This assess- ment has been levied more than once since it is also included in a real property assessment. ANDs FURTHER, under Section 4986 (1) (b): Code 02008 - Assessment No. 2072, Robert L. Painter is assessed for ossessory interest in land and improvements with a valuation of 00, Tenant terminated residency within six months of the lien date. On month-to-month rentals possessory interest is considered to be of no value if occupancy terminates less than aix months after the lien date, or prior to August 31., 1968. Termina- tion of occupancy after assessment has been made and within six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion of no value. There- fore, in accordance with assessor's policy, this assessment should be cancelled. zal L2 R& 0. Seatonp Asfilstent issessor RESOLUTION NO. 63/670 Page 2 of 14Z Code 08001 - Assessment No. 2293, Helen Boutte is assessed for possessory interest in land and improvements with a valuation of $290. Tenant terminated residency within six months of the lien date. On month-to-month rental$ possessory interest is considered to be of no value if occupancy terminates less than sic months after the lien date, or prior to August 31, 1968. Termination of occupancy after assessment has been made and within six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion, of no value. Therefore, in accordance with assessor's policy, this assessment should be cancelled. Code 08001 - Assessment No. 2426, Gregg Pavach is assessed for osssessory interest in land and improvements with a valuation of 320. Tenant terminated residency within six months of the lien date. On month-to-month rental, possessory interest is considered to be of no value if occupancy terminates less than six months after the lien date, or prior to August 31, 1968, Termina- tion of occupancy after assessment has been made and within six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion of no value. There- fore, in accordance with assessorts policy, this assessment should be cancelled. Code 08001 - Assessment No. 2533, Douglas and Dawn Hagar are assessed for possessory interest in land and improvements with a valuation of $480. Tenants terminated residency within six months of the lien date. On month-to-month rental.. possessory interest is considered to be of no value if occupancy terminates less than six months after the lien date, or prior to August 31, 1968. Termination of occupancy after assessment has been made and within six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion of no value. Therefore, in accordance with assessor's policy, this assessment should be cancelled. Code 09000 - Assessment No. 2903, Minnie Williams is assessed for personal property with a valuation of $100. This is an erroneous assessment since the assessee had gone out of business prier to the lion date. Code 53Q04 - Assessment No. 2029, Ruth and Harold H. Jones are assessed for possessory interest in land and improvements with a valuation of $220* Tenants terminated residency within six months of the lien date. 4n month-to-month rental, possessory interest is considered to be of no value if occupancy terminates less than six months after the lien date, or prior to .August 31, 1968. Termina- tion of occupancy after assessment has been made and within six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion of no value. There- fore, in accordance with assessor's policy, this assessment should be cancelled. Lee R. 0, Baton, Aasistant Assessor I'll..''.,............................................ .... ....... Code 62051 Assessment No. 2008, Paul P. Asher Is assessed for improvements with a valuation of $640. This is erroneously assessed since the assessee was not the owner on the lien date. This assessment should be cancelled as it is being levied against the proper assesses. Code 66029 - Assessment No, 2002, John Cenovich is assessed for possessor7 interest in land and improvements with a valuation of $240. Tenant terminated residency within six months of the lien date. On month-to-month rental, possessory interest is considered to be of no value If occupancy terminates less than six months of the lien date, or prior to August 31* 1968. Termination of occupancy after assessment has been made and within six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion of no value. Therefore, in accordance with assessor's policys this assessment should be cancelled. Code 79063 - Assessment Na. 2021p R. B. Morehead is assessed for possessory interest In land and improvements with a valuation of $140. Tenant terminated residency within six months of the lien date. On month-to-month rentals possessory interest is considered to be of no value if occupancy terminates less than six months after the lien date, or prior to August 31, 1968. Termination of occupancy after assessment has been made and within six months of the lien date con- stitutes an opinion of no value. Therefore$ in accordance with assessor's policy,, this assessment should be cancelled. Code 79096 - Assessment No. 2016, Fairbanks Credit Corp. is assessed for improvements with a valuation of $1P300. This is erroneously assessed since the assesses was not the owner on the lien date. This assessment should be cancelled as it is being levied against the proper assesses. Code 98012 - Assessment No, 2005, F. Taneredy, R. Veachi and R. McMillan are assessed for personal property with a valuation of $4,850 and improvements with a valuation of $710. This is an erroneous assessment since the assesses had gone out of business prior to the lien date, I hereby consent to the corrections and changes in the above resolutions, JOHN A. XEJEDLY District Attorney By. R. U. Neaten ileputy Assistant Assessor ,44opted by the Board this day ofto�er .—, 19 ,6 91 Page ,i of