Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011968 - 68-579 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the M'att'er of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 68/579' of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 196& 1969 It has been ascertained From the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's office what was 'intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa- tion Code 4831, the following defects in description and/or form: and elerical errors of the assessor on, the roll should be eor- rested; Code 08001 - Assessment No. 3317, Guy F. Atkinson Company., c/o Stressed Structures, Inc. is assessed for Possessory Interest in Land $140 and Possessory Interest in Improvements $2,220. There has been a clarioal. <error of the Assessor or defeet in forte: which should be corrected to readt Stressed. Structures, Inc., c/o Guy F. Atkinson Company. Code 09012 - Assessment oto. 20260 Alameda-Contra Costa Council of Camp 'Fire Girls is assessed for personal property with a valuation of *830. The assessee filed for Welfare Exemption within the proper filing period;. however, the exemption was denied due to lack of proper information* Pursuant to amended findings, the Mate Beard of Equalization has allowed the exemption.. There- fore, the assessment roll should ;be correctedto show personal property with a valuation of *$30, exemption *830- R* 0. Seaton., Assistant Assessor cc: Assessor (G. Giese) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 68/579 .._ Code +62006 .. Assessment No. 2464, Alameda-Contra Costa Council of Camp Fire Girls is assessed for personal property with a valuation of $270. The A.s'sessee filed for Welfare Exemption within the proper filing period$* however, the exemption was denied due to lack of proper information. Pursuant to amended findings, the state .Hoard of Equalization has allowed the exemption. There- fore, the: assessment roll should be corrected to show personal property with a. valuation of $270, exemption $270. Code 66088 - Assessment No. 2051, E. J. Nicholson is assessed for personal property with a. valuation of $650. There has been an assessors s error in calculation; therefore, the roll should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of 00. It has boon ascertained by the assessor from an audit of the asse3s see t s books of account or other papers that there has been a. defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records fur- nished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substantially higher valuation than he would have enured on the roll if the information had been correctly furnished; and, there- fore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Cade, Section 4831.5, the assessor certifies to the auditor that the following correc- tions should be made on the assessment roll: Code 76449 - Assessment N'o. 2021, Western Stares, Inc. is assessed for personal property with a valuation of $7,110. Therm has beesn an error by the assessee in reporting cost of inventory therefore$ the roll should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation or $4,930. It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from records in the 'Assessorrs office that taxes have been levied or charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below; and., therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation. Code, Section 4986 (l) (a), the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in whole or in part on the following assessment: Code 66488 - Assessment No. 2021, Datab is assessed for personal property with a valuation of *90. This is erroneously assessed since it was levied more than onces, being a duplicate with Assessment No. 6608-2o5i. I hereby consent to the correc- tions and changes in the above resolution. JOHN A. NE'JZDLY" District Attorney Ax R. . Seaton Deputy Assistant ,assessor PASS} and ADOPTED on August 20, 19688. RESOLUTION No. 68/579 Page 2 of 2