Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011968 - 1968-447 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO, ,68/447 of Contra Costa County WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board request's for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District 'Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 196$ - 196-9 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in. the Assessors office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa- tion Cade 4831 , the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected: Code 2002 - Assessment No, 2740., Kenneth O. Sorenson is assessed for leasehold improvements with a valuation of $16,250 and personal property with a valuation of $1.10. There has been an assessorts error in 'computations; therefore, assessed value should be corrected on the roll to show leasehold improvements with a valua- tion of $130000 and personal property with a valuation of $110. Code 2008' - Assessment No. 2065, Baruh Liquors, Inc. is assessed for personal property with a valuation of $34,390. There has been an assessor'ts error in computation; therefore, assessed value should be 'corrected to $31,890- eaEon Assistant Assessor cc: Assessor (G. Giese) Pagel Auditor Tax Calle ctor RESOLUTION No. 68A47 _ _ _ _ Code 9000 - Assessment No. 2693, Robert S. &: Nellie W. Heyer, are assessed for personal property with a valuation of 1100 and improvements with a valuation of $830• There has been an assessor's error since the incorrect percentage factor was used in computing, assessed valuation of improvements'; therefore, the assessment roll should be corrected to show personal_ property with a valuation of $1100 and improvements with a valuation of $SIC. It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records; furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess pers6n:al property which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substan- tially higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll if the information had been correctly furnished: and therefore, pur- suant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4631.51 the assessor certifies to the auditor that the following corrections should be made on the assessment roll: Code 9011 w Assessment No. 2012, Stanley E. and Bernice A. Lewis are erroneously assessed for personal property with a valua- tion of $4780. The assessees over reported equipmentsince they included interest charges in cost; therefore, assessed valuation should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of $4160. Code 11017 - assessment No. 2137, Roger D. Greenlee is erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuation. of *1050 since he reported inventory also assessed to Standard, Cil. This should be corrected to show a valuation of $890.; Code 73005 - Assessment No. 2020$ Harry J. Lucas Masonry, is erroneously assessed for personal property with a 'valuation of $2780 since a portion of his equipment is already levied against another assessee. This should be corrected to show a valuation of 203( It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from records in the Assessor►s office that taxes have been levied or charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below, and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4986 (1) (a) , the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in whole or in part on the following a.ssessmenta Code- 8001 - Assessment No. 3536, C T Supply Company is erroneously assessed with personal property with a valuation of $8610. It has been levied, more than once, being a duplicate with .Assessment No 8001-2504, R. 0. Seaton Assistant Assessor Code 9000 - Assessment No. 2901, Wheelan Studiosof Oakland` is erroneously assessed with personal property with a valuation of 14801 as it has been levied more than once, being; a duplicate with Assessment No. 9000-2314- It 000-231 ..It has been ascertained from the assessment roll' and from records in the assessor's office that taxes have been levied or charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4986 (1) (b) , the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in whole or in part on the following assessments: Code 9058 - Assessment No. 20029 Neel.d D. Tanksley is erroneously assessed with personal property with a valuation of $50, as he has been assessed in Alameda County where the property is located. Code 53004 -- Assessment No. 2064, Shasta Pipe & Supply Company is erroneously assessed with personal property with a val- uation of $240, since the merchandise did not arrive In the United States until after the lien date. Cede 66009 w Assessment No. 2003, :Harald Smith Company is erroneously assessed with personal property with a valuation of *780. This assessment should be cancelled as it is being levied against another assessee. I hereby consent to the corrections and changes in the above resolution. J010 A. MEALY District Attorney �' 01 Ar By R. 0. Seaton -Deputy Assistant Assessor oil ed by the Board this _LL—day of � � 'age -.3 of __