HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011968 - 1968-013 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll RESOLUTION NO. 68/13
of Contra Costa County
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196 , - 196,E
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the assessor' s office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and. Taxa-
tion Code, Section 4831., the following defects in description and/or
form and clerical. error of the assessor on the roll should be cor-
rected.
In Code Area 1000, Parcel No. 71-152-022, Cataline Built
Homes, Inc. , are erroneously assessed with Land value of $5,420 due
to error in property description. This assessment should be cor-
rected to reads Por Sec 25 T2N RlE Ex MR 38.85 Acres, with a band,
value of $5,360. Correction is requested on second installment.
In Code Area 1000, Parcel No. 71-152-023, Cataline Built
Horses, Inc. , are erroneously assessed with Land value of $2,970 dine
to error in property description. This assessment should be cor-
rected to read; Por Sec 25 T2N RlE ex MR 7.75 Acres, with a Land
value of $2,060. Correction is requested on second installment.
In Code Area 4002, Parcel. No. 400-040-008, is erroneous
inasmuch as portions resulting from Cancellation #380/1967 were
based on incorrect acreage calculations . That portion designated
as (1968) Parcel No. 400-040-025, assessed as nontaxable property
to the State of California, should be described as Ro El. Pinole
6.354 Acres, with a Land value of $3250. FURTHER,,
R. 0. SEATON
Assistant Assessor
RESOLUTION NO. 68/13
Copy to: Assessor (Mrs. Kettle) Page 1. of 2
Auditor ---
Tax Collector
tk
2-
That portion remaining as Parcel No. x}00--0 .0-008 (and
designated as Parcel No. x.00-040-026 for 1968) , assessed to
Hercules, Incorporated, should be corrected to read: Ro E1 Pinole
8.45 Acres, with a Land value of $4320. Correction is requested on
the second installment.
In Code Area 8001, Parcel No. 560-310-008, assessed to
Bray oil Company, is erroneously assessed with Improvement value of
,$199,730 and Personal Property value of $ 9,390 due to defect in
description of property on the assessee's property statement. This
assessment should be corrected to read: Land (no change) $41,630;
Improvements $158p420; Personal Property $49,280; making a total
assessed value of $249,330. Correction is requested on the second
installment of taxes.
In Code Area 82019, Parcel No. 37_120-022., assessed to
Charles W. Buckley, is erroneously assessed with Land value of
$2700 due to error in property description. This assessment should
be corrected to read: 5.67 acres, and Land value should be corrected
to $2230, .making a total value of $2480. Correction is requested on
second installment.
In Code Area 82006, the following assessments are erroneous
and/or illegal due to incorrect interpretation of deed conveying
easements only. These assessments should be corrected in accordance
with Section 4631 or cancelled in accordance with Section 4986(1) (b) :
Parcel No. 29-040-002, assessed to Pedro Martins & Sons, Inc. ,
should be corrected as follows: Description: Por Secs 100 15 T2N
R3E EX 75% MH 442.44 Acres, with Land value 38,590; Improvements $90;
Total value $33,680. Assessee requested correction.
Parcel No. 29-040-081, assessed to William B. Honegger, et al. ,
should be corrected as follows: Description: 7 MR Por Secs 10 & 15
T2N R3E 442.4. Acres, with. Land value of $990, Total $990. Assessee
requested correction.
Parcels No. 29-040-003, 29-040-004, 29-040 .005, and 29-040.0061,
assessed to Myra H. Honegger, should be cancelled.
I hereby consent to the changes
and corrections in the above
R. 0. SEATON resolution.
Assistant Assessor
JOHN A. NEJEDLY, District Attorney
eputy
Adopted by the Board this
day of 19�•
RESOLUTION No. 68/'13
Page 2 of 22-