Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011967 - 67-879 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STA'T'E OF CALIFORNIA In. the Matte of Changes } of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION No. 67/8`79 of Contra Costa County } } WHEREAS, the County .Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1961 - 196 it has been ascertained- from the assessment rola. and Prov records in. the assessor's office that taxes have been levied or changed erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below; and, therefore, pursuant to the; revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4986 ) (b) o, the folio iz g uncollected tax, penalty, or casts heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in i4hole or in part on the following assessments: Code 76021 - Assessment leo. 2001, City of Martinez is assessed with improvements with a valuation of $12503. This should be cancelled as this assessment was erroneously levied on improve- ments that are not subject to taxation, being exempt 'under ..art. X1110 Section l of the State Constitution. Code 82034 - Assessment No. 2014, Bruce Bo e rmn is er- roneously assessed with improvements with a valaa.tioh of $300, as It was sold prior to the lien Ute. An assessment is being added under Assessment No. 82034-2226 on the 1967-68 roll.. usov,)TICN No. *67/879 S.-.F Z•`♦ "-��;� i.+,441 cJ Sa L3 -Y3.t..,k .(:},t�i»'+v hT�S',3 d. eu9 Assessor { G. Giese). Auditor Tax. Collector Page 1 of It has been ascertained by the assessor from an. audit of the a.ssessee r s books of account or other papers that there has been a defect or defects of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement and/or in other informa.tion, or records furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess it at a substantially higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll if the information had been correctl furnished to the assessor; therefore, in accordance wil.th Sections 4531.5 and 532 of the California Revenue and `laxation Code, the following; cor- rection should be entered on the roll; and, pursuant to Section 4833, the assessor requests the Board. of Supervisors to order the auditor to cancel any uncollected delinquent penalty, cast, redemp- tion penalty, interest, or redemption fee which bas attached hereto- fore or hereafter because of such error and because of assessor' s inability to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delin- quency data Code 2008 - assessment No. 2057, Hofmann company is errone- ously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $34500 due to a defect of description and clerical error of assessee in his property statement since he over reported depreciable equipment. This should be corrected to show personal property with a valuation of $2560. 1 hereby consent to the corrections and changes in the above resolutions. JOHN A. NE JEDLY District Attorney BV6 0 R. 0. Seaton, AsslsEanE assessor Deputy �� � ss'FF,�� v::t by .s��C�'.�'tf. d.e."a.�'^„ �.- ��+ RESOLUTION NO. 67/879 Page 2 of 2