HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011967 - 67-766 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll. } RESOLUTION NO. 67,/766
of Contra. Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments.
For the Fiscal Year 196.7 - 11968—
It
196It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor' s Office what was Intended and what should,
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and
Taxation C od.e, Section 48310 the following defects in description
ion
and/or fora and clerlcal, error of the Assessor on the, roll should
be corrected.:
In Cade Area. 2008, Fcl. leo. 132-213-4051 Frank P. and Bonnie
A. Lane are erroneously assessed with land value of $700 and. improve-
ments
prove-men.ts of $2824 as, due to oversights the 1967 values were not entered
on the Total. Property Record, and, subsequen.tly, were ,not posted to
the assessment roll.. This assessment ;should be corrected to read :
Land. $1140, Improvements $3100. Assessee has wai.vved equalization
hearing.
In Code Area. 9000, :Rol.. leo. 184-070-022, assessed to Ra-Ford
Investment Compa.ny, is erroneously described due to clerical error
in interpretation of dead granting easoment only to Contra. Costa
County Flood Control. Description should be corrected; to read:
Newell Tract, For Lot: 1 and por RO San Ramon. 2.20 a.c. There is no
change in value .
SEATON
Assistant Assessor
67 /° 66
Copy to. Assessor (,Mrs. Kettle ) Wage'; 1 of
Auditor
Tax Collector
:'JRI'' R, in Code area 1000, Pel. No. 066-091-003, assessed
to Beppie and Lucille Marchetti., it has been. ascertained From audit
of the assessee °s books of account that due to error in his property
statement, personal property on the 1967-68 assessment roll Has been
assessed at a substantially higher valuation than would have been
entered if the information had been correctly furnished; and, in
accordance with Section. 831.5* the following correction should be
made: Personal Property should be changed from $7590 to $7540. Also,
it has been ascertained that due to defect in description of Personal
Property on the 1966-67 property statement, Personal Property was
assessed, at a lower valuation than would have been entered had the
cast been reported accurately. In accordance with. Section 531.1, an
escaped assessment of Personal Property In the amount of 520 for
the year 1966-67 should be entered, making a net increase of $470 in
Personal Property value on the 1967-66 assessment roll. Assessee has
waived equalization. hearing.
I hereby consent to the corrections
£x �y t y �3��; and. changes in th.e'. above resolution..
R. 3 J. .E:itY...S.O.t'C
Assistant Assessor JOHN A. WEJEDLY
District Attorney
By
Deputy
s.
tds�ptedi tecariii � a c r> _ ��" "
176
Page 2 of