The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011967 - 67-681 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA hxn the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 67/681 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests tsar correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the .District Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments. For the Fiscal Year 196-7 - 196-B Tt has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the assessor' s office What was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa- tion Code 46312 the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; and pursuant to Section 40-33, the assessor requests the 'Board of Supervisors to order the auditor to cancel any uncolleeted. delinquent :penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee which has attached, heretofore or hereafter because of such error and be- camse of assessor' s inability to complete valid proced-ares initiated prior to the delinquency date Code 82034 - Assessment No. 1995, boat CF 2379 AJ is assessed to Lewis W. Schmitt, assessed value $360* Boat and raotor were errone- ously rrone-ously assessed as newly purchased whenactually purchased in 1959. Assessment No. 82034-1995 should be corrected to show a valuation of. x:170- Tq. 6776aton .Assist-ant Assessor co. Assessor (G, Giese) Auditor Tax Collector S, . RESOLUTION No. 67/681 page 1 of lb has been ascertained from the assessment roll and om records in the Assessor' s office that taxes have been levied or charged erroneously or illegally for t.e reasons as stated below; and., therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and. Taxation Code, Section 14.986 (1) (a) , the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs here- tofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancel,l.ed in vihol.e or in part on the following assessments-. Code 1444 -» Assessment No. 496, boat CF 3587 AG is assessed to Donald L. Andrews, assessed value 1224. This assessment was levied more then once, being a duplicate witl. Assessment No. 1444-2321.* Code 82434 - Assessment No. 188al , boat CF 0716 BC is assessed. to Edward S. :hard, assessed value $1410. this assessment was levied T ore than once, being a duplicate with Assessment No. ' 82034-1455. And, FMTHITM, under Section 4986 (1.) (b) 9 the following assessments should be cancelled: Code 1000 -- €s,,ssessMent Y,0. 51L, boat aF 6456 CS is assessed to Ronald Lewis, assessed value $6.54. This assessment was erroneously levied since the boat was sold prior to lien data and the situs has been determined to be sun Mateo County. They have been notified to assess for 1967-68. Code 2002 - Assessment No. 349, boat CF 4053 AH is assessed, to H. D. Plumb, assessed. value $25-0. This assessment was erroneously levied since the a- tus of the boat has been determined. to be San Luis Obispo County, where it has been assessed, for !967-68. Code 2442 - Assessment No. 367, boat CF 9580 AG is assessed to Jim Sumpter, assessed value *124. This assessmentwas erroneously levied since the boat was sold prior to Lien date. An assessment is bring added under Assessment No. '191.75-2 on the 1067-68 roll. Code 2002 w Assessment NO. 406, beat OF 772)- CM is assessed to Robert Cogburn, assessed, value X94. This assessment was rrron.em ou.sly Levied since the a.ssessee was not the owner on the lien date. Code 3444 r Assessment No. 39, boat CF 6006 CAT is assessed to D. J, Boothe, assessed value 74• "his assessment was erroneously levied since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Rl Dorado County, where it has been assessed for 1967 -68. Cade 8001 w Assessment No. 334, boat CF 10214, CK is assessed to A. Bo err, assessed value $320. This assessment was erroneously levied since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Lake County, -a-here it has been assessed for 1.967-68. R. 4. Seaton Assistant Assessor RESOLUTION NO. 67/681 Page 2 of Code 8001 _ Assessment No. 1198, boat 264-624 is assessed to Ed Godwin., assessed value $1200. This assessment was erroneously levied since the situs of the boat has been determined to be .Alameda County, where it has been assessed for 1967-68. Code 12012 - Assessment No. 74, boat CP 5272 AK is assessed to C. W. Dunstans assessed value M0. This assessment was errone- ously levied since the situs of the 'beat has been determined to be Napa County, where it has been assessed for 1967-68, Cade 53002 - Assessment No. 391, boat CF 7748 AK is assessed to Mario Moni,ngar, assessed value j120. This assessment was erroneously levied since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Zan Joaquin Countys where it has been. assessed :dor 1967-66, Code 53€09 - Assessment No. 536, moat OF 3045 AG is assessed to Maynard lrick, assessed value $550. This assessment was erroneously levied since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Solano County, where It has been assessed for 1967-68. Code 53009 - Assessment No. 5Q. boat OF 6887 AH is assessed to John H. Kannengeiser, assessed value $ 0. This assessment was erroneously levied since the 'coat was destroyed priorto Lien, date. Code 53009 - Assessment No, 559, boat CF 6163 CT is assessed to Merle P. Fol.adian, assessed value TWO. This assessment was errone- ously levied since the boat was sold prior to lien date and the situs has been determined to be Marin. County, where it has been, assessed :dor 1967-68- Code .967 .68.Code 73€ 05 - Assessment No. 229, boat OF 241k BM is assessed to Gene , Millard, assessed value 00. This assessment was errone- ously rrone_ously levied since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Alameda. County, where it has been assessed for 1967-68, Cade 79002 - Assessment No. 85, boat 257. 793 is assessed to James L, ockritz, assessed value 1650. This assessment was errone- ously levied since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Alameda, County, where i Code 790159 Assessrrient No, 287, boat OF 4311 K-W is assessed to Russell Sloni er, assessed value _,`S,70. This assessment was errone- ously levied since the assessee was not the owner on the lien date. 34, ,.�'L _k, s 0 Code 820 1 - Assessment No. 1537,, boat '10P 6525 """' 48 a-goo a d to Robert P, Drurmraond, assessed value w15 4. This assessment was erroneously- levied. since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Alamoda Gounty, where it has been assessed for 1967-68, Code 8201h - Assessirent No. 16"11,, boat C7 3097 AJ is assessed to Jacaue -1`1. LaMlarche, assessed value j% .0'-`. Th-is assessment was errone- ously levied since the boat was sold prior to lien date and the situs has been deterr..iined to be Alameda County, where it has been- as3-essed -1 0� for 19' 7-68. Code 820301 - _kssessment No. 1.851, boat CF 8526 OB is assessed to Wra* V* Wayblep Jr., assessed value $460. This assessment was errone- ousl-r levied since the boat was sold prior to lien date a:-ed the situs has been determined to be PkIrxieda %Caunt-y, where it has bee-n assessed for 10/6?-68. Code 82038 - Assessment No. 1, boat CIF 0361 C(DI is assessed to Charlot"Cle R. Levine, assessed value ,,1100. "'hio, assessment was erroneously levied- z_inze the boat was sold prior to -lien date, An assessment is being added under Assessment ii-o. 82038-138 on. the 1967-68 roil. code 85004 - Assessment No. 36, boat CP 1151 CE is assessed to Glen, 11', Claypool, Jr. , assessed value $11.0. `_'h is assessment was erroneously levied since the 'boat was sold prior to lien date. An assess--raent is be-In- added under Assessment 1;o. 8001-1_09 to the 19167-68 roll. C'ode 85001-1, Assessment No, 12-7, boat F 3654 AG is assessed to to Glen 'Claypool, assessed value t100. Ibis assessment was erroneously levied since the boat was sold Prior to lien date. An assessment is being, added under Assessment No. 8001-1510 on the 196-1-6-b roll, Code 85064. Assess C nent No. 21, boat 11886 AJ Is assessed - to I obert L. Usinger and Russell Usinger, assessed value $170. This assessment was erroneously levied since the boat was sold Drior to 1-.en date and the situs has been deternlned to be Marin County. They have been notified. to assess for 1967-68* 1 hereby car-sent to the corrections and chanres in the above resolutions. jOHN A. NEWMMY District At LL-;ILIK -z_j R-.—rj. Seaton Deputy Assistant Assessor RESOLUTION NO. 67/681 'Page of ZL, . o a. J rte- s 'i.�+.ie ,{Z'a�C�.b?:t, 1�.a,C»� � �day o REQLUTION NO. 67/681 page 4 of