HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 01011967 - 67-657 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes
of the Assessment Roll RESOLUTION No. 67/657
of Contra Costa County
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
tor correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 1967 - 190i
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessorts office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and4 therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation
Code 48-31, the following defects in description and/or form and
clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected;
and, pursuant to Section 033, the assessor requests the Board of
Supervisors to order the auditor to canoel any uncollected delin-
quent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption
fee which has attached heretofore or hereafter because of such error
and because of assessor ts inability to complete valid procedures
initiated prior to the delinquency date:
Code 9000 - Assessment No. 2925, Duane Wiebe is erroneously
ansessed for personal property with a valuation of 11350 ; due to
a double assessment on a portion of personal property, -this should,
be corrected to show personal property with, a valuation of 91130.
R. 0. Seaton
Assistant Assessor
cc: Assessor (G. Giese )
Auditor
Tax Collector RESOLUTION Q. 67/657 Page 1 of
Code 1.2488 Assessment No. 2005, Vaughn Kan.elli.s is er-
roneously assessed .for personal, property with a. valuation of ',M80,
due to error in computation, and should be corrected to read
personal property $1763.
Code 62437 - Assessment No. ?-047, Silven. J. Ronchatto is
erroneously assessed for personal property with, a valuation of $3454,
due to an error in description, and should be corrected to show
personal property with a valuation of $1.284.
Code 790331 -- Assessment No. 2008, -Curtis 0. Perry is er-
roneously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $1020,
due to an error in extension, and should be corrected to show per-
sonal property with a valuation of $164.
Code 79086 - Assessment No. 2001s t. Anthony Claret
Seminary is erroneously assessed for personal property with a valua-
tion of ',§335'0. Amended findings from the Mate Board of Equaliza-
tion show that all personal property should be exempted= therefore,
the roll should be corrected to show zero value.
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records In the Assessor' s office that tees have been 'levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as 'stated below;
and, therefore., pursuant to the revenue and Taxation Code, Section
4986 (1) (b) , the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled, in
whole or in part on the following assessments:
Code 1000 - Assessment No. 2478, Arthur and Laura Grant
are assessedfor possessory interest in. lard and improvements with
a. valuation of $180. Tenant terminated residency within six months
of the lien date. on month-to-month rental, possessory interest
is considered to be of no value if occupancy te.rmi..nates less than
six months after the lien date, or prior to August 3!1, 1967. Ter-
mination of occupancy after assessment has been made and within
six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion of no value.
Therefore, in accordance with assessors s policy, this assessment
should be cancelled.
Code 1444 w Assessment No. 2529, 'Willard Russell, fanner
is assessed farpossessory Interest in land and improvements with
a valuation of >. 50. Tenant terminated residency within. six.
months of the lien date. On month-to-month rental., possessory
interest; is considered to be of no value if occupancy terminates
leas them six months after the lien date, or prior to August 31.,
1967. Termination of occupancy after assessment has been made
and within six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion of
no value. therefore, in accordance with, assessor' s policy, this
assessment should be cancelled.
B. 0. Seaton
Assistant Assessor W65 7
Page 2 of
Code ? 00?6 - Assessment No, 211.1, Rat.'ph Day is erroneously
assessed with parsonal property with a valuation of $150 as the
personal property did not exist or, the lien date.
I hereby consent to the
correotims and changes in
the above resolutims
J011"N' A. MKz 'DLY
District Attorney
a Tea cin Deputy
Assistant Assessor
w day O w......
RESOLUTION hm. 67/657
Page Of "�