HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02262008 - D.1 a
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ------ `O Contra
FROM: FEDERAL D. GLOVER, CHAIR ` - Costa
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
°sr, - County
DATE: Febru coax
SUBJECT: MOTION TO RECONSIDER POTENTIAL LOCATIONS TO SITE A
STATE RE-ENTRY FACILITY
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. RECONSIDER February 12, 2008 action to advance for state consideration the following five parcels
identified by staff as potential sites to host a state re-entry facility:
♦ Marsh Creek Detention Facility, Clayton, APN 078-120-011
♦ Waterfront Road, Martinez, APN 159-310-030
♦ Waterfront Road, Martinez, APN 159-310-031
♦ Cummings Skyway at Highway 80, APN 355-010-XXX(Formerly 335-010-004)
♦ Deer Valley Road, Brentwood, APN 057-050-012
2. RECONSIDER February 12, 2008 direction to the County Administrator to return to the Board with
information on Superfund sites as possible re-entry facility sites.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: ❑ YES SIGNATURE:
❑ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ❑ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
❑APPROVE tOTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD WN
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER [
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS: I' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
�( CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
`UNANIMOUS(ABSENT. ,NL I ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
AYES: NOES:
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED: FEBRUARY 26,2008
Contact: JULIE ENEA(925)335-1077 JOHN CULLEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
cc: SHERIFF-CORONER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
B �{
Y: Deputy
a
Motion to Reconsider Potential Re-entry Facility Sites in Contra Costa County February 19,2008
County Administrator's Office Page 2
Background
The Administrative and Procedural Rules of the Board of Supervisors provide that a ficial vote on any
matter before the Board of Supervisors may be reconsidered under the following circumstances;
the reconsideration occurs not later than the adjournment of the next regular meeting;
♦ the Board member moving the reconsideration originally votes"yes"on the matter to be
reconsidered.
Following the Board's February 12 action identifying potential sites for a state-operated community re-entry
facility, I was contacted by citizens and fellow elected officials concerned about the potential impacts that a
state re-entry facility would have on our communities. Due to the accelerated state application process for
local jail construction funds,people were generally not aware that the Board was considering this matter,
even in a preliminary way. Due to the absence of public testimony on the matter,the Board was unaware of
the strong sentiment of opposition to the placement of a re-entry facility in this County. For this reason,I
ask the Board to reconsider its February 12 actions in light of the public concern that has been expressed.
ADDENDUM TO D.1
FEBRUARY 26, 2008
On this day, the Board of Supervisors reconsidered February 12, 2008 Board action to
advance for state consideration the five parcels identified by staff as potential sites to host
a state re-entry facility, and direction to the County Administrator to return to the Board
with information on superfund sites as possible re-entry facility sites.
Chair Glover stated he requested as the Chair to bring this matter back to the Board,
remarking this issue had come before the Board two weeks ago. He indicated not only
does he have major concerns with the Antioch site but all sites within the County. He
clarified he was not against re-entry facilities because of the need for people to be
provided services as they reenter a community, but he strongly emphasized that the sites
identified by staff are not traditional re-entry facilities, and explained these facilities
would bed up to 500 offenders. He went on to say the Board considered in their last
Deliberation that if a site was found, we would have the ability to apply for funds that
would allow the County to build onto the facilities that exist today within the County
system, and he noted there would still be a need for the County to do this at some time
within the future.
Supervisor Piepho noted for the record she opposed the Antioch site on February 12,
2008 and reiterated that when the issue of locating a re-entry facility first came before the
Board she expressed concern about its closeness to highly populated communities. She
said the Board recognizes the need for jail beds but she is not convinced that trading state
money for the beds would be worth accepting community impacts that might come with a
re-entry facility. She announced copies of the addenda that define the conversations the
Board had with the Sheriff and the Sheriff s Department employees could be obtained
with the Clerk of the Board's office.
Supervisor Gioia said in all the previous discussions, all Board members asked important
and thoughtful questions and expressed concerns about how this would move forward.
He recalled on February 12, 2008, Board members decided to consider potential sites for
a community re-entry facility and keep options open. Supervisor Gioia said he would
rather see money used for violence prevention programs as opposed to increasing the
number of beds. He went on to say at some point there needs to be discussion about a
local state partnership on the re-entry system. He said the Board needs to figure out in the
future how to address re-entry..
Supervisor Bonilla said she agrees with the Board and questioned whether the Sheriff had
any opinion that he could share as the expert on the County's current jail system, and
pointed out the Board relies on the Sheriff for strategic planning of the County jail. She
stated the time frame given by the state is not enough time to approach the'community for
feedback. She requested a referral to the new Public Safety Committee to discuss
overcrowding of the Countyjail, and in the prevention of crime.
1
3
John Cullen, County Administrator, said the Sheriff told the Board two weeks ago that at
this point, it is a matter of policy and a financial decision for the Board.
Chair Glover said in his role on the Justice Committee of the California State Association
of Counties (C SAC) Executive Committee he presents today's action of the,,Board, which
will hopefully give an opportunity to have a positive dialogue on how this can be done to
minimize impacts on the communities.
Supervisor Uilkema said the County needs to explore other options that are available to
carry out a long-term goal. She said according to the Sheriff, this problem will not go
away, and said she hopes there will remain an interest in the subject. ti
Chair Glover called for public comment and the following spoke:
■ Walter Ruehlig, Chair, Antioch Unified School District, said he is opposed to this
project, as 4673 students would be affected by the prison facility proposal.
Supervisor Gioia noted currently offenders serve their time in state prison and are paroled
back to the County they came from. He pointed out the state is trying to move to these
models to have offenders transferred in their last nine months to these re-entry facilities
in the County. He asked attendees of the Board meeting for suggestions about these re-
entry facilities and how re-entry facilities that are community based could.be designed to
improve the chance of success.
■ Devi Lanphere, Antioch Chamber of Commerce, agreed with Supervisor Gioia's
suggestion to get the stakeholders involved and find out what works,in their
community. She told the Board the Antioch Chamber of Commerce opposes
considering the Deer Valley site for a 500-bed re-entry facility and said the site
does not meet the criteria for many reasons.
■ Michael Hall, Antioch resident, said the issue should have been what is good for
the County. He said backpedaling on political issues to clean up the mess made
two weeks ago is unacceptable.
■ Gary Gilbert, United Citizens for Better Neighborhoods, noted the'Board of
Supervisors has continued to view Antioch as its dumping ground. He told the
Board inmates do walk away from these facilities, and then communities and
schools go on lock down.
■ Gary Agopian, Antioch Unified School District, (Trustee), said the Antioch
Unified School District Board approved a letter to the Board stressing their
concern about the proposal to consider the use of a site across the site from the
new High School and a mile away from Deer Valley High School and Diablo
Vista Elementary School. He informed the Board he was upset at the lack of
communication between the School District and the County.
2
■ Jim Conley, Antioch resident, told the Board he e-mailed a letter opposing the
Antioch site. He said the Board has failed the citizens of Antioch and the County
by not stepping on the land before a vote went in. He said he finds-it hard to
believe in a 5/0 vote one-way at one meeting and a 5/0 vote the opposite way tow
weeks later, and emphasized a vote is a vote.
Supervisor Gioia clarified the Board had voted to keep options open to get
information even though it was viewed that some options did not make sense. He
said there should have been a larger debate with stakeholders but the time frame the
state presented was not enough. He elaborated the Board needed to look at sites to
show due diligence to the state and explained that even if sites would be removed, the
state would ask the County if available sites had been looked at under the County
standard.
■ Brian Kalinowski, Antioch City Council, asked the Board to place the City of
Antioch's resolution into the record for this item. . He asked the Board to direct
the County Administrator to bring back options for consideration for citizens in
this County to know that the Board takes the concept of day facilities or
transitional facilities important and said this would be alibenefit to the County..He
said the Antioch City would be happy to be a partner with the Board, adding that
Antioch is an unacceptable site.
■ Allen Payton, Antioch resident, told the Board he appreciates the e'omments made
by the Board but it is not their comments but the vote that counts. He asked the
Board to consider some sites if they need to stay at the table with the state but to
remove Antioch or any sites close to schools, churches,,or neighborhoods, and
business and employment areas.
■ Janet Kennedy, Martinez City Council, recalled the City of Martinez had sent a
letter to the Board expressing their concerns about the two Waterbird Way sites.
She informed the Board she appreciates their willingness to look at this further
and emphasized the proposed site is located outside the°'Urban Limit line.
■ Greg Manning, Mayor, City of Clayton, informed the Board he wrote a letter to
the Board objecting to all the sites chosen for are-entry facility. He pointed out
one needs to think not only of the citizens but those who would be incarcerated
and returning. He said the City of Clayton Counsel agree with the"
recommendation by the Chair.
■ Ralph A. Hernandez, Chair, Citizens for Democracy, told the Board he
understood that to consider something proposed is not necessarily.to allow it. He
said there are purposeful,political misrepresentations by certain groups who want
to use this to discredit Chair Glover in particular. He said Supervisor Gioia made
this very clear in the addendum for.the Board Minutes that the decision made is to
keep all choices open and on the table, and the Board did not say the County
would like to build new beds.
3
Chair Glover said he has been clear since the first vote there would never be a prison
built in Antioch and remains opposed to this. He stressed the Board did do "due
diligence"by asking people to call, write and to support the action before the Board
today.
By unanimous vote, with all Supervisors present, the Board took the following action:
AMENDED Recommendations to read:
1. RECONSIDERED February 12, 2008 action to advance for state consideration
the following five parcels identified by staff as potential sites to host a state re-
entry facility:
■ Marsh Creek Detention Facility, Clayton
■ Waterfront Road, Martinez
■ Waterfront Road, Martinez
■ Cummings Skyway at Highway 80
■ Deer Valley Road, Brentwood
2. RECONSIDERED February 12, 2008 direction to the County Administrator to
return to the Board with information on Superfund sites as possible re-entry sites,
and
3. REFERRED to the new Public Safety Committee to discuss overcrowding of the
County jail and the prevention of crime.
1
4
ET' I25I'8 08 18: 82 9256724917 CIT',' OF CLAVI H BGE 02/02
41TY . 1-�OLA' 702
7 FAlrnd'ed 1R�7. Irt'er(Oriifn'}?9�i+'T .F'�+ � t,xe.nN+E.\Itvxrv.;,l.f±sto
•, ,r'�'',� o f'uc K.T'r.rcn.[d'. .L1:•I�xr
1 `.3<517-125p 4if,'eX�TRntlttAti
(j{)(�(� }-�rRT"T1t3: t7L11L ` �.L,1\'Tt�\.t:hi..CiYtiRtvi.• .
1%m,.�y.R.VCA I.Ci'r'
T}'.t.t.d'HU�1:(`) 5)tt`�3-7:�t1tl 1".�x(925)£y?2-/gt;
22
February 2008
�koq,IR�� ER WITH
l onarable Faler&; G:ove,
315 E, Leland Rel.,
Pittsburg, CA,94565
Clear Supervisor("lover
The Clayton City Council and the City of.Cl )Ion have grave concerns about the County-s tentativc {rant
plot with the C:aiikirnia Department of Corrections to 4ite a 500 bed "Re.F:ntry Facility' in Chntra Costa
County. We strecifically dei not want-this proposal used as a miserable justification for expansion of the
County.Tail FaTrn om Marsh Creek Roae. .
I first leaned of these State plans tstr February 7`t whiie atlending the Contra Costa Mayors' Conference.
One of tn,y fellow mayors, with close ties to:the Centra Costa Sheriff's Department,-told me of a'
presentation lie hid'rmently attended outlining the various sites. When I asked if the Marsh Creek
Facility was ort the list of proposed sites, he said it was but the_Sheriff's Department preferred the
Ricbrrtand site.
I was therefore shocked to read in the February 13"' issue, of the Contra Cvsru Time.a the; County
Administrator preferred the Ciaylonuarsh Creek site. County residents:,in the Morgan 7'ctzttor y area acid
Clayton reside-nis are already continually impacted by unplanned prisuny departure. Cla34on is the first.
slop felt Marsh Creek-F'acilit}'es tpces who seek funds and transportation. The intro6ctior of 5 times
the number of current 'snmaics al this Facility, of unknown crimin$i ',background, does not present a
positive regional situation fmin Cla,00n's perspective.
The propnsal raises a great many snore question,'that'► it aaswers. The Statc tacver looks to lower Coun;N.
or City costs at its own expense. If the Counts•were to accept this-gift horse'", it would soon be'feeding'
and eating not only for the horse but its jockey and his emcndcd family. Would we trust the Mate to
honor its ward it future nears that such a facility will remain a 4-year transitional.inmate program?
At a time Whczi the County is no, longer hiring`and social programs are being cut, the State "Re-Frtry
Facility"'. sclicme is an Al tithed, rasped proposal without any appropriate or public studies. it lacks the
basic vitl information nccded by the Board to reach a well considered and reasoned conclusion_ Faced
with a lack of Vital pertinent informatitm and gi+erl the very nature of the concept, the Clayton City,
Council unanimously guests the Berard of Supervisors of Contra Ccx,ta County soundly Tejeci this
proposal.
Thank you for Nrour continued interest iri the welfare of our Cita and surrounding communi4es.
Sincere!
' , Cgrnring
Mayor
f
9256724917
0212512008 10: 021 9256724917 CIT'r OF CLAYTON F`Al.:,E 01x'02
`r orf T
IT y 'LAT"'
,
_..j �.. �'CNrr[`Pr/Tt,:.j�i� yjflCytf70y.it![i�i�,G�,,' --•- ~ `'�..
FAX COVER SHEET
6000 heritage Trail • Clayton, CA .94517-1250
(925).673-7300 - Fax No. {9' 5) 672-4917
DATE: q 2.610 b
TO: ��' .'N
FAX NO. PHONE NO.
FROM:-1� �-C_� Y"? -
F,,kX NO. P1-ONTE NO. U-1 Q�_ .
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER. SHEET;:
RE; op
c'- c � 1 .-=
t �t
Community Development
lie ar'tmenr 92 i G7 -71340
h � C;Ft' CUIN7_l'i
wiliiam Walcutt, Tmayor
Engineering Department (925) 61-2,9700 CirCgorY J.Mannin,. Vice t[nyor
Julie K. Pierce
David T. Sheet+
Hank Stratford
RESOLUTION NO. 2008/18
'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
OPPOSING THE SITING OF A NEW PRISON FACILITY
IN THE CITY OF ANTIOCH
WHEREAS,the City Council recently learned, by reading the newspaper, of
Contra Costa County's intention to consider siting a prison facility in our community;
and
WHEREAS, neither elected officials nor city staff were contacted by Contra
Costa County representatives, or.by our District Supervisor; and
WHEREAS;the facility is located within a mile of the largest high school in the
eastern Contra Costa area(with a student population of 3,300),,within a mile of a brand
new Kaiser Permanente Hospital facility, across the street from the propsed Dozier-
0Libbey Medical School (with an anticipated population of 750 students), and in the heart
of a new residential area to be developed in the community; and'
WHEREAS, the proposed location is located in a detention basin; and
WHEREAS, the County's own Flood Control District was unaware of the
proposal;and
WHEREAS, the item was placed on the agenda, considered and app roved by the
Board, with no attempt at gaining City input; and
WHEREAS, this facility has the potential to create negative impacts on the
quality of life for residents of Antioch, Brentwood, and all of Contra Costa County; and
WHEREAS, not a single citizen has expressed support for the:concept; and
WHEREAS, there are other sites within Contra Costa County more suitable for
the location of such a facility:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Antioch City Council, we
unanimously oppose in the strongest terms the proposed Antioch location for a State
prison facility,and that the Council calls on Supervisor Federal Glover to now take the
actions necessary, which should have been previously undertaken,to oppose this facility.
RESOLUTION NO. 2008/18
Page 2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was_passed and.adopted by
the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day
of February 2008, by the'following voter
AYES: Council Members Kalinowski, Davis, Moore, Simonsen and Mayor
Freitas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
L. JOL MARTIN, iTY.CLER.K
, . 1O
♦Ir Inuu �
-_ .•IIi A •fir :��„ , nnn /
1111111■ •,.,.•,.'�
:C-- -Ilrlllllt
•.. .tl ISI
■n■gg11111►/�>• ,Un1►` iinni� ?p� rrlluuun/•I
off
i.N••,• ,,,�•moi i :�' �.�����anN= _-In =.r/�
:Ivt• ••uulu►►♦ppb. % � ..��uulnn e 5 Pn� Ii1 .
''gip► •�•11 j �I �:. �'i1�J1uUn� _.1►. 11:,i •nllltllllllllllpl
♦\••►•►,a•••�/•�����•�► -=o::°'a ==b'e:/ - �••/a1_� i ■1111111111111///bq` 1
.���P••�•i��i��j�1 .•f'Si uununllu/� �--Ia. • li ♦ /'�/��
► � Illntlt - ■ , /i �1-111-1 •=
i O�Oo►.ii�•G� _oiC nunnl?,:�muu: _ '_ C:1��r /�ii�i ��i v wllllo::uq
/i/�i••ti►iG i.y p�:umill■■: num: -�.••.�•���%
� IIIIIIIII►I . •��' ■It1 ,•.♦ • � -. IIIIt111111111/11►� 1
,••/ //I/llgll„ -niiiliiii.u, %un1111: :►�� �'���' muunmw u.
� Illtll■O/ pQ\:�_ /llllullnlm: i•� �tdn ... -w -- -. • ', ,
�Iq ///a al\\•1I_�=Ilnnnl� •cnunluu= •. • �. • ••
y���111�ulnlr►/•„ /�dl� ..-_lunnn_ �cnnnnul= • .• Qf1111111/■► G �:i���-. •
iHIM llllh\�/fllll!U► �iulllllllllOn\ ►►►��� 1��••�'Imo►
�i�/114uuun- 'r ♦ PRnuun►i �nunnn, r [II""-1 i�1\II��.. 1
/nnnm i
.+II �•�,•��9O■1�:::::::j:1 ■ �� 11111 ;`,.•::•'1/IOIU� 1
/unlun`• . �fQ►. c C,\tO- �' fy,{` ,■Ilq �t•�,, O••■x1111■ .
►••11111111► ��: •. ♦I. Irnnr►,►•: p�)' • ,., .•
•rnun,•e;;\., `��♦•p`i::C iii i•>_•an�l,.. li�l �Ir ••„,0•••,pwu : -
♦���,uqud\�=_�;♦iC: :%u1=G�iu� .��` p41►� . a\\pl\a`���N\`I\.•`;op.'1
,♦•-_..n. -__�\,d■: :uunu uunlu ,t• y :�u= '♦. 1�\IIIII�IPPP�p• n,l
,���_.1-11= =u il�=1. '_ i1 `•,i�1►�1\;{\\a.4;#, F
�1���_C._=wA-i / _ ►•�.`���:: '�' �/I►I�p,: /+ pltJ"`.AN i�``I,�n
�.� =�� -ct\► =511►.•O�`.h:�C�I�. .+I,`I,Ip,-a,� -_—_
.a -p-I��- �IIIQ►�� .:�Vie::: �\\,P ,P• ___=C-
�- % 1111= =Ilp,♦ �0.: hn�p1-�f� .'1 ",.\` •IIIIIIIIII��w___�_C
1191'BInb/a.�/1111111111�'�1 -1111111111D`�1111111111111111111���alliii' e
p uunnmunnnummJ. vnnnul°°°q/11
n7. 1'b, �.nuuuuu, �oliuunnup I , 1nw• +�
�♦ ••I ••anuui.- -4uunnnn4 Ilull ��■tn� � '.
7,I'�•`/►O��•��♦�`p0`� �/pllnmuull► hlu4 ♦•i•au-- .; �`,�X�tr� '' �
♦ ♦��!�. � 1\\ �,/IIIIIIIIpIr,Illllhl .•`�•.■11:� w-ygra�,ts a
♦ . ► � is
1►1 �•••��\1f••►i�1�A{IJ••✓ :�_?C lap qip l :�.��.�►i�Iuun� .�yxr�.v,T'�'s
A•= ♦ O• . •„ A/ :C. ., �•.�psi uum� a
♦. �� •"p♦•„ •,• IP,q ��� / •• ♦•I■111111- q' ��.'
� ���.,/��•NP, •pl,llll� I�j�►�l P Mod- W� '. 91♦�II■/IIa1a: �' a ,,
pt ,. �•Iit._111 IAI •UC ��i�1■•nl: •���
51
� ••,►►• .�i�_ _pulp , �dll{: �. ��'��� � ,,,”'
• •�- - _.11111 • • �-A- ��
,i IQ�Vd� `.rnn :tulu■��gut►�� ••/lu. ar; I,�III ,�
•�nunuo „�
C numm npll r, S uu,u► {eta• ♦�.I�■ � �
:�/111111110 Ittlllllllllll/e� �'1►��• �,
��►�nnnum nnnururn: � ►�.I1ti. �paaav�, II. - r 1
�{lugpnutr�pnnnuuJ�- � '-
• .. tumQ==mim�/. �► �■,•d1ll � :ajiiii� ���1` ,— '�
�,:••y'I�nu111�SIPun��►� l�♦.����`\\••►� .�il�.•�1��- ■.■■n� 1��
/111111`�1 � `\ ,♦ ♦,.�.�,.� i.■::�.11�
`•ate P O I /I CCC:� _•1111 • r
► �►111% b. ��v�/� e�0 Ip ♦.�.�O � ::: -s
■1■ 11 1111'• � ��� �•`�� ®'-- �� �• ��7
11 `1 .' y7 � • / � �• ■■ -�
ID-'�IIP`I`J`� �i`_10•�1/� IU�.••�•�/�•.�i i a
•�%; S �� �,/I��;� �I •' ♦ Q.w•X11:• �
�i IPI � .� ��i�♦` � ••tt��: ��.-. ■P C
,,• 'p• �I ♦ .�`\neat •t►� O.�O�♦•�i..�►��p
�• �J`�i�y I . � ♦�•���1•.• ISI.�-��r111
,,;i.� �IU .� 11111 ♦•♦ � • ••./
��:il►�O'`I• �%' �: •/1j1j�� •i��ii��,���••,►�\111111nu1w� • ;%
♦.
MA•►:nmu►•.I ,.®•/i.l� iii .♦• ♦• ♦�O �.♦•{Ulan-wu-
:n111111 �..►� �•1► •i.OIi1lf nnuulllu , a
�n11111111 lllnuunri�/�� �/I��nunnn■ ,�® 1� �C p�w■a/►�i��almm�v�.
•nu- nnprq ��. .I. /yII q!9�k�V ♦vc/.• ::��� Q��1►Q r��1I11:0�. •
a�m:uu1►' .•``y�y► /1JU�IinJ�•�p`�,'�♦Iq•s�i y:��•�i•AIn►�♦/i••i��A�. w
� ...�uv • •� Iii Ihy �P • e���i ♦ ��� � S .
•♦♦C / :O, • 1►I•I ^o•I♦ Ii,.♦ ♦ ♦ •i� If1ui//� �I:�:w
�♦♦•♦. ♦ q/ � •i II9I'Q: �`♦• ♦♦ .111!1�/ iii �I♦ i
► ♦♦ ♦ yi Jh• 111 111.�.� 111. ' ♦ i. �♦ �{111\��•IAS.
�:NII • i'�♦I♦.� Gflirifaf IA■
u Q:■IIt i ,\
���,•``, .•`,,I j�h911 llUu�nl`ip.� . ! •••• V ♦ •Q��r�ill\ 1
��O ��\ \♦/ 9ry� ;o�°•`.,. 1' _ ♦ IP t•' P,• ♦ p i OPS
/�/ C 111 � �\O �.�.�C 1. i��i�• !.�•(1111 � I��� t� t ��
I�1 U��:��r'' nnii ill//nr%���►C_ III , .♦ ♦{Iii!, X11�•-�1111 f
♦ it p. i;..11111 Ii��`, 'I�� 111.
ninp9�'�ii;:: �,�e__�►�•�I /j :.�,� •I .� �r :�1�Illii
MIA mm-go
/19,h► =i0�,••Ct1111111
►I I/►���.`�,Q♦�`,,,IIIIc f11\ , I�r.1�•.11
nunun►�G:• ,/�I.u1b�iunnnpbn► `��♦III��1♦111� `U Inu,11■1�•
nunni �anminn.� �' �, 111� ��1�'r/�iil il./♦♦ �► ,
/tl Iw =nnny?/*OI/'G/: t0 dam• �1���� ��G G
11 C =IIInU■ /� If';Ip' t,l 111 fp1�� ���♦ -
♦�111,/_-: =rola/ ��/ 1111 ,����� �►���
/ ' uq=. `I 1 Clul ♦�. ►I.•. •SII/
/I�Ip��''e r_uurup,�w=•u.� ��:1►111111 �•�.
�pV►,� ,. _m� �:7► ■- - � (011111/�.�-=�1.
Q. i��i� 9 y II �' G!' 4 •111 111111111111 . QII
• •I i•••i♦ � 1/II• Ilini�i= i' i ••� nlp„p111�:'� \I►t:
. �♦ i�. •� . ��{111111 11111111 =•�ii i�► ' ■-_•••�1 -•
i.®iii i..:i•i�I r1///A- '_■u �L,111■►: y• IOf11 :•1�//• /
i'I j �:�•.���i�'1� 1111■ —AWE Ir ♦\• 11 �I - 1 1�i
���♦ �.-t ������-__Inn!=IIn�S-1��`�\,•••�iiini? :����sq��:�� �►��
i{Ilnll-►P� Illi■_=nun 5 Ilh�=-�.`�``•,011: i����'�•••i�►i►�i��tt♦�is
i ��Q�.!5B1!1 11111 111 rl IIU�=ji/���p•�um OP •/.•• •i/I�i �••♦ i
�i�1111u� 111�_urJ�niiiur�%��►�i4♦..q�1 C:: .�.����0 �• •,�♦� ��
., 11111 =CI . C-_-_l1�i .��-: ♦ ��O 10 ♦�� •
hauu.j -lulu_ - i'��' ♦IID°nnulun• ►��♦♦♦ Q�♦♦ ��Y
., �. -1111 Illlluunur����! �/Ibunnnluun1u1t1 • �,ii'•,�♦
�S • �ol��i��' ((fin/���\�I�/��UI��.•i0 O -- �—/_�*
WAR, Contra Costa County
Flood Control
corvrRa. oGeCOUNTY
RECEIVEn—
&Water Conservation District
FEB 1 9 2008
OFFICE OF
n to rof i ce COUN �.
� 1NrpAroR
Memo
TO: John Cullen, County Administrator
DATE: February 14, 2008 e—
FROM: Maurice M. Shiu, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Flood Control District Sites Considered by the Board for the State
Reentry,Fad lities
FILE: Chron
MESSAGE:
At the February 12, 2008, Board of Supervisors Meeting, the Board recommended
five locations throughout the County for use as. a State Prison Reentry Facility.
This memo provides some additional background information on the three Flood
Control District-owned sites:
Site 1: Parcel 057-050-012, Drainage Area 104, Sand Creek Basin, Deer
Valley Road
This parcel is the northern half of the site commonly known as the Upper Sand
Creek Basin, a partially constructed stormwater detention facility that stores peak
stormwater flows from Sand Creek and upstream developed areas and slowly
releases it back into Sand Creek. This prevents flooding of downstream areas in
the Cities of Antioch and Brentwood. The basin site spans four contiguous Flood
Control District-owned parcels totaling 41 acres, and the Flood Control District is
intending to purchase six additional acres to the south to accommodate the
ultimate basin footprint.
The first phase of the basin was constructed in 1994, was expanded onto the
16-acre parcel in 2002, and has been periodically expanded ever since. Currently,
the expanded basin covers all 16 acres of the 16-acre northern parcel and 38 acres
of the entire 41-acre site. When complete in approximately 2011, the basin will
include a regional sports park in conjunction with the City of Antioch. A site plan
showing the basin and sports park is attached.
255 Glacier Drive Martinez,CA 94553-4825
TEL: (925)313-2000• FAX: (925)313-2333 17,
www.ccci)ubl icworks.orq
Contra Costa County
Flood Control E
OUfvTY
T
&Water Conservation District
8C18
FFICC-
TPATCR
interottice
Memo
TO: John Cullen; County Administrator
DATE: February 14, 2008
FROM: Maurice M. Shiu, Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Flood Control District Sites Considered by the Board for the State
Reentry Facilities
FILE: Chron
MESSAGE:
At the February 12, 2008, Board of Supervisors Meeting, the Board recommended
five locations throughout the County for use as a State Prison Reentry Facility.
This memo provides some additional background information on the three Flood
Control District-owned sites:
Site 1: Parcel 057-050=012, Drainage Area 104, Sand Creek Basin, Deer
Valley Road
This parcel is the northern half of the site commonly known as the Upper Sand
Creek Basin, a partially constructed stormwater detention 'facility that stores peak
stormwater flows from Sand Creek and upstream developed areas and slowly
releases it back into Sand Creek. This prevents flooding '''of downstream areas in
the Cities of Antioch and Brentwood. The basin site spans four contiguous Flood
Control District-owned parcels totaling 41 acres, and the 'Flood Control District is
intending to purchase six additional acres to the south to accommodate the
ultimate basin footprint.
The first phase of.the basin was constructed in 1994, was expanded onto the
16-acre parcel in 2002, and has been periodically expanded ever since. Currently,
the expanded basin.covers all 16 acres of the 16-acre northern parcel and 38 acres
of the entire 41-acre site. When complete in approximately 2011, the basin will
include a regional sports park in conjunction with the City of,Antioch. A site plan
showing the basin and sports park is attached.
255 Glacier Drive Martinez,CA 94553-4825
TEL: (925)313-2000• FAX: (925)313-2333 a_
www.cccp u b l i cworks.o rq
Sites 2 and 3: Waterfront parcels (APN 159-310-030 and 031)
These sites are the north and south end'of what is commonly called the Pacheco
Marsh, or Praxis Property. The 123-acre parcel consists of marshlands that served
as a dredge spoils disposal site in the early 1970s. It currently is characterized
mostly by wetland habitat: The. site was previously slated for development in the
early 1980s, but was deemed infeasible because of the extensive wetlands present
on the .site. The site ultimately was sold to a partnership, of the Flood Control
District; the Muir Heritage Land Trust, and the East Bay Regional Park District
(EBRPD) for the delinquent taxes owned on the property. This., partnership is
detailed in a Memorandum of. Understanding (MOU) that was approved by the
Board on July 23, 2002.
The primary. use of the property, as. stipulated in the MOU, is for wetlands
restoration and mitigation. Secondary uses include an educational and interpretive
program with the Muir Heritage Land Trust and a staging area for the EBRPD (this
property is located at the. confluence of the'Ironhorse Trail and Bay Trail). Any
other use of the property would need approval from the Muir Heritage Land Trust
and the EBRPD. A copy of the MOU is attached for reference.
A restoration plan has been completed for the parcel and is awaiting
implementation. Once these 'marshlands and wetlands have been restored, the
parcel is intended to be used as mitigation for the upcoming US Army Corps of
Engineers Lower Walnut Creek restoration project, which is located on the
adjacent parcel. A map of the restoration plan is attached.
If you should have'any further questions on the constraints or opportunities on
these parcels, please contact Paul Detjens at 313-2394 or pdeq@pw.cccounty.us.
MMS:PRD:cw
G:\FldCtl\Watershed Planning- Engineering\Zone 3B\Pacheco Marsh\State Reentry,Facilitites.doc
Enclosures
c: Julie Enea,County Administrator's Office
R. Mitch Avalon, Deputy Chief Engineer,flood Control
Karen Laws,Real Property
. 2
Dear Supervisor Uilkema:
I am writing to you regarding the proposal to use the Martinez shoreline parcel known as Pacheco Marsh
as a site for a new jail.
As you may know, in 2002 CCCFCD, Muir Heritage Land Trust(MHLT) and the East Bay Regional Park
District (EBRPD) cooperated to purchase that tax-defaulted property using funds from the Trust for Public
Lands. The shared goal was the restoration of wetlands and fish/wildlife habitat on the site. According to
an MOU executed by the three parties (attached for your information), the primary use of the property is to
be restoration to mitigate for impacts to wetlands and other habitat resulting from CCCFCD's planned
Walnut Creek Channel project, as required by the regulatory agencies, as well as other future CCCFCD
projects. Secondary compatible uses provided for in the MOU include interpretive signage (MHLT ) and
trail staging, public education area and a multi-use trail connecting the Iron Horse Trail on the Walnut
Creek Channel to the San Francisco Bay Trail at the Benicia Bridge. The MOU further calls for future
transfer of property ownership to another entity which will provide long-term maintenance and
conservation of the property.
The source of funding for the acquisition, along with the terms of the agreement and the intentions of the
respective parties, would seem to rule out this site as a viable candidate for construction of a jail. On
behalf of the Park District, I would like to request that the property be removed from consideration for this
purpose.
Sincerely,
Nancy H. Wenninger
Land Acquisition Manager
East Bay Regional Park District
2950 Peralta Oaks Court
P. O. Box 5381
Oakland, CA 94605-0381
(510) 544-2607
[attachment "Adm-C350l2873.pdf' deleted by Gayle B Uilkema/BOS/CCC]
. �t1
February 26, 2008 Board of Supervisors meeting
Consider with D.1 (Re-entry sites)
Julie Enea Td:-Jane Pennington/COB/CCC@CCC
02/2412008 02:04 PM cc:
Subject: Fw;proposed prison facility in Antioch
Jane,
Here is some public comment I received for Tuesday's meeting.
Julie
---- Forwarded by Julie Enea/CAO/CCC on 02/24/2008 02:04 PM---
"Sandra Pruett"
<midds3rd@gmail.com> To dsans@cao.cccounty.us,Idris@cao.cccounty.us,
02/22/2008 09:08 PM jenea@cao.cccounty.us,sgoet@cd.cccounty.us
cc
Subject .proposed prison facility in Antioch
Dear Board of Supervisors:
I can't believe you would even remotely consider putting this facility in between two high schools
and in our community. Perhaps because you don't live in Antioch, you don't care about the
people who live and raise their families here. We have the lion's share of section 8 housing. put
your prison facility in lafayette, moraga, richmond, concord or pittsburg. We are already dealing
with enough problems.
Sandra Pruett
Antioch, CA
"Linda Nakaji" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us
" <gerkna@sbcglobat.ne cc:
t> - Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/21/2008 05:49 PM
Please respond to
"Linda Nakaji"
This message was sent from:
http: //www.co.contra-cbsta.ca,.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_fo=.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
,Name of sender: Linda Nakaji
Address of sender: 2675 Presidio Drive
Phone of sender:
Email of sender: gerkna@sbcglobal.net
Agenda Date: 02/12/08
Agenda Iteml: d4
Agenda Item2 :
------------------------- COMMENTS -------------------------
Please do not allow the state to build a prison re-entry facility �In Antioch
or near Brentwood. We are already dealing with decreasing home values, an
unusually large amount of home forclosures, issues with section 8 housing,
increasing crime, etc. Please do not build something that will add to our
problems and decrease our home values further: Please, as our leaders, help
us .improve the quality of life in Antioch and Brentwood.
"Sue Henley" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us
<susanhenley@airclou cc:
d.net> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/25/2008 02:20 PM '
Please respond to"Sue
Hen!ey'
This message was sent from: -
http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
Name of sender: Sue Henley
Address of sender: 3107 Morgan Territory Road
Phone of sender: 925 '672-1155,
Email of sender: susanhenley@aircloud.net
Agenda Date: 02/26/08
Agenda Item1:
Agenda Item2 : D.1
--------------------------- COMMENTS ----------------
I want to oppose the proposed'prison at the •Marsh Creek''Jail. The proposed
site has no sewer hook-up for several miles from Clayton, the road is already
at peak capacity for existing traffic and the residents feel like our smaller
population offers the path of least resistance!
I share several hundred feet of fence with the Marsh Creek Jail, which •the ;
Morgan Territory and Marsh Creek residents, along with then Supervisor
Torlakson„ were able to get donated by the Naval Weapons Station to secure an
outer boundary. We worked with then Sheriff Rainey and^Warren Rupp, who was
in charge of the Marsh Creek Jail. We worked very hard to -get the number of
escapes down and an automated phone system which worked"well to inform
residents as escapes happened.
I have had my husband's truck stolen after an escapee hid out 'on my property.
I narrowly missed an encounter with a naked escapee that was captured hiding
in the creek underbrush.next to my home a year- or two ago.
Almost-everyday we listen to the shooting, -at the gun range at the Jail. The
sounds from pistols to assalt weapons pepper the air for miles around. We
understand the need for this range, and the importance to all the officers who
use it. We live with it and,look forward 'to the 10pm curfew! At the Marsh
Creek Jail things have been built and enlarged without proper public notice or
public input. A few days ago we saw the Heliport sign! When :did `that get
approved? _.
We are and have been doing our share of cooperation with the Facility, but we
will not live with a prison! .
Thank you,
Sue Henley
"Mark Spencer" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us
<mark.spencerl @com cc:
cast.net> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/25/2006 02:32 PM
Please respond to"Mark
Spencer"
This message was sent from:
http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm .
Name of sender: Mark Spencer
Address of sender: • 2496 Inez Way Antioch.
Phone of sender: 925-706-7473
Email of sender: mark.spencerl@comcast.net
Agenda Date: 02/26/20
Agenda Iteml:
Agenda Item2: D.1
-----------------------=- COMMENTS ---------------=-
Contra Costa County. is not the right place for a new prison. Please reconsider
the effects on the already depressed housing market by constructing a prison
in this County. No city area in the county would benefit from this planned
project.
"Roger&Donna To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us
Johnson" cc:
<Roger41044@aol.com Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/25/2008 04:31 PM
Please respond to
"Roger&Donna
Johnson" -
This message was sent from:
http://www.cc.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
Name of sender: Roger & Donna Johnson
Address of sender: 3101 Morgan .Territory Road
Phone of sender: 925-672-4987
Email of sender: Roger41044@aol.com
Agenda Date: 02/26/08
Agenda Item1:
Agenda Item2: D.1
------=------------------ COMMENTS -------------------------
We are opposed to a the prison facility being built off Marsh Creek Road and
near Morgan Territory Road. This is too close .to an established residential
area and would make an already congested and dangerous Marsh Creek Road used
for commute from Brentwood and East County even more congested and dangerous.
Cummins Skyway area near Rodeo is a better choice as it is not as near to
homes and businessess and better located for access from freeways and non
commute roadways.
------------------------------------------------------------
"Don &Jan Van To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us
r` Laeken" cc:
<jvanlaeken@hotmail.c Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
om>
02/25/2008 05:01 PM
Please respond to"Don
&Jan Van Laeken"
This message was sent from:
http: //www.cccounty.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_f orm.htm
Name of sender: Don & Jan Van Laeken
Address of sender: 2801 Morgan Territory Rd.
Phone of sender: (925) 673-1993
Email of sender: jvanlaeken@hotmail.com
Agenda Date: 02/26/08
Agenda Item1: D1
Agenda Item2 : _
------------------------- COMMENTS -------------------------
We want to go on record opposing the possibility of locating a state prison on
Marsh Creek Road. Currently we have the Marsh Creek Detention facility and
deal with bright lights, a noisy shooting range and additional traffic on the,
2 lane Marsh Creek road. To put a State Prison at the same sight would
significantly increase the lights and the traffic to and from the facility.
Marsh Creek is a winding two lane road with many accidents. (many of them
fatal)
It is already an alternative to the traffic on Hwy 4 and is extremely busy
during commute hours.
A more urban area with easier access would be a better location.
"CARMEN WILLIAMS" To: comments cob.cccounty.us
<BIGDON2@MSN.COM cc:
> Subject: [BULK] BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/25/2008 05:10 PM
Please respond to
"CARMEN WILLIAMS"
This message was sent. from:
http: //www.cc.contra-costa.ca'.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
Name of sender: CARMEN WILLIAMS
Address of sender: 2977 MORGAN TERRITORY
Phone of sender: (925) 672-0408
Email of sender: BIGDON2@MSN.COM
Agenda Date: 02/26/20
Agenda Iteml:
Agenda Item2: D.1
------------------------- COMMENTS -------------------------
I AM VERY MUCH OPPOSED TO A PRISON FACILITY IN THIS AREA. WE ALREADY HAVE A
DRUG ALCOHOL TREATMENT.FACILITY AND A DETENTION FACILITY IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
I THINK THAT IS ENOUGH.
"Thomas Lenz,M.D." To: comments@cob.cccounty.us
<tlenzmd@aol.com> cc:
Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/25/2008 05:12 PM
Please respond to
"Thomas Lenz,M.D."
This message was sent _from:
http: //www.cccouhty.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
Name of sender: Thomas Lenz, M.D.
Address of sender: 1108 Whispering Pines, Clayton.
Phone of sender: 925-672-0727
Email of sender: tlenzmd@aol.com
Agenda Date: 02/26/08
Agenda Iteml:
Agenda Item2: D.1
-------------------------COMMENTS -------------------------
Locating a small state prison reentry facility' at the Clayton location would
be devastating to an area that is already encroaching onto the Mount Diablo
State Park and Reserve. The congested traffic on Marsh Creek Road would only
worsen. The Clayton site would also have a negative impact on the development
of high end family homes with a substantial tax base. A much better location
would be on the Cummings Skyway where there would be easy access to 'Highway 80
and the ability to transport inmates to various job training programs.
------------------------------------------------------------
7
"Kelly McDougall" To: comments@ cob.cccounty.us
<homes@mcdougallte cc: _
am.com> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments,from Website
02/25/2008 05:15 PM
Please respond to "Kelly
McDougall"
This message was 'sent from:
http: //www.cc.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
Name of sender: Kelly McDougall
Address of sender: 3135 Morgan Territory Rd
Phone of sender: 925-787-0448
Email of sender: home s@mcdouga11 team.com '
Agenda Date: 2/26/08
Agenda Item1:
Agenda Item2: D.1
------------------------- COMMENTS -------------------------
I don' t believe that March Creek Rd. is a good location to place a 500-person
jail because:l) Roads can not handle the traffic, they are already maxed.2)
There is no public transit.3) There us no public sewer system and the prison
would need to have septic tanks .4) Personal Reason, I share a fence with the
current detention center and I have had escapees enter my property, I have
also had people drive onto my property that I feel are looking for pick up
spots for escapees.5) I have a 10 MONTH OLD CHILD.6) My property value will
go down and I am one of several properties in the immediate area that are
currently worth more than $1 Million Dollars and I know this to be true since
I am a licensed state of CA Realtor and this will hurt the property values in
the area as well as in Clayton.
I feel there are better options for a prison i.e. Cummings Skyway in Richmond
or the Industrial area- of Martinez where there are public facities, public
transit, jobs and major thoroughways for the immense amount of new traffic on
the roadways.
Kindly consider my family's plea so. that we do not need to move out of the
area I have called home since I was 10 years old in 1979.
Regards,
Kelly McDougall
"Robert& Sandy To: comments@cob.cccounty.us
r: McDougall" cc:
<mcdougaltm@aol.co Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
m>
02/25/2008 05:37 PM.
Please respond to
"Robert&Sandy
McDougall"
This message was sent from:
http: //www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm
Name of sender: Robert '& Sandy McDougall
Address of sender: 2705 Morgan Territory Rd
Phone of sender: 925-672-2499
Email- of sender: mcdougaltm@aol .com
Agenda Date: 2/26/08
Agenda Item1:
Agenda Item2: D.1
------------------------- COMMENTS -------------------------
We have lived in our home on Morgan Territory since 1979 . Over the years we
have dealt with escapees from the detention center, noise from the shooting
range and the traffic these have. put on our roads.
We oppose a future prison due to but not limited to the following reasons:
1) Roads are currently at there capacity for traffic and can not accommodate
the increased amount of traffic. a prison would bring.
2) There are no public facities such as sewer, public transit or even hotels.
3) As Licensed Realtors in the state of California I know it to be fact that
our property value will decrease if a prison is allowed. Our area is blessed
with many (most) million dollar properties. Our small ranches are one of the
last places in Contra Costa County where families can still have the country
dream just outside of town. Ourdaughter and her family (our 10 month old
grandchild) live just a few homes down. We want the quality o.f life for the
"new generation" .
We feel there are other more appropriate options for a prison such as Richmond
or Martinez for examples where there are public facilities such as public
transit, public sewer, larger more major roadways and facilities for visitors
such as hotels.
Please do not put the prison on Marsh Creek Road in Clayton. If the prison
does pass we and our family who have enjoyed living here for the past almost
30 years will have to move from the area.
Regards, Bob & Sandy McDougall
"Jane Buyny" To: comments@cob.cccounty.us
<jbuyny@gmail.com> cc:
Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/25/2008 05:45 PM
Please respond to"Jane
Buyny
This message was sent from:
http: //www.cccounty.us/depart/,cao/agendacomments_form.htm
Name of sender: Jane Buyny
Address of sender,: 3111 Morgan Territory Road
Phone of sender: 925. 672-0236.
Email. of sender: jbuyny@gmail.com
Agenda Date: 2/26/08
Agenda Iteml:
Agenda Item2 D.1
--------------------- --- COMMENTS -------------------------
I am a resident on Morgan Territory Road, living on a property which backs up
to the current prison. 'We have lived her. for 20 years, and during that time
have had a prison escapee break into. a party we. were having. We had an
escapee .hiding up a tree on Morgan Territory Road when I took my child to wait`
for the school bus. It is -a` rural community, small in number, and,therefore a
target to, have an inappropriate prison addition thrust on it. However, is
this area really suited to that? This. area is entirely residential, with no
public transportation, retail, service, -or jobs. There is only one road in
and out of the area. How can this be a site lending .itself to facilitating
the release. of prisoners? Further, families of prisoners have no way of ,
getting here to visit unless they have •cars, as there is no bus service. I
feel it would be much more appropriate to build a facility nearer to services,
labor, jobs, .and transportation. It is, not suitable to put a prison in
the middle of a family residential area..
"Robert and Robin To: comments@cob.cccounty.us
r„ Grifiths" cc:
<grifrobin@aoi.com> Subject: BOS Agenda Comments from Website
02/26/2008 03:42 AM
Please respond to
"Robert and Robin
Grifiths"
This message was sent from:
http: //www.cccounty.us/depart/cao/agendacomments_form.htm
Name of sender: Robert and Robin Grifiths
Address of sender: 3133 Morgan Terr. Rd. , Clayton
Phone of sender: 925 672-2390
Email of sender: grifrobin@aol.com
Agenda Date: 022608
Agenda Item1:
Agenda Item2: D.1
-7------------------ COMMENTS ------------------------
This comment has to do with the proposed re-entry facility to be located on
Marsh Creek Rd: in C.-C. County, address, Clayton. We, as 25 year residents of
this neighborhood strongly oppose the use of this site for the re-entry
facility. The detention farm was here when we purchased our property and has
occasionally been problematic, what with escapees and the additon of open air
waste treatment ponds. This proposal for a new prison to house more hard-core
offenders will present many more issues than the existing farm. There will be
the possibility of more septic systems and more open air treatment ponds.
There is no public transportation and the already highly impacted use of Marsh
Creek Rd. would surely increase. As it is, these rural roads do not get much
attention from our county. The possiblity of escape is still present, whether
it is a minimum or maximum prison. This is a small community and we can be
most vocal when the need arises. We, as long time residents of!
this county, strongly urge the board to seek other locations within the
county that would be more suitable to this type of facility. We had not been
given any written .notice of. this meeting or it's agenda, so time was not
possible to attend this meeting. In the past, the county, at least had the
courtesy to notify the local propety owners of their plans.
------------------------------------------------------------
i
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item #:
Complete this,form and place it in the upright box near the Date:
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My comments will be: ❑ General
Personal h forrnatiorr is optional. This speaker's card Nrill be
incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑❑/ For
Name(PRINT): C� Against
To ensure yarn-name is announced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling
❑ I wish to speak on the subject of.
Address: A-/ �.y
City: kT( o C /
Phone: J �5�
I am speaking for: n1--'Myself
❑ I do not want to speak but would like to
❑ Organization: leave continents for the Board to consider
(Use the back of this form)
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item . ' -/.
Complete this-form and place it in the upright box near the Date:
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My coinments will be: ❑ General
Personal ii formation is optional. This speaker's card will be
incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For
Name(PRINT): 416it �� X.-?z W Against
To ensure your name iss armo�orr ectly,you mciy want to include its phonetic spelling —/
+L� I wish to speak on the subject of.
Address: .2521 WWrl< keV -21r7lle aip' t
City:
Phone: 75�� bitYj"
I ani.speaking for: ❑ Myself
❑ I do not want to speak but would like to
IR Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider
(Use the back of this form)
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Aeenda Item#: E21
Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date:
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My comments will be:. ❑ General
Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be
incorporated into the public record of this meetings., ❑ For
Name(PRINT): Vl�i t� 11'Z�y� Against
To ensure your name is a►inounced comectly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling
❑ I wishto speak on the subject of-
Address:
fAddress:
II__
City: 1 n-P2
Phone: -
I am speaking for: ❑ Myself
Organization: rn Ul"�i t1 Z :Ct ❑ I do not want to speak but would like to
� ^ ` leave comments for the Board to consider
l�n LAI (Use the back of this forst)
u
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORINT (3 Minute Limit) I wish twsyeako,n Agenda Item #:
Complete this,form and place it in the upright box near the Date:
speaker's podium, and wait to be called'by the Chair.
My continents will be: ❑ General
Personal it formation is optional. This speaker's card will be
incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For
Name (PRINT): �' AI/A Against
To ensure your narne is announced carve tly you ingy want to inchtde its phonetic spelling
�I
I wish to speak on the subject of:
Address: ®� r- vVltr ( ��! 1 ��� ej�is 4
City:
Phone:
I an speaking ❑ Myself
t pg for: Y
❑ I do not want to speak but would like to
Organization: T' C, T, 0 leave comments for the Board to consider
(Use the back of this form)
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item
Complete this fora;and place it in the upright box near the Date:
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My comments will be: General
Personal information is optional. This speaker's Gard will be Q (�
incorporated into the public record of this rrteeting. 4-21i'For'
Name(PRINT): ,1 t -�-JJ1 �- El Against _.
To ensure your name is announced cor redly,you nary want to include its phos dic spelling
Address:
City;
Plione:
o (CA
lam speaking for: ❑ Myself —
❑ Organization:
to
6(u
412
---=---J
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM(3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#:
Complete this form and place it in the upright box near theDate: z. 6%
speaker's podiutn,and wait to be called by the Chair. i --�
My comments will be: C General
Personal ittfortitatimi is optional. This speaker's card tivill be
incorporated into the public firecord off this meeting. 1 ❑ For
Name(PRINT): LO 1 t� r ❑ Against
To ensure your rxarr:e is announced correctly you nuxy wa i to include its phonetic spelling
El .I wish to speak on the subject of
Address: ` )oh U "A I.J .
u
city: too�
Phone:
I ani speaking for: O Myself jam_
Q Qrgaiiiz'tioii: `� �(�C y,{ c � O I do not want to speak but would like to
leave comments for the Board to consider
(Use the bank of this form)
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM
(THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
Complete this form
,�and
))place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board.
LM f 46611
Name: /' Phone:
Address: 62-6 (� City: rU�
(Address and phone riurnber are optional;please note that this card will become a public record kept on file.
with the Clerk of the Board in association with this meeting)
I am speaking for myself or organization.
CHECK ONE:
I wish to speak on Agenda Item # b Date:
My comments will be: ❑ General ❑ ForAgainst
❑ I wish to speak on the subject of:
0 1 do not wish to speak but would like to leave these comments for the Board to consider:
Please see reverse for instructions and important information
REQUEST TO.SPEAK FORM
(THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
Complete this form and place it-in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board.
Name. ye r 41, Phan.: 19--7 56
J
Address: C/ ree 14,Y/J City:
(Address and phone, i7umber are optional;please note that this card will become a public record kept on file
will) the Clerk of the Board in association with this meeting)
I am speaking for myself or organization: 5c4 7YA-
CHECK ONE:
_j F-1 I wish to speak on Agenda Item # Date:
My comments will be: ❑General ❑ For Against
El I wish to speak on the subject of:
❑ I do not wish to speak but would like to leave these comments for the Board to consider:
Please see reverse for instructions and important information
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) , I wish to speak on Agenda Item #:
Complete this,form and place it in the upright box near the Date: -�
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My conunents will be: ❑ General
Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be
incorporated into thepublic record of this meeting. El For
Name (PRINT):
'
(�GLV U . � El Against
To ensure your name is announced c rrectly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling
❑ I wish to peak on the subject of:
Address: q`J it
City: bri -
3 `f2IPhone: q)5 753 5312-
I
am speaking for: CYMyself
CKI do not want to speak but would like to
❑ Organization: leave coinlnents for the Board to consider
(Use the back of this form)
k ,
I
1
Infnrruation for.Sneakers: \
In lien of speaking, I wish to submit these comments:
I. Deposit this form into the upright box next to the
speaker's podiunt before the Board's consideration of" T to D-C r11l��c7 sltvoDvl-
your item
2. Wait to be called by the chair. Please speak into the 0==U ��f �
microphone at the podium. Don �r
3. Begin by stating your name and your city or area of t�qq
residence,and whether you are speaking for yourself or �C7J 5'IL
mo, mil6Y1 d -,Yii°GI 5e
on behalf ofan organization. }
�CA;
4. If you have handout materials,give them to the Clerk. f
5. Avoid repeating comments made by previous speakers.
Chair may limit the time allocated to speakers so thatr!� �GD(( V(/1
6, y p
all maybe heard.
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM(3 Minute Limit)- I wish to speak on Agenda Item#:
Complete this form and place it in the upright box near the Date:
speaker's podiutn, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My comments will be: ❑ General
Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be
incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For
Nalue(PRINT):
O Against
To ensure your name is announced correctly,you sexy want to include its phonetic spelling
❑ .I wish to speak on the subject of.
Address:
City:
Phone:
I am speaking for: ❑ Myself
❑ Organization: 1 do not want to speak but would like to
leave comments for the Bogw to consider
__ (Use the back oft Or o
Information for Sneakers: In lieu of speaking, I wish to submit these comments:
1. Deposit this form into the upright box next to the
speaker's podium before the Board's consideration of
your item ,dl e WCv1 i
2. Wait to be called by the chair.Please speak into the
microphone at the podium. ' Ln Q.b`1 Q`n
3. Begin by stating your name'and your city or area of pry -}���-- ' C'_ IJ i-}�
residence, and whether you are speaking for yourself or
on behalf of an organization. SCS;, A-8vlt?v efs QOS$ 01 4 OTaW
4. If you have handout materials, give thejn to the Clerk. _��e�t, .. 1 K .Vor a+y,
5. Avoid repeating comments made by previous speakers. 11
J's 0-
6.
?-6. The Chair may limit the time allocatedto speakers so �-
that all may be heard. G`tr 04 e
V) \0C-p-
��
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Litnit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#:
Complete this"form and place it in the upright box near the Date.'
speaker's podiwn, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My comnents will be: ❑ General
Personal ittforination is optional. This speaker's card will be
into:posted into die,public record of this tt:e ting. ❑ For.
Name(PRINT): IAE L Against
To ensure y6ur name is announced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling
I wish to speak on the subject of:
Address: IJt �ct�-✓ �")
City: + A) S
rlE
Phone:
II
I aIn speaking for: ❑ Myself
I do not want to speak but would like to
❑ Organization: ;f leave comments-for the Board to consider
(Use the back of this forth)
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item #: .pk,
Complete this,form and place it iii the upright box near the Date:;! e7 v
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My conunents will be: General
Personal hiformation is optional. This speaker's card will be
incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ❑ For
Name (PRINT): L-'Gg-A El Against 1q
To etsen•e your pante is arrt: urtced correctly,.yott nzay want to include its pitortetic spelling
I wish to speak on the subject of-
Address:
City:
Phone: �
I am speaking for: Myself
❑ I do not want to speak but would like to
❑ Organization: leave continents for the Board to consider
(Use the back of this forst)
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute Limit) I'wish to speak on Acenda Item#: .
Complete this form and place it in.the upright box near the Date: Z 2 w d
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
My'comments will be:. ❑ General
Personal information is optional. This speaker's card will be
incorporated iitto the ptiblic record of this meeting. -. ❑ For
Name(PRINT):: X11 eW ,4e—w L/•J!>Lc�S,�l' ❑ Against
To ensure your name is announced correctly,you may want to include its phonetic spelling El
I wish to speak on the subject ect of:
J
Address:
City:
Phone:
I am speaking for: ❑ Myself
❑ I do not want to speak but would like to
I Organization: A1—;70e:-,W consider
/J leave comments for the Board to ons
(Use the back,of this form)
If i _
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (3 Minute U nit) I wish to speak on Agenda Item#:
Complete this,form and place it in the upright box near the Date: d'�-.
speaker's podium, and wait to be called by the Chair.
! My comments will be: General
Personal it formation is optional. This speaker's card-+,ill be
incorporated into the public record of this meeting. ElFor
Name(PRINT): V O gG ❑ Against
To ensure your name is announced c r�y i Arywantfoinclude its phwTetic spelling
f El wish to speak on the subject of:
Address: . gs4q Shayar\O pIC W
City: �t o ck
Phone: '7 9 4 95
I ea
amsP g
kin for: Y
M self
El I do not want to speak but would like to
❑ Organization: leave comments for the Board to consider
�� (Use the back of this forth)