Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02122008 - C.11 (8) ' CLAIM / BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD ACTION: FEBRUARY 12, 2008 Claire Against the County, or District Governed by ) the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT and Board Action, All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to California Government Codes. ) you is your notice of the action taken your claim by the Board of CLAIM AGAINST DEPARTMENT 16 (Paragraph IV below), Jervisors. nPursuant to Government Code AMOUNT: TO BE DETERMINED JAN 1 1 2008tion 913 and 915.4. Please note all COUNTY COUNSEL "Warnings". CLAIMANT: MONICA WASHINGTON MARTINEZ CALIF ATTORNEY: UNKNOWN DATE RECEIVED: JANUARY 11, 2008 ADDRESS: 1511 M SYCAMORE AVENUE #1435Y DELIVERY TO CLERK ON:JANUARY 11, 2008 HERCULES'," CA 94547 BY MAIL POSTMARKED: HAND DELIVERED FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. JANUARY 11, 2008 JOHN CULLEN, C Dated: By: Deputy iI. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supe visors ( ) This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). (�laim is not timely filed. The Clerk should retum claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimantsright to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 9113). (✓f Other: _7711f__7711f_ O � or/ OUt7D( C.6njr� I''G. ✓ Dom' !J /rlo�C-G ILl/�ns��'lG!/1� �!/�G� �/O ��� � co>,rf �� Dated: By: �Deputy County Counsel III. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). IV. BOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Supervisors present: . (� This Claim is rejected in full. O Other: I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the'Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. Dated: f ^OL ! HN CULLEN, CLERK, ByAU�uty Clerk WARNING (Gov. code section 913) Subject to certain exception,you have only six(6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited in the snail to file a court actiai on this claim.See Government Code Section 945.6.You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney,you should do so immediately. For Additional Warning See Reverse Side ofThis Notice. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that t am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martluez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown above. Dated: 4-vfJOHN CULLEN, CLERK By puty Clerk I OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 5E--L SILVANO B. MARCHESI COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTACOUNTY COUNSEL Administration Building 651 Pine Street,9'"Floor SHARON L. ANDERSON Martinez,California 94553-1229 '� _ CHIEF ASSISTANT (925)335-1800 GREGORY C. HARVEY 11 js�1H �� 0• VALERIE J. RANCHE (925)646-1078(fax) '�•, �' �4o ASSISTANTS .v Osr'� COUK� January 22, 2008 Monica Washington 1511 M Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 Re: Government Tort Claim of Monica Washington Dear Ms. Washington: We are in receipt of your government tort claim,which is currently being processed. If your intent was to file a claim against the Superior Court of California or one of its employees, please be aware that the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is not the proper entity to serve. Any claims against the court or its employees should be directed to the Superior Court Executive Office. Please see Government Code Section 915, subdivision(c) for further directions. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, SILVANO B. MARCHESI COUNTY COUNSEL By: Monika L. Cooper Deputy County Counsel MLC/kmo BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMAN A. A claim relating to a cause of action for death or for injury to person or to personal property or growing crops shall be presented not later than stn hal b resented thss after the accrual ruot l of the r than cone ause of action. A claim relating to any other cause of actio P ar after the accrual of the cause of action. (Gov. Code § 911.2.) B. Claims must be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street,Martinez,CA 94553. C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims,Penal Code Sec. 72 at the end of this form. was 8 a nommonammons nownwass mass as mommommus mossommusew as Oman 0 a Damon maps a ago an an 0 a I _ Reserved for Clerk's filing stamp RE: Claim By: Monica Washington ) RECE` ieD Against the County of Contra Costa or j 1 1 LUuo JAN District) viScf+S (Fill in the name) CLoRKCONRRACOTAU. The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the County of Contra Costa or the above-named district in the sum of$ TBD and in support of this claim represents as follows: 1 When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date and hour) please see attached statement and exhibits 2. Where did the damage or injury occur? (Include city and county) Please see attached statement and exhibits 3. How did the damage or injury occur? (Give full details-,use cxt<ayaper if required) Superior Court of California, County of contra Costa,FamilY .aw, Department 16 4. W hat particular act or omission on the part of county or district officers, servants, or employees caused the injury or damage? Please see attached statement and exhibits 5 What are the names of county or district officers, servants, or employees causing the damage or injury? Honorable Judge Thomas Maddock Rebecca ?, Court Clerk, Department 16 6. What damage or injuries do your claim resulted? (Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed. Attach two estimates for auto age.) Please see attached statement and wd bits 7. How was the amount claimed above computed? (Include the estimated amount of any prospective injury or damage.) _ Please see attached statement aid exhibits 8. Names and addresses of witnesses,doctors,and hospitals: ------------- Please see attached statement and exhibits 9. List the expenditures you made on account of this accident or injury: DATE' TWE AMOUNT ■■•asasssssssaasssssManassas srssssswssssassaasWassong ssssssssssswrssssassUna sago sasof Gov.Code Sec. 910.2 provides"'The claim shall be signed by the claimant or by some person on his behalf." SEND NOTICES TO: (Attomev) 1 Name and address of Attorney ) - � tn ( 's Sim) 1511 M Sycamore Avenue #125 -(A ) Hercules, CA 94547 Telephone No. ) Telephone No. 510-388-9073 ■■aaamen News soon ssSousse sssssssssssssssasswas sMason ssssessssssssssssssssssaswas now aaI PUBLIC RECORDS NOTICE: Please be advised that this claim form,or any claim filed with the County under the Tort Claims Act, is subject to public disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, §§ 6500 et seq.) Furthermore, any attachments,addendums,or supplements attached to the claim form, including medical records, are also subject to public disclosure. s■sssssssssssssss■sssswsosaw sssssswwwssssssrsssssssssssssassissssssssmass assSamoan ssa NOTICE: Section 72 of the Penal Code provides- Every person who, with intent to defraud,presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, city, or district board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account voucher, or writing, is punishable either by imprisonment in the County jail for a period of not more than one year, by a fine of not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by both such imprisonment and fine, or by imprisonment in the state prison, by a fine of not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000),or by both such imprisonment and fine. Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, California 94547 510 388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS', COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CLAIM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM STATEMENT OF CLAIM This claim came about due to the misconduct of Honorable Judge Thomas Maddock. Judge Maddock ignored that any communication regarding the merits of the case, hearing and any of the rulings made of the matter, must also be copied to the opposing party and that he as a judge cannot address any issues in any case in the absence of proper notice, motion to the court, and an opportunity for an open hearing regarding the merits of my case and made rulings that were not copies to me; issued orders in the absence of proper notice and took unfair advantage of my pro per status. Judge Maddock deemed me a vexation at the request of Richard Jacobsmeyer on 3-5-07; and I have had difficulty filing documents since that time. FACTS OF THE CLAIM I wrote a letter with a heavy broken heart to you were Presiding Judge dated October 02, 2007 where I conveyed to you that my children and me were being mistreated by Commissioner Jeffrey Huffaker. I was feel let down by your response to my cry for help from you when you wrote, "Thank you for you interest in our court", your response of our court is as if the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa belongs to Judge Maddock and Commissioner Huffaker and not the citizen. Judge Maddock did nothing to help my children and me. But in direct 1 Contact, after default was entered and judgment pending against Richard Jacobsmeyer, attorney at law in pro per, he wrote a letter to you on February 16 2007, alleging that I did serve him with the first amended complaint; filed by me. Judge Thomas Maddock promptly motioned the court in defense of Richard Jacobsmeyer scheduling a special hearing to address Richard Jacobsmeyer's allegations. Judge Thomas Maddock on behalf of Richard Jacobsmeyer sanctioned Monica Meadors-Washington $100.00. 1 had no choice but to accept sanctions and paid $100.00 sanctions. More than one decent attorney stopped me in the hallway in disbelief at what had just happened to me; suggesting that I get the case out of Department 16. 1 filed a supplemental complaint to support my claim against Richard Jacobsmeyer. Judge Maddock questioned me about the Supplemental Complaint that I filed on March 21, 2007. The court transcripts will reflect that when I shared with the court, its contained a brief summary of my case and my declaration of how Richard Jacobsmeyer does not follow the rules and regulations of the court; violating my right to privacy; his liability for defaming my character; his admission of discussing this matter with others; his nerve, gall and audacity of mentioning my three minor children, Judge Maddock said, "unfile it"; at that point the supplemental complaint was unfilled by the "court". The court motioned for the bailiff to give it to me and he did give the un-filed supplemental complaint to me. I found the papers clipped to the court un-filed documents as follows: a) A facsimile from Department 16, to Richard Jacobsmeyer from Rebecca (See attached); b) Facsimile Transmission Verification Report (See attached); These documents were not served on me. Judge Thomas Maddock took further advantage of me pro per status by defending the case for Richard Jacobsmeyer allegations of non-service at the next hearing; where I brought to Judge Maddock's attention that Richard Jacobsmeyer had written another letter to the courts that was dated March 13, 2 2007, alleging non-service before the due date of service; but post marked to me in May, where the Judge Maddock said I was being unfair to the court for bring it to attention. I believe that if Judge Thomas Maddock had given my letter of October 2006 half the attention that he gives to Richard Jacobsmeyer, some justice would have been served in my cases and unnecessary litigation would have been avoided. As a result, I Monica Meadors-Washington and three minor children have been damaged and are suffering mental anguish, loss of social position, disgrace, humiliation and embarrassment, foreclosure, as well as actual pecuniary loss due to destruction and disruption of the parent (alienation) children relationship and loss of financial support. 3 Mois Meadors-Washington 151 Sycamore Avenue#125 X07 Her ul s, California 94547 stoR co of SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORf ` 'VQ 2 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 3 \ 4 ) 5 Monica Meadors-Washington, Case No.--CW-0880 6 Plaintiff, SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT ) 7 vs. ) ) $ Richard Jacobsmeyer, ) ) 9 Defendant ) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 i 1 Meadors-Washington v. Jacobsmeyer 2 C06-00880 3 BRIEF SUMMARY OF MY CASE: Plaintiff is suing Defendant for 4 delaying benefits on a worker' s compensation claim that has been s deemed industrial and payable by a QME. Moreover, the claim has 6 been accepted by my employer and their insurance carrier. The 7 Defendant began delaying my claim for worker' s compensation 8 benefits on August 4, 2004 . 9 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT: I can testify io competently to the facts in this declaration and provided ii evidence. The Defendant has provided evidence and filed the 12 evidence in this matter, that support this SUPPLEMENTAL 13 COMPLAINT. The Defendant has now defamed my character in 14 retaliation for Plaintiff filing this complaint. (1) The is Defendant testified to the WCAB that I threatened my former 16 treating physician Dr. Ferris. The Defendant and the attorney 17 for Dr. Ferris, James Alexander reported this to the WCAB, but 18 did not provide the evidence of such a threat, "stating I think 19 it was Mrs. Meadors, but I don't have the document, but I am 20 quite sure it came from her". This further delayed my benefits . 21 (2) In documents filed with this court in this matter the 22 Defendant admits that he spoke with other attorneys and gave his 23 rendition of what my other cases are in regards to under the 24 pretence of judicial notice. (3) The Defendant states, I cannot 25 regain custody of my three minor children and that he is going to 26 notify the WCAB that I have a pending dissolution of marriage. 27 (4) The Defendant copies all correspondences in regards to this 28 matter to my WCAB attorney. The Defendant has violated my right i 1 Monica Meadors-Washington 2 C06-00880 3 4 to privacy, is libel for defamation of character and admittedly 5 discussed this matter with other outside counsel. 6 7 I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true 8 and correct. 9 �-5-aab7 10 11 M ca eaddrs�ington "t6n 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 MC-030 ATTORNEY OR PARTY VYnHOUT ATTORNEY(Nance S We Bar number and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 M Sycamore Avenue,#125 Hercules, CA 94547 v, 2 C i , • TELEPHONE NO.. FAX NO.(Ophornal): E-MAIL ADDRESS(opGonal): MAR 21 201 ATTORNEY FOR(Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,COUNTY OF Contra Costa K•rONx , w: nit:couer SUS !M COU STREET ADDRESS: 725 Court Street CO! TIM '11E2 CALIFORNIA MAILING ADOREss: P.O. Box 911 Y crrY AND nP coDE: Martinez,CA 94553 BRANCH NAME: Civil PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Monica Meadors-Washington DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Richard Jacobsmeyer CASE NUMBER DECLARATION C06-00880 I declare the following: On 2-16-2007,after filing a CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT in regards to this matter I checked the Contra Costa County Superior Court website that provides online case information. It reads: 2/15/2007 ORDER GRANTING DEMURRER WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND,RULING MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT AND DISMISSING ACTION(D) This lead me to believe,I was not required to appear on 02/21/2007 at 8:30AM DEPT.16. When I received notice for the scheduled hearing for 3/26/2007 at 8:30AM DEPT.16, from the Honorable Judge Maddox I was then made aware of the tentative ruling system, and that I can call in the day before after 1:30pm to find out if appearance is needed. The individuals that have served documents in regards to this case on my behalf will appear and confirm/verify service. The Defendant will be asked/required to pay for their appearing in court. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: 3-5-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington (rYPE OR PRKT NAME) t of DECLaRArrn ❑ Attorney for M Plaintiff ❑ Petitioner ❑ Defendant ❑ Respondent ❑ Other(Specify): d Use DECLARATION paw CIVMSC06-00880 Actions-Martinez Civil Page 1 of 3 Home Move To This Date Viewed Date coon Text Disposition !mage 03/26/2007 8.30 HEARING ON OSC RE:WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE AM DEPT. 16 DISMISSED BY THE COURT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR ND FRAUD OF SERVICE a103/2DEPT 1 6/2007 8 :30 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ❑ aAM DEPT?630 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPLETED ❑ PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF CASE ot 02/16/2007 MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, DECLARATION ON Applicable N1A RICHARD JACOBSMEYER FILED. SERVED ON 02/12/07 102/1612007 111 IrApplicable DECLARATION OF MONICA MEADORS FILED ot1 02/16/2007 gYASE MONICA GEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FILED JINot N/A Applicable ORDER GRANTING DEMURRER WITHOUT LEAVE TO 02/15/2007 AMEND, RULING M OTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT AND Not N/A DISMISSING ACTION (D) 102/05/2007 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FILED JNot N/A BY RICHARD JACOBSMEYER Applicable 01/26/2007 8:30 HEARING ON DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT OF MONICA COMPLETED F 1AM DEPT. 16 MEADORS FILED BY RICHARD JACOBSMEYER AM DEPT?630 RICHARD O JACOBSMEYER OR STRIKE FILED BY COMPLETED a 01/25/2007 —]FPPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS FILED BY MONICA MEADORS IL NIA a101/25/2007 ORDER FILED ON WAIVER OF FEES AS TO MONICA GRANTED N/A MEADORSlS GRANTED 01/25/2007 (U.J.) 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT OF MONICA Not MEADORS FILED JApplicable NIA 01/25/2007 PLTFS REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS JINot Applicable IPM DEPT. 613 D6EFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 22 TO Not Applicable ❑ 01/09/2007 4:13 JIDEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 22 TO IFN—ot - [PM DEPT. 16 1116. jApplicable 12/29/2006 5FCMC5 CALENDARED ON 02/21/07 IN DEPT.22. HAS Zlicable BEEN UPDATED TO 02/21/07 IN DEPT. 16. i TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME : 03/23/2007 10:21 NAME : DEPT 16 FAX : 9259575912 TEL : 9259575716 SER.# : 000F6J135618 DATE,TIME 03/23 10:20 FAX NO./NAME 918665630092 DURATION 00:01:32 PAGE{S} 06 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD EGG Dept 16, Judge Maddock Contra Costa Phone: 925-957-5716 Fax: 925-957-5912 Superior Court To: lq : From ►/� � •� Fac -.� 3- z Pages: Phone: Date: 3/z 3/07 Re: L-(1 CC: ❑Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑Please Reply ❑Please Recycle • Comments: I manner. This is exactly the land of activity that this statute was designed to protect and 2 defendant is entitled to such protection on behalf of his client 3 4 Wherefore Defendant requests that the Court issue its order granting Defendant's Demurrer, 5 Striking Plaintiff's complaint and/or Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to CCP 6 425.16,awarding costs and fees for plaintiff's having filed a frivolous and incomprehensible 7 complaint and for such other relief as the court may deem proper- 8 PLAINTIFF SHOULD BE DEEMED A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT 9 Defendant further requests the court to consider exercising its power pursuant to CCP 10 391 to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. Ms. Meadors has filed at least 9 civil complaints in 11 the past 8 months,all involving extremely vague or legally unsustainable causes of action. She 12 is able to file these complaints without cost by filing in forma pauperis. However each of the 13 defendants is required to incur costs and attorneys fees,not to mention the expenditure of time 14 and effort to address these spurious actions. As pointed out above,plaintiff has used these 15 complaints to attempt to achieve results that she has not been able to obtain in other proceedings. 16 She has even filed new complaints against the same party where she has her complaint dismissed 17 by the court; thereby requiring defendants to have to respond again to such frivolous actions, 18 incurring additional costs and fees etc. While each of these actions will undoubtedly result in a 19 judgment against plaintiff for costs and fees,Ms. Meadors is currently unemployed and 20 essentially judgment proof. It is very unlikely that any of the defendants is going to be able to 21 recover their judgments against plaintiff. If they attempt to do so it is likely that success will 22 cost more than the result. 23 Unless stopped,Ms. Meadors will create a vicious circle. Even when the court dismisses 24 one case, another will be filed to force the defendants to continuously defend themselves from 25 her actions. 26 Plaintiff meets the criterion for CCP 391 in that she has filed frivolous pleadings in 27 several of her cases. She has filed declarations in some of the existing proceedings that she is 28 unavailable for appearances and then appears during that time frame in other proceedings. She has refilled complaints against a defendant(Fortenberry Realty)after here initial case was I dismissed. She has failed to appear for multiple hearings in her various cases without excuse 2 causing additional delays as matters are continued for her to respond to the court's needs. All of 3 these actions have resulted in defendants in each case having to incur additional expenses for the 4 multiple maces in her cases brut involve no financial burden for her at all. 5 This defendant fully expects that after the plaintiff's cases against him are dismissed she 6 will simply refile her case with similar vague and incomprehensible allegations thereby causing 7 additional expense and effort to Mtet the allegations. Only the court can stop this continuous 8 abuse of the legal process by plai n�ff. Defendant requests that thrs court take judicial notice of 9 plaintiff's multiple filings in this o6nt as reflected in the Request for Judicial Notice to be filed 10 herein and restrict plaintiWs right to initiate additional proceedings pursuant to CCP 391 and for 11 such other and further relief as the court deems proper_ 12 13 y Submitted: 14 _ 15 Dated_ Ric _ yer 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CLAIM e .11 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD ACTION: FEBRUARY 12, 2008 Claim Against the County, or District Governed by ) the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to California Government Codes. ) you is your notice of the action taken 4ection your claim by the Board of CLAIM AGAINS DEPARTMENT 50 D ?297� pervisors. (Paragraph IV below), JAN 1 1 2008en Pursuant to Government Code AMOUNT: TO BE DETERMINED 913 and 915.4. Please note all COUNTY COUNSEL "Warnings". CLAIMANT: MONICA WASHINGTON MARTINEZ CALIF. ATTORNEY: UNKNOWN DATE RECEIVED: JANUARY 11, 2008 ADDRESS: 1511 M SYCAMORE AVENUE #1t5V DELIVERY TO CLERK ON:JANUARY 11, 2008 HERCULES'," CA 94547 BY MAIL POSTMARKED: HAND DELIVERED FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim. JANUARY 11, 2008 JOHN CULLEN, -k Dated: By: Deputy C ¢__ iI. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Y This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that it was filed late and send warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 911.3). (y0ther: �e G�Gi,-p Sor,l u-H me I., s e '� OGGv. i✓�G 6 ki orait, 2,00-7, All deu1-ns o►- nor, -t7c) '-7 / /0-7 awe (cc4 arlA rf1.o ao Ajq�t i le Lam:-k I' G ,seC J'�rn QJe�66c_ Dated: 1' "Ir By Deputy Deputy Cou ty Counsel III. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator(2) ( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3). I.V. QOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Supervisors present: . I („ This Claim is rejected in full. O Other: I certify that this is a true and con-ect copy of the'Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DatedX- 6rt4-,*, ► HN CULLEN, CLERK, By Deputy Clerk WARNING (G v. code section 913) Subject to certain exceptions,you have only six(6) months from the date this notice was personally served or deposited In the nnafl to file a court action on this claim.See Government Code Section 945.6.You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult an attorney,you should do so immediately. *For Additional Warning See Reverse Side of This Notice. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the Unites) States Postal Service in Martinez, California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to the claimant as shown above. DatelvlG* JOHN CULLEN, CLERK By Deputy Clerk OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL SILVANO B. MARCHESI COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA • " w �� COUNTY COUNSEL Administration Building s = '••+ 651 Pine Street,9"'Floor -�•,• SHARON L. ANDERSON Martinez,California 94553-1229 '�' ;. CHIEF ASSISTANT (925)335-1800 A� � ;1"`" . .� �� GREGORY C. HARVEY 0. (925)646-1078(fax) t ' VALERIE J. RANCHE �• y - ;�O ASSISTANTS pA.COUK'C`; NOTICE OF UNTIMELINESS AS TO A PORTION OF THE CLAIM TO: Monica Washington 1511 M Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 RE: CLAIM OF: Monica Washington Please Take Notice as Follows: In regards to the claim you submitted on January 11, 2008 on your own behalf, portions of the claim are timely and portions are untimely. The portions of the claim prior to July 11, 2007 that you presented against the County of Contra Costa governed by the Board of Supervisors fail to comply substantially with the requirements of California Government Code Sections 901 and 911.2, because they were not presented within six months after the event or occurrence as provided by law. Because the portions of the claim prior to July 11, 2007 were not presented within the time allowed by law, no action was taken on those portions of your claim. The claim was forwarded to the Board for action only on the timely portions of the claims. The only recourse at this time is to apply without delay to the County of Contra Costa governed by the Board of Supervisors for leave to present a late claim as to the claims which are untimely. See Sections 911.4 to 912.2, inclusive, and Section 946.6 of the Government Code. Under some circumstances, leave to present a late claim will be granted. See Section 911.6 of the Government Code. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you desire to consult an attorney, you should do so immediately. SILVANO B. MARCHESI COUNTY COUNSEL By: Monika L. Cooper Deputy County Counsel Page 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1012, 1013a, 2015.5; Evid. Code, §§ 641, 664) I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My siness address is Office of the County Counsel, 651 Pine Street, 9th Floor,Martinez, CA 94553-1229. On 23- D , 1 served a true copy of this Notice of Untimeliness as to a Portion of the Claim by placing t document in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Martinez, California addressed to Monica Washington, 1511 M Sycamore Avenue, #125, Hercules, CA 94547 as set forth above. I am readily familiar with Office of County Counsel's practice of collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I declare under penalty of perjury under th ws of the State of California and the United States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed o - D at Martinez, California. athleen O'Connell cc: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (original) Risk Management Page 2 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAIMANT A. A claim relating to a cause of action for death or for injury to person or to personal property or growing crops shall be presented not later than six months er thenot aterf the than one year e of action. A claim relating to any other cause of action presented after the accrual of the cause of action. (Gov. Code § 911.2.) B. Claims must be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at its office in Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street,Martinez,CA 94553. C. If claim is against a district governed by the Board of Supervisors, rather than the County, the name of the District should be filled in. D. If the claim is against more than one public entity, separate claims must be filed against each public entity. E. Fraud. See penalty for fraudulent claims,Penal Code Sec. 72 at the end of this form. mass 0 mammas was wagon mousse owns spa 0 nummusessm sun among DONNE 0 a ommeassomm 0 own an Onnal Reserved for Clerk's filing stamp RE: Claim By: Monica Washington ) Against the County of Contra Costa or ) RECEIVED g ) 1 District) JAN1 LUUU (Fill in the name) ) CLERK BOARD OF SUPERV1SCRS CONTRA COSTA co. The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the County of Con Costa or the above-named district in the sum of$ TBD and in support of this claim represents as 1. When did the damage or injury occur? (Give exact date and hour) Please see attached statement and exhibits 2. Where did the damage or i Lw7_occur9 (Include city and county) Superior�urt of California, County of Contra Costa, Family Law, Department 50 3. How did the damage or injury occur? (Cave full details; use extra paper if required) Please see attached statement and exhibits 4. What particular act or omission on the part of county or district officers, servants, or employees caused the injury or damage? ----- Please see attached statement and exhibits 5 What are the names of county or district officers, servants, or employees causing the damage or injury?--________ --__- -- Jeffrey Jeffrey D. Huffaker, Court Commissioner Lisa Zeeb-Johnson, Court Clerk, Department 50 6. What dmnage or mjurim do you claim resulted? (Give hill extern of injmies or damages claimed. Attach two for mW dwage-) Please see attached�wd exhibits 7. How was the amount claimed shove computed? (Include the estimated am©unt of any prospective him or d -) Please see attached stlftmeftt and a du 8. Names and addresses of wimesms,doh and bits Please see attached s 9. List the expenditures you made on amount of this accident or ry50.DO DATE TD& OU' 2-14-M 5.000.DO 9-14-2006 4,000.DO 10-262006 750.00 1141-2006 soc.00 735.2007 SK-00 ■//■■t■flssfs••aaiaaa■\■\■amasses■t■fat■!te■/seas!/!■raja latalf•a■■ssaiae was a all so a as Gov_Code Sec. 9102 provides-Tbe claim shall be signed by the claimant or by some person on his SEND NOTICES TO: (Atmel Name and address of Attorney C � 1511 M Sycamore Avenue#125 (Acl ) r Hercules, CA 94547 )T No. 510-388-9073 Telephone No. ) — ■aaaafamtaaaa/latastlasas■■ssls�lalslt!/!s!!slat■/!l!/t■lfatmtaafafs\\\anal mamma so PUBdC RRCORDS NOTICE— please be advised that this claim form,or say claim filed with the CountY under the Tort Claims Act, is:,abject to public disclosure under the California PuWie Records Act (Gov. Code, 55 6500 et seq.) Furthermore, any attachments,addendums,or suppkments anscbed to the claim form,including medical records, are also:subject to public disclosure. a Susan asa■•assaassasSusan aaasse/ta•asetaaeons laels!■s!■!sa!lslsasmaaa a as a as asvan taasa NOTICE: Section 72 of the Penal Cot*Vides; Every person who,with invent to defraud,presents for allowance or for payMeUt to any state board or officer, or to any county, city, or district board or officer, audxximd to allow or pay the same if genuine, anv false or fraudulent claim, bill, account voucher,or wrift is punishable cidwr by kfVisa MVV in the County jail fnr a period of not more than one year, by a foe of not exceeding one thousand dollars (S1,000.00), or by :Doth such imprisonment and fine, or by imprison in the state prison, by a fine of not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both such imprisonment and fine. Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM January 7, 2008 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM STATEMENT OF CLAIM This claim came about because of a crime was committed when Commissioner Jeffrey D. Huffaker takes an action (or fails to take an action) in violation of statue enacted by a state legislature, or by Congress. Commissioner Jeffrey D. Huffaker fails to take action when a statue requires him to do so because he holds a special position of trust, such as that of a doctor, nurse or teacher. Crimes are persecuted by the state, and not by individuals. Commissioner Jeffrey D. Huffaker committed perjury, broke the law and is personally involved in my family law matter Washington vs. Meadors case.: D02-04735. He lies on court record and on court documents. Commissioner Huffaker is violating the civil and human rights of me and my three minor children. He is abusing me and my three minor children. Commissioner Jeffrey D. Huffaker has broken the laws and violated my rights everyway possible under the sun. Commissioner Huffaker has not behaved in the best interest of my three minor children's best interest now ages 9, 7 and4; my two oldest children suffering with the life threatening illness Sickle Cell Anemia. Because of the Commissioner's cruelty our children are suffering serious mental abuse inflicted by him. Commissioner Huffaker is in violation of Family Code Statue 6 3 02 1; this part applies in any of the following: (d)An action for exclusive custody pursuant to Section 3120. (e)A proceeding to determine physical or legal custody or for visitation in a proceeding pursuant to the Domestic Violence Prevention Ace (Division 10 (commencing with Section 6200)). In an action under section 6323, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to authorize physical or legal custody, or visitation rights, to be granted to any party to a Domestic Violence Prevention Act proceeding who has not established a parent and child relationship pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 6323. (f)A proceeding to determine physical or legal custody or visitation in an action pursuant to the Uniform Parentage Act (Part 3 (commencing with Section 7600) of Division 12). (g)A proceeding to determine physical or legal custody or visitation in an action ClaimCCCBoardofSupervisorsHuffaker 1-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM brought by the district attorney pursuant to Section 17404. June of 2005 Steve L. Washington abandoned me and our three minor children; contending to our children, our family and our neighbors that he did not want to live with me and our children; and that we are not his priority; subsequently leaving his whereabouts unknown and our three minor children in my total custody and care. After court motion and hearings, I had sole physical custody of our three minor children and Steve L. Washington had reasonable visitation with reasonable notice. We shared legal custody. The parties attended mediation once in September of 2005. We agreed upon custody and visitation, but when Mr. Washington was ordered to pay child support he began to battle me for custody. There is a process that has to be followed and Commissioner Huffaker has not followed the process. Commissioner Huffaker has modified visitation three times without the parties attending mediation; ordered minor's counsel without the parties attending mediation; ordered supervised exchange without the parties attending mediation; did not require the attorneys for Mr. Washington to substitute in as the attorney of record; communicated ex- parte Sylvia D. Woods, Charles J. Hammer, Claudia Coale, Martha Rosenberg, Marlene Becking and Steve L. Washington. I did not sign consent to the order of Charles J. Hammer to represent our three minor children in the family law matter, because of past negative experiences with Mr. Hammer. I believe Charles J. Hammer is a predator and will do anything for money. He is a master manipulator and uses court as welfare; taking advantage of families involved in family law matters. On March 11, 2006, during his court ordered visitation, Steve L. Washington left our children unattended in his vehicle, in the back of a secluded parking lot unattended. That afternoon, Mr. Washington left our children unattended at a amusement park. This is the same day that Charles J. Hammer was present with Steve L. Washington and Mr. Washington stated that I denied him court ordered visitation. When I reported this to the courts Mr. Hammer orchestrated the events that got a abrupt change in custody from me to Mr. Washington. ClaimCCCBoardolSupervisorsHuffarerl-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM Charles J. Hammer was not the minor counsel of our three minor children and no evaluation was began or done by Claudia Coale, MFT. No evaluation was began or done by Marlene Becking Ph.D.; therefore making any and all communication with these individuals ex-parte and illegal. Commissioner Huffaker changed custody without the parties attending mediation. The orders changing custody were filed and stamped filed on 9- 15-2006 three days before the hearing, by court clerk Lisa Zeeb-Johnson of Department 50. The Commissioner ignores that any communication regarding the merits of my family law matter/case, hearing and any of the rulings made in the matter, must also be copied to the opposing party and that he as a Commissioner cannot address any issues in any case in the absence of proper notice, motion to the court and an opportunity for an open hearing. The time is always right to do what is right; now is the time to remove Commissioner Jeffrey D. Huffaker from his position. FACTS OF CLAIM 9-26-2005 Commissioner Huffaker allowed Sylvia D. Woods to represent and argue for the Petitioner in case.:D02-04735, with out being substituted in as attorney of record, she gave expert testimony on the subject of Sickle Cell Anemia, a life threatening illness that my children suffer with, without medical knowledge or expertise on the subject. The Commissioner allowed Ms. Woods to verbally set aside the retro-active child support order. 12-22-2005 Commissioner Huffaker again allowed Sylvia D. Woods to go before him without being substituted in as the attorney of record. When the Commissioner and Petitioner in case.:D02-04735 saw that I was represented by counsel, the Commissioner allowed the Petitioner to call Ms. Woods, postponing the hearing until Ms. Woods arrived. Ms. Woods' promotes conflict and made the Commissioner's face red with anger, he lost control of his courtroom and took his anger out by modifying visitation without the C IaimCCCBoardolS uperyisorsH uffaker 1-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM parties attending mediation, ordered his friend Charles L. Hammer as minors counsel, order 50/50 payment of Mr. Hammer's fees, ordered supervised exchange including 50/50 payment; all of this without the parties attending mediation or the filing of the income and expense declarations. 4-6-2006 After the Petitioner in case.:D02-04735, left our girls unattended at an amusement park and in his vehicle unattended. The Commissioner modified visitation without the parties attending mediation; ordered evaluation without the parties attending mediation; accepted and ruled on false statements and bogus documents filed by his friend Mr. Hammer, Sylvia D. Woods and Terry S. Wheeler. The Commissioner ignored the recommendation of our three minor children's physician. The Commissioner was persuaded by his friend Mr. Hammer to order evaluation without a motion or the parties attending mediation (specifying Claudia Coale); ordering me to pay one half of the cost of evaluation and I am on a fixed disability income. The Commissioner refused to order Mr. Washington to pay one half of community property to avoid foreclosure of the property. Moreover, the Commissioner refuse to order the other parties to follow the court rules of procedure by serving filed documents upon me. Sylvia D. Woods notified the Commissioner on court record I filed and served a lawsuit to she and her associate Terry S. Wheeler for fraud on 4-24-2007 for fraud. The Commissioner checked the computer and saw that this was true and did not require that she withdraw. In retaliation for me not signing consent for Mr. Hammer to represent our three minor children, Mr. Hammer told Commissioner Huffaker to punish me with a change in custody and that is exactly what the Commissioner did on 9-18-2006. 4-13-2006 At a special set hearing, the Commissioner refused to accept the testimony from out three minor children's physician, because it was in favor of me and not in favor of Steve L. Washington. Our children's physician telephoned the Commissioner to give him some incite into our children's life ClaimCCCBoardofSupervisorsHuffaker I-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM threatening illness and to verify his signature on his recommendation and notify the Commissioner that Charles J. Hammer had lied about their conversation, down playing the seriousness of Sickle Cell Anemia. Once again the Commissioner modified visitation without the parties attending mediation. 5-6-2006 Steve L. Washington left our three minor children unattended outside of his home during his visitation period. Our children were attacked by the neighbors dog (the attack was unprovoked). The dog had our baby's hand in his mouth, puncturing her finger with his teeth. Our then seven and six year old were forced to fight off this dog. I motioned the court for Mr. Washington to have supervised visitation. The facilitator that works directly with the Commissioner told me that the Commissioner was going to wait before he changed visitation. 6-29-2006 At the parties settlement conference, the Commissioner allowed his friend Mr. Hammer to turn the settlement conference into a hearing surrounding custody and visitation, so that Mr. Washington could avoid his fiduciary duties. 7-25-2006 The Commissioner issued an UNREPORTED MINUTE ORDER after ex- parte communication with Claudia Coale, Charles J. Hammer, Sylvia D. Woods and Steve L. Washington. The Commissioner disallowed me to adequate time to respond, nor was there adequate service of this document. 9-15-2006 Lisa Zeeb-Johnson, clerk in department 50 stamped and filed the orders for the illegal change of custody. These orders were presented at the hearing scheduled to be heard and ruled on 9-18-2006. 9-18-2006 The Commissioner entered the courtroom in department 50 red with anger and snarling at me, he then ruled on a recommendation conference that did ClaimCCCBoardofSupervisorsHuffaker I-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM not take place. He ruled on a change of custody without the parties attending mediation, granting sole physical and legal custody to Steve L. Washington without evidence or a legal basis. The Commissioner then went against our children's physician's recommendation for children then ages 7, 6, and 37 months. Two of our children have Sickle Cell Anemia and if and when they become ill and hospitalized I cannot go to the hospital or provide the nurturing they need. Our children are without their mother. The Commissioner's ruling is intentionally cruel and goes against many California Statues designed for the best interest of our minor children. The Commissioner concealed the fact the his decision was made on 9-15- 2007 when the orders were filed and by Lisa Zeeb-Johnson, courtroom clerk, department 50. The entire hearing on 9-18-2006 was a faros to punish me as Mr. Hammer requested. Everyone was in on this, including the counsel I retained Paula Grosh (after the change in custody Paula Grosh told me that she had been Sylvia Woods paralegal). The Commissioner allowed Sylvia D. Woods to represent Steve L. Washington from the audience of department 50. He ruled on a Supplemental Declaration filed by the Petitioner on 9-14-2006 that had not been served upon me. The Commissioner did not address my timely filed and served motion of 5-4-2006, HRG ON F/L, MTN/OSC, TO/FOR MODIFY VISITATION & CHILD UPOOT W/TEMP ORDERS, but reported it completed. 9-27-2006 The Commissioner issued a Domestic Violence TRO against me with no legal bases, evidence, facts or support. 10-4-2006 The Commissioner instructed Deputy Custodio to telephone me at my home leaving a voice message at my home and cell phone for me to call him and identifying himself as court security. Deputy Custodio questioned me about mail that supposedly went to the Commissioner's home. Although, I knew nothing about what he was talking about the Deputy continued to press the issue and offering legal advice in regards to my court proceedings. ClaimCCCBoardotSupervisorsHuffakerl-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washmgion 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM Moreover, Deputy Custodio is the same officer that served the TRO upon me and asked me to met him at the Casino San Pablo. 10-17-2007 The Commissioner re-issued the Domestic Violence TRO that does not have a legal bases or evidence to support it. He ignored my motion and evidence that proves, I should not have a TRO and that custody should not have been changed. 11-8-2006 The Commissioner re-issued the Domestic Violence TRO that does not have a legal bases or evidence to support it. The Commissioner ordered me to go against my children's physicians recommendation and what is best for their well being during this difficult time of our lives. He threatened to permanently give our children to the father on 1-22-2007 if I did not go against what is best for our children 1-22-2007 The Commissioner vacated the Domestic Violence TRO against me that is not supported by evidence or law. 2-15-2007 Commissioner Huffaker allowed Charles J. Hammer, Esq. to add himself as a interested party to our family law matter, without my consent of knowledge. 3-15-2007 The Commissioner ordered me to pay child support without a motion to the court, although I am a disabled teacher, qualified injured worker, injured on the job and during the course of employment with the Oakland Unified School District and living below the level of poverty. 8-7-2007 Commissioner Huffaker scheduled a trial in regards to custody and visitation for 8-7-2007. Due to the fact that my family law matter is poisoned by constitutional error,judicial prejudice and judicial breaking of ClaimCCCBoardotS uperyisorsHuffaker 1-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM the law; custody and visitation is not at issue before Commissioner Jeffrey D. Huffaker ever. This being fact, I timely filed Peremptory Challenge 170.6, Notice of Motion, Motion For Peremptory Disqualification and Declaration in Support of Motion 170.6, date to be heard 10/25/07, Time 8:30am, Dept: 50, Declaration In Support of Motion for Peremptory Challenge 170.6,Affidavit of Prejudice,Affidavit in Support of Peremptory Challenge 170.6, Statement of Disqualification of Commissioner Jeffrey Huffaker 170.1, Notice of Non-Receipt of Petitioners Trial Brief and Request for Sanctions, Request for Dismissal Petitioner's Failure to Serve Failed Trial Brief Upon Respondent and Judicial Review case no.:C07- 01538. Therefore, on this date of 8-7-2007 Commissioner Jeffery D. Huffaker did not have jurisdiction. Commissioner Huffaker established the jurisdictional facts and terminated the status of the marriage upon the filing of the Petitioner's preliminary declarations. The parties in this matter did not agree to a Status-Only Judgment is non-existent. (1) Family Code section 2104 has not been complied with. (2) The Parties have not complied and exchanged current Income & Expense Declaration that included all natural facts and information regarding our hearings, accumulations and expenses. (3) The Parties have not fully complied with Family Code section 2102 and have not augmented the Preliminary Declarations of Disclosures, including disclosure of all material facts and information regarding the characterization of all assets and liabilities, the valuation of all assets and liabilities, the valuation of all be community property or in which it is contended the community has an interest, and the amounts of all obligations that are contended to be community obligations or for which it is contended the community has liability. The waiver that took place on 8-7-2007 was not knowling, intelligent or voluntarily entered by both parties. There is no Declaration in Support of Request for Separate Trial. Moreover, Commissioner Huffaker is aware that the Petitioner has not filed the following: (1) At-Issue Memorandum (2) Request to Set for Trial ClaimCCCBoardofSupervisorsHuffaker 1-7-2007 • Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM (3) Set a trial date (4) Set a Settlement Conference date Commissioner Huffaker heard and set F/L Special Hearing at 13:30 in Department 50, 8-7-2007 1:30pm Dept. 50 F/L Special Set Hearing on: Domestic Violence restraining Order, Granted ending on 8-6-20012 at 12:00am. I have not committed Domestic Violence on anyone, there is no evidence or legal bases to support such a order. Commissioner Huffaker miss represented the truth that I was made aware of this hearing and that I agreed in writing to this order. This Domestic Violence Restraining order along with other issues in my case were addressed in the absence of proper notice, Respondent was not given the opportunity for an open hearing and was mailed to me and not properly served. 9-27-2007 The Commissioner ignored my timely filed request for a hearing de novo, before a Superior Court Judge after the notice of judgment. The male clerk, that wears the wig in the family law department would not schedule the hearing, but said he had to take it to the department and I have yet to get the requested hearing. 10-15-2007 The Commissioner denied my right to the scheduled peremptory hearing scheduled to be heard on 10/25/2007. He issued a Unreported Minute Order, without the required transcripts, and contains judicial perjury which is unlawful. 12-14-2007 The Commissioner issued a Amended Unreported Minute Order that is unlawful and contains judicial perjury that contains the transcripts from 9- 18-2006. Commissioner Jeffrey D. Huffaker should be immediately remove from the Superior Court System in Contra Costa County. He in innately enable to hold such a position. He was sued for malpractice and quickly settle the matter. He is being sued in conjunction with something in conjunction with the city of Oakley and the Judicial Review I have pending. The position that he currently holds cannot afford his incompetence. ClaimCCCBoardofSupervisorsHufFaker 1-7-2007 Monica Meadors-Washington 1511 Sycamore Avenue, #125 Hercules, CA 94547 510-388-9073 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLAIM People who are victimized by the court system need to be paid attention too. I am being forced to endure the wrath of Commissioner Jeffrey Huffaker. I did not ask for this, nor am I to blame and if you are blaming me you are blaming you daughters, sisters and mothers. I am a victim. As a result, I Monica Meadors-Washington and three minor children have been damaged and are suffering mental anguish, loss of social position, disgrace, humiliation and embarrassment, foreclosure, as well as actual pecuniary loss due to destruction and disruption of the parent (alienation) children relationship and loss of financial support. ClaimCCCBoardofSupervisorsHuffaker 1-7-2007